Resolution-PC 2006-13~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PG2006=13
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2005-00169 '
BE GRANTED, UNCONDITIONALLY
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for
Reclassification for real property situafed in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follows:
PARCEL 1- SANTA ANA AND OUVE STREET PROPERTY: THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK "A", OLIVE STREET, SANTA ANA STREET, KROEGER STREET,
WATER STREET, AND WATER ALLEY, ALL AS SHOWN ON THE RE-SUBDIVISION OF .
THEODORE REISER'S SUBDIVISION OF VINEYARD LOT G2, FI~ED 1N BOOK 1, PAGES 10
AND 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1, PARCEL 2, SOUTH
STREET, AND OLIVE STREET, ALL AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 85-364, FILED IN BOOK
210, PAGES 37 AND ' 38 OF PARCEL MAPS, BOTH W THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF OLIVE STREET WITH SANTA'ANA
STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 85-364; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE
OF SAID SANTA ANA STREET NORTH 74° 18' 42" EAST 689.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15° 32'
33" EAST 1652.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH STREET AS SHOWN
ON SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT DISTANT THEREON NORTH 74° 23' 25"' EAST 689.76
FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF OLIVE STREET WITH SOUTH STREET AS'
SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SOUTH STREET
SOUTH 74° 23' 25" WEST 689.76 FEET TO SAID CENTERLINE INTERSECTION -OF OLIVE
STREET WITH SOUTH STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF OLIVE STREET
NORTH 15° 32' 33" WEST 1651.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2- SANTA ANA AND OLIVE STREET PROPERTY THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK "C', BLOCK "D", SANTA ANA STREET, KROEGER STREET,
ORANGE STREET, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAILROAD, AND THOSE UNNAMED ALLEYS
WITHIN BLOCK "C', ALL AS SHOWN ON THE RE-SUBDIVISION OF THEODORE REISER'S
SUBDIVISION OF VINEYARD LOT G2, FILED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 10 AND 11 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1, PARCEL 2, PARCEL 3, SOUTH
STREET AND ATCHISON STREET, ALL AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 85-364, FILED IN
BOOK 210, PAGES 37 AND 38 OF PARCEL MAPS, BOTH IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTtON OF OLIVE STREET WITH SANTA MA
STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 85-364; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE
OF SAID SANTA MA STREET NORTH 74° 18' 42" EAST 689.76 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 15° 32' 33" EAST 1652.62 FEET TO A POINT IN THE
CENTERLINE OF SOUTH STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT BEING
DISTANT THEREON NORTH 74° 23' 25" EAST 689.76 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE
INTERSECTION OF OLIVE STREET WITH SOUTH STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL
MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SOUTH STREET NORTH 74° 23' 25" EAST
462.86 FEET TO THE (NTERSECT(ON WtTH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ORANGE STREET (FORMERLY SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA RAILROAD) AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP AND REISER'S SUBDIVISION;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE AND (TS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION NORTH 15° 30' 55" WEST 1653.26 FEETTO THE
CENTERLINE OF SANTA ANA STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG
SAID CENTERLINE OF SANTA ANA STREET SOUTH 74° 18' 42 WEST 463.65 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CR\PC2006-13 - -1- PC2006-13
~ i
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of
Anaheim on January 23, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing'having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of theAnaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 "Procedures", to hear
and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission; after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts: ,
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of Portion A from the i(Industrial) zone to the RM-3
(Multiple Family Residential) zone, and Portion B from #he l(Industrial)' zone to the RM-4 (Multiple Family ,
Residential) zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates the properties for Low-Medium and Medium Density
ResidentialJand uses; and the proposed reclassification would be consistent with the General Plan and
implement the goals and policies contained irr the Housing Element. '
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the '
orderly and proper development of the community. :
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their
permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and theirpermitted
uses generally established throughout the community. ,
5. That one person spoke with questions regarding the development, and that no one indicated
their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition`to
subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposaf to reclassify Portion A from the I(Industrial) zone to the RM-3 (Mult+ple
Family Residential) zone, and Portion B from the I(Industrial) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential)
zone; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the
independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any
comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to exclude the above-described Portion A from the I(Industrial) zone and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-3 (Multipte Family Residential) zone and Portion B from the I(Industrial) zone
and to incorporate said described property into the RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone unconditionally.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City
Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole
discretion.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to
the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to
the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in
delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
-2-
~ ~ _
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
January 23, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set f in Chapter 18.60 "Procedures" of
the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures an a e epl~ce by ' C ncil Resolution
_:.
in the' event of an appeaL
CHAIRMAN, AN HEIM ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~-~-~.._ ~
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE` ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ,
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission held on
January 23, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof: ,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, EASTMAN, FLORES, KARAKI, PEREZ, ROMERO, VELASQUEZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMM)SSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this !~ day of F~t ~cs~r ,.
2006.
/r~t/!~l.l.o
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION