Resolution-PC 2006-55~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006=55
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
: RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION'OF SPECIFIC '
PLAN AMENDMENT NO: 7 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC
PLAN N0. 92-2, AMENDING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS SE7 FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.116 OF TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofAnaheim adopted the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-2 on September 27, 1994, to provide a long range, comprehensive plan for future
development of approximately 549-acres within the Anaheim Resort. The Specific Plan includes zoning
and development standards, design guidelines and a public facilities plan, and permits the development
of hotel/motel, convention, retail and other visitor-serving uses; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapters 18.68 and 18.72 of the Anaheim Municipaf Code, the
City of Anaheim Planning Director initiated General Plan`Amendment No. 2006-00442 and Amendment
No. 7 to The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (the "Project Actions"); and
WHEREAS, in connection with the adoption of Specific Plan No. 92-2, the City Council
certified Environmental Impact Report No. 313, with a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement
of Overriding Consideration, and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5599 amending
Ordinance Na 5454 relating to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, Amendment No: 1, which
amendment revised the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by
reclassifying and incorporating a 4.67-acre parcel into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92 2 Zone;
and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, a request
to amend the zoning and development standards to add "Coffee House" as a conditionally permitted
accessory use in conjunction with an automobile service station, was denied by the Planning Commission
on October 12, 1998 and the petition was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant at the January 26,
1999 City Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5685 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 1 to the Anaheim Resort Specifiic Plan No. 92-2, which ,,
adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code relating to structural setbacks and yard requirements to reflect the local street status of
Convention Way; and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5964 amending
Ordinance Nos. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which
amendment revised the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by
reclassifying and incorporating a 0.73-acre parcel into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone;
and
WHEREAS, on September 21, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5703
relating to Adjustment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which adjustment amended
the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
relating to the minimum landscape setback requirement for properties adjacent to Manchester Avenue
between Katella Avenue and the southern boundary of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5769 relating to
Adjustment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning
and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to
temporary pa~king requirements; and
Cr\PC2006-55 t , PC2006-55
. ~
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5910 amending
Ordinance Na 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 4 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which
adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code relating to office uses in a legal non-conforming building; and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5922 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 5(which also incorporates Amendment No. 4) to the
Anaheim.Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which amendment revised the legal description and boundaries
of the Anaheim Resort Specific plan by reclassifying and incorporating 27-acres into the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone; and
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5954
amending Ordinance Na 5453 relating to Amendment No. 6 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-
Z, which amendment modified the Zoning and Development Standards pertaining to the esta6lishment of ,
mini-market/convenience markets as accessory uses in conjunction with a relocated'service station and
prohibition of tow truck operations in conjunction with service station #acilities; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 7 to the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan No: 92-2 relates to modifications to the Zoning and Development Standards pertaining to
the establishment of an ARR (Anaheim Resort Residential) Overlay'to provide the opportunity to develop
residential units in conjunctionwith high-quality, luxury hotets within targeted areas; and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on June 12, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission,' after due consideration, inspection,
investigation and study made by itself and on its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, Amendment Na 7 to
establish an overlay to provide the opportunity to develop residential units in conjunction with high-quality,
luxury hotels is proposed for targeted areas that have site characteristics that are enhanced by special
land use and development standards.
2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Anaheim General Plan, including the standards and tand use guide{ines provided therein;
and, that it would encourage development of quality, full-service hotels which complement convention,
family entertainment and recreation in the community and enhance the City's position as a nationally
recognized tourist center; and
3. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would result in development of a desirable
character by permitting land uses which are compatible with both the existing and proposed development
in the surrounding neighborhood; and, that future development pursuant to the ARR{Anaheim Resort
Residential) Overlay would be enhanced by the special land use and development standards set forth in
the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone; and
4. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment contributes to a balance of land uses
throughout the City by introducing residential uses at the periphery of The Anaheim Resort and assisting
with the City's balance of jobs and housing, while continuing to ensure that high-quality full-service hotels
are developed in keeping with the character of The Anaheim Resort; and
5. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment respects environmental, aesthetic and
historic resources consistent with economic realities in that the ARR (Anaheim Resort Residential)
Overlay provides zoning and development standards for the integration of residential Units within high-
quality full-service hotels, that are subject to the design guidelines of the Anaheim Resort Speci~c Plan -
2
~ ~
No. 92=2 and:appiicable mitigation measures contained within Mitigation MonitoringProgram No. 0085b
associated with The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Amendment No. 7- Anaheim Resort
Residential Overlay Initial Study/Mitigated Negative beclaration and incorporated herein; and
6. That a person spoke with questions pertaining to the request, and a person spoke in
opposition to an unrelated matter; and that a person spoke and a letter.was received expressing concerns
regarding the request. That 2 people spoke in favor of the request.
WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment No. 7 to the`Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
Na 92-2 Zoning and Development Standards are identified in the attached draft ordinance and
incorporated herein.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS: That the Anaheim
Planning Commission has reviewed the Proposed Project Actions, and by motion did find and determine
and recommend that the City Council find and determine that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects
the City's independent judgment and analysis, that the change from visitor-serving uses to residential `
uses will not create an additional impact in and of itself, and that the project, as mitigated, will `not have a
significant effect on the environment; approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt Updated and
Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No: 0085b; and determine that the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085b'are adequate to serye as the
required environmental documentation for the proposed Project Actions, including the General Plan .
Amendment, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, the Anaheim
Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim approve
Amendment No. 7 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 to revise the Anaheim Resorf Specific
Plan No. 92-2 Zoning and Development Standards as set forth in Attachment A to this Resolution, which
attachment is hereby incorporated herein as though set forth in fulL '
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of '
June 12, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 "Procedures"
of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may replaced by a City Council
Resolution in the event of an appeal. -
CHAIRMAN, AHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
.
./~~--~-~-y~..-~-
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
3
• i :
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) . : '
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.,
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) :
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission
held on June 12, 2006,' by the following vote of the members thereof:
: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, EASTMAN, FAESSEL, FLORES, KARAKI, ROMERO, VELASQUEZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, l have hereunto set my hand this ~'~ day of
, 2006.
~
.~~~/~-^~+~'~^---
" SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM FLANNING COMMISSION
~ ~
[DRAFT] Attachment A
REVISED NNE 12, 2006
Revisions are indicated with underline.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.
7 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO: 92-2,
AMENDING ` ORDINANCE NO. 5453, AS PREVIOUSLY
~ AMENDED, AND AMENDING ZONING AND
' DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SET 'FORTH IN CHAPTER
- 18.116 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.93 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, on September 27, 1994, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted
Ordinance No. `5454 amending the zoning map to reclassify certain real property described
therein into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92 2 zone subject to certain conditions as
specified therein, and Ordinance No. 5453 relating to establishment of Zoning and Development
Standards for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 by the addition of Chapter 18.48 to
said Code; and '
WHEREAS, on June 3, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance Na 5599
amending Ordinance No. 5454 relating to the Anaheim Resort Specific P1an No. 92-2,
Amendment No. 1, which amendment revised the legal description and boundaries of the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by reclassifying and incorporating a 4.67-acre parcel into the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort Specific' Plan No. 92-2, a'
request to amend the zoning and development standards to add "Coffee, House" as a'
conditionally permitted accessory use in conjunction with an automobile service station, was
denied by the Planning Commission on October 12, 1998 and the petition was subsequently
withdrawn by the applicant at the January 26, 1999 City Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance Na 5685
amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 1 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in ,
Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to structural setbacks and yard
requirements to reflect the local street status of Convention Way; and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5964
amending Ordinance Nos. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-2, which amendment revised the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan by reclassifying and incorporating a 0.73-acre parcel into the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan Na 92-2 Zone; and
WHEREAS, on September 21, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance Na
5703 relating to Adjustment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which
adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code relating to the minimum landscape setback requirement for properties
~ •
adjacent to Manchester Avenue between Katella Avenue and the southern boundary of the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5769
relating to Adjustment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific P1an No. 92-2, which adjustment
amended' the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code relating to temporary parking requirements; and -
' WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance Na 5910
amending Ordinance No. 5453 xelating to Adjustment No. 4 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in
Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to office uses in a legal non-conforming
building; and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5922
amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 5(which also incorporates
Amendment No. 4) to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which amendment revised the
legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific plan by reclassifying and
incorporating 27-acres into the Anaheim Resort Specific P1an No. 92-2 Zone; and
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2005 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5954 '
amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 6 to the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-2, which amendment modified the Zoning and Development Standards pertaining to
the establishment of mini-market/convenience markets as accessory uses in conjunction witfi a
relocated service station and prohibition of tow truck operations in conjunction with service
station facilities; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment relates to modifications to the Zoning and
Development Standards pertaining to the esta.blishment of an ARR (Anaheim Resort Residential)
Overlay to provide the opporhanity to develop residential units in conjunction with high-quality,
luxury hotels within targeted areas; and
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2006 the Anaheim City Planning Commission
considered the proposed Amendment No. 7 and recommended to the City Council that it adopt
an ordinance incorporating said proposed amendment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DOES ORDAIN THAT ORDINANCE NO. 5453 BE, AND THE SAME IS HEREBY,
AMENDED TO REVISE THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN ~
CHAPTER 18.116 OF THE ANAHEIM MLJNICIPAL CODE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That Section .050 of Chapter 18.116 of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows:
18.116.050 DEVELOPMENT AREAS.
~ ~
The Specific Plan area encompasses two land use districts and ~ two Overlay Zones as
set forth below:
.010 Commercial Recreation (G-R) District - Identified as Development Area 1 on
Exhibit ' 3.3.1 a of the Specific Plan document entitled "Development Plan". ' Development
density areas for this district are set forth in Section 18.116:060 (Development Density Areas -
C-R District). Development regulations for this district are set forth in Sections 18.116.070
([Jses - C-R District)
~.020 Public Recreation (PR) District - Identified as Development Area 2 ori Exhibit
3.3.1 a of the Specific Plan document entitled "Development Plan." Development Regulations for
this district are set forth in Section 18.116.110 (Land Use and Site Development Standards -
Public Recreation (PR) District (Development Area 2). '
.030 Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay .- MHP Overlay boundaries are identified on
Exhibit 3.3.2a of the Specific Plan Document entitled "Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay Zone."
Development Regulations far the MHP Overlay are set forth in Section 18.116.120 (Mobilehome
Park' (MHP) Overlay).
- .040 Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay - ARR Overlay<boundaries are
identified in Section 18.116.095.030. Development regulations for the ARR Overlay are set
forth in Section 18.I16.095 (Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay).
SECTION 2. .
That Section .OS of Chapter 18.116 of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be
added, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows:
18.116.095 ANAHEIM RESORT RESIDENTIAL (ARR) OVERLAY
.010 Purpose. The purpose of the ARR Overlay is to provide the opportunity to
develop residential units in conjunction with high-quality, luxury hotels.
A20 Approval. Projects that are developed according to the standards of the
ARR Overlay require approval of a final site plan and a conditional use permit as provided
for in Section 18.116.040 and may require a development agreement as determined by the '
Planning Director and processed according to the procedures set forth in Resolution No. '
82R-565 (Procedures Resolution) adopted by the City of Anaheim pursuant to Section
65865 of the Development Agreement statute.
.030 Location. The residential overlay boundaries are identified on Attachment A
to Ordinance adopted on , 2006 (Amendment No. 7) and include those areas
within the C-R District located east of Anaheim Boulevard/Haster Street and those areas
within the C-R District located south of Wilken Way.
.040 Option to Use Underlying Zone. The provisions of this section shall not apply
to parcels that have been ; or are proposed to be developed entirely pursuant to the
underlying C-R District, provided that all requirements of the'underlying District are met
~ ~
by the project except as specifically approved otherwise by variance or: other official action
by the City. '
.050 Residential Zone. The ARR Overlay shall not, be considered :a residential "
zone, where such designation requires properties that develop adjacent to'residential zones
to meet additional setback and height restrictions.
.060 Uses. Projects developed pursuant to the ARR 'Overlay shall include a
minimum three hundred (300) room`full-service hotel that complies with California Civil
Code Section 1940(b)(2); and may include 'any of the uses permitted or 'conditionally
permitted in the underlying C-R District. In addition, projects may include residential uses
as accessory to the hoteL '
.070 Development Standards. All development standards established for the C-R
District shall be applicable to the ARR Overlay. Additional requirements are as follows:
.0701 New Construction. The Residential Overlay _shall apply to new
construction only and not to projects that are renovations or remodels. The conversion of
existing hotels rooms to dwelling units is prohibited.
.0702 Integration of Uses. All residential units shall be physically integrated
into a hotel development as defined in Section 18.116.095.060.
.0703 Maximum Number of Residential Units. The project's total number
of residential units shall not exceed the proposed development's total number of hotel
rooms.
.0704 Location of Residential Units. Adjacent to the public right-of-way, '
residential units shall be located at least two floors or twenty-five (25) feet above ground-
leveL
.0705 Infrastructure and Service Impacts. The proposed development shall
not result in infrastructure impacts greater than those associated with the subject
property's permitted hoteUmotel density, as allowed by the property's underlying C R
District density designation, unless such impacts are duly analyzed and mitigated pursuant
to subsequent environmental review. Such impacts shall be determined through a sewer
and traffic impact analysis to be submitted to the City Engineer. Additional infrastructure
studies may be required as determined by the Planning Director.
.0706 Parking. Due to variations in parking demand and the needs of each
project, vehicle parking requirements, the demand for drop-off and pick-up locations and
the design of the parking areas, including ingress and egress, shall be determined as part of
the final site plan review based upon information contained in a parking demand study
prepared by an independent traffic engineer, as approved by the City of Anaheim. The
parking demand study shall be prepared at the property owner/developer's egpense and
provided as part of the fmal site plan application. Parking spaces specifically designated
for non-residential and residential uses shall be marked by the use of posting, pavement ,
markings, and/or physical separation. Parking design shall incorporate separate entrances
and exits or a designated lane for residents.'
~ •
.0707 F1oor Area. The minimum floor area for residential units is shown in
Table 116-J (Minimum Floor Area: Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay Zone).
For purposes of this section, a"bedroom" is a private habitable room planned or used for
sleeping, separated from other rooms by a door or a similar partition. Further, all rooms
(other than a living - room, family room, dining room, bathroom, hall, lobby, closet, or '
pantry) having seventy (70) square feet or more of floor area, or less than fifty percent
(50%) of the total length of any wall open to an adjacent room or hallway, shall be
considered a "bedroom."
Table 20 A '
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA:
ANAHEIMRESORT RESIDENTIAL (ARR) OVERLAYZONE :
Minimum Floor Area
Studio units: 600 square feet. The number of studio units'shall not exceed 20% of the _
. total number of residential units
One-bedroom units: '700 square feet '
Two-bedroom units: 825 square feet :
Three-bedroom units: 1,000 square feet
More than three- 1,000 square feet plus 200 square feet for each bedroom over three
bedroom units:
.0708 Minimum Landscape and Recreational-Leisure Areas. In addition to
the minimum landscape and open space required by Section 18.116.070.120.1207, ~e
~ recreational-leisure area shall be provided epual to a minimum of ten (101 percent of
the total area of the site. This recreational-leisure area may be provided in private areas,
common areas, or a combination of both.
.Ol Common Recreational-Leisure Areas. All common
recreational-leisure areas shall be conveniently located and readily accessible from all
residential units located on the building site and shall be integrated with and contiguous to
other common areas on the building site. The common recreational-leisure areas shall not
include any required setback areas, any driveways or parking areas, trash pickup or
storage areas or utility areas. f~Areas counted toward meetin~ this,requirement mav be
located inside or outside the building, subiect to the aqnroval of the Plannin~ Director.
; 0;~~~6i~are$ ne~eu~9~ =ei$iiiz icree~-s~i.,~~ura n-i~:i-a
i ~ r ,.~.,.,..a~ : +.,..,,..~ +,. • + i a ~ ~,..,n*
~ ~G'/'"~iV'iTi'L'1"ilTCi.TPIii~.TlITTI~i~'i~I7T'VTGCi'VTGII~Cll7~GC[~VII"iC~=G1{"7t .
1'Yf'~ . . . . . .
~ •
.02 Private Recreational-Leisure Areas. In order for private patios
and balconies to count toward the Recreational-Leisure Area requirement, they s~a~l~e~
,
^~~-shall not be less than thirty=five (35) square feet in area, with a minimum
dimension of five (5) feet. '
.0709 Loading Areas. Residential uses shall have one (1) off-street loading
space or moving plaza for every one ~hundred and fifty '(150) units. Loading spaces or
moving plazas shall be located near entries and/or elevators and shall be incorporated into
the design of vehicular access areas. Decorative paving, removable bollards and potted
plants are permitted and encouraged to enhance loading spaces or moving plazas.
.0710 Private Storage Facilities. General storage cabinets with a' minimum
size of one hundred (100) cubic feet capacity shall be required for each residential unit.
Provision of said storage areas shall be in addition to the minimum floor area of the unit.
Storage areas may be located inside the dwelling unit, adjacent to the dwelling unit's
balcony or patio, e~-in close proximity to the dwelling unit, or in close nroximitv to an
elevator.
.0711 Security. Residential units shall be designed to ensure the security of
residents through the provision of secured access points/lobbies, entrances and exits that
are separate from the non-residential uses and are directly accessible to residential parking '
areas.
.0712 Restriction on Activities. Commercial uses shall be designed and
operated, and hours of operation limited, so that residents are not exposed to offensive
noise, especially from traffic, trash collection, routine deliveries or late night activity. No'
use shall produce continual loading or unloading of heavy trucks at the site between the
hours of 8 p.m. and 6 a.m.
.0713 Vibrations and Odors. No use, activity or process shall produce
continual vibrations or noxious odors that are perceptible without instruments by the
average person at the property lines of the site or within the interior of residential units or
recreational-leisure areas on the site.
.0714 Lighting. Outdoor lighting associated with commercial uses shall not
adversely impact residential uses, but shall provide sufficient illumination for access and
security purposes. Such lighting shall not blink, flash, or oscillate.
.0715 Windows. Residential windows shall not directly face loading areas
and docks. To the extent windows of residential units face each other or hotel rooms, the
windows shall be designed and/or oriented to maximize privacy.
• •
SECTION 3. PENALTY.
Except as may otherwise be expressly provided, any person who violates any
provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction thereof, be
' punished in the manner provided`in Section 1:01.370 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
, SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY
The City Council of the City of Anaheim declares that should any section,
paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance hereby adopted be declared for any reason to be
invalid, it is'the intent of the Council' this it would have passed all other portions of this
ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared
invalid. '
SECTION 5. SAVINGS CLAUSE
Neither the adoption of this ordinance nor the repeal or amendment of any other
ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect'the prosecution for violations ofordinances,
which violations were committed prior to the effective,date thereof, nor be construed as a waiver
of any tax, license or penalty or of the penal provisions applicable to any violations thereof. The
provisions of the ordinance, insofar as they are substantially the' same as ordinance provisions
previously adopted by the City relating to the same subject matter, shall be construed as
restatements and continuations, and not as new enactments.
THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the day of ,, 2006, and
thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the - day of
, 2006, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF ANAHEIM
By
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
~i--~ ~
Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay
Site A
~ Site B
~ ~ The Anaheim ResortT"" Boundary
~ The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary