Resolution-PC 2007-74. ~
' RESOLUTION NO: PC2007-74
A RESOLUT{ON OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FORRECLASSIFICATION NO. 2007-00206 BE GRANTED, UNCONDITIONALLY
(2121 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUE) "'
WHEREAS,'the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a Gerified petition for
Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follows:
THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE' STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF ORANGE; CITY OFANAHEiM, AND:IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL l:.
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF fHE SOUTHWEST`QUARTER OF THE'NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 26„TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN
CA.JON DE SANTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON'A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGECOUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBEDAS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION26, DISTANT THEREON NORTH 89° 58' 50" EAST 175.90 fEET FROM THE CENTER OF
SAID SECTION, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE CENTER LINE OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, `
40.00 FEET WIDE,'ASDESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY OF ORAfVGE, RECORDED 1N BOOK
231,PAGE230 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID
SOUTH LINE, NORTH 0° 01' 19" WEST 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 65° 05' 10' EAST 68.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11° 24'
02" WEST 305.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF THIS COURSE, WITH A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 220.00 FEET; THENCE'.NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 24° 40' 00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 94.71 FEET; THENCE
TANGENT TO SAID CURVE,iNORTH 36° 04' 02" WEST 90.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCYOF
THIS COURSE WITH A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 970.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 4° 46' 13" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 80.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE WITH A LINE PARALLEL
WITH AND DISTANT 60.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES,FROM THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S 100-FOOT RIGHT OF
WAY, BEING THENORTHEAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LANDCONVEYED TO SAID
STATE BY DEED REGISTERED AS CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 8481 W THE OFFICE OF THE :
REGISTRAR OF TtTLES OF SAID COUNTY; THENCEALONG SAID PARALLEL LWE, NORTH 400 50'
15" WEST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26; THENCE ALONG
SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 1015' 18° WEST TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26; THENCE EASTERLY
ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE INTERSECTION THEREOF WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID CERTIFICATE OF TITLE N0. 8481; THENCE IN A
GENERAL SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THEEXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL
OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID CERTIFICATE OF TITLE TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 26; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 89° 58' 50" WEST 276.94
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING 7HEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS INCLUDED
WITHIN PARCELS 3 AND 4 SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN STATE HIGHWAY RELINQUISHMENT MAP
RECORDED 1N STATE HIGHWAY MAPBOOK 4, PAGE 5 TO 11 {NCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID '
ORANGE COUNTY.ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION INCWDED WITHIN PARCEL 1
SHOWN ON THATCERTAIN STATE HIGHWAY RELINQUISHMENT MAP RECORDEDlN BOOK 10, .
PAGES 28 TO 34 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY'. ALSO EXCEPTING
THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY, EASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:'BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHWEST'CORNER OF PARCEL 1, AS
Cr\PC2007-74 ' -1- PC2007-74
• ~
' SHOWN 0N EXHIBIT'"B" ATTACHED THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CC 89-01
RECORDED•)ULY 31, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-403514 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF'SAID
ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 89°06'34' EAS7 222.01 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE '
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101 °23'25" AN ARC DISTANCE
OF 26.54 FEET; THENCENORTH 10029159T WEST 1.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°0729" EAST
197.71 FEET TO THE BEGINNING bF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE'NORTHERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 24°5211" AN ARG DISTANCE OF `10.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25°28'10" EAST 32.50 FEET TO '
THE BEGINNING OF ATANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY QND HAVING A RADIUS OF '
25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLYALONG SAID GURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
24°5201' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 10.25FEET; THENCE'NORTH'39°56'9" WEST 122:12 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 41°24'09" WEST 363:34 FEET THE TO BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 103020 FEEI'; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF' 1028180 AN ARC DISTANCE OF 26.45 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39°55'53"'1850:89 FEET.
PARCEL'2:
PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT B ATTACHED TO THAT CERTAW CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE N0. CC89-01 RECORDED JULY 31, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89=403514 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY CAUFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of
Anaheirn on July 9, 2007,'at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by faw
and in accordance with the provisions ofthe Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 "Procedures'; to hear and
conside~ evidence for antl against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and '
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and '
determine the following facts:
1. That the appticant proposes reclassification of Parcel 1 from the,l (Industrial} zone and Parcel 2
from the T(Transition) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone or less intense zone.
2: That the Anaheim General Plan designates both properties for Medium Density Residential land
uses and the proposed RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone is the appropriate implementation zone for this
land use designation.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the
orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their '
permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted
uses generalty established throughout the community because it would result in a residential project that is
consistent with the type of housing envisioned for the area
5. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
CALfFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAt QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that
the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration and together with any comments received during the public review process and further flnding on
- -2- PC2007-74
~ ~
the basis of.the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence,that the project will '
have a significant effect on the environmenf.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
unconditianaily approve the subject!Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map
of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-described property from the I(Industrial) zone and the T.
(Transifionai) zone and to incorporafe said described properties into the RM-4 (Multiple-Family Residential)
zone.
BE IT,FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthis resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitmenf by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City'
Council, which shall be a Iegislative acY, which may be;approved or denied by the City Councii:at its sole -
discretion. :
BE IT:FURTHER RESOLV.ED that the applicant is responsible for paying ali charges related to
the processing of this discretionary_case application within 15 days of the issuance bf the final invoice or prior to
the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay a1f charges shall result in
delays in the issuance'ofrequired permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOCUTION was adopted.at the Planning Commission meeting of
July 9, 2007. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 'Procedures" of the
Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appea{ procedures and may be replaced by a Gity Council Resolution in
the event of an appeaL
CHAI N, AHE ICA PLAN I COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_ ~
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ,
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. .
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission held on
July 9, 2007, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, EASTMAN, FAESSEL, KARAKI, ROMERO, VELASQUEZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FLORES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ day of _ ,
2007. '
~~ .3 ~~%`~G°"'L~,~.°
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-3= PC2007-74