Loading...
1971/01/1971-22 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 12, 1971, 1:30 P.M. As to his personal affairs, he has been married 29 years, has 3 children. He retired from the U.S. Navy in 1962 after 20 years of active duty. He is President of American Realty, 1000 East Lincoln Avenue, Ana- heim, California. At this time, Mr. Roth was called forward to the Council table and the oath of office was administered by the City Clerk. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 4:10 P.M. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend John C. Bevan, Chaplain of the Anaheim Memorial Hospi- tal, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman William J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION: The following Resolution on the retirement of The Reverend John Quatannens, of St. Boniface Catholic Church, was unanimously adop- ted by the City Council: "WHEREAS, the City Council has learned o{ the retirement of a cherished friend, Reverend John Quatannens; and "WHEREAS, Father Quatannens served as Assistant Pastor 'to Saint Boniface from April, 1937 to November, 1940, and as Pastor from June, 1958 to the date of his retirement, January 1, 1971; and 71-23 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M "WHEREAS, during his years of dedicated service to this com- munity, he has exemplified the highest virtues of citizenship, service and charity and has endeared himself to people of all faiths; and "WHEREAS, with the building of the beautiful new Saint Boni- face Church and Parish Hall, enhancing the spiritual heritage of our commun- ity, Father Quatannens realized a fulfillment of a life-long dream, "HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that we do hereby express to REVEREND JOHN QUATANNENS our deep personal appreciation and gratitude and the appreciation and grati- tude of the citizens and residents of~this City for the faithful'community-'~ services he has so unselfishly rendered. "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we extend sincere best wishes for good health and continued happiness during the years of his well-earned retirement. "AUTHORIZED AND APPROVED this 19th day of January, 1971. S/ JACK C. DUTTON, MAYOR S/ CALVIN L. PEBLEY, MAYOR PRO TEM ATTEST: S/ DON R. ROTH, COUNCILMAN S/ DENE M. WILLIAMS, CITY CLERK, CITY OF ANAHEIM S/ MARK A. STEPHENSON, COUNCILMAN S/ W.J. (BILL) THOM, COUNCILMAN" MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held December 29, 1970, were approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $872,542.78, in accordance with the 1970-71 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-19 AND VARIANCE NO. 2222: Submitted by Ralph Wheaton, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R~3, to construct a 14-unit, one and two-story apartment complex on property located on the south side of South Street, west of Harbor Boulevard; and further described as 608 West South Street, with waivers of: a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of R-A zoned property. b. Code requirement that access to carports be from the alley only. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-222, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along South Street, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond 71- 24 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along South Street, for street lighting purposes. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along South Street for tree planting pur- poses. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and west property lines. 7. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the appropriate park and recreation fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 10. Drainage of subject property shall be provided in a manner satis- factory to the City Engineer. 11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action by the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 12. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Cormnission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-223, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No. 70-71-19. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, Revision No. 1. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro- perty which is approximately 85 feet wide and 300 feet deep, the existing uses and zoning in the in~nediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and con- curred with the recommendations of the City Planning Con~nission, to which he received an affirmative reply. Paul Treat, 690 East Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, Agent, stated he believed having access to the carports from the street was more desirable than from an alley. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-12: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-12 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Com- mission, omitting reference to Condition No. 9 ia Condition No. 12. Refer to Resolution Book. 71- 25 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (70-71-19 - R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYE S: C OUNC I LME N: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-12 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-13: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-13 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2222 as requested, subject to the condi- tions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2222. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-13 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-22: Submitted by William J. Vetter, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-1 on property located on the east side of State College Boulevard, south of South Street; and further described as 822 South State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-226, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along State College Boulevard, for street widening purposes. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along State College Boulevard, including preparation of improvement plans and in- stallation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with stand- ard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that street lighting facilities along State College Boulevard shall be in- stalled as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Direc- tor of Public Works; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the instal- lation of the above-mmntioned requirements. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along State College Boulevard, for tree planting purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent residential property. 7. That any parking area lighting proposed along the south and east sides of the building, shall be down-lighting of a maximum height of 6- feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to pro- tect the residential integrity of the area. Parking area lighting located 71-26 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 1.9: 1971, 1:30 P.M. elsewhere on the property shall not exceed the height of the building and shall be shielded so as not to intrude into residential structures. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 9. That the drainage of and through subject property shall be dis- posed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 10. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south and east property lines. 11. That parking on the south and east sides of subject property shall be designated and used for employee parking only. 12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 13. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, above men- tioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject 2~- acre property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, calling attention to the fact that this is one of the last remaining properties in the area with R-A Zoning, and briefed the evidence submitted to and consid- ered by the City Planning Commission. He added that the owners have indica- ted they intend to develop the property into a commercial shopping center, if the zoning is approved. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was ~present and con- curred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative reply. Mr. Roberts reported the Development Services Department recommenda- tion that the two following Conditions, to be numbers 12 and 13, be added, re- numbering the present Condition Nos. 12 and 13 to Nos. 14 and 15, and adding Condition No. 13 to the requirements of Condition No. 15: 12. That trees, on 20-foot centers, shall be planted along the south and east boundaries of subject property to protect the integrity of the adja- cent R-1 properties. 13. That trees shall be planted in the planter areas within the in- terior of the development and that screen-type landscaping shall be installed in the planters adjacent to abutting streets. In reply to Councilman Dutton, the Applicant's Agent agreed to the two additional conditions as stated by Mr. Roberts. Jerry King, 3602½ Marcus Street, Newport Beach, Developer, requested they be allowed to determine how the interior shall be landscaped and what vegetation is to be used, as long as they follow the standards set for C-1 property. Mr. Roberts advised it was the intent of the Planning Commission that trees higher than automobile rooftops be planted in the interior, rather than low-growing shrubs; however, they had not specified any particular type of tree. Following Council discussion, it was determined that the new Condi- tion No. 13 should be amended to add: "Subject to the approval of the Super- intendent of Parkway Maintenance." RESOLUTION NO. 71R-14: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-14 for adop- tion, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commis- sion, plus the two additional conditions recommended by the Development Ser- vices Department, as amended. Refer to Resolution BooR. 71-27 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (70-71-22 - C-i) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL~N: NOES: COUNC IL~N: ABSENT: COUNCIL~N: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-14 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2100: Submitted by Daryoush Mahboobi-Fardi, re- questing approval of revised plans for a proposed one and three-story, 115- unit apartment complex on R-A zoned property located on the west side of Pearl Street, north of Wilshire Avenue. (69-70-1 - Resolution of Intent to R-3.) The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-210, recommended approval of said revised plans., subject to conditions. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was reques- ted by Councilman Stephenson at the meeting of December 22, 1970, and public hearing scheduled this date. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the in, mediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Con~nission. He added that the revised plans indicate the 115 apartment units wouldbe housed in two buildings, to be constructed 13 to 19 feet from the R-O pro- perty boundary on the north, and the majority of the parking spaces would be subterranean, with four open spaces along the east boundary. He further added that the proposed third-stories would be along the south boundary. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and wished to address the City Council. Harry Knisely, 1741 South Euclid Street, Agent for the Petitioner, stated that the original approved plans included two and three-story buil- dings and that the presently-proposed third story would serve as a buffer~ from Freeway noise for the residents behind the property proposed develop- ment. He added that he believed the revised plans now under consideration are superior to the original approved plans. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op- position. Dr. Mc Lemore Bouchelle, 1416 Birchmont, asked what distance the buildings would be from the north property ~line. Udy Bauer, representing VTN, Architects on the project, advised that the proposed buildings would not be closer than 19 feet from any pro- perty line; that the glass line would be 24 feet, 4 inches from the boun- daries on the north and south, and 29 feet, 8 inches on the east and west. Dr. Bouchelle said that, since he was required to have a 25-foot setback from the boundary line adjacent to subject property, he felt the same regulations should apply to the Petitioner. Mrs. Harold Le Duc, 1400 Birchmont, stated that in 1969 the area residents reluctantly had agreed to accept a project of 100 living units on subject property, resulting in R-3 zoning being approved for the property, but no construction was undertaken and the land was sold; they now are pre- pared to accept a ll5-unit project, and there is a "For Sale" sign on the property. She objected to the possibility that area residents would be asked to make additional compromises if the land continues to change ownership with- out construction. 71-28 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. Mrs. Le Duc requested the following additional conditions be im- posed if subject petition is granted: 1. If the current project is not under construction by the expira- tion of the extension of time granted December 22, 1970 (to expire August 19, 1971,)Variance No. 2100 and Reclassification No. 69-70-1 would become null and void. 2. Setbacks as represented on the plans submitted today become minimum setbacks to be considered for any further plans submitted for this land, this to apply to living units, garages, streets, alleyways, etc. 3. No variance for height be granted for any future plans submit- ted. 4. An 8-foot block fence to be erected from the highest grade level of either property to protect R-O residents from any possible visual intrusion of privacy. Mrs. Le Duc stated that she and other area residents she had con- ferred with agreed to accept subject plans because the Architect had assured them the third-story building would have no windows facing north, and that the elevation is such that the line of vision prevents occupants from the second-floor buildings from looking into their recreational area and homes. She added that area residents would like the property developed, but requested it be so done that it meets with their approval. The City Attorney advised the City Council has the right to change zoning at any time, and there is no way a future Council can be bound by de- cisions made by the present Council. He added that unless there are prohibi- tive deed restrictions,the R-O residents adjacent to subject property have the right to build accessory buildings up to their property line and connect them by roof to the main building, if desired. In reply to Councilman Stephenson, Mr. Knisely advised the Applicant could be ready to start construction in approximately six weeks, and added that the "For Sale" sign on the property is marked "Sold." With regard to Council discussion regarding a wall separating the properties, Mr. Roberts advised that Zoning Ordinances require construction of a 6-foot masonry wall separating Multiple-Family from Single-Family land use; however, the City Planning Cormnission had phrased the pertinent condi- tion to state "No higher than 8-feet," as a result of discussions with resi- dents in the R-O Zone. In reply to Councilman Thom, Mr. Knisely stipulated to construction of an 8-foot wall; however, it felt it would be unnecessary because the plans prevent visual intrusion into the R-O lots. Mrs. Le Duc advised that the request for an eight-foot fence resul- ted from their experience that patio lights shine over a 6-foot fence. She felt that having the patio lights shine down would not alleviate the problem. She also requested the required wall be of cement block construction, since an ornamental fence would not provide the desired privacy. Councilman Dutton expressed concern that an 8-foot wall next to the R-O property would shade plants from sun. In reply to a query by John Kimball, 1464 Birchmont Drive, Council- man Dutton explained the height of a wall is measured from ground level at the highest elevation. Councilman Stephenson suggested that there might be a more pleasant atmosphere created by construction of a 6-foot wall, with lighting directed downward from a maximum height of six feet, since an 8-foot wall can create a prison-like appearance. Mr. Bauer suggested that a condition that any exterior outlet must be no higher than 6 feet from the finished floor of the buildings would prevent light from shining into adjacent properties. 71-29 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M. In reply to Dr. Bouchelle's concern that ceiling lights on patios would be over six feet high and would shine into their property, Mr. Bauer advised that there would be no ceiling lights on the patios. It was determined that sufficient evidence had been presented, and Mayor Dutton declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-15: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-15 for adoption, approving revised plans for Variance No. 2100, subject to the following recommendations of the City Planning Commission, as amended: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 69-70-1. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Revision No. 2; Exhibit No. 4, Revision No. 3; and Exhibit Nos. 5, 6, and 7, Revision No. 2. 3. That a masonry wall along the northerly property line of sub- ject property shall be constructed 8 feet above the grade of the adjacent property. 4. That any previous plans submitted and approved shall be de- clared null and void by approval of the aforementioned revised plans. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING REVISED PLANS FOR VARIANCE NO. 2100. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-15 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1213: Submitted by Ledger T. and Gladys K. Smith, to establish a travel trailer park on M-1 zoned property located on the north side of Katella Avenue and on the west side of Howell Avenue, with waiver of: a. Minimum required front setback area. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-216, denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Ledger T. Smith, Applicant, and public hearing scheduled this date. The City Clerk submitted correspondence from Harry Knisely, Attor- ney for the Applicant, requesting public hearing be continued to February 2, 1971, to allow additional time for study and preparation. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, pub- lic hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 1213 was continued to February 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M., as requested. MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED APPLICATION - CABLE T.V.: Submitted by Theta Cable of California, for a CATV system in Anaheim. A presentation by Theta Cable was made on Decem- ber 15, 1970 and discussion was continued to this date to allow for develop- ment of specifications by the City Manager. Upon recommendation of the City Manager, the subject of Cable TV was continued to February 16, 1971, to allow for additional time of prepara- tion of material, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Ste- phenson. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held December 28, 1970, pertaining to the following appli- cations, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: 71- 30 City Hall~ Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- January 19, 1971, 7:30 P.M. VARIANCE NO. 2223: Submitted by Chester C. Karson, to construct a swin~ning pool within 2 feet of the side lot line on R-1 zoned property located on the north side of Coronet Avenue, west of Brookhurst Street; further described as 2251 Coronet Avenue, with waiver of: a. Minimum required side yard setback. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-230, granted said variance. VARIANCE NO. 2224: Submitted by Saga Development Company, Incorporated, to permit seven single-family residential units on R-O zoned property located on the south side of North Street, east of Loara Street, with waivers of: a. Minimum required front yard. b. Minimum required side yard. c. Permitted fence or wall location. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-231, approved said variance. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1214: Submitted by Modular Technology, Incorpora- ted, to establish a condominium development on R-A zoned property located at the southeast corner of Rio Vista Street and Frontera Street (Resolution of Intent to R-3 pending - 69-70-56, Tracts Nos. 7218 and 7219), with waivers of: a. Maximum permitted wall height. b. Minimum required landscaped setback. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-228, granted said conditional use permit. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1219: Submitted by Alfonso J. Ettlin, to permit an M-2 use described as an outdoor dismantling yard and the reassembly of parts into dune buggies and race cars, on M-1 property located in the North- east Industrial Area, south of Orangethorpe Avenue, on the east side of the future extension of Red Gum Street, with waiver of: a. Required 6-foot masonry wall to enclose outdoor storage facilities. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution NOo PC70-229, approved requested use and denied requested waiver. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 630: Submitted by Shawn Company, for approval of developnmnt plans proposing construction of a wooden, one-story, 1,730-square foot structure for the storage of equipment and materials. Conditional Use Permit No. 630 was granted for the continued use of an office and storage yard for landscape contract work on M-1 property, located midway between Kraemer Boulevard and Glue G~m Street, adjacent to and south of the Orange County Flood Control Channel. The City Planning Con~nission, by Motion, approved development plans subject to development of the site in accordance with requirements of the M-1 zone. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1140: Submitted by Donald J. Fears, Architect, for approval of revised plans proposing to shift the 5-story apartment de- velopment for the elderly, to the easterly portion of the site; and further proposing parking along the westerly property line. R-A zoned property located on the west side of Western Avenue, south of Lincoln Avenue; and further described as 219 South Western Avenue. (Resolution of Intent to R-3 - 69-70-20). The City Planning Commission, by Motion, approved revised plans for said conditional use permit. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council, and no further action taken. 71-31 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-75 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1155 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by L. Ned Miller, Cuesta Development Corporation, for a thirty-day extension of time for the establishment of a 120-bed nursing home, and a 150-bed board and care home for the aged on R-A zoned property located on the north side of La Palma Avenue, east of Euclid Street. (Reso- lution of Intent to C-O - 66-67-75). The City Planning Cormnission, by Motion, granted a retroactive 6-month extension of time, to expire May 9, 1971 to Conditional Use Permit No. 1155, and recommended the City Council grant a similar extension of time for completion of conditions approving Reclassification No. 66-67-75. The City Council took no further action on Conditional Use Permit No. 1155, thereby sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commis- sion, granting a 6-month extension of time. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, a retroactive 6-month extension of time was granted to complete conditions approving Reclassification No. 66-67-75, to expire May 9, 1971, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. DECISION - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-17 AND VARIANCE NO. 2215: Submitted by Hughes Markets, Inc., requesting a change of zone from C-1 to R-3, to es- tablish a 2-story, 306-unit apartment complex on property located at the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between buildings. b. Minimum distance from a covered parking space to a dwelling unit. Public hearing was held and closed on January 12, 1971, and de- cision deferred to this date, to allow for receipt of an executed agreement from the Developer, to contribute $10,000.00 as its share of the drainage facilities necessary in connection with subject property. Report of the City Engineer was submitted, advising that said exe- cuted storm drain facilities agreement had been received, and recommending City Planning Commission Condition No. 11 of approval to Reclassification No. 70-71-17 be amended to read as follows: 11. The Developer be required to participate in the necessary drainage to the extent of 16.6% of the cost of the storm drain in Beach Boulevard, from Orange Avenue northerly to the Carbon Creek Channel, including catch basins and appur- tenances. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-16: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-16 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Plannin8 Commission, amending Condition No. 11, as recommended by the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN AREAS SHOULD BE CHANGED. (70-71-17- R-3) 71-32 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-16 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-17: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-17 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2215, in part, as granted by and subject to the conditions set forth bY the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2215, IN PART. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN:' ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-17 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-18 - WORK ORDER NO. 681: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-18 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COM- PLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE SCHWEITZER PARK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT ACROSS CARBON CREEK CHANNEL, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 681. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECI- FICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC LMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - February 11, 1971, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-18 duly passed and adopted. RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATION - A.H.F.P. PROJECT NO. 466 AND 509 - LEWIS STREET UNDER- PASS: Upon the recommendation of the City Engineer, it was moved by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson~ that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign Right-of-Way Certification in connection with the right-of-way for the Lewis Street Underpass - A.H.F.P. 466 and 509. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-19 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-19 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN GRANT DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Arvel C. and Lucille B. Collins, Bernice Meiers.) Roll Call Vote: 71-33 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-19 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - MOBIL STREET SWEEPER: Assistant City Manager Robert M. Davis reported on a comparative specification and operating cost analysis study with various area cities on street sweeper equipment, and recommended purchase of a Mobil Street Sweeper from Kemp Yorke Equipment Company, in the amount of $15,480.15, including tax, as the best sweeper equipment meet- City's requirements. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth, purchase from Kemp Yorke Equipment Company in the amount of $15,480.15, including tax, was authorized, based on analysis of operational costs, as recommended. MO- TION CARRIED. SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY: The Assistant City Manager reported on a proposal submitted by Hobbs Trucking Company for the purchase of City-owned property located north of La Palma Avenue, at Pauline Street, (sweeper disposal site), in the amount of $17,476.00, stating the original figure of $20,855.00, au- thorized as a sale price on September 8, 1970, was excessive in view of the extra cost to the purchaser in cleaning, filling and compacting the land. Also submitted was report of the Director of Public Works, suggesting a $3,300.00 reduction in the original authorized price, based on the estimated expense to the purchaser to cover the cost of a soil and compaction report, and the necessary cleaning, filling and compacting, leaving a recommended sale price of $17,555.00. Councilman Roth requested a limitation of 60 days be set for close of escrow on the proposed sale. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-20: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-20 for adoption, authorizing the sale of City-owned property located north of La Palma Avenue and Pauline Street, (sweeper disposal site), to Hobbs Trucking Company, in the amount of $17,555.00; escrow to be completed within 60 days as recommended. , Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE THERE- FOR. (JULIANNA STREET SWEEPER DISPOSAL SITE.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-20 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-21: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-21 for adoption, approving the report of the Superintendent of Streets regarding Street Lighting Assessment District 1970-1 (Proposed) Tract No. 1948. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE BY THE CITY UNDER THE STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1931. (Street Lighting Assessment District 1970-1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-21 duly passed and adopted. 71- 34 .City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-22 - STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1970-1 (PROPOSED).- TRACT NO. 1948: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-22 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTEN- TION TO MAKE CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1931, DESCRIBING THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE, NAMING THE STREETS UPON WHICH THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE MADE, REFERRING TO THE REPORT OF THE SUPER- INTENDENT OF STREETS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, FIXING THE PERIOD OF TIME FOR WHICH THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE MADE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS. (Public Hearing - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M.). Roll Call Vote: AYE S: C OUNC ILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-22 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Roth: a. City of Rialto - Resolution No. 1488 - Urging annual inspec- tion of every motor vehicle for efficient emission control devices. b. City of Huntington Beach - Resolution No. 3276 - Urging that Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) consider the adoption of a policy to oppose any bill on a State or Federal level which does not involve local government in the decision-making process regarding the orderly development of a region. c. City of Orange - Resolution No. 3089 - Urging both the Gover- nor and Legislature of the State of California to enact and approve legisla- tion restricting the sale, distribution and exhibition of pornography and obscene material to persons under eighteen years of age. d. Division of Highways - Public Notice of Opportunity for Design Hearing - Construction of an additional overcrossing of La Palma Avenue at the Santa Aha Freeway. e. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Minutes - December 17, 1970. · f. Cultural Arts Con~nission - Minutes - December 31, 1970. g. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of December,1970. h. Annual Reports for 1969-1970. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2902: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2902 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-64(7) - M-l) CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT - ROYAL INNS OF AMERICA: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, the Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to exe- cute a Consent to Assignment by Royal Inns of America, Inc., of its rights and interests under agreement by a deed of trust in favor of Glendale Federal Savings and Loan Association, to secure a note in the principal amount of $5,750,000.00. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-23: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-23 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book~ 71-35 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES January 19, 1971, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 70R-472 AND AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS CLERICAL JOB CLASSES. (Junior Clerk and Junior Typist Clerk) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-23 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-24 - DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS: Councilman Roth offered Resolu- tion No. 71R-24 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO DESTROY ORIGINALS OF CERTAIN RECORDS IN THE POSSESSION OF THE CITY CLERK. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-24 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by M_rs. Isabel A. Lopez, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana Logia #24, for permit to conduct public dance January 24, 1971, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, from 4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chap- ter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Po- lice, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom. MO- TION CARRIED. INVITATION: The City Clerk reported an invitation to the City Council to attend a Reception, Sunday January 24, 1971, honoring Reverend Father John C. Qua- tannens on his retirement as Pastor of st. Boniface Catholic Church. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request .~ the Assistant City Manager, Coun- cilman Dutton moved to Recess to Exec-~ive Session for the purpose of dis- cussing personnel matters. Councilma~ Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (2:45 P.M.). RECESS: At the conclusion of Executive Session, and upon return of all Council- men to the Council Chambers, Councilman Thom moved to Recess to 7:30 P.M. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:05 P.M.). City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL M_INUTES - January 19, 1970, 7:30 P.M. PRE SENT: AB SENT: PRESENT: COUNCILb~N: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and I~tton COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORiqEY: ~loseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called ~ .p meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present (7:c~ · ~,~ ~'~i.). 71- 36 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971~ 7:30 P.M. REHEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-13 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1202: Sub- mitted by Bernardo M. Yorba, et al, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-2 on Portion A, and from R-A to R-1 on Portion B, to establish a planned residential development on Portions A and B, located southwesterly of the in- tersection of Santa Ama Canyon Road and Imperial Highway, extending in an east- west direction from the future alignment of Imperial Highway to Royal Oak Road, and in a north-south direction from Santa Ana Canyon Road, north of the future alignment of Nohl Ranch Road, with waiver of: a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of R-A zoned property, on Portion A only. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Ne. PC70-186, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-187, denied said conditional use permit. The City Council, pursuant ~ Resolution No. 70R-573 disapproved Reclassification No. 70-71-13, and pursuant to Resolution No. 70R-574 denied said conditional use permit. The City Council, at their meeting held December 8, 1970, authorized the City Clerk to schedule rehearing of subject applications before the City Council, subject to the payment of appropriate fee and upon receipt of recom- mendations from the City Planning Commission concerning revised plans which would reduce the number of proposed dwelling units and also establish a pitch and putt golf course on a portion of subject property. Rehearing was scheduled for December 29, 1970, at which time it was continued to this date at the request of Harry Knisely, Attorney for the Ap- plicant. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, at their meeting of Janu- ary 11, 1971, recommended revised plans be approved, subject to conditions. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts outlined the proposals to be con- sidered at this time on the subject 110 acres, and noted that the original plans called for construction of 410 multiple-family units on Portion A, and 180 single-family dwellings on Portion B, having an overall density of 5.4 units per gross acre. The revised plans propose development of 334 multiple- family units, and 171 single-famil~ dwellings, with a density of approximately 4.6 units per gross acre, and also utilizing the center 15 acres as a co~ner- cial pitch and putt golf course which would be open to the public. Other changes indicated in the revised plans, according to Mr. Rob- erts, are designating Imperial Highway as a primary highway of 6 lanes, with a 14-foot landscaped median divider, and reducing the units facing Imperial Highway to single-story, rather than two-story, with rather dense landscaping and berms shielding residences from view along Imperial Highway. Also, al- though the single-family dwellings will be situated on minimum lots of 5,000- square feet, those homes on the western boundary adjacent to the existing Lusk Development would have 10,000-square foot lots and lot lines for single- family pads eliminated. Mr. Roberts advised that the City Planning Commission had recommended to the City Council that the single-family lots in the western portion be in- creased to approximately 7,200-square feet, except for those adjacent to the Lusk Homes, which would remain 10,000-square feet in size and thus reduce the number of single-family dwelling units to approximately 135, and the overall density to about 4.2 units per gross acre. In answer to Councilman Pebley, James Meyer, Vice-President of Cal- prop Corporation, Developers, reported they have agreed to reduce the number of their single-family units to 135, making a density of 2.6 for these units. He requested that the 7,200-square foot minimum lot size condition for single- family dwellings be reconsidered, in view of the cluster-type of planning they have devised in an attempt to retain as much of the natural terrain as poss- ible, and that a minimum size of 5,000-square feet of buildable space be al- lowed, which would mean single-family dwelling lots would vary in size from 71-37 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19~ 1971~ 7:30 P.M. 5,000-square feet to 10,000-square feet, with the rest of the land to be maintained in its natural state by the owners. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Meyer advised they would agree to a condition that the area presently designated for a pitch and putt golf course be maintained as a special recreational use, agreeable to both the City of Anaheim and the Developers, in the event the golf course idea proved unsuccessful; also, that grading operations for the golf course would commence concurrent with the start of the third phase of the constr~ction of the townhouses,the course to be completed during the fourth phase of townhouse construction. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council in favor of subject application. Henry Fallek, 140 Orange Hill Lane, representing the Nohl Ranch Homeowners Association and those people directly adjacent to subject pro- perty, advised they support the Calprop Corporation proposal of 135 single- family dwellings. Bob McQueen, 4831 McKinnon Drive, representing the Santa Ana Canyon Improvement Association, advised they approved of the idea of the townhouses being individually owned by the occupants, and the perpetuity program with respect to maintaining the appearance of the area. Noting that the Orange County Planning Commission recently had approved another mobile home park for the Canyon Area, he stated his or- ganization felt there should be a little of every type of construction in the Canyon, and that since they felt Calprop Corporation and the Yorba family were endeavoring to maintain the beauty Of the Canyon in their pro- posal, his organization would support them. However,he asked if all the units were going to be the same color, and if there would be doors on the garages. Phil Joujon-Roche, 21527 Mohler Place, representing the Santa Ana Canyon Property Owners Association, advised that his organization sup- ports the proposed development with the City Planning Commission recom- mendations. He also expressed concern that there now are 160 acres of the Canyon used for mobile home parks, with about 8 mobile homes per acre. He estimated there would be about 5 mobile homes to each residence in the Canyon from Imperial Highway east, and stated that he would like to see a curtailment of such approvals. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. A1 Hyatt, 251 Orange Acres Drive, President of Peralta Hills Homeowners Association, advised that his organization is pleased that the building sites on the western boundary, adjacent to the Lusk develop- ment, would be a minimum of 10,000~square feet, and that the area desig- nated for a golf course would be retained as a recreational area, in the event the golf course is not successful; however, they opposed the app- lication because they felt the proposed density is extremely high and not compatible for the General Plan for the Hill and Canyon Area. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Coun- cil; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. In response to Council discussion, the City Attorney recommen- ded Condition No. 2, for Conditional Use Permit No. 1202, be amended to read: "The area designated in the plan as special recreational area shall be developed as a pitch and putt golf course, or some other recreational use, as approved by the City Council, and its maintenance shall be as- sured by contract or otherwise, to the satisfaction of the City Attor- ney." Councilman Roth stated he was satisfied with the proposal, since the Developers have set a definite time schedule for construction of the 71-38 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 7:30 P.M. golf course, and also agreed to a contract approved by the City Attorney to maintain that land as an appropriate recreational area, should the golf course prove infeasible. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-25: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-25 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the following conditions recormnended by the City Planning Commission, and further amended by the City Council, and re- scinding Resolution No. 70R-573: 1. That a final tract map for each phase of development shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder, and covenants, conditions and restruc- tions shall be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Depart- ment and the City Attorney's office prior to City Council approval of said final tract maps; and further that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map; and further that vehicular access rights to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedi- cated to the City of Anaheim. 2. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 3. Drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 5. Any use, subdivision, site design or the construction of any building, fence, sign or structure, or the removal or deposit of natural material for each phase of development shall be subject to review by the Development Services Department. Plans shall be submitted indicating front, side, and rear elevations, plan view and a cross section through the propo- sal and through sufficient adjacent properties to indicate the relationship of the proposal to those properties. Plans or drawings should also show proposed building or structure locations, and in reasonable detail walls, walks, topography, existing vegetation, proposed parking layout and loca- tion, landscape and irrigation proposals, building materials and color schemes. The Development Services Department shall consider the request to insure that the proposed improvements will meet the purpose and intent of the proposed scenic corridor, not present an unsightly appearance, limit the op- portunity to obtain the optimum use and value of land improvements, or impair the desirability of living conditions in the same or adjacent areas. It shall be the responsibility of the Development Services Department to maintain the objective of the Anaheim City Counc~il to retain the natural topography and scenic beauty of the Santa Ana Canyon Scenic Corridor. To achieve these ends, the Development Services Department shall require such changes as are deemed necessary to accomplish the purpose of this section. The Development Services Department shall not grant approval until satisfied that the purpose set out herein shall be accomplished, and no Building Permit or final building inspec- tion shall be issued until approval is given. Where a question arises as to the administration of these conditions or where there is a difference of opinion as to whether the intent and purpose of these conditions for the proposed Scenic Corridor is being met, the Plan- ning Commission shall,upon receipt of a written request outlining in detail reasons for said request, hear the matter at a public hearing. Appeal from decision of the City Planning Commission shall be to the City Council in written form stating in detail the reasons for said appeal, and said appeal shall also be made at a public hearing. 6. The maximum overall height of any building shall be twenty- five feet measured from the roof ridgeline to the highest finished grade level at the foundation. Roof-mounted equipment including exterior mounted radio and tele- vision antennas shall not be permitted in order to preserve the view from above as well as from the horizontal. 7. Landscaping and screening: That a comprehensive landscape plan shall be submitted to the De- velopment Services Department for review and approval for each phase of de- velopment. 71-39 ~ity H~i.:. Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January .19, .1971, 7:30 P.M. The entire required setback area adjacent to the Santa Ana Canyon Road and Imperial Highway shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall consist of lawn, trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Ail landscaped areas shall be permanently maintained in a neat and orderly manner as a condi- tion of use and shall be provided with hose bibbs, sprinklers, or simi- lar permanent irrigation facilities. When a prospective building site and/or subdivision contains a Eucalyptus tree windbreak the developer shall either: 1) leave the trees in their natural state, 2) prune the trees to a height not less than 20 feet, or 3) remove the existing trees and replace them, one tree for each three existing trees at an appropriate location, with trees from the list of windbreak substitute trees on file with the Development Ser- vices Department. Trees shall be 8 feet in height at the time of plant- ing. All areas remaining in a natural state (no cut or fill) shall be planted with adequate native plant material subject to approval of the Development Services Department. Said natural areas shall be permanently maintained and provisions for such maintenance shall be included in the covenants, conditions, and restrictions. An irrigation system may be pro- vided but shall not be required. All cut or fill slopes shall be planted with adequate plant ma- terial and irrigated with an irrigation system to protect the slopes against erosion. Plant material shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Department. Said planting shall consist of at least 1 tree per 300 square feet and 1 shrub per 150 square feet of actual bank slope area and a ground cover to completely cover the bank within 2 years from the time of planting. A functional test of the sprinkler system shall be perfomed by the installer in the presence of a City Inspector prior to approval by the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. 8. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning sub- ject property, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year. 9. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 10. That this reclassification is granted subject to the com- pletion of Conditional Use Permit No. 1202, and any plans developed and approved under said conditional use permit. 11. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such par- cel, provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently exist- ing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Coun- cil for a lot split. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first phase of the planned community, a standard shall be established by the Planning Commission and City Council for the total number of units to be developed within the entire project, and the developer shall commit him- self to a maximum number of units that will be developed on each building pad. The total of all the units to be built on all of the pads shall not exceed the total number of units established for the entire project. 13. The owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim appropriate fees as established by the City Council for park and recreation p~rposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building per- mit(s) is (are) issued for ~ach pha~a of d~v~lopmant. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN AREAS SHOULD BE CHANGED. (R-2 - Portion A; R-1 - Portion B) 71-40 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 19, 1971, 7:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-25 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-26: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-26 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1202, subject to the recormnen- dations of the City Planning Commission, as further amended by the City Coun- cil, reading as follows, and rescinding Resolution No. 70R-574: 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the com- pletion of Reclassification No. 70-71-13. 2. The area designated in the plan as "special recreational area" shall be developed as a pitch and putt golf course or some other recreational use as approved by the City Council, and its maintenance shall be assured by contract or otherwise to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, construction to be commenced in the third phase of development and completed in the fourth phase of development of the town houses under Portion A. 3. Subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, (Revision No. 2), 2, (Revision No. 1), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9; provided that a maximum of 135 single-family dwellings shall~be developed in Portion B and a maximum of 331 townhouse units shall be developed in Por- tion A. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1202. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resoldtion No. 71R-26 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 7288 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-13 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1202): Developer - Calprop Corporation; located on the west side of Imperial Highway (proposed), south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, and con- tains 103 proposed R-2 lots as condominiums. (70-71-13 and CUP-1202). The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held October 19, 1970, recommended denial of Tentative Map, Tract No. 7288, on the basis that since the requested R-1 and R-2 zoning on subject property had been denied, the existing R-A zoning would not permit subdivision of the property as pro- posed. The City Council, at their meeting held December 1, 1970, denied said Tentative Map, as recommended by th~ City Planning Commission, in con- junction with their review of Reclassification No. 70-71-13 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1202. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held January 11, 1971, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7288, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Mmp of Tract No. 7288 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 70-71-13 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1202. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 71-41 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 1.9~ 1971~ 7:30 P.M. 4. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Department and the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restric- tions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 5. That the vehicular access rights except at street openings to Imperial Highway shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6. That drainage of Tract No. 7288 shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephen- son, Tentative Map, Tract No. 7288 was approved, subject to the recormnen- dations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. RICHARD A. BIGLER AND ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECT, WALNUT CANYON GOLF COURSE: On recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Pebley moved that the Administrative Staff be authorized to enter into contract nego- tiations with Richard A. Bigler and Associates, of Laguna Beach, for de- sign of the proposed Walnut Canyon Golf Course; contract to be drafted and submitted to the City Council for approval. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. To the foregoing Motion, Councilman Thom voted "No." ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 8:45 P.M. Signed · _ -~.~_ ~ ~ ~ '~ City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- January 26,~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: AB SENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION: John Collier DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES: Gordon Hoyt CITY ENGINB~R: James P. Maddox SENIOR PERSONNEL ANALYST: Garry McRae ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend John Jackson, of the Crescent Southern Baptist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Don R. Roth led the Assembly in the Pledge of Al- legiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: The following Proclamation was issued by Mayor Dutton, unani- mously approved by the City Council, and presented to Dr. Souw, of the Orange County Dental Society, and to the winner of the Orange County Children's Dental Health Poster Contest: Children's Dental Health Week - February 7 to 13, 1971.