Loading...
1971/02/2371-121 City Hall, Anahelm,.California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 16, 1971, 7;30 P.M. Mr. Murdoch advised that the Federal program under which the Hol- stein Homes were built tended to encourage the type of development that had been constructed there. Also, referring back to the homes on Polk Street, mentioned by Co~nissioner Seymour, Mr.' Murdoch reminded the two bodies pre- sent that these homes were built prior to annexation to the City, as was the case with Dream Homes along Brookhurst Street, and the 'Freeway Park Homes, all of which are below the standards of the City of Anaheim, and would not have been allowed to be built if those areas had been a part of Anaheim at that time. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. ~DTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 9:45 P.M. Signed Deputy City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRE SENT: AB SENT: PRE SE NT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: John Harding CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Granzow ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Don E. McDaniel Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Paul Keller, of the First Presbyterian Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Don R. Roth led the Assembly in the Pledge of Alle- giance to the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS: The following Proclamations, issued by the Mayor, were unani- mously ratified by the City Council: "Easter Seal Month" - March 1 to April 11, 1971. "Quality Week" - March 1 to 7, 1971 "Sertoma's Freedom Week" - February 22 to 28, 1971. "Red Cross Month" - March, 1971. 71-122 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held on February 2, 1971, were approved on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Stephenson moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $795,672.48, in accordance with the 1970-71 Budget, were approved. GENERAL PLAN A~NDMENT NO. 122 - DECISION: Proposed increase in residential den- sities in that area bounded on the west by Imperial Highway, on the north by Esperanza Road, on the east by Eucalyptus Drive, and on the south by Santa Ana Canyon Road. The City Planning Commission reaffirmed their previous recommenda- tion that the Santa Ana Canyon area develop as a low-density residential com- munity, and that Exhibit "A", of General Plan Amendment No. 122, as amended, be approved. Public Hearing by the City Council was continued from the meeting of November 17, 1970, to February 16, 1971, at which time said hearing was closed and decision continued to this date, pending action by the Orange County Planning Commission on Orange County Use Permit No. 3121, providing for a 347-space mobile home park on property zoned R-2~4,000 located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, opposite Mohler Drive (Danker property.) Communication received this date from Howard L. Budlong was read in full, suggesting development of the area commence in the River bottom, due to drainage problems. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - FLOOD HAZARDS: In answer to Councilman Dutton's question concerning the Army Corps of Engineers' report, Fir. Charles Roberts advised that the reports received are in the form of three letters and are preliminary reports, each applying to specific acreage on the north side of the Santa Ana River and east of Imperial Highway, covering approximately 410 acres. The three letters submitted have indicated the existing channeli- zation of the Santa Aha River would accommodate a flood of a lO0-year fre- quency, however, a flood of greater magnitude could result in a great deal of damage in the Canyon area. Mr. Roberts further advised that the Army Corps of Engineers have indicated that their report covering the entire Canyon area will not be avail- able until the Fall of 1971. ORANGE COUNTY USE PERM-iT NO. 3121 - (DANKER PROPERTY): Regarding the Orange County Use Permit above referred to (Danker property) Mr. Roberts reported that the Orange County Planning Commission has continued the public hearing on said Use Permit ~o permit the mobile home park to March 30, 1971; and that the property is presently zoned R-2-4,000. Mr. Glenn Meyer, Vice-President of American Mobile Home Company, ad- vised that they have withdrawn their request for the County Use Permit and will develop modular housing under multiple-housing (fourplex), instead of mobile homes; plans are presently being checked by the County of Orange and fees have been paid~ In answer to further Council. queries, Mr. Meyer stated the project will not be built under the 235 Program, Rent Supplement Program, but will be built under 221~D-3~ which is a cooperative ownership financing program and will comprise approximately 42 acres~ with slightly less than 10 units per acre. 71-123 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. EXTENSION OF CITY SERVICES - ANNEXED AREAS: Mr. Meyer referred to letter dated February 17, 1971, received by the City Clerk's office this date, re- questing the County R-2-4,000 Zoning be recognized and also asking for clari- fication as to when water and sewer facilities will be extended to the pro- perty so a planning date for construction might be made. Mr. Geisler advised of the policy of the City, wherein City ser- vices, particularly sewers, are not extended to any area not within the lim- its of the City of Anaheim, that subject property must be annexed in order to receive City services. Mr. Meyer advised that they realized the property must be annexed to the City, but wanted to know when they could expect water and sewers up to the property in order to determine if they would be required to build their own sewer and water facilities. He further reported that Mr. Danker has approved the necessary easements to bring the sewer to this property. Mayor Dutton advised that an answer could not be given at this time, inasmuch as the property was not annexed to the City, and that the is- sue before the City Council was General Plan Amendment No. 122, to determine land use. Mr. Bob Flores, of Kemmerer Engineering Company, reported on meet- ing with the City Engineer prior to designing subject property, wherein they were advised that when sewer and water were available the property would be supplied, and that all that was needed was the necessary easements, which have been granted by Mr. Danker, the owner of the property. Mr. Robert Davis clarified the policy of the Council, regarding ex- tension of utilities within the area designated by the Local Agency Formation Commission as the City of Anaheim's zone of influence. He stated that the City of Anaheim, in long-range planning intends to serve this area, however, at the present time he doubted that the property in question could be physi- cally annexed to the City of Anaheim to meet the annexation requirements without some interim area also being annexed. Under the present policy, fa- cilities are not extended until a specific request for annexation is received and annexation is in process. Sewers are not extended until required fees are paid. The City Clerk submitted and read letters filed by H. Roger Howell, of the Law Firm of Rutan & Tucker, involving the Yorba property, advising of their desire to annex to the City of Anaheim and their willingness to cooper- ate fully for sewer and water service and appropriate rights-of-way along with the annexation. Mr. Roberts reminded the City Council regarding the proposed mobile home park development on the Danker property that when the recommendation to the Orange County Planning Commission was formulated, concern was expressed by the City Council that the proposed mobile home park did not incorporate the necessary arterial highway system within the area. The City of Anaheim has not had an opportunity to review the project now referred to by Mr. Meyer and there is no assurance that a circulation system is being provided to meet the needs of the area. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 122: Mr. Don McDaniel again explained proposed Amendment, Exhibits "~'~ "B"~ "C" and "D." Discussion was held by the City Council and permitted developments under the low-medium density designation were outlined by Mr. Roberts. He advised that this designation included R-2-5,000, Single-Family subdivisions, with 5,000-square foot lots, mobile home parks, or any type of multiple-family development that could be developed under the standards of the existing R-2 Zone. Mr. Geisler reminded the City Council that the issue before them was an Amendment to the General Plan, which was not zoning at all, and that under a General Plan, nothing other than that which would qualify under the R-A zone could be built as the zoning would still be R-A. 71- 124 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, !:30 P.M. He further advised that a General Plan is an indication of what the areas may be zoned in the future by considering densities in a general area and that before anything could be built the area would require precise zoning. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-72: At the conclusion of discussion that followed, Coun- cilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-72 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 122, Exhibit "C" which, in his opinion, was in accordance with previous actions taken in the area and the most logical development. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMEND- MENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 122, EXHIBIT "C" Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: AB SENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-72 duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 800: Submitted by Wonderbowl, Inc., re- questing an amendment to City Planning Commission Resolution No. 173, Series 1957-1958, granting Variance No. 800, to establish a 48-lane Bowling Alley with incidental uses on property zoned R-A, located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Walnut Street, (1177 West Katella Avenue), by deleting Condition No. 1 of said Resolution, which prohibits vehicular access to and from Walnut Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-221, denied requested amendment. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Mr. Monte L. Widders, Attorney representing Brunswick Corporation. Public hearing was scheduled January 26, 1971, and continued to this date at the re- quest of Mr. Widders. Mr. Roberts noted the location of subject property and the zoning and uses in the immediate vicinity, noting the single-family residential sub- division to the west, the undeveloped R-A property to the north and east, and a combination of commercial and residential type uses to the south. He briefed the history of Variance No. 800 and subsequent actions taken from 1957, when the application for the Wonderbowl facility was originally filed. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Richard Reinjohn, Attorney representing Brunswick Corporation, referred to Findings No. 2, 3 and 4, of City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC70-221, denying requested Amendment, and asked that the City Council consider the following: 1. Subject conditions were placed upon the property in 1957 and since that time the City has growm considerably. In 1957 the Convention Cen- ter did not exist, nor the motels and commercial zoning on Katella Avenue that are now in existence. 2. Roads and improvements have changed, however, their basic prob- lem, that of traffic, has not been solved. Mr. Reinjohn called attention to the Traffic Engineer's favorable report relative to their request and also reported that a Driveway Permit was issued in February, 1969, by the Engineering Department, who were then unaware of the restrictions because, he believed, the restrictions had not been recorded. 71- 125 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Andy Messina, Manager of Wonderbowl, submitted and rea~to the Council a Petition purportedly containing 1,660 signatures of customers favoring and requesting the access to Walnut Street be permitted. A plot plan of the Wonderbowl property, indicating the parking area and traffic pattern accon~nodating approximately 300 cars, was.shown and explained. Mr. Messina noted the difficulty in exiting onto Katella Avenue, due to the fact that their view is obstructed by automobiles and i trucks parked in front of the facility and also by the stacking of cars on KatellaAvenue, especially when there has been an event at the Stadium or Convention Center. In answer to a concern raised by residents in the area regarding the safety of their children, Mr. Messina reported that their busiest time was between 8:30 and 9:30 P.M., a time when children, as a rule, were not outside playing. Mr. Don Jensen, District Manager of Brunswick Corporation, reported that the problem came to their attention in 1968 through the League officers, and at each meeting, which are held twice a year, the problem of ingress and egress has been brought up. Mr. Jensen related his observance of the situation, especially at peak periods, and advised that although the services of a security guard has helped in directing the flow of traffic it had not reduced the existing congestion. Mr. Reinjohn submitted two pictures, one showing the egress to Katella Avenue, and one showing where the wall was partially down when the driveway construction was started and then stopped. He further noted that the Traffic Engineer was of the opinion that the best location for the driveway would be opposite Holgate Street. He ad- vised that this location was not necessarily their choice, as they would prefer to have the driveway further north, however, they had no objection to the Holgate Street location. Mr. Reinjohn reported that he traveled west on Holgate Street'and noted all streets to the south, between Walnut and Ninth Streets, were cul- de-sac streets and did not intersect with Katella Avenue. He doubted whe- ther many people would travel through the residential area to Ninth Street to get back to Katella Avenue and thought this route becoming a thoughfare was extremely remote. He stated that one of their main concerns was people who wanted to go east on Katella Avenue, who are now turning north on Walnut Street, making a U-turn at Holgate Street,. and returning to Katella Avenue where there is a signal and a left-hand turn to the east. This, in his opinion, was a safety factor that should be considered. In conclusion, Mr. Reinjohn noted that the property to the north of subject property is zoned and will eventually have driveways onto Walnut Street, and in the interest of safety access to Walnut Street from the Won- derbowl property should be available now. tion. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppo$i- Mr. George Hedstrom, 1747 Heather Lane, advised that when they built their homes there in 1955 the entire area was designated for single~ family homes; that there were then maps of the area indicating the streets and subdivided lots. Reference was made to the petition submitted to the City Planning Commission containing 90 signatures. Mr. Hedstrom reported that although there were only 90 signatures on the petition, every signature represented a homeowner. He advised of the lack of sidewalks in the area and reported that the children play in the streets. He felt a great majority of people would use Holgate Street to Ninth Street to get back to Katella Avenue. He called attention also to the peak morning period when women's leagues bowl. 71-126 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Hedstrom referred to the 15-foot landscape requirement along Walnut Street and advised that it was originally planted with ivy and trees, however, the ivy and some of the trees have died because of lack of care. He stated that when the access restriction was placed upon the Wonderbowl property it was the intention of the City Council to place this restriction along the entire length of Walnut Street from Katella Avenue to north of the Disneyland Hotel. Regarding traffic, Mr. Hedstrom noted the increase in traffic everywhere creating hazards at every driveway, both residential and busi- ness. He called attention to Linbrook Bowl on Brookhurst Street, which ex- periences the same problems when endeavoring to turn left from their property. In conclusion, Mr. Hedstrom stated that Walnut Street was the di- viding line. To the east is the entertainment zone, and to the west, people have to live. Mrs. Beverly Wells, 1215 Holgate Street, addressed the Council on behalf of the residents in the neighborhood opposing any changes in Variance No. 800 that would permit the Wonderbowl access to Walnut Street at Holgateo In representing the residents, Mrs. Wells advised that out of 89 houses along Holgate between Walnut and Ninth Streets, 86 are represented on the petition of protest previously referred to. She stated the basis of their objections is the increased use of Holgate that would disturb their peace and endanger the lives of their children and, in addition, would set a pre- cedent for the opening of the Disneyland Hotel property onto Walnut Street. Mrs. Wells reported that the Wonderbowl parking lot was a congre- gating place for teenagers, many of whom never patronize the bowling alley. In addition, it appeared that the lot was being used for the parking of the Grey Line busses for the Disneyland Hotel. Mrs. Wells further reported that she had been advised by the City Traffic Engineer regarding accidents at the Wonderbowl location, that there was nothing on record that he considered to be a major problem, especially for that size flow of traffic, and that getting in and out of the property would be no more of a problem than at any other intersection. Mr. Joe Wade, 1747 Walnut Street, addressed the Council in opposi- tion, advising that, if the driveway was permitted at the north end of the property it would be directly across from his and his neighbor's driveways. He further advised that they must back out of their driveways and with a driveway directly across the street it would add to the already-existing hazards. Mr. Wade agreed that cars park on Katella Avenue in front~of the Wonderbowl property and suggested that the curb be painted red and the area designated a "No Parking Zone" which would provide greater visibility on Katella Avenue. Also reported was, particularly in the summer months, it had been noted that subject parking lot was used by campers, trailers, and motorhomes as an overnight parking facility. In conclusion, Mr. Wade was of the opinion that the decision to allow access to Walnut Street was the type of decision that could only be determined when the additional 28-1/2 acres is developed and that it would be very hasty and ill--advis'ed to make a decision at this time based on the information of one concern which, in his opinion, did not need a driveway. Mr. Kit Carson felt the situation was a legal matter in that there was a ruling made that there be no access onto Walnut Street. He noted there have been no changes, it is the same bowling alley, and the residential area is the same. In his opinion, there should be a significant change in the area before this ruling is reconsidered. Mayor Dutton, in reply, advised of some of the changes made in the past 13 years, noting the construction of the Convention Center and the im- provement of Walnut Street. 71-127 City Ha.l,.~, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Reinjohn, in rebuttal, stated they understood the position of the residents, however, in their opinion, there have been major changes and there is a need for access to Walnut Street. He briefly outlined some of the changes which justified the request. He felt the concern for Holgate Street was overemphasized, and agreed there would probably be additional traffic but the amount would be negligible. He felt it was unnecessary to wait for further changes, when change was necessary now. It being determined sufficient evidence had been received, Mayor Dutton declared the hearing closed. Councilman Pebley stated that when Variance No. 800 was granted, this restriction was placed on the property for the protection of the resi- dents to the west. He felt that had these restrictions not been placed on the property, the Wonderbowl would not have been built. He also felt that the situation had not changed and that the Wonderbowl had no more problems in entering and exiting their property than Linbrook Bowl and many other businesses in the City. Further discussion was held, and it was noted that the accident rate at this location had not changed substantially in the last few years. Mr. Geisler advised the City Council that, according to his mem- ory, the restriction of access to Walnut Street applied only to the Wonder- bowl property in the granting of Variance No. 800, and not to the Disney- land property or the other property to the north. At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Pebley moved that the request to delete Condition No. 1 of City Planning Commission Reso- lution No. 173, Series 1957-1958, be denied. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. To this Motion, Councilman Dutton voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. Councilma~ Roth suggested the Traffic Engineer further investi- gate the parking on Katella Avenue fronting the Wonderbowl to determine if other provisions should be made. RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a 5-minute Recess. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:15 P.M.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. (3:25 P.M.). PUBLIC NEARING - PROPOSED STRgET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1970-1 (TRACT NO, 1948): Pursuant to Resolution No. 71R-22, duly published in the Anaheim Bulle' tin and notices posted in accordance with law, public hearing was held on proposed Street Lighting Assessment District 1970-1, encompassing Tract No. 1948. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, for or against the formation of said District; there being no response, de- clared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-73: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-73 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF Tt{E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING THAT THERE WAS NOT A MAJORITY PROTEST AGAINST STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1970-1, TRACT NO. 1948. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIkMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-73 duly passed and adopted. 71-128 Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februar 23 1971 1:30 P.M. ~ESOLUTION NO. 71R-74 - WORK ORDER NO. 4927: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No.71R-74 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A Pp~C IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHT- ~'~ING IN TRACT NOo % APPRDVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUC- TION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICA- TIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Open Bids, March 18, 1971, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-74 duly passed and adopted. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - RECLASSIFICATION_.__NO. 60-61-107_~__CONDITIONALUSE PERMITS NOS 35 AND 246: Western Skies Trailer Park, 2770 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, to show cause why said Reclassification and Conditional Use Permits should not be revoked for failure to comply with conditions relative to offsite improvements. Mayor Dutton asked if the Owner of subject property was present and wished to address the Council. Edward D. Anderson, Owner, advised the City Council that he had attempted to comply with the requirements to install curbs, gutters and side- walks on his property, however, when applying for the necessary permit he had been advised by the Engineering Department that a fire plug installed by the City two or three years ago was too close to the driveway and that he must move it before a permit will be issued. Mr. Anderson stated that the manager of his facility and other area residents had attempted to persuade the City installation crews to install this fire plug in a different location at the time it was put in; however, this had not been done. Since then, the fire plug has been hit by cars turn- ing in the driveway. He advised that if the City Council deemed it his duty to move the fire plug at this time, he would do So. In reply to Councilman Stephenson, Mr. Anderson stated the exist- ing driveway had been installed approximately eight years prior to the time the fire plug was put in. City Manager Keith Murdoch advised that it appears that the owner of the property is willing to install the improvements, and since it also appears obvious the City installed the fire hydrant, if it is necessary to relocate it, it would be the City's obligation to do so. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, the owner of subject property was ordered to complete installation of the r~quired o£f~Ite improvements within 90 days from this date. MOTION CARRIED. REOUEST - USE OF TRAIL~_~ JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES: Request of Art M. Carrizosa, Mini- ster, Anaheim Knott Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, dated January 15, 1971, for a one-year extension of time for the temporary use of a trailer as combination office and living quarters, at 3320 West Orange Avenue, was sub- mitted together with report of the City Engineer and report of the Develop- ment Services Department recommending approval. 71-129 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by cOUncilman Pebley, said request was granted. MOTION CARRIED. ACCESS ROAD - TRACT NO. 5083 (WASATCH DRIVE): Request of Kyle Thomas was submit- ted January 26, 1971, for an audience before the City Council on problems created by closure of an access road into Wasatch Drive that served Tract No. 5083. At that time the subject was referred to the City Engineer for investigation. On February 9, 1971, the City Engineer advised that he was prepared to make a report. At that time the subject was deferred to this date to al- low interested area residents to be in attendance. City Engineer James Maddox noted the access road referred to is' located east of Taylor/Lakeview Avenue between the Riverside Freeway and the former Santa Ana Canyon Expressway. He advised that a month ago access in or out of Tract No. 5083 could be attained either off Taylor/Lakeview Avenue via the old, original Santa Ana Canyon Road into Wasatch Drive or via the eastbould lane of the present Santa Aha Canyon Road. However, since then the State Division of Highways completed construction on the freeway and connecting ramps, closing off the old, original Santa Ama Canyon Road and tearing it out, and had provided curb returns in and out of Wasatch Drive via the westbound lane of the existing Santa Aha Canyon Road. ~ Mr. Maddox stated that in discussion with area residents, they had, indicated a desire either to have the old, original Santa Aha Canyon Road access road replaced, or some other solution that would not require driving up the eastbound lane of the Santa Ana Canyon Road to Pinney Drive to make a U-turn and come back the westbound lane to enter Wasatch Drive, an extra distance of 1.35 miles. Mr. Maddox informed the City Council that a query to the State Di- vision of Highways about the possibility of either again providing the access road off Taylor/Lakeview Avenue at a cost of approximately $24,000.00, or a left-turn pocket off the eastbound lane of the Santa Ana Canyon Road across the westbound lane and into Wasatch Drive at a cost of approximately $7,000. had brought a reply strongly recommending against either method of giving access to the tract; however, they had indicated they might consider a left- turn pocket from the Santa Aha Canyon Road eastbound lane to enter the pro- perty on the north side of the Santa Ana Canyon Road at a location about midway between Wasatch Drive and Finney Drive, requiring a cross-over of the S.A.V.I. Canal, which proposal was estimated to cost $100,000.00. Mr. Maddox stated the two proposals submitted to the State Division of Highways could create extremely dangerous traffic situations, especially since a left-turn pocket off the eastbound lane of the Santa Ana Canyon Road into Wasatch Drive would place it on a natural curve of the roadway, not only blocking the view of traffic coming on the westbound lane, but making it ex- tremely possible that motorists not familiar with the area would unknowingly enter the pocket and get into the oncoming westbound traffic lane. Mr. Maddox recommended the present available accesses via Pinney Drive - either a U-turn off the eastbound lane of the Santa Ama Canyon Road onto the westbound lane and then exiting at Wasatch Drive, or taking Pinney Drive to Gerda Drive - were safest and best. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Maddox advised that the pre- sent Santa Ana Canyon Road and the freeway and ramps are now under the juris- diction of the State Division of Highways. City Attorney Joseph Geisler recommended neither of the proposals submitted by the City Engineer be considered since they could both prove hazardous to traffic. Regarding the possible solution supplied by the State Division of Highways, he advised there was a question as to whether the City legally could expend $100,000.00 to solve a special traffic problem for private individuals, not being a general traffic problem; that if such an access were considered, a Special Improvements District probably should be created wherein the cost would be borne by the persons who would bene- fit, just as the developer would have borne the cost if the access had been 71-130 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. provided at the time of development. He added that in his opinion, the County should have never permitted the tract to develop with only a temporary access and the developer should have been required to provide a permanent access. Councilman Roth felt it was unfair to require the residents of the tract to pay for an access that should have been the responsibility of the County or State to see was provided by the developer of the tract. Mayor Dutton invited a representative of the area residents to ad- dress the Council. Kenneth Fenrich, 4805 Wasatch Drive, noted a newspaper article sup- posedly quoting the City Engineer as stating that the residents of Tract No. 5083 not only did not know what solution they were requesting for their prob- lem, but also had not checked into existing plans at the time they purchased their homes. Mr. Fenrich advised that in 1965, when these homes were built, the Freeway plans were not in existence. He referred to the present unsafe condition for children walking along Wasatch Drive to go to school and stated that the situation may be compounded if the State, as they understood they planned to do, installed a storm fence on the northwest side of Wasatch Drive. Mr. Fenrich offered a proposal that the old, original Santa Aha Canyon Road be reinstalled as a one-way street, from Taylor/Lakeview Avenue to Wasatch Drive, providing ingress to the area, and egress be obtained by the existing entrance to the present westbound lane of Santa Ana~Canyon Road from Wasatch Drive. Mr. Maddox advised a one-way street would cost approximately $18,000. or $20,000.00, plus approximately $10,000.00 to purchase the easement from the State; however, the main problem would be getting the State to give the access rights. He further advised that in discussing this suggestion with the State Division of Highways they indicated they would not approve it as it is too close to the on-ramp of the Freeway. George Kiene, 4820 Wasatch Drive, presented copies of Orange County Planning Commission and State Division of Highways correspondence dated 1963, wherein the old, original Santa Aha Canyon Road was designated the access road into Tract No. 5083, (Mr. Kiene asked that the City Clerk make reproductions of the correspondence for the files and return his copies to him.) He added that the status of "temporary access road" was not applied to that road until after the homes had been sold. He advised that area residents have expressed concern that requiring vehicles to travel the extra 1.3 miles could cause prob- lems of ambulance delays and inadequate fire protection. He added that Inspec- tor Morgan, of the Anaheim Fire Prevention Department, had informed him that an extra 3 to 5 minutes delay in reaching any fire could mean the fire could get out of control. Mr. Kiene further stated that. the existing Fire Station (No. 8) for that area, is equipped with only one small pumper which, he be- lieved, was inadequate to handle any major fire; the next closest fire station is near Autonetics and about 5 to 10 minuts away, while it would take about 17 minutes for equipment to get to their area from downtown Anaheim. With regard to Police protection, Mr. Kiene contended under the pre- sent conditions any burglar could see a Police car approaching, long before it got into the tract, and could vacate the property. Mr. Kiene referenced discussions 'with John Grisinger, of the State Division of Highways, !n which Mr. Grisinger stated the proposed one-way access street would not meet requirements of the Code because of the limited traffic, and thus would be considered a driveway; also, that there would have to be a minimum distance between the corner and the road turnoff. He stated that he had not observed spaces of more than 5-feet between a corner and entrances to a service station, and also he did not feel the proposed access street would cause any more problems in the future than it did in the past. Fire Chief Stringer advised that, contrary to Mr. Kiene's statements, the fire-fighting equipment at Station No. 8 is a 1,000-gallon pumper with a 1,700-foot hose and is the same equipment used at all Fire Stations in the City. Chief Stringer presented the Fire Station Log on the recent fire in Tract No. 5083, which showed that it took 2 minutes to get to the fire, after the Fire 71-131 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. Department was alerted. He asserted the delay that caused concern to the resi- dents was occasioned by the fact that the City of Orange Fire Department was notified first, and then the Orange County Fire Department.. It was overhearing the call to the Orange County Fire Department that alerted Station No. 8 to the fire, and thus they were already preparing to answer the call when it fi- nally came through to the proper station. He also advised that Engine No. 5, out of Station No. 5, reached the fire in 9 minutes; that the Batallion Chief, out of 500 East Broadway, made a run up there and back in 15 minutes. Chief Stringer also advised that the residents in that area have been in- formed and supplied with stickers that they are to notify the Anaheim Fire Department in case of fire. M.T. Davis, owner of the first house on the left in the cul-de-sac in subject area, advised he had never observed any traffic problem created by the former access road off Taylor/Lakeview Avenue. He felt with the City's support the State would listen to their problem. City Manager Keith Murdoch suggested the various proposals again be reviewed by the City and further consultations held with everybody con- cerned, including the State Division of Highways, to see if any solution could be arrived at. THE TOWN TOUR COMPANY: Owner's Notification, regarding Route No. 6, involving change of route, establishment of fares and schedules was submitted, together with request that the signs provided by the City to the Anaheim Jitney Systems be changed to show the name of The Town Tour "FunBus" Company, and further, that the City consider installing benches at bus stops in the recreational areas and along Harbor Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue. Since the cessation of operations by Anaheim Jitney Systems, change in Route No. 6 would reinstate and provide bus service to the downtown Anaheim area, City Offices and Municipal Court. It was further requested that there be a 90-day trial period to analyze the feasibility of revised Route No. 6, and that an Objective Com- mittee, representing the City Manager and Chamber of Commerce, be appointed to make the analysis during the trial period to determine if the income meets expenses and, in the event it does not, further requesting the City consider subsidizing a portion of the costs for this service. REVISED ROUTE NO. 6: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Roth, change of Route No. 6 was approved as proposed, together with estab- lisment of fares and schedules, as set forth in Owner's Notification to the City Council, dated February 10, 1971. MOTION CARRIED. BENCHES: Mr. Mike Valen, President of the Town Tour Company, reported there were approximately 20 locations where the placement of benches would be a ser- vice. He further reported that he did not intend to use the benches for ad- vertising. Mr. Murdoch advised that if Mr. Valen would furnish the list of sug- gested locations the City Manager's office would contact Bench Ad Company, to see if they would be interested in furnishing the benches. OBJECTIVE COMMITTEE: No Council action was taken on the request to appoint an Objective Committee. As to the possibility of subsidizing expenses of Route No. 6, it was the consensus of the Council that this possibility was extremely remote. SIGNS: On condition that the signs replacing the Anaheim Jitney Systems signs be furnished by the Town Tour Company and donated to the City of Anaheim, with the understanding that said signs become the property of the City of Anaheim, it was moved by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that the City replace the Anaheim Jitney Systems signs with the "FunBus" signs as re- quested. MOTION CARRIED. 71-132 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by Imogene Salatich, for entertainment permit to allow one piano-bar player at Fat Fogarty's, 2221 West Ball Road, was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Mmnicipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. HUNTINGTON BEACH - FREEWAY ROUTE 39: Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson, advised the Council that the State Division of Highways is holding a public hearing on the proposed Route 39 Freeway at 8:00 P.M., on March 31, 1971, in Buena Park, and asked if, in view of this, the City Council would like to change their scheduled hearing on this on the evening of March 30, 1971. City Manager Keith Murdoch stated that if the Council did not wish to change the date of their meeting and wanted to get some information to the State Division of Highways meeting the following night, it would be possible for somebody to make a verbal report at that meeting. By general Council consent, the date of March 30, 1971, 7:30 P.M., for hearing on Route 39 remained unchanged. It was reported that for the public hearings held by the City Plan- ning Commission approximately 1,800 notices were mailed to those within the City of Anaheim affected by proposed Route No. 39. Inasmuch as the public hearing before the City Council is legally advertised in the Anaheim Bulletin, it was agreed and determined by the City Council that the normal courtesy of mailing be eliminated in this instance. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-75 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 613-B: In accordance with recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R- 75 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OFALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT: THE LA PALMA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, FROM APFROXIMATELY 599 FEET WEST OF, TO 1,529 FEET WEST OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 613-B. (O.E. Henderson - $16,586.60) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-75 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-76 - AWAltD OF WORK ORDER NO 614-B: In accordance with recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. ?1R- 76 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT: THE STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM APPROXIMATELY 855 FEET SOUTH OF TO 1,245 FEET SOUTH OF VE~NT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANA- HEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 614-B. (R.J. Noble Company - $7,494.00) Roll Call Vote: 71-133 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P,M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-76 duly passed and adopted. WORK ORDER NO. 681 - AWARD OF CONTRACT: On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Pebleymoved award of contract on Work Order No. 681 (Schweitzer Park Pedestrian Bridge Across Carbon Creek Channel) be deferred to March 2, 1971. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - TRACTOR LOADER: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 1 Tractor Loader with Back Hoe, as follows: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX, WITH TRADE-IN McCoy M~tor Company, Anaheim ........ $7,266.10 Milo Equipment Company, Santa Aha ......... 7,537.45 On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Stephenson moved that the low biM'of McCoy Motor Company be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $7,266.10, including tax and less trade-in. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom: 1. Claim filed by Rose, Klein and Marias, on behalf of Scott Van Vactor, for purported personal injuries sustained by collision with a City vehicle, on or about November 20, 1970. 2. Claim filed by Everett E. Demler, Attorney, on behalf of Joan Marie Carrillo, Debbie Marie Carrillo, Kathleen Marie Carrillo, Nina Marie Carrillo, and Daniel Rodriquez Carrillo, for purported general and special damages in connection with the death of their father, Danny Carrillo, as re- sult of an accident at an Anaheim intersection purportedly maintained in a dangerous and defective condition, on November 15, 1970. 3. Claim filed by James S. Hamilton for purported personal property damages sustained to his automobile by gate at the Lewis Street Sub-station, on or about January 25, 1971. 4. Claim filed by Gary Spires, for purported personal property damages sustained to his automobile due to an insecure manhole cover in the street, on or about January 29, 1971. MOTION CARRIED. APPLICATION FOR ~AVE TO PRESENT LATE CLAIM: Filed by John A. Palladino, Attorney, on behalf of Alisha Mankau and Ashok Mankau, for personal injuries purportedly sustained on or about February 20, 1970, was submitted and denied, as recom- mended by the City Attorney, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson: a. City of Culver City - Resolution No. CS-6516 - Opposing the rate increase requested by Southern California Edison Company. b. City of Stanton - Resolution No. 954 - Requesting the Public Utilities Commission to provide a direct aerial route from the Orange County Airport to Sacramento. c. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application of The Western Union Telegraph Company, a corporation, for an order authorizing it to revise certain intrastate rates and charges applicable to message tele- graph and other services within the State of California. d. Cc, m~nity Center Authority - Minutes - February 1, 1971. e. Before the Public Utilities Co~nission - Application of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a corporation, for authority to reduce to non-agency status their station at Orange, County of Orange, State of California. 71- 134 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. f. City of Newport Beach - Resolution No. 7372 - Urging the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California to seek action to alleviate the problem of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers. g. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application of Sou- thern California Gas Company for authority to include in its tariff schedules a provision to relate charges for firm general service to deviations of re- corded temperatures from average temperatures. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2910: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2910 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-26 - R-A - Walnut Canyon Annexation) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2910 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2911: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2911 for adop- tion. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-6(1) - R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2911 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2912: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2912 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-23 - R-A - Esperanza-Fairmont, Esperanza-Roth, Esperanza-Carrillo Annexations) ORDINANCE NO. 2913: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2913 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANA~EIMAMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-18 - C-l) ORDINANCE NO. 2914: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2914 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE AN~IMMUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (56-57-76(3) - M-l) ORDINANCE NO. 2915: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2915 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAMEIMAMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-65 - R-2-5,000) ORDINANCE NO. 2916: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2916 for first reading. 71-135 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-13(2) - R-I) GREEN FEES - SENIOR CITIZENS: Request of' E.O. Hutson, Treasurer, Anaheim Senior Citizens Club, was submitted February 9, 1971, to establish a special rate for green fees at the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course for members of the Ana- heim Senior Citizens Club, together with report of the Parks and Recreation Director recommending denial. At that time the subject was referred to the City Manager's office for further investigation, report and recommendations. Report of the City Manager was submitted, recommending that no special group be given a preferred rate at the golf course and that the current policy remain unchanged. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, request was denied, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-77 - ACCOUNTING OFFICER - SALARY: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-77 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING A RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR A JOB CLASS, AND AMENDING SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION NO. 70R-472. (Accounting Officer) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILM~N: ABSENT: COUNCILM~N: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-77 duly passed and adopted. PADS BUDGET: The City Mana§er reported that the Board of Directors of PADS had requested member cities to submit in writing their intention to support the PADS Budget for fiscal year 1971-72. Anaheim's share, based on a formula of $500.00, plus 5¢ per capita, would be $9,000.00, with a possible additional request of $900.00. Mr. Murdoch advised that $9,000.00 has been included in the Data Processing Budget proposed for fiscal year 1971-72. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, a letter was authorized to be forwarded to PADS stating that $9,000.00 has been allocated in our tentative 1971-72 Budget for membership in PADS; how- ever, at this time this Budget has not been finalized nor accepted. MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL FUND - CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: The City Manager reported a request from the Finance Committee of the Cultural Arts Center, proposed for the Horace Mann School, that a special fund be set up so contributions may be accepted on the basis that they will be returned if contributions are insufficient and the Cultural Arts Center does not become an actuality. In reply to Councilman Pebley, City Attorney Joseph Geisler ad- vised that any contributions to the City is tax deductible as long as the funds are used for municipal purposes; however, if these contributions are made on a contingency basis, it is not tax deductible until the contingency is met. Also, if the City accepts gifts for the proposed Horace Mann Cul- tural Arts Center on a contingency basis, it is committing itself to refur- bish the building for that purpose, and the City Council already has said they will not do this. Mr. Geisler recommended that if the Cultural Arts Financial Committee wishes to accept contingent gifts, they accept them as a con~ittee and not turn them over to the City until there no longer is a contingency. He further recommended no gifts be accepted on a contingency basis that are under $500.00. 71-136 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 23, 1971, 1:30 P,M, At the suggestion of Mr. Mmrdoch, it was agreed that a meeting of the Chairman of the Cultural Arts Finance Committee, the City Attorney and City Manager be held to review the conditions set up in the minutes of the School Board and attempt to work out the required course of action to be brought back to the Council, if Council action is required. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On recomendation of the City Manager, Councilman Roth moved transfer of funds in the amount of $22,500.00 from the Council Contingency Fund to Account No. 312-120 be authorized to cover overtime for police opera- tion caused by several events that were not and could not be foreseen at the time the budget was prepared. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-78 - PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF MIRALOMA AVENUE: Councilman Thom of- fered Resolution No. 71R-78 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF MIRALOMA AVENUE BETWEEN JEFFERSON STREET AND VAN BUREN STREET° Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Febley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-78 duly passed and adopted. CITY CLERK: Councilman Pebley, on behalf of the City Council, extended best wi~hes to City Clerk, Dene, on her recent marriage to Harold W. Daoust. PROMOTION TOUR REPORT: Mayor Dutton reported briefly on the recent Visitor and Convention Bureau promotional tour of the Pacific Northwest. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the~request of the City Manager, Councilman Thom moved to Recess to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing a person- nel matter. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:45 P.M.). ADJOURNMENT: At the conclusion of Executive Session, and upon return of all Coun- cilmen to the Council Chambers, Councilman Stephenson moved to adjourn. Coun- cilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 6:20 P.M. City Clerk