1971/03/0271-137
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971~ 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
COUNCILMEN: None
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION: Reverend Stanley Herber, of the Free Methodist Church, gave
the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Hal Steinruck, of the City Personnel Depart-
ment, introduced new employees attending the Council meeting as
part of the City's orientation program.
Mayor Dutton welcomed the new employees.
SUGGESTION PROGRAM AWARDS: Mayor Dutton issued plaques to the following
City employees, in recognition of suggestions received:
Joe Gazzeny - for installation of a ramp for wheel chair use at
the Convention Center.
Steve Tokai - for placing mats to dry feet on at City Hall entran-
ces.
In view of the fact that James Masterson previously had received
a plaque for a suggestion award, Mayor Dutton presented him with
a $25.00 Savings Bond, for recommending buying a small battery
charger to start vehicles at the Utility Center.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held February 9,
and Adjourned Regular Meetings held February 15 and 16, 1971 were approved
on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read-
ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading
of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Roth seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINAlqCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $1,188,477.49, in accordance with the 1970-71 Budget, were approved.
REHEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1157: Submitted by Dr. Irving Moskowitz,
to establish a one-story, 99-bed general hospital in conjunction with a 240-
bed convalescent hospital on C-1 and P-L zoned property located between Ana-
heim Boulevard and Lemon Street, north of Ball Road.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-27,
granted said conditional use permit.
The City Council, pursuant to Resolution No. 70R-316 denied said
application, and on November 10, 1970 a motion to grant a request for re-
hearing failed to carry a majority vote of the Council.
71-138
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971~ 1:30 P.M.
Request for rehearing again was submitted on February 16, 1971, by
Jerry D. Nilsson, M.D., Agent for the Applicant, and granted on the basis
that new and additional information could possibly affect the decision of
the City Council.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and recalled
that just prior to the first consideration of subject application, Conditional
Use Permit No. 1137 was approved by the City Council for a convalescent hospi-
tal to be built on part of this same property.
Mr. Roberts called attention to the fact that in his letter re-
questing a rehearing on subject conditional use permit, Dr. Nilsson stated
that the facility now proposed for this application would be more a specialty
hospital than an acute general hospital. He added that Dr. Nilsson has in-
dicated he would like the application considered at this time, according
to the original plan submitted; however, if the application is approved he
probably will revise those plans at a later date. Mr. Roberts stated that,
although the City Planning Commission had not reviewed the additional mater-
ial submitted by Dr. Nilsson, their approval of the original application
probably still was valid.
He suggested that in the event the application is approved, the
City Council may wish to consider the following two points in formulating
the conditions of approval:
1. Some type of screening device be provided along the Anaheim
Boulevard frontage which might be along the lines of a decorative, masonry
wall behind the landscaped area, as originally was recommended by the City
Planning Commission.
2. All accesses for ambulance vehicles be from Anaheim Boulevard,
rather than Lemon Street, to preclude nuisance to people living in the R-1
subdivision in the area.
In reply to Councilman Dutton's comment that he understood a mas-
onry wall already existed on Anaheim Boulevard, Mr. Roberts advised that,
if so, the first condition he recommended would not be necessary.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
wished to address the City Council.
Jerry D. Nilsson, M.D., Agent for the Applicant, advised he has
practiced medicine in Anaheim for approximately 9 years, specializing in
surgery, and particularly radical cancer surgery. In an effort to clarify
some erroneous public disclosures that had resulted from his presentation
before the City Council on February 16, 1971, at the time he requested a
rehearing, Dr. Nilsson read from transcript of that presentation relative
to the inadequacy of local hospitals to treat cancer problems that he sees,
although local physicians and surgeons were competently trained. He stated
he had no criticism of either the local physicians or surgeons, or their
treatment or training, and his regard for the local hospitals was high, how-
ever, the antagonism resulting from hearsay and discussion of those two afore-
mentioned points had done a great deal of damage to the medical community.
Dr. Nilsson advised that his references were to Anaheim and Orange
County cities north of Anaheim only, and did not include Santa Ana or any
of the beach cities. Dr. Nilsson cited statistics on the past and future
incidents of cancer in the United States. He advised that he presently is
on the staff of eleven hospitals within a five or six-mile radius of this
area and that there are certain pieces of equipment he and his colleagues
have unsuccessfuly endeavored to have the hospitals purchase. One example
he cited was the Russian Stapler, used to connect tissues in surgery, and
costing approximately $3,000.00. He stated that this piece of equipment
was purchased by him personally and carried from hospital to hospital since
he believes its use allows surgery to be performed more rapidly and effi-
ciently. He also mentioned several other small pieces of equipment that are
not now available in the local hospitals.
71-139
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
Dr. Nilsson further stated there is no individual in Northern
Orange County specifically trained to manufacture prosthetic devices neces-
sary to allow a patient to swallow following radical surgery of the maxilla.
This surgery also requires specifically trained nurses for post-operative
care.
Dr. Nilsson further stated that although there are now many drugs
on the market competent to chemically treat cancer, at the present time
there is no profusion unit, nor full-time chemotherapist in Anaheim, al-
though there is one chemotherapist in Fullerton who also is a hemotologist.
Regarding orthopedics, Dr. Nilsson stated there presently are
multitudes of bedridden people suffering from degeneration of the hip joint
who could be walking with surgery that would include a plastic joint and
new plastic bone cement if the hospitals had the new, finer instruments
and also a laminar flow unit to sterilize the operating room air, such as
presently is being manufactured in Garden Grove. He advised that at pres-
ent, hip replacement surgery results in about 9% of the patients becoming
infected and consequently permanently crippled. However, with the use of
the laminar flow device, this incidence of crippling infection could be re-
duced to less than 1%.
Dr. Nilsson also stated that at present any person requiring open-
heart surgery must leave Anaheim to obtain it since the only Anaheim hospi-
tal with the necessary heart-lung pump is Anaheim Memorial, and that unit
is not presently being used. He added that many hospitals cannot buy this
equipment because it is very expensive; however, there are many well trained
chest surgeons capable of performing open-heart surgery in this area.
Another deficiency noted by Dr. Nilsson is a satisfactory pul-
monary laboratory that would be used in rehabilitation, diagnosis and treat-
ment of pulmonary diseases, before, after and during surgery.
One of the greatest deficiencies in the Anaheim area, according
to Dr. Nilsson, is that there is no basic cancer research being done be-
cause of lack of facilities except in Orange County Medical Center and
hospitals related to the medical school being developed at Irvine, although
area physicians are well trained and many previously have done extensive
research.
Dr. Nilsson stated that another obstacle in treating a radical
cancer patient in this area today is the expense, since the cost of 5 or
6 weeks of treatment is in excess of $10,000.00 at present.
Dr. Nilsson listed some problems that he realized presented ob-
stacles in obtaining much of the aforementioned equipment:
1. They are extremely expensive.
2. It is often not economical equipment since there are not
enough patients in any one local hospital to warrant the purchase.
3. Personnel specifically trained to utilize the equipment
often is lacking.
4. It is often difficult to change the habit and behavior pat-
tern of physicians, hospitals and personnel in adapting new equipment.
Dr. Nilsson stated that originally he had thought to either
harass or harangue the local hospitals into buying the desired equipment;
however, he now believes it would be advantageous to have a new special
services hospital in the area° He added that at this time his major prob-.
lem is the Duffy Bill, which prohibits construction of a hospital in Cali-
fornia if work has not been started prior to June or July of 1971, unless
it was approved by Comprehensive Health Planning Association. He added
that since it would be virtually impossible to start planning a new hospi-
tal and begin construction before June,and since he not only'did not have the
knowledge nor the 5 or 6-million dollars required for construction,he de-
cided to investigate the plans for a general hospital he learned had for-
merly been rejected by the City Council, on the basis that Comprehensive
Health Planning Association had decreed no further hospital beds were needed
and that development of additional beds would jeopardize development plans
of present existing hospitals.
71- 140
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
Investigation had convinced him the location proposed for the
hospital was ideal.
He then approached the Applicant, Dr. Irving Moskowitz, with the
following questions:
1. Would he release his position, his plans, to Dr. Nilsson?
2. Would he build a hospital to Dr. Nilsson's specifications?
3. Would he arrange financing and construction of the hospital?
4. Would he be content with a landlord's position in the matter,
receiving a profit and return on financing through this modality?
5. Would he permit Dr. Nilsson to operate the hospital in a man-
ner Dr. Nilsson thought appropriate,without interference?
Dr. Nilsson stated Dr. Moskowitz assured him that if he could ob-
tain the required conditional use permit, Dr. Moskowitz would built to Dr.
Nilsson's specifications and his position would remain as landlord only.
Dr. Nilsson stated that his intention was to have a special services
hospital, not a general hoslital. He, as a surgeon, was most interested in
cancer; however, orthopedics, cardio-vascular surgery and organ transplants,
when proven feasible, must also be planned. Dr. Nilsson stated that pres-
ently there are three modalities for organizing such a hospital - non-profit,
proprietary, or government-owned facilities.
Non-profit hospitals (Anaheim Memorial and Martin Luther) are not
obliged to pay the same taxes, yet charge the same prices as proprietary
hospitals (Garden Park, West Anaheim and Anaheim General); government-owned
hospitals, in his opinion, are inefficient and it is almost impossible to
accomplish anything in them. He advised he was proposing a non-profit cor-
poration named Anaheim Special Services Hospital, with a tertiary responsi-
bility and organizational configuration: one-third of the organization rep-
resented by the medical staff (one-third of which would be general practi-
cioners, and one-third department heads - department heads being Head and
Neck, Bone, Gastric and Mixed Tumors, Gynecology, Plastic, Anesthesia, Urol-
ogy, Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy, Chest Tumors, and Cardiovascular;) the
second segment would be business administration to insure the hospital was
run economically and on a sound fiscal basis; the third segment would be rep-
resentative of the community, such as the Member of the City, the various
religions, industry, unions, insurance companies, medical aspects of State
programs, Medicare, American Cancer Society, and the Hospital Association.
He stated he believed a hospital of this type would best serve the City if
it belonged to the city and the people in it.
He proposed that the doctors would have instant redress to the ad-
ministration and the hospital corporation if they needed new equipment; they
would immediately be able to discuss problems with Medicare, Medical, Blue
Cross and Aetna representatives. Thus all problems could be discussed and
completed within the hospital.
He also proposed the hospital would be equipped with a central com-
puter that would perform patient surveillance, from the moment the hospital
was entered, including physical, diagnosis, laboratory determination, and
monitoring during and following surgery. He further stated that to his know-
ledge, there presently is no such system available in this area.
Robert Williams, Coastal Medical Corporation, 1606 East Maywood
Street, Santa ~%na, advised they had been commissioned to propose a system
to meet Dr. Nilsson's requirements, and they were proposing:
12-bed unit for heart care, including a 4-bed acute care system,
a 4-bed moderate care system, and 4 beds with radio transmitters so the pa-
tients could move around.
8-bed surgical intensive care unit, with 4 beds equipped with radio
transmitters.
71- 141
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M.
4-bed respiratory intensive care unit with very involved electro-
cardiograph monitoring and PO2 equipment.
At least 4-bed surgical recovery unit.
2 fully-instrumented isolation rooms.
3 major operating rooms - one fully instrumented with full X-ray
angiogra~hic devices and a cart for patient implants; one with cardiovascu-
lar surgery team completely equipped; one for radical cancer surgery.
Mr. Williams stated the advantage to the patients in the proposed
system would be a saving in cost from a shorter stay in the hospital and
speed-up of procedures;also computer storage of information on reactions to
drugs, etc., would supply valuable immediate educational material, and thus
eventually the computer also could project how patients would respond to cer-
tain drugs or treatments.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Williams advised that the cost
of such systems runs between $100,000.00 and $750,000.00; however, the first
phase of what is proposed for the hospital in question would cost about
$250,000.00.
Boyd Agnew, President of Agnew-Higgins, Inc., 7532 Anthony Avenue,
Garden Grove, with the aid of diagrams, explained the laminar flow unit
which his company manufactures and which is used to decrease airborne in-
fection in an operating room. He stated that today the air of the average
operating room is changed 10 to 12 times an hour; a laminar flow unit chan-
ges the air up to 200 times an hour and keeps the atmosphere in motion to
eliminate particles settling.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Agnew advised that as far as
he knew, their's was the only company in Orange county manufacturing laminar
flow units at a cost of $7,500.00, plus shipment and installation charges;
also, 6 units presently have been sold to hospitals; 3 are in operation,
2 in California and 1 in Ohio.
In reply to Councilman Dutton, Dr. Nilsson stated he does not own
stock in any company manufacturing laminar flow units, nor in anything else.
Dr. Nilsson reported that some of the physicians who originally
had signed a petition in favor of the proposed hospital had since requested
that their names be removed, although each one had read the petition before
signing it.
He summarized by stating that he did not believe the hospital he
is proposing would be a competitor of the local hospitals, since it would
not be interested in routine surgical procedures and would not be involved
in obstetrics or standard traumatic procedures; it would be a hospital equip-
ped to handle the more complicated surgical problems related to the cardio-
vascular system, pulmonary system, orthopedics and cancer treatment. He
added that the hospital he is proposing is not in any way comparably designed,
staff-wise or organization-wise with any other hospital now in existence in
this part of the County; however, he believed its existence would stimulate
other hospitals to compete with it.
With regard to charges that had been made that his facility would
remove personnel from other hospitals, Dr. Nilsson advised that since his
hospital would require specially-trained personnel he proposed originally
to derive these from centers in which such special work is now being done
and these employees would train persons from other communities and other
states.
Dr. Nilsson advised that if the requested conditional use permit
is approved today, the hospital would be in existence one year from this
date.
Councilman Pebley asked if Dr. Nilsson had any knowledge as to
whether those physicians who had requested their names be removed from the
71-142
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M.
petition in favor of the proposed hospital had an interest in any present
or future hospitals being built in Anaheim.
Dr. Nilsson replied he believed, although not certain, that Dr.
Cooperband had a financial interest in West Anaheim and Anaheim General Hos-
pitals. Dr. Nilsson further advised that he understood some who signed his
petition had been pressured to remove their names.
In reply to Council questioning, Pr. Nilsson advised that since he
was a general surgeon he intended to continue to take his patients to the hos-
pital according to their wishes, since he has found all the hospitals very
good; however, if a patient requires the special equipment he proposes for
the new hospital, he would recommend the new hospital for the patient.
Dr. Nilsson also stated that, although the Applicant, Dr. Moskowitz,
has built several hospitals, to his knowledge he has not built a hospital in
Orange County, and he personally does not know anything about his medical prac-
tice; his inspection of the plans for the proposed hospital to be built by the
Applicant on subject property indicated it was architecturally excellent. He
added that although some changes should be made in the facility, it is planned
for the care of patients and not overwhelmed by administrative facilities.
In reply to Councilman Stephenson, Dr. Nilsson advised that, al-
though he does not have a signed contract, he does have letters of intent
that the equipment he has recommended for this proposed hospital would be
supplied by the developer; the computer system would, at least in the begin-
ning, be supplied to the hospital as a gift if the hospital is a non-profit
entity. However, he added, the hospital is estimated to cost about $4,000.000.
and to employ 350 to 500 people; if this equipment was not installed, physicians
would not use the facilities and thus the developer would lose his investment.
In reply to Councilman Roth's query as to what would be the result
if Dr. Nilsson should decide to leave this area after the hospital was built,
Dr. Nilsson stated that such was a probability within one or two years; how-
ever, his only interest was in getting an ultramodern hospital for Anaheim
which would be organizationally set up much the same as Martin Luther Hos-
pital, wherein its existence and progress would be persistent and not depen-
dent on any one individual. He added that he has no financial interest of
any kind in the proposed hospital.
In reply to Councilman Thom, Dr. Nilsson advised that he knew of
no special accreditation criteria in the State for a specialty hospital, such
as is proposed, and assumed it would be accredited as every other general hos-
pital.
Councilman Thom, referring to Dr. Nilsson's petition statement that
there presently is no facility for accurately utilizing the newest methods of
treatment of cancer in Anaheim, stated he understood at least 5 units in Or-
ange County have this type of equipment in operation now, and cited as ex-
amples that St. Jude Hospital has a linear accelerator which is super-voltage
treatment; Martin Luther has cobalt; and Orange County Medical Center has
super-voltage cancer treatment in operation. Regarding lack of laminar flow
units for orthopedic surgery, Councilman Thom stated that, since Los Alamitos
Hospital and Doctors Hospital in Santa Aha presently have such devices, and
Martin Luther Hospital has one on order, there actually are some available
in the County.
Dr. Nilsson replied that he has performed surgery using the lami-
nar flow unit in Los Alamitos, however, very few Anaheim surgeons go to Los
Alamitos. Also, he understood St. Jude Hospital is putting in a modified
device, and Martin Luther has one on order. However, his remarks had refer-
red to Anaheim and Orange County cities north of Anaheim and did not involve
Santa Aha or any of the beach cities.
With regard to cancer treatment, Dr. Nilsson agreed Martin Luther
Hospital presently has a cobalt device, and St. Jude is in the process of
installing a linear accelerator. However, these facilities are not the com-
plete answer to radiation therapy, although both of these hospitals will
71- 143
.City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2~ 1971, 1:30 P.M.
progress in that respect. He added that he believed every hospital should
be equipped with all of the required equipment.
Replying to Councilman Dutton, Councilman Thom advised, as a mem-
ber of the Board of Directors of Martin Luther Hospital, that that hospital
recently had been authorized by the Board to purchase a laminar flow unit.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council
in favo~ of the application.
Mrs. Ann Madison, 220 East Vermont Avenue, stated she had to drive
her mother in to the University of California Medical Clinic in Los Angeles
for cancer treatment, and thus she would like to see the proposed facility
constructed in Anaheim. She added,however, that regardless of whether the
proposed facility would be a special services hospital or a general acute
hospital she felt that the southeast area of Anaheim should have a hospi-
tal.
Robert Hill, M.D., 10732 West Katella Avenue, stated he was a
general practitioner and wished to be able to refer the patients he was not
qualified to treat to the best facility and still have that facility in this
area so he could follow their progress. He added he did not believe any of
the local hospitals could provide the facilities proposed for this hospital.
He cited the case of a teenager, Gary Hall, who recently had died from can-
cer, and who would not have been able to get the necessary treatment here
in Anaheim, even if his illness had not been so advanced it could not be
treated.
Mrs. Dolora Hall, mother of Gary Hall, advised that four days
prior to her son's death he had to be isolated, and because the hospital
did not have an isolation room such as is proposed for the facility in ques-
tion, it took two days to decide how to prepare anyone to enter the room.
Nancy Parry, M.D., 1720 West Ball Road, General Practitioner,
stated she believed there is a strong need in Anaheim for a facility such
as is proposed, so that local General Practitioners can follow the progress
of patients who must be referred for special care. She stated that, at pres-
ent she cannot follow the progress of a patient she has referred who is in
Orange County Medical Center because she is not on the staff.
RECESS: Councilman Thom moved for a 5-minute Recess. Councilman Pebley seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (3:30 P.M.).
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council being present. (3:40 P.M.).
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op-
position.
McLemore Bouchelle, M.D., 1781 West Romneya Drive, General Surgeon,
presented a petition purportedly containing 72 signatures of Anaheim area
physicians in opposition, and stated he believed that facility, as proposed,
actually constitutes an acute general hospital.
Replying to Councilman Dutton, Dr. Bouchelle advised that the op-
posing physicians stated no specific reason for the opposition.
He also presented a letter from F. Earl Woodhull, M.D., stating
his signature on the original favorable petition was not to be construed as
an endorsement of any specific hospital. Dr. Bouchelle also called attention
to a le~er received by the Council from five physt¢tans~ requesting removal
of their signatures from the original favorable petition, and further ad-
vised that some physicians had signed both petitions, signifying a change
of mind from favoring to opposing the proposed hospital facility.
In reply to Councilman Roth, Dr. Bouchelle stated that many fac-
tors, which he could not publicly state, had caused those physicians to
change their mind about supporting the proposed hospital. Dr. Bouchelle
stated that it was the consensus of those physicians opposing the proposed
hospital facility that the best approach to improving Anaheim hospital care
71- 144
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971~ 1:20 P.M.
would be to enlarge and build hospitals that would be controlled by doctors
in the area and used as a site of practice by the doctors in the area; that
since this proposed hospital is planned for use as a cancer hospital, it is
not planned to be used by any surgeons in Anaheim. He added that there pre-
sently are 14 Board Surgeons listed in Anaheim, 3 of whom have moved away,
and the other 11 have expressed their disapproval and do not feel the proposed
facility could provide the care indicated at a reasonable expense to the pa-
tient. He reported that Dr. George Moore, of Roswell Park Medical Center in
New York, allegedly the leading authority on profusion and the treatment of
melanoma by profusion, had stated there no longer is an indication profusion
is needed for the treatment of this disease.
Dr. Bouchelle stated he believed a hospital of the size proposed
in the subject application could not provide enough patients to enable phy-
sicians to make a living from it.
Replying to Dr. Parry's comment that she was unable to follow the
progress of a patient in Orange County Medical Center, Dr. Bouchelle asserted
any physician in Orange County was free to follow his patients in that facil-
ity.
Councilman Pebley asked for a designation as to which of the phy-
sicians who signed the opposing petition are stockholders in any present or
proposed hospitals.
Dr. Bouchelle replied that he personally did not own any stock in
a hospital; and he could not reply for others who had signed the petition.
However, he did not feel this would affect their decision to back or not to
back the hospital.
In reply to Councilman Dutton's comment that he would like a defi-
nite reason stated as to why these physicians oppose the proposed hospital,
Dr. Bouchelle advised there were many things that were known but for legal
reasons could not be stated; they were opposed to the proposed hospital be-
cause they do not feel there is a need for a hospital in this area of this
sort; hospitals and facilities in the area are adequate and it would be bet-
ter to support and enlarge those in the area than to build another which they
felt would not meet the needs and standards of the community.
In reply to Councilman Roth's query as to whether Dr. Bouchelle
was stating that area physicians would not refer patients to the proposed
hospital facility, Dr. Bouchelle advised he understood none of the 11 Board
Surgeons in the area would use it.
Nicholas Roberti, M.D., Radiologist at Martin Luther Hospital for
ten years, reported that approximately half of his time is spent in treating
cancer with radiation therapy. He noted little has been projected for the
new facility in this area and felt it important it be known what is presently
available. He thereupon reported that there are 8 cobalt machines in Orange
County, two of which are in Anaheim and are under-utilized, since there are
only about 25 patients who are receiving this treatment per day at Martin
Luther Hospital. He added that an inexpensive cobalt unit costs from $100,000.
to $150,000.00; the four to six-million volt linear accelerator at Orange
County Medical Center is very much under-utilized and cost over $250,000.00;
a second one is being installed at St. Jude Hospital.
He further advised that the twenty-two-million volt betatron unit
would cost about $500,000.00 to $1,000,000.00. Dr. Roberti stated this ma-
chine is not available in the area, however, he did not believe the proposed
facility would contain a betatron unit, and thus it would still be a general
hospital, since it would not have any equipment not already available.
Marshall Stonestreet, M.D., 1834 West Lincoln Avenue, General Surgeon,
stated he did not believe the proposed facility was needed in Anaheim; that
there was no assurance prosthetic devices would be manufactured in the facil-
ity; and that he predicted patients in such a Class B hospital would have to
be charged $120.00 per day. He further stated he did not believe the physi-
cians who had requested their names be withdrawn from the favorable petition
had read the petition, and thus did not know what they were signing.
71-145
.qity Hall~ Anaheim~..California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2~. 1971, 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Roth, referring to a former statement that a pump used
in open-heart surgery was not n~ in use, asked if the Orange County Medical
Association concerned itself to the extent that they recommended to area hos-
pitals that certain equipment be repaired, etc.
Dr. Stonestreet advised the Orange County ~edical Association in-
spects a hospital only at the request of the hospital; however, a joint com-
mission of A.M.A. members and the American College of Physicians and Surgeons
members periodically inspects hospital facilities, and also an inspection team
of the California Medical Association routinely inspects hospitals which have
requested such service, although this team is mainly concerned with the work
of individual doctors and committees of doctors.
In reply to Dr. Stonestreet's request, the City Attorney advised
that the Duffy Bill decrees that unless it has the approval of Comprehensive
Health Planning Association, no hospital can be approved for California that
had not had its application in before January 1, 1970, and construction of
such hospitals had to be started before July 1, 1971. However, the City Coun-
cil, after a hospital was approved by the State, could determine whether it
would grant the conditional use permit to allow construction of the hospital
in Anaheim.
Mr. Geisler added that, in view of the presentation made by Dr.
Nilsson this date, there was a question as to whether the facility he has
now proposed constituted a different application from the one originally re-
quested.
William Shigekawa, M.D., 1120 West La Palma, representing the Orange
County Surgical Society, which is composed of the Board Certified and the
American College of Surgeon members of Orange County, advised that an ad hoc
committee of this Society had met with Dr. Nilsson to clarify statements
printed in the press following Dr. Nilsson's original appearance before the
Council, and had then determined that they believed the hospital facility, as
proposed, would be of no benefit to this general area at the present time;
that major, super-radical cancer surgery still should be done at major cancer
hospitals, such as the Roswell Park facility in New York, and the one in Texa~
He further added that the majority of these types of hospitals are financed
by large government and state grants, and at this time a proposal is being
prepared to construct a major cancer treatment and research center for the
entire southwestern part of the United States next to the Los Angeles Coun~
General Hospital, to be financed by government grants.
Eric Anderson, M.D., 1711-A West Romneya Drive, Internist, stated
the surrounding megalopolis has readily available any equipment or facility
needed to treat patients, and thus he did not feel Anaheim needed to have
all of this specialized equipment. He added that the equipment Dr. Nilsson
stated was not now available in Anaheim either was brand new or was not con-
sidered worthwhile by the confreres in the institutions. He added that he
believed the existing hospitals should be improved and enlarged to provide
better service, rather than construct another small hospital.
Thaine Price, M.D., 1001 South Brookhurst Road, Fullerton, General
Surgeon with a sub-specialty in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, stated
that in the last 10 years he had referred only two or three patients to
U.C.L.A. Medical Center for further complicated cancer treatment and then
because the professor of surgery had a special interest in these cases. He
added that he believed a hospital with a minimum of 300 beds would be ne-
cessary to support the expensive equipment needed for all types of camcer
surgery; also~ that this proposed hospital would not have the technological
support of the University and he did not believe it could carry out compli-
cated cancer surgery without such support.
Lynn Wiseman, M.D., 1242 West Lincoln Avenue, stated that although
development of the laminar flow unit did significantly cut the rate of infec-
tion in surgery, the plastic bone glue used in a total hip prosthesis is le-
gal in the United Stated on a temporary basis only, because of its purported
toxicity, and is being released only to specialized, investigative orthopedic
surgeons in university hospitals. Dr. Wiseman further stated that he believed
to obtain the best care in a hospital, the doctors must serve on committees
to assure this care. As a general rule, the greater number of small hospitals,
71-146
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
the lower medical care falls. This is because of the extensive self-regulatory
mechanism that the medical profession has set up in hospitals such as the var-
ious committees referred to who supervise the work done.
Dick Johnson, Chairman of the Voluntary Citizen Board of Trustees
of Anaheim Memorial Hospital, advised that the shell of the 4th and 5th floors
of Anaheim Memorial Hospital already are built, and if additional hospital
beds are needed in Anaheim, they can be readily available. He further ad-
vised that Anaheim Memorial Hospital will go before the Comprehensive Health
Planning Association within the next 30 days to present a very comprehensive
plan of new service to the community of extremely sophisticated intensive
care concepts for the very critically ill, much like what can exist in a uni-
versity hospital setting.
Gene Dahlgren, Martin Luther Hospital Administrator, stated that
the laminar flow unit recently ordered by Martin Luther Hospital has been
under consideration for the past several months.
Referring to policing hospital care by committees of doctors, Mr.
Dahlgren stated that larger institutions could provide better care for pa-
tients because of the larger number of physicians on the staff to make up
the policing cormnittees.
Mayor Dutton invited Dr. Nilsson to present a rebuttal.
Dr. Nilsson, referring to Dr. Bouchelle's statement that he could not
publicly state the reason for the opposition by the physicians signing the pe-
tition presented this date, asked that Dr. Bouchelle make any accusation he
has to make public, so he can answer it.
He stated that, although those physicians supporting his proposal
have been under considerable duress because of it, they have indicated they
will continue their support. He added that until today, he had not described
the structure of the proposed facility to the Board Surgeons or the Orange
County Medical Society, nor to anyone else except those who had derived the
configuration, but had only implied what he was interested in doing, thus the
only objection the opposing physicians could have would be to an additional
general hospital; since his proposed facility would be interested in the more
severe problems of patients and would have no obstetrical services, it would
be a special services hospital and not a general hospital.
Regarding the statement attributed to Dr. George Moore that profu-
sion no longer is of use, Dr. Nilsson advised that at the time he was associated
with Memorial Hospital in New York the correct technique for this procedure had
been found, but not the drug. He contended the same situation exists today;
however, the drug will be discovered, and when it is, he believes the hospitals
should be prepared for it.
Dr. Nilsson disagreed that chemotherapists would not come to this area
full time, and that Anaheim surgeons would not use the proposed facility. He
expressed the belief that if the proper and best facilities are available, the
physicians naturally will use them and it will attract specialists such as
chemotherapists.
With respect to the size of the hospital, Dr. Nilsson declared every
project starts small, and this one also would grow as other area hospitals
have; however, he noted th at Martin Luther Hospital has not grown during his
9 years in Anaheim.
Replying to Dr. Price's statement that he had referred only 2 or 3
patients to U.C.L.A., Dr. Nilsson commented that Dr. Price's patients are all
referred to him and he only receives those patients he can and will treat.
He added that there are several surgeons in Anaheim, including Dr. Price, who
are capable of performing the more complicated surgeries but who do not be-
cause the facilities to do so are not available.
With regard to the question of how such special care could be given
to patients at a lower cost, Dr. Nilsson advised that, although an average
room costs $56.00 per day, as soon as a patient has progressed beyond the
necessary specialized care, he would be transferred to the adjacent approxi-
mately ~50 bed convalescent facility at a cost of $26.00 per day, and in that
facility still would receive excellent care and be close to emergency treat-
ment if needed.
71-147
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MrNuTEs - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
Replying to Dr. Wiseman's statement that the plastic glue is not
now available for the hip surgery for which the laminar flow unit is so im-
portant, Dr. Ntlsson agreed the Food and Drug Administration is withholding
this at present, although it is being used successfully in England, Sweden
and Switzerland. He stated he believed that, because of the importance of
this surgery today, either the existing glue or another soon will be avail-
able.
In answer to Dr. Roberti, Dr. Nilsson advised that his proposed
facility also would be equipped with producers of high-energy radiation
equipment for the treatment of tumors.
Dr. Bouchelle stated that he knew Dr. Nilsson to be an excellent,
well-trained Surgeon; that his only objection was to adding another small
hospital to Anaheim as doctors cannot police as they should a multitude of'
small hospitals.
It was determined sufficient evidence had been presented, and
Mayor Dutton declared the hearing closed.
In reply to Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney advised he did
not believe it would be possible to restrict any hospital the Council ap-
proved to a special services hospital; that if the conditional use permit
application is approved it would be an approval of the original request
for a 99-bed general hospital.
RESOLUTION; Councilman Thom noted the rehearing had been granted on the
basis that the proposed facility would provide high energy radiation, cancer
treatment, isotopes, orthopedic procedures, etc.,not available in existing
hospitals; however, the lack of these facilities was refuted by the physi-
cians testifying this date. Also, the Orange County Health Planning Coun-
cil had upheld the original reco~mmndation of the Comprehensive Health Plan-
ning Association of Orange County that subject application for a new 99-bed
general hospital be denied.
He stated that his non-remunerative, voluntary service as a member
of the Board of Directors of Martin Luther Hospital, had made him more aware
of the impact such a facility as proposed this date would have on the over-
all health care of Anaheim and Orange County citizens, and he believed the
quality of health care would be lowered and the base diluted by fragmentt-
zation of hospitals. He thereupon offered for adoption a Resolution deny-
ing Comditional Use Permit No. 1157.
The foregoing Resolution failed to carry by the following Roll
Call Vote:
AY~S: COUNCIL~N:
NOES: COUNCIL~N:
A~SENT: COUN¢IL~N:
Thom
Roth, Stephenson, Pebley and Du'tton
None
Mayor Dutton declared said Resolution failed to carry.
Councilman Dutton stated he agreed with some of Councilman Thom's
statements; however, he believed putting all the hospital controls in the
hands of one group could injure local citizens by creating a monopoly that
could raise prices at will. He noted that both Martin Luther and Anaheim
Memorial Hospitals also started ~s small facilities; also, there presently
is no hospital in the southern part of Anaheim.
He further stated he believed a landowner should be able to use
his land in the best possible manner, provided he does not injure his
neighbors or the conmmnity, and he did not feel another hospital in that
area would injure either.
Councilman Stephenson stated he did not think anything should be
rejected that would improve the treatment of cancer; also, if the special
services facilities as outlined by Dr..Nilsson were not provided as prom-
ised'by the Applicant, the physicians would not patronize the facility and
he would lose his investmant.
71- 148
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Roth expressed concern that the application for appro-
val actually is a general hospital, although it has been proposed as an
ideal cancer facility, and suggested that if approved, it be done on the
condition that the facility will be as Dr. Nilsson has outlined. He also
objected to the opposing physicians refusing to publicly state their reasons
for the opposition to the proposed hospital.
Councilman Pebley also requested that if approval is granted,
there be some way to assure the facility would be a non-profit hospital,
would be a cancer treatment hospital, and the original applicant would be
the landlord only, as Dr. Nilsson had testified this date.
Mr. Geisler stated he questioned who would operate the proposed
facility if, as Dr. Nilsson stated, he had no financial interest in the hos-
pital and the Applicant would serve only as landlord. Also, he advised that
the Council must determine whether the proposal being discussed today is a
new application or the original application; if is is a new application,
it must go back through the City Planning Commission for action.
Mr. Geisler further advised that there also is a question as to
whether or not the City Council legally can reverse their previous decision
because of a change of heart if the action is to be taken on the original
application; that changing conditions to reverse a previous decision must
be based on zoning regulations.
Mr. Geisler stated that if the C~ty Council wanted to approve the
facility as presented this date, they could make the conditions that the hos-
pital would in fact be operated by some organization headed by local doctors
who would be the operating force and the lessee of the hospital, and not by
the hospital development group headed by the Applicant, and would be set up
in the manner outlined this date.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-79: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-79 for
adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1157, subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the
completion of conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 1137.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
3. That an organization, satisfactory to the City Council, for
the operation and use of the hospital be established prior to commencement
of construction and prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1157.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton
Thom
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-79 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Councilman R0th m0v~d to Reees~ to 7:30 P.M. Councilman Staphans0n
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:40 P.M.).
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council being present. (7:30 P.M.).
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-24 AND VARIANCE NO. 2228: Submitted
by Ben W. Sandknop, et al, requesting a change of zone from R-A to ~3 to
establish 18 one and two-story apartments on property located on the east
side of Stinson Street, south of Lincoln Avenue; and further described as
134, 138 and 142 Stinson Street, with waivers of:
71-149
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
a. Maximum building height within 150 feet o~ an R-A zone.
b. Minimum required landscaped setback.
c. Minimum required side yard.
d. Minimum distance from a'covered parking space to a dwelling
unit.
e. Required 6-foot masonry wall.
f. Code requirements that access to carports be from the alley
only.
The City Planning Cor~nission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-17,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, in-.
cluding preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for the alley on the south side of the property, or other appurtenant
work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accord-
ance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the
City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Sttnson Street shall
be installed as required by the Director of l~ublic Utilities, and in accord-
ance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the
Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satis-
factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee
the installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City
of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Stinson Street for street
tree purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter-
mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
5. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shiel-
ded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
6. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City
of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined
to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the
building permit is issued.
8. That a 5-foot chain link fence be provided along the south
side of the Orange County Flood Control Channel subject to the approval of
the Orange County Flood Control District.
9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. i and 2 above mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void
by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within
one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
10. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Co~nission, pursuaat to Resolution. No. PC71-18,
approved said variance in part, Waiver "a" being determined not necessary,
Waiver "e" denied, and Waivers "b", "c", "d" and "f" granted, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassif~cation No. 70-71-24, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, provided, however, that a 6-foot
masonry wall shall be constructed along the east property line, and on the
R-1 property south of the existing alley, and that a 12-foot wide gate shall
be provided within said wall to provide the R-1 property owner ingress and
egress to the alley which he presently enjoys, as stipulated to by the pe-
titioner, and in accordance with permission given by ~he single-family home-
owner for said construction.
71-150
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
The City Clerk introduced correspondence received at open meeting
from Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Dunn, 127 Stinson Street, in opposition to subject
request.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro-
perty, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the
evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He
added that the alley system south of subject property, running from Stinson
Street halfway to Magnolia Avenue, and then up to Lincoln Avenue, was required
to provide traffic circulation and drainage.
Councilman Pebley asked what use of the property could be made, other
than the proposed apartment complex.
Mr. Roberts advised a convalescent hospital previously was approved
for this property, but never developed.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with
the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an
affirmative reply.
sition.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppo-
James Giamboi, 2613 West Lincoln Avenue, owner of the E1 Rancho Mo-
tel and manager of the apartments on Stinson Street across from subject pro-
perty, expressed opposition to the proposed apartment complex on the basis
that it would attract undesirable, cheaper and noisy tenants, since anyone
with "more substantial living" would want an apartment where he could have a
better view and a place for children to play; that it would create a hazard
for the vehicular traffic, since visitors would have to park on Stinson Street
and that street, being only 54-feet wide, would not be wide enough to facili-
tate parking, and if cars were parked there emergency vehicles would not be
able to turn around. Referring to the existing alleyways, Mr. Giamboi con-
tended either they were obstructed with cars parking or were used as a drag
strip to beat the traffic light at Magnolia Avenue. He also ~uggested a turn-
around should be provided at the end of Stinson Street.
Replying to Councilman Thom, Mr. Roberts advised that a review of
the General Plan determined there was sufficient access for all types of ser-
vice equipment at this location.
Answering Councilman Pebley's query of what other use he thought
could be made of this property, Mr. Giamboi stated he did not object to apart-
ments per se being constructed on that site, but to the number of apartments
proposed. He suggested a duplex, such as the facility he manages on ~Stinson
Street, would be more appropriate since it would reduce the number of cars and
allow space for a play area for children.
Mrs. Doris Giamboi, 2613 West Lincoln Avenue, alleged an Anaheim
Fireman attending a fire at the Casa Valencia the day before had told her
there was no possible way for fire trucks to get in and out in an emergency
if the proposed apartment complex was constructed. She also stated that trucks
turning down Stinson Street have had to use private property to turn around.
Mrs. Gia~nboi further contended it would be difficult to rent the proposed
apartments because of the location, and advised that she rents by the week a
duplex apartment she and her husband manage on Sttnson Street in conjunction
with their motel~ since the owner of the duplex apartments has been unable to
keep permanent tenants there.
Mr. Giamboi also voiced objection to the proposed 6-foot masonry
wall, with a 24-foot gate, proposed for the south boundary of subject property,
on the basis that it would allow additional traffic at that point.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
71-151
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
In reply to Councilman Roth, the City Engineer advised that the
curb on Stinson Street is 18 feet east of the centerltne, thus the roadway
would be 36-feet within a 54-foot right-of-way.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R, 80: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-80 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recon~nended by the City Plan-
ning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (70-71-24 - R-3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-80 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO, 71R-81: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-81 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2228, in part, subject to conditions,as
recon~nended by the City Plannimg Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2228, IN PART.
Roll Call Vote:
AYE S: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-81 duly passed and adopted,
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-11 - TERMINATION: The City Planning Commission, pur-
suant to Resolution No. PC71-19, recommended termination of Reclassifica-
tion No. 59-60-11 (Resolution No. 5542), on the basis that none of the
conditions have been met within the established time limit and the pro-
perty is covered by Reclassification No. 70-71-24 and Variance No. 2228.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-82; Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-82
for adoption, terminating Reclassification No. 59-60-11, as recommended by
the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL
PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-11.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCII~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-82 duly passed and adopted.
VARIANCE NO. 1305 - TERMINATION: The City Planning Commission,pursuant to Reso-
lution No. PC71-21, recoz~mended termination of Variance No. 1305 (Resolu-
ti~n No. 6560), on the basis that the petitioner never has exercised said
variance, nor has any extension of time been requested. Property located
oll the east side of Stinson Street, south of Lincoln Avenue, an~covered
under Reclassification No. 70-71-24 and Variance No. 2228.
71-152
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-83: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-83 for
adoption, terminating Variance No. 1305, as recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PRO-
CEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 1305 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO.
6560 NULL AND VOID.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-83 duly passed and adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 936 - TERMINATION: The City Planning Commission, pur-
suant to Resolution No. PC71-20 terminated Conditional Use Permit No. 936
(Resolution No. PC67-78), on the basis that the Petitioner did not exercise
said permit and has proposed R-3 reclassification of the property under Re-
classification No. 70-71-24.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
the City Council concurred with action taken by the City Planning Commission
in terminating all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 936. MOTION
CARRIED.
Mayor Dutton left the Council Chambers and Mayor Pro Tem Pebley
assumed Chairmanship of the meeting. (8:00 P.M.).
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-29 AND VARIANCE NO. 2229: Submitted
by Preston K. and Docia W. Allen, requesting a change of zone from R-A to
R-3 to establish a 106-unit, tWO-Story apartment complex on property located
on the south side of Ball Road, east of MacDuff Street, with waivers of:
a. Minimum distance between buildings.
b. Maximum building height within 150 feet of single-family zoned
property.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-22,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That street lighting facilities along Ball Road shall be in-
stalled as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director
of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to
the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installa-
tion of the above-mentioned requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City
of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road for tree planting
purposes.
3. That sidewalks shall be installed along Ball Road as required
by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications
on file in the office of the City Engineer.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter-
mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That a 6-foot raasonry wall shall be constructed along the east,
west, and south property lines.
9. That drainage from subject property shall be disposed of in a
manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim'the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
71-153
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the build-
ing permit is issued.
11. Prior t~n~he introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro-~.
petty, Condition Nos.l/2 and-8,above mentioned, shall be completed. The pro-
visions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by
action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within
180 days from date hereof, or su{h further time as the City Council may grant.
12. That Condition Nos./4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Cormnission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-23,
approved said variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re-
classification No. 70-71-29, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, PROVIDED however, that where the distances between
facing walls are less than that required by Code, no windows shall be placed
in said walls, as stipulated by the petitioner.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the Applicant was present and con-
curred with the recommendations of the City Planning Con~nission, to which he
received an affirmative reply.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the Council;
there being no reply, declared the hearing closed.
City Engineer James Maddox recommended if subject reclassification
is approved, an additional condition be imposed, as follows:
13. That, in lieu of a standard cul-de-sac being constructed on sub-
ject property, a modified cul-de-sac shall be constructed within the exist-
ing right-of-way of Sherrill Street as approved by the City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-84: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-84
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission, plus the additional condition recommended by the City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(70-71-29 - R-3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-84 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTIONN0. 71R-85: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-85
for adoption, granting Variance No. 2229 as requested, subject to the condi-
tions reconm~nded by the City Planning Co~nission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2229.
Roll Call Vote:
71-154
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-85 duly passed and
adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-30 AND VARIANCE NO. 2231: Submitted
by Robert E. Jones and Lewis M. Wolter, requesting a change of zone from R-A
to R-3 to establish a 67-unit, one and two-story apartment complex on property
located on the south side of Orange Avenue, east of Knott Avenue; and further
described as 3346 and 3352 West Orange Avenue, with waivers of:
a. Maximum building height within 150-feet of R-A zoned and single-
family zoned property.
b. Minimum distance between buildings.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-24,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 57-feet in width from the centerline of the street
along Orange Avenue for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, includ-
ing preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such
as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facili-
ties, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Orange
Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and
in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of
the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satis-
factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Orange Avenue for tree planting
purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east,
west-adjacent to R-A property, and south property lines.
9. That drainage from subject property shall be disposed of in a
manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be ap-
propriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro-
perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by
action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within
180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
12. That Condition Nos, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under
this resolution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or
within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, whichever occurs first, or
such further time as the City Council may grant.
The City Planning Co~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-25,
approved said variance, subject to the following conditions:
71-155
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
1. That this variance is granted subject to ~he completion of Re-
classification No. 70-71-30, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit No. 1.
Report of the City Engineer was submitted, recommending that if
Reclassification No. 70-71-30 is approved, the requirement for right-of-way
dedication and installation of engineering improvements on Orange Avenue be
deleted, and the City construct street improvements in exchange for ulti-
mate dedication in accordance with the City's prior offer relative to
A.H.F.P. Project No. 567.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the Applicant was present and con-
curred with the City Planning Cor~nission recormnendations, to which he re-
ceived an affirmative reply.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the Coun-
cil; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-86: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-86 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Plan-
ning Comission, amending Condition No. 12 thereof to read: "12. That
Conditions Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections," and further amended
as recommended by the City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(70-71-30 - R-3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-86 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTION NO, 71R-87: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-87 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2231 as requested, subject to the conditions
recomended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2231.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pehley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-87 duly passed and
adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2230 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70-19 - R-2-5,000,
AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7088): Submitted by Alice Adell Brady and Barbara Jean
Hidle,-requesting waiver of certain Code sections for R-A zoned property
located on the east side of Rio Vista Street, north of Lincoln Avenue,
said waivers being:
a. Minimum required front setback.
b. Minimum required floor area.
71-156
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-16,
denied said variance.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by J.W. Klug Development Company, Agent for the Applicant, and public hearing
scheduled this date.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed
the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
He further noted that in 1969 subject 14 acres of property was approved for
R-2-5,000 zoning, except the 6 parcels adjoining the existing R-1 develop-
ment to the east were approved for R-1 zoning, (Reclassification No. 69-70-
19), and the Tentative Tract Map No. 7088 has been approved.
Mr. Roberts advised the City Planning Commission denied subject
request on the basis that Waiver "b" would affect in excess of 60% of the
development.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the Applicant or his Agent was pre-
sent and wished to address the Council.
John Klug, 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, Agent, advised that
his company has reanalyzed their plans, subsequent to the action taken by
the City Planning Commission, and have determined the size of two of the
under-minimum size homes could be increased to the following mix, which
would make an overall, average-size home of 1,580-square feet over the en-
tire tract:
23 of Plan 225 homes to be increased from 1,225-square feet to
1,300-square feet.
29 of Plan 400 homes to be increased from 1,400-square feet to
1,470-square feet.
Mr. Klug stated that although the homes proposed are slightly smal-
ler than the ones they have built in the past (the problem being impossible
to build that size house on a 5,000-square foot lot), they are comparable
in value and price range, since the difference has been put into the exter-
iors, and the homes would sell for from $27,000.00 to $33,000.00.
In reply to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Roberts advised that the re-
vised sizes of homes submitted today by Mr. Klug actually would result in
a greater number of the proposed homes being under the 1,525-minimum square
feet than originally proposed; however, the deviation from the actual re-
quirement would be substantially reduced, and had this been presented to
the City Planning Commission it might have been approved.
Assistant Development Services Director Ronald Thompson commented
that homes across the street from subject property, which were developed by
Mr. Klug's firm, proved very desirable and were of high quality and well re-
ceived by the community.
Mmyor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the Council
in opposition.
0§den Vincent, 147 South Kingsley Drive, referred to a petition
of opposition previously submitted to the City Planning Co~ission, and ad-
vised that he still objected to the smaller size homes proposed for this de-
velopment. He also stated objection to the proposed street plan for the de-
velopment, in that D~tch Avenue, which could have been one of the main ave-
nues for taking traffic out of the tract, would be an inco~lete street. He
noted that Hempstead Avenue recently was extended; however, this was one block
down from Lincoln Avenue, and traffic would be required to travel Kingsley
Street to get to it.
The City Council reviewed the plans, it being noted that Tentative
Tract No. 7088 was approved November 18, 1969, and the issue before the Coun-
cil wa~ the requested variance.
71-157
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30
Mr. Vincent also objected to the drainage situation in the area.
The City Engineer advised the drainage in the area follows the
natural grade, going westerly on the southernmost street, and then out
to Rio Vista Street.
Mr. Vincent continued to discuss the traffic patterns in the
general area, and plans for the circulation system that eventually will
evolve as the area develops were outlined to him.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address
the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Councilmen Roth and Stephenson expressed concern that allowing
the smaller size dwellings could establish a precedent and result in re-
quests for approval of even smaller homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-88: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-88 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2230, in part, denying Waiver "b", and grant-
ing Waiver "a", subject to the following conditions recon~nended by the Inter-
departmental Committee and amended by the Development Services Department:
1. That this variance is granted, subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 69-70-19.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and
16, provided however, that the floor areas shall comply with standards out-
lined in the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2230, IN PART.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Peb!ey
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-88 duly passed and
adopted.
CITY PLANNING CO~ISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Cou~aission
at their meeting held February 8, 1971, pertaining to the following appli-
cations were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
VARIANCE NO. 2233: Submitted by Eurline Campbell, proposing tO add a third
unit over the existing garages on R-2 zoned property located on the east
side of Harbor Boulevard, south of La Palma Avenue; and further described
as 932 and 934 North Harbor Boulevard, with waivers of:
a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of R-1 zoned property.
b. Building site area per dwelling unit.
c. Minimum required parking.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-14,
denied said variance.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. NO. ~23: Submitted by Sherman Ninburg, Southland
Ambulance Service, requesting an indefinite extension of time for the con-
tinuation of an ambulance service on R-A zoned property located on the east
side of State College Boulevard, north of Placentia Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a retroactive ex-
tension of time from December 18, 1969, to December 18, 1971, with an addi-
tional two-year extension of time to expire December 18, 1973.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council, and no
further action taken.
71-158
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, ~:30 P.M.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1221: Submitted by Vicki Nelson, to establish
an automatic carwash with accessory gasoline sales on C-1 zoned property
located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and East Street.
The City Planning Con~nission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-15,
granted said conditional use permit.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested
by Councilman Thom and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule the matter
for public hearing before the City Council.
PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE - SUNKIST STREET TO MIRALOMA AVENUE: City Planning
Commission Resolution No. PC71-26 was submitted, recommending that portion
of Sunkist Street extending northerly from La Palma Avenue to the Riverside
Freeway be renamed "Miraloma Avenue."
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-89: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-89 for
adoption, as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CHANGING THE NAME
FOR A PORTION OF SUNKIST STREET TO MIRALOMA AVENUE. (From the north side of
La Palma Avenue to the center of the Riverside Freeway Overpass)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-89 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-90 - WORK ORDER NO. 702: Councilman Thom offered Resolution
No. 71R-90 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEDIIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: TH~ WILKEN WAY STREET IMPROVE-
MENT, FROM OERTLEY STREET TO APFROXIMA~ELY 99 FEET EAST OF HARBOR BOULEVARD,
IN THE CITY OF ANAKEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 702. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORI-
ZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING %"dE CITY CLERK
TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be Opened - March 25, 1971 - 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COb'NC ILMEN:
AB SE1Tf: COb-NC ILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
D~tton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-90 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-91 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 6Bl: In accordance with recom-
mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No.
71R-91 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
71- 159
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENT: THE SCHWEITZER PARK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT ACROSS CARBON
CREEK CHANNEL, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 681. (KEC Corporation-
$17,906.28)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES :' COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-91 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-92 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman stephenson offered Resolu-
tion No. 71R-92 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
GRANT DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Harland H. and Carol J. Mar-
schel and Martin and Asuncion Vasques; Dwight M. Auchard; Raydell Richard
and La Wanda Hazel Bobst; Wesley Charles and Margaret Edna Collier; Leo
Gogerty; William A. and Joan D. Eddy; Presley Development Company and Raymond
G. and Estelle K. Spehar and Marcia Ann Halligan)
Roll Call Vote:
AYE S: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, ~]om and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-92 duly passed and
adopted.
PURCHASE OF GASOLINE: The Assistant City Manager reported that effective March 1,
1971, the new contract for the purchase of gasoline by the County of Orange
will be with Standard Oil Company, as follows, contract to run to February
29, 1972:
Supreme:
50-199 Gals. 200-399 Gals, 400 Gals, and Over
.2465 .2265 .2165
Truck & Trailer
.197
Low Lead:
.229 .209 .199 .179
On recommendation of the ASsistant City Manager, Councilman Ste-
phenson moved that the City of Anaheim join with the County of Orange in
their contract for the purchase of gasoline, as outlined above. Council-
man Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPI~iNT - RADIOS: On recommendation of the Assistant City Manager,
Councilman Stephenson moved the purchase of 15 Motorola Radios, for use by
Public Works and Utilities Departments be authorized, in the amount of
$12,190.50, including tax. Codncilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMEI~f - SHIRTS A~D CAPS: The Assistant City Manager reported on
informal bids received for the purchase of Shirts and Caps, as follows:
71-160
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M.
VENDOR
TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX
Wisser Sporting Goods, Anaheim ......... $3,640.33 - 1% - 30 days
Conlin Brothers, Whittier ........ 3,752o91 - Net - 30 days
On recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Roth
moved that the low bid of Wtsser Sporting Goods be accepted and purchase au-
thorized in the amount of $3,640.33, including tax, which expenditure would
be recovered through the sale these Shirts and Caps during the Summer Recrea-
tion Program. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by George Demakos, for personal injury
damages purportedly resulting from slipping on an area on the Harbor Boule-
vard Overpass of lhe Santa Ana Freeway, on or about February 18, 1971, was
denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the in-
surance carrier on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephen-
son. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson:
a. City of Fountain Valley - Resolution No. 6048 - Requesting the
enactment of appropriate legislation regulating the maintenance and storage
of dangerous drugs and narcotics.
b. Anaheim Public Library Board - Minutes - January 18, 1971.
c. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Minutes - January
21, 1971.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2912: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2912 for a4option.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-23 - R-A - Esperanza-Fairmont, Esper-
anza-Roth, Esperanza-Carrillo Annexations)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Ordinance No. 2912 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2913: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2913 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF TRE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-18 - C-I)
-Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCII~N:
AB SENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Ordinance No. 2913 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2914: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 2914 for adoption.
Refer to ~rdinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OFT HE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (56-57-76(3) - M-l)
71-161
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971 - 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
AB SENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Ordinance No. 2914 duly passed and adop-
ted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2915; Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2915 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-65 - R-2-5,000)
ORDINANCE NO. 2916: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 2916 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-13(2) - R-i)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Ordinance No. 2916 duly passed and adop-
ted.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-93 - A,R.F,Pt NO. 490:
tion No. 71R-93 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
Councilman Stephenson offered Resolu-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE
COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCREASE THE ALLOCATION WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY
FINANCING PROGRAM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BROOKHURST STREET, A.H.F.P. NO.
490. (Brookhurst Street from~ Crescent to Lincoln Avenues.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-93 duly passed and
adopted.
CABLE TELEVISION: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis submitted drafts of an
Ordin~ce governing franchise and specifications for a CATV System, and
proposed notice inviting sealed proposals, and requested the City Council
review these documents and make any recommendations to the City Manager's
office, ~fter which the documents will again be brought before the City
Council for further consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-94: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-94 for adoption,
amending Resolution No. 71R-9, nunc pro tunc.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TME CITY OF ANABEIMAMENDINGRESOLUTION
NO. TLR-9, Igu'NC PRO TUNC ~0 CORRECT CERTAIN CLERICAL ERRORS THEREIN. (Water
Rates)
Roll Call Vote:
71-162
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1971, 1:30
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-94 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-95: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-95 for
adoption, amending Resolution No. 70R-344, nunc pro tunc.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 70R-344, NUNC PRO TUNC, TO CORRECT CERTAIN CLERICAL ERRORS. (Abandonment)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Roth, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 71R-95 duly passed and
adopted.
ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER PARKING - Y~CA GOOD FRIDAY BREAKFAST: Request of William
G. Jolissant was submitted for waiver of parking fee at the Anaheim Convention
Center for the 4th Annual YMCA Good Friday Breakfast, from 7:30 A.M. to 9:00
A.M., April 9, 1971.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Thom, said re-
quest was granted. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJO~NT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 8:55 P.M.
City Clerk