Loading...
1973/01/2373-45 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTE~; - January 23, 1973~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAOER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John H. Dawson DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Aloha M. Farrens UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION; John Collier ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDENT: George Edwards ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Paul Keller of the First Presbyterian Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Dutton and unanimously approved by the City Council. March of Dimes Month - January 1973. Junior Achievement Week - January 29 to February 1, 1973. Cindy James and Mike Duffy, members of the Junior Achievement Pro- gram accepted the proclamation. MINUTES: M~n~tes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held January 9, 1973 were approved ~>~ motion by Ceun~:~l~an P~bl.~,~ s~e~!~d by Councilman i'hom. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDIN~qCES AND RESOLUTIONS: C:ouucilman Pebley moved to waiv~ the reading ~n full of all or~inances and resolution~ and that consent t.o the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION ~ANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEb~NDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the an~ou~t of $1,159,907.50, in accordance with ~he 1972-73 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED AMENDMEbrf~ TO TITI,E 18~ RESIDENTIAL YARDS AND BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: Mr. Roberts reported that this amendment was initiated at the request of the City Council to bring front yard and building setbacks~ witi~ respect-to garages, in all residential zones into conformance with those estab~~ lished under the RS-5000 zone. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, and hearing no response, declared the hearing closed. ORDINANCE NO. 312~: Following brief Council discussion regarding the short- ~ned driveways and typ~ of ~utomatic garag~ door open, rs to b~ r~uir~d, Councilman Pebley offered Ordinanc~ No. 3129 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTIONS 18.13.030(C-1), 18.18.0~0(2), 18.20.030(1) and 18. 24.030 (1) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNIC%I~AL CODE AND AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.13, 18.18, 18.20 and 18.24 BY ADDING THERETO NBW SECTIONS 18.13.030(C-1), 18.18.030(2), 18.20.030(1), AND 18.24.030(1). PRIVATE PATROL PERMIT - THORPE SECURITY~ Application for private patrol permit filed by Charles Larry Thorpe for security patrol and guard ~ervtce, to be -46 Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. performed within the City of Anaheim, was submitted and granted subject to pro- visions of Chapter 4.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas MOTION CARRIED. ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1141 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of H. H. Gaines, dated December 7, 1972 was submitted for an extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 1141, for continued operation of a cat kennel for boarding, raising and sale of domestic show cats, together with report of the Development Services Depart- ment recommending said extension be granted, and report of the City Engineer without recommendation. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, a three- year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 1141 was granted, as recom- mended, retroactive to December 2, 1972 and extending to December 2, 1975, sub- ject to termination at such time the realignment of West Street is initiated pursuant to General Plan Amendment No. li5. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1309 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of D. C. Hulbert, of Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates was submitted for a six-month extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 1309, for complianc~ with certain conditions pur- suant to Resolution No. 72R-259, together with report of the Development Services Department recommending said extension be granted, and report of the City Engineer without recommendation. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, a six-month extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 1309 was granted as requested, retroactive to December 25, 1972 and to expire June 25, 1973. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1305 - TERMINATION: Termination requested by Larry Fishman, Aldorado Properties, of said conditional use permit which was approved for the establishment of a semi-enclosed restaurant on C-2 zoned property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Magnolia Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-24 ter- minated Conditional Use Permit No. 1305 as requested at their January 22, 1973 meeting. No further action was taken by the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 82 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-13 AND TENTATIVE, TRACT NO. 7370): Submitted by American National Housing Corporation pertaining to construction of 41 single-family residences on 9.2 acres of proposed R-1 zoned property located in the Santa Ana Canyon, east of Lakeview Avenue between the Santa Ana River and the Riverside Freeway, together with E.I.R. Committee Analysis recommending adoption of said report as submitted. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council accepted Environmental Impact Report No. 82 and Committee Analysis there- of, and adopted said report as the Statement of the Council. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 83 ~RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-40 ~2~ AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6734~: Submitted by Westfield Development pertaining to construction of 66 single-family residences on 20 acres of proposed R-1 zoned property located west of Walnut Canyon Road, south of Santa Aha Canyon Road, together with E.I.R. Committee Analysis, recommending adoption of said report as submitted. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council accepted Environmental Impact Report No. 83 and Committee Analysis thereof, and adopted said report as the Statement of the Council. MOTION CARRIED. E..NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT - HARBOR BOULEVARD (WEST SIDE) FROM 745 FEET NORTH OF ROMh~¥A DR~VE TO 450 ~T NORTH OF ROI~YA DRIVE: Environmental Impact Report prepared by the Engineering Division s~aff'for theimprovement of Harbor Boulevard (west side) from 745 feet north of Romneya Drive to 450 north of Rommeya Drive, a pro- Ject of the City of Anaheim, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council. 73-47 City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23t 1973t 1:30 P.M. Councilman Pebley moved that it be the finding of the Council that there will be no substantial long-term adverse environmental impact nor will there be any significant irreversible changes involved in the proposed project and that the Environmental Impact Report, as submitted, for Harbor Boulevard (west side) from 745 feet north of Romneya Drive to 450 feet north of Romneya Drive, be adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the Council, and ordered filed with the City Planning Department. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT - SHARP SUBSTATION: Environmental Impact Report pre- pared by the City Electrical Division, for Sharp Substation, an electrical dis- tribution substation located north of La Palma Avenue, east of Pauline Street, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council. Councilman Thom inquired whether the E.I.R. Review Committee routinely reviews the impact reports prepared by City Divisions pertaining to City projects. Mr. Hoyt advised that the Committee had reviewed the report relative to the Sharp Substation, and their cor~nents were incorporated into the final report as submitted, and it is for this reason that a separate E.I.R. Committee Analysis was not presented. ~ Councilman Thom commented that for the sake of conformity, this Cor~nittee should review and report on the City's own Environmental Impact Reports. Mr. Murdoch concurred and stated that this procedure, if not already practiced, would be initiated. Councilman Dutton moved that it be the finding of the Council that there will be no substantial adverse environmental impact and there will be no adverse irreversible changes involved in the proposed project, and that the Environmental Impact Report, as submitted, for the Sharp Substation be adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the Council, and ordered filed with the City Planning Department. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION ON RECLASSIFICATION NOS. 70-71-49 AND 71-72-30: Request by Gilbert U. Kraemer, Jr., President, Upper-K Ranch Corporation, for clarifi- cation of zoning on a 40 acre parcel located immediately south of the River- side Freeway, east.of Imperial Highway, was submitted. Mr. Roberts presented a map of the area for Council's review and reported that, pursuant to Resolution No. 71R-510, in Reclassification No. 70-71-49, the City Council approved R-2 5,000 (now RS-5000) on the Upper-K Ranch (Kraemer) property. Subsequently, Classic Development Corporation applied for R-2 5,000 on 105 acres comprised of the Upper K property and additional lands to the south and east, which was denied, however R-1 was approved pursuant to Resolution No. 72R-140, under Reclassification No. 71-72-30, with a variance to waive the 7,200 square foot area requirement in the R-1 zone. Mr. Roberts advised that when Mr. Kraemer submitted RS-5000 tract maps for all of the Upper-K Ranch property, it was noted by staff that the two Resolutions of Intent overlap on a portion of the property, and he has, there- fore, requested clarification from Council as to which of these two Resolutions of Intent now apply, RS-5000 or R-1. The area map was reviewed at the Council table and discussion held and Councilman Thom stated he was of the opinion that since the R-1 zone was the most recent action, that this should be the zoning which prevails on the portion of property in question. The tract maps submitted by Classic Dmv$1opment were reviewed at the Council table and Mr. Roberts again indicated the property in question, and advisad that the property in this overlap area was designated originally for a school and park site, however, since that time the School District has in- dicated they are no longer interested in school construction on the property due to potential flood hazards, 73-48 .City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Gilbert Kraemer, President, Upper-K Ranch, advised that when Classic Development applied for RS-5000 and C-1 under Reclassification No. 71-72-30, they originally had authorization from him for the inclusion of his portion of property in the application, however, this authorization was with- drawn and the agreement terminated. Councilman Sneegas asked if the previously proposed park and school site comprised the entire portion which is under discussion, to which Mr. Kraemer answered affirmatively. Mr. Geisler advised that the Council should, by motion, define their zoning intent for the properties so as to avoid confusion when the developers submit their tract maps. Councilman Dutton moved that the Council confirm their original decision for RS-5000 zoning on the Kraemer property. Councilman Stephenson requested clarification as to whether this motion would decrease the area proposed for R-1. Councilman Thom stated he was always opi~osed to the RS-5000 zone and had voted for R-1 zoning under Reclassification No. 71-72-30,and this is what he had intended for this property. Mr. Geisler noted that all of the property under both applications is still zoned R-A. That the only matt&r before the Council is a request for a definition of the areas to be included under each Resolution of Intent. At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Dutton restated his motion that it be the finding of the City Council that the Upper-K Ranch property (Kraemer), included in Tract Nos. 8080, 8081, and 8082 be developed RS-5000 under Resolution of Intent No. 71R-510 in Reclassification No. 70-71-49; and that the Classic Development Corporation property in Tract Nos. 7617 and 7730 to 7734 inclusive, be developed R-1 under Resolution of Intent No. 72R-140 in Reclassification No. 71-72-30. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST FOR REHEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1360: Submitted by David Doering, said conditional use permit to establish a cocktail lounge in an existing com- merical structure on C-2 zoned property located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Carleton Avenue,was denied by the City Council pursuant to Resolution No. 73R-15 as result of public hearing held January 16, 1973. Applicant now states he has new evidence to submit, as the major complainant against the granting of this conditional use permit, Mrs. Sullivan, has withdrawn her objections and as spokesman for the other neighborhood resi- dents has indicated they also wish to withdraw their opposition, and he there- fore requests rehearing. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, rehearing of Conditional Use Permit No. 1360 was granted, subject to payment of $50.00 fee. To this motion, Councilman Sneegas voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 - RESIDENTIAL HILLSIDE ZONE: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, public hearing was scheduled February 6, 1973, 1:30 p.m.~ to consider amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code by adding Chapter 18.14 (RN-22,000, Residential Nillside, low density, single- family zone) thereto. MOTION CARRIED. COUNTY OF ORANGE USE PERMIT NO. 3377 (ZA): Request to establish a commercial stable for a maximu~f 200 horses on property havir~ a frontage of approximately 298 feet on the south side of Winston Road, approximately 1320 feet east of State College Boulevard, was submitted. Also submitted was excerpt of City Planning Commission meeting held January 22, 1973 recommending that the Orange County Zoning Administrator be urged to request withdrawal of said permit from consideration and advise the 73-49 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. petitioner to initiate annexation proceedings and appropriate zoning petitions to the City of Anaheim and develop in conformance with City ordinances, since subject property was surrounded on all sides by Anaheim City Limits. Zoning Supervisor Roberts briefed the location of subject property (approximately 8.9 acres), the existing industrial uses and zoning of the ad- joining properties, and.reported no contacts regarding annexation to the City of Anaheim have been received. He advised that the proposal includes a train- ing ring enclosed by a four-foot high fence in the center of the property, surrounded on the east, west and south by a total of 180 fenced horse stalls to be located 30 feet from the east and west property lines, 10 horse exercise enclosures five of which would abut the Neville Chemical Company property, the retention of the existing dwelling and garage for a caretaker's living unit, and the paving of the front portion of the property for a depth of 300 feet, or approximately 90,000 square feet for a parking area. Plot plan of the proposed stable was reviewed by the Council and discussion was held relative to the possible nuisance and offensiveness to the adjacent areas that could result from such a large number of horses on a nine acre parcel (22 horses per acre). Councilman Sneegas was of the opinion that whatever action was taken now would be committing the property to a like use or zoning upon annexation, unless there was a specific action at this time to indicate an interim use only and subject to annual review. Director of Development Services Alan Orsborn reported that Mr. Keith Cook of Marco Oak Company, Anaheim, has advised of their firm's reluctance to relocate their existing industry to their property adjacent to the proposed com~nercial horse stable, if such is approved. At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was moved by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, that the Zoning Administrator of the County of Orange be advised that this City Council is opposed to the es- tablishment of the 200 horse con~nercial stable and recommends denial thereof on the basis it would be offensive to the general area, and a protest has been received from an industrial property owner proposing to relocate their existing industry to adjacent property. MOTION CARRIED. The Council requested a member of the Development Services Department staff to be present at the County public hearings on this matter to express the views of the City of Anaheim. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-26 - WORK ORDF~t~NO. 672-A: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 73R-26 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH STREET AND STATE COLLEGE BLVD., IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 672-A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC,; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - February 15,' 1973, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES; COUNCILMEN: NOE$~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-26 duly pas~ed and adopted. 73- 5O City Hal[~ Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-27 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 73R-27 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Cal Prop Corporation; Sprayon Products, Inc.; Gregg T. and Laurel M. Pamson; Netta A., Edward D. and Howard D. Anderson; Frank E. and Clara L. Koss; Columbus E. and Marie M. Walls) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-27 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH PROPERTY - COMMUNITY CENTER: Mr. Murdoch reported on negotiations conducted as a result of Council ,~uthorization, for the purchase of the Zion Lutheran Church property located on Chartres Street between Emily Philadelphia Streets, for use primarily as a Senior Citizens Center. He stated that the Council had already established that this acquisition will be included in the 1972 Revenue Sharing priorities and advised that the decision regarding incremental construction of the Civic Center will not effect the priority of this purchase. He advised that a offer of $185,000.00 was made and communication has been received from the Board of Trustees of the Zion Lutheran Church indicating their acceptance of this, subject to Council approval. Mr. Murdoch stated that several other properties were investigated as potential Community Center sites~ but these proved to be not large enough o~ otherwise not as suitable as the Zion Lutheran Church property and recommended that the Council approve the purchase at $185~000.00. In answer to Councilman Sneegas, Mr. Murdoch replied that this parcel includes three structures, the church building, a 12,000-square foot educational building, and the parsonage. Councilman Pebley inquired as to the disposition of the present Senior Citizens Center on Chartres Street. Mr. Murdoch responded that this would be used for Park and Recreation Department office space on an interim basis. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council approved purchase of the Zion Lutheran Church property at the price of $185,000.00, said funds to be allocated from the 1972 Revenue Sharing Funds and further approved an additional $55,000.00 from the 1972 Revenue Sharing Funds for cost associated with remodeling this property. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - TWO 1500 GALLON COMBINATION FLUSHER WATER TANKS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of two 1500 gallon combination flusher water tanks, Unit-A for the Water Division and Unit-B for Park-way Maintenance as follows, and recommended acceptance of the iow bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNTa INCLUDING TAX Garwood-Los Angeles, City of Industry - Klein Products, Inc., Ontario National Tank &Mfg. Co. - ............. Keesee Tank & Pump $23,972.90 24,408.75 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of Garwood-Los Angeles was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $23,972.90, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. 73-51 _City Hall! Anaheimi California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January.23, 1973, .1:30 P.M. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS TRAFFIC CONTROL EQUIPMENT - CITY OF TIJUANAt MEXACO: Mr. Edward Granzow, Traffic Engineer, reported he has been approached by Marco A. G. Vtllegas and Rogelio Verber M., members of the Tijuana Police Department, under the auspices of Lieutenant William Blue of the Newport Beach Police Depart- ment, expressing the desire to acquire several items of our traffic control equipment which have become surplus over a period of years due to replacement with more modern equipment. He advised said items are not usable by the City on any future projects~ have no trade-in value, are of no use for replacement of parts, and are occupying much-needed storage area. Mr. Granzow expressed the opinion the disposition of such outmoded, surplus equipment for a token charge would be a generous gesture, gratefully appreciated by the City and citizens of Tijuana, as the equipment is practically hand rebuilt for use in their traffic control. The Council concurred with this gesture of friendship and good will, and on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Dutton, authorized the disposal of several items of outmoded, surplus traffic control equipment to the City of Tijuana, Mexico, for a token charge of $1.00, as recommended by the Traffic Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims,were denied as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Claim submitted by Michael Paul Daugherty, John L. Sullivan, Robert William Kane, Daniel J. Woida, Peter Drumm, Bamma La Fern Reynolds, Kim Francis Foster for alleged battery, false imprisonment, etc., purportedly caused by City of Anaheim, Police Department personnel,on or about November 18, 1972 through January 9, 1973. b. Claim submitted by Mrs. Don Taggart, for purported property damage to tail light of vehicle, caused by City vehicle backing into her at parking lot on north Euclid, on or about January 12, 1973. c. Claim submitted by Rick Blalock, Blalock & Associates, for pur- ported unnecessary expenses as a result of action of the Anaheim Police Depart- ment, on or about December 21~ 1972. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-28 - SUNKIST STREETt CROSSING NO. BM-513.1: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 73R-28 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A REQUEST TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR FUNDS FROM THE CROSSING PROTECTION FUND FOR PROTECTION OF CROSSING NO. BM-513.1 AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY TRACKS AND SUNKIST STREET CROSSIN~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-28 duly pased and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE~ The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Cultural Arts Commission - Minutes - December 11, 1972. b. Financial and Operating Reports for the Months of November and December, 1972: Water Division (November) City Treasurer (December) c. Annual Report - Building Division - 1971 and 1972. 73-52 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL M~NUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. d. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Notice of Hearing - In the matter of the application of the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation, for authority to increase certain intrastate rates and charges applicable to telephone services furnished within the State of California. e. City of Rohnert Park - Re: Public Employment Program. (Emergency Employment Act of 1971) MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 31.?3 Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3127 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (53) - M-i) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3127 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3128: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3128 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (72-73-20 - C-R) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3128 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3130: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3130 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (72-73-6 - C-l) ANAHEIM BIKEWAY CONCEPT: (Continued from December 26, 1972, for research into cities with established bikeways as to their effectiveness in decreasing accidents and indications of percentage of use.) Mr. John Collier, Director Parks and Recrea- tion Department presented an up-dated report on the bikeway concept prepared by Parks and Recreation Department in conjunction with the Bikeway Concept Committee of the Parks and Recreation Commission, and advised that although considerable research was initiated, no conclusions could be drawn from the sources contacted regarding the effectiveness of established bikeways in reducing accidents or figures reflecting percentage of use. This is due to the fact that the bikeway concept is a relatively recent innovation in this Country and those communities contacted which have had a system of bicycle paths in operation had not statistics. It was discovered, in limited studies, in European countries that properly developed bikeways can reduce the accident rate as much as 60%~'however intersections continued to remain a problem. Mr. Collier observed that the search was further complicated by the different methods used to demarcate bicycle lanes from automobile traffic lanes, and that some cities had relatively vague systems, Safety recommendations compiled as a result of this research conclude that the cyclist should travel in the same direction as the automobile; that a physical barrier is more desirable than striping and signing, (however no bt- cycle system was located which had used barriers); intersections at which bicycles and autos merge should have warnings clearly marked; and that the ending of a 73-5~ Citv Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES January 23, 1973~ 1:30 P.M. bicycle path should be clearly designated as such. The separate right of way approach was considered by most of the people contacted in this study as con- ducive to safer bicycling, according to Mr. Collier. Regarding demand and usage of bicycle lanes, Mr. Collier commented that these factors are difficult to ascertain since, to date, no statistics are available from Orange County cities with bikeways, except for Huntington Beach which indicates 500% increase in use since implementation. However he submitted information pertinent to the use of bicycles which, in his opinion, indicates the increased interest in bicycling in recent years. He referred to a letter from Mr. Lindel, Principal of Loara High School, which states that 15% of their studentbody commutes by bicycle daily, and actual bicycle count reveals 270 to 350 bicycles on campus each day. Using these figures, Mr. Collier stated that an estimated 6,000 commuters could be projected from the school system. Mr. Collier further noted the statistics on stolen bicycles as indicative to the increase in bicycle popularity. Mr. Collier concluded by presenting the following recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Department and the Anaheim Bikeway Concept Committee: 1. That the City of Anaheim joi. n with the County of Orange and neighboring cities in the adoption of a policy to officially encourage: (a) The use of bicycles as an inexpensive and pleasant means of transportation and (b) encourage the development of safe and convenient bikeways wherever appro- priate. 2. That the City of Anaheim adopt the Bikeway ConcePt in its present form as a master plan to enable this City and neighboring ones to plan for an interrelated bicycle system. 3. That the City undertake a pilot project of a two-mile section of the suggested bikeway system in order to determine the extent of use and test the safety aspects of such a plan. The Committee suggested that the pilot project extend from Ball Road to La Palma Avenue on State College Boulevard. Mr. Edward Granzow, with the aid of a chart, outlined the striping proposed for 86-foot wide streets which will permit the creation of six-foot wide bike paths adjacent to the existing curb. The plan provides a eight-foot parking lane between the bike path and the traffic lane, which would make the parking area six feet from the existing curb. On the 86-foot streets, there would still remain sufficient room to accommodate four twelve foot traffic lanes and a left turn lane. Mr. Granzow pointed out that one of the reasons State College Boulevard was suggested for the pilot program is that it has the neces- sary width, however, using this street will require prior State approval. Mr. Granzow related the costs of a two-mile pilot program with var- ious means of demarcation such as paint striping, plastic markers, asphalt berm and two-inch concrete curb, the least expensive being striping estimated at $10,300.00. He advised that this sum reflects the cost of modifying the existing striping on State College Boulevard for the two miles and noted ~that on streets where striping has been painted so as to accommodate six traffic lanes, such as Ball Road, the cost would be reduced by $4,500.00 per two miles. In answer to Councilman Stephenson's comment regarding the necessity or advantage of designating a bike lane next to the curb when the law already requires it be ridden there, Mr. Granzow stated that this program would increase the motorist's vision and awareness of bicycles riders, especially at right turns and from driveways. Councilman Pebley was of the opinion, that this plan would create a traffic hazard because of the cars parked six feet out from the curb, especially when few cars are parked in this manner. Mr. Granzow advised that the stripes to designate the parking lane would make the boundary of the right traffic lane as well and noted that the width of this lane would not be decreased. Councilman Stephenson stated that the propose~ pilot program would not be conclusive as far as safety is concerned, being only two miles long. Discussion was held regarding a dangerous situation that could result City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973t 1:30 P.M. from parking cars six feet from the curb on a heavily used street such as State College Boulevard, and Councilman Thom inquired whether the bikeway concept could be altered to place the bicycle lane outaide of the parked cars. Mr. Granzow advised that this alternative would be possible, however he noted this would not afford the same degree of safety to the cyclist, nor would it alleviate the bicycle-auto conflict at right turns. Councilman Dutton suggested the possibilities of incorporating alter- nate streets and little used sidewalks into the bicycle pathway system be ex- plored. At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was moved by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas that the report be accepted, and the Traffic Engineer be instructed to contact the State Division of Highways for their posi- tion on the use of State College Boulevard and other State highways within the proposed bikeway system, and upon receipt thereof, a public hearing will be scheduled to receive public input on the matter before determination is made on whether to implement the report. MOTION CARRIED. The City Council requested that the Anaheim Bikeways System Concept together with the map proposed for street and bike lanes, be included in the next edition of the Anaheim Newsletter to further insure that the public is fully advised of the proposed bikeway system concept and the public hearing date. RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a five minute recess. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:20 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being present. (3:25 PoM.) REVENUE SHARING FUNDS/CIVIC CENTER STUDY: Council decision relative to the Civic Center Study, was continued from the meeting of December 26, 1972, to allow for review and recommendations by the Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Merrill Skilling, employed by Northrop Corporation and member of the Chamber of Commerce Task Force organized to study the proposed Civic Center Project, advised he was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Chamber to present their recommendations. That in order to arrive at a position, the Chamber established a Task Force comprised of representatives from the business community, City staff, and three representatives of a financial institution well versed on municipal finance. Mr. Skilling reported they have developed a tentative plan containing several steps, as follows: Step No. 1 would be a fact finding phase so that all of the information could be brought together which would be necessary for the City Council to use in order to make a decision to go ahead with a first increment of construction. This would be accomplished by a Task Force which would be comprised of the City Manager, a representative, or more, from the Chamber of Commerce, a consultant, who is an expert in the field of municipal financin§~ and an architect. These people, together with their resources behind them, would compile information as to the proposed size and shape of the building, area allocations, specific location of the building on the site selected, cost figures, such as what is being paid out in rent now, etc., and some financial justification for whatever action is taken. Mr. Skilling recommended that if authorized, such a Task Force be given specific information as to what the Council would require before making a decision on the first increment of construction. 73-55 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. He estimated the Task Force would require at least two months to prepare their facts and reports which would then be compiled by the City Manager into a report for submission to the Council for their review and decision. Mr. Skilling advised that there would be no Chamber of Commerce costs involved, in such a Task Force, even though their representative may be professional, however there would be charges from the financial consultant and the architect which he estimated would be from $10,000 to $15,000 for this first task that would be required. That if the Council determined to proceed with construction of a Civic Center in increments~the first increment could probably be built two years from now, or by the end of 1974. That under the overall pro- gram, further construction could be planned perhaps in the 1975 and 1976 periods. Mr. Skilling reported that one of the most logical elements of finan- cing at this time for the first phase would be revenue sharing. That their tentative plan, which would still be subject to the Task Force and the fact finding, would be to take approximately $330,000 out of the 1972 funds, about $860,000 from the 1973 funds and perhaps a small amount from the 1974 funds to complete the project, which would be approximately one million and a quarter dollars out of three years of revenue sharing funds, for the entire project. That although revenue sharing is the prime consideration, the Task Force would review alter- native methods of funding as may be suggested by the financial con- sultant. In reply to an inquiry by Mayor Dutton, Mr. Skilling advised that the Chamber had received the December 14~ 1972 Civic Center Study report to the City Council and expressed some concern as to the size and shape of the proposed building being too great, however, did concur at this time with the amount of the construction costs, but advised that every year of delay will cost an extra one-half million dollars. That the costs of construction will increase at the rate of 10% a year which is twice as much as would be paid on bonds or other methods of financing. Mr. Skilling strongly urged the City Hall construction program com- mence as soon as possible, even though it must proceed in increments. Councilman Pebley asked if this was an indication the entire project should be commenced at this time instead of proceeding in increments, because of the large amount that could be saved. That if another method of financing was being considered, other than revenue sharing, he would be in favor of bor- rowing the money now for the entire project, as he was of the opinion that within the next three years construction costs would increase 15% a year, rather than 10%. Mr. Skilling advised he agreed regarding the increase and suggested the Task Force be authorized to consider this and report on these facts and some alternatives that may be available. Councilman Thom requested further report on the use of $330,000 from the 1972 funds. Mr. Skilling advised this amount would be used for architectural fees and working drawings, certain remodelings and renovations that will need to be done in existing facilities, and perhaps some demolition. That he was referring to the total cost, not just construction costs. Councilman Thom stated he felt the fact finding phase and the Task Force was very good and would like to see this method implemented, however he would be reluctant to use any type of lease back financing; that he would perfer the "pay as you go" approach even though it may be more expensive, or a bond issue which is voted on by the public. Mr. Murdoch concurred that the Task Force concept indicated is an essential step, however, suggested that the Council make a decision.on whether 73-56 .City Hall, Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. or not they are going to consider an incremental construction of the first in- crement as an initial step, or whether they are going to seriously consider something of a much greater magnitude. That the present and future requirements for the next few years can be taken care of in an increment of approximately 30,000 to 32,000 square feet, plus the former Bank of America building, and the existing City Hall. That with that first increment, the needs can be met for the immediate future, but probably not the 1990 needs. Further, that the first increment financing can be handled out of the 1972 Revenue Sharing Funds, which the City already has, and the 1973 funds which will arrive in April. That if the Council determines to proceed with the first increment and activity, he questioned the necessity for a financial consultant at this time for that first increment~ however~ such a consultant may be appro- priate for the next phases of construction. Councilman Dutton concurred that if Council action is to proceed under revenue sharing for the first phase, no financial consultant would be required at this time. Mr. Skilling agreed that a consultant would not necessarily be needed for the first increment if revenue sharing funds are to be used, however, a financial consultant would present other financing alternatives for consideration, an overall view of the entire project from the beginning, and a long range plan for the total five or six year program of which the first increment would be a portion. Councilman Sneegas questioned whether or not this was, in fact, spending one and a quarter million dollars now for the first phase and then'perhaps forcing the public to some other type of financing to complete the project. That he was in favor of a pay as you go plan, without obligating the future. Mr. Skilling again reiterated his position that a financial consultant was needed to advise the Council what their over all projections and alternatives might be. Mr. Geisler advised that his office could provide the various methods of financing available to the City, and once the Council determines how the~ wish to proceed, then a financial consultant would be in a position to prepare the documentation, but in his opinion, no municipal financial consultant would make a determination as to how much it would cost to build under one method or another. Mr. Murdoch stated that if the decision is to proceed with the planning of the first increment with a Task Force, as he understood it, the first duties of the Task Force would be to up-date the space analysis, prepare the preliminary design, prepare a preliminary estimate of costs, site analysis, list specific occupancy by function, what the occupancy of the first increment oF the new build- ing will be, and the financing. The other portion that the Task Force would be responsible for would be the temporary facilities, such as the former bank building across the street, the existing City Hall; whether to demolish the building across the alley or to continue to occupy it, whether we should continue to lease those buildings and offices currently leased; any remodeling necessary for occupancy of existing buildings; and the time schedule and order for the moving of various function~ from one building to another. These matters would be tied in with the total plan and would be reported back to the Council {or the Heclslon as to whether to go ahead now with the final plans to go to bid on the first increment. In reply to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Murdoch advised the Task Force would also include "in house" representatives familiar with the functions and needs of the various City Departments. Mr. Murdoch recommended that before the actual make-up of the Task Force is determined, a representative from the architectural firm that has done the preliminary studies up to this point, outline what has been done. 73-57 City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Murdoch referred to the adjusted list of proposed revenue sharing recommendations, noting that the 1974 allocations exceed the anticipated avail- able funds. He suggested that from the 1974 allocations, perhaps, the Pearson Park plunge remodeling ($150,000) could be held over for one year; that the Vermont Street Garage building and equipment could be over a two year period, reducing the $600,000 to $470,000 for 1974 and adding $130,000 to 1975; and moving the Lincoln Avenue and Katella Avenue landscaping ($150,000) to 1976. Further,. include in the 1976 recommendations, $160,000 under Parks and Recrea- tion, swimming pools, as this would be about the time we would be involved in a cooperative program with Placentia School District and the Orange Unified School District. That with these adjustments, the figures are approximately in balance, recognizing that there will be some interest earned during this period that will increase the available funds slightly. MOTION: Councilman Dutton moved that Phase One be approved and the Task Force be established. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Thom noted that Phase One also recommended the employment of an architectural firm. Mr. R. J. Dimit, representing the architectural firm of Adrian, Wilson and Associates, the firm responsible for the preliminary space studies and plans prior to the last bond issue, was invited to address the Council. Mr. Dimit advised they were commissioned to assist the City in pre- paring for the bond issue, which basically, was the first step in the design of a new City Hall. That because of the time element at that time, they worked entirely with City staff to obtain anticipated growth figures and space analysis and then translated the gross figures into costs, design and plans for a com- pletely new structure. That although the concept has now changed to a program utilizing existing structures and construction by increments, Mr. Dimit ex- pressed their firm's desire to continue working on the Civic Center Project and they wou~d welcome the opportunity to work with the Task Force. Mr. Dimit and Mr. Murdoch explained the charts and graphs posted on the wall, indicating the functional interrelationship of the various City de- partments or functions and showing the groupings where those functions have a definite close relationship; that one or more of these groupings or units would presumably be a part of the first increment. Further, said graphical material is backed up by a considerable amount of statistical data which could be quickly reviewed by the Task Force and up-dated. Councilman Thom was of the opinion a new approach was necessary, in- asmuch as these charts supposedly represent the recommendations of the 1968 Citizens Capital Improvement Committee, however, when their inputs were syn- chronized in this graphic manner, a majority of the members were disappointed in the results and refused to support the 1970 bond issue. Councilman Peble¥ moved that the Task Force be created and that Mr. Sktlltng, Mr. Dtmit~ Mr. Murdoch and Mayor Dutton be appointed a members. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. Discussion was held on the foregoing ~tion, particularly with respect to the naming of an architectural fi~m, and the inclusion of a financial con- sultant on the Task Force. Councilman Pebley withdrew the foregoing motion, and Councilman Stephenson withdrew the second. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the previous action was clarified to indicate approval of Phase One, and that the Task Force authorized at this time not include a financial consultant. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Murdoch asked if the Council desired to review proposals from several architects. That the preliminary work in conJunction with the Task ? ~}-58 Hal!~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. Force would probably be on a time and material basis until the specific work to L~ do~c~ is known. Councilman Thom moved that the architect be selected from those main- taining their principal office of business within the geographical area of Anaheim or Orange County. Councilman Sneegas stated he supported the effort to use local firms whenever possible, however for this large a project, he felt the City should make every opportunity to obtain the best. He requested research on buildings designed by local architects, particularly city halls or other Municipal buildings. Mr. Murdoch advised he would submit to the Council a list of those architects whose principal offices are in Anaheim, and those outside of Anaheim but in Orange County, and compile information as to city halls, public buildings and other structures they have designed. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-29 - EMPLOYMENT OF KENNETH G. OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES - LEWIS STREET SUBSTATION: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 73R-29 for adoption, employing Kenneth G. Osborne & Associates to perform geological engineering services in connection with the construction of a 220-k-V substation at the existing Lewis Street Substation for the sum of $1,430.00. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH KENNETH G. OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND cITy CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-29 duly passed and adopted. ~SOLUTION NO. 73R-30 - BROTHER'S KEEPER COMMUNITY PROGRAM: Councilman Thomoffered Resolution No. 73R-30 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: AB SENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-30 duly passed and adopted. DEATH OF PRESIDENT JOHNSON - NATIONAL DAY OF MOURNING: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council declared that Thursday, January 25, 1973, designated as a National Day of Mourning, be recognized throughout the City of Anaheim and authorized City offices closed that date in memoriam. MOTION CARRIED. CHARGES - ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUND RESIDENTIAL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES - RULE NO. 15.1: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the electrical underground residential distribution facilities rates as established by Gordon Hoyt, Utilities Director, in his memorandum of January 10, 1973, were approved and ratified for a term of one year. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - VIETNAM VETERANS A~AINST THE WAR INC.: Request of Mr. James A. Mitchell, Vietnam Veterans Against the War, Inc., dated January 23, 1973 for use of 73-59 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. Stoddard Park for purposes of holding a rally with speakers and music on Saturday, January 27, 1973 was submitted. Mr. John Collier stated that Parks and Recreation Department had reviewed said request and recon~aend Pearson Park as more suitable for this purpose, advising that this recommendation is contingent upon the approval~of the Police Department. Mr. Mitchell informed the Council that the rally includes, subject to approval of route by the Police Department,a walk which is intended to take the group past the Disneyland frontage on Harbor Boulevard, and the location of Stoddard Park nearer that route is the reason they specified said park. Councilman Dutton noted that this request was submitted at the last minute, not permitting sufficient time for investigation and thereupon moved that the Applicant be denied the use of a City park for a rally on Saturday, January 27, 1973. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. Mr. Mitchell stated that it would be possible for his group to defer the rally one week to Saturday, February 3, 1973. Councilman Thom suggested, in light of the fact similar groups have been permitted the use of Pearson Park, that the Council consider granting use of this park subject to the Applicant posting bond to cover the costs of clean up and any additional Police Officers required. Mr. Mitchell stipulated that this would be agreeable. second. Councilman Dutton withdrew his motion and Councilman Pebley the Councilman Stephenson moved that action on this request be deferred one week to allow time for Council ~to receive Police Department recommendations and to ascertain amount of bond to be posted. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT - SANTA ANA RIVER AND SANTIAGO CREEK GREENBELT COMMISSION: Councilman Sneegas reported that the City Attorney's analysis of the Joint Powers Agreement establishing the Greenbelt Commission dated January 18, 1973, has been received. He stated that he is satisfied that the legal and financial liabilities incurred as a result of the agreement are justifiable, and offered a resolution for adoption entering said agreement. Prior to voting on this resolution, Mr. Murdoch commented on the City Attorney's analysis, specifically that Mr. Geisler interprets the four items under Section No. 7 as making this Commission more than just an advisory body, in that Item No. 4 ("Afford the Commission an opportunity to review and com- ment on Environmental Impact Reports for projects within the project area.") would mean that within the Commission jurisdiction, no project could proceed without submission of the Environmental Impact Report to the Commission. Mr. Murdoch pointed out that the Commission has the right,at present, to receive and comment on Environmental Impact Rgports. Councilman Sneegas stated that the City would not be obligated to comply with the Commission's comments or recommendations. Mr. Murdoch submitted that although the City may not be bound by the agreement, this section still creates another step in the process of land de- velopment by which the Council will be required to submit the E.I.R. and the project could not proceed until the Commission had met and taken some action on it. In effect, this section makes an action by the Commission mandatory. For this reason, he recommended that prior to the City's entry into the agree- ment, further analysis with the possibility of an amendment be undertaken. Following brief Council discussion, relative to the ramifications of the agreement, Councilman Sneegas withdrew his resolution, and by general Council consent, action on the Joint Powers Agreement to establish the Green- belt Commission was deferred. 73-60 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. HOUSE MOVINGS - VICINITY OF ANAHEIM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: Letter and complaint relative to houses placed on blocks in preparation for moving, thereby creating a hazard- ous situation in the vicinity of Anaheim Memorial Hospital was reviewed by City Council on January 16, 1973. Councilman Thom distributed to interested parties in the audience, copies of letters from James W. McAlvin, Administrator, Anaheim Memorial Hospital~ dated January 18, 1973, directing the house moving companies involved to remove said houses from the property within four to five days from the time they have been blocked up. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATING COUNCIL OF ORANGE COUNTY: On motion by Councilman ?ebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas~ Mayor Dutton and Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson were appointed the official representative and alternate respectively to the Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:10 P.M. Signed ~ ~. ~Z/~.z~/~ Deputy City Clerk Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- January 30, 1973, 1:30 P.M The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton (Pebley entered at 1:45 P.M.) COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith Ao Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John H. Dawson CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR: John Collier CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. Reverend Jim Green of Bethal Baptist Church gave the Invocation. SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, RESOLUTION OF RECOGNITION: A resolution designating Boy Scout Troup No. 526 of the Anaheim District of the Orange County Council of Boy Scouts of America, official representative of the City of Anaheim at the National Boy Scout Jamboree to be held in July in Farragut, Idaho, was unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to two members of the troup by Mayor Dutton.