1972/02/15 (2)City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by William J. Herrick, Environmental Leisure Corporation, Agent, and public
hearing scheduled this date.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and read the
findings of the City Planning Commission, relating the facts on which they
based their decision to deny both the use and the requested sign waiver.
Mr. Roberts advised that, subsequent to the City Planning Commis-
sion hearing, the Applicant had submitted revised plans,which made the re-
quested sign waiver unnecessary; therefore, the only issue before the Coun-
cil at this time would be the requested usage.
Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson asked if the Applicant or his Agent was
present and wished to address the Council.
Thomas P. Walker, Applicant, presented a report listing the re-
sults of a survey he had made of twenty -seven of the existing industries
in the immediate area, showing that there was a need among these businesses
for 1,700 hotel /motel rooms per year. He stated that the twenty -seven busi-
nesses surveyed comprised 2.6% of the total industrial community of Fuller-
ton and Anaheim.
Mr. Walker advised that California 6 Motels, the organization for
whom the proposed motel would be built, was industrially oriented and pro-
vides low -cost rooms and also conference rooms specifically tailored for
such usage.
He submitted an artist's rendering of a Riverside, California 6
Motel, indentical to that proposed for this location. (Rendering returned
to the Applicant.)
William J. Herrick, 2020 Canyon Court, La Habra, President of Cali-
fornia 6 Motels, in reply to Council questioning, advised that there would
be no kitchen facilities in any of the rooms of the proposed motel; that
the rooms would be 12 feet by 18 feet; that they have constructed a similar
motel at Beach and Whittier Boulevards, in La Habra.
He also advised that after the first year of operation, the pre-
dominant part of their business is anticipated to be industrially oriented;
that the room charges would be $6.00 for single occupancy, $9.00 for two,
$11.00 for three, and $14.00 for four persons.
l asked if anyone Vii hod to address the Council
in oppusi.t o being no response, declared the hearing closed.
R.ESULUTLUN N0. 'iZ Councilman Thom stated ne felt the proposed use was
appropriate, and the offered Resolution No. 72R -53 for adoption, grant-
ing Conditi >nai- Permit No. 1283 for the use only, subject to the follow-
Lng IntEzY.;= rtrcon*ne;i t.ons,
amended to reflect the re-
vised Llr:
Anaheim
'righting p...
72 -83
of subject property shall pay to the City
per fl ant foot ,.l one Via Burton Street for street
ks shall be installed along Via Burton Street
ind i n accordance with standard plans and
in the office o: the City Engineer.
owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City
l5c per front foot along Via Burton Street for tree
as L'y
specifications on
f rat
of Anaheim Cu i:'. ,sum
planting pu:p
;.,rage areas shall be provided in accordance with
c.ved 3l: f h the office of the Director of Public Works.
at r shall be installed as required and deter
mined to no ssary by flle Chief of the Fire Department.
property shall be served by underground utilities.
City Hall,. Anaheim,__Cal. o0UNGIL MINUTES 1( 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
ner
;hot
ith pio H t
tion, or pfoci
perio, of
time as the (At', oront.
4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall
h: ,omplie2 i oo. ::nol building and zoning inspections.
(fo itat ct p•opertv shall he developed substantially in ac-
COF' on file with the City of Anaheim mar-
h "To Hs i:on No. 1) and 5.
,dop'co.
toll
AYES: COLNt
NOES: 0 ict 1E
ABSTAINED:
Ai!.Sf.NT:
ect property shall he disposed of in a man-
.au;ineer.
Nos. 1 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied
o ef he activity authori.,:ed under this resolu-
1 ;w building ptocmit is issued, or within a
o:, kAlichever arst, or such further
KLOLUTION .!(:fl OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
FSE PERMIT 'TO. L
Pebfey, Thom and :itephenson
Hone
Tit ton
Thc arod Resolution No. 72R-53 duly passed and
Mayor ri oLoirmaaship of the meeting.
EBELL (7.1.UB REQUEST ;;s:oR:.E* CorrosoondenLe from Ruth Salaets, Chair-
7 the Ebe,1 o lonrovemelat ColTmitLoe, dated January 28,
97o, :as .o City ruurn 1 L )operation in their pro-
(f "Idopti 7 er Missing in \ofion serviceman for the
plop(u:e 7 pruti to ino also make the commun-
ity more aware 000 with the plight of these servicemen. Attached
to 1;e1- 1Ett7er q's 1( tters from Disneyland and the Disneyland Hotel,
ofltr'og o)roring such persor when is returned to the
United St
lAVO: ttntpresontatives of the Ebell Club to address
Coy
Mrs. MafLyo rhcll Club President, stated that if the City
Council agrees ro -.7:7,uest, the Ebell Club would like the Mayor to draw
the name from among those in a Marine Officer's cap, which she was holding.
Mts. LeEd Arcaer, a member of the Comuunity Improvement Committee,
in reply to Council questioning as to just what would be expected of the City
if the Council agreed to their request, advised that they would like the se-
lectee proclaimed "Anaheim's Officially Adopted Prisoner Of War," since there
presently is ne tc fram ilaheim who is either a prisoner of war or
missing in aottoa rhat there would he no expense to the City
through this program.
Councilan, 'i.oth stated he felt the program was very conuitendable
and he was in favor of the City supporting the program.
Mrs. Eilien Anthony, also a member of the Conunittee, stated that
when the selectee is r turred to the United States,he and his family would
be invited to Anaheim and they would then like the City Council to proclaim
a day in honor of -51 orifoner of war.
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
the City deunciJ proeLtimeki the serviceman to be selected as Anaheim's Of-
ficially Adopted Prisonor of as requested by the Ebell Club. MOTION
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED,
City Hall, Anaheim„ ii COUNCIL MINUTES ,7 ehruary 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
Ma Ont' a arew from the Marine Officer's cap, the name of
Captain Lawr :tel., taken prisoner FAprliary 15, 1968, as the person
proclaimed Ana.i, ()facially Adopted Prisoner of War.
WOMEN'S DIVISION, A.NAHFLM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUEST MISS ANAHEIM PAGEANT:
Recp of RI th H President, and Bettye Eppler, Chairman of the
Mis An :,amber of Commerce, dntod
L h= f a- Anaheim Room and al 1
ion u L Miss Anaheim Pageant,
is repoL or '--,tadThir:1 and Convention Centor
115.t€ 0 t th a Andheim
roh(arsal on
Ti 1 a cs! in=! "ont-of-poC,Lt"
co :vailable.
by =,:(a,u.n.=,
ridon
II;
l'unth Cc,:
Vti OCISly„
square n
campuses
Jere 1. at( `t• ati
have
'7.ouna. I
enfecs,.
r .•;iact i vould make the
t. tem{ rit anC on mot on
'cup n se of :Ilk ..\.r 11 ot Room
.Jr t11( S Arn'Thnirr
C •tin of the Stadium
72-85
Lh, advised fhat they
1m Ui on,. e
!itv o ommun-
==)=1 Council to ad-
at rLin. tralme the
;enters -ip,ht months pre-
informatinn C.: financing possibilities.
r.11- adLan of bniiding o 10,000
'Thnter of 1 Anaheim high school
r'\nfle n the com-
t I i
thL' u!au- 1 partitions
:A =fir!ed o q'tta 1 ler rooms,
he 000.00 al thoh if al l six
=Jo', !tc reduced to a total cost
H,J: Ole and Science classes
-eln landscape the Centers': 1. at Student
-s last, year in favor of the
pi Eert:nee for a. corn-
ahc im ;U g} r=as ;40.r osier a fund amount-
ing r •:1 I I ri t i oc t
tha.f He
tit. Council has provided funds for
11C thi 'r ai en Jddi tion to the Convention Center,
as o'er ;ark •and recreation activities for teen-agers;
vsere inadequate. He
snide t yo,mr Ger Leirs vandalism
hy
prs1 to Lhe Park and Recrea-
i011 t {acids to finance it. Also,
•.11 -1cr.ec.1 the centers be changed
!alb to high
72 -8b
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Roth advised that in meetings of the Park and Recreation
Commission he had attended, he had understood they were including in their
budget proposal for this year the possibility of constructing one such center
as a pilot program.
Mr. Schaefer commented that it was felt the Park and Recreation Com-
mission would determine other projects that are higher priority; also, that
the students desired all six of the buildings to be constructed this year.
Candy Lyman, 9751 Random Drive, advised that Al Checco of the Anaheim
Park and Recreation Department, who counsels the Youth Council, had secured the
bid of $125,000.00 for one building, and $600,000.00 for all six buildings. She
noted that costs continue to increase, and two years ago it was estimated such
a building could be constructed for $50,000.00 to $100,000.00.
Pam Gibbons, 1273 North Siesta Street, in reply to Councilman Roth's
comment that he understood the Park and Recreation Commission had been consi-
dering this program as one of their highest priorities, stated they did not
want to wait the 5 or 6 years it would take for the Park and Recreation Com-
mission to provide the buildings, since the Youth Council felt they were a
real necessity at this time.
City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that unless the high schools
were going to turn over a part of their property to the City for such con-
struction so that it would be City owned, the City could not finance the pro-
ject; also, there was no justification for the City to provide baby sitting
facilities or manpower, since that could not be considered a public project,
in his opinion.
He further advised that it would not be a proper project for the
City to get into recreational activities where the facilities are not City
owned; that it would only be proper to utilize Park and Recreation Depart-
ment facilities and manpower to provide recreational activities on City-owned
property.
Councilman Dutton explained to the members of the Youth Council
that neither the new golf course nor the Convention Center expansion would
be financed by City funds; that the golf course would be paid for by reve-
nues generated by the Course, and that the Convention Center expansion would
be financed by the issuance of bonds by the Community Center Authority, which
bonds would be paid for by funds from the Room Occupancy Tax.
Miss Gibbons advised that although they could not guarantee all
of the proposed Community Centers would be paid for by the students, their
plans were to have student membership fees of $1.00, to be used to repay
the cost of the buildings.
ings?
Councilman Stephenson asked who would maintain and operate the build-
Miss Gibbons replied that part of the staff could be student vol-
unteers, although the majority would probably have to be provided by the Park
and Recreation Department.
Mr. Schaefer advised that these details had not been finalized, but
part of the maintenance probably could be done by the high school janitorial
staff. He added that there would be a need for one Activities Director in
each Center; that it was felt many of the activities could be supervised by
college or high school students.
Park and Recreation Director John Collier advised that a previous
Council had toured the high school facilities and discussed possible loca-
tions of such centers with Superintendent Wines; that the concept considered
was that land for such centers would be leased to the City on a long -term
basis.
Referring to the idea of providing baby- sitter facilities, Mr. Col-
lier advised that this service often is provided for mothers participating in
a program and is paid for by the mother so that there is no cost to the City.
72 -87
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
He also advised that the Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed the pro-
posed program, but there has been no direct discussion with the High School
Board of Trustees as of this time.
In reply to Councilman Roth, Mr. Collier advised that the Park and
Recreation Commission had hoped to finalize the budget priorities in the coming
week, and that the Community Center Project is one item being considered; that
the Park and Recreation Commission, at the time they met with the Youth Coun-
cil, had raised the question of the necessity for additional meeting space and
had asked the students to provide more information which was presented at the
last meeting.
Mr. Murdoch,referring to the comments by the City Attorney with re-
ference to recreational programs, stated that he would like to review these
programs with the City Attorney to determine that all of them are being con-
ducted within the rights and obligations of the City.
Councilman Thom expressed concern that at the time the City Council
met with the Youth Council earlier, the students were given the impression
that the City would determine if it was feasible to enter into their proposed
project, although no progress has been made on this to this date.
Councilman Roth advised that discussion on the feasibility has been
carried on at the Parks and Recreation Commission level, and he agreed with
their decision to consider including it in next year's budget, building one
center at Anaheim High School, since they had their funds set aside for it,
consideration of additional centers to depend on the success of the first one.
Mayor Dutton thanked the students for their presentation.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held January 24, 1972, pertaining to the following applications,
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
VARIANCE NO. 2321: Submitted by John F. and Catherine Q. Ganahl, to estab-
lish a printing shop in an existing building on P -1 zoned property located
on the east side of Topeka Street, north of Lincoln Avenue, with waivers of:
a. Permitted uses in the P -1 Zone.
b. Off- street parking requirement.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -7,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE NO. 1612: The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No.
PC72 -8, terminated all proceedings on Variance No. 1612, on the basis that
the Petitioner no longer plans to exercise the use permitted, and that Variance
No. 2321 was approved for the same property.
VARIANCE NO. 2322: Submitted by Herbert and Ethel Myers, to locate a proto-
type model of the factory -built home in the required 50 -foot building setback
for a period of six (6) months on M -1 zoned property located on the west side
of Miller Street, south of Orangethorpe Avenue, with waiver of:
a. Setback along an arterial highway.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -5,
granted said variance for 180 days, expiring July 22, 1972, subject to con-
ditions.
VARIANCE NO. 2323: Submitted by Donald R. Gililland and Vernon Dunham, to
erect a monument -type sign 40- square feet in area, on 11.1 zoned property lo-
cated on the south side of La Palma Avenue, west of Kellogg Drive, with waiver
of:
a. Minimum height of a free standing sign.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -6,
approved said variance.
7 2- 88
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
VARIANCE NO. 2201: Submitted by Charles R. Hobbs, B.F. Syfan Corporation, re-
questing an extension of time to establish a 6 -unit apartment development on
R -3 zoned property located on the east side of Cambridge Street, north of Cam-
den Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a retroactive ex-
tension of time from September 10, 1971, through January 10, 1973.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no fur-
ther action taken.
VARIANCE NO. 2312: Submitted by Anaheim Hills, Incorporated, and Texaco Ven-
tures, Incorporated, proposing to subdivide the 31 acres into 22 lots on County
Al Zoned property located in the Santa Ana Canyon, south of Walnut Canyon Res-
ervoir, near the southeasterly terminus of Walnut Canyon Road, with waivers
of: (Resolution of Intent to R -A 70 -71 -33 Tract No. 7558)
a.
b.
c.
Minimum lot area.
Minimum lot width.
Minimum front yard.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -3,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
The City Council reviewed this action and took no further action.
Developer, Anaheim Hills, Incorporated, and Texaco
Property located southwest of the Walnut Canyon Reser-
Canyon Road, and south of the terminus of Walnut Can
containing 22 proposed R -A zoned lots.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7558:
Ventures, Incorporated.
voir, south of Santa Ana
yon Road at Orange Park,
The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held January 24, 1972,
approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7558 is granted
subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 70- 71 -33, now pending, and
Variance No. 2312.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the
Orange County Recorder.
5. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior
to approval of a final tract map.
6. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana-
heim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be ap-
propriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
7. That Tentative Map of Tract No. 7558 is approved subject to com-
pletion of annexation of the tract to the City of Anaheim.
8. That a roadway be dedicated and improved to provide utility and
vehicular access from the west end of Tract No. 7558 northerly to Serrano Ave-
nue. The access roadway shall be constructed with a minimum width of 25 feet
of pavement and a walkway on one side with a minimum width of 3 feet.
9. That grading, excavation and all other construction activities
shall be conducted in such a manner as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from the project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm
water runoff originating from or flowing through this project.
10. That Ridge Road "A" shall be constructed in accordance with City
of Anaheim Standard Plan No. 122.
11. That the drainage from Tract No. 7558 shall be conducted to the
point of its ultimate disposal in a manner that is satisfactory to the City
Engineer.
72-89
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
The Deputy City Clerk submitted correspondence from the Orange
County Planning Department, requesting a 60 -day continuance on considera-
tion of Tentative Tract No. 7558, since they understood the developer plans
to remove about 100 feet from the top of Robber's Peak, a site which appar-
ently is of historical significance. Also submitted was report of the Parks
and Recreation Director, pointing out the background on Robber's Peak, and
listing alternate plans for providing a road in that area.
Councilman Dutton stated that, although the City Council ordinar-
ily attempts to preserve anything of historical significance, Robber's Peak
(or Roost, as it is sometimes called) is comprised of an isolated pile of
rocks which would be hazardous for children and very costly to improve into
a park.
Councilman Roth expressed the opinion that priorities for Park
and Recreation fund should be such that the money is spent in areas where
it will benefit the most people. He stated he felt the highest priority
for Park and Recreation funds for 1972 should be development of Twila Reid
Park; that there are many more people in the west end of town than would be
in the area of Robber's Roost, and also the people west of Highway 39 have
been promised a park nor quite some time.
Councilman Stephenson stated he also would not be in favor of build-
ing a park at Robber's Peak.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Roth, Ten-
tative Map, Tract No. 7558 was approved, subject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -54 MO1 {LER DRIVE ANNEXATION INHABITED: The City Planning
Commission, at its meeting held January 24, 1972, by Motion, recommended
Mohler Drive Annexation, Inhabited, be approved as being a logical exten-
sion of the boundaries of the City of Anaheim and that appropriate City of
Anaheim zoning be initiated as such time as an annexation ordinance has been
read.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -54: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 72R -54 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF INHABITED TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (MOHLER DRIVE ANNEXATION)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -54 duly passed and adopted.
HIGH SCHOOL SITE NO. 4 ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: The City Planning Com-
mission, at its meeting held January 24, 1972, pursuant to Resolution No.
PC72 -13, recommended the City Council urge Orange Unified School District
to name High School Site No. 4 "Anaheim Hills High School."
Councilman Dutton noted correspondence dated February 15, 1972,
from Robert C. McQueen, President of the Santa Ana Canyon Improvement As-
sociation, requesting that, since High School Site No. 4 will serve the en-
tire Canyon, it be named Canyon High School.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that the High School
site is located at the southeast corner of Imperial Highway and Santa Ana
Canyon Road, and is outside of the property owned by Anaheim Hills.
Council discussion followed, wherein it was noted that although
the City Planning Conuuission made the recommendation, said school site is
under the jurisdiction of the Orange Unified School District.
72 -90
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that under the Charter, such
recommendations should not be made by the City Planning Commission unless
they are requested by the City Council. He added that, to his knowledge, at
no time has a City Council recommended a name for any high school.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
Resolution No. PC72-13 was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7439, REVISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70 -71 -56 AND CON-
DITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1244): Developer, William J. Krueger. Property located
on the east side of Euclid Street, south of Orangewood Avenue, containing 49
proposed R -3 zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held February 7, 1972,
denied said tentative tract.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Dutton, action
on Tentative Tract No.7439 was continued. to be considered in conjunction with
Reclassification No. 70 -71 -56 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1244. MOTION
CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 6734, REVISION NO. 1, AND 6772, REVISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFI
CATION NO. 68-69-40): Developer Westfield Development Company. Property located
on the west side of Walnut Canyon Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, and
contains:
sal.
Tentative
Tentative
The City
approved Tentative
conditions:
Tract No
Tract No
Planning
Tract No.
6734 24 proposed R-1 zoned lots.
6772 42 proposed R -1 zoned lots.
Commission, at its meeting held February 7, 1972,
6734, Revision No. 1, subject to the following
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6734 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68- 69 -40.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the
Orange County Recorder.
5. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior
to approval of a final tract map.
6. That drainage of Tract No. 6734 shall be disposed of in a man-
ner satisfactory to the City Engineer. The applicant shall be responsible
for the transmission of drainage from Tract No. 6734 to its ultimate dispo-
7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
8. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east
property line. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall
be installed between said wall and the Anaheim flood channel, plans for said
landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superinten
dent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City
of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscap-
ing.
9. That the City Council reserves the right to amend or delete the
assumption of landscaping maintenance if Council policy changes.
10. That all streets in Tract No. 6734 shall be constructed in ac-
cordance with current City of Anaheim Standard Details for hillside streets.
11. That final elevations and floor plans shall be submitted to and
be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit.
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held February 7, 1972,
approved Tentative Tract No. 6772, Revision No. 1, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6772 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68- 69 -40.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form
for approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the
Orange County Recorder.
5. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim
prior to approval of a final tract map.
6. That drainage of Tract No. 6772 shall be disposed of in a
manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. The applicant shall be respon-
sible for the transmission of drainage from Tract No. 6772 to its ultimate
disposal.
7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the build-
ing permit is issued.
8. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east
property line or top of slope bank, whichever is the higher elevation. Rea-
sonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed
between said wall and the Anaheim flood channel, plans for said landscaping
to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Park-
way Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim
shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.
9. That the City Council reserves the right to amend or delete
the assumption of landscaping maintenance if Council policy changes.
10. That all streets in Tract No. 6772 shall be constructed in
accordance with current City of 'Anaheim Standard Details for hillside
streets.
11. That drainage facilities and easements shall be constructed
and dedicated, as required by the City Engineer, to drain the southerly por-
tion of Tract No. 6772 into the Walnut Canyon channel.
12. That final elevations and floor plans shall be submitted to
and be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit.
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
Tentative Maps, Tracts Nos. 6734, Revision No. 1, and 6772, Revision No. 1,
were approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 7617. 7730. 7731. 7732. 7733. 7734. 7735. 7736. 7737. 7738
AND 7739 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72 -30 AND VARIANCE NO. 2327): Developer
Classic Development Corporation. Property located on the south side of the
Riverside Freeway and on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of
the intersection of Walnut Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road, contain-
ing:
on Tent :at
7738 Trod
t.ion Na,
Tentative Tract
Tentative Trct
Tentat.i.v(- ...o t
Tent a'ti'.
Tentative Traci-
Tentative Tr dot
Tentative
E'en tt t
Tent 3 t _'J r
Tent.itie r =i t
No. 7617
No. 7730
No 7731
Nc 2
No. 77:3
No. 7
No.
r.,
77-.°
onimi
38 proposed R-2-5,000
64 proposed R -2 -5,000
49 proposed R- 2-5,000
63 proposed it- 5,000
67 proposed R -2 -5,000
69 proposed R-2-5,000
56 proposed P-2-5,000
+7 proposed R-2-5,000
51 Fr nosi, R -2-5,000
48 propose R-2-5,000
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
zoned
lo ts.
lots.
lots.
lots.
lots.
lots.
lots.
lots.
lots.
lots.
lots.
72 -91
ion. t 'its meeting held 'February 7, 1972,
11T i :utt�, scat by Councilman Dutton, action
M. Y731, ,732 7 733, 7754, 7735, 7736, 7737,
ea ed in conjunctio r; with Reclassifica-
27. MOTION CARRIED.
72 -92
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
FINAL TRACT NO. 7566 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71- 72 -15): Developer Anaheim Hills,
Incorporated, and Texaco Ventures, Incorporated. Property located at the
northeast corner of Royal Oak Road and Nohl Ranch Road, containing 80 R- H- 10,000
zoned lots.
The Assistant City Engineer reported that said final map conforms
substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bonds have been
posted and required fees paid, and thereupon recommended approval of Final Map
of Tract No. 7566, subject to the following conditions:
1. Receipt of approved drainage letter agreements from downstream
property owners.
2. Receipt of satisfactory access easements to existing public utili-
ty easements.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Final
Map of Tract No. 7566 was approved, subject to the conditions recommended by the
Assistant City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -55 WORK ORDER NO. 791: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolu-
tion No. 72R -55 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: POLICE FACILITIES BUILDING
SUNSCREEN, 425 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER
NO. 791. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZ-
ING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened March 9, 1972, 2 :00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -55 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -56 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution
No. 72R -56 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Frank A. Klaus)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -56 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -57 IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION (MARJORIE J. AND ALAN R.
TALT): Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -57 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN IRREVO-
CABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FROM MARJORIE J. TALT AND ALAN R. TALT. (One -foot
strip along the west side of Belhaven Street.) (67 -68-70 and 69- 70 -29)
72-93
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson,Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -57 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT LEAPFROG TRANSFORMERS: The City Manager reported on the
recommended purchase of 15 100 KVA 12000 120/240 Volt Leapfrog Transform-
ers, and advised that the one manufacturer, General Electric Company, has sub-
mitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $19,199.25, including
tax. He thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, pur-
chase was authorized in the amount of $19,199.25, including tax, as recommended
by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by Allen Hemsley for purported personal
property damages to the front door of his home caused by an Anaheim Police
Officer, on or about June 22, 1971, was denied, as recommended by the City
Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Council-
man Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Roth:
a. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of January, 1972:
Building Division.
b. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Minutes January
20. 1972.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3012: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3012 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69 -70 -56(2) R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3012 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3013: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3013 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61 -62- 69(48) M-l)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3013 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3014: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3014 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
72 -94
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69- 70-55(3) M-1)
1.
window in the
2.
one foot from
in the window
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3014 duly passed and adopted.
CONTINUED DECISION HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Public hearing was held February 8, 1972,
on application submitted by Mark Herman, requesting permission to move a dwell-
ing from 9222 Bloomfield Street, Cypress, to 942 Salem Street, Anaheim, and also
that the park and recreation in -lieu fee be waived. At that meeting the hear-
ing was closed and decision delayed to this date to allow further investiga-
tion.
Correspondence dated February 11, 1972, from Mrs. Leona Wheeler
was submitted, wherein she asked that if the house moving permit is granted
it be subject to the following conditions:
Install obscure glass in the two sections of the long, sliding
rear of the south side.
Install metal awnings that cover the entire window, out about
the wall, which obstructs the view in and out but not sideways,
in #1 and the next window that is the bathroom. This latter
window is already obscure glass.
3. On the next window (next from the bathroom) being a 36 -inch
window, 32 inches from the floor, install a regular shade awning of metal,
the bottom being below the center of the window. This will make the awning
bottom below the top of the fence. An awning similar to the above two would
be an alternate.
At the bottom of Mrs. Wheeler's letter the Applicant had indicated
his willingness to comply with the foregoing requests.
Councilman Dutton stated he did not think it was equitable to compel
the Applicant to comply with Mrs. Wheeler's requests, since they are not re-
quired by Code.
H.A. Chamberlain, 7200 Melrose Street, Buena Park, Agent for the Ap-
plicant, advised that they had no objection to stipulating to the requests of
Mrs. Wheeler, since the Applicant had determined these things would be neces-
sary for protection from the sun since this side of the house faces south.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -58: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -58 for
adoption, approving said house moving permit, subject to the three conditions
stipulated to by the Applicant, and also granting waiver of the applicable
park and recreation in -lieu fees.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE
MOVING PERMIT TO MARK HERMAN, TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 9222 BLOOMFIELD,
CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA, TO 942 SALEM STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -58 duly passed and adopted.
City Hall, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
"PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT OF ORANGE COUNTY Councilman Dutton requested a review
of "Physical Environment of Orange County A Report on the Deteriorating
Condition of Orange County's Natural Environment," distributed by the Orange
County Planning Department.
Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson stated
he felt the report was one of the most comprehensive and up -to -date ones on
the environment of Orange County the staff had an opportunity to review, and
the understanding of the problems and their interdependency hopefully would
lead to better cooperation between local governmental agencies and the ul-
timate solution to some complex problems.
He added that it was felt there were many ways in which the prob-
lems could be solved, although all of the recommendations set forth at the
end of the report probably would not be applicable to Anaheim.
Mr. Thompson advised that reviewal of the report by various gov-
ernmental agencies could cause friction that would create action e.g. pre-
viously it had been unknown that some neighboring communities do not have
industrial waste ordinances.
He further advised that the report gave the impression environ-
mental impact studies would be appropriate for all uses; however, he did
not feel Anaheim had either the manpower, capability or money for an en-
vironmental impact study for all developments, both private and public,
although they should be considered for those developments that would have
a major impact.
Mr. Thompson stated that the Development Services Department staff
has attempted at all times to inform the Council of problems of environmen-
tal concern.
Councilman Dutton expressed concern over two items in the report:
1. Environmental impact studies already are required by
the Counties and State as far as public and government developments are
concerned, and he felt it was excessive to now propose the same require-
ment for all developments in Orange County and its cities.
of dollars.
2. Requiring these studies would cost developers thousands
Councilman Thom stated he felt that Anaheim probably could not do
much about implementing very many of the recommendations in the report, but
that it could cooperate with other governmental agencies in the ultimate
solution of such problems,
!h: added t'n. t at some levels the problems :could be under Federal
jurisdiction :'sift, t iCiC• w}':!'i? the Federal agency would start to implement
some solutl i r. J1... the ;ooneration of the cities.
?r. Thompson or his review.
72 95
RESOLUTION NO. 2R-59 FP. .::.OACHMENT PERMIT KWIKSET: Councilman Roth offered
Resolution No. 72R -51) or adoption., amending Resolution No. 71R -503 nunc
pro tune.
._o Lt+r 3ook
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU-
TION NO. 71R-503 N1.?NC IRO TUN(' T6 REFLECT THE CORRECT NAME OF KWIKSET,
DIVISION OF EMHART CORPORAT
11 Vote:
C: t!NC. .Li41'.N: Roth, F t -..phenson, Peh ey Thom and Dutton
ONES. 7NCi.T,CTM Ncne
ABSENT: C 1.;.,MLN: None
e a z a, .:l i<< .ol+ Lion No. 72R-59 duly passed and adopted.
72 -96
City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES February 15, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -60 ANAHEIM HILLS NO. 4 ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED): Councilman
Roth offered Resolution No. 72R -60 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED
AS ANAHEIM HILLS NO. 4 ANNEXATION. (UNINHABITED)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -60 duly passed and adopted.
FIRE INSURANCE RATES LA PALMA INDUSTRIAL PARK: Councilman Stephenson noted
correspondence dated January 31, 1972 from El Dean Wilson of Oranco Indus-
trial Properties, regarding the recent increase in the fire insurance rates
for La Palma Industrial Park, and asked what caused this large increase.
The City Manager reported that he had received a similar letter
and had replied, requesting a report from their insurance carrier; also,
he had requested that the Fire Chief investigate the situation.
Mr. Murdoch advised that since Anaheim had received an improved
fire rating two years previously, which resulted in lower insurance rates,
he felt it was possible it could be the materials used by a tenant that
caused the increase. He added that this would be a topic for discussion
at the meeting the Council will have with the Northeast Industrial Associa-
tion on February 29, 1972.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Roth seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 3:10 P.M.
Signed (11 22'2. Z4/1.e11-4/
Deputy City Clerk