Loading...
1973/04/2473-319 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES -April ~?, 1973, 1:30 P.M. Mr. William S. Lewis, Superintendent of Streets and Sanitation, explained that the developer proposes to lease or subdivide each of the buildings separately and consequently these individual tenants or owners will most likely fence these properties, leaving the Sanitation Division with the problem of individual access. In addition he outlined the problems encountered in front collections such as tying up one traffic lan.e, and noted that in most instances a tenant will locate trash containers to the rear of the property, which in this case has no accessway for trash trucks according to the plans. Councilman Dutton stated that according tO the commercial trash contractor, with whom he has spoken, it would be possible to make front collections at subject property. Mr. Lewis reiterated that front collections in this industrial park would necessitate tying up a traffic lane while rolling trash dumpsters up and down the driveway and that this is an impractical solution as far as the Streets and Sanitation Division is concerned. Following discussion of the possible alternatives, Councilman Dutton moved that the easements for the Grove Industrial Park not be re- quired and that the trash containers be located to the front or side of the buildings, at the owners discretion, so long as they are behind the front property line. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Stephenson moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 4:10 P.M. City Clerk City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John H. Dawson CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDENT: George H. Edwards ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Robert Harris of the First Southern Baptist Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973, 1:30 P.M. PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Dutton and unani- mously approved by the City Council: a. "Law Day USA" - May 1, 1973 Accepted by Jackie Thoma$on, Attorney at Law. b. "Loyalty Day" May 1, 1973 - Accepted by Mr. Edward Saucedo, Commander of the Anaheim V.F.W. Post No. 3173. c. "Better Hearing Month" - May, 1973 - Accepted by Lt. Bastrup and Mr. Harry Reid, on behalf of the Kiwanis Club of Anaheim. d. "Correct Posture Month" - May, 1973. MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meetings held April 3, April 10 and April 17, 1973 was deferred to the next regular meeting. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $2,070,613.75, in accordance with the 1972-73 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 111: Initiated by the City Planning Com- mission, to consider secondary access solution for properties located from 554 through 638 South State College Boulevard (north of South Street and south of Virginia Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-53, recommended that the City Council adopt Exhibit No. "C" of Area Development Plan No. 111 as the best alternative to service the seven lots located between Virginia Avenue and South Street. Zoning Supervisor Roberts described the location of subject properties, and indicated that action on the secondary access, as well as Reclassification No. 72-73-37 was initiated by the City Planning Commission as a result of requests made on two parcels in the center of this block for commercial zoning. Because of the potential trend towards commercial uses exhibited in this area, the City Planning Commission directed staff to prepare Area Development Plan No. 111 to consider the secondary access possibilities. He described the existing zoning and uses of subject and adjacent properties. The subject property is divided into three portions for discussion purposes, Portion Nos. 1 and 2 already being zoned C-l, and the third portion, which is the center section of the block has a frontage of 443 feet on State College Boulevard and is developed with seven single- family residences on R-1 zoned lots. Mr. Roberts advised that when this particular block was considered in the "front-on study" several years ago, it was determined not appropriate for con- version to commercial uses, however several changes have occurred in the area since that tithe. State College Boulevard is presently designated a primary arterial highway wit;h 53~-foot half width dedicated and when the seven parcels develop an additional three-foot dedication will be necessary for widening of the street along thig portion, which is presently 50~-foot half width. He described the size, placement and nature of the single-family properties in question. Three exhibits, labeled "A", "B" and "C" were posted and explained by Mr. Rob~2rt5 as follows: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Indicates one or two standard 20-foot alley returns to State College Boulevard. Indicates one to three evenly-spaced private vehicular access drives to State College Boulevard. Indicates no access drives to State College Boulevard and the existing alley between Virginia Avenue and South Street would continue to be utilized as the primary source of vehicular access to the parking areas at the rear or side of the various properties. City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Roberts advised that the City Planning Commission recommended Exhibit No. "C" be adopted, which alternate was also recommended by the City Traffic Engineer as it would create no additional conflict points with traffic on State College Boulevard. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council, either in favor or opposition to Area Development Plan No. 111; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-156: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 73R-156 for adoption, adopting Area Development Plan No. 111~ Exhibit No. "C". Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 111, EXHIBIT NO. "C". Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-156 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-37 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Petition initiated by the City Planning Commission for a change in zone from R-1 to C-1 on property located on the east side of State College Boulevard, north of South Street, further described as 556 through 622 South State College Boulevard was submitted together with application for Exemption Declaration Status prepared by the Development Services Department. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-55 recommended that no environmental impact report be required and further recom- mended that Reclassification No. 72-73-37 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along State College Boulevard for street widening purposes. 2. That the Vehicular access rights to State College Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 3. That specific plans for any proposed development or remodeling on the property shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval. 4. That the existing structure shall be brought up to the minimum ~tandards of the City of Anaheim including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim. 5. That thc garages shsll be removed from the rear of the property ir, order to provide adequate parking and turn around area. 6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 7. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded ~om view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 8. That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down-lighting c~f a maximum height of six feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 9. That the final parking plan shall be approved by the Development S~rwlces Department, and any landscaped areas in the parking area shall be pro- tected with six-inch high concrete curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be pro- v~ded for parking spaces. 10. That a six-foot masonry wa~l shall be constructed on the R-1 Zoned property on the east side of the alley directly opposite the subject parcels if ~be R-1 homeowners consent ~o the construction of said wall. If the R-1 home- ~>m~ers do not consent to the wall being located on their property, the owner(s) ~>f subject I>roperty shall be absolved of the responsibility for constructing ~ueh a wall.. 73-322 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. 11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 12. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 13. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for lot split. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, it was the finding of the City Council that the impact of the project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Roberts advised that subject property is comprised of a portion of the property involved in Area Development Plan No. 111, and the location, current uses and zoning was previously described. He noted that when this item was con- sidered by the Planning Commission an additional concern regarding the manner of development of subject parcels was expressed, i.e., whether two or more of these would be assembled into a more desirable commercial development or whether they would be developed on an individual basis. Mr. Roberts reported that it was the consensus of opinion among the Commissioners that if the property owners develop subject parcels on an individual basis, they could foresee no detrimental problem. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or opposition to Reclassification No. 72-73-37; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Mr. Murdoch referred to Condition No. 8 recommended by the City Planning Commission to be imposed upon approval of subject reclassification, which sets a maximum height limitation of six feet for parking area lighting. He advised that the six-foot light standards pose a problem to the City insofar as vandalism is concerned and suggested that eight foot light stagdards be required. Mr. Roberts stated that when the concerns of the Council and Administra- tion regarding use of six-foot light standards as opposed to eight standards where presented to the City Planning Commission, they expressed very strong feeling against raising the height limits of the light standards in order to protect the residential integrity of adjacent R-1 properties, and consequently the recommen- dation was not changed. Mr. Murdoch questioned whether eight-foot standards with down-lighting would project lights into an adjacent residential area. Mr. Roberts related that when this condition was first worded to include a maximum six-foot height, it was in regard to a proposal to establish a parking lot in conjunction with a commercial operation immediately adjacent to a residential use, the house being only five feet from the boundary line between the two properties, and the Planning Commission was concerned that the parking area lighting be kept below the six foot block wall. Councilman Sneegas felt that the type of lighting which is easiest to maintain will give better service and therefore provide greater protection for the property, and in his estimation the eight-foot standards would be less vulnerable to vandalism. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-157: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 73R-157 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested, and amending Condition No. 8 of the recommended Planning Commission conditions to read as follows: 8. That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down-lighting of a maximum height of eight feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. Refer to Resolution Book. 73-323 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72-73-37 - C-i) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The MaYOr declared Resolution No. 73R-157 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-35~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1379 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Request of Doug Browne for change in zone from R-1 to C~i and the following Code waivers to establish retail sales and repair of musical instruments and studio for music lessons in two existing residences on property located on the east side of State College Boulevard, north of South Street, further described as 602 and 608 South State College Boulevard was submitted together with application for Exemption Declaration Status: a. Minimum side setback from an "R" Zone. b. Maximum building height within 150 feet of an "R" Zone. Reclassification No. 72-73-35 was withdrawn by the Petitioner, in that the property was included in Area Development Plan No. 111 and Reclassification No. 72-73-37, which actions were initiated by the City Planning Commission. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-54, recommended that no environmental impact report be required and that Conditional Use Permit No. 1379 be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the com- pletion of Reclassification No. 72-73-37, now pending. 2. That specific plans for any proposed development or remodeling on the property shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning the property for commercial uses. 3. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the petitioner shall provide adequate sound attenuation devices in the structure to eliminate a noise nuisance being created by the proposed musical activity. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, it was the finding of the City Council that the impact of the project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor asked if anyone either in favor or opposition to Conditional Use Permit No. 1379 wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-158: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 73R-158 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1379 subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1379. Roll. Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-158 duly passed and adopted. 73-324 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-36~ VARIANCE NO. 2487 AND ENVIRONMENTAl. IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Request of Mr. and Mrs. Arden Strand, Mr. and Mrs. Harvey P. Shunk, Mr. and Mrs. Harvey W. Shunk, Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Nugent, Mr. and Mrs. Roy Nakatsuka and Mr. and Mrs. Alexander Horowitz, for change in zone from R-A to R-3 and the following Code waiver to establish a 127-unit, four- plex apartment development on the north side of Cerritos Avenue, west of Knott Avenue, was submitted together with application for Exemption Declaration Status: a. Minimum required landscaped setback. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-57, recom- mended that the City Council require an environmental impact report prior to con- sideration of Reclassification No. 72-73-36 and that the change of zone from R-A to R-3 be denied, and further recommended subject property be incorporated in the RS-5000 zone, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a tentative and final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition No. 1, above mentioned shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said condition is complied with within one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-58, denied Variance No. 2487. The City Clerk advised that in addition to the application for Exemption Declaration Status an environmental impact report had been submitted by the Applicants, however this has not been processed but was submitted for information only. Further that the staff report on subject reclassification and variance recommends that no environmental impact report be required. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, it was the finding of the City Council that the im- pact of the project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED. Zoning Supervisor Roberts briefed the location of subject property and noted t~at the site comprises a total of eight lots, presently in use for agricul- tural purposes. The proposed developer of the property is requesting rezoning to R-3 and waiver of the minimum required landscaped setback adjacent to a local street which would affect two lots out of a proposed 32 lot subdivision on which they propose to reduce the landscaped area to ten feet and the other five feet would be utilized as part of an open parking space. The project will have a total of 127, one and two-story, tri-plex and four-plex dwelling units; the minimum lot size will be 7500 square feet to a maximum of 12,000 square feet. Mr. Roberts read the findings on which the Planning Commission based their recommendation for denial and subsequent recommendation that RS-5000 would be a more compatible designation. Councilman Pebley stated that it appeared to him that the project proposed under this reclassification and variance typifies the development pro- posals which the City Council has in the past encouraged in other parts of the 73-325 City Hall~ Anaheim~ CalJ. fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. City. He noted the present surrounding land uses and stated that the amalgama- tion of these parcels and removal of the chicken ranch would be in his estima- tion an improvement to the area, which the owners might not be able to afford with an RS-5000 development. Councilman Dutton referred to Finding No. 3 of the Planning Commission resolution indicated that their denial is based partially upon the fact that this project would tend to attract families with children, which would increase the school-age population. He noted that according to letters contained in the environmental impact report submitted by Covington Brothers, from the Anaheim Union High School District and Savanna School District, no problems regarding the potential school-age population increase would be anticipated. Mr. Roberts advised that the Planning Corm~ission's denial was suppor- ted somewhat by the letter received from the Planning Director, City of Cypress, indicated opposition to apartment units across Cerritos Avenue from an estab- lished R-1 tract to the south. Further Mr. Roberts stated that the Planning Commission had not reviewed the letters referred to by Councilman Dutton. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent were present and wished to address the Council. Mr. Barry Zimmerman, representing Covington Brothers, 2451 East Orange- thorpe Avenue, Fullerton, stated that the salient points of his prepared pre- sentation were already presented in Mr. Roberts' report and the ensuing dis- cussion. Utilizing a colored rendering he pointed out the location of two schools adjacent to subject property and noted that the landscaped green-belt which will be incorporated into the project design will provide an additional buffer area to the four R-1 lots abutting to the north. He advised that the school district has indicated approval of the proposal to place a street through subject property and have requested that a "squeeze gate" which excludes veh- icular traffic be placed at the entrance to the school property, to which the developer has agreed. Mr. Zimmerman maintained that the exterior of the pro- posed apartment unit will be compatible with the R-1 houses. He reported that the circulation element provides for no through traffic, which should curtail both the amount of the speed of traffic through the project. Councilman Stephenson asked how much distance there would be between the apartment project and the R-1 tract to the south. Mr. Zimmerman answered that the project would be separated by the full width of Cerritos Avenue plus the width of a service road, which would be at least 150 feet or more. Mr. Bob Hunter, 717 Grove Avenue, Anaheim, representing Don Lee Realty, Tustin, pointed out that the subject proposal presents an oppor- tunity to eliminate a potential health and safety hazard. He indicated that there is presently an abandoned well o~ the northwest corner of the property and through negotiations they have bought the shares in the well, at a con- siderable cost, from the four owners and with the development of the project the well will be properly capped~ He noted that the rezoning of subject property would not set a trend, in that R-5 has already been established in the area and this is the last remaining parcel to be developed. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else either in favor or opposition wished to address the Council~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-159: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 73R-159 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the zone to R-3 as requested, subject to the following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee: 1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Variance No. 2487 and Tentative Map of Tract No. 8204~ 73-320 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973~ 1:30 P.M. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and'recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 6. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property line adjacent to the R-1 parcels. 7. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said condition is complied with within one year from the date here- of or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72-73-36 - R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-159 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-160: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 73R-160 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2487 subject to the following conditions recom- mended by the Interdepartmental Committee: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclass- ification No. 72-73-36 and Tentative Map of Tract No. 8204. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2487. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-160 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 8204 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-36 AND VARIANCE NO. 2487): Developer, Covington Brothers; property located north of Cerritos Avenue, west of Knott Avenue; containing 32 proposed R-3 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 19, 1973, denied Tentative Map, Tract No. 8204. The City Clerk reported in the event the tentative tract map is approved it is recommended Condition No. 8 be amended as follows: 8. That the lot lines of Lot Nos. 1 through 6, shall be extended to the north tract boundary to include the parkway on the north side of "B" Street 73-327 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. and that a road and public utility easement shall be granted to the City for "B" Street, said easement shall not include the northerly four and one-half foot strip and block wall. In answer to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Zimmerman stipulated to the 12 conditions imposed upon said tentative map, including the addition to Condition No. 8. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Ten- tative Map, Tract No. 8204 was approved subject to the following recommendations of the Interdepartmental Committee: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8204 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72-73-36 and Variance No. 2487. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 6. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 8. That the lot lines of Lot Nos. 1 through 6 shall be extended to the north tract boundary to include the parkway on the north side of "B" Street and that a road and public utility easement shall be granted to the City for "B" Street, said easement shall not include the northerly four and one-half foot strip and block wall. 9. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Cerritos Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 10. That standard curb and property line returns shall be provided at the northwest corner of "A" Street and Cerritos Avenue. 11. That the property owner(s) shall furnish to the City Attorney's Office satisfactory evidence of mutual access rights between Lot Nos. 7 and 8 to provide both lots access to the alley. 12. That prior to approval of the final tract map, the property owner shall submit a program, satisfactory to the City Attorney, that will guarantee the perpetual maintenance of the landscape strip along the north side of "B" Street. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2489 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 90 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1383): Request of Anaheim Hills, Inc., for the following Code waivers to subdivide property located on the north side of Canyon Rim Road, east of Nohl Ranch Road into 229 RS-5000 zoned lots in four tracts was submitted to- gether with E.I.R. No. 90 and E.I.Ro Review Committee Analysis thereof: a. Minimum lot width on cul-de-sac. b. Maximum lot coverage. c. Required setback between front property line and garage. d. Requirement that single-family residential structures rear on arterial highways. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-66, recom- mended that E.I.R. No. 90 be adopted as the Council's Statement and granted Var- iance No. 2489 in part, denying waiver a., b., and c., and granting waiver d., subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclass- ification No. 71-72-44 and Tentative Map of Tract Nos. 8220, 8221, 8222, and 8223. 2. That final specific plans shall be submitted and approved in accor- dance with provisions of the PC, PLANNED COMMUNITY, ZONE prior to the approval of the final tract maps. 73-328 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April.......24, 19..7.3,. 1:30 P.M. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed I~v James L. Barisic, Vice President, Anaheim Hills, Inc., and public hearing scheduled this date. The City Clerk read a letter received from Melvin L. Miller, property owner in the vicinity of subject property, dated April 19, 1973, regarding drain- age inadequacies and problems purportedly caused by Anaheim Hills' grading. Councilman Thom inquired of the Assistant City Attorney whether the letter received from Mr. Miller and the problem therein described has any bearing upon the acceptance of the environmental impact report relative to this project. Mr. Dawson advised that the entire matter of drainage policy is resently under discussion at staff level, and that this would most appropriately be considered along with the tract maps. He assured Council that the problem referred to in Mr. Miller's communication will be corrected before the substan- tial development is underway, and that it would not have any direct relationship to the environmental impact statement. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council accepted E.I.Ro No. 90 and Committee Analysis thereof, together with City Planning Commission recommendation, and adopted same as the Statement of the Council. MOTION CARRIED. Zoning Supervisor Roberts advised that the proposal under considera- tion involves 83 acres in the Northridge section of Anaheim Hills, north of Canyon Rim Road, extending to the northerly boundary of the Anaheim Hills property. He utilized a 100 scale colored plot plan submitted by the developer for his report. Mr. Roberts explained the requested waivers as follows: The variance requested regarding the 45-foot minimum width on a cul-de-sac applies to one lot on which the proposed width would be 40 feet; maximum lot coverage for RS-5000 would be 35%, whereas there are lots exceeding that coverage up to 42%; however 95% of the lots are in compliance; required front property line and garage set- back, which in the RS-5000 Zone can be provided either by a 25-foot setback or 6 to 10-foot setbacks with automatic garage door openers, the developer in this instance proposes 10 lots which would be between 10 and 25 feet and 4 with less than 6-foot garage setbacks. In addition the plan indicates a total of 6 lots which would side-on an arterial highway rather than rear-on. Mr. Roberts advised that there is a resolution of intent to the R-2 Zone on subject property at this time, however instead the developers are pro- posing to develop to the RS-5000 Zone, which would be a less intense land use. The density, according to the current plan, would be 2.7 dwelling units per gross residential acre, which would be in conformance with the adopted Anaheim Hills development plan. The original land use and density element indicated this particular property was to have 350 single-family patio type homes with a density of 3.9 units to the acre. Mr. Roberts advised that the matter of having an RS-5000 ordinance read on the property rather than R-2 as originally proposed was discussed with the City Attorney's Office and it is the joint opinion of the City Attorney and Development Services Department that this is feasible. Mr. Roberts summarized the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and noted that the reasoning for approval of waiver d, (waiver d., - single-family structures rear onto arterial highways) was that the grade dif- ferential was such that a conversion to commercial uses would be unlikely. Further they felt there was not sufficient justification to grant the first three waivers in that the property is of a size which would permit conformance with the RS-5000 Zone. Councilman Thom inquired as to whether any of the cul-de-sacs shown on the plot plan were longer than 500 feet, to which Mr. Roberts noted one which appeared to be 600 feet including the knuckle. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent were present and wished to address the Council. 73-329 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, 1:30 P.M. Mr. James Barisic, Vice President, Anaheim Hills, Inc., stated that he would prefer to have Mr. Wesley Mohr of Richard B. Smith Inc., discuss the various Code waivers requested and the restrictions placed on this development by the Hillside topography. He commented that originally patio homes were proposed for the Northridge section, and as development came closer to fruition it was felt that in order to attract a quality builder it would be wise to decrease the density originally proposed. He advised that they have succeeded in making arrangements with Richard B. Smith, Broadmore Homes who have built a similar type of unit as proposed for these tracts in the Turtle Rock Community of Irvine. Mr. Barisic further noted that by working with the Planning Division and by reorienting alignment of lot lines they reduced the individual lots from 237 to 229. He referred to the difficulties of building in a hillside area which are compounded when attempting to conform to zoning standards developed for flat areas. He advised that every attempt was made to minimize the waivers requested with the result that relatively few lots out of the total 229 are affected by this variance. In conclusion he assured Council that all units will be equipped with automatic garage door openers. Mr. Wesley Mohr, Executive Vice President, Richard B. Smith, Inc., advised that in compliance with requests from the City Planning Department they provided a 40 scale precise plan of the proposed development in order to deter- mine where, if any. these variances would occur. He also referred to the diffi- culties encountered in hillside development and specifically mentioned the required 40-foot street setbacks with which this development must comply even though the difference in elevation between the pad and street is already 40 feet. He stated that in all likelihood, when the 2~ scale plans are prepared it will be possible to rectify these various situations, thus making the requested waivers unnecessary, and stated that they intend to do this wherever possible. Councilman Stephenson questioned why waivers to permit a front garage setback between 10 and 20 feet were requested. Mr. Mohr stated he did not recall the reason for this request as it would seem that if that much depth were available that the structure would be pushed up to the minimum setback, allowing more space in the rear yard. He felt once again that this will very likely be corrected when the precise plans are drawn. Councilman Thom inquired if the difficulties arose from attempt- ing to transpose a predesigned unit, which was built at Turtle Rock, onto sub- ject site, and stated that if this were the case then redesigning could elimin- ate the need for the variances. Mr. Mohr replied that this is not the case, but that the specific pad areas, out of which a large percentage are unbuildable slopes, are the under- lying cause. high. Councilman Dutton observed that some of the maximum lot sizes are very In conclusion Mr. Mohr once again reassured Council that every attempt will be made to eliminate the variances wherever possible, but, on the advice of the Planning Division, they have elected to request approval of these waivers at this time. The Mayor asked if anyone in opposition wished to address the Council. Mrs. Mary Dinndor£, 131 La Paz §freer, representing the §anta Ana Canyon Homeowners Association, expressed opposition to Variance No. 2489 on the basis that while extensive grading is required in order to develop subject area, no geological or seismic reports have been submitted relative to the affects this grading will have on the area, and referred to the drainage problems dis- cussed in Mr. Miller's letter~ She further objected to the construction of additional tracts of homes n(~ting the attendant traffic and noise, which she f(~els threatened to destroy !he rural character of the hill and canyon area. She also maintained that regardless of automatic garage door opening equipment and length of driveways, people still tend to park their cars on the streets. She stated that she concurred with thc Planning Co~nission recommendation and urged that Council ~ustain t}~i~ rccc~r~m~:ndat~on by denying thc appealed waivers. City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, 1.;.30 P.M. Assistant City Attorney Dawson assured Mrs. Dinndorf that the drainage problem in the t]ill and canyon area has received serious attention from the City staff and that the proposed revised Condition No. 45 and revised certification to be placed on the tract maps should provide a solution to this concern. Mrs. Joseph E. D. Morris, 400 South Torrey Pine Circle, stated that she lives on a cul-de-sac in the Westridge section of Anaheim Hills and from her experience with minimum front setbacks, she would object to the granting of any further such waivers. She related several difficulties which the minimum front setback has caused in her neighborhood, citing storage of recreational vehicles and parking on the shortened drivewavso She noted that the reduction in front yard setback is no guarantee of a larger rear yard. She advised that the people in her area are very unhappy with these minimum front setbacks and that she feels action should be initiated to change the ordinance permitting them. Mrs. Morris further referred to minimum lot width stating that the pro- posed 40-foot frontage on a cul-de-sac street is not sufficient and that the ad- jacent home would be encroaching upon the driveway. She maintained that the developer should attempt to place fewer homes on a cul-de-sac. The Mayor offered the Applicant a few minutes for rebuttal. Mr. James Barisic explained that in comparing the plot plan for this particular development with any development for the flat areas, it will be noted that a considerably greater amount of visual and physical separation exists be- tween all units because of the nature of the terrain. He stated that he was not familiar with all of the problems mentioned by Mrs. Morris but indicated willing- ness to meet with the Westridge Homeowners group in an attempt to inform them as to the plans for development. Mr. Mohr explained that many units in subject tracts will have a separation of 16 to 18 feet. In regard to parks, which he noted was of concern to the Planning Commission, he advised that Anaheim Hills, Inc. has agreed to an approximate ten acre park site in the immediate vicinity of this proposed development. In addition, this patio home concept incorporates two miniparks into the overall design. These miniparks would not be dedicated to the City but would belong to the homeowners association. Additionally, he stated that covenants, conditions and restrictions for this project will attempt to alle- viate the problems encountered by homeowners in the past. Mayor Dutton closed the hearing. RESOLUTION NO 73R-161: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 73R-161 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2489, subject to the following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee. 1. That this variance is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Map of Tract Nos. 8220, 8221, 8222, and 8223 and the completion of Reclassifica- tion No. 71-72-44. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor- dance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16; provided however, that final specific plans shall be submitted and approved in accordance with provisions of the PC, Planned Community, Zone prior to the approval of the final tract maps. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2489. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley and Dutton Thom None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-161 duly passed and adopted. 73-331 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973~ 1:30 P.M. TENTATIVE MAPS~ TRACT NOS. 8220~ 8221~ 8222, AND 8223 (VARIANCE NO. 2489): Developer, Richard B. Smith; property located on the north side of Canyon Rim Road, east of Nohl Ranch Road; Tract No. 8220 contains 63 proposed RS-5000 zoned lots; Tract No. 8221 contains 61 proposed RS-5000 zoned lots; Tract No. 8222 contains 41 proposed RS-5000 zoned lots; Tract No. 8223 contains 64 proposed RS-5000 zoned lots. Prior to consideration of these tentative tract maps, Assistant City Attorney John H. Dawson presented the revised version of Condition No. 45 from "standard recommendations for the Interdepartmental Committee for public safety and general welfare and Development Services Department," hereinafter re- ferred to as the "Hillside Development Drainage Requirement" as well as the revised City Clerk's Certification to be placed on the tract map title sheet as follows: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE REQUIREMENT: That drainage of said pro- perty shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drainage facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners involved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and shall be functional through- out the tract and from the down-stream boundary of the property to the point of ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final building inspection or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimburse- ment agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. REVISED CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATION: I, DENE M. DAOUST~ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PRESENTED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE DAY OF , 19__, AND THAT THEREUPON SAID COUNCIL DID~ BY AN ORDER DULY PASSED AND ENTERED, APPROVE SAID MAP AND DID ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING OFFERS OF DEDICATION BY ALL PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND COVERED BY THIS MAP: (1) FOR STREET PURPOSES: (2) THE DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND APPUR- TENANCES; (3) ALL VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ETC. ETC.; (4) ETC. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING OFFERS OF DEDICATION WERE CONDITION- ALLY ACCEPTED TO BECOME EFFECTIVE AT SUCH TIME AS THE CITY ENGINEER HAS RECORDED A CERTIFICATE STATING THAT ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED, INSTALLED AND ARE IN AN OPERABLE CONDITION. Mr. Dawson advised that since the last discussion, the Hillside Devel- opment Drainage Requirement (revised Condition No. 45) has been revised once again and although the developer will still be required to install drainage facilities to carry runoff waters from higher properties to the ultimate dis- posal, as approved by the City Engineer, this revision states that this must be completed prior to the issuance of any final building inspection or occupancy permits. This differs from the previous revision in that under the previous requirement no building permits were to be issued except for six model homes until such time as the drainage facility was installed. He stated that the second revision was drawn up following conferences with developers as well as the Engineering Division in which it was disclosed that the latter method of withholding final building inspection and/or occupancy permits, while providing as satisfactory a control for the City, will permit construction to go forward in the proper sequence without any hiatus in financing or development. Further, under this latest version, no home may be occupied until the drainage system is complete and operable and streets and public improvements will not be accepted until the City Engineer has certified that the drainage facilities are in and operable. Mr. Dawson advised that there are a great many ramifications involved in the formulation of a Council policy on drainage, and that the City Attorney's City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. Office, in conjunction with Development Services and the City Engineer are working on a recommendation for presentation to Council. However, he recommended that as an interim measure, the revised City Clerk's Certification and the "H~llside Development Drainage Requirement" be adopted by the City Council and applied to the tracts under consideration as well as any other hill and canyon area develop- ment that comes before Council. He noted that the interim conditions would be susceptible to later revision to conform to Council policy should it be necessary. Mr. Robert Davis added to Mr. Dawson's comments that it will take con- siderably longer than one additional week to come up with a drainage policy for recommendation to the Council and suggested that an additional amount of three weeks to one month's time be alloted for preparation of this policy. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the "Hillside Development Drainage Requirement" and revised City Clerk's Certification were adopted for use as interi~n measures and the further discussion of drainage policy was continued from May 1, 1973, as scheduled, for an additional three weeks to one month. MOTION CARRIED. Prior to consideration of approval of the tentative tract maps, Mayor Dutton recognized Mr. James Barisic, who requested that Council reconsider Con- dition No. 14 of Tentative Tract No. 8220 and Condition No. 15 of Tentative Tract Nos. 8221 and 8223 which provides that a six-foot decorative openwork wall be installed at the top of the slope adjacent to Canyon Rim Road. He noted that Canyon Rim Road will be one of the primary scenic drives in the Anaheim Hills area. He presented a rendering indicating the effect of placement of these fences on the slopes, showing they obscure the view. He stated that the motive behind fencing is to create visual and physical separation, which he maintained has al- ready been provided via the slopes created. Mr. Ronald Thompson indicated that the staff does not recommend place- ment of a wall which would create a "tunnel" affect but rather an openwork type of fence such as was used in the Lusk development. It is felt that some fencing theme should be instituted to avoid the situation of having each individual home- owner place a different type of fence along bis property line, which would, in terms of the scenic highway, be undesirable. He further felt that in this area there is a safety factor involved in locating a fence adjacent to the roadway. He concurred that it is important not to destroy the view potential. Mr. Wesley Mohr described the type of fencing which is planned for the project, indicating that the typical entryway work will be installed at each street which intersects the arterial, as well as for any homes which are of close proxim- ity in grade between the roadway and the street. He advised that the covenants, conditions and restrictions will contain a restriction as to the type of fencing permitted and noted that usually the homeowner will place fencing at the toe of the slope rather than at the top. In conclusion, he expressed his opinion that berming, with landscaped groupings would be a much more attractive treatment for the scenic highway corridor than an ornamental fence and suggested that this re- quirement be deferred until such time as final approval of the plans is con- sidered, so that they may attempt to come up with an aesthetically pleasing sol- ution to the problem, which would be subject to Council approval. Regarding the restrictions imposed by C. C. & R.'s, Mr. Thompson related that problems have been encountered where these imposed restrictions are not pre- sent in the basic Zoning Code and the City cannot enforce private deed restrictions and must issue permits if the request is permitted according to Zoning Code. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 2, 1973, ap- proved Tentative Map, Tract No. 8220 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8220 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 2489 and Reclassification No. 71-72-44. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi- sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 73-333 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973, 1:30 P.M. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to an approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Aha Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That Canyon Rim Road shall be fully improved from Nohl Ranch Road to the eastern boundary of Tract No. 8221. Said improvements shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the improvements for this tract. 11. That fire breaks shall be provided as required and approved by the Fire Chief. 12. That prior to approval of the final tract map, final specific plans shall be submitted and approved in accordance with provisions of the PC, Planned Community, Zone. 13. That special brochures shall be prepared for the purpose of instructing prospective purchasers of these homes on the proper maintenance and watering of landscaped slopes, and copies of the brochures shall be posted in the garage and kitchen of each house. 14. That a 6-foot, decorative, openwork wall shall be constructed at the top of slope adjacent to Canyon Rim Road on Lot Nos. 1, 7, 8, and 63. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed within the slope areas of each lot adjacent to the roadways and in the street parkways. Plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the property o~er shall assume responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping to the lot lines, regardless of the location of the walls. The City of Anaheim shall assume responsbility for maintenance of landscaping in the Canyon Rim Road right-of-way. 15. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Canyon Rim Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 2, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 8221 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8221 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 2489 and Reclassification No. 71-72-44 and the completion of annexation. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. C_ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, 1:30 P.M. o. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That Canyon Rim Road shall be fully improved from Nohl Ranch Road to the eastern boundary of this tract. Said improvements shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the improvements for this tract. 11. That the full traveled way of Larkridge Street shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the improvements for this tract. 12. That fire breaks shall be provided as required and approved by the Fire Chief. 13. That prior to approval of the final tract map, final specific plans shall be submitted and approved in accordance with provisions of the PC, Planned Community, Zone. 14. That special brochures shall be prepared for the purpose of instruct- ing prospective purchasers of these homes on the proper maintenance and watering of landscaped slopes, and copies of the brochures shall be posted in the garage and kitchen of each house. 15. That a 6-foot, decorative, openwork wall shall be constructed at the top of slope adjacent to Canyon Rim Road on Lot Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed within the slope areas of each lot adjacent to the roadways and in the street parkways. Plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the property owner shall assume responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping to the lot lines, regardless of the location of the walls. The City of Anaheim shall assume responsibility for maintenance of landscaping in the Canyon Rim Road right-of-way. 16. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Canyon Rim Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 17. That prior to the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8221, the owner(s) of subject property shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate an ease- ment for riding and hiking trail purposes over that portion of subject property over which the Four Corners Pipe Line Company has an easement for pipe lines and incidental purposes upon the date of approval of this tentative tract map. Said offer to dedicate shall be irrevocable for a period of twenty years and may be accepted by the City of Anaheim at such time as it is determined that development of such facilities would be in the best interests of the City of Anaheim. Said irrevocable offer to dedicate shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 2, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 8222, subject to the follOwing conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8222 is granted sub- ject to the approval of Variance No. 2489 and Reclassification No. 71-72-44. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi- sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilitic~. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed convenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, con- ditions, and restrictions shall be record<~d conc~rrcntly with the final tract map. 73-335 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 19737 1:30 P.M. 6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That Canyon Rim Road shall be fully improved from Nohl Ranch Road to the eastern boundary of Tract No. 8221. Said improvements shall be con- structed prior to or concurrently with the improvements for this tract. 11. That fire breaks shall be provided as required and approved by the Fire Chief. 12. That a blanket easement for street and public utility purposes shall be granted to the City of Anaheim for possible future streets to be ex- tended to the adjacent property to the north (the extent of said blanket ease- ment shall be as approved by the City Engineer), and a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City shall be posted to guarantee the installation of said street improvements. When the property over which said blanket ease- ment extends is developed, precise street alignments shall be determined and the portions of the blanket easement not required for the streets shall be of no effect. 13. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, final specific plans shall be submitted and approved in accordance with provisions of the PC, Planning Community, Zone. 14. That special brochures shall be prepared for the purpose of in- structing prospective purchasers of these homes on the proper maintenance and watering of landscaped slopes, and copies of the brochures shall be posted in the garage and kitchen of each house. 15. That prior to the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8222, the owner(s) of subject property shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate an easement for riding and hiking trail purposes over that portion of subject property over which the Four Corners Pipe Line Company has an easement for pipe lines and incidental purposes upon the date of approval of this tentative tract map. Said offer to dedicate shall be irrevocable for a period of twenty years and may be accepted by the City of Anaheim at such time as it is determined that development of such facilities would be in the best interests of the City of Anaheim. Said irrevocable offer to dedicate shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 2, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 8223 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8223 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 2489 and Reclassification No. 71-72-44. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 73-336 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - A~ril 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. 7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That Canyon Rim Road shall be fully improved from Nohl Ranch Road to the eastern boundary of Tract No. 8221. Said improvements shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the improvements for this tract. 11. That the full traveled way of Larkridge Street shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the improvements for this tract. 12. That fire breaks shall be provided as required and approved by the Fire Chief. 13. That prior to approval of the final tract map, final specific plans shall be submitted and approved in accordance with provisions of the PC, Planned Community, Zone. 14. That special brochures shall be prepared for the purpose of instruct- ing prospective purchasers of these homes on the proper maintenance and watering of landscaped slopes, and copies of the brochures shall be posted in the garage and kitchen of each house. 15. That a 6-foot, decorative, openwork wall shall be constructed at the top of slope adjacent to Canyon Rim Road on Lot Nos. 1 and 34 through 64. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed with- in the slope areas of each lot adjacent to the roadways and in the street parkways. Plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the property owner shall assume responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping to the lot lines, regardless of the location of the walls. The City of Anaheim shall assume responsibility for maintenance of landscaping in the Canyon Rim Road right-of-way. 16. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Canyon Rim Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 17. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City of Anaheim to guarantee removal of land- scaping and improvements within the future right-of-way of Grande Vista Street. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Tenta- tive Map, Tract Nos. 8220, 8221, 8222, and 8223 were approved subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, with the addition of the "Hillside Development Drainage Requirement" to replace Condition No. 8 on all four maps, and including the provision that interpretation of Condition No. 14 of Tentative Map, Tract No. 8220 and Condition No. 15 of Tentative Map, Tract Nos. 8221 and 8223 will permit alternate treatments in place of the 6-foot openwork decorative wall, said alternate subject to Council approval. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by David R. Doering, for entertainment permit to allow one to three western singers at The Marquis, 1203 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police on motion by Councilman ?ebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - KRAEMER BOULEVARD (EAST SIDE) FROM 735 FEET NORTH OF LA PALMA TO 635 FEET NORTH OF LA PALMA: Environmental impact report prepared by the Engineering Division staff for the improvement of Kraemer Boulevard from 635 feet to 735 feet north of La Palma Avenue, a project of the City of Anaheim, was sub- mitted together with E.I.R. Review Committee Analysis. Councilman Thom moved that it be the finding of the Council that there will be no substantial adverse environmental impact and there will be no adverse, irreversable changes involved in the proposed project, and that the environmental ?3-337 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24; 1973~ 1:30 P.M. impact report, as submitted, for Kraemer Boulevard from 635 feet to 735 feet north of La Palma Avenue be adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the Council, and order filed with the City Planning Department. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 2, 1973, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 2485 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Application by Imperial Land and Investment Company, requesting the following Code waivers to establish a mini-warehouse facility on R-A zoned property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of the Orange and Riverside Freeways was submitted together with application for Exemption Declaration Status: a. Minimum setback from an arterial highway. b. Minimum setback fron a local street. c. Minimum parking area landscaping when area is visible from and within 400 feet of an arterial highway. d. Minimum number of required parking spaces. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-65, recommended that no environmental impact report be required and granted said variance subject to conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental im- pact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED. The City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2485. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1362 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Application by A. P. A. 101, requesting the following Code waiver to permit a three-story hotel for "active senior citizens" on C-1 zoned property located on the west side of State College Boulevard, north of Center Street, further des- cribed as 201 North State College Boulevard, was submitted together with appli- cation for Exemption Declaration Status: a. Minimum number of required parking spaces. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-64, recommended that no environmental impact report be required and granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental im- pact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED. The City Council took no further action on Conditional Use Permit No. 1362. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1382 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Application by F M C Corporation, to continue the storage and handling of two pounds of Class "C" explosives in the M-1 Zone on property located on the south side of the cul-de-sac of Burton Place, south of Via Burton Street, further des- cribed as 1400 North Burton Place was submitted together with application for Exemption Declaration Status. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-68, recommended that no environmental impact report be required and granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental im- pact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED. The City Council took no further action on Conditional Use Permit No. 1382. 73-338 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. PC73-69 - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18~ CHAPTER 18.04 AND 18.64 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: Pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-69, the City Planning Commission recommended amendments to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code by additions to Chapter 18.04 General and amendment to Chapter 18.64, Conditional Uses relating to storage of explosives. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, public hearing on recommended amendments to Title 18, Chapter 18.04 and 18.64 was set for May 22, 1973, 1:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1383 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 90: Applica- tion by Anaheim Hills, Inc., to establish a six-unit, planned residential develop- ment to be used as a model home complex with sales office and home decorating sales center (Tract No. 8223) on R-A zoned property located on the north side of Canyon Rim Road, east of Nohl Ranch Road was submitted together with Environmental Impact Report No. 90. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-67, recommended that Environmental Impact Report No. 90 be adopted as Council's state- ment and granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING: Environmental Impact Report No. 90 was adopted as the statement of the City Council in conjunction with Variance No. 2489, April 24, 1973. The City Council took no further action on Conditional Use Permit No. 1383. VARIANCE NO. 2267: Request submitted for an extension of time to permit a mobile- home and travel trailer sales lot with service facilities, and mobilehome unit used as an office on C-1 zoned property, located at the northwest corner of Midway Drive and Anaheim Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, by motion, granted extension of time to expire July 20, 1974. The City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2267. RESOLUTION NO. PC73-70 - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT - SANTA ANA RIVER BICYCLE TRAIL: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC73-70, finding and determining that the Santa Ana River Bicycle Trail would have no environmental impact and would be in conformance with the adopted Anaheim General Plan, was submitted for City'Council review. The City Council took no further action on City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC73-70. TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS NOS. 7617~ 7730~ 7731~ 7732? 7733 AND 7734~ REVISIONS NO. 3 AND 7735 AND 7736~ REVISIONS NO. 2: Developer, Classic Development Corporation; property located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, opposite Mohler Drive, east of Imperial Highway; Tract No. 7617, Revision No. 3 contains 44 proposed R-1 zoned lots; Tract No. 7730, Revision No. 3 contains 57 proposed R-1 zoned lots; Tract No. 7731, Revision No. 3 contains 44 proposed R-1 zoned lots; Tract No. 7732, Revision No. 3 contains 51 proposed R-1 zoned lot; Tract No. 7733, Revision No. 3 contains 56 proposed R-1 zoned lots; Tract No. 7734, Revision No. 3 contains 49 R-1 proposed R-1 zoned lots; Tract No. 7735, Revision No. 2 contains 57 pro- posed R-1 zoned lots; Tract No. 7736, Revision No. 2 contains 39 proposed R-1 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7617, Revision No. 3 subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilites. 73-339 City Hall? Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973~ 1:30 PoM. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drainage facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners in- volved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type suffici- ent to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and be functional from the downstream boundary of the property to the point of ultimate disposal prior to issuance of a building per- mit, provided, however, that building permits, but not final building and occu- pancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and the unpaved portion of the north side of the Santa Ana Canyon Road right-of-way in accordance with the requirements of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 9. That the City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 10. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 11. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7730, Revision No. 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu £~s as d~t~rmin~d to b~ appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drainage facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners in- volved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type suffici- ent to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said propc~rty to ultimate disposal as approved by the 73- 340 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - A~ril 24, 1973~ 1:30 P.M. City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and be functional from the downstream boundary of the property to the point of ultimate disposal prior to issuance of a building per- mit, provided, however, that building permit, but not final building and occu- pancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. This shall also include satisfactory provision for disposal of drainage of "H" Street. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ama River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and the unpaved portion of the north side of the Santa Ana Canyon Road right-of-way in accordance with the requirements of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 9. That the City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 10. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Santa )~na Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 11. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. 12. That a left-turn pocket for eastbound Santa Aha Canyon Road traffic shall be provided at the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and "L" Street. 13. That in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, a 6-foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided adjacent to the north line of Tract No. 7730, Revision No. 3. 14. That prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, the owner(s) of subject property shall submit plans for City Council review and approval showing the steps which shall be taken by the developer to reduce the noise level generated by freeway traffic to 65 dBA's in the rear yards of the lots adjacent to the Riverside Freeway and to 45 dBA's inside the homes (with windows and doors closed) on these lots as stipulated to by the petitioner. The sound-attenuation devices shall include as a minimum a 6-foot high earthen berm topped by a 6-foot high decorative masonry wall with gates for maintenance access on each lot along the rear of the lots abutting the freeway, plus whatever addi- tional measures are necessary to achieve the levels stated above. These plans shall be certified by a recognized acoustical expert stipulating that the pro- posed sound-attenuation measures will achieve the levels stated above. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7731, Revision No. 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the ovrner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council~ said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drain- age facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners involved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drain- age right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973, 1:30 P.M. be functional from the downstream boundary of the property to the point of ul- timate disposal prior to issuance of a building permit, provided, however, that building permits, but not final building and occupancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Aha River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. 9. That in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, a 6-foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided adjacent to the north line of Tract No. 7731, Revision No. 3. 10. That prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, the owner(s) of subject property shall submit plans for City Council review and approval showing the steps which shall be taken by the developer to reduce the noise level generated by freeway traffic to 65 dBA's in the rear yards of the lots adjacent to the Riverside Freeway and to 45 dBA's inside the homes (with windows and doors closed) on these lots as stipulated to by the petitioner. The sound-attenuation devices shall include as a minimum a 6-foot high earthen berm topped by a 6-foot high decorative masonry wall with gates for maintenance access on each lot along the rear of the lots abutting the freeway, plus what- ever additional measures are necessary to achieve the levels stated above. These plans shall be certified by a recognized acoustical expert stipulating that the proposed sound-attenuation measures will achieve the levels stated above. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7732, Revision No. 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drainage facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners in- volved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type suffici- ent to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and be functional from the downstream boundary of the property to the point of ultimate disposal prior to issuance of a building per- mit, provided, however, that building permits, but not final building and occu- pancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. 73-342 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES April 24~ 1973, 1:30 P.M. 9. That in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, a 6-foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided adjacent to the north line of Tract No. 7732, Revision No. 3. 10. That prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, the owner(s) of subject property shall submit plans for City Council review and approval showing the steps which shall be taken by the developer to reduce the noise level generated by freeway traffic to 65 dBA's in the rear yeards of the lots adjacent to the Riverside Freeway and to 45 dBA's inside the homes (with windows and doors closed) on these lots as stipulated to by the petitioner. The sound-attenuation devices shall include as a minimum a 6-foot high earthen berm topped by a 6-foot high decorative masonry wall with gates for maintenance access on each lot along the rear of the lots abutting the freeway, plus whatever addi- tional measures are necessary to achieve the levels stated above. These plans shall be certified by a recognized acoustical expert stipulating that the pro- posed sound-attenuation measures will achieve the levels stated above. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7733, Revision No. 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drainage facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners in- volved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be construc- ted and be functional from the downstream boundary of the property to the point of ultimate disposal prior to issuance of a building permit, provided, however, that building permits, but not final building and occupancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage dis- trict reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ama River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and the unpaved portion of the north side of the Santa Ana Canyon Road right-of-way in accordance with the requirements of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installatlon and acceptance, the City o£ Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 9. That the City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 10. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 11. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7734, Revision No. 3, subject to the following conditions: ~73-343 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drainage facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners in- volved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type suffici- ent to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and be functional from the downstream boundary of the property to the point of ultimate disposal prior to issuance of a building per- mit, provided, however, that building permits, but not final building and occu- pancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. This shall include pro- visions for disposal of drainage of "A" Street and "C" Street at the north tract boundary satisfactory to the City Engineer. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and the unpaved portion of the north side of the Santa Aha Canyon Road right-of-way in accordance with the requirements of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 9. That the City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 10. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 11. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. 12. That a left-turn pocket for eastbound Santa Ana Canyon Road traffic shall be provided at the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and "A" Street. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7735, Revision No. 2, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit ~s issued. 7 .~ - City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drainage facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners in- volved have executed written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type suffici- ent to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and be functional from the downstream boundary of the pro- perty to the point of ultimate disposal prior to issuance of a building permit, provided, however, that building permits, but not final building and occupancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and the unpaved portion of the north side of the Santa Ana Canyon Road right-of-way in accordance with the requirements of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 9. That the City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 10. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 11. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. 12. That in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, a 6-foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided adjacent to the north line of Tract No. 7735, Revision No. 2. 13. That prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, the owner(s) of subject property shall submit plans for City Council review and approval showing the steps which shall be taken by the developer to reduce the noise level generated by freeway traffic to 65 dBA's in the rear yards of the lots adjacent to the Riverside Freeway and to 45 dBA's inside the homes (with windows and doors closed) on these lots as stipulated to by the petitioner. The sound- attenuation devices shall include as a minimum a 6-foot high earthen berm topped by a 6-foot high decorative masonry wall with gates for maintenance access on each lot along the rear of the lots abutting the freeway, plus whatever additional measures are necessary to achieve the levels stated above. These plans shall be certified by a recognized acoustical expert stipulating that the proposed sound- attenuation measures will achieve the levels stated above. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 24, 1973, approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 7736, Revision No. 2, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. That necessary right-of-way for offsite drain- age facilities be dedicated to the City, or that all property owners involved haw~ e×ecuted written right-of-way dedication to the City, or that the City Council 73-345 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, ]:30 P.M. will have initiated condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the required drainage right-of-way, the cost of which shall be borne by the developer. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Aha Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be constructed and be functional from the downstream boundary of the property to the point of ultimate disposal prior to issuance of a building permit, provided, however, that building permits, but not final building and occupancy permits, may be issued for model homes not to exceed six (6) in number in any one tract. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the develop- ers of said property upon their request. 7. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 8. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. 9. That in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, a 6-foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided adjacent to the north line of Tract No. 7736, Revision No. 2. 10. That prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, the owner(s) of subject property shall submit plans for City Council review and approval showing the steps which shall be taken by the developer to reduce the noise level generated by freeway traffic to 65 dBA's in the rear yards of the lots adjacent to the Riverside Freeway and to 45 dBA's inside the homes (with windows and doors closed) on these lots as stipulated to by the petitioner. The sound-attenuation devices shall include as a minimum a 6-foot high earthen berm topped by a 6-foot high decorative masonry wall with gates for maintenance access on each lot along the rear of the lots abutting the freeway, plus what- ever additional measures are necessary to achieve the levels stated above. These plans shall be certified by a recognized acoustical expert stipulating that the proposed sound-attenuation measures will achieve the levels stated above. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council approved Tentative Maps, Tract Nos. 7617, 7730, 7731, 7732, 7733, and 7734, Revisions No. 3 and Tract Nos. 7735 and 7736, Revisions No. 2, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the "Hillside Development Drainage Requirement" replacing Condition No. 6 on all eight maps. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP; TRACT NO. 7769 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-34, VARIANCE NO. 2391): Developer, Woodbine Corporation; tract located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, west of Solomon Drive, and containing 162 proposed R-1 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval and required fees paid. Mr. Dawson advised that this final map would be one of those on which the new City Clerk's Certification should be used. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7769 be approved subject to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. DELAY IN AWARD - WORK ORDER NO. 674-A: By general Council consent, award of Work Order No. 674-A (Harbor Boulevard and North Street street improvement) was deferred to May 1, 1973, on recommendation of the City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-162 - PURCHASE OF CAST IRON WATER PIPE AND FITTINGS: In accor- dance with recommendations of the Purchasing Agent, Councilman Pebley offered Re~olution No. 73R-162 for adoption. Rc~f~,r to Resolution Book. 7 3- 34t~ ~.it~ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 19737 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL UNDER DATE OF APRIL 18, 1973, AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE FURNISHING OF CAST IRON WATER PIPE AND FITTINGS - SERIES OF 1973 (PACIFIC STATES CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY - $194,186.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-162 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-163 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 8002: In accordance with recommen- dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 73R-163 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: PHASE II - CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIR SUBSTATION AT BALL ROAD AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 8002. (Jelco Incorporated - $378,512.38) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-163 duly passed and adopted. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - WORK ORDER NO. 8004: Mr. Murdoch reported on possible revision in award of Work Order No. 8004, Sharp Substation Phase II. He displayed a pic- ture of the Sharp Substation plot plan indicating the landscaped area, and street widening which is projected, as well as the wall originally planned. He recom- mended that negotiations be undertaken with the contractor to change that portion shown as a wall to a chain link fence, due to the nature of the property on the west side of the street, which it would appear would not be affected by such change. Conversion to chain link fence would reflect in estimated decrease in cost of $20,000. Mr. Murdoch further stated he would like to explore supplementary methods of financing or delays in actual street construction, due to the fact that although these substations are proposed to be built from bond funds, the total amount of these is not sufficient to cover all projects anticipated and therefore savings are mandatory wherever possible. Mr. Murdoch pointed out that the City's Environmental Impact Statement indicates construction of a wall to the west of the substation and that with the conversion to chain link fencing no change in berms or landscaping is suggested. The landscaping may be increased or of a different type which would provide ade- quate screening. A different situation exists at the Clair Substation, according to Mr. Murdoch, since the properties adjacent to Clair are developed to either residential, existing or proposed commercial uses. In answer to Councilman Sneegas, Mr. Edwards, Electrical Superintendent, stated that the cost of the reinforced concrete eight-foot wall would be $86 per foot versus $7 per foot for the chain link fence. OH motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Change Order No. [, Work Order No. 8004 was authorized replacing the eight-foot concrete wail proposed for the west side of the Sharp Substation with chain link fencing. MOTIO~ CARRIED. '73-347 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24~ 19737 1:30 P.M. Mr. Murdoch inquired if Council would object to a delay in the pro- posed street widening and improvement in the immediate area of the Sharp Sub- station, to which Council indicated no opposition. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-164 ~ AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 8004: In accordance with recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 73R-164 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: PHASE II - CONSTRUCTION OF SHARP SUBSTATION AT LA PALMA AVENUE AND PAULINE STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 8004. (Jelco Incorporated - Plan B - $288,898.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: AB SENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-164 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-165 - WORK ORDER NO. 1246: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 73R-165 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE SANTIAGO BOULEVARD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 397 FT. EAST OF TO APPROXIMATELY 230 FT. WEST OF NOHL CANYON ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1246. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC,; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - May 17, 1973, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-165 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-166 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 73R-166 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Signal Oil and Gas Company; James B. & Margaret S. Munson; Kenneth Wayne & Judy N. Atkins and Gonzalo A. & Diane A. Merchan; William Walter & Doreen Evelyn Fullerton; George & Irene B. Ferguson) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Thom and Dutton None Pebley None The Mayor declared Resol~tion No. 73R-166 duly passed and adopted. 7~-348 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - A~ril 24, 19737 1:30 P.M. PURCHASE OF MATERIAL - ALUMINUM WIRE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of aluminum wire for the Electrical Division as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT; INCLUDING TAX General Electric Supply Co., Anaheim ......... $16,031.28 Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles -(incomplete bid~ 16,077.50 Westinghouse Electric Supply Co., Anaheim ...... 16,526.67 Alcan Cable Corp., Fullerton ..... (incomplete bid~ 15,426.37 On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of General Electric Supply Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $16,031.28, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF MATERIAL - STEEL PIPE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of steel pipe for the Water Division, as follows and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR United Concrete Pipe Corp. - - - - Ameron Pipe Products Group .... TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX ........ $21,147.00 ........ 21,689.06 On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of United Concrete Pipe Corporation was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $21,147.00, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - 18 69KV LIGHTNING ARRESTORS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 18 69kv lightning arrestors for the Electrical Division as follows and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX Westinghouse Electric Supply, Anaheim ....... General Electric Co., Anaheim ......... General Electric Supply, Anaheim .......... McGraw - Edison, Pico Rivera ............ Ohio Brass, Pasadena ............... $16,726.50 16,821.00 17,746.16 18,748.80 19,089.00 On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of Westinghouse Electric Supply was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $16,726.50, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - TRACTOR MOWING UNIT: The City Manager reported on the recom- mended purchase of one tractor mowing unit and advised that the one manufacturer, Toro Pacific, has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $9,583.35, including tax. He thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, pur- chase was authorized in the amount of $9,583.35, including tax, as recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 73R-167 - AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 73R-167 for adoption, amending the agreement with Community Center Authority and authorizing same to proceed with installation of carpeting at the Convention Center. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF CARPETING AT ANAHEIM CONVEN- TION CENTER, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: 732349 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, 1:30 P.M AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-167 duly passed and adopted. TRANSFER FROM COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND - CONVENTION CENTER CARPETINg:: Mr. Mnrdoch reported that bids for replacement of carpeting have been received by the Community Center Authority together with recommendations from the City Engineer. He advised that the City's share of the cost for replacement of carpeting at the Convention Center amounts to $87,705.27 of which $50,000 is allocated in the current year's budget and the remainder projected in next year's budget. However, it is preferable to have the monies actually avail- able upon award of contract and therefore he requested that the amount of $37,705.27 be transferred from the Council Contingency Fund to cover the balance of the costs. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, transfer from Council Contingency Fund in the amount of $37,705.25 was authorized to cover the unbudgeted balance of the cost for replacement carpeting, Convention Center. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas: a. Claim submitted by John C. Hager for personal property damage purportedly sustained as a result of collision with City vehicle at Beach Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue, on or about March 7, 1973. b. Claim submitted by Klaus-Peter Deyring for personal property dam- ages purportedly sustained as a result of collision with City vehicle at parking lot driveway near Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue, on or about March 19, 1973. c. Claim submitted by Thomas A. Moshenrose for personal property damage purportedly sustained as a result of condition of State College Boulevard, on or about March 24, 1973. d. Claim submitted by Mrs. Natalie Ross for personal property loss purportedly resulting from neglect on the part of the Anaheim Police Department, on or about March 30, 1973. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. City of Cypress - Resolution No. 1347 - Supporting Orange County's Major League Baseball Club - The California Angels. b. Public Utilities Commission - Re: Order instituting investigation on the Commission's own motion into methods of compliance with the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 - Case No. 9452 Copy of Rule 17.1 (procedures to be util- ized for the preparation and submission of Environmental Impact Reports). c. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of March, 1973: Fire Department City Treasurer's Office d. City of Stanton - Resolution No. 73-12 - Supporting Orange County's Major League Baseball Club - The California Angels. e. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application of Southern California Gas Company for (a) a general increase in its gas rates, and (b) for authority to include a purchased gas adjustment provision in it's tariffs. f. Community Center Authority Minutes - April 2, 1973. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3158; Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3158 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-13 (8) - R-l) .C.it)~ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3158 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3159: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3159 as an Urgency Ordinance for adoption. Said ordinance was read in full by the City Clerk. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. (R-A ZONING - PROPERTY WITHIN MOHLER DRIVE ANNEXATION) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None Stephenson None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3159 duly passed and adopted. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Theresa and Thomas Mangiarotti and Theresa and Peter J. Muscarella for on-sale beer and wine lic- ense for 2954 West Ball Road was presented by the City Manager. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Attorney was authorized to file a conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application on the basis that the premises are presently located in a C-1 Zone which does not permit the on-sale sale of alcoholic beverages. MOTION CARRIED. COST/FEE STUDY - ZONING AND LAND USE PETITIONS: Mr. Ronald Thompson summarized the zoning and land use fees which were recommended as the result of the Cost/Fee Study and Addendum dated February 27, 1973 as follows: FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATIONS Reclassifications (zone changes) 1. $400 + $1.00 per acre. 2. $100 for the reading of a zoning ordinance where separate ordinances are required under any one zoning action. Subdivisions (tentative maps) 1. $300 per subdivision + $1.00 per lot. Conditional Use Permits 1. $150 fee except for PRD's, mobilehome and travel trailer parks. 2. $1000 fee for planned residential developments, mobilehome and travel trailer parks. Variances 1. $150 fee for variance involving yard, height, area, and minor modification of any one lot or parcel. 2. $1000 fee for variances involving land use, density, and modifi- cations for large residential developments and subdivisions. 3. $1000 fee for all sign and billboard variances. App~al Fees 1. One-half the cost of the original zoning and land use petition filing fee. 73-351 City Hall~ Anaheim~ Califorina - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24? 19737 1:30 P.Mo Councilman Pebley inquired whether Mr. Murdoch concurred in these recommendations and whether he could envision any effect on future growth as a result of these. Mr. Murdoch replied that when considered in correlation with Council's expressed intent to recover as close to the actual cost of processing these petitions as possible, he would concur that the recommendations as presented come as close to this objective as can be reasonably expected. However these still do not recover costs completely. Mr. Murdoch further observed that the fees are higher than the people who normally utilize zoning petitions are ac- customed to paying, but the rationale has been that this is a portion of the cost of developing or improving property and in most cases, there is a resul- tant financial benefit. In answer to Councilman Dutton, Mr. Murdoch stated that there is some offset to the zoning costs received as a result of the building permit fee, as this revenue is more than the cost of issuance of same and inspection of buildings. Mr. Ronald Thompson compared the recommended fees of February 27, 1973 with charges made in other cities and by the County, revealing that most of these recommendations would be higher than other Orange County cities but on a parity with fees charged by the County. There is no fee presently charged in the County which would be commensurate to the recommended $1,000 fee for variances involving large residential developments and subdivisions, etc., according to Mr. Thompson. This fee is justified on the basis of the extensive amount of time involved on behalf of the Planning Division as well as the City Engineer to perform the indepth analysis required for these applications. Mr. Thompson further observed that rezoning portions containing several parcels under one blanket resolution of intent is an economical method of approach which should be implemented whenever possible. Mr. Thompson noted that should the recommendations for increase in zoning fees as listed above be accepted and implemented by the Council, it is estimated that the increased fees would cover approximately one-half of the total cost of the zoning petitions. In connection with the various cost/fee studies, Mr. Thompson stated that they did endeavor to compute the costs of processing E.I.R.'s. Although an excess of 95% of these are handled via the 19 point questionnaire, he advised that the reports which are analyzed by the E.I.R. Review Committee with written report to the Council currently average $160 each. Mr. Merrill Skilling, repreSenting the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, stated that following review of the cost/fee studies and recommendations of February 27, 1973, the Industrial Committee became concerned regarding the ex- pensive procedures involved in obtaining variances, conditional use permits and rezoning actions, and rather than comment upon the recommended increase in fees presented the following recommendations for Council consideration: 1. Past practices in granting variances and conditional use permits should be reviewed. Where a Variance or Conditional Use Permit is consistently granted, it is suggested that the basic ordinances be changed to universally allow the conditions at variance. 2. The number of variances and conditional use permits required would thereby be reduced as well as the cost for the City to process them. Mr. Thompson stated that the Planning Division has been and is working to amend the Codes to reflect Council's thinking and intent. Councilman Sneegas observed that the special instances which cause the need for variances will persist no matter how the Codes are amended. Mr. Murdoch stated that he feels it is unrealistic to think that the entire costs of processing zoning application can be completely recovered. By general Council consent, further consideration of the Cost/Fee Study and recommended fee increases was held over to ascertain what percentage of zoning application costs if any, is offset by the revenue received as a result of building permit fees. 7 3- 352 .City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 24, 1973, 1:30 P,M. SOLICITATION PERMIT - ~VA4NGELiSM CRUSADES, INC,: Application submitted by Mrs. Tuk Soon Kang, on behalf of Evangelism Crusades, Inc., 3438 59th Place, Los Angeles, for permission to solicit door-to-door, previously deferred from April 10, 1973, to allow time for further investigation into the organization, was denied on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. RASTER STREET OVERCROSSING - SANTA ANA FREEWAY: By general Council consent, further discussion of the Haster Street overcrossing configuration was continued to May 1, 1973 for report by the City Engineer. JOINT MEETING - PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Mr. Murdoch recommended, due to important policy matters regarding the impact of park facilities being con- sidered by the Parks and Recreation Commission, that a joint meeting for dis- cussion of policy as well as economic impact and recreation programs be held. By general Council consent, a joint meeting was tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, May 1, 1973, 7:00 p.m. 1973 CARROUSEL BUDGET: Mr. Murdoch presented the request received from the Women's Division, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce that the City authorize the cost of the brochures in the amount of $600.00 and secretarial services in the amount of $350.00 be included within the total costs of the 1973 Carrousel at the Convention Center. Mr. Murdoch expressed the opinion that the secretarial work involved in this project could most appropriately be done by the Cultural Arts Secretary, since this is the major cultural event of the year. The brochures in previous years have been sponsored by various organizations. He pointed out that the City's last year expenditure was approximately $10,000.00 and noted that it is difficult to estimate costs until a program has been put together. He suggested instead that a budget amount be set, so that the Women's Division would have a monetary framework within which to develop the Carrousel project. In answer to Councilman Sneegas, Mr. Murdoch reported that the $10,000.00 referred to included City personnel costs and equipment owned by the City for which no charge was made. He outlined the cost of the Carrousel for 1972 which totaled $9,613.00. Councilman Stephenson moved that the total budget from City funds for the 1973 Carrousel event at the Convention Center be established at a maximum sum of $10,000.00 including materials, equipment and personnel costs of the Convention Center staff. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PROGRESS REPORT - ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, 1977: Mr. August F. Lenain, City representative to the Orange County Water District submitted the written 1972 Progress Report dated April 3, 1973 for City Council review. Additionally, he extended an invitation to the Council and to whomever they wished to designate, as guests, to tour the Water District facilities; said tour to be scheduled for a date after July 1, 1973. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned 4:45 P.M. Signed City Clerk