1973/05/2273~,37~%
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
COUNCILMEN: None
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John H. Dawson
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION: Reverend Arthur Harrington of the Trinity United Methodist Church
gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Dutton and
unanimously approved by the City Council.
"Anaheim Senior Citizens Day" - May 26, 1973.
"Realtor Week" - May 20 through 26, 1973.
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: A resolution commending the American Legion Post
No. 72 for their "Law and Order Night", May 26, 1973 and urging cit-
izens support of same was unanimously adopted by the City Council.
RESOLUTION: A resolution in support of "Mobile Home Week", May 26 to June 3,
1973, was unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to
Mr. H. Werner Buck, of H. Werner Buck Enterprises.
INTRODUCTION: Mrs. Ree Burnap, Immediate Past President of the Anaheim and
Garden Grove Chapter of the League of Women Voters introduced Mrs.
NormaValletta, 6291 Killarney Avenue, Garden Grove, the in-coming
President.
Mayor Dutton congratulated Mrs. Vallettaand wished her success in her
forthcoming term of Presidency.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held April 24, 1973
were approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas.
MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the
reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver
of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title,
specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or
resolution. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount
of $474,109.57 for the period ending May 15, 1973 and $1,182,762.45 for the
period ending May 22~ 1973~ in accordance with the 1972-73 Budget, were approved.
PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE - STORAGE OF
EXPLOSIVES: Initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider amendment to Title
18 Zoning, by addition of Chapter 18.04, General and amendment to Chapter 18.64,
Conditional Uses, relating to the storage of explosives.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-69, recom-
mended that the Anaheim Municipal Code, Sections 18.04 and 18.64.020(4e) be
amended as follows:
ADD:
"Section 18.04.150
The storage of Class "C" explo-
sives may be permitted in any
zone subject to the conditions
73-3~'8
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
contained in the Uniform Fire
Code but in no event shall such
storage exceed 20 pounds."
Amend:
Section 18.64.020(4e)
to read:
"Explosive, storage of Class
"A" and "B" and storage of Class
"C" in excess of 20 pounds."
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, either for
or against the proposed amendment and addition to Title 18; there being no re-
sponse, declared the hearing closed.
ORDINANCE NO. 3162: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3162, amending
Title 18 as recommended by the City Planning Commission, for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.04, BY
ADDING SECTION 18.04.150; AND AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.64, SECTION
18.64.020(4e), RELATING TO ZONING. (Conditional Uses - Storage of Explo-
sives.)
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-40~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1387 AND
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Request of Angelo and Carl Zaby, for
change in zone from R-A to C-1 and the following Code waiver to establish an
auto rental, lease and wholesale agency on property located at the southeast cor-
ner of Mountain View Avenue and Katella Way was submitted together with applica-
tion for Exemption Declaration Status:
a. Required masonry wall abutting a residential zone. (Withdrawn)
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-75, recom-
mended said reclassification be approved subject to the following conditions and
further recommended that no environmental impact report be required:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 60 feet in width from the centerline of the street along
Katella Way for street widening purposes including two 15-foot property line radii.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Katella Way, Manchester Avenue and Mountain View Avenue, including preparation
of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and
gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other ap-
purtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in
accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the
City Engineer; and that street lighting facilities along Katella Way, Manchester
Avenue and Mountain View Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of
Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file
in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Katella Way, Manchester Avenue
and Mountain View Avenue for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with ap-
proved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence-
ment of structural framing.
6. That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south
property line.
7. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly s~ielded from
view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
8. That a parcel map to record the approved division of subject pro-
perty be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in
the office of the Orange County Recorder.
9. That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down-lighting of
a maximum height of eight feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the
property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area.
'73'379 :'
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
10. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
11. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a man-
ner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
12. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Dir-
ector of Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the
building permit.
13. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro-
perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 8, above mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by
action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one
year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant.
14. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor-
dance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
15. That Condition Nos. 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 14, above mentioned,
shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-76, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and granted Conditional
Use Permit No. 1387 in part, denying waiver a., being no longer required, sub-
ject to the following conditions:
1. That this Conditonal Use Permit is granted subject to the comple-
tion of Reclassification No. 72-73-40, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor-
dance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
3. That vehicles to be sold at wholesale on the premises shall be
only those vehicles owned originally by the petitioner. Vehicles originally
purchased by someone other than the petitioner shall not be sold from subject
property, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Sneeg&s,
seconded by Councilman Stephenson, it was the finding of the City Council that
the impact of said project and reclassification would be trivial in nature amd
that no environmental impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts reported that revised p~ans were
submitted by the Applicant on May 21, 1973, and therefore the Development Ser-
vices staff has had an opportunity to review these revised plans only briefly.
From the staff viewpoint, there are areas of concern as yet unresolved regard-
ing adequate access for trash vehicles, and location of the gas pump and sign.
Following brief discussion, it was moved by Councilman D~tton, secom~d
by Councilman Sneegas, that the public hearing on Reclassification No. 72-73-4~
and Conditional Use Permit No. 1387 be continued to June 5, 1973, and that said
reclassification and conditional use permit be referred back to the City Plam~im~
Commission for review and recommendation on the revised plans.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-41t VARIANCE NO. 2493 AND ENVIRO~NTAL~
IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Request of Mabel and Howard H. West, for chan~e im
zone from R-O to R-3 and the following Code waivers to construct a ten unit
apartment complex on property located on the west side of Citron Street, north
of La Verne Street, was submitted together with application for Envtrorarmmt&l
Impact Report Exemption Status:
a. Maximum lot coverage.
b. Minimum required s~tback.
c. Minimum distance between buildings.
d. Minimum width of pedestrian passageway.
e. Minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-73, recom-
mended said reclassification be disapproved and that the City Council require
the petitioner to file an environmental impact report. Pursuant to Resolution
No. PC73-74, the City Planning Commission denied Variance No. 2493.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by
Mr. Guiseppe Notaro and public hearing scheduled this date.
73-380
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
Mayor Dutton observed that the Development Services staff recommends
that Exemption Declaration Status be granted on the basis that the proposal would
have no significant environmental impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Stephenson,
seconded by Councilman Dutton, it was the finding of the City Council that the
impact of said project and reclassification would be trivial in nature and that
no environmental impact report or statement is required. To this motion~
Councilman Thom voted "no". MOTION CARRIED.
The City Clerk submitted and read letter from Joseph C. Stephenson,
Agent for the Applicant, requesting R-2 zoning instead of R-3 and withdrawing
Variance No. 2493 as revised plans subsequently filed would comply with the R-'2
Code requirement.
Mr. Roberts briefed the location of subject property and adjacent zoning
and land uses, noting that the parcel to the south of subject property has been
designated R-3 since 1961 and there are currently nine apartment units on said
parcel.
Subsequent to the City Planning Commission's denial of Variance No.
2493, and recommendation that the reclassification be disapproved, the Applicant
submitted revised plans which indicates seven units rather than ten and a devel-
opment scheme which obviates the previously requested Code waivers, therefore
withdrawing the variance petition.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent were present and wished
to address the Council.
The Applicant was represented, and answered that he had no further re-
marks at this time.
The Mayor asked if anyone in opposition to the proposed zone change and
apartment project wished to address the Council.
Mr. Malcolm Lockwood, 916 Winter Street, owner of the property directly
to the rear of subject parcel submitted a petition containing signatures of 125
purported property owners in opposition to the proposal.
Mr. Lockwood read the prefacing statement from the petition which in-
dicates they view the proposal as an exploitation of an R-O, R-1 neighborhood
for commerical profit, whereas there is already ample R-2 and R-3 Zone property
available for commercial investment within the City. They felt the construction
of these units would constitute an invasion of their privacy, noting that there
would be no buffer zone to the adjacent R-O tract.
Mr. Lockwood further called attention to the potential problems of access
by trash trucks, parking congestion, lack of recreational facilities and increase
in the crime rate, which he felt the construction of apartment units on subject
site will precipitate.
Councilman Stephenson asked Mr. Lockwood whether he thought that those
people who had endorsed the petition of opposition would view the project differ-
ently with the decreased density from ten units to seven units.
Mr. Lockwood stated that the consensus of those who had circulated the
petition was that they were against the construction of any additional apartments
in this area.
Councilman Dutton observed that the revised plans proposed less density
and require no waivers from site development standards~ and further are not the
plans reviewed by the City Planning Commission on which they based their denial.
Mr. Roberts outlined further concerns discussed by the Planning Commis-
sion in relation to R-3 or R-2 zoning for subject property, specifically the set-
ting of a precedent for similar requests on Citron Street, possibly extending the
multiple family use northerly to La Palma Avenue.
73-38t~
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Lockwood added to this that the City Planning Commission at their
hearing expressed concern regarding the lack of any buffer zone to the existing
residential areas north and west of this site.
Mrs. Howard Olson, 912 North Citron, advised she has lived at her pre-
sent address since 1947 and that she has been opposed to the construction of
apartment units since the inception of those located on the corner of Citron
and La Verne, as they are intruding into a residential area. She concurred with
Mr. Lockwood that the crime rate has risen since the introduction of a transient
population to the neighborhood. She submitted photographs which she stated were
taken on a Sunday, and which illustrated the congested parking situation in her
neighborhood. (These were reviewed by Council and returned to Mrs. Olson.) She
further suggested that an environmental impact report be required of the Appli-
cant.
Councilman Pebley moved that the public hearing on Reclassification
No. 72-73-41 and Variance No. 2493 be continued to June 12, 1973, and that the
revised plans be referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommenda-
tion. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-42~ VARIANCE NO. 2494 AND ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Request of Guiseppe Notaro for change in zone from
R-A to C-1 and the following Code waiver to construct a two-story office build-
ing on property located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Magnolia
Avenue, was submitted together with application for Environmental Impact Report
Exemption Status:
a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family resi-
dential zone boundary.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-71, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required in connection with
classification No. 72-73-42 and that said reclassification be approved, subject
to the following conditions:
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Lincoln Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of
all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and pav-
ing, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifi-
cations on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for street lighting
purposes.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for tree planting
purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commen-
cement of structural framing.
6. That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east
and south property lines.
7. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view.
8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
9. That the final parking plan shall be approved by the Development
Services Department, and any landscaped areas in the parking area shall be pro-
tected with six-inch high concrete curbs, and concrete wheel stops shall be pro-
vided for parking spaces.
10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
11. That the owner(s) shall acquire access to the alley located on the
west side of subject property.
73-382
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 11, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provi-
sions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action
of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from
the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant.
13. That Condition Nos. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-72, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required in connection with Variance
No. 2494 and granted said variance subject to the following conditons:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclass-
ification No. 72-73-42.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos.
1, 2, and 3.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Pebley,
seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the
impact of said project and reclassification would be trivial in nature and that
no environmental impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Roberts briefed the location of subject property and advised that
the requested waiver of maximum height adjacent to a single-family residential
zone boundary applies to the property to the east, which also fronts onto Lincoln
Avenue and is currently in use as a dog kennel. The City Planning Commission,
although the General Plan indicates this area appropriate for medium density resi-
dential uses, recommended approval of the reclassification and the requested waiver
on the basis that most of the uses established in the surrounding area are commer-
cial in nature.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present and satisfied with the recom-
mendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative
reply.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor
or in opposition to the reclassification and proposal to construct an office build-
ing; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-181: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 73R-181 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission, amending Condition No. 3 to show 60 cents per front front as the
street tree planting fee, in accordance with the new fee schedule adopted May 8,
1973.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(72-73-42 - C-l)
Roi1 Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
AB SENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-181 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-182: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 73R-182 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2494, subject to the conditions recommended by the
City Planning Commission.
Refer To Resolution Book.
73,-383
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
VARIANCE NO. 2494.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas,Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-182 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2490 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS:
Request of Atlantic Richfield for the following Code waivers to erect four "self
serve" signs on C-1 zoned property located at the northeast corner of La Palma
Avenue and State College Boulevard was submitted together with application for
Environmental Impact Report Exemption Status:
a. Maximum number of free-standing signs.
b. Minimum distance between free-standing signs.
c. Minimum height of free-standing signs.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-79, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and denied Variance No.
2490.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by Mr. Tommy C. Gunderson, Project Engineer, Atlantic Richfield Company, and
public hearing scheduled this date.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Sneegas,
seconded by Councilman Stephenson, it was the finding of the City Council that
the impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental
impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
Zoning Supervisor Roberts briefed the location of the property on which
the "self serve" signs are proposed and noted that this site is presently an
Arco service station, which is situated at the intersection and within a 15 acre
shopping center complex. The Applicant is requesting the Code waivers to per-
mit placement of "self serve" signs at the end of the self service islands, with
price signs immediately below these. He read the findings on which the City
Planning Commission based their denial.
Councilman Dutton asked if the service station intends to provide both
self service and full service pump islands.
Mr. Monte Rathbun, 1020 East Vermont, Agent for the Applicant, answered
that the two outside pump islands will accommodate self service customers and
the remaining inside pair will provide attendant service. Additionally, he noted
that Council did allow the Mobil Oil Company a similar type of signing in con-
nection with Variance No. 2280 on September 14, 1971.
Councilman Dutton concurred that Council has approved the "self serve"
type sign to be placed on the pump islands in dual service gasoline stations in
the past.
Councilman Sneegas questioned whether the signs proposed under this
variance are of comparable size to those previously approved.
Mr. Rathbun submitted photographs illustrating the type o£ signing
proposed, which were reviewed by Council along with the plans.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to.address the Council regarding
Variance No. 2490; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-183: Councilman Stephenson observed that this type of sign
is necessary to designate the islands which offer self service and are integral
to the function of the station and thereupon offered Resolution No. 73R-183 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2490, subject to the following condition recom-
mended by the Interdepartmental Committee:
73-384
~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973, 1:30 P.M.
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos.
1 and 2.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2490.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
AB STAINED: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Thom and Dutton
None
Pebley
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-183 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2491 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS:
Request of Atlantic Richfield for the following Code waivers to erect three
"self serve" signs on C-1 zoned property located at the southwest corner of La
Palma Avenue and Euclid Street was submitted together with application for Envir-
onmental Impact Report Exemption Status:
a. Maximum number of free-standing signs.
b. Minimum distance between free-standing signs.
c. Minimum height of free-standing signs.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-78, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and denied Variance No.
2491.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by
Mr. Tommy C. Gunderson, Project Engineer, Atlantic Richfield Company, and public
hearing scheduled this date.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Sneegas,
seconded by Councilman Dutton, it was the finding of the City Council that the
impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental impact
report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council reviewed the report submitted by the Development Ser-
vices Department.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council regarding
Variance No. 2491; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-184: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 73R-184 for
adoption granting Variance No. 2491, subject to the following conditions recom-
mended by the Interdepartmental Committee:
1. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director
of Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos.
1 and 2.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2491.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Pebley
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-184 duly passed and adopted.
73-38~i
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
BUSINESS LICENSE FEE WAIVER - FELINE AND CANINE FRIENDSI INC.: Request of Dudley H.
and Rose Hosea, dated April 19, 1973 for waiver of the business license fee in
connection with the management of the business affairs of Feline and Canine
Friends Inc., 505 North Bush Street, a non profit corporation, was submitted
together with reports from the City Treasurer, Police Department and City
Attorney's Office, indicating no objection to the granting of said request.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the
business license fee was waived for the operation of Feline and Canine Friends,
Inc., as requested, in accordance with Council Policy No. 305. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST FOR TERMINATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 219: Request of Robert A.
Resnick, Resnick Company, dated April 23, 1973, for termination of Conditional
Use Permit No. 219 was submitted together with reports from Development Services
Department recommending that Parcel No. J be deleted by an amendment to Resolu-
tion No. 62R-423.
Mr. Roberts advised that the request being made is for exclusion of
Parcel No. J, which is a portion of Lot No. 1, Tract No. 4621 from the legal
description of Conditional Use Permit No. 219 to allow sale of said property and
development to multiple family dwelling units. Conditional Use Permit No. 219
was approved for a planned residential development with Parcel No. J as the
recreation area to serve the total project. However this portion was a part of
the project that went into foreclosure and was subsequently sold to another
developer.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-185: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 73R-185 for
adoption, amending Resolution No. 62R-423, to delete a portion of Lot No. 1,
Tract No. 4621 (Parcel No. J) from the legal description of Conditional Use
Permit No. 219 as recommended by Development Services Department.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 62R-423 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 219.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-185 duly passed and adopted.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held April'30, 1973 pertaining to the following applications w~re
submitted for City Council information and consideration:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 80 - ANAHEIM HILLS: Environmental Impact Report
No. 80 pertaining to Anaheim Hills total project consisting of 4,198 acres
located south of Santa Aha Canyon Road, east of the Newport Freeway and extend
ing easterly beyond Mohler Drive to Weir Canyon, having a southerly boundary
approximately along the Santa Ana Mountains ridgeline, was submitted together
with E.I.R. Review Committee Analysis thereof, and City Planning Commission
recommendation that said E.I.R. be adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement
of the City Council,subject to the recommendations of the E.I.R. Review Co~m~ittee.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by
Councilman Sneegas, the City Council accepted ~vironmental Impact tteport No.
80 and Committee Analysis thereof, together with the City Planning Commission
recommendation, and adopted same as the Statement of the Council, subject to
the requirement that an E.I.R. be submitted for each development within the pro-
ject area. That these E.I.R.s shall contain sufficient detailed information to
permit an environmental impact evaluation and may refer to the project E.I.R.
regarding subject matter which pertain to the overall area. MOTION CAB~IED.
VARIANCE NO. 2495 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Application
by Neville D. Libby for the following Code waiver to permit a mobilehome in con-
junction with an existing single-family residence on R-1 zoned property located
on the north side of Cerrttos Avenue, east of Euclid Street was submitted to-
gether with application for Exemption Declaration Status:
73-386
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
a. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-86, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and granted said variance
for a period of five years, to be reviewed annually thereafter, subject to con-
ditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Sneegas,
seconded by Councilman Stephenson, it was the finding of the City Council that
the impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental
impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2495.
VARIANCE NO. 2497 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Application
by Louis L. Neuman requesting the following Code waiver to allow expansion of a
nonconforming auto repair garage on C-2 zoned property located on the north side
of Lincoln Avenue, west of West Street (1111 West Lincoln Avenue) was submitted
together with application for Exemption Declaration Status:
a. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-88, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and granted said variance
subject to conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Pebley,
seconded by Councilman Stephenson, it was the finding of the City Council that
the impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental
impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2497.
VARIANCE NO. 2498 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: Application
by David R. Doering, requesting the following Code waiver to allow a dance hall
in conjunction with an existing on-sale liquor establishment on C-2 zoned property
located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Carleton Avenue (1203 West
Lincoln Avenue) was submitted together with application for Exemption Declaration
Status:
a. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-89, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and granted said variance
subject to conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Pebley,
seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the
impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental impact
report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2498.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1392 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS:
Application by Maynard B. Bill, requesting the follow-lng Code waivers to expand
an existing nonconforming automobile maintenance and repair facility for mainte-
nance and repair of motorhomes and campers on M-1 zoned property located on the
west side of Haster Street, north of Katella Avenue was submitted together with
application for Exemption Declaration Status:
a. Minimum required front setback.
b. Minimum required number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-85, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and granted said conditional
use permit subject to conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Pebley,
seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the
73-387
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental
impact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Conditional Use Permit
No. 1392.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1385 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 91: Appli-
cation submitted by Robert Louis and Helen Allgeyer Clark requesting the follow-
ing Code waivers to establish a car wash on C-1 zoned property located at the
northeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Brookhurst Street was submitted together
with Environmental Impact Report No. 91 and E.I.R. Review Committee Analysis
thereof.
a. Minimum number of required parking spaces.
b. Maximum number of free-standing signs.
c. Minimum distance between free-standing signs.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-84, recom-
mended that E.I.R. No. 91 be adopted as Council's Statement and granted said
conditional use permit subject to conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded
by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council accepted E.I.R. No. 91 and Committee
Analysis thereof, together with City Planning Commission recommendation and
adopted same as the Statement of the Council. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Conditional Use Permit
No. 1385.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 598 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS:
Application by Adeline Thompson Fechter to add to and establish a drive-in dairy
in conjunction with a previously approved miniature golf course, trampoline cen-
ter, drive-in restaurant, arcade, and associated activities on C-1 zoned property
located on the east side of Magnolia Avenue, south of La Palma Avenue, southeast
of the southeast corner of Magnolia and La Palma Avenues, was submitted together
with application for Exemption Declaration Status.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC73-83, recom-
mended that no environmental impact report be required and granted addition of
said use to Conditional Use Permit No. 598, subject to conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXEMPTION STATUS: On motion by Councilman Pebley,
seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the
impact of said project would be trivial in nature and that no environmental im-
pact report or statement is required. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Conditional Use Permit
No. 598.
POLICY INCREASE IN STREET TREE FEES: Mr. Murdoch inquired whether Council intended
that the increased street tree fee of 60 cents per front foot, adopted May 8~
1973, be assessed on the City Planning Commission items reviewed at this meeting,
which are required to pay such a fee, and additionally whether the increased fee
is to be assessed against those zoning actions which have previously been
approved, where these fees have not been paid as yet.
Councilman Pebley felt it was a matter of Council integrity that these
fees not be increased unless the petitioner is so notified and given an oppor-
tunity to make payment at the original rate.
Councilman Thom observed that allowing such a grace period would in
affect mean that the taxpayers are forced to make up the difference in cost from
15 cents to 60 cents for the trees.
Following discussion, the consensus of Council opinion was that a per-
iod of 30 days be permitted those who have been assessed street tree fees of
15 cents per front foot to pay same at that rate,after which the street tree fees
are to be assessed at the new rate. Further that the City Planning Cormnission
73-388
City Hall, Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
items reviewed this date will remain at 15 cents per front foot. However, in
future zoning cases the City Planning Commission is to levy the new street tree
assessment of 60 cents per front foot.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City
Council determined that those applicants who have been assessed a street tree fee
of 15 cents per front foot will be permitted to pay at this rate until July 1,
1973 after which, without further notice, all street tree fees will be 60 cents
per front foot, and further moved that the City Clerk publish this action as a
"legal notice". MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 128 - REDEVELOPMENT ELEMENT: On motion by
Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, public hearing was
scheduled June 5, 1973, 1:30 P.M. to consider adding a Redevelopment Element to
the General Plan in accordance with the requirements of Section 65503 of the
Government Code, State of California. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 126 - HOUSING AND RESIDENTIAL ELEMENT: On motion
by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, public hearing was sch-
eduled June 5, 1973, 1:30 P.M. to consider an amendment to the Housing and Resi-
dential Element of the General Plan in order to comply with Section 65302 of the
Government Code, State of California. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 127 - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT: On
motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, public
was scheduled June 5, 1973, 1:30 P.M. to consider amendment to the General Plan,
by adding an Open Space and Conservation Element in accordance with the require-
ment of Section 65302 of the Government Code, State of California. MOTION CARRIED.
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN - PROJECT "ALPHA": On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by
Councilman Sneegas, joint public hearing with the Community Redevelopment Commis-
sion to consider project "Alpha" was set for an adjourned regular meeting, June 21,
1973, 1:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS NOS. 8115~ 8116~ 8117 AND 8134; REVISIONS NO. 1 (VARIANCE NO.
2455): Developer, R. H. Grant Company of California; property located on the south
side of Nohl Ranch Road, west of Royal Oak Road; Tract No. 8115, Revision No. 1
contains 74 proposed R-H-10,000 zoned lots; Tract No. 8116, Revision No. 1 con-
tains 67 proposed R-H-10,O00 zoned lots; Tract No. 8117, Revision No. 1 contains
68 proposed R-H-10,000 zoned lots; Tract No. 8134, Revision No. 1 contains 59
proposed R-H-10,000 zoned lots.
on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, action
on Tentative Maps, Tract Nos. 8115, 8116, 8117 and 8134, Revisions No. 1 was con-
tinued to be considered in conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 12 and
Variance No. 2455. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 8320: Owner/Developer, Anaheim Memorial Hospital; property
located at the northwest corner of La Palma Avenue and West Street; containing
two proposed C-O zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held May 14, 1973, approved
said tentative map subject to the following conditions:
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi-
sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval.
2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
4. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tentative
Map, Tract No. 8320 was approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Plann-
ing Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
73"3891
,City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
FINAL MAP; TRACT NO. 7450: Developer, J. W. Klug Development Company; tract located
east of Imperial Highway, south of Esperanza Road; containing 75 proposed
zoned lots.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, action
on Final Map, Tract No. 7450 was continued to May 29, 1973, as requested by
Mr. Terry L. Crowther, of Pacesetter Homes, Inc., in his letter dated May 14,
1973. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-186 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 1246: In accordance with recommen-
dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No.
73R-186 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER-
FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE SANTIAGO BOULEVARD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY
397 FEET EAST OF TO APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET WEST OF NOHL CANYON ROAD, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1246. (G. W. Shore Construction
Company - $33,964.00)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-186 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-187 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 2253: In accordance with recommen-
dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 73R-187
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER-
FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE WATER IMPROVEMENT ALONG THE ROUTE 57 FREEWAY FROM LA PALMA
AVENUE TO SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 2253.
(Brown & Hensley Engineering Construction Inc. - $62,307.50)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILM~.N:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-187 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-188 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 807: In accordance with recommen-
dations of the City Engineer~ Councilman Stephen$on offered Resolution No.
73R-188 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER-
FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE BROOKHURST PARK BASEBALL AND FOOTBALL FIELD LIGHTING, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 807. (McCain Construction Company,
Inc. - $76,105.00)
73-390
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
AB SENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-188 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nos. 73R-189
through 73R-192 inclusive for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-189 - WORK ORDER NO. 679-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE NORTH STREET - STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM MAVIS
STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 29 FEET EAST OF PAULINE STREET, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 679-A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES,
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be Opened - June 14, 1973, 2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-190 - WORK ORDER NO. 680-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE RICHFIELD ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT, FROM LA PALMA
AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 635 FEET SOUTH OF LA PALMAAVENUE, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 680-A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES,
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be Opened - June 14, 1973, 2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-191 - WORK ORDER NO. 681-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE BALL ROAD & DALE AVENUE NORTHWEST CORNER STREET
IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 681-A. APPROVING THE
DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES~ DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCOR-
DANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CON-
STRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - June 14, 1973, 2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-192 - WORK ORDER NO. 1245: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE KATHRYN-LINDSAY ANNEXATION SEWER IMPROVEIMENT,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1245. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTH-
ORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS~ ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIltlgCTING TH~ CiTY
CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - June 14, 1973, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 73R-189 through 73R-192 inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
7~-3~9~
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - FINAL COMPLETION: Upon receipt of certification from
the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nos. 73R-193
and 73R-194 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-193 - WORK ORDER NO. 665-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE
PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE LA PALMA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM
APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET WEST OF TO APPROXIMATELY 1210 FEET WEST OF EAST
STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 665-B. (El Camino
Contracting Co.)
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-194 - WORK ORDER NO. 566-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE
PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE LEWIS STREET UNDERPASS AT THE ATCHISON,
TOPEKA& SANTA FE RAILWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 566-B.
(Sully Miller Contracting Company)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 73R-193 and 73R-194 duly passed
and adopted.
WORK ORDER NO. 566-B - EXTENSION OF TIME - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Recommendation of
the City Engineer that an extension of 31 working days be granted the Sully
Miller Contracting Company for Work Order No. 566-B - Lewis Street underpass
at the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway was submitted for City Council
consideration.
The City Engineer's report advised that delays of five working days
due to inclement weather and 26 working days waiting for changes in the Metro-
politan Water District line were experienced by the contractor and the project
was completed on February 21, 1973, with a delay of 84 working days. He further
advised that if the recommendation for extension is approved by the Council, the
extended contract completion date~would be December 6, 1972 with assessable
liquidated damages of 77 days at the rate of $100 per day, for a total assessment
of $7,700.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, an
extension of 31 working days was granted the Sully Miller Contracting Company
and liquidated damages in the amount of $7,700 assessed for Work Order No.
566-B, as recommended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED.
LETTER AGREEMENT - TWINING LABORATORIES: Letter agreement with Twining Laboratories
of Southern California Inc., to provide certain testing of materials for the
Clair and Sharp Substation projects, Work Order Nos. 8002 and 8004, respectively,
was submitted and approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by
Councilman Dutton, subject to condition that the maximum sum for said services
be $2,000 or approximately $1,000 for each substation. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-195 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Thom offered Resolution
No. 73R-195 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Pacesetter Homes, Inc.; Ellis-,
Schrader, Inc.; Joseph J. & Mary Catherine Bernice Gorskt; Ida & Marian A.
Rannow; Richard E. & Doreen L. Smith; Harold D. & Cecile E. Lockard; 6ibson
Greeting Cards, Inc.; Prime Contractors, Inc., & Ralph & Jeanne Bjorklund;
Moran Properties, Inc.; Grover Escrow Corporation)
73-392
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973; 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-195 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-196 - EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS (KRAEMER PROPERTY,: The City
Attorney advised that development north of Santa Aha Canyon Road is being delayed
because of inability of the developers to acquire one piece of property needed to
complete the storm drain and recommended that the City initiate eminent domain
proceedings to acquire same.
Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 73R-196 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE
NECESSITY FOR AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF REAL
PROPERTY FOR DRAINAGE EASEMENT PURPOSES. (North of Santa Aha Canyon Road)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 196 duly passed and adopted.
WORK ORDER NO. 651-B - BALL ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT: The City Attorney reported that
the contractor on Work Order No. 651-B, Moses Galluzzo, has defaulted on the agree-
ment and the bonding company has assumed responsibility for completion of the job.
Approximately nine stop notices have been filed by various equipment and material
suppliers pertaining to this job, and the bonding company has been unable to re-
solve differences with the following four and have therefore requested permission
to file bonds in an amount of 125% of the claims stated in these stop notices, pur-
suant to Section 3196 of the Civil Code:
1. M. & S. Contracting -
2. Jim's Blade Service -
3. Atlas Loader Rentals -
4. G. & G. Equipment Rental -
$23,125.00
6,560.75
774.34
1,170.63
The City Attorney recormnended that the City Council exercise its dis-
cretion to authorize the contractor to file said bonds, as this would be sufficient
protection.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City
Council authorized the Summit Insurance Company to post bonds in the amounts of
125% of the claims stated in the four stop orders listed above, pursuant to Section
3196 of the Civil Code, as recommended by the City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED.
By general Council consent, the Council further determined that they did
not wish to delegate exercise of discretion as authorized by Section 3196 of the
Civil Code to staff.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT.- TWO FIRE PUMPER UNITS: The City Manager reported on informal
bids received in response to standard speci£1catlon which were complied and fin-
alized by Chief Riley along with the Fire Chief of Huntington Beach, with input
73- 39.3
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
from fire chiefs throughout the County. He reported that Huntington Beach ac-
cepted the quotations for two fire pumper units for Anaheim as well as for their
own requirements, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid:
VENDOR
TOTAL PRICE PER UNIT EXCLUDING TAX
Howe Fire Apparatus Co., Inc., Sacramento .....
Crown Coach Corp., Los Angeles ..........
P. E. Van Pelt, Inc., Oakdale ............
The Boardman Co., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma ....
Motor Truck Distributors Co., Los Angeles .....
Ward La France Truck Corp., Los Angeles .......
$41,651.00
44,053.69
44,386.00
43,400.00
45,889.85
52,364.71
Councilman Sneegas inquired as to the type of engine specified for
these pumpers,to which Mr. Murdoch replied that the pumper is to be diesel
powered and that the acquisition of these two engines initiates the diesel re-
placement program, with the two older engines placed in reserve to curtail down
time.
Mr. Murdoch further advised that in the budget revision a recommenda-
tion is presented that both of these pumpers be allocated from Revenue Sharing
Funds. He indicated that the budget revision incorporates the Revenue Sharing
Funds received to date as well as those received in the current and coming fis-
cal years into the same time frame as the budget itself, and that this revision
will require Council action in June. In the mean time, funding is available
in the unappropriated reserve to cover this purchase and he recommended that the
order be placed now, if this is Council's intent, as delivery will not take place
for approximately one year.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the
low bid of Howe Fire Apparatus Company Incorporated was accepted and purchase
authorized in the total amount of $43,733.55, including tax per unit. MOTION
CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - REPOWERING OF PUMPER NO. 6608 (1961 SEA, RAVE): The City
Manager reported on informal bids received for repowering with diesel engine
Pumper No. 6608, which includes change in rear axle ratio and fire pump gear
ratio as follows and recommended acceptance of the low bid:
VENDOR TOTAL PRICE~ EXCLUDING TAX
Crown Coach Corporation, Los Angeles ....... $ 9,872.00
Lawless Detrot Diesel, City of Industry ....... 10,082.36
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas,
the low bid of Crown Coach Corporation was accepted and purchase authorized in
the amount of $10,365.60, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City
Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman
Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton:
a. Claim submitted by John Sheldon Greer, for personal injuries pur-
portedly resulting from pothole in street, causing jam of front motorcycle wheel,
on or about February 26, 1973.
b. Claim submitted by Bernard W. and Thelma M. Jordan for extreme
emotional distress purportedly as a result of negligent misidentification of
bodies of dec~d~nts, or or about February 13, 1973.
c. Claim submitted by Carl E. Tennis, for personal property damage
purportedly as a result of being hit by an Anaheim Police unit, or or about
March 31, 1973.
d. Claim submitted Robert G. Campbell for personal injuries purpor-
tedly sustained as a result of slipping on cement area of Anaheim Municipal
Golf Course, or or about April 6, 1973.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-197 - A.H.F.P. - LA PALMA AVENUE AND CONVENTION WAY: Councilman
Sneegas offered Resolution No. 73R-197 for adoption.
73-394
City Hatl~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973, 1:30 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE RELATING TO THE ARTERIAL
HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1972-73. (La Palma Avenue and
Convention Way)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-197 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-198 - ANAHEIM HILLS NO. 8 ANNEXATION: Councilman Stephenson offered
Resolution No. 73R-198 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED
ANAHEIM HILLS NO. 8 ANNEXATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-198 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 73R-199 - TUSTIN-MIRALOMAANNEXATION: Councilman Stephenson offered
Resolution No. 73R-199 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED
TUSTIN-MIRALOMAANNEXATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 73R-199 duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion
by Councilman Pebley,-seconded by Councilman Stephenson:
a. City of Costa Mesa - Resolution No. 73-38 - Supporting the UCI
School of Medicine On-Campus Teaching Hospital; and further requesting Anaheim
Council support.
b. City of Irvine - Resolution No. 154 - Urging the California State
Legislature to adopt legislation to alleviate the problem of litter and waste dis-
posal created by th~ ~al~ of b~wrag~s in disposable, nonreturnable containers;
and further requesting Council take a similar position.
c. City of Westminister - Resolution No. 1465 - Urging the United States
Congress to appropriate funds to complete the study of the Santa Ama River Basin
flood hazard.
d. City of Buena Park - Resolution No. 4919 - Urging the United States
Congress to appropriate funds to complete the study of the Santa Aha River Basin
flood hazard, and implement measures to alleviate the threat of flooding.
e. City of Newport Beach - Resolution No. 7983 - Expressing opposition
to public employer-employee relations legislation, which would conflict with the
meet and confer process; and further requesting consideration by the Anaheim City
Council of a similar resolution.
73-395,
~it~ Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
f. City of Newport Beach - Resolution No. 7984 - Opposing the intro-
duction of bills by the State Legislature containing exemptions from Senate Bill
90 reimbursement provisions; and further requesting consideration by the Anaheim
City Council of a similar resolution.
g. Peninsula Animal Welfare Society, Inc. - Requesting support of
California State Assembly Bill No. 1056.
h. Humane Legislation Advocates - Requesting support of California
State Assembly Bill No. 1056.
1973.
].
k.
April, 1973:
Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Minutes - April 27,
Cultural Arts Commission - Minutes - April 9, 1973.
Community Center Authority - Minutes - April 16, 1973.
Financial and Operating Reports for the Months of March and
Customer Service Division - March - April
Building Division - April
City Treasurer's Office - April
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3163: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3163 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.272 (k) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING
DURING SCHOOL HOURS RESTRICTED. (No parking during school hours - Knott
Street - east side (Hansen Elementary School), west side (Apollo Junior
High School)
ORDINANCE NO. 3164: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3164 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.152 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TWO-HOUR
PARKING. (Manchester Avenue - both sides, from Loara St. to Broadway)
ORDINANCE NO. 3165: Councilman
reading.
Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3165 for first
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-55 (4) - M-l)
ORDINANCE NO. 3166: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3166 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-34 - R-i)
ORDINANCE NO. 3167: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3167 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3014, NUNC
PRO TUNC, RELATING TO ZONING. (Amend Condition No. 4)
ORDINANCE NO. 3168: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3168 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF TME CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-13 (7) - R-I)
REVISED HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ,D~AINA~E REquIREMENT: Assistant City Attorney John
Dawson submitted a proposed revision to ~{~ ~erim Hillsi~le Development Drain-
age Requirement adopted April 24, 1973 to be imposed wherever applicable as a
condition of approval of tentative tract maps. The revised drainage require-
ment is as follows:
"That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a
manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of
the site, sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading per-
mit, no work on grading will be permitted between October 15th and
April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities have been
73-396
City Hall, Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
installed and are operative. Positive assurance shall be provided the
City that such drainage facilities will be completed prior to October
15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities shall
be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have initiated
condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne
by the developer) prior to commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to
carry runoff waters originating from higher properties through said
property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said
drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall
be completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the down-
stream boundary of the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior
to the issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy permits.
Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the
developers of said property upon their request."
Mr. Dawson stated that this proposed modification brings the require-
ment into line with the flood control district dates for the rainy season, these
being October 15 to April 15, and also adds the provision that no work on grading
is permitted between these dates unless all off-site drainage facilities have been
installed and are operative. Mr. Dawson further advised that the City Attorney's
Office in conjunction with the developers are presently engaged in formulation
of a series of guidelines proposed to be appended to the drainage requirement,
and that these will be submitted to Council for approval at a later date. He
advised that the City Planning Commission reviewed the substance of this interim
drainage policy, and have indicated concurrence. He noted that certain tenta-
tive maps which were approved May 8, 1973 had the revised Hillside Drainage Devel-
opment Requirement imposed upon their approval, and would be further subject to
this modification, contingent upon Council's adoption.
Councilman Thom questioned the segment of this condition which states,
"said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be
completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary
of the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any
final building inspections or occupancy permits."
Mr. Dawson explained that the intent of this is to ensure that the off-
site drainage facilities shall be installed and operational before any any final
building inspection, so that no municipal services will be initiated and no human
occupancy will be permitted. He conceded that perhaps there is no significant
leverage which the City can apply to ensure that the off-site drainage facilities
are the first item of construction, and that perhaps the phrase "among the first
items of construction" would be more acurate. He reiterated that the first revi-
sion which denied issuance of any building permits until these drainage facilities
were installed and operable proved to be an impractical approach because it set
the requirement for completion of construction prior to the availability of
financing.
Councilman Pebley noted that the desired affect of this requirement is
to encourage the developer to install the drainage as he progresses, and it is
logical to assume that this will be achieved, since no developer wishes to have
houses constructed which cannot be occupied.
Mr. James Barisic, Vice President, Anaheim Hills, Inc., stated that his
firm recognizes the need to control drainage in the hillside area and they are
willing to go along with anything reasonable, and that they concur with what has
been developed to date. Their concern however, is that this policy is not
definitive enough; that the term "facilities" has a broad range of definition
and that the City's intent should be specified more accurately. In this
regard he urged Council to adopt together with the latest revised Hillside Develop-
m~nt Drainage Requirement, those guidelines which have been jointly developed to
date. He stated that these are required by the developers so that they can assess
their position regarding water concentration and diversion. In particular he
mentioned the section "drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient
to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property
to ultimate disposal" as ambiguous. He referred to the flexibility which will be
prerequisite of a drainage policy to serve the hill and canyon area and noted
instances where alternatives to concrete pipe would be more suitable and acceptable
from the property owners' and engineers' viewpoints.
73~397
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973~ 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Barisic further stated that he felt the City is far enough along
in preparation of a good and workable design for drainage in the hill and canyon
area so that such guidelines can be specified now. He urged that the revision
of the drainage requirement presented today be adopted as an interim measure
and that Council direct guidelines be formulated jointly by City staff and
developers and accelerated so that these are accessible to the developer in the
implementation of the drainage policy.
Councilman Thom noted that the revisions previously adopted have been
approved on an interim basis and thereupon moved that the May 14, 1973 revision
of the Hillside Development Drainage Requirement be adopted as set forth above,
as an interim policy, and further moved the Engineering office be directed to
work concurrently with the developers in preparation of guidelines to be appended
to said drainage requirement. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion.
Mr. Murdoch explained that in all likelihood, these conditions are not
going to be changed in any significant form and that it is highly unlikely that
the guidelines will be specific enough to cover the actual design of the drainage
facilities. He stated that he felt each one of the drainage areas will have a
slightly different type of solution and no single guideline can be applied to
all.
Mr. Barisic agreed that it will be incumbent upon the developer to
provide an engineering solution for each specific problem, which will be subject
to review and approval by the City Engineer. However there are so many differ-
ent situations which exist in the hill and canyon area, the developers would pre-
fer to have these alternatives spelled out, i.e., that the drainage may be
handled in any number of specified ways, based on sound engineering practices.
Mr. Murdoch introduced the Oak Canyon Park site as an example, noting
that this is a drainage course and that the desire of the City as well as the
developer is to retain as much of the natural character and beauty of this canyon
as possible. Because the up-stream development will precipitate an increase
inquantity and velocity of drainage water into Oak Canyon, adequate drain-
age facilities must be installed. However he noted that there are various tech-
niques which may be employed to provide adequatedrainage some of which would
not be as aesthetically pleasing as others.
Mr. Barisic reviewed in broad parameters, the type of guidelines re-
garding diversion and concentration which they would prefer, and gave examples
of the alternative types of construction which they feel should be available to
the developers and property owners, if such are deemed advisable from an engin-
eering viewpoint, rather than utilization of the term "facilities" without des-
ignating exactly what such facilities may consist of. He noted that in some
instances a combination of natural drainage, check dams and conduits may be the
most suitable.
City Attorney Joseph Geisler summarized the situation as ultimately
being whether the final authority regarding the drainage system rests with the
City Engineer or the developer's engineer. So far as the City is concerned
legally amy drainage structure is satisfactory if when the City acquires juris-
diction it flows to ultimate disposal without flowing onto private property.
He therefore recommended that such drainage decisions be based on the judgement
of the City Engineer.
Mr. Geisler further noted that there are no problems in adopting per-
manent guidelines and that these can be brought to Council as soon as the City
Engineer and the developer's representatives concur.
Mr. Murdoch stated that the City's intent is not to arbitrarily impose
the most expensive solution when considering individual drainage situations, but
cautioned that there is the risk that none of the alternative will provide
sufficient protection. He reiterated that the alternatives will be explored when
presented by the developers, and if, in fact, the City Engineer is satisfied that
an alternative will provide reasonable protection, that type of facility will
be approved.
The Mayor called for Council vote on the motion previously stated by
Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED.
73-398
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1973; 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Approval of application filed by Lloyd L. Lowry for permit to
conduct public dance in conjunction with the First Annual Whittier Police Benefit
Show on May 20, 1973 at the Amaheim Convention Center, (approved Administratively
as recommended by the Chief of Police subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 to
the Anaheim Municipal Code and that six police officers be hired to police the
dance), was ratified on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman
Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED.
RED CROSS (STOFFEL HOUSE~ - HISTORICAL LANDMARK: The City Clerk advised that at the
May 8, 1973 meeting the Stoffel House was designated an an historical landmark
on the same basis as the Mother Colony House, and on further investigation repor-
ted the City on that occasion accepted the deed for the Mother Colony property
and established a governing board. It was therefore recommended that the phase
"on the same basis as the Mother Colony House" be deleted.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the
aforementioned motion was amended to state that identification of the Stoffel
House presently owned by the Anaheim Chapter of the American Red Cross, located
at 418 North West Street, as a historical landmark be approved as requested by
Mrs. R. J. Anthony, Chairman of Volunteer Anaheim Service Center, on condition
that the City assumes no liability, no responsibility for maintenance or repairs.
MOTION CARRIED.
TEMPORARY RECESS: Councilman Thom moved for a temporary recess for the purpose of
convening as the Redevelopment Agency. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED. (3:44 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being present.
(3:46 P.M.)
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Manager, Councilman Sneegas
moved to recess to Executive Session. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED. (3:47 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being present.
(4:40 P.M.)
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Sneegas moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 4:41 P.M.
City Clerk