Loading...
1966/01/119162 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND RATIFYING THE OPINION OF THE CITY ATTORNEY THAT THE BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED UPON LAND OWNED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ARE IN FACT OWNED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, SUBJECT TO A LEASE FOR A TERM OF YEARS TO THE NON-PROMT CORPORA- TION. (Alcoholic Beverage License Application - Anaheim Stadium, Automatic Canteen Go.) Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte and Krein COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMAN: Chandler COUNCILMAN:- Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-12 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM STADIUM - CONSTRUCTION STATUS~ Councilman Dutton requested a written report on the status of the Anaheim Stadium construction and completion. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 3:55 P .M. SIGNED: , City Clerk ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley, Chandler (entered the meeting 2:45 P. M.), and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Ihompson. PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Roy Heissner. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meeting held December 14, 21 and 28, 1965, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title~ specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-13: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-13 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES (Lillian H Hinrichs - Katella Avenue) ' 9163 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein None Schutte and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-13 duly passed and adopted, DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $966,863.60 in accordance with the 1965-66 Budget, were approved. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed the week of January 17, 1966, through January 23, 1966, Medic Alert Week. Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MICROPHONES - COUNCIL TABLE: Councilman Pebley moved that new mounted micro- phones be installed at the Council Table. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 58-59-68: Request of A. J. Wassenmiller, property owner, and T. E. Lewis, acting on behalf of D. M. Tarbell, purchaser, for removal of Condition No. 1, Ordinance No. lall, as it pertains to Lot 48, Tract No. 3240, was submitted together with departmental reports. (C-1 property located at 1584 West Katella Avenue) Said Condition No. 1 reads as follows: "That the residential appearance of the buildings shall be maintained." Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney for the applicants, requested that the proposed amendment be applied to both lots, a8 and ag, Tract No. 3240, both of which front on Katella Avenue and are under the same ownership, as is Lot 47 to the south. He noted that the existing converted residential structure on Lot 49 will be removed and a new commercial building constructed, with the real estate office use to be continued. It was noted that subject reclassification included five lots, and Mr. Ronald Thompson reported that plans for the commercial buildinq to be constructed on Lot ~8 have been reviewed and found to be in compliance with the C-1 zone. Discussion was held regarding possible public hearing to consider the requested amendment, and Mr. Knisely noted that the two persons who objected to the commercial buildings at the time of the original public hearing have since sold their properties. He submitted a petition approving the requested amendment, signed by owners of six properties to the east and west of subject properties, and across Katella Avenue on the north. Mr. T. E. Lewis addressed the City Council noting that C-1 zoning has been granted on properties across the street to the north, under similar circumstances, without the condition of maintaining the residential appearance. Because time was of the essence, he requested that the amendment be approved at this time. ORDINANCE NO. 2236: At the conclusion of further discussion~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2236 for first reading, deleting Condition No. 1, Ordinance No. 1411, on Lots a8 and 49 only, and authorizing amendment to deed restrictions filed on said lots accordingly, subject to submission of plans for Lot 49, indicating the nature and extent of remodeling or construction. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1411 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 58-59-68. (C-l) SIGN REQUEST - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 57-58-52: Request of Eugene Briesemeister, Heath & Company, for five foot sign encroachment over the Euclid Street right-of-way, together with plans and departmental reports, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council. C-1 property included in Reclassification 9164 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. No, 57-58-52, and located at the northwest corner of Euclid Street and Glenoaks Avenue. Mr. Eugene Briesemeister reviewed copy of the recommendations by the City Engineer and Development Services Department. In answer to Council questioning, he explained that the building setback will be so near the front Euclid Street property line, that it will be impossible for the proposed free-standing sign to clear the roof line without a five foot projection, which he felt would not be detrimental to the area. Mr. Thompson called attention to altgrnative "B" recommended by the Development Services Department to relocate the proposed building 10 feet westerly. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Pebley moved that the requested sign encroachment be denied in accordance with the recommenda- tions of the City Engineer and the Development Services Department. Council- man Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. A~USE~ENT MACHINE PERMIT: Application filed by Richard Arthur Howard (John Panner, owner) for amusement machine permit to allow one baseball-type machine at Golden Billiards, Inc., 831 South Knott Avenue, was submitted and 9ranted, subject to provisions of Chapter 3.24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Abel Caballero, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana, Anaheim Lodge No. 249 for permit to conduct public dance to be held January 16, 1966, 4:00 to 8:00 P.M., at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting of December 20th, 1965, pertaining to the following applica- tions, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 791: Submitted by K. Yoshitomi, et al, requesting permission to establish a private recreational facility (skateboard course and roller skating area); R-A property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Magnoiia Avenue. Granted, subject to conditions, pursuant to City Planning Commis- sion Resolution No. 1877~ Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 792: Submitted by Earl A. and Martha E. Dunn re- questing permission to establish a Hofbrau with on-sale beer and wine in an existing structure; C-1 property located at 1742 South Euclid Street. Terminated by the City Planning Commission, on the basis of the petitioner's request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 793: Submitted by George E. Losness, requesting permission to expand an existing motel; R-A property located at 1126 West Katella Avenue. Granted, subject to conditions, pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1878, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 654: Request for permission to include an additional 15 feet at the rear of property for parking and vacuum stations, coin-operated car wash granted by the City Planning Commission December 7, 1964, property located on the east side of East Street, north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission approved said request, based on the fact that the City Attorney's Office recommended that the lessees assume all responsibility for the additional 15 feet bein9 subleased to the coin- operated car wash company. 9165 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11, t966, 1:30 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 708: Request for extension of time for compliance with conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 708; convalescent hospital located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, between South and Vermont Streets. The City Planning Commission granted 180 day extension of time. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered Conditional Use Permit applica- tions. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-86 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 794): Property located east of Dowling Avenue, extending from Orangethorpe Avenue to Placentia-Yorba Boulevard; Resolution of Intent No. 65R-233 for R-3 zoning pending. As result of Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 794 for a multiple-family planned residential development on subject property December 20, 1965, Resolution No. 1880, Series 1965-66, was adopted, setting out amended conditions for completion of the R-3 zoning and development under subject reclassification, the original conditions having been contingent upon approval of the tract map only. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-14: Councilman PeOley offered Resolution No. 66R-14 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 65R-233 to establish the following conditions for completion of R-3 zoning and development of subject pro- perty: That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to the City Council for approval and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder, or: a. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Orangethorpe Avenue, for street widening purposes. b. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Crowther Avenue, for street widening purposes. c. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Orangethorpe and Crowther Avenues, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. d. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Orangethorpe and Crowther Avenues, for street lighting purposes. e. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Orangethorpe and Crowther Avenues, for tree planting purposes. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That £ire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 5. That all vehicular access rights to Orangethorpe and Crowther Avenues, except at street, drive and/or alley openings, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. Refer to Resolution Book. 9166 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 65R-233 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 64-65-86. (R-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein None Schutte and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-14 duly passed and adopted, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 794 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-86): Submitted by Francis M. Dowling, et al, requesting permission to establish a multiple family planned residential development (116 units - 2 story) with waivers of maximum height within 150 fees of R-A zone, minimum distance between buildings and minimum living unit distance from dedicated street; R-A property described in the forgoing Reclassification Nco 64-65-86. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1879, Series 1965-66. The forgoing applicaZion was reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken thereon. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS -TITLE 18~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Clerk was instructed to schedule public hearing February i, 1966, 1:30 P.M., to consider City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1889, Series 1965-66, recommending amendments to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapters 18.16, R-A, Agricultural Zone, and 18.20, R-O, One-Family Suburban Zone. MOTION CARRIED. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 61: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Clerk was instructed to schedule public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 61, recommending an amendment to the General Plan - Circulation Element - Highway Rights-of-Way, by the addition of Howell Avenue as a secondary highway. MOTION CARRIED. (Public hearing February 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.) TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6127: Developer~ Covington Brothers Construction Company; tract located east of Acacia Street, between Orangethorpe Avenue and the Riverside Freeway on Benmore Lane, and contains 5 R-3 lots (resubdivision of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Iract No. 5268 - Reclassification No. 63-64-17). The City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 3, 1966, approved said tentative map, noting thai all conditions of approval had been complied with at the time Tract No. 5268 was recorded (March 30, Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6127, be approved as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-15 - AWARD OF S.S~ PROJECT NO. 304.-A~ UNIT 1: In accordance with the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-15 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: RELOCATION OF HOUSES ON KATELLA AVENUE - 1021 AND 1201 EAST KATELLA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, S.S. PROJECT NO. 304-A, UNIT NO. 1. (Snow House Movers - $30,200.00) 9167 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11~ I966~ 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein None Schutte and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-15 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-16 and 66R-17 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-16: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND iNSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM; PROJECT NO. 352B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Project No. 352B - Bids to be opened February 39 1966, 2:00 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 66R...1'7: A RESOLUTION OF THE citY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE IHE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGE~OOD AVENUE, FROM STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TO ANAHEIM BOULEVARD~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. SS 389-B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAiD PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS~ ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CItY CI.ERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSrRUCi'ION THEREOF. (Pro.jec'~ No. SS 389-B - Bids to be opened February 3~ 1966, 2:00 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein None Schutte and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-16 and 66R-17 duly passed and adopted, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - FINAL COMPLETION: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-18, 66R-19 and 66R-20 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-18 - JOB NO. 961: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL TO INSTALL STREET LIGHTING IN TRACT NO. 2~51, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, gOB NO. 961. (E. D. ~ohnson and Company) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-19 - JOB NO. 967: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER~ FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLEll THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: I'HE IMPROVEMENT OF BAXTER STREET, FROM VIA BURTON STREET TO RIVERSIDE FREEWAY~ IN THE CITY OF ~NAHEIM, JOB NO. 967. (Sully-Miller Contracting Company) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-20 - WORK ORDER NO. 6010: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MAIERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL 9168 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES January i11 1966~ I:30 P.M. UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION iNCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT; FURNISH, FABRICATE AND DELIVER TO JOB SITE, CONCRETE-STEEL CYLINDER PIPE FOR A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN IN LA PALMA AVENUE, EXTENDING FROM HARBOR BOULEVARD TO PAULINE STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 6010. (American Pipe and Construction Company) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein None Schutte and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-18, 66R-19 and 66R-20, duly passed and adopted. PERALTA HILLS ANNEXATION NO. 2: Minutes of the Local Agency Eormation Commission of Orange County, California, meeting held December 8, 1965, were submitted approving proposed annexation to the City of Anaheim designated as Peralta Hills Annexation Nco 2, on the condition that the City of Anaheim submit a written statement to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, stating that the City will require~ in conjunction with development of the land, construction of adequate drainage facilities in a manner meeting the approval of the City Engineer. Upon receipt of said written statement by the executive officer, said condition shall be deemed to have been satisfied and the proposed annexation unconditionally approved by the Local Agency Formation Commissions On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that the condition establ~,~ea by' the Local Agency Formation Commission on Peralta Hills Annexation No~ 2, be accepted. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. YORBA LINDA ANNEXATION: Minutes of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County, California, meeting held December 8, 1965, denying proposed annexation to the City of Anaheim designated as the Yorba Linda Annexation, were submitted, and ordered received and flied with the City Attorney in connection with litigation authorized by the City Council January 4, 1966, on motion b? Councilman Pebley~ seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilman Chandler entered the meeting, 2:45 P.M.) CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: Claims submitted by Jimmy V. Anderson concerning injuries and damages purportedly resulting from au~omoOile accident at the intersection of Ball Road, West and ~iore Streets, September 21, 1965, involving Delfosse, Schuerman, et al, were denied and referred to the City Attorney and City's Insurance Agent, on motion by Counciiman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and ffiled, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. From Alan Cranston, State Controller - Motor Vehicle License Fee Fund~ and Apportionment to Cities. b. Resolution No~ 66, City of Oakdale, supporting United States efforts in South Vietnam. c. Minutes - Community Center Authority - Meeting of December 20, 1965. d. Minutes - Anaheim Stadium Commission - Meeting of December 2, 1965. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2235: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No.2235 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. 9169 }.ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING YO ZONING. (65-66-34 - C-O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2235 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NO. 2237: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2237 for first reading, R T AN 0 DiNANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-21 - R-3) ORDINANCE NO. 2238: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2238 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-96 - C-O) MID-YEAR SALARY REVIEW: Council action on Mid-Year Salary Review and recommended salary adjustmenzs was continued from the meetings of December 28, 1965, and January 4~ 1966, for=~,. rther study. Assistant City Manager Robert Davis called attention to one modification to tk;e Personnel D~rector's recommendations, which would place the position of Systems Analysn in Salary Schedule 54, rather than Schedule 58, as previously reccmmended, due %o a revision in the projected responsibilities of said position. Personnel Director Roy Heissner addressed the City Council; advising that after givin9 consideration to all materials submitted and verbal comments by the representatives of various employee organizations, the Persom:el Department Staff has no additional adjustments to recommend at this time. He reported ~hat all City positions were reviewed, prior to submission of the recommended salary adjustments, that currently in process are additional studies of several positions, and recommendations resulting from these studies can be expected prior to July !, 1966. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-21: Councilman Dui[on offered Resolution No. 66R-21 for adoption, approving salary adjustments as recommended, with modification to the position of' Systems Analyst as noted. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl. OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS JOB CLASSES, AND SUPER- SEDING SECTION 2 OF' RESOLUTION NO. 64R-461, RESOLUTION NO. 65R-193, AND RESOLUTION NO. ,%5R-399 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. Rot! call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCI~MzN: Dutton, Peble¥, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-21 duly passed and adopted. (Councilman Chandler left the meeting, 3:10) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-22: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-22 for adoption, authorizing reduction in the work week of those Fire Department personnel workin9 on a twenty-four hour basis, from 67.2 hours to 63 hours, to be effective March 4, 1966, as recommended by the Personnel Director. Refer to Resolution Book. 9170 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING RESOLUTION NO. 63R-910, PERSONNEL RULE #5 HOURS OF WORK AND PAY DAY. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein None Chandler Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-22 duly passed and adopted. (Councilman Chandler returned to the meeting, 3:15 P.M.) POPULATION ESTIMATE - CITY OF ANAHEIm: In connection with the population estimate to be conducted within the City, Administrative Analyst John Roche advised that the State Finance Department has recommended the employment of Mrs. Alma Juchnik and Mrs. Beverly Veress for the positions of Census Supervisors, compensation to be $3.50 per hour, $15.00 per diem rate, plus travel expenses to and from Sacramento, California. He reported that both parties are experienced in the conduction of State and Federal Census. At the conclusion of brief Council discussion, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that employment of Mrs. Juchnik and Mrs. Veress be authorized as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-23: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-23 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO MAKE AN ESTIMATE OF THE INCREASE IN POPULATION OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC II,MEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No, 66R-23 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM STADIUM CONSTRUCTION: It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that it be the desire of the Cizy Council that concrete be sealed in the seating area of Anaheim Stadium, in addition to the concourses, and that said portion of the work be accomplished within the $16,000,000o00 contract, if possible. MOTION CARRIED. LIONS CLUB CONVENTION~ 1968 - INVITATION: On the recommendation of Councilman Pebley, the City Council authorized Mayor Krein to send a letter, or other appropriate document, with the local group who will be attending the 1966 Lions International Club District #4 Convention in San Francisco~ inviting them to hold their 1968 Convention in Anaheim. 8~CES$: Councilman Dutton moved to recess to V:00 P.M., Councilman Peble¥ seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:15 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein. Alan G. Orsborn. Ronald Thompson. Ronald Grudzinski. 9171 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11, 1966, 1:30 P.M. INVOCATION: Reverend Stanley Herber, of the Yree Methodist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 785: Submitted by Heritage Construc- tion Corporation, requesting permission to establish an office building, with waivers of maximum height within t50 feet of a single-family zoned boundary, and minimum required parking; R-A property located on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, south of Katella Avenue (1844 South Harbor Boulevard). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1856, Series 1965-66, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Harbor Boulevard, for street lighting purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Harbor Boulevard, for tree planting purposes. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on ~iie with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary ey the Chief of the Yire Department. 5. That all construction shall be in conformance to the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City of Anaheim. 6. That Condition Nos. i and 2~ above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the lime That the Building Permit, is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. 7. That any air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets. 8. That Condition Nos. 3~ 4, 5 and 7, above menLioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. 9. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through '7, Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council and public hearing scheduled this date. Associate Planner Ronald Thompson, located subject property on the appropriate Sectional District Map~ and noted existing uses in the immediate area. He called attention to findings made by the City Planning Commission in approving subject application. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the applicants wished to address the City Council. Mr. David E. Termohlen, Architect and Authorized Agent for the Developer, noted the close proximity of subject property to the convention center under construction~ advising that the proposed building would be oriented thereto, and serve a need of the city by making available offices facilities for representatives of organizations who will need up to one years time to prepare for conventions and exhibits. He was of the opinion that the high rise structure would benefit Heritage Construction Corporation by virtue of its location in view of the large volume of traffic in the area of Disneyland. He thereupon presented for Council review a rendering in color depicting the proposed structure (copy thereof retained for filing). In response to Council questioning, Mr. Termohlen reported that requests from National Exhibitors to lease space in the proposed building have already been received. Ne advised that at the rear of the structure there will be a nine-story parking building. In addition, trash pickup will be from the basement area. Plans for the proposed development were reviewed by the City Council, and Mr. Termohlen further advised that building plans were 9172 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 1t, 1966, 1:30 P.M. completed and ready to be submitted for building permit. He described the unique features of the proposed building, such as the fact it had no columns and was suspended from the roof structure, and was purported to be the most earthquake proof type of structure. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. There was no response. Mr. Jack Lindquist, 2730 West Skywood Place, representing Disneyland, Inc., addressed the Council advising that they have no objections to the pro- posed office structure, but do request that the City's Land Use Policy for the commercial-recreation area be studied in relation to this high rise building to determine whether modification to the policy is necessary. Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager, and while Councilman Pebley felt that the granting of subject conditional use permit would establish a precedent for future requests of a similar nature, Councilman Chandler was of the opinion it would be allowing a variation from the policy for the area, and in no way established a precedent. RESOLUTION: Councilman Chandler offered a resolution, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 785~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and finding that the ac%ion is an exception to the General Commercial-RecreaYion Area Land Use Policy which in no way establishes a precedent for further exceptions, and further finding that the proposed building will fill a need which exists for an office facility in connection with utilization of the C.-R area. Councilman Pebley stated that although he was prepared to vote in favor of the foregoing resolution~ he would also vote for any future application of a similar nature. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the foregoing resolution was ordered tabled, pending further consideration by the entire City Council, MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-60 AND VARIANCE NO. 1750: Submitted by Harold W. Thornton, Leonard Smith .- Agent, requesting a change of zone from R-1 to C-1 and waivers of minimum required building setback, required landscaping and parking spaces, maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone, and six-foot masonry wall behind planting area opposite single-family zone~ proper'fy located at the northwest corner of Anaheim Boulevard and Valencia Avenue (101 West Valencia Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 1871 and 1872, Series 1965-66, recommended denial of Reclassification No. 65-66-60 and denied Variance No. 1750. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, calling attention to findings of the City Planning Commission in denying the applications. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Leonard Smith, Agent, 125 South Claudina Street, called attention to the General Plan Map, illustrating the entire length of Anaheim Boulevard from La Palma Avenue to projected Ball Road for various commercial uses. Mr. Smith displayed a map illustrating actual uses in the general area of subject property which were not in conformance with existing zoning, as the proposed commercial bullding would be in conformance with the General Plan for the area, he requested approval of subject applications. The Mayor asked if anyone was presenZ in opposition to subject petitions, and, noting that a group of people indicated their opposition, asked if they had a spokesman. 9173 Gity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIES - January 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Edward O'Brien, 910 Iroquois Street, Attorney representing 25 homeowners in the residential area in question, objected to the en- croachment of a commercial property into an established single-family residential neighborhood, and further noted existing deed res%fictions prohibiting commercial use. In his opinion, the approval of subject petitions would constitute spot-zoning, and establish a precedent for which there is no need. Mr. O'Brien called attention to the petition of protest presented at the public hearing before the Planning Commission, signed by owners of 25 out of the 27 homes in the neighborhood. Also addressing the City Council in support of the statements by Mr. O'Brien, was Mr. Henry Mang, 107 MacArthur Manor. In rebuttal, Mr. Smith advised that the applicants propose to remove the existing dwelling and construct a laundry and dry cleaning pick-up facility in accordance with the C-1 zoning, and the proposed tenant has agreed to the lease. He was of the opinion that the entire length of Anaheim Boulevard would be developed commercially in the future, The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mr. Del Clancy, 100 West Valencia Avenue, directly across the street from subject property, objected to a commercial building in full view of his residence, and expressed the opinion that if C-1 zoning were approved, it should encompass the entire area at one time. The Mayor stated that a good cross section of the evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-24: Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council and discussion held; at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 66R.-24 for adoption, concurring with the recom- mendations of the CiTy Planning Commission, denying subject reclassifica- tion. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (65-66-60) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-24 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-25: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 66R-25 for adoption, sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission, denying subject variance. Refer to Resolution Book. A R[gOLUTION OF TME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1750. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, ?eb!ey, Chandler and Kreln None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-25 duly passed and adopted. g174 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January tl, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 65-66-62: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from R-2 and R-3 to C-i; property described as two parcels of land with a total and combined frontage of approximately 722 feet on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, bounded on the south by Santa Ana Street, on the north by' Broadway, and on the east by Helena Street (Considered in conjunction with Area Development Plan No. 25). Pursuant to Resolution No~ 1873, Series 1965-66, the City Planning Commission recommended denial of C-1 zoning, and further recommended that subject property be reclassified to the C-O, Commercial Office Zone, subject to %he following conditions: i. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim 8 strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Harbor Boulevard, for street widening purposes, including a 25- foot radius corner return at Broadway and a 15-foot radius corner return at Elm Street and Santa Aha Street. 2. Ihat the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim 15-foot radius corner returns along Helena Street at Broadway, Elm Street and Santa Aha Street. 3. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 34.75 feet in width, from zhe center line of the street, along Santa Aha Street, for street widening purposes. 4. That the sidewalks, curbs and gutters shall be repaired along Harbor Boulevard, Helena Street, Broadway, Elm Street and Santa Aha Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Puollc Works. 6. Ihat Condition Nos. 19 2 and 3, above mentioned~ shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date nereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7. That Condition No. 4, above mentioned~ shall, be complied with prior to final building lnspectlono Assistan~ Planner Francis Nutto, noted the location of subject property and advised that Area Development Plan No. 25, considered by the Planning Commission in conjunction with subject application, would not be before the City Council for specific consideration at this time. He re- ported that various possible developments of the properties in the area were considered by the Commission, and as a result, the most appropriate use for subject property was determined to be high quality commercial offices, compatible with a civic center type complex° Mr. Nutto further advised that the Commission held in abeyance Area Development Plan No. 25 pending a C:vic District study relative to the boundaries and standards of a proposed civic district in the general area. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Nutto advised that the C-1 zoning request was initiated by the Planning Commission as part of the Harbor Boulevard Study, between Lincoln Avenue and Ball Road, all of which properties were to be considered for C-1 zoning at the direction of the City Council; that C-O zoning could be approved under a C-1 request, C-O being a more restrictive zone. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mrs. Helen Reynoso, owner of property at the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Santa Aha Street, addressed the City Council noting previous dedication made for the widening of Harbor Boulevard, and expressed concern that additional dedisation would devaluate her 70-foot by 90-foot property. Mr. D. Cuadros~ 1505 East Broadway~ owner of property at 324 South Harbor Boulevard, noted that land assembly of small parcels would be neces- sary for development under C-O zone regulations~ and was of the opinion that the C-O minimum parcel requirement would afford difficulties to those owners of small properties who might wish to develop or individually lease their properties for commercial purposes. 9175 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Miss Elva Haskett, 327 South Helena Street, addressed the Council in favor of the C-O zone, being of the opinion that a cultural institution would be an ideal use for the property, and the C-O zone would be more conductive to such a use. In response to request of Mrs. Vivian Englebrecht, owner of 313 and 315 South Helena Avenue, representing the owner of property at 312 South Harbor Boulevard, Mr. Nutto further clarified the status of Area Development Plan No. 25. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-26: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-26 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to C-O as recommended, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CI/Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF /HE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (55-66-62 - C-O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-26 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8:35 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council bein9 present with the exception of Councilman Schutte. PUBLIC HEARING - SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD ACCESS POINTS: Public hearing was held to consider specified access points to Santa Aha Canyon Road, between Jefferson Street on the West and the proposed Weir Canyon Highway on the East~ for purposes of circulation and transportation demands of the development and pro- posed development of properties on both sides of the Santa Ana Canyon Road. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1850, Series 1965-66, recommended the adoption of a Santa Aha Canyon Road Access Proposal, to be established in conjunction with the State of California Division of Highways and the County of Orange Road Department, as depicted on Exhibit Noo 7. Planning Supervisor Ronald Grudzinski noted the limits of the study area, and advised that residents in the Canyon are concerned about possible access points, should they choose to develop their properties. The State Division of Highways has recommended a joint agreement between the City of Anaheim, the County of Orange and the State, establishing specific points of access which would be allowabl~ unfil such f{me as the Riverside Freeway is completed, and the Santa Aha Canyon Road subsequently relinquished by the State. Mr. Grudzinski noted the State Division of Highways has pro- posed eleven access points within the limits of subject area, and the City Planning Commission's consideration and action was depicted on exhibits posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers, described as follows: Exhibit No. 1: Inventory of any development proposed in the subject area to date, such as locations of subdivisions, established resi- dential areas, public schools and parks; also, proposals made to the County of Orange, and incorporating proposals of the Hill and Canyon General Plan; purpose to gain an idea of the development which may be expected. 9176 gity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. Exhibit No. 2: Illustration of drainage tributary areas, to aid in calculating highway drainage necessities. Exhibit No. 3: Master Plan of Arterial Highways, adopted by the County of Orange. Exhibit No. 4: Projected traffic volumes at intersection points. (City Engineering Division). Exhibit No. 6: State Division of Highways eleven proposed inter- sections and access points which it was felt would satisfy needs of the City and the County. (The City was requested to review and make comments and/or recommended changes.) Exhibit No. 5: Pattern of possible subdivision development in the area, to aid in recommending modifications to Access Points Nos. 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11, proposed by the State. Exhibit No. 7: The Development Services Department Staff prepared an exhibit illustrating the eleven four-way intersections, or access points as modified, noting the basis for slight relocation of those five referred to. Councilman Dutton asked what primary concerns were expressed by property owners at the hearing before the Planning Commission. Mr. Grudzinski reported that existing access held by property owners is depicted on the exhibits with a triangle symbol. The concern ex- pressed was whether or not present access rights would be affected by the adoption of the proposal, and they were advised that these rights would not be affected in any way until such time as they might wish to develop the property. The proposed subdivision or reclassification would then be reviewed by the City, and access could be reoriented, if necessary for the preservation of the safety and general welfare of the citizens. Mr. Grudzinski stated that where access and circulation problems exist, property owners are encouraged to meet and collectively resolve the problems. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mr. David Collins, 1077 West Ball Road, representing some owners of property in the area, addressed the Council noting that nearly all of the eleven access points were recommended as four-way intersections. He asked if the City had any definite information concerning the projected freeway construction on either side of the Imperial Bridge. Mr. Grudzinski advised that no concrete date has been stipulated by the State Division of Highways, however they have indicated sometime in 1969 or 1970. In answer to further question of Mr. Collins concerning the traffic study (Exhibit No. 4), Mr. Grudzinski advised that the traffic volume indicated is the local projected average of daily traffic at total saturation of the Santa Ann Canyon Road and did not reflect projected traffic volume of the proposed freeway. Mr. Collins noted the existing traffic problems on Santa Ann Canyon Road, and the additional impact which will be realized when homes now under construction are occupied. He was of the opinion that the City should make every effort to encourage the State to accelerate the Freeway construction. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Tom Heffernan, Attorney representing Mrs. Mable Yorba, addressed the Council noting the location of her three acre parcel, west of Access Point No. 5, as depicted on Exhibit No. 7. He advised that his client re- sides on the property, and has no intention to develop at present, and she has access at the rear of the property to "Old Santa Aha Canyon Road", and from there westerly onto the highway. 9177 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Owners of property to the East of Mrs. Yorba's land were desirous of access to the Imperial Highway, or to Santa Ana Canyon Road; and Mr. Heffernan expressed opposition to the Access Points numbered 5 and 6, as recommended by the City, being in favor of those points proposed by the State of California. In his opinion, the latter would prevent the pos- sibility of taking a large portion of Mrs. Yorba's property for roadway purposes and the loss of her home. Mr. Grudzinski noted that the corner property referred to, east of Mrs. Yorba's property, now has a resolution of intent to rezone, which is subject to the approval of the State Division of Highways. The State has declared Imperial Highway from Santa Aha Canyon Road northerly a freeway, and no access thereto is being granted at the present time; they have indicated no intent of granting access unless the five-way intersection of Imperial, Santa Aha Canyon Road, and "Old Santa Aha Canyon Road" is closed. The parcel now has access only to the "Old" road, through the Yorba easement. The access proposal, if adopted, would not force any of the property owners to relinquish the access rights they now have unless development was contemplated. Mr. W. Hollowell requested further comments pertaining to drainage studies made in connection with subject proposal. Mr. Grudzinski advfsed that no engineering details were considered; the Staff studied the major tributary areas of the hill, and attempted to point out those major drainage courses which might need to be handled by structures or streets. Mrs. Hazel Maag, 19801 Del Rio, (County territory) addressed the Council reporting an existing drainage problem affecting her property. IT being determined that no one else wished to address the Council, Mayor Krein declared the ihearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-27: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-27 for adoption, approving The adoption of the Santa Aha Canyon Road Access Proposal (Exhibit No. 7), in accordance wi~h recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING THE ACCESS POINTS TO THE SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD AS INTENDED ON EXHIBIT NO. 7, AS A LOGICAL METHOD OF PROVIDING ACCESS FO THOSE PROPERTIES FRONTING SAID ROAD. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Du±ton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-27 duly passed and adopted. REPORT - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 - ULTIMATE SEWER LINE REQUIREMENTS: Director of Public Works Thornton E. Piersall reported on existing and ultimate sewer trunk line requirements for the Santa Aha Canyon, both inside and outside the city limits, and briefly reviewed action taken by the City Council April 27, 1965 (page 8597). Mr. Piersall further advised that the City has recently notified the District of the need to serve the area, and offered to proceed with necessary construction, pending reimbursement from the District for their portion of %he sewer lines which would serve properties within Sanitation District No. 2. At a meeting with the Board's Special Finance Committee, they requested the City to furnish an estimate of the proposed repayment period. 9178 ~.ity Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 11, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. On the recommendations of the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton moved that the Mayor be authorized to forward a letter to the County Sanitation District's Board of Directors, suggesting a five-year plan for reimbursement of the costs for that portion within the district for immediate construction of needed sewer facilities. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-28: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-28 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED REMISING, RELEASING AND QUITCLAIMING C~RTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO A. F. SCHROEDER AND LOUISE SCHROEDER. (Approximately 10 acres) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 66R-28 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn, Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 9:45 P.M. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 18, 1966, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley (entered the meeting i:50P.:M,) Schutte, Chandler and Krein. ' ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER; Robert Davis. CIIY AITORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn.~ CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Thompson. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. INTRODUCTION: Mayor Krein introduced Mr. George Byer, a visitor from Anchorage, Alaska, who held the office of Mayor of Anchorage from 1959 %o 1961, and is presently a Borough Assemblyman in said city. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Certificate of Honorary Anaheim City Council Membership was authorized to be prepared and forwarded to Mr. Byer. MOTION CARRIED. to him. Mr. Byer expressed appreciation for the warm reception accorded ~ROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed the month of January 1966, March of Dimes Month. Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council.