1966/03/01-!.276
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler (entered the meeting 2:iS'P.M.)
and Krein.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis.
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Furman Roberts.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR: John Collier.
ASSISTANT CITY ENGIN£HR: Ralph Pease.
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts.
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Marvin Krieger.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Francis Nutto.
Mayor Krein called the meeting to order.
PRESENIATION OF HEALTH AWARDS - ANAHEIM RESIAURANIS: Mayor Krein and Mr. Robert
S. Stone, of the Orange County Health Department, presented Award of Excellence
Plaques to the following restaurant establishments:
Winchell~s Donuts, dO0 North Anaheim Boulevard.
Burger Chef, 511 South State College Boulevard.
Jones' Cafe±eria, ~00 South Euclid Street.
Mr. Stone reported that as of February 22, 1966, there were 230
eligible restaurants in the City of Anaheim, 142 of which have received
awards (approximately 61 percent).
Mayor Krein thanked Mr. Stone, and congratulated the restaurant
operators.
MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings held
February 15, 23 and 25, 1966, was deferred one week (March 8, 1966).
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that
consent to the walver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen,
unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman
for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RINKER ANNEXAIION: Public hearing was held pursuant to Resolution
No. 66R-64, published in the Anaheim Bulletin January 31 and February 7,
1966, and wrltten notice mailed to only property owner within the proposed
annexation as shown on the last Equalized County Assessment Roi1.
Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or
against the proposed Rlnker Annexation. There was no response.
Ihe City Clerk reported that no written protests to said annexation
have been filed at her offlce.
Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUIION NO. 66R-151: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-151
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE IN IHE PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
KNOWN AND DESIGNAIED AS RINKER ANNEXAIION.
Roll call vote:
9277
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-151 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2257: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2257 for
first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS RINKER ANNEXATION.
(Uninhabited)
PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 70: Public hearing was held to
consider City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1917, Series 1965-66,
recommending amendment to the General Plan, Circulation Element - Highway
Rights-of-way by the addition of Muller Street and Crescent Way as
collector streets, rather than local streets, pursuant to General Plan
Amendment No. 70.
Associate Planner Marvin Krieger, noted the location of the
streets in questlon on an exhibit posted on the east wall of the Council
Chamber, and the existing development in the immediate area; advising
that the designation as collector streets would allow the requirement
of uniform building setbacks in the industrial area. He reported that
said streets have a total dedication of 60 feet; 36 foot ~ravelway
and 12 foot parkways, which could be widened to four travel lanes
(40 foot width) with l0 foot parkways, as a temporary measure at this
time.
Mr~ Krieger referred to feasibility studies regarding the
eventual Santa Aha Freeway overcrossing by Crescent Avenue, which would
further increase the flow of traffic on Muller Street and Crescent Way.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council
for or against the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 70, there being
no response~ declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-152: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-152
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO 'THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 70. (Muller
Street and Crescent Way)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, and Krein
None
Schutte and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-152 duly passed and adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 136 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Reverend Clyde
R. Freeman, Pastor, Grace Baptist Church, dated February 9, 1966, was
submitted for three year extension of time for temporary use o£ portable
educational building on property described in Conditional Use Permit No. 136.
Attention was called to the following recommendations of the
Development Services Department:
It is recommended that a 2-year extension of time be granted on the
portable building, subject to electrical, heating, and plumbing codes
and that, as proposed by the petitioner, the interior of the building
be remodeled wlth fire-proof material.
2. It is further recommended that the petitioner submit to the City
Planning Commission for approval a revision of plans for the entire
}278
City Nail, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
development, as pointed out in the petitionervs request, at such time
as plans are available.
Two year extension of time was granted by the City Council,
subject to the recommendations of the Development Services Department,
on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Chandler entered the meeting, 2:15 P.M.
ORANGE COUNTY TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 4777: Developer - Marian Development Co.;
tract located on the south side of the Riverside Freeway, west of Mohler
Drive in the east Anaheim Hill and Canyon area, and contains 69 proposed
R-1 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 28,
1966, recommended that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to
approve said tentative map, based on the fact that the proposed lot size
density and circulation element was in accordance with the proposed Hill
and Canyon General Plan and the Santa Ana Canyon Access Points Study.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
the City Council concurred with recommendation o£ the City Planning Commission
and ordered a copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission
MOTION CARRIED. '
SIGN ORDINANCE REVIEW: In accordance with the City Council action taken October
5, 1965, directing the Development Services Department to review the Sign
Ordinance for possible revision, particularly as it pertains to all com-
mercial developments on corner parcels of land, not necessarily limited
to service stations.
Associate Planner Francis Nutto, reported in detail on proposed
changes in the exlsting ordinance, which it was believed would reduce the
number of variance requests pertaining to non-conforming signs.
Council discussion was held and at the conclusion thereof, it
was determined that any action bn the foregoing issue be deferred to April
5, 1'966, for further study.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-153: On the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation
Director, Councilman Peble¥ offered Resolution No. 66R-153 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL
PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH PUBLIC WORKS JOB NO. 1003, AND DECLARING
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-99 NULL AND VOID FROM AND AFTER THIS DATE.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-153 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-154 - AWARD OF JOB NO. 1006: In accordance with the re~
commendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution
No. 66R-154 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING
ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT:
THE IMPROYF~ENT OF PORTIONS OF KATELLA AVENUE AND HARBOR BOULEVARD, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1006. tR. J. Noble Company - $13,839.60)
9279
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
Ihe Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-154 duly passed and adopted.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, JOB NO. 933: On the recommendations of the City Engineer,
Councilman Dutton moved that Change Order No. 1, Job No. 933 (Fire Station
No. 7, 2222 East Bali Road), consisting of extra work in the amount of
$176.90, be authorized. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 - WORK ORDER 6004: On the recommendations of the City
Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Change Order No. 6, Work Order
No. 6004, in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00 for moving waste stripping
~ materlal at Walnut Canyon Reservoir to an off-site location, at $~$ per
cubic yard, be authorized. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion.//MOTION
CARRIED. $1.60
TRANSFER OF FUNDS - WORK ORDER NO. 6004: On motion by Councilman Dutton,
seconded by Councilman Pebley, transfer of funds in an amount not to
exceed $30,000~00 was authorized from the Council Contingency Account
to Work Order No~ 6004, in connection with Change Order No. 6. MOTION
CARRIED.
RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATION: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, it
was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that the
Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign Right-of-Way Certification in
connection with the right-of-way for Haster Street, from Orangewood Avenue
to Simmons Avenue, Project No. 278~ MOTION CARRIED.
CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Dutton, cancellation of city taxes was authorized on property
acqulred by the Orange County Department of Real Property Services for
public purposes, Project No. Y21, Orchard Drive, Parcels Nos. 105, and
105~1~ formerly assessed to Yorba Gravel Company, deed recorded November
9, 1965, in Book No., 7734, at Page 226, Official Records of Orange County,
California. MOTION CARRIED.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-155 to
66R-158, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book~
RESOLUTION NO. 66R.-155: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Glen Ruf'erd and Velma Dale McCormick)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R,-156: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Ethel M. Reichardt)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-157: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(John C. Knu%zen, Jr. and Irene G. Knutzen, William C. and Margaret
Sangster, Lonnie M. and Wary R. Dunn)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-158: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(George Nakanishi~ Henry and Ayako Nakanishi, Kenneth and June Makino}
Roll call vote:
Authorized change to $1.60, Minutes of March 29, 1966, page 9339.
9280
~.ity Hall~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1~ 1966, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-155 to 66R-158, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-19: On motion
by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, dedication of vehicular
access rights by Anaheim-Euclid Convalescent Hospital to Tonia Place, in
connection with Reclassification Nco 64-65-19, was accepted by the City
Council, and the recordation thereof was authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO.. 66R-159: Councilman Chandler offered
Resolution No. 66R-159 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON THAT PORTION OF A FORMER ANAHEIM UNION
WATER COMPANY RIGHT OF ~AY EASEMENT OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING
THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF
THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing March 22, 1966 1:30 P M., Lot 52, Tract
No~ 3390) ' '
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
SchutTe
'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-159 duly passed and adopted.
'~UITCLAIM DEEDS: Councilman Chandler offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-160 to 66R-163,
both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-160: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED QUITCLAIMING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, INCLUDING A WELL, PUMPING PLANT, STANDPIPES
AND IRRIGATION LINES. (California Drive-In Theatres, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-161: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED QUITCLAIMING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, INCLUDING A WELL, PUMPING PLANT~ STANDPIPES
AND IRRIGATION LINES. (Reese Milner)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-.162: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED QUITCLAIMING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, INCLUDING A WELL, PUMPING PLANT, STANDPIPES
AND iRRIGATION LINES. (Visalia Industrial Co., and Factory Development Corp.)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-163: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED QUITCLAIMING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED~ INCLUDING A WELL, PUMPING PLANT, STANDPIPES
AND IRRIGATION LINES. (Albert and Ida Marie Brunet)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-160 to 66R-163, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
9281
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-164: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 66R-164
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OY THE CITY COUNCIL OY THE CITY O? ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECIING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE EASEMENT DEEDS
COVERING PROPERLY O? THE ANAHEIM UNION WATER COMPANY SUBJECT TO
EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS BY THE CITY. (Orange Coutny Flood Control
District and Yorba Linda County Water District)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-16~ duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-165: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-165 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO
BETWEEN L. E. TRAVER, DOING BUSINESS AS ANAHEIM SECURITY PATROL AND THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM RELATING TO THE DEPUTIZING OF GUARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
DIRECTING TRAFFIC ENTERING~ LEAVING, AND TRAVERSING THAT PORTION OF
BROOKHURST STREET WHICH BORDERS THE CIRCLE SEAL CENTER PROPERTY.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 66R-165 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-166: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 66R-166 for adoption,
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ANAHEIM BOYS CENTER, INC.
AND ANAHEIM OPTIMIST CLUB WITH REFERENCE TO THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF
CERTAIN LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutfon, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
Hone
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-166 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-167: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-167 for
adoption,
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH J. S. BELOND AND RUTH M.
BELOND FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY. (La Palma
Avenue extension east from Jefferson Street)
Roll call vote:
:} 282
Nail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: C ~
OUNCILMaN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-167 duly passed and adopted.
TEMPORARY ROADWAY CONS'rRUCTION - ANAHEIM STADIUM: On report and recommendation
of the Assistant City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that the City
Engineer be authorized to proceed with negotiations with the County of
Orange for an agreement to construct a four lane temporary roadway, con-
necting Orangewood Avenue and Main Street across the Santa Ana Rive.r,
serving Anaheim Stadium; said agreement to include removal of the roadway
at a later date, and total amount of contract not to exceed $18,000.00.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
KATELLA AVENUE - SANTA ANA FREEWAY OVERCROSSING: Assistant City Engineer
Ralph Pease, reported that work on the four-lane Katella Avenue bridge
over the Santa Aha Freeway, currently under construction by the State of
California, is not expected to be completed before April 23, 1966, and a
serious traffic problem has been indicated when baseball games commence
in Anaheim Stadium April 9, 196'6. He recommended that steps be taken to
accelerate the construction of the overcrossing.
It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
that the City Engineer be authorized to negotiate with the S~ate of Cali-
fornia:s Contractor for an agreement whereby the City of Anaheim would
absorb the costs cf overtime charges to accelerate construction of the
Katella Avenue bridge across the Santa Ana Freeway, completion date to be
prior to April 9, 1966, and amount of payment not to exceed $10,000.00.
MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported on informal bids received
for the purchase of 200, 60 gallon plastic trash receptacles, as follows,
and recommended acceptance of low bid that of Ten-Eyck Supply, Los Angeles,
in the amount of $3,952~00, including tax:
len-EycK Supply, Los Angeles
Easterday Supply, Fullerton
Blake~ Moffit & lowne, Long Beach
Free Drop Fop, North Hollywood
Zellerbach Paper, Los Angeles
Quality Paper, Los Angeles
Best Maintenance, Los Angeles
Taverner-Fricke, Los Angeles
Unlon Carbide Plastics, Anaheim
Priddy Paper Co., Los Angeles
$3,952.00
4,617.60
4,850.56
6,662.24
No bid
No bid
Late (returned)
No bid
No bid
No bid
On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman
Chandler moved that the lo~ bid of Ten-Eyck Supply be accepted.and purchase
authorized in the amount of $3,952.00 including tax. Councilman Pebley
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE: Mr. Davis reported on lnformal bids received for the purchase of 14
Marbelite Street Standards, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the
second low bid that of GESCO, Anaheim, in the total amount of $3,219.02,
including tax:
GESCO, Anaheim
Line Material Co., Los Angeles
goslyn Paclfic, Los Angeles
WESCO, Anahelm
Consolidated Electric Supply, Anaheim
ESD, Anahelm
E. D. Johnson, Anaheim
$3,219.02
3,189.61
3,248.8F
3,249.16
3,279.01
3,280.90
Late return
On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman
Dutton moved that the bid of GESOO, tn the amount of $3~2!9.02, be accepted
and purchase authorized as the lowest and best bid~ as one percent sales
tax differential can be applied to the Anaheim firm. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOIiON CARRIED.
9283
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
PURCHASE: Mr. Davis reported on informal bids received for the purchase of
one Hydraulic Truck Crane, as follows, and recommended accep[ance of [he
low bid~ that of Lambert Truck Equipment, Los Angeles, $11,485.76, including
tax:
Lambert Truck Equipment, Los Angeles
Calavar Corp., Santa Fe Springs
$11,485,76
13,327.4m
On [he recommendations of the Assistan[ Ci[y Manager, Councilman
Pebley moved that the low bid of Lambert Truck Equipment be accepted and
purchase authorized in the amount of $11,~85.76, including [ax. Councilman
Dutton seconded the motion. MOIION CARRIED.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submi[ted by Gerard Mitt for wa[er damages to
s[ock s[ored at A & M Auto Parts, purportedly resulting from backed up
sewer water, February 2, 1'966, was denied and referred to [he City At[orney's
Office and Insurance Carrier, on mo[ion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by
Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed~
on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton:
a. Resolution of City of Chowchilla expressing support and devotion to
members of Armed Forces fighting in Vier Nam.
be
Orange County Coordinating Republican Assembly - opposing lease-back
purchase arrangements and non-profit corporations established by
elected officials,
Resolution of commendation for Bill St. John re his efforts as Host
to County Clerks, Registrars of Voters and Clerks of the Board of
Supervisors throughout State of California.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2254: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2254 for adoption.
Refer [o Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 7.16.120, SECTION m.52.090, SECTION 1~.32.3m0,
AND SECTION 14o32.350, AND BY AMENDING SECTION 14.32.190. (Anaheim
Stadium Regulations - Parking Restrictions)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
/he Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2254 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2255: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2255 for adop%ion.
Refer %o Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.22 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 14.32.180 AND BY ADDING
SECIIONS 14~32.084, 14.32.153, 14.32.182, 14.32.183 AND 1~.32.184.
(Publlc and Private parking lot regulations, restricted parking, area of
Anaheim-Fuller[on Municipal Court)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: Schutte
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2255 duly passed and adopted.
928,4
~it¥ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 2258: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2258 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-133 - C-l)
ORDINANCE NO. 2259: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2259 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-55 - R-l)
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATI.ON: Application submitted by Edward M.
Williams and Jack S. Stansfield for New On-Sale Beer and Wine license
(bonafide eating place), for un-named business at 108-110 North Jefferson
Street (C-1 zone), was submitted by the Assistant City Manager to the City
Council for their information. It was noted that application for Conditional
Use Permit No. 825 to permit on-sale beer and wine on said property, has
been filed by the applicants; however said application has not been heard
before the City Planning Commission.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis
that the C-1 zone does not allow on-sale sale of alcoholic beverages.
MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED JITNEY SERVICE: Copies of the proposed ordinance regulating jitney
services were submitted to the City Council and representatives of the
Southern California Rapid Transit Districts, at the Council meeting held
February 23, 1966, at which time action was continued to this date.
The City Clerk read letter dated February 28, 1966, from Southern
California Rapid Transit District, calling attention to amendments to the
proposed ordinance regulating jitney service, as suggested by the District.
Also read was letter submitted this date at open meeting by Mr.
Harry Knisely, in support of the proposal made by Anaheim Jitney System.
It was noted that Southern California Rapid Transit District has
notlfied the City of Anaheim of modification of schedules and additional
routes to serve Anaheim Stadium.
Deputy City Attorney Alan Watts briefly reviewed draft of the
proposed ordinance, advising that, it would basically differ from the Taxi-
cab Ordinance only where it pertains to scheduled routes.
The City Council determined that action on the proposed ordinance
be deferred one week (March 8, 1966) for further study and consideration
by a full City Council.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-168: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-168 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 66R-92 NUNC PRO TUNC~ TO CORRECT A CLERICAL
ERROR IN THE DESIGNATION OF VOTING PRECINCT NO. 53.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-168 duly passed and adopted.
9285
Gitv Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966~ 1:30 P,M.
RESOLUIION NO. 66R-169: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-169 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING
THE SUBMISSION OF A REQUEST TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR
FUNDS FROM NdE CROSSING PROTECTION FUND FOR PROTECTION OF OVERCROSSING
NO. 2-168,3 AT THE INTERSECTION OF SANTA FE RAILROAD AND SOUTH STREET~
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
iECESS: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 7:00 P.M.
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:30 P.M.)
A~TER RECESS:
PRESENir:
ABC ENI:
PRESENI:
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-169 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Chandler
Mayor Krein called the mee±ing to order.
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein.
COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
CiTY MANAGER: Keith A~ Murdoch~
CiTY AI'TORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CiTY ,CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
8EYELOPMENI SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborno
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
IRANFiC ENGINEER: Edward Oranzow.
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald 'Thompson.
DEPUTY CIFY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts.
PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski.
FLAG SALUrE: Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
HARBOR BOULEVARD Si'UDY: The Council determined January 25, 1966, that the
matter of parking on South Harbor Boulevard and designation as a four-lane
highway would be determined on (or prior to) March 1, 1966.
S~t':,' Engineer James P. Maddcx summarized the results of a canvass
conducted in the arsa relative to willingness of property owners to
dedicate necessar}; easements for the widening of the street. He advised
*hat a]l owners o~ the 1'.03 parcels involved have been contacted by mail;
-he r'es.Jlt5 bric. fi'/ as foiiows:
13 parcels have dedacated
34 parcels undecided
3 parcels decline
53 no response
f'4r. Maddox noted that some of the owners of the 53 parcels
reslde oul of the city, or have been away when attempts were made to
contact them; however efforts will be continued so that the study may be
completed.
In answer to Mayor Krein~s question, Mr. Maddox advised that the
sss block which comes nearest to ~ull dedication 2s located on the ~est
side of Harbor Boulevard between Water and South Streets. He reported
fha+ after xeceipt of ded~ca±ion fox a full block, design work could be
~nitsated witP,[n a ~ew ~ee~s, with actual construction commencing in four
-o fi'~e months.
William I. Kott~ D.D.S., 601 South Harbor Boulevard, submitted
~o the Cit¥ Clerk fully executed deeds for street widening fronting his
p~operty, He called attention to various communications received from
-he City Engineering D~vision regardlng the futuse widening of Harbor
9286
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
Boulevard, and was of the opinion that some confusion exists in the minds
of property owners who are not sure whether widening of the street will be
done in small sections, or on a block-by-block basis. Further, he felt
it would be detrimental to owners of commercial properties to prohibit
on-street parking.
Mrs. Marguerite Coons, 625 South Harbor Boulevard, advised that
if parking in front of commercial establishments is restricted, it would
be necessary to provide off-street parking on the property. She called
attention to her request for access from Harbor Boulevard to her property
which has been filed with the City.
Mr. Frank Feldhaus, 617 South Harbor Boulevard, occupant of an
office on property owned by Dr. Kott, addressed the Council relative to
a sign which he installed at said address, which would have to be relocated
if and when the street is widened~ He further inquired whether there would
be future provision for municipal off-street parking in the area.
Mr. Feldhaus was advised of the City's policy for relocating
exlsting improvements when streets are widened. It was noted that if
dedication is received from the owner of the only remaining parcel between
Water and South Streets (west side), the street will be widened as soon as
possible, and on-street parking retained.
Councilman Chandler in answer to Mr. Feldhaus question regarding
municipal parking lots, recalled that at the time an Area Development Plan
prepared by the Development Services Department staff was reviewed by the
Council, it was suggested that parcels east and west of the alleys parallel-
ing Harbor Boulevard possibly could be used for parking to serve the com-
mercial frontage on Harbor Boulevard.
Further discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilmen
Dutton and Pebley suggested that a definite time be established for the
restriction of' parking in those areas where sufficient street widening
dedication has not been received to accomplish the project; that in the
interim period, on-street parking be retained~
Mayor Krein was of the opinion that as soon as the last dedication
on the west side of Harbor Boulevard (600 block) is received, work should
proceed immed:ately to improve that block; further, that the balance of
property owners should be contacted at the earliest possible date, and the
Engineering Study completed, in order to determine what additional portions
of The street can be widened.
Mr. Ora Hardacre, 555 South Harbor Boulevard, expressed concern
for those property owners who have dedicated, but are located in a block
where only minor dedication has been obtained. He advised that parking is
essential to his antique business, and the establishment of on-site parking
would be a considerable expense to him.
In answer to Council questioning, the City Engineer reported that
two dedications have been received on the west side of the street in the
500 block, out of a total of twelve properties.
Councilman Chandler noted the sequence of events which preceeded
the situation at hand, and was of the opinion that at this point, plans
should proceed to widen the street according to the schedule of the
Engineering Division and ~'No Parking" should be established wherever
dedication for the widening of Harbor Boulevard, from Broadway to.Ball Road,
has not been obtained.
Mrs. Marguerite Coons requested clarification of the foregoing
proposal, as it would pertain to a block where only one property failed
to make dedication.
The City Councl] indicated that the street would be widened and
parking retained, except fronting the parcels not dedicating.
9287
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman
Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that the City Attorney be instructed
to prepare an ordinance providing that as of September 1, 1966, there will be
no parking at any time on either side of Harbor Boulevard, between Broadway
and Ball Road, exempting the areas where dedication has been sufficient for
the ultimate widening of the street, in.accordance with the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Dut±on moved that the City Attorney be instructed to
draft an amendment to the Policy, relative to payment of expenses by owners
of property if dedication and improvement occurs after completion of the
city project, and also an additional policy regarding the breaking of curbs,
where isolated parcels have been dedicated and the street not widened.
Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council further instructed the City Engineer to proceed
expeditiously with plans for the widening of South Harbor Boulevard.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-48, CONDITIONAL USF
PERMIT NO. 769 AND GENERAL PLAN A~ENDMENT NO. 48: Continued from the meetings
of November 23, 1965 and February 15, 1966, to allow the City Planning
Commission an opportunity to review revised plans; application submitted
by Grace E. Dickerson requesting change of zone from R-A to R-2, and
permission to construct a ~2-unit planned residential development at
1651 East Broadway.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1816,
1817 and 1818, Series 1965-66, recommended disapproval of Reclassifica-
tion 65-66-48, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 769, and recommended
disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 48.
Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject
property, and advised that after reviewing revised plans at the City
Planning Commission meeting of February 16, 1966, the Commission re-
affirmed their previous recommendation that subject property should be
developed for single family residential use; and further recommended
that should the City Council determine that a higher density is justified
the revised site plan represents probably the least disruptive pattern
for R-2 planned residential development of the property.
Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council and compared
with plans previously submitted; and Mayor Krein asked if anyone re-
presenting the petitioner wished to address the City Council.
Mr. J. Lane lilson, of MacMahon, Nelson and Tilson, Attorneys
representing the petitioner, stated it was his opinion that the revised
plans were for a development similar to single family residential, that
previous objection of the City Council has been overcome by elimination
of the perimeter driveway in favor of a dedicated street through the
center of the property, and by the limitation of all buildings to single
story height.
Mr, Tilson called attention to existing R-3 apartment develop-
ments approximately two blocks to the west on Broadway. He further
advlsed that the Lincoln Avenue frontage of subject property is zoned
C-i, that adjacent thereto is an existing motel, and in his opinion the
proposed garden type development would not be a disruptive factor in
the area.
The ~layor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in
opposition.
Mr, Stanley Hankins, 223 Wayside Place, briefly reviewed past
action of the City Planning Commission and City Council pertaining to
subject property, and called attention to an opinion expressed by the
Planning Commission on February 16, 1966, that the property remain more
suitable for single family residential development. He was of the opinion
that, should the R-2 zoning be approved, the petitioners would apply for
a higher density development at a later date.
9288
Git¥ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Hank%ns objected to the introduction of any multiple family
residential use into the established area surrounded on three sides by
single family residential development. He referred to studies previously
prepared by the Development Services Department Staff, illustrating
several methods for development of subject property into R-1 homes, and
he felt that no changes have occured in the area to warrant' a reversal
of past decisions denying other petitions for multiple family residential
use on the property in question.
Other objections to the proposed development voiced by Mr. Hank%ns
were that the proposed development would double the population of the
neighborhood, and that the approval of the petitions would depreciate the
General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and the zoning laws adopted for the
protection of homeowners. He further called attention to petition of
protest filed prior to the first public hearing on subject applications,
purportedly signed by 9a home owners in the area.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council.
Mr. Ron Barker, 247 Date Street West, concurred with statements
made by Mr. Hankins, and advised that his home is immediately adjacent
to subject property, and was purchased because of the well established
single family residential character of the area. He reported that five
of the other eight residents on the west side of his street were opposed
to the R-2 development.
Mrs. R. ~. Cariker, 251 Date Street West, addressed the Council
advising of her concern that the addition of 42 families to the area
would augment an over crowded situation at the neighborhood elementary
school, and possibly would result in children being taken to other schools
by buses.
Mr. Edward Stephenson, 252 Date Street West, asked how the
proposed development would affect property owners in the area with respect
to taxes. He was of the opinion that the trafflc conditions on Broadway
wlll be greatly increased by the opening of Anaheim Stadium, and the
proposed development m~_ld add to the anticipated.
~r. Fred Davis, 209 Wayside Place, addressed the Council in
opposition to an,? multiple famlly use, and advised that he has been un-
able to locate a comparable home in any other part of the City.
Mr. Iilson, in reouttal, stated that the proposed development
a condominium containing 42 high quality units, which would be
~?;a* the develooer does not intend to cater to families wlth
Jq]idr~r~. It the Dropert~ were developed for slngle family reslden%ial,
app:oxlmately 21 two-s!or,,, dwe].llngs ~ould be constructed, ~hich in his
would result ~n ~eater c~owded SChool s:tuation than would the
lc~men· prop~ =en. N~:: req~ s~ d a favorahla decision by the Comncil.
Councilntan Peele'., q.Jest~or:ed the status of ownership of subject
;,,,~r. Robert E. S~r~ger, 26.92 Mainway Drive, Los Alamitos, one of
Ina :ievelopers, advlses ~hat the condom:nium sn:ts can be sold under a
!ease-hold agreelnent, that upon +ha death o[ the owner, the property is
r.he Ma'v'~r declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUIIC. N: Couqcii::an Krein wa{~ of the opin~ion that the property is
s:ngle famil'/ reside;:t]al in character~ and he thereupon offered a
resnR:! ion upholding the action taken by the Planning Commission, dis-
C % "~ .
approvLr:g Reci assifi atlon No.,
D1sct~ss~on ~as held by the City CO~JNCil, Councilman Dutton being
opinion that the addltior', of children to the school population was
valid argumen{ aga?,nst the multiple family residential use,
9289
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March.l, !9.~6~ 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Pebley failed to see a hardship pertaining to subject
property. He felt that the establishment of a multiple family residential
use surrounded on three sldes by R-1 properties would be an intrusion.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved
that determination on the resolution to deny subject reclassification
be deferred one week (March 8, 1966, 1:30 P.M.). Councilman Pebley
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-79 (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6138.
REVISION NO. 1): Submitted by Alice A. Brady and Barbara J. Hidle for a change
of zone from R-A to R-l; property located north of Lincoln Avenue, between
Rio Vista and Kingsley Street.
Recommended for approval by the City Planning Commission,
pursuant to Resolution No. 1927, Series 1965-66, subject to the following
condition:
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City
Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
Mr~ Thompson noted the location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He reported that subject
tract map origlnaily encompassed the entire property, however, because of
pending negotiations by the City for a park site on said property, north
of Dutch Avenue extended, a revised tract map has been filed for 25 R-1
lots on the southerly approximate 5°8 acres.
The Mayor asked if the petitioners or their representative
wished to address the City Council,
Mr. Donald Greek, 2a15 South Manchester Avenue, Anaheim, Engineer
of the tract~ stated that the reclassification is in conformance with the
Anaheim General Plan, and the tract map submitted is in accordance with
all standards of the City of Anaheim.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition, there bein9 no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-170: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-170
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changin9 the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission,
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-79 - R-l)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dui±on, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-170 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6138, REVISION NO. it Developer - Willard L.
Miller; tract located approximately 1,320 feet east of Rio Vista Street and
].,450. feet north of Lincoln Avenue, and contains 25 proposed R-1 lots.
[ne City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 31,
., ~, approved said tentafive map, with the following finding, and subject
~c the following conditions:
?indinq Nc. 1.
That prior to the approval of a final tract map, the City Council is
urged to make final determination as to whether or not the park site
9290
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
shall be acquired northerly of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6138, Revision
No. t, and if it is determined that the park site shall not be acquired,
the developer should be required to dedicate and improve the entire width
of Dutch Avenue prior to the approval of a final tra6t map.
Conditions:
1, That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
2, That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6138, Revision No, 1,
is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 65-66-79.
3. That Dutch Avenue shall be a 32-foot half street.
4. That Street "A" shall be named Alice Street; and that Street "B" shall
be named Barbara Street, aS requested by the developer.
5. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satisfactory
to the City Engineer.
6. That the minimum street grade shall be 0.20 percent grade.
Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6138,
Revision No. 1, be approved subject to the recommendations of the City
Planning Commission. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING 65-66-80 AND VARIANCE NO. 1758: Submitted by Ferne M. Keele
for a change of zone from R-1 to R-3, and waivers of minimum setback area,
detached dwelling floor area, side yard buildlng setback and 6-foot
masonry wall; property located on the east side of Olive Street at Valencia
Street (846, 846~ and 850 South Olive Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1922,
Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification subject
to the following conditions:
1. '[hat the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of' land 32 feet ir: width, from the center line of the street,
along Olive Street, for street widening purposes.
2. [hat the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Olive Street, for tree planting
purposes.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $25,00 per dwelling unit, for new units only, to be used
for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time
the building permit is issued.
4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $2,00 per front foot along Olive Street, for street lighting
purposes.
That Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied
wlth within a perlod of 180 days from date hereof, or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1923,
Series 1965-66, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Olive Street,
as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans
and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer.
2, That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
3. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifi-
cation No. 65-66-80.
4. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building inspection.
5. That any air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from
view from abutting street.
6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
9291
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M..
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
Mayor Krein asked if the applicant or her agent had anything
to add to the evidence previously presented.
Mr. Wayne Gobel, representing the builders of the proposed
duplex, advised that subject property is a double lot, and the appZicant
proposes to replace an old existing dwelling on the rear of the property
with a new duplex dwelling.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council
in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearth9 closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-171: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-171
for adoption, authorizin9 preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-80 - R-3)
Roll Gall vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-171 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-172: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-172
for adoption, granting Variance No. 1758, subject to the recommendations
of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
VARIANCE NO. 1758.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-172 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-81 AND VARIANCE NO. 1759: Submitted
by So-Go Enterprises for a change of zone from R-A ±o C-1 and waivers of
minimum parking requirements and maximum building height; property located
on the east side of Dale Avenue at Ravenswood Drive (1222-1224 South Dale
Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 1928
and 1929, Series 1965-66, recommended said reclassification be denied,
and denied said variance.
Using sectional district maps posted on the east wall of the
Council Chamber, Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property
and the exlsting uses and zoning in the immediate area. He called
a!tention to findings of the City Planning Commission which were the
basis for the recommended denial of subject petitions.
}292
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor asked if the petitioner or a representative was present.
There was no response.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in
opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-173: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-173
for adoption, upholding the action of the City Planning Commission denying
Reclassification No. 65-66-81.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN
AREA OF 17~E CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (65-66-81)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-173 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NC,. 66R-174: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-174
for adoption, upholding the action taken by the City Planning Commission
denting :,/ariance k!o. i759,
Refer to Resol~tion Book.
A RESOLLflON OF N~E C!IY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING
VARIANCE NO. 1759,
Roil call ~ore:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dut±cn, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schut±e
Fhe :'~iavor declared Resolution No. 66R-1'7~ duly passed and adopted.
FUBLIC ~:" ~
..~nR:NG - RECLASS£FICAIION NO. 65-66-82 AND CONDIYIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 805:
Submf+ted by Moter: M. and b%ude M. Dizney requesting change of zone from
R-A *,:: R-3, and waivers of maximum structure heigh+, accessory buildings,
d~s~arc~ b~tweer,. [uildings and living un, ts more than 200 feet from a
stan'dara street~ propert,/ !c. cated on ~h.e south side of Ball Road between
Sal~ lvetue a::d [6rp Drive ( ,,
~ , ,2828-28o~ West Ball Road~
The ,3ity Planning Sommissicn oursuant to Resolution No. 1924,
S~:e.~. ] ''~?-c,o~ recommend~:d._ approval of subject reclassification, subject
to +a~ f liow~r:9 conditions:
1. r~a: the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Ball Road, for str~+ widening purposes.
2. P'a? street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
r qu'rements of: *he Cit,,' of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as curbs
ard ~u~%ers, aidewalks~ s{reet grading and paving~ drainage facilities~
.,z :'fher appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City
_ ql?'eer and i~ accordance wlth standard plans and specifications on
f:~le ~n the office ef the City Engineer~ and that a bond ~n an amount
ard f )Tm satisfactory tc the Ci~,/' of Anaheim shall be posted ~ith the
~ c cuarantee ~he i};stallat;~on of 5a~d engineering requirements.
3, ihat the o~ners of sublect prcperty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
The sum o~ $2.?}0. per ~ron+. fcc~. along Ball Road~ for ~t~.r~et= lighting
purpo sea.
4~ That iht owners of subject property shall pay {o the Clty of Anaheim
*he sum c.~ 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road, for tree planting
purpo sea.
5. ihat lhe owners cf subject property shall pay to the C~ty of Anaheim
the sam of $25.00 per dwelllng unit, to he used [or park and recreation
purp.c, ses, said amoun~ to be pa~d at the time the building permit [s issued.
9293
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1~ 1966, 1:30 P.M.
6. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner satisfactory to the
City Engineer.
7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied
with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1925
Series 1965-66, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 805, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
2. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 65-66-82.
4. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the property
lines where garages do not abut the property line, as stipulated to
by the petitioner.
5. That the proposed 15 foot one way alley, extending southerly from
the private drive, shall be increased to a 20 foot two way alley to
provide adequate circulation, as stipulated by the petitioner.
6. That any air conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly
shielded from view from abutting street.
7. That Condition Nos. l, 2, 4, 5 and 6, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building inspection.
8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 10, provided~ however, that the plans
shall be revised to include the reduction of any structure within
150 feet of R-l, One Family Residential, Zoned property, to one
story in height.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He called attention to
findings of the Clty Planning Commission precedent to their action, noting
that the Conditional Use Permit was granted with the following exception:
Waiver of one story height limitation was granted from the R-A zone
boundary on the west, but was denied within 70 feet of the existing and
developed R-1 zone to the east.
Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioner wished
to address the City Council.
Mr. Dwight E. Bennett, Architect for the developers, indicated
his presence for the purmose of answering any questions of the Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-175: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-175
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RBLATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-82 - R-3)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-!75 duly passed and adopted.
9294
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-176: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-176
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 805, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission, denying therefrom
requested waiver of one story height limitation within ?0 feet of the
E-i property to the east.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 805.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-176 duly passed and adopted.
BROADWAY-BROOKHURST ANNEXATION: Request for consent to start proceedings for
the annexation of certain territory to the City of Anaheim was submitted.
Councilman Chandler moved said request be referred to the City
Planning Commission for report and recommendations. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS: On motion by Councilman Chandler,
seconded by Councilman Pebley, Horace E. Camp and Lewis Herbst were re-
appointed Members of the Anaheim City Planning Commission for the ensuing
term. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
SPECIAL COUNSEL - ADVANCE PAYMENT: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded
by Councilman Pebley, advance of $5,000.00 to A. Patrick Nagel, Special
Counsel, was authorized, said advance to apply to his fee, with final
accounting and approval by the City Council. MOTION CARRIED.
TERMS OF SPECIAL AGREEMENT - ANAHEIM STADIUM, PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL: Mr. Geisler
submitted and read draft of a letter outlining terms of proposed agreement,
pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-150.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
execution of said letter was approved as serving under the intent of
Resolution No. 66R-150. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENI: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion, MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 9:25 P.M.
City Clerk