Loading...
1974/10/017~-983 City ~!!., A~aheim, California - COUNCIL--S - October. l~ !9~a. 1:$0 P.H. The City CounCil of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCIL HEHBF.qS: Eayvood, Pebley (arrived at 3:00 P.H.), Sneesas and Thom ABSENT: COUNCIL HEHBERS: Seymour PRESENT: CITY HANAGER: Keith A. Hurdoch ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: John Harding ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: B~I Hopkins DEPUTY CITY ATTORIqKY: Prank A. Lowry,. Jr. CITY CLERK: Alona H. Hougard DEPUTY CI1~t CLERK: Linde D. Roberts ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Willia~ G. Devitt ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts PLAnNInG SUPERVISOR: Don,HcDaniel ASSOCIATE FLANNER: Bill Young Hayor Thom called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Lowell Linden of the First Congregational Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the Assembly in the Pledge of A~legiance to the Flag. .,INTRODUCTION OF NE~ KHPLOYKES: Hr. Frank Campa~noni of the City Personnel Depart- ment introduced 21 new employees attending the Council meeting as part of the City's orientation program. .Hayor Thom welcomed the new employees to the City team. H_INUT._~S: Minutes of the Anahei~ City Council Regular Heeting held August 27, 1974, ~ere approved as corrected, on s orion by Councilwo~an Kay. sod, seconded by Councilmen Sneegas. HOTION CARRIRD. ..~IVE~..OF .P~DING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Sneegas moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Hembers unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilwoman Kayvood seconded the motion. ~IOTION UNANIHOUSLY CARRIED. R~POR~,- FIHANCIAL DKHAHDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $933,525.98, in accordance with the 197~-75 Budget, were approved. C-.~T~ PUBLIC HEARING - G.KNKRAL FLAN AHKHDM~.. NO. ~.$~: To consider the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 132 as the Seismic and Safety Element of the Anaheim General Plan, together with application for Exemption Statue from the requirement to prepare an environmental ~npact report. The City Planning Coue~ssion, pursuant ~o Resolution No. PC74-167, recommended adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 132 ~n accordance with Exhibit ~ublic hearing on subject ~eneral Plan Amendment vas held on September 3, 1974, continued to the meeting of September 17, 197~, and further continued to this date to alloy time for further study and review. Deputy'City Clerk L~nda Roberts, advised' that subsequent to the public hearing held September 17, 1974, a revised element dated October, 197~, had. been submitted by Plann~ Division for Council consideration. Yr. Don l~Dan:Lel, Planning Supervisor, reported that subsequent to the September 17, 1974 meeting, the staff did meet with the Association of Engineer- ing Geologiets (AKG), who expressed certain concerns relative to the Seismic and Safety Elmnt as proposed at that t~m8. The proposed Element lmo been revised in accordance with what the Planning staff felt were appropriate rscoumendations frou the AEG. He OBphaSiSed that 8over~ of the areas of concern pointed out by 74-984 City Hall, Anaheimr California - COUNCIL MINUTBS - October ir 1974r. 1:30 P.M. the AEG pertain to the technical interpretation of reference sources used in pre- paration of the Element and these concerns were largely resolved with an explana- tion of staff procedure and with documentation of reference sources. Mr. McDaniel further pointed out that while those suggestions were incorporated which are considered by staff to be appropriate, he did not wish to imply that the AEG is completely satisfied with the approach the City chose to use in preparation of this element. Further, he commented that the Development Services Department Planning Staff is satisfied that the revised Element is complete as a general planning policy tool which incorporates the necessary technical information for the purposes of the document. Mayor Thom referred to comments made at the public hearing of September 17, 1974, by Mr. Eagen, of the Association of Engineering Geologists, and asked if the errors of omission pointed out at that time were corrected in the proposed doc,,ment, to which Mr. McDaniel replied affirmatively. The Mayor asked the Council and members of the audience if they had any further comments relative to t~e proposed General Plan Amendment No. 132; there being none, he declared the hearing closed. ENVIRq.h~/ENT~.AL IMPACT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council finds and determines that the adoption of the proposed Element will have no significant effect on the environ- ment and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-482: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 74R-482 for adoption, adopting General Plan Amendment No. 132, Exhibit '~" Revised, dated October, 1974, ~s the Seismic and Safety Element of the Anaheim General Plan. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 132, EXHIBIT '%" REVISED. (Seismic and Safety Element) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour and Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 7~R-482 duly passed and adopted. COUNTY OF O~ANGE SEISMIC AND SAFETY ELEMENT: Mayor Thom introduced Mr. Rick Munson, Orange County Geologist, to present a brief overview of the information compiled to date by the County in preparation of their Seismic and Safety Element, which Element will also be incorporated as part of the City's upon its completion. Mr. Munson gave a brief report with slide illustrations, demonstrating the potential geologic hazards throughout Orange County with pertinent statistics. He reported that the County is also combining both the Seismic and Safety Elements into one complete document, which will be rather extensive and which is expected to go to print in three to four weeks. Mr. Munson advised that the County's Seismic and Safety Element will include maps which identify those areas which would be most likely affected by various intensities of shaking, major landslides, seismic sea wave run-up and liquefaction. At the conclusion of the presentation, the Mayor thanked Mr. Munson and again reiterated that inasmuch as the results of Mr. Munson's work will become a part of the City's Seismic and Safety Element, he felt it was appropriate for the Council to review this material. CONTINUED D.~CISION - AMENDM~ TO TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODEr ZONING: To consider a~.ndment to Title 18, Zoning, of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertain- i~ to Site Developsmnt Standards of all one-family residential zoned districts, relating to garage setbacks and parking standards. 74-9~5 City ilall, Anaheim, C&lifornia -'C~..UNC.XLItXNU~.ES.- October 1,~,1974a 1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-156, reco~nded adoption of Exhibit '~". Public hearing was held on September 17, 1974 and decision on adoption of the proposed amendment to Title 18 continued to this date to allow staff time to rewrite the amendment to provide for more flexibility. Nayor Thom asked if the Council wished to reopen the public hearing to receive additional testimony, and the Council Hembers indicated that if there were persons in the audience who wished to speak, then they felt they should be afforded an opportunity to do so. Hayer Thom asked if anyone wished to address the Council and thereupon recognized ~Lr. John Hillick, and reopened the public hearing. M~. John Millick, Vice Presid6nt, Anaheim Hills, Inc., stated that although the revised amendment to Title 18 under discussion does offer the flexi- bility which both developers and Council were seeking originally, he wished to cement on several aspects of the proposed amendment. He took exception to the statistics provided as backup information which indicate that 5.4 autos per household provides an accurate standard, noting that if the high end of Orange County Planning Department 1973 statistics are used, which includes all vehicles including motorcycles, campers, etc., the figure derived by appropriate formula is 2.24 vehicles which is considerably lower. He stated that the statistics would provide amore meaningful figure if the number of licensed drivers and number of automobiles were compared to determine how many parking spaces should be provided per household. The ntmber $ or 6, in his estimation is very arbitrary. Hr. Hillick commented that the minimum setback requirement being estab- lished at ~ot less than 20'.feet would require that all garages.which are less than 20 feet from the front setback would be side-on garages. Further, he was of the opinion 'that this would reduce rather than increase the amount of plant materials and green area on the street. He race,ended as a substitute for this provision that the Council might allow front-on garages at the 10-foot setback with garage door openers. He also noted that they would prefer that the 20-foot setback requirement be increased to 25 feet. Hr. Bill Young, Associate Planner, noted that several alternatives were listed in the proposed amendment since it was felt in view of the complexity of the situation and interrelationship between parking and setbacks that these could be used as a ground for discussion. The recommendation for averaging of setbacks in all zones was included since they felt this would bring the Contemporary residential zones much closer to the point of allowing a larger percentage of the lot to be used for recreational purposes. Hr. Young stated that the recommendation on the minimma setback of 20 feet was mede with the intent of presenting the developer with some form of compromise to alloy a closer location of the garage to the front setback line. The original 25-foot requirement in the Code was for convenience as it permitted opening of the garage door with an automobile parked in the driveway and not necessarily because the staff considered it any better than 20 feet, but 20 feet is considered the absolute minimum which is workable. Hr. Young stated that the miniman four spaces per unit was changed in the revised amendment to provide for five spaces per unit to be located somewhere in close proximity to said unit because of the developer's contentions that perkins need not be on-site to be effective, whereas in the past, two parking epaceswere required on-site or enclosed:in a saraSe, and there was by inference two open spaces plus one to three spaces at curb-side depending on the width of the lot. In reply to Hr. Ntlick'e suggestion that an equation be considered com- p&ring the number of automobiles with the number of licensed drivers, he noted that this has bee done and tb~ results are reported on Page No. 3 of the staff report. With resard to the 6- to 10-foot setback, the staff has devised a table which could be used to provide the flexibility of allowing a portion of the lots to have 6- to 10-foot front setbacks. However in the experience of the depart- uental and the nondepartmental staff and the Traffic Ev4ineer, the 6- to 10-foot front setbacks are not that effective and are not in the beet interests of traffic safety. 74-986 City ~all, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Deputy City Attorney Frank Lowry advised that it is the opinion of the City Attorney's Office that the provision for averaging or percentages in front setback requirements would not survive the scrutiny of a legal action since it is felt that using the averaging or percentage technique is discriminating in that it grants one property owner a right which another property owner does not enjoy. He pointed out that this provision, while it might not create problems in new developments and could be supported by the City Attorney's Office for new tracts, would precipitate potential problems in older tracts. They foresee the possible effect on owners of older homes who may wish to expand into the 25-foot front setback, which was required at the time that particular house was built, .and Council would have a difficult time denying this type of activity if other property owners enjoyed this privilege. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council relative to the proposed amendment to Title 18 regarding garage setbacks and parking standards for one-family residential zones; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. Councilwoman Kaywood related some of the history pertaining to this proposed amen~ent, noting that during her tenure on the Planning Commission a subdivision of 5,000-square foot lots with 20-foot setbacks and 5 to 7 bedrooms was recognized, even pr$o~ to ~pmpletion, as creating a parking problem since parked cars on the s~gr~_~N~¥e~x~_~u~ overlap the sidewalks and protrude into the street and caus~~ ~-s~re~parking. Because of this, the Planning Commission at that time felt that the 20-foot setbacks were obviously inadequate and increased the standard to 25 feet. Following the next municipal election, a paragraph was added to!the Code which permitted six- to ten-foot setbacks with automatic garage door openers as well, which was never intended, to her knowl- edge, by that Planning Co-w, ission. She pointed out that the problem is, and has been, a shortagd of parking spaces and the six- to ten-foot setbacks, even with automatic garage door openers, does nothing to solve this problem becausethe shortened driveway reduces the number of parking spaces available and necessi- tates heavy on-street parking which, in turn, makes it difficult or impossible for street sweepers to perform their Jobs, and that can result in a health hazard. ORDINANCE NO. 3359: Councilwoman Kaywood further advised that her purpose is to prevent and correct, not create such problems, and thereupon offered Ordinance No 3359 for first reading amending Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertain- ing to garage setbacks and parking standards in all one-family residential zoned districts, in accordance with Exhibit "A", as recommended by the City Planning Commission. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTIONS 18.13.030 C.l., 18.14.030(2)(a)3., 18.18.030 2.(a), 18.20.030(1)(a), 18.24.030(1)(a), 18.26.050(5)(a)3., 18.13.030F, 18.16.050(8), 18.18.030(6), 18.20.030(5), 18.24.030(5), and 18.26.050(6) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND ENACTING NEW SECTIONS IN THEIR PLACE, RELATING TO ZONING. (Front yard and garage setbacks; off-street parking and loading requirements) PUBLIC ~FAR.~G - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE~ ZONING: To con- sider amendments to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Zoning, pertaining to definitions of and location requirements for, Planned Residential Developments (PRD's). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-179, recom~anded adoption of the ameng_ment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as set forth therein and further recommended rescinding Resolution No. 64R-861 pertaining to criteria.for the development of Planned ReSidential Developments. Mr. Bill Young advised that this proposed amendment to Title 18 revolves around the recent addition to the Code of RM-4000 Zone and those amendments to the Code which are necessary to bring the remainder of the zones into conformity with the requirements of RM-4000. He noted that the only sections in the pro- posed amendment which would be of a substantive nature are the redefinition of a planned unit development which expandson the previous definition and can include any commercial or industrial development which would be of planned unit develop- ment nature; as well as'the section which permits the PRD's in multiple-family zones by right, provided these comply with standards of the RM-4000 Zone. * See Minutes of November 5, 1974, 1:30 P.M., Pa~e No. 74-1074, "Minutes". 74-987 City ~Ba11~ Anahet~ Ca~!f0rnia - COUNCIL EINUTES - October 1~ .1974~ 1:30 P.H. The Nayor' asked if anyone Wished to address the Council relative to the proposed amendment to the Anahetm Hunicipal Code pertaining to def~nitions of and location requirements for PRD's; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. ORDINANCE NO. 3360: CouncilW°~an Kayvood offered Ordinance No. 3360 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTIONS 18.08.605, 18.64.020(1)(e), 18.13.020.C.3, 18.18.025(1), 18.20.015(1), 18.24.015(1), 18.26.040(1), 18.28.040(1) AND ANENDING SECTIONS 18.04.162, 18.28.020(1); AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 18.08.605, 18.13.020.C.3, 18.18.025(1), 18.20.015(1), 18.24.015(1), 18.26.040(1) AND 18.28.020(1)(e) PERTAINING TO ZONING. (Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) and Residential Planned Unit Development (R.P.U.D.) in the ~-4000 Zone; densities) RESOLUTION NO. 74R-483: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 74R-483 for adoption, rescinding Resolution No. 64K-861, which established the criteria for development of Planned Residential Developments. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REP~G RESOLUTION 64R-861. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: A~SENT: COUNCIL HEIiBERS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL NEHBERS: None COUNCIL NEI~ERS: Seymour and Pebley The Hayor declared.Resolution No. 74R-483 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC ~EARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 74-7§-10z VARIANCE NO. 2621: ApPlication by Cruz and Madeline Vargas for a change tn zone from R-A to C-1 and the following Code waivers to permit the continued use of an existing truck storage yard and to construct a commercial office building on property located on the west side of Mountain View Avenue, south of Katella Way, was submitted together with appli- cation for Exemption Status from the requirement to prepare an environmental ~apact report: a. Hlntmu~ driveway width. (Withdrawn) b. Htntmum front yard setback in the R-A Zone. c. Permitted uses in the C~l Zone. d. Nlntmmside yard setback. e. Nax/Jaumbuilding height. 0~ithdrawn) The City Plannln$ Cosmtsston, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-183 recommended that the Council declare subject project exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental /mpact report, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Qualtty Act,and further recommended approval of Reclass- ification No. 74-75-10 subject to the following conditions: 1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Mountain Vtew Avenue including preparation of improvement plans end installation of all t~prove~ents such as curbs and ~utters, sidewalks, street sradtns and pav/n~, dralna~e faculties, or other apimrt~naut ~ork shall be.co, plied with as required by the City En$tneer and in accordance'with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Hountain View Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifica- tions on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and for~ satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned require~ents. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of &naheim the su~of 60¢ per front foot alonsHount&in ¥iewAvenue for tree plant- ing purposes. 74-988 City Hall. Anaheimt California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 7. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject prop- erty, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provi- sions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That Condition Nos. 3, 5 and 6, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission or City Council may grant. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-184, recommended that the Council declare subject project exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and granted Variance No. 2621 in part, waivers "a" and "b" having been withdrawn by the Applicant and waiver "c" granted for a period of two years, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclass- ification No. 74-75-10, now pending. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and ~pecifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 (Revision 1) and 2 through 5; provided, however, that trash storage areas shall,be provided' in conformance to City standards and adequate corner cut offs shall be provided within the parking area to accommodate trash collection vehicles, and interwoven redwood or cedar slats shall be installed in the proposed gate across the entrance driveway, as stipulated to by the petitioner. 3. That this variance is granted for a period of two (2) years, and upon request by the petitioner, an additional period of time may be granted upon approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. 4. That the storage yard shall be used exclusively for storage of trucks owned by the petitioner, said trucks not to exceed two-ton capacity, and that no construction clean-up materials shall be stored on the subject property, as stipulated to by the petitioner. Zoning Supervisor Roberts reported that subject property is comprised of approximately 1 acre of land located on the west side of Mountain View approxi- mately 420 feet south of Katella Way; that the property has been used for some time as a storage facility for vehicles involved in construction cleanup. The Applicants are requesting change in zone to C-1 and it is their intent, in addi- tion to the existing construction storage activity, to construct a new office building on the front portion of the property. A part of this would be used for office space to conduct a storage business already present on the property and the remainder would be available for rental by other businesses. Mr. Roberts reported that the original application did not include a request for the change of zone to C-1 and the five waivers originally applied for were necessary in that the property was to remain in the R-A zone. However, the reques~ for C-1 zoning filed pursuant to Reclassification No. 74-75-10 eliminates the need for waiver "b", and due to revised plans waiver "a" is no lOnger neces- sary. Waivers "d" and "e" apply to parcels north and south of subject property . which are still in the R-A zone. The Planning Commission in reviewing subject project felt that the trend in the iamediate surrounding area is for commercial zoning and if the surrounding parcels were in the C-1 Zone, these waivers would not be necessary and, therefore, approved the variance, in part, and recommended approval of the reclassification. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent were present and satisfied with the recom~ndations of the City Planning Commission, and Mr. Carlos Vargas, 1184 North Madford, Agent for the Applicants, replied affirmatively. 74 -989 City Hallt Anaheimt California - COUNCIL .N!NI~ES - October It .1974t 1:30 P.M. The Mayor' asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or in opposition to subject reclassification or variance, and ther~ being no response, he declared the hearing closed. ..E~V!RONMENTAL IMPACT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council finds and determines that this project will have no significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED. R~SOLUTION NO. 74R-484: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-484 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT~ COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING TBAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (74-75-10 - C-l) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL lqi~qBl~S: Kal,~ood, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour and Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-484 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-485: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-485 for adoption, ~ranting Variance No. 2621, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2621. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour and Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-485 duly passed and adopted. DINNERTDANCING AND AMUSEMENT DEVICES PERMITS: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the following applications for permits were approved as recommended by the Chief of Police: a. Application filed by John F. Butler for Dinner-Dancing Place Permit for the Sirloin Inn, 3244 West Lincoln Avenue, to allow dinner-dancing on Thursday through Sunday nights from 9:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., subject to the provisions of Chapters 3.28 and 4.16 of the AnaheimMunicipal Code. b. Application filed by Juanita F. McGhee for Amusement Devices Permit Co allow Cwo pool tables aC the Red Lion Inn, 120 East Lincoln Avenue, sublect to the provisions of Chapter 3.24 and 4.20 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. c. Application filed by James T. Moore, Rowe Service .Company, Inc., for Amusement Devices Permit to allow one lukebox~ two pinball games and two pool tables at Billy Jack's' 2800 Miraloma Avenue, sublect to the provisions of Chapters 3.24 and 4.20 of the AnaheimMunicipal Code. 4. Application filed by James T. Moore, Rowe Service Company, Inc., for Amusement Devices Permit to allow two luke boxes at the Golden Forest Inn, 1050 West Katella Avenue, subject to the provisions of Chapters 3.24 and 4.20 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 5.' Application filed by James A. Grubb, for Amusement Devices Permit to allow one pool table at The Spur, i???A West Lincoln Avenue, subject to the provisions of Chapters 3.24 and 4.20 of the AnahehaMunicipal Code. MOTION CIRRIED. 74-990 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL I~S - October iF 1974~ 1:30 P.M. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PARADE FEE - AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY BIKE-A-THON: Request filed by Gerald Wolf, Chairman of the Bike-A-Thou, ~m~_rican Cancer Society, for waiver of the parade fee in connection with a Bike-A-Thon to be held October 19, 1974, was submitted for Council consideration together with reports from the City Attorney's Office and Police Department recom~nding said request be denied on the basis that the $25 application fee is required to pay the cost of processing the application and is not in the nature of a tax. Councilman Thom moved that the request for waiver of the $25 Parade Permit Fee submitted in connection with the American Cancer Society Bike-A-Thon be denied in accordance with recommendation of the City Attorney's Office, on the basis that this is a processing fee and not a tax. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Pebley entered the Council Chambers. (3:00 P.M.) EXT,~NS,,I,ON QF TIME 7 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73-74-11~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1415 AND T~NTATIVE MAP, TRA~.T NO. 8409: Request of Marlene A. Fox, 610 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, dated September 25, 1974, on behalf of Southwest Properties, Inc., for a one-year extension of time to Reclassification No. 73-74-11, Condi- tional Use Permit No. 1415 and Tentative Map, Tract No. 8409, was submitted for Council consideration,..~together with reports from the City Engineer and Develop- meat Services Department. Subject reclassification, conditional use permit and, tentative tract were a~proved by the City Council on October 9, 1973 to establish a llD-unit planned residential development at a proposed density of 10 units per residential acre. Zoning Supervisor Roberts reported that the letter from Ms. Fox request- ing the extension of time calls attention to the following facts: 1. That Tract No. 8409 was a subject of litigation initiated by the Orange Unified School District (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 208920) challenging the adequacy of Environmental Impact Report No. 97. On March 15, 1974, a written opinion was rendered denying the School District's request for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus and Permanent Injunction. 2. Subsequent to that time the School District filed an appeal in the District Court of Appeals, San Bernardino, further rendering the fate of this project uncertain from the viewpoint of the Developer. 3. The appeal was voluntarily dismissed by the School District during the first week of August, 1974, after the settlement agreement between the City, the Orange Unified School District and Anaheim Hills, Inc./Texaco Ventures, Inc., had been executed. Hr. Roberts further advi8ed that .the letter indicates Southwest Prop- erties, Inc., has been working diligently to be in the position to submit the tentative map to the City to be approved as a final map, and noted that the plans for final map are now in plan check. He stated that review of thedevelopment plan indicates that with the density currently proposed of 10 units to the acre, the project would conform to RM-4000 standards. Councilman Thom noted that although he was not originally in favor of this particular project, he would not wish to Jeopardize the settlement agreement between the parties concerned, and for that reason moved that a one-year extension of tim~ be granted to Reclassification No. 73-74-11, Conditional Use Permit No. 1415 and Tentative Map, Tract No. 8409, expiring October 9, 1975. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION ~0. 74R-486 -WOR~ORDERMO..717-B: Upon receipt'of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Sneega8 offered Resolution No. 74R-486 for adoption. Rarer to R~solution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TRg CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AHD THE FURNISHING OF AT~. PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIP- NKNT AND ALL UTILITIES ~ TRANSPORTATION IHCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORKNKCESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND CONPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROV~f,.TO WIT: TR~ LA PALNAAVI~U~ STREET IMPROVEMgNT, IN THE CITY OF ANAR~IN, WORI~ORDERNO. 717-B. (Sully-Miller Contracting Company) 74-991 City Hallt Anaheimt California - COUNCIL NINUTES - October it ~97&~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call'Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom COUNCIL N EMBERS: None COUNCILMEN BERg: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-486 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-487 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-487 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF.TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Donald R. McWilliams, et al.; Anaheim School Dist. of Orange County; Dorothy E. Hard/nE; Carlton Brown and Co., Inc., et al.; Dale E..Fowler, et ux.; Ball Road Industrial Park; K.E.C. Company; Charles W. Homer, et ux.; Leslie R. Kloppenburg, et ux.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL N~MBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-487 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - PORTABLE VARIABLE LAPSE-TIME RECORDER ANDHONITOR SYSTEM: Mr. John Harding, Administrative Assistant, reported on the recommended purchase of one portable variable lapse-time recorder and monitor system and advised that the only bid meeting specifications was submitted by Videodetics, in the amount of $4,869.75, including tax. He thereupon reco~nded the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilmen Sneegas, purchase was authorized in the amount of $4,869.75, including tax, as recommended by the City Manager's Office. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES - 32 TONS ANNUAL RYE GRASS SEED: Mr. John Harding, Administra- tive Assistant reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 32 tons of annual rye grass seed for the Anaheim Hills and Anaheim Municipal Golf Courses and recommended acceptance of the iow bid submitted by Germains, Inc., in the amount of $12,989.77, including tax. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of Germains, Inc., was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $12,989.77, includin$ tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - FOUR TURF TRUCKSTERS: John Harding, Administrative Assistant reported on the-recommended purchase of four Turf Trucksters for the Parks Divi- sion for which Cushnmn Motor Sales has submitted a quotation in the amount of $13,356, including tax. He noted that these particular units are recom~nded because they are adaptable to equipment presently used by the Parks Division. Council,m~ Sneegas noted that these units cost as much as full-sized trucks and inquired whether they deliver comparable service, to which Mr. Harding replied that the Mechanical Maintenance Superintendent indicates these do render as much,service as a full-sized truck and further advised 'that this may be the last year for purchase of this type of Unit since'other manufacturers are coming out with trucks which will adapt to City equipment. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneesas, the City Council authorized purchase of four Truckster8 from Cushman Motor Sales in the amount of $13,356, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF RItUI-PMENT - FOUR PORTABLE RADIOS AND ONE CHARGER: Mr. John Harding, Administrative Assistant, reported on the recommended purchase of four portable radios and one charser for the Utilities Department line crews and advised that Motorola, Inc., has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $$,$24.72. He noted that because of the necessity to interconnect such equip- ment, the City has previously used one manufacturer, Motorola, Inc. 74 -992 City Ha.ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, purchase of four portable radios and one charger was authorized in the amount of $5,524.72, from Motorola, Inc., as recommended by the City Manager's Office. MOTION CARRIED. CONSULTANT SELECTION AND STUDY OBJECTIVES - MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER STUDY: Report from the Planning Division of Development Services Department was submitted regarding progress on consultant selection and objectives for the Multi-Modal Transportation Center Study. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by COuncilman Pebley, the City Council endorsed the Marketing and Planning Committee's recomme_ndation that Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall or Kaiser Engineers could both successfully complete the study with a high level of competence; and further reaffirmed its objective of having the study completed as soon as possible in an ~ffort to facilitate the provision of an Inter-City (Anaheim) Transportation System which will assist the City in its Redevelopment Project; and directed that this position be forwarded to the Orange.County Transit District Board of Directors. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Claim submitted by Reno Petrella for general damages and injury purportedly sustained as a result of actions of Anaheim Police Officers, on or about June 23, 1974. b. Claim submitted by R~ E. Quick for damage sustained to washing machine purportedly as a result of iow voltage supplied by City of Anaheim, on or about September 4, 1974. c. Claim submitted by Leilani M. Scheper for damage and injury purport- edly sustained asa result of action of Anaheim Police Officers, on or about September 12, 1974. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLU%.ION !~0- 74R-488 - LEASR PORTION OF CITY PARKING LOT TO AMERICAN COLLRGE OF LAW: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 74R-488 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE LEASING OF A PORTION OF A CERTAIN PARKING LOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF LAW. (Parking Lot No. 4) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-488 duly passed and adopted. AGREE~S R~GARDING i-MILLION GALLON RESERVOIR AND 1320 ZONE Pb~PING STATIONS LOCATED IN ANAH~IHHILLS: The Deputy City Clerk presented three agreements necessary to employ Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services regarding the design of a 1-million gallon reservoir and pumping station near Hidden Canyon Road and Avenida Santiago in the Anaheim Hills area. In accordance with Rule No. 15, Section B.4.A, Anaheim Hills, Inc., the Developer, will make the initial capital investment for the facilities and will, in turns be reimbursed for said facilities over a period of time from a 22I special facilities water rate sur- charge from the customers which these facilities will-serve. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired why the first proposed agreement between the Cities of Anaheim and Orange indicates that Anaheim would de-annex certain properties if the City of Orange determines they will construct a reservoir in this location as well. Hr. Larry Sears, Water Superintendent advised that during the negotiat- in~ discussions with the City of Orange, this was one of the provisions they very strongly desired inserted in the agreement. It states that if the City of Orange 74-993 ti. fy Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL. ,~K!NU~E, S - October 1, 1974, 1:30 P.M. builds a reservoir at this site in the future and if it is feasible, they will request de-annexation of certain property at the cotton boundary line between the tvo cities. He also noted that the City of Orange was further concerned as to the appearance of the project since it is located on the ridge line. Mayor Thom corroborated that this point was debated during discussions which lasted several months. ~OLUTION NOS. 74R-489~ 74R-490 Ah'D 74R-491: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolu- tion Nos. 74R-489 through 74R-491, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RI~LUTION NO. 74R-489: S RESOLUTION OF THE CITY-COUNCIL OF IRE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A~ AGREE~T BEllmEN THE CITY OF AIIAHEIHAND CITY OF ORAl/GE ADJUSTING THE COHNON BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN SAID CITIES TO PFA~ilT CERTAIN TERRITORY TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIN FOR A WATER RESERVOIR SITE. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-490: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERI'NG CORPOR- ATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES REGARDING DESIGN OF A ONE MILLION GALLON RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION, AND AUTHORIZING THE NAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE S.AID AGREEMENT. RES, OLUTION NO. 74R-491: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN A~ TO PROVIDE FOR THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF A ONE HILLION GALLON RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION TO BE PAID FOR BY ANAHEIM HILLS, INCORPO- RATED/TEXACO ANAHEIM HILLS, INC., AND TO AUTHORIZE THE NAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL ~I/BERS: COUNCIL MENBERS: COUNCIL ME~BERS: Kayvood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 74R-489 through 74R-491, both inclu- sive, duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence vas ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom: a. Before the Public Utilities Coemission - Application of Stuart Alan Nlssenick, dba The Co-ordinators, for a certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to operate a sightseeing tour service between Buena Park, California and San Ysidro, Californh. Application of Stuart Alan Hessenick, dba The.Co-ordinators, for a certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to operate a sightseeing tour service between Anaheim, California and Magic Mountain in Valencia, California. Greyhound Lines, Inc. vs Stuart Alan Messenick, dba The Co-ordi- nators. b. Before the Public Utilities Conenission - Application of Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Western Division) for authority to publish automatic labor cost adJustmant tariff provision. c. Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 91 by Senator Petris, Re American Indians. d. Orange County Board of Supervisors -' Resolution No. 74-1294 - Re Police Protection Services to agencies by contracting. e. Stockton East Water District - Resolution No. 74-75-7 - Opposing' the Stanislaus R/vet Initiative - Proposition 17. f. Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County - Placentia ~solution No. 74-R-193 and No. 74-R-194, Garden Grove Resolution No. 4636-74, Fountain Valley hsoluti°n No. 7237, No. 7238, No. 7239 and No. 7240, Costa Masa Resolution No. 74-63 and No. 74-66 and Stanton Resolution No. 74-59. 74-994 City Hall~ Ana,hetm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. g. Airport Land Use Commission - Minutes - September 5, 1974. h. Community Redevelopment Commission - Minutes - August 28, 1974. i. Anaheim Public Library Board - Highlights/Minutes - August 26, 1974. J. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of'August, 1974 for the City Treasurer and Engineering Division. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3358: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3358 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIHAMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 PERTAINING TO PARKING. (No parking anytime - Dale Avenue, east side, north of Ball Road) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL HEHBERS: COUNCIL HE~BERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Hayor declared Ordinance No. 3358 duly passed and adopted. "DYNAMIC ANAHEIM STORY" - ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Mr. Joe Wade of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce introduced the "Dynamic Anaheim" concept developed by the Chamber of Co~rce together with business leaders throughout the community. He introduced Helen Budinger of the Southern California Gas Company and Jack Ward of Sir Speedy Printing who were both instrumental in its development. The "Dynamic Anaheim Story" ~as demonstrated for the Council audiovisually with a presentation on a television monitor, showing the various business, industrial and recreational facets of the CitY. At the conclusion of the film presentation, books prepared in conjunction with the concept, which carry further the theme of "Dynamic Anaheim" and present a good deal of hard factual information were distributed to the Council Members. Mr. Wade reported that this television film technique allows the Chamber to deliver information in a dynamic fashion to any businessman in the Country interested in Anaheim's story, and it can be displayed on any television screen. He felt that the concept as it has been designed is a fine example of what can be accomplished when business, industry and government pull together. Mayor Thom, on behalf of the Council thanked the Chamber representatives for the presentation and commended the '~Yn. amic Anaheim Story" as one of the most informative documents written about the City and remarked that it should prove to be a fantastic sales tool. OUTLINE OF BUDGET SUPPLEMENT DEALING WITH EMPLOYMENT OF CITY PERSONNEL. UNDER P.E.P. AND C.E.T.A. FUNDS: Mr. Murdoch referred to the $292,000 deletion authorized from the 1974-75 Budget Just prior to approval of same which removed certain positions in order to provide the funds for the Financial and Management Practices Audit. He noted that at that time it was anticipated that these positions could be replaced with P.E.P. or C.E.T.A. Funds. However, he reported that restrictions on use of C.E.T.A. Funds include that the persons so hired come from economically disadvan- taged sections of the City with high unemployment rates, and consequently it will not be possible to fill all the positions anticipated directly with C.E.T.A. Funds although some positions may be provided through trade-offs. He further advised that the combined total funds available to the City of Anaheim from P.E.P. and C.E.T.A. amounts to Just under $500,000, whereas the portion deleted from the Budget was $292,000, so that there will be monies for additional person- nel. He advised that they intend to draw up a budget supplement proposal for Council consideration which will outline the various positions to be provided through these funds. He remarked that it was his understanding that the Council did intend to provide the deleted positions if P.E.P. Funds were available and advised that if Council had any objections to this approach he would prefer to be so informed at this time. 74 -995 City Rallm Anahei~ California - COUNC~L. KINUTES - October ls 1974~ 1:30 P.M. A primary area of difficulty, Nr. Hurdoch reported, has been in the hiring of fire personnel where the City's Affirmative Action Program was aggres- sively initiated. He noted that they were not able to fill these positions with P.E.P. Funds and still ~eet the A~fir~ative Action goals: He co=~ented further that in the recruiting for these fire positions it was deemed necessary to main- Cain employment standards even in the Affir~ative Action Program, and the City has been successful in this recruitment process; however, in doing so, cannot utilize P.E.P. Funds for these positions. Consequently, there is an imbalance in the budget which amounts to $58,000 which could possibly be provided from some other area of the budget. He advised that these transactions would be clearly spelled out in the supplementary budget proposal. Hr. Hurdoch co=~ented that in order to use C.E.T.A. Funds, which are available for e~ploy~ent of people in the low skilled or unskilled categories, the plan which the City staff would like to proceed ~rlth is to form a roving task force, whereby these individuals would be placed into a pool and utilized wher- ever their talents could best be applied. In this connection he noted that the Stadium-Convention Center Director has done a fine Job in productively utilizing these people in maintenance of these structures. In addition, it is felt that these people could be utilized in park maintenance and in particular at the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, to clear up some of the rough areas, thereby increasing speed of play and enhancing utilization of the course. He advised that if this approach seems appropriate and satisfactory to the Council, it will be set up in chis manner and included in the budget supplement. There were no co~nents or discussion from Council, indicating prelimi- nary approval of the concepts briefly outlined by the City Nanager. CONSTRUCTION OF T~O DROP STRUCTURESI A~A~EIHHILLS GOLF COURSE: The City Hanager. reported Ghat Hr. John Collier, Parks, Recreation and the Arts. Director, is quite concerned about the construction of two additional drop. structures in the reset- ,voit channel which runs through the Anaheim Hills Golf Course. He noted that this is a Water Division responsibility and it would probably be necessary for the City to install these whether or not the Golf Course was there. It is pos- sible to construct'these drop structures with utilization of the type of crews the Park Department has, if supplemented. The'estimated cost for these drop structures is $6,000, which ~as not budgeted. Hr. Hurdoch added that it is con- sidered necessary that this work be completed prior to the rainy season this winter. On motion by Council~an Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council authorized the transfer of $6,000 frma the Council Contingency Fund for the purpose of constructing [wo drop structures in the channel running through the Anaheim Hills Golf Course. ~OTION CARRIED. R~SOLUTION NO. 74R-492 - OMEGA-WINSTON ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED): Pursuant to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation Commission's Resolution No. 74-106, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-492 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED OMEGA-WINSTON ANNEXATION. (5.2 acres located on the north side of Winston Road, west of Sunkist, uninhabited) ~mll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL M~BERS: NOES: COUNCIL M~BERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL H~BE~S: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom None Se]mour The Hayor declared Resolution No. 74R-492 duly passed and adopted. I~SOLI~.IOHNO. 7~a-493 -NOm.~n_DRIVENO. 3 ~TI~ (~~IT~): Purs~t to ~t~rity ~ted by the ~cal ~cy Fo~tion C~88i~'8 ~solution No.' 74-118, ~ctl~ ~d offer~ Resolutt~ No. 74R~93 for adoption. 74-996 Cit~ Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED MOBLER DRIVE ANNEXA- TION NO. 3. (7.1 acres located east of the intersection of Mohler Drive and Santa Ama Canyon Road, uninhabited) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOEs: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL HEHBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-493 duly*passed and adopted. ASSISTANCE I~EAGUE OF FULLERTON PRIVATE DANCE - WAIVER OF LICENSE FEE: Request of Helen Seften,. Assistance League of Fullerton, dated September 26, 1974, for permit to conduct private dance on October 12, 1974, from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M., on the Orange Freeway Route 57 and waiver of fees was submitted for Council con- sideration together with recommendations from the City Attorney's Office, License Collector and Police Department that this dance permit be approved subject to the employment of five uniformed private security officers to police the dance. The City Clerk advised that there is no permit fee for a private dance, but perhaps the request for waiver of a fee is in connection with a business license for sale of food or beverages. Mayor Thom remmrked that the requirement for five uniformed private security officers sounded quite stringent. Councilman Sneegas left the Council Chambers. (3:40 P.M.) The City Manager noted that an event such as this, being held out of doors, would require these officers for traffic control and also to prevent gate crashers from entering the party. In answer to Council inquiry, Mrs, Seften advised from the audience that tickets for the event were pre-sold and would not be available at the gate. She further advised that she had contacted and received the approval of the State Department of Transportation and Yeager Constructors to conduct this event. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council approved permit for a private dance to be held by the Assistance League of Fullerton on October 12, 1974, from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M., on the Orange Freeway Route 57, Ball Road overpass, subject to the hiring of five uni- formed private security officers to police the event'and further waived any applicable business license fee in connection therewith (Councilman Sneegas absent). MOTION CARRIED. LAW ENFORCE~ PURPOSES GRANT - CERTIFICATION OF NON-SUPPLANTING: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council authorized Mr. M. R. Ringer, Finance Director, to execute certification of non-supplanting relatimg to law enforcement expenditures for the twelve-month period ending June 30, 1974, to be submitted to the Orange County Criminal Justice Council (Councilman Sneeias absent). MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Sneegas returned to the Council Chambers. (3:45 P.M.) SUGGESTION RgC~LNG LOW-VOLUME PLUMBING FIXTURES - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. NO. 2: Councilwoman Kaywood advised that a special meeting has been set by the Orange County Sanitation District.N~tn~^legarding trunk sewer capacities and design criteria for the Santa Ana/I~e~ptor Sewer, Reach No. 3, which will be located from La Palma and Grove Streets to the Orange County boundary. The District is anticipating a request from AnaheimHills for the annexation of 63 acres to connect to this sewer. In this regard the District Board suggested that the City of Anaheim explore the possibility of requiring low-volume plumbing fixtures in that area, as well as other methods which might be required in new construction (residential, commercial or industrial) as a further means of conserving water throughout the City. * See Minutes of November 5, 1974, 1:30 P.M., Page No. 74-1074, "Minutes". 74-997 City ~all~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. William Devitt, Assistant City Engineer, advised that the Engineer- ing Division would not have any objection to exploring the feasibility of water conservation measures, Deputy City Attorney Lowry indicated that in order to require the low- volt-ac, plumbing fixtures it might be necessary to amend the Building Code Just adopted and he was not certain that the Code pemits the Council to force a type of sanitation device on a developer which is more expensive. Mr. Murdoch commented that it would be worthwhile to determine what the cost differential would be and noted that in the past garbage disposals, when made a requirement in new construction, eliminated the collection of garbage materials. Mr. Lowry pointed out that the new Uniform Plumbing Code is presently being reviewed by staff and will be before the Council in the next few weeks for adoption, and this would be an appropriate time to consider the. matter. Councilwoman Kay~ood stated that she desired to go further into the subject of possible methods to conserve water than Just the low-volume flush. She noted for instance that suggestions have been made by architects that boosters /no~ r be placed on each p~m~ fixture and more oonsideratiOncSi~en to the location of the water heaters to make it possible to conserve the ieee water which asmatty runs down the. drain while waiting for the water to heat up. She felt that there must be other ways which, with some forethought, a great deal of precious natural resources could be saved. Mr. Murdoch briefly noted the research activities being conducted in the conservation area by the California Innovative Group towards reducing energy requiremedts. No further discussion was held at this time and no Council action taken, RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to Executive Session. Councilman Sneeias seconded by motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:50 P.M.) A~TER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council Members being pre- sent with the exception of Councilman Seymour. (4:45 P.M.) ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Sneegas moved to adjourn to Thursday, October 3, 1974, at 6:00 P.M. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 4:45 P.M. city Clirk f * See Minutes of ~ov~aber 5, 1974, 1:30 P.M., Page No. 74-1074, "Minutes".