Loading...
1966/03/229316 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler (entered the meeting 2:07 P.M.) and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PROCLAWArlON: Mayor Krein proclaimed the week of May 1 through May 7, 1966, "Anaheim Cultural Arts Week", in conjunction with the community program sponsored by the women's division of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held February 23, 1966, and Adjourned Regular Meeting held February 25, 1966, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED.. DEMANDS: Report of demands against the City, in accordance with the 1965-66 Budget, amounting to $1,162,267.50, was submitted and ordered received and filed. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PUBLIC NEARING - ABANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of a portion of a former Anaheim Union Water Company right-of-way easement, extending across Lot 52, Tract No. 3390 (west side of Chantilly Street, south of La Palms Avenue), pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-159, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin March 10, 1966, and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against the proposed abandonment, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. The City Engineer reported that subject easement was obtained through purchase of the Anaheim Union Water Company facilities by the City. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-207: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-207 for adoption, approving said abandonment. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF A FORMER ANAHEIM UNION WATER COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREIN- AFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (Lot 52, Tract 3390) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Du±ton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-207 duly passed and adopted. 9317 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22, 1966, 1:30 SIDEWALK WAIVER - 1500 EAST CERRITOS AVENUE: Request of Familian Pipe & Supply Co., for waiver of sidewalk requirement at 1500 East Cerritos Avenue, was submitted together with ~eports from the City Engineer. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that temporary sidewalk waiver be granted, providing that no permanent planting or permanent type improvement be permitted within the area reseryed for future sidewalk. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - 501 EAST CERRITOS AVENUE (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-55-42): Request of Wilbur Hank for waiver of sidewalk requirement at 501 East Cerritos Avenue, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with reports from the City Engineer and Development Services Department. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that temporary waiver of sidewalk requirements be granted, providing that no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalk. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-30 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 743 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Elless Corporation (Lincoln Square), dated March 4, 1966, was submitted for 90 to 120 day extension of time to Reclassification No. 65-66-30 and Conditional Use Permit No. 743, for compliance with certain conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-863 and Resolution 65R-864. Also submitted and reviewed by the Council were reports from the City Engineer and the Development Services Department. On the recommendations of the Development Services Department, 180 day extension of time was granted on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - ~AIVER OF LICENSE FEES: Communication dated March 9, 1966, was submitted from Joseph Chenault, requesting waiver of solicitors license fees to allow solicitation of subscriptions to national magazines. Mayor Krein asked if the applicant was present. There was no response. On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton moved that Council action on the foregoing issue be deferred, pending the applicant's submission to the City Attorney's Office, of information pertaining to the activities proposed and the basis for the request, and report thereon to the City Council. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - A.I.D. UNITED GIVERS CAMPAIGN: Communication dated February 28, 1966, from R. C. Slaughter, Controller, requesting permission to conduct A.I.D. United Givers Campaign in commerce and industry only, on a year-round basis through a payroll deduction program, was submitted. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the Associated In- Group Donors was present~ there was no response. The City Council directed the City Clerk to reschedule said request at a later date, and to notify both the applicants and the Anaheim United Fund organization of the pending request, in order that representatives of both groups might be present. PERMIT - DISNEYLAND FIREWORKS DISPLAY: Application for the summer season fire- works displays at Disneyland Park, commencing at 9:00 P.M. June 17, 1966, through September 10, 1966; also Friday and Saturday, September 30 and October 1st, 1966, and at midnight New Years Eve, December 31, 1966, was submitted by Atlas Fireworks Company, together with explanatory letter dated March 18, 1966, from Jack B. Lindquist, Manager of the Marketing Division, Disne¥1and, and report from Assistant Fire Chief of the City of Anaheim, James J. Heying. }318 R.i~y Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 22, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said application for fireworks displays at Disneyland Park was granted, as requested. MOTION~CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 28, 1966, pertaining to the following applica- tions, were submitted for City Council information and consideration. VARIANCE NO. 1762: Submitted by Boykin B. and Irene L. ~arper, requesting waiver of minimum required floor area for second dwelling on R-3 property located at 535 Victor Avenue. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. ].954, Series 1965-66. VARIANCE NO. 1763: Submitted by Alberta I. Browne requestin9 permission to establish a physical therapy clinic in an existing R-2 residential structure at 1011 East Broadway. Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1955, Series 1965-66. VARIANCE NO. 1764: Submitted by Whitman Center, Incorporated, requesting waiver of maximum structure height to permit the construction of a 20 story office structure on C-2 property, at the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Chapman Avenue, excluding Parcel 150 feet by 150 feet at the immediate corner (Reclassification No, 59-60-115). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1956, Series 1965-66, granted said variance, subject to conditions VARIANCE NO. 1765: Submitted by Robert B. and Joan E. Gordon, requesting permission to establish a beauty shop in an R-1 residence, located at 1628 South Brookhurst Street. Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1957, Series 1965-66. VARIANCE NO. 1768 (RECLASSIFICATION NO 65-66-83 AND TRACT NO. 6146): Sub- mitted by Denver Wilkerson, Buford L. Wilkerson, Dale J. Moore and David Ho McConnell, requesting waiver of minimum lot area on R-A property, located at 848, 900, 906 and 910 South Knott Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1958, Series 1965-66, granted said Variance, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 810: Submitted by Nicholas J. and Lillian Dovalis, requesting permission to establish a convalescent hospital with waiver of building height limit; C-1 property located at 3615 West Ball Road. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution Nco 1950, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 816: Submitted by Joseph and Ann Silver requesting permission for on-sale beer in an existing restaurant; C-1 property located at 34i4 i~est Ball Road. Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1951, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 817: Submitted by George and Elaine F. Smith, requesting permission to expand a non-conforming child nursery; C-1 property located at 118 North Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1952, Series 1965-66, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. 9319 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PEPJ~IT NO. 818: Submitted by Clifford L. Wolfswinkel, requesting permission for on-sale beer and wine in an existing restaurant; C-1 property located at 1228 South Brookhurst Street. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution Nos 1953, Series 1965-66, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 819: Submitted by Wil£red R. and Dolores Atkinson, requesting permission to establish a home for unwed mothers in an existing structure, R-2 property located at 902 West Broadway, Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1965, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 795: The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1957, Series 1965-66, terminated all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 795, which was approved January 13, 1966, for the establishment of a church and Sunday school facility in existing structures, located at 1831 and 1837 West Orange Avenue. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permit and variance applications. VARIANCE NO. 1766 (TENTATIVE MAPS,.TRACTS NOS. 4476~ REVISION 1~ 5593~ 5591 AND 6198): Submitted by Rinker Development Company, requesting permission to establish a 340 unit single family detached subdivision with waivers of (1) front yard setback, (2) lot area and width, and (3) reverse corner lot width; R-A property located at the northeast corner of the Riverside and Newport Freeways. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1949, Series 1965-66. The foregoing action, taken by the City Planning Commission February 28, 1966, was reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken. TENTATIVE MAPS, TRACTS NOS. ~476~ REVISION NO.1, 5593, 5591 AND 6198: Developer - Rinker Development Corporation~ tracts located north and east of the intersection of the Riverside and Newport Freeways, and are proposed for subdivision into four 85 units, single family subdivision, on property approved for R-3, multiple family residential zoning (Reclassifications Nos. 63-6~-20 and 63-64-21). The City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 28, 1966, approved said tentative maps, subject to the following conditions: Tentative Tract No. 4476, Revision No. 1: That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 4476, Revision No. 1, is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 1766. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That the drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. That the alignment of the tract boundary, adjacent to the freeway right-of-way, shall be approved by the State Division o£ Highways. 5. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the southerly property line separating Lot Nos. 1 through 11 and the Riverside Freeway. 6. 'That Street "G" shall be named Sagamore Street; and that Street "H" shall be named Pageant Street. 9320 City Hall, Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Tentative Tract No. 5593: 1. That the approval of Tentative Man of Tract No. 5593 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 1766. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That the discharge of drainage into the Santa Ana River shall be approved by the Orange County Water District, Orange County Flood Control District and the City Engineer. 4, That the alignment of the tract boundary, adjacent to the freeway right- of-way, shall be approved by the State Division of Highways. 5. That Street "B" shall have a mO-foot roadway and 10-foot parkways. 6. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the southerly property line separating Lot Nos. 64~ Vi3, 71, 72 and 74 through 77, and the Riverside Freeway. 7. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the northerly property line separating Lot Nos. 58 through 63 and 132 through 141 and Riverdale Avenue, except that Corner Lot Nos. 63 and 132 shall be stepped down to a height of 30 inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian open- :rigs shall be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right-of-way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Follow- ing installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. That the divider island, in Riverdale Avenue, shall be planted with reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, with plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley open- ings, to Riverdale Avenue, for the south side only, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 10. That Street "A" shall be named Alderdale Circle; and that Street "B" shall be named Roxanne Street. Tentative Tract No. 5591: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5591 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 1766. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as dore than one subdivision, each subdiviszon thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satisfactory to the Clty Engineer. 4. That the alignment of the tract boundary, adjacent to the freeway right- of-way, shall be approved by the State Division of Highways. 5. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the southerly property line separating Lot Nos. 12 through 24, and the Riverside Freeway. 6. That Street "E" shall be named Roxanne Street; and that Street "F" shall be named Flora Slreet. Tentative Tract No. 6198: 1. That the approval of 'Tentative Map of Tract No. 6198 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 1766. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satisfactory to the City Engineer, 4. Ihat the alignment of the tract boundary, adjacent to the freeway right-of-way, shall be approved by the State Division of Highways. 5. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the southerly property line separating Lot Nos. 25 ~hrough 57 and the Riverside Freeway. 9321 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. 6. That the blue border of Tract No. 6198 shall include the street extendin9 southerly from Riverdale Avenue and Riverdale Avenue north of Lot Nos. 63 and 132. 7. Ihat Street "B" shall be named Bainbridge Avenue; Street "C" shall be named Edgepark Street; and that Street "D" shall be named Fauna Avenue. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the foregoin9 tentative maps were approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATIONS NOS. 63-64-20 AND 63-64-21: Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Plannin9 Commission Meetin9 held February 28, 1966, was submitted recommendin9 certain amendments to conditions of Reclassifications Nos. 63-64-20 and 63-64-21, pursuant to Resolutions of Intent Nos. 64R-103 and 64R-105; said amendments in accordance with action taken on Variance No. 1766 and Tentative Tract No. 4476, Revision No. 1, and Nos. 5593, 5591 and 6198. On the recommendations of the City Attorney, action on the foregoing recommendation was deferred one week (March 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.). GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 73: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Clerk was instructed to schedule public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 73, a proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan, Highway Rights-of-way, designating a portion of La Palma Avenue as a primary highway. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP~ 'TRACT NO. 6192: Developer - Orange County Development Corporation (Variance No. 1770). At the request of the Developer, Council action on the above noted tract was deferred, to be considered in conjunction with Variance No. 1770, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. METAL BUILDING POLICY AMENDMENT: In accordance with action taken by the City Council February 23, 1966, authorizing amendment to Council Policy No. 526, Assistant Development Services Director Robert Mickelson, submitted for Council review final draft of the amended policy, designated as Exhibit "A", including standards for sealed finishes of metal buildings. He advised that palnting contractors and supplzers who were contacted~ indicated that the criteria set forth in said Exhibit "A" would be acceptable minimum standards. The City Clerk read communication received this date from Western 0il and Gas Association, giving endorsement by the petroleum industry of the amended policy. Also noted were similar letters from the Los Angeles Paint, Varnish and Lacquer Association, and Wilson and Hampton, Painting Contractors. (Councilman Chandler entered the meeting, 2:07 P.M.) Councilman Dutton moved that amendment to Council Policy No. 526, designated as Exhibit "A", be approved. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF FULLERTON SIGN PERMIT: Request to the City of Fullerton Planning O0mmisg~on for p0rmi~ion to ~r~c± and maintain a tomporary ~ubd~v~ion direction sign, to be located on the west side o£ §tare College Boulevard, nO0 feet south of Orangethorpe Avenue, approximately 150 feet north o£ the City Limits. Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held March 14, 1966, was submitted recommending that the City of Fullerton Planning Commission be informed that the City of Anaheim has a policy regarding the erection of temporary signs, and if said request was approved, that they consider requiring a time limitation of six months, together with posting of a bond to insure removal of the sign after the time limitation expires. 322 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and ordered a copy thereof forwarded to the City of Fullerton PlannZng Commission. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF FULLERTON - PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE: Proposed change of zone from C-2 General Commercial, C-M, Commercial Manufacturing, and M-l, Light Manufactur- ing zones to the C-l, limited Commercial zone, with the designation that it is potentially suitable for uses permitted in a C-3, Central Business District ,Commercial classification; property located on the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, between Harbor Boulevard and Lemon Street. Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held March 14, 1966, was submitted recommending notification to the City of Fullerton that the proposed change of zone would be compatible with the existing and projected future development in the area. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Council indicated their appreciation of receiving notice of the pending zoning action, and took no action thereon. MOTION CARRIED. CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, cancellation of city taxes was authorized on the following properties: a. Property acquired by the Orange County Water District for public purposes, formerly assessed to Stella T. Danker, deed recorded February 7, 1966, as Document No~ 4138, in Book 7832, Pages 784-787, Official Records of Orange County, California. b. Property acquired by State Division of Highways for public purposes, formerly assessed to Sioux Honey Association, ORA 5 PM 36.4 C6008 - Simpson, CCC 125034, Parcel 6; Final Order of Condemnation recorded January 25, 1966, in Book 7820, Page 667, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED. AWARD OF CONTRACT JOB NO. 1000: At the request of the Assistant City Manager, award of contract for Job No. 1000, construction of a maintenance building for the George Hansen Community Park site, was continued one week (March 29, 1966) for additional study by the Engineering Division, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-208 - JOB NO. 890 B: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-208 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE PONDEROSA PARKSITE, AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE AND HASTER STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 890-B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZ- ING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AU~ORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVIIING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCIION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened April 14, 1966~ 2:00 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-208 duly passed and adopted. 9323 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P,M. CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 1 AND 2~ JOB NO. 389-B: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. 389-B, consisting of extra work items in the respective amounts of $12,754.20 and $3,241.28 increases, be authorized. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-209 - JOB NO. 304-A UNIT 1: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-209 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR~ SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECES- SARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: RELOCATION OF HOUSES ON KATELLA AVENUE--lO21 AND 1201 EAST KATELLA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, S. S. PROJECT NO. 304-A, UNIT NO. 1. (Snow House Movers) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-209 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-210 - JOB NO. 303-A: In accordance with certification received from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Schu±te offered Resolution No. 66R-210 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, FROM STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TO APPROXIMATELY 2862 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ PROJECT SS NO. 303-A. (Sully Miller Contracting Co.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-210 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMEN'I: Councilman Chanaler offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-211 through 66R-218, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-211: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Henry Schindler) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-212: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim City School District of Orange County) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-213: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (David S. and Marion Collins) ~324 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22, 1966, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-214: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Homer A. and Ruth A. E. Nelson) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-215: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (g. K. and Frances Fleshman) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-216: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Makot Corporation) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-217: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Mako± Corporation) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-218: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Makof Corporation) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-211 through 66R-218, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of two (2) Utility Carts, as follows, and re- commended acceptance of the low bid, that of Irv Seaver Motorcycles, Santa Aha, in the amount of $2,714.92, including tax: Irv Seaver Motorcycles, Santa Aha Roy's Motorcycle Shop, Santa Aha B. Hayman Co., Los Angeles West Point Ind., Long Beach $2,714.92 2,761.20 2,756.00 1,378.00 On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Peble'? moved that the low bid of Irv Seaver Motorcycles, in the amount of $2,714.92, including tax, be accepted and purchase authorized. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE: Mr. Robert Davis reported on informal bids received for the purchase of Underground Residential Distribution Cable, as follows, and recommended e ~ acc p~ance of the low bid, that of Rome Cable Company, in the amount of $37,306.88, including tax: Rome Cable Co., Los Angeles Graybar Electric Supply, Inc., Anaheim Westinghouse Electric Supply CO.~ Anaheim General Electric Supply Co., Inc.,Anaheim Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., Los Angeles Line Material Co., Pico Rivera $37~306.86 41,858,44 22~646,00 22~781,20 No Bid No Bid On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that the low bid of Rome Cable Co. in the amount of $37,306.88, including tax, be accepted and purchase authorized. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-219: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-219 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 9325 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE SUBORDINATION OF CERTAIN EASEMENTS OF THE CITY TO A CERTAIN EASEMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN A SUBORDINATION OF EASEMENTS AGREEMENT. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dut±on, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-219 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHARTER STUDY COMMITTEE: In accordance with communication dated March 21, 1966, from Harold Smith, President of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, request to discuss the Charter Study Com- mittee's recommended amendments to the City Charter, was ordered taken off agenda, to be rescheduled at the request of the Chamber of Commerce. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-220: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-220 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO THE CITY A LICENSE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN AND USE AN ELECTRIC SUPPLY LINE ACROSS OR ALONG THE PREMISES OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY AT OR NEAR THE STATION OF ATWOOD, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-220 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-221: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-221 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES IN~ ON, OVER AND ACROSS CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. (Katella Avenue - 1320 feet north of Walnut Street) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-221 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte: a. Controller of the State of California - Apportionment of Trailer Coach Fees. b. City of Huntington Beach, Resolution No. 2324 - supporting street name change from Knott Street to Golden West Street. c. City of Brawley, Resolution No. 3001 - Expressing support and devotion to the members of Armed Forces of this CountTy fighting in Vier Nam. d. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application No. 48237 - AIRPORIRANSIT: Petition for Proposed Report and Amended Answer of Southern California Rapid Transit District. }326 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. e. Before Public Utilities Commission - Application of The Western Union Telegraph Company authorizing increase intrastate rates and charges to Private Line Service. ' f. Financial and Operating Reports - February 1966. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE - DOWLIN$ AVENUE~ KRAEMER BOULEVARD AND GLASSEL[. STREET: Relative to the matter of renaming Dowling Avenue (City of Anaheim), Kraemer Boulevard (City of Placentia), and Glassell Street (City of Orange), said street ultimately to be one through street, Mr. Murdoch requested an expression from the City Council regarding the suggestion that' the street name be hyphenated~ for instance, Kraemer-Glassell. Councilman Chandler moved thai, letters be written to the Cities of Placentia and Orange, suggesting the hyphenated name, as recommended. Councilman Dution seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2264: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2264 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-80 - R-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2264 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2265: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2265 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69(13) - M-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2265 duly passed and adopted. .ORDINANCE NO. 2266: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2266 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-19 - C-O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN; NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Du%ton, Peble¥, Schut%e, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2266 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2267: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2267 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 4.80, TRANSPORTATION--JITNEY SERVICE. 9327 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2267 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSAL ANAHEIM JITNEY SYSTEMS~ INC.: The City Clerk read communication received this date from Thomas G. Jaeger, Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc., requesting an initial permit to proceed with their proposed jitney operation pending the effective date of Ordinance No. 2267, in order to acquire necessary equipment and complete insurance requirements prior to the opening of the baseball season, Said letter advised that the corporation would accept full responsibility and hold the City harmless, in the event the Ordinance was not adopted. Discussion was held by the City Council and City Attorney relative to finalizing the application for a jitney system under the provisions of the ordinance, and necessary trial operation period. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that a temporary, or interim permit, on a roving basis, be granted to Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc. to operate under the provisions of Ordinance No. 2267 at their own risk. Further, that application for permit be considered after effective date of Ordinance No. 2267 and City Council review of operations be at±er a reasonable trial period. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2268: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2268 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69(17) - M-L) ORDINANCE NO. 2269: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2269 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-113 - R-3) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information: A. Application submitted by James Madison Thurmond for Person to Person 'Transfer of On-Sale Beer license at The Golden Key, 2625 West Lincoln Avenue (C-2 zone). B. Application submitted by Daniel V. Hayes, President, for New On-Sale Beer and Wine license (bonafide eating place) at La Cadena Restaurant, 1228 South Brookhurst Street (C-1 zone - Conditional Use Permit No. 818). C. Application submitted by James and Margaret Thomson'for Person to Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer license at Carl's Tavern, 1~7 South Anaheim Boulevard (C-2 zone). D. Application submitted by Peter and Carmen Escobar, President, for Person to Person Transfer of On-Sale General license (bonafide eating place) at Casa Escobar, 1731 South Harbor Boulevard (C-1 zone - Variance No. 1095). No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. PROPOSED RELOCATION - MOTHER COLONY HOUSE: Reference was made to communication dated March 9, 1966, from R. Ken Wines, Chairman, Orange County Chapter of the American Red Cross, suggesting the relocation of the Mother Colony House from its present site at ~14 North West Street to a park or other grounds frequently used by the public. 7328 City Hall~ Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22, 1966~ 1:30 It was determined by the City Council that public discussion would be scheduled before the Council on notice by the City Manager, and after receipt of recommendations from the Parks and Recreation Director. KATELLA AVENUE UNDERPASS - SANTA FE ~AILROAD: Pursuant to Council action taken March lb, 1966, authorizing the initiation of eminent domain proceedings on certain real properties for public utility easements, to be used for construction of slopes for proposed grade separation on Katella Avenue east of State College Boulevard (Resolution No. 66R-201), the City Engineer was requested to re-analyze the matter relative to the evaluation of said property and the part:al loss of access rights theretol report to be made to the City Council at the next meeting (March 29, 1966). RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (2:50 AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. BEQUEST - USE OF STADIUM/CONVENTION qENTER PHOTOGRAPHS: Mr. Tom Liegler, Manager, Anaheim Stadium and Convention Center, addressed the Council advising that many requests have been received from purveyors of food products and equipment which will be used or sold at Anaheim Stadium and Convention Center, for permission to use photographs of the Stadium and of the Convention Center in connection with their advertising. He requested an expression from the Council relative to such requests° At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, it was determined that when considering such requests for use of photographs, the Stadium and Convention Center Manager be authorized to exercise his discretion, that the proposed advertising will be in good taste, and any photographs to be used will include a caption reading, "by permission of the City of Anaheim", EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to executive session to allow the City Attorney to inform the City Council relative to litigation pending before the City of Anaheim. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:30 P.M.) Said executive session extended through the dinner hour. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENt: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kreino COUNCILMEN: None. CI~Y MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CItY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene Mo Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborno ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. INVOCATION: Reverend Tom R. Pendell, of the First Methodist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION - ORANGE COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.: Mr. John S. Wright, President, Orange County Property Owners Association, Inc., submitted and read resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of said association February 19, 1966, wholeheartedly urging the electorate to oppose proposed Charter Amendment #402. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 811: Submitted by Lawrence A. Muckenthaier, et al., requesting permission to establish a service station within V5 feet of R-A zoned property, not at the intersection of two arterial streets; C-1 property located at the northwest corner of Loara Street and Crescent Avenue. 9329 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1937, Series 1965-66. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Stephen F. 6allagher, Attorney representing the petitioners, and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Ronald Thompson, Zoning Supervisor, noted the location of subject property at the intersection of an arterial street and a collector street (Loara Street), and the uses and zoning in the immediate area. He called attention to findings of the City Planning Commission precedent to their denial of subject conditional use permit. Concerning said findings, Councilmen Dutton and Chandler noted that although service stations are allowable as a matter of right at the intersection of two arterial streets, an automobile service station is allowable in the C-1 zone by conditional use permit. With reference to Finding No. 5, Councilman Dutton inquired what traffic hazard would be established by the proposed use. Mr. Thompson reported that the City Planning Commission was referring to the traffic using the multiple access drives inherent to service stations, and the potential danger to pedestrian traffic emanating from the residential area to the north and the elementary school to the east. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioner wished to address the City Council. Mr. Stephen S. Gallagher, Attorney for the Applicant, was of the opinion that the designation of Loara Street as a collector street, should no longer apply; that the advent of the post office facility north of subject property has resulted in a considerably increased traffic situation. He advised that the service station was proposed for subject property because of the high traffic count on both streets; further, he noted that a conditional use permit was granted by the City Planning Commission for a service station on Wilshire Avenue, at a location were there was no intersection of another stree±. Relative to pedestrian traffic, Mr. Gallagher advised that the elementary school has a chain link fence along Loara Street, and the called attention to the lack of public sidewalks on the school property, the Broadway Shopping Center, and other properties with the exception of the Post Office north of subject property. He noted that the only protest to subject conditional use permit was from owners of the Post Office to the north, who purchase said property from the petitioners. In conclusion, Mr. Gallagher compared the service station to other commercial uses allowable under the existing C-1 zone, being of the opinion that the service station would be used by existing traffic in the area, while restaurants or other businessess would attract traffic from other areas. He requested that the conditional use permit be granted as the highest and best use of the property. Mr. Fred S. i-inlhoff, of Texaco, Inc., advised that Loara Street is designated an arterial street between Crescent Avenue and Santa ^ha Freeway to the south; that the freeway off-ramp channels heavy traffic into subject area. Considering the regional shopping center on the south side of Crescent Avenue, the post office to the north, and existing traffic, he was of the opinion that Loara Street was, in effect, an arterial street. Mr. Lawrence A. Muckenthaler, owner of subject property, noted that North Street has its westerly terminus at Loara Street, and Crescent Avenue carries westbound traffic as a continuation of North Street. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to the proposed service station, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. ~330 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. The City Manager read telegram received this date from Sapp Construction Company, owners of the post office property to the north, objecting to the proposed service station as a potential detriment to their property and to the neighborhood. Mr. Yintnoff advised that there would be 300 feet of vacant pro- perty between the post office property line and the service station site, RESOLUTION NO. 66R-222: Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that subject property was an appropriate location for a service station facility, taking into consideration the other developments in the area; and he thereupon offered Resolution No. 66R-222 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No~ 811, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Crescent Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 2. That the owner of subject property shall deed to thc City of Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Loara Street, for street widening purposes, including a 15-foot radius corner return. 3. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Loara Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. 7o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 811. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-222 duly passed and adopted. FUTURE BUSINESS LEADERS OF AMERICA: Members of the Future Business Leaders of America and their Teacher, Dee Cox, were welcomed to the Council Meeting by Mayor Krein. GIRL SCOUT TROOPS 140 AND 310: Mayor Krein recognized and welcomed Girl Scout Troups 140 and 310, of the Anaheim Girl Scout Council. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1760: Submitted by Lincoln Square, care of Weger Company, Inc., requesting waivers of number, height and location of free grand,nc ~ignsl R-A property located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street (C-1 zone pending, Reclassification No. 65-66-30). Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1940, Series 1965-66. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Winchell Donut House, Inc., and public hearing scheduled this date. 9331 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property on sectional district maps posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber. He called attention to the City Plannin9 Commission findings which were the basis for their denial of subject variance. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the Council. Mr. Don Fears, 1711Westmont Drive, Architect representing Winchell Donut House, Inc., advised that the proposed sign was the national trademark for the business, and identical to those used in other local areas; that there are tentative plans for one other sign to be constructed on subject property, having a 262 foot frontage. Mr. Fears further advised that residential properties to the south are faced away from subject property, and he noted that property to the east contains a higher ratio of free standing signs than they are requesting. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. Mr. Gary M. Jones of 2039 West Embassy, directly south of subject property, advised that although the homes on Embassy do not face the proposed commercial area, they do have rear living-rooms and patio areas. Concerning signs on adjacent property to the east, he noted that the commercial development there consists of separated buildings. Also addressing the City Council in support of Mr. Jones' statements was Mrs. James V. Passo, 114 Empire Street. Councilman Schutte noted the pending C-1 zone on subject property, and asked what type of development the opponents would suggest. Mr. Jones was of the opinion that any shops and the signs constructed on subject property should be in accordance with municipal ordinances. In rebuttal, Mr. Fears reported that the sign proposed for Winchell Donuts would be 27~ feet high, that ordinarily these signs have a flashin9 light in the sign pattern, and the petitioners have offered to delete the flashing feature. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Fears stated that the donut shop will be set back 35 to 40 feet from the property line, as required by the Municipal Code, and the sign is necessary to identify the shop for passing traffic, upon which much of their business is dependent. Further, that said sign would be approximately 18 feet west of the east property line, with an additional sign for the shopping center at the northwest corner of the property. In answer to Councilman Schutte's question, Mr. L. A. Moffet, Real Estate Manager for Winchell Donut House, Inc., advised that their proposed sign is their standard symbol which has proven to be effective for a business which is open many hours in addition to those kept by commercial shops. He was of %he opinion that motorists do not ordinarily notice stores set back towards the rear of the property, unless there is adequate identification near the street, and he noted that much of their business is based on impulse patronage. Councilman Chandler failed to see why the requested Winchell sign could not be located in the center 20 percent of subject property, with an additional sign for the shopping center attached to the same standard. Mr. Moffet advised that to incorporate another sign, it would be necessary to modify the Donut House sign, thereby deviatin9 from their symbol. He noted that the face of the sign was 16 feet in height, leavin9 11 feet of pole standard. ~332 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Mayor Krein announced that sufficient evidence from those present had been received, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO 66R-223: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-223 for adoption, granting waiver of required height limitation of free standing signs to allow a height of 27½ feet, and denying waivers of number and location of free standing signs, subject to the following conditions: 1. That adequate clearance of existing electrical lines shall be provided as required by the Electrical Division, Department of Public Utilities, and the State of California g.O. 95. 2. That no flashing lights shall be allowed on the free standing signs. 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 & 2. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1760. Noll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-223 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-83 (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6146)t Submitted by Wilkerson, Moore and McConnell, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-l; property located approximately 240 feet east of Knott Avenue and 396 north of Ball Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1935, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a final tract map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He advised that the street in the proposed subdivision would be an extension of Glen Holly Drive. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion. Mr, Michael Zehra, 3406 Glen Holi¥ Drive, stated that he was not opposed, but desired information concerning the parceis adjacent to subject property fronting on Knott Avenue, Mr. Thompson reported that the four parcels referred to were being retained, however he understood there were no immediate plans for development. In answer to Mr. Zehra's further question, Mr. Thompson noted thai the General Plan indicates business and professional use in the general area on both sides of Knott Avenue. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-224: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-224 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 9333 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ l:30. P.M~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-83 - Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-224 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6146: Developer - Da Nor Development Company; tract located northerly of Ball Road, easterly of Knott Avenue and westerly of Glen Holly Drive, and it is proposed for subdivision into 12 R-1 lots. The City Planning Commission at their meeting of February 16, 1966, approved said tentative map, subject to the {ollowin9 conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 61a6 is granted subjecf to the approval of Reclassification No. 65-66-83. 3. Thai a variance shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim to permit four R-A Zoned parcels of less than one acre in area, prior to the recordation of a final tract map. Councilman Pebley moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 61a6, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Plannin9 Commission, Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOIION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-8a: Submitted by Ameri9o and Clarina J. Cerolini and Steve and Minnie Kirlakitsis, requesting change of zone from M-1 and P-L to C-2; property located at 1010 East Katella Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1941, Series 1965-66, recommended said reclassification be denied. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, calling attention to the findings of the City Planning Commission in recommending said reclassifica- tion be denied, Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council. Mr. Michael Cerolini advised that subject property measured 80 feet by 250 feet, and due to its size and shape, it was a difficult parcel to develop. He was of the opinion that the proposed liquor store and restaurant with bar was the only logical development thereof. He further noted that the 50 foot setback required for industrial development in the area would be prohibitive to the business proposed. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Chandler moved that Council determination on the foregoin9 issue be continued to allow the petitioners to file a conditional use permit application for the commercial use proposed on M-1 property. Councilmen Krein and Dutton were of the opinion that the use proposed on the narrow parcel between two established industrial properties was not appropriate. Councilman Chandler withdrew the foregoing motion. g334 G.ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUIION NO. 66R-225: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 66R-225 for adoption, upholding the action taken by the City Planning Commission, denying Reclassification No. 65-66-84. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER D~SCRIBED. (65-66-84) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-225 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO.. 65-66-85: Submitted by John M. and Marylee Straine, requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l; property located at the southwest corner of Magnolia and Rome Avenues (805 South Magnolia Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1942, Series 1965-66, recommended denial of said reclassification. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, noting findings made by the City Planning Commision in recommend[fig denial of subject reclassifica- tion. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to the requested commercial zoning. Mrs. Ken Jahnke, 2579 West Rome Avenue, expressed opposition, being of the opinion that the granting of subject reclassification would be spot zoning in a residential area. Mrs. Willard Smith, 915 South Kenmore, referred to her letter of opposition written to the City Planning Commission, dated February 16, 1966, and requested that the residential be retained. Mr. Harry Burkowitz, 922 South Verona Street, addressed the Council in support of the foregoing opoosition. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council in favor of subject reclassification. Mr. D. Cac:oppo, 837 South Magnolia Avenue, stated that he had resided in the area since the homes were built, the character of the area having changed from a rural atmosphere to a developed residential neighbor- hood. He noted difficulties in attempting to sell their property for residential purposes, due to the heavy traffic on Magnolia Avenue, which creates a hazard to %he children in the neighborhood as well as to residents attempting %o drive into their driveway. Mr. Cacloppo referred to pending C-1 reclassification No. 60-61-44, and Site Development Plan, which included properties on the west side of Magnolia Avenue between Rome Avenue and Ball Road~ and noted that said reclassification required~ in effect~ development of three lots at a time for c-1 purposes. In bls opinion, each property owner should be allowed to develop his parcel for some suitable small business, and subject re- classification should be approved. Mayor Krein requested a show of hands from those persons present in the Council Chamber who resided on Magnolia Avenue and were in favor of subject reclassification. Approximately nine persons responded. 9335 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. Mrs. Doge, 821 South Magnolia Avenue, addressed the Council in favor of the reclassification, noting the three existing schools in the area to which children must walk durin9 peak hours of heavy traffic; that if commercial development took place, sidewalks would be installed. She noted that two of the opposin9 speakers did not live on Magnolia Avenue, and the third resided in a home which was considerably set back from the street. Relative to dedication for street widening and alley installation to the rear of properties described in the earlier reclassification, Mrs. Doge advised that they would have no back yard if an alley were constructed. She noted the shopping area across the street, and advised of small busi- nesses, which several residents were desirous of establishin9 in their homes. Mr. Ken Jahnke, 2579 West Rome Avenue, referred to property values in the area and advised that he was not opposed to commercial zoning, but was opposed to using existin9 dwellings for commercial purposes. He noted that Magnolia was designated as an arterial street while still under the jurisdiction of the County of Orange, as it was when the homes were constructed. Also addressing the Council in opposition was Mr. Gerald Doge, of 825 South Magnolia Avenue. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Thompson advised that under Reclassification No. 60-61-44, only three parcels have been developed for a service station at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue. The City Clerk read provisions of the resolutions of intent to zone properties under Reclassification No. 60-61-44, adopted February 14, 1961, which classed lots together in series of three. At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, Councilman Schutte moved that public hearing be continued to May 24, 1966, at 7:00 P.M., to allow study of the area to be made by the Development Services Department staff to determine whether the recommendations and requirements of Reclassification No. 60-61-44 can be modified to satisfy the needs of the property owners. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mrs. Ao J. Lettellier, 2568 West Rome Avenue, addressed the Council requesting that the conversion of residential dwellings for business purposes not be allowed on the properties in question, and she was of the oplnion that commercial uses were not compatible with residential areas. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-86: Submitted by Walter and Judith A. Hemphill, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-l; property located on the west side of Gilbert Street, south of La Palma Avenue (951 North Gilbert Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 19~3, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification, unconditionally. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He noted Variance No. 1746 was recently approved by the City Council for a lot split, a condition of which was that appropriate zoning be established. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-226: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-226 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, unconditionally. Refer to Resolution Book. ~336 C.it¥ Hall~ Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-86 - R-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-226 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 65-66-8.7~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 815 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 72: Submitted by Betty M. Brawner and Jack H. Burgess, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-l, and permission to operate a service station within 75 feet of R-A, Agricultural zoned property, not at the intersection of two arterial streets; property located at the sou±heast corner of State College Boulevard and South Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1944, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along South Street, for street widening purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along State College Boulevard, including a 25 foot radius corner return, for street widening purposes. 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anahelm along South Street and State College Boulevard, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installa- tion of said engineering requirements. a. I;:at the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2300 per front foot along South Street and State College Boulevard, for street lighting purposes. 5. Ihat the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along South Street and State College Boulevard, for tree planting purposes. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, m and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Conditional Use Permit No~ 815 was granted by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1945, Series 1965-66, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 65-66-87. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, and further provided that development shall be in accordance with the service station site development standards. General Plan Amendment No. 72 was recommended for disapproval by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1946, Series 1'965-66. 9337 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He called attention to property adjacent on the south, which was approved for division into two parcels during the past year (Variance No. 1695). Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council. Mr. Duane Stout, 9776 Katella Avenue, representing the petitioners, advised that the Richfield Oil Company is prepared to lease the property for a new, rustic-type service station; that already heavy traffic will be greatly increased when Anaheim Stadium opens. In answer to Council questioning, he noted that a Tic-Toc Market is planned for the balance of the property, and it was his understanding that South Street was pro- jected for a secondary highway with four, eleven foot travel lanes. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. Mr. Joe Smedley, 2109 East South Street, advised that he desired the zone on subject property to remain the same. He noted that the City Traffic Engineer had advised him that the proposed street widening and arterial street designation of South Street was a proposal; further, Mr. Smedley noted there was no traffic light at the intersection, that South Street makes a wide deviation in alignment at State College Boulevard, and he objected to a service station not at the intersection of two arterial streets. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Smedley suggested that some other development be projected for subject property which would cause less of a traffic hazard, and other factors detrimental to the area. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to offer opposition; there was no response. In rebuttal, Mr. Robert Croft, 638 South State College Boulevard, advised he was the closest property owner affected; that extremely poor visibility conditions for traffic approaching State College Boulevard from the east, would be relieved by the proposed development, and he urged favorable consideration of subject application. Mr. Stout returned to the stand to report on engineering information concerning the future widening of the street, advising that with no parking, there would be 46 feet between curbs, allowing four full travel lanes. Mr. Smedley asked how on-street parking restrictions were accomplished, and noted that it might be premature to discuss this when the street widening is only a proposal. Councilman Chandler noted that the widening of South Street is designated on the Circulation Element of the General Plan, Arterial Streets and Highways. Mayor Krein announced that a good cross section of the evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed on Reclassifica- tion No. 65-66-87, Conditional Use Permit No. 815 and General Plan Amendment No. 72. Council discussion was held, and the City Engineer confirmed the plans for the widenin9 of South Street east of State College Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-227: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-227 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 9338 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 22~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-87 - C-i) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-227 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-228: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-228 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 815 subject to the re- commendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDIFIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 815. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein None No n e The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-228 duly passed and adopted. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, General Plan Amendment No. 72 was disapproved. MOTION CARRIED. 1966-67 BUDGET: Mr. Robert King, 557 Dune Street, requested permission to address the Council relative to the forthcoming City Budget; specifically pertaining to certain items in the current budget which, in his opinion, should be eliminated. Inasmuch as the 1966-67 Budget had not yet been presented to the City Council, it was determined that suggestions or recommendations be directed to the City Manager for his consideration and evaluation during the process of preparing, and prior to analyzing, the recommended budget. Further, consideration by the City Council to be at the scheduled public hearing on the proposed budget. ADJOURNMEN[: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 9:15 P.M. SIGNED City Clerk