Loading...
1966/05/24}444 City Hall, Anaheim~ Californ[a - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte~ Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams° DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed May 27 and 28, 1966 "POPPY DAYS". Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. Councilman Dutton suggested the City cons[der erecting a plaque in a prominent location listing the names of the Anaheim residents that made the supreme sacrifice for our Country. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held May 3, 1966, were approved on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that the consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Schutte seconded by motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. DEMANDS: Report of financial demands against the City in accordance with the 1965-66 Budget, totaling $1,222,924o04 was submitted and ordered received and filed. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN~ HILL AND CANYON AREA: Public hearing was held February 8, 1966, and continued to April 26 and again to this date for further reporf and recommendations from the Planning Commission and Development Services Staff. Mr. Ronald Grudzinski briefly summarized the events to this date concerning subject issue, noting three additional points recommended by the Staff and considered by the City Planning Commission as result of information received from the Luck Corporation, as follows: 1. Projected dwelling unit: differences per tributary area. 2. Development concept change. 3. Probable use of the Walnut Canyon Golf Course or special park. REGARDING POINT NO. 1: Mr. Grudzinski reported that the total dwelling projected by [he Staff of the approximate 5,000 acre ranch, and that of the Lusk Corporation, were practically equal, although certain tributary areas differ considerably, the differences could be accounted for and reacted to as development progresses, and improvements of public facilities, such as schools and parks, could be phased to satisfy the population demand. REGARDING POINT NO. 2: Mr. Grudzinski advised that this was brought to the ~ttention of the City Planning Commission due to the fact that the development concept emphasized by the Lusk proposal appears to be on the average i0,000 square foot lots subdivision rather than the 20,000 or 40,000 square foot lot subdivision. In the opinion of the Staff, this would pose no problem, as it was assumed that if the market and economics demand, the larger' sites would be geveloped. REGARDING POINT NO. 3: Mr. Grudzinski reported that the concern in this area of study was the possible limiting factor of utilities, particularly sanitary sewers, which would limit the number of homes that could be cons- tructed, should a portion of the projected golf course or park area be 9445 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. developed for residential use. He further reported that the studies made by the Engineering Division, Hydraulics Section, indicate sufficient capacity in all projected utilities to accommodate an additional 600 homes in this area. Mr. Grudzinski stated that prior to any residential development of the golf course or park area, amendment to the General Plan would be necessary reclassifying the collector highway along Mohler Drive to a secondary highway, adding an additional Satellite Elementary School, and adding additional two acres to park land to the nearest community park, plus an additional acreage at one of the existing commercial centers. read: In conclusion, the following recommendations were submitted and 1. Inform Mr. Nohl and Lusk Corporation that the utility lines have sufficient capacity to accommodate single-family usage of the golf course in Walnut Canyon. 2. That at this time the Hill and Canyon General Plan be adopted as previously recommended by the City Planning Commission. 3. That the City re-emphasize their desire to preserve beautiful, natural community assets, such as Walnut Canyon, and further encourage Mr. Nohl and the Lusk Corporation to plan any development in Walnut Canyon around the preservation of this natural beauty. In further summarizing the meeting held by the Planning Commission, Mr. Grudzinski reported that concern was expressed towards retention of the Walnut Canyon area as some type of open space, and as a result, the Planning Commission further recommended that the City Council urge the Orange County Board of Supervisors to consider the area around the Walnut Canyon Reservoir as a County Regional Park, in order that the natural beauty may be maintained and insured. Mr. Bill Lusk, Vice President of the Lusk Corporation, advised that they were in accordance with the presentation made by Mr. Orudzinski and the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. He stated that their only concern however, was the acquisition of a County Regional Park in the Walnut Canyon area. He further reported that the Walnut Canyon area will be preserved, and any residential use near the golf course would be designed in fingers and would be minimal. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to be heard, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. During the discussion that followed, Councilman Dutton and Councilman Schutte, expressed disapproval of the Walnut Canyon Reservoir area being designated as a County Regional Park. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-364: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 66R-364 approving the General Plan for the Hill and Canyon area as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITP COUNCIL OE TH~ CITY 07 ANANEI~ ADOPTING A GENERAL PLAN FOR THE HILL AND CANYON AR~A IN THE CITY OP ANAHEIM ENTITLED "HILL AND CANYON GENERAL PLAN, GUIDE FOR FUIURE DEVELOPWENI, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA," DAIED OCIOBER, ~965. Roll call vote: 9446 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-364 duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT: Public hearing on proposed abandonment pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-276 was continued from the meeting of May 3, 1966 to allow for a report from the City Engineer on methods that could be employed by property owners in filling, crushing or removing the existing water pipe, should abandonment be accomplished. Mr. Maddox reported on the various methods of filling or crushing the line, advising that the least expensive method appeared to be crushing in those areas not occupied by structures or walls, and in other areas by filling the pipe with drillers mud; the estimated cost involving the total easement proposed for abandonment to be $5,500.00. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-365: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-365 for adoption abandoning said easement as requested, subject to reservation of a 5 foot public utility easement, 3 foot ground and 2 foot overhang~ as requested by the Light and Power Division over the northerly 5 feet of subject easement, and further subject to the following conditions: 1. Owners of Lots 51 and 64 shall remove the existing concrete breather stand. 2. Owners of Lots 51 and 65 shall sign a hold harmless agreement with the City of Anaheim. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR UNDERGROUND PIPELINE PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES UPON, ALONG, UNDER, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PRO- PERTY. (Tract No. 1451 - 65-33A) Roll. call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-365 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Application filed by James McCurry for permission to move a dwelling from 3624 North Rosemead Boulevard, Rosemead, California, to 859 South Claudina Street, was submitted together with reports from the Development Services Division and Building Division. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-366: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-366 for adoption, granting housemoving permit subject to the recommendations of the Development Services Division to wit, "That a third garage (20 feet by 10 feet).be constructed at the rear of the property, no closer than 5 feet from the rear property line" Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT IO JAMES MC CURRY TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 3624 NORTH ROSEMEAD, BOULEVARD, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, TO 859 SOUTH CLAUDINA STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Corrected, Minutes of June 14, 1966, page 9482. 9447 ~it¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-366 duly passed and adopted. WAIVER OF BUSINESS LICENSE FEES: Request of Lynn E. Thomson on behal£ of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, for waiver of license fee for the Latter-Day Saints Employment Center located at 625 South Euclid Street, was submitted. It was noted in the letter of request that this activity was a part of the church welfare program in Orange County; that all expenses were paid by the church, and no charge is made to employer or employee for the referral service. Councilman Chandler moved that it be the finding of the City Council that as long as the referral services conform to statements set forth in the letter of request dated May 6, 1966, it be the finding of this Council that the function is a part of the church activity and no fee is required by City statutes. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion MOTION CARRIED. ' SIDEWALK WAIVER - 1730 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD: Request of Hammond Brothers Corporation for waiver of sidewalk requirements at 1730 South Anaheim Boulevard, was submitted together with recommendations of the City Engineer. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, temporary sidewalk waiver was granted subject to no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalks, for a period of two years. MOTION CARRIED. BEQUEST - NIOBE STREET: Petition signed by Mr. and Mrs. William Connelly, et al, requesting a cul-de-sac be constructed on Niobe Street at Brookhurst Street was submitted together with reports and recommendations from the City Engineer and Development Services Division. Councilman Chandler noted that Niobe Street being a public street was a concern to the general public, and could not be closed without a ' public hearing. Recommendatiors .of the City Enqineer and Development Services Division that said street not be closed and reasons therefore, were submitted and read. Mrs. Jaqueline Olden, 2172 Niobe Street, addressed the Council explaining the problems in the area caused by traffic and parking. In discussing the parking problem caused by employee and Doctor parking on the residential street which was adjacent to the Sherwood Medical Center, Mrs. Olden was of the opinion that the neighbors would approve the area fronting their homes, being a no parking zone, as their concern was children entering ~nto the street. She felt that they would have as much parking as they presen[ly have, inasmuch as parking in front of their home is used by other than the residents. At the conclusion of the discussion, the matter was referred to the Traffic Engineer for a parking study and also possible widening of Brookhurs? Street at this point. The issue to be rescheduled before the ,City Council at a later date. RECLASSIFICA?ION NO. 58-59-49: Request of Glen L. Johnson to remove deed restrictions filed in conjunction with ~eclassification No. 58-59-49, limiting the use of the propert7 to a truck terminal, was submitted together with reports and recommendations of the City Engineer and Development Services Division, a448 'City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24, 1966, 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, removal of deed restrictions was approved subject to the applicant's con- formance with the conditions of Reclassification No. 61-62-69. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED ABANDONMENTS: Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-367 and 66R-368 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-367: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF GUM ROAD AND AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREIN- AFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; AND DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing June 14, 1966, 1:30 P.M. - Vicinity of Estella Avenue and Euclid Street - 66-3A) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-368: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR STREET PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREIN- AFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing June 14, 1966, 1:30 P.M. - Vicinity of Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard - 66-2A) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-367 and 66R-368 duly passed and adopted. REQUEST - TRAILERS.- TEMPORARY OFFICE: Request of S. D. Anderson of Baker- Anderson Corporation, for permission to place two trailers for a period of one year on property located at 3612 West Ball Road for use of temporary offices by the Metropolitan Water District and their company, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said request was granted subject to the approval of the Building Division and the Sanitation Division. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5058, REVISION NO. 4: Tract located on the South side of the Santa Aaa Canyon Road approximately 2,000 feet east of Imperial Highway, proposed for 63 R-1 residential lots, was submitted together with recommendations of the City Planning Commission. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, recommendations of the City Planning Commission were approved and ordered forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission for their consideration. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - CALL FOR BIDS: Councilman Schutte offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-369 and 66R-370 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-369: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND LEMON STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 419B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENT iN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF, (Bids to be opened June 16, 1966, 2:00 P.M.) 94a9 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MIN~JTES - May 2n~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-370: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE LEMON~ SANTA ANA AND ATCHISON STREETS SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CI[Y OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 951; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ AUTHORIZING THE CON- STRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened June 16, 1966, 2:00 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None 66R-369 and ~ The Mayor declared Resolution No./66R-370 duly passed and adopted. WORK ORDER NO 600~ CHANGE ORDER NO. V: In accordance with the recommendations of the City Engineer, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, Change Order No. 7 to Work Order No. 600~, Walnut Canyon Reservoir increasing the contract by $3~,998.20 was approved. MOTION CARRIED. RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATION - A.H.F.P. PROJECT NO. 2Vl: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to sign right-of-way certification pertaining to Broadway Street improvement from 1312.65 feet east of Loara Street to Loara Street. MOTION CARRIED. CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, cancellation of city taxes on the following properties was authorized: a. Property acquired bp' the State of California for highway purposes by deed executed by Beverly E~ Hodges, recorded March lm, 1966 in Book No, 7867 Page 26=, of Off:cial Records of Orange County, California. b. Property acquired by t~he State of California for highway purposes psrsuan~ to de,ad executed Oy Gar-Lo, Inc., recorded March 29, 1966 in Book 7883 Page ].9 of Official Records of Orange County, California. c. Property acquired bt' the Placentia Unified School District for public use, pursuant to deed recorded April 19, 1966, in Book Nco 790m Page 800 of Official Records of Orange Count,/, California. d. Property acquired by the Placentia Unified School District for public use~ pursuant to deed recorded April 19, 1966 in Book 790~ Page 804 of Official Records of Orange County, California. MCITiON CARRIED. PURCHASE - TURF-VAC: In accordance with. recommendations of the Ass:stant City ~Ianager, purchase of lurf-Vac for use at the Anaheim Stadium from the Power Rig Equipment Company of Long Beach, the only known manufacturer and dls!ributor in this area~ in the argount of $.2~678.00~ was authorized. [~Ol] ON CARRIED. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolutions No. 66R-371 to c,b:.-~,, bofh incl. usive, for adoption. Refer~o..~ Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-~!A[ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANI DEED CONVEYING TO IHE C!IY OF ANAHEIM CERIAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENI FOR ALLEY AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (I. A101son and Elizabeth I. 9450 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-372: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Clifford L. and Eleanor M. Wolfswinkel) RESOLUIION NO. 66R-373: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (I. A101son and Elizabeth I. Olson) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-374: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES. (Orange County Flood Control District) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-375: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR POLES AND ELECTRIC POWER LINES. (Henry Boisseranc and Louise Boisseranc) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-376: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anna L. $kiles) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-377: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Neii Reitman) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-371 to 66R-377, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS - HARBOR BOULEVARD: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, dedication of vehicular access rights executed by A101son and Elizabeth I. Olson in conjunction with Reclassifica- tion No. 63-6m-90 was accepted, and recordation authorized. MOTION CARRIED. TEMPORARY ACCESS - HARBOR BOULEVARD - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-6a-90: Pursuant to request of Mr. A101son, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, temporary access to Harbor Boulevard from property described in Reclassification No. 63-64-90, was granted until such time as Harbor Boulevard fronting subject property is widened. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the following claims were denied and ordered referred to the Insurance Agent: Ernest Jarman in the amount of $100.00 representing amount deducted from claim paid for purported damage to auto April 10, 1966, in the parking lot of the Anaheim Stadium. Dale J. Moore for purported damage to auto April 17, 1966, in the amount of $800.00. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-378: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-378 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER SECTION 2107.5 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE. 9~51 C.it¥ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No, 66R-378 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meetfng of April 21, 1966. b. Excerpts from the minutes of an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Orange held May 3, 1966. c. Before Public Utilities Commisssion - Application No. 47772 of George ~. Smith for additional transmitters for Radio Station KME-438. d. Financial and Operating Reports - April 1966. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application of Minut~ Market for Off- Sale General~ Person to Person Transfer, 1200 South Brookhurst, was submitted for Council information. No further action was taken by the City Council. QRDINANCE NO. 2282: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2282 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.i90 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking - Broadway - La Palma Avenue) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2282 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2283: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2283 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-92 R-A - Rinker Annexation) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2283 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2284: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2284 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. /65-66-32 - M-i/ Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein None None 9452 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2284 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2285: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2285 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING CHAPTERS 6.04, 6.08 and 6.12 THEREOF, AND BY ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 6.04 RELATING TO A DISASTER PLAN. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Put/on, Pebley, Schutte and Krein Chandler None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2285 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2286: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2286 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE la, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (Portions of La Palma Avenue - No Parking) ORDINANCE NO. 2287: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2287 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-90(1) - C-O) ORDINANCE NO. 2288: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2288 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-129 - C-O) ORDINANCE NO. 2289: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2289 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-2~(3) - M-l) ORDINANCE NO. 2290: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2290 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-99 - C-il ANAHEIM RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM (ARTS): Request of Martin M. Ostrow, Attorney for ARTS, for exclusive franchise for a term of 99 years to operate a high speed rapid transit monorail system in the City of Anaheim, was presented to the City Council May 17, 1966, and continued to this date per telephone request of the applicant. Mr. Harry R. Horn, Chairman of the Urban Renewal Advisory Committee, reported that final report of Victor Gruen and Associates on the redevelopment of the downtown area, and recommendations of the Urban Renewal Advisory Committee, will be presented to the City Council in the near future. Mr. Horn requested the City Council meet with the Advisory Committee and representative o£ the Victor Gruen and Associates, before decision is made on the requested franchise in order to determine if the proposal would be in conflict with their report and recommendation. Mr. Martin Ostrow, Attorney, addressed the Council advising that Mr. Milton Jenkins from the Union Pacific Railroad Transportation De- partment was present, and that they were both principals in ARTS. 9453 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Ostrow briefly reviewed former application of Mro Earl Welch (DARTS) filed in 1963, and the disposition thereof. He further advised that Mr. Welch had formed a new group and again applies for a franchise to be developed by private capital and private financing. Mr. Ostrow stated that the exact type of monorail system would be determined by feasibility report; however, before necessary funds, estimated to be from Seven-Hundred Ihousand Dollars to One-Million Dollars, are expended for such a survey, it was necessary to know what they were expended for and to have something concrete before approaching private capital or funds, and also necessary to know that they could proceed if it was feasible. He stated that it was on this basis they request a 99 year franchise subject to complete review of the City Council in two years so that if the Council was not satisfied with the progress made at that point, the franchise could be cancelled by mutual consent. Mr. Ostrow reported that the type of rapid transit they plan would be a compatible system and integrated system that would tie in with any future development. He gave as an example the possibility of such a system extending from San Diego to the northern boundary of Southern California. He stated that originally the system would link the Disneyland area, Knott's Berry Farm area, the Convention Center area, the Stadium area and the downtown business area. In his opinion such a system would satisfy the needs of the permanent residents and tourists in this vicinity. In answer to a Council question, Mr. Ostrow advised that the exact route would be determined by where it would be economically feasible tc move masses of people, and they would work with the Urban Renewal Advisory Committee or any other group to make sure the proposal is completely agreeable to all segments. Mayor Krein asked who would determine the feasibility as to routing and other factors. Mr. Ostrow was of the opinion that the final decision would be made by mutual consent of the City Council and the group; the economic feasibility decision would necessarily have to made by the group; however, in his opinion, any route would necessarily be tied into the downtown area. Discussion was held concerning right-of-way which in most instances would be City streets~ the private right-of-way which would be the responsi- bility of the group. Also noted was that there was insufficient information at this time to grant a franchise and comply with City Charter requirements. In answer to Council questioning as to who were involved in the organization, Mr. Ostrow reported that neither Food Machinery Corporation nor Mr. Lipko are involved in the proposal. It was the general feeling of the City Council that until a concrete proposal is received including the feasibility, routes and type of system, no action could be taken. Mr. Ostrow was advised to contact the City Attorney for the purpose of working out a proposal for further Council consideration; the matter to again be scheduled on the Council Agenda at a later date. Mr. C. Kenny, 2001 South Haster, presented a picture of a duo-rail system, and advised that he would be willing to furnish other photos and breakdown on this particular system (p{cture not £11ed {or the record). FIREWORKS DISPLAY - DISNEYLAND - MAY 30, 1966: Request of Atlas Fireworks Company for permission to stage a fireworks display in conjunction with the opening of "It's A Small World" May 30, 1966, was granted on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 177a: Submitted by Gulf Oil Company requesting waiver of maximum number of signs permitted, sign height, maximum permitted sign area., and sign location; property briefly described as located at the northeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Dowling Street. '9454 ~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - MaY 24, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Public hearing was held May 10, 1966, at which time the hearing was closed and resolution denying said variance deferred to this date for a full Council. Further information from the applicant was requested by the City Council. Mr. Mickelson, of Mickelson Associates of Anaheim representing the applicant, referred to the location of the station and advised that the existing sign is mainly directed to local street traffic, the requested sign would be 53 feet in height and directed to freeway traffic. Re further advised that they request one additional sign 53 feet in height to be 10 feet by 33 feet or a total of 330 square feet, however the sign could be reduced to 300 square feet in sign area. During the discussion that followed, it was noted that the location of the requested sign was proposed to be on the property line next to the adjacent property. Roll call vote on the resolution before the City Council denying said variance was called for: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler and Krein Dutton, Pebley and Schutte None Said resolution failed to carry. Councilman Pebley offered Resolution granting said variance subject to the sign being a maximum height of 53 feet, and located within the center ten percent of the property, and denying the balance of subject application. Plans were reviewed relative to the location of the sign, and Mr. Mickelson reported problems of placing the sign within the center ten percent of the property; thereupon, resolution granting said variance was withdrawn by Councilman Pebley. Mr. Mikelson was advised to present plans as ~ where the sign location was desired, and obtain a letter of consent from the adjacent neighbor, to be further considered by the City Council at the meeting to be held May 31, 1966, 1:30 P.M. HOLIDAY - GOOD FRIDAY: Council intent relative to the establishment of Good Friday as a half-day holiday was clarified to mean from 1:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. or ~:00 hours. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-379: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-379 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 66R-21 AND ESTABLISHING RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR A NEW JOB CLASS. (Junior Civil Engineer) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution NO. 66R-379 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Chandler, the City Council recessed to 7:00 ?.M. MOTION CARRIED. (4~05 P.M.) 9455 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECIOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENI SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski. INVOCATION: Reverend Stanley Herber of the Free Methodist Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Schutte led the. Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICAIION NO. 65-66-65: Initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider change of zone from R-A to C-i, Portion No. 1, of the La Palma-Rio Vista Annexation; that portion briefly described as located at the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Sunkist Street. Said public hearing was continued from the meeting of February 23, 1966, to allow for the filing of a specific use on subject property. It was reported that application for a specific use, No. 65-66-121 was filed May 21, 1966, by the Union Oil Company. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, public hearth9 on Reclassification No. 65-66-65 was continued to July 19, 1966,,7:00 P.M., to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 65-66-121. MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-85: Submitted by John M. Straine requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l; property briefly described as lqcated at the southwest corner of Rome Avenue and Magnolia Avenue (805 South Magnolia Avenue). Said hearing was continued from the meeting of March 22, 1966, to allow for an area study by the Development Services Department Staff, the property fronting the west side of Magnolia Avenue between Ball Road and Rome Avenue. Ronald Grudzinski noted the location of the property and summarized the study made by the City Staff, wherein it was recommended that if the fifteen property owners involved agreed, they could do the following: 1. Dedicate and improve a 20 foot alley at the rear of the property after which any one lot at any particular time could be reclassified commercial. 2. Reclassify one lot at a time as long as dedicated access to an existing alley stub is available, such stub startin9 at one end of the block or the other. 3. In %he event that the property owners cannot agree to requirements £ound necessary to meet commercial standards, it was recommended that the status quo be maintained and that the existing Resolutions of Intent Nos. 6665 through and including 6669 (ReclassifiCation No. 60-61-44) which requires development in groups of three lots each. The economics involved by the various method whereby the property could be used for commercial purposes was explained, indicating that the cost involved would reader the properties uncompetitive with existing commercial properties. Mr. Grudzinski further reported that the staff study was discussed with the property owners, however it was not known if an agreement was reached. 9456 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mrs. Mary E. Strain,, 332 South Western, Applicant, requested that the proposal of development of the property submitted to the City Planning Commission by John F. King, Developer, be considered. Mrs. Willard Smith, 915 South Kenmore Street, advised of her approval of a planned commercial development program, and of her disapproval of single lot development. Mr. Cacioppo, 837 South Magnolia Avenue, expressed disapproval of Plan Plan "C" permitting development of lots as the alley extension becomes available due to the fact that his property is located approximately in the center of subject block. Mr. Cacioppo.~called attention to the required dedication for alley and street widenin9. He reported that the lots were originally 120 feet in depth and dedication required being 53 feet, which dedication was without compensation, and with necessary setbacks very little property would remain that could be used for commercial purposes. He failed to understand why a business such as telephone offiqe could not be operated from the existing home; combining the commercial and residential use. Mrs. Cecil Smith, 2450 Robin Hood Place, Orange, California, owner of 80'9 South Magnolia Avenue,kapproved of development in accordance with Exhibit "C". Mrs. Smith asked if a few exceptions could be made wherein some could use their properties for both commercial and residential° Mrs. Jahnke, 2579 West Rome Avenue, approved of commercial use with an alley at the rear and objected to the combination of residential and commercial use. Mrs. Dodge, 825 South Magnolia Avenue, favored commercial zoning and reported that several realtors have advised that there would be very little chance of selling the homes for residential use. It was determined that sufficient evidence had been presented, and thereupon the Mayor declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council recognizing the many problems involved; it was determined that further time should be given to allow an opportunity for the property owners to agree on a plan of development. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, decision of the City Council was deferred to June 21, 1966, 7:00 P.M., to allow for the working out of the problem by the property owners. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Pebley left the meeting (7:52 P.M.). PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 833: Submitted by Robert L. Miller requesting permission to establish office use in a r.esiden±ial structure, and waiver of 20,000 square foot minimum site requirements, and Section 18.~0.050(a) requiring all parking at the rear of a residential structure; property located at 866 South Harbor Boulevard (Reclassification No. 65-66-63). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1966, Series 1965-66, granted said conditional use permit subje¢~ to the following conditions: That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Harbor Boulevard, for street widening purposes. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Harbor Boulevard, for tree planting purposes. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 9457 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued, or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. 5. That any air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shiedlded from view from abutting streets. 6. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the compietion of Reclassification NO. 65-66-63. 7. That trees shall be planted along the east property line of subject property so as to provide an effective screen 5 years after planting. 8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of the Property and advised said property was included in resolution of intent to zone the property C-0 on the east side of Harbor Boulevard between South and Vermont Streets (Reclassification No. 65-66-63). He noted the existing zonin9 and use in the area. In further explaining plans of development, Wt. Thompson reported that the proposed driveway would be on the south property line. The Mayor asked if the proponent wished to address the Council. Ann Madison of Allison Real Estate, 918 West Lincoln Avenue, representin9 the applicant, presented a picture indicating the manner in which they propose to develop the property. She further reported that the two parking spaces requested for the front of the property would in the existing driveway. Mrs. Wesley Jones, 956 South Helena Street, addressed the Council on behalf of Mr. John Langford, spokesman representing the majority of the residents on Helena Street, Mrs° Jones read from a statement prepared by Mr. Langford, wherein the economics involved in developing the property by land assembly were recognized and considered; however, lot by tot development could result in haphazard developments along this main thoroughfare, and in their opinion, would not be in the best interest of the City of Anaheim. In conclusion it was recommended that the lots remain residential until such time as C-O development becomes economically feasible. Mrs. Jones further advised of their concern regardin9 the increase traffic that would result on Helena Street should these properties fronting Harbor Boulevard develop other than under C-O standards. Mrs. Miller, Applicant, reported that their block was the only block south of Lincoln Avenue that still retains residential zoning, in her opinion it would be unfair to allow commercial use on both sides of the street and deny the use to them. Mrs. Jones reported that the subject lot was somewhat unique in that it had no rear alley. Wiss Madison called attention to other commercial uses in the area and advised that the property could not be sold for residential use. Plans of development were referred to and Miss Madison stated that if the two requested parking spaces in front of the property were objectionable, they would be willing to eliminate %hem and redesign the rear parking area to meet code requirements. In her opinion, this was the best possible use of the property at the present time. It was determined that sufficient evidence had been presented, thereupon the Mayor declared the hearing closed. 9458 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Discusssion was held by the City Council and further determined that if the conditional use permit was approved, it should be understood that access to Harbor Boulevard would be only temporary. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-380: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-380 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 833 subject to the re- commendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 833. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-380 duly passed and adopted. TBAPORARY ACCESS - HARBOR BOULEVARD: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, temporary access to Harbor Boulevard was granted to 866 South Harbor Boulevard (Reclassification No. 65-66-63 and Conditional Use Permit No. 833) for a period of three years. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1779: Submitted by Ledger T. Smith requesting waiver of number of free-standing signs, location and maximum sign area; property briefly described as located on the north side of Katella Avenue west of Howell Avenue (2331 East Katella Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1997, Series 1965-66 denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Kirby McKillip of Shell Oil Company, on behalf of the applicant, and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of the property and briefly summarized the hearing held before the City Plannin9 Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant addressed the Council reporting that subsequent to the meetin9 of the City Planning Commission, the property owner and Shell Oil Company have agreed to move the requested second sign approximately 50 feet back, in his opinion, this would solve the possibility of obstructing the view of adjacent property, however, he further reported the adjacent property was under the same ownership° Mr. Knisely expressed disagreement with finding that the proposed underpass would not present a problem, and called attention to similar situations at other locations whereas only tall signs are visible. Plans were reviewed and discussed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-381: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 66R-381 for adoption granting Variance No. 1779, subject to the following conditions: 1. Locating the sign 32 feet northerly from location noted on Exhibit No. 1. 2. Obtaining a letter of approval from the adjacent property owner. 3. That adequate clearance of existing electrical lines shall be provided as required by the Electrical Division, Department of Public Utilities and the State of California G.O. 95. 9~59 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 24~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibits Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1779. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dut?on, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Pebley. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-381 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-11m: Submitted by Edwin Durst requesting change of zone from M-1 to P-L and C-2; property briefly described as located east and south of property located at the southeast corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Lemon Street. Said public hearing was rescheduled to May 31, 1966, 7:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 9:04 P.M. SIGNED City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were submitted by Mayor Krein and unanimot~sly ratified by the City Council: "ORANGE COUNTY FIREMEN'S DAYS" - J,Jne 18th an'd 19th, 1966. "'PLAY SAFE' VACATION TIME" - June ls.t ±hrough August 31st, 1966. "JUNE IS DAIRY MONTH". MINUTES: Mir:sics of the Anaheim City Council meeting held May 10, 1966, were approved on motion by Councilman P~bley, seconded by Councilman Schutte. Counci. man Dutton being absent May lOth, abstained from voting on said motion. MOTIONi CARRIED. !~AIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; Coun¢~lma8 Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Sfhotte Seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.