Loading...
1966/06/219493 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3une 21~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - 1966-67.BUDGEI_ CITY OF ANAHEIM: City Manager Keith Murdoch reported that copies of the proposed 1966-67 budget were presented to the City Council on 3une 1, 1966, and public hearing was scheduled this date for consideration thereof, said proposed budget having been reviewed by the City Council and the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. He noted that the City Department Heads were present to answer any questions which might arise. Mayor Krein asked if any Councilman had a question to ask. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Fire Chief Edward 3. Stringer reported that the proposed $10,800.00 expenditure in the Fire Department budget for telephone alarm system would provide for the installation of an instrument board at the headquarters fire station, together with foundation work for the system. Ultimately, telephone alarms would be available for public use throughout the City, and could be used to report a fire or an accident, or to call police, etc. Councilman Schutte commended Mr. Murdoch for his outstanding accomplishment in the preparation of each year's budget, and he noted that the City tax rate has not been increased for many years. Mr. Murdoch thanked Councilman Schutte, and advised of the excellent cooperation of the City Staffs~ resulting in a fine team effort which benefits both the operation of City Government and its citizens. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Byron Thompson, 9351 Thistle Road, President of the 250 member Anaheim Golf Association, and also representing the Anaheim Ladies Golf Club, advised that they use the Municipal Golf Course and are proud of the course, and the manner in which it is maintained. He requested that consideration be given to construction of a club house at the facility in the coming year, or to the establishment of a championship type golf course and club house, a program which the organization would be willing to sponsero The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council concerning the proposed budget~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Schutte moved that the proposed 1966-1967 budget be approved and adopted. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-107 AND CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 834: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from C-3 to C-l, and permission for an existing service station as a conforming use in the C-i, General Commercial Zone; property located at the southwest corner of Santa Ana Street and State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos.. 2031 and 2032, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said Reclassifica- tion and approved said Conditional Use Permit, unconditionally. Zoning Supervi~r'Ronald Thompson advised that subject petitions were initiated, together with eight others to be considered by the Council this date, for the purpose of establishing appropriate C-1 zoning on existing service station properties. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against subject reclassification and conditional use permit, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 9494 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-412: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-412 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-107 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: CO UNC I LM EN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-412 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-413: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-413 for adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission granting Conditional Use Permit No. 834. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 834. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I L~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-413 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO,. 65-66-108: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from R-A to C-l; property located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and State College Boulevard. Recommended for approval by the City Planning Commission, unconditionally, pursuant to Resolution No. 2033, Series 1965-66. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-414: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-414 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-108 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIiNEN: NOES: COUNCIIJ~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-414 duly passed and adopted. 9495 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-109 AND CONDIIIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 835: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from R-A to C-l, and permission for an existing service station as a conforming use in the C-l, General Commercial Zone; property located at the northwest corner of Vermont Avenue and State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. 2034 and 2035, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said Reclassification, and granted said Conditional Use Permit, unconditionally. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against subject petitions, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-415.: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-415 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-109 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-415 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-41~: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-416 for adoption, sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission granting Conditional Use Permit No. 835. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 835. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-416 duly passed and adopted. Pq.~LIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-110 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 836.1 Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from C-3 to C-i, and permission for an existing service station as a conforming use in C-l, General Commercial Zone; property located at the northeast corner of State College Boulevard and Westport Drive. Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 2036 and 2037, Series 1965-66~ the City Planning Commission recommended approval of said Reclassification, and granted said Conditional Use Permit~ unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against subject petitions~ there being no response~ declared the hearing closed. 9496 Qit¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - CQUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-417: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-417 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERJ~INING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-110 - C-l) Roi1 call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-417 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-418: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-418 for adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission granting Conditional Use Permit No. 836. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 836. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES t COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-418 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION ~0. 65-66-111 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 837: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from R-3 to C-l, and permission for an existing service station as a conforming use in the C-l, General Commercial Zone; property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and East Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 2038 and 2039, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said Reclassification, and granted said Conditional Use Permit, unconditionally. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against subject petitions, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-4%9: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-419 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING g~OULD BE A~ENDED AND T~AT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-111 - C-i) Roll call vote; AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-419 duly passed and adopted. 9~97 ~it¥ Hal.l, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - 3une 21~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-420: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-420 for adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission granting Conditional Use Permit No. 837. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 837. Roll call vote. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILM£N: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-420 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-113: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from R-A to C-l; property located at the northeast corner of Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2040, Series 1965-66, the City Planning Commission recommended approval of said Reclassification, unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, for or against subject petition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-421: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-421 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-113 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-421 duly passed and adopted. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT - PROPOSED SETTLING BASIN - NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL AREA: Petition containing 71 signatures representing owners of property located in the area known as the Atwood-Cone requesting action be taken to prevent the Orange County Water District's creation of a sand and gravel operation with conversion of said property into a settling basin, was submitted, together with correspondence received from Samuel Hurwitz, setting forth reasons for said request. Mr. Howard Crooke, Secretary-Manager of the Orange County Water District~ in answer to Councilman Dutton's question~ advised that it was estimated that five years would be required before the subject property would be converted into a settling basin and that a longer time has been taken at the Grill Pit~ however~ on two occasions excavation was stopped for an extended period of time and the area used for water spreading. Regarding the proposed settling basin, Mr. Crooke advised ~ha~ the area next to the water entry facility would be excavated first, then depending on the availability of water, climatic conditions, and demands for watery portions of the area could be used while excavating portions of the remaining area. 9498 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3une 21, 1966, 1:30 Regarding the availability of another site, Mr. Crook.e reported that the entire recharge area was explored and it was possible at some future date the District would like to acquire existing pits at a reason- able price for river water storage and desilting basins before trans- ferring the water into the proposed settling basins and by doing this, the existing pits would be gradually refilled to approximately 10 feet or 15 feet of the surface. He reported on their investigation made of the Burris Pit wherein it was determined that the facility was too close to the river. He stated that the settling basin must be in the recharge area and the better locations were upstream, north of Lincoln Avenue. Mr. Crooke explained the amount of water spreading and the amount received from the Metropolitan Water District and further advised that in the future it has been indicated that they would be required to take much larger flows at shorter periods of time and they were endeavoring to maintain an adequate water supply for all users in the districts. Further, water must be spread where the percolating areas are located and spreading can be handled efficiently and economically; the removal of sand is required basically to develop these facilities and the depth of excavation was predicated on the pressure of the water; removal of the sand was incidental to the development of the spreading facility. Mr. Crooke reported that it could not be determined at this time if the Crill Pit and the proposed basin would he sufficient for future needs and advised that there were no sites in Orange County to store water above ground, therefore storage must be below ground. Mr. Crooke explained that long range planning was necessary and related past experiences wherein water was at the point of adjudication and that plans must be projected to serve an estimated 900,000 people in the District. In conclusion, Mr. Crooke reported that the Orange County Water District Board has given many months of consideration to this issue and has determined that the proposed site is the best site available. Mr. Loren Blakely, Consultant Engineer, 125 South Claudina Street, Anaheim, advised that over the past 30 years he had made quite a study of water basins in all of the Southern California area and further advised that there were many places in Orange County below Scully Point where water could be and has been spread. With the aid of a map, Mr. Blakely pointed out how the river course had changed over the years creating fingers of gravel under the former river area; areas wherein water could be spread, reporting the technical and geological characteristics of various locations in the general Orange County area. He advised that at any point along the river channel where there are existing pits where sand and gravel have been removed there was a possibility of spreading water and receiving double utilization out of existing pits, and there were many different locations where water could be put under ground at many times of the year. Reference was made to the possibility of utilizing the Prado Basin for surface water storage to be spread throughout the year in prepared areas. Mr. Samuel Hurwitz advised that the signers of the petition represent approximately 700 acres of land in the area. He further advised that they were in agreement with the Orange County Water District program, however, their only difference was in the taking of this 95 acres off the tax rolls and invading the industrial zone for the purpose of creating a sand pit and eventual settling basin. In his opinion full consideration was not given to the City of Anaheim as this use will forever prevent a higher tax producing development of the land and shift the tax burdens to the tax payers of Anaheim. 9499 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 1966~ 1.:30 P.M. Comparison of tax paid by the Autonetics Development to the possible tax on subject property for a similar development was noted to be in the neighborhood of $750,000 annually at present rates. Mr. Hurwitz advised of Mr. Loren Blakely's experience in this field and was of the opinion that it was Mr. Blakely's contention that subject site was not the only site available for water settling basin and that other areas further down the river could mo're adequately serve the purpose. He was of the further opinion that the site selected was based on the fact that it was the only sand producing area. With the aid of a map, Mr. Hurwitz noted road and highways developed and projected for the area; the location of the proposed site and existing pits in relation to further and existing industrial developments. Attention was called to zoning requests for other than industrial use whereby land could be sold at higher prices and the strict adherence to the present industrial zoning preventing encroachment of other uses in the area. Mr. Hurwitz stated that he realized that the Orange County Water District has taken the position that they do not have to comply with City zoning laws and suggested that the City endeavor to persuade them to find other means of providing water to this area other than converting those 95 acres into a pit and if necessary to take what- ever steps are required through our courts of law. Mr. Hurwitz further suggested that an individual engineering firm be retained to make a study as to determine whether or not the subject 95 acres is the only place that can be used for a settling basin and whether or not the existing depleted gravel pits could not be used if found, in fact, that additional settling basins are necessary. Letter written by John B. Kilroy to Orange County Water District was read into the record opposing the proposed development. Similar letter from Stearns Realty Company was referred to. In conclusion Mr. Hurwitz advised that ali the factors involved indicated to him that the Orange County Water District was merely getting into a sand and gravel business. Discussion was held regarding whether or not the Orange County Water District was in fact not bound by the City zoning laws, and assuming the District was taking this position, Councilman Chandler noted that the zoning use projected by the Water District was a spreading basin, and the use that Mr. Hurwitz felt the property would be put to was a sand pit, and under these circumstances asked if the Orange County Water District would not be required to obtain a permit from the City to excavate and sell sand as a business over the period of years before using the area as a settling basin. Mr. Hurwitz reported that an Orange County permit was granted in connection with the sand and gravel operation of the Crill Pit; however, it was his understanding that in recent years it was the opinion of the District as a separate agenc~ not under the Board of Supervisors, that they were not required to comply with zoning law% ~and it Was his opinion that it was not right for any governmental agency to ignore city zoning laws. Discussion was also held on the possibility of testing the issue in court. Mayor Krein stated that he would like to see {he Orange County Water District make a very thorough study to locate'the facility in another area that would not interfere with the development of the northeast section. Mr. Robert Crigler, President of Robert Crigler Realty Company, reported that at the present time he was negotiating with two 5astern firms for development in this immediate area and at the time the Sprayon people were brought to the area various properties were shown~ one being adjacent to the rock and gravel operation, to the east of subject property. He stated that the Sprayon Company paid more per acre for their present site as they felt the area adjacent to the rock and gravel operation would be detrimental to their operation and not desirable at any price. 95OO City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 Mr. Crigler further advised that he has been engaged in this business for over 20 years dealing exclusively with National firms and National firms want a public image of dignity, quality and substance and will not place a new branch operation adjacent to a rock and gravel pit. As a result, where such an operation exists, it depresses property values in the area and definitely hampers future development. Mrs. Bessie Wall presented pictures of her home and asked if the City Council realized what 97 acres at a depth of 60 feet to the rear of her property would mean. She stated that they purchased the land many years ago and had paid thousands of dollars through the years in taxes. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a 10 minute recess. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:40 AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. Mr. Crooke stated that he was not aware that this was a public hearing, however, it apparently had developed into one and thought the Orange County Water District should have adequate time to present what is happening in the District. He further advised that the District has many consultants and named some of the firms and engineers rendering service. Mr. Crooke briefly reported some of the activities of the District since 1955 and the status and conditions of existing pits. Regarding the incomparability of spreading areas and industry, Mr. Grooke called attention to the fact that the Crill Pit excavation was commenced prior to the establishment of the Autonetics facility and and that there was apparently no incomparability. Mr. Grooke stated that they do not like to take property off the tax rolls, however, the situation has been evaluated, other sites have been considered, and spreading areas must be planned well in advance so that when needed they were available. Mr. Murdoch referred to the contention made by Mr. Blakely that the area basically easterly of Dowling had an underground slope considerably greater than that lying west and south of Dowling, and because of that physical condition the Warner Pit was less suitable than perhaps the Garden Grove area or Burris Pit. Mr. John /cups of the Orange County Water District stated that he agreed in that you could spread water down stream of Dowling Street, however, disagreed that you could spread water in Garden Grove as anything that approaches the Santa Ana Freeway is too far down stream. He further advised that there are no advantages of placing the spreading area down stream of Dowling and there were many disadvantages and, in his opinion, the present site was preferable. Mr. Murdoch, referring to the point brought up that it was very possible the existing pits already excavated could be utilized for the spreading operation, noting the difficulty of the steepness of the banks, asked if this perhaps could be remedied by acquiring land adjacent to the existing pits. Mr. Crooke advised of the reasons these areas were less desirable and related how flooding conditions could create considerable loss of water and run off to the ocean. In finality it was determined that the first decision necessary would be whether or not the use was a proper land use at that location and would require an advisory opinion from the City Planning Commission, and secondly, whether or not the public use on the part of the Water District was paramount to the zoning ordinance. 9501 City Hall, Anaheim, ~,alifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the discussion was further continued to 3uly 19, 1966, 1:30 P.M., to allow for analysis of available Orange County report and the practical problems involved. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Don Pierotti, 501 St. John Way, Placentia, called attention to the strawberries grown in the immediate area and the need for quantities of water and asked if water could be pumped to these areas thereby assisting in the spreading and sinking activities. He stated that he was pumping water out of the ground and that approximately one-half of it went back into the ground as he irrigated. Regarding future pits, Mr. Pierotti wondered why the pits could not be constructed with pre-cast tops and excavated below. Mr. Pierotti related conversation with the County tax office and the projected tax by 1971, he felt should the taxes increase to a point where the land could not be used for agricultural purposes, and the land not be attractive to industries, some of the owners would be seriously affected. SIGN REQUEST - FREEDMAN WAY (CREST HOTELS).~. Request of H. E. Roddewig, Vice President, Crest Hotels, for permission to erect five off-site signs on City property at various points along Freedman Way, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with the plans, and recommendations of the Development Services Department and the City Engineer. Mr. Howard Clayton, 1068 Briarfield, San Diego, representing the Crest Hotels, advised of complaints received when visitors are unable to locate the entrance to the hotel, and noted that only two of the original five proposed signs were going to be pursued: The corner of Harbor Boulevard and Freedman Way, on the traffic island (where the Melodyland Theatre Marquee sign is located), The corner of Freedman Way and Hotel Way. He submitted plans for review, illustrating the proposed location of the two signs. Mr. Tom Lacy, of Southern California Edison Company, addressed the City Council requesting an opportunity to review the specific locations proposed, and advised that they were desirous of learning how the sign requests would pertain to the Edison Company right of way. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and on the recommenda- tions of the City Manager, it was determined that action on the foregoing requests be continued one week (June 28, 1966, 1:30 P.M.) for further investigation. ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER - ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE: Councilman Chandler reported on application for alcoholic beverage license, made available to Automatic Canteen Corporation of America, which could be used to make application for alcoholic beverage license at the Convention Center; however, the Concessionaire has not been selected by the City for that facility. The City Attorney's Office was authorized to immediately contact the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the purpose of determining whether application can be made at this time. 9502 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 P.M. (Councilman Dutton left the meeting, RECLASSIFICATIONS NOS. 60-61-85 AND 60-61-109, AND CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 120: Request of Victor C. Maler, dated May 24~ 1966~ for release of improvement bondsposted as conditions of subject petitions~ was submitted together with reports from the Development Services Depart- ment and the City Engineer. On the recommendations of the City Engineer and the Development Services Department, Councilman $chutte moved that the bonds be released, provided that one of the following conditions be met: 1. That similar bonds be posted by the new owners of subject properties. 2. That the present owners request reclassification to R-A zone. 3. That the improvements bonded for are installed. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-102: Request of Mr. and Mrs. 3ohn Callahan and Russell 3. Murray, dated M~y 13, 1966, for release of bond No. B-95389, posted as condition of said reclassification, was submitted together with reports from the Development Services Department and the City Engineer. On the recommendations of the City Engineer and the Development Services Department, Councilman Schutte moved that the bond be released, provided that one of the following conditions be met: 1. That similar bond be posted by the new owners of subject property. 2. That the present owners request reclassification to R-A zone. 3. That the improvements bonded for are installed. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilman Chandler left the meeting, 4:53 P.M.) SIDEWALK WAIVER - 211 WEST KATBLLA AVENUE {ZEYN STREET FRONTAGE ONLY): Request of George Baney, President, Glacier Falls Ice Arena, dated May 17~ i966, for waiver of sidewalk requirements on the Zeyn Street frontage of property located at 211 West Katella Avenue~ was submitted. The City Engineer briefed his amended recommendations~ dated June 21, 1966. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, it was moved by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that the temporary sidewalk waiver be denied, the parkway area along the Zeyn Street frontage to be paved with concrete from the back of the curb to the property line, except for 4 foot by 4 foot tree wells provided in locations designated by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilman Chandler returned to the meeting, a:57 9503 City Hal!, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, !:30 P.M. ORANGE COUNTY TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO, 5019: Developer - Mr. and Mrs. Nick Pokrajac; tract located at the southeast corner of Coronado and Blue Gum Streets, and proposed for 15 M-1 Light Industrial Zoned lots. Excerpt of the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting of June 20, 1966, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to approve Tentative Tract No. 5019, subject to the following conditions: That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivisions, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That all improvements shall be installed in accordance with the standards of the City of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Council sustained the action taken by the City Planning Commission, and ordered a copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED· ORANGE COUNTY RECLASSIFICATION CASE NO. ZC66-28(ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCF NO. 5716): Petitioner, Tic Toc Markets, Inc., proposing a zoning change from the R-3 "Apartment" district to the C-1 "Local Business" district~ property located on the east side of Gilbert Street, 62 feet south of Ball Road in the West Anaheim area. Excerpt of the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held June 20, 1966, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to deny Orange County Case No. ZC66-28, based on the findings made by the City of Anaheim in Orange County Use Variance No. 5716. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, recommendations of the City Planning Commission were sustained by the City Council~ and a copy thereof ordered forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY RECLASSIFICATION CASE NO, ZC66-34: Initiated by the Orange County Planning Commission proposing a zoning change from the "Apartment" district to the C-l,"Local Business" district for property located on the southeast corner of Gilbert Street and Ball Road, approximately 245 feet by 160 feet in area (includes property described in Case No. ZC66-28). Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting of June 20, 1966, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to approve Orange County Case No. ZC66-34, subject to the following conditions: That the owners of subject property deed to the County a strip of land 53 feet in width along Ball Road for street widening purposes, including a 15 foot minimum radius return. That the owners of subject property deed to the County a strip of land 32 feet in width along Gilbert Street for street widening purposes. 0 That street improvements along Gilbert Street and BaIi Road be in conformance with City of Anaheim standards. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, recommendations of the City Planning Commission were sustatned~ and copy thereof was ordered forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. 9504 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966..~ 1:30 AWARD OF JOBS NOS. 3507 AND 889, PHASE I: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that award of contracts for jobs Nos. 3507 and 889, Phase I, utility yard between South and Vermont Streets, be continued to July 5, 1966, 1:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO,,, 66~-422 - AWARD ~OF PROJECT NO, 419B: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-422 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND LEMON STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 419B. (William R. Hahn - $6,938.00) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-422 duly passed and adopted. .RESOLUTION NO, 66R-423 - AWARD OF 30B NO, 951: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-423 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT: THE LF~ON, SANTA ANA AND ATCHISON STREETS SEWER IMPROVF~ENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 951. (Rogers & Davies Pipeline Contractors - $130,463.56) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-423 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nos. 66R-424 and 66R-425 and 66R-426 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 69R-424: A RESOLUTION OF THE GI/Y COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVFJ~ENT OF SAGE PARK, AT /HE CORNER OF LIDO LANE AND LIDO PLACE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 975. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF: AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bid opening date, July 14, 1966, 2:00 P.M.) 9~05 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 2!., 1966i i:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-425: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE GEORGE HANSEN COMMUNITY PARKSITE, AT THE NORTH~-. EAST CORNER OF CRESCENT AVENUE AND VENTURA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 971; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PRO'FILES~ DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bid opening date, July 14, 1966) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-426: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERJ~INING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND N£CESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF EAST STREET, FROM SYCAMORE STREET TO BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, SS PROJECT NO. 306-A; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PRO- FILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bid opening date, July 21, 1966) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 66R-424, 66R-425 and 66R-426 duly passed and adopted. RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATION - SS PROJECT NO. 306-A: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign right-of-way certification in connection with the right-of-way for SS Project No. 306-A (East Street improvement from Sycamore Street to Ball Road). Councilman Pebley abstained from voting on the foregoing issue. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-427 - JOB NO. 945: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-427 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,'MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND CON~LETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: A PREFABRICATED STEEL, RIGID FRAME BUILDING IN THE CITY MAINTENANCE YARD AT 518 SOUTH CALUDINA STREET, IN THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 945. (Thompson Constructors) Roll call vote; AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIIJ~EN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kreln None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-427 duly passed and adopted. CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 - JOB NO. 389-B: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that Change Order No. 3, 3ob No. 389-B, consisting of constructing temporary road across the Santa Ana River at Orangewood Avenue, in the amount of $2,186.41, be authorized. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 9 506 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 P.M. COMMENDATION - SULLY MILLER CONTRACTORS: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer, the City Council authorized Mayor Krein to send letter of commendation to Sully Miller Contractors for their excellent cooperation with the City in completion of the Katella Avenue over- crossing of the Santa Ana Freeway, and the Orangewood Avenue street improvement, including the temporary road across the Santa Ana River~ prior to the opening of Anaheim Stadium. ANTI-TRUST LITIGATION - WATER PIPE MANUFACTURERS: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler that the City Council authorize payment in the amount of $200°00 to the State Attorney General's Office, in con- nection with antitrust suit against certain water pipe manufacturers, entered into by the City of Anaheim, together with other entities, as authorized February 23, 1966 by Resolution No. 66R-149. MOTION CARRIED. CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal purposes~ pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-396, formerly assessed to Macobe, Inco, deed recorded June 9, 1966, as Document No. 5877 in Book 7955, Page 424, Official Records of Orange County California. MO/ION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY - MRS. JEAN L. ADAMS: Claim submitted by Mrs. Jean L. Adams, for damages purportedly resulting from accident with City of Anaheim vehicle, on or about June 1, 1966, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney.and ordered referred to the Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutteo MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: Correspondence from the Orange County Street Naming Com- mittee regarding proposed renaming of Golden West Street - Knott Avenue, dated June 10, 1966, was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLIdATION~ Application submitted by Takao Matsunaga and Yasumi Miyamoto for new on-sale beer and wine license, premises located at 923 South Beach Boulevard (C-1 zone), was pre- sented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, the City Attorney w~authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis that the requested use requires Conditional Use Permit. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Alexander J. Miller, for new off-sale beer and wine license for Tiny Tim Markets, Inc., 601 South Magnolia Street (C-1 zone), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. No Council action was taken on said application. ORDINANCE NO. 2295: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2295 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.64, SECTION 18.64o020 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE~ WITH REFERENCE TO CONDITIONAL USES. (Ambulances) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None. Dutton The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2295 duly passed and adopted. 9~07 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2296: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2296 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-94 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Dutton The Mayor declared Ordinance Noo 2296 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2297: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2297 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-92 - C-1 & R-3) ORDINANCE NO. 2298: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2298 for first reading° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-62(2) - R-3) ORDINANCE NO. 2299: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance Noo 2299 for first reading° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-63(2) - C-O) ORDINANCE NO. 2300: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2300 for first reading° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-100 - C-i) PROPOSED SALARY ADJUSTMENT - CITY PERSONNEL: Mr. Murdoch reported that copies of report and recommendations concerning proposed salary adjustments for City personnel have been distributed to the City Councill however~ sub- sequently, additional information pertaining to certain classifications has been received~ which indicates further adjustment would be warranted in the near future° Personnel Director Roy Heissner advised that four organizations representing City employees have requested an opportunity to make pre- sentations to the City Council June 28, 1966, in connection with the salary proposals° On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Council consideration of proposed salary adjustments was continued to June 28, 1966, 7:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered ResoluQon Nos. 66R-428, 66R-429, and 66R-430 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book RESOLUTION NO. 66R-428: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert R. Pralle) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-429: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (George K. Reed, Jr°, Cuba Reed, and Katherine Beatie) 9508 Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3une 21 1966 1:30 P.M. RESOLUIION NO. 66R-430: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING ~ASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert L. Miller) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein~ NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton. The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 66R-428, 66R-429 and 66R-430 duly passed and adopted. DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RI TS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-63 2 : On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, dedication of vehicular access rights by Robert L. Miller to Harbor Boulevard, in connection with Reclassification No. 65-66-63(2), was accepted by the City Council and the recordation thereof authorized. MOTION CARRIED. ~EGAL ADVERTISING - RESOLUTION NO. 66R-43]: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Noo 66R-431 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CALLING FOR SEALED PROPOSALS FOR PUBLISHING OF LEGAL NOTICES. (Bid opening date, 3uly 21, 1966, 2:00 P.M.) Roi1 call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution No 66R-431 duly passed and adopted. · RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Pebley seconded the motion. Councilman MOTION CARRIED. (5:20 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte. PRESENT: CITY ~ANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Michelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RECLASSIFICATION NO, 65-66-85: Submitted by John M. Straine requesting change of zone from R-l-to C-l~ property briefly described as located at the southwest corner of Rome and Magnolia Avenues (805 South Magnolia Avenue). Public hearing was held March 22, 1966, and continued to May 24, 1966, at which time the hearing was closed and decision of the City Council deferred to this date to allow property owners in the area an opportunity to agree on a plan of development. 9509 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Planning Supervisor Ronald Grudzinski briefly reviewed the hearing before the City Council May 24, 1966, noting that three alternative plans prepared by the City staff for the commercial development of re- sidential properties between Ball Road and the service station at the northwest corner of Rome and Magnolia Avenues; Exhibit A, illustrating development of parcels in blocks of three; Exhibit B, blocks of two parcels; and Exhibit C, individual lot development under site development standards, with controlled access° He called attention to the recom- mendations of the staff that, should property owners be unable to agree on a plan of development, the status quo be maintained, and existing Resolutions of Intent for C-1 zoning (Resolution Nos. 66R-665 through 66R-669, Reclassification No. 60-61-44) remain in effect, allowing development in groups of three lots. Mr. Frank Riggi, 1200 West Katella Avenue, Agent and Coordinator representing the property owners, submitted a list of conditions for C-1 zoning approved and signed by owners of Lots 127 through 141, Tract No. 1591, excepting the owners of Lots 131 and 138. He referred to an exhibit which he had posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers, and noted that six access points from Magnolia Avenue were shown, allowing one shared access between groups of two lots, with Lot 127 being served from Ball Road through existing alley, and Lots 140 and 141 being served by an alley from Rome Avenue. In his opinion, the access points pro- posed on the exhibits previously prepared by the City Staff did not pro- vide adequate ingress and egress to serve each parcel. Discussion was held by the City Council and the City Attorney, and it was agreed that to accomplish the proposal as set forth by the property owners, an Area Development Plan defining the exact access points, should be adopted; that dedication of all vehicular access rights to Magnolia Avenue, except at the specific access points, would be necessary~ and that private agreements should be entered into by each pair of pro- perty owners for their reciprocal ingress and egress over the access ways. That deed restrictions should be a requirement, and if single parcel~ developments were to be permitted, for which off-street parking was not sufficient, reciprocal parking agreements would be necessary. At the conclusion of the discussion, Mr. Riggi was advised to work with the Development Services Department Staff to coordinate ~he proposals submitted for the fifteen lots, incorporating the considerations noted by the City Council. Councilman Chandler moved that Council action on Reclassification No. 65-66-85 be deferred two weeks, 3uly 5, 1966, 1:30 P.M., to allow the Agent an opportunity to contact the adjacent property owners and obtain an expression of o~inion regarding the reciprocal access agree- ments which would be necessary prior to initiation of a new reclassi- fication on the fifteen parcels, with limited access points as proposed. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-115: Submitted by Cassatt and Margaret Geall and 3ack G. and Lethal H. Dell, requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l; two lots located at the northwest corner of Dallas Drive and Katella Avenue (1771 and 1775 So. Dallas Drive). Pursuant to Resolution No. 2027, Series 1965-66, the City Planning Commission recommended said reclassification be denied. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. The City Clerk called attention to three letters received in her office, two in support of subject application, and one in opposition. Mayor Krein asked if a ~epresentative of the petitioners wished to address the Council. 9510 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1966, 1:30 Mrs. Cassatt Geall, 1775 South Dallas Drive, addressed the Council, advising that they have been unable to sell their home for residential purposes, due to the heavy traffic on Katella Avenue~ that although their driveway and address are on Dallas Drive, the dwelling was originally a model home and was oriented'to Katella Avenue; and that they had no specific plans for development of the property. She called attention to a beauty shop in the same block on Katella Avenue, and to a truck storag~ area across Katella Avenue to the south. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. Mrs. Wildene Menezes, 11031 Dallas Drive, addressed the City Council objecting to the proposed reclassification. Councilman Chandler pointed out that the policy of the City Council has been to require specific plans for development before ap- proving a different type of use on property, particularly where adjoining parcels are residential. Mr. Robert Ames, 1759 South Dallas Drive, advised that he was one of fifty people who signed a petition of opposition which was submitted at the hearing before the City Planning Commission. He noted that properties adjacent on the west have an existing alley paralle.I to Katella Avenue, and if subject reclassification were approved~ dedication for extension of that alley and for the widening of Katella Avenue would leave little area for commercial development. Mr. Ames stated that he was opposed to "spot zoning". Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that the public hearing be continued to August 30, 1966, 7:00 P.M., to allow the applicant an opportunity to submit plans for commercial development of subject property; said plans to be submitted to the City Planning Commission for advisory report to the City Council. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - ANNUAL INDEPENDENCE DAY PROCLAMATION: Communication dated June 3, 1966, from Michael So Zebra, requesting that a Proclamation be issued, both in 1966 and annually thereafter, in observance of the Ringing of Bells at 2:00 O'Clock P.M., Eastern Standard Time, July 4, in celebration of the anniversary of our nation's independence, was submitted and ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler° MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 8:10 City Clerk