Loading...
1974/11/0574-1074 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Don McDaniel CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR: Dan Van Dorpe Mayor Thom called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend John Fast of the Free Methodist Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Thom proclaimed the week of November 11 through 17, 1974, "Youth Appreciation Week in Anaheim", which was unanimously approved by the City Council. Said Proclamation was presented to Mr. Darwin Stockwell, President of the Anaheim Optimists Club,'who described some of the activities of the Club in connection with Youth Week, and introduced three foreign exchange students visiting the Council meeting, as follows: Annette Doreng of Denmark; Janne Hukkinen of Finland and Uls Luedenann of West Germany. CER~,~pICA, TES OF.APPRECIATION: Certificates of Appreciation were presented by the Mayor to Water Division Employees Leonard W. Bout, Jr., Don R. Nygard, and Michael C. Jonas for their assistance in the rescue of automobile accident victims during the course of their work. CORRE~TIQNS .T~. MINUTES: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, corrections of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held October 1, 1974, were authorized as follows, and said Minutes were approved as corrected: Page No. 74-986, Paragraph No. 3, Line No. 6, omit the word "heavy" and insert "a safety hazard, and"; Page No. 74-996, last paragraph, change "Santa Ana Interceptor Sewer" to "Santa Ana Canyon Interceptor Sewer"; and on Page No. 74-997, Paragraph No. 5, Line No. 4, imsert the word "hot water" after the fourth word; and on Line No. 5 of the same paragraph, omit the words "good" and "usually", and in place of the word "good", insert "cold". MOTION CAI~IED. , On motion by Councilwoman Kmywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held October 3, 1974, were approved, and correction of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting held October 8, 1974, was authorized as follows, and said Minutes were approved as corrected: Page No. 74-1012, Paragraph No. 13, change "Seymour" to "Sneegas". MOTION CARRIED. waiver of readin8 ia hereby 8tven by all Council Member8 unless, after reading o~ ~he ~i~le, specific requea~ ia ~de ~y a ~unctl M~er ~or ~he rea~Am~ c~ such ordinance or reaolu~ion. ~uncil~n ~aeeaaa aecoa~ed ~he ~tcn. ~TIO~ U~I~U~ uRPO~T - F~IAL DBZfA~ID8 AGAINST TILEGITYt Deuande asaine~ the City ~n the amount of $2,707, 32.76, in accordance FiSh ~he 107~-75 Budee~, were approved. Pu._~POSED OP. DX~CE ~Wn~LATIN~ N~W~RAC,E~ ON..PUBL~C ~HTS OF WAY: Cit2 Attorney ~an Watts briefl~ o~rised his report (copies fu~iohed each Council Member) and advised tha~ the proposed ordinance, prepared at the direction o~ the City Council a~ ~heir meeting held October 15, 1971, ~uld prohlbiC the pictorial axpoaure st certain portions of the hu~n body on newaracks located on public 74-1075 CiC~ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. rights-of-way, and includes a section which would regulate the location of these racks on public rights of way insofar as they may interfere with the pedestrian usage of the sidewalks, the latter portion having been included for consideration by the City Council. In answer to question by Councilwoman Kaywood with reference to the possible prohibition of the display of pictorial violence and gory details, Mr. Wa~ts expressed the opinion that such pictures could be used in connection w~h a legitimate news story, and to attempt to prohibit such photographs on newsracks might be interpreted as interference with the freedom of speech. In response to comment by Mayor Thom regarding previously proposed covers for newsracks, Mr. Watts noted that it had been discussed, but in his opinion to require covering the racks so that only the name of the paper shows would fall into the realm of regulating the content of news publications. Councilman Sneegas related it had been his impression that any rasula=ion which pinpointed a particular type of newspaper could be held as unconstitutional, and if the objective can be accomplished without calling attention to specific publications, his reaction would be favorable. He remarked that he was satisfied with the proposed ordinance, however, was in favor of limiting to three or four the number of newsracks in any one location on these rights-of-way. Mayor Thom called attention to a local restaurant which recently installed on their private property a sizable group of attractive newsracks. He then asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on the proposed ordinance. Mrs. Margaret Hanshew, 1618 East Redwood, addressed the Council stating that although she firmly believes in freedom of the press, she also felt that there should be some standard, and people should not be afraid to voice their opinions. Mr. Frank Karcher, 506 North Dwyer Drive, Vice President of Carl Karcher Enterprises, reported that some of the biggest complaints received at their restaurants were in reference to the number of newsracks and the material displayed although these racks are located on the public right-of-way. He was of the opinion that they should be confined to private properties so that the newspaper people would have to solicit businessmen for space, and the businessmen could be selective in accordance with what their patrons desire. He further felt that the racks are often a safety hazard and a nuisance. Mayor Thom pointed out that the ordinance, as proposed, would only regulate the racks, not remove them from the public rights-of-way. Councilman Sneegas reported that he had answered many people who called him concerning newsracks on private properties by explaining that he felt businessmen would be impressed if their customers advised them they would not patronize their business as long as certain publications were displayed on their property. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that it is not necessary for these newstands to be unattractive, nor to take up a great deal of room, and she cited the newer circular type of revolving racks containing five or six different pub- lications. Also noted were bus stop benches in Santa Barbara which contain built-in newsracks at each end and even some landscaping. Mr. Paul Laninger, Vice President of the East Anaheim Homeowners' Association, commended the Council for their efforts to make this City a better place in which to live. Councilman Seymour noted that he had been supportive of the concept to resulaCe these objectionable publications for some time, and he felt the adoption of the proposed ordinance would be a step in the right direction. He co~ended Councilman Sneegas for his leadership im Chis matter. 74-1076 City Hall~ Anah__ei___m, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P~M. Councilman Sneegas noted that although he is connected with the vending machine business, he has nothing to do with newspaper vending racks. ORDINANCE NO. 3369: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3369 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4 BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 4.82, REGULATING NEWSRACKS ON PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. PUBLIC HEARING - UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE~ 1973 EDITION: To consider adoption, by reference, of a Uniform Plumbing Code, entitled "International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1973 Edition", with Appendices A, B, C, D, E, F and G, included, with amendments thereto, to be known as the Anaheim Plumbing Code, and amending Title 15 by adding thereto a new Chapter 15.20. Chief Building Inspector Dan Van Dorpe was present to answer any ques- tions by the Council. Concerning t~e possibility of previously mentioned water conserving plumbing fixtures being included in the Code, he advised that the issue is being studied by a research committee of the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, and if any of these water conserving fixtures become available, they will be included in the Uniform Plumbing Code He reported that the City's Senior Plumbing Inspector is a member of the Board of Directors and of the Association's research committee. Mayor Thom asked if any member of the audience wished to address the City Council; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. In response to question by Councilman Seymour, Mr. Van Dorpe stated that the establishment of the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1973 Fee Schedule would represenC no increase in fees. QRDINANCE NO. 3363: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3363 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.20 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ADOPTING THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1973 EDITION, APPENDICES A, B, C, D, E, F AND G, INCLUDED, WITH AMENDMENTS THERETO; AND AMENDING TITLE 15, BY ADDING TIiERETO A NEW CHAPTER 15.20. ~11 Call Vote: AYES: NOES: COUNCIL M~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MgMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3363 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-545: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-545 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SETTING FORTH LOCAL CONDITIONS JUSTIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1973 EDITION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared P~solution No. 74R-545 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-546: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-546 for adoption. 74-1077 F City Hallt Anaheimt California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SETTING THE FEE SCHEDULE OF T~ UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1973 EDITION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMEERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-546 duly passed and adopted. AMUSEMENT DEVICES PERMIT: Application filed by Clifford G. Jones for Amusement Devices Permit to allow one juke box, one cigarette machine and one bowler and pinball game at the Red Lion, 120 East Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapters 3.24 and 4.20 of the Anaheim MuniCipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. ENCROACMMENT PERMIT NO. 74-5E: Submitted by Mr. Wayne Callaghan, Anaheim Hills, Inc., to permit three existing signs to remain within a portion of dedicated roadway commonly known as Anaheim Hills Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road. Also submitted was report of the City Engineer recommending approval of said request. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-547: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-547 for adoption, granting Encroachment Permit No. 74-5E. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WITH TEXACO ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. (74-5E) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-547 duly passed and adopted. REPORT - STREET NAMING AND PREMISE NUMBERING: Assistant Development Services Director Ronald Thompson briefed the contents of report from the City Engineer and Development Services Department dated October 18, 1974, recommending revision to Section 15.08.020.02, Divisional Lines, changing the north/south divisional line from an imaginary line east from the intersection of East Center Street and State College Boulevard, to a meandering line east of State College Boulevard to the intersection of the Newport and Riverside Freeways, as shown on the Address and Street Zone Master Plan. Further, that east of the intersection of the Newport and Riverside Freeways, the north/south divisional line was recommended to be changed to Santa Aha Canyon Road. He advised that the recommmndations were the results of discussions with members of the Police and Fire Departments and the Post Office in an effort to minimize response time for mmerge~cy service and to provide for the best possible service to citizens. No businesses would be involved, and no changes would be effected until after the Christmas holidays. City Engineer James Maddox reported that of the approximate 1,000 residential structures which would be renumbered, it is estimated that 40% are unoccupied. Respondin$ to question by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Thompson reported that many of the residents have not yet been advised of the pending renumbering, and many of the approximate 600 occupied dwellings have recently been annexed to the City. During discussions on the matter, it was surmised that in the hill and canyon area, the determination of the'north/south divisional line should have 74-1078 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5, 1974, 1:30 P.M. been designated at Santa Ana Canyon Road or the Riverside Freeway, rather than along an imaginary line which created gaps in block sequence and hampered emer- gency response time. Mr. Thompson further advised that approximately one year ago the old ordinance had been updated, however, in order to provide the basic service for the citizens, it was felt that the proposed system of numbering would be more practical, especially in the canyon area. Discussion was held regarding the fact that the proposed changes would be implemented mostly for the convenience of those providing services to the area, and Mr. Murdoch was of the opinion that new house numbers should be made available to those whose addresses were being changed by the City. Councilman Pebley pointed out that the change would also benefit resi- dents of the area and their guests, making it easier to locate an address. In response to question by Councilman Sneegas, Mr. Maddox reported that the old street signs are usually kept in place for one year, together with the new signs. Councilwomen Kaywood felt that residents should be encouraged to install house numbers which can be seen at night as well as in the daylight. She pointed out that on Harbor Boulevard where there are many neon signs, she would prefer seeing the posted addresses in order to better facilitate locating an address. ORDINANCE NO. 3370: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3370 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SUBSECTION 15.08.020.02 AND ENACT- ING A NEW SUBSECTION 15.08.020.02 IN ITS PLACE RELATING TO STREET PREMISE NLgMBERING. (Divisional Lines) Councilman Seymour recommended that a warmly written letter be mailed to the affected citizens notifying them of the proposed changes and noting the Justification therefor as explained in the report submitted. Further, that they be offered the choice of either having the one style of house numbers the City has available or obtaining their own. Councilwoman Kaywood concurred, being of the opinion that the changes would sound less like an arbitrary decision if presented in this manner. Councilman Seymour moved that a letter be directed to all affected property owners, setting out the proposed changes and the Justification, plus the availability of house numbers. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED REQUEST - HOTEL AND MOTEL PRICE SIGN ORDINANCE: Submitted by Bill O'Connell, General Manager, Stovall Properties, requesting adoption of a new ordinance governing hotel and motel price signs or stronger enforcement of the existing ordinance. Said request was continued from the Council meeting held September 24, 1974, to allow time for review of the existing ordinance and of steps taken by the Cities of Las Vegas, Nevada, and Phoenix, Arizona, to resolve their problems. Copy of communication dated October 29, 1974, written to Mr. O'Connell by the City Attorney's Office was submitted (copies furnished each .Council Member), in which it was noted that the City of Phoenix has advised that they have no sign ordinance. A copy of the State Statute and Ordinance of Las Vegas, Nevada, has been received. The State Law permits a City to prohibit the posting of rate signs. According to the Las Vegas City Attorney, they receive very little opposition to their rate sign ordinance. Council discussion was held, and it was determined that the Zoning Enforcement Officer be instructed tO exercise stronger enforcement of the existing ordinance governing hotel and motel price signs. 74-1079 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5, 1974~ 1:30 P.M. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 14, 1974, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: 1. VARIANCE N0~635~ TENTATIVE MAPS, TRACT NOS. 8775~ 8793~ 8795 AND 8796~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 134~ AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 136 (SUPPLEMENTING MASTER E.I.R. NO. 113): Submitted by Brigham Young University, to construct a 326-unit, 4-tract subdivision, with a theme tower and 2 free- standing signs on R-A zoned property located northwesterly of the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Euclid Street, with the following waivers of the Anaheim Municipal Code: a. Required lot frontage on a public street. b. Maximum structural height. c. Maximum sign area. d. Prohibited signs. F The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-202, granted said variance in part, waivers "c" and "d" having been eliminated by the submission of revised plans and therefore withdrawn by the Petitioner, subject to conditions. With reference to the man-made lake which is to be a part of the development, Councilwoman Kaywood asked whether there would be guards on a 24- hour basis. Mr. Jim Christiansen of Matreyek Homes, Inc., came forward to reply that while the project is under construction, there will be several guards around the property and after the walls are constructed~there will be a guard on duty 24-hours a day, with more guards being added as the number of units is increased. He pointed out that some of those who were opposed to the project would like to see the lake fenced, which inhis opinionwould detract from the beauty of the development. Also noted was the fact that there are over 2500 man-made lakes in California which have no fences and no guards; that no one has drowned in them and that some of them have elementary schools nearby. Concerning the depth of the lake, Mr. Christiansen called attention to Environmental Impact Report finding contained in the City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC74-202, providing that Paragraph No. 4, Page No. 7, of Environ- mental Impact Report No. 136 shall reflect that the lake depth be no more than one foot at the shore line, and slope to a maximum of three feet at the distance of twelve feet from the shore, being a 4:1 slope. He advised that the Petitioner had previously stipulated that the lake bottom would be extended from the shore line on a very gentle slope to a distance of twelve feet, providing a platform so that if anyone should fall into the water, even a small child, would have only to stand to avoid drowning. Mr. Christiansen submitted to the Council copies of the proposed wording change for said E.I.R. provision, as follows: "That paragraph 4, Page 7, of Environmental Impact No. 136 shall reflect that the slope of the lake bottom will not be steeper than 4 horizontal to 1 vertical, so that the depth at a distance of 12 feet from shore line is not more than 3 feet; and stipulating further that the depth of the lake at the shore line shall in no case exceed one foot." In response to question by Councilman Pebley, Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts stated that in his opinion the proposed change in wording would better clarify the matter. At the invitation of Councilman Seymour, Mr. Ben Bay, 2148 West Grayson Avenue, Anaheim, representing COAL, Coalition of Anaheim Leaders, addressed the City Council requesting permission to set forth three points which he felt should be considered at a public hearing, if necessary. City Attorney Allan Watts counseled that if the City Council intends to make revisions or additions to conditions of the variance, it should be done at a public hearing. Mr. Bay continued, advising that Chapter 6.56.010 and 6.56.020 of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires that any bodies of water located on private 74-1080 City H211_~ Ana~j.~m~_C,a!ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5, 1974, 1:30 P.M. property containing water at a depth of 18" or more must be enclosed by a fence or a wall, making the water inaccessible to small children; and that if a fence is not employed, in lieu of it, a guard must be posted to keep the water under observation at all times. He pointed out that this would be a costly service which would necessarily be added to the monthly fees charged by the Condominium Association for maintenance, etc., and he failed to see why a properly construc- ted, protective fence could not be installed around the lake which would meet the ordinance requirements and be more economical. If not, it was his request that there be an added condition that a specific number of guards be posted and night lighting provided due to the size and dimensions of the lake. Secondly, Mr. Bay noted the concern of those persons residing to the west that Coronet and Falmouth Avenues not be opened into subject property during construction; that there be a traffic signal installed at La Palma Avenue and Romneya Drive prior to commencement of construction; and that heavy construc- tion equipment and trucks be limited to those streets for ingress and egress of the property. The third point of concern by Mr. Bay was that there be some guarantee that runoff waters from subject property will not fill the streets of the area to the west to a point higher than the curbs; that the City Council be shown detailed plans for drainage and for the lake; and that it was his understanding that the lake would be excavated to a depth exceeding 20 feet during the first phase of development, but would not be lined until some time next year. Relative to the drainage, City Engineer James Maddox reported it would not be likely that there would be any more than a schematic plan for drainage on file at this stage. He noted Condition No. 8 of all four tract maps which requires drainage to be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. Mr. Roberts pointed out that Condition No. 14 of Tentative Tract No. 8793 requires that the lake and all public street improvements within the four tracts shall be developed with the first phase of construction of said tracts, and Condition No. 15 requires that specific plans for the development of the lake must be submitted to and approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of the building permit on the first phase of construc- tion. This points out that the lake is an integral part of the drainage plan which would have to be reviewed by the City Engineer prior to Council approval. Mr. Maddox concurred, stating that his office would review and make recommendations on the entire drainage plan, including the lake, prior to approval by the City Council. Council discussion was held, and question asked as to the eventual opening of Coronet and Falmouth Avenues. Mr. Christiansen returned to the stand to advise it is their desire to keep these streets closed during construction because he felt it could cause problems if trucks and other construction equipment were using these streets. He noted that the Petitioner had offered to share the cost of installing a traffic signal at the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Romneya Drive at the beginning of construction. Mr. Christiansen called attention to the fact that the Petitioner had insisted that all off-site improvements be constructed prior to final building inspection of the first phase of development, and although they intended to com- plete the lake at the same time, the Flood Control District will not issue a grading permit until April 15 of next year for drainage work. Consequently the developer will dig the lake now, thereby allowing run-off waters to recharge the underground waterbasin through this lake excavation. Completion of the lake will occur when the drainage is provided. Councilman Seymour stated it was his belief the City Council is inter- ested in obtaining assurances regarding the concerns expressed by Mr. Bay in order that the Petitioner may proceed with his project immediately. Mr. Watts counseled that the matters discussed seemed to refer to conditions imposed on the tract maps by the Planning Commission, and any proposed amendment or addition thereto would not require public hearing, as would amend- ments to conditions of the variance. 74-1081 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. In response to question by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Christiansen reported that the lake would be lined with concrete and vinyl, however specific plans would be submitted for approval at a later date. Mr. Bay returned to the stand to advise that inasmuch as the Council Minutes are not recorded verbatim, he felt that commitments made by the Developer should be locked into the development with specific wording. Councilman Seymour asked whether Mr. Bay was satisfied that the drain- age and lake conditions were tied to the tentative maps, with the City Council havin$ final approval. Mr. Bay replied in the affirmative.' Councilwoman Kaywood requested that the tapes of today's meeting be retained for possible future reference. In response to Councilmen Seymour and Thom, Mr. Watts advised that Title 6 of the Anaheim Municipal Code basically provides that pools, ponds or other bodies of water on private property having a depth of 18 inches or more be fenced, or in lieu thereof, that a guard be provided. The Code, however, does not take the matter further to describe the locations, types of guard situations, or other details. Mr. Christiansen pointed out that there are over 20,000 dwellings situated around lakes in Southern California, and the City of Anaheim is the only jurisdiction who requires a fence or guard. He was of the opinion that the provisions were primarily designed to be applied to swimming pools, and further noted that the States of Arizona, Nevada and Hawaii do not require fences around thistype of lake. Councilman Pebley agreed with Mr. Christiansen and was of the opinion that if the 24-hour guards were required after completion of development, the homeowner association fees would be increased. Councilman Sneegas expressed the opinion that an unfenced.and unguarded lake would not constitute a precedent-setting situation, and he noted the set- tling basin by the Santa Aha River along Lincoln Avenue where waters fill and drain continually without the benefit of a fence or guard. He saw no need for the fence and felt the matter comes down to individual control by parents teach- ing their children to exercise caution. If the slope of the lake bottom is to be as gradual as depicted by the developer, he failed to see how anyone could drown in the lake unless it was intentional. Councilman Seymour agreed that the Code section had been intended for swimming pools and was of the opinion that to require a fence around the lake would destroy the aesthetic beauty of the development and to approve the lake and then require the posting of guards would be contrary to the entire concept. He felt it would be impossible for an accidential drowning to occur in the lake as projected. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that even though small children are carefully taught and cautioned about hazards they may encounter, they do not fully understand the dangers until an accident happens. Councilman Seymour expressed concern that plans for drainage facilities for the lake and the entire project be submitted and approved as early as possi- ble, and that a condition be attached to the tentative tract map requiring that there be no access to Coronet and Falmouth Avenues during the construction period. Councilwoman Kaywood requested the record to show. that the Developer stipulated to provide guards at the lake 24-hours a day during construction. CERTIFICATION - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 134 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 136 (SUPPLEMENTING MASTER E.I.R. NO. 113): Environmental~ Impact Report Nos. 134 and 136, supplementing Master E.I.R. No. 113, having been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and belief does hereby certify, 74-1082 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that E.I.R. Nos. 1.34 and 136 are in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City and State Guidelines, including amendment to Paragraph No. 4 of Page No. 7 of E.I.R. M,. 136 to reflect that the slope of the lake bottom will not be steeper than 4 horizontal to 1 vertical, so that the depth at a distance of 12 feet from shore line is not more than three feet; and stipulating further that the depth of the lake at the shore line shall in no case exceed 1 foot. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 2635: Variance No. 2635 was reviewed by the City Council and no further action was taken. TENTATIVE MAPS~ TRACT NOS. 8775~ 8793~ 8795 AND 8796: Developer, Matreyek Homes, Inc.; property located northwesterly of the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Euclid Street, having approximate frontages of 510 feet on the west side of Euclid Street and 2,000 feet on the north side of La Palma Avenue. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held October 14, 1974, approved said tentative maps, subject to the following conditions, and further recommended to the City Council that the traffic signal proposed by the Developer at the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Romneya Drive be installed at the beginning of construction of the Anaheim Shores Planned Community on the basis that the Developer and the Planning Commission feel strongly that a need will exist immediately upon construction of said project and, additionally, that the Developer has committed to pay one-half the cost of said installation: Tentative Map~ Tract No. 8775 (.five proposed R-2 zoned lots): 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8775 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 73-74-36 and approval of Variance No. 2635. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi- sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That the condominium covenants, conditions and restrictions, including but not limited to provisions for trash collection, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map; and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 9. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the City of Anaheim's standards for private streets. 10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 11. That vehicular access rishts, except at street amd/or alley open- inss, to Rommeya Drive shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 12. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Pire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 13. The full ultimate right-of-way for Romneya Drive fronting Tract No. 8775 shall be included in the tract. 74-1083 City Hall~ A~aheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5, 1974~ 1:30 P.M. 14. That Romneya Drive shall be constructed with two 12-foot wide parkways and two 26-foot wide roadways, separated by a 12-foot wide planted median strip. 15. That all public street improvements within this tract and Tract Nos. 8793, 8795, and 8796 and the lake within Tract No. 8793 shall be developed with the first phase of construction of said tracts and shall be completed prior to final building and zoning inspection of the first phase; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted to guarantee the ultimate improvement of said public streets and of the lake. 16. That the westerly boundary of subject tract, abutting Tract No. 8795, shall be moved easterly to exclude the entire width of the private street at said boundary. Tentative Map, Tract No. 8793 (eiBht proposed R-2 zoned lots): 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8793 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 73-74-36 and approval of Variance No. 2635. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi- sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That the condominium covenants, conditions and restrictions, including but not limited to provisions for trash collection and 24-hour security guard at the lake site (Lot No. 1), shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map; and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding. to insure maintenance of common property and buildings and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 9. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the City of Anaheim's standards for private streets. 10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at ~he time the building permit is issued. 11. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley open- ings, to Romneya Drive and La Palma Avenue shall be dedi~cated to the City of Anaheim. 12. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 13. That Romneya Drive shall be constructed with two 12-foot wide parkways and two 26-foot wide roadways, separated by a 12-foot wide planted median strip. 14. That all public street improvements within this tract and Tract Nos. 8775, 8795, and 8796 and the lake within this tract shall be developed with the first phase of construction of said tracts and shall be completed prior to final building and zoning inspection of the first phase; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted to guarantee the ultimate improvement of said public streets and of the lake. 15. That prior to the issuance of the building permit on the first phase of construction, specific plans for the development of the lake must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. 74-1084 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Tentative Map~ Tract No. 8795 (six proposed R-2 zoned lots): 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8795 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 73-74-36 and approval of Variance No. 2635. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi- sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That the condominium covenants, conditions and restrictions, including but not limited to provisions for trash collection, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map; and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 9. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the City of Anaheim's standards for private streets. 10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building petnit is issued. 11. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alleY open- ings, to Romneya Drive shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 12. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 13. That Romneya Drive shall be constructed with two 12-foot wide parkways and two 26-foot wide roadways, separated by a 12-foot wide planted median strip. ii. That all public street improvements within this tract and Tract Nos. 8775, 8793, and 8796 and the lake within Tract No. 8793 shall be developed with the first phase of construction of said tracts and shall be completed prior to final buildin$ and zoning inspection of the first phase; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted to guarantee the ultimate improvement of said public streets and of the lake. 15. That the easterly boundary of subject tract, abutting Tract No. 8775, shall be moved easterly to include the entire width of the private street at said boundary. Tentative Map~ Tract No. 8796 (five proposed R-2 zoned lots): 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8796 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 73-74-36 and approval of Variance No. 2635. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi- son, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That the condominium covenants, conditions and restrictions, includin~ but not limited to provisions for trash collection, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map; and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 74-1085 City Hall; Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5, 1974~ 1:30 P.M. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 9. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the City of Anaheim's standards for private streets. 10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 11. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley open- ings, to La Palma Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 12. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 13. That all public street improvements within this tract and Tract Nos. 8775, 8793, and 8795 and the lake within Tract No. 8793 shall be developed with the first phase of construction of said tracts and shall be completed prior to final building and zoning inspection of the first phase; and that a bond in an a~ount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted to guarantee the ultimate improvement of said public streets and of the lake. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tenta- tive Maps, Tract Nos. 8775, 8793, 8795 & 8796 were approved, subject to the recommmndations of the City Planning Commission, with the following amendment and additions: Ten:ative Map~ Tract No. 8793: Condition No. 15, to be amended as follows: "That prior to the recordation of the final tract map for the first phase of developmmnt, specific plans for drainage facilities, including the lake, must be submitted to and approved by the City Planning Commission and the City Council." TeutattveMape~ Tract Nos. 8775~ 8793~ 8795 and 8796: Add the following two conditions: 1. That there shall be no access to Coronet and Falmouth Avenues from subject property during construction. 2. That a traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Ro~eya Drive and La Palma Avenue at the beginning of construction; the developer having stipulated to payment for one-half the cost of said signal. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: The City Manager asked whether the Council would be interested in a report concerning a proposed amendment to the ~ode relative to fences or guards around bodies of water located on private properties. Councilman Pebley moved that staff be instructed to prepare an amend- ment to the Code for Council consideration which would eliminate the requirement for fencing or guards .in situations of this nature, retaining, however, the requirement insofar as pools and ponds are concerned. Councilman Seymour seconde~ the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 2. ~NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NEGATIVE DECLARATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 1&95: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the city Council finds that subject conditional use permit will have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED. 74-1086 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1495: Submitted by Thompson-Lee Engineering Con- tractors to establish M-2 Zone uses consisting of a contractor's office, repair shop and storage yard in the M-1 Zone; property located on the south side of Coronado Street, east of Blue Gum Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-203, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. 4. ENVIBONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council ratified the determination of the Director of Development Services that the activities proposed in the following actions fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 2 and Section 3.01, Class 1, respectively, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the require- ments for an environmental impact report and are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file said report: Variance No. 2639 Variance No. 2642 MOTION CARRIED. 5. VARIANCE NO. 2639: Submitted by William F. Darlin to construct a free- standing sign in the C-O Zone; property located on the east side of Euclid Street, north of Alomar Avenue, with Code waiver of: a. Permitted signs. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-204, granted subject variance, subject to conditions. 6. VARIANCE NO. 2642: Submitted by Richard Bentley to establish a Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program Medical Clinic on C-1 zoned property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, between La Plaza and Cemetary Road, with Code waiver of: a. Minimum off-street parking. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-205, denied said variance. 7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1311 - TERMINATION: Submitted by T. J. Moriarty, Real Estate Department, Shell Oil Company, Anaheim District, requesting termina- tion of Conditional Use Permit No. 1311; C-1 and C-3 zoned property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and State College Boulevard and developed with a carwash and service station. Said conditional use permit was superseded by Conditional Use Permit No. 1329. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-206, terminated all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 1311. 8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1342 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Paul Bandy for an extension of time to meet conditions of approval for the establish- ment of a child nursery on R-A zoned property, located on the south side of South Street, west of State College Boulevard. Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held October 14, 1974, reflected the granting of a one-year extension of time to said conditional use permit, to expire October 10, 1975. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken. 9. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by'Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council finds that the following project will have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report: Application filed by Donald J. Duncan for a grading permit for a single-family home site, 13616 Crescent Drive in Peralta Hills. 74-1087 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. 10. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - ANAHEIM CIVIC CENTER: On motion by Councilman Thom, consideration of the environmental impact report for the Anaheim Civic Center was continued three weeks (November 26, 1974, 1:30 P.M.). Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 11. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 8783 (VARIANCE NO. 2644 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 135): Developer, Presley of Southern California; property located southeast of the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Royal Oak Road and contains 140 proposed R-H-10,000 zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, action on Tentative Map, Tract No. 8783 was continued to be considered in conjunc- tion with Variance No. 2644 and Environmental Impact Report No. 135. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-548 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 727-A: In accordance with recommenda- tion of the City Engineer, Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 74R-548 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PRO- POSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECES- SARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE NUTWOOD STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 727-A. (McGrew Construction Company, Inc. - $17,728.09) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: None TheMayor declared Resolution No. 74R-548 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-549 - WORK ORDER NO. 730-A: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-549 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE SANTA ANA STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, EAST STREET TO STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 730-A; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - December 5, 1974, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-549 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-550 - WORK ORDER NO. 1008: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 74R-550 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 74R-511 RELATING TO INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR WORK ORDER NO. 1008 (FIRE STATION NO. 9). (Extends bid date to November 14, 1974) 74-1088 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-550 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - TWO 1974 50~000 G.V.W. CAB AND CHASSIS: The City Manager reported on the proposed purchase of two new 1974 50,000 G.V.W. class cab/chassis, advising that these units were available from Universal Refuse Removal Company, Sun Valley, California, at considerable savings over 1975 units, and recommended purchase be authorized in the amount of $21,194.70 each, including tax. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, quota- tion of Universal Refuse Removal Company was accepted, and purchase authorized in the total amount of $42,389.40, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - EIGHT 3/4-TON PICKUP TRUCKS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of eight 3/4-ton pickup trucks and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX Hendricks G.M.C., Anaheim Santa Aha Dodge, Santa Aha Anaheim Dodge, Anaheim McCoy Ford, Anaheim $33,086.84 35,214.68 37,237.65 37,906.55 On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of Hendricks G.M.C. was accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $33,086.84, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - THREE 1/2-TON PICKUP TRUCKS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of three 1/2-ton pickup trucks, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX Anaheim Dodge, Anaheim Hendricks G.M.C., Anaheim McCoy Ford, Anaheim Santa Ann Dodge, Santa Aha $12,457.81 11,902.74 12,369.59 12,077.48 On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of Hendricks G.M.C. was accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $11,902.74, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - SIX 10~000 G.V.W. CAB AND CHASSIS: The City Manager reported on the purchase of six 10,000 G.V.W. cab and chassis, and recommended acceptance of the Iow bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX Santa Ama Dodge, Santa Aha Hendricks G.M.C., Anaheim McCoy Ford, Anaheim Anaheim, Dodge, Anaheim $26,633.42 29,031.28 28,428.20 27,476.76 On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of Santa Aha Dodge was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $26,633.42, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF MATERIAL - ACRYLIC PANELS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 2,160 acrylic panels for use at the Central Library and recommended acceptance of the second low bid due to the 2% discount terms and it is a local vendor: 74-1089 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5, 1974~ 1:30 P.M. VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX Graybar Electric General Electric Supply Company ShuSart, Glendale Voss-Hutchinson, South Gate $ 9,616.32 9,501.84 9,411.32 12,020.40 On m~ti°n by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the bid of Graybar Electric Fas accepted as the lowest and best qualified bid, and purchase authorized in the amount of $9,616.32, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following Claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by C9uncilman Pebley: a. Submitte4 by Karen S. McMillan and/for Daniel K. McMillan, a minor, for damages as result as the death of Mr. McMillan, purportedly resulting from condition Of signs, lighting and traffic safety at intersection of Orange- thorpe and Lakeview Street on or about July 17, 1974. b. Submitted by Jill S. McFarland for property damage, purportedly resulting from improperly functioning traffic signals at La Palma Avenue and Euclid Street on or about September 14, 1974. c. Submitted by Gordon C. Hzmmond for property damages, purportedly resulting from City of Anaheim Troublemen checking power failure in the area on or about September 23, 1974. d. Submitted by Mrs. Kendrick G. Ellis for damages to water system, purportedly resulting from faulty water meter on or about October 24, 1974. e. Submitted by Daniel B. Barragan for property damage, purportedly resulting from malfunction of the City sewer line on or about October 28, 1974. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-551: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-551 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO CERTAIN CONDUIT IN TRACTS NOS. 7566 and 7569 TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FROM THE ROBERT H. GRANT CORPORATION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAME. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOne None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-551 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-552: Councilman Seymour suggested that in connection with the examination of the State Board of Equalization's sales and use tax records that Arthur Young & Company be consulted since, in working with other cities in the past, they have been successful in finding considerable sums of money owed to the cities. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-552: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-552 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND USE TAX RECORDS. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None . , , The Mayor declared ReSolution No. 74R-552, duly passed and adopted. 74-1090 City Hal_l~.__~.~ah~lm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. City of Fullerton - Notice of Public Hearing - Amendment A-984-3, November 6, 1974. b. United States of America, Federal Power Commission - Notice of Extension of Procedural Dates - Southern California Edison Company. c. Cities of Irvine, Fullerton and La Habra - Orange County Citizens for Proposition 15 - Urging Support. d. Anaheim Public Library Board Minutes and Highlights - September 16, 1974. e. Community Center Authority - Minutes - October 7, 1974. f. Community Redevelopment Commission -'Minutes - October 23, 1974. g. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of September, 1974, for the Police Department. h. Annual City Financial Report. (Year ending June 30, 1974) MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3365: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3365 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, BY ADDING CHAPTER 14.57, SECTIONS 14.57.010, 14.57.020 AND 14.57.030, RELATING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL. Roll Call Vote: AYEs: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3365 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3366: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3366 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (63) - C-R) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3366 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3367: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3367 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (64) - C-R) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3367 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3368: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3368 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. 74-1091 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-46 (5) - R-A, Tustin-Miraloma No. 4 Annexation) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3368 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3371: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3371 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-31 (5) - M-l) ORDINANCE NO. 3372: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3372 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (72-73-51 (12) - R-H-22,000) RESOLUTION NO. 74R-553: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-553 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH RECREATION LAND PLANNERS, INC., TO PREPARE A BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILI- TIES PLAN FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. ($11,595.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-553 duly passed and adopted. FINAL MAP~ TRACT NO. 7787: Developer, Wittenberg National Company; property located north of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Anaheim Hills Road; containing 50 pro- posed RS-5000 zoned lots. Approval of said final map was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting held October 29, 1974, and held over to a future date to allow time for the City Staff to undertake a study to determine the feasibility of providing a direct access to Santa Aha Canyon Road from Tract No. 7787. Mr. William Holzwarth, 888 North Main Street, Santa Ana, Attorney representing the Wittenberg National Company, requested permission to address the City Council. He advised that when the final map was considered on October 29, 1974, the developer was not present; however, he and the tract Engineer were present today, and they have completed a preliminary financial study which indi- cates that to redesign the subdivision to provide for an additional outlet onto Santa Ana Canyon Road from subject property would cost the developer in excess of $80,000 for engineering redesign, loss of approximately four building lots, etc. According to the City Traffic Engineer, Mr. Holzwarth reported the present collector street in the vicinity is capable of handling 6,000 automobile trips per day, while current estimates indicate there are presently only 2,100 trips per day being made. In his opinion, the Justification for provision of additional access points emanated from a 1966 study conducted by the City (Santa Aha Canyon Road Access Points, Exhibit 7, adopted by Resolution No. 66R-27 on January 11, 1966), which indicated a number of access points, No. 9 thereof designated adjacent to subject property, and No. 9A a short distance away. In conclusion, Mr. Holzwarth noted that a final map for subject tract, in compliance with all requirements, had been submitted by the developer for approval, and he requested reconsideration of the action taken October 29, 1974, due to the time involved and potential financial loss if the tract must be redesigned. 74-10q2 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5; 1974; 1:30 P.M. Recalling the discussion of the October 29, 1974 Council meeting, Councilman Seymour asked whether the developer's Engineer had contacted members of the City Staff in an attempt to discuss alternatives. Mr. Holzwarth advised it had been their understanding that the tract Engineer would contact the developer to see if he wished to proceed with redesign. The financial appraisal was the result of that meeting, and the $80,000 figure projected as the loss would not include the cost of doing another study. Councilman Seymour recalled testimony at the October 29, 1974 meeting that homeowners in the subdivision adjacent to subject property had been promised, when purchasing their homes, that there would be additional access to Santa Ana Canyon Road. Mr. Holzwarth replied that the developer had spoken with representa- tives of the Real Estate firm selling these homes and was advised they did not recall specifying certain areas where there would be additional collector streets. He noted that another collector street would be developed in the last subdivision being developed adjacent to the park. Councilman Pebley recalled the Santa Aha Canyon Road Access Point Study, and it was his impression that at the time the City Engineer and Traffic Engineer felt there should be as few access points as possible. Councilwoman Kaywood expressed concern that the issue was being discussed without notice to the people in the area. She felt that reliable people had been specifically advised by salesmen where access points would be located. It seemed to her it was convenient that the salespeople did not recall their advice. Mr. Holzwarth further advised that some of the interested residents were represented at this meeting by an Attorney, and in addition, Mr. Wittenberg had talked to a number of the residents during the past week, and his company is willing to work with the people involved. The developer, however, had complied with requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and had submitted a final map which was recommended for approval by the City Staff since it was substantially in compliance with the approved tentative map. It, therefore, seemed to him that the matter of what area residents were previously told about access points was not an issue which should result in the withholding of Final Tract Map approval. In response to question by Councilman Pebley, Mr. Holzwarth stated he felt the developer had a legal right to proceed with the development since all requirements were met. He noted that the Subdivision Map Act provides that within ten days of the filing of a final tract map, or at the next meeting, whichever is later, saidmap must be approved, denied, or continued with the developer's consent. The developer, however, was not present on October 29, 1974. Mr. John R. Parker, 1215 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, representing certain homeowners in the Anaheim Highlands area, advised that he had briefly reviewed the City's file on Tract No. 7787. He stated he had been informed by the City Traffic Engineer that traffic on a residential street should not exceed 1,500 car trips per day, and he did not think that designating such a street as a collector street would change the character thereof. At the present time, there is only one access to Santa Aha Canyon Road in the area, and none is provided in the development proposed to the east of Tract No. 7787. In effect, there will be approximately 175 homes in the Anaheim Highlands development and a similar number in a development to the north, which will result in 350 to 400 homes having automobiles exiting through the residen- tial streets until property to the east is developed. Mr. Parker pointed out that the tentative map of subject tract was approved March 28, 1972; the City's Ordinance requires recordation of a tract map within one year of tentative map approval, however OhM ay 8, 1973, an exten- sion of time was granted to March 28, 1974. On April 23, 1974 a second extension of time was granted, and it was Mr. Parker's position that an invalid tract map was before the Council. He urged the City Council to deny the final map on the basis that the time extensions were invalid, and the tentative map had expired. 74-1093 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. City Attorney Alan Watts advised that as an administrative practice, the City has granted some retroactive extensions of time to tentative tract maps, and the position in these instances has been that insofar as the Council acted within the two-year period allowed by the Subdivision Map Act, the exten- sions were valid even though retroactive. Mr. Parker pointed out that the homeowners have several alternatives, one being to request denial of the map; another, to bear the expense of litiga- tion based on misrepresentation by the salespeople; and a third, to seek some type of injunctive relief to prevent development. These people understood they would be living in a residential area, but 2,100 automobile trips per day seemed a sizable number for a suburban area. In conclusion, Mr. Parker requested that either the final map be denied, or that the developer consent to a continuance for a reasonable length of time so that some alternate means of access to the property can be worked out, at a minimal cost. Councilman Seymour remarked that the Counsel for the Wittenberg Company indicated the action of the Council must be either to approve, deny or continue the final map with the concurrence of the developer, and it was his opinion that was the action taken by the Council at the October 29, 1974 meeting. The tract Engineer agreed to the continuance for the purpose of meeting with the Staff to resolve the problem of an additional access point. The City Council indicated it had been their intent that the matter be again considered on November 19, 1974. Mr. Murdoch recalled that at said meeting, the representative of Toups Engineering had agreed to the continuance and had stated he would check with his client to determine whether they desired to conduct an additional study. No action was taken by the Council at this time. RECESS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved for a three-minute recess. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:04 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City Council being present. (4:07 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 74R-554 - GREENWICH ANNEXATION: Pursuant to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation Commission, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-554 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED GREENWICH ANNEXATION. (Inhabited) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-554 duly passed and adopted. FIREWOP.~ DISPLAY PERMIT - WESTERN HIGH SCHOOL: Application filed by R. Bob Souza of California Fireworks Display Company, for permit to allow public fireworks display at Western High School Stadium, November 9, 1974, at 9:00 p.m., sponsored by the Western High School A.S.B., was submitted and granted as requested, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. CO~UNII"f CENTgR AUT~IORITY MEETING: Mayor Thom advised that the date for the Joint meeting of the City Council with the Community Center Authority, tentatively scheduled for November 19, 1974,, will be rescheduled at a later date. 74-1094 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - CITY COUNCIL OBSERVERS: Councilwoman Kaywood commended the Chamber of Commerce on their new policy of having observers present at the Council meetings. In her opinion, informed Anaheim citizens are Anaheim's greatest asset. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT "PARK-AND-RIDE" FACILITY: CouncilwOman Kaywood reported on the Orange County Transit District preview, held October 26, 1974, of their new "park-and-ride" facility located at Magnolia and Orangethorpe Avenues in Fullerton, advising that 900 parking spaces have been provided, as well as bicycle facilities, and a bus line on Magnolia Avenue has been added. Fifteen- minute service to Los Angeles and return at peak traffic hours wi~ be available, and the one-way fare will be $.55, however if a patron is transferring from the Orange County Transit District bus, the $.25 fare will be deducted from the Southern California Rapid Transit District fare. CONVENTION CENTER EVENT: Recent performance at the Anaheim Convention Center of the Welsh Guards Argyle and Southern Highlanders was commended by Councilwoman Kaywood. CONVENTION CENTER SCHEDULE OF EVENTS: Councilwoman Kaywood commended the Convention Center staff on the new schedule of events brochure which includes an order form and location map. She was of the opinion that the form would result in an increase of prepaid orders. REPORT - PROJECT T.L.C.: Councilwoman Kaywood reported on the first Project T.L.C. luncheon held at St. Paul's Presbyterian Church this date, where she had extended greetings on behalf of the City Council, and advised that the program is designed to assist people of limited incomes who are 60 years of age or older and have difficulties with shopping, cooking, etc. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CODE: With reference to a complaint received about an existing West Anaheim hedge which is located within the front yard setback on private property, and which has grown to a height considerably greater than the 42-inch limit established in the Zoning Code, Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that if the hedge was an amenity which was not creating a hazard, the City Council might wish to consider amending the ordinance. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts reported that this requirement has been part of the Zoning Ordinance for a number of years, but has been enforced on a complaint basis only. Concerning the property in question, one of the primary reasons the residents purchased the home approximately four years ago was that they liked the privacy afforded by the hedge. A complaint has been received that the tall growth is a hazard, especially to bicycle traffic. Councilman Seymour expressed the opinion that it would be appropriate to amend the ordinance, noting that as result of a previous study of dwellings fronting on arterial streets and highways, it had been determined that a 6-foot block wall would be appropriate in the front yard setbacks along these arterial thoroughfares. Tall growth, therefore, on less traveled streets seemed reasonable. Mayor Thom concurred, pointing out that the shrubbery is more attractive than a fence or wall. Councilman Sneegas agreed that the hedge should remain so long as it does not constitute a traffic hazard. By general consent of the City Council, staff was instructed to prepare a proposed amendment to the Zoning Code to allow such planting in the front yard setbacks, where not hazardous. REMOVAL OF T~EES - SANTA ANA CANYON: Councilwoman Kaywood reported that she has received a great many letters concerning the removal of Eucalyptus trees in the Santa Aha Canyon. She noted that the Canyon Area General Planning Task Force was looking into the matter to see what could be done about the removal of mature trees, even on private property, since the entire City is affected. She questioned what could be done to preserve the trees, noting that other cities have ordinances prohibiting their removal. 74-1095 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Council discussion was held, and Councilman Pebley felt the City should not have the prerogative to forbid a property owner to remove a tree from his front or rear yard. Mayor Thom noted the trees are protected on government lands and although he agreed that trees should be preserved wherever possible, he also felt that government should not enter into this area. He noted additional personnel costs which could be incurred to enforce such an ordinance. He suggested that the Council might look into some means of planting more trees, such as was done in connection with the Scenic Corridor Overlay. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that the City of Santa Barbara has had no problems with their existing ordinance prohibiting the removal of trees. Councilman Sneegas advised that he had several Eucalyptus and California Sycamore trees on his property, however, he intends to remove and replace these trees after a one-year period, since he desires other varieties. In his opinion the City should not legislate the removal of trees from private property. Councilman Sneegas further advised that he had been contacted by Mr. Bernardo Yorba, who requested an opportunity to meet with the City Council to discuss the reasons for removing the trees from his property. The City Council indicated they would be glad to hear Mr. Yorba. CA~ON .A~ GENERAL PLANNING TASK FORCE: Councilman Seymour advised that the Canyon Arma ~eneral Planning Task Force has met six or seven times and are continuing to mmet nearly every week. They are receiving a broad spectrum of viewpoints, and by November 26, 1974, he hoped to have a report for the Council. FINANCIAL REPORT - CITY OF ANAHEIM: Councilman Seymour expressed appreciation for the quarterly financial statement furnished to the City Council, and stated he looked forward to discussing several questions with Department heads. The City Council indicated their preference for continuing to receive financial reports on a quarterly basis. P~CESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Manager, Councilman Pebley moved to recess to Executive Session. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION tAXIED. (4: 35 P.M.) AFTER ~CESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City Council bein$ present. (5:40 P.M.) R~OLUTION NO. 74R-555: On the recommendations of the Personnel Director, Councilman Snmmsas offered Resolution No. 74R-555 for adoption, establishing rates of com- peneation for various management Job classifications, and superseding portions of Resolution No. 73R-491 and amendments thereto: Convention Center and Stadium Director Development Services Director Fire Chief Finance Director Library Director Parks, Recreation and the Arts Director Personnel Director Police Chief Public Works Director Redevelopment Director Utilities Director City Attorney City Clerk Assistant City Manager - - Ctty Manager 10% increase 0% increase 9% increase 9% increase 9% increase 9% increase 9% increase 0% increase 10% increase new position · 10.6% increase 9% increase 0% increase 01 increase 10.6% increase Refer to Resolution Book. A P, ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSTATION FOR VARIOUS MANAGEMENT JOB CLASSES AND SUPERSEDING PORTIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 73R-491 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. (Effective November 1, 1974) 74-1096 City Hall~ An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 5~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas ahd Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-555 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Seymour commented that the City Council had attempted to evaluate each of the positions in the light of the Job performance. Keeping in mind that the City is undergoing the Management Practices and Financial Audit which will ultimately result in various recommendations, he stated that he would be interested in reviewing said recommendations as-they pertain to compensation for all Department heads, as they come from the Arthur Young & Company. Upon adoption by the Council of these recommendations and depending upon the Depart- ment Head's adherence and progress made towards the established goals, then at that time he would be open for reconsideration of increases and making any necessary adjustments. Mayor Thom stated that Councilman Seymour's remarks were indicative of what the Council Members had been discussing during the Executive Session through the appraisal of all job positions in the management capacity. After the audit- ing firm has made recommendations, service levels have been established, and methodology established to implement goals and objectives, then there will be a reappraisal of those positions at that time. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Sneegas moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED, Adjourned: 5:48 P.M. Signed Deputy .City Clerk