Loading...
1974/11/1274- 1097 City Ball. _A~mhetm. California- COUNCIL HINUTES- Norther 12. 1974. 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCIL HEHBERS: Kaywood, Pebley (arrived 1:35 P.M.), Sneegas and Thom. COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour CITY MANAGER: Keith A, lturdoch ASSISTANT CITY HANAGER: Robert H. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Aloha ti. Hougard STADIUH-CONV~ION CENTER DIRECTOR: Thomas F. Liegler PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: John J. Collier CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONING SUPERVI$(~t: Charles Roberts ~I~G S~VISOR: Don NcDaniei ASSISTANT PLANNER: G. Alan Daum Hayor Thom called the meeting to order. ~: Reverend Dick Alexander of the First Christian Church gave the Invocation. ~}_~: Councilwoman Kaywood led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ~: liinutes of the regular meetings of the City Council held October 15 and October 22, 1974 were approved as corrected (typographical errors); on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom. I~0TIOI~ CARRIED. WAI~ O~ RE]~II~ - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Ka~r~ood moved to ~ive the reading in ~ull of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Hembers unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Hember for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Sneegas seconded the ~otton. ND~IONUNANIHOUSLY CARRIED. R~P~T,- FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City'in the amount of $778,227.19, in accordance with the 1974-75 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC I~ARI~C - HOUSRI4OVING pRRNIT: Application submitted by Rosalie Iiyers for a eptcial permit to move a structure from 13822 Harbor Boulevard, Garden Grove, to l&06 South Knott Avenue, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council together with report from the Development Services Department recommending said permit be ~ranted subject to the following conditions: The conversion of the existing single-car garage to a habitable 2. 3. 4. 5. A new two-car garage be constructed. The existin~ roof be replaced. The electrical system be brought up to current code requirements. Plumbing and remodeling of the building be~reworked so as to cmaply wi~h current code. The City Clerk advised that correspondence was received from Union Development Company, a property owner..wtthin 300 feet of the proposed move-on, indicating no objection. Zoning Supervisor Roberts advised that the proposed move-on is below the minimum floor area requirement which is the basic reason for the suggestion that the garage be made into a habitable room; a two-car garage is required in the R-1 Zone. Based on inspection by the Building Division it is the under- standing that the proposed move-on structure tsnot in the best repair'and requires some renovation but that it is consistent with the type of structures in the area. He advised that there are move-on hmaes to the north and east of this site. The llayor asked if the Applicantwere present and concurred with the reco~endations of Development Services Department. 74-1098 City Mall, Anmheim. California - COUNCIL MINUT~$ - ~gvember 12. 1974. 1:30 P.M~ Carol Johnson, 3324 West Thornton Avenue, Anaheim, appearing on behalf of Rosalie Myers read a list of improvements which Mrs. Myers proposes to perform on the existing home, which conformed with all the recommendations made by Development Services Department. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or opposition to the subject housemoving permit; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. In answer to Councilman Sneegas, the City Clerk advised that no protests were filed. RESQIIITION NO. 74R-556: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-556 for adoption granting said housemoving permit Subject to the conditions recommended by the Development Services Department. Refer to Resolution Book. A REEIIITI~; OF M CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF AI~IM (~lh'fll~ A HO~SEMOVING PERM~ TO ROSALIE MYERS TO MOVE A DWELLING HOUSE TO 1406 SOUTH KNOTT AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL I~MBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-556 duly passed and adopted. CONTLNUED REQUEST - FORTUNE' T~LLING IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM: Request of Boris J. Baranowski, Attorney representing George Williams, regarding the constitu- tionality of that section of the Anaheim liunicipal Code which prohibits fortune telling was continued from the meetings of September 17 and October 29, 1974, for further study of the City Ordinance and to await the result of certain court cases pending. The City Clerk advised that the City Attorney's Office continues to recommend that Council action on the proposed amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 4.40, be held in abeyance pending a decision of the Orange County Superior Court Case scheduled December 12, 1974. Councilman Pebleymoved that the request be continued as recommended by the City Attorney. Mr. Baranowski was recognized by the Mayor and he contended that · whatever decision is rendered by the court on December 12, 1974 in Orange County, such .decision wouldnot be a determining factor in any suit which he might file, as the pending case does not go into the merits of this case. In the litigation in question (Steve Adams versus the City of Santa Ann) they are charging that the plaintiff is being deprived of pursuing the occupation of amusing people by fortune telling. Mr. Baranowski asserted that he has shown Council very clearly that the ordinance is unconstitutional and that it is an exercise in futility and a waste of taxpayer's money to continue with an ordinance which is inappro- priate in the 20th century in Anaheim. Mayor Thom advised that he is inclined to accept the advice of legal counsel for the city to take a super-cautious approach in this matter. Mr. Baranowski asked if he might be permitted, when a decision is made on the Alameda County ordinance, which is almost word for word exactly as stated in the Menlo Park ordinance and the amendment which the Anaheim City Council proposes to adopt, to inform the Anaheim City Attorney's Office of that ruling and to ask if at that time his request might be heard before the Council. 74-1099 City Kall_ Ahab,tm. ~alifornia - COUNCIL HINUTES - November 12~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. City Attorney Alan Watts stated that it would be more relevant and there would be more validity in determining the course of action to recommend for the Anaheim City Council t° know what the Superior Court of this County is going to do as opposed to any other County. Councilman Pebley restated his motion to continue Mr. Baranowski's request, and any action regarding amendment to Section 4.40.010 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the City Attorney, until such time as a deci- sion is made by the Orange County Superior Court. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ~O_NTI~VJED REOUEST.FOR .EXT~N~.ION OF T!~ - .I~CLASSIFIQATION NO,...69- 70- 25. TENTATIVE ?~ACT..N0, 7137..(FINAL TRACT_.MA~.NO, 7666): Request of Terry L. Crowther, Project Nanager, Pacesetter Homes Inc., for extension of time to Reclassification No. 69-70-25 and Tentative Map Tract No. 7137 was continued to this date from the meeting of October 29, 1974 to allow the Applicant time to submit a supplement to E.I.R. No. 64. Mr. Roberts reported that said E.I.R. Supplement had not, to date, been submitted. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the request for extension of time to Reclassification No. 69-70-25 and Tentative Tract No. 7137 was continued to the meeting of November 26, 1974, pending submission of an addendum to E.I.R. No. 64. MOTION CARRIED. ~qTERTAL~ PERHIT: Application filed by Rochan E. Ferd.fur Entertainment.Permit to allow three go-go dancers at the Never On Sunday Cocktail Lounge, 2810 West Lincoln Avenue, 7 nights per week from 6:00 P.M. to 2:00 A.M. was submitted and granted for a period of one year subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. ~QUEST - WA!~ OF BUS!NESS LICENSE FEE - AN. Ag~IMCOU~SELING CENTER: Request of Mrs. Ileen L. Ready, Anaheim Counseling Center for waiver of business license fee in connection with the operation of an abortion and family planning center at.1701S. Euclid Avenue was submitted together with reports from the City Attorney's Office and License Collector indicating no objection to said waiver. Mayor Thom stated that because of religious convictions he would abstain from discussion and voting on this issue. He indicated that he did not believe it would be fair for him, as a Councilman, to vote on such 'issue because his vote would be prejudiced by his religious and moral convictions. He thereupon requested Councilman Pebley to assume chairmanship of the meeting and left the Council Chamber. (1:50 P.M.) Councilman Sneegas stated that the basic purpose of this clinic constitutes such a traumatic moral issue to so many citizens, that he would have to vote against the waiver of the fee, because even though the waiver would only amount to $25.00 per year, the Council would be subsidizing this organization. Mrs. Ileen L. Ready, representing Amaheim Counseling Center advised that this organization is designated as tax-exempt by the Internal Revenue Service; that they have a medical license and are approved by the State of California, Health Department, and are also tax-exempt for personal property. Councilman Sneegas was of the opinion that if the waiver is ~ranted, as requested, the issue is that many people would feel they are subsidizing an activity to which they are morally opposed. He inquired of the City Attorney what bearing the fact that this organization is officially. designated as tax-exempt by the Internal Revenue Service has on the decision at hand. Hr. Watts reported that pursuant to Section 3.04.130 of the Anaheim Municipal Code organizations which are non-profit and charitable are exempted from the provisions of the business license tax requirement. As a matter of policy, hoverer, it has been the practice of the City Council to have these matters specifically come before them to make a determination, generally folloving the reco~nendations of staff. He stated that in this instance he 74-1100 C_~.a.].l~ Anaheim~ California - C0~R~CIL ~S - Nov,mbar 12. 1974~ 1:30 P.M. would find it difficult to support the position that this is not a charitable organization. He outlined the various approaches which Council may take at this point, one being to take "no action" on the item. He stated that if Council takes an action which would determine in their opinion that this is not a charitable and non-profit organization, staff is obligated to follow that position and collect the license tax or file an action in the appropriate court to collect this tax. Councilwoman Ea~ood questioned how Council could determine that the organization is not charitable and non-profit, if in fact it is. Councilman Sneegas stated that in the sense of the law the organiza- tion qualifies as non-profit and charitable but he noted that if these issues come before the Council for such determination it should be within their poli- tical jurisdiction, otherwise they should be handled as a routine administra- tive matter. Councilman Pebley, as acting Chairman, determined to allow each side of the controversy two minutes to explain their position. Mrs. Ready apprised Council of the type of counseling and referral services provided to the Indigent and to those Iow-income families, at the price they cam afford to pa~ for family planning. Mrs. Anthony Lucia, 2866 East Standish Avenue, Anaheim, voiced her objections to the granting of a waiver of the business license fee, as well as to the portion of this activltywhich would relate to abortion, on behalf of the Pro-lire'Political Action Committee of Orange County. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired of the City Attorney whether there has ever been any instance in which the Council, despite the recommendations from the City Attorney's Office and License Collector that the non-profit organization met all qualifications, acted against this recommendation, to which Mr. Watts replied negatively. Mr. Watts added that to his knowledge there are situations where there might be some question as to the character of the charitable aspects and it is to this that the Council would make their determination, however in this instance there appears to be no evidence to dispute the charitable nature of the operation. At the conclusion of discussion Councilman Sneegas moved to deny the'waiver of business license fee for the Anaheim Counseling Center, 1701 South Euclid Street and Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. Councilwoman Kaywood voiced her concern as to whether the Council would be doing something illegal by denying this application for waiver of 'the business license fee. Mr. Watts stated that if the foregoing motion carries, what will transpire ts that the License Collector will be obligated to take action to collect the $25.00 license fee. Councilman Sneegas clarified his position on the issue stating that he does not wish to Judge whether this activity is right or wrong for anyone else, that this is their own personal decision to make, but that he does not wish to be any part of subsidizing any operation which so many citizens find adverse to their own beliefs. Acting Chairman Pebley called for a vote on the foregoing motion to deny the waiver of business'license fee for the Anaheim Counseling Center. To this motion Councilwoman Kaywood abstained from voting; Councilman Thom was temporarily absent; and Councilman Seymour was absent. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Thom returned to Council Chamber and resumed Chairmanship of the meeting (2:10 P.M.). 74- 1~01 City ,ltall. Anmh~im, California- cQLr~,~ ,~IND~S- November 12. 1974. 1:30 P.M. BUSIllES$ LIC~N~ ,FEE WAIVER- CITY OF HOPE THRIFT SHOP: Request of Hr. ~el Heinir~er, Area Coordinator, City of Hope Thrift Shops for waiver of the Business License Fee in connection with the operation of a Thrift Shop at 2808 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, was submitted together with recommendations from the License Division, Police Department, City Attorney's Office and Development Services Department. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, waiver of the business license fee was granted in accordance with Council Policy No. 305, subject to their obtaining the appropriate clearances from the Planning, Building and Fire Depart~nents. MOTION CARRIED. DISCUSSION- PROPOSED BURRIS SAND PIT RECLAHATION PROJECT (CRA~E COUNTY USE ~ERM~ NO. 3560): Mr. l~ilip Strong, 2839 E. Alden Place, spokesman for the East Anaheim Homeowner's Association was recognized and advised that he wished to bring to Council's attention certain facts gathered by the homeowners in the area concerning the Burris Pit project so that the Council will be apprised of the potential effects of this proposed project upon the adjacent Anaheim residents as well as all'residents of Orange County. Hr. Stron~ related the approximate dimensions of the pit as it exists and some of the history of the excavation that created same, including the fact that it was not until 1968-69 that it was declared a hazard due to the flooding and water seepage into the pit. Hr. Strong advised that the Orange County Planning Commission followed minimum rules for notifying those in proximity to the project and consequently they had very little time to prepare for the hearing. He listed the property ownerst concerns as follows: 1. That the plan provides that it will take 5 to 10 years to complete the fill project, and they feel that this is too long. With modern technology it could be accomplished in approximately two years. 2. It is not wise to place a dump of this masnttude over the Orange County water supply since there would be water contact with the percolating ponds by seepage from the pit. He noted that certain of the materiak placed on the list for a Class 3 dump may be questionable as to safety for this fill because of the amount of time they will be in water contact. 3. The end use proposed is unacceptable. Mr. Strong stated that the E.I.R. contains a picture of a recreational vehicle park or camp as a proposed end use. Hr. Strong stated that there are alternatives for the development of this area and read a statement from the Orange County Planning Co~mission report indicating that the use of this property as a regional park.would be consistent with the Santa Ana River-Santiago Creek Greenbelt plan. He noted that the problem with this approach would be funding, although there is a $300,000 Grant. In addition, he noted that they received further information from the Director of the Harbors, Beaches and Parks Department that 1.21 million dollars has been funded and budgeted for the Burris Pit project for acquisition and shoring of the sides. In addition, this would create a park for the people living in the area and solve that problem as well. Another alternative use to the dump project,suggested in an Environmental Service Division's staff report to the Orange County Planning Division, was a water oriented public park which would also provide a ground-water recharge basin which would additionally create a savings to the County of $2,000,000 per year. Also, the acquisition and construction period would be considerably less than is necessary to complete the proposed fill operation. Mr. Stron~ related that at the next Orange County Planning Coeealeelon Neettn~, November 19, 1974, an alternate engiueerin~ study will be reported relative to this project. 74-1102 City Hall. A--hain. California - COUNCIL fff_NUTES - November 12; 1974. 1:30 P.M. In answer to Mr. Roberts, Mr. Strong indicated that at the November 19th Orange County Planning Co~mission meeting, Mr. Bailey of the Orange County Flood Comtrol District, will be present to discuss their possible interest in the Burris Pit property to be utilized as part of the County's percolation system and to also incorporate same into the Greenbelt Plan. At the conclusion of Mr. Strong's presentation, Mayor Thom reminded the homeowners that the Anaheim City Council will not vote directly on this issue, but iS able to make recommendations to the County Planning Conmaission and Board of Supervisors. He sun~aarized the recommendation previously forwarded and advised that the Council appreciated the update on the matter and would take the facts presented under advisement should further recommendation or revision of their previous recommendation be made. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out for the benefit of the homeowners in that area, that the Anaheim City Council was only apprised of this proposed project at the meeting of October 29, 1974, at which time they had to consider the matter prior to other public hearings in order to direct the recommenda- tion to the County Planning Commission via a Staff Mamber, the hearing being scheduled at 3:30 P.M. on that same date. Further, she did not feel the County should give the City such short notice on matters which require long- range decisions. She stated that she had not seen a copy of the E.I.R. and had no information on which to base a decision. She commented that she has heard that the E.I.R. reports 280 trucks per day would be dumping at the site and she would never have voted as she did if she had been aware of this. She requested that a copy of the E.I.R. be forwarded 'to her as soon as possible. Councilman Sneegas related that he just recently moved from the immediate area and had persOnal knowledge of the hazardous and miserable situation created by a gaping hole in the ground adjacent to these homes and he has always pushed for some action on filling this dump site. He reminded the homeowners present that the problem is that there is one tremen- dOusly deep hole in the ground which must be filled with materials before another usa can be made of it. In discussing a time limit for the project he questioned how a pit this large can be filled in a shorter time without bombardtn$ the area with trucks. He noted that much inaccurate speculation exists rasardtn~ the effect and inconveniences of the proposed project. He stated that he felt the proposal presents a logical method to fill the hole with enough materials of a type which must be acceptable to the Flood Control District. Councilman Sneegas reported that this subject has come up before the Oreenbalt Commission but the Flood Control District has never expressed any interest in the property. For the benefit of the audience, he described a percolation basin, noting that this would not be a beautiful body of water but a m~d puddle which fills and empties periodically. He further noted that there are many demands on the funds available from the Harbors, Beaches and Parks Department, whereas this proposal calls for development by a private developer and will cost the taxpayers no further money to become rid of this problem. He suggested that if the homeowners are opposed to the end results, that they oppose that portion of the issue but still push for the filling of the Burris Pit to cou~nence immediately. Mr. Strong related that they felt to allow the private developer to begin his dump site project is allowing a "foot in the door" for a future recreational vehicle park, whereas, they prefer to see the property retained as public land. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that once the pit is filled the developer would have to obtain a Use Permit for whatever he proposed to do, and that the ultimate use is not a portion of the permit under consideration. Councilman Pebley related the anxiety of adjacent homeowners and the attempts made to fill in this pit when he was Mayor. He felt that the motion made by the City Council on October 29, 1974 and the recommendation subse- quently forwarded was in concert with the homeowners' desires. He further assured the property owners, as a member of the Water Quality Control Board, that there would be very strict controls enforced over what would be permitted to be placed in the dump site. 74-1103 C!t~l~ll, .A~ah_eim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES .- November 12~ 19~4~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Strong advised that the homeowners certainly agree that the pit must be filled but that they desired to leave the options open for-'some of the alternatives and they would wish to have strong controls imposed on any dumping operation; At the conclusion of discussion, Mayor Thom urged members of staff and/or City Council to attend the East Anaheim Homeowners Association meeting on NOvember 13, 1974, South Junior High School, 7:30 P.M. at which time this matter will be discussed further. STREET ~ C~ANGE - STKELE DRIVE.TO LU.L~Y .L~..: Report from the Building Divi- sion of-Development services Department advising of confusionwhich results from the fact that premise numbers on short segments of Steele Drive are not consistent with the City numbering grid and recon~nending, in order to rectify the situation, that the segment of Steele Drive running north from Lullaby Lane be changed to Lullaby Lane, retaining the existing premise numbers, was' submitted for Council consideration. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the recou~nended street name change from Steele Drive to Lullaby Lane was approved. MOTION CARRIED. , /Ze~.Sa~.~.~s~e~~-assa~-Ce~se~l~ema~~that this situation is not likely to arise again in future tracts since amendments to the premise numbering and street naming ordinance have been adopted. REPO~_.~.- NATI~ FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM: lit. Don McDaniel, Planning Supervisor, advised that pursuant to Council direction the Development Services Depart- merit staff is monitoring the National Flood Insurance Program, and reported that the City recently received notice of its flood status (see letter dated July 26, 1974 and flood hazard boundary maps forwarded by Department of Housing and Urban Development on file in the Office of the City Clerk). He introduced Mr. G. Alan Daum, Associate Planner, to apprise Council of the situa- tion to date. Mr. Daum briefly outlined the history and development of the National Flood Insurance Program to the point in 1973 when the requirements of the program became mandatory. He explained that cities with identified flood hazards are required to participate in the program or face the loss of Federal or Federally-related financing for construction or acquisition. Pur- suant to the passage of the Federal Disaster Protection Act, consultants have prepared special flood hazard boundary maps for each co,unity and the com- munity then has the opportunity, to submit application for participation in the program based on the description of its flood boundaries as given, or the City may challenge these initial findings. Mr. Daum advised that this is the situation withwhich Anaheim is currently faced. He advised that staff feels the official identification of flood bOundaries by the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA) contractor is arbitrary in that these do not reflect knowledge of the 100-year flood levels as shown by the A~my Corps of Engineers. Within the areas so desi~nated as being in the flood hazard area, prior to-'receivin$ anyFederally-related financing any property owner or potential property owner' would be required to purchase flood insurance at:thetime that the City enters the program. In view of the arbitrary nature and the discrepancies in the local information regarding 100-year flood boundaries and the FIAboundaries, staff has chosen to challenge these initial findings. -Mayor Thom inquired precisely what.the discrepancies between these boundaries are, and using a prepared exhibit posted on the east wall of the COUncil Chamber, Mr. Daum indicated thatthe portion colored in orange which virtually would cover 90% of the City's total area, was desisnated by the FIA, whereas the cross-hatched portionwould constitute that area which the Army Corps of Engineers indicated to be within the 100-year flood hazard and which included much less of the City's total area. In reply to concern expressed bY Councilwoman Kaywood, Zoning Supervisor Roberts advised that short stub streets w~ll continue with the same principal street name and See ~nutes of December 3, 1974, 1230 P.M., Pass 74-1172, "M~nutes". 74-1104 CitY Halla ~aheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 12~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Daum reported that July 1, 1975 is the cut-off date by which any city with identified flood hazard areas must enter the basic program or face the loss of federally-related financing for construction, acquisition or major modifications in its flood hazard areas. It is the opinion of staff that if the designations made can be re-studied and a more accurate assessment undertaken, the city would be entering the program in the initial phase with more accurate designations and these would not subject so much of the City to the purchase of the flood insurance. Mr. Daum pointed out that it may still be necessary to enter the program with the flood hazard designation as given by the FIA Gonsultant if the appeal is still pending on the July 1, 1975 cut-off date. Mr. Daum further reported that the second phase of the program requires another contract consultant to perform an actuarial rate study which would form the basis for the rates charged in the second section of the insurance program. He stressed that based on these actuarial studies all construction in the hazard areas would have to be elevated a minimum of one foot above the flood level or be flood-proof. All new construction, improv~ments and acquisition would be subject to this requirement and to the purchase of insurance. Hr. Daum concluded that the City's status in this program at this point is to challenge these initial findings based on local information which reflects that this entire area is nOt a flood plain as shown on the FIA maps. In answer to Councilwoman Kaywood Mr. Daum advised that the cost for the initial phase of insurance would be subsidized by the Federal Govern- ment and the .subsidized rate would average, for a single-family residential structure, 25¢ per $100 of assessed valuation, with a maximum coverage of $35,000. Flood insurance for contents would also be available for a maximum amount of $10,000 at 36¢ per $100. In the second phase the level of maximum coverage would be raised to $70,000 and an actuarial rate would be charged. Councilwoman Kaywood observed that this is not in any way an inexpensive program and, in view of the current'inflationary cycle, will most likely prove an additional hardship to many families. Councilman Pebley inquired how the flood insurance requirements would affect the existing property owner within a designated flood hazard area. Mr. Daum replied that unless the property owner urdertook a major modification to his property, which would require additional federally related financing or refinanced his mortgage, there would be no requirement that he purchase the insurance. However, in the event of a flood disaster, he would not be eligible for Federal Disaster Relief. Mr. Daum pointed out that the intent of the program is to encourage as many homeowners as possible to enter at the subsidized rate which they can then continue with even when the City enters the second phase. Mr. Hurdoch felt that an important question to consider at this point would be to identify what the City's obligation might be after entry into the plan to remedy the situation on existing construction, i.e., will the City have the obligation to bring this within the flood requirements or will those apply only to new construction. Mr. Daum replied that the restrictions would apply only to new construction in flood hazard areas. However he also noted that the co~nity must adopt appropriate land use controls as required in the FIA regulations'. These controls would be based on the findings of the actuarial rate study and might require that all new construction be elevated a minimum of one foot above the flood level before the developer can receive the insurance. Hr. llirdoch su-w-arized that there is no obligation for a property owner to take out this flood insurance unless he wishes to finance a renova- tion project after the City has entered the program, at which time any new construction or rehabilitation would require raising the entire structure one foot above the flood plain, and he inquired if thiowere a correct assumption. 74-11'05 City Hall. i-shAim~ C&lifornta- COUNCIL MIN~E8 - Nov~-vher 12. 1974. 1:30 Mr. Daum indicated this may be correct once the actuarial rate has been established for the regular program and further clarified at .the request of Councilwoman Kaywood, that in view of the fact that the land use controls have not been forwarded from FAA in any definite form, there is a potential for other interpretations and it is not known apparently what the requirements will be. However, it is anticipated that new construction will be required to be elevated. Having been informed by Mr. Daum that "Federally-related Financing" includes ail types of financing (VA, FHA, Federally Insured Savings & Loan) except that provided by large insurance companies, Mayor Thom noted that it appears there is no alternative for Council but to enter the program at some point in time. Council discussion ensued relative to the potential effect which the elevation of new construction within a project area Such as "Alpha" may have on existing structures surrounding same, in the event of a flood disaster. During discussionMr. Murdoch pointed out that one of the alternatives would be to construct flood protection devices which would change the flood plain picture considerably. Councilwoman Kaywood also pointed out that the Army Corps of Engineers has recently considered a different courser that of preventing development in flood plain areas. In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Daum advised that the FIA Consultants employed to identify Anaheim flood hazard areas were a Pennsyl- vania firm who conducted this study, from Pennsylvania, relying on information from various sources. In view of the significance of the program, the staff felt it important to request that these boundaries be reconsidered so that if Council does wish to enter the program, at least the City will enter with some accurate flood hazard boundaries. At the conclusion of discussion Councilwoman Kaywood advised that the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities is conducting a Flood Insurance Seminar on November 21, 1974, and Mr. Daum advised that they do plan to attend. Having received theupdated report and information, the City Council took no further action on the matter. WORK ORDERNO. 839 -_ANAg~IM CONVENTION CENTER RECARPETINC QF A~EI~A STAiRWAyS AND ~_A~: The City Clerk submitted the recommendation of the City Engineer that award of Work Order No. 839 be made to Custom Floors, the low bidder at $49,647.00. On ascertaining that this was the only bid received, although three firms did pick up copies of the specifications, Mayor Thom voiced the opinion that he would not like to see a ]ob of this magnitude awarded by default. He felt staff should aggressively solicit bids throughout the Orange County and Southern California area. He indicated that this is a particularly com- petitive field and that even carpet mills may be interested in a direct sale. Mr. 3ohn Roche, Convention Center Maintenance Supervisor, advised, in answer to Mayor Thom, that only the usual legal notification was used, and that the cost of the carpeting itself pursuant to the bid received is $17.64 per yard, with installation charge at $3.13 per yard; and that it is planned to be placed over the existing pad. He stated that this firm has performed similar'work in the past and the price bid was $18.83 per yard plus $3.00 for installation. Stadium and Convention Center Director Tom Liegler exhibited a sample of the proposed carpeting for' CoUncil. He noted that perhaps one of the reasons more bids vere not received Was due to the fact that this job involves primarily the carpeting'of stairvays. Hr. Roche advised that the specifications are not so tisht so as to preclude bids, as most of the carpet mills can supply the required colors and quality. 74-1106 C£tM Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - NGv-mher 12, 1974. 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the award of Work Order No. 839 was continued one week to ascertain whether or not the three firms which picked up specifications had intended to submit bids for this Job and why they decided against same. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTIO~ NO. 74R-557 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO, §6S-B: In accordance with recommenda- tions of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-557 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RE~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED P~0PO~AL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL W(~IKNECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE ~ROOKIiURST STREET AND LINCOLN AVENUE STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF A~AHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 668-B, A.H.F.P. NOS. 590 AND 680. (Altfillisch Construction Company-$447,658.95) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSEI~: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-557 duly passed and adopted. R~soIIITI~NO. 74R=558 - FINAL COMPLETION, WORK ORDgR NO..2273 -.MOHLER-DRIVE.WATER ~: The City AttOrney advised that this final completion certification was issued upon his advice, due to the problem with the Del Giorgio property which is as yet unresolved, to allow the contractor to be officially terminated. That portion of the work on the Del Giorgio property will be performed at some later time either by force account or by calling for bids, whichever is appropriate. Upon receipt of certification from the~Director of Public Works and on infot~ation from the City Attorney, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-558 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIP~NT AND ALL UTILITIES AND T1La~ISPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND TME PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEI~2qT, TOW-IT: THE MOHLER DRIVE AREAWIDE WATER IMPROVE- MENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 2273. (G. R. McKervey Inc.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R.-558 duly passed and adopted. Pl_~_~JTI(~ NO. 74R-559 .-. DEK~S OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-559 for adoption. Refer to Resolution BOok. ~ ] A ,~O~!.ON OF THE C~TY COUNC~L 9~ THE CITY OF ANAItEIM AOCEFfLN,~ CERTAIN DEEDS AND"~.I~O .~I~%R !LECORD. ATIO~. (Kenneth E. Olson, et ux.; Kenneth'E. Olson, et us.; E. Raymond Parkhurst, et ux.; The Owen Company; American Housing Guild-Los Angeles; Lyle Maynard Nyland, et ux.; Gary V. Spielman, et ux.; Theodore N. Pullos; Kris Allen Busbea, et ux.; Reuben R. Moran, et us., Dept. of Vet. Affairs of the State of California; Violet Marbelle Jeffers; Services Distributors, Inc.) 74-1107 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MIh-0TES - November !2~ 1974, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-559 duly passed and adopted. RESOIIITION,NO. 7~R-560 - PURCHASE OF STATE.DEPARTNEI~ OF HIGHWAYS t~OPERTY (P~ ~ SIDE OF BA~, l~. ~ST OF S~A~A.~EWAY): City ~ger Ketth ~rdoch advised that the agre~ent is now prepared between the City of Anaheim ~nd S~ate Division of Highways for acquisition of excess highway property looated near Ball Road and the east side of the Santa ~a Freeway. At the ~t~ this proposed park was originally dtscussed,~. ~rdoch noted that it was thought it could be purchased on a te~ basis over a period of three years, h~ever, that method has posed some difficulties for 'both parties. ~e Ci~y is tn a position to purchase the property for $91,300 in a single yelr by transferring $61,300 from Federal Revenue Sharing funds from the previously budgeted park projects, specifically funds which were allocated for acquisition of Rtverdale Park. He advised that funding for acquisition of Riverdale Park would still be adequately covered because of approval of Co~y Federal Revenue Sharing for one-half of that purchase price and ~r~he~re this project c~ld also be included in 1974-75 Revenue Sharing funds, since approximately $118,000 has been included for park acquisition · nd development. ~O~I~ NO. 7~-560: Counctlw~an ~ood offered Resolution No. 74R-560 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A ~ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAl{ElM ACCEPTING A DEED TO CE~TAINPROPERTYAND DIRECTING ANDAUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREFOR, (R/W 91559 - State Department of Transportation, Grantor) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-560 duly passed and adopted. ~SOll~fl~NO, 7&R-56~ - EXT~ON OF I~E _AC_._P-~_EMENT- ROCK~LL INTERNATIONAL il~ MD[FIT~ING ST%~ON IN CHAPARRAL PARK: Mr. MurdOch reported that Rockwell In~erna~ional has requested a one-year extension to the lease agreement pre- viously entered pursuant to Resolution No. 73R-598 on December 18, 1973, to permi~ an air monitoring station operated by Rockwell International for the Environmental Protection Agency in Chaparral Park. In answer to Councilwoman Kaywood, Parks, Recreation and the Arts Director John Collier advised that there have been no complaints received from the adjacent residents. R~SOLUTIO~NO. 74R-561: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 74R-561 for adoption, approving the terms and conditions of a one-year extension to the lease agreement between the City and Rockwell International for placement of an air monitoring station at Chaparral Park. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE EXERCISE OF OPTION EXTENDING A LICENSE TO ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FOR ONE YEAR. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: C(IINCILMEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-561 duly passed and adopted.. 74-1108 City ~all. A~hlim. Galifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - Nov-mher 12. 1974. 1:30 P.M. ~/R~s~ OF NATER?At - ACSR .WIRE CAB~.~.: The City Hanager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 25 reels of ACSR wire cable and recomuended accep- tance of the low bid. General Electric Supply Co~, Anaheim .... Graybar Electric Co, Inc., Anaheim ..... West~house Electric Supply Co., Anaheim . llectric Supply Dist., Santa Arm ...... Total Amount Includin~ _Tax $56,798.12 59,640.42 60,785.98 67,091.03 0n motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the low bid of ~eneral Rlectric Supply Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the ~aount of $56,798.12 including tax and reel deposits. MOTION CARRIED. ~m~.t?~a (~ ~ce~m. ZION LUTI~.~P-AN CHURCH SANCTUARY - ANA-HODJBSKA PLAYERS: The City Manner reported on the proposal received from the Ana-HodJeska Players to remodel the Sanctuary of the former Zion Lutheran Church into a theatre facility. The prin~ry emphasis in this remodeling would be to develop a stage-type of confi~ura- tion. The Ana-ModJeska Players propose to perform all of the work and provide the materials for remodeling, and to do a portion of the electrical work. Hr. Hurdoch advised that in order to meet OSHA requirements, approximately $20,000 in electrical work, primarily rewiring, must be performed in the sanctuary. In answer to Council questions, Mr. John Collfe~ Director of Parks, Re- creation and the Arts, advised that the Ana-ModJeska Players estimate the remainder of the remodeling portion will cost between $25,000 and $30,000 for labor and materials. Although the remodeling operation is to be conducted by the Ana- 1/odjeska Players, Hr. Collier stressed that the theatre, once complete, would be available for co,~unity use and the responsibility for scheduling of same would .rest with the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department. He described some of the potential uses for a theatre facility, noting that the acoustics in the building are excellent and that it accon~nodates 310 persons. Councilman Sneegas voiced concern that this may split up the use of the Cultural Arts Center, to ~hich Hr. Collier responded that ~d~en the Cultural Arts Comtssion reviewed the proposal they pointed out that one of the problems at the Center is that the room is a multi-use facility without a slanted floor and con- sequently it is difficult to use for anything of a performing nature. Hr. Collier further advised that the Cultural Arts Comisston unanimously reco~endedCouncil approval of this project and that the Parks and Recreation Com- mission is in favor as well, although they have not yet taken any formal action on Councilwoman Kay,sod advised that she had attended the last meeting of the Parks and Recreation Co~ission at which this proposal was discussed and that quite a bit of excitement was engendered by it. She stated that all of the Park and Recreation Commissioners are aware of the proposal. Councilwoman Kay, sod further pointed out that the benefits of having such a theatrical facility would reach not only the members of the Ana-Modjeska Players, but to all these who would avail themselves of the opportunity to enjoy the performances given. She felt that such a centralized location, enablin~ the players an opportunity to rehearse under appropriate conditions, will attract more interested people and ~ould add a great deal to the co,,~nity. She ~urther noted that there are only two other auditoriums =ith slanted floors available for public use, these being the Anaheim High School and Fremont Junior High School Auditoriums and they must be booked six months ahead of time. Mayor Thom felt it would be an excellent proposal with the one caveat that this Ittll be retained as a multi-purpose facility for seneral c~,unity use. The City lianager advised that if Council wishes to approve this proposal, the ~undl for the rewiring of the City's portion could be transferred from the Riverdale Park account since there is more money in this account than would be needed this fiscal year. 74.- llO~ City Hall: Anaheim. California- COUNCIL MINUTES- November 12. 1974. 1:30 P.M. Councilwoman Kaywood wished to clarify that the City is already in possession of this structure; that they are not purchasing it at this time; and that this $20,000 in electrical work is required to be done under OSHA regulations, regardless of the use which the City makes of the structure. In answer to Mayor Thom, Mr. Collier advised that schematics are being worked out by a volunteer who has professional expertise in the theatre and have been reviewed in general by the Parks and Recreation staff and appear to be sound. He advised that the portion of wiring which the City would per- form includes the house lighting to the panel. The Ana-Modjeska Players would carry the lighting from the panel on and complete the theatrical lighting requirements. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council approved the concept of remodeling of the Zion Lutheran Church Sanctuary by the Ana-ModJeska Players and further approved that the City perform the necessary electrical work in the amount of $20,000, bringing electrical services up to the panel and rewiring of the house lights; it being clearly understood that the intent of the motion is that the facility, once remodeled, still be a multi-purpose facility for use by the entire tour munity. MOTION CARRIED. RESOL~flON NO. 74R-562 - L~F~ASE OF 100 PARKING SPACES IN CITy.LOTS BY THE PACIFIC ~LEPHO~E COMPANY FOR EMPLOYEE PARKING;. Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-562 for adoption, approving the terms and conditions of a lease of 100 parking spaces in City Lot Nos. 4, 5 and 9 to the Pacific Telephone Company. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE lEASING OF A PORTION OF CERTAIN PARKING LOTS OWNED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. ($600.00 per month) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-562 duly passed and adopted. Councilwoman I/ay~ood advised that 'she has received several complaints regarding the Telephone Company employees using the parking spaces provided at the south end of Pearson Park and inquired whether something might be done to prevent this. Mr. Watts suggested that the best way to handle the situation would probably be to contact the local officials of the Telephone Company and re- quest that they emphasize that their employees use the parking spaces provided them. Councilwoman Kaywood requested that such a letter be forwarded. CLAIIIAGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Phillip Stein, Attorney, on behalf of Dennis Lee Lipper for damages purportedly resulting from wrongful withholding of monies by the'Anaheim Police Department sustained on or about October 18, 1974 was denied as recou~ended by the City Attorney, on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. ~01ti~ISP~DEI~E: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas: a. Hetropoli~an Transportation Engineering Board - Federal Noise Standards and Regulations. b. Santa Ana River/Santiago Creek Greenbelt Cmmnission~- Progress Report -9-28-74 - 11-1-74. c. Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County - Notice of Maeting November 7, 1974. Airport Land Use Con~nission for Orange County - Minutes - October 17, 1974. 74-1110 City Hall: .~--haim. California - CO--IL MI~ffES - NQvamhar 12. 1974- 1:30 P.M. d. Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County: Fountain Valley Resolution Nos. 7247, 7248, 7249 Los Alamitos Resolution No. 693 Placentia Resolution Nos.74-R-208, 74-R-209 Fullerton Resolution Nos. 5790, 5792 Anaheim Resolution Nos. 74R-516, 74R-517 Co~unity Redevelopment Commission - Minutes - October 30, 1974. MOTION CARRIED. 0RDIN~CE NO. 3369: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3369 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4 BY ADDING TMERETO CHAPTER 4.82, REGULATING NEWSRACKS ON PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3369 duly passed and adopted. Councilwoman Kaywood wished to point out that the Anaheim Bulletin had printed an erroneous statement to the effect that she was against the particular ordinance, which is incorrect. 0R~INA~¢E ~O. 3370: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3370 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDII~CE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SUBSECTION 15.08.020.02 AND ENACTING ~NEW SUBSECTION 15.08.020.02 IN ITS PLACE RELATING TO STREET PREMISE NUMBERING. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, She,gas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COKrNCIL ~MBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3370 duly passed and adopted. ORDII~CE NO. 3371: Councilman Sue,gas offered Ordinance No. 3371 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-31(5) - M'l) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMEERS: NOES: COUNCIL~MBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3371 duly passed and adopted. ORDI,I~,CE NO.,.,,,3372: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3372 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OFT HE ANAHEIM I~INICIPAL CODE ~ELATING TO ZONING. (72-73-51(12) - RIi-22,000) Roll Call Vote: 74-1~11 City .Hall. Anaheim. California- COUNCIL HI,It, S - Novmmher 12. 1974. 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3372 duly passed and adopted. .r~.~DTli~NCE NO. 3373: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3373 for first reading, thereby setting public hearing on same December 10, 1974, 1:30 P.M. AI~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AI~AHEIM ADOPTING BY REFEP~CE A COMPREHENSIVE ORDIHAHCE CODE TO BE KNOW~ AND DESIGNATED AS THE "ANAHEIM I~JI~ICIPAL CODE", ~ P. gPEALING ALL OTHER ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH SAID CODE. ORDII~E NO, 3374: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3374 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1, SECTION 1.04.110 AND ADDING A N~W SECTION 1.04.560 CREATING A REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 0RD.II~.E NO. 3375: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3375 for first reading. AN ORDII~CE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM. t~ICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-62(16) - R-3) Concerning this ordinance just introduced, Councilwoman Kaywood noted that this particular area (east side of Webster between Ball Road and Orange Avenue) is terribly congested with bumper to bumper parking on both sides of the road. She felt that to approve further R-3 zoning in this area would just compound the problem. Council discussion indicated that this zoning was approved for the area many years ago and after extensive public hearings and discussions. Councilman Pebley indicated he would not be in favor of changing the zoning intent at this period. REI~..~ISHII~GAI~D 0P~ATIO~ OF T~ PERALTAADOBE: Mr. Murdoch suggested it might be appropriate if Council were to refer the matter of refurbishing, maintenance and operation of the Peralta Adobe to the Cultural Arts Commission for their recommendation. He noted that hopefully some existing organization, or one could be formed, which would take on the responsibility of operation of this type of facility. Councilwoman Kaywoodquestioned why the previous reco~nendation that this be handled by the Bowers Museum would not be suitable. Mayor Thom replied that the Anaheim Cultural Arts Commission is very desirous of retaining control of projects which are within the Jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim, in particular, since many donations from Anaheim citizens have gone to the Bowers Museum rather than remain in Anaheim because there is no repository for them. In answer to Councilwoman Kaywoo~Mr. Murdoch advised that as yet no application for Heritage Funds has been forwarded by either the County or City, but there are provisions in that Act which would provide funds, if they are available, for the purpose of refurbishing facilities of this nature. Funds for acquisition are available only if the Secretary wants'to allocate' some of the discretionary funds. Mr. Murdoch noted that the previous proposal discussed and approved in concept by Council was for Joint City/County acquisition of the property.. The question now remains what rill happen with regard to maintenance and opera- tion of the facility, once acquired and refurbished. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council referred the question of maintenance and operation of the Peralta Adobe to the Anaheim Cultural Arts Commission for study and recommendation. H0~ION CARRIED. 74-1112 City Hall...Anaheim. California -.COUNCIL MINUTES - November 12._1974. 1:30 P.M. REOUEST FQg SEWER.AND.WATER SERV%CE - NORTH OF ESP~RA~ZA ROAD- JOHN D, LUSK & SON: The City Manager submitted the request from John D. Lusk & Son dated November 8, 1974 for water and sewer services to Tentative Tract No. 8232, which is located in County territory on the north side of Esperanza Road. Copies of the request were distributed to Council Members. Mr. Murdoch reported that John D. Lusk & Son has been informed that the City of Anaheim does not have any capacity in the Yorba Linde County Water District linc'since LAFCO confirmed their previous decision that Anaheim would not annex:any property north of Esperanza Road~and placed that property within the Yorba Linde sphere of influence. The City's sewer'and'~ater lines were'con- sequently designed accordingly.. At the present time Mr. Murdoch advised that there are approved tracts which use'up whatever, capacity is currently available. No further action was taken by the City Council. R~Q~EST - ANAw~XM CWmmm~R OF COM~-~CE BICE1T~NNIAL COMMITTEE: ~. ~rdoch recalled that th~ ~amber of C~erce has previously requested that the Council desi~ate the ~a~er of C~erce as the Official Bicentennial Co~ittee. They now have some concerns relative to the ta~exe~t features of gifts ~ich ~y be made to the organization for the Bicentennial Celebration. ~ere are two ~thods of obtain- in~ a ta~exe~t status for these gifts, one requiring incorporation and re- questim~ a rultmg ~ the Internal Revenue Service. Alternatively, the Council cam dest~ate the Bicentennial Comittee as an Official City C~ittee and set up a t~st fumd for amy gifts received. ~is would aut~tically put such gifts imto the t~exe~t status. He advised that the administration of such a fund ~ul~ emtail no additional cost nor e~loyees for the City; it would be silly an accenting ~tter. At the conclusion of discusmion, by general comment, Council indicated they were tn favor of the establishment of a Bicentennial Trust Fund. ~J~i~D ~~ W~K s~ssIo~ - ~D~SDAY. NO~ER 20. 1974. 10:00 A.M.: Mr. ~rdoch ~dvl~ed that he ~uld like to se~ up an adjourned reeler Council work session to dt~eu~ and have pregen~atton~ made relative to the transportation system; trans- ~or~tton ~enter; co~nlty se~tces center and co~ntky development ~ideline~. Following brief discussion it was dete~ined by general Council consent that the City Council would meet in Executive Session for lunch at 12:00 noon on Tuesday, November 19, 1974 and that an adjourned regular work session would be held on Wednesday, Nove~er 20, 1974, 10:00 A.M. at the ~nagement Control Center, 114 South Claudine Street. F!~WO~_K8 DISPLAY ~I~MIT - SF/~VITE HIGH SCHOOL A.S.B.: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, a public fireworks display permit was granted to the California Fireworks Display Company for public display of fireworks, at Glover Stadium, La Palms Park, November 14, 1974 at 9:30 P.M., sponsored by the Servite High School A.S.B. as recomended by the Anaheim Fire Marshall. MOTION CARRIED. P, ESOLVTI(~ NO. 74R-563 - LAC~_MSTA NO, 1 A~XATION (U~inhabited): Pursuant to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation Commission Kesolution No. 74-117, Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 74R-563 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN ANDDESIGNATED LA CRESTA NO. 1 ANNEXATION. (.93 acres, south side La Crests, east of Blue Gum) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-563 duly passed and adopted. 74-1113 City Hall, Anaheim. Californi~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 12. 1974. 1:30 P.M. mmmp_th~I~NOS. 74R-564 A~D 74R-565 AM~..NDINGRgSOLUTIONNOS. 73R-506 ~ 74R-309 ~: Counctl~n ~ood offered Resolu~ion Nos. 74R-564 and 74R-565 for ad,itOh ~dtng the description of ~ang~ood Avenue to desi~a~e o~e as a pr~ street fr~ Santa ~a River to State ~llege Boulevard: Refer to Resolution Book. m~SOX/Y'ZXOH NO. 74~R., 564: A It~SOI~TIO~OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAMEIH~ING RESOLUTION ~0. 73R-506 BY CHANGINCTM~ WCRDS "SANTA ANAFREEWAT' TO "SANTA ANARIVER" IN COI~I~ WITH GENERAL PLAN AMEND~ NO. 129, EXHIBITS NOS. A, B AND C. NO. 74R- 565: A R~SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A)~NDING RESOLUTION HO. 74R-309 BY CHANGING THE WO~DS "SAh'fA ANA FREEWAY" TO "SANTA ANA RIVER" IN co~CTxoN WITH CHANGES IN THE CIRCULATION ELE~NT OF ARTERIAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ON THE GENERAL PLAN. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL ~MBERS: COUNCIL ~MBERS: CIFJNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom None Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 74R-564 and 74R-565 duly passed and adopted. POSSIBLE A~NDM~ T.Q GODE TO I~OMIBIT OV~-~NXTE FARKING OF .TRUCKS AND TABqfERS O~ Pd~SID~NTIAL STREETS: Councilwoman Kaywood advised that she had received several complaints regarding the overnite parking of trucks and trailers on residential streets. She noted that these do constitute a terrible traffic hazard and inquired whether there is some means by which this City could prevent the problem. Mr. Watts replied that there is no ordinance in the Anaheim Municipal Code which specifically prohibits overnite parking of trucks and tankers, although there is a provision against the parking of any vehicle longer than 72 hours. He related that the City of Fullerton does have an ordinance which prohibits parking of all vehicles between 3:00 and 6:00 A.M. Following brief discussion by Council, the City Attorney was requested to investigate the possibilities of amending the Anaheim Municipal Code t° preclude the parking of a specific' size truck over- night on City streets. , ~QM~TS - P~OPOSITION "H" ELECTION RESULTS:' MayOr Thom requested that his fellow Council Members seriously consider the course of procedure they are going to take relative to the amount of money budgeted for Phase 1 of the City Hall. He voiced his opinion that the massive opposition to the proposition on the ballot indicates that the constituents do not wish the Council to proceed and that this reaction is based primarily on the economic condition in this Country at the present time. He urged the members of the Council to go back to the people, as he is in the process of doing, to obtain an accurate read-out on these results. ~.~~: Councilman.. Pebley moved to adjourn to Monday, November 18, 1974 at 7:30 P.M. at th· Anaheim Convention Center for the purpose of meeting with the C~nity Center Authority. Councilman Sneegas seconded the wtton. MOTXONCAR~XED. Adjourned: 4:50 P.M. City Clerk