Loading...
1974/11/2074-1140 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER Amaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20~ 1974~ 10tO0 A.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in Adjourned Regular Session. ~SE~: P~SE~: ~SE~: PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour and Thom COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pebley and Sneegas REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: McDaniel, Morris, Leo, Pry, Cotler, Mendez and Os,id REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Alona M. Hougard DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Mac Slaughter FINANCE DIRECTOR: M. R. Ringer HUMAN RELATIONS CONSULTANT: Joe Garza GRANT IN AID COORDINATOR: Everett Polanco DIRECTOR OF REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: Knowlton Fernald ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Don McDaniel ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Bill West Redevelopment Commission Chairman Morris called the Redevelopment Com- mission meeting to order. Mayor Thom called the Adjourned Regular Council meeting to order, indicating that this Joint session with the Redevelopment Commission was called to hear presentations on the Anaheim Intermode Transporta- tion System and Community Development Act. A~IN Ih'fERMI)DE TP~SPORTATION SYSTEM: Mr. Don McDaniel advised that the pUrpose of the presentation iS to 1.) identify the Intermode System itself, 2.) identify the reason the City desires this system, or whether it desires a system at all. 3.) identify how to proceed with the studies necessary for feasibility and service areas if the Intermode System is acceptable. Mr. Don McDaniel using a series of slide projections described the approved OCTD Transit Corridor, Amtrak Railway right-of-way and current freeway routes, including points of confluence of these systems within the City of Anaheim. He described the various types of regional transportation plan for the Orange County area and advised that the Anaheim Intermode System is an intra- city feeder connector which will supplement and support the various existing and proposed regional transportation systems. The Anaheim Intermode System service areas were described and the proposed route explained. At the conclusion of his presentation Mr. McDaniel noted that the combination or interfacing of a series of transportation systems Join or come close together in the vicinity of the Anaheim Stadium. These systems in them- selves would not do the complete Job as far as the City of Anaheim is concerned. In order to make such a transportation system work, the Intermode Transportation System '"loop" is planned to Join the major activity areas, these being the Stadium, Convention Center-Disneyland, Downtown Area (Redevelopment Project Alpha) and the Southeast Industrial Area. Mayor Thom reported that the OCTD has recently voted to approve proceeding with 'a study and contract has been awarded to Daniel, Mann, Johnson, and Mendenhall. Mr. Murdoch further noted this will be a Joint Anaheim/OCTD effort for which application will be made for UHTA funds. The study as presently envisioned will primarily concern the transportation center to be located in the southeast Anaheim co~nercial-recreational area. And in-depth study of this proposed "loop" should probably be conducted supplemeatary to the OCTD study, Mr. Hurdoch commented. Mayor Thom voiced the opinion that a good transportation system is an essential ingredient for economic growth. Co~missioner Fry ~qui~ed why such heavy emphasis was placed on the .' leg of the "loop" going down the Amtrak right-of-way rather than State College Boulevard and it was explained that this was only because these tracks do exist and the Amtrak system will probably be expanded, providing a station in Anaheim. In addition, it was considered preferable to use these for Joint right-of-way rather than utilizing a major street. 74-1141 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER Anaheimm California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20} 1974~ 10:00 A.M. Commissioner McDaniel inquired whether the key emphasis on the Transpor- tation System would be the entertainment-recreational center activity areas rather than a factual everyday system for the people of Anaheim, to which Mr. Murdoch replied that in planning such a system the major activity areas were considered and the four which were suggested were selected for various reasons: The Convention Center-Disneyland area obviously was chosen because of the very large transient population; the Stadium will fit very well, as will the Convention Center into a park-and-ride system. Mr. Murdoch further noted that a good part of the thinking which went into this planning was based on anticipated EPA requirements for mass transit as a part of their efforts to reduce the number of vehicles on the road. The Southeast Industrial area was included because it is a high employment area. Commissioner Cotlervoiced the opinion that this would work well into the concept discussed by the Redevelopment Commission, i.e., to enable an indi- vidual to live, work, play and shop without having to use an automobile. The "loop" system would expand the area which the residents of the central city area would be able to utilize as far as making movements within the co--,unity. Commissioner McDaniel advised that he liked the concept but felt that the program should have greater intrusion into the community to strengthen the vehicle removal aspects. Commissioner Morris was of the opinion that the "loop" would not serve the people in the community, but would be primarily for the visitor, since the residents would have to travel some distance to arrive at the "loop" itself. He felt this system would be only a very smell part of the transportation system needed for the City of Anaheim. Hayor Thom reminded the Commissioners that the OCTD is currently embarked on a saturation service transportation schedule. Coms~issioner Cotler pointed out, in answer to Commissioner Morris, that his statement regarding use of the "loop" system by the residents would be correct if one considers the "loop" as a separate function. But, if it is viewed as it would actually be, as an integral part of a system which allows the interfacing of several types of transportation, it is likely that many Anaheim residents would use it. He noted the systemwould enable an individual to enter the City, park his vehicle and move about within the City. This would eliminate penetration of the center city core by vehicles; He voiced his concern as to the depth of the study which is going to be performed, and questioned whether this transportation system would Justify some investigation by the Urban Planning Specialists currently being interviewed by the Redevelopment Commission. Councilwoman Kaywood further responded to Commissioner Morris that the transportation "loop" would also be serving the citizens of Anaheim by alleviat- ing the heavy traffic on Katella Avenue and other surface streets adjoining the Convention Center, Stadium, etc., thereby making the City less congested and easier for its citizens to move about. Commission Leo noted that tourism would provide only a portion of the potential users of such a transportation system. He stated that one-half million convention delegates annually spend a minimum of three days in the City, 80% of which are without their own vehicles. During further conversation, Commissioner Leo also commented that this "loop" lends itself to an east-west "loop" at some time in the future. Mr. Murdoch concurred, noting that this is only one possible "loop" configuration, others may be feasible which would service adjacent cities as well as Anaheim. In this connection, Mayor Thom advised that this presentation will be scheduled before the Orange City Council and he requested if possible, that two of the Redevelopment Com~issioners be present at that time. Commissioner Morris stated he would be happy to appoint two members to attend. 74-1142 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20~ 1974~ 10:.00 A.M. Commissioner Morris stated that if the Redevelopment Commission did develop a highly concentrated employment situation in the core area, this "loop,' could be used for transportation of these people to and from the other activity areas. Councilwoman Kaywood described the park-and-ride program being imple- mented by the OCTD, providing 900 parking spaces and bicycle racks as well, with bus service from 6:00 a.m. at 15' minute intervals during the rush hours to and from Los Angeles on the Southern California RTD. She felt this same idea could be implemented, using the Stadium parking lot, which would certainly provide transportation service for Anaheim residents. Councilman Seymour noted that it would be foolish to consider this system a panacea for all of Anaheim's transportation problems. He did not think that this is the intention. Rather he felt the emphasis of this Intermode System would be: 1.) to create an attraction which will bring more people, both tourists and convention delegates, to the City; 2.) to exploit to its full potential the downtownmarket area, which is planned by the Redevelopment Commis- sion. He noted that this central city area fo.r soma time has been cut off from potential customers in the Commercial-Recreational Area by the freeway and also because there has been no reason to travel to it, no unique attractiveness. He stated that in his opinion this Loop System would be the "insurance policy" for the success of the Redevelopment Project Alpha Area. Further he remarked that the type of transportation provided on the Intermode System must be a unique, enjoyable travel experience, such as a monorail. He felt that the unique char- acter of the transportation system would be a crucial ingredient to the success of the plan to revitalize the downtown area. Councilman Seymour further pointed out that in consideration of this system, all concerned in its development must remember that financing of this project will most likely be through a Federal Transportation Asency. He stated that the Federal Government is not concerned with the resolution of Anaheim's transportation problems per se, but rather is interested in the combination of facilities interfacing at one location, which might solve a regional transporta- tion problem. Councilman Seymour stated he would be interested in comments from the Redevelopment Commission as to what effect such a "loop" might have on Project Alpha and whether it would necessitate any change in direction or planning which is currently underway. Commissioner Cotler replied that it would not change their planning at all, but actually reinforces their general theory. He stated that one of the main areas of concern in redevelopment planning has been the circulation of large numbers of people in and out of the downtown areas. He concurred with Councilm-n Seymour's comments relative to the type of Intermode transportation to be provided. He was of the opinion that this transp°rtation system must provide a ride that is an interesting and enjoyable enough experience that people will utilize it for no other reason than to ride it. He noted the extreme difficulty in getting people to use public transportation and stated that usually only severe economic pressure will do the Job. Commissioner Mendez suggested that if the Intermode System is basically a~med at economic development, that this be clearly defined, since the question regarding its use as a basic transportation system for residents will undoubtedly come.up again and again. Further comments from the Redevelopment Commission on the Intermode Transportation System were as follows: Commissioner Oseid 'pointed out that feeder lines could be put into this system for expansion; Commissioner McDaniel felt this transportation system would enable the Redevelopment Commission to develop a stronger marketing program; Commissioner Leo pointed out that there should be a unique shopping center to go along with the unique ride; Commissioner Fry noted that 10 or 12 years.ago there was a proposal presented to the City for soma form of unique transportation which he would like to see resurrected. Commissioner Cotler authorized a resolution of the Anaheim Redevelop- ment Commission be prepared in support of the concept of the Anaheim Intermode Transportation System, and in support of a joint study with OCTD and the City of 74-1143 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER Anaheimf California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20f 1974~ 10:00 A.M. Anahe:~, provided that in the conduct of this study the Redevelopment C~tssion is afforded an opportunity for input regarding the direction of Project Alpha, which can then be forwarded to the Commission's traffic consultant to incorporate into his planning the possibilities which this study might open. Commissioner Nendez seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Further discussion was held directed toward the establishment of a citizen's group to work with the consultants and staff during the study period, which is also a prerequisite to Federal funding. Members of the Redevelopment Commission felt this group should work and meet autonomously. It was further determined that the size of this committee should be from 11 to 13 members. At the conclusion of discussion, Councilmen Seymour moved that the City Council, within the next 30 days, appoint a citizen's co~mittee with the expressed purpose of working with the Redevelopment Commission and Redevelopment Agency as well as with the OCTD in the Joint transportation study. Councilwomen Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Leo suggested that the President of the Anaheim Area Visitors and. Convention Bureau be a member of this committee. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT: Mr. Ronald Thompson, Assistant Director of Development Services advised that the Development Services staff has been charged with the responsibility of coordinating and developing the plans and programs necessary to implement the Community Development Act.. He reported that Anaheim's entitle- ment for the first year would be $524,000 and over the period of the next 6 years the City WOuld receive approximately 9.4 million dollars from the program. He introduced Mr. Bill West, Associate Planner, to review the progress to date. Mr. West announced that this presentation will be divided into three portions: I. A brief review of the current status of preparation of the'Grant application. II. Slide show depicting various housing needs within the City of Anaheim. III. Discussion of specific issues regarding which staff feels they need further direction from Council and various commissions. I. CURRENT STATUS OF GRANT APPLICATION: Mr. West distributed a memorandum addressed to the City Council dated November 19, 1974, which outlines the status of the project and requirements to be met, together with a proposed flow chart indicating the involvement of the various governmental, city department and private sectors of the community. (Complete memorandum and flow chart on file in the Office of the City Clerk.) He reviewed the five major elements which will make up the Grant Application, these being: 1.) summary of a three year community development plan; 2.) a one year community development program; 3.) a housing assistance plan; 4.) required certifications; 5.) community development program budget. The Development Services Department has proceeded, pursuant to Council's direction of October 24, 1974 to analyze the Community Development Act of 1974 further and to evaluate the necessary scheduling of functions required to complete the Grant Application. They have prepared draft outlines for a Community Develop- ment Plan (CDP) and Housing Assistance Plan (HAP). ~I' SLIDE SHOW: Mr. West at this time advised that they wished to illustrate one problem area which these plans will address, that of inadequate housing. In this regard a brief survey was undertaken in order to attempt to identify housing units which are substandard and those in which remedial action can be taken. A number of slides depicting housing units located in Anaheim were shown and Mr. West pointed out'Building Code violations and lack of necessary maintenance where indicated. At the conclusion of the slide show, Mr. West stated that one of the techniques of application of this Act which has been more closely investigated was to designate a target area in which to implement pilot programs. He indicated 74-1144 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER Anahei~t California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20~ 1974~ 10:00 A.M. a section of the Center City Area, bounded by the Riverside Freeway to the north, East Street to the east, Ball Road to the south and Harbor Boulevard to the west. This area has definable demographic, economic and social characteris- tics which identify it as a likely target area for Community Development Funds. In this particular section of the City it was ascertained that there are twice the number of elderly citizens; there is a difference of $2,000 between the median family income of citizens in this area as compared to the entire City; and the number of minority residents indicates the ratio to be two times higher than the rest of the City. Also identified in this area was a large concentration of substandard and dilapidated housing in need of improvement. The Redevelopment Project Alpha Area is located in the center of this proposed target area. Mr. West noted that they considered that it might be appropriate to designate neighborhoods outside of the Redevelopment Project Area as the target area for the first year's program and institute pilot programs of Code enforcement or rehabilitation of housing, or to consider upgrading public facili- ties such as parks, street lighting, curbs and gutters which would make the area less likely to become blighted. Mr. Murdoch pointed out in this respect that this follows his line of thinking, that Community Act Funds not be used in Redevelopment Project Alpha Area due to the fact that $500,000 will be available from the Community Develop- ment Act Entitlement for the first year, whereas the Redevelopment Agency has at least four times this amount in tax increment funds for the current fiscal year. In answer to Commissioner Morris, Mr. Murdoch explained that housing code enforcement currently is primarily on a complaint basis, however if it is decided to use Community Development Act Funds for this purpose, then the City could be selective, i~e., exclude enforcement in commercial or industrial structures with these funds. III. POLICY ISSUES: Mr. West read the policy issues section of the report to the City Council including staff recommendations as follows. The CDP and HAP should include objectives and goals which attempt to: 1.) Meet the housing needs including replacing and relocation needs of families who may reasonably be expected to need housing in the community, particularly those families with low or moderate incomes; 2.) Prevent and elimi- nate slums and blight as well as upgrade neighborhood environments through: a. Rehabilitation b. Housing Code Enforcement c. Renewal d. Open Space Programs e. Public Works Programs 3.) Improve and upgrade community services and facilities to meet the social needs of residents in areas affected by community development activities, i.e., community centers and senior citizens facilities. Mr. West noted that the preparation of this application is currently geared to emphasize meeting the housing needs of low and moderate income persons, and providing needed physical and capital projects designed to help prevent the spread of blight in these designated areas of need. It is further recommended that to obtain positive results, that Block Grant Funds be directed to a specific area in the City, and it would appear that the first year target area should be located in the central city sector as indicated previously, (the area bounded by the Riverside Freeway to the north, Bast Street to the east, Ball Road to the south, Harbor Boulevard to the west). Mr. West advisedthat the staff recommendations regarding citizen particip~tion, is that due to the present time limits of the first year applica- tion,'the Council may'wish to utilize existing public bodies and City personnel to provide a vehicle for citizen input into the community development planning process. This approach should include: 74-1145 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20t 1974.~ 10:00 A.M. 1. Holding public hearing before both the Planning Commission and the City Council. 2. Presenting the basic elements of the CDP and HAP to (a) Community Redevelopment Commission (b) Parks Commission (c) interested and affected citizen groups. 3. Preparing and mailing newsletters. 4. Contacting citizens in the area and informing them of the opportuni- ties in their area, and enlisting their cooperation and participation in the planning process. 5. Publicizing the planned programs. Alternative Citizen Involvement Programs which are designed to provide on-going citizen participation in the first and/or subsequent program years might include: 1.) Community Development Advisory Committee; 2.) Public relation and educational programs; 3.) A polling of the community for its ideas on com- munity development. In conclusion Mr. West reported that although it was originally thought the application requirements could be completed by December 1, 1974 for early submittal, this is unlikely because as of this date HUD has not provided the final application forms and guidelines and because Council input is necessary for development of the required plans. During discussion, Councilwoman Kaywood advised that the County Human Relations Commission has set up a central relocation agency and it was reported that advice and information is available to all cities from this agency. She suggested that staff contact the agency for procedural information and policy, to avoid duplication of effort. Mayor Thom indicated no objection to any views and goals as set forth, but was concerned as to how the CDP and HAP would be coordinated with the planning being done by the Redevelopment Agency. Mr. Murdoch responded that the concept as he envisioned it for the first year and possibly for the first three-year program would be an emphasis on concentration of Community Development Act Funds outside of Project Alpha, the rationale being that the Project Alpha Area does have substantial funding capacity. Brief discussion then ensued during which Mr. Nurdoch pointed out that a sharing of funds or expenses approach could also be utilized and that a project need not necessarily be excluded from rehabilitation or Code enforcement programs because it is located within Project Alpha boundaries. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted that one of the reasons it was anticipated that the Community Development Act Funds would be used outside of Project Alpha Area was to avoid the possibility of providing amenities which might later, because of redevelopment activity, be removed. Mr. Murdoch indicated that it is essential that the two plans, redevelop- m~nt and community development, work together and that any pilot program must be at least considered by the Redevelopment Commission and Agency. Commissioner Hendez voiced his concern over the fact that housing for low income families is an extremely complicated problem, as demonstrated by the total failure of the housing acts of 1964 and 1968. He felt this should be kept in mind as well as the fact that the problem to be solved is that of providing low-cost housing and not a City rehabilitation problem. He noted that in the past the housing acts were used as a means of bringing in funds but these funds w~re not eventually spent in the direction of providing the needed dwelling units. He felt that the causes of the problem have to be dealt with and that public input is necessary. He stated that the low-income housing problem is much too complicated for private industry to attack, but that some groundwork must first be accomplished and this is the direction into which he hoped the Community Development Funds would be channeled. Hr. Everett Polanco, Grant in Aid Coordinator, reported in response to N~yor Thom, that he has ascertained from HUD that a great deal of information on Housing Act Section 23 was published in the Federal Register, November 19, 1974 Edition. ! ! 74-1146 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20~ 1974~ 10:..00 A.M. Mr. Murdoch summarized that what staff is seeking at this point is whether Council has any different feelings as to utilization of the Community Development Act Funds, from that which has been outlined in the goals and objec- tives herein described. He referred Council to the list submitted of eligible activities which indicate some of the other items which could likely be included in the grant application. He commented that the intended empbmsis of the Commun- ity Development Act is to fulfill housing needs first, with social considerations secondary in importance. Councilman Seymour stated that his main interest in the Community Development Act, when the possibilities were initially presented to Council, was rehabilitation of older structures in the City wherever this is possible, so as to avoid the uprooting and moving of families. Further~ his interests lie in the area of improving open space amenities and municipal facilities in these older neighborhoods as well. He stated that he did not wish his comments to be construed as being non-supportive of rehabilitation of housing for iow and moderate income groups. Rather, he feels that the community facilities are extren~ly important to the well being of these groups and also felt that this would be a better utilization of funds, since 9.6 million dollars is not a great deal of money for housing renovation. He stated he would prefer to see the funds available from tax increments, which are of much greater magnitude, support the housing rehabilitation program, and the Community Development Act Funds used to provide improved streets and alleys, street lights, neighborhood parks, senior citizens centers, libraries, etc. He commented that if such facilities and improvements are not provided, and instead housing only is rehabilitated, he was of the opinion that this would only delay the eventuality of deterioration of the neighborhood. Councilman Seymour concluded that while he is totally in accord with what is proposed he would prefer to see a major emphasis placed on the public works and facilities areas rather than on housing itself from Community Development Act Funds and to utilize, to whatever degree possible, tax increment financing funds to handle the housing problem. Commissioner McDaniel left the meeting. (12:00 noon) Discussion was directed towards the citizen participation and involve- ment in development of these programs and Councilman Seymour strongly urged that the approach to this be a combination of the methods presented above, and he would recommend equal emphasis on the Community Development Advisory Committee. Such Coamittee should be set up with the guidance of Mr. Joe Garza, Community Relations Consultant. Commissioners Morris and Leo left the meeting. (12:05 P.M.) During discussion of the potential use of a Citizen's Advisory Commit- tee, Co~missioner Cotler voiced his opinion that this Coaanittee should work directly with and report to the Redevelopment Co~misssion. He pointed out that the Redevelopment Commission's responsibilities do ~ot. stop at Project Alpha boundaries, and that ultimately all portions of the City will be incorporated in redevelopment project areas. The mechanics of establishing communication lines between Cwo such groups were discussed and it was considered that perhaps one of the members of the Citizen's Advisory Group sit in regularly at Redevelopment Commission hear- ings. It was also determined that it would be valuable to have a Redevelopment Commission Member present to act as liaison at the Citizens' Advisory Group meetings, although it is difficult for the Commissionersto find time to cover all of these activities. Commissioner M~ndez left the meeting at 12:25 P.M. and returned at 12:35 P.M. Deputy City Attorney Mac Slaughter advised that the Community Develop- ment Co~mission had no quorum during the period that Commissioner Mendez was absent. During this discussion, Mayor Thom pointed out that he would be con- cerned that the CDP and HAP Programs remain flexible enough so that once com- munity involvement is initiated, if it is ascertained that the people wish a change in direction, this can be implemented. 74-1147 MANAGEMENT CONTROL CENTER ..Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 20, 1974, 10:00 A.M. At the request of Mayor Thom, Redevelopment Director Knowlton Fernald s-~rized his reactions to the presentations on both the Anaheim Intermode Transportation System and the Community Development Act. He agreed that the transportation system is very essential to anything proposed in Redevelopment Project "Alpha" and stated that he concurred with everything said. He further agreed that the Commission's consultant in urban planning should also review this proposal. Regarding the Community Development Act, Mr. Fernald advised that because of the time schedule it is expected that the first application will be schematic and general and that the important thing to remember is that there will be a continuing review process and the opportunity to present a revised, updated or more refined application and plan for the second year of the program. Evaluation of the first year's achievements in light of the stated goals and objectives will be made. He commented that obviously the ultimate goal will be a good City-wide program which puts redevelopment and community development activities together. Hr. Fernald further related that there are several ways in which Com- munity Development Act Funds can be used which would generate more mileage from the 9~ million dollar entitlement, one of these being to utilize these funds in conjunction with a local banking institution to grant subsidized low-interest loans to individuals who would otherwise not qualify. Councilwoman Kaywood described the success of this technique in the pilot program conducted in 1964 by the Neighborhood Housing Service in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. Mr. Fernald pointed out that Council might also consider direct sub- sidy under Section 8 and com~ntedthat there are many innovative ways to use the funds under this section. Hr. Polanco noted that Council might also consider using the Community Development Act entitlement as matching funds for other Federal grants. During discussion which ensued regarding the fact that although most of the Categorical grants previously administered by HUD have been consolidated into the Community Development Act, there are a few opportunities left. Mr. Polanco described the possibility of Council forming a housing authority which would then make funds available to the private construction sector to build the necessary dwelling units. At the conclusion of discussion, no further action was taken by the City Council. RECESS: The Redevelopment Commission recessed to 1:45 P.M. for continuation of dis- cussion held over from the meeting of November 13, 1974. (1:00 P.M.) ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Seymour moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: l:00 P.M. F Signed City Clerk~