1974/12/3174-1252
City. Ha!l, ~.~_!m_~: California - COUNCIL HINUTES - December 24, 1974, !:30 P.H,
Councilman Seymour explained that he considers when an Anaheim business
receives a contract it means more to the City in sales taxes, and to the extent
this additional degree of benefit can be measured, this is consistent with pro-
viding the Anaheim businessman that additional opportunity.
The City Attorney advised that he would review the City's bid procedure
as set forth in the Charter and would prepare a report to the Council regarding
his evaluation of the City adopting such a policy.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn to Tuesday, December 31, 1974, at
1:00 P,M. Councit~an Sneegas seconded the motion. HOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 4:30 P.M.
cit]~ cle~
City H~d~, ~ Cal~fornLa - COUNCIL ~!NUTES - December
The City Council of the City of An~he~ met in adjourned regular session.
IMyor !~o Tem'Seymaur called the meting to order.
-Garry 0.. ~che ~ed that ihs work :period ~eclmtiun
f~ FiSm ~ion Peroounml, as sec forth in the Council.:.minUtee of December 24,
1974, ia mecordencawith the Departmmnt of Labor rules, be meemded to reflect
8;00A.N. es follows:
"The 1975 Work Period for gmp. loyee8 of the City of Anaheim mUnn, ged
fL~e ~ activities shall he a recurring Cwenty~four (2~) consecutive
d~y p~ bm~ at 8:00A.M. on J~ry 1, 1975".
Ne. lic~mm further recommended that the following ~rk period declaration
b,~ epremd Am ~ tm chm .Council mi,mates th:ts date, in accOrdance with 9elmrt-
~t ~ ~ ~:
for Isployoes of the City of Anmbet~mus·pd in
]dm ~ aftivtttmo' ,dmtLl be · recurring fourteen (14) day period he'sinning
ly.lSBae-..lcouoomC of the City Council, the forqotn~ 1973 employee
unW~ .~' ~ ~ a~Chow/~edmt--C° hein~alrfead 'in full ia the ed~utee of
74-1253
CJ. ty _/alta ~ Cal. J. fo..ru:.h. , ~IL ~S - Deceuber 31~ 1974, 1:00 P.N.
L ~O. 7~1-6~: On recoumuhtions by the City Attorney and the Finance
DAractor, ~ouncilmen Sneesas offered Resolution No. 74R~634 f°r adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A ~ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH A~PROVINC THE ~ERHS AND
C~DITXOHS OF AH AHKHDMKHT TO A LEASE BETb'E~ THE CITY OF A~iflBIH AHD SECURITY
PACIFIC HATIGKiL BAHK DATED FEBRUAIY 5, 1974, AND AUTHORIZING THE HAYOR AND CITY
CLKRK TO EX~CUTE SAID AHKHDMKHT OH BEHALF OF THE CITY OF AHAHEI~q. (Convention
Center expansion equipment)
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEHT:
COUNCIL I~I,IBER~:
COUNCIL ~HBEIS:
COONCTL M~I~:
Kay~ood, Sneesas and Seymour
None
Pebley and Thom
Mayor Pro Tam Seymourdeclared Resolution No. 74R-63~ duly passed and
oThe Assistaat City Manaser reported ouin£oruml'bids received
f 288 feet end 1,0~0 feet of 20-inch and 14-inch, respectively,
Ductile Iron Pipe for the Water Division and recommended acceptance of the low
bid:
V~
U. S. Pipe & Foundry, Reldw~n Park
Pacific States 2asr Iron Pipe, Los Anseles
TOTAL AMOUNT I~LUDING TAX
$27,813.30
29,097.38
On motion by Councilmtn Sneesas, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
low bid of O. S. Pipe & Foundry ~as accepted and purchase authorized in the
amount of $27,813.30 includius tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PUU~0F ~~ , 3~ "LAiP.~." TRANSFORHERS: The Assistant City~dnaser
r~q~orted ~ cb re~ed ~rc~seof ~ "L~p F~og" t~lfO~r8 ~O~ the
~ectri~ Diviei~ ~ ~d t~t ~neral Electric C~any, t~ ~e mnufac-
~urer mt~ s~cifi~i~ ~ requir~nt8 of ~he City, ~8 8uhi~ed.a
~ti~ for ~id eq~t ~ the total ~t of $27,196.42 incl~s tax.
~ t~r~ receded t~ ~rc~e be authorized.
Mayor Thom entered the meeting. (1:06 P.M.)
On motion by Councilman Sneesas, seconded by Councilwoman Kayvood,
purchue eao:auchorised in the auount of $27,196.42 includins tax, as reconnended
by the Assistant City Manaser. M~TIONCARRIED.
Mayor Thom assumed Chairmuship of the meetins.
- IA CIT. LES _ _ JAHUAIY 10 1975: Hr. Davis requested reserva-
t Cities Seminar on SettinS Policy Directions
for Co~mmity Development, to be held at the Royal Inn in Anaheim, January 10,
1~75.
Mayor Thom and Councilvoman Kayvood indicated their intent to attend
tiao meet~us ·
ooOu recomendation by the Assistant City Ha u assr, Councilman
lution Ho. 74R-631 for adoption,
Refer to Re~olutiou Book.
A IIJOLUTIONO! Tll CITY COUNCIL O! THE CITY OF AHA~IHAUTRORIZINGAHACREEHEHT
Wr~d TII COUBFEY OF ~ KETI~I~THE PROVISIOH OF CERTAIN HEALTH SERVICES
I~MMJABUAIY 1, 197S TO Arid INCLUDING ~ 30, 1975..
Call Vote:
COUBCIL ~BERS: Kayvood, Seyuour, Sneesao and Thou
COUBCIL~MBm: Boue
COUBCIL~BIIS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-631 duly passed and adopted.
74-1254
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES. - Decem.b~._r 31, 1.97~., .~:.00 P.M.-
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-632: On recommendation of the Assistant City Mana{er,.Councilman
Thom offered Resolution No. 74R-632 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVINGTHE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FOR THE HASTER STREET OVERCROSSING OF THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY, A~D AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
L~ywood, Seymour, Sne~gas amd Thom
None
Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-632 duly passed md adopted.
Councilmen Pebley enteredthe meeting. (1:12 P.M.)
COUNCIL POLICIES NUMBERS 106 AND 118: City Clerk Aloha Hougard briefly summarized
memorandum report from the City Attorney dated December 26, 1974, (copies fur-
nished each Council Member), recommending revision to Council PoIicy No. 106 to
schedule public hearings on the City Council agenda at the hour of'2:30 P.M.,
leaving the hour from 1:30 to 2:30 for departmental reports. Alsosugiested was
the repeal of Council Policy No. 118, which provides for the I:30'P.M. scheduling
of public hearings and incorporation of its language as a part of Council Policy
No. 106, amended, however, to provide for thescheduling of public hearings at
2:30 P.M'. The first two paragraphs of Council Policy No. 106 ~ould remein
effective with the following addition'to constitute its entirety:
AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL:
'!City Council Meetings are scheduled to co--ncc at 1:30 P,M.
In General, Council Agendas are to be structured, in the followins, manner:
a. Call To Order
b. Invocation
c. Pledge of Allegiance
d. Departmental Reports
e. Consent Calendar
f, Public Hearings
It is the policy of the City Council that the time period of 1:30 to
2:30 shall be held open for Departmental Reports, and that at 2:~0, or as promptly
thereafter as possible, the Public Hearings will commence.
Matters set on the Consentcalendar will be approved *~n one Roll Call
vote provided, however, that when any member of the Council, Staff ~or Citizen
wishes that a matter be heard separately, it mey be taken off the Consent Calendar
as determined by the City Council.
In the event that the City Council determines that any public hearing
should be held in the evening, it may set such public hearing for an evening
meeting."
On motion by Councilmen Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman laywood,
amendment to Council Policy No. 106 was authorized as recommended by the City
Attorney and City Clerk. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Seymour moved that Council Policy No, 118 be repealed.
Councilwomen Kaywood seconded the mOtion. MOTION CARRIED. "
ELECTRICAL REVENUE BOND ELECTION: The City Clerk announced that the City's electri-
cal revenue bond measure has been designated as "Proposition A" on the ballot
for the March 4, 1975 election.
74-1255
O~J~.*~ ~!~ ~I0~ ~T~EE: Council~o~a ~od reported
~ tl~ Or~oqe County Laa~u~ of Clties h~d suggested tlmt the Orange County
Board of Supervisors be requested to -eke City staff appointments to the County's
~alti~l Transportation Coe~ttee, and she thereupon recoe~anded Planning
hpervisor Don HcDaniel.
By general consent, the City Council recoumended Mr. Don E. HcDaniel
for mmberahip on the County Nulti-Nodal Transportation C~ittee,
STREET STRIPING: Council~man Kayvood reported on a newspaper article relating to
the savings realized by the State of Washington by using an alternate method of
painting 3 inches on one side of the 4-inch highway stripe at one painting and
$ inches on the other side at the next painting. She suggested that the City
might want to investigate the possibility of savings by using a similar method
for street striping.
Counc~ Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Suoe81a seconded the
Adjourned: 1:17 P.M'
Si~ned~
Deputy City Clerk
CIty ~LI, Ao~l~tme C~!iforni. a - COUNCIL HIHUTES - Daces,ber 31, 1974, !:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in raSular session.
COL~CIL ~NBERS: Kay~ood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
CO~CIL ~ERS: Bona
ASSISTANT CITY ~: Robert M. Davis
CITY il'l~l~: &t~n R. l/arts
D~FUTY CITY ~= Linda D. Roberts
ASSlSTAF[ DBV~L/)~IIT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson
Z~I]~G SOPEIVI~= CharIas Roberts
PSRSOIO~L DIRKCEOi: Garry O. HcRee
CITY BI~IBEKR: James P. Naddox
FTIIA~CK DTREC'IOI: N. R. Ringer
lliyor Thom called the meeting to order.
~: Councilman John Seymour led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Fla~.
Minu~es of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held December 10, 1974,
approved, on ~otion by CounciLman Peblsy, seconded by Councilwoman Kayvood.
WAIVKIL. ~ ~ ORD~S AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the
~ all ordinances and ~luttons, and that consent tO the
u~Lver of reading is hereby given by all Council Nembers unless, after reading'
of the title, specific request is Bade by a Council He~her for the reading of
aech ordinance or resolution. Councilman Sneega8 seconded the motion. HOTION
LUBiIOIIOOSLY tallieD.
n :.. ~ ' CITY: Den~nds against the City in the amount
o , in acCOrdance rich the 1974-75 Budget, vere approved.
C , · ~ .. _,_ _ ~ Actions taken by the City Planning Coum~ssion at
~ .mothS bela Deeeeher 9, 1974, pertaining to the foll._o~v~.. $ applications
uebre ~c~ for city ~c~ ~fomtion ~ consideraCi~.
~ - ~IVE DECIAIATION: On motion by Com/ctlman
~ bY ~~ Pebley, the City cOUncil finds end determines that
26~$ WiLt have no aisnificent effect on the environment and is, there-
frog tbs requirement to prepare an environssen~al impact report.
74-1256
Cit~ Hall, A~_aheimm California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 31} 197~}.1:30 P.M..
2. VARIANCE NO. 2645: Submitted by L. V. BoStwick to permit the continued use
of an existing trailer sales and service facility on C-1 zoned property located
at the northwest corner of Midway Drive and Anaheim Boulevard, with Code waivers
of:
a. Permitted uses.
b. Requirement that uses be conducted within a building.
c. Minimum building Setback adjacent to R-A zoning.
d. Maximum building height within 150 feet of R-A zoning.
e. Minimum number of parking spaces.
f. Required block wall adjacent to R-A zoning.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-238,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-637 - VARIANCE NO. 2267 - TERMINATION: Request of
L.V. Bostwick, dated December 23, 1974, was submitted for ter~ainationof
Variance No. 2267 inasmuch as Variance No. 2645 was approved by the City Plan-
ning Commission December 9, 1974. Also reviewed was memorandum report from the
Zoning Division recommending the termination of said variance. Councilwoman
Kaywood offered Resolution No. 74R-637 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book..
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEED-
INGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 2267 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 71R-326
NULL AND VOID.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
COUNCIL M~2tBERS: None
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-637 duly passed and adopted.
3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EX--ION: On motion by Councilman
Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council ratified the determination
of the Director of Development Services that the activity proposed under Variance
No. 2656 falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3, of the City of
Anaheim Guidelines to the requirement for an environmental impact report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirea~nt to file said report.
MOTION CARRIED.
4. VARIANCE NO. 2656: Submitted by Clifford Hemmerling, to permit a trailer to
be used as a classroom on C-1 zoned property located at the northwest corner of
Broadway and Euclid Street, with Code waiver of:
a. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-240,
granted said variance for a period of one year, subject to review and consider-
ation for extension of time upon written request by the Petitioner.
5. VARIANCE NO. 2653: Submitted by Arthur N. Whizin, to permit a trailer to be
used as a temporary office on R-A (SC) zoned property located on the south side
of Santa Ana Canyon Road, opposite Fairmont Boulevard, with Code waivers of:
a. Permitted uses in the R-A Zone.
b. Permitted uses in the SC Overlay Zone.
c. Maximum sign area.
The City Planning Commission, at the request of the Petitioner, termi-
nated all proceedings in connection with Variance No. 2653.
74-1257
City ~l, Anaheimv California - COUNCIL ~flh-OTES - December 31, 197}~. 1:30 P.H.
6~: CONDITI0tb~L USE pERHIT N0. 1344 - EXTENSION OF TIHE: Sub~itted by Harie N.
aod Coluabu~ E. llalls for extension of tine to permit the continued use of a
boardins home for six senior citizens in an existins sinsle-family residence on
R-1 sorted property located at the northvest corner of Alberta end Lemon Streets.
The City Planning CouecLsston granted a tvs-year ex~ension of time to
expire November 27, 1976.
7, VARIAI~EIK~. 23~SAND 264~ - TERNINATION: Request sub~LctedbyAlex L.
~s~, Preeid~nt,'Aldo~ Corporation'Investment Development, for teraLtnation of
s~bJect variances previously sranted to establish an automobile polishing and
mixing business, and to establish a recreational vehicle rental and repair
facility, respectively, on property located at the southwest corner of Hiraloma
Avenue end ~raemer Boulevard.
The City Planning.Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC74-241
a~d PC74-2~2, terminated all proceedings in connection vith Variance Nos. 2348
amd 2461.
8~ ~i~0ND~I~,(!JlId. UsE P~T .No. ~,4~82 ,~ APPROVAL OF PL&NS: Subntttted by Ro~ld O.
~on, ~eoid~t, ~li~ Gr~ ~ Corporation, requesti~ r~iew ~d approval
of fill d~elop~nt plans, incl~S a detailed landscapins plan, in compliance
rich requir~nts of ConditionNo. 8 of the Pla~ins C~ssion's Resolution No.
PCT~-iSI. ~id c~itio~l use ~t proposes to ~tablish a public skill
drill course on H-1 zoned property located souChveaC of hcella Avenue ~d the
Ora~ ~e~ay.
The City Planning Commission approved flnal development plans, tnclud-
ins the landscaping plan.
~IL ACTI.ON: The foregoing applications (Item Nos. 2, and 4 through 8) were
revieved by the City Council and no further action vas taken.
~~ ~il~h~, '~ed by C~il~ ~r, C~ City Co~cil
f~ ~ deCe~s C~C the proJec~ requiri~ a gradi~ pe~c co prepare a
for a e~e-f~ly resid~ce aC 211 PeralCa Hills ~i~ ~11 ~ve no
~i~ a~ ~ ~h~ ~r~ ~d is, therefore, ex~ ~a ~he require-
~o prepare ~ ~viro~al ~act r~porC. ~TIO~ ~I~.
l~. KIfV~~A~., !~,,ACT REPOB.~ ~., ,1-37 - RECLASSI:FICATIO, N NO. 71-72-18 -
~ ProPerty located at the southeast corner' Of Br°advay and Loara
Streets.
The City Planning Coumtssion recomended that the City Council certify
said environmental impact report as beins in coupliance with the Environmental
(l~alttyAct; provided, however, that due to land use changes in the area, and
p&rticttlarly the advent of the school site to the south beco~ins surplus prop-
erty and available for develops~nt, there mey be resultant effects in the entire
a~a if subject property'is developed R-3, and consideration of said zoning of
the property should be reserved until such time as City staff has had an oppor-
.tu~ity to present the General Plan A~end~ent and Area Development Plan for the
s~bJ~ct area in order to assess said effects, including that the departmental
r~orts frme the Parks, Recreation'and the Arts Department and Ensineerins
DlviSioa mey require additional input to include said effects of the additional
l~d b~co~in$ available for resid~ntial development in the area.
Ho. 7 -72- 8 -,,,,EXT ZON oF NO. Submitted
by K. A, bX~, ~o~t, ~l~ ~elo~t C~y, l~, , req~sting ~
~~ of C~ for ~elo~C of a 42~-~tt apa~C proJec~ at the south-
~ ~r of' ~~y ~ ~ra Streets, a~ further req~mti~ m~nt to
C~ttm ~s. 1, 6, ~ 15 of Cb b~luCion of intent Co ~e a-3, No. 7~R-527.
Councilwo~an Kaywood made the follo~ing cosnents relativeto the environ-
~tal t~pact report: Th~ reclassification for R-3 zoningon subject property has
e~ptr~dI there is a current floodin~ problem in the vicinity and nb storm drains
om Loara StreetI ~illow Park is now two acres less than it should be for the
t~aber.of residents presently served; and if the apartments are constructed, an
74-1258
.~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 31~ 1:30 P.M'
additional five acres would be lost. She failed to see how the g.I.R. Could
qualify inasmuch as it is vague with regard to parks, glosses over the storm
drain problem, and does not deal with the vacant 20 acres immediately to the
south.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Seymour was of
the opinion that there should be soma transitional use north of the existing
single-family homes to the south, progressing to the approved R-3 use on subject
property, therefore, it seemed in order to approve an extension of time for the
reclassification. He felt that the question of whether the entire 17 acres
should be deVeloped for apartments was open to discussion.
Councilwoman Kaywood voiced concern that the ratio of apartments to
single-family homes was currently one to one and to continue constructing more
apartments than single-family residences would result in amore transient popu-
lation. She felt one or two rows of apartments might be appropriate, but was
opposed to the use for the entire parcel.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts reported chat in a~dttion .to the 17-
acre subject parcel, there was a 22.7-acre parcel to the south~previ°usly
designated as a future Junior high school site which was now available for other
development; also, there was a 1-acre parcel adjacent to the northeast corner of
subject property which now contains one dwelling unit' making an overall total
of approximately 40.7 acres to be considered for future develoPment. Further,
the School District property has not yet been sold, and at th· direction of the
City Council, the Development Services Department staff had initiated a General
Plan Amendment and an Area Development Plan to explOre the circulation needs
within the area, which would come before the City Planning COmmission in' January.
Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that action on subject ~.t.R. and
request for extension of time be Withheld pending consideration of the Area
Development Plan and the General Plan Amendment.
Councilman Pebley pointed out that subject property is in the vicinity
of the Anaheim Plaza Shopping Center, which had been experiencinga lull in
sales, and apartments would bring additional people to the area ~nd stimulate
business. Further, with industrial uses on the north side of Broadway and
across the railroad tracks to the east, he was of the opinion the property was
ideal for the intended use. He noted the R-3 zoning was approved some two years
ago, undoubtedly the Petitioner had made a sizable investment on the strength of
that approval, and it is likely there is soma difficulty in obtaining financing
at the present time.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that former Council had approved many
5,000-square foot single-family dwellings adjacent to railroad' tracks in the
Santa Aha Canyon.
Councilman SeymoUr was of the opinion that soma Council directiOn
should be given to the City Planning Commission regarding the.ultimate develop-
ment of the entire 40.7 acres.
Councilman Sneegas Stated it should be made clear that the Council
exPects some lower density development on the School District property.
Councilwoman Kaywood read from the December 9, 1974 City planning
Commission Minutes relative to the Commission's reservations based on suitability
of land use and densities implied by E.I.R. NO. 137 and'suggested that action be
withheld until staff has an opportunity to present the GPA and Ai)P.
Councilm~n Pebley moved that a one-year extension of time be approved
for subject reclassification. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion.
Councilwoman Kaywood remarked that when a reclassification expires and
an extension of time subsequently is requested, theCity Council has an oppor-
tunity to review theproposal in the light of what may haVe occurred in the
area, and she was concerned about the high ratio of apartmentlunits tosingle-
family dwellings in the City.
74-1259
,City ~, ...Agahe~, California - COUNCIL ,N~NU~ES - Deceuber 31a 1974,. 1;~0 'p.a.
Councilman Seymour expressed the opinion that if the entire 40.7 acres
were developed into single-family homes the purchase price wou~d have to be more
th~n $50,000 for e~ch. He questioned for what segment of the population the
ho~s werebeing developed and was of the opinion that apartments or townhouses
would fill a need without which a segment of the population would be forced to
live in other cities.
Council~oman Kaywood stated that a large portion of the population is
unable to purchase single-family homes because of the high selling prices and
noted that the vroposed apartment complex is for adults only and willbehish rent.
Hr. Ken Nelson, one of the proponents of subject reclassification, was
recosnized by Councilman Seymour, and in response to Council~oman hywood's
question he stated that for one new apartment complex in Costa Mesa they are
charging $205 to $215 for one bedroom apartments and $260 to $270 for two bed-
rooms; these rates are typical of what must be charged. He further advised that
he currently had townhomes forsale in the $35,000 to $41,000 range, which would
call for monthly payments of $375 to $450.
Councilman Pebley reiterated his motion to grant the extension of
time, and further moved that Environmental Impact R~port No. 137 be certified as
being in compliance with the Environmentalquality Act. Council~an Sneegas
seconded the motion.
Cotmcil~o~n Kaywood pointed out that the flood proble~ in the area
was a fact, and there was no ~mney in the budget for stor~drains. In her
opinion, it was necessary to solve these problems prior to any development on
the property.
Councilman Thom moved that E~vironmental Impact Report No. 137 be
referred to the Development Services Department staff and the Planning Commis-
sion witha request that the questions raised be fully answered. Councilmen
S~y~our seconded the motion.
Upon being advised by the City Attorney that if the E.I.R. was referred
back to the Plannin~ Commission, any action to axtend the zoning application
w~uld necessarily be delayed, Councilmen Thom and Seymour withdrew the foregoing
~otion and second.
llr. Roberts interpreted the position of the City Planning Commission
p~tainin~ to their reco~ndation on the g.I.l, as being that the City Council
certify the report based on the information supplied by the Applicant, plus
additional co, ants in the staff report dated December 9, 1974, Page No. 8, Item
No. 4, a through e, as an infor~ative document; the publication sulmitted by the
D~veloper, along with these additional comments noted in the staffreport would
be adequate to satisfy the minimum requirements of the City and State Guidelines.
Councilwoman Kaywood was of the opinion that to state the problems was
not enoush, and she ~mttld like to seesome solutions.
Councilman Pebley asked the City Engineer if he would approve final
plans for the project without adequate drainage.
Hr. Maddox replied that adequate drainage facilities would have to be
provided by the Developers.
Council~an Sneesas stated he had read the Engineerin~ report, and he
pointed out that subject property alone was not causing the flood condition, and
he failed to see any reason to deny subject project on that basis. In all fair-,
ness, every property owner should have the same rights and ~heee problems should
not be resolved at one ~an's expense; they mst be a general public obligation.
The vote was called for on the following motion: "E.I.R. No. 137
having been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning
Ce~selou to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of
C~tifornia ~nviron~ntal Quality Act, the City' Council actin~ upon such inform~-
tion and belief does hereby certify that E.I.R. No. 137 is in compliancewith
the California ~nvirou~sntal quality Act and City and State Guidelines."
To this ~otion, Councilwoman Eaywood voted "no". MOTION CARRIED.
74-1260
City .Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL HINUTES - December 31~ 1974~.1:30 P,H. .
The vote was called for on the motion to grant a one-year extension of
time to Reclassification No. 71-72-18, retroactive to March 7, 1974, and to
expire December 7, 1975. To this motion, Councilwomen Kayw°od voted "nO".
HOTION CARRIED.
It was noted by Mr. Roberts that the staff had recomsmnded that request
by the Applicant to delete and amend certain conditions not be considered at
this ti~e, pending consideration of the General Plan Amendment and Area Develop-
ment Plan which include these items as well as the metier of circulation.
INVOCATION: Lt. Neal Hogan of the Salvation Army gave the Invocation.
PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 OF ~ ANAtlEIMMUNICIPAL COD~: Public hearing
was held to consider proposed amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Hunicipal
Code which would renumber ordinances and amend certain sections ofTitle 18 to
confor~ to new numbering provisions of the recompiled Anaheim Municipal Code.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone wished to address the City Council pertain-
ing to the proposed amendment; there being no response, he declared the public
hearing 61osed.
ORDINANCE NO. 3386: Councilmen Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3386 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHELN RENUMBERING AND AHENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF
TITLE 18, CHAPTERS 18.01, 18.02, 18.05, 18.22, 18.23, 18.24, 18.25, 18.26,
18.27, 18.32, 18.34, 18.44, 18.45, 18.46, 18.48, 18.61, 18.63 AND 18.87 TO
CONFORH TO THE NE~ NUMBERING PROVISIONS OF THE NEW RECOMPILED ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE.
TENTA~.IVE TRA~.T NO. 8142 - EXTENSION OF TIM~: ReqUest of F. G. Linton, Jr., Vice
President, ~erican Housing Guild, dated November 13, 1974, was sub~it~ed for a
one-year 'extension of time to Tentative Tract No. 8142, together With reports
and reco~-aendations of the Zoning Division and the City Engineer.
On motion by Councilmen Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, a one-
year extension of time was granted retroactive to November 7, 1973, and to
expire November 7, 1975, subject to the following recommendations of the City
Engineer:
a. Installation of landscaping and irrigation facilities on all
slopes within the tract as required by the Hunicipal Code,. within 60 days.
b. Installation of street name signs throughout the tract'prior to
occupancy of any structures in the tract; temporary signs will be acceptable
during construction.
MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE N0. 2532 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Roland J. JenSen, dated November 12,
1974, wes submitted for a one-year extension of time to Variance No. 2532,
together with reports and recomsmndation of the City Engineer and the Zoning
Division.
Councilwomen Kaywood called attention to Finding Nos. 6 and 7 of the
Zoning Division report dated December 31, 1974, noting that the proposed develop-
ment does not meet current parking requirements for apartment complexes, and
that the only buffer to the existing single-family homes to the north and west
would'be the ~arage walls of the project.
Mr. Roland Jensen, Owner, was recoEnized and in answer to question by
Councilman Seymour as to the status of the variance, advised that plans have
been submitted, building and tree planting fees paid, and bond posted for street
lighting, and it is anticipated that construction will conmencewithin 60 days.
Councilmen Pebley moved that the extension of time be granted as
requested.
74-1261
City ~all, Anaheimt California - COUNCIL HII~ITES - December 31., !974, ~:30' P.N.
Councilman Seymour was of the opinion that the extension should be
granted for not more than 90 days, pointing out that the owner had stipulated to
the commencement of construction within 60 days.
Councilman Pebley amended his.motion to grant the extension of time to
Variance No. 2532 for a period of 90 days only. Councilman Seymour seconded the
motion. To this motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no'. MOTION CARRIED.
XECLAS$IFICATION NO. 71-72-23 , EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Mr. H. J. Belshe,
dated December 2, 1974, requesting a one-year extension of time to Reclassifica-
tion No. 71-72-23, Parcel No. 2, was submitted together with reports and recom-
mandations from the City Engineer and Zoning Division.
On motion by Councilwoman Eaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, a one-
year extension of time was granted for Parcel No. 2, Reclassification No.
71-72-23, to expire January 11, 1976, subject to construction of sidewalks and
posting of street lighting bond within 60 days. HOTION CARRIED.
RECLA~.~$IFICATION NO. 72-73-48 ~ EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Harry L. Gates,
President, Galy Construction Corporation, dated November 19, 1974, for extension
of time to Reclassification No. 72-73-48, was submitted together with reports.
and reco~endation of the City Engineer and the Zontn$ Division.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, an
extension of time to Reclassification No. 72-73-48 was granted, retroactive to
June 26, 1974, and to expire June 26, 1976, as recommended by the Zoning Division.
MOTION-CARRIED.
CANCELLATION OF BOND, RECLASSIFICATION NO. }9-60-62: Request of Hr' Robert Collins,
Creative Development Corporation, for authorization to cancelBond No. H-148,942,
which ~as posted to insure street improvements .required under Reclassification
No~ 59-60-62, was approved by the City Council at their regular meeting held
July 30, 1974, provided that a replacement bond be posted.
Comemnication dated Noveaber 19, 1974, was submitted by Hr. Collins
describing efforts to effect the replacement of the bond by the property owner,
and requesting cancellation of said bond inasmuch as the corporation did n°t
purchase the property end has no further interest therein.
Also submitted and reviewed by the City Council were reports from the
Zoning Division and the City Engineer, the latter recommending that the bond be
cancelled, subject to repeal of the ordinance which granted the reclassification,
or the posting of a substitute bond.
City Attorney Alan Watts noted there were three alternatives, to
repeal the ordinance which changed the zone on the property, to grant the request
for cancellation of the bond which would preclude the installation of the
street i~provemant, or to utilize the 1911 Act, the property owner to be notified
to ~ake necessary street i~provements or the City would make said improvements
and an assessment levied on the property for the costs therefor.
Hrs. Frances Neville, 10~02 Dewey Drive, Garden Grove, was recognized
by Councilman Seymour and advised she:was the Realtor representing the property
owners who had no bond on the property. Mr. Collins posted a bond in Connection
with an option escrow to purchase said property which was never cons---,~ted.
The property owners ~are willing to do'anything possible to assist in obtaining
the release of the bond for Hr. Collins, however, they were unable to qualify
for a bond without submitting bids from subcontractors for the work, and they
have no plans to develop the property.
Hr. ~atte advised that intoday's market conditions, the bonding
co~anies are very reluctant to write open-end bonds. One way to resolve the
problem would be for the property owners' to install the necessary curbs and
~utters, or subsLtt a Certificate of deposit for the money for said improvements,
which would be an interest drawing account for the depositors.
Hrs. Neville suEgeeted that the bond be released without a substitute
bond since a future developer would be required to comply with City regulations.
74-1262
City Ha. Il, ~aheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 31~ 1974~ 1:30 ~..M.
Councilman Pebley asked the City Engineer if any particular problem
had resulted from improvements not being installed.
Mr. }laddox stated there was no immediate urgency for the installation.
Councilman Seymour suggested that inasmuch as bonding has become
difficult to obtain, perhaps there should be a policy to lien properties so that
payment would be realized or other arrangements made.
Mr. Watts suggested that because of the particular circumstances on
the parcel in question, it might be more appropriate to require installation of
curbs and gutters prior to issuance of a building permit. This would necessitate
a~ending Condition No. 4 of Ordinance No. 1981 to read:
"4. (a) That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim,
along Dale and Lincoln Avenues, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street
grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other pertinent~work, be com-
plied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and
(b) that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall be ~osted with the City at the time of application for a building
permit to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements."
ORDINA~,,CE NO. 3387: On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman
Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3387 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1981 IN RECLASSIFICA-
TION PROCEEDINGS 59-60-62 BY AMENDING coNDITION NO. 4 THEREOF.
Councilman Pebley moved that the bond posted for street improvements
required'as a condition of ~mclassification No. 59-60-62 be released. Councilman
Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORANGE..CO.U~. USE PERMIT NO. 3568: Proposing the establishment of a maintenance and
storag~yard for heavy equipment, and the establishment of two relocatable
structures for use as a cat kennel; property located on the west side of Jefferson
Street, south of Orangethorpe Avenue, in the northeast Anaheim area.
Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held
December 23, 1974, was submitted recommending that Council recommend to the
Orange County Planning Commission that either:
a. That the Orange County Use Permit 3568 be terminated and appropriate
petitiOns be processed through the City of Anaheim; due to pending annexation of
subject property to the City of Anaheim; or
b. That since subject property is within the sphereof influence of
the City of Amaheim and will eventually be annexed to the City of Anaheim that
if the Orange County Planning Commission approves Use Permit No. 3568, the
property should be developed in accordance with the City of Anaheim ML Site
Development Standards.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts reported that annexation proceedings
for subject property have been completed with the exception of recordation,
which bas resulted in applications for the proposed use being submitted to both
the County of Orange and the City of Anaheim.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the
Council concurred with the City Planning Commission reco~nendations and ordered
them forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission for their consideration.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION ~O. 74R-633 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution
No. 74[-633 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
74-1263
F
tit7 ~ll, Anaheim' California - COUN~IL MI.~t~ES - December 31~ ~974~ 1:30' P.M.
A RESOLI~ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIHACCKPTING CERTAIN DEEDS
AHD ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. '(La Jolla Avenue Associates; Shigeto Fukuda;
Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc. & Anaheim Hills, Inc.; Xenophon Y. and Esther P.
Zabel; Dora Gene Golder; Julie W. Bond; Harold g. and Denise R~illard; Hax V.
and HarJorie H. Eliason)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL NEHBERS: Kayvood, Seyaour, Pebley, Sneegas and Tho~
COUNCIL MKHBERS: None
COUNCIL NEHBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-633 duly passed and adopted.
RESOL~I~ NO. 74R-635 - AGrEEMeNT, AMEKICAN NATIONAL HOUSING ~O~PORATION:
Councilwoman Kaywood questioned the date of FebrUary 1, 1974, reflected on Page
14o. 2, Paragraph No. 3 of the proposed agreement.
Water Superintendent Larry Sears advised that the facility vas com-
pleted on FebrUary 1, of 1974, and warranty is one year from that date.
Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-635 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.'
A P~SOLUTION OF TRg CIT~ COUNCIL OF T~g CITY OF ANAItgIN APPROVING TH~ T~ ~
~ITIONS OF ~ AG~ WI~ ~RI~ ~TIO~ HOUSING ~~TION TO ~-
B~E ~ID C~TI~ ~R I~T~ING A P~SS~ ~G~R FACILI~ ~ P~T OF
~ SE~Y 'DIS~IB~ION SY~ OF ~CT 7470 ~D A~ORIZING ~E ~YOR ~
CI~ C~ ~ ~E SAID ~~.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL M~qBERS:
(I)UI~IL ~I~IS;
~)UNCIL
Kayvood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 74R-635 duly passed and adopted.
RESOL.UTION NO. 74R-636: Councilmn Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-636 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNt"/ OFO~ANGE RELATING TO THE AKTERIAL HIGHWAY
FINANCING PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR.1974-75. (AHFP No. 735 - Canyon Rim Road and
Serrano Avenue)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL NKHBERS: Kay,sod, Seymour, pebley, Sneesas and Thom
COUNCILMI~BERS: None
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-636 duly passed and adopted.
CO.P~ENCE: The folloving correspondence vas ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilvomsn K~ood, seconded'by Councilman Tl~m:
1974.
1974.
a. Community Redevelopment ~ission - Minutes - December 11, 1974.
b. Anaheim Publtc Library Board - Highlights and Minutes - November 4,
c. Anaheim Public Library Board - Highlights and Minutes - November 18,
d. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of November, ~974
for the Anaheim Public Library and the City Treasurer.
74-1264
City Hall, ~mahe. im, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 31~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M.
e. Before the Public Utilities Commim3ion - Investigation for the
purpose of establishing a list for the fiscal year 1975-76 of existing and
proposed crossings at grade of city streets, county roads or state highways most
urgently in need of separation, or projects effecting the elimination of grade
crossings by removal or relocation of streets or railroad tracks, or existing
separations in need of alteration or reconstruction as contemplated by Section
2404 of the Streets and Highways Code.
f. Notice of Filing Application for Increases for Intrastate Telephone
Rates - The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company.
g. Monthly Report - Electrical Division-Utilities Department, November,
1974.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3384: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. '3384 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING CERTAIN SECTION AND SUBSECTIONS OF
TITLE 18 RELATING TO ZONING. (Minimum floor area per dwelling)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywo°d, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL HEHBERS: None
The Hayor declared Ordinance No. 3384 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3385: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3385 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIMAHENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION
14.32.110 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THIRTY-MINUTE PARKING ZONES.
(Anaheim Boulevard, west side from 527 feet north of centerline of Ball Road to
482 feet north of centerline of Ball Road)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None :
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3385 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3388: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3388 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIHAMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-47 (13) - ML)
ADJOURNHENT: Councilman Pebley moved Co adjourn. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 2:35'P.M.
Signed ' ·
Deputy City Clerk