Loading...
1966/08/2396~1 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLrrES - Auqust 23, ~966, 1:30 AWARD - ANAHEIM POLICE DEPARTMENT: Mayor Krein presented Chief of Police, Mark Stephenson~ with a framed certificate of achievement awarded to Chief Stephenson and his department by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc., for police traffic supervision in recognition of the department's 1965 performance in the National Safety Council's traffic inventory. On behalf of the City Council~ the Mayor commended Chief Stephenson and the department. (Councilman Pebley entered the meeting, 1:45 P.M.) MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held August 9, 1966, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLU/ION$: Councilman Schutte moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRI£D. DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $660,526.75, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget~ were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICSTION NO, 60-61-44: Submitted by Elmer and Dora Kammel) et al, requesting a change of zone from R-1 to C-i; property located on the west side of Magnolia Avenue between Ball Road and Rome Avenue. Pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 6664 through and including 6669, adopted February 14, 1961, the City Council approved C-1 zoning, subject eighteen (18) lots to be assembled into six (6) packages of three (3) lots each as a method of development, pursuant to original Area Development Plan No. 56. The City Council at their meeting held July 26, 1966, ordered subject reclassification reactivated and a scheduling of public hearing this date, to allow further study by the Development Services Department staff for an Area Development Plan to be prepared indicating development along the principles and requirements imposed for Reclassification No~ 65-66-85 (C-1 zoning approved for parcel at 805 South Magnolia Avenue). Mro Grudzinski briefed the history of subject application and of Area Development Plan No. 56, reporting that said plan was restudied and revised, with three proposed alternatives for development presented to the Planning Commission; that subsequent meetings were held by the staff and owners of subject properties° Revision No. 2 of the Area Development Plan was presented to the Council May 24~ 1966, and after continuances and discussions with property owners) the staff was directed to again revise the plan~ to be similar to Exhibit C of Revision No. 1, and to incorporate comments of the City Council~ Mr. Grudzinski then called attention to two exhibits posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber~ marked Area Development Plan No. 56~ Revision Noo 2~ Alternatives No. 1 and 2~ both illustrating independent parcel development~ with a continuous 20-foot alley along the rear of subject properties from Ball Road to Rome Avenue, and dedication of 50 feet from the centerline of Magnolia Avenue for future street widening. He reported that Alternative 1 depicted access to the properties from the alley only, while Alternative ~ showed proposed additional access from Magnolia Avenue, the precise location thereof to be determined as development progresses. Mr. Grudzinski further briefed the discussion held by the City Planning Commission~ and advised of the Commission's recommendation to the City Council that Alternative No. 2 of said Area Development 9642 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23~ 1966, 1:30 P,M, Plan No. 56, Revision 2, be adopted as a reasonable solution to circulation problems which would be faced by the property owners in converting homes for commercial purposes. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council. Mr. Frank Riggl, 1200 West Katella Avenue, advised that he had contacted all property owners involved and explained the revision to the Area Development Plan~ comparing the proposed new conditions of zoning to those currently existing~ however, many of the owners desired provision for more access from Magnolia Avenue. Mr. Grudzinski noted that existing Resolutions of intent provide for development of the parcels with a single access way from the street to serve each group of three, and in answer to Council questioning, he advised that the City Traffic Engineer had projected a maximum number of six access points. In reply to further questioning, Mr. Grudzinski reported that after dedication for alley and street widening, the typical size of each parcel would be approximately 60 feet by 80 feet; that the alley dedication was designated to be obtained entirely from subject properties. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mrs° Mary Rood, 817 South Magnolia Avenue, asked how much of their properties would be required to provide parking for neighborhood commercial uses. Mr. Grudzinski briefed provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to required off-street parking and maneuvering space for vehicles. Mr. Joseph Lewis, 915 South Magnolia Avenue, was of the opinion thaz the only feasible means of developing the properties for commercial use was to provide access from Magnolia Avenue; that the widening of the street would relieve the hazard to vehicles turning right from that street. Mrs° Co Io Smith, 809 South Magnolia Avenue, requested clarification of the revised Area Development Plan, questioning whether approval thereof would limit the area to only one access from Magnolia Avenue. Mr. Riggi further reported on efforts to obtain reciprocal access aggreements from the property owners, advising that two owners were unwilling to sign such an agreement. Mrs. Mary Rood again addressed the Council being of the opinion that one access for every two parcels, or provision of an access wherever possible without creating major problems~ seemed feasible° She asked whether it would be compulsory for property owners to execute reciprocal agreements for access. Council discussion was held, and Mro Grudzinski noted that the Straine property (southwest corner of~ Magnolia and Rome Avenues) has been approved for C-1 zoning (Reclassification No. 65-66-85)~ with an alley along the westerly side of the property, and the three (3) southern- most properties located at the northwest corner of Magnolia Avenue and Ball Road have been developed for C-1 usage; and he noted the possibility of progressive development of the remaining parcels from each of these, incorporating the 20-foot alley dedication. City Attorney, Joseph Geisler, was of the opinion that some provision must be established for the maintenance of any access way from Magnolia Avenue, for the dimensions of the parking areas, and for the actual area allowable for any proposed business. The Anaheim Municipal Code requires all commercial uses to be served by an alley, and provision for storage of trash with access thereto for disposal° He noted that every access way from Magnolia Avenue will reduce the amount of on-street parking available~ which will be restored when the street is widened. 9643 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 Mr. Geisler was of the further opinion that a maximum of three access points from the street should be approved for the entire area, subject to the owners execution of complete documents providing for the reciprocal use and the maintenance of these accesses. After conferring with the property owners present in ~he Council Chamber, Mro Riglgi reported that all were in favor of the Area Development Plan Revision designated as Alternate 2. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. On motion by Councilman $chutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Area Development Plan No. 56, Revision 2, Alternate 2 was approved by the City Council° MOTION CARRIED% (lO) RESOLUTION NO, 66R-565: Councilman Chandler offered Resol6tion No. 66R-565 for adoption, rescinding Resolution Nos. 6665 through and including 6669, and authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone of subject properties to C-l, subject to the following c6nditions: (1) That the owner (s) of subject property shall deed tothe City of Anaheim a strip of land 50 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Magnolia Avenue, for street widening purposes, including a 15-foot radius corner return. (2) That the owner (s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 20 feet in width, being the east 20 feet of the westerly 21 feet of subject property for alley purposes. (3) That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim for such alley shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amoun~ and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. (4) That the sidewalks shall be installed along Magnolia Avenue and Rome Avenue, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City 5ngineer. (5) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. (6) That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. (7) That Condition Nos. 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. (8) That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Magnolia and Rome Avenues shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. (9) Each separate parcel of property may comply with necessary conditions when access is provided by means of dedication for the 20-foot alley along the westerly boundary. Development to be in accordance with Area Development Plan No. 56, Revision 2, Alternate 2, as approved by the City Council, August 23, 1966, or as amended by the City Council at a later date. Refer to Resolution Book. ** A RESOLUTION OF TH£ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING /HAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NOS° 6665 THROUGH 6669. (60-61-44 (C-l) Roll call vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein COUNCILMEN: None COUNCIIJ~EN: None Mayor Krein declared Resolution No~ 66R-565 duly passed and adopted. ~. ** NOTE: Title of above Resolution No. 66R-565 changed as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 6665 TO 6669, BOTH INCLUSIVE, IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 60-61-44. 9644 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 P,M~ SIDEWALK WAIVERt Request dated August 15, 1966 from Warren Finley, Attorney representing Imperial Containers, Inc., for waiver of sidewalk requirements on property located on the south side of Miraloma, approximately 500 feet west of Dowling Avenue, was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, temporary sidewalk waiver was granted providing that no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalk, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application submitted by Frances B. Gonzales on behalf of $ociedad Progresista Mexicana #24 for permit to conduct public dance August 28, 1966 at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4o16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. NDTION CARRIED° AMUSEMENT MACHINE PERMIT - 210 SOLFfH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD: Application submitted by Norman E~ Garrison, dba Signal Vending Service, on behalf of Don Hansen, for amusement machine permit to allow coin operated pool table at 210 South State College Boulevard~ was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 3°24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED° SIGN REQUEST: Application submitted by A. Go Winovitch~ BRC, U. S. Navy Recruiting Branch Station, for permission to install three recruitment signs on public right-of-way, at the intersections of Lincoln Avenue with: Manchester Avenue, Euclid Street, and Beach Boulevard, was reviewed by the Council together with report from the Zoning Division, Development Services Department~ /he City Engineer read his report dated August 229 1966o It was moved by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley, that said sign request be denied, in accordance with City Engineer's report dated August 22, 1966~ MOTION CARRIED° SIDEWALK WAIVER - 2501 WEST LA PAIA4A AVENUE: Communication dated 3uly 26, 1966, from Roger Do Gregg, requesting waiver of sidewalk requirements at 2501 West La Palma Avenue, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with report from the City Engineer° On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that temporary waiver of sidewalk requirements be granted, subject to the provision that no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalk° Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° RECLASSIFICAIION NOo 65-66-51 ~- EXTENSION OF TIME~ Communication dated August 2~ 1966, from Thomas O. Speer~ representing Lusk Corporation, was suDmitted for 180 day extension of time to Reclassification No. 65-66-51 for compliance with certain conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-107. Also submitted and reviewed by the City Council was report from the Zoning Division, dated August 23, 1966, recommending that said extension be granted~ subject to the following conditions: That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Lincoln Avenue and Villareal Drive, abutting parcel 3~ for street lighting purposes° That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot, along Lincoln Avenue and Villareal Drive, abutting parcel 3, for tree planting purposes. 180 day extension of time was granted, subject to immediate compliance with the recommendations of the Zoning Division~ Development Services Department, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° 96a5 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held August 1~ 1966, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 865: Submitted by Aaron E. Swain, Sro and M. E. Swain, requesting permission to establish a restaurant and to permit the expansion of an existing motel with waiver of minimum lot width; R-A property located at 2029 South Harbor Boulevard. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC 66-28, the City Planning Commission granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. CONDIIIONAL USE PERMIT ND, 734: Submitted by Aaron E. Swain, Sr., on property described in Conditional Use Permit No. 865, to establish a motel~ and requesting permission for future establishment of restaurant and cocktail lounge, with waiver of minimum lot width. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC 66-29, the City Planning Commission terminated all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 734, for lack of compliance with conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 866: Submitted by Rosalie Metzger, John W. and Grace Eo Hein, requesting permission to establish a church; R-A zoned property located on the west side of Rio Vista Street, with the northerly boundary located south of the centerline of Lincoln Avenue. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC 66-30. VARIANCE NO, 1817: Submitted by Highland Properties, Incorporated requesting a waiver of minimum front setback on M-1 zoned property, located on the southwest side of Manchester Avenue~ the northerly boundary located south of the centerline of Katella Way. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC 66-31. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 648: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 66-42 terminated all proceedings in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 648, as requested by the applicant. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered Conditional Use Permit and Variance applications. PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGES: Excerpt from the minutes of City Planning Commission meeting held August 1, 1966, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Street naming committee be urged to consider the following recommendations: Rose Drive - Linda Vista Avenue - Jefferson Street - to be changed to Linda Vista Street, extending from the north side of the Riverside Freeway northerly to Imperial highway; and south of the Riverside Freeway to remain Tustin Avenue. Taylor - Lakeview Street - Lakeview Street to terminate at the Santa Ana River. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Council concurred with recommendations of the City Planning Commission and ordered a copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Street Naming Committee. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED STREET NA~E CHANGE, DOWLING AVENUE TO KRAEMER-GLASSELL STREET: Zoning Supervisor, Ronald Thompson, briefed excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission held August 15, 1966, pertaining to proposed street name change for street designated Dowling Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Kraemer Boulevard in the City of Placentia, and Glassell Street in the City of Orange, wherein it was determined that the Riverside Freeway was a natural separation for naming the street with two separate 9646 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 names~ and the Commission recommended that the Orange County Street Naming Committee be urged to consider the name Kraemer Boulevard for that portion of the street north of the Riverside Freeway~ and Glassell Street for that portion located south of the Freeway° Councilman Dutton moved that the City Council concur with said recommendations and order a copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Street Naming Committee. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nos. 66R-566 through and including 66R-572 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book° RESOLUTION NOt 66R-566: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL FACILITIES. (Sierra Downs, Inc.) RESOLUTION NOt 66R-567: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERIAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (H. K. Marvin) RESOLUTION NO, 66R-568: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Elizabeth A. Fick) RESOLUTION NO, 66R-569: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUND SERVICES. (N. T. & Dorothy Y. Ulvestad) RESOLUTION NOt 66R-570: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUND SERVICES. (Dorothy Y and N. To Ulvestad) RESOLUTION NO, 66R-571: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT EOR ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUND SERVICES. (Una D~ Strodthoff, Dorothy and N. T. Ulvestad) RESOLUTION NO, 66R-$72: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Lee O. and Florence L. Webb) Roi1 call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 66R-$66 through and including 66R-572 duly passed and adopted° RESOLUTION NO, 66R-573: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-573 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT DEED CONVEYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY. 9647 City Hall, Anaheim, Californi. a - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 P,M, Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILBEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Resolution No. 66R-573 duly passed and adopted° CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler~ the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel taxes on properties acquired by the City of Anaheim for Municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-536 recorded August 12, 1966, as document No. 8679, in book 8017, page 985, et seq.; and Resolution No. 66R-537, recorded August 12, 1966, as document No. 8681, book 8017, page 989~ et seq., official records of Orange County~ California. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton: (a) (b) Claim submitted by G. K. Hirschberg, Attorney for Robert Sall, for injuries purportedly resulting from a fall on City owned property, on or about August 3~ 1966. Claim filed by W. L. Hollowell (also known as Willis Hollowell) and Anite 3. Hollowell, for damages purportedly resulting from construction and maintenance of the Walnut Canyon Reservoir and its outlet causing flooding during the first three months of 1966. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-574: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-574 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO THE CI/Y A LICENSE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN AND USE A COMMUNICATION LINE ACROSS OR ALONG THE PREMISES OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY AT OR NEAR THE STATION OF ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY~ CALIFORNIA. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCII~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Resolution No. 66R-574 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-575: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 66R-575 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES. 9648 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Resolution No. 66R-575 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. Application before Public Utilities Commission - Greyhound Lines, Inc. - requesting a Statewide increase in intrastate passenger fares. Case Noo 8496 before Public Utilities Commission - investigation for the purpose of establishing a list for the year 1967 of railroad grade crossings of city streets or county roads most urgently in need of separation or reconstruction. co Financial & Operating Reports for the month of July, 1966. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO, ~314: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2314 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Subdivisions) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2314 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO, 2315: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2315 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (19) M-1 and P-L) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2315 duly passed and adopted. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: The following Alcohelic Beverage License Applications were presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for information: (a) (b) (c) Application submitted by Gerald Lewis Horn and Ethel Horn, for person to person transfer of On-Sale Beer Iicense at The Golden Key, 2625 West Lincoin Avenue (C-2 Zone) Application submitted by Robert D. Bolinder on behalf of Albertsons, Inc., for new Off-Sale Beer and Wine license at Albertsons market, 1670 West Katella Avenue (C-1 Zone) Application submitted by Marvin Thomas Braddock, et al, for person to person transfer of On-Sale General license (Bona Fide Eating Place), for Un Named business, 287 So. Euclid Street (C-1 Zone, Conditional Use Permit No. 829) 9649 City Hall~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 23~ 1966. 1:30 P.M. (d) (e) Application submitted by Carter Bowl, Inc., Carter S. Boehm, President, for person to person transfer of On-Sale General license at Carter Bowl, 1177 West Katella Avenue.(Variance No. 800) Application submitted by Bernard Arthur Hicks for person to person transfer of On-Sale Beer license at the Rocket Ro~om, 405 S. Brookhurst Street. (Allowed by C-1 zoning unider Orange County jurisdiction) No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 827: Submitted by Raymond B. Terry requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant with waiver of minimum required landscaped setback; C-1 property located at 711 West Katella Avenue. Public hearing before the City Council was held August 16, 1966, at which time the hearing was closed and Council determination continued to this date for visual inspection of the property and of similar restaurant operations. At the request of the Attorney representing the petitioners, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ that decision of the Council be continued to September 20, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION - EAGLE EYE ARMED GUARD SERVICE: Council consideration of private patrol application submitted by Rosemary W. Gravelle, was continued from the meeting of August 16, 1966~ at the request of the applicant; said application being to permit the conduction of Security Patrol and Guard Service, an existing business currently operated by Hubert A. Palmer, as Eagle Eye Armed Guard Service~ 918-B West Lincoln Avenue. At the request of the City Council~ the City Clerk briefed report from the Police Department dated 3une 8, 1966, and reported that certain requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to private patrol services have not been met. The applicant addressed the Council advising of her recent marriage~ changing her name to Rosemary Siple, and noted pending arrangements to provide necessary insurance, bond and state license. It was noted that the business would be operated under the former owner's state license until September lOth. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ issuance of said private patrol permit was approved, subject to compliance with all provisions of Chapter 4.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code prior to September 10, 1966. MOTION CARRIED. CONCESSION - CONVENTION CENTER - INFORMAL PROPOSALS: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, submitted and briefed supplementary staff report on reanalysis of informal proposals received for the concession contract at the Convention Center° Davis reported on the maior items further evaluated which were: 1. Salary of the manager. 2. Raw food cost percentages. 3o Method of inventory and accounting control. 4. Amount of equipment to be furnished. As result of the restudy, Mro Davis advised that the Staff Committee reaffirmed their original recommendation; that the proposal of Szabo Food Service Inc. be accepted and negotiation for contract be authorized. Mr. Davis further reported that even though the projection indicates a $4~000.00 net loss, this figure includes an amount of $60,000.00 for the amortization as one fifth payment of the total $300,000°00 estimated for equipment, which technically is a capital investment rather than an operating cost. 9650 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton recognizing that everyone is interested in obtaining the best'proposal for the city~ was of the opinion however, that the Szabo Food Service, Inc. proposal was changed since the original was submitted, and gave as an example the "no loss guarantee~' filed later; and was of the further opinion that Canteen Corporation should be given the opportunity to negotiate or alter their proposal. Mr. Davis stated that the guarantee against loss was subsequent to the original recommendations of the Staff Committee and was not taken into consideration, and that with either firm there were a number of points that would require negotiation as the contract is written. Mr. Geisler reported that the Committee recommendations were based on the original bids of both firms together with certain clarifications by both firms; he thereupon noted certain points that were discussed and further clarified° At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Schutte moved that the recommendations of the Staff Committee be accepted, and negotiations for contract with Szabo Food Service~ Inc. be authorized. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. Roll call vote was called for: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, $chutte and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared the motion carried° MUNICIPAL PARKING LOTS - OVERTIME PARKING: Mr. Davis reported on enforcement of overtime parking on city-owned parking lots, advising that the Chief of Police has been requested to maintain a record of all citations issued for violation of the two hour parking limit on the lots, and to enforce the time limit equally on all lots. It was suggested by Councilman Pebley that, if the city owned more parking lots than are necessary to accommodate downtown shoppers and customers~ the possibility of selling or leasing of two or three lots to provide employee parking for businesses in the area be considered; and he requested that this proposal be investigated° PROPOSED LEGISLATION - SoB. 3408: Copies of Legislative Bulletin from the National League of Cities, dated August 12th, 1966, relative to Senate Bill 3408, intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1966, was submitted for Council information, it being noted that the enactment of the proposed legislation would extend to all local governments, federal standards for employment of personnel. ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5765: Requesting establishment of an automobile salvage yard in the M-i~ Light Industrial district; property located approximately 260 feet west of Van Buren Street and 580 feet south of Orange- thorpe Avenue, 500 feet north of the Anaheim City boundary and the North East Industrial areao Pursuant to action taken by the City Council August 9, 1966, authorizing the filing of official protest to the Orange County Planning Commission in the matter of said use variance, Mro Davis reported that an appeal hearing on the matter has been scheduled September 7, 1966 at 9:30 A.M. REPORT - CITY ATTORNEY: The City Attorney was requested to prepare a brief description of duties and responsibilities of the office of the City Clerk° RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P~M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° (3:55 P.Mo) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order° 9651 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CI/Y ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn, ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. ASSISTANI CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease° INVOCATION: Reverend L. R. Lash of St. Pauls Presbyterian Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flago PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 864: Submitted by Walter R. and Judith A. Hemphill requesting permission to establish a child day nursery; R-1 property located at 951 North Gilbert Street (southwest corner Rainbow Avenue and Gilbert Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Noo PC 66-13 granted said conditional use permit, subject to the followin9 conditions: 1. That the curbs and 9utters shall be repaired along Rainbow Avenue, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. That Condition Nos. I and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zonin9 inspections° That the conversion of the existin9 structure shall conform to the Uniform Buildin9 Code as adopted by the City of Anaheim. That any air conditionin9 facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abuttin9 street(s). That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Noo lo That the proposed nursery shall be operated 5 days a week from 8 A.M. to 6 PoMo and a maximum number of 30 children shall be permitted, as stipulated by the petitioner° Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Frederick J. Ball~ and public hearing scheduled this date° Mrs Thompson noted the location of subject property, and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called attention to findings of the Commission in 9rantin9 subject conditional use permit, particularly with reference to the petitioner"s stipulation that the school would be operated five days per week from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.~ and would be limited to a total number of 30 children. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and Mr. Thompson further reported that both plot plan exhibits were intended by the Commission for inclusion as condition of approval. The City Clerk called attention to two letters and a petition of approval, the latter containing 19 signatures of area residents, and to a letter of opposition~ all received in her office August 22~ 19660 Mayor Krein asked if the applicants wished to address the City Council° Mrs. Walter Hemphill, 951 North Gilbert Street, addressed the Council advising that she would be the director of the proposed nursery school, and she gave a brief resume of her teaching experience. She displayed a copy of the plot plan~ noting extensive landscaping, provision for off-street parking, and the care which was taken to plan play-ground areas so as to minimize any disturbance to adjoining residents° 9652 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo Because the proposed operation would be a full time nursery school for children two and one half to five years old~ as opposed to a day care nursery~ the children would be on the premises by 8:00 A.Mo, which Mrs. Hemphill felt would not conflict with neighborhood children going to school between 8:30 and 9:00 A.M. The play-ground would not be used by all the youngsters at any one time except for a limited period after luncheon9 and 3 authorized adults would be supervising them during that time. Mrs. Hemphill further advised that no commercial uses were planned in conjunction with the school. She described existing uses in the area~ and showed a photograph of the Anaheim School District Maintenance and Storage buildings across Gilbert Street to the east. She was of the opinion that subject property was unique as it faces Gilbert Street~ and is not a part of the adjacent subdivision° In answer to Council questioning9 Mrs. Hemphill advised that the State of California allows one child for each 75 square feet of space~ or up to 300 children~ based on the area available at this location; however they definitely plan on a maximum number of 30. She displayed additional photographs to illustrate improvements which they have made to the property. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Frederick 3. Ball~ 2420 Rainbow Avenue~ advised that he had viewed other nursery schools in the city and found them to be bordered by~ or surrounded by commercial enterprises; and he felt the proposed school would establish a precedent for commercial uses in the single-family re- sidential area. He noted that 30 children was a large group on the play- ground~ even though the area was set back from adjoining residences~ and he questioned whether the nursery school would accept any handicaped children. Mrs. Robert Hudson~ i001 Irene Placer advised that she also viewed several Anaheim nursery schools and had spoken to many residents of homes close to these schools~ finding that the greatest complaint was to the noise emanating from the schools. Other complaints included devaluation of residential properties9 chain-link fencing which exposed play-ground areas to view~ and hazards caused by children being left-off and picked-up by their parents. In conclusion~ she was of the opinion that the requested nursery school was a business encroachment into a residential area. Mr. Edgar Brown, 1015 Irene Place~ advised that the High School property to the east~ and the industrial land between La Palma Avenue and the Santa Aha Freeway~ were buffered by streets and homes from the majority of properties in the area; however the parcel in question was immediately adjacent to residences, and in his opinion~ the value of their homes would be severely lowered. He noted that owners of approximately 33 homes in the neighborhood have made substantial additions to their homes. Mro 3ames Do Ferguson~ 1019 Irene Place~ presented a petition of opposition containing approximately 99 signatures, which he stated represented two thirds of the homes~ and included all those homes immediately adjoining subject property° In rebuttal~ Mrs° Hemphill advised that no handicapped children would be attending the school~ and she was of the opinion that if any of those who were protesting the use had requested to see their plans for the property~ they would have found nothing detrimental, Mrs~ Hemphill further advised that they plan to reside in the home on the separate lot at the southeast corner of subject property~ and to construct a garage on subject parcel. She felt that their well planned nursery school would be an asset to the neighborhood. Mrs. Frederick 3~ Ball, 2420 kalnbow Avenue~ questioned provisions made for off-street parking on subject property~ Mr. Ronald Thompson reported that plans called for five off-street parking spaces. 9653 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINLr[ES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Walter Hemhill addressed the Council calling attention to existing uses on Gilbert Street, such as major commercial shopping~ service stations, restaurant, golf course, a church, schools, agricultural, electrical substation, apartment houses, homes with 6,000 square foot lots~ and at Crescent Avenue, a sign indicating a 200 bed convalescent hospital and apartment complex to be constructed. He felt that the City Planning Commission had carefully considered all facts involved before determining to approve subject conditional use permit. Mr. Herman Jones, 1014 Irene Place, addressed the Council in opposition~ noting that no one had spoken in favor, with the exception of the applicants. Mr. Floyd E. McClellan, 2403 Greenbrier Avenue, read excerpts from the Anaheim Bulletin concerning subject conditional use permit. He stated that the area was entirely single-family residential, and he requested denial of the permit. Mayor Krein announced that sufficient evidence from those present had been received, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-576: Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the proposed use would be an encroachment into a residential area, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 66R-576 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 864. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-576 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (7:55 AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present~ PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT - WAYNE B. REEDSTRUM: Mr. Reedstrum addressed the Council relative to Section 1.04~380 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and Section 502 of the Anaheim Charter~ advisin9 that in his opinion, there was a lack of sufficient justification to continue in existance Section 1.04.380 of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ and that said continuance may be illegal as it was his further opinion, it may be in direct conflict with Section 502 of the Anaheim Charter° Mr. Reedstrum stated that original Ordinance No. 1512 and amendments thereto providing for payment of out-of-pocket expenses to City Planning Commission members was 3ustified~ as nowhere in the Charter is such a provision covering City Planning Commission expenses; however, the inclusion of Councilmen and Mayor by Ordinance No. 1974 could not be justified (said section was read in full)o Reference was made to Section 301 of the Charter, and Mr. Reedstrum was of the opinion that Charter Section 502 superseded Anaheim Municipal Code Section No. 1.04.380. He advised that each Councilman upon assuming the duties of Councilman was aware of the compensation provided as a General Law City, and with the approval by the voter by the City Charter, the Council compensation was established as $400 per month for each Councilman and $800 per month for the Councilman designated Mayor. The next highest cities are the Cities of Fullerton and Garden Grove~ which compensation is $300 per month° 9654 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 23, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Reference was made to the City Budget as it pertains to the City Council "Other Charges" which Mr. Reedstrum felt included monies paid Under Section 1.04.380o Comparison of City of Riverside and Anaheim Charters relative to compensation was made~ and Mr. Reedstrum read an article appearing in the Riverside paper, wherein a violation of the Charter was charged and a Superior Court Judge ruled that a specific amount was being paid over and above what was specified in the Charter, and was in fact in violation of the Riverside Charter. In conclusion, Mr. Reedstrum requested that Section No. 1.04.380 be revised eliminating any reference to the Council and Mayor, and that the Budget be modified accordingly and an order issued that these expense checks be stopped. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 8:48 P.M. City Clerk Hall. Anaheim, California ~- COU~CIL~INU/ES - Auqust 30th~_!966, 1:30 P.M____~ The Citv Councl] of the City of' Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Du~ton~ PeOley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None, PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Ge~sler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Wi]l~ams. CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G, Orsborn, ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENI SERVICES DIRFCIOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson, PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald GrudzznsK1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES: Gordon Hoyt, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watrs~ Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. ~N/RODUCTiON: At ~nvitatlon of Mayor Krein~ Personnel Safety and Training Coordinator Thomas Tyre, introduced a group of new City' Employees attending the meeting as part of their orientation program~ PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were proclaimed by Mayor Krein: "Stay in SchooZ Week~' ~ September 11 through 17., 1966. "Hungarian Freedom Fighters Day" ~ October 23, 1966. Said proclamations were ratified by the City Council. ,M~NU/ES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetlng held August 16~ 1966~ were appzoved~ on motion by Counci].an Peblev, ~econded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. ' ' WAIVER OF READING ~ ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion, MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.