Loading...
1966/10/049712 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoM. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein. COUNCILMEN: Chandler. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Furman Roberts. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. MINIYI~ES: Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting held September 27 was deferred to the next meeting. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolution, and that consent to the waiver of reading lis hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the moti. on. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Krein proclaimed October 8 and 9, ]966, as "Fall Art Fest~val Days". Mayor Krein proclaimed October 28 and 29, 1966, as "Hallowe'en Memories Days". Said proclamations were ratified by the City Council. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $129,242.05 in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 826: Submitted by Chiell L. Pharris requesting permis- sion for sand and gravel excavation and removal to a depth of 75 feet; R-A property located at 6722 Miller Street. Public hearing was held July 5, 1966, and continued to July 19, 1966. Council decision was continued from the meetings of July 26 and August 30 to this date. Mayor Krein noted that the public hearing was closed and unless requested by a Councilman, no additional evidence or testimony would be received. Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that one pit excavated at a depth of 75 feet would be preferable to two areas excavated to a depth of 40 feet, and thereupon offered resolution granting permission to excavate subject property to a depth of 75 feet. Councilman Pebley noted that the Engineers for the Orange County Water District and the Engineer representing the applicant differ in their opinion as to the depth of the pit, and thereupon asked the representative of the City Planning Commission if their recommendations were based on the advise of the Orange County Water District Engineer. Mr. Ronald Thompson replied that the City Planning Commission approved the conditional use permit for a net depth of 53 feet, based on the evidence submitted at the meeting including the recommendations of the City Public Utilities Director. Councilman Dutton asked the Public Utilities Director Gordon Hoyt, if there has been any evidence that the water has been contaminated as result of water in existing excavation pits. Mr. Hoyt replied that there have been no such cases in Orange County to his personal knowledge; however, there have been cases such as in the Los Angeles area where chemical contaminant8 have been placed in pits which have contaminated the underground water basin for ~ome period of time. 9713 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo In answer to further Council inquiry Mr. Hoyt explained his reasons for not opposing a net depth of 53 feet; one being that the deeper the pit, the moreintimately it becomes in contact with the underground basin, and another reason, the problem of policing the area after termination of the mining operation. Councilman Dutton noted in the Loren Blakeley report that once the subject pit is excavated to a depth of 75 feet the bank between this pit and the Crill Pit, could be removed and incorporated into the Crill settling basin operation. Councilman Dutton asked Mr; Hoyt if this possibility had been explored. Mr. Hoyt advised that to his knowledge, Mr. Crooke, of the Orange County Water District, has expressed no interest in sucha proposal; primarily because of the difficulty of preparing it for water spreading operations, and the difficulty of maintaining the side slopes. Additional discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. Hoyt. The City Council noted that the statements made by the Engineers representing both sides of the issue were conflicting, and also noted the recommendations of the City Director of Public Utilities and the City Planning Commission. At the conclusion of the discussion, roll call vote was called for on the resolution granting permission to excavate the pit to a depth of 75 feet. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler Said resolution failed to carry. RESOLUTION NO° 66R-637: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-637 for adoption sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission in grant- ing Conditional Use Permit No. 826, to permit excavation to a maximum depth of 175 feet above sea level (53 feet), subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Miller Street for the northerly 965 feet only, for street lighting purposes, and shall be complied with prior to the time that the building permit is issued or within the period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 2. That Reclassification No. 61-62-69 now pending on subject property shall be completed within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 3. That the existing excavation shall be filled to the 175-foot datum (53 feet) with clean sand, the quality of which shall be approved by the City of Anaheim. 4. That a berm planted with approved perennial and screen lanscaping shall be installed along the north, west and south boundaries as indicated on Exhibit "A"; provided however that the landscaped berm shall be inter-_ rupted and setback at the entrance to adequately screen from view the sand pit operations. 5. That a written agreement shall be entered into by the property owners for the installation of irrigation facilities and maintenance of landscaping satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, and further, agreeing that if the landscaping is not maintained in a satisfactory manner, the City may maintain said landscaping and charge the cost of said maintenance to the property owner. The agreement executed by the property owner shall be recorded and run with the land and be binding on all successor heirs and assigns. 6. That Conditions Nos. 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a peri. od of 90 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 826. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-637 duly passed and adopted. 9714 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo Mr. Stanley Hur~itz, Attorney representing the applicant, requested the public hearing be reopened, in view of the fact that Mr. Hoyt had presented evidence that they iha~ not ~had~a~ Opportunity to rebut, i ; MayOr Kcein explained that the public hearing was closed; however, any Councilman, by right, may ask for an opinion from anyone. As to reopening the public hearing, this would be a matter for Council determination. Mr.~ Hurwitz Advised t~at ~the'difference between excavation to 53 feet and 75 feet would~ean a dDBference in revenue of approximately $400,000. to his client, andagain requested ~ke public hearing be reopened to receive additional testimony from Mr. Blakeley. Councilman Dutt°n move~ that the request be denied, and the public hearing not be reopened. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. To this motion, Councilman Schutte voted "No". MOTION CARRIED° PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NOo 1822: Submitted by W. H. Jewett requesting waivers of the following: (1) Maximum free-standing sign area,(2) Maximum number of free-standing signs and (3) Minimum distance between free-standing signs; M-1 and P-L zoned property located at the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission denied Variance No. 1822, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-63. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Mr. Bill Winterberg, of PBR Company, Authorized Agent, and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Slide photo- graphs were projected on the east wall of the Council Chamber illustrating that subject property with an existing free-standing sign at the corner oriented in a northwesterly direction, and another free-standing s~aller sign on the Katella Avenue frontage, located near the east boundary of subject property. Mr. Thompson called attention to findings of the City Planning Commission in denying subject application, and advised that a new service station located at the corner of Katella Avenue and Brookhurst Street, utilized one free-standing sign at the corner, in compliance with the City Sign Ordinance, said sign being similar than the exi~ting~sign on Sdbject property, but turned 90 degrees so as to be diagonally oriented to two-way traffic on both streets. Mayor Krein asked if a'representative of the petitioners wished to address the Council. Mr. Bill Winterberg, Agent for the petitioners, advised that the service station on subject property was in a unique position, due to the unusually heavy traffic count at certain times; that the station site was being remodeled to meet service station minimum site development standards, and it was proposed to plade~one~new sign on each ~f the two canopie~ over the relocated pump islands along the Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard frontages, replacing the two existing signs, which would be eliminated. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council for or against subject variance, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-638: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-638 for adoption, granting said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That reasonable landscaping shall be provided on subject property in accordance with adopted Service Station Minimum Site Development Standards, as indicated on the plans, prior to final building inspection. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 9715 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO° 1822. Roll call vote: AYES: CO~JNCIIiMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-638 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-15 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 878: Submitted by Bill Asawa requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 and permission to establish a motorcycle sales and service agency; property located at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Stonybrook Drive (720 South Beach Boulevard). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-65, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Beach Boulevard and Stonybrook Drive, for tree planting purposes. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Stonybrook Drive, for street lighting purposes. 3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 4. That the conversion of the existing structure shall conform to the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City of Anaheim, prior to final building and zoning inspections. 5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from 'view from abutting streets, and the sound buffered from adjacent residential homes, prior to final building and zoning inspections. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-66, the City Planning Commission granted said conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: That this Condltional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 66-67-15. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. ! and 2, provided however, that the sign located in the northerly driveway approach shall be removed as stipulated by the petitione~ The City Council on August 2, 1966, granted permission for temporary sales and service of motorcycles for a period of 60 days on subject property, at the applicants risk, conditioned upon the filing of necessary zoning applications. The City Clerk read communications from owners of property in the immediate area, Eldon D. Skolil, MoDo, and James ~. Snow, of Snow House Movers, dated September 26 and October 3, 1966 respectively, pro- testing noise, dust, hazardous conditions which have come about as result of the motorcycles being ridden into the residential area to the east, and further protesting the motorcycle race track on the easterly portion of subject property. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning ~in the immediate area, briefing the history of zoning actions on subject property. Slide photographs were projected on the east wall of the Council Chamber, showing the front of the business with the motorcycles on display, 9716 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo the rear of the building showing the present service area, and the easterly portion of the property. Relative to complaints concerning a race track. Mr. Thompson advised that the reclassification and variance were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. subject to development in accordance with plans presented; said plans did not include any racing area. Councilman Dutton reported that he visually inspected the property, and noticed the track which was graded, marked and being used. Mayor Krein asked if the applicant or his representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. Robert Zady, owner of the business, advised that the track on the rear of the property had been planned for use in conjunction with the Anaheim Union High School District Driver's Education Program; that the track was too small to be used for racing; that if the City Council approved, they intended to install cyclone fence surrounding said track. In answer to Council questioning Mr~ Zady briefed plans to pave the track area on the east side of the property, and advised that it would be necessary to expand the existing building in the future, which would eliminate the track. Mr. Zady further advised of the driver's safety program sponsored by the manufacturers of the motorcycles, in conjunction with which he had worked with the High School. District to further the driver education pro- gram for motorcycles. He indicated his willingness to eliminate use of the track from subject property, should the Council so desire. Discussion was held by the City Council and the petitiOner re- lative to display of motorcycles in front of the building, and proposed elimination of the track on the easterly portion of the property. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mr. Dean Varner, of 730 South Beach Boulevard, advised of problems which had occured with motorcycles coming into the residential area, and that he would be required to move should the problem continue. He noted that he had no objections to the actual business if conducted in a quiet manner. Mr. Howard Whipple, Manager of the Beach-Ball Apartments, 730 South Beach Boulevard, agreed with Mr. Varner having no objections to the business and advised that there had been some complaints from his tenants about the noise, dust and dirt, and the vehicles coming into the residential area and on the sidewalks. 'resting the motorcycles after repair was now their main objection creating a dangerous situation, especially for the children. Mr. Zady was of the opinion that some of the traffic into the residential area had been due to the fact that no driveway existed on the south side of subject property, and he outlined plans to construct the 30-foot drive to eliminate that problem~ Mrs. Howard Whipple addressed the Council and submitted a petition of protest to the race track signed by 49 residents of the apartment de- velopment. Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-639: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-639 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND 9717 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-15 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-639 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-640: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-640 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 878, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and further subject to the following conditions: 1. Amendment of the legal description of subject property to include only that portion hereof presently projected for motorcycle sales and service, excluding therefrom the unpaved area to the east projected for Driver's Education or any other use such as testing or racing. 2. All storage of vehicles, other than for display sale purposes, shall be inside a building or behind a 6-foot masonry wall. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 8780 Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-640 duly passed and adopted~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-16: Initiated by the City Planning Commissi~on proposing a change of zone from R-1 to C-l; property located at 456 and 460 Mariposa Place. It was noted that subject property had been proposed as the location of the City' Fire Station, and was currently being used for two single family residences fronting on Mariposa Place, as did adjacent residences to the south. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-67, recommended approval, of subject application for C-O, Commercial-Office zoning, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 46 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Euclid Street, for street widening purposes, including a 15 foot radius corner return. 2. That the vehicular access rights, to Mariposa Place shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Westmont Drive and Mariposa Place, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot, along Westmont Drive and Mariposa Place, for tree planting purposes. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That a solid six (6) foot masonry wall be constructed to the rear of a 3-foot fully landscaped setback along the west property line; stepped dow~ go 30 ~nches at the intersection of Westmont Drive and Mariposa Place. 7. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets and all sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 9718 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo 8. That in the event lights are installed in the parking area, the light standards shall not exceed six (6) feet in height, and the lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residential properties. 9. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 10. That Condition Nos. 5, 6, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection~ 11. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of an appropriate variance when a use is established for the property. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, being bounded by Euclid Street on the east, Crescent Avenue on the north, and Mariposa Place on the west, and called attention to existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, and noted the slide photographs of subject property projected on the east wall of the Council Chamber. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed reclassification. Mr. Garth Murphy, 441 North Mariposa Place, requested clarifica- tion of the intended uses of subject properties, and advised that Mariposa Place is a cul-de-sac street, and they object to any use which would in- crease traffic in the area. He noted that the location of the nearest existing fire station is on the other side of the Santa Ana Freeway. Councilman Dutton called attention to the Planning Commission's approval of subject petitions, being subject to review of a future variance for any specific use. He advised that the proposed new fire station would be located on Loara Street, near North Street. Mrs. George Walter, 459 Mariposa Place, advised she was not opposed to C-0 zoning, however she did object to "spot" zoning in t~e area without a definite plan. She noted difficulties in refinancing homes in the neighborhood, due to the close proximity of existing commercial uses in the area, and she called attention to deed restrictions on the homes within Tract No. 1591, which prohibit any commercial use without the written consent of two-thirds of the property owners. Mr. Murphy again addressed the Council, calling attention to the untidy appearance of the two lots in question. Mrs. Evelyn Puckett, 2472 Glencrest, owner of adjacent properties at 442, 446 and 450 Mariposa Place, advised of their efforts to maintain their property in the best possible condition, and objected to the manner in which subject properties were maintained. Attention was called to the existing sign on a fence on the Euclid Street boundary of one of subject lots, advertising a clothing business, and Mrs. Puckett objected to the sign in a residential area. Mr. Harold Campbell, 460 Linden Place, noted that his home was within 300 feet of subject property, and he expressed concern that any commercial zoning thereof would result in a potential refinancing problem for his property~ Regarding deed restrictions on the 'property, Mr. Campbell was of the opinion that prospective purchasers should be advised of the existing res- trictions. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-641: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-641 for adoption, authorizing preparation, of necessary ordinance changing the zone to C-0, as recommended, subject to conditions recommended by the City Planning Cormnission. Refer to Resolution Book. 9719 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF %ME CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THA~I TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67.-16 C-0) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIIJ~_EN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-641 duly passed and adopted. SIGN REq'UEST - 300 NORIM ANAHEIM BOULEVARD: Application for sign permit, submitted by PBR Company, on behalf of Phillips Petroleum Company, for permission to replace an existing projecting sign with a new sign ad- vertising the name of the new owners, servic, e station located at 300 North Anaheim Boulevard (3 foot projection), was reviewed by the City Council together with reports from the Building and Zoning Divisions of the Development Services Department.. On the recommendations of the Development Services Department, Councilman Dutton moved that said sign permit be granted, provided that the lowest portion of the sign be a minimum of ten feet above the public right-of-way. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held September 12, 1966, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO~ 1821: Submitted by W. J. Troutman and J. R. Scholz requesting waivers of the following: (1) Maximum permitted number of free-standing signs, (2) Minimum distance between free-standing signs, (3) Maximum free-standing sign area, and (4) Location of free-standing sign; property located at 558 South Anaheim Boulevard (northeast corner of Water Street and Anaheim Boulevard). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-74, granted said variance for waivers (1) and (2), subject to conditions, and denied the balance of said request. VARIANCE NOo 1826: Submitted by Gulf Oil Corporation, requesting waivers of the following: (l) Free-standing sign location, and (2) Maximum sign height; C-2 property located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Helena Street. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-75, the City Planning Commission granted item (l), for location of sign, subject to Conditions, and denied item (2) for waiver of maximum sign height. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 880: Submitted by Leo Freedman requesting permission to establish offices for the California Highway Patrol; R-A zoned property located on the south side of Freedman Way, the westerly boundary of subject property located east of the centerline of Harbor Boulevard. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-68. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 661 (Conditional. Use Permit No. 880): City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-69, terminated all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 661, for a restaurant with cocktail lounge, on approximately the same property described in Conditional Use Permit No. 880. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 881: Submitted by Sam Domino requesting per- mission to estab]ish a motel; R-A zoned property located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, the southerly boundary thereof being north of the centerline of Katella Avenue. 9'720 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-70. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 882: Submitted by Skeoch Development Corporation requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant; C-1 property located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Gilbert Street. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-71. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 760 (Conditional Use Permit No. 882): Pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-72, the City Planning Commission terminated Conditional Use Permit No. 760, to permit establishment of a service station on property described in Conditional Use Permit No. 882. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 883: Submitted by Fredricks Development Corpora- tion requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant; C-1 property located at 2015 East Ball Road. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-73. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permit and variance applications. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 544 (Conditional Use Permit No. 874): Property located at the southeast corner of Harbor BoUlevard and Manchester Street, and approved for an 82-unit motel in conjunction with a family restaurant. The Zoning Division recommended termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 544, which was superseded by Conditional Use Permit No. 874 approving the establishment of an indoor theater and restaurant on subject property. RESOLUTION NO° 66R-642: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-642 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 544, AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NOo 64R-705 NULL AND VOIDo Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-642 duly passed and adopted. ~ENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO~ 6315: Developer, Empire Savings and Loan Association; tract located at the northeast corner of Catalina Avenue and Aladdin Street, and contains one R-3 lot. Excerpt from the Minu~es of the City Planning COmmission meeting held September 28, 1966, noting the Commission's approval of subject tentative map, was read by the City Clerk. Mr. Thompson reported that subject property was a portion of a 30 acre parcel (Tract No. 5958), that the westerly 20 acres thereof had been developed, and the developers did not wish to complete development on the balance at the present time; therefor subject tentative tract would revert the property' to acreage and allow the developers to be relieved of their bond; a subsequent tentative map or conditional use permit to be applied for when development was eminent. 9721 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo Councilman Pebley moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6315, be approved as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Councilman Dutcon seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (3:23 PoMo) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilmen Schutte and Chandler. CHANGE ORDERS - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, the following change orders were authorized, on motion by Councilman Peb]ey, seconded by Councilman Dutton: CHANGE ORDER NOs i PROJECT NOo 303-A: Change Order No. 1, Project No. 303-A, consisting of extra work and materials in the amount of $3,351.88. CHANGE ORDER NOo 1 JOB NOo 5019: Change Order No. 1, Job No. 5019, consisting of extra work and materials in the amount of $6,663.01. CHANGE ORDER NOo i- JOB NO° 971: Change Order No. 1, Job No. 971, consisting of extra work and materials in the amount of $665.34. MOTION CARRIED~ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - FINAL ACCEPTANCE: Upon receipt of certifications from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-643 and 66R-644 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-643 - JOB NOo 971: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE GEORGE HANSEN COMMUNITY PARKSITE, AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CRESCENT AVENUE AND VENTURA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO,, 971. (Edward B. Silvery, dba Silvery Construction Co.) RESOLUTION NOo 66R-644 PROJECT NO° 110 UNIT 3: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI~CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTAIION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OE ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMEN'I, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST STREET AND LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NOo 110, UNIT 3. (Steiny & Mitchel, Inc.) Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein None Schutte Chandler The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-643 and 66R-644 duly passed and adopted. (Councilman Schutte entered the meeting, 3:45 PoMo) SALE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY: Brief discussion was held concerning the method to be employed in the sale of city owned property located at the southwest corner of Euclid Street and Westmomt Avenue. It was the concensus of City Council opinion that sale should be by negotiation, rather than at public bid, and the City Manager was authorized to proceed accordingly. 9722 City Hali~ Anaheim~ California - COUNC~ MiNUTES - October 4~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: On mction by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the %nsurance Agent: a. Claim submitted by Farmers Insurance Group, Don Marthens, Agent, on behalf of Norma Terkelson, for damages purportedly resulting from city vehicle striking a parked car, on or about August 25, 1966. b. Claim filed by Alva Svoboda or Svoboda Manufacturing Company, for damages purportedly resulting from power failure on or about September 1, 1966. MOTION CARRIED° ~EQUEST FRIENDS OF THE ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY: Communication dated September 15, 1966, from Elizabeth J. Schultz, Chairman, Friends of the Anaheim Public Library, was submitted expressing the hope that, at such time as the Anaheim Union Water Company may be dissolve, certain historic records and documents may be assigned to the special room at the Central Library which is set aside for housing and preserving historic materials. The City Council indicated their willingness to assist in any way possible to acquire said records for storage and display at the Central Library. DISASTER PLAN - CiTY OF ANAHEIM: in accordance with Ordinance No. 2285, City of Anaheim Disaster Plan was accepted by the City Council as a supplement to said ordinance, on motion by Councilmam Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION N0o 66R-645: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-645 for adoptS.on. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AN ACTUARIAl, SURVEY TO BE MADE RELATiNG TO RETIREMENT OF CITY EMPLOYEES° Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-64.5 duly passed and adopted° CORRESPONDENCE: %he following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton" Before Public Utilities Commission - Application of Orange Coast Sightseeing Company - to points in Long Beach, Long Beach-Los Angeles Harbor Area & Marineland. The City Manager noted that the proposed service would originate at various points in Orange County, and will be of benefit to the City of Anaheim, and saggested said application be supported. The City Council indicated approval of the City Manager's suggestion and Resolution in support of the type of service proposed was ordered prepared for Council consideration at a later date. C o City of Brea Resolution No. 1289 ~ recommending Orange County Board of Supervisors to submit the Orange County Flood Control District bond issue to the vote of the people at the earliest possible date. Minutes - Anaheim Parks~and Reereation Commission ~ meeting of September 8, 1966. d. Financial & Operating Reports for the Month of August, 1966. MOTION CARRIEDo 9723 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 4, 1966~ 1:30 PoM. DEED OF EASEMENT - RESOLUTION NOo 66R-646: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-646 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Union Oil Company of California) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-646 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOo 2324: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2324 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66-67-7 C-l) JOB NOo 988 - ANAHEIM STADIUM SCOREBOARD: The City Council, on September 13, 1966, considered proposed acceptance of scoreboard construction at Anaheim Stadium, and tabled final acceptance of Job No. 988 to this date. Mr. Murdoch reported that Stadium Director Tom Liegler would be able to make detailed recommendation to the City Council at the next regular meeting pertaining to final acceptance of the scoreboard construction. Further Council consideration relative to the foregoing issue was deferred to October 11, 1966. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, transfer of funds in the amount of $2,500.00, was authorized, from the Council Con- tingency Account for the City's Record Retention and Destruction Program, Account No. 209-110, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED~ RESOLUTION NOs 66R-647: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-647 for adoption. ADJOURNMENT: Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXPRESSING APPROVAL OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY ISSUED BY THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION TO AIR CALIFORNIA, INC0 the motion. ADJOURNED: Roil call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-647 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded MOTION CARRIED° 4:00 PoM~ SIGNED City Clerk