1966/11/292825
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 28, 2:00 P.M.
Mayor Krein asked if any Council member had any further
questions, and called for a roll call vote on the foregoing motion:
Councilman Dutton: Aye.
Councilman Pebley: Aye. That with their pledge of cooperation
as to future shows~ he felt Melodyland should be allowed to continue
its Present booking, as if there is to be any damage to the City, it
has already been effected.
Councilman Schutte: Aye. On the assurance of the City Attorney
that the show would not run beyond December 25th, 1966.
Councilman Chandler: Aye.
Councilman Krein: Aye. He felt that Melodyland, by their
statement, has indicated that they are willing to cooperate with the
City. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED°
ADJOURNED: 2:30 P.M.
SIGNED
Deputy City Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler°
CITY MANAGER: Keith Ao Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrenso
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease.
ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson.
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson.
PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski.
PUBLIC UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon Hoyt.
FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden°
Mayor Krein called the meeting to order.
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT: Resolution in support of recreation development in
the area of Mineral King, California, proposed by Mr. Walt Disney, was
read in full~
Councilman Krein offered said resolution of support for
adoption by the City Council.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
Mayor Krein declared said resolution duly passed and adopted.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meeting held November 15, 1966,
were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman
Pebley. MOTION CARRIED°
9826
City Hall, Anaheim, California - C~UNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND ~RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that
consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen,
unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council-
man for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley
seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED°
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $107,049o54, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANC~ NO. 1800 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-120):
Submitted by Coalson C. Morris requesting a waiver of the minimum required
site area and minimum side yard setback for development of professional
office building to be located on the west side of East Street between
Sycamore and Wilhelmina Streets (609 North East Street; Reclassification
No. 65-66-120 - C-O zone pending).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-8
denied Variance Noo 1800o
Public hearing was continued from the meetings of August 16
and November 15, 1966, for submission of development plans°
Due to a possible conflict of interest, Mayor Krein withdrew
from the discussion and action on this issue, and Mayor Pro Tem Pebley
assumed chairmanship of the meeting.
Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson reported that the Development
Services Staff contacted the petitioner, who indicated his intent to submit
a letter requesting permission to withdraw Variance No. 1800.
Councilman Dutton moved that said public hearing be continued
to December 13, 1966, pending receipt of letter from the applicant.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Later in the meetihg, the petitioner was present and he.
indicated his intent to proceed with plans at a later date.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
the foregoing motion to continue subject variance was rescinded° MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Dutton moved that public hearing on Variance No.
1800 be continued to May 23, 1967, 1:30 P.Mo Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. To this motion Councilman Krein abstained from voting.
MOTION CARRIED°
Mayor Krein resumed chairmanship of the meeting.
REQUEST - INDEPENDENT BANK OF ANAHEIM: Request of Independent Bank of Anaheim,
continued from the meeting of November 15, 1966, was deferred Until later
in the meeting.
DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT: Application filed by J. W. White Jr., on behalf
of Fredricks Development Corporation, for dinner dancing place permit at
The Golden Pheasant Restaurant, 1168 South State College Boulevard, was
submitted and granted, subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion
by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Duttono MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting held November 7, 1966, pertaining to the following
applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 894: Submitted by Alwyn S. and Lucille G.. Jewell,
c/o Heritage Construction Corporation, requesting permission to establish
a twelve story (151 foot) office building with waiver of minimum required
parking spaces; R-A zoned property located at 415 West Katella Avenue.
9827
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966~ 1:30 PoMo
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Noo PC66-138
granted said Conditional use permit, subject to conditions=
VARIANCE NOo 1838: Submitted by Southland Machinery Company requesting
permission to establish outdoor display of industrial equipment, and
waiver of required masonry wall (chain link fence proposed), in conjunction
with industrial building under construction; M-1 zoned property located at
1822 South Lewis Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution PC66-140
granted said variance, the waiver of required masonry wall being granted
only along the northerly boundary of subject property for the westerly
209~43 feet, subject to conditions~
VARIANCE NO~ 1047: City Planning Commission Resolution NOo PC66-148,
amending Resolution Noo 90, Series 1958-59, approving said variance,
to add the establishment of a flower shop as a permitted use thereto$
R-A zoned property located at the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard
and Wilken Way~
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 702: The City Planning Commission granted
request of First Christian Church of Anaheim for six months extension
of time for completion of conditions, to expire May 18, 1967; property
located west of the southwest corner of Harbor Boulevard and South
Street~
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and
no further action taken on the above numbered Conditional Use Permit and
Variance applications~
VARIANCE NOo 1837: Submitted by Gloria Ann Maddock requesting permission
to establish a dance studio in a garage; R-1 property located at 3108
West Teranimar Drive°
Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions,
pursuant to Resolution Nos PC66-139o
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was
requested by Councilman Dutton, and the City Clerk was instructed to
schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: O6 motion by Councilman Dutton.
seconded by Councilman Pebley, public hearings were scheduled January
17, 1967, 1:30 P~Mo, to consider the following proposed amendments to
Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code:
a~ City Planning Commission Resolution No~ PC66-146, recommending
amendment to Title 18 by the addition of Chapter 18o13, R-H, 10,000
Residential~lHillside Low Density Single.-Family Zone.
bo City Planning Commission Resolution Noo PC66~146-A, recommending
amendment to Title 18 by the addition of Chapter 18~39 C-H, Commercial
Hillside, Zone~
co City Planning Commission Resolution Noo PC66~147, recommending
amendment to Title 18, Chapter 18~04 General Provisions - Section
18~04~020(6) Use ~ to include the R-H, 10,000 Residential Hillside, Zone°
MOTION CARRIED°
REQUEST, TEMPORARY STRUCTURE ~ RETAIL SALES: Communication dated November
22, 1966, was submitted from K. Michael Kinses and Go T. Barnett, re-
questing permission to erect a l0 foot by 20 foot temporary structure
for temporary use on a month to month basis :for retail cut flowers;
C-1 property located at the southwest corner of Euclid Street and Lincoln
Avenue.
Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson briefed report from the
Zoning Division dated November 29, 1966, advising that no plans for
9828
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 28, 1966, 2:00 PoMo
the proposed structure had been submitted.
Councilman Pebley was of the opinion that such request was of
a permanent nature, not a seasonal business~
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
the foregoing request was denied. MOTION CARRIED°
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-746 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WAGE SCALE: Councilman
Schutte offered Resolution No~ 66R-746 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF ~HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND
DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT, OR
TYPE OF WORKMAN, OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM°
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 66R-746 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-747 - AWARD OF ~ORK ORDER NOo 1066: In accordance with
recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution
No. 66R-747 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A
SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER
FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT
AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER,
AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE VERMONT STREET NURSERY DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENT, AT
1426 EAST VERMONT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1066.
(R. J. Noble Company - $5,137.85)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIIaXiEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution NOo 66R-747 duly passed and adopted~
RESOLUTION NOo 66R-748 - AWARD OF JOB NOo 478B: On the recommendations of the
City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-748 for
adoption o
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING
ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT:
THE IMPROVEMENT OF JEFFERSON STREET, FROM APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF
LA PALMA AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 628 FEET SOUTH OF LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 478B. (R. J. Noble Company - $20,704.10)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 66R-748 duly passed and adopted.
9829
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 2~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-749 - JOB NOo 1070: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution
No. 66R-749 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION
AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING
IRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF 'SUNKIST STREET
AND LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 1070; APPROVING THE
DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THERMDFo (Bids to be opened December 22, 1966,
2:00 P.Mo)
Roi1 call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-749 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-750 - JOB NOo 955: Upon receipt of certification from the
Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution NOo 66R-750
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY
ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR,
SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORATION
INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK
NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT,
TO WIT; THE ZEYN-NORTH STREET STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, 3OB NO° 955. (Scott Brothers Construction Inc.)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-750 duly passed and adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos° 66R-751 and
66R-752 for adoption~
Refer to Resolution Book°
RESOLUTION NOo 66R-751: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSES. (Homer C. and Maude Guttridge)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-752: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO .THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY'FOR AN EASEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF POLES AND ELECTRICAL POWER LINES° (Fredricks Development
Corporation)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos, 66R-751 and 66R-752 duly
passed and adopted.
9830
City Hall, Anaheim, California - C9UNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
REQUEST - INDEPENDENT BANK OF ANAHEIM: Council consideration of request from
Stanley Pawlowski, Vice President and Manager of the Independent Bank of
Anaheim, to consider their organization as a depository for demand funds
from the City of Anaheim, was continued to this date.
Report dated November 25, 1966, from Finance Director Douglas
Ogden was submitted, recommending that subject request be rejected, and
existing policies on relations with banks be approved (copies furnished
each Councilman).
Mr. Stanley Pawlowski, 408 North Pine Street, stated he had
reviewed the Finance Director's report, and noted that there was no
indication that alternate solutions had been explored. He was of
the opinion that a system of rotating various active accounts between
banks would be the most equitable method of achieving participation by
all chain and independent banks in the area.
Discussion was held by the City Council, City Manager and
Finance Director, and Mr. Ogden advised that out of the nine bank
corporations having branches in the City, the City of Anaheim presently
has accounts with six. That although the City does not favor any one
bank over another, the payroll account would amount to a sum close to
the capital of the smaller banks, and such a large account could not be
deposited in a bank having limited capitalization.
Mr. Ogden explained the advantages to the City under the present
policy, and advised that alternatives were carefully studied and considered,
and discussions held with banking representatives. He called attention to
the incidental factors which would be involved in a rotation system, such
as printing of checks and other forms, and data processing services, and
recommended reducing the number of accounts to two.
Mr. Murdoch noted that from the City standpoint, good money
management practices would require that all accounts be deposited in
only one banking facility, however, the present policy is a compromise
from the ideal. He was of the opinion that rotation of the accounts
would be the most equitable method of allowing participation by all
banks, but he cautioned that funds should not be distributed to any
greater degree than they currently are.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Dutton
noted it has been the policy of the City Council that when all things
are equal, City business be conducted first with businesses in the City
of Anaheim, then with those in the County, then in the State, next in
the United States, and lastly with international firms. He was of the
opinion that inconvenience was not a valid basis for refusing to rotate
bank accounts, and he noted that the Independent Bank is a local organiza-
tion comprised of people from this community, and also has a branch located
on Orangethorpe Avenue in the City of Adaheim.
Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the City Council has
always considered recommendations of the Staff, and has supported these
recommendations whenever possible.
Mayor Krein noted that after discussing subject request with
the Finance Director, and considering the City Manager's support of Mr.
Ogden's recommendations, he felt that his personal support must be given
to these recommendations.
Councilman Pebley advised that he had no objection to the
rotation of accounts, provided it could be accomplished safely, with no
additional expense to the City.
Mr. Pawlowski reported that their capital and surplus presently
amounts to approximately $1,750,000.00, and they would be able to handle
an account up to $1,500,000.00, and they also offer data processing
services.
9831
City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Schutte moved
that the recormnendations of the Finance Director and City Manager be
sustained by the City Council, and existing policies of the City concerning
banks be approved; further, that the City shall encourage the rotation of
bank accounts among the banks of the City in a manner consistent with
reasonable money management principles. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
The Finance Director was instructed to further explore
proposed bank account rotation and to report to the Council within the
next few weeks.
PURCHASE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase
of two one-half ton pick-up trucks, as follows, and recommended acceptance
of the low bid, that of Mc Coy Ford in the amount of $3,976.88 including
tax:
Mc Coy Ford, Anaheim
G.M.C. Woods, Inc., Anaheim
International Harvester, Anaheim
Cone Brothers
Anaheim Dodge
Guardian Chevrolet
$3,976.88
4,157.92
4,170.11
No Quote
No Quote
No Quote
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Pebley
moved that the low bid of Mc Coy Ford be accepted and purchase authorized
in the amount of $3,976.88. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED°
WALNUT CANYON RESERVOIR PROJECT - WORK ORDER NO. 6004: Communication dated
November 10, 1966, from Martin and Flandrick, Attorneys representing
Dana Company, Inc., and Cooley Brothers, Inc., a joint venture, excavating
and grading sub-contractors for the Walnut Canyon Reservoir project,
was submitted (copies furnished each Councilman).
Said letter set forth certain problems encountered on the
project and requested the City Council to clarify certain itmes.
Assistant City Engineer Ralph O. Pease briefed the contents
of his memorandum report, dated November 25, 1966, calling attention
to the fact that the sub-contractor is under the supervision of the
prime contractor on the project.
Mr. Robert Neher, 2456 Huntington Drive, San Marino,
addressed the City Council advising of their meeting with the prime
contractor, a representative of the City Attorney's office, and Mr.
Pease, and he described the basis of the subcontractor's request.
On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Pebley
moved that the correspondence and the Engineering Memorandum be ordered
received and filed. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE CONTROLS: On motion by Councilman
Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, City of Santa Ana Resolution No.
66-145, in support of local control of alcoholic beverage licensing,
was ordered received and filed° MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-753: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-753
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPPORTING
LOCAL CONTROL OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSING.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
9832
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES November 29~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-753 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2333: Councilman Pe~ley offered Ordinance No. 2333 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-24 - R-A and M-1 - Blue Gum-
Coronado Annexation)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2333 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2334: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2334 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No Parking, portions of Ninth Street)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2334 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2335: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2335 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-27 - R-3)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2335 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2336 RINKER ANNEXATION NO 2) INTERIM ZONING: Councilman
Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2336 as an Urgency Ordinance for adoption.
Said Ordinance was read in full by the Deputy City Clerk.
Refer to Resolution Book,
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Rinker Annexation No. 2 -
R-A)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
None
Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2336 duly passed and adopted.
9833
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29~ 1966, 1:30 P.M.
AIRPORT COACH SERVICE: Council action on Airport Coach Service proposed
option and ground lease for 2.13 acres of Convention Center property
(portion of Zahl leasehold, west of the Convention facility, fronting on
Katella Avenue) was continued from the meeting of November 22, 1966, to
permit the City Attorney to review the documents and incorporate modifica-
tions expressed and agreed to by the proponents.
Mr. Murdoch submitted and read communication dated November 29,
1966, from Mr. Don Boyles, President of Airport Coach Service, setting
forth amended terms as result of the discussion held at the last meeting.
Mr. Boyles was present and agreed that the lease would be
exercised when construction commenced, and rental payments paid during
the construction period. Further, that the matter of storage, parking,
access, and ingress and egress along the easterly boundary of subject
property could be handled as separate items at the appropriate time
and after the City Staff has had an opportunity to work with the
Architect for the project.
Attention was called to Item 2, the Reappraisal provision of
the letter submitted this date, wherein it was noted that the increase
in base rental payment for the period from the 21st year through the
30th year be limited to a maximum of 25 percent of the annual rental
paid during the final 20 years of the lease term. Mr. Boyles advised
that the word "final" was an error in transcription, and should read,
"first".
Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager, and
City Attorney Joseph Geisler reported that it was his understanding that
Councilman Chandler had no basic objections to the amended proposal.
Councilman Dutton moved that the letter from Airport Coach
Service, dated November 29, 1966, be accepted, and the City Attorney be
authorized to prepare necessary documentation for the specific approval
of the exact option agreement and lease agreement by the City Council.
Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
STADIUM CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR - CONTRACT REINSTATEMENT: Communication
dated November 25, 1966, from Mr. Leonard Smith, President of Anaheim
Stadium Corporation, was submitted requesting that action taken by the
City Council November 15, 1966, to terminate contract of Mr. Kenneth
Gedney as Owner's Representative, be rescinded and the contract be left
in force.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley
action to terminate contract of Kenneth Gedney as Owner's Representative,
was rescinded, said contract to remain in force. MOTION CARRIED.
MEETING - KENNETH CORY: The City Manager reported that request has been
received from Mr. Kenneth Cory, State Assemblyman-Elect of the 69th
District, to meet with the City Council and Principal Administrative
Officers of the City to further the close and continuing working re-
lationship between City Officials and State Representatives in the best
interest of the people served by both.
The City Manager was directed to arrange for such a meeting.
RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:45 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tem Pebley called the meeting to order.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley.
COUNCILMEN~ Krein.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK~ Aloha M. Farrens.
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn.
9834
City Hall, Anaheim, California - qouN.cIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR:
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson.
PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski.
Robert Mickelson.
INVOCATION: Reverend Murray L. Morford, of the First Church of the
Nazarene, gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-115: Submitted by
Cassatt Geall and Jack Dell requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-i;
property located at 1771 and 1775 South Dallas Drive.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 2027,
Series 1965-66, recommended said reclassification be denied.
Public hearing was continued from the meeting of June 21 and
August 30, 1966, for completion of negotiations and development plans
for subject property.
Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject
property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area.
Attention was called to Petition of Opposition filed in the
office of the City Clerk November 18, 1966, containing 108 signatures.
Also noted was communication dated November 18, 1966 from Mrs. Geall
requesting that public hearing be further continued to allow completion
of plans.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the petitioners were present.
Mrs. Cassatt Geall, 1775 South Dallas Drive, owner of the corner
parcel at Katella Avenue, addressed the Council advising that although
they have been diligently working on developing the property, they have
been unable to complete their plans. She noted that subject property
was no longer suitable for residential purposes.
Mr. Jack Dell, 1771 South Dallas Drive, owner of a portion of
subject property, noted commercial development along Katella Avenue
throughout Anaheim, and advised that the area from Nutwood Avenue to
Brookhurst Street is the last of the residential usage between Brookhurst
and Euclid Streets. He stated that they had hoped the C-1 zoning would
be approved in order to sell the property for development under the C-1
Site Development Standards of the City.
Council discussion was held, Councilman Chandler being of the
opinion that the approval of the commercial use adjacent to single
family residential properties would require designation of the use and
protection to the residential area. Councilman Dutton suggested that the
petitioners withdraw their application for commercial zoning, and reapply
at a later date when development plans have been formulated.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
request to continue public hearing on Reclassification No. 65-66-115 was
denied. MOTION CARRIED.
Mrs. Geall and Mr. Dell appeared before the City Council and
requested permission to withdraw subject reclassification.
Councilman Dutton moved that permission to withdraw Reclassifi-
cation No. 65-66-115 be granted. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
The petitioners were advised that their oral request should be
confirmed by a written request.
9835
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - RECLASSIFICATIONS NOS. 66-67-33 AND 66-67-34: Public hearings
were held to consider changes of zone on adjacent properties, as follows:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-33: Submitted by Howard Morf and Lyle Morgan
requesting change of zone from M-1 and P-L to C-1 to allow establishment
of a dental office and future commercial facilities; L shaped property
located south and east of a parcel at the southeast corner of Orangethorpe
Avenue and Lemon Streets.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No.
PC66-133 recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Orangethorpe Avenue and Lemon
Street, for street lighting purposes, within 180 days from date
hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
2. That any air conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly
shielded from view.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-34: Initiated by the City Planning Commission
for a change of zone from M-1 and P-L to C-l, in order to place existing
service station site in the appropriate zone; property located at the
southeast corner of Lemon Street and Orangethorpe Avenue.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No.
PC66-134 recommended approval of said reclassification.
Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject
properties and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He
summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning
Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the applicants for Reclassifica-
tion No. 66-67-33 wished to address the City Council.
Mr. Robert A. Bowdle, representing the Percy H. Goodwin Company,
Authorized Agents, stated that he had no further evidence to present at
this time.
The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the City
Council in opposition to subject reclassifications, there being no
response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassifications Nos. 66-67-33
and 66-67-34.
RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-754 and
66R-755 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinances
changing the zones as requested, subject to the recommendations~of the
City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-754: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF
CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-33 - C-l)
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-755: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF
CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (66-67-34 - C-l)
Rol'l call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
Krein
9836
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-754 and 66R-755,
duly passed and adopted.
(Councilman Chandler left the meeting, 7:22 P.M.)
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION iNO. 66-67-37: Inititated by the City Planning
Commission requesting change of zone from R-3 to R-A; property briefly
described as located at the southwest corner of Crescent Avenue and
Gilbert Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-145
recommended approval of said reclassification, and recommended that no
abandonment be made along Crescent Avenue or Gilbert Street, even though
dedication has been made to these streets'ultimate width; and further
recommended that all securities posted with the City of Anaheim as
condition of Reclassification No. 63-64-77, which changed the zone on
subject property to R-3, be released upon the finalization of the proposed
abandonment of Innsdale Avenue and Cambria Street.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject parcel, and reported
that the property was reclassified to the R-3 zone in 1964, pursuant to
Reclassification No. 63-64-77, in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit
No. 532, granted for multiple family planned residential development;
that request for termination of said Conditional Use Permit was referred
to the Planning Commission by the City Council on August 30, 1966 for
initiation of reclassification proceedings to re-establish R-A zoning on
the property. He called attention to Findings Nos. 6 and 7 of the City
Planning Commission's resolution, as follows:
6. That the Commission recommends that n__o~ abandonment shall be made along
Crescent Avenue or Gilbert Street, even though dedication has been
made to these streets' ultimate width.
7. That the Commission recommends that all secdrities posted with the
City of Anaheim be released upon the finalizing of the proposed
~abandonment of Innsdale Avenue and Cambria Street.
(Councilman Chandler returned to the meeting, 7:25 P.M.)
Mr. Thompson noted that Innsdale Avenue and Cambria Street
were dedicated interior streets on the property which would serve the
proposed multiple family residential development, and abandonment pro-
ceedings for both streets were currently being processed, pending the
Council determination on subject reclassification.
Discussion was held by the City Council, City Manager, ~City
Attorney and Assistant City Engineer, it being noted that dedications
for the ultimate widening of Crescent Avenue and Gilbert Street has
been received, and current development in the area does not require
immediate improvement of these streets.
The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the City
Council for or against the proposed reclassification, there being no
response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-756: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-756
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone to R-A as requested.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (66-67-37 - R-A)
Roll call vote:
9837
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29, 1966, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
Krein
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 66R-756 duly passed
and adopted.
Councilman Dutton moved that release of cash securities posted
for improvements, pursuant to Reclassification No. 63-64-77 (Conditional
Use Permit No. 532), be authorized as soon as arrangements can be made,
and prior to completion of abandonment proceedings for the interior
streets, dedicated pursuant to said Reclassification No. 63-64-77.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90: Public hearing was scheduled
to consider City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC66-135, recommending
the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 90, establishing new symbology
for properties on both sides of East Street between Sycamore and North
Streets on the west and Wilhelmina and La Palma Avenue on the east,
and on the south side of La Palma Avenue between East and Hawthorne
Streets.
Planning Supervisor Ronald Grudzinski located the area under
consideration on the General Plan Map, posted on the west wall of the
Council Chamber. He briefed the history of the General Plan for the
area in question, noting that General Plan Amendment No. 90 was the
third and final phase of the East Street Study (from Lincoln Avenue
to the Riverside Freeway). Further, that General Plan Amendment No.
18, for a neighborhood commercial symbol at the southwest corner of
North and East Streets, was disapproved, and General Plan Amendment
No. 52 Exhibit A, was approved by the City Council on October 25, 1966,
for a neighborhood commercial symbol at the southwest corner of
Sycamore and East Streets.
Mr. Grudzinski further reported that General Plan Amendment
No. 90 was concerned with two areas, number one being the west side of
East Street between Sycamore and North Streets, recommended by the
Planning Commission for commercial-professional designation on the
General Plan; area number two being the east side of East Street
between Wilhelmina Street and La Palma Avenue, including the south
side of La Palma Avenue between East Street and a point approximately
100 feet west of Hawthorne Street, recommending medium density residential
development.
The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the City
Council.
Mr. J. C. McIlwain, 601 North East Street, stated he was in
favor of commercial designation for the west side of East Street,
particularly between Sycamore and Wilhelmina Streets. He noted the
heavy traffic, which had increased since the opening of access to and
from the Riverside Freeway on East Street, and the establishment of
various commercial facilities in the area.
Mr. McIlwain advised that the lots in his block are narrow,
and some homes are located in close proximity to the street, which would
present a problem when the widening of East Street takes place.
Mr. Robert M. Dillon, 726 North East Street, addressed the
Council stating he would favor the same designation of potential
development for both sides of the street, and he noted that several
lots in the area of his residence are approximately one-half acre in
size. He was of the opinion that commercial office development on the
west side of the street would compound the existing traffic and on-
street parking problems in the area.
The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone else wished to address the
City Council.
9838
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 29~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Clifton W. Marshall advised that he resided at 744 North
East Street, and also administered property located at 1254 East North
Street, and was of the opinion that a gradual change in the area was
inevitable. He favored the amendment as proposed, and urged approval
thereof by the City Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address
the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Chandler
was of the opinion that the approval of medium density residential
symbology for the east side of the street would discourage any potential
commercial designation for that area in the near future; that if it is
felt that any type of commercial designation should be considered there,
the amendment should not be adopted as proposed. He noted that the
size and depths of the lots on the east side of the street rendered
these properties more logical for commercial development than those on
the west side of the street.
Councilman Dutton noted that nearly all requests for zone
changes in the area have been on the west side of the street. However,
he would have no objection to a proposed General Plan Amendment depicting
commercial-professional uses on the east side.
Mr. Grudzinski reported that as result of complete East Street
study, the City Planning Commission felt there had been no indication
that commercial-professional uses were appropriate on the east side of
the street at the present time; however taking in consideration the Size
and shape of the properties on the east side, south of La Palma Avenue,
the Commission felt low medium density residential development would be
more appropriate than the existing low density indicated on the General
Plan.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved
that the Planning Staff be instructed to prepare an alternate General
Plan Amendment and Report depicting proposed land use of the area along
both sides of East Street between Sycamore and La Palma Avenues, that
the City Planning Commission be requested to offer comments and a report
on the suggested alternate General Plan Amendment, and that decision of
the City Council on General Plan Amendment No. 90 be deferred to
December 20, 1966, 7:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 8:15 P.M.
Deputy City Clerk