Loading...
1962/02/065447 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session~ COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: 3ohn Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order. MINIIfES: Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting held January 30, 1962, -was deferred to the next meeting. RECLASSIFICAIION 60-61-4: Request of Calark Corporation (Robert E. Johnson) for approval of revised plans for R-3 development, property located on the west side of Euclid Avenue between Ball Road and Cerritos Avenue, was continued from the meeting of January 30, 1962, resulting from a tie vote of the City Council on this issue° Mr. 3ohnson addressed the Council advising that he still had the property in escrow; however, after consulting with property owners in the area, apparently the general feeling is that this property could best be developed for medical or professional use. He thereupon requested this matter be held in abeyance to allow additional time for the preparation of necessary plans. In accordance with Mr. Johnson's request, action by the City Council was ordered deferred for sixty days, on motion by Councilman Chand- ler, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Request of Mr. William S. ~acTavish for a Dance Permit at 135~ West Center Street, was held over from the me,ting of January 30, 1962 for further investigation° Correspondence was submitted received from Mr. MacTavish, explain- ing in detail their programs (copies of which were delivered to each Councilman). Mr. Murdoch advised that the Chief of Police's recommendations for denial were based upon experience of similar public dances that have occurred at this and other locations; however, upon reading the letter submitted by Mr. MacTavish, there may be a difference between the type of dance requested by Mr. MacTavish and the type of dances upon which the Chief has based his recon~nendations. Mro Darrell Dean, 7195 Hoover Way, Buena Park, addressed the Council urging the granting of the Dance Permit, and further elaborating on the details of the dance and entertainment° He advised that attendance is limited to two hundred or two hundred and ten people, and that the dance closes at twelve o'clock midnight. Discussion continued and the meeting with Assistant City Attorney Joseph Geisler was briefed by Mr. Dean, wherein the activity was ruled a "public dance" Also noted was the fact that a "public dance" requires C-3 Zoning, which would necessitate the reclassification of this property. It was determined that further investigation and reports relative to the safety of the building should be obtained before final action is taken on the application. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Cha~dler, that this matter be referred to the City Manager, City Attorney, Fire Chief and Police Chief for a meeting to determine the exact nature of the operation intended and a definite recommendation. MOTION CARRIED. 5448 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. 3ack Libbey, of Capitol Records, addressed the Council commen- ding the activity of this group and recommending favorable consideration of their request° It was determined by the City Council that this dance activity is not to continue or be permitted until approval is obtained. FIFTEEN MINUTE ZONES~ LFt~ON-CHARIRES STREETS: Request of the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company for fifteen minute zone,.the first three car spaces on the north side of Chartres Street, and also three car spaces fronting the building located at 200 North Lemon Street, was ordered deferred, pending report and recommendations from the Downtown Merchants' Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. CENTRAL LIBRARY PLANS - AMENDMENT: Request from Mr. Joe Jordan, Architect, for approval of a specification substitution, and approval of installation of wet stand pipes in the basement, and fire alarm system throughout the build- ing in lieu of a sprinkler system in the basement only, was submitted. Mr. Jordan, Architect, stated technically this is not a request for a substitution of specifications, it is~ in fact, a request for relief from a Code requirement requiring sprinkling of basements. He related the reasons this is normally required, and how conditions differ in this instance~ explaining the safety measures that have already been taken into consideration° He further advised, with the storage of books and paper material in the basement, and in the event a fire occurs, damage from water could exceed the damage from the fire. He stated they had never intended to sprinkle any of the floors, that a full fire alarm system installation was planned~ Mro Robert Phillips, City Fire Marshall, addressed the Council strongly recommending against the waiving of said requirement. He stated this Involved three Codes~ the Uniform Building Code, the Fire Prevention Code, and the State Fire Marshall Code, and felt waiver of this requirement could establish a precedent. He further reported that at the present time, occupancy is being withheld on two buildings in Anaheim because the basements are not being sprinkled° He felt the cost of sprinkling would be quickly recovered by the reduced fire insurance rate. Mr. Jordan advised that if the building was partially sprinkled, that is, the basement only~ the City would receive practically no decrease in fire insurance rate; however, if the total building was sprinkled, a seventy-five per cent saving would be realized plus the advantage allowed %o publicpropertyo He estimated that the fire rate on this building would be fifty cents per Hundred Dollars, and if the total building was sprinkled, it would be reduced to approximately five cents per Hundred Dollars~ He explained that the original planning was a two story development with base- ment above grade, so that this expenditure for sprinkling system would not be required; that the budget could include the sprinkling of the basement, but could not include sprinkling the entire building in order to reduce the fire rate, as this would cost between $35~000~ and $40,000° For this reason, financial relief would be required° Mr. Jordan stated that any changes for sprinkling the entire building that might be required in the specifications could be handled within the schedule that has been projected~ because only one subcontractor would be affected~ however~ the system has to be supplied through an eight inch main without metering~ and would require an outside vault° Mro Murdoch stated as far as pipe and installation of fixtures are concerned, this could be handled through the Public Works Department; however, regarding the construction of the vault, he felt this should be a part of the contract. 5449 City Hall~ 68aheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Jordan estimated the cost of the sprinkling system to be in the neighborhood of fifty cents per square foot, or approximately $35,000. or $40,000° Fire Chief Stringer recommended sprinkling the entire building, and explained the initial and greatest cost would be for the basement; the cost of the balance of the building would be nominal~ At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Thompson, that the Council authorize the inclusion of the sprinklers on ali three floors plus the riser for the future floor° An9 additional funds required for the cost of said sprinklers to be taken from the Contingency Fund° MOTION CARRIED. INTRODUCTION: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, introduced two gentle- men from Yugoslavia, Mro Toso Dragnic, the Chief of Budget Review for the Cities of Zagreb, and Mr~ Dragisa Djokovic~Secretariat of Finance for the Republic of Titojvad, who are visiting Anaheim among other Cities, for the purpose of studying our operations in connection with financing various facilities° He explained that Anaheim was selected because we are listed in the U~ So Bureau of Census as one of the fastest growing Cities in the Country° Both gentlemen briefly addressed the Council~ ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application submitted by Mr~ B~ H.. Shimel, for Entertain- merit Permit for the Kit Kat~ 1.22 East Lincoln Avenue~ was submitted and granted~ subject to [he recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Coons~ seconded by Councilman Thompson° MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER: Request of John B~ Kilroy Company for waiver of sidewalk requirements on Anaheim Road from approximately 1320 feet east of Dowling Street to Dowling Streen~ on Dowling Street from Anaheim Road to approxi- mately 1320 feet south of Dowling Street; and on the extension of Coronado easterly from Dowling Street~ was ~ubmitted.. In accordance with the recommendations of 'the City Engineer, waiver of sidewalk requirements as requested was granted on motion by Councilman Frv~ seconded b'y Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED~ SIGN APPLICATION: Sign application for sign to be erected at 727 South East Street by the Wilshire Oil Company was reviewed by the City Council together with plans, Said permit was granted by the City Council on motion by Council- man Thompson~ seconded by Councilman Chandlero MOTION CARRIED~ SIGN APPLICATION: Sign application submitted for sign 'to be erected on South Harbor Boulevard~ north of the Charter House Restaurant by Standard Oil Company was reviewed by the City Council tone%her with plans~ Said sign permit was granted on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Fry° MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION: Sign application submitted by Mro Richard Tom on behalf of Mrs. Nell. Olsen for the relocation of a sign at 1665 Wes% Katella Avenue was submitted~ ApclJcation together with plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that requested location of the sign would exceed the normal four foot encroachment permi[[ed~ 5450 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. In viewing the plans, it was felt that this could be worked out by locating %he sign column at the rear of the concrete block wall, and thereupon it was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry, that the request to relocate the existing sign be granted, providing the projection over the street right-of-way does not exceed four feet. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-4]: A request was submitted by Mr. Richard Tom on behalf of Mrs~ Nell Olsen, requesting to reduce a curb radius from 35 feet to 25 feet, and approve the south and east property lines on Katella Avenue and Tiara Street to intersect at approximate right angles in lieu of a 25 foot radius as required by Standard Plan No. 1000. Recommendations of the City Engineer that provision of Standard Plan No. lO00 not be waived~and stating the reasons therefor, was reported on by Mr. Murdoch. Councilman Chandler asked if, under the circumstances, a hard- ship situation existed~ Mr. Murdoch answered that this could be the case, however due to the lack of time, only the standards and the deviations therefrom were investigated; that the plot plan and other particulars pertaining to this corner had not been checked. Councilman Coons, upon reviewing the plot plan, was of the opinion that this problem could be solved between Mr. Tom and Mr. Maddox. Councilman Chandler moved that the City Council grant the request subject 'to the approval of the City Engineer, with the understanding that the ~ity Engineer must approve any radius or any engineering facilities° If no such approval is obtained, this matter is to be scheduled on the next Council Agenda~ Councilman Coons seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP~ TRACT NO. 4442: Subdivider, Marborough Homes (A~ R. McDaniel, Engineer); tract located at the northwest corner of Wagner and Sunkist Streets, and contains 35, R-1 lots. Mr. Maddox reported that this tract was approximately ten acres, that bonds have been posted and required fees paid; that the map conforms substantially to the Tentative Map previously approved~ and recommended approval of said Final Map. Final Map~ Tract No. 4443 was approved on the recommendations of the City Engineer, on motion by Councilman Fry~ seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. CANCELLATION OF CITY 'TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons, cancellation of City Taxes was authorized on property acquired by the Centralia School District for school purposes, pursuant to deed recorded in book 5957, page 8929 Official Records of Orange County. MOTION CARRIED. .RESOLUTION NO, 62R-97: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-92 for passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF, REAL PROPERTY FOR A FIRE STATION AND PUBLIC LIBRARY. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: 5451 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-92 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-93: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nco 62R-93 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE COMPROMISE OF CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION. (City vs. Stern Realty Co.) On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-93 duly passed and adoptedo SALE OF SURPLUS PUNLPING EQUIPMENT: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following informal bids received for the sale of surplus pumping equipment for which the City no longer has any use, and recommended the acceptance of the highest bid. McCalla Bros., Santa Ana Orange County Pump Coo, Santa Ana $ 1,150o00 9'75.00 On the recommendations of the City Manager, sale of surplus equipment as listed in %he request for bids was authorized to the high bidder, McCalla Brothers, in the amount of $1,150.00, on motion by Council- man Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons~ MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-94: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-94 for passage and adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE THEREOF. (Vista Furniture Company, $2,000.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None° The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-94 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. Statistical Report - Orange County. Annual Report of Financial Transactions, concerning Streets and Roads of Cities and Counties of California, Fiscal Year 1960-61. ~ECESS: Councilman Coons moved to recess to 7:00 O'Clock P.M. Councilman Chandler seconded %he motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:00 P.M.) 5452 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meeting %o order, all members of the Council being present. INVOCATION: Lie~tenant Brown of the Salvation Army gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Schutte led %he audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. BOY SCOUTS: Recognition and welcome was extended to members attending Council meeting from Trou? 20 of the Zion Lutheran Church. ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - CITY MEASURE: Resolution of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce (copies of which were furnished each Councilman) was submitted urging the City Council to place a measure on the ballot of the forthcoming Municipal General Election, April 10~ 1962~ increasing the compensation of City Councilmen from $50.00 per month to $250.00 per month~ with an 'addi- tional $50.00 per month for the Mayor. Mr. George Strachan, General Manager of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Council reporting that in the past years the Board of Directors have taken action twice requesting this measure be placed on the ballot, and if placed on the ballot, they would do all they could to assure its success. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-95: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-95 for adoption, approving the resolution submitted by the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, and authorizing the measure be placed on the April 10, 1962 ballot. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CHamBER OF COMMERCE IN CONNECTION WITH PLACING A PROPOSED INCREASE IN COMPENSATION FOR COUNCILMEN AND MAYOR ON THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION BALLOT. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo None. None° The ~,aayor declazed Resolution No. 62R'95 duly passed and adopted. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held 3anuary 22, 1962, pertaining to the following appli- cations~ were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 187 - Submitted by W. C. Higdon; City Planning Commission Resolution Noo 205, Series 1961-62, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 187. VARIANCE NO. 1441 S ' - ubmltted by Gilbert J. Noguera; City Plan- ning Commission Resolution No. 207 Series 1961-62 9rantin9 Variance No. 1441. ' ' VARIANCE NO. 1442 - Submitted by Mildred M. Hammerman; City Planning Commission Resolution No. 208, Series 1961-62, granting Variance No. 1442. CONDITIONAL USE PERA4IT NO. 19d - Submitted by Anaheim Christian Reformed Church; City Planning Commission Resolution No. 209, Series 1961- 62, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 194. 5453 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 196 - Submitted by C. G. Vaughan; City Planning Commission Resolution No. 211, Series 1961-62, 9ranting Conditional Use Permit No. 196. No further action was taken by the City Council on the above numbered applications. TEN/ATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 4538 -.Developer, Alvin Stitch (Engineer, A. R. McDaniel). Tract located between the proposed Brea G~nyon Freeway and Rio Vista Street, southerly of Lincoln Avenue, and contains 28, R-1 lots. Excerpt of the City Planning Commission Meeting of January 22, 1962, was submitted approving said Tentative Map subject to the following conditions: 1. A "Lot C", one foot in width, shall be established along the east tract boundary within the limits of the proposed cul-de-sac. 2. A predetermined sale price shall be established for "Lots A, B, and C" subject to approval of Final Map. 3. "Lot C" shall be offered for dedication to the City of Anaheim. 4. Requirement that should the subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be sub- mitted in tentative form for approval. 5o Subject to the approval of plot and building plans by the Planning and Building Departments. 6. Subject to the installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall abutting along the west boundary line of subject tract where said tract abuts the proposed freeway right-of-way. Mr. Martin Kreidt reported on Precise Plan No. 37-123-1, indica- ting development from the southwest corner of the intersection of Rio Vista and Lincoln Avenue, and also reported on a meeting this morning with the developer, a representative of the City Attorney's Office, the Director of Public Works, the City Engineer, the Assistant City Engineer, the Planning Director and himself, stating that a detailed drawing of the cul--de-sac street was prepared by the developer pertaining to Lots A, B, and C in the tract. As result of the meeting, it was recommended that ConditionsNo. 1, 2 and 3 of the City Planning Commission's recommendations be substituted with the following~ That a "Lot C", one foot in width, be established along the "Street D" frontage of "Lot A", along the east tract boundary within the limits of the proposed cul-de-sac, and along the "Street D" frontage of "Lot B"~ that vehicular access rights from "Lot C" to "Street D" shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim, and that there shall be an irrevocable offer of dedication of "Lot C" to the City of Anaheim conditioned upon the payment, by the abutting property owner~ of an equitable portion of the cost of the street and improvements of "Street D" as determined by the developer and approved by the City Engineer and further provided that said con- ditional dedication shall be recorded prior to, or at the time of, the recordation of the final map. In addition, Mr. Kreidt further recommended %he detail of the print Of the cul-de-sac and a wall requirement along the freeway boundary on the west side of the tract be a part of the Council approval. Mr. McDaniel reported they were in full agreement with all requirements, with the exception of the wall requirement along the freeway boundary, and requested relief from this requirement, stating his reasons therefor. He called attention to the possible grade problem after the con- struction of the freeway. Discussion was held regarding the 35 foot lot, noted as "Non- Buildable Lot", and Mr. McDaniel advised that they presently were negotiating with the property owners to the East for the sale of this lot to provide an overall orderly development of the entire area. ~454 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Councilman Coons moved the Tentative Map of Tract No. 4538 be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. substituting Conditions Nos. 1, 2 and 3 thereof, with Condition recommen- ded by Mr. Kreidt; further, that Condition No. 6 of City Planning Commis- sion's recommendations be eliminated; and further subject to the dedication of said 35 foot lot to the City of Anaheim at the expiration of five years so that a standard lot may be developed in the event of failure to sell said lot to either adjoining property owners W]th]n five years at a price not to exceed an amount established b~. the developer and approved by she City Engineer. Councilman Thomoson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PLAN STUDY NO. 37-123-1: Councilman Chandler moved approval of Planning Study No. 37-123-1 as being %he tentative optimum development for the land shown on %hat plan. Councilman Coons seconded the mo%ion. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. l14R: Excerpt from City Planning Commission minutes approving revised plans, Variance No. 1148, was submitted and ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 1314: Excerpt from City Planning Commission minutes interpreting that a dry-cleanin9 operation on subject property is a permitted use under the approved variance, was submitted° Said excerpt was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTIOn'4 NO. 62R-96: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-96 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY WITH REFERENCE TO THE INSTALLATION OF TWO FLASHING LIGHT SIGNALS AT THE VERMONT AVENUE CROSSING OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY'S TRACT (CROSSING NO. 2-168.7). On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by 'the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-96 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE i'~iO. 1676: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1676 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ,~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-14 - C-3 and C-l) After hearth9 read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1676 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived° Councilman Coons seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 191: Submitted by Real Estate Disposal Corpora%ion, requesting permission to erect a double faced, 14 foot by 48 foot outdoor advertising structure, 25 feet above grade, on property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue at the Santa Aha Freeway. 5455 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 197, Series 1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit° Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed and public hearing scheduled. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Ernest Goldsworthy, representing United Outdoor Advertising Company, advised that because of %he heavy Christmas mails, notice of public hearing before the City Planning Commission was not received un%il after the hearing had been held. For this reason, they had not been represented. In their opinion, this sign would not be in violation of the Freeway Sign Ordinance, as it would be located approximately 50 feet or 65 feet east of Manchester, and would not be seen from any travelway of the freeway. Mr. Martln Kreidt reported the City Planning Commission traversed the freeway in both directions~ and was of the opinion that it would be possible %o view the sign from the freeway. Mr. Goldsworthy reported that they would agree %o amending the application, lowering the height of the sign° The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Plans from the file were reviewed by the City Council, and i% was determined that the sign would be seen f~om the freeway, which would be in violation of the Freeway Ordinance. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-97: Councilman Coons offered Resolution Nco 62R-97 for adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 191. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 191, On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schut%e. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-97 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-53: Submitted by Ho E. Krueger, requesting a change of zone from R-1 and R-2 to R-3 on property located on the north side of Broadway, between East Street and Fahrion Place (1249 Hast Broadway)~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 191~ Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 with any substantial revision of development plans to be subject to review by the Planning Commission, and to be set for Public Hearing, and referral to the City Councll. 2. Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Broadway. 3. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Broadway in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 5456 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. 5. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in ~ze, access- ible to trash-truck pick-up and adequately enclosed by a mlid fence or wall, prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 6. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the westerly boundary of subject property prior %o Final Building Inspection. 7. Dedication of access rights to the stub end of Oak Street and Chestnut Street and the alley connecting said streets in order to prohibit access to Oak and Chestnut Streets and the a-lley connecting said streets. 8. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 2, 3, and 7. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Martin Kreidt explained the location of the subject property, the existing zoning in the immediate area, and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission resulting in their findings and recommendations~ He further reported that all the development would be single story construction, as all of the subject property is within 150 feet of R-1 Zone. Mr. Ha Eo Krueger, applicant, addressed the Council urging the granting of the reclassification, stating %hat the property comprises approximately 1.52 acres, and in his opinion, their plan of development would beautify the area. Mrs. A. L. Brown, 1239 East Chestnut Street, addressed the Council in opposition to the reclassification, stating her reasons therefor were contained in the petition of protest submitted %o the City Planning Commission. She felt the property should be developed into single story duplexes or single family residences, in keeping with %he residences already established in the area. Plan of development as well as application file was reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that %he applicant was proposin9 a more restrictive use of the land in requestin9 R-3 zoning. Mrs. Lyle Diggins, 1238 East Oak Street, addressed the Council favoring the reclassification, and stated her only requirement would be that a fence be constructed and that construction be limited to one story. Mro Glen Stroud, 1239 East Oak Street, stated that according to the revised plan, and with the restrictions which had been recommended by the City Planning Commission, in his opinion no better development or use could be made of the property, and urged favorable consideration of the reclassification° The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-9~: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nco 62R-98 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No~ 7 thereof %o read: "Dedica~on of vehicular access rights to the stub end of Oak Street and Chestnut Street and the alley connecting said streets in order to prohibit vehicular access to Oak and Chestnut Streets and the alley connecting said streets."~ and further subject to the filing of Deed Restrictions limiting the development of the property to single story construction. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-5S - R-S) 5457 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-98 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-57: Submitted by Ball-Brookhurst Corral Company, requesting a change of zone from C-1 to C-3 (service station only) on property located on the southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Ball Road° City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 192, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 with the architecture of the proposed service station conforming with %he existing Ball-Brookhurst Corral Shopping Center. 2~ Recordation of C-3, Heavy Commercial, Zone deed restrictions limiting the use of subject property to service station use only. 3. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item No~ 2~ The Mayor asked if' anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Plans from the file were reviewed by the City Council° RESOLUTION NO. 62R-99: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-99 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to adequate parking provisions in accordance with Code requirements, be provided and maintained. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING 'THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-57 - C-S, service station only) On roll call the foregoi~ resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schu%teo None° None~ The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-99 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-62: Submitted by John S. Wright, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-i, property located on the east side of Euclid Avenue be±w~n Cri~ Avenue and Sumac Lane (1620 Sou~h ~uclld Avenue). (Filed in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 190) C~cy Planning Commission puzsuant to Resolution No. 195, Series 1961--02, recommended said rec].assificalion be denied° The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. 5458 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962, 3:00 Mro John Wright, 1620 South Euclid Street, addressed the Council explaining their plans for a medical center on the Euclid Street fron%ageo He displayed a rendering of the proposed building, advising its location to be approximately 240 feet from the nearest residence; that the building would be concrete and steel construction° He felt this use of the property would be the least offensive to the residents in the area. He was also of the opinion that Euclid Street would eventually be a commercial street, and stated they were looking ahead ten years in designing the building; however, in order to keep a harmonious neighborhood and to allow additional time to prepare a more acceptable plan of development, requested Reclassification No~ 61-62-62 be withdrawn~ As result of Mr. Wright's request, Mayor Schutte declared the hearing closedo RESOLUTION NO. 62R-100: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-100 terminating proceedings pertaining to Reclassification No. 61-62-62. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'EHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-62. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None° None° The Mayor declared Resolution No, 62R-100 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 190: Submitted by John S° Wright, requesting permission to establish a trailer park on property located on %he east side of Euclid Street between Cris Avenue and Sumac Lane (1620 South Euclid Avenue). (Filed in conjunction with Reclassification No° 61-62-.62.) City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 196, Series 1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit. Public hearing was scheduled in accordance with Council policy° The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr~ John Wright, applicant, addressed the Council and presented a plot plan of the overall development. He explained the fine points planned for the proposed trailer park, bein9 patterned after the Oasis, in Arizona° He stated that the five acre Edison Company easement strip would be developed into a recreational area, including a 9olf course; that the lot at the north end of the park would be 80 feet deep, allowin9 a 20 foot buffer in which a row of orange trees would be retained~ Further, when the park is completed, only a portion of the 9olf course would be viewed from the s%reeto He explained that 'this is to be an adult park, thereby alleviating any tax burden on the schools~ and stated that the Stanford Research Report indi- cates that property values do not decrease in areas where such a development exists; further, trailer park developments come under very stringent regu- lations. He also reported that in considering a garden type apartment development, he took into consideration the possibility of the increased school burden,, 5459 ~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Feoruary 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. At the conclusion of his explanation of the proposed development, Mr. Wright requested %his application also be withdrawn, %o fur%her work with the neighbors on a more acceptable plan~ As result of Mr. ~right:s request, Mayor Schutte declared %he hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-t01: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-101 for adoption, granting th'e request to withdraw the application and termina- ting the proceedings. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 190. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schu%te. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-101 duly passed and adopted. Mrs. Manley, 3333 Ball Road, addressed the Council stating she was interested in another item to be considered by %he City Council, but wan%ed to express her approval of Mr. ~right~s plans of development and surprise that it isn't acceptable to the neighbors° PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIEICATION NO. 61-62-65: Submitted by Edward N~ and Mary Rose, requesting a change of zone from R-1 to C-1 (business and professional offices), property located at the northeast corner of Carnelian Street and Katella Avenue (10972 Carnelian Street). City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 198, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied. The Mayor asked if Anyone wished %o address the Council° Mr. Mart].n Kreidt noted the location of the property and stated that at the Planning Commission it was learned that the existing residence was to be converted for thls use° He further reported that the additional twenty foot s'treet dedication required for the widening of Katella Avenue, would necessitate removal of existing residence from the property. Mr. John White, 97'76 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, addressed the Council representing the applicant, and stated since %he denial by %he City Planning Commission, a review of the problem has been made, and i% has been agreed that %he only feasible development for this property :na commercial vein would be 'to remove the existing structure and erect a new commercial building° As Mr. Richard Tom~ A~chitec%, has not had sufficient time to complete the new plans, he requested %his matter be set over for thirty days° Mr. Larry Thomas, 1773 Carnelian Street, addressed the Council in opposition to the rezoning, and referred to the petition of protest filed with the City Plannlng Commission, He stated the d~elling was only seven years old, and %o grant %his reclassification in his opinion would be spot zoning~ He called attention to the unoccupied C-1 area in the immedla~e vicinity, ~hich he felt should be developed before granting additional C-1 Zoning° Inasmuch as the applicant lntended to change the application, said change having not been considered by %he City Planning Commission, 1% was moved by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Ihompson, %ha% Application Nco 61-62-65 be referred back to the City Planning Commission for report and recommendation. MOTION CARRIED. 5460 PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-66: Submitted by Stella E. Turner, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue between Dale Avenue and Beach Boulevard, its southerly boundary abutCin9 the Orange County Flood Control Channel. (Filed in conjunction w th Conditional Use Permit No. 192) The City Plan,ling Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 199, Series 1961-62, reconmended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1o Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 with the provision of a 35 foot setback from Lincoln Avenue, said se%back area to be provided with landscaping of all areas not reserved access drives or walks~ 2. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall or equivalent construction along the eas'~, south, and west boundary line of subject property. 3. Subject to th,~ approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 192. 4° Preparation o: street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Lim:oln Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accord nce with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Er~gineer. 5. Payment of $2~00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Lincoln Avenue. 6. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Buildin9 Permit. 7o Provision of trash s¢ora9eareas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior %o Final Buildin9 Inspection. 8. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos° zl and 5. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the subject property and summarized the Planning Commissions findings and recommendations. He further reported that garages as shown on the plan would encroach into the setback area. Mr. James Utterback, 800 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, Cali- fornia, representing the applicant~ presented for review a rendering of the proposed 9arden type project comprising 52 units, and stated their plans were being redrawn to comply with ail Code requirements° The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. ~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-107: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-102 for adoption authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission° Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-66 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution wag duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-102 duly passed and adopted. 5461 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 199: Submitted by Stella E. Turner, requesting permission to construct a planned unit development on property described in Reclassification Proceedings No. 61-62-66. The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 200, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the follow- inq conditions: Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, with the provision of a 35 foot setback from Lincoln Avenue, said setback area to be provided with landscaping of all areas not reserved for access drives or walks. 2. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall or equivalent construction along the east, south, and west boundary line of subject property. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-66. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Lincoln Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer~ 5. Payment of $2~00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Lincoln Avenue. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25°00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of' the Building Permit. 7~ Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall prior to Final Building Inspection. ' 8. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos~ 4 and 5. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. No one addressed the Council, and no new evidence was presented; thereupon the Mayor declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NO. 62R-103: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-103 for adoption, grantin9 Conditional Use Permit No. 192, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer 'to Resolution Book~ A RESOLIIIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 192, On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-103 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-68: Submitted by Jo Harold Smith, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l, property located on the north side of Ball Road between Western and Knott Avenues (3311 West Ball Road). City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 201, Series recommended reclassification to R-'(} zonir~3, i~miced to one story saoject to the followin9 conditions: 1. Recordation of standard R-3, Multiple Family Residential; Zone deed res- trictions limiting to one story the maximum height of structures erected on subject property. 2. Subject to the submission of development plans, for multiple family residential development of subjec[ property, to the Planning Commission for review. 5462 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California _ COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. 3. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the northerly boundary of subject proper%y~ said wall to correspond in height to the grade level the abutting properties prior to Final Building Inspection. 4o Posting of a bond for a period of one (1) year to insure %he installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the easterly and westerly boundaries of subject property at time of development. 5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Ball Road, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in 'accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in %he Office of the City Engineer. 6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Rd. 7. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permi%o 8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by %he Dep~tmen% of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible 'to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior %o Final Building Inspection. 9. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1, 57 and 6. Petitions requesting certain deed restrictions in the event the property is reclassified %o C-1 zoning, containing 78 signatures, were submitted by Mrs. Gladyce Brunner (copies of petition statement furnished each Councilman). Mr~ Martin Kreidt noted the location of the property and the use and zoning in the immediate area. He summarized the evidence submitted %o the City Planning Commission resulting in their findings and recommendations for R-3 zoning limited %o single story construction. Mr. Kreidt also advised that as a result of a request received from the Savanna School District, da%ed January 16, 1962, the Planning Commission directed the preparation of a precise plan study of the area extending from Knott Avenue to Ball Road. The Precise Plan Study was considered by the City Planning Commission at their meeting yesterday (February 5, 1962), and as a result, the City Planning Commission's recommendations were that development of those properties fronting on Ball Road be in accordance with R-3 Zone requirements limited to single story struc%ureso Mrs° Robert Brunner, 3302 West Deerwood Drive, addressed %he Council presenting a map indicating the location of the subject property in relation to the location of those in opposition. Mrs. Brunner sugges- ted C-1 zoning~ limited %o business and professional uses, as in her opinion~ R-3 development would not be suitable on Ball Road because of the increased density in the area and the excessive traffic on Ball Road. Mr~ Norman 3ohnson~ 3302 West Glen Wood Drive, addr~ sed the Council presenting a petition purportedly containing 318 signatures pro- 'testing the R-3 zoning in the general area of Knott Avenue, Western Avenue, and Ball Road~ He reminded the Council that the request is for C-1 zoning, and questioned the City Planning Commission's recommendations of R-3. At Mr. Johnson:s request, those in support of his presentation of opposition were asked to stand° A map marked "Exhibit A" was presented indicating the zoninq of the surrounding properties. Mr. 3ohnson reported that the existing h~mes in the area were valued from $20,000. to $30,000., and further reported that approximately 200 apartment units presently exist near Western Avenue~ and more than 500 units are under construction. Mr. 3ohnson then presented "Exhibit B" indicating how the entire area could be developed, in the best interest of all concerned~ into residen- tial homes. He related statistics on the value of %he property and the number of R-1 lots that could be realized, whereby the land owner would receive a greater return from an R-1 development than from an R-3. He stated that the overall area was considered because %hey were aware of the fact that others in the area would request R-3 Zoning. He felt if an overall plan of the entire area could be approved by the City Council, it would eliminate future public hearings on separate parcels. Mr. Johnson then summarized the basis of %heir opposition briefly: 5463 City Hall~ Anahei~California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. (a) The trend to devalue existing properties. (b) Increased noise, (c) Traffic congestion. (d) School density. (e) The creation of the need for additional park facilities. Exhibit B was reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that the two parcels directly south of Deerwood, one being the property under. consideration, were recommended to be in the Administrative - Professional Zone; that the balance of the entire area was recommended to be R-1. Mr. Johnson was complimented by the City Council on his presen- tation (Mr. Johnson retained Exhibits A and B). Mro Kreidt reported on the evidence and consideration given by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held yesterday concerning Precise Plan Study 39-6-4. He noted the area suggested to be zoned C-i, R-3 and R-l, and advised that this plan study will be forwarded to the City Council without recommendations. Mro 3. Harold Smith, applicant, 3405 West Ball Road, advised of the size of their property and explained their plan to develop a commercial building comprising approximately seven small retail stores, one store %o be occupied by him for his own electrical business. He stated the project is not being built for re-sale, and that they would be happy %o work with the community on a nicer type construction, which would be to their benefit as well as the area° That in considering the price of the land, the cost of an R-3 development would be prohibitive. In his opinion, the loaning agencies would be the first to control the over-development of commercial° He further reported %hat their residence is on Ball Road approximately one block from the subject proper%y, and they %oo would oppose any R-3 development on Ball Road because.of traffic and other conditions° He further advised that %hey have dedicated necessary property for the Ball Road street widening program, and installed engineering improvements~ He requested favorable consideration of his application, thereby making it possible for him to establish his business on this property~ Mr. Herb Lightle, 1212 South Oakhaven Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to commercial and R-3 zoning, and requested the area be retained for single family residences. Mro Frank Atzet, 3253 West Ball Road, owner of adjacent property, addressed the Council advising that a% the present time he had no plans for immediate development of his property. Mro Michael Zehra, 3406 Glen Holly Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to R-3 development, and stated his reasons therefor. Mrs. Manley, owner of property at 3333 West Ball Road addressed the Council favoring %he application as submitted by Mr. Smith. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and Mr. Kreidt reported that the City Planning Commission will further consider the Precise Plan Study of the area at their meeting of February 19, 1962. Councilman Coons moved that public hearing on Reclassification No. 61-62-68 be continued for three weeks, February 27, 1962. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Coons moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Fry seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (10:15 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schu%te called the meeting to order~ all members of the Council being present. 5464 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING~ PERALTA HILLS ANNEXATION: Public hearing held pursuant to Resolution No. 7453, published in the Anaheim Bulletin and Placentia Courier January 4 and 11, 1962. The following certificate was submitted and read in full by the City Clerk: PERALTA HILLS ANNEXATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that upon receipt of written protests %o the inclusion of properties within the proposed PERALTA HILLS ANNEXATION, this office checked said written protests to determine the sufficiency %hereof, and I FURTHER CERTIFY, %hat according to the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Orange, State of California, the assessed valuation of privately owned property, including improvements %hereon, within said proposed annexation, is ............................ $ 71,300.00 AND, the Orange County Water District and State of California, Division of Highways, appear as owners of property within said territoryl the valuations thereof are not indicated on said assessment roll. AND, I FURTHER CERTIFY that the %oral assessed valuation of property, including improvements thereon, owned by persons within said territory proposed to be annexed, who have filed written protests and whose ownership I have been able to verify~ is ................. 10,890.00 IN WITNESS ~{EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of %he City of Anaheim this 6th day of February, 1962. (SEAL) ./s/ Dene M. Williams CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM The City Clerk also reported that received late this date in her office~ was a protest from the Orange County Water District, describing their property located within said proposed Peralta Hills Annexation, and submitting a communication from Albert O. Mittman, Chief Appraiser in the County Assessor's Office, submitting in accordance with Section 35313 of the Government Code of California that the value of land owned by Orange County Water District totaled $710.00~ and that the value of all other publicly owned property is: Land - $14~801 Improvements $97~30; totalin9 $111,910. On the recommendations of Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Thompson moved that public hearing on Peral%a Hills Annexation be continued to March 6, 1962. Councilman Chandler seconded %he motion. MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. James K. Robison, owner of property at 17532 Peralta Hills Drive, asked what their rights were in protesting a certain portion of the annexation. Mr. John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, briefly explained the provisions of the Uninhabited Act, and advised that written protests may be filed up to the time of the closing of the Public hearing. 5465 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6~ 19627 3:00 P.M. Mr. Charles Bever, 17592 Peralta Hills Drive, representing 100 per cent of the home owners in the area south of the Santa Aha Canyon Freeway, addressed the Council in opposition to the inclusion of their proper%les in the proposed annexation. He advised that in their opinion, the Peralta Hills area was an entity in itself, and objected to the inclu- sion of only a small portion in %his annexation; that any annexation or development should encompass the entire Peralta Hills area. ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 4913: Excerpt of City Planning Commission meet- ing of February 5, 1962, recommending Orange County Use Variance No. 4913 be approved, subject to conditions, was submitted to the City Council. It was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry, to concur with the City Planning Commission's recommendations. MOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENT - ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Mr. Bob Mickelson of the City Planning Department was appointed Alternate Member of the Architectural Control Committee filling the position formerly held by Mr. Gordon Steen, on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATION: Application of James L. Brush for person-to- person transfer of On-Sale General License for the Embassy at 300 West Center Street was submitted, and on the recommendation of Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney's office be authorized to protest said application on the basis that the granting of the application may create a Police problem. Councilman Coons seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-104: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-104 for passage and adoption° Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 7016, SECTION 3, ALLOCATION OF CLASSES OF EMPLOYMENT TO SALARY AND WAGE SCHEDULES~ (Assistant Data Processing Supervisor) On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-104 duty passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-105: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-105 for' passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECL~ION OF A CONTRACT WITH COATES, HERFURTH AND ENGLAND AS CONSULTING ACTUARIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE 1957 STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ACT. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-105 duly passed and adopted. 5466 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. VARIANCE NO. 1221: In accordance with Resolution No. 5535, Condition Nco 2, landscaping plans as approved by William Stronach, Park and Recreation Director, were approved by the City Council on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. MISS DODGER - MISS ANGEL CONTEST: Mayor Schutte reported on request received by him for City participation in Miss Dodger and Miss Angel Contest~ and suggested said request be referred to the 3unior Chamber of Commerce. On the recommendations of Mayor Schutte, it was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry, that said request be referred to the 3unior Chamber of Commerce. MOTION CARRIED. APRIL 10, 1962~ GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - BALLOT ISSUES: Mayor Schutte submitted for Council consideration the mat%er of placing on %he ballot the question of the location of the Civic Center. Discussion was held relative to the necessity of comparative cost estimates, a probable bond issue~ and the possibility of a different location. It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Fry, that the location bounded by Broadway, Harbor Boulevard, Santa Aha Street, and the west line of the City owned property, and the location bounded by Broadway, Center Street, Claudina and Philadelphia Streets, be placed on the ballot for the determination of the people as to the possible location of the City Hallo Councilman Chandler moved said motion be tabled for ~wo weeks (there was no second). On roll call vote requested by Mayor Schutte, the foregoing motion failed to carry by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry, Schutte. Chandler, Coons and Thompson. None. Councilman Coons stated that the reason for his negative vote on the previous motion was because in his opinion this could preclude any other possible choice of another site, and coupled wiqh an issue of this nature should be a bond issue for the construction thereof. Councilman Chandler added his endorsement to this statement. Councilman Thompson moved it be the sense of this Council that at such time as the City is prepared %o build a City Hall and offer a bond issue to the people, that we ask the people %o decide on a location at that time° Councilman Coons seconded the motion. On roll call vote as requested by Councilman Chandler, the fore- going motion was duly passed and adopted. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons and Thompson. Fry and Schutte. None. Mayor Schutte submitted a letter from the Orange County Property Owners Association~ recommending that a measure be placed on the ballot making the office of Mayor an elective office, subject to the will of the people by popular vote. Discussion was held regarding the duties of a Mayor in a General Law City as compared to a Charter type City, and as this is normally in conjunction with a change %o Charter form of Government, Coun~lman Chandler felt that the Council had a further duty to the people to study %his issue before placing the me.~sure on the ballot. 5467 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Councilman Coons suggested we acknowledge receipt of the letter from the Orange County Property Owners Association and thank them for their interest, advising them that it is our feeling that the issue involved in their recommendation goes beyond the point of just an election of a Mayor by popular vote, such as area representation, district representation, the possibility of more than a five man Council, the formation of the Charter for the City, and other items of a similar nature; that all these things should be studied in considering a Charter form of Government. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 140 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 186: Mr. James Maddox, City Engineer, reported on a meeting with Mr. Freedman and Mr. Stout of McDaniel Engineering, regarding waiver of sidewalks and permitting the construction of industrial type curb in lieu of standard type curb. He advised that Mr. Freedman remained at the meetinq only a short time½ however, Mr. Stout and Mr. Freedman agreed on a solution. He explained %he terms of their agreement as outlined in his letter to Mr. Freedman dated February 5, 1962. It was moved by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Fry, thai the conditions as required by %he City Engineer pertaining to these developments be approved. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN~EI'T~ Councilman Thgmpson moved Lo adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNTD~i 2: 0.5 A.M. City Clerk City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: 3ce Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. DIR£CTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersallo PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreid%. Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the City Council meetings held January 30, 1962 and February 6, 1962, were ~pp~oved on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler° MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-106: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 62R-106 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIR- ECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF FEBRUARY 13~ 1962, (Warrants Nos. 16380 to 16700 and 17101 to 17132, both inclusive, totaling $812,295.77.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: