1962/03/065522
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 28, 1962, 10:00 A.M.
The committee appointed to check and compute the bids on the bonds
for which bids were opened previously during this meeting reported that
the bid of United California Bank is the .bid yielding the lowest net interest
cost:
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-201: After considering the various bids and the report
thereon, it was moved by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Coons,
that Resolution No. 62R-201 entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AWARDING $2,215~000 BONDS OF SAID CITY TO THE BEST BIDDER
AND RE3ECTING ALL OTHER BIDS," be adopted.
Upon the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None.
said Resolution No. 62R-201 was declared adopted.
ADJOURN: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn. Councilman Thompson seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 11:30 A.M.
City Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session°
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte (entered
the meeting 3:15 P.M.)
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch~
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis°
ASSISTANY CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson,
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams,
CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddoxo
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E~ Piersallo
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Dick Reese,
· Mayor Pro Tem Fry called the meeting 'to order°
MINUTES: Minutes of the City Council meeting of February 20, 1962, were approved
on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION
CARRIED.
REQUEST - PERMISSION TO USE PEARSON PARK: Communication dated February 7, 1962,
from Dr. William Townsend, President of Board of Trustees, Divine Science
Fellowship Church, requesting permission %o hold Easter Sunrise Services
ak the northwest corner of Pearson Park, Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore
Street, and also requesting permission to use facilities to cook their
breakfast after the services, was submitted.
Councilman Chandler moved sai'd request be granted, subject to
regulations of the Park and Recreation Department. Councilman Thompson
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
5523
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
REQUEST - ANAHEIM CHORALEERS: Communication dated February 28, 1962, from J.
Carroll Beckwi%h, Jr., President, Board' of Directors, Anaheim Choraleers,
requesting financial support from the City for their concert to be held in
the Anaheim Unlon High School Auditorium, March lO, 1962, without charge
to the public, was submitted.
Councilman Coons moved the amount of $550° be authorized to
support this program. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion° MOTION
CARRIED.
REQUEST - DOG LICENSE PENALTIES: Communication dated February 19, 1962, from
the Orange County Veterinary Medical Association requesting waiver of
penalties made for tardiness in licensing dogs too young to receive anti-
rabies vaccination by January 31, 1962, was submitted°
Said request was referred to the City Attorney's office to
determine if such a waiver would be in conflict with the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
PARKING METERS - DOWNTOWN AREA: Petition containing twenty signatures of
businessmen and merchants along East and West Lincoln Avenue, North Los
Angeles and North Lemon Streets, requesting replacement of parking meters,
and that time limits recently removed from the four parking lots be
reinstated, and also petition containing eight signatures requesting
parking meter replacements on the North and South sides, 100 block West
Broadway, was submitted (copies furnished each Councilman)°
Mro Edward Brewer, 228 E. Lincoln Ave°, stated that the removal
of parking meters is seriously affecting business due to the fact that
customers are unable to find parking places, and requested that the park-
ing meters be replaced with a minimum of delay°
Mr~ Earle T. Jackson, 237 E. Lincoln Ave., was of the opinion
that the majority of businessmen and merchants did not favor the removal
of the parking meters° He stated that various employees of businesses
located in the previously metered areas are using these spaces for all-day
parking, leaving none available for customer parking, and requested the
meters be replaced immediatelyo
Mayor Schutte entered the meeting, 3:15 P.M.
Mro Dick Metteer, 223 E, Lincoln Ave., stated that in his opinion
this request was not the final solution to increasing business in the
Downtown area; but if the meters were replaced, the Downtown Merchants'
Association could further study and analyse the situation and submit a
suggested solution to the problem, taking everything into consideration°
Inasmuch as the removal of the parking meters were the result of'
a reque~:t and Public Hearing, Councilman Coons moved that this meeting of
the City Council be adjourned to Thursday, March 8, 1962, at one o'clock
P.M., for the specific purpose of discussing whether parking meters should
be replaced to allow the Downtown Merchants' Association to work with City
technical departments on a workable solution° Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Chandler moved that notice of the meeting to be held
March 8, 1962, be advertised in a blocked off box, in the Anaheim Bulletin,
one notice to be in each section of the newspaper, Wednesday, March 7,
1962. Councilman Coons seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATION: Application submitted by Bill Compton for permission to erect
a non-conforming sign at 1827 West Katella Avenue (Roaring Twenties),
together with plans, was submitted°
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Plans were reviewed and it was noted that this is to be an
integrated sign for four business establishments at this location.
Councilman Chandler moved said sign application be granted as
requested. Councilman Coons seconded 'the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
5524
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-115 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Communication dated
February 24, 1962, from Joseph Co Whitman for 180 day extension of time
for compliance with conditions of Reclassification No. 59-60-115, was
submitted and granted, on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by
Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 1324: Request of James H. Hodges, Authorized Agent, for extension
of time, Variance No. 1324, was submitted.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney, advised the Council of actions taken
by the applicant in compliance with Section 18o68o040(2), that the land has
been purchased, loans ready for recordation, and under the terms of the
lease, delivery of the completed project must be on June 15, 1962.
Councilman Thompson moved that it be the finding of this Council
that proper diligence has been shown to sufficiently meet the requirements
of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and said variance is considered valid.
Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
AMUSEMENT MACHINE PERMIT: Application by George Arthur Lakey for Amusement
Machine Permit for the 927 Club, 927 North Los Angeles Street, was submit%ed
and granted, subject to the recommendations of %he Chief of Police, on
motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application by Sidney Charles Le Ritz and Elden Earl
Easdale for Entertainment Permit for the Royal Archer Restaurant, 815 So.
Brookhurst St., was submitted and granted, subject to the recommendations
of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Council-
man Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
ANAHEIM BOARD OF REALTORS: Communication dated February 23, 1962, from the
Anaheim Board of Realtors was submitted, recommending M-1 Zoning of
property bounded by Orangethorpe Avenue and Placentia-Yorba Blvd. on the
North, the Riverside Freeway and Santa Ann River on the South, the Orange
Freeway Right-of-Way on the ~es%, and the Imperial Freeway Right-of-Hay on
the East.
Councilman Coons moved that said letter be held to be considered
in conjunction with Planning Study of the City Planning Commission when
this matter is referred to the City Council by the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL PLANS - POLICE FACILITIES: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis recom-
mended acceptance of Final Plans for the Police Facilities Building, and
reported that the final plans have been reviewed and accepted by the Build-
ing Department, City Engineer and Police Department; however one area is
still being checked concerning minor things that might affect maintenance.
On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Robert
Davis, Councilman Fry moved ~ha% Final Plans, aa prepared by §mi~h, Powell
and Morgridge, Architects, for the Police Facilities Building, be accepted.
Councilman Thompson seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
5525
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962, 3:00
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-207: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution Noo 62R-202 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND
DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT, OR TYPE
OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS FOR THE FURNISHING
OF ALL MATERIALS, PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND COM-
PLETION OF A POLICE FACILITIES BUILDING OF CONCRETE AND MASONRY, LOCATED AT
HARBOR BOULEVARD AND SANTA ANA STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, WORK ORDER NO
4600. ·
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-202 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-203: Councilman Coons offered Resolution Noo 62R-203 for
passage and adoption~
Refer 'to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: A POLICE FACILITIES BUILDING
OF CONCRETE AND MASONRY, LOCATED AT HARBOR BOULEVARD AND SANTA ANA STREET,
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, WORK ORDER NO. 4600, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF;
AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Bids to be opened April 5, 1962, 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None,
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-203 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-204: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-204 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT BIDDING ON THE POLICE FACILITIES BUILDING AND THE CENTRAL PUBLIC
LIBRARY BUILDING AS A COMBINED PROJECT IS IN THE BEST PUBLIC INTEREST, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED
PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION IHEREOF AS A COMBINED PROJECT.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopfed
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None.
5526
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-204 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-205: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-205 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND
DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT OR
TYPE OF WORKMAN, OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL MATERIALS, PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUC-
TION, INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF UNDERGROUND, REINFORCED CONCRETE
WATER VAULTS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-205 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-206: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nco 62R-206 for
passage and adoption,
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: CONSTRUCTION OF FIVE UNDERGROUND
REINFORCED CONCRETE WATER VAULTS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AT THE LOCATIONS
HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED, WORK ORDER NO. 4034; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION TH~EOF; AUTHOR-
IZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be opened March 29, 1962, 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None,
None,
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 62R-206 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-207: Councilman Goons offered Resolution No. 62R-207 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND AN EASEMENT
FOR ALLEY PURPOSES UPON~ OVER~ ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED
REAL PROPERTY~ FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; AND DIRECTING
THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION.
(Public hearing March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
5527
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None°
The Mayor declared Resolution NCo 62R-206 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVH MAP~ TRACT NO. 4582: Developer~ Bo & Ko Properties (Engineer, A. R.
McDaniel). Tract located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, 135 feet
west of the Brea Canyon Freeway, and contains 43 R-1 lotso
Excerpt of the City Planning Commission meeting of February 19,
1962, was submitted approving said Tentative Map, subject to the following
conditions:
1o Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall where subject
tract abuts the proposed freeway right-of-way°
2. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as
more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall
be submitted in tentative form for approval°
3° Subject to the approval of plot and building plans by the
Planning and Building Departments.
Mro Dick Reese reported that the City Planninq Commission has
recommended where Multiple Yamily or Single Family Residential lots are
developed next to a freeway or arterial highway right-of-way~ a six foot
masonry wall shall be constructed by the subdivider abutting said rights-
of way to provide a uniform appearance rather than a variety of fencing.
Mro Jacobsen, representative of McDaniel Engineering Company,
reported that they were in full agreement with all City Planning Commission
requirements with the exception of the block wall along the freeway
boundary, and requested relief from this requirement as a condition of
approval, stating his reasons therefor°
Councilman Coons moved 'the Tentative Map of Tract Nco 4582 be
approveds subject 'to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission
with the exception that Condition NCo 1 be eliminated° Councilman Fry
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 4597: Developer, Mit-Mcr Development (Engineer, A. R.
McDaniel)o Tract located northerly of Wagner Avenue~ easterly of Sunkist
Street~ southerly of South Street~ and abutting proposed freeway, and
contains 31R-1 lots~
Excerpt of the City Planning Commission meeting of February 19,
1962, was submitted approving said Tentative Map, subject to the following
conditions:
1o Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall where subject
tract abuts the proposed freeway right-of-way.
2o Increase the centerline radius on Hilda Street and Mancos
Avenue between the southerly tract boundary and "A" Street.
3° Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as
more than one subdivision~ each subdivision thereof shall be
submitted in tentative form for approval°
4. Subject to the approval of plot amd building plans by the
Planning and Building Departments°
Councilman Chandler moved the Tentative Map of Tract Nco 4597 be
approved, subject to 'the recommendations of the City Planning Commission
with the exception that Condition Nco 1 be eliminated° Councilman Coons
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
5528
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 4551: Developer, S. V. Hunsaker & Sons, (Engineer,
Millet, King and Associates)° Tract located on the northeast corner of
Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street, and contains 28 R-3 lots.
Excerpt of the City Plannin9 Commission meetin9 of February
19, 1962, was submitted approving said Tentative Map, subject to the
following conditions:
Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the
R-3~ Multiple Family Residential, Zone°
2. Dedication of vehicle access on Haster Street and Orangewood
Avenue except at street and alley openings°
3. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as
more than one subdivision thereof shall be submitted in
tentative form for approval°
4o Subject to the approval of plot and building plans by the
Planning and Building Departments and the review of eleva-
tion plans by 'the Architectural Committee°
Councilman Fry moved the Tentative Map of Tract No. 4551 be
approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Coons seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: It was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by
Councilman Chandler, that 'the Orange County Board of Supervisors be
requested to cancel County Taxes on property acquired by the City of
Anaheim for public purposes, from Salvador R~ and Jacinta P. Herrera as
recorded February 13, 1962, in Book 6005, Page 994 of Official Records
of Orange County~ (Resolution NCo 62R-85) MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed
on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons:
ac Mrs° Albert Pandevigne, regarding Downtown Parking Meters.
bo Joseph So Fotia~ regarding Downtown Parking and Shopping
Conditions°
Co Feather River Project Association~ Agenda and notice of
meeting°
d, Minutes~ Orange County Mosquito Abatement District~ meeting
held January ].9, !962o
MOTION CARRIED,
RECESS: Councilman Coons moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (5:10 PoM.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order, all members of the
Council bein9 present.
INVOCATION: Rev~ Lance, Pastor of the Grace Brethren Church, gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Schutte led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flago
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-20~: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-208
for the adoption of a General Zonin9 Plan of the City of Anaheim as indi-
cated by the painted map on the wall of the Council Chambers, and that a
public hearin9 on 'this General Plan be scheduled before the City Planning
Commission at the earliest possible dateo
Refer to Resolution Book°
5529
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM INITIATING
IMMEDIATE STUDY TOWARD THE ADOPTION OF A GENERAL ZONING PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM AND REQUESTING THAT IMMEDIATE HEARINGS BE HELD THEREON BEFORE
THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL TO THE END THAT A GENERAL
PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE LAW BE ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENt: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None~
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-208 duly passed and adopted.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-68: Submitted by J. Harold
Smith requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-1 on property located on the
north side of Ball Road between Western and Knott Avenues, and further des-
cribed as 3311 West Bail Road°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 201,
Series 1961-62, recommended reclassification of subject property to R-3
Zoning limited to one story in height~ subject to conditions°
Public hearing was held February 69 1962, and continued to
February 27, 1962 to allow preparation of a Planning Study of the immediate
area, and again continued to this date for consideration in conjunction
with Planning Study No. 39-6-4°
Planning Study No, 39-6-4: Mro Richard Reese, Planning Director,
displayed three maps of the area, located on both sides of Ball Road and
extendin9 from Knott Avenue 'to Highway 39, said maps indicating present
zonin9 in the area, the existing land use in the area, and Exhibit No. 3,
incorporatin9 the findings and recommendations of the City Planning Com-
mission° He summarized the evidence presented at the City Planning Com-
mission hearing on Plan Study Nco 39-6-4, and reported on their findings
and recommendations resulting therefrom as follows:
FINDINGS: 1o Tha~ a Commission policy is hereby adopted that commercial
development shall be concentrated at 'the intersection of arterial highways
and that commercial uses shall not be permitted to develop in a strip
fashion along said highways° Furthermore, 'that those properties along said
arterial highways shall be developed for residential use wherever possible,
either Single Family backing or siding on said highways with appropriate
wall or landscaping installation or where it is impractical for single
family development, said properties shall be developed for multiple family
development backing up 'to 'the single family development on the rear and
developed in accordance with the R-S, Multiple Family Residential,
standards including the wall and one story height limitation within 150
feet of property projected for R-l, One Family Residential, Development.
2. That, in respect to the projected commercial development at
the intersection of the arterial highways, the following general conditions
shall apply°
a. That access shall not be permitted to those properties pro-
jected for commercial development from any abutting
residential streets°
bo That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be installed wherever
commercial property abuts property projected for residential
use.
Co That all commercial structures shall maintain a six (6) foot
setback from the required wall wherever said property abuts
property projected for residential use~
5530
Ci%v Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
ee
That ail commercial structures shall be single story in
height and shall maintain architectural conformity with the
residential development in the surrounding area.
That the development of all properties included in said
Planning Study No. 39-6-4 shall be subject to the appropriate
Interdepartmental Committee Recommendations pertinent %o the
individual properties in said area in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Adopt Exhibit No~ 3 of Planning Study No. 39-6-4 and to
forward said plan to the City Council with the recommendation that all
development in subject area be subject to the foregoing recommendations
and findings°
Mr. Reese indicated graphically the recommendations of the City
Planning Commission on the map marked "Exhibit 3" and answered questions
of the Council pertaining to said Study.
The Council determined that presentations pertaining to said
Planning Study could also be considered as evidence pertinent to the public
hearing before them on Reclassification No. 61-62-68, and thereupon Mayor
Schutte asked if anyone wished to address the Council. ·
Mr~ Norman Johnson, 3302 West Glen Holly Drive, addressed the
Council, being of the opinion that 'the land use as recommended by the City
Planning Commission represented the highest profit that could be derived
from the land rather than 'the best use for the land and the neighborhood.
That they are opposed to the R-3 Zoning in this area of beautiful homes and
felt that the major consideration should be given to the permanent home
owners adjoining these properties along Ball Road~ 'that there are new homes
being built to the East of their homes which is the kind of progress they
support rather 'than multiple and commercial zoning, which would devaluate
the property~ contribute nothing to the stability of the community, over-
crowd 'the schools, add additional noise and traffic congestion on Ball Road,
and create 'the need for additional park facilities in the area.
Mro Johnson submitted his map marked "Exhibit B" indicating how
the entire area could be developed as single family residence for the
benefit of all concerned, and was of the opinion that the land owners could
receive a greater return from %heir land with an R-1 development rather than
an R-3o He felt that there was no need for additional R-3 in the area,
because ~t appeared that the entire area north of Orange will be developed
as multiple unitSo
With reference to the app!icatlon of Mr° Smith, Mr. Johnson
stated that they were in favor of the smbject property being zoned C-1 if
limited to buslness and professional offices oniyo
Mro Gordon Watker~ 3!00 West Rome Avenue, addressed the Council
also presenting a ougges~ed plan for development of the entire area
indicating R-1 homes with a solid block wall along Ball Road with only two
entrances° He was of the opinion that the area under consideration should
be retained for nice single family residential development~ and that if it
was felt the City needed more R-3 developments~ 'the downtown area was the
most logical ].oca'tiono
Mr. Gordon Dooley, resident on South Knott Avenue~ felt the City
Planning Commission should be complimented on their s~udy and recommendations
both by the land owners on Ball Road and the Cinderella Tract owners; how-
ever, was of the opinion t~at 'the area behind %he exis%in9 apartments should
be zoned R-3, single story adjacent to %he existing R-1 tract, with commer-
cial along Knott Avenue°
5531
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
In answer to Councilman Thompson's question regarding his opinion
on Mr. Smith's application, Mro Dooley advised that he did not wish %o voice
his opinion as his property and home is on Knott Avenue~ however generally
he favored the sectional zoning recommended°
Mrs. David Kent, 1301 South Courson Drive, questioned why Ball
Road would be more suitable for multiple family living if it was undesir-
able for single family living°
Mro Michael Zebra, 3406 Glen Holly Drive, addressed the Council
in opposition to the recommended R-3 zoning, and was of the opinion that
commercial zoning on subject property would be more desirable than R-3
zoning.
Mrs. Do Ho McConnell, owner of property on South Knott Avenue,
advised regarding the plannlng study, that they are satisfied with commercial
abutting Knott Avenue; however desired R-3 zoning on the remainder of %heir
property instead of R-1 as it appears in the recommendations of the City
Planning Commission°
Mrs° Genevieve Simpson, 3309 West Deerwood Drive, addressed the
Council in opposition %o R-3 zoning°
Mrs° Robert Ag Brunner, 3302 West Deerwood Drive, resident
directly behind Mr~ Smith's property, addressed the Council in opposition
to R-3 zoning, however favored a business and professional zoning which
would allow the property owners revenue without density~ and if said use is
allowed, requested a six foot wall be constructed along the rear of subject
property from the grade level of her property~ as %he subject property is a%
a lower level° She also referred to the drainage ditch on subject property
which has been a continuous problem in 'the area°
Mrs. Brunner called attention to the fact that west of Beach
Boulevard there were no civic buildings and asked if consideration could be
given to the establishment of a branch library in this area°
In closing, Mrs° Brunner stated that they are definitely opposed
the development of the area as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Mro Robert Cecil , 824 South Oakhaven Drive, addressed the Council
favoring Mr. Johnson's plan of development°
Mrs° June Lenc, 3312 West Glen Holly~ addressed the Council in
opposition to the recommended Planning Study and read from a Civics High
School Iextbook pertaining to separation of R-1 and R-2 residential districts°
Mro John Simpson~ 3309 West Deerwood Drive, addressed the Council
in opposition to the recommended plan of the City Planning Commission~ and
was of the opinion that existing R-3 in the area of Ball Road and Knott
(Reclassification Nco 61-62-13) was being used as a precedent for further
R-3 Zoning in this entire area, and requested an investigation of this par-
ticular action and other actions taken Oy 'the City Pian~ng Commission
regarding the existing land use and that recommended for the area° With
regards to subject propert¥~ Mro Simpson sta'ted 'that he would prefer a C-l,
Business and Professional Off:ces, on Mm~ Smith's property rather than R-3.
Mro Bo L~ ~i.lkerson, 900 South Knott Avenue, objected to the
comments made regarding the actions of the City Planning Commission, and
was of the opinion %he City Planning Commission Study and re¢omme~datioms
were reasonable.
Mr. Go Po Bzooks~ 2341 Ball Road, and also representing Mr. Heath,
Mr. Seymour and Mr° Manni, owners of Cinderella Homes, addressed the Council
in opposition to the recommended plan and advised that they felt their
property was not adaptable for R-3 Zoning°
5532
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mayor Schutte asked if the applicant wished to address %he
Council.
Mro Smith, applicant and owner of subject property, referred
to his statements made at the previous meeting, and again stated that
because of the size of his property (130 feet in depth and 152 feet in
width, after dedication) and the value of the frontage on Ball Road, he
did no% believe it would be qualified for good R-3 property; that he
also has his home on Ball Road and has dedicated the property fronting
his home as well as subject property for street widening purposes and
has installed the improvements° He reported that he had purchased subject
property approximately one year ago with the intent %o build small retail
stores, one to be occupied by his own retail electrical business, and
further explained %he proposed commercial construction and architecture
which would blend in with 'the Cinderella Tract. He felt that %o grant
his request would guarantee both the home owners and the property owners
on Ball Road a definite 'type of development in keeping with the area.
Mr. Smith stated he was not financially able to develop his
property for other than his own needs, and 'that his committments were for
single story C-i, and he could not develop R-3 or be restricted to business
and professional offices onlyo
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response~ declared the hearing closed°
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-209: Discussion was held by 'the City Council regarding
the applicant's requested use of subject propertyt the recommended R-3
Zoning by 'the City Planntng Commission, and the request of the adjacent
neighborhood for a limited C-l, Business and Professional, development.
At the conclusion of 'the discussion, Councilman Coons offered Resolution
NCo 62R-209 for passage and adoption, denying Reclassification Application
Nco 61-62-68~
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF
THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61.-62.-68 )
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None o
None o
The Mayor declared Resolution NCo 62R-209 duly passed and adopted.
Further discussion was held by the City Council regarding Planning
Study Nco 39-6-4, Exhibit Nco 3, as recommended by the City Planning Cum-
mlsslon, and the proposed development of the entire area as indicated by the
plans presented by Mro Johnson and Mro Walker, and at the conclusion of the
discussion, the Council deferred action on said Planning Study' to further
study all the plans and evidence submit%ed~
RECESS: Councilman Coons moved for a ten minute recess° Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (9=55 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order~ all members of the
Council bein9 present.
5533
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
CONTINU£D PUBLIC HEARING, PERALTA HILLS ANNEXATION: Public hearing was held
February 6, 1962, pursuant to Resolution Nco 7453, published in the Anaheim
Bulletin and Placentia Courier January 4 and 11, 1962, and said public
hearing was continued to this date on the recommendations of the City
Attorney to allow time for receipt of additional written protests°
The City Clerk verbally reported as follows:
That according to the last equalized assessment roll of the County
of Orange, State of California, the assessed valuation of privately owned
property, including improvements thereon, within said proposed annexation,
is
71,300o00
That the Orange County Water District and State of
California, Division of Highways, appear as owners of property
within said territory° That the valuation of said property,
submitted pursuant to Section 35313 of Government Code of
California by the Orange County Water District, is as follows:
Value of property owned by Orange
County Water District:
Land
Value of all other publicly owned
property:
$ 710o
Land $ 14~880~
Improvements __~97~030~
$ 1119910.
That the total assessed valuation of property, including
improvements thereon, owned by persons within said territory pro-
posed to be annexed, who filed written protests on or before February
6, 1962, and whose ownership I have been able to verify, is 10,890o00
That the total assessed valuation of property, including
improvements thereon, owned by persons within said territory pro-
posed to be annexed, who have filed written protests since
February 6, 1962 and up to the hour of this meeting, and whose
ownership I have been able to verify, is
That the value of property owned by Orange County Water
District, as submitted by them pursuant to Section 35313 of the
Government Code of California, and on which said Orange County
Water District has filed a written protest to said proposed
annexation, is
9,390.00
710.00
'The Mayor asked if anyone present wished to file a written protest,
there being no response~ declared the hearing closed°
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-210: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No° 62R-210
for passage and adoption, finding that a majority protest on both privately
and publicly owned property has not been filed°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST OF HITHER PRIVATELY-OWNED OR PUBLICLY-OWNED
PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN MADE IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR TM~ ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
UNINHABIYED IERRIIORY YO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS
PERALYA HILLS ANNEXAYION.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
5534
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Norm°
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-210 duly passed and adopted.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mro Andy Anderson~ 17651Peralta Hills Drive, and Mr. Ward
Howlun, 17872 Peralta Hills Drive, owners of property adjacent to said
proposed annexation~ addressed the Council in opposition thereto°
The foJlowing owners of property within the proposed annexation
addressed the Council in opposition to the inclusion of their properties
therein: Mro Charles Beret, 17592 Peralta Hills Drive; Mrs° James K.
Robison, 17532 Peralta Hills Drive; and Dorothy Gossett, 617 South Birch
Street, Santa Ana~ California, one of the heirs of the Clara Luchan estate.
Reasons for their opposition, briefly~ were as follows:
1o Increased taxes without City benefits such as fire and police
protection and public utilities°
2o Any annexation or development should incorporate the entire
Peralta Hills area°
3o No zoning in the City of Anaheim Code to allow them to main-
taln their present residential standards with reference to the
size of %heir lots, dwellinqs, and the keeping of livestock.
4o Inclusion in an uninhabited~annexation which does not allow
them the right to vote in an election°
The City Manager reported on water and sewer services available
in the area, and discussion was held by the City Council regarding future
subdivisions and development of the County territory, and at the conclusion
thereof, Councilman Coons moved that final consideration of the Ordinance
of Annexation be postponed to March 20, 1962, at 3:00 P.M., and that an
opinion and ruling from the County Health Department be obtained regarding
the type of sanitation facilities which would be allowed in the Peralta
Hills area~ should there be immediate development° Councilman Chandler
seconded the mo%iono MOTION CARRIED°
ORDINANCE NO. 1679: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance Nco 1679 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-46~ Lot 12 Only C-i~ Baney
Property) '
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No° 1679 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Coons moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived° Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and gchu((e.
None°
None°
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No° 1679 duly passed and adopted.
5535
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1680: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1680 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1680 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived° Councilman Coons seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIFJD.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None°
None.
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No. 1680 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1681: Councilman Fry offered Ordinance No. 1681 for final reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1631 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-16o
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1681 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Fry moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived° Councilman Coons seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry~ Thompson and Schutte.
None°
None°
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No. 1680 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1683: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance Nco 1683 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-36, C-i)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 1683, and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Coons moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived° Councilman Chandler seconded the
mo%iono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call th~ foregoing Ordinance was 8uly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSEhrf: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None°
None.
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance Nco 1683 duly passed and adopted.
5536
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1684: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance Noo 1684 for final
readingo
Refer to Ord:nance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1216 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. F-56-57-45o (R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Noo 1684
and having knowledge of the contente therein, Councilman Coons moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived° Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call 'the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo
None°
None~
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance Noo 1684 duly passed and adopted.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: Financial and operating reports for the month
of February, 19629 were ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman
Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons~ MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-211: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Noo 62R-211 for
passage and adoption~
Refer 'to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECbTION OF A RIDER TO THAT CERTAIN EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT
LOAN AGREEMENT MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY AND THE CITY ON JUNE 17, 1959, EXTENDING THE TERM THEREOF.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vo'[e:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCi L~I~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 62R-211 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-212: Councilman Coons offered Resolution Noo 62R-212 for
passage and adoption°
Refer- to Resol. u[::~on Book°
A RESOLUTION OF ]HE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROPRIATING
CERTAIN FUNDS FOR PROMOTION AND ADVERTISING WORK FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM;
AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT WITH THE ANAHEIM AREA VISITOR AND CONVENTION BUREAU
FOR THE DOING OF SAID WORK; AND PROVIDING ~OR COMPENSATION TO ANAHEIM AREA
'VISITOR AND CONVENTEON BUREAU FOR SERVICES TO BE RENDERED TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM. ($50cO ')
On roll ~,all the forego~n9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNC I LMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry~ Thompson and Schutte.
None o
None o
The Mayor' declared Resolution No° 62R-212 duly passed and adopted.
5537
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
GASOLINE CONTRACT: On report and recommendations of the City Manager, it was
moved by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Fry, that the City
continue %o purchase gasoline under the County Contract at the price
accepted by the County from Signal Oil Company at $o1611 for regular
gasoline, and $.1991 for ethyl gasoline° MOIION CARRIED.
TRANSFER OF FUNDS (DEVELOPMENT OF MEL GAUER PARK SITE): On the recommendations
of the City Manager, Councilman Thompson moved that transfer of funds in the
amount of $20,000° from the ContingencY Fund to the development of the park
site adjacent to the Mel Gauer School Fund be authorized° Councilman Fry
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
PARK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT: Councilman Thompson moved that studies be made by the
appropriate departments to adjust the program for park site development to
see that 'the development of these parks bring equities in all areas.
Councilman Fry seconded the mo%Juno MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE AND FINAL MAP~ TRACT NO. 46~4: Subdivider, George Larr~bee; tract
located east of State College Boulevard and south of Placen'tia Avenue°
Tract No~ 4614 contains 16 lots, being a re-subdivision of Lots 2 through
24 of Tract Nco 3370°
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of March 5, 1962,
approved said Tract Nco 4614~
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Coons
moved that Tentative and Final Map, Tract NCo 4614, be approved° Councilman
Thompson seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY - TRACT 4533: On the report and recommendations of the
City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that purchase be authorized of
Lots A and B, Tract Nco 4533~ at the purchase price of $4,400°00° Council-
man Coons seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
TERMINATION OF CONTRACT - STEWART CO~SSARTES: On the recommendations of the
City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that the contract with Stewart
Commi~=~£les, concessionaire at the Golf Course, be terminated on the con-
ditions that they continue to perform on a percentage basis until the City
readvertises for bids and the successful bidder assumes the opera%iono
Councilman Coons seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE: Councilman Coons moved that the Planning
Staff and the City Planning Commission hold the necessary studies and hear-
ings for the possible adoption of an amendment to the Zoning Code to
include a Hillside Zone and Residential development° Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn to March 8, 1962, 1:00 P.M., for
the purpose of considering the replacement of parking meters in the downtown
area; and al. so moved waiver of further notice of said adjournment.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 12:00 Midnighto
S I G N ED: _,~-~..~c_ ~, ~ ' City Clerk