Loading...
1962/03/13554O City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session, PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Try, Thompson and Schutte. COUNCILMEN: Coons. CITY MANAGER: Keith A, Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: ,Joe Geisler, CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: ,James P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt, Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order, MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting held February 27, 1962, Adjourned Regular Meeting held February 28, 196~, and Regular Meeting held March 6, 1962, were approved on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-214: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-214 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLV[ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINSY THE CITY AS OF MARCH 13~ 1962. (Warrants Nos. 16916-17100 and 17133-17~14, both inclusive, totaling $775,573.41.) On roll call the foregoing resolotion was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte, None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-914 duly passed and adopted. SIGN APPLICATION: Application submitted by Moore Realty for permission to erect a sign at 1719 West Katella Avenue, together with plans, were reviewed by the City Council. Councilman Chandler moved said sign application be granted as requested. Councilman ~ry seconded the motion. MG2ION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 4408: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that temporary waiver of sidewalks on proposed Allec Street, Cerritos Avende between Allec Street and Lewis Street, and alon9 Lewis Street in i'ract No. 4408, be granted with provision that no trees or other permanent piantin9 be permitted in the area designated for said sidewalks. Councilman thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - 735 WEST!~OOD DRIVE: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved thai temporary waiver of sidewalks at 735 Westwood Drive be aranted with provision that no trees or other per- manent planting be permitted in the area designated for said sidewalks. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER - SIDEWALKS, CURBS, GUTTER AND PAVING, 424 SOUTH ATCHISON STREET: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Thompson moved that tem- porary waiver of sidewalks, curbs, gutter and paving aZ 424 South Atchison Street be granted Mutual Citrus Products Company, on condition that a bond be posted to insure installation of said improvements within two years, or upon demand of the City. Councilman ~ry seconded the motion. MgFION CARRIED. 5541 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 196~, 3:00 P.M. AMUSEMENT MACHINE PERMIT: Application submitted by Louis Ed Bennett for Amuse- ment Machine Permit (two pool tables and one juke box) for "The Caravan", 226 North Manchester Avenue, was granted, subject to the recommends%ions of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Council- man Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application submitted by Willard C. and Mabel P. Compton for Entertainment Permit for "The Alibi", 8~1 South Brookhurst, was granted, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-64: Request was submitted by Robert M. Mueller for approval of final building and elevation plans in accordance with a condi- tion of Resolution No. 62R-197. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and approved on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. PARKSITE~ SUNKIST AND UNDERHILL AVENUE: Communications and petitions from Sunkist School Parent-Teachers Association and property owners in the vicinity of Sunkist Street and Underhill Avenue, requesting grass be planted on the Sunkist parksite, and also requestin9 early development of the park, suggesting the location of the Little Leaque ball diamond, and offerinc assistance in the development of the park ~y the formation of work part,es, were submitted. Mr. Murdoch reported on a meeting held by Mr. Stronach and a large group of the people in the area, and as a result, it was determined to locate [he temporary ball diamond against the easterly end of the park, adjacent to the Freeway right-of-way, separated from Underhill Avenue by approximately 100 feet. He further advised that these school facilities would not be opened when this ball diamond would be in use. Mr. Ed Culling, President, Anaheim Sunkist Civic Association, advised that they approved the solution worked out with Mr. Stronach. Mrs. Myrna Nish, q538 Tennyson Avenue, advised the Council of %he plans for use of the proposed ball diamond and explained that the equipment would be portable. Mr. Murdoch advised that this was not expected 'to be a permanent ball park, that at such time as final development of the park takes place, this particular ball diamond would no longer exist. Others addressing the Council on this issue were: Mrs. Cyprien, Mr. Keith Beachler, and Mr. Beatty. Discussion was held rela'tive to the priority scheduling of development of park sites presently acquired; the possible agricultural use of the areas that are not scheduled for early development and the easement located between the school property and the park site, and the maintenance thereof. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved that the recommendations of the Director of Parks and Recreation concerning the Sunkist parksite development be adopted and approved. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PLAN STUDY 43-56-]: Mr. Martin Kreidt explained four plans considered by the City Planning Commission in their Plan Study 43-56-1 of an area briefly described as Euclid Street to Adria Street, and Buena Vista to Palais Road, considered in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 201, and requested Council endorsement of Plan No. 2. 554~ City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - CO[MOIL MINUTES - March 15~ 196,~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. Murdoch called attention to a drainage easement which drains much of the property to the east, and if Plan No. 2 was adopted, a normal method of handling drainage would be cut off and the City would be faced with maintaining a drainage easement from the end of the cul-de-sac street to Euclid Avenue. Councilman Chandler moved to endorse the projected use of the property as a Planning Study, Exhibits Nos. 3 and 4, reserving any endorsement of engineering, drainage or street pattern. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 201: Submitted by A. C. Willia and Norman L. Butler~ Jr., requestin9 permission to establish a church on property presently zoned R-A, located briefly on the east side of Euclid Street between Palate Road and Buena Vista. The City Planning Commission granted Conditional Use Permit No, 201, subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 207: Submitted by Vernon E, and Esther Van Veghel, requesting permission %o establish a used car lot on property presently zoned C-2, located at the northwest corner of South Los Angeles Street and South Street. The City Planning Commission granted Conditional Use Permit No. 207, subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 208: Submitted by Finley Lewis, et al, requesting permission to establish a service station on property presently zoned R-l, located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue. The City Planning Commission denied without prejudice Conditional Use Permit No. 208. Mr. Martin Kreidt explained it would be contrary to the Anaheim Municipal Code to 9rant the Conditional Use Permit as the property is presently zoned R-1 due to the fact thai application for rezoning, No. 60-61-44, in which the subject property is included, has never been finalized. No further action was taken by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 1445: Submitted by Calark Corporation, requesting waiver of side- yard setback requirements and minimum width of garages, on property presently zoned R-3, located on the west side of Rose Street approximately 203 feet south of Broadway. The City Planning Commission denied without prejudice Variance No. 1445. No further action was taken by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 1446 - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 4545: Submitted by Emil H. Von Seggern, requestin9 waiver of minimum parcel size requirement on property presently zoned R-Ay located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue between Has%er and Spinnaker Streets. The City Planning Commission granted Variance No. 1446, subject to conditions. Although "no action" was taken by the City Council on Variance No. 1446, the correct method of handling situationswhere a subdivision creates a "non-conformin9 R-A lot" by means of a companion reclassification for R-1 zoning was explained by Councilman Chandler. 5543 ~.jty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. VARIANCE NO. 1447: Submitted by Maria G. Hurtado, requesting waiver of minimum floor area requirement of a proposed second dwelling, property located on the north side of Chartres Street between Topeka and Atchison Streets. The City Planning Commission granted Variance No. 1447, subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 1448: Submitted by Herman G. Reich, requesting waiver of minimum rear yard setback requirement on property located at the knuckle formed by the intersection of Clover Avenue and Fulton Street. The City Planning Commission granted Variance No. 1448, subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 1449: Submitted by Charles B. Shiner, Jr., requesting waiver of minimum rear yard setback requirement, property presently zoned R-1 and located at the knuckle formed by the intersection of Savoy Avenue and Dover Street. The City Planning Commission granted Variance No. 1449, subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 1456: Submitted by Trust Development Company, Inc., et al, requesting waiver of minimum front yard setback requirement, property presently zoned R-3 and located briefly on the west side of Western Avenue between Lincoln and Orange Avenues. The City Planning Commission granted Variance No. 1456. No further action was taken by the C~ty Council. STREET NAME CHANGE: Excerpt. from ~he minutes of the City Planninc Commission meeting held February 19, 1962, recommending that proposed street name change of Woodworth Road to Palais Road, west of N~twood Street and north of Chanticleer Road in Tract No. 388?, not be adopted, was submitted (copies furnished each Councilman). No further action was taken by the City Council. PUBLIC HEARING, HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Submitted by Manuel B. Cardoza requesting permission to move a dwelling from 9089 South Moody Street, Cypress, Cali- fornia, to 816 South Agate Street, Anaheim, California. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. B. J. Long, 810 South Agate Street, submitted a petition purportedly containing twenty signatures of property owners in the area objecting to said House Moving Permit. Mayor Schutte left the meeting, 4:fi5 P.M. Petition of protest was referred to Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant C~ty Manager, to ascertain if said protest represented $0 per cent of the owners of property within 300 feet radius of subject property, and said hearing was deferred for this report. Later in the meeting, after comparinq the list of those receiving notice of said public hearing with those appearing on petition of protest, Mr. Davis reported there were 31 parcels of property within the 300 feet radius includin9 subject property; that protests filed represent 15 parcels of property, being less than majority required to terminate proceedings. 5544 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mrs. Manuel Cardoza advised that the subject property is in escrow pending the Council's decision, that the house to be moved is well built and in excellent condition. It has large rooms, and when painted and the yard landscaped, in her opinion it will be equivalent to any house in the area. Mr. B. J. Long stated that the only objection of ±he neighbors was the age of the house to be moved in. In their opinion, a house 25 or 30 years old would not be in keeping architecturally with the present homes on the street, which are only six years old. Major R. L. Jones, 807 Agate Street, Director-at-large of the Sherwood Forest Association, said that although he had not seen the house to be moved, he had talked with neighbors on Agate Street and found them opposed to the 9ranting of this permit because of the age of the house. Mayor Pro Tem Fry asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-215: Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that the 50 per cent protest provisions prohibiting granting of house moving permits was established in order to maintain neighbor harmony, and therupon offered Resolution No. 62R-215 for adoption, denying the application of Manuel Cardoza for a House Moving Permit. Pefer to Resolution Book. A RESOLLFflON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING THE APPLI- CATION OF MANUEL B. CARDOZA FOR A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 9082 $OlffH MOODY STREET, CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA TO 816 SOUTH AGATE STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: Chandler, Fry and Thompson. None. Coons. COUNCILMEN: Schutte. Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-215 duly passed and adopted. Mayor Schutte returned to the meeting, 4:40 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 1685: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1685 for first and final readin9. Said UrgencY Ordinance was read in full by the City Clerk. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO TWO NEW SECTIONS NUMBERED 14.32.080 AND 14.32.090 RELATING TO PARKING. (One and Two Hour Parking~ Downtown Area) On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No. 1685 duly passed and adopted. 5545 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1969~ 3:00 P.ML It was moved by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Thompson, that the request of Dr. C. M, O'Brien, D. C., for limited parking or park- ing meters on Melrose Street and East Lincoln Avenue be referred to the City Manager for study and recommendation, and to be considered at the next City Council meeting (March 20, 1962). XOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENT - LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Communication dated March 5, 1962, from Mrs. Martha G. Raymond, Secretary, Anaheim Public Library Board of Trustees, regarding expiration of terms of two Library Board members on April 30, 1962 was submitted. On the recommendations of the Library Board, Mr. Arthur W. Gray, Jr., and Mrs. Elizabeth J. Schultz were reappointed to the Anaheim Public Library Board of Trustees for the ensuing term, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENT - ANAHEIM CITIZENS' CIVIL DEFENSE COMMITTEF: On the recommendations of the Civil Defense Coordinator, Charles E. Griffith, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Fry, that Mrs. Phyllis Jean Langorgen be appointed, member at large, of the Anaheim Citizens' Civii Defense Committee. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 140: At the request of Mr. Leo Freedman, final building and elevation plans for construction of service station were sub- mitted for approval in accordance with condition of Resolution No. 7131. Plans were reviewed by the City Council and discussion was held. Councilman Chandler moved that final buildinq and elevation plans for Conditional Use Permit No. 140 be approved subject-'to conformance with all requirements of Building, Engineering and Planning Departments. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PRELIMINARY PLANS, CITY HALL REST RO0~ FACILITIES: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that preliminary plans, with corrections noted and as prepared by Botich . Munns, Architects, for the City Hall Rest Room Facilities, be approved and the Architect authorized to proceed with final plans. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:10 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order, ,~:o:n.: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. ABSENT: oOUNC t LMEN: Coons. INVOCATION: FLAG SALINE: Rev, Buttram, Pastor of the Town Church, gave the invocation. Mayor Schutte led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 200: Submitted by Lutheran Home Association of California, requesting permission to establish Home for the Aged and construct new building on R-A property located at 891 South Walnut Street (northwest corner of Walnut Street and Ball Road), The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 222, Series 1961-62, 9ranted said Conditional Use Permit for expansion of an existin9 Home for the Aged, subject to the following conditions: City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1 with plans for the future development of an additional 75 units on the westerly portion of subject property to be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval prior to development. 2. Provision of parking facilities as required, said parking to be pro- vided on the site of subject property. 3. Dedication of 53 feet from the centerline of Ball Road westerly 442 feet plus or minus of subject parcel. (30 feet existing,) 4. Dedication of 36~ feet from the centerline of Ball Road approximately 160 to 200 feet west of the easterly property line of subject property (35 feet existing). 5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Road. 6. Installation of sidewalks along the westerly 368 feet plus or minus Ball Road frontage of subject property in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 7. Installation of a 4 foot wide sidewalk along the easterly 274 feet plus or minus Ball Road frontage of subject property subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, acces- ible to trash-truck pick-up and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 9. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Mr. Gilbert I. Huffman, and public hearing scheduled before the Council this date. Mayor Schutte stated that he was affiliated with the Lutheran Home Association, the applicant, and thereupon turned the meeting over to Councilman Fry, Mayor Pro Tem, and withdrew from participation as Councilman. Mayor Pro Tem Fry asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. A. J. Schutte explained their proposed three story addition to the Lutheran Home, and advised that he has met with the people who filed the appeal and that they are now satisfied with their proposed development. Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject R-A property and the existing land uses in the immediate area, and specifically called attention to Finding No. 6 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. 222, Series 1961-62, as follows: That is is hereby deemed necessary, in order to permit the develo._oment of subject property in accordance with the plans submitted, that the waiver of the following sections of the Anaheim Municipal Code be granted as authorized by Code, Section 18.64.070: a. Waiver of Code, Section 18.16.020 to permit the construction of a three (3! story building. b. Waiver of Code, Section 18.16.030 (1 and 3) to permit the existing buildings to extend into the required front and rear yards. C. Waiver of Code, Section 18.16.030 (4-c) to permit a density of single dwelling unit construction in excess of one family per 6,000 square feet of lot area. Mayor Pro Tem Fry asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-216: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-216 for passage and adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 200 as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLFEES - March 13, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLLFEION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 200. On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the foIiowing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: Chandler, Fry and Thompson. None. Coons. COUNCILMEN: Schutte. Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared ResoIu%ion No. 62R-216 duly passed and adopted. Mayor Schu%te returned to the Council Table. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 61-62-59 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 189: RECLASSIFICATION NO, 61-62-59: Submitted by William T. and Leona Greger, Owners, Vandruff Developments~ Inc., Agent, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, property described briefly as located on the west side of Sunkist Street between Lincoln Avenue and South Street, approximately 255 feet south of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 218, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification~ subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. 2. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 189. 3. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the north, west and south bound~ries of subject property and the provision of a six (6) foot dec- orativ~ masonry wall on the easterly property except for those areas reserved for ingress and egress to Sunkist Street and with the instal- lation of landscaping in the proposed planter area abutting Sunkist Street, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said land- scaping and walls to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Sunkist Street (20 feet existing). 5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Sunkist Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Sunkist Street. 7. Provision of a five (5) foot utility easement along the northerly and southerly boundaries of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties at the time of the installation of service facilities. 8. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 9. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in slze~ accesible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall~ prior to Final Building Inspection. 10. Provisions for the adequate drainage of subject property subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to Final Building Inspection. 11. Provision of an eight (8) foot utility easement along the westerly boundary of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties at the time of the installation of service facilities. 12. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 4, 5 and 6. City Hall~ Anaheim¶ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 189: Requestin9 permission to construct a planned unit development on property described in Reclassification No, 61-62-59. The City Plannin9 Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 219, Series 1961-62, 9ranted said Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos, 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No, 61-62-59, 3. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the north, west and south boundaries of subject property with the provision of a six (6) foot decorative block wall on the easterly property line except for those areas reserved for ingress and egress to Sunkist Street and with the installation of landscaping in the proposed planter area abutting Sunkist Street, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and sub- ject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Sunkist Street (20 feet existing). 5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Sunkist Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Sunkist Street. 7. Provision of a five (5) foot utility easement along the northerly and southerly boundaries of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties at the time of the installation of service facilities. 8. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 9. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accesible to trash-truck pick-up~ and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 10. Provisions for the adequate drainage of subject property to be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 11. Provision of an eight (8) foot utility easement along the westerly boundary of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties at the time of the installation of service facilities. 12. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 4, 5 and 6. Communication dated February 6, 1962, from Mr. Richard A. Dragoo, protesting said application and requesting that the petitions presented at the City Planning Commission hearings be made a part of the file and con- sidered by the City Council at this hearing, was submitted. Councilman Chandler withdrew from the Council Table and took no part in the discussion or action, being a party of interest %o subject application. Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject property~ the existing land use in the area and existing zoning in the area, and presented a Planning Study indicating possible development; also he presented in map form Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 indicating various projections such as expansion o£ the existing commercial center and development o£ the remaining area as R-3 and R-l, or the development of the entire area for residential purposes. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Vandruff~ the Agent~ President~ Vandruff Development, placed their proposed plans for a garden-type development on the wall and advised that these would be exclusive type one-story apartments, renting at an approximate figure of $155.00 per month, and be completely enclosed by concrete block wall surrounding the entire property, including the front, 5549 C_itv Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. a'~ will be nicely landscaped with canary island pines as a theme. He referred to the basic objections to apartments, and was of the opinion that they have overcome these objections as their garden-type development is a carefully planned project which will enhance the community and not detract from it. Mr. Norman Smedegaard, Attorney representing Mr. Vandruff, further explained their proposed project (101 units) and advised that much time and consideration has been given to this development prior to the filing of applications, which applications have now been approved by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. W. C. White, 2214 Virginia Avenue, resident in the area, addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed development, being of the opinion that the construction thereof would not be compatible to the restrictions placed on their residences. Mr. Thomas Avery, 2520 Westport Drive, representing a large number of home owners in the immediate area, addressed the Council in opposition to subject applications, being of the opinion that this is the one remaining continuous R-1 area in Anaheim, which does not have the R-3 encroachment, that they did not feel R-3 is needed in this area of prime residential character, and urged denial of said development. Mrs. Charles Moore, 500 Peregrine Street, advised her home is adjacent %o the proposed development and questioned the drainage engin- eering, as their property is four feet lower than subject property. Mr. Earl Dahlman, owner of property at Sunkist and Lincoln, advised that they do have a drainage problem and that they have lost their orchardi that he believed the property owner should be allowed to develop his property to its highest and best use. Mr. and Mrs. Jack Paulus, 2527 l~estport Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to the erection of apartments oF any kind in the middle of a single family residential area. Mr. Paulus was of the opinion that Exhibit No. 3 as presented by Mr. Kreidt was the best and most logical~plan for development in this area. Mr. Smedegaard advised that the drainage problem would be met zn accordance with City Engineering requirements, that the developer of the property believes this %o be %he best and highest use for his property, and urged favorable consideration by %he Council, in accordance with the recommends%ions of the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearino closed on Reclassification No. 61-62-59. ~ RESOLUTION NO. 62R-217: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-217 for passage and adoption, denying Reclassification No. 61-62-59. Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. /61-6~-59! On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Fry, Thompson and Schutte. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Coons. TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler. The Mayor declared ResOlution No. 62R-217 duly passed and adopted. 5550 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLFFES - March 13, 1962~ 3:00 Mayor Schutte asked if anyone wished to address the Council regarding application for Conditional Use Permit No. 189, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-218: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-218 for passage and adoption denying Conditional Use Permit No. 189. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 189. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. COUNCILMEN: Chandler. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-218 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Chandler returned to the Council Table. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-73: Submitted by Lydia Davis, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-2, property described briefly as located on %he east side of Beach Boulevard between Lincoln Avenue and Buena Park City Limits, being approximately 720 feet north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 224, Series 1961-62, recommended reclassification to C-i, Neighborhood Commercial, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the northerly boundary and the easterly boundary of subject property except for that area occupied by the existing residence. 3. Limitation of the use of the existing residence to residential purposes only with no combined residential and commercial use permitted. 4. Removal of the existing residence on subject property at such time as the residential use of said residence is discontinued at which time a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be installed on the easterly boundary thereby providing a continuous block wall along the entire easterly boundary of subject property. 5. Installation of a minimum six (6) foot landscaped strip along the entire frontage of subject property, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Stanton Avenue and Beach Boulevard, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 7. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Stanton Avenue and Beach Boulevard. 8. Provision of a ten foot utility easement along the westerly boundary of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at the time of the installation of service facilities. 9. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 10. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 6, 7 and 8. 5551 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and summarized the evidence reported to the City Planning Commission at their hearing and their findings and recommendations resulting therefrom, that C-1 was recommended instead of C-2 because the proposed uses indicated were allowable in C-1 Zone. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. It was noted by the Council in reviewing the plot plan con- tained in the file that the uses indicated were a hardware store, an auto supply store, and a drug store. Mr. Phil Manning, representing Mrs. Davis, advised that the parcel on which the existing house is located is not a part of this pro- posed development; however, is included in the rezoning application, that there will be a six foot block wall surrounding this existing property. Regarding the thirty foot easement, Mr. Manning advised that this was an easement between the Akron Company and Mrs. Davis. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-219: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-219 for passage and adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone to C-l, subject to the recommendations of the City Plan- ning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-73 - C-i) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-219 duly passed and adopted. ~UBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO, 61-62-74 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 199: ~.ECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-74: Submitted by Paul Pletz, Owner, Rothman-Steen and Associates~ Agents, requesting change of zone from R-1 and R-O to C-1 and R-3 on property described briefly as located at the northeast corner of East Street and South Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 225, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 190: Submitted by Paul Pletz, Owner, requesting permission to establish a multiple family planned unit development on a por- tion of property described in Reclassification No. 61-62-74. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 226, Series 1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated the location of subject property on the map and the existing land uses and existinq zoning in the immediate area, and also referred to the exhibits and Planning Study No. 29-94-2, submitted to the Council at a previous hearing. He summarized the evidence reported to the City Planning Commission at their hearing resulting in their findings and recommendations, and specifically called attention to Finding No. 4 of Resolution No. 225 as follows: 555~ City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not con- form to the intent of Precise Plan Study No. 29-94-2 as recommended by the Planning Commission to the City Council for the ultimate development of the subject property, and that the Planning Commission does hereby re-affirm said recommendation, thereby keeping faith in the matter of resolving the problems affecting those properties located on the west side of East Street between Water Street and South Street. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to be heard. Mr. John Rothman, Rothman-Steen and Associates, representing Mr. Paul Pletz, Owner, addressed the Council urging favorable consideration of subject applications, and was of the opinion that the parcel of property is too small for development as recommended, and that the east side of East Street would not be desirable for residential use; that Mr. Pletz believes the highest and best use of the property would be by development of a small neighborhood shoppin9 center alon9 East Street, and that a Speedee Market with small adjacent service shops would meet an existing community need. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, Mr. Duncan Vanderbilt, 705 Grove Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition and referred to the petition of protest filed with the City Planning Commission containing fifty-nine signatures; that as a general rule C-1 and R-3 do not upgrade a residential community, and questioned why a nice R-1 development could not be considered with a solid block wall along East Street; that even though there is existing commercial on the west side of East Street, he did not believe this should be the basis for considering that the east side of East Street should also be commercial, and was of the opinion that East Street itself should remain the boundary line between commercial and residential. Mr. Harold Hall, 1240 Crestbrook Place, addressed the Council in opposition %o the requested applications, and was of the opinion that the residents in this area would continue to shop at the major shopping centers which serve this area now; that East Street is the buffer and commercial zoning should not be moved across said street. Mr. Rothman advised that on February 23, 1962, he sent a letter to the fifty-nine people who signed the petition of protest advising the people that it was their intent to withdraw the R-3 Zoning completely and present an R-1 subdivision and requested the opportunity to meet with them to further explain their proposed plans and also the small commercial development; that he did not receive any response from the residents. He advised that Mr. Pletz has determined that there is a potential need for a small center in this area of 767 homes, and requested that said appli- cationsbe granted. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification Application No. 61-62-74. RESOLUTION NO 62R-220: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-220 for passage and adoption, denying Reclassification No. 61-62-74. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-74) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. · AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-220 duly passed and adopted. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 199, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-221: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-221 for passage and adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 199. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 199. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNC I L~EN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-221 duly passed and adopted, pUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-75: Submitted by James Allen Bodine, Owner, Charles G. Hart, Authorized Agent, requesting change of zone from R-1 to R-3, property located at 124 South Bush Street (east side of Bush Street between Lincoln Avenue and Broadway). The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 227, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be approved~ subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the northerly boundary of subject property where subject property abuts Property classified in the R-l, One Family Residential, Zone. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Bush Street. 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 5. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division. which are adequate in size, accesible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. ~Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item No. 3. Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject property, the existing land usage in the area, and the present zoning of the area~ and surmmarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission at their hearing and their findings and recommendations resulting therefrom. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the ounc~l C ' . Mr. Charles Hart, Agent, was present to answer any questions. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address theCouncil, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-222: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No, 62R-~q2 for passage and adoption, authorizin9 the preparation of necessary Ordinance changin9 the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-75 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte0 None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-222 duly passed and adopted, PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-76: Submitted by Arthur R. Budd, requesting change of zone from R-3 to C-l, property described briefly as located a% the northwest corner of Euclid and Chalet Avenues, being Lots 140-145 of Tract No. 2779. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 228, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be approved for C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, restricted to Business and Professional offices only, subject to the followin9 conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Installation of a six (6) foot landscaped strip along the planned highway right-of-way line of Euclid Avenue, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, prior to Final Building Inspection. 3. Recordation of standard C-i, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone Deed Restrictions limiting use of subject property to medical and dental offices only and restricting maximum height to one story. 4. Dedication of vehicular access rights along Euclid and Chalet Avenues with continuance of access rights to the public alley. 5. Use of existing structure on subject property to be subject to the approval of the Chief Building Inspector. 6. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Euclid Avenue (50 feet existing). 7. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 8. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 3, 4 and 6. Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject property, the existing uses in the area and the present zoning in the area, and summarized the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission at their hearing and their findings and recommendations resulting therefrom. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council9 and the Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Dr. Arthur R. Budd, applicant, 1019 North Ferndale, Fullerton, California, advised that this proposed medical and dental development was designed primarily to avoid a traffic problem along Euclid Avenue, that they did not believe that parking along Euclid Avenue would interfere with the flow of traffic because of the width of the Avenue. He called atten- tion to their parking arrangement and to the in and out drive off Chalet Avenue, which does not require the use of the existing alley~ that they were advised that because of the traffic situation on Euclid Avenue, it 5555 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. would be better planning to limit the ingress and egress to Chalet Avenue~ however, they would prefer an entrance off Euclid Avenue if a traffic study so recommended. /he Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mrs. Frank Highlen, 1330 Falcon Street, whose property adjoins subject property, addressed the Council advising it was her understanding that along the alley there was to be constructed a iow wall to prevent the people from backing into the block wall along the rear property line of the adjoining residential lots. In answer to questions from the audience, the Assistant City Attorney and the City Engineer advised that the alley in question was a dedicated alley included in the recordation of the Final Map, Tract No. 2779. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-223: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-223 for passage and adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone %o C-l, limited to business and professional offices only, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission with the following amendment to Condition No. 4 thereof: Dedication of vehicular access rights along Euclid and Chalet Avenues except for two access drives on Euclid Avenue and one access drive on Chalet Avenue. Also, subject %o the following conditions: 1. Dedication of vehicular access rights to the existing alley at the west of subject property. 2. Provision for the construction of a block wall along the westerly boundary line of subject property not less than three feet in height. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-76 - C-l, Business and Professional Offices only) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-223 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:15 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order, Councilmen Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte being present. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-77 AND VARIANCE NO. 1444: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-77: Submitted by Dr. LeRoy O. Schultz, Owner, Theodore E. Pearson~ Authorized Agent, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-1 on property at 2426 Orange Avenue, and briefly described as located on the south side of Orange Avenue between Bruce Street and Webster Avenue. City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINIIrES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 229, Series 1961-62~ recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 with the revision of Elevations of Plan A and B to provide for wood shingle or shake roofs. 2. Recordation of Record of Survey Map in accordance with the Record of Survey submitted by the petitioner~ prior to issuance of the Building Permit. 3. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 4, Subject to the approval of Petition for Variance No. 1444. VARIANCE NO. 1444: Submitted by Dr. LeRoy O. Schultz, requesting: 1, Waiver of minimum lot width requirement on proposed Lots 3 and 4. 2. Waiver of minimum front yard setback requirement on all proposed lots. 3. Waiver of minimum rear yard setback requirement on proposed Lot 2. on property contained in Reclassification No. 61-62-77. The City Planning Commission pursuant to %heir Resolution No, 230, Series 196]-62, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5~ 6, 7, 8 and 9 with the revision of Elevations of Plan A and B to provide for wood shingle or shake roofs. 2. Recordation of Record of Survey Map in accordance with the R~cord of Survey submitted by the petitioner, prior to issuance of the Building Permit. 3. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 4. Subject to the approval of Petition of Reclassification No. 61-62-77. Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated the location of subject property on the map and the existing zoning in the area, and summarized the evidence presented %o the City Planning Commission at their hearing and their findings and recommendations resulting therefrom. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council~ and the Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Frank E. Hortel~ Jr., President of Pacco Construction~ Inc.~ addressed the Council further explaining the proposed plans of development, and advised that all dedications have been made and improvements installed. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 61-62-77. RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-224: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-224 for passage and adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-77 - R-i) City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: C OUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler~ Fry, Thompson and Schut%e. None. Coons. /he Mayor declared Resolution No, 62R-224 duly passed and adopted. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council regarding Variance No. 1444, there being no response~ declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-225: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-225 for passage and adoption, granting Variance No. 1444, subject to the recommenda- tions of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1444. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-225 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-78: Submitted by Alex L. Fishman and 3erry Marks, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-2 (Parcel No. 1) and P-1 (Parcel No. 2), property described briefly as located on the west side of Empire Street between Lincoln Avenue and Hiawatha Avenue~ approximately 250 feet south of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 231~ Series 1961-62, recommended Reclassification No. 61-62-78 be approved for P-l, Parking Zone only~ subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1 with appro- priate modification for compliance with the conditions outlined herein. 2. Dedication to the City of Anaheim of all vehicular access rights from the subject property to Empire Street. 3. Provision and maintenance of a twenty (20) foot wide access driveway extending northerly from subject property to Lincoln Avenue with the installation of suitable concrete barriers not less than one and one- half (lb) feet in height abutting and parallel to both sides of said driveway subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to Final Building Inspection of the parking lot. 4. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall, where said walls do not exist, along the southerly boundary of subject property and the instal- lation of a five (5) foot wide strip of landscaping including tree wells with the installation of trees therein at forty (40) foot intervals, as indicated on Exhibit No. 1, plans for said landscaping to be subject to the approval o£ the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said walls and landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 5. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall five (5) feet westerly of and parallel to the easterly boundary of subject property on Empire Street with the provision of landscaping in said five (5) foot setback together with landscaping in the parkway portion of Empire Street abutting subject property, said landscaping to include trees at forty (40) foot intervals, and further provided that the plans for. all land- scaping shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Super- intendent of Parkway Maintenance and said landscaping and walls to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection of the parking lot. City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - March 13~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. 6. Provision that should lighting be installed in the P-i~ PARKING~ ZONE area of subject property, light standards shall not exceed a maximum height of six (6) feet, shall be directed and reflected away from adjacent residential properties~ and shall be subject to the approval of and inspection by the Chief Building Inspector, 7. Dedication of 30 feet from the monumented centerline of Empire Street (22 feet and 30 feet existing). 8. Preparation of street improvement plans and the installation of all improvements on the Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street frontage of the parcel of property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer~ as stipulated by the petitioners. 9. Installation of sidewalks on Empire Street abutting subject property in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 10. Provision of a five (5) foot utility easement on south property line and eight (8) feet on west property line to adequately serve the subject property and other property, at the time of the installation of service facilities. 11. Relocation of existing irrigation line if necessary~ prior to Final Building Inspection of the parking lot. 12. Dedication of Lot "A" along Empire Street. 13. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 2, 7, 8, 9 and 12. Letter of protest from Lincoln Park Civic Association dated February 10~ 1962~ and also letter of protest from John D. Moore~ dated March 3, 1962, were submitted (copies having been furnished each Council- man). Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject property, the existing uses in the area and the present zoning of the area, and advised that the City Planning Commission did not consider that the request for C-2 was appropriate at this time because said request was for the establishment of a nursery on Parcel No. 1 at a future time, and therefore recommended P-1 Zoning on both Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2 entirely for parking. Mr. Kreidt summariTed the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission at their hearing resulting in their findings and recommendations, and specifically called attention to Finding No. 5 of Resolution No. 231, as follows: That the petitioners agree to the dedication and installation of all improvements for that property owned by the petitioners~ but not in- cluded in subject petition, said property being situated on the south- west corner of Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and the Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Alex Fishman, Co-Owner of Lin-Brook Hardware, addressed the Council briefly outlining the history of Lin-Brook Hardware~ and advised that Lin-Brook has expanded with the growth of the City in every respect, with the exception of parking; that they were withdrawing their request for C-2 Zoning and urged favorable consideration by the Council of the P-1 Zoning as recommended by the City Planning Commission. He summarized reasons why in his opinion the reclassification should be granted, as follows: 1. It is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. It is in the best interests of the people of the City of Anaheim~ and it contributes to the good and welfare, to tax revenue, safety~ and convenience of the people of the City. 3. It is good zoning practice, compatible and complimentary to existing permitted uses. 4. /here is a genuine need and necessity for adequate off-street parking in this area. 5. Progress along Lincoln should be encouraged rather than stifled. City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P,M, Planning Department recommendations consistent with the actual and reasonable way out of this area and the State development of roadways in this area point to this as a most logical use. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Dick Tevlin, President of Lincoln Park Civic Association, addressed the Council in opposition, being of the opinion that the applicants created their own problems through expansion without providin9 adequate parking in conjunction therewith. He compared Lin-Brook to the large similar developments such as Gemco and Fed-Mart, and referred to their restrictions pertaining to parking, and noted that these establish- ments were not adjacent to residentially developed property; that they realize that Lincoln is a very heavily travelled highway, however felt that the hazardous traffic conditions were created by the expansion of Lin-Brook in this area, which was originally intended to be a neighborhood commercial area. He felt that the former reclassification where conces- sions were made by both sides was the fairest and most logical reclassifi- cation. Mr. /om Welch, 2048 Embassy Street, living across the street from subject property, addressed the Council in opposition, advising that the original variance was for a small neighborhood commercial with twenty parking spaces; next they were told to clean up the area and place the outside storage inside the building; next they were allowed to increase the size of their building, however the outside storage still remained and promises to clean up the area had not been kept; that the accident rate in this area has increased because of left turns off Lincoln Avenue, and also the patrons cut across the vacant lot without the benefit of curb breaks, and enter on to a residential street. He was of the opinion that to increase the parking area would not decrease the traffic problem which exists; that they were in favor of the zoning solution as result of their compromise at the hearing in 1959 (Resolution No. 5038, Reclassifi- cation F-58-59-47). Mrs. Stella Chavos, Chairman of the Committee in 1959 when zoning of this area was before the City Council, addressed the Council in opposition outlining the history of the various zonin9 actions, and was of the opinion that the intent of the original Variance No. 630 which was granted for a controlled commercial hardware store has been violated, and the development has now expanded beyond the intent of a !qeighborhood Commercial Zoning, and should be relocated in an area of sufficient size to accomodate this expanded activity. In her opinion, the R-1 potential in this area has increased rather than decreased in the last two years, and as result restrictions on this property should be greater than they were two years ago. Mrs. Chavos felt that the residents in the immediate area com- promised in good faith regarding action pertaining to the entire six acres included in Reclassification No. F-58-59-ag~ and requested that said' rezoning action be reinstated in accordance with the original Council action. In her opinion, the removal of the parcel of property owned by Mrs. Groover was the result of misinformation and should not have been deleted without a public hearing. She further advised that according to her information, Centex Company were %he owners of Lot "A", being a ten foot strip along Empire Street. Mr. Richard Myers, 234 Empire Street, addressed the Council in OpPOsition, being of the opinion ~ha~ ~he e×panslon was £or personal 9aln and not for the benefit of the City of Anaheim, due to the increase of congestion and traffic hazards in the area. Further, that any additional expansion would devaluate the adjacent residential properties. Mr. George Strachan addressed the Council statin9 that he was not appearing as an official representative of the Chamber of Commerce, however, there has been a definite policy established as far as the Chamber of Commerce is concerned, to try and protect all interests in the City, both residential and commercial. He was of the opinion that the area was City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 commercial, and with proper protection to the adjacent residential properties recommended the Council uphold the action taken by the City Plannin9 Com- mission. Mrs. Zustiak, 2108 Hiawatha, addressed the Council in opposition to said reclassification, and questioned whether or not Lin-Brook would install sidewalks on Empire Street, inasmuch as they have not installed sidewalks in front of their present business. She objected to the loud speakers used by Lin-Brook and the apparent fire hazard which exists. Mr. Fishman again addressed the Council sta%in9 that he had no part in the hearth9 pertainin9 to Reclassification No. F-58-59-47; however they are the owners of the entire property under consideration at this time; that their present request was initiated after receiving notice from the City Attorney's office of Code regulations pertaining to storage of merchandise outside of a building; that when a Building Permit was applied for to adequately cover this material, it was learned that insufficient parkin9 prohibited the issuance of the Building Permit, He further advised that all of the buildings on the property are constructed in the area covered by the original Variance No. 630. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that City Council decision on this application be deferred for three weeks (April 3, 1962) to allow for a complete report from the City Attorney's Office concerning the present status of Parcels 1, 2 and 3~ as indicated in Reclassification Proceedings No. F-58-59-47. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-226: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-226 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT TO THE CITY TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A STORM DRAIN INLET IN SAID DISTRICT'S REINFORCED BOX CULVERT OF THE ANAHEIM-BARBER CITY CHANNEL AT CERRITOS AVENUE. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-226 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-227: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-227 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLU/ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PIPE LINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO THE CITY A LICENSE TO CON- STRUCT AND MAINTAIN ONE PIPE LiNE 27" IN DIAMETER ACROSS OR ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY AT OR NEAR THE STATION OF ATWOOD, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: 5561 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-227 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-228: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-228 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A PRE- LIMINARY AGREEMENT FROM PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY, SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, AND NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR STREET WIDENING AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES ON PRIVATELY-OWNED PARCELS OF PROPERTY ALONG CERRITOS AVENUE AND LEWIS STREET. On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte, None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-228 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-229: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-229 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT, OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL MATERIALS, PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF CHAIN LINK FENCES IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-229 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-230: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-230 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE FURNISHING, INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISH AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCING AROUND PORTIONS OF THE PERIMETER OF THE OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 4004a~ IN ACCOR- DANCE WITH AND CONFORMING IN GENERAL TO PRELIMINARY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER, DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONFORMING THERETO TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE BIDDER; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened March 29, 1962, 2:00 P.M.I 5562 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and sdopted by the following vote:' AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COI~CILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-230 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-231: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-231 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS, FOR THE FURNISH- ING OF ALL MATERIALS, PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS AND ALLEYS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION OF PAVING, CURBING, GUTTERS, STORM DRAINS AND SIDEWALKS, AND FOR THE RELOCA- TION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF FIXED TIME TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry~ 'Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-231 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-232: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-232 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE, FROM STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD (PLACENTIA AVENUE) TO ACACIA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 94; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened April 5, 1962, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES; COUNCILMEN; ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-232 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTIO~ NO,. 62R-233: On the certification of Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works~ and George F. Oelkers, Director of Public Utilities, that Weardco Construction Corporation have completed the construction of the Olive Hills Reservoir and !Mater Transmission Main Unit No. 4, Work Order No. 4004, in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-233 for passage and adoption. 5563 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF 36" CONCRETE CYLINDER PIPE, WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN, UNIT NO. 4, FROM RESERVOIR TO RIVERSIDE FREEWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 4004. (Weardco Construc- tion Corporation) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNt I LMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-233 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-234: On the certification of Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works~ that Crosby Construction Company have completed the con- struction of an addition to the Finance Building of the City of Anaheim at 114 South Claudina Street, Job No. 663, in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-234 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF AN ADDITION TO THE FINANCE BUILDING OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AT 114 SOUTH CLAUDINA STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. 663. (Crosby Construction Company) On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-234 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-235: On the certification of Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, that Orange County Sewers, Incorporated, have completed the Beach Boulevard Sewer Improvement, Job No. 1229, in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-235 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WAIER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BEACH BOULEVARD SEWER IMPROVE- MENI, FROM APPROXIMATELY 1300 FEET SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO LINCOLN AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1229. (Orange County Sewers~ Inc.) ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-235 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-236: On the certification of Thornton E, Piersall, Director of Public Works, that Staler, Incorporated, have completed the Lincoln Avenue Sewer Improvement, Job No. 1235 in accordance with plans and speci- fications, Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-236 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABORs SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATERs AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE LINCOLN AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 325 FEET EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD TO DALE AVENUEs IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1235. (Stalers Inc.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandlers Frys Thompson and Schut%e. None. Coons. Mayor Schutte declared Resolution No. 62R-236 duly passed and adopted. CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS - 816 SOUTH AGATE STREET: On the recommendations of the City Managers Councilman Thompson moved that the City Attorney's Office be directed to prepare necessary resolution authorizing the commencement of Eminent Domain proceedings on property located at 816 South Agate Street. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Fry offered the following resolutions for passage and adoption: Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-237: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Candell - Brown) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-238: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Centralia School District) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-239: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Orange County Flood Control District) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-240: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Camille Alle¢, Jr.) City EaL1, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINIIfES - March 13, 196~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-241: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Lloyd R. Pettengill) On roll call the foregoing Resolutions Nos. 62R-237 to 62R-241, both inclusive, were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-237 to 62R-~41~ both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, cancellation of City taxes was authorized on property acquired by the Orange County Flood Control District formerly assessed to Ronald T. Reynolds, recorded February 2, 1962, in Book 5996 at Page 539 as Document No. 1029, Official Records of Orange County (Project E1 - Santa Aha River Channel, Parcel No. 1206). MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1682: Councilman Fry offered Ordinance No. 1682 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-26 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1682 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Fry moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COL~NCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No. 1682 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1686: Councilman Thompson offered Ordinance No. 1686 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-49 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1686 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Fry moved %he reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1687: Councilman Thompson offered Ordinance No. 1687 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-60 - M-1 and P-L) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1687 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Fry moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 5566 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13, 1962~ 3:00 CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler~ seconded by Councilman Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. Herb Eggett, President; Orange County Property Owners Assoc. Feather River Project Association (Resolution~ Notice of Meeting~ and 1962 Annual Budget. RENEWAL - BLUE CROSS INSURANCE: On the recommendations of the City Manager and Assistant Personnel Director, Councilman Thompson moved that renewal of the Blue Cross Insurance be authorized and the increase in rates approved. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - SCOREBOARD~ LA PALMA PARK: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Fry moved that the request of American Legion Baseball Tournament for an "ad" panel on %he scoreboard at La Palma Park be approved, subject to %he following conditions: 1. Advertising thereon to be approved by the City Council. 2. Maximum of two advertisements on the panel. 3. No alcoholic beverage advertisements. 4. Maximum period of five years, at which time the sign and all rights for rental of advertisement space become the property of the City of Anaheim. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PLANNING STUDY NO. 39-6-4 (BALL ROAD): Communication dated March 8, 1962, received from Mr. Norman Johnson requesting action by the City Council on April 3, 1962, on the Ball Road Planning Study (between Knott Avenue and Highway 39), recommended by the City Planning Commission, was submitted and read. Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that the City Clerk inform Mr. Johnson that the Planning Commission is working on a General Plan to be presented to the City, and when the General Plan is ready to be presented, hearings will be held on it and after its adoption, a Precise Plan Study can be made and adopted by the City Council. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATION - 300 WEST CENTER STREET: On report and recom- mendation of the Assistant City Attorney and the Chief of Police regarding the results of a thorough investigation of the activities at said premises~ Councilman Fry moved that the protest filed by the City Council with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board %o the application for person to person transfer of On-Sale General filed by 3ames L. Brush, Embassy Club, 300 West Center Street, be withdrawn. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-242: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-242 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH GOLDEN WEST BASEBALL COMPANY FOR THE LEASE OF LA PALMA BASEBALL FIELD FOR PRACTICE AND THE HOLDING OF EXHIBITION BASEBALL GAMES. (March 25, 1962 to April 22, 1962) 5567 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 13~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. Coons. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-242 duly passed and adopted. REPORT - ALL-NIGHT PARKING: Councilman Chandler requested that report and recommendation be obtained from the Traffic Engineer and Police Department regarding the possible elimination of all-night parking on the streets in all areas of the City. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thompson moved to adjourn. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 11:40 P.M. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 20, 1962, 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte, COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISIANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Ihornton E, Piersall. ASSISTANT CIIY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard Reese. Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Schutte led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. MINLrIEs: Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held March 8, 1962, were approved on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Public Hearing was held on applica±ion submitted by Edmund E. Bohnet, requesting permission to move a dwelling from 2001 South Haster Street, Anaheim, to 653 Velare Street, Anaheim. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.