1962/04/17~643
City Hall: Anaheimt California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17: 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler~, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN: Thompson,
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis°
CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order and announced that this
was the time and place fixed for the canvass of the returns of the General
Municipal Election held April 10, 1962, and appointed the following
Canvassing Board:
Inspector:
Judge:
Clerk:
Clerk:
Councilman Fry.
Councilman Schutte.
Councilman Coons.
Councilman Chandler.
The tally list of each election precinct was compared and the
number of votes cast for each candidate, and the number of votes cast for
and against each measure noted and recorded.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-360: At the conclusion of the canvass of the votes cast,
Councilman Fry offezed the following Resolution No. 62R-360 for passage and
adoption, declaring the results of the General Municipal Election held on
April 10, 1962.
Refer to Resolution Book.
%644
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-360
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF
ANAHEIM ON THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 1962, DECLARING
THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE
PROVIDED BY LAW.
WHEREAS, a regular general municipal election was held and
conducted in %he City' of Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of Califor~
nia, on Tuesday, the loth day of April, 1962, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of said election was duly and regularly
given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting pre-
cincts were properly established; that election officers were
appointed and that in ali respects said election was held and con-
ducted and the votes cast thereat~ received and canvassed and the
returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the
provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the
holdin9 of elections in general law cities; and
WHEREAS, on the 17th day of April, 1962, at 'the hour of
3:00 P.M., the City Council duly assembled at its 'usual place of
meeting and has canvassed the returns of said election and as a result
of which, the City Council finds that the number of 'votes cast and the
names of the persons voted for, the office each person was voted for,
and other matters required by law 'to be as stated hereinafter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM,
CALIFORNIA~ DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That there were 89 voting precincts established
for the purpose of holding said election consisting of consolidations
of the regular election precincts in the City of Anaheim as established
for the holding of state and county elections.
SECTION 2. That said regular general municipal election was
held for the purpose of electing the following officers of said City
as required by the laws relating to general law cities in the State of
California, to wit:
Three Members of the City Council of said City for the. full
term of four years;
SECTION 3. That at said regular general municipal election,
the following measures were submitted to the electors of said City, to
wit:
QUESTION NO. I
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ANA-
HEIM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
YES
That Section 1.04.320 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amen-
ded to increase the compensation
of the members of the City
Council from Fifty Dollars per NO
month each, payable monthly~ to
Two Hundred Fifty Dollars per
month each, payable monthly.
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
QUESTION NO. II
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ANA-
HEIM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
YES
That Section 1.04.320 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amen-
ded by adding Section (a)
thereto, providing that the
Councilman selected as Mayor
shall receive in addition to
his compensation as Councilman, NO
an additional Fifty Dollars per
month, payable monthly.
SECTION 4. That the whole number of votes cast in said City
(except absent voter ballots) was 11,911.
That the whole number of absent voter ballots cast in said
City was 40 making a total of ll~951votes cast in said City.
SECTION 5. That the names of persons voted for at said
eiection for Member of the City Council of said City are as follows:
A. J. Schutte
Joe R. Thompson
Ray Campbell
Jack C. Dutton
Samuel A. Freedman
Joseph W. Halliburton
Fred T. Krein
Albert A. Marcoux
Albert (Al) M. Morse
Lloyd E. Mount
Henry (Russ) Ruskin
Walton F. Tare
Marvin A. Wendt
John S. Wright
That the measures voted upon at said election were as
follows:
QUESTION NO. I
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ANA-
HElM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
That Section 1.04.320 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amen-
ded to increase the compensation
of the members of the City
Council from Fifty Dollars per
month each, payable monthly~ to
Two Hundred Fifty Dollars per
month each, payable monthly.
QUESTION NO. II
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ANA-
HEIM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
That Section 1.04.320 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amen-
ded by adding Section (a)
thereto, providing that the
Councilman selected as Mayor
shall receive in addition %o
his compensation as Councilman,
an additional Fifty Dollars per
month, payable monthly.
That the number of votes given at each precinct and the num-
ber of votes given in the City to each of such persons above named for
the respective offices for which said persons were candidates and for
or against the measures were as follows:
5646
7
0
h'
, I
! I
j :
i
5648
.< I
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
that:
SECTION 6. The City Council does declare and determine
A. J. Schutte was elected as Member of the City Council
of said City for the full term of four years;
Fred T. Krein was elected as Member of the City Council
of said City for the full term of four years;
Jack C. Dutton was elected as Member of the City Council
of said City for the full term of four years;
That as a result of said election, a majority of the
qualified voters voting on said measure relating to
Question No. I did not vote in favor thereof, and shall
not be deemed adopted and ratified.
That as a result of said election, a majority of the
qualified voters voting on said measure relating to
Question No. II did vote in favor thereof, and shall be
deemed adopted and ratified.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the
City Council of said City, a statement of the result of said election,
showing:
(1) The whole number of votes cast in the city;
(2) The names of the persons voted for;
(3) The measures voted upon;
(4) For what office each person was voted for;
(5) The number of votes given at each precinct to each
person, and for and against each measure.
(6) The number of votes given in the city to each person,
and for and against each measure.
SECTION 8. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and,
upon compliance by the persons elected with the provisions of S~ction
11565 and Section 11568 of the Elections Code of the State of Califor-
nia, shall deliver to each of such persons so elected a certificate of
election signed by her and duly authenticated; that she shall also
administer to each person elected, the oath of office prescribed in the
State Constitution of the State of California and shall have them sub-
scribe thereto and file the same in her office. Whereupon, each and
all of said persons so elected shall be inducted into the respective
office to which they have been elected.
SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of
original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minu'[e of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceeding-s of %he'
City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the
same is passed and adopted.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this
17th day of April, 1962.
ATTEST:
//s/ A. 3. Schutte
MAYOR OF '[HE CITY OF ANABEI~
/s/ Dene M. Williams
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OE ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
5650
City Hall,. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUMFY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 62R-360 was introduced
and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of
the City of Anaheim, held on the 17%h day of April, 1962, by the follow-
ing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
None.
Thompson.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said Resolution No. 62R-360 on the 17th day of April,
1962.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of the City of Anaheim this 17th day of April, 1962.
(SEAL)
/s/ Dene M. Williams
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
Mayor Schutte declared Resolution No. 62R-360 duly passed and
adopted.
RECESS:- Councilman Coons moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. (4:20 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN: Thompson.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall.
CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox.
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
INVOCATION: Rev. Emery Collins, Pastor of the First Southern Baptist Church,
gave the invocation.
FLAG sALUTE: Mayor Schutte led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag.
OATH OF OFFICE: The Oath of Office was administered by City Clerk DeLe M.
Williams %o newly elected Councilmen A. J. Schu%%e~ Jack C. Du%ton and
Fred T. Krein.
Mr. Glenn O. Fry a88resse8 {he Councll an8 {he auS{ence, sia%In9
that it had been a privilege and an honor to serve on the Anaheim City
Council, an honor which very few of the City's population will ever
experience. He thanked each member of the City Council with whom he had
worked, for the many courtesies shown him, and further stated that he was
certain the affairs of his beloved City were in good hands.
5651
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
COUNCIL REORGANIZATION: City Clerk Dens M. Williams called tbs meeting to order.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Dutton, Krein and Schutts
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. '
The City Clerk announced that nominations were in order for the
office of Mayor of the City of Anaheim.
Councilman Dutton nominated Rector L. Coons Mayor for the City of
Anaheim. Councilman Krein seconded the nomination.
Councilman Chandler moved the nominations for Mayor of the City
of Anaheim be closed. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
On roll call, a unanimous vo%e was cast for Rector L. Coons, Mayor
of the City of Anaheim.
Mr, Schutte extended his congratulations to Mayor Coons, and
pledged his support to issues that are good and moral.
Mayor Coons stated that he accepted this position with humility;
that he would do his best to represent the City ably and lead the Council in
their actions in a harmonious manner and for the very best interests for the
City of Anaheim.
Mayor Coons announced that nominations were in order for the office
of Mayor Pro /em for the City of Anaheim.
Councilman Dutton nominated Odra L. Chandler Mayor Pro Tempore for
the City of Anaheim. Councilman Krein seconded the nomination.
Councilman Krein moved the nominations for Mayor Pro Tempore of the
City of Anaheim be closed. Councilman Du/ton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED°
A unanimous vote was cast for Odra L. Chandler, Mayor Pro Tempore
of the City of Anaheim.
.PRESENTATION TO GLENN G. FRY: Mayor Coons called Mr. Fry to the Council Table
and presented a plaque in grateful acknowledgement for public service ren-
dered to the City of Anaheim during his term as Councilman from 1954 to
19629 and as Mayor Pro '/em from 1959 to 1962.
Said plaque was accepted with gratitude by Mr. Fry.
MINUTES: Minutes of the regular meetings of the City Council held on April 3,
1962 and April 10~ 1962~ were approved with the correction of the word
"scaling" to "squaring" in Resolution No. 62R-356 on page 5634, April 10~
1962 minutes, on motion by Councilman Schutte seconded by Councilman Krein.
MOTION CARRIED. '
POLICY - COUNCIL REORGANIZATION: Mayor Coons moved that it be the policy of
this City Council to reorganize the Council and elect the Mayor and Mayor
Pro Tem on the third Tue§day Of April of each year. Councilman Dutton sec-
onded the motion To this mo~ion Councilman Schutte voted "No"
CARRIED. ' · MOTION
PUBLIC HEARINGS RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-81 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 209:
Reclassification No. 61-62-814 submitted by Bill T. Asawa and George W.
Asawa~ Owners~ requesting permission %o change %he zone from R-A %o R-3 on
an irregularly shaped parcel of land located on the east side of Beach
Boulevard be%ween Orange and Rome Avenues, and further described as 710-
800 South Beach Boulevard.
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962~ 3:00 P..M.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
254, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, subject to the
followin9 conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1, 2, 3,
and revised plans, providing for an access drive twenty-eight (28)
feet in width, alon9 the easterly boundary of subject property and
the moving of the entire project twenty-eight (28) feet toward the
westerly boundary of subject property, said revised plans to be sub-
mitred to and subject to the approval of the Building and Plannin9
Departments.
2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the northerly, southerly
and easterly boundaries of subject property, and on the westerly boun-
dary except for that area reserved for the sixty (60) foot access drive
prior to final buildin9 inspection.
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Beach Boulevard, including any necessary remodelin9
and/or reconstruction of the existing drainage structure, subject to
the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted
standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Beach
Boulevard.
5. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to
be collected as part of the Buildin9 Permit.
6. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access-
ible to trash [ruck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence
or wall, prior 'to Final Building Inspection.
7. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 209.
8. Provision of necessary fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim
Fire Marshall.
9. 'rime limi[ation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item No. 2, 3 and 4.
Conditional Use Permit No. 209, submitted by Bill T. Asawa and George W.
Asawa, Owners, requesting permission to waive single story height limita-
tions and waive minimum side yard setback requirements on property
described in Reclassification No. 61-62-81 (710-800 South Beach Boulevard).
[he City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
255, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and
revised plans, providing for an access drive twenty-eight (28) feet
in width, along the easterly boundary of subject property and the
moving of the entire project twenty-eight (28) feet toward the westerly
boundary of subject property, said revised plans to be submitted to
and subject to the approval of the Buildin9 and Plannin9 Departments.
2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the northerly, southerly
and easterly boundaries of subject property, and on the westerly
boundary except for thai area reserved for the sixty (60) foot access
drive, prior to final building inspection.
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Beach Boulevard, including any necessary remodeling and/or
reconstruction o~ the existing drainage structure, subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted
standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer.
4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Beach
Boulevard.
5. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
6. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access-
ible to trash truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence
or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection.
7. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-81.
5655
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
8. Provision of necessary fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim
Fire Marshall.
9. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos. 3 and 4.
Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject
property and the existing land uses in the immediate area, and briefly
summarized the evidence presented to the City Planninq Commission at their
hearth9 and their findings and recommendations resulting therefrom. He
advised that the applicant proposes a total of fifty-eight R-3 units~ some
of which would be two-story development.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Bill Asawa, owner of the property, advised that their proposed
plan for development was in accordance with the plans submitted to the City
Planning Commission, and urged favorable consideration of his application for
rezonin9 and conditional use permit.
In reviewing the plans and the files, the Council noted that the
description contained in the request for R-$ Zoning included the entire
property~ and not just the parcel of property under consideration.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council on
either 'the reclassification application or the conditional use permit~ their
being no response~ declared the hearing closed on both matters.
Councilman Schutte moved that action by the City Council on
Reclassification No. 61-62-81 and Conditional Use Permit No. 209 be
deferred for one week, April 24~ 1962~ for further investigation and to
allow the new Council members to become more familiar with this particular
request. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Chandler requested that prior to any action on said
ma't~ers by the City Council~ that the exact legal description of the parcel
of property in question be furnished by Mr. Asawa.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-89: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Frank M.
Del Giorgio, owners, requesting permission to change the zone from R-A to R-3
on property located on the south side of Broadway, between Euclid Avenue and
Loara Street, its northwest corner being approximately 300 feet east of the
southeast corner of Euclid Avenue and Broadway.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 256,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to conditions.
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2
subject to the submission and approval of revised elevation plans by
the Building and Planning Departments.
2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the southerly, easterly and
westerly boundaries of subject property where said walls do not
presently exist prior to final building inspection.
3. Subject to the approval of a Petition for Conditional Use Permit in
order to establish a multiple family planned unit residential develop-
ment.
4. Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Broadway,
(30 feet existing).
5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Broadway, submect to the approval of the City Engineer
and in accordance with adopted standard plans on file in the Office of
the City Engineer.
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on Broadway.
7. Provision of a five foot utility easement along the easterly and
southerly boundaries of subject property to adequately serve the subject
property and other properties at the time of the installation of service
facilities.
56~4
~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
8. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to
be collected as par[ of the Building Permit.
9. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access-
ible to trash truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence
or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection.
10. Provision of necessary fire hydrants as required by the City of
Anaheim Fire Marshall.
11. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Items Nos. a, 5 and 6.
Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject
property and existing uses in the area, and advised that in accordance
with Condition No. 3 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. 256,
the applicants filed Conditional Use Permit No. 220 for a planned unit
development, which application was denied by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting of April 16, 1962, because of failure of the applicant or
his representative to appear and present revised plans upon request by the
City Planning Commission.
Discussion was held by 'the City Council, and Councilman Chandler
moved that public hearing on Reclassification No. 61-62-82 be continued to
May 15, 1962~ and further requested public hearing on Conditional Use
Permit No. 220 be scheduled and heard in conjunction with said zoning
application. Councilman Krein seconded 'the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-83 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 215:
Reclassification No. 61-62-83, submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Vincent L. Kuljis,
owners, requesting permission to change the zone from R-A to C-1 on property
located on the sooth side of Ball Road between Brookhurst and Empire Streets
and further described as 2130 l~est Ball Road.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
25?, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to the
following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the west, south and east
property lines of subject property and with the provision of a 42 inch
masonry wall on the northerly property line except for those areas
reserved for ingress and egress to subject property, prior to final
building inspection.
3. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 215.
Dedication of 55 feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road
(50 feet existing).
5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Ball Road, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the office of 'the City Engineer.
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball
Road.
7. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 for apartment units
only, ~o be collected as part of the Building Permit.
8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access-
ible to trash truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence
or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. Provision o£ the necessary fire hydrants as required by the City of
Anaheim Fire Marshall.
10. Installation of plan'tin9 in the proposed planting area abutting the
planned highway right-of-way l~ne of Ball Road, said landscaping plans
to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent
of Parkway Maintenance and to be ins'tailed prior to Final Building
Inspection.
11. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Items 4, 5 and 6.
5655
City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Conditional Use Permit No. 215, submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Vincent L. Kuljis,
owners, requesting permission to establish a three story apartment hotel
with a restaurant, cocktail lounge and penthouse, on property described in
Reclassification No. 61-62-83 (2130 West Ball Road).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
258, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the
following conditions:
1, Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the west, south and east
property lines of subject property and with the provision of a 42 inch
masonry wall on the northerly property line except for those areas
reserved for ingress and egress to subject property, prior to final
building inspection.
3. Subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 61-62-83.
4. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road
(50 fee~ existing).
5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Ball Road, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer,
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball
Road.
7. Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 for apartment units
only, to be collected as part of the Buildin9 Permit.
8. Provision of 'trash storage areas as determined by 'the Department of
Public Uorks, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size,
accessible to trash trock pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid
fence or wall, prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection.
9. Provision of the necessary fire hydrants as required by 'the City of
Anaheim Fire Marshall.
10. Installation of planting in the proposed plantin9 area abuttin9 the
planned highway right-of-way line of Ball Road, said landscaping plans
· to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent
of Parkway Maintenance and to be installed prior to Final Building
Inspection.
1i. Zime limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Items 4, 5 and 6.
Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map 'the location of subject
property and existing land uses in the immediate area, and briefly summar-
ized the evidence presented to the City Plannin9 Commission at their hearin9
and their findings and recommendations resulting 'therefrom, and specifically
called attention to finding number 6 of City Planning Commission Resolution
No. 257, reading as follows:
That it is hereby deemed necessary to permit the specific waiver of
Code Section 18.40.020, 35 foot height limitation in the C-l, Neigh-
borhood Commercial, Zone in order to permit a maximum buildin9 height
of thirty-seven feet in order to develop subject property in accordance
with plans presented, said waiver permitted under the authority
9overned by Section 18.64.070 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
He advised that the requested reclassification is for C-1
Zoning 'to establish commercial facilities, and 'the Conditional Use Permit
is necessary in order to permit establishment of an apartment hotel with
restaurant and cocktail lounge.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mrs. Mary L. Andrews, 927 Nutwood Street, addressed the Council
having no objection to the hotel and the R-3 use, as she realized this was
a commercial street; however, was opposed to the cocktail lounge which she
believed was not a suitable use for the property because of the close
proximity of the two grammar schools, Francis Scott Key and St. Justin
Martyr.
$656
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00
In answer to Mayor Coons~ question, Joseph Geisler, Assistant
City Attorney, advised that the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board normally
considers the close proximity of schools as grounds for denial of appli-
cations for liquor licenses.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to be heard.
Mr. Bob Watkins, Real Estate Broker representing the owners
of the property, and Mr. William N. Johnston, builder, addressed the
Council requesting favorable consideration by the Council on said appli-
cations as granted by the City Planning Commission~ that if the operation
of the cocktail lounge was to be denied, that it be pursuant to action
taken by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address theCoun¢il,
there bein9 no response, declared the hearings closed on Reclassification
No. 61-62-83 and Conditional Use Permit No. 215.
Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and dis-
cossion was held.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-36I: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No.
62R-361 for passage and adoption, authorizing the preparation of necess-
ary Ordinance changing the zone to C-l, as requested, subject to the
recommendations of the City Plannin9 Commission, with the followin9
amendment ~o Condition No. 1, 'thereof:
Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3
with the exception that said development shall be limited to three
story construction, aa that reference to ihe cocktail lounge noted
on the plan submitted be deleted.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUI'ION OF tHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT tITLE 18 OF tHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (61-62-83 - C-l)
On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Sfhutte and Coons.
None.
None·
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-361 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-367: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-362
for passage and adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 215 for the
establishment of a three-story apartment hotel, with a restaurant, subject
to the recommendations of ~he City Planning Commission with the followin9
amendment to Condition No. 1:
Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1, 2 and 3
with the exception that said development shall be three-story construc-
tion and %hat reference to the cocktail lounge noted on the plan
submitted be deleted,
further, that the request for inclusion of the cocktail lounge in said
Conditional Use Permit application is denied.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 215.
5657
City. Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-362 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-8a AND VARIANCE NO. 1452~ AND CON
SIDERATION OF PLANNING STUDY NO. 15-21-]:
Reclassification No. 61-62-84, submitted by Mary B. Doeskin, owner,
requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 on property located on the
south side of Ball Road between Dale Street and Magnolia Avenue, and
further described as 2748 West Ball Road.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
259 recommended that said Reclassification be denied.
Variance No. 1452, submitted by Mary B. Doeskin, requesting permission to
waive single-story height limitations~ and waive wall requirements on
property described in Reclassification No. 61-62-84 (2748 West Ball Road).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
260~ Series 1961-62, denied said Variance application.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant.
Planning Study No. 15-21-1. Mr. Martin Kreidt reported on Planning Study
No. 15-21-1, and indicated on the map the existing land use, the existing
zoning and the proposed plans for development of properties in this immediate
area, and advised that Exhibit No. 3 of said Planning Study was adopted by
the City Planning Commission and forwarded to the City Council as the pro-
jected development for 'those properties located on the south side of Ball
Road extending easterly from Dale Avenue to the Edison Company easement.
Mr. Kreidt indicated the location of subject property on the
map~ and summarized the evidence presented at the City Planning Commission
hearing, resulting in their findings and recommendations for denial of the
proposed two-story multiple family residential development.
The City Clerk submitted and read a petition of protest contain-
ing 94 signatures of property owners residing in Stanton and Anaheim,
protesting said reclassification and variance for the following reasons:
1. We wish this area to remain a single dwelling residential zone.
2. This change would devaluate our property.
3. This change would constitute spot zoning which could set a precedent
for 'the entire area.
4. This change would create an undesirable noise factor.
5. We feel that double story apartments would be an infringement on our
privacy.
6. We do not wish the wall requirement waived.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Jack Wood, 2738 West Ball Road, addressed the Council in
opposition, being o£ the opinion that the £1oodlng conditions which they
have experienced in the past will become even greater with the construction
of the proposed development.
5658
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17~ 1962~ 3:00
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to be
heard.
Mr. Joseph Geisler, Assistant City Attorney, reported that Mr.
Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, had advised him that he had
a previous scheduled meeting, but would appear before this Council as soon
as possible; and requested that said hearing be continued to a time later
in the evening.
Councilman Chandler moved that public hearth9 on Reclassification
No. 61-62-84 and Variance No. 1452 be continued until such time as the
applicant's representative appears, or until the meeting is to be adjourned,
whichever is first. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
(See page number 5660 for continuance of said public hearing.)
Councilman Chandler moved that Item No. 12 on the Agenda pertain-
in9 to fly nuisance complaint be considered as the next item of business
for the convenience of the 9rester number of people in the audience.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
COMPLAINT - FLY NUISANCF: Petition dated April 4 , 1962, containing approxi-
mately 82 signatures of residents in the area bordered by Broadway on the
North~ Orange Avenue on the South, Magnolia Avenue on the West, and
Gilbert Avenue on the East, requesting the Anaheim City Council to
investigate the methods employed by all chicken farms in an effort to
reduce the fly hazard and nuisance, was submitted. (Copies furnished
each Councilman.)
Summary of the fly nuisance problem and fly control activity
by the Orange County Health Department was submitted to each Councilman
by the City Manager.
The Mayor asked if the spokesman for the group wished to
address the Council.
Mr. Merrill A. Groat, 324 South Beachy Place, addressed the
Council submitting a photograph and explaining in detail the nuisances,
hazards and health dangers caused by the great number of flies in their
area which they attribute to the operation of the chicken ranches and
their unsuccessful methods of control. He referred to the chicken ranch
operated by Mr. Jack Shinn , who uses a special controlled method, and
whose neighbors are not bothered with flies, and requested that the City
investigate and include this method of control in the Fly Ordinance, and
that said Ordinance be continuously enforced.
Others addressing the Council with complaints of excessive flies
in their areas were Michael Zebra, 3406 Glen Holly Drive, who also requested
that positive action be taken, such as the City killing the flies and bill-
ing the parties responsible; Mr. Joseph Halliburton, 2516 Beachy Place; Mr.
William Martin, 1917 Beacon Avenue, emphasized his complaint regarding the
noise nuisance and the lights at the chicken ranches being on at 2:00 A.M.
and 11:00 P.M.; Mrs. Patrick Ochoa, 1330 Oriole Street, Brentwood Park
Tract; Mr. Bert Oison, 4Q2 Opal Street suggested that the chemicals be
supplied and the control maintained by the City of Anaheim; Mr. Merrill
Groat suggested that a garbage truck be provided by the City to pick up
the chicken droppings and haul them to the dump for burying.
Mr. Jack Wood, 2738 West Ball Road, associated with the chemical
and veterinary business, reported on various surveys prepared by colleges
and universities regarding the breeding habits of flies and the methods of
control; that flies become immune to the chemicals very rapidly, and
mew controlled chemicals are continuously required; that in his opinion
the only effective control is to keep the droppings and manure broken up
and hauled away. In this regard, he advised that a group of poultrymen
and dairymen are negotiating to lease property on 'the Irvine Ranch near
the E1 Toro area as a dump site for this purpose.
5659
~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Discussion was held by the City Council and the Assistant City
Attorney~ and Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council~ five repres-
entatives from the Poultrymen and Dairymen Association to be contacted by
Mr. Wood, and five representatives from the areas affected by the flies, to
be contacted by Mr. Groat, meet together on April 24, 1962, at 9:00 O~Clock
A.M. in the Council Chambers to 'try and work out a solution to the fly
control problem~ the results of said meeting to be reported at the meeting
next Tuesday evening. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Schutte moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:20 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order~ all members of the
Council being present.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-109: To consider a proposal to
amend Ordinance No. 1518 by eliminating the requirement~ "that an area
six feet would be landscaped and said landscapin9 maintained along Swan
Street" in accordance with Reclassification No. 59-60-102. Property des-
cribed as Lots 26 and 28 of Anaheim Home Tract in the City of Anaheim~ and
further described as 1121 - 1125 Swan Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
261~ Series 1961-62~ recommending the amendment to Condition No. 2 of
Ordinance No. 1518~ which Ordinance amends the Anaheim Municipal Code and
the Zoning Map~ changing said Condition No. 2 to read as follows:
2. That an area ten feet in width be landscaped~ and said land-
scaping maintained along Homer Street.
Mayor Coons asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
being no response~ declared the hearing closed.
ORDINANCE NO. 1697: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1697 for
first reading, amending Ordinance No. 1518 in Reclassification Proceedings
No. 59-60-102 in accordance with the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1518 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 59-60-102.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1697 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICAIION NO. 60-61-38: Request of Richard E. Ostroot to proceed with
the conditions of the R-3 portion only of Resolution of Intent No. 6481
(northeast corner of Nutwood and Ball Road) was deferred from the meeting
of April 10, 1962, to allow for further investigation and report.
Mr. Chrysle~ Authorized Agent for Mr. and Mrs. Ostroot~ submitted
and read communication dated April 16, 1962, from Richard E. and L. Mable
Ostroot requesting the City Council to reconsider their original applica-
tion for Reclassification No. 60-61-$8 on subject property, and that they
be granted R-3 zoning on the north 408 feet, and C-l, Unrestricted Commer-
cial, on the balance o£ the property to the South, bein9 approximately 222
feet, and agreeing to then dedicate bond and improve all the property on
Nutwood and Ball Road within this year. Mr. Chrysler further advised %hat
they had no objection to filing an application for Conditional Use Permit
for their requested planned unit development on the proposed R-3 portion of
the property.
5660
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Plans and the file were reviewed, and discussion was held by
the City Council and Assistant City Attorney regarding their proposed
plans for a planned unit development on the R-3 portion, and Mr. Chrysler
was advised that the request of the applicant for a change of zone from
C-l, restricted to business and professional offices, to Unrestricted C-1
must be submitted in proper application form and filed with the City
Planning Commission. The City Council further su99ested that the appli-
cant comply with the conditions of Resolution of Intention Number 6a81,
and receive his zoning, and then make application for reclassification %o
Unrestricted C-1.
Councilman Chandler moved that the request of Mr. and Mrs.
Ostroot for permission to proceed with the R-3 portion only of Reclassi-
fication No. 60-61-38 be denied. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion,
MOTION CARRIED,
PUBLIC HEARINGS~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-84 AND VARIANCE NO. 1459: (Con-
tinued from page number 5658.)
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant,
apologized for bein9 late and thanked the Council for continuing the
hearing. He explained the groposed plans for development and stated that
Zhey would revise their plans if the Council considered the density too
high, and if they felt there were too many multiple story apartments;
that there was definitely an engineering problem in this area, but did not
feel it should be held against subject property, as these problems can be
worked out satisfactorily with the Enqineerin9 Department. Re advised that
he had spoken with the neighbors on tie East and West of subject property,
and they appeared to be in favor of 'the requested rezoning.
Mrs. Loretta Ogden, 8631Lola Avenue, Stanton, residing directly
behind the property in question, addressed the Council in opposition, and
reiterated in detail their objections listed in their protest petition.
Mrs. Helen Ellis, 8591Lola Avenue, Stanton, also addressed the
Council in opposition to the requested reclassification.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished 'to address the Council,
there bein9 no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification
No. 61-62-84 and Variance No. 1452.
Councilman Schutte offered a resolution denying said application.
Discussion was held by the City Council regarding Plannin9 Study
No. 15-21.-1 recommended by 'the City Plannin9 Commission, and also the
possibility of an overall study of the R-3 in the City including the
vacancy factor.
Councilman Schutte withdrew his previous resolution.
Councilman Chandler moved that action by the City Council be
deferred on Reclassification No. 61062-84 and Variance No. 1452 to May 15,
1962, to allow for an overall study and report by the City Planning Depart-
ment regardin9 the R-3 zonina and existing apartments in the City of Anaheim.
Councilman Krein seconded th~ motion. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATIONS - BEN ROCHELLF: Application for three non-conforming signs
(oversize) at 130 South Beach Boulevard, ~ogelher wi~h plans, were submitted
and reviewed by the City Council, and discussion was held.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his representative was
present. There was no response.
566l
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler moved that action on said sign application
be continued for one week, April 24, 1962, 3:00 P.M. to allow for inspec-
tion of the premises. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATION - CROWNING GLORY INC.: Application for permission to erect a
non-conformin9 sign (roof sign) at 2202 East Lincoln Avenue, together with
plans, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council. Mr. George C.
Coulter, Attorney representin9 the owners, further explained the size and
location of the requested sign, and submitted a photograph indicatin9 the
dimensions of existin9 signs in the area (photograph retained by Mr.
Coulter).
Mr. A1Mausky, Advance Neon Sign Company, advised that the
requested location of the sign would not interfere with any of the existing
signs.
Councilman Chandler moved that action on said sign application
be continued for one week, April 24, 1962, 3:00 P.M., to allow for inspec-
tion of the premises. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATION - INGE REALTY COMPANY: Application for permission to erect a
non-conformin9 sign at 510 South Beach Boulevard, together with plans, was
submitted by the owners of the Calico Motel, the adjacent property owners.
Said sign application requests the removal of the existing large billboard
· type sign, to be replaced by a ten foot by twenty-five foot billboard sign
on the south property line of the Inge Realty Company property.
Mr. Robert MacMahon, Attorney representing the owners of the
Calico Motel, further explained the undesirable conditions which exist
because of the location of the present sign, and submitted four colored
photographs showing the location of said existing sign on the north property
line of Inge Realty Company, and its relationship to 'the entrance of the
Calico Motel; that the use variance for the Real Estate office and existing
sign was 9ranted by the County Board of Supervisors prior to annexation to
'the City of Anaheim. Further, that the new sign on the south property line
will be an all-metal sign and reduced in size.
A% the conclusion of discussion by the City Council, Councilman
Dutton moved that said sign application be granted, subject to the provision
that when the Real Estate office is no longer operated by Inge Realty Company,
the sign must be removed. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF CURB AND GUTTERS - 805 NORTH PAULINE STREET: Request of Mr. Frank
Armenia for a waiver of curb and gutter requirements at 805 North Pauline
Street, and agreeing to replace damaged sidewalks, was submitted, together
with recommendations from the City Engineer.
Councilman Chandler moved 'that temporary waiver of additional
curb and gutter construction requirements be 9ranted, subject to the
replacement of approximately eighty square feet of sidewalk on North Street
and replacement of approximately seventy-five square feet of sidewalk on
Pauline Street, in and adjacent to the driveway, and complete replacement
of driveway apron. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CLARIFICATION - SECTION 18.80.080 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODF: Request of
Keystone Construction Company, Stanley Caplicki, Agent for Mr. Norman Kerr,
for clarification of Section 18.80.080 of the Anaheim Municipal Code with
reference to the erection of an additional single family dwelling on property
located at 728, 729 and 733 North Sabina Street, was submitted (copies fur-
nished each Councilman).
5662
~itv Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3.:00 P,M.
Mr. Geisler, Assistant City Attorney, read the Code Section in
question and advised that it has been the interpretation that existing
undeveloped land is any land which has not been devoted to buildings~
that any building which has been constructed may be added to, and may be
con-tinued in existence; that no additional dwellin9 structures may be
constructed unless they meet the Code requirements or a variance is
9ranted 'therefor; 'that if the applicants wish to construct buildings
less than 1225 square feet, they must apply for a variance from the
Code section, and it would depend upon the particular conditions of the
lot and conditions of the surroundin9 area whether it could be 9ranted.
Mr. Christopher Marsh, representative of Keystone Construction
Company, addressed the Council bein9 of the opinion that the area in
question was not ~ndeveioped property as it is located in the older
developed section of town, and also requested clarification as to what
constitutes an addition to an existin9 sin91e dwelling'
Mr. Geisler further advised that the addition could not be by
the construction of a porch nor an addition with an open roof, but must
be an addition with a continuation of the full roof line, or where a wall
joins the two sections.
Councilman Chandler moved that the City Council approve the
interpretation as stated by the Assistant City Attorney. Councilman
Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDIIIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 107: Request of Zion Lutheran Church for a waiver
of the street lightin§ assessment charge on the Cypress Street frontage
on property contained in Conditional Use Permit No. 107, was submitted.
Councilman Schutte, being a party of interest, took no part in
the discussion or action on said request.
Memorandum dated April 17, 1962, from George F. Oelkers,
Director of Public Utilities, was submitted and read in full by the City
Manager.
Councilman Chandler moved that temporary waiver of the street
lighting assessment on the Cypress Street frontage be granted until such
time as the Building Permit is obtained. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST, WAIVER OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS, 119 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD: Submitted
to the City Council was request of Nelda S. Quarre~ for a waiver of minimum
commercial parkin9 requirements at 119 South Harbor Boulevard~ due to the
f°ll°win9 extenuating circumstances:
1. Subject property is adjacent to a dedicated city alley. The
owner of the property deeded 4 feet by 131 feet to the city
for their use. The proximity 'to the alley eliminates the
space needed for turn around and drive way.
2. The property adjoins a 68 space private parking lot that is
owned by the corporation of which the owner of subject
proper~¥ is a major stockholder. This lot is rarely more
than one-third occupied.
Mr. Murdoch, City Manager, submitted and read the report and
recommendations of the City Planning Department, dated April 17, 1962.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Philip Quarre~ addressed the Council advisinq that they
proposed to construct a new modern commercial building of ~pproximately
1850 square feet, and that the total lot size is approximately 5~030 square
feet; that they intend to provide nine parking spaces which they feel is
adequate in view of the fact that the property is adjacent to the City alley.
Further, that the proposed commercial building will be occupied by one
tenant, the Phillips Mortgage Corporation, and they do not anticipate any
5663
Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
need for a large amount of parking spaces.
Discussion was held by the City Council, Assistant City Attorney
and Mr. Kreidt, Zoning Coordinator, regarding the Code requirements and the
necessity for a public hearing upon filing a proper application, and it was
noted that the proposed use of the building was a C-1 use; however, the
property was in a C-2 Zone.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Krein moved that
the applicant be instructed to file for a variance, and if he desires to
proceed with his building construction at this time~ that he sign a state-
ment agreeing that he not be given a final inspection until and if the
variance is granted, as recommended by the Planning Department; it being
understood that this motion in no way prejudices any decision of the City
Council in the event a variance application is filed, and if said application
is denied by the Council, that the applicant has no recourse of hardship.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
It was further suggested that Mr. Quarre~ meet with Zoning Coordinator,
the City Manager and Assistant City Attorney in an effort to resolve said
parking problem without variance application.
REQUEST - TAXICAB PERMITS: Request of E. A. Slagle, President, Yellow Cab Com-
pany of Northern Orange County, Incorporated, for permission to transfer
certain taxicab permits from two old units to two new units~ and also
requesting four new permits for new vehicles, was submitted and granted,
on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton MOTION
CARRIED. '
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:45 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, Councilmen Chandler~
Dutton, Krein and Coons being present. Absent, Councilman Schutte.
TENTATIVE 'tRACT NO. 4567: Owner-Developer, Lusk Corporation; tract located on
the east side of Anaheim Reservoir Access Road, south of Newport Freeway
Frontage Road~ and contains 48 proposed R-1 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of April 2, 1962,
found the following facts:
1. That meetings will be held and estimates obtained to deter-
mine the economic feasibility of all utilities being placed
underground~ by both the developer and the City. /he meetings
will be attended by representatives of 'the Edison Company,
BoyleEngineering~ Lusk Corporation, City of Anaheim Utilities
Department, and the City of Orange, to consider the cost of
placing the City's utilities underground, the cost of
placing the developer,s utilities underground with provisions
for reimbursement and the type and location of street lighting,
including method of energizing. A recommendation will be
submitzed to the City Council for a determination prior tO
submission of a Final Map.
That a ken (10) foot easement for hiking and riding along the
easterly line of Lot Nos. 1 thru 15~ both inclusive be pro-
vided. Meetings will be held with representatives of the City
of Anaheim Park and Recreation Division, County of Orange~ and
City of Orange and a recommendation will be submitted %0 the
City Council for a determination prior to submission of a
Final Map.
and recommended approval of said Tentative Map, subject to the following
conditions:
566,~
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
1. Requirement 'that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. Subject to the approval of plot and building plans by the Planning and
the Building Departments.
3. Olive Hills Access Road to be dedicated and improved to the satisfac-
tion of the City of Anaheim and County of Orange and to the standards
for a hill-side Secondary Highway.
4. Grading, geological reports and landscaping subject to the approval of
the City Engineer.
5. Landscaping and a tree planting plan for the Secondary Highway subject
to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, prior to
the approval of the Final Map.
6. That provision be made for underground utilities with above-ground
vaults.
7. That a ten (±0) foot easement for hiking and riding along the easterly
line of Lots 1 thru 15, both inclusive, be provided.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property on
the large map and recommended that conditions numbers 6 and 7 of the City
Planning Commission be amended to include, "prior to approval by the City
Council of the Final Tract Map."
Mr. William Lusk, 10522 Santa Gertrudes Avenue, Whittier, was
present for the purpose of answering any questions the Council might
have.
Mr. Murdoch submitted and read report dated April 16, 1962, from
the City traffic Engineer, relative to traffic volume projection figures
and hillside roadways, and advising that 'the proposed roadways in Tract No.
456?, providing there is no access to Olive Hills Road, and further that
p~ovision is made for emergency parking as indicated on cross sections
prepared by the City, wi±l meet the minimum standards as proposed by the
City; that the County is in agreement with the cross sections proposed by
the City, and has indicated that they are adequate and therefore acceptable
· to them.
Councilman Chandler moved 'that Tentative Map of Tract No. 4567
be approved~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commis-
sion, and further subject to the provision that the requirements of
Conditions Numbers 6 and 7 be determined by the City Council upon reports
%0 them of [he results of the meetings indicated in Findings No. 1 and 2 of
the Crty Planr~:ng Commission~ and prior to the approval of the Final Tract
Map. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Further discussion was held by the City Council regarding the
necessity for recommendations as to density, plannin9 and zonin9 of the
general area under consideration, and a'[ the conclusion thereof, Councilman
Chandler moved that 'the maps and the equipment that are in existence at the
present time for t:he entire acreage be obtained to assist the Planning
Department:, the C~zy Plannin9 Commission and City Council in 'their studies
and recommendations concerning the desired use of the subject area (Santiago
Land Company properzy and Louis Not1 property. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOIION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-363: On the recommendations of 'the City Engineer, Councilman
Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-363 for passage and adoption, awarding
~ob No. 5004 for construction of a storm drain in Cerritos Av~ue from
West Street %0 approximately ~,663 feet west of West Street to the low
bidder, Howard Sewer Company, in the amount of $73,294.24.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5665
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN IN CERRITOS AVENUE, FROM WEST
STREET [0 APPROXIMATELY 2,633 FEET WEST OF WEST STREET, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 5004. (Howard Sewer Company)
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by /he followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-363 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-364: On the recommendations of the Director of Public Works,
Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-364 for passage and adoption,
awarding Work Order No. 419-8.0 for the removal of weeks and rank grow~ch to
the low bidder, John C. Warner, dba, Commercial Lot Cleaning Company, in the
amount of $9,806.'75.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUFION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT ~0 THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR AND EQUIPMENT TO CUT AND REMOVE ALL WEEDS AND RANK
GROWTH UPON ALL LOTS AND AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO.
419-8.0. (Commercial Lot Cleaning Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-364 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-365: On 'the recommendations of the Director of Public Works,
Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-365 for passage and adoption,
awarding the concession for 'the sale of confections and refreshments at the
Anaheim Municipal Golf Course to Stewart Commissaries on their bid of 2% of
the first $28,000. annually and 5% of all over $28,000. annually.
Refer 'to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONYRACT YO }'HE HIGHEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
RIGHT TO OPERATE THE PUBLIC CONCESSION AT THE ANAHEIM GOLF COURSE IN THE
CIFY OF ANAHEIM. (Stewart Commissaries)
Or} roll call the foregoinq resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSE~'F: ~OUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutbe.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-365 duly passed and adopted.
5666
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PURCHASE OF FIRE TRUCK: On report and recommendation of the City Manager and
Fire Chief S[rlnger, Councilman Chandler moved that purchase of a 1~000
gallon Seagrave 'triple combination pumper be authorized from the Seagrave
Corporation in the amount of $25,140.00 plus tax~ F.O.B. Columbus, Ohio.
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-366: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-366
for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Jose and Augustina Cisneros)
On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons,
None,
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-366 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-367: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-367
for passage and adoption.
Refer 'to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Triney Lemus)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Dotton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
'[he Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-367 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-368: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-368 for
passage and adoption.
Refer 'to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Masami Ogata)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCiLMtN~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandlery Dutton~ Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-368 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-369: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-369 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5667
gity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Earl F. Vipond, et ux)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 'vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-369 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-370: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-370 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR STREET PURPOSES. (Orange County Flood Control District)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Du%ton, Krein and Coons.
None,
Schutte,
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-370 duly passed and adopted.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Dutton, request to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for %he
cancellation of County taxes on property acquired by %he City of Anaheim for
municipal purposes pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-271~ property formerly
assessed to Joe Rodriquez and Frances Rodriquez, deed recorded March 29,
1962, as document number 20520 in Book 6054 at page 299, Official Records
of Orange County, was authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUIION NO 62R-371: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-371 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUI[ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECLrrION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA
AND SANTA ~E RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO THE CITY A LICENSE TO USE CERTAIN
LAND SITUATED AT OR NEAR ANAHEIM FOR THE WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF
CERRITOS AVENUE.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dut%on~ Krein and Goons.
None.
Schu%te.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-371 duly passed and adopted.
5668
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
RENEWAL~ LIBRARY BOOKS INSURANCF: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by
Councilman Chandler, renewal of the Home Indemnity Company Policy Number
VP 14848 by Policy Number VP 16282 coverin9 Library Books was approved
and premium authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED TRASH CONTAINER PROGRAM: Mr. Piersall, Director of Public Works,
presented to each Councilman a copy of the Proposed Trash Container
Program as revised April, 1962, for their study and consideration.
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - JAIL FACILITY CHARGES: Resolution No.
62-383 of 'the Orange County Board of Supervisors, dated March 2?, 1962,
pertaining to charges for care of City prisoners in the County Jail, was
submitted and ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler,
seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The followin9 correspondence was ordered received and filed,
on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION
CARRIED:
a. Feather River Project Association, Notice of Annual Meeting
May 4, 1962.
b. A. J. Coughlin, 2316 East Romneya Drive, dated April 13, 1962.
ORDINANCE NO. 1694: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1694 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-15, C-i)
After hearing read in full the 'title of Ordinance No. 1694 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Coons seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1694 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1695: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1695 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF IHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No Parking at any time, Magnolia Avenue on the east side from Lincoln
Avenue northerly to the south end of the Orange County Flood Control
Bridge.)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1695 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Coons seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by-the followin9 vote:
5669
Qity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1695 duly passed and adopted.
DEDICATION DEED~ ACCESS RIGHT$~ OAK STREET AND CHESINUT STREET: Councilman
Chandler moved that the dedication deed of Robert C, Miller and John W,
and Deanna R. Baumgardner, for any and all vehicular access rights on or
to the stub ends of Oak Street and Chestnut Street, and to the alley
between and connecting said streets, property included in Reclassification
No. 61-62-53, be accepted by the City Council. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1696: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1696 for final.
readin9.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-53, R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1696 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call 'the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dution, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1696 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1698: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1698 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-40, C-i)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1698 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
readin9 in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dui:on seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1699: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1699 for first
readin9.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-80~
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1699 and
having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Chandler moved %he
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1700: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1700 for first
reading.
5670
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1962, ~:00 P.M.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (60-61-82 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1700 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-379: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney
and City Manager, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 62R-372 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STIPULATING WITH
THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CO~B~ISSION IN CONNECTION WITH THE PURCHASE OF THE
"HEINER TRACT" FROM THE PACIFIC WATER COMPANY.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-372 duly passed and adopted.
30IN/ MEETING - CITY COUNCIL AND CITY PLANNING COMMISSIONs The City Manager
reported that if it is agreeable with all members of the City Council,
the joint meeting of the City Council and the City Planning Commission
has been scheduled for Thursday evening, May 3, 1962, in the Council
Chambers.
CLARIFICAIION, TRACT NO. 4261: Request of Stephen W. Bradford on behalf of
Mel McGaughy, developer of Tract No. 4261, for clarification regarding
certain conditions of approval of said Tentative Map, was submitted and
read. Mr. McGaughy addressed the Council requesting clarification of the
requirement pertaining to the one-foot strip on the easterly side of
subject tract.
Mr. Murdoch explained that one-foot strips adjacent to improved
streets and alleys are normally retained by the developer, who submits
an irrevocable offer to dedicate at a price fixed by the City Engineer for
recovery of one-half the actual cost of said improvements~ however, the
problem in this case is that the one-foot strips extend across the stub
ends of two projected streets.
Discussion was held regarding the possible solution and control
of the one-foot strips that cross the stub ends of projected streets.
Consideration was given to dedication of these strips to the City as
easements or conditional dedication if the streets are extended. At the
conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Dutton and
seconded by Councilman Krein that the two one-foot lots projected across
the stub ends of the two proposed street extensions be dedicated to the
City in fee, that an irrevocable offer to dedicate the balance of the
one-foot strips at a price determined by the City Engineer be filed with
the City of Anaheim prior to approval of the Final Tract Map. To this
motion, Councilman Chandler voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
AD3OURNED: 1:15 A.M.
SIGNED'~.~:-~a--~ /~'~',
City Clerk