Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1962/05/22
City Hall, Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: The City Council of the CiTy of Anaheim met in regular session, COUNCILMEN: Chandler (entered the meeting 3:05 P.M.), Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the regular City Council meetings held May 8, 1962, and May 15, i962, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Kreln. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLbIiON NO, 62R-476: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-476 for passage and adoption. Refer ~o Resolution Book. A RESOLUFION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OY THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING i"BE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF MAY 22, 1962. War:anhs Nos~ 1816~ to 18461, both inclusive, totaling $745,204.12.) On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEM[: COUNCILMEN: 'TEMPORARILY ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. COUNCILMEN: Chandler~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-476 duly passed and adopted. SIGN APPLICAIiON~ ANTHONY SCHOOLS: Application filed by Mr. Fritz Goosens for permission ~o erect a non-conforming sign at 125 East Ball Road was sub- mitted to the City Council. at their meeting of May 15, 1962, and continued to th:is da'~e for further investigation. '[ne Ci't~' Manager reported that the applicant also favored a dire¢'zive 'type sign for the entire building, and he will modify his plans; the matfer to agaln be scheduled on the Council Agenda upon 'the filing of a revised sign applloation. WAIVER - LICENSE FEES~ Upon report and recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Schutie mo~ed that the verbal request of the Anaheim Host Lions Club for waiver o: license fees for the conduction of the carnival and circus at La Palma Park in ~onjunction with Hi Neighbor Day be granted. Councilman Dutton seconded [ne motion. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST~ FIREWORKS PERMIT: Request of Northern Orange County Council of Boy Scouts of America for permission to conduct fireworks displays on June 1 and 2, i962, at La Palma Park in conjunction with their American Heritage Pageant, was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that said fireworks permit be granted, subject to the requirements of the Cihy F~re Department, and further subject to the condition that said displays do not conflict with any prior scheduled activities. Councilman Krein seconded 'the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. 5?66 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. Refer 'to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLA~I, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN IN BROOKHURST STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY 4,630 FEET SOUTH OF CERRITOS AVENUE TO CERRITOS AVENUE, AND IN CERRITOS AVENUE FROM BROOKHURST STREET TO NUTWOOD STREET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 5005. (Kordick & Son, Incorporated, and R. E, Crane, Joint Venture, $333,089.90.) On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-481 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUIION NO. 62R-482: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-482 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUtiON OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES 'TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT, OR EYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL MATERIALS, PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE FURNISHING AND INSTALLATION OF LIBRARY SHELVING AT THE ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY, BRANCH NO. 1, LOCATED A[ 2650 WEST BROADWAY, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, WORK ORDER NO. 4500c. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons, None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-482 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-483: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-483 for passage and adoption. Refer 'to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF LIBRARY SHELVING FOR ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY, BRANCH NO. 1, LOCATED AT 2650 WEST BROADWAY, WORK ORDER NO. 4500c! APPROVING THE SPECI- FICATIONS THEREOF; AND DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR THE FURNISHING AND INSTALLATION OF SAID SHELVING. (Bids to be opened June 14, 1962, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-483 duly passed and adopted. 5767 City Hall, Anaheim, California -~ COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-48a: On the certification of the Director of Public Works that Crosby Construction Company has completed Jobs Numbers 635, 641, 644 and 648 (Parksite Rest Room Facilities, Types A and B), Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-484 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resoluiion Book. A RESOLUTION OF FHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLAMr~ LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENI AND ALL UFILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSFRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROV~ENr, TO WIT: PARKSITE REST ROOM FACILITIESs TYPES "A" AND "B', IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOBS NOS. 635, 641, 644 AND 648, (Crosby Construction Company) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by ~he following vole: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dui/on, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R~484 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. ~>2R..48~: On 'zhe certification of the Director of Public Works that James A. Moran Constraction, Inc., has completed %he construction of the Knoi~ A~en~e Storm Drain, Job No. 5003, Councilman Schu'tte offered Resolution No. 62R-485 for passage and adoption. Refer io Resolution Book. A RESOLUI'iON OF fHE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLEIEON AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENI' AND ALL UflLIriES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WAFERs AND PEREORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCi AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING POBLIC !MPROVEME~i', TO WIT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN IN KNOTT AVENUE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE I0 THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONfROL CHANNEL, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 5003. (James A. Moran Cor:str'~ctlon, Inc.) On rol~ call t~e foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEM7: CObNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Sch'utte and Coons. None. None. f'he Mawor declared Resolution No. 62R,-485 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R,-486: On the certification of the Director of Public Works that Shamrock Park Consiruction Company has completed the Bali Road Sewer Improvements ,Io~ No. 123Vs Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R,-486 for passage and adoption. Refer io Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O~ IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLEIION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMEMF AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, EUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BALL ROAD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM PLACENTIA AVENU~ TO APPROXIMATELY 3,317 FEET EAST OF PLACENTIA AVENUEs IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1237. (Shamrock Park Construction Company) 5768 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roil call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons, None. None. Mayor declared Resoluzion No. 62R-486 duly passed and adopted, DEEDS OF EASEMfiNZ: Councilman Schutte offered Resoiu%ions Nos. 62R-487 to 62R-503, both inclusive, for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUi~ION NO. 02R-487: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAN'[ DEED CONVEYING 'FO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim School Distric[) RESOLU[ION NO. 62R-488: A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAMi' DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPER['Y FOR AN EASEMEMY FOR ROAD AN~ PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (ARab. elm Sc~ooI Disiric[) RESOLUi[ON NO~ 62R-489: A RESOLUYiON OF YHE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPilING A GRAM7 DEED CONVEYING TO YHE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY ~OR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC ~ILITY PURPOSES. (La~ewoos indb~iiiai Corp. and Kilro¥ Ozange County' Industrial Corp.) RESOLU[iON NO. e2R-490: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN R~AL PROPERTY ~OR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. ~Daie E. ~owlez) RESOLU;iON NO. 02R-491: A RESOLUIION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO '[HE CiTY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN RhAL PROPER'i'Y FOR AN EASEMEMI FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC U~iLITY PURPOSES. (James WiLl, lam Moore, eL ux) RESOLUZiON NO, ©2R-492: A RESOLUIiON O~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF '~HE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPi'ING A GRANi' DEED CONVEYING 'I'O '[HE CiTY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERi'Y FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC U~ILITY PURPOSES. (~. C, Bryani, eL ux) RESOLOilON NO. 62R-492: A RESOLUIiON O~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPi"ING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING ~0 THE CITY O~ ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMEM[ FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES , orcnroaa RealLy Corp.) RESOLU[ION NO, 62R,-494: A RESOLUYION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPER'£Y FOR AN EASEMENI FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Grace Missionar-¥ Baptist Church) RESOLUrZON NO. 62R-~95: A RESOZUrION OS ~rSE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPER'fY ?OR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC DEBILITY PURPOSES. (Pabio V, Domin~sez~ e% dX) RESOLUTION NO. 02R-.496: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE crrY OF ANAHEIM ACCEP't'ING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPER~Y ~OR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UFILi'IY PURPOSES. (Arthur and Richard Henning, Anne Henning Paulus) 5769 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUEION NO. 62R-497: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAN~ DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOE AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (John B. Kiiroy) RESOLUi'iON NO. 62R-498: A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Roger W. Pannier et ux, and Helen M. Pannier) RESOLUYiON NO. 62R-499: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERi'Y FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Factory Development Corp.) RESOLUi'iON NO. 62R-500: A RESOL~I'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANF DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (The Lutheran Home Association of California) RESOLUTION NO 62R-501: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANt DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Securit~ Pirst National Bank; Estate of Sophie B. McCormick) RESOLUiiON NO, 62R-502: A RESOLUI'iON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAN~ DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERFY POR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILIFY PURPOSES. (Cra:g lewet~ & Co.) RESOLUilON NO, 62R-t03: A RESOLO'i'ZON OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPF[NJ A .3RANI' DEED CONVEYING TO ThE CI'iY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY POR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (First Bapt'ist Ch,.~rc, n of B~ownfield~ 'Texas) Or: z'o±l, call the foregoing Resolatlons Nos~ 62R-~487 to 62R-503, boll ,_n~..~as:!:~e~ we:re duly passed arid adopted by the following vote'. AYES: COdNC ILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: CO'JNC iLMEN: Chandler, Duu~on, Krein, Schu%te and Coons. None, None. [he Maxo: declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-487 to 62R,-503, both inc±usive~ ,d:..i¥' p~sed ai~d adopted. CANCELLATION Oi COUNTY IAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Scha~te~ the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cance~ County 7axes on properly acquired by the Ci~y of Anaheim for munici- pal p~rposes~ pazsuanz to Resolu't~on No. 62R-311~ formerly assessed to Louie C. and He±eh V. Oregel, Deed recorded April 20, 1962, as Document No. 19260, Boo~ 6087, page 896; and properly acquired pursuant to Resolution No. ©2R-312, formeri~ assessed 'to Alice B. Fitch, Deed recorded April 26, 1962, as Document No. i953~ in Book 6088, page 303, Records of Orange County, CaiLfornla. MOiiON CARRIED. TRASH CONTAINER COLLECHON REGULAi'ION: ~iodification of 'the Trash Collection Ordinance was continued to the next meeting, May 29, 1962. CORRESPONDENCE: the following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman SchuLie, seconded by Councilman D'u[ton. MOTION CARRIED. a. Par~ and Recreation Commission, Minutes of: May 10, 1962. State Department of Public Health, Rabies Control. c. Feather River Project Association. d. Orange County Association for Mental Health, regardin9 the understanding of mental i11ness~ e. Orange Coun't¥ Board of Supervisors, Agenda. 5770 City Hail~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUfES - May 22~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 58-59-11 - TRACT NO. 2495: Request submitted by Loran D. CovingLon, Co,ingion Brothers Cons[ruction Company, for waiver of block wall. requirement pursuant to the Anaheim Municipal Code at 195 Guinida Lane (Lot 2, 2tact No. 2495 - R-3 development), was submitted and denied on motzon off Co,nciiman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schut%e. MOTION CARRIED, Later on in the meeting Mr. Loran Covingion appeared and addressed ~he Council, fully explaining his request and advising that subject property was the iasi remaining R-3 lot %o be developed in Tract No. 2495, and would be the only lot required to cons±ruct a block wail; that there is an alley immediately adjacent to said property on %he North, and if said condition was not waived, he would be placed in the position of constructin9 a wall on 5he north side of the alley on another person~s R-1 property. i~ was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman CARRiED.nba, Lne previous action den¥in9 said request be rescinded. MOTION Co~nciiman Du~'ton moved that the request for waiver of the block wail requirement (Lo~ 2, Tract 2495) be granted because 'the requirement of the wail. is a non.~-f~ifillable condition. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. i707: Co~no~.~man Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1707 for final ~eading, Refer co Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF I'HE CiTY OE ANAHEIM AMENDING TIFLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING YO ZONING. (61-62-56 - C-1 and C-3) After nearing read in full 'the title of Ordinance No. 1707 and having Knowledge of the contents %herein, Councilman Schutte moved 'the reading in iull of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the mo'L~on~ MO'FiON UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roil call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the ~oilowlng vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEN[: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons, None, None, Mayor Coons declared Ord.inance No. 1707 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NO. 17i4: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1714 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE O~ 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 14.32.185 RELATING TO PARKING. (No parking on Sundays, Empire Street) After bearing read in full the 'title of Ordinance No. 1714, and having know]edge of 'the contents thereln, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the mo~ion. MO?ION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1715: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1715 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OE ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61~62'-70 - R-3) 5771 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962, 3:00 P.M. After hearing read in full the title of' Ordinance No. 1715 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1716: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1716 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING 70 ZONING. (61-62-79 - R-3) After hearing read in full 'the title of Ordinance No. 1716 and having Knowledge of the contents 'therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1717: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1717 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF 'THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING 70 ZONING. (6i-62-94 - C-I) Afher treating zead in full the title of Ordinance No. 1717 and ha~ing ~nowdedge of ~e '- , ~o~,zen%s [herein, Councilman Schut%e moved the readln~ zn f~,~[ of sazd Ordinance be waived, Councilman Chandler seconded · the moL~on~ MOl'ION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. i7i8: Counc:iman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1718 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF FHE CZ'fY O~ ANAHEIM AMENDING 'TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELA'IING TO ZONING. (61-62-12 - R-3 and C:-i) After hearing read in full 'the title of Ordinance No. 1718 and having knowledge of ~he contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading :in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Soh'utte seconded the mOtr~On. MOtiON UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO~ 1719- RHCLASSiFiCA'fION NO. 61-62-]: Mr. [heodore Roelfsema, representing ~he applicant, addressed the Council requesting clarification pertaznin9 to Condition No. ~ of Resolution of Intention No. 7125, and advised that they have not oeen able to obtain a bulldinq permit for the consiruction of said driveways because zoning on subject-property has not been adopted by Ordinance, and they cannot obtain clearance to have the Ordinance of Rezoning adopted because the driveways are not installed; that he would be willin9 Lo pos~ a bond guaranteeing 'the construction of the driveways as [heir plans have been submitted for plan check, and 'they are read'v to proceed with construction. Disc,ssion was held by City Council, and it was determined that the condition requiring the driveway installation could be made a part of the suildin9 permit, and further, upon the signing of a waiver by the applicant, all Cii¥ Departments were requested to proceed with the necess- ary plan checkin9 prior 'to Final Reading of the Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 1719: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1719 for first readlng. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF '[HE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE R~L..IING FO ZONING. (61-62-1 - C-l) 5772 City Hall~ Anaheim, Calif~ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962, 3:00 P,M. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1719 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded [he motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1720: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1720 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CfPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-55 - Afier hearing read in full 'the 'title of Ordinance No, 1720 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the moiion~ MO'IION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATIONS: The City Manager reported that the application for off-sale beer and wine license filed by Vincent J. Buccheri and Frank L. Ciampa for the Italian Villa, 406 North Placentia Avenue, has been received, and said premises are located in a C-1 area; however application for the proper zoning will be heard before the City Planning Commission on June 28, I962. On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved Cna[ the City A.ttorney~s office enter 'the City's protest because of improper zoning, and request the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to contlnae thei~ ~earing on said Alcoholic Beverage License until final ac'riCh on the proper zoning application is 'taken by the City Council, Councilman Duzton seconded 'the motion. MOTION CARRIED. POL:CY O~ ihE COONCfi,: Codnciiman Chandler moved inapt it be the policy of this Ci~, Co,,'~:~! 'tna't requests for approval of re'vised plans or any plans 'that m~$~ oe approved oy the Cily Council, Oe firs'[ reviewed by lhe Plan Checker in the Cit., Plan~.,ing Department, and then scheduled for Council action, togelne: with reporis and recommendalions. Councilmar~ Krein seconded the m~.tlon~ MO[iON C ~ ' .ARR~ED~ COONCiL POLICY MANUAI.~ A( the suggestion of Councilman Chandler, the City Codnc-il req~;ested the City Manager to arrange for a joint meeting with the Cl'Ly Pl~anning Commission for the p~rpose of considering possible amendments and addi'hlons ~o the Co~ncii Policy Manual. Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 3:52 P.M, POLICE FACILi[IES BUiLDiNG: rhe City Manager reported on five changes to the specificaiions for ine Civil. Defense Con%roi Center room and appurtenant a~l.~oles in the Police Building suggested by' [he Civil Defense Committee; that ~bree of the five changes have been cleared, and the remainin9 two suggested are as follows: Provide lh.e same structural protection as planned for the Control Center room proper ov providing three and one-half ~oo~ thick ceilings and one and one~haif foot thick ~alis for 'the followin9 rooms: [he i'rans~ormer and Generator Rooms. lhe Pump and ~ell Room. c, The Stairwell, d. fhe Radio Equipment Room, eo The Telephone Equipment Room, Provide a stub-out for an aaxiliary radio antenna, minimum four-inch conduit, in an open area on the proper't? sufficiently removed from the proximity to any' building or proposed building. 5773 Qity Hall, Anaheim~ California -COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr, Murdoch reported that Mr. Maddox, City Engineer, met with the Civil Defense Committee regarding the suggested changes, and the committee indicated their request was for protection against blast, up to thirty-five po~mds per square inch; that 'the Architect has also investigated this request and advises that the [oral cost of 'the change as suggested would be approximately $75,000. including Architect,s fees and contingencies, and wo,~!d involve five wee~s total delay, as the thickness indicated would require a ~bszarz:a~ change in 'the plans. As the Co~;nciZ determined a% the time of %he initial design to pz'o~ide for fal].-oa% protection only, Mr. Murdoch asked for an action by' [he Coun¢i] regarding tLis request for additional expense to provide for protection ct Ehe equipment in 'these ratio'us rooms equivalent to %he pro- tection provided for personnel in the Coniroi Center Room. in regards to 6he request for an auxiliary radio antenna, Mr. Murdooh advised 'that ghe es'Lima:ed cost would be approximately $350., that this saggested change has merit and can be handled without any delay in the construction of 'the building on a minor change order basis~ The Council concurred with this method of handling this change~ Disc~ssion was held by the Ciiy Council on ~he initial request for Ca.:-o~L protection only, and 'the action by the Council at that time 'to provide basement furl-out shelters and additional protection for the Con/roi Center.~ was reviewed. Cooncilman Krein was of -the opinion that there is ins~}f±lz.~enL reliable information avatlaeie at this time to insure protection against ~Zasi. AL ~he :Lonely}s/on of the discussion, Councilman Du'tton moved 'that no changes ~e made :tn the present plans ~o provide additional Slast or fali'~ool p~oLecg~on, Coanci]man Chandler seconded the mo%ion MOTION CARRIED, ~ ~,~r~ Mt::rdo¢~ ~uz'thez reported that the oihez /hree suggested changes :.a',,e been resolved wiln the Commi%'~ee as follows: a~ The prov:~sion for emergenc/ fuel tanks - This provision was included in .... z~a,zuns b.~L not apparent on the plans. b, Req.:es<: for the re~;locaL~on of' a par% of the ~ ~-~ ~onu~ol Room activities - fa'is request was rev'iewed at the time of design with the Police Depart- menl and was determined to be non-workaoie on a day-to-day basis, c. Questioned the adequacy of the sewer pump situation under emergency' conditions --This has been reviewed with Zhe Commi'htee and they are satistied rna% no changes are necessary to live under emergency con- ditlons, CLARIFICATION - SiON APPLICATION_= 510 SOUTH BEACH BOULEVARD: At the request of Mr. Murdoch, Mr. Homer t~allace, Chief Building Inspector, explained the sign permit issued to Mrs. Remland, owner of the proper%y, for the removal and relocation of the inge Realiy Company sign in accordance with sign application filed o'V the Calico Motel (ad3acent property owners) and approved [by the C:ily Council; that said building was issued for the con- s%ruct~on of' the large billboard sign set back fifteen feet from Beach Boulevard, as indicated on 'the plan submitted, reviewed and approved by the Cic'y Coanci]~ He further advised 'that 'the billboard sign which existed on the north Remland property line has seen removed and 'that Inge Realty Company now objects to the fifteen foot setback required for the new bill- board slgn~ The Clty Council advised Mr. Wallace that the building permit was issued correctly, and any requested deviations would require 'the filing and processing of a rev:ised sign application. 5774 City Hall, Anaheim, California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Walter Welch, 6068 Beach Boulevard, Attorney representing Mr. Inge, addressed the Council advising that he has been informed by Mr, MacMahon, Attorney representing the Calico Motel, that when he presented said sign application and plans to the City Council, he was not aware the plans indicated a fifteen-foot separation between the two proposed signs, and as adjoinin9 property owner, they had no objection to the placement of the billboard sign adjacent to the neon sign. At the request of the City Council, minutes of the meeting held April 17, 1962, pertaining %o the approval of said sign application, were read by the City Clerk. The City Council informed Mr. Welch that in reviewing the application submitted, the Council was fully aware of the fifteen feet between the two signs, as indicated on the plans; that Mr. MacMahon in his presentation advised that an agreement had been reached between the two adjacent property owners in the form of the sign application. Mr. Inge addressed the Council advising that it would be useless for him 'to erect the sign as 9ranted, as the existing motel would block the sign from view, and further advised that the original application and plans for the removal and relocation of his sign was made without his knowledge and authority. Mr. Welch advised that Mr. MacMahon had obtained a limited agreement regarding the removal of the existing sign, however it did not give him ao%hority to appear before the City Council with %he application for the relocation of their sign. Discussion was held by the Ciiy Council regardin9 the history of the sign granied by the County of Orange, and now under the jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim through annexation, and the policies of the Council pertaining to the erection of signs in the City of Anaheim were noted by Councilman Chandler. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was determined by the City Council that the sign permit issued by the Buildin9 Department to Mrs. Remland was a valid permit, and if the parties affected do not agree with 'the 'terms of said permit, 'they must necessarily file a new application together with plans. PROPOSED AMENDMENI IO CODE - POSTING ON UTILITY POLES: The City Council directed the City A't%orney~s office to prepare an Ordinance prohibiting the posting of ali signs and notices by any person on utility poles in the City of Anaheim. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 4545: Developer, R. A. Karos, et al; tract located north of Simmons Street and west of Lewis Street, and contains 15, R-1 lots. Map of said Final Tract was placed on the bulletin board, and the City Engineer reported that bonds have been posted and required fees paid. Thai a condition of the Tentative Map was the processing to completion of a variance application (Variance No. 1446) allowing the establishment of an R-A sub-standard lo% north of subject tract. He further advised that %he applicant has this date complied with the conditions of Variance No. 1446 by deeding the necessary dedication on Orangewood Avenue, posting a cash deposit in the amount of $1500, for the street impr0vemen%s, paid ~h~ s%reet lighting fee in the amount of $262. and provided for the utility easement; thai said Final Map conforms substantially to the Tentative Map previously submitted and approved, and he recommended the approval of said Final Map. 5775 City Hall, Anaheim, California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On the report and recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 4545 be approved by the City Council. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CITY ATTORNEY'S OPINION: At the request of Councilman Chandler, written opinion from the City Attorney's office was requested pertainin9 to the forty-day time limits established in the Zonin9 Code for action by the City Planning Commission on Reclassifications and Variances and Conditional Use Permit applications. REPORT - HOUSING CODE: Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney's office prepare a report concerning the inclusion of 'the housing code in the Anaheim Municipal Code for submission on July 3, 1962. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:50 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: The meeting was called to order by Councilman Coons, 7:10 P.M., all the members of %he City Council being present. INVOCATION: Rev. Harold Grotey, First Baptist Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUIE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to ~he Flag. PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. 1463: Submitted by Supreme Investment Company, requesting waiver of Section 18.32.100 of %he Anaheim Municipal Code to allow vehicular access from street to garages, Lots 1, 4 and 22, Tract No. 361i. Lots located briefly as follows: Lo% 1, northwest corner of Orang,wood and Mountain View Avenues; Lot 22, northeast corner of Orange- wood and Mountain View Avenues; Lo% 4, southwest corner of Mountain View and Pearson Avenues. Ihe City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 288, Series i961.-62, denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed in the office of the City Clerk and publi$ hearing scheduled. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney, advised that he was retained today by Mr. Albert Boss of the Supreme Investment Company to assist in this appiication, and requested that public hearing be continued to allow him an opportunity to review the file. At the request of Mr. Knisely, public hearing was continued to June 12, 1962, 7:00 P.M., on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO. 1465: Submitted by Florence Fitzgerald Janes, requesting permission to construct a motel on property located on the north side of Ka~ella Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Clemen%ine Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 290, Series 1961.-62, granted sazd Variance, subject to the following conditions: Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3, except as amended by the following conditions. That the number of parking spaces be increased by the use of an addi- tional portion of subject property to a maximum of thirty-five (35) feet in width, in accordance with code parking requirements and that all parking spaces be fully improved and striped as ten (10) by twenty (20) foot spaces. 5776 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962~ 3:00 P.M, 3. Dedication of sixty (60) feet from the monumented centerline of Katella Avenue (40 feet existing). 4. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Katella Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Katella Avenue. 6. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Provision of a minimum vertical clearance of eleven feet. 8. Provision of fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall prior 'to Final Building Inspection. 9. Time limitation of one hundred and eightY (180) days for the accom- plishment of Item Nos. 3, 4 and 5. 10. Postin9 of a one 'year bond to insure the construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall alon9 all boundaries where parkin9 is adjacent to abutting undeveloped property classified in the R-A, Residential- Agricu].'tural, Zone, in the event abutting property is used for other than commercial purposes. 11. Provision of landscaping in the required twenty foot setback area, plans for said iandscapin9 to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. 12. That ihe facade of the buildin9 be of masonry construction. Appeal from action taken by' the City Planning Commission was filed by Mr. Leo Freedman and public hearing scheduled. Mro Kreidt noted the location of 'the property' and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Plannin9 Commission advising that no protests had been filed. He noted the existing uses in the area and stated that the rear portion of the property would not be developed at the present time. He further advised that this property had been previously approved for an R-3 planned unit development. ' }'he Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Leo Freedman noted that the variance covers practically all the remaining frontage on Katella Avenue, and objected to the variance because Lhere has been no provision made for a street %o parallel Zeyn and Clementine Streets to extend northerly from Katella Avenue, thereby openin9 up a large undeveloped parcel of property to the North. He requested the petitioner be required to provide for a street in the same manner as he was required to do in conjunction with Tract Nos. 3084 and 3330. Mr. Freedman submitted and read a letter da'ted May 22, 1962, from I. Petersen, Manager of 'the Charter House Hotel, protesting the variance due to the fact that a street similar to Zeyn and Clementine Streets had not been provided. Mr. Freedman was informed that the street requirement in a sub- division tract is in accordance with State laws. Mr. Freedman further reported that %he Three Thousand seat theater projec'% would become a reality, and this requested street would be a tremendous assistance to traffic and an outlet to Katella Avenue, rather than having all the traffic from the theater channelea out to Harbor Boulevard. In answer to Councilman Dutton~s questioning, Mr. Freedman stated he owned /he property to the North, and intended to extend Freedman Way easterly over this property; that plans were presently being developed by McDaniel Engineering Company for this extension; however, he did not plan to construct a North-South road, as this is the area reserved for parking for the theater project. 5777 C.ity Hali~ Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Joe Franklin representing Mrs. Janes, applicant, objected to the possibility of 'taking approximately 36,000 square feet of their property for a street to the Freedman property. He called attention to the existence of Clementine Street, which extends to the Freedman property, and is only approximately 200 feet distant; and further advised that the commercial frontage along Katella was sold by Mr. Freedman to them; that the northern portzon was reserved by him for the 'theater project. He stated 'their plans of developmen't would requ:re the entire frontage and will enhance the area. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLLUION NO. 62R-504: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-504 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1465 in accordance with recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer 'Lo Resolution Book. A RESOLUi'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1465. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the foil. owing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEN[; COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. fhe Ma~or declared Resolution No. 62R-504 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. 1469: Submitted by Mr. arid Mrs. James L. Pritchard, requesting permission Lo construct and operate radio and 'television rental and sales with repairs, on property located on the south side of Ball Road, approximately 211 feet west of Fern Avenue (2920 West Ball Road). fhe Ci%t Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 293, Series i961.-62, denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed in the office of the City Clerk and public hearing scheduled. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of subject property and summarized the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission, including a duplicate application signed by 'those persons favoring 'the varianc~ and also individual protests presented. Ne stated that the basis of the Commission's denial would be found lin Finding No. 6, which refers to a Planning Study that determined the best use projected for this area would be R-3 development. He also reported that the Commission felt that the proposed use would constitute a commercial encroachment into a residential zone, changing the character of the area. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert Claggeit, A~I.A., 1077 Wes~ Ball Road, Anaheim, Agent for the applicant, addressed the Council stating that commercial develop- ment of a smaller natare with proper design can be a convenience to a neighborhood. He reported the correct use in this variance ~as to construct and operate a radio and television shop, sales and service, with repairs, instead of "rental and sales with repairs" In rebuttal to the {indings of the City Planning Commission, Finding No. 9, he felt there were exceptional and extraordinary circumstances applicable to the subject property. Regard- ing Findin9 No. 3, he stated because of the value of the property, the variance was necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property rlght; and because of the scsi of the property, it would not be feasible to develop it as single family residential, and it would be questionable if R-3 could be constructed to receive a sufficient return on the investment. Regarding Finding No. 4, the use bein9 detrimental to adjoining property owners, he referred to the petitions favoring the use signed by a majority of 'the people within 400 feet of the property. 5778 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962, 3:00 P.M, Regarding Finding No. 5, he stated the two persons referred to did not object [o 'the use, but requested the construction of a concrete block wall separation between [heir properties. Mr. Claggett wondered if the Planning Study referred to took into consideration the cost of the property, and stated in his opinion, R-3 would not be the highest and best use of this property. Mr. Carl Giannetti, also Agent for /he applicant, called attention 'to the size of the property and the fact that there is at present a house, garage and small stucco building on the land. In his opinion R-3 zoning would be undesirable because dedication would reduce the size of the parcel toa¢¢ommodate no more than eleven small units. Such a small project would be unable to compete with the larger present developments offering swimming pools, etc. He urged the 9ranting of · [he variance, making it possible to establish this small business that would 'field a sufficient income to properly maintain the property. Mr. O. D. Johnson, 9571 Holder Road, stated his only objection was 'that the application did not have a requirement of a six foot masonry wall between the two properties. He stated there was at present a lower wall which was sufficient; however, if a commercial venture was approved, he felt [he wall should be higher. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there oeing no response, declared the hearing closed. In answer to a question of Councilman Chandler's, Mr. Claggett staled a variance was requested instead of the reclassification because 'the applicant was not in financial position 'to proceed with the total commercial development. The applicant felt this was the best approach to their problem. Mr. Claggett called attention 'to the drawings, which indicate the portion of the property to be improved at this time. In answer %0 a question of Mayor Coons, regarding the actual use of the property, Mr. Clagge/% stated that the applicant has a foreman that will take care of the radio and television repairs, that he himself nas electronic equipment which he assembled for another business, and the Lwo are closely allied. RESOL'UI'iON NO. 62R~505: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-505 s'ustaining ac[ion taken by the City Plannina Commission denying Variance No. 1469. ~ Refer '%o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1469, On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the ~ollowing vole: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dui[on, Krein and Coons. Schu'tte. None. ']'he Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-505 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 61-62-88: Submitted by Raymond Spehar requestin9 a change of zone from R-3 to C-1 (restricted to business and professional offices), property located at the southwest corner of Euclid and Chalet Avenues. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 286, Series 196i-62~ recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 5779 O,ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1962, 3:00 That signs be unlighted and limited to windows and doors with one free- s'Landing sign for the purpose of identification shingles not %o exceed 6 inches by 30 inches and that no flags, banners, or rotating lights be erected subject %o the revised plans as submitted. Dedication of 53 feet from 'the monumented centerline of Euclid Street (50 feet existing). Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible %o trash-truck plckup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wail, prior to Final Building Inspection. Time limitation of one hdndred eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item No. 2. Recordation of C-i deed res%fictions limiting the use of subject property to bdsiness offices and professional offices only. Installation of landscaping in the proposed planting areas and the parkway areas, plans for said landscaping to be submi'tted to and sub- ject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property, the present zoning and use in the area, and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission; however, called attention to a clerical error in Condition No. 1~ and reported %ha% according to the staff interpretation of the in'tent of the City Planning Commission, Condition No. 1 should read: "Fha[ any signs established on subject property ce unlighted and lima%ed co o~gns pla~ed [nsLde windows, doors and buildlng entrance ways, with one f~ee stanoing =ign for 'the purpose of identification shingles, each s~,~ng~e not co exceed six inches by thirty inches, that no flags, banner~ or totalling i[ghts ~e erected, and further subject to development subs~an%~ia]i~ ~n accordance wrth revised plans as submit'ted." asked if anyone wished io address the Council. Mrs~ N,,,iand, i330 Falcon, asked what type of business was intended for the pzo. pe~t~ and further, if exits would be on Euclid Street or ChaJeL~ Mrs~ Hyiand was advised of 'the 'type of businesses 'that would be included in ' '~ ¢ b,~s~re~s oz professional", and also noted from the plans that e~trances are planned izom Chalet and %he alley, Reference was made to recen't zonina ac'Lion 'taken in conjunction with C-} zoning or} the property located immediately north of subject property (Reciass~flcation No. 6[-62-:76) and condrtions applied to said reclassifica- tzon ou.i~suan% ~0 Reso~.ution No. 62R-223, were submitted and read~ M~. Sam Freedman advised that they request a wail between the two properties. }4r. Spehaz, applicant, felt the requirement o± a wall next to the alley would affec~ no p~rpose and could change the ratio of parking require- ments. l'he Mayor asked it anyone else wished 'to address the Council, there being no response, declared the nearing closed, RESOLUTION NO. 62R.-506: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-506 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, suo3ect to the foliowin9 conditions: that an'y signs establish, ed on subject property be unlighted and i~mited to signs placed inside windows, doors and building entrance ways, with one free standing s~gn for the purpose of identification shingles, each shingle not to exceed six inches by thirty inches, that flags, banners or rotating lights be erected, and further subject to deve~opmen~ substantially in accordance wi~h revised plans as submitted. 5780 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22, 1962, 3:00 P.M. 2. That a landscaped strip, of a minimum width of six feet, shall be provided and maintained abutting the planned highway right of way line on Euclid Street; that plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance; and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to final building inspection. 3. Ihat the ases of subject property shall be limited %o business and professional offices only. 4, That 'the owner of subject property shall place of record City of Anaheim C-1 Deed Restrictions, approved by the City Attorney, which restrictions shall limit the uses of subject property to business and professional offices only, and shall limit the height of all buildings constructed on subject property to one story. 5. ?hat the owner of subject property shall dedicate to the City of Anaheim all vehicular access rights to Euclid Street and Chalet Avenue ~cgpi for one onale% Avenue. access drive on Euclid Street and one access drive on 6. That the owner of subject property shall dedicate to the City of Ana- heim ail vehicular access rights 'to the existing alley on %he west side of subject property. 7. t'hat a block wall, of a minimum height of 3 feet, shall be constructed along 'the westerly Ooundary of subject property prior to final build- ing inspection. 8. That use of existing structures on subject property shall be subject to the approval of 'the Chief Building inspector. 9. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 fee% in width, from %he center line of the street, along Euclid Street for street widenlng purposes. i0. I'ha% adeqaate areas for trash storage, accessible to trash-truck pic~'ap, shall be provided as determined and required by the Street Maintenance and Sanitation Division of' the Public Works Department, which areas shall be enclosed by a solid fence or wall prior %o final building inspec~ion. ii. That Conditions Nos. ~, 5, 6, and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied wilt wi%hln a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further 'time as the City-Council may grant. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUI'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING I'HAT tITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT ~HE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61'-62-88 .- C.-i, restricted) On roil call the foregoing resolution was ddly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. rne Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R,~506 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-95: Submitted by Real Investment Company requestina a change of zone from R-1 to R-3, property located on the north s:de of'~Stonybrook Drive approximately 285 fee~ wesq of ~es%ern Avenue. The Ci.[y Planning Commission pursuant %o Resolution No. 295, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property, summarized the evidence submitted %o the City Planning Commission by reference to the minutes of the meetingo He noted the existin9 zoning in the area and further advised that present plans do not incorporate the entire subject property. 5781 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. Communication received from Justin E. Thompson, dated May 12, 1962, approving said reclassification, was submitted (copies furnished each Councilman). The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, advised that the plans submitted do not cover the entire parcel, and for this reason requested continuance of the public hearing for the purpose of submitting revised plans; however, since it was apparent that others were present concerning 'this issue, suggested their evidence be received at this time. The Mayor asked if the group had a spokesman to express their opinions, and invited the next speaker to address the Council. Robert Cecil, 824 South Oakhaven Drive, Anaheim, member of %he Mount Calvary Lutheran Church, addressed the Council on behalf of the church people, stating that al%hough the church sent a letter taking the stand neither for or against the reclassification, that because of his service to 'the church, he felt that he was qualified 'to speak for the people of the church. He reported on the future building program of the church, and their interest in maintaining its property value. In his opinion, %he reclassification would not be conducive to the area, nor in the best interest of the people. He felt %his was not %he type of develop- men% 'they would desire adjacent to their parish, and requested the petition be denied and 'the Planning Commission,s recon~enda%ion upheld. Mr. Don Brooks, 3210 S%onybrook Drive, called attention to the surrounding properties and feared that the granting of the reclassifica- tion would establish a precedent in the area for the presently undeveloped land. Mr. Dick Wainwright, 6a6 Courson Drive, owner of the property west of subject property, stated that Mr. Thompson, who submitted the letter of approval, was the seller of the subject property, and is not concerned about its development. Regarding %he change in plans of development, no one is aware of what the changes are, and in his opinion, to mix multiple and single family dwellings would depreciate the property value of the single family residences, and for this reason, opposed the reclassification. Mr. Knisely explained 'that the subject property contains 30,909 square feet, and if developed into high density development would accommodate approximately twenty-five units. Their plans are for eight units on the property, and the land under the present R-A zoning would permit five units. In his opinion %he area, being next to the church, park and schooi~ would be a favorable location for this project. Mr. Knisely requested the opportunity %o submit revised plans, to see if %hey would be accep%able, and further explained that the size of %he parcel precludes R-i subdivision, and makes necessary a development of this type. Mr. Wainwright stated that after the change of zoning is accom- plished, they would have no guarantee that a high density of twenty or more units would no~ be established. Mayor Coons explained if the plans were approved~ development according the %he approved plans could be made a part of the reclassifica- tion. size. Mr. Cecil called attention to homes in the area on lots of equal A gentleman from the audience asked why the property was no% developed in 1958 along with the subdivision. 5782 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 22~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. Knisely explained that he did not represent Mr. Hintz at the time of the subdivision development, and to the best of his knowledge, the previous application which had been denied by the City Council was for a high density apartment unit. Mr. Zehra advised that the Westridge Home Owners Association was in complete agreement with the Planning Commission's recommendation. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished 'to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearin9 closed. Councilman Krein offered resolution to uphold the Plannin9 C°mmission~s recommendation, denyin9 said reclassification. Said reso- lution failed to carry by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Krein and Schut%e. NOES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dui'ton and Coons. szon was held by 'the City Council. At the con- clusion th , ' ~ man Chandler moved that action of the City Council be deferred to June 12, 1962, 7:00 O'Clock P.M., for the submission of revised plans in accordance with the request of Mr. Knisely. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. IRACI NO. 4532: Mr. Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, reported that the developer of rrac't No. 4538 has requested 'the period of the irrevocable offer of sale of Lot "A", filed in conjunction with said tract, be extended from five years to ten years. The City Council disapproved the extension of the time limit of the irrevocable offer for sale. ADJOURNMEhFf: Councilman Dutton moved 'to adjourn. the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNE~ 9: O0 P.M. SIGNED: .~~~, ~,~ City Clerk Councilman Chandler seconded