1962/05/295783
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENt: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, button9 Krein, Schutte and Coons.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN; None,,
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Kei%h A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M~ Williams.
DIRECTOR OF POBLiC WORKS~ Thornton E. Piersall.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Minutes of 'the regular City Council meeting held May 22, 1962, were
approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRIED~
SIGN APPLICATION .- BROADWAY HALE PARKING LOT: Application for permission to
erect a non-conforming sign (four-foot projection and oversize) a% 500
North Loara Street, together with plans was submitted and reviewed by the
City Council. '
Councilman Chandler moved said sign application be granted with
the provision that there be no projection over the property line. Council-
man Schutte seconded 'the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATION - U-TOIE-EM MARKET AND QUICK SHOP: Application filed by
Hanover Homes~ !nCo~ for permission to erect three non-conforming signs
(oversize, not in center of property, and all signs visible from the
freeway') were ~ed together with plans9 and were reviewed by the City
sub~.'~
Council Sign ~ocation~ i!.01=i109 West South Street°
The Council noted that investigation by the Building Department
indicates tha~ existing ~'V~' billboard sign s,:ill remains on the property
after repeated notices informing Pacific Outdoor Sign Company that said
sign is in violation of the Anaheim Municipal Code9 and further, that the
owner of %he property does not propose to remove said sign.
Councilman Chandler moved 'that action on said sign application
be deferred to June 26, t9629 3:00 PoMo, and that ail interested parties be
informed that no further signs will be permitted on the subject property
until 'the demands of the City concerning conformance with the freeway sign
ordinance have been complied with° Councilman button seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED°
SIDEWALK WAIVER - 611 AND 617 ETON PLACF: Request of Covington Brothers Con-
struction Company for waiver of sidewalks at 611 and 617 Eton Place (Lots
1 and 2, Tract No, 1599) was submitted,
On the recommendations of 'the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton
moved that temporary waiver of sidewalks be granted as requested~ subject
%o the provision that no permanent planting be permitted in the area
reserved for sidewalks. Councilman Krein seconded %he motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - TOP HAT COCKTAIL LOUNGE: Application for entertainment
permit allowing piano player four days a week at the Top Hat Cocktail
Lounge, 180 West Lincoln Avenue~ together with recommendations of the
Chief of Police9 was submitted and reviewed by the City Council.
5784
City Hali~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Dui/on moved said Enterhainment Permit be granted for a period
of one year only, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police.
Councilman Schutie seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICA'TION NO. 58-59-99: Request of Mr. Merrill Kennedy, Business Manager~
Janiff Corporation~ for permission to proceed with C-1 reclassification on
a portion of the property contained in Reclassification No. 58-59-99, was
submitted, together with proposed development plans and a letter of agree-
ment from Charles E. Venner, Vice President, Magnolia Sanitarium, Inc., the
adjacent property owner, allowin9 Janiff Corporation to use thirty of their
seventy-four parking stalls.
Discussion was held by 'the City Council regarding the problem
involved if '[here should be a change of ownership on either property, and it
was noted that /he letter of agreement allowing the use of the parking
stalls does not contain any terms or conditions, and apparently could be with-
drawn a't any 'time. Further, that the sanitarium is allowed on'the adjacent
proper/y by condi'Lionai use permit~ ~n~ to 9rant this request would allow
C'r'! parking on property not commercially zoned.
Councilman Chandler moved that said request to proceed be denied.
Councilman Dutlon seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSiFiCATION NO~ 61-62-83 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 215: Request of
William N, Johnston, WNJ investment, Inc., for reconsideration of the
requirement contained in Resole[ion No. 62R-361, prohibiting the conduction
o~ a oocktail lounge on property described in Reclassification No. 61-62-83,
was subm:i~ied, Loge'ther with letter received by 'them from Harold L. Raab,
licensed Land S'uzve¥or~ advising that the field measurements from the east
line of io~ 4~ 'Trac'L No. 162, to the west property line of the parochial
school (east ~ine of Empire Street) is 394~25 feet.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Atlorney representing Mr. Johnston, advised
t~a% Mr. Johnston had presented said application to the City Planning Com-
mission~ however, at the time of the hear:rig before the City Council, he
was od4 of Sown,.and therefore he feels that the matter may not have been
fully presented %o the City Codncii~ That the proposed hotel and restaurant
wiii be o~ class A cons(ruction and operated by a major hotel chain, and a
cocktail lounge is a necessary part of this proposed de'velopmen~. That they
were of the opirlion thai the distance from the school was the concern of the
Alcoholis Beverage Control Board~ and 'therefore requested a re-hearing before
the City Council at 'the applicant's expense.
Discussion was held by '[he City Council regarding the requested
zoning on the property, and Mr. Johnston advised that his original intent
was to file an application for C-,2 Zoning; however the Planning Staff
suggested that he apply for C-1 Zoning and file a Conditional Use Permit for
'the high~rise building and the cocktail lounge°
Further discussion was held by the City Council, and at the con-
clusion thereof, Councilman Krein moved that said request for re-hearth9 be
denied. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FRANCHISE APPLICATION - SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPE LINES~ INC. Mr. Joseph Geisler,
Assistant City Attorney, explained the application for franchise filed by
Southern Pacific Pipe Lines~ Inc.~ and advised that they have requested a
blanket franchise for a period of forty years to construct and maintain
pipe lines in and under all public streets and highways and other public
places now or hereafter dedicated to public use.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was felt thai
parcels of property purchased for municipal purposes should be excluded
from the franchise, as future improvements and construction on the property
could require the removal and relocation of the pipe lines.
5785
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Eugene Freeland, Bank of America Building, San Diego, Calif-
ornia, representing Southern Pacific Pipe Lines and Engineering Management,
Inc., addressed the Council further explaining their application and
advised that the application was made for specific routes throughout the
city; that a general franchise in accordance with 'the 1937 Franchise Act
would enable them to obtain excavation permits for additional lines within
the city without appearing before the City Council; however, if the Council
desired to remove "in public places" from the franchise, it would be
agreeable to them.
RESOLUI'ION NO. 62R-508: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-508
for passage and adoption, setting June 26, i962 al 3:00 P.M. as the public
hearing date on said franchise application for the construction and mainten-
ance of pipe lines in and across public highways in the City of Anaheim.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
I~IENTION TO GRANT A FRANCHISE TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPE LINES, INC., FOR
THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, REPAIR, RENEW AND REMOVE PIPE
LINES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF OIL, GAS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES THEREOF IN
AND ACROSS PUBLIC HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR A HEARING THEREON AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF SAID HEARING.
(Public Hearing June 26, 1962, 3:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COONCILMEN:
ABSENY: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schatte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-.508 duly passed and adopted.
CANCELLA'~ION OF CITY TAXES: On motion Oy Councilman Schu%te, seconded by
Councilman Du%ton, cancella[ion of City Taxes was authorized on property
acquired by the Orange County Flood Control District by final order of
condemnation, Superior Court Case No. 88598, recorded May l, 1962, in Book
6094 at Page 602, Official Records of Orange County, as Instrument No. 938
(Projecl Nco Bi .- Carbon Creek Channel, Parcels Nos. 515.01 and 515.1).
MO'IION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-509: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-509 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A PERMIT
SUBMITTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT [0 THE CITY TO
CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A STORM DRAIN CONNECTION WITHIN SAID DISTRICT'S
RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CARBON CREEK CHANNEL AT WESTERN AVENUE.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the foil. owing vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler., Dutton, Krein, Schu%te and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-509 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUIION NO. 62R-510: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-510 for
passage and adoption.
5786
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND
APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY
GRANTING TO THE CITY AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 30-INCH WATER
PIPE BENEATH THE PROPERTY AND TRACKS OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY BETWEEN
SOUTH ANAHEIM AND MARLBORO, CROSSING BENEATH THE CENTER LINE OF SOUTHERN
PACIFIC COMPANY'S TRACKS AT ENGINEER STATION 57+74.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSEM[: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-510 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-511: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-511 for
passage and adoption.
Refer [o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUFION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND
APPROVING THE EXECUT~ION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY,
GRANTING TO THE CITY AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 63-INCH PIPE
LINE FOR STORM DRAINAGE WATERS BENEAIH THE TRACKS AND PROPERTY OF THE
SOU?HERN PACIFIC COMPANY BETWEEN ITS STATIONS OF WEST ANAHEIM AND STANTON,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons°
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-511 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO~ 62R.-512: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-512 for passage and adoption.
Refer %o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET
PROPOSAL FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER SECTION 2107.5 OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE~
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schu{te and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolut~n No. 62R-512 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-513: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-513 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5787
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: 'THE IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA
AVENUE, FROM JEFFERSON STREEt TO THE CITY LIMITS WEST OF DOWLING AVENUE,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. lOa; APPROVING tHE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IHE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTH-
ORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids 'to be opened June 14, 1962, 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoln9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by [he following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSE~[: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-513 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-514: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-514 for
passage and adoption.
Refer %0 Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF fHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING ThAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF' A POBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN
IN STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, UNDERNEATH THE TRACKS OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD, IN 7HE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 676; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ AUTHOR-
IZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, Ei'C.; AND AUtHORiZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO PUBLISH A NOTICE iNVI'[ING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids ~o be opened June 21, 1962, 2:00
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by 'the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dui/on, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-514 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-515: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-515 for
passage and adoption.
Refer 'to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL O~ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY R~QUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE LA PALMA AVENUE SEWER
IMPROVEMEMT~ ~ROM DOWLING AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY ~30 FEET WEST OF DOWLING
AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1248; APPROVING 'IRE DESIGNS, PLANS,
p ~
ROFIL=S, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTH-
ORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids %o be opened June 14, 1962, 2:00 P.M.)
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
5788
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-515 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-516: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-516 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert G. Williams, et ux)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: C OUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-516 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE - CAPS: Mr. Murdoch reported on informal bids received, as follows, for
3,500 caps with two inch black "A~, and recommended acceptance of the low
bid:
Grove Sporting Goods, Garden Grove
Du'tz Hilbers, Anaheim
Center Sportin9 Goods
Hisser Sporting Goods
$ 3,003.00 including tax.
3,348.80 " "
No Bid
No Bid
Councilman Chandler moved that the low bid be accepted and purchase
authorized from Grove Sporting Goods in the amount of $3,003.00. Councilman
Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE - T-SHIRTS: Mr. Murdoch reported on informal bids received, as follows,
for 4,000 T-.Shirts, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid:
Dutz Hilbers, Anaheim
Wisser Sporting Goods, Anaheim
Grove Sportin9 Goods, Garden Grove
Center Sporting Goods, Anaheim
$ 3,521.96 including tax.
3,936.92 " "
No Bid
No Bid
Councilman Schutte moved that 'the low bid be accepted and purchase
authorized from Dutz Hilbers in the total amount of $3,521.96. Councilman
D'utton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO.62R-517: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Council-
man Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-517 for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO TN~ LOW~gT ~gPON~IBL~ glDD~P FOP
FURNISHING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF CAST IRON WATER PIPE AND FITTINGS.
(Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Company, Los Angeles, California~ total
amount, $259,123.00 - lo~ bidder)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
b'y the following vote:
5789
~ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3;00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-517 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-5i8: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer,
Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-518 for passage and adoption,
awarding the construction of the Fire Station Buildin9 Headquarters at
Broadway and Melrose Streets, Job No. 4700, to Kiely Corporation in the
total amount of $329,200.00. (Base bid, $328,000.00; Addendum No. 3,
$1,200.00,)
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLb]DING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: A STEEL FRAME AND MASONRY TWO STORY AND BASEMENT FIRE STATION
HEADQUARTERS BUILDING LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY AND MELROSE
STREET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NUMBER 4700. (Kiely Corporation)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler.
The May'or declared Resolution No. 62R-518 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLIFfION NO. 62R-519: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer,
Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-519 for passage and adoption,
awarding the Miller Street Improvement from Orangethorpe Avenue to Anaheim
Road, Job No. 682, %o the low bidder, Sully Miller Contracting Company in
the amount of $5,633.35.
Refer'to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO ~rHE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF MILLER STREET FROM ORANGETHORPE AVENUE TO
ANAHEIM ROAD iN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 682. (Sully MiIler Contracting
Company, $5,633.35.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by /he following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-519 duly passed and adopted.
5790
C,ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU[ES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-520: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer,
Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-520 for passage and adoption
awarding the Sunkist Street Sewer Improvement, Job No. 1247, to Orange
County Sewers, Inc., in the amount of $1a,062.15.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE SUNKIST STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT FROM 257 FEET SOUTH OF
LINCOLN AVENUE TO 754 FEET NORTH OF SOUTH STREET, AND 151 FEET SOUTH OF
SOUFH STREET TO 737 FEET SOUTH OF SO~[H STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
JOB NO. 1247. (Orange County Sewers, Inc., $14,062.15)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Schu%te and Coons.
None.
None.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler.
The Mayor declared Resolution No, 62R-520 duly passed and adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 149: Request of Mr. Lee H. Vaughan for waiver of
certain Building Code requirements pertainin9 to shake roof construction
on his restaurant, was submitted.
Mr. Vaughan addressed the Council further explaining that the
proposed shake roof was on 'the front portion of the restaurant only, which
is to be constructed adjacent 'to 'the three swimmin9 pools of Sunset Pools.
Mr. Homer Wallace, Chief Building Inspector, advised this request
could be handled in his office if it was the intent of Mr. Vaughan to place
the decorative shake roof on top of the fire re:ardent roof.
Councilman Dutton moved said request be referred to the Chief
Building Inspector. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITF~S: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting held May 14, 1962, pertaining to the following applications
were submitted for City Council information and consideration~
VARIANCE NO. 1473: Submitted by Herman and Helen L. Jones, requesting a
waiver of rear yard setback requirements on property located at 1014 Irene
Place. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 314,
Series 1961-62, granted said Variance, subject to conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 223: Submitted by Cornelia Connely School of the
Holy Child, requesting a waiver of block wall requirement on property located
at 2323 West Broadway. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their
Resolution No. 315, Series 1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit.
Recommendations of the City Planning Commission to the City
Council {hat the school be permitted to post a two-year bond to insure the
establishment of a six foot masonry wall on the east boundary of subject
property, in lieu of the $2,000.00 cash bond (posted September 11, 1961) was
also submitted.
5791
~.ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it mas determined
that the applicant should construct the wall immediately, and upon final
building inspection, the $2,000.00 cash bond will be released.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 227: Submitted by John D. Gray, requesting
permission to construct a multiple planned unit development on property
consisting of Lots 2 through 11 of 'Tract No. 2911. The City Planning
Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 312, Series 1961-62, granted
said Conditional Use Permit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 231: Submitted by Land Estates, Inc., request-
ing permission %o establish a family billiard center on property located at
2216 ~est Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their
Resolution No. 316, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 239: Submitted by S. V. Hunsaker and Sons,
requesting permission to establish a recreation area on property located
at 604 North Moraga Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their
Resolution No. 317, Series 196i-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0...23~: Submitted by Vera M. Starmer, requesting
permission to establish a service station on property located at 1109-1101
East North Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolu-
tion Nco 319, Series 1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit.
fhe foregoing applications were reviewed by the City Council and
no further action was taken on the above-numbered Conditional Use Permits
and Variance appiication~
ORDINANCE NO. 17la: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1714 for final
reading~
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 14.32.185 RELATING TO
PARKING. (No Parking on Sundays, Empire Street)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1714 and
having knowledge of %he contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call, the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 17la duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1715: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1715 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL COD5 RHLATING TO ZONING. (61-6g-70 -
After hearing read in full ~he title of Ordinance No. 1715 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion, MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
5792
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoin9 Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1715 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1716: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No, 1716 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-79 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1716 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
readin9 in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Dutton, Krein, Schu%te and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1716 duly passed and adopted,
ORDINANCE NO. 1717: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1717 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-94 - C-i)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1717 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1717 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1718: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1718 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-12 - C-1 and R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1718 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
5793
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCII~EN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons,
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1718 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1719: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No, 1719 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-1 -
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1719 and
having knowledge of the contents 'therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roil call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1719 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOo 1720: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1720 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-55 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1720 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schut%e moved %he
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1720 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1721: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1721 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.12 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. (Professions and Services - Fixed place o£ business
within City.)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1721 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
readin9 in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
5794
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINLfI'ES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE - COIN OPERATED LAUNDRY MACHINES: Discussion was held by
the City Council regarding the annual license fee required for the
operation of coin-operated laundry machines which are installed in an
apartment unit or trailer park for use only by the occupants, and not
open to use by the general public.
No action was taken on said proposed amendment.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed
on motion by Councilman $chutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION
CARRIED.
a. Invitation - California Fire Show, June 2, 1962.
b. Feather River Project Association~ Minutes - Financial Statement -
Notice of meetin9.
c. Orange County Board of Supervisors' Agenda.
d. California Veterans United for Proposition No. 2.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-521: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-521 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED
QUITr-CLAIMING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR A RIGHT OF
WAY FOR WATER PIPELINE PURPOSES. (W. R. Haynes R A. Karos, and J. N.
Hall.) ' '
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schu~cte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-521 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-522: On the recommendations of the City Manager~ Councilman
Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-522 for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOL~"ION OF iNTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE STATE EMPLOYEES~ RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
On roil call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-522 duly passed and adopted.
MEDICAL SELF HELP PROGRAm: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager~ reported on
the meeting he attended with Mr. Caief~ Actin9 Civil Defense Coordinator,
at which meetin9 the Medical Self-Help Program and the method of giving
first aid instructions to the public, the goal being to train one person in
each family in medical self-help 'to aid in any type disaster or emergency,
was explained~ that the course will be given in eight two-hour sessions and
start with the basic medical faculty group, who would train the instructors,
who in turn would train the general public; that one hundred and fifty
training kits would be furnished by the federal 9overnment~ which would
include all the materials required to train 15,000 people in this program;
5795
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
that the sole responsibility of the City would be the record keeping for
the program, which as far as can be determined at this time would involve
part of one personas time.
In answer to Councilman Krein's question regarding support of
the program by the local doctors, Mr. Davis reported that the Orange
County Medical Association was represented at said meeting; however, there
is no local Anaheim chapter of the Medical Association.
Discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, the Council
requested that the medical and professional group of the Anaheim Chamber
of Commerce be contacted for the purpose of scheduling a joint meeting with
the Council to determine if the local medical group will lend their support
to such Medical Self-Help Program.
RESIGNATION - FINANCE DIRECTOR: Letter of resignation from Miss Beatrice M.
Miller, Finance Director, to be effective August 1, 1962, was submitted and
read by Mr. Murdoch.
In order to protect Miss Miller's retirement, said letter was
referred to the City Attorney"s office to determine if Council acceptance
should be on a resignation basis or for voluntary retirement.
RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Dutton
seconded the molion. MOTION CARRIED.
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, 7:10 P.M., all members
of the Codncil being present.
INVOCATiON~ Rev. Francis Cook, First Methodist Church of Anaheim, gave
the invocation~
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-98: Submitted by Calvin L. Pebley
(A. R. McDaniel, Agent), requestin9 change of zone from R-A 'to R-3, property
briefly described as located on the south side of Ball Road between Oakhaven
Drive and Knott Avenue, and further described as Tentative Map, Tract No.
4627.
A copy of letter from Michael Zebra, President, and John Simpson,
Executive Vice-President, of the Westridge Home Owners Association, dated
May 24, 1962 (copies duplicated for each Councilman) requesting thirty-day
exzension of time, was submitted and considered.
Discussion was held by the City Council on the requested thirty-
day extension. At the conclusion thereof, it was agreed that one spokesman
from each side express their reasons for or against said extension.
Mr. Herbert Lightle, 1212 South Oakhaven Drive, stated the home
owners requested the continuance be approved in order to provide and
promote action and understanding that could be beneficial ~o all concerned.
He stated that ~ecause of the recent building of a twenty-eight unit
apartment house on Ball Road, those in the area were fearful that a repeti-
tion of this might occur, and for this reason would welcome a meeting
between the petit}oner and those who are directly affected and their
authorized representatives to study this matter so as to more fully under-
stand each other.
Councilman Chandler asked Mr. Lightle if the group felt a contin-
uance would result in some sort of an R~3 agreement between them.
5796
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Lightle answered that they would like to have an opportunity
to meet with the petitioners, and further advised that they had not seen
the plans of development. He stated that if this reclassification was granted
and aisc if R-3 was approved on the property to the rear of his property,
he would be in a channel of R-3 zoning°
Councilman Chandler explained that the question was asked in
order to ascertain if a compromise R-3 agreement might be reached, that if
the group was entirely opposed to any R-3, further continuance would not
be warranted as the decision would necessarily be that of the City Council.
Mr. A. R. McDaniel, Engineer representing the applicant, advised
that plans of development were presented prior to the City Plannin9 Commis-
sion meeting, and no changes have been made in the proposed development;
that the only change made was to the tentative map which was revised 'to
eliminate the possibility of two-story construction. He further advised
that the hearing has been properly advertised and all documents have been
on file~ and because of the costly time factor 'to both the seller and
developer, requeszed the matter be considered this evenin9,
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton moved
that the request for thirty-day continuance be denied, and the public
hearin9 proceed. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. To this motion
Councilman Schutte voted "No." MOTION CARRIED.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 296,
Sezies 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Development substantially' in accordance with revised map of Tentative
Map of tract No. 4627 dated April 24, 1962o
2. Development plans for each parcel to be submitted to and subject to
'the approval of the Architectural Control Committee to conform to all
R.-3 Code requirements.
3o Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwellin9 unit, to be
collected as part of the Buildin9 Permit.
4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible
to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall,
prior to Final. Building Inspection.
Communication from Mr. A. L. Wolfert dated May 22, 1962, stating
his unwillingness to dedicate additional property for a street on the
easterly boundary of his property, adjacent 'to Tract No. 4627, was duplicated
and copies thereof submitted to each Councilman.
Mr. A. R. McDaniel addressed the Council statin9 they were pre-
pared to proceed on the plans submilted; the tentative map as revised
contains 30 lots, and it is proposed to construct four units per lot. He
requested the right to address the Council later, after determinin9 the
nature of the objections°
Mr. Lightle, Mr. Zehra and Mr. Simpson were invited to the
Council Table 'to review proposed plans of development.
Mr. Zehra stated he didn't believe, in looking at the plans, they
could commit themselves for the group that would be affected; that the
leaders of the Westridge Home Owners~ Association refrained from partici-
pation to allow those directly affected to make their request specifically;
however in addition to these directly affected people, there are many
other area residents concerned with this, and for this reason referred to
their previous request for time to allow an opportunity for 'the group to
work out the problem at a local level.
Mayor Coons stated that the records show the file to be fairly
complete, that the tentative map and plans have been available for those
interested to review.
5797
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Ronald Tiday, Attorney representin9 the applicant, stated
that all construction will be single-story structures, shake roofs, and
will rent for approximately $150.00 per month. He explained that this
will be a very high %ype development, and further stated that no variance
to the present R-3 zoning is requested, that ~he conditions as recommended
by the City Planning Commission are acceptable.
Mr. Jack Brown, 1223 South Oakhaven Drive, addressed the Council
in opposition to the reclassification. He stated he represented the
neighbors before the City Plannin9 Commission, and at that time presented
a petition of opposition containing over ninety signatures. He further
reported that nearly half the dwelling units west of Beach Boulevard in
use or proposed, are already multiple family units, which in accordance
with the recent survey, is above the average in the City of Anaheim. He
felt they were already in the midst of what could be termed "tenament row".
Mro Brown noted that subject property was a large parcel and in his
opinion would be spot zonin9 settin9 the pattern for the surroundin9
available property, eventually destroying the residential character of
the area° He further reported %hat the feelin9 of the people he repres-
ented had not changed, and that 'they were more concerned than before°
Laurie Wend, 812 South Westchester Drive, on behalf of Mrs.
June Lenc, requested those present to turn in petitions (later in 'the
meeting said petitions were filed purportedly containing 1050 signatures).
Mr. Simpson, 3309 l~est Deerwood Drive, asked what the land use
reason was that this property should be considered for R-3 development.
Mr. Kreidt referred to Plan Study No. 39-6-4, covering the
area oetween Knott Avenue and Beach Boulevard, extendin9 approximately
1300 feet north and south of Ball Road. He summarized the evidence sub-
mitred to the City Planning Commission resulting in their recommendations,
and advised that the original recommendation was for single and two-story
structures; later 'the plan was revised to single story multiples only.
He explained ihat ii appeared logical that the commercial development at
the souiheast corner of Knott Avenue and Ball Road would be expanded
easterly, which would incorporate the parcel of property immediately west
of sdbject property'. Development of subject property to multiple family
zone would provide a transition to the existing single family residential
and 'the projected expansion of the commercial zone.
Mr, Kreidt used as an illustration 'the East Anaheim Shopping
Center, where a transition of land use by apartment developments has
provided not only a transition to the single family residences but also
has provided additional purchasing power in the vicinity of' the shopping
center~
Reference was made 'to City Planning Commission's Resolution No.
296, Series 1961-62, and findings therein were noted.
Mr. Simpson asked if this buffer policy of multiple family
between commercial and single family residential was an official policy of
the Council.
~r. Kreidt explained that multiple family is considered a very
proper transitional type of land useadjncenz commercial centers, being
a more intensive type use than a single family residential district. He
noted the type of conflicts that occur between single family and commer-
cial, and stated it wa~ the feeling of the City Planning Commission ~hat a
transitional use of multiple family would be desired rather than a direct
meeting of commercial and single-family land use.
Mr. Simpson noted the locat~nof subject property on %he map
posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers and also noted that the
subject property is adjacent to R-A and not the commercial zone.
5798
Q.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUI'ES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Dwight Mize, advisor of A. L. Wolfert, owner of R-A property
adjacent to the commercial on the West and subject property on the East,
stated Mr. Wolfert approved the R-3 development proposed by Mr. Pebley. He
felt the zoning on gtc Woifert~s property should be considered s%rictly
temporary, as his property in all probability will be developed either R-3 or
commercial.
Mr. Norman 3ohnson, 3302 West Glen Holly Drive, referred to the
map developed at 'the time Mr. Smlth~s property came before the City Council
for consideration, and stated that the reason Mr. Smith's application was
denied was because of spot zoning. He further stated that this study was
made as a result of the interest shown in the area and their feeling of
encroachment of R-3 into the R-1 area. Mr. Johnson pointed out that until
such time as Mr. Wolfert has a petition filed with the Planning Department
for a change of zone, there is no action that can be interrogated which is
in connection with this application. He felt the property on the other
%tree corners of the present commercial was destined for R-3 or commercial,
but called attention to many other presently undeveloped land in the area,
and questioned its future zoning. In his opinion, the entire area was %o
be considered.
Mr. Johnson referred to their former suggestion that -the area be
zoned R-l, and recalled their reasons substantiating this suggestion, and
further stated that each signature on the petition submitted this evening,
approximately 1,050, represents a voice in the matter, and asked %he City
Council to whom they held allegiance~and to whom they were responsible and
committed, and to whom could the home owners put their %rust. He referred
to a decision handed down by the U. S. Supreme Court, wherein a decision
shall not be predica'ted on land values, but the use to which this land is
put must be predicated on the best land use. As a comparison, Mr. Johnson
advised that 'the owner of property was planning to sell it %o another to
develop, who in turn, in all probability, will parcel 'the property curl and
on the o%her side are %he assignees of the peri'rich who are interested in
malnta±nlng %heir desirable R-1 neighborhood°
Mr. Zebra asked if this concept of creating a buffer zone from
commercial %o R-3 to R-I, abutting one another, was a %rue concept.
Mro Joseph Geisler, Assistant Ci[7 A{torney, advised that the
basic concept of zoning is that, it has been felt in the past few years,
in order to protect those people who have devoted their property to a
specific use, and for an orderly' system of development so 'that the uses
which are next to one another will not be totally incompatible, zones
have been established, the heaviest being Mandfacturing, or M-i~ %he
least heavy, R-1. The graduation from the heaviest type of use to 'the
minimum type of use is M-l, C-3, C-2, C-l, R-3~ R-2~ and R-1.
An area which is in between and basically considered as unde-
veloped land, or outside the urban scope, is considered agricultural land,
or R-A. In almost all concepts of zoning, agricultural zones are included
to prevent any area from being used indiscriminently. The basic concept
of lesser use 'than commercial is any R-2 or R-3 use. This is 'the residen-
tial use and considered compatible with other residential~ however, it is
a higher intensity residential than R-i, and is considered more compatible
with the commercial uses. R-A is the zone that keeps the land from being
indiscriminentl¥ developed without any regulation. I~ is the transition
Of an area from agricultural use %o an urban area, and mus% be held under
regulations until, it is developed to its ultimate or urbanized use°
Ag~cul~uraZ lan~ w~h~n a city is hardly considered as a developed state.
Mr. Zehra asked if 'this concept of zoning was a generally
accepted one, and noted tha~ subject property is located between two
residential areas as such, and to pre-suppose or assume what the
remaining piece will be zoned is, in his opinion, out of order.
~799
~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler advised 'that the concept of going from the
least burdensome use to the most burdensome use, in his opinion, is an
ideal situation; however as long as he has been a member of the City Council,
'the City Council itself had no solidified policy or belief concernin9 the
transitional type development. Councilman Chandler further advised that
work was in progress to develop such a polic¥ for adoption.
Mr. Zebra was of the opinion that the property adjacent to the
present commercial (Mr. Woifert"s property) was the area that would become
the buffer zone.
Mayor Coons explained that Mr. Wolfert"s property was zoned R-A
and must be recognized as a transitional zone° He noted that the Wolfert
parcel was recommended for commercial, and if and when an application is
made, rezoning will be considered, tf granted, the transitional then
would be consumated~ It has to be realized that the R-A property someday
will oe zoned 'to a higher use.
Mr. Zehra stated there has been an expression of intent on the
part of Mr. Wolfert of his plans for his property, however in his opinion,
to use this expression as a basis of reclassification of subject property
would be setting the stage for future zonin9 of the Wolfert's property. He
felt the subject property could best be used for R-l, and would enhance the
homes and character of the majority of the area.
Mr. Ronald i'iday in rebuttal referred 'to 'the notice sent to the
residents in the area representin9 the project to be two-story instead of
one-story construction, and pointed out that the people who have signed the
petition were not presented the 'true facts. Regarding to whom 'the Council
was responsiole, he staied the Council's responsibility was to the total
125,000 people, and not any one particular group that appears on a specific
occasion. Reference was also made to the proposed General Plan on the west
wall of 'the Council Chamber, prepared by Mr. Eisner in 1958, and Mr. Yiday
advised it was his understanding that 'this area now under discussion has
been proposed and projected for R-3, since the preparation of the General
Plan map in 1958. He did not believe that the applicant was asking for
anything new~ He further advised that he has known Mr. Pebley for fifteen
years, that Mr. Pebley is a native of Anaheim, and has been an orange
rancher all these years~ He stated that when the street is widened to its
ultimate width (106 feet) the front of the street will come within nine feet
of the house in which Mr~ Pebley has lived for thirteen years. In referring
agaln to 'the proposed master plan, he called atien!ion to ihe fact that the
marl who prepared hhe plan had no individual in mind, and was concerned only
with the over-all planning of the city. Mr. Tiday felt ~hi$ was extremely
9god planning, and stated ~hat the type of development projected would not
be a ~urden to the communi~'y, and requested the reclassification be 9ranted.
For a point of clarification, Mr. Tida'y was informed that the
General Plan map has been in the process of revision by the Planning
Department, and is not now as originally submitted by Mr. Eisner.
Regarding whether this area was on the original plan projected for
R-3, Mr. Richard Reese, Planning Director, stated to the best of his know-
ledge ii was; however, the General Plan, even after its adoption by the City
Council, was only an expression of land use, and wo~;Id still necessitate
specific applications for rezoning of property.
Mr. Simpson stated, regarding the petition and the erroneous
information contained in the flyer, r~rred to paragraph three o£ lhe
application and quoted the wording therein. He recognized that the developer
has agreed to limit 'the project to one-story construc[ion.
Petitions purportedly containing 1050 signatures were submitted and
read by Mr. Simpson.
58OO
City Halt~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLFrES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Two pictures indicating the general condition of the existing
apartment house on Ball Road and showing trash containers fronting the
property were presented (pictures retained by Mr. Simpson), and Mr.
Simpson reminded the Council that this was the western entry into the
city. Regarding the map on the west wall as a proposed land use, he
felt 'the map had been on the wall for such a long period of time that
people are now being deceived by it. He stated it was only a proposal
and has never been adopted by the City Council, and in his opinion the
map should be removed. He also felt that the Plan Study prepared by the
Planning Commission, never having been adopted by the City Council,
should not be a part of this application. In his opinion, the map on the
west wall should be replaced with one indicating existing zoning.
Mr. William J. Wend, 812 Westchester Drive, advised he was one
of' the circulators of the petition, and assured the Council that the
signers were fully aware of what they had signed.
It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman
Krein, %hat said public hearing be closed. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-523: Further discussion was held by the City Council
pertaining to the evidence submitted; at the conclusion thereof, Council-
man Krein offered Resolution No.62R-523, denying Reclassification No.
61-62'98o
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLLTIION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF
THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-98)
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC IL~EN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-523 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 4627: Mr. A. R. McDaniel, Engineer, requested
Tentative Map, Tract No. 4627, be withdrawn in view of action taken on
Reclassification No. 61-62-98.
Councilman Chandler moved that the verbal request of Mr. McDaniel
to withdraw Tentative Map, Tract No. 4627, be granted. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Schutte moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8:55 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all members of the Council
being present.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-90 AND VARIANCE NO. 1459: Submit'ted
by S. V. Hunsaker and Sons, concerning property briefly described as a
parcel of property 640 fee% by 640 feet, located at the northeast corner
of Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-90: Requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3,
on property described above.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 298,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to the following
conditions:
5801
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUIES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 through 7,
with the exception that a minimum of seven (7) different elevation
plans shall be submitted for Architectural Committee consideration and
subject to Architectural Committee approval for development of subject
property, and with the further exception that a variable front yard
setback of 15 to 20 feet be established where possible, said alterations
subject to the approval of the Architectural Committee.
2. Payment of Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
3. Recordation of a Final Map of Tract No. A551 of subject property.
4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access-
ible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or
walt, prior to Final Building Inspection.
5. Installation of recreation facilities on Lot Nos. 23 and 24 prior to
Final Building Inspection.
VARIANCE NO. 1459: Requesting waiver of single-story height limitations
on property described above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 299,
Series 1961-62, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos° 1 through 7,
with the exception that a minimum of seven different elevation plans
shall be submitted for Architectural Committee consideration and subject
to Architectural Committee approval for development of subject property,
and with 'the further exception that a variable front yard setback of
15 to 20 feet be established where possible, said alterations subject to
the approval of the Architectural Committee.
2. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
3. Recordation of a Final Map of Tract No. 4551 of subject property.
4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible
to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
5. Suboect to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-90.
6. Installation of recreation facilities on Lot Nos. 23 and 24 to be
dedicated and installed as a recreation area prior to Final Building
Inspection.
Letter dated May 17, 1962, appealing that portion of Condition
No. 1 requiring a minimum of seven elevations was submitted by Phillip R.
McGraw, Attorney for the applicant (copies thereof duplicated for each
Councilman).
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the
evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission resulting in their
recommended approval for both the reclassification and variance, subject to
conditions. He further stated that as result of the two-story developments
observed by the Commission in the field, the Commission felt there should
be one elevation for every four lots, or a total of seven different eleva-
tions for this project.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Phillip McGraw, Attorney representing the applicant~ 914
West Center ~reet, stated he would dlrec~ his remarks to both the
reclassi£1cation application and the variance. He reported that this area
has been projected as a heavy density, R-3 area, and much of the area is
presently developed into multiple family use. He stated the applicant has
developed other tracts of high quality construction, and referred to a
recently completed project, Tract No. 2567, located on Crescent Avenue
approximately 660 feet east of Gilbert Street.
5802
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962, 3:00
Mr. McGraw advised that these units are planned to be retained
by the developer to be rented for approximately $125.00 to $175,00 per
month, and further explained the refinements planned for these units.
Regarding the seven elevations, Mr. McGraw reported that only
two elevations were developed in Tract No. 2567, but because of the
arrangement and deviation, there appears to be six different elevations
in the tract. Regarding Condition No. 5, he stated it should be noted
that the recreational facilities are to be on the rear portion of Lots
Nos. 23 and 24. As for single-story construction, Mr. McGraw noted other
two-story apartments in the immediate vicinity, and stated the only
problem exists at the southwest corner; further, in this particular
instance, there would be no problem of invasion of privacy. He urged
the granting of the reclassification and variance, and noted that no
objections had been filed with the City Planning Commission.
Mr. Bob Lowry, Architect, 2127 North Main Street, Santa Aha,
presented an illustrative rendering of the units proposed, being the
same as developed on Crescent Avenue, and advised that the reason they
object to the requirement of seven elevations is because the buildings
will be grouped by twos, facin9 onto a single landscaped courtyard. He
further advised that there was only one street on which five of these
combinations will be built, and stated they felt three or four good
elevations could be designed; but more than that, it was their feel[n9
they would not be as good as what they are trying to develop.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Lowry stated that since the City Planning Commission meeting,
they have tried to develop three additional elevations, but they were not
in favor of them.
Mrs. Nancy Schmall, 108 Criswood, addressed the Council reporting
she had only become aware of the proposed zoning yesterday afternoon, and
requested further time in order that the residents in her area could review
the proposed plans. She stated the home owners felt that they are bein9
over-run with apartment buildings, and that the children in the area are
now sent to five different elementary schools; and at the present time there
are not sufficient facilities to accommoda~ more children. Mrs. Schmall
advised that they had heard that there was to be a park across the street;
however from all indications, this does not appear to be in the immediate
future.
Mayor Coons explained that the reason she did not receive
written notice of' the public hearing was because they were beyond the
three hundred foot radius.
Mr. Murdoch reported that the proposed ten acre park site immed-
iately south of subject property is presently in the process of condemnation.
Mrs. Schmall asked that they be given a chance to see the plans as
a group, and only hope that they are not proposed for two-story construction
because of the single-story construction across the street.
Mayor Coons asked the applicant if he would object to a delay of
one week so that [hose persons interested could review the plans.
Mr. McGraw stated that time is of the essence to the developer,
and that approximately one month's delay has already been experienced due
to the republication of the hearing; and although he agreed to a one-week
delay, suggested Mrs. Schmall see the completed project on Crescent Avenue.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
5803
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
to defer action on Reclassification No. 61-62-90 and Variance No. 1459
June 6, 1962, 3:00 O'Clock P.M. To 'this motion Councilman Dutton voted
"No." MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-97: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Finley
Lewis, requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-3, property briefly described
as located at the northwest corner of gall Road and Magnolia Avenue (923-
931 South Magnolia Avenue); (formerly a portion of Reclassification No.
60-61-44).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 301,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the owners of subject proPerty place of record, City of Anaheim,
C-3 Deed Restrictions on Lot Nos. 124 and 125 of Tract No. 1951,
approved by the City Attorney, which restrictions shall limit the uses
of said lots to service stations only or to business, professional
and real estate offices; pharmacies; medical and dental centers; banks;
coffee shops or restaurants not to exceed seatin9 capacity for 50
persons (no drive-in, drive-through, or walk-up and no liquor); tele-
phone answering services; book and stationery stores; confectionery,
including ice cream sales; flower shops; barber or beauty shops;
exhibit halls, (no retail sales from floor); specialty gift shops;
tobacco shops; photo shops; laundry agencies or clothes cleaning
agencies; shoe repair shops; tailor shops; men's, women's and children's
clothing shops; diagnostic laboratories; bakeries; studios related to
permitted uses; interior decorators' studios; and toy and hobby shops.
2. That the owners of subject property place of record City of Anaheim C-1
Deed Restrictions on Lot No. 126 of Tract No. 1951, approved by the
City Attorney, which restrictions shall limit the uses of the property
to business, professional and real estate offices; pharmacies; medical
and dental centers; banks; coffee shops or restaurants not to exceed
seating capacity for 50 persons (no drive-in, drive-through or walk-up
and no liquor); telephone answering services; book and stationery
stores, confectionery, including ice cream sales; flower shops; barber
or beauty shops; exhibit halls (no retail sales from floor); specialty
gift shops; tobacco shops; photo shops; laundry agencies or clothes
cleaning agencies; shoe repair shops; tailor shops; men's, women's and
children's clothing shops; diagnostic laboratories; bakeries~ studios
related to permitted uses; interior decorators' studios; and toy and
hobby shops°
3. Tha± no buildings nor structures shall be used for both commercial and
residential purposes.
4. That all buildings or structures erected on ssbject property shall be
1,m~ted 'to one story in height and no single building shall exceed 4,000
square feet in floor area.
5. Ihat off.-street parking shall be provided on the basis of a minimum of
4 spaces per 1.,000 square feet of gross floor area.
6. ~hat the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 50 feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Magnolia Avenue for street widening purposes.
7. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
str~p of land 20 feet in width on and along the west side of said
oroperty for alley purposes.
8. 'That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
~trip of land 52 ~et in width, {rom the can%er llne o£ the street, along
Sail Road for street widening purposes.
g. That the owners of subject proper~y shall deed to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $~.00 per front foot on ali street frontage, for street lighting
purposes, which amount shall be paid prior to the final reading of the
ordinance reclassifying said property.
5804
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
10. That plans for the development of subject property shall provide for
future improvement of the alley in the rear of said property to City
standards, when various contiguous properties, having access to Rome
Street or Ball Road, shall have been developed in accordance with the
precise plan on file with the City. Interim paving and maintenance
shall be provided by the owners for isolated groups.
11. That driveway assess onto Magnolia Avenue shall be limited to the
minimum number necessary, and as indicated on the precise plan on file
with the City, except for Lot Nos. 124 and 125.
12. That sidewalks shall be installed by the owners of subject property to
the City standards, when various contiguous properties shall have been
developed in accordance with the precise plan.
13. That subject property shall be developed to conform to the site plan
of development on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit A,"
and by reference made a part hereof, except that Lot Nos. 124 and 125
shall be developed in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, and the
existing residence on Lot No. 125 shall be removed prior to Final
Building Inspection of the proposed service station site on Lot Nos.
124 and 125 and plans for the ultimate development of Lot No. 126
shall be subject to the Architectural Committee, and in accordance
with the conditions contained herein.
14. That a Faithful Performance Bond in an amount and form satisfactory to
the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City, prior to 'the readin9
of 'the ordinance reclassifying said property guaranteeing the perform-
ance of the following items:
(a) The erection of a 6-foot masonry wall and the installation of
trees to buffer the homes to the west of subject property,
· the 'type and spacing of the trees 'to be approved by the City
Parkway Maintenance Superintendent.
(b) The improvement of all structures as indicated on the
approved final development plans.
15o That Conditions Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 above mentioned be complied with
within a period of ninety (90) days from the date of Council approval
or such further time as the City Council may grant.
Correspondence dated May 27, 1962, received from Mike A. Girardi,
930 South Kenmore Street, was submitted and read, protesting said reclassi-
fication and asking if the request can be denied in such a manner that it
cannot be re-applied for.
In answer to the last questlon of Mr. Girardi, Mayor Coons stated
any home owner has the right and privilege to file an application for
rezonin9 on his property, as often as he desires.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of 'the property and reported these
three parcels are included in pendin9 C-1 Reclassification No. 61-62-44. He
referred to a study prepared in connection with the former application,
wherein the property was to be developed in groups of three parcels. The
Planning Commission recommendations have incorporated the bulk of the
requirements contained in City Council Resolution of Intention pertainin9
to Reclassification No. 61-62-44, bat amended so as to accommod,i~Le a serv_.,_~
station on the southerly parcels. Hr. Kreidt called attention to a
typographical error in Condition Ho. 9, and suggested an amendment to
Condition No. 10.
Mr. C. ~. Young, 1040 East Sixth Street, Santa Ana, representing
the applicant, requested the reclassification be approved as shown on the
plot plan, and slated they will remove all of the buildings. Regarding the
third icL, he stated it was their intention to purchase the third lot and
then sell it £or development for a compatible use.
Mr. Young pointed out the followln9 facts:
There is a precedent already established; three corners of this inter-
section are zoned for Heavy Commercial, therefore this corner by its
association is suitable for Heavy Commercial.
5805
~.ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
2. There is at present a definite hardship. Traffic is so heavy on this
street, it makes it no longer suitable for single family residences.
3. They are complyin9 and have endorsed the former requirements of
Reclassification No. 5i-62-44 by development in groups of three lots.
The Mayor asked if anyone wi'shed to address the Council pertain-
in9 to this reclassification; there being no response, declared the hearing
closed.
Discussion was held, and Councilman Chandler referred to the
former reclassification (61-62-44) and was of the opinion that all possible
assistance had been given to allow this R-1 area which was developed in
County territory to be developed as a Restricted C-i, which, in effect,
was a compromise to all parties concerned - those fronting onto M~gnolia
Avenue and those residents of the single family tract to the West, who
were very much opposed to a commercial reclassification. In his opinion,
none of the principles or conditions have changed.
wall.
Considerable discussion was held relative to location of the
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-524: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-524
authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission,
with the following amendments:
Condition No. 9. The word "deed" be changed to "pay".
Condition No. 10. Amended to read,"That plans for the development of
subject property shall provide for immediate improve-
ment of the alley in the rear of said property to City
standards."
Condition No. 14a. To read, "The erection of a six foot solid masonry wall
on the west side of the alley on the residential
property, unless written waiver is filed by the adjoin-
inn property owner, and installation of at least two
fifteen gallon trees per residential Iot to buffer the
homes on the west side of subject property, unless written
waiver is filed by the adjoining property owner."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLU}ION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
( 1-62-9 - c,-3}
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following 'vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, and Coons.
Chandler, and Schutte.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-524 duly passed and adopted.
STATEMENT MADE BY MAYOR COONS PRIOR TO VOTING ON ABOVE RESOLUTION: At the
request of Mr. Kreidt, the following statement made by Mayor Coons was
requested to be entered into the minutes:
"Ibis was all set up under six groups of three lots, and these two
lots on the corner, I think if we deny this application we are denying the
appl:cants a property right wh:ch is enjoyed by the other three corners. I
don't believe [hat this is any precedent, %hat the deviation from the
orig:nal zoning action will affect the other fifteen lots."
5806
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-99: Submitted by Mr. Lew Sinor,
requesting change of zone from R-3 to C-i, property located at the north-
east corner of La Palma Avenue and Citron Street (777 West La Palma
Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No, 308,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to the
following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2
with the exception that the private access drive shall be relocated
along the northerly and easterly boundaries of the subject property
and that perpendicular parking be established to the rear of the
proposed buildings. Said buildings shall have a minimum six (6)
foot landscaped setback, plans for said landscaping to be subject to
the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said
landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
2. Recordation of deed restrictions to business and professional type
businesses including barber shops and beauty shops and to prohibit
sale of liquor on subject property.
3. Installation of 'tree wells at 40 foot intervals on the parkway portion
of the planned highway right-of-way line, plans for said landscaping
to be submitted to the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said
landscaping to be installed prior %o Final Building Inspection.
Installation of a ten foot landscaped strip along the Citron Street
frontage of subject property, plans for said landscaping to be sub-
mitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of the
Parkway Maintenance and said landscaping to be installed prior to
Final Building Inspection.
4. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of La Palma
Avenue (50 feet existing).
5. Dedication of 30 feet from the monumented centerline of Citron Street
(25 feet existing).
6. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access-
ib].e to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence
or wall, prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection.
7. Installation of driveways on La Palma Avenue and Citron Street in
accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the'Office of
tge City Engineer.
8. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accom-
plishment of Item Nos. 4, 5 and 7.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property, and reported that
the City Planning Commission recommended the reclassification %o permit
the establishment of a four office building.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Coumil,
Mr. Sinor, applicant, addressed the Council and requested relief
from the requirement of a ten foot landscaped strip along the Citron Street
frontage, due to the fact that their plans are to have ingress and egress
onto Citron Street as well as La Palma Avenue, and the remaining area, if
landscaped, would be so small it would present a maintenance problem.
Plans were reviewed by the City Gouncil.
Mr. Kreidt advised that the Planning Commission,s recommendation
pertaining to the landscaping was on th~ ba~i~ ~ha~ ~h~ par~{ng area coula
be revised, resulting in the same number of car spaces, and landscaping
would provide screening for the pedestrians.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
58O7
C.ity Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-525: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-525,
authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested,
subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION O? THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OS ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 O? THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(61-62-g9 - C-i)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-525 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-100 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 226:
Submitted by Ann T. Unger and Ova D. Mikesell (Robert S. Unger, Agent),
pertaining to property located on the south side of Romneya Drive, approx-
imately 30'7 feet west of State College Boulevard.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-100: Requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3,
property described above.
The City Planninq Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 309,
Series 1961-62, recommende~ said reclassification subject to the foilowing
conditions:
1. Development substantiaIly in accordance with Exhibit No. 2, except
that the revised plans in accordance with conditions outlined herein
to be reviewed by the Planning Department before the file is submitted
to the City Council.
2. Limitation of structural heights to one story, provision of a minimum
twenty-one (21) foot wide ingress and egress drive, with a minimum
fifteen (15) foot radius corner cutoff and a fourteen (14) foot
vertical clearance.
3. Provision of a masonry wall across back of carports and stucco on
sides of each group of carports, with bumpers installed at the rear of
each carport, and the provision of a fifteen (15) foot space between
Carport No. 18 and dwellin9 unit No. la and Carport No. i and dwellin9
unit No. 8; construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the south and
west boundaries of subject property. Plans for carport construction and
shake roof construction to be subject to Architectural Control Committee
approval.
Dedication of 32 feet from the monumented centerline of Romneya Drive
(20 feet existing).
5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Romneya Drive, subject to the approval of the City Engineer
and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office
of the City Engineer,
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on Romneya
Drive.
7. Payment of a Park and R~creation Fee o£ $25.00 per dwelling unit to
be collected as part of the Buildin9 Permit.
8. rovzs~on o£ trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
p " o
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible
to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. Installation of fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim Fire
Marshall prior to Final Building Inspection.
5808
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINU[ES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
10. Provision of a 3 foot public utility easement and 2 foot overhang along
the westerly and easterly boundary of subject property to adequately
serve the subject property and other properties at the time of the
installation of service facilities.
11. Subject to the approval of Petition of Conditional Use Permit No
226.
12. 'Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accom-
plishment of Item Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 10.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 226: Requesting permission to construct a
multiple family planned unit development on property described above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 310,
Series 1961-62, 9ranted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 2, except
that the revised plans in accordance with conditions outlined herein
to be reviewed by the Planning Department before the file is submitted
to the City Council.
2. Limitation of constructional heights to one story, provision of a
minimum twenty-one (21) foot wide ingress and egress drive, or a thirty
(30) foot two-way drive, with a twenty-one (21) foot radius at the
intersection of the ingress and egress of the southerly drive if a
one-way drive is provided.
3. Provision of a masonry wall across back of carports and stucco on
sides of each carport, bumpers installed at the rear of each carport,
and provision of a fifteen (15) foot space between Carport No. 18 and
dwelling No. 14 and Carport No. i and dwelling No. 8~ construction of
a six (6) foot masonry wall on the south and west bounda~es of subject
property. Plans for carport construction and shake roof construction to
be subject to Architectural Control Committee approval.
4. Dedication of 32 feet from the monumented centerline of Romneya Drive
(20 feet existing).
5, Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Romneya Drive, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer.
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Romneya
Drive.
7. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit %o be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by %he Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access-
ible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence
or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-100.
10. Installation of fire hydrants shall be installed as required by the
City of Anaheim Fire Marshall prior %o Final Building Inspection.
11. Provision of a 3 foot public utility easement and 2 foot overhang along
the westerly and easterly boundary of subject property to adequately
serve the subject property and other proper%les, at the time of the
installation of service facilities.
12. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
ment of Item No. 4, 5, 6 and 11.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission pertaining
to Conditional Use Permit No. 226 was scheduled for public hearing, {o be
considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 61-62-100, in accordance
with City Council policy.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the property and advised
in accordance with the City Planning Commission,s revision of Condition No.
1, revised plans have been submitted by the applicant, and also revised
plans have been submitted by the proposed purchaser. He further reported
that the revised plans as submitted by %he applicant conform with the City
Planning Commission,s recommendations, and the revised plans submitted by
the prospective purchaser do not have adequate turn around area to accommo-
date fire trucks at %he southerly end of the proposed drive.
5809
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor asked 'if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Bob Unger, Agent, 354 Orangewood, addressed the Council
advising that the only plans requested to be considered in this proposal
are the ones submitted and signed by him. He referred to the requirement
recommended by the City Plannin9 Commission of a six-foot block wall on
the west side of the property, and stated that the property is bounded on
the West and South by the school, which will have an eight-foot wire fence,
and his plans were to construct a grapestake fence paralleling that of the
school.
Revised plans submitted by Mr. Unger were reviewed by the City
Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mr. Fred Stephenson, 1713 East Romneya Drive, referred to petition
of protest presented to the City Planning Commission, and advised that all
signers were people living directly northwest of subject property. He
called attention to the close proximity of the school, and present condi~on
of the street (Romneya Drive), and felt the area would not benefit by this
project.
Mr. Richard Knox, 1813 East Romneya Drive, addressed the Council
in opposition to the proposed apartment project.
Ar. Unger stated in his opinion the development he planned would
upgrade the area, and referred to the condition of the street (Romneya Drive)
and stated 'the reason that the street hasn't been widened is because there
has been no development in this area. He further explained that there would
be six buildings, or twenty-four one-story units on approximately one and
one-half acres~
Revised plans were reviewed by Mr. Stephenson.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-526: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-526
denying Reclassification No. 61-62-100.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUFION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING 'THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-100)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEN/:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
COUNCILMEN: None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-526 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-527: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-527
denying Conditional Use Permit No. 226.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLU/ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 226.
On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
5810
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLffES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-527 duly passed and adopted,
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO, 61-62-101: Submitted by F. J. Schubert, et
al (F. J. Schubert, Agent) requesting property located on the east side of
Euclid Avenue be reclassified from R-t %o C-l, property described as:
PARCEL NO. 1:
PARCEL NO. 2:
A parcel 322 feet by 100 feet, with a frontage of
322 feet on the east side of Euclid Avenue and 100
feet on the north side of Alomar Avenue.
A parcel 100 feet by 122 feet with a frontage of
122 feet on 'the east side of Euclid Avenue and 100
feet on the south side of Atomar Avenue.
{616, 620, 62a, 626, 630, 700 and 706 South Euclid Avenue.)
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 297,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property~ and stated that
the Planning Commission felt the reclassification and utilization of the
single family residence would be detrimental to the surrounding area.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Fred Schubert, 630 South Euclid Avenue, addressed the Council
stating that the application was made in accordance with observance of
other actions taken by the City Council on similar situations (State
College Boulevard). He stated that at the present time, only 630 South
Euclid Avenue is intended for commercial use, which is a real estate office,
planned for a portion of the existing garage. A rendering was presented
showing plans. Mr. Schubert advised the residential property on main
arterial highways are becoming less desirable for residential use because of
the traffic and noise, and referred 'to a traffic count of November 7, 1961,
indicatin9 20~157 cars daily. He further advised that there were only a
few homes on Euclid Avenue between the Riverside Freeway and Ka%ella Avenue
that have not been put to commercial use, and noted zoning and use in the
immediate vicinity. He stated that the reclassification was not for specu-
lation, but one of relief to sell these properties for a use in keeping with
Euclid Avenue.
Attention was called to the fact that subject property is a portion
of the tract on which deed restrictions have been filed (Tract No. 2381).
Mr. Joe Bradly, 707 Aivy Street, addressed the Council in opposi-
tion to the reclassifications and stated commercial use of this property
would increase traffic in the neighborhood, which is of concern to a great
many of them because of increased danger to their children. A further
traffic problem would also be created in the alley. In addition, this
would be spot zoning of commercial in a fairly new residential area,
bringing other objections such as parking problems, noise and lights.
Mr. Wayne Silver, 603 Amboy Street, called attention to the vacant
commercial property on the market, and asked if there is a need for more.
He stated that A10mar Street is pre antlv aCcommo~a{ing an increase in tra{£ic
because of the apartments to the South.
Mr. Charles Murphy, 630 Alvy Street, addressed the Council in
opposition, calling attention to the lack of parking, and referred to the
present undeveloped land between Lincoln Avenue and Katella Avenue.
5811
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Bob Daniel, 602 Alvy Street, addressed the Council in
opposition, and referred to homes on Brookhurst Street north of Lincoln
Avenue as an example of homes that have been converted to commercial use.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-528: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-528
denying Reclassification No. 61-62-101.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF
THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-101)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCIII4EN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCIII4EN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-528 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO 1479: Submitted by Walter Hauptman and William
Isaac, requesting permission to construct an addition to an existing motel
located on the west side of Haster Street approximately 130 feet south of
Katella Avenue.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 313,
Series 1961-62, denied said variance.
Appeal from action taken by the Planning Commission was filed and
public hearing scheduled.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and referred to the
City Planning Commission,s letter of transmittal, statin9 that the Planning
Commission was not aware of the Council"s directive to the City Attorney and
City Manager"s office to attempt to solve this problem, and as a result when
the property was reviewed, the Commission was not in a position to consider
all facts.
Mr. Harry Knisely, representing the applicant, advised the proposed
development was compatible with that of the area.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak against the application,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-529: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-529
granting Variance No. la72, subject to the followin9 conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Installation of a minimum six foot wide strip of landscaping abutting
the planned highway right-of-way on Haster Street, in addition to
installation of landscaping in the parkway portion of Haster Street
right-of-way, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject
to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said
landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
3. Installation of driveways on Haster Street in accordance with the
adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in siz~ accessible
to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid block fence or
wall prior to Final Building Inspection.
5812
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Haster
Street.
6. Time limitation of 180 days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 3 and 5,
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF IHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
VARIANCE NO. 1472.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-529 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Councilman Coons moved for a five minute recess. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:25 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the
Council being present.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-530: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City
Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-530 for passage
and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.52 (ZONING
CODE - M-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND
REFERRING SAID PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO HOLD AND CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING OR HEARINGS AND MAKE A REPORT OF ITS
FINDINGS, SUMMARY OF HEARING AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-530 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-531: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City
Attorney, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-531 for passage
and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT ALL CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 5672 TO BE COMPLIED
WITH BEFORE AN ORDER ABANDONING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND AN EASEMENT FOR
ALLEY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG CERTAIN PROPERTY THEREIN DES-
CRIBED WOULD BE MADE, HAVE BEEN COMPLIED INITH; AND THAT THE DESCRIPTION
OF THAT PORTION OF ALLEY AND EASEMENT FOR ALLEY PURPOSES ORDERED ABANDONED
SHOULD BE AMENDED. (Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
b813
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNC I LMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Du±ton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-531 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-532: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City
Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-532 for passage and
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACA-
TION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND AN EASEMENT FOR ALLEY
PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED
HEREIN. (Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
'Ihe Mayor. declared Resolution No. 62R-532 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO~ 62R-532: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City
Attorney, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-533 for passage
and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTEhFiION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND
PUBLIC UI'ILITY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIR-
ECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION.
(Romneya Drive at Homer Street - public hearing J'une 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by 'the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None,
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-533 duly passed and adopted.
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ,- COUNTY OF ORANGE: On the recommendations of the Assistant
City Attorney and City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that the County of
Orange be 9ranted an Encroachment Permit to allow the installation of planter
boxes in the sidewalk portion of the street right-of-way on Homer Street at
the site of the Municipal Court Building under construction. Councilman
Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-534: On report and recommendations of the Assis%an~ City
Attorney, Councilman Nrein offered Resolution No. 62R-534 for passage and
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5814
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLiFfION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION,
CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EXTENSION AND PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT CONSISTING OF WATER MAINS, LATERALS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS
AND WORKS IN CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND IN PORTIONS
OF UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND THE
ACQUISITION THEREOF BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OF DYKE WATER COMPANY AND ELECTING TO SUBMIT THE
MATTER OF DETERMINATION OF JUST COMPENSATION TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-534 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-535: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-535 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES.
(Eva Doyle property, northwest corner of Philadelphia and Broadway.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-535 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-536: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney,
Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-536 for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERJ~INING THE
NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, OF REAL
PROPERTY FOR HIGHWAY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, AND RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-386.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-536 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1722: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney,
Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1722 for first reading.
5815
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION THERETO OF PROVISION PROHIBITING
THE INHALING, DRINKING, OR BREATHING OF CERTAIN SUBSTANCES. (Section
7.16.055 - Inhaling or Drinking Certain Substances.)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1722 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 11:35 P.M.
· -~ City-Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session
(State Primary Election June 5, 1962).
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Coons.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddo×.
PLANNING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the meeting held May 29, 1962, were
deferred to the next meeting. (June 12, 1962)
RECLASSIFICATION NO 61-62-90 AND VARIANCE NO. la59: Submitted by S. V.
Hunsaker and Sons concerning property briefly described as a parcel of
property 6nO feet by 640 feet, located at the northeast corner of
Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street, requestin9 change of zone from R-A
to R-3.
VARIANCE NO. 1459: Requesting waiver of single story height limitation
on property described above.
Public hearing was held before the City Council May 29, 1962.
At that time public hearth9 was closed and action by the City Council
deferred to this date to allow residents in the area an opportunity to
examine proposed plans of development.
Correspondence from Nancy S. Schmall, requesting public hearing
be re-opened, was submitted.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
public hearth9 was ordered re-opened. To this motion, Councilman Dutton
voted "No." MOTION CARRIED.