Loading...
1962/06/065815 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 29~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION THERETO OF PROVISION PROHIBITING THE INHALING, DRINKING, OR BREATHING OF CERTAIN SUBSTANCES. (Section 7.16.055 - Inhaling or Drinking Certain Substances.) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1722 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 11: 35 P.M. SIGNED:,~ _~. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session (State Primary Election June 5, 1962). The meeting was called to order by Mayor Coons, PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson. CIIY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CIIY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. PLANNING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the meeting held May 29, 1962, were deferred to the next meeting. (June 12, 1967) RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-90 AND VARIANCE NO. 1459: Submitted by S. V. Hunsaker and Sons concerning property briefly described as a parcel of property 640 feet by 640 feet, located at the northeast corner of Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3. VARIANCE NO. 1459: Requesting waiver of single story height limitation on property described above. Public hearing was held before the City Council May 29, 1962. At that time public hearing was closed and action by the City Council deferred to this date to allow residents in the area an opportunity to examine proposed plans of development. Correspondence from Nancy S. Schmall, requestin9 public hearing be re-opened, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, public hearing was ordered re-opened. To this motion, Councilman Du%ton voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. 5816 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. A petition was submitted and read, purportedly containing 413 signatures in opposition to the granting of Variance No. 1459, and requesting that all of the recommendations of the City Planning Commission be adhered to. Mrs. Nancy Schmall addressed the Council on behalf of the Orange- wood and Haster Citizens' Committee, which is composed of residents in the area between Katella and Chapman Avenues, and the Santa Aha Freeway and Harbor Boulevard. Mrs. Schmall noted that only a portion of Lots 23 and 24 are to be used for recreational facilities, and in her opinion, this would mean more people crowded into an area where there are no recreational facilities for the people who are already there. She further advised that she had personally inspected the apartment development on Crescent Avenue, and found the interio~to be the quality claimed; however, in her opinion, the exteriors were not distinctive. Snapshots of apartment buildings observed at the northeast and northwest corner of Pearson Avenue and Mountain View, showing the unkempt condition of the yards, were submitted. Mrs. Schmall stated such buildings, she feared, encouraged vandalism and malicious mischief, not only to the buildings in question but others in the area. Attention ~^,as called to the limited facilities of the schools, and that children who live ih the area presently are attending at many different schools. She stated although the City has under condemnation proceedings the area for park facilities, the property does not yet belon9 to the City, and it may be as lon9 as five years before this site is developed into a park. Mrs. Schmall stated in the interest of all concerned, the property in question should be zoned R-3; however she could see no reason for allow- in9 two-story construction. Mr. Phillip McGraw, Attorney representing the applicant, stated although he has not seen the petition, it was his understanding that it is in opposition to the waiver of single-story construction only. He felt no real basis of objection to the two-story development had been shown. Regardin9 the Variance, he stated it only applied to the southwest corner of the subject property, where diagonally across the street a single family residential tract exists; however in checkin9 the subject property, it was found that it is beyond the limits requiring single-story development in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, bein9 more than 150 feet from the boundary line of the R-1 tract. Mr. McGraw noted the R-3 development being constructed immed- iately to the West, existing R-3 two-story on the North and East, and to the South the property under condemnation for a City park. In his opinion, there was only one use that could be made of the proper%y, and that was two-story compatible with other property that has been developed in the area. He further advised that Hunsaker and Sons have had their escrow extended due to problems which have been no fault of their own, and now have only one week remaining in which to close escrow on the property. He stated %hat they have shown good faith and have shown development of a high quality, and felt 'this would be an asset to the community. In connection with Lots 23 and 2a in [he development of recreational area, he stated as far as the publlc hearing before the City Planning Commission was concerned, ii was perfectly clear 'thai it was %o be developed on a portion of these lots only. Reearding elevations, he requested .the requirement of the City Planning Commission Ne reduced from seven elpva~ions %o four, ~^~i%h modifi- cations. It was established at the last hearing that the Planning Commis- sion asked for one elevation for each four lots, but actual development was to be in pairs, which would reduce the elevations required accordingly. 5817 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Marc Andrews, Realtor representing Mrs. Bostick, owner of the property, referred to the recent opposition to R-3 in the City of Anaheim, and felt the Council was wise in judging each property on its own merits. He noted development in its immediate vicinity, and felt the pattern on the east side of Haster Street has been established, and in the interest of the right of a property owner, urged the granting of the applications. Mrs. Schmall stated in this particular instance with the park planned across the street, two-story development would not be a proper environment for children and adults using the park facilities. Sim Hunsaker advised that the property will be subdivided into a tract (Tentative Map, Tract No. a551), and will be improved similar to Tract No. 2962. Plans of development were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. At the request of Councilman Dutton for clarification of Condition No. 5 of the reclassification, and Condition No. 6 of the Variance, pertaining to the recreational facilities proposed for Lots 23 and 24, Mr. Kreidt stated it was his understanding that the recreational facilities would apply only to the central portion of these two lots, and was so noted by the developer at the City Planning Commission's hearth9. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-537: Councilman Dutton recognized the Council's policy of disapproving R-3 in areas where no present R-3 development exists; however in his opinion, this area was definitely suitable for R-3 multiple story use, which would be in accordance with development in the immediate area, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 62R-537, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the following amend- ments: Condition No. 1 - changin9 the number "seven" to "four". Condition No. 5 - to be deleted. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-eo - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schu%te and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-537 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-538: Councilman Du%ton offered Resolution No. 62R-538 granting Variance No. la59, in accordance with the City Planning Commission's recommendations, with the following amendments: Condition No. 1 - changin9 the number "seven" to "four." Condition No. 6 - to be deleted. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. ].459. 5818 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons, None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-538 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. laSV: Submitted by Dietrich LeBeau Development Company, requesting permission to construct a two-story professional office buildin9 on property located on the south side of Katella Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street. Public hearth9 was scheduled in accordance with order of the City Council May 8, 1962, at which time the Plannin9 Staff was requested to prepare a Plan Study of the perimeter and area of influence of the Disney- land Park. Mr. Murdoch reported that the Planning Study requested by the City Council will be considered by the City Planning Commission June 1962. It being agreeable with Mr. Macgahon, Attorney representin9 the applicant, public hearin9 was continued to June 26, 1962, 3:00 O'Clock P.M., on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION: Application submitted by Chaos, Inc., requesting permission to erect a sign 65 feet in height (total 278 square feet) on property located at 1560 South Harbor Boulevard. Plans were reviewed by the City Council and explained by Mr. Agnew of the Santa Aha Neon Company. It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dution, that said permit be granted with the condition that the sign be reduced to 60 feet, or be set back from the property line so that the height of the sign does not exceed the distance from the centerline of the street. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Chandler did not participate in the discussion on this issue, nor vote. SIGN APPLICATION: Submitted by Kramers Hofbrau, requesting permission to erect a sign 25 feet in height on property located at 1160 North Dowling Avenue. Plans were reviewed by the City Council and discussion held. Councilman Dutton moved said permit be granted as requested. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. To this motion, Councilman Chandler voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Request of Club Social Lagunero De California, Raymond Ramos, Business manager, for permission to hold a dance June 16, 1962, at the Carpenters' Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was submitted. Councilman Dutton moved said public dance application be granted, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 5819 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6, 1962~ 3:00 RE<~UEST TO HANG BANNERS: Request of Los Angeles County Fair Association, Phil D. Shepherd, Secretary - Manager, for permission to hang banners announcin9 the dates of the 1962 Los Angeles County Fair, was submitted, Councilman Krein moved said request be granted, and the Fair Association be advised to contact Mr. George Oelkers, Director of Public Utilities, regarding arrangements for the locations of said signs. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-28: Request of White Front Stores, Inc,, Mac H, Gilburn, Store Supervisor, for permission to construct a small key shop on the White Front Store property located at 2222 South Harbor Boulevard, together with plans, was submitted. Mr, James Pratty, operator of the proposed key shop, explained that the shop will be a separate eight foot by eight foot hexagon building, located directly in front of the canopy of the existin9 ~hite Front Store, and will be an asset to the development. Plans were reviewed by the Council and discussion held regarding the various additional accessory uses which have been allowed outside the store proper on the White Front property, and the conditions of approval in each instance. Mayor Coons requested that the City Attorney's office investigate all previous proceedings on subject property with respect to compliance by the applicants with conditions of approval. Councilman Chandler moved that the request for construction of a key shop be denied. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. It was suggested to Mr. Pratty that he contact White Front Stores, Inc. with regards to a location for his key shop under the main store roof. VARIANCE NOS. 1391~ 1269 AND 1314: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Schutte moved that Pacific Employers' Insurance Company bond dated May 29, 1962, in the amount of $1,300.00, posted by Thomas R. Coughlin in lieu of cash security previously posted October 5, 1961, be accepted, and release of said cash bond authorized. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO?~' 60-61-11: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the request of Robert Clagett on behalf of Dr. H. Lestmann, owner, for a one year extension of time to Street Improvement Bond No. B-10059~, United Pacific Insurance Company, dated November 6, 1961, be granted. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. POLICE FACILITIES AND CENTRAL LIBRARY BUILDING: Request of William D. Greschner Company to change landscaping subcontractors from Henry C. Soto Corporation to Aldomar, Incorporated, and the approval of said change by 3ce 3ordan, A.I.A. & Associates, was submitted. Councilman Krein moved said request for change in landscaping subcontractors be granted. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. The City Council requested the City Attorney's office to request the Architect and contractor to notify the City Attorney of any discrepancies or unusual situations which may arise in the construction of the Police Facilities Building and Central Library. 5820 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUYES- June 6, 1962, 2:00 P.M. PARK DEVELOPMENT POLICY: Mr. Murdoch further explained the proposed Park Development Program dated May 21, 1962, submitted by Mr. Richard K, Kamphefner, Park Development Coordinator (copies furnished each Councilman) recommending a two-step modified park development plan as follows: 1. Grade and install sprinkler system, turf and trees at the eight (8) totally undeveloped parksites at an increased rate -- accordin9 to precise development plans. 2. Continue facilities and structural development but at a slightly decreased rate from that provided in our present park development program. Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schutte moved that the Council adopt said modified park development policy, and that 'the program be carried out as the budget permits. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-539: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-539 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE EXTENDING THE TERM OF THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT FOR SOIL AND MATERIAL CONTROL TESTS, DATED AUGUST 2, 1960, FOR A TERM COMMENCING JULY 1, 1962, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1963. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly Passed and adopted by the following vote: ,aYES: COUNC i LMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-539 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-SaO: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-540 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resol~tion Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, ~0 WIT: THE ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD ~0 APPROXIMATELY 1300 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1249; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING tHE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CItY CLERK rO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOS. (Blds to be opened June 28, 1962, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call f~he foreqoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNC]LMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The May, or declared Resolution No. 62R-540 duly passed and adopted. 5821 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-541: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-541 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 62R-493 ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED FROM NORTHROAD REALTY CORPORATION. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-541 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-542: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 62R-542 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Elinor C. Hanson) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCII~EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCII~EN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-542 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-543: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City Attor- ney, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-Sa3 for passage and adoption. Refer [o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 62R-535 (Eva Doyle property). On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-Sa3 duly passed and adopted. COMPENSATION - CITY EMPLOYEES: Mayor Coons asked the Council if they wished to further discuss the recommendations of the Personnel Director and City Manager pertaining to the revised salary schedule for the next fiscal year, as each Council member has received a copy of said report. Mr. Albert J. Coughlin, 2316 East Romneya Drive, Anaheim, Business Manager of Local Union No. 47, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and speakin9 on behalf of members of their union who are employed in the Utilities section of the City Utilities Department, requested permis- sion to speak on the salary resolution. 5829 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. Coughlin was invited by the Council to come forward to the microphone. Mr. Coughlin thanked the Council and requested that the salary resolution be deferred until the union members and the representatives of the union had an opportunity to discuss with the appropriate members of the City departments the matter of negotiation of wages, in accordance with the provisions of Assembly Bill No. 2375; that although they have had various meetings, they have not had an opportunity to discuss wages. He advised that they have only an idea of what is being presented as a salary resolution, which is based upon some discussion with the Personnel Director as to the policy in regards to wages as they apply to the Utility Department; that from this discussion, he understands that the wage rates that will be applied in the Utility Department will be established by using the Edison Company rates as a bench mark; that there are also other Utility Companies and employeers of linemen and electrical workers in this local area, and suggested that this matter be deferred until a survey can be conducted of the wages paid by other power industries in this area. Mr. Coughlin stated that in general, the City has a good benefit program; however, in making their own survey of wages and frinqe benefits, they found that the City of Anaheim employees pay about $45.00-per month to receive the same retirement benefits as Edison Company employees; that they realize this amount is returnable, however, the purpose of such a program is for retirement protectzon, not to merely save money. In comparing the medical program, Mr. Coughlin noted that the Edison Company employees receive complete medical and hospitalization coverage beyond retirement to the date of death. He stated he was pointing out these matters to substantiate their request that a survey also be made of the District of Water and Power and the Cities of Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena to establish an average wage and benefit program, rather than merely using the highest or the lowest figures. Mr. Coughlin stated he realized the time schedules of the City make it very difficult at this time to enter into negotiations, but believed in all fairness to the employees of the Utilities Department, the linemen and electricians that have asked them to represent them, ConsiderJtion should be given to a survey that would indicate the rates and benefits of the employers of electricians and linemen, and use this average as a proper bench mark. Mayor Coons asked Mr. Coughlin if he was able to give them some indication as to how many of the City employees belong to the union, and have asked the union to represent them. . Mr. Coughlin replied that about seventy-five per cent of the electric Utilities Department including the sub-stations and Meter Depart- ment, the line crew and electric crews, have signed authorization cards; that they would be willing to have a secret ballot election in those groups that they profess to represent, or have the authorization cards and the City's list of employees taken to a minister for the purpose of checking and determining 'the exact percentage. Mr. Dawson,Assistant City Attorney, was of the opinion that the most proper and best procedure would be by an election. Discussion was held by the City Council regarding lack of evi- dence that Local 47 Union was authorized to speak on behalf of the electrical employees, and it was felt that proper written certification and authority should be filed indicating the right of representation, as no official notice of representation has been received by the Council. Mr. Coughlin advised that they have had meetings with the City Manager and City Attorney; that they would welcome an election in this particular group of employees to determine whether or not they desire the union to represent them; further, that it is a fact that some employees of the Electrical Department have joined the union, as about fifty per cent of the employees are dues-paying members; that the standard method of union 5823 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. procedure is to first receive the employees' authorization, then the join- ing of the union, and then calling for an election. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and Mr, Murdoch reported that Mr. Turner, City Attorney, had advised that in the case of governmental agencies, particularly with a municipality, that a contract with a union cannot be entered into; however the City is required to receive and discuss matters with representatives, either union or otherwise, when employees have requested said representation; that because of this legal inability to enter into a contract with the union, there appears to be some question as to whether negotiation, as generally considered in matters with unions, has any part in a municipality; and likewise, an election to determine representation would have no particular point. Mr. Coughlin further advised that the legal opinion of the union is that a City is not restricted from signing a contract with a union, but it is not mandatory in the law; that various cities have labor agreements with labor unions. Councilman Chandler felt union representation should be only after an election is held in the orderly course of events, and that the budget of the City should not be withheld at this time for the benefit of a specific group of employees. Mayor Coons concurred with Councilman Chandler's statements, and was of the opinion that the salary resolution could be adopted, and if subsequent to the adoption thereof the evidence of representation and negotiations warrant adjustment in this salary schedule, adjustment in the budget accounts could be made. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-Sa4: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-Sa4 for passage and adoption, approving the compensation rates for City employees as recommended by the Personnel Director and City Manager, inasmuch as it appears any possible future adjustments could be taken care of. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CREATING VARIOUS CLASSES OF EMPLOYMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE RATE OF COMPENSATION THEREFOR AND RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS NUMBERS 6148 AND 7016. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. Nonm. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-54a duly passed and adopted. CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County taxes on the following parcels of property acquired by the City for municipal purposes. MOTION CARRIED. a. Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-398 from Marlborough Homes, deed recorded May 15, 1962 as Document No. 11044 in Book 6109 at Page 260. b. Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No. 6QR-412 from Jose and Franclsca Morena, deed recorded May 15, 1962 as Document No. 10252 in Book 6108 at Page 13. c. Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-451 from Mel-Ken Corporation, deed recorded May 22,' 1962 as Document No. 16934 in Book 6117 at Page 974. 5824 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6~ 196~ 3:00 P.M., Property acquired pursuant to Re~olution No. 62R-384 from Daniel Saucedo and Jessie A. Saucedo, deed recorded May 16, 1967, as Document No. 11607 in Book 6110 at Page 31, Offi- cial Records of Orange County, California. ORDINANCE NO. 1723: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1723 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-30 - C-if Harris property only) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1723 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1721: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1721 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3,12 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. (Professions and Services - Fixed Place of Business Within City.) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1721 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schut%e seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1721 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1722: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1722 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION THERETO OF A PROVISION PROHIBITING THE INHALING, DRINKING, OR BREATHING OF CERTAIN SUBSTANCES. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1722 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by 'the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I LME N: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. ~{ayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1722 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. 5825 City Halls Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6, 1962, 3:00 a. Feather River Project Association Newsletter. b. Orange County Board of Supervisors - Agenda. c. Michael Zebra, et al, letter dated May 31, 1962. d. Before the Public Utilities Commission~ application Of the Greyhound Corporation for order authorizing a State-wide increase in intra-state passenger fares other than fares in the Peninsula, Contra Co~ta and Matin services. REQUEST TO USE PEARSON PARK: Mr. Murdoch submitted and read request received from the All-Star Baseball League, Incorporated, for permission to use Pearson Park Baseball Diamond for their openin9 day of baseballs on June 10, 1962, from 11:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., and also requesting permission to set up a refreshment stand durin9 that period. Memorandum from Mr. Lloyd Trapp, Recreation Superintendents recommending denial of said request because of previously scheduled activities for the park and advising that the Peter Marshall Park has been scheduled to handle this League for the summer, was also submitted. Councilman Chandler moved said request for use of Pearson Park be denied. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-5a5: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-ES5 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF BOYLE ENGINEERING, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, IN CONNECTION WITH FURNISHING ENGINEERING SERVICES TO DESIGN AND PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER MAIN ALONG CERTAIN STREETS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT COVERING SAID WORK. (Rio Vista Street Water Main) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEN/: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-545 duly passed and adopted. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATIONS: The following alcoholic beverage license appli- cations were submitted to the City Council by the City Manager: a. On-sale beer (person-to-person transfer) filed by David W. Johnson for "The Alibi", 821 South Brookhurst, Anaheim. b. Person-to-person transfer, on-sale general, filed by Rampford, Incorporated, for King's Row, 409 West Katella Avenue. c. New off-sale beer and wine, filed by Avis D. and Manfred G. Williams for "Your Family Market", 1813 South Manchester Avenue, Anaheim. No action was taken by the City Council on the above applications. MICROFILMING OF CITY RECORDS: On report of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that a survey be made regarding microfilming of City recordss and that the expenditure of the necessary funds for said survey be authorized from the Council Contingency Fund. Councilman Dutton seconded the mo%ion. MOTION CARRIED. 5826 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. ARCHITECT - BRANCH LIBRARY AND BRANCH FIRE STATION: Mr. Murdoch reported that proposals have been received from the local Architects, and requested the Council's opinion on the method of determining the Architect for branch libraries and branch fire stations. The Council requested the City Manager to review said proposals and forward his recommendation to the Council. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-5~6: Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager regarding terms and conditions pertaining to leasing of certain City-owned property to William H. Montague. At the conclusion of said discussion, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-5~6 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE LEASING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO WILLIAM H. MONTAGUE AND FRANCES ELIZABETH MONTAGUE. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-546 duly passed and adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 125: Discussion was held by the City Council regard- ing the non-compliance with certain conditions contained in City Planning Commission Resolution No. 275, Series 1960-61, granting the operation of a heliport with appurtenant facilities. Councilman Chandler moved that the Los Angeles Airways be notified that compliance with the conditions contained in said resolution must be commenced within two weeks from this date. Councilman Coons seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO. 2903: Mr. John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, reported that the improvements within Tract No. 2903 were installed by the bonding company, and that he had been informed by the City Engineer that all improvements including streets, sewers, water and so forth, have been inspected and found satisfactory, and therefore it would be in order for the Council to accept the improvements and the improvement bond exonerated. On the recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Schutte moved that the improvements within Tract No. 2903 be accepted and %he improvement bond exonerated; and further, that %he City Attorney's office be authorized to endorse the check received from the bonding company to the contractor who completed the work. Councilman Dutton seconded %he motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 5:30 P.M. City Clerk