The URL can be used to link to this page

1962/07/175939 CiTy Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. PRESE~Ir'f: ABSENY: PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte (entered the meeting, 3:07 P.M.), Chandler, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreid%. Mayor Coons called the meeting %o order. MINUTES: Minutes of the regular City Council meeting held July 3, 1962, were approved, as amended (page 5889 - "18 feet" changed to "18 inches"), on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting held July 10, 1962, was deferred to the next meeting (July 24, 1962) and correction of motion concerning permission granted Anaheim American Legion subject to payment of $125.00 (page 5937) was authorized. SIGN APPLICA'IION~ PAUL~S RECORDERS: Communication dated July 12, 1962, from Paul D. Engdahl requesting reconsideration of application for permission to erect roof sign at 1763 South Harbor Boulevard, was submitted. Mr. Engdahl addressed the Council giving a resume of his back- ground and experience, and explained that 'this business is not a "record shop"; that 'they sell tape recorders, and will have on display demons%ra- tion models from all over the world. He advised that the store is located in the same buildin9 occupied by a liquor store and a beauty shop, and has only a twelve-foot frontage. Co'uncllman Schutte entered the meeting, 3:07 P.M. Mr. Engdahl submitted several photographs for Council review, showing the store from different locations, and further reported that his location is the center store, and approval of the sign has been given by the owner of the property and the other two tenants. Photos were also submitted showing signs similar to his request existing in the East Anaheim Shoppin9 Center. During the discussion, Mr. Engdahl was advised that this activity was allowable only because his particular location was zoned C-I, and that according %o Council policy, commercial ventures in the Disneyland area are permitted only by Conditional Use Permit or Variance. Councilman Chandler moved that the City Council indicate that integrated sign be considered the choice of the Council, and that said sign application, as submitted, be denied. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (Photographs were returned to Mr. Engdahl.) SIGN APPLICATION~ KNAPP SHOES: Request for reconsideration of application for permission to erect a free-standin9 sign at 2051 Harbor Boulevard, previously denied without prejudice by the City Council, was submitted. 5940 Ci't¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. Russ Jenkins, West Coast General Manager for Knapp Brothers Shoe Manufacturing Corp. explained the reason for their request~ due to the fact that the s~ore location is approximately 300 feet from the property line. He further explained provisions of their lease, and stated this is zo be an integrated sign providin9 advertising space for zhe other stores. Plans were reviewed and discussion held by the City Council; at the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Krein, that said sign application be granted in accordance with letter and plans submitted at open meeting, and with the provision that additional signs added below the Knapp Shoe sign be no larger than ten square feet each. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION, DORIC HOTEl.: Application for permission to erect a free standing sign at 130 West Katella Avenue¢ together with plans, was sub- mitted and reviewed by the City Council. A representative of the San Diego Sign Company addressed the Council explaining proposed sign and location. It was moved by Councilman Schuite, seconded by Councilman Krein, that said sign application be granted as requested. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICAI'ION~ ROWE DEVELOPMENY COMPANY: Application for permission to erect 'two temporary' directional signs, 12 fee't by 36 feet each, at 2025 Santa Ann Freeway and 800 North Euclid Avenue, together with plans~ was submitted. Mr. Keith Bright, representing the sign company', advised they wished to change their request for sign at 81i No. Euclid Avenue to 800 North Euclid Avenue; the signs would be of a temporary nature, to be removed in six months. Discussion was held by the Cit? Council; at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved said sign applications be granted for six mon't~s, with provision that a $100. deposit be made for each sign ~o insure removal thereof ~n six monihs, and that written authority from the land owner be presented prior to issuance of sign permits. Councilman Dutton seconded /he motion. To this motion~ Councilmen Krein and Coons voted "No" MOTION CARRIED. (Renderings of plans were returned to Mr. Bright.) SIDEWALK WAIVER, 601 EAST BALL ROAD: Request of Menasha Container of California for waiver of sidewalk requiremenl at 601 East Bail Road, was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that temporary waiver of sidewalks a't 601 East Ball Road be 9ranted, with provision that no permanent planting be allowed in the area reserved for sidewalks. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-85: Communication from Henry F. Haas requesting ~emporary waiver of block wail requirement, as condition of Reclassifica- tion No. 59-60-85~ was submit%ed. Mr. Haas advised that there are eight-foot driveways on the east and west sides of subject property, and 'to install block walls ai this time would interfere with a proper turning radius. Discussion was hel. d by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Chandiar~ seconded by Councilman Schutte, that said request be granted, susject to installation of a block wall on the north property line prior 'to Final Building Inspection~ and further subject to the posting of a bond in lieu of block walls on %he east and west property lines. MOTION CARRIED. 594i Ci__%¥ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICArION NO. 59-60-93: Communication dated July ii, i962, from Martin N. Glick, M & M Development Company, requesting temporary waiver of block wail requirement, was submitted. Mr. Martin Kreid't advised that the Planning Department recommended that bonds oe posted 'to insure block wall construction. It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that said request be granted, subject to the recommendations of 'the City Planning Department. MOTION CARRIHD. Councilman Chandler took no part in Lhe discussion or action on the above request. VARIANCE NO. 1437: Communication from Mr. and Mrs. Willard Justice requesting a six monLhs extension of 'time to Variance No. 1437, was submit[ed and 9ranted, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-6I-2 AND VARIANCE NO. 126'7: Request of Mr. Louis E, Disinger for waiver of block wall requirement between his commercial property on La Palma Avenue and the alley to the North, was submitted, Mayor Coons asked if the applicant was present. I'here was no response. ~,~r. Kreidt reported said masonry wall is a requirement of %he Code~ [o oe installed between R-3 and C-1 properties. Discussion was held by 'the City Council; a't the conclusion zhereof, Councilman Chandler moved tha~ waiver of block walt requirement be denied, on the basis that ihe developer of Tract No. 381o has indicated no approval of this request. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-32 - REVISED PLANS: Revised plans submitted b'y John Adams were reviewed by the City Council and compared wlth plans previously approved under Reciass~fication No. 60-61-32. Communication from the applicant dated July 2~ 1962, was submit'ted, setting forth requested revisions to the original site plan. Mr. A1 Bradley, Engineer for Mr. Adams, stated in his opinion the revised plans conform substantially with the plans previously approved. Discussion was held by the City Council~ and i~ was determined that substantial changes to 'the plans were requested; thereupon Councilman Schutte moved that the City Clerk be authorized to schedule public hearing, to consider revised plans, subject to the paymen~ of an additional filin9 fee. Councilman Dutton seconded the mo[ion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-55-32, VARIANCE NO. 1436 (TRACT NO. 3301) - REVISED PLANS: Request of W. W. Ferdi for Council approval of revised plans, was submitted. Revised plans were compared with original plans previously approved, and discussion held; at the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that revised plans be approved, subject to conformance with requirements o~ Variance No. 1436. MOTION CARRIED. ~..i~y Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, i962~ 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-89 - REVISED PLANS: Communica'tion dated June 15, 1962, from Frank A. Brown, et al, requestin9 approval of revised plans for Reclassification No. 61-62-89, was submitted. Memorandum from the City Planning Department noting revisions was submitted. Mr. Roger Boillin, representing the applicant, advised of their plans of development; that the existing structure is in%ended 'to be remodeled as a recreation facility; that the pool will be located beiween said house and 'the apartments. He further advised Chat the front yard setback will be fifteen feet, whereas original plans showed twenty-five feet. Discussion was held by the City Council and Mr, Boillini at the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein~ that revised plans ce approved, providing they conform ~o all the building requirements in the existing struc'ture, ar~ remodeling of exiszln9 structure %o conform with ~he arcni'tec'ture of the de'velopment~ further, that building plans be submitted ~o the Piannin9 and Building Department for approval, prior to issuance of Building Permit. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - LEO FREEDMAN WAY: Request of Leo Freedman for temporary waiver of requirement to remove two Edison Compan'y power poles adjacent to north ~.;:~ line of Leo Freedman ~ay, as condition of Conditional Use Permit No. 186, and permlssion '~o place [emporar~ metal safe guards around the poles until suet Lime as negotiaz~ons ~lih Edison Company san ce concluded, was submitted, The Ciiy Manager reported that aport $omptetion of the 'theatre, final building inspection and opening o~: ~he ~' ~ree~ could ne withheld by the City until suoh time as the power poles are removed. The City Engineer recommended temporary waiver be granted suojec~ to compliance with Engineering requirements and agreement 'to remove said power poles upon demand b? ~he tilt. It was moved by' Councilman Dut'con~ seconded by Councilman Sch. uzte, that said request be granted, s-ubject to the recommendations of' the City ~anager and City Engineer. MOiiON CARRIED. (Councilman Chandler did no% ta~e part in the discussion or action in this matter,) EEQUESI - DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: Request of Mr. William E~ Spitler, Commander, Disabled American Veterans, Northern Orange County Chapter 94, for permission to conduct annual "The q~een of 'the Blue and Gold Contest", was submitted and granted, on motiol~ by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Duiton. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Mrs. James McDill on behalf of her son in the amount of $36.75 for injuries sustained in a fall on a par~way, July 1, ~962, was submitted. Councilman Schu'tte moved said claim be denied and referred to the City Attorney and the Ci'ty~s insurance carrier. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. ~OTION CARRIED. DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT: Application for Dinner Dancing Place Permi%~ Coral Roof Restaurant, 231 ~. Kateila Avenue, filed by Robert ~. Spence, was submitted and reviewed by' the City Council. 5943 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU~ES - Jul'? 17~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. On recommendations of the Chief of Police, Councilman Dutton moved said Dinner Dancing Place Permit be 9ranted, with the provision all requirements of the Police Department are met; further, said permit be wiihne]d pendin9 compliance with requirements. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. INTERIM BUSINESS LICENSE - PALM MUSIC STUDIOS: Request of Palm Music Studios for Interim Business License to conduct dancing classes at 924 South Euclid Avenue until such time as a Conditional Use Permit is obtained, was submitted (copies furnished each Councilman). Mr. ~inars, applicant, advised that request for Conditional Use Permit ~s scheduled for hearin9 before the City-Planning Commission on August 6~ 1962 (Conditional Use Permit No. 2?8). On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ request ~or Interim Business License for Palm Music Studios was 9ran'ted to Augcst 6, 1962, it being understood that this action does not predetermine action bi the City Planning Commission or Ciiy Council on said Conditional Use Permit, and in 'the event said Conditional Use Permit is denied, the applicant has no recourse to the City Council on the basis of hardship. MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RECOMMENDATION: Communication dated July 2~ i962, from George SLrachan~ General Manager of 'the Anaheim Chamoer of Commerce~ recommending re%en'tion of the name "East Street," due io ils historical significance, was submitted. Councilman Schut%e moved that the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce recommends'Lion be referred to the Orange County Street Naming Committee for their consideration. Councilman Du%ton seconded ~he motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, FRAC~ NO. 4551: Subdivider, S. V~ Hunsaker & Sons¢ tract located on the northeast corner of Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street, and contains 28 R-3 lots. rte City Engineer outlined the boundaries of subject tract, reported that required dedication of the portion marked ~'Noi a Parle' has been received, ~hat required bond has been posted and fees paid, and thai subject map conforms substantially with tentative map previously approved. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Final Map~ Tract No. 455~, was approved on motion by Councilman Sc~uite, seconded by Counc~iman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. NORTHEAST ANNEXATION NO. 7, BOUNDARY COMMISSION REPORT: Orange County Boundary Commission repor~ dated July 2~ 1962~ finding and determining that boundaries of the proposed Northeast Annexation No. 7 are not definite and certain, as based on County Counsel opinion dated June 27, 1962, was submitted. Said report was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by' Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one 2000 KVA, 12000 volt transformer~ as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid. Line Material Co., Los Angeles (amended Parks & Company, Long Beach Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc. Garland-Affolter, Los Angeles General Electric Co., Los Angeles $ 8,785.92 9,398.47 9,557.60 10,400.00 Returned - Late Bid) City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Murdoch reported that a letier from the iow bidder was received calling attention 'to a misquoted price, due to a misunderstanding of a verbal translation of a Western Union telegram from the factory; the secretary understood the price to be $8,0a8.00, confirmin9 telegram revealed the price to be $8,4a8.00, and requesting permission %o either withdraw bid or amend said bid accordingly. 'the error being considered a "clerical error", Councilman Dutton moved that the amended bid of Line Material Company be accepted, and purchase authorized in the amoun't of $8,785.92, including 'tax. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MORION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-6a~: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-6a2 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSIYY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC- TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THREE INTERSECTIONS, MORE PARTICULARLY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 707; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE-' MEN'T IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOIICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids "to be opened August 9, 1962) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-642 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO, 62R-643: Thornton E. Piersall, DirecZor of Public Works, certified completion of Project 100, in accordance wiih plans and speci- fications, and recommended acceptance of said work. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-6~3 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ~TY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING TH~ COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR~ SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UIILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION~ INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC iMPROVEMENT, TO W!T~ THE IMPROVEMENT OF LEMON STREET, FROM LOS ANGELES STREET TO THE RIVERSIDE FREEWAY~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PRO- JECT NO. 100o (Sully-Miller Contractln§ Coo) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-6a3 duly passed and adopted. 5945 ~.i%y Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-644: On certification of the Director of Public Utilities, that A. S. Schulman Electric Company have completed Work Order No. 2830, in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-644 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF /HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE DESIGNING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF TWO NEW 66/12 KV SUBSTATIONS, THE NORTHEAST SUBSTATION AND THE SOUTHEAST SUBSTATION; AND CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO TWO EXISTING SUB- STATIONS, THE HANNUM SUBSTATION AND THE ANAHEIM SUBSTATION; UNDER WORK ORDER NO. 2830, AS HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY SET FORTH. (A. S. Schulman Electric Company) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIII4EN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-64a duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-645: Councilman Schu%te offered Resolution No. 62R-6a5 for adoption. Refer 'to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE RENEWAL OF 'THE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE PERSONNEL BOARD RELATING TO EXAMINATION FOR JOB CLASSIFICATIONS. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed arid adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler~ Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No, 62R-6a5 duly' passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-646: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 6~R-626 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AGREE- MENT FOR MUTUAL AID FIRE PROTECTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE CITY OF STANTON; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION THEREOF. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte~ Chandler~ Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-6a6 duly passed and adopted. 5946 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-647: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-647 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASE- MENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim Union t~ater Co.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schuite, Chandler, Krein and Coons, None. None. 'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-647 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-648: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-6a7 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim Union Wa'ret Co.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons, None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-6a8 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-649: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6QR-6a9 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE FREEWAY PARK HIGHWAY LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR THE YEAR 1962-63. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-649 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-650: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-650 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESS- MENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1958-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR, AUGUST 1, 1962, %o JULY 31, 1963, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. $947 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July i7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly' passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-650 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-651: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-651 for adoption. Refer 'to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESS- ME~F ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1959-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR, AUGUST 1, 1962 TO JULY 31, 1963, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-651 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-657: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-652 for adoption, awardin9 contract for the improvement of Orangethorpe Avenue, from East Street 'to Lemon Street, Project No. 103, to the low bidder, Griffith Company, in the amount of $59,288.02. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLi~'ION OF THE CI~Y COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOW~ST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNiSHiNG OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILII[ES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVBM~NT~ IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGETHORPE AVENUE FROM BAST STREET TO LEMON STREET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NOo 103o (Griffith Company) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by 'the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-652 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO 62R-653: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-653 for adoption, awarding contract for the improvement of Nutwood Street, from 558.70 feet south of Cerritos Avenue to 1,335.50 feet south of Cerritos Avenue, Job No. 686, to the low bidder, Sully-Miller Contractin9 Company, in the amount of $5,898.87. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE 5948 Q.izy Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES ,- Jul'? 17~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. FURNISHTNG OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQ1/IPMENT AND ALL IFf!LITiES AND TRANSPORTATION, iNCLb~ING POWER~ FUEL AND WATER~ AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVE- ~ENT: THE NUTWOOD STREET I~PROVEMENT FRO~ APPROXIMATELY 558°70 FEET SOUTH OF CERR!TOS AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1335o50 FEET SOUTH OF CERRITOS' AVENUE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NOo 686° (Sully-Miller Contracting Company) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schu'%te, Chandler, Krein and Coons, None. None. The Mayor declared Resolu'tlon No. 62R-653 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-654: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered ResoluTion No. 62R-654 for adoption, awarding contract for the Blue Gum Street Sewer improvement, from Anaheim Road 'to 330 feet south of Coronado Street, 3ob No. 1250, to the low bidder, 3.P,S. ContracTing Company, in the amount of $33,219.20. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWES] RESPONSIBLE BtDD£R FOR THH FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR~ SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPNtENT AND ALL O71Lii[IfE$ AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FU~L AND WATER~ AND PERFORM= 7NG ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC 2MPROVEMENT~ THE BLUE GUM STREET SEWER i~PROVEM~NT FRO.~ ANAHEIM ROAD 'FO APPROXZMATELY 330 FEET SOUTH OF CORONADO $%REET iN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE~ JOB NOo 1250o f.IoPoSo Contracting Company) On roll call the foregoing resol'ution was duly' passed and adopted by 'the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. '[he Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-65a duly passed and adopted. ~!TY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 388, SERIES 1961-6P: It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Cooncilman $chutte, that City Planning Commission Resolution No. 388, Series 1961-62, regarding an amendment to the M-l, Light Manufacturing Zone, be scheduled for public hearing before 'the City Council on 3uly 31, 1962, 7:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1732: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1732 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-.88 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1732 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOYION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 5949 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Du%ton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons, None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1732 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1735: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1735 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 6.21. After hearing read in full the 'title of Ordinance No, 1735 and havin9 knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schu%te moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler~ Krein and Coons. None. None, Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1735 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO 1564: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1564 for final reading. Refer 'to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 6, CHAPTER 6.20 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. After hearing read in full the 'title of Ordinance No. 1564 and having Knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 156a duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1737: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1737 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-52-27 - After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1737 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman $chutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 5950 C.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, t962, 3:00 On roll call the foregoin9 ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons, None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1737 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NO. 1738: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1738 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-86, C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1738 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ACCESS RIGHTS, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-64: Councilman Dutton moved %hat dedication of access rights to Harbor Boulevard, filed in conjunction with Reclassification No. 61-62-6a, be accepted. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1739: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1739 for firs% reading. AN ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-64 .- C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1739 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. pRDINANCE NO, 173I: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1731 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TitLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELAIING TO ZONING. (61-62-8 - C..i) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1731 and having knowledge of the contents 'therein, Councilman Krein moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 173i duly passed and adopted. FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: Financial and operating reports for 'the month of June, 1962, were ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. 5951 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to ?:00 P.M. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:05 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Ihe meeting was called to order by Mayor Coons, 7:00 O"Clock P.M., all members of the City Council bein9 present. INVOCATION: Rev. Virgil Nix of the Trinity Sou%hem Baptist Church 9ave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 234 AND PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 235: CONDITIONAL USE PERMI'I NO. 234 - Submitted by Vera M. $tsrmer and Beveridge G. Chambers, requesting permission to establish a service station on property located at the northwest corner of North and East Streets (1109- 1101 East North Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant 'to Resol'u'tion No. 319, Series 1961-62, denied said conditional use permit.' Resulting from appeal from action %aken by the City' Planning Commission flled by David A. Russell, Agent, public hearing was held by the Ci'%? Council June 26, 1962, and continued %o this date at the request of Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney for 'the applicant. CONDIilONAL USE PERMII NO. 235 - Submitted by Charles R. Simon [David A. Russell, Agent) requesting permission to establish a service station on property located st the southeast corner of La Palms Avenue and East Street (i204 East La Palms Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 320, Series I961.~62~ denied said conditional use permi't. Appeal from action taken by 'the City' Planning Commission was filed by Mr. Russell~ Agent, and public hearing held by' the City Council June 19, 1962, at which time said conditional use permit was denied, purs~ant to Resolution No. 62R-588. A% the request of Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney' for the applicant, re-hearing was authorized and public hearing scheduled this da~e. Mayor Coons noted that the applicants in both applications are represented by Mr. Knisely, and inasmuch as both applications are for service station use and in the same area, stated that evidence will be 'taken on both issues at this time, with action of the City Council follow.- lng concurrently. Mr. Kreidt noted the locations of the subject properties, and from 'the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting, briefed 'the evidence presented to 'the Commission and their findings reed!ting there- from; that service stations at these two locations would be incompatible with 'the area, and that the existing residences could be adequately maintained in a residential use. The Mayor invited Mr. Knisely to address the Council. Mr. Knisely, Attorney representing the applicants, reported that as result of recent actions taken by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange, La Palms Avenue extension will be a reality~ that the intersection o£ East Street and La Palms Avenue will become a major intersection. In his opinion, the people opposing this will be benefi~ed by the La Palms Avenue extension and these installations, as the rear portions of their properties are destined for either commercial or multiple family use. He further reported that the City Traffic Engineer favored the proposals because it will clear the intersection and provide better visibility and traffic control. 5952 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of 'these applications, or if anyone wished to speak in opposition rio either or both applications. Mr. Fred Jeter, 1028 East North Street, addressed the Council in opposition, stating that in his opinion, a service station will not improve safety, and will depress the neighborhood. Regarding the traffic situation, he called attention to the traffic on Sunset Boulevard, He further advised that they have tried to be good Anaheim residents, that their houses are painted and their yards maintained, and that the subject property can stay as it presently is, a satisfactory place to live. Mr. Backl~nd, 1015 5asr North Street, resident at this location for eleven years, advised that the safety of his children crossing the street will not be improved by the insfallation of a service station, and in his opinion, because of 'the number of driveways into a station, an unsafe condition will be created for the children progressing towards school along this intersection. He further advised that the street is heavily traveled during certain times of the day. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, invited Mr. Knisely' 'to speak in rebuttal. Mr. Knisely advised that upon checking with personnel in the City, it has been found that a commercial corner does provide better 'visibility, traffic control and safe't'~. Regarding the residential character of 'the area, in his opinion the situation has already changed. At the request of the Mayor~ Mr. Murdoch read report dated July i6, 1962, from 'the Traffic Engineer, concerning the present and pro- jetted traffic on La Palma Avenue and North and East Szree'ts~ briefly, that at the present time appro×ima'teiy 3,296 cars travel La Palma Avenue within a twenty-four hour period, and with the extension of La Palma Avenue, it is anticipated 'that 'this figure will double; that at the present 'time, approximately 6,500 'vehicles travel North S~treet west of East Street, and with the extension of La Paima Avenue, this figure is expected 'to be reduced. The Mayor asked if anyone in the a~:dience had any questions concerning 'the 'traffic Engineer:s reporL. Mr. Backlund failed to see what bearing the 'traffic report had on the issue, and reminded the Council that 'the Planning Commission considered 'the traffic situation prior i~o their denial of 'the applications. He could not see where 'the extension of La Palma Avenue would change the desirability of the area for resident:iai, and further advised that he had no objections to the extension of La Palma Avem~e, bu't was of the opinion that service stations in the area would still jeopardize %he safe[:y of his children going to and from school. Mr. GelKer, 1025 East North Street, addressed 'the Council stating he was very much opposed 'to the service station, and failed see how a service station could improve or control 'traffic. In his opinion, the control of traffic was a matter of streets and signals. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on both issues. Further discussion was held by the City Council concerning traffic, street dedication, sidewalks, R-3 Zoning in the area, the possibility of the lot at the northwest corner being a double frontage to%, as result of the La Palma Avenue extension, and open-type developments allowing greater visibility of the intersection. 5953 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-655: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-655 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 234, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of La Palma Avenue (thirty feet existing) including corner return. 2, Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of East Street along the entire East Street frontage of the property. 3. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for La Palma Avenue, subject to the approval of %he City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on North Street and East Street in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of ~he City Engineer. 6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for s~reet lighting purposes on North and Ess! Streets. 7. 'Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Items Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. Refer 'to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 234. On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schuite~ Chandler and Coons. Krein. None. 'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-655 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-656: Councilman Dutton offered Resolu*tion No. 62R-656 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 235, subject to the followin9 conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from 'the monumented centerline of La Palma Avenue (forty feet existing), including corner return. 2. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of East Sireet along ~he entire East Street frontage of the property. 3. Deve±opment substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. i and 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on East Street. 5. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on La Palma Avenue and East Street, in accordance with adopted standard plans on file in %he office of the City Engineer. 6. ~ime limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Items Nos. 1~ 2~ 4 and 5. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE cz'fY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 235. On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly' passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dut%on, Schutte, Chandler and Coons. Krein. None. 'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-656 duly passed and adopted. 5954 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July i7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-i09: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Harold Swanson, requesting a change of zone from R-1 to C-1 [restricted to medical offices) on property located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Olana Way (2117 East Lincoln Avenue), City Planning Commission pursuant 'to Resolution No. 364, Series i961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied, Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and reported that the applicant proposed to utilize the existing structure for commercial purposes; 'that there were deed res'tric'zions on the tract limitin9 the use of the property to residential only. He further summarized 4he evidence presented to the Commission concernin9 commercial use of the alley, and commercial encroachment in a residential area. The Mayor asked if the apptican± or his agent wished to address 'the Council. There was no response. Yhe Mayor then asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to the reclassification. Mr. William Connolly, 2401 Ward Terrace, addressed the Council in opposition, stating that 'this would be a direct encroachment o{ a commercial use in a residential area, 'thereby establishing a precedent. He advised that their plans were to provide for parking in the rear yard, thereby creatin9 more traffic in the alley', which is now being used for commercial purposes by trucks delivering merchandise to the Party Pantry, contrary to their understanding, which was that this alley would be closed off. He felt this use would further decrease property values in 'the area, and told of his experience in trying to sell his home. Mr~ Connoily advised of available commercial locations in tne area, and stated that they were tryin9 to maintain zheir resideni~ial area, which was most difficult 'to do under the circumstances. Mrs. Leonard Harvill, 2118 Ward Terrace, addressed the Council advising that their son was hit in the alley, and since, a stop sign has been erected. She further advised %hat the deed restrictions were the original restrictions placed on the 'tract in lg53, and ~hat'thematter of lifting the restrictions came up in 195~, when the same property' was then proposed for a doctor's office, In her opinion, there wasn't sufficient area in the rear yard to accommodate parking, and the fence wo~ld have to De removed in order to use the alley. Discussion was held concerning homes on heavily traveled streets that are allowed 'to deteriorate as compared to maintenance of property put into a higher 'use. [he Mayor asked if the applicant was present in the audience, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 52R-657: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-657, denying Reclassification No. 61-62-109. Refer to Resoiutlon Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF rH~ CIIY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-109) On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dui/on, Schut'te, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-657 duly passed and adopted. 5955 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINgTES - July 17~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARiNG~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 6i-62-iI~: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Steven Roach~ requesting a change of zone from R-2 to C-2 and M-1a two parcels of property located at 1747 West Lincoln Avenue. City Planning Commission pursuant 'to Resolution No. 367, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification~ subject to 'the following con- ditions: 1, Prepara'tion of street improvement plans and installation of ail improve- men'ts for Lincoln Avenue, suo3ec% %o the approval of the Ci'ty Engineer and in accordance wi[h the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for stree't lighting purposes on Lincoln Avenue. 3. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by 'the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- idle to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final B~ilding Inspection. 4. Provision of a three (3) foot public utiii'ty easement and a two (2) foot overhang easement along the westerly boundary of the subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at the time of 'the ins%alla'tion of the service facilities. 5, ins'Lallation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary Dy the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall~ to provide adequate fire protection. Ylme ].imitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for [he accomp- _.zshment of Icem Nos. 1, 2 and 4. 7, De~,e;opmenL suoscantlally in accordance with Exnioit Nos. I through 5, 8. l[nsta~.j, ai, ion or a thirty.-five (35) fool ]andscaped seL~ac~ abut.Lin9 tree Lincoln Aven~;e right-of-war i:ne, and !mat sai~ landscaping be ~r~ua,~.ed pr[or Lo Final Building Inspection. 9. Pus:~ng o± a bond %o insure [he construction of a six (63 foot masonry ~ai~ ~heze said properly abuts property Res~denLia~ Agricultural, Zone. ),'!r. Krei.dt noted :,he location of the properL.~ and summarized the ev,~dence and f;ndings of ~h.e Ci~ Planning CommissLon res~,lLing in 'their recommendac.~ons~ and for]her advised that :]~:ere was a long-term J. ease on 'the pz'oper ay., ?4r. Ben Hess, Agent for [he app±icant, was present and advised Lha, ~,e [~as a fif't?-five ~ear lease on i. he propercy. the Mayor asked if anyone wished Lo speak in opposition or in favor of the application, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUIION NO. 62R-658: Councilman Krein offered Resolu',Lion No. 62R-658, authoriz:.ng prepara'Lion of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to ~:he recommendations of the City' Planning Commission. Refer [o Resolu[ion Book. A RESOLU[iON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF: 'tHE CITY O~ ANAHEIM [:iNDING AND DETER.- MINING 'IHA1~ I'I[LE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE REL. Ai~ING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND I'HAY rile BOUNDARIES O~ CER[AIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (6:-62-1i2 - C-2 and On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Duthon, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. Yhe Mayor declared Resolution No. 6~R-658 duly· passed and adopLed. City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINglES - July 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-ii3 AND VARIANCE NO. 1487 (TE~'ATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. a735): RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-t13 - Suomitted oy Paul H. Pletz~ requesting change of zone from R-O ~o R-I, proper't'¥ located at the northeast corner of Easz and South Streets. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 351, Series 1961-62, recommended said reciassificaLion, subject to the folio~ing conditions: 1. Subject to the recordation of Final 'Tract Map No. 4735 on subject property. 2. Subject to the grantlng of Variance No. 1a87. VARIANCE NO. 1487 - Requesting waiver of front yard setback requirements on property described above. City Planning Commission p~rsuani 'to Resolution No. 352, Series 1961-62, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions; 1. Subjec't 'to the recordation of Final Tract Map No, 4735 on subjec't property. 2. Subject to Architectural Commintee approval of buiidin9 plans. 3, Subject to %he approval of Reclassification No. 6!.-62-113~ Mr. Kreidt noted the location of '~he property and summarized the evidence presented ~o the Planning Commission~ and f~rther referred to three e×nibiLs placed on the east wail of ~he Council Chambers indicatin9 land use, zoning in the area and projected plan sc~dV indicaLin9 R.~I development. He explained the variance was ac permit a twent?.~foot front yard se't~ack. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agen-L wished to address the Council. Mr. A. R, McDaniei, Engir~eez representing the applicant, requested if the application was granted, tha:.. ':~e i'tem pertaip, ing to the six foot wall be clarified, and s;.;~gested ~baL ~:,, Oe six feet. as measured from the f'inished sidewalk on Eas. S.reeL. Mr. Haroild ~ia±l, i240 Crestoroo~ P~.ace, addressed the Co~mcil ask:ns 'what. distance from iSe s:.~eeu the waii wo,~id be placed~ and if the Clzy is to maintaln the parkway area. ?,~r. Kreidh answered zhat. the Piam'ting Commission~'s recommendation is, af"her the inszailation ct landscaping and approval by theCl'ty, the will accept this and mainuain ~ne ]andscap~ng, as the proper4y will ne separated from this strip ny a six foot wall. In answer to further questioning of Yr. Hail, Mr. Kreidt advised that there would not be a wail reqaired around the ent:ire subdivision. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished co address /he Councii, there being no response, dec~ared ~.ne hearing ciosed on Reclassification No. 61-62-II3 and Variance No. La87. RESOLUTION NO. 62E-659: Councilman Dalton offered Resolution No. 69R~659 authorizing preparation of necessazy ordinance ar'arising 'the zone as requested, subject Lo the recommendat-,ons o~ the Cii7 Pia~ming Commission° Refer to Resolution Book. A BESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OE i'HE CII'Y Of~ ANAHEIM 9iNDING AND DE[ER- MINING THAI' I'ITLE 18 CE file ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED A?~ THAI' tHE BOUNDAR.[ES Ot CERiAiN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-11.3 ~ 5957 C~ty Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July' 17, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call 'the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schuthe, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-659 dui? passed and adopted, RESOLU'I'ION NO. 62R-660: Councilman Du~on offered Resolution No. 62R-660, granting Variance No. 1487, subject to 'the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRAM~ING VARIANCE NO. 1487. Prior to voting on 'this issue, Mayor Coons requested the record to show that the granting of said variance does not constitute deviation of policy; that the reason the variance is considered is because of 'the shallow depth of the lots and the fact that this has been a problem area as far as development. On roil call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by ~Pe following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCiLWEN: ABSENf': COUNCILMEN: Dutuon~ Schutce, ChandLer, Kzein and Cooas~ None. None. 7ne Mayor declared Resol. ut/on No, 62R.-660 duty, passed and adopted, TENI'ATIVE WAP~ fRACT NO. 4?35: Developer, ?aL"cimac, incorporated; tract located on properly,, descrloed above Reclassification No. ~:-C2~-1~3)~ and contains twenly pz~oposed R-I lo~s~ Cliff P.Lanning Commission recommended sala I'enia~zlve Map, susjecL to u~e tozlowing conditions: lo Prov.~sion of a forzy.-seven (4'7) fOOL cul-de-sac radius° 2. Shou:.d this subdivision be deveJ, oped as moze chart one subdivision, each subdzvision shall be submitted in tentative form for approval, 3. Subject to the approval of plot and building plans b~ 'che Planning and Buziding Departments. 4. Dedication of all access rights to Eas~ Street. 5. installation of a six (6) fool masonry walk along Lhe Eas'L Street right-, of-wa'y abut-Ling Lot Nos, 1, 2, 3, 4 and along the South SlreeL right-s, of-, way abuhiing Loi No. 1~ except that said wail shall be stepped do~n Lo a he=ght of 42" in the front one-hal~ of Lbe front yard setback of Lot No. ~ and the height of 42" in Lhe back one~haJf o~ said setback o~ Loi No. z~ together wilt the installation of reasor;abLe landscaping in the uncemented por6ion of the Hash Street and South Si, reeL right.-of~way, the ~11 distance of said wa2~ consLruc~ion~ plans for sai~ landscaping io be s~emiLhed co and subject to hr~.e approvaJ o~ Lhe Superintendent of Parkway Wazntenance~ and f'uriher provided zhaz follo'~?ing irmtallaiion and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall ass.~me responsio:lii'ty for mainten~ ance of said landscaping. 6. Subject ~o the approval, of Reclassification No. 6z~6'P~.li3 and Variance No. i487. At the request of Mr. McDanlel, action on 'fentat:ive Map, Tract No. ~735, was deferred from the City Council meeting held July 3~ 1969, to be considered in conjunction wiLh reclassiflcation and variance. 5958 ~.iZy Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. It was moved by Councilman Ddt%on, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that Tentative Map of Tract No. 4735 be approved, as recommended by the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 5 for clarification, that the six foot masonry wail be measured from the sidewalk grade. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-i15: Submitted by Leo W. Vandor, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l, property located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Knott Avenue. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 368, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, suoject to 'the following conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road and Knott Avenue (30 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvemen~ plans and installation of ali improvements for Ball Road and Knott Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plan~ on file in 'the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Road and Knott Avenue. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by 'the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible %o trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 5. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for 'the accomp- lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 6. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 with 'the exception that the proposed parking shall be revised to provide 60 degree angular parking in accordance with code requirements, and that a six (6) foot wail be constructed along ~he north and east boundaries of subject property. 7. Installation of six (6) foot m~nimum strip of landscaping on the Knott Avenue and Ball Road right-of-way land abu<ting subject property'. Plans for said landscaping to be submitted 'to and subject 'to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, said landscaping to be installed prior to final building inspection. 8. Recordation of C-1 Deed Restric'tions restricting subject property to medical and professional offices of one story construction only. g. Provision of the extension of an irrigation pipeline on subject property to the opposi'te side of the proposed masonry wall on 'the north boundary of subject property. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the evidence submitted 'to the City Planning Commission, reporting that revised plans presented to the City Council this evening were received after the Commission,s hearing. He called attention to the recommenda- tions of the Planning Department concerning the revised plans, and stated that the Planning Commission:s recommendations were based on evidence which has now been sup~emented by the revised plans. Original and revised plans were reviewed by the City Council, and changes noted. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Elizabeth D. McCarter, 1112 North Brookhurst, representing the authorized agent, noted the need for such a facility in the area, and advised that the balance of the property will be developed as plans for the hospital mature. She presented a rendering of 'the proposed medical building, calling attention to the marble front igneous rock trim. 59~9 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July i7~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Harold Rosebrugh, building contractor, advised that the height of the entrance was eight and one-half feet; however the adjacent lot is available for additional access, if this is found to be necessary. Mr. Rosebrugh further explained 'their plans of development. In answer to inquiries of Mr. Young, owner of property directly to the North, it was reported that the height of the buildin9 walls would be approximately nine feet or nine and one-,half feet; that there would be a five-foot setback for the stone planter, fif'ty-seven feet to the rear of the building, and from the rear of the building, approximately fifty-two feet would be a six-foot high concrete block wall. Mr. Young stated their home was set back approximately one hundred and one feet from the side of the street, and that the proposed location of the building would not interfere with their residence. Further discussion was held, and Mayor Coons stated that according to the scale of 'the drawing, it appears that it will be 'twelve feet to the top of the building. The Mayor asked if' anyone else wished to address the Council, there pein9 no response, declared the hearth9 closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-661: Furiher discussion was held by the City Council, and revised plans were again reviewed. At the conclusion %hereof, Council- man Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-661, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject 'to the recommen- dations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 6 thereof, to read, Development subs'tan%iali% in acoordance wi'th revised plans marked "lxhi~i~ B", and that a six foot wall be cons'trufted along the North and East boundaries of suOjeft property; and further suoject to provision of an asphalt driveway of sufficient width extending from %he Ball Road frontage to the parking lo't~ as shown on the plot plan for the development of the parkin9 lo%, with sufficient turn-around provided for %rash-truck pickup, and sufficient area for trash storage as required by 'the Public ~orKs Department, $anltalion Division; fur%her, all future development be reviewed by the Planning Staff and Building Departments for issuance of building permit for adequate protection of access, irash disposal pickup, and for conformit? of architecture. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF tHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER,- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF 'THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-115 - On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Du%ton, Schutte, Chandler~ Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-661 dui? passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten-minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called 'the meeting to order, all members of 'the City Council being present. 6960 Cit~all~ Anaheimi California ~. COUNCIL MINIfF. ES ~ TuL,, ~ ~oAo 3~00 PoMo PUBLIC HSARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 61=62.=It6~ Submitted by Viola Mo Jones~ requesting a change of zone from R,-d ~o R,-3 on property located on the west side of Bush Street: approximately 141 feet north of Broadway (225 South Bush Stree~)o The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to 'their Resolution No~ 369~ Series 1.961=62~ ~ec o m mended ~:aid reclassification be denied° Mro Kreidt noted the location of the property and zoning in the immediate area~ and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission~ reading from %~e City Planning Commi:~sion minu~es~ testimony given concerning the width of the ~<ree% and oonge~'tion of the alley, resultingin their findings and recommended denial° The Mayor asked if the Appiican% wished to address the Councii~ Mrs° Viola Jones~ Applicant? addressed the Council~ noting other property in 'the area bein9 rezoned za R:.3o She stated that the property is in need of repair~ which she has been unable to do° Further~ that she has an opportunity to sell the property to Mro Lindneberg~ who plans to develop it with four units and five garages° In answer %o questions of girl's S~eln~ the City Coun¢i!~ from the plans~ explained the proposed development of the four units and five garages~ concerning side and front yard setba~ks~ number of garages required~ location of refuse areas~ requirement of 6 foot masonry wall~ that plans are for one, three.-.bedroom unit and '%hree~ 'two.~.bedroom units~ with patios along the alley side° ~iss Swain stated that they did not want to spoil anything for Mrs~ Jones~ however, they have lived at this location for eighteen years, and because of the parking and other condltions~ di~;approved the proposed R-3 reclassification. She further called attention 'to the lack of play area for the children° Mrs° ,lanes stated them no one couid deny 'that the proposed development would not improv~ 'the area° Mrs° Swain~ 211 South Bush Street:~ cai]ed attention to the fact zhat on six lots on the eaat side of this street, there are presently twen'ty~flv'e family unita~ creating a crowded condition on 'the narrow street~ caused primaril~ because %enant~ do not ~e the garages provided~ [he Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council~ there being no zesponse, declared 'the hea~ing cJossdo RESOLUTION NOo 62R.~662~ Further discussion was held by the City Council, and at 'the conclusion thereof~ Counoilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R~,662, authorizing preparation of nace:~samy ordinance, changing the zone as requeated~ subject to the following condi4ionsg ia P;~yment of $25°00 per dwelling unit~ Park and Recreation Fee to be collected as a part of the Building Permito 2o Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Depar%~ ment of Public ~ork~, Sanitation Divismon, which are adequate in size~ accessible to trash truck pickup~ add adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall~ prior to the Final Building inspection° 3o Paym~n't o{ $~o00 per {ton% {oo~ for street lighting purposes on Bush Street° 40 'rime limitation of 180 days for the au~omplishment of Item 3o 5. Development substantially in accordance with plans marked Exhibits 1, 2~ 3 and 4o 6o Installation of a six foot masonry wall on the north and south boundary lines of subject property° Refer to Resolution Booko 5961 ~Anaheim_~_California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17~ 1~962~ 3~00 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHHIM FINDING AND DETERs, MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~NDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (61,~62~,116 On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote~ AYES ~ COUNC ! iN~N ~ NOES i COUNCILN~N: ABSEN/~ COUNCILN~N~ Dutton~ Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons° None° Noneo The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R=662 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 61=62-118~ Submitted by Lo Bo Harbour, Jrt, requesting change of zone from R~.A to C-l, property located at the north~ west corner of Lincoln Avenue and Monterey Street° The City Planning Commission, pur~uan't to their Resolution Nco 372, Series .1961~62, recommended said reclassification~ subject to the following ¢onditions~ to Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Lincoln Avenue in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineero 2o Payment of $2o00 per front foot for street lighting poses on Lincoln Avenue and Monterey Street° 30 Time limitation of one hundred and eighty days for the accomplishment of Item Nos° 1 and 2o 40 Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos° 1 and 2 with the exception that parking space NCo 48 be deleted and replaced in part with a minimum six foot strip of landscaping, that the patio walls abutting the Monterey Street right=of-way be relocated three feet westerly to provide a three foot minimum landscaped strip abutting Monterey Street~ and that the building including any marquees maintain a th~.rty~five foot setback from the Lincoln Avenue right-of=way llneo 5o Recordation of private deed restrictions limiting the use of subject property for business and professional offices onlyo 6o Provision of a minimum of a three and one-half foot land~ sGaped setback area along the wail of subject property. Mro Kreidt noted the location of the property, and briefly summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission, calling that the opposition presented was more a sincere desire to have a masonry wall constructed between their properties and subject property° The Mayor asked if the Applicant wished to address the Council° Mr° Lo Bo Harbour~ Applicant, 2283 West Lincoln Avenue, addressed the Council~ advising that he and gerrill Butler were the owners of the property; that approximately four years ago~ prior to annexation to the City of Anaheim, the property was zoned C-1 by the County° In his opinion, the requested use, was in conformance with the proposed general plan of zoningo He noted the commercial activities already established in the area, and further advised that they had no objections to the requirements as recommended by the City Planning Commission° Plans were reviewed bythe City Council, and it was noted that there is in existance a six foot solid wooden fence along the north property lineo The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor or in opposition to the reclassification, there being no response~ declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NO. 62R-663~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-663 for passage and adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance~ changing the zone as requested~ subject to the recommendations of the City ~ Anaheim,~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES -!ul_~'~_~96.'-2_m_.3~00 PoMo pi o .~annzng Commission, and further subject to construction of a six foot masonry block wail across the northerly property line of subject property° Refer to Resolutzon Booko A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAI' 'TITLE 18 OF YHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (61-62,-118 On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followinq vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN~ NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT~ ~,OUNC~.LMEN~ Dutton~ Scbatte~ Chandler~ Krein and Coons° None° None° The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R,~663 duly passed and adopted,~ PUBLIC HEARING _ RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 61~62-119~ Submitted by Harry Knise.!y~ requesting a change of zone from R-I to C.:.l, property located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Bayles:~' Street (1515~ 15~3~o and i531 West Katella Avenue).~ The City Pl.snning Commi~sfon,~ pursuant to the_,~;~ Resolution' ' ': No~ 373~ Ser~es 1961-62~ recommended said recla~ssifnca[.ion~ subject %o the following cond!t'_~onss lo Payment of $2~00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Katelia Avenue and Bayless Street~ 2o Prov].sion of trash storage ~reas as de'term!tried by the Department of Pubii(~ Works~ Sanitation D!vision~ which are adequate in size~ accessible to trash-truck pickup~ and adequa~e!y en~!o~:~ed by a solid fence or wail~ pr~'.or to Final Bui].ding [nspec'tion~ 3o Time limitation of one hundred and eighty day~:, for the accompl:t_shmen/ of Item No, 1~ 4o Recordation of deed zest:r'u~Ttzon~:, ~.fm.[.['.ing the use of subject property to church purposes~ bus_~ess and pyofessl, o'aal offioes only, 5~ Provision of a slx foot masonry wall to 'the rear of subject pzoper~v, said w;~il %o match masonry we:i abutting ~3ub.ject property, 6o Subject to the 'approval of the Archi~:ectural Con%r,c] mit'tee for any alteratJoms 'to any existing structures o 7~ Provision t~at subject szructures shall remain as R-.] single fam:ly residences until buildings are completed prior f.o Fi. nal. Building [r, spect ~on ~, 8~ That a co.on dzzveway be used between Lot Nos. 9 and and shall be mazntained by both property owners of ad3oining said driveway. Mr, Kriedt noted the location of 'the property and briefly summarized t~evidence submitted to 'the City Plannlng Commission,. He called attention to the plan 'in the f~le~ indicating alterations to the existing el. evations. The Mayor asked if the AppL:~,cant wished 'to address the Council,, Mr. Knisely stated that the property id the west was in the ownership of Mro Hint. z~ that the property to the eas~ was in the owner- ship of the Friends' Church~ and advised of the plan of development for each ~ + Mr. Knisely further requested that if the 'zoning was granted~ and because the property is presently in three ownerships, that. rezoning of the individual lots be permitted separately~ The Mayor asked zf anyone else wi~hed to address the Council, Mro Stanley St. obaugh~ 1524 Holgate Avenue~ owner of the property d:rectly to the rear of Mr~ Knisely's ].ot~ stated [hat although he was not in opposition to the reclassification~ he did object to the change in the structural appearance of the homes~ as the homes in their tract~ 5963 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINlffE$ - July 17 backing up to this property, have rear living rooms° He also requested, that the walls to be constructed correspond with the existing walls on each side of their home° Plans in the file were reviewed by the City Council and it was noted that the change contemplated at this time did not change the residential character of the property, and that no changes were contemplated at this time on the rear of the property° Mro Stobaugh called attention to the fact that the lot lines of their tract did not correspond with the lot lines of the subject property, and asked how this would effect the construction of the wallo Mrs Knisely advised that the church property is ready at this time to blacktop the parking lot and construct the wail~ and agreed to make the construc'tion of the wall a part of the application~ the color thereof to be stipulated by the Planning Staff° The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed° RESOLUTION NO. 62R-664~ Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Noa 62R~664 for passage and adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to~ Mro Knisely build~ng a block wall along the southerly portion of Lot 13~ and, each of the three sub~ect properties may prove up their requirements for rezoning separately and a part, providing that the app!ieat±on fee shall apply to the first property proved up on, and each subsequent property will require an additional application feeo Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (61-62-119- C-l) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMENi Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons° None° None° The Mayor declared Resolution No° 62R-664 duly passed and adopted° REQUEST - ANAHEI~ ~UNiCIPAL EMPLOYEES,~ ASSOClATION~ Request of Vo Co Newton, Secretary of Anaheim Municipal Employees" Association, to appear before the City Council to be recognized as representative agency for the employee's of the City, was submitted° Also submitted at open meeting, was letter dated July 17, 1962~ from Gerald Eo Hill, President, containing excerpts of their Constitution, Article II, and advising that the Association is currently conducting a drive for membership and of six departments, ~5 members are enrolled° Mro Gerald Hill, addressed the Council, and further clarified correspondence, advising that the intent of the request was recognition as one of the organizations representing City Employees, and secondly, the membership in the Association expires on 3une 30th, and they are currently resigning members$ that membership during 1961-62 was approximately 450 employees° He felt the letter was self-explanatory and that there was room for more than one organization, if needed, however, the Association was of the opinion that they could represent City Employees at less expense° Mro Hill reported that at the present time a grievance procedure is being formulated, to be presented to the Board, and if approved, presented to the general membership and sent to the City Council and City Manager° 5964 ~Anaheim~ California = COUNCIL MINUTES ~ July 17, 1962_~_3~00 PoMo Reference was made to AB 2375 and Mro Hill stated it was his understanding that the City shall provide the groundwork for implementation of the lawo Regarding difficulties :in the Electrical Department~ the Association had only recently heard of itc ~ Councilman Chandler made a statement~ summarized as fotlows~ He felt it was obvious that this was relevant to the attempt by the Electrical Union to organize the electrical workers and possibly other workers in the City; that the Council is constrained by State Law to permit any employee to have representation of his choice before the City Council~ which law~ he as a Councilman~ intends to conform too In his opinion, it should be a Council poliuy that any employee~ individually, could be heard at any hearing concerning wages or working conditions~ and further, entitled to be represented by anyone who he has given that specific authority, either the Association or any organization° Regardless of who presented the case regarding substandard working conditions~ all due con~ sideration would be given~ and if it appears a poor working condition existed~ he felt sure action would be taken to remedy the situation° According to his knowledge of the ].aw~ the City has no legal authority to enter into a contract with any organization, thereby delegating legislative powers that are vested in the City Council by the people at an election, and in his opinion, in the case of City Government~ where it is questionable whether or not ordinary processes of a labor union could be carried out~ that it was sensible economically for the employees to have their own aasociation and be represented by that aasociation, however~ the £mployees~ Association would only represent those employees from whom specific authorization had been obtained° That this would also be true of Union represantation~ and if any individual represented himself, he would be constrained to listen° Councilman Dutton, in concurring with Councilman Chandler,s remarks, asked if there was any procedure within the Code to handle these matters° Mro John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that the State law states that employees of government may organize or not~ as they choose, and may be represented by an organization° Councilman Dutton advised that he was referring specifically to our own local government° Mro Murdoch advised that there are several sections of the Anaheim Municipal Code dealing with activities of personnel° In administrative matters, the City Manager does have the responsibility of the activity in that area° That City Council has the responsibility of approving, modifying, or adopting any rules and regulations pertaining to employee activity~ including salaries, wages, working conditions, etCo Mayor Coons advised that he concurred with Councilman Chandler,s statements~ that no employee of the City need join any or§ani:~atlon to be represented before the City Council° Certainly though~ any employee of the City has the right to join any organization and authorize that organization to represent him in such instances as the occasion might demand° Councilman Krein advised that Councilman Chandler exactly expressed his opinions regarding this matter° Mr. Hill explained that he had mentioned the grievance procedure but other matters pertaining to the welfare of the employees will be considered° Mayor Coons advised Mro Hill that recommendations of the Municipal Employees" Association in the past have reached the City Council through the City Manager. 5965 C~.ty Ha.lip Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL M!NlffES ~, Ju~3~O0 PoMo Councilman Chandler reported that Mr o Murdoch has been requested %o put the thoughts of the Council concerning this matter in ~e~er~ +' form to be sent to each employee° MtSo Peggy Montgomery~ Vice President~ Anaheim Municipal Employees~ Association~ stated~ as a Member of the Public Relations Committee~ she has attended several meetings of other city associations, and has learned that most of the benefits other cities ars endeavoring to acquire, Anaheim already haso She further stated~ that in her opinion~ Anaheim employees have earned these benefits~ and was confident Mro Murdoch and Personnel had their interests° She felt most of the employees of the City did not have too many things to complain about~ and if the Electrical Department had come to the Association, she felt certain~ they would have tried to be of assistanceo Mayor Coons thanked the speakers and those members in attendance and extended an invitation to attend any Council meeting° ~EQUEST - INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERE~ Correspondence dated 3uly 109 1962~ signed by 3ohnny Dobson~ Vernon Oo Deviney~ Ihomas F. Tabor~ Lawrence Ro $tratton~ and William Lo Newman~ authorizing Local 47 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers~ through its ~epresentatives to represent them, and requesting a meeting with the Ci6y Council to consider promotional salary advancement and stand-by and c.- ~ ~ (copy submitted to each Councilman)° ..~l.~ou~., pay~ was submitted Mayor Coons advised that it would be bf.::, recosmendati,on 'to refer subject letter to the City Manager~ and if it ca,not be res. o.lved~ to be further considered by the City Council° 2t was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ that the ~et,~er be referred to the City .Manager f'oz resolution of the problem and report° MOTION CARRIED° Mro Albert Jo Coughlin, Business M,zn;~g~:~ 'c:? fo,;..~] a~[ of [nternazional Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, addressed 'the Council stating 2t was his understanding 'that his letter of .Tune 20~ 1962 was %o be considered° He referred to his appearance before the Ci'ty Coum~il pr~ior to Council action on the Salary Resolution~ advising that on behalf of the members of the Electrical Department, they were not in accord with the Salary Resolution~ and at that time, it was indicated that there waaa ;~ck of proof 'that Local 4'? in fact~ represented City Employees° Mro Coughlin advised that his letter to Mro Murdoch dated March 22, 1962, indicating~ according to Chapter lO~ Division 4, Title i of the Government Code,that 'they would like to meet with the proper designated authorities of the City to engage in collective b:~rg.~ining~ as set forth in the code, and at 'that time, offered to substanr:ia~e the fact that they did represent the people° That as result, a meeting wa~q held April 6%ho~ ::nd resulting from his letter to Mr° Murdoch dated March 9~h, another mea'tfing was held May 4tho Following this meeting~ it was h~fi~ understanding that they would meet again, and a tentative date wa~ ~chedu]ed May 18th~ however? at thzs time, Mro Murdoch was in the procesa of preparing the budget° As result of their letter 'to the City C:ouncii May 31~ 1962~ and his appearance before the City Council atthe ±ime the Sa!arv Resolu'tion was adopted, they were informed that they should verff¥ 'the fact that they represented people in the department~, in the June 20th letter, Mro Coughlin advlsed that they wou~d meet wJth the City Council~ or its representatives~ to verify representation and it was his understanding that this was the issue scheduled for consideration at this meeting° Mrs, Coughlin agreed the question of repre~:~entation should be settled and explain the intent of the law as he understood it~ that is~ 'to strengthen and establish uniform and orderly methods of communications between employees and the public agency by which they are employed° He further advised? ~at it was his understanding that the City Council wanted them 'to substantiate the 5966 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California -. COUNCIL MINL~ES ru ~'~ , " = ~ ~962~ 3~00 Po~o fact that they represented the majority, and he previously offered~ stated that if they didn't represent the majority, they would withdraw° He was of the opinion, that the Union should not have to appear before the City Council concerning grievances; that some machinery should be established designating certain people to be contacted on various pro= blems, recognizing, of courser the C~'~'~s .uu.~n.~ responsibility concerning wages and salaries° ~ro Coughlin stated that under the Code, the governing body of a public agency or other representatives as may be properly designated, shall meet and confer with representatives of employee organizations upon request° In his opinion, the law does set forth a provision for orderly transaction of business° Mayor Coons referred to Councilman Chandler~s statement just previously made, that any employee who wishes to join a union or association may do so, if he desires, and designate a representative of that organization to represent him~ and he need not join any organization, he can represent himself° He further stated, other than verbal statements, the letter signed by the five employees of the City has been the first visual evidence presented of representatiOno That in accordance with Counc!l~s action~ said letter is referred to the City Manager~ and at such time as the Union representatives and the City Manager meet, additional evidence of representation can be presented° Mro Coughlin referred to the letter of ..!une 20th~ :~equesting a meeting to substantiate the local authorization claimed~ <~nd further advised that they hoped to learn this evening how the Council would like this verification of authority a¢~ompiished~ and suggested it be accomplished by a secret election° Mayor Coons doubted an election would be necessary because~ as previously expressed~ out of the 88 employees in the Electrical Division, if the Union had authorization to represent 70~ the other 18 would be at liberty to represent themselves~ whereas, a secret ballot would infer that the Union represents ali, which might not be the caSeo Mro Coughlin referred to the two problems presented ¢oncernin9 promotional salary advancements, and stand.-by and call.~out pay, and advised that they were prepared to ~;how that this was not in line with practice of the majority in the industry, and asked if each time there is a dispute~ should a different set of names be presented~ or, co, id they establish the fact that they represent at least a majority in the Electrical Division° Ne stated, that in his opinion~ the Council floor was not the proper place to discuss and endeavor to resolve these issues° He further advised, regarding the motion ~efe~ring the letter to Mro Murdoch, that he did not hear any arrangements made for a meeting with the representatives of the five petitioners and asked if all their requests are to be initiated with the City Coun¢ilo Mayor Coons replied that the requests are to be referred to Mr o Murdoch, and if it is an unreso~vable problem.~ they would have the right to appeal to the City Gouncil~ and +,',hereupon, extented an invitation to attend future Council meetings to Mro ~C:ougblin and ?.he employees accompanying hlmo CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Kreino MOTION CARRIED° a. Minutes of the Orange County Boundary Commission .-[Incorporation of North Tustin Area - corrected° bo International Conference of Building Officials ~. regarding uniformity of building regulationso co Feather River Project Association NewsletZero do American Municipal Association = dated July 5, 1962o eo Orange County League of Cities Executive Committee Meeting and General meeting minuteso 5967 City ,Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES =, ful~96_~2 3aO0 PoMo fo Linbrook Builders Hardware = dazed S'ulv 5~ 1962 go Resolution Nco 62-808 of County Board ~,f Supervisors thanking cities for cooperation durin9 Primary Election° PROPOSED ORDINANCE - OVERNIGHI PARKING: Discussion was held concernin9 pre- sent overnight parkin9 conditions on the City streets, and the City Attorney was requested to draft an ordinance prohibitin9 overnight parking, for further Council consideration° CIVIL DEFENSE~ Civil Defense Committee report and individual identification tags were distributed to each Councilman° A.B.Co APPLICATION: On motion by Councilman $¢hutte~ seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Attorney was authorized to protest application of Walter William Parks~ 1121 West South Street, on the grounds that property is presently zoned C-lo MOTION CARRIED~ · ORDINANCE NOo 1740~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance Nco 1740 for first reading o AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AN~NDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14o32~ SECTION 14~32o190 OF 'THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING° (no parking ~ east side~ North Lemon Street~ from Los Angeles Street to 450 feet south of Commercial Street -~- no parking, Lido Street~ both sides) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 1740~ and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Chandler seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRI£Do ORDINANCE NOo 1741~ Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance Nco 1'?'41 for first reading° AN ORDINANCE OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM A~£NDING TITLE 1~ CHA~TER 1o04, SECTION 1o04o370, PARAGRAPH (g), AND SECTION 1o04o380 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODEc (Planning Commission - Powers and Duties = ~ Expense atlowanoess Planning Commission and Council Members) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No° 1741 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION UNaNImOUSLY CARRIEDo RESOLUTION NOo 62R-665~ adoption~ Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nco 6.0~,665 for Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE PAYNtHNT TO N~TROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OF THE SU~ OF $700,000°009 REPRESENTING THE PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE ESTIN~TED COST OF CONSIRUCTING STAGE 1 OF TH~ EAST ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER NOo 2 AND FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES t COUNCILN~N NOES: COUNCILMEN ABSENT ~ COUNCI LN~N Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons° None° None° The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R=665 duly passed and adopted° EMPLOYN~ENT QUALIfiCATIONS - Councilman Dutton brought up qualifications for the employment of a Park and Recreation Director, concerning the requirement of a college degree as a prerequisite, and requested an executive session at the conclusion of this meeting to further discuss the issue° ,5938 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-641: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-641 adoption. Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDATORY AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT DATED JULY 11, 1961 FOR 30INT EXERCISE OF POWERS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EAST ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER NO. 2 BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY MUNI- CIPAL WATER DISTRICT, COASTAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND CITY OF SANTA ANA. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-641 duly passed and adopted. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - EAST ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER NO, ?: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, the following plans and specifications were approved: Plan No. 639 - Feeder No. 2 from Yorba Linda to Barranca Road, Plan No. 644 - Construction of pressure control structures for East Orange County Feeder No. 2. Plan No. 650 - Construction of East Orange County Feeder No. 2 from Red Hill Avenue to San Joaquin Reservoir, M~ION CARRIED. LEGAL ADVERTISING: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Clerk was authorized to call for bids July 31, 1962, for the City's legal advertising, required by law, to be published inside and outside the City of Anaheim. MOTION CARRIED. CONTRACT AMENDMENT - CONSTRUCTION OF POLICE FACILITIES (WORK ORDER 4600): On the recommendations of the City Engineer and Ralph F. Milor, of Smith, Powell & Morgridge, Architects, substitution of Hauserman Company in lieu of Builders Specialties, subcontractors for sliding partitions, Section Q of the specifications, was authorized on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN: (9:30 P.M.) City Clerk Councilman Dutton seconded 5968 City Hal!, Anaheim, California - COlfNCIL MINUTES - July 17~ 1962~ 3~00 PROCLAMATION - BOBBY SOX SOFTBALL WEEK~ In conjunction with the first regional V.FoWo Bobby Soxers (girls) softball tournament, and at the request of Jay B~ Combs, Commander of Veterans of Foreign Wars, Anaheim Post No. 3173, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, the Mayor was requested to proclaim the week of July 21 through July 28, 1962, "Bobby Sox Softball Tournament Week"° MOTION CARRIED° ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn, Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED~/~ll:O0 PoM.) ~ City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES ,-. July 24~ 1962~ 3:00 PoMo The City Council of the C:zy of Anaheim met in regular session~ PRESENT ABSENT: PRESENT COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons° COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Kezth A, Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY AT[ORNEY: Yohn Dawson° CiTY CLERK: Dene DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS~ Ihorn%on E. Piersallo CITY ENGINEER: James P, Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A Ree~!;eo Mayor Coons called the meeting to order~ MINUTES: Mznutes of the regular City Council meeting held July 10, 1962 were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Schutte~ MOTION CARRIED. Approval of the minutes of the regular City Council meeting held July 17, 1962 was deferred to the next meeting, July 31~ 1962o RESOLUTION NO. 62R-666: Councilman Krein offered Reso].ution No, 62R-666 for passage and adoption Refer to Resolutzon Book~, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CFIY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF JULY 24, 1962~, (Warrants Nos~ 19354 to 19586~ both inclusive -±.talin9 $1~612,189o46) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Du+ton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons,~ None~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62~-666 duly passed and ad,pred,> SIGN APPLICATION - STANDARD OIL COMPANY: Application requesting permission to erect a non-conforming sign (over-sized with four foot projection) at 2400 West Ball Road, together with plans, was submitted and reviewed by the C~ty Council. Councilman Chandler moved ~iaid sign application be granted, subject to the pr.vis,on that there be no projection over the right-of-way