Loading...
1962/08/076010 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session, PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: Dutton. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. MINUTES: The minutes of the regular City Council meetings held July 24, 1962 and July 31, 1962, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. WESTERN MISSIONARY ARMY: Request of Western Missionary Army regarding re-submission of their application to solicit funds within the City of Anaheim was continued from the meeting of July 31, 1962, to allow the City Attorney's office to consider additional evidence presented at the July 31, 1962, meeting, and for further comprehensive report regarding this request. At the request of Mr. Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, said request was further continued and ordered re-scheduled in two weeks (August 21, 1962, 3:00 O'Clock P.M.) and the City A'ttorney~s office was authorized to forward copy of their opinion to the attorney representing the organization~ on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION: Application of James A. Vaughn-for permission to erect a free- standing, reader panel sign, at 1203 East Vermont Avenue, was submitted. Mr. Vaughn addressed the Council advising that the sign would not be detrimental to the property or the area. Plot plan noted on the back of the application, together with pic- ture of the proposed sign location, were reviewed by the City Council. Discussion was held; at the conclusion thereof, said issue was continued to the next meeting (August 14, 1962, 3:00 O'Clock P.M.) to allow further investigation to consider the overall total size of the sign and possible obstruction. SIGN APPLICATIONS: Application for two double-faced directional signs to be located at 210 West Katella Avenue and 520 West Orangewood Avenue were sub- mitted by Desta Development Company. Because of former interest in the Desta Development Company, Councilman Chandler withdrew from the discussion and action on these appli- cations. Discussion was held by the City Council and consideration given to a precedent, which would be established by allowing directional signs for the renting or leasing o£ apartment units; which would be contrary to direction given the City Attorney for the preparation of a sign ordinance limiting signs, more or less, to the sale of goods or services sold on the premises. At the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schu4te moved said applications be denied. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Request of Mr. Paul D. Engdahl for approval of four foot by twelve foot integrated sign, advertising "Paul~s Recorders", to be located at 1763 South Harbor Boulevard, was submitted. City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. Engdahl presented two photosw~;~ the proposed sign sketched on the photos, indicatin9 its visibility approachin9 from the North and South. He explained that the proposed integrated sign required an additional pole, which has been objected to by 'the owner of the liquor store because of the possible interference with customer parking, and %hereupon requested a one- week continuance to endeavor to work out this problem. Councilman Chandler explained that the integrated sign the Council had in mind would make it possible to give the same type of advertising to 'the three stores, the beauty shop, liquor store, and Paul's Recorders. Mr. Engdahl explained the revision in the sign was the reduction of the height of the sign from six feet to four feet, and the elimination of the words, "Parking in the Rear". At the request of the applicant, Councilman Krein moved said request be continued one week (August 14, 1962), to endeavor to resolve the present objections and comply with %he Council's suggestions of an integrated sign. Councilman Schut%e seconded 'the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST~ TEMPORARY WAIVER - CURBS, GUTTERS~ SIDEWALKS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Request of C. L. Werner, Foster Sand and Gravel Company, for temporary waiver of requirements of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 12.28, at 201 East Commercial Street, was submitted. Mr. Wurdoch reported that the grade of this property was flat, and if curbs and gutters were installed on this property only, a drainage prob- lem would be created, and recommended a temporary waiver pending a cooperative program for the installation of improvements by' all the property owners at one time. Mayor Coons called attention to paragraph three of Mr. Werner's letter, wherein it was agreed that if temporary waiver is granted, compliance with said Code section would be made upon demand of 'the City. Further discussion was held; at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved a temporary waiver of sidewalks be granted, on condition said sidewalks be installed on demand by the City, and further subject to the dedication of thirty (30) feet from the monumented centerline of Commercial Street, and the posting of a bond for the installation of curbs and gutters. Councilman Schutte seconded 'the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: In accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police, Entertainment Permit requested by Duane H. Hess for "Duane's Pirate Cavern", i031 North Euclid Avenue, was granted on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOIION CARRIED. EXTENSION OF TIME - VARIANCE NO. 1305: At the request of Clarence H. Winery, twelve months extension of time was granted to Variance No. 1305, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. EXTENSION OF TIME - SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 79: At the request of Richard C. Richmond, Chairman, Board of Trustees of St. Mark's Methodist Church, one year extension of time was granted to Special Use Permit No. 79, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST TENT SHOW: Request of Antoon for permission to establish a Arabian Night tent show accommodatin9 three hundred people for a one-month period on the Domino Motel property (South Harbor Boulevard) mas submitted. The Mayor asked if the applicant was present. There was no response. It was moved by Councilman Chandler. seconded by Councilman Krein, said request be denied. 6012 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Discussion followed concernin9 the original establishment of the Domino Restaurant and Motel, which was by variance in accordance with Council policy. Consideration was also given to the outdoor restaurant operation and the type of blockade used at the rear of the property dividing the Disneyland parking lot from this area. At the conclusion thereof, the Planning Department was requested to investigate the status of the variance pertaining to parking. Further discussion was held concerning parking requirements for the activity requested. Police preliminary investigation report was read by Mr. Murdoch. At the request of Councilman Schutte, motion was withdrawn by Councilman Chandler, second was withdrawn by Councilman Krein, and said matter ordered re-scheduled August 14, 1962, 3:00 O'Clock P.M., requesting Mr. Antoon's presence with full information regarding this activity. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 230 - REVISED PLANS (61-62-103): Request of Mr. Chip Chasin for approval of revised plans for multiple housing project on property located at 11231 Heater Street, was submitted. Revised plans were compared with original plans approved. Mr. William Wolsborn, 12041 Santa Rosalita Street, Garden Grove, California, representing Mr. Chasin, advised that the revision eliminated the two-story construction on the front portion of the five acre site, thereby reducing the total units from 92 to 86, retaining the original number of parking units and original recreational area. Revised plans dated this date (August 7, 1962) signed by Mayor Coons were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 106 - REVISED PLANS: Request of LeRoy Rose, A.I.A., for approval of revised plot plan for the Temple Beth Emet development, located at 1770 West Cerritos Street, was submitted. Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council, together with recommendations of the City Planning Department. Councilman Schutte moved said revised plans be approved. Council- man Chandler seconded the motion. (Approved revised plans dated and signed by Mayor Coons.) MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - PERMISSION TO TEMPORARILY OBSTRUCT STREET AND SIDEWALK: Request of Marvin K. Bird, A. and M. Music Company, 10351 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California (southwest corner of Magnolia Avenue and Chanticleer Street), for permission to temporarily block residential street and sidewalk to allow delivery trucks to unload pianos in their garage driveway on Chanti- cleer Street, was submitted. Mr. Bird addressed the Council further explaining his business operation, and advised that the property is located within the City of Stanton, and is zoned C-l, which permits sale of new and used pianos; how- ever his garage driveway is off Chanticleer Street, which is within Anaheim city limits, and he has been informed by the City A~torney's office that he must obtain a permit from the City Council to allow the obstruction o£ the sidewalk and street in the unloadin9 of the pianos to be placed in his garage display room; that with the exception of one family, his neighbors did not object to the unloading, which occurs about ten times a year, and takes approximately ten or fifteen minutes for each delivery. Discussion was held by the City Council, and in reviewing a map of the area, it was noted that only the lot itself is in the City of Stanton, that the street curbs, gutters and sidewalks on both Magnolia Avenue and Chanticleer Street are within the City of Anaheim. 6013 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. In answer to question by the City Council, Mr. Bird advised that he purchased the property after it was zoned C-1 by the City of Stanton, and that he did not have off-street parking. Councilman Schu%te moved that said request for permit to tempor- arily obstruct the street and sidewalk (Section 19.16.050 of the Anaheim Municipal Code) be set for public hearth9 before the City Council on September 11, 1962, 7:00 P.M. with proper notification to the adjacent property owners. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion, MOTION CARRtSD. EXTENSION OF TIM5 - JOB NO. 1249: The City' 5ngzneer recommended that an exten- sion of time be granted to L. L. Dobkins Company from May 15, 1962 to June 12, 1962, in connection with Job No. 1242, and further recommended that the contractor be assessed $675.00 as liquidated damages. It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, that the Council authorize settlement of liquidated damages on the basis of $675.00, and further authorized the City Attorney's office to forgive the period from May 15, 1962, to June 12, 1962, in connection with the settle- ment. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-39: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman $chutte, the Mayor and City Clerk were au'thorized to sign consent %o the amendment of deed restrictions recorded July' 5, 1962, in book 6168 at page 410, as document number 3520, Official Records of Orange County, filed by Joseph M. and Mary M. Anton, pursuant to Resolution No. 7403 in Reclassi- fication No. 61-62-39 (amendment corrects description to read, Tract 374 instead of Tract 247). MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST TO USE CITY FACILITIES - POP WARNER FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION: At the request of the City Manager, further consideration relative to fees and charges for use of City facilities by youth groups, was continued to the next meeting, August 14, 1962. PROPOSED SUNKIST STREET WIDENING - JOHN CYPRIEN PROPERTY: Inasmuch as further investigation and study has indicated this improvement not to be of an urgency nature, Councilman Chandler moved that further consideration and action by 'the City Council regarding the widenin9 of Sunkist Street fronting the John Cyprien property be withheld until such time as the City Engineer determines the necessity thereof. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - 100 FOOT AERIAL LADDER TRUCK: 'The City Manager reported that one informal bid was received for the purchase of a motor-propelled, tractor-drawn, 100 foot aerial ladder 'truck; that because only one bid was received, the specifications were again reviewed by the City, and it is felt that the specifications are correct, and therefore recommended that purchase be authorized from the Seagrave Corporation in the amount of $52,677.00, plus ~ax. On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Schutte moved that the bid of the Seagrave Corporation in the amount of $52,B77.00, plus tax, be accepted and purchase of Seagrave Model 900-KT-iO0,100 foot aerial ladder truck be authorized. Councilman Coong ~econae8 fhe motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE - RECORDING EQUIPMENT: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported on investigations made pertaining to the type of recording equipment most suitable for the Council Chambers, and recommended the purchase of the Ampex system, comprising four recordin9 heads and two erasing heads, from Campbell's Photo Center, Santa Aha, in 'the amount of $3,794.65, including tax. 6014 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On the recommendations of the City Manager and City Clerk, Council- man Krein moved that purchase of the Ampex recordin9 system for the Council Chambers be authorized, and that the expenditure of necessary funds therefor be authorized from 'the Council Con-tingencY Fund. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FIRE INSURANCE~ FIVE YEAR POLICY - EXTENDED COVERAGF: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, thai renewal of fire insurance under the five year policy plan, and payment of premium in the amount of $4,523.58, be authorized. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-717: Memorandum opinion from John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, dated August 6, 1962, relative to bids received July 31, 1962, for legal advertising within the city and outside the city, was submitted to each Councilman. Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-717 for passage and adoption, awardin9 contract for legal advertisin9 within the City of Anaheim to the Anaheim Bulletin. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER WHOSE BID BEST RESPONDS IN QUALITY, FITNESS AND CAPACITY, FOR ALL LEGAL ADVERTISING REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE PUBLISHED IN A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION, PRINTED AND PUBLISHED WITHIN THE CII'Y. (Anaheim Bulletin) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by 'the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons, None. Dutton. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6~R-717 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-718: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-718 for passage and adoption, awarding coniract for legal advertisin9 outside the city to Placentia Courier. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF T½E CIYY COUNCIL OF tHE CIFY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CO~!7~ACI' TO £HE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER WHOSE BID BEST RESPONDS IH QUALITY, FI I'NESS A~D CAPACITY, FOR ALL LEGAL ADVERIISING REQUIRED BY LAW FO ~E PUBLISHED IN A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION, P!~!NTED AND PUBLIS}{ED OUTSIDE ~H~ C~FY, BU~ IN ~HE COUNTY OF ORANGE. (Placentia Courier) On roil call the foreooin::~ resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followinfi vote: AY ES: COUNC I L~JEN: NOES: COUNC J L!,,'iEN: ABSENT: ~OUNCJt ~E~: Schu//e, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Dutton. 'The ~ayor decimated P, esolui:ion No. 62R-718 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: 'Councilman Kreia offered Resolutions Nos. 69R-719 to 62R-723, both inclusive, for passaqe and adoption. Refer to Resolution book. City Hail~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-719: A RESOLUTION OF THE City COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY CE ANAHEIM CERTAIN RE/IL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES (Dudley b Dorman~ ' RESOLUTION NO. 62R-720: A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN R:>,z PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (~Jattie Welsh Bostick) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-721: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROunD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES ('Theodore F. Worth) ' RESOLUTION NO. 62R-722: A RESOLUTION OF THE CIFY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i~nzIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO rile CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Sumiyuki Hayashigawa) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-723: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAW~ DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAl. PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church of Anaheim) On roll cai1 the foregoing Resolutions Nos. 62R-719 to 62R-723~ bo[h zncidslve, were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton. The Mayor declared Resol~tions Nos. 62R-719 to 62R-723, both inc~us~ve~ duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION HO. 62R-724: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-724 for passage and adoption. Refer 'to ~esolution Book. A PESOiI:'iiON OF THE CITY COUNCIl, OF FHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- ~INING FNAi PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLEiiON OF' A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, FO WIT: THE BALL ROAD STREET IMPROVE- WENT, FROM LOARA STREET TO SHERRILL S~REE'I~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ JOB NO. 4809t APPROVING THE DESIGNS~ PLANS, PROFILES, D~AWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BO? ['l{E CONSTRUCTION 'T~EREOFt AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WI'IH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.} AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING IRE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. {Bids to be opened August 30, lg{2~ 2:00 P.M.) On roi1 call the foreqoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the foiiowing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler~ Yrein and Coons. None. Dutton. Fhe Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-7?a duly passed and adopted. PROJL.~. "D. i04 - RIGHT OF ENTRY LICENSE CER'rlPiCAFION: On mo[ion by Councilman Chandier, seconded by Councilman Krein, the Mayor and City Clerk were author'~zed to sign Right of Entry License Certification in connection with The right of way for Project No. 104, La Palma Avenue from Jefferson Street to the ~ity limits west of Dowling Avenue. MOTION CARRIED. .... o2~-72~: Councilman Krein offered Roso~u~ion No. 62R-72~ for passage and adoption. 6016 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OF ANAH£IM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMEhV WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA EE RAILWAY COMPANY WITH REFERENCE TO THE WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT O? A PORTION O? LA PALMA AVENUE. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Dutton. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-725 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-726: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-726 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO 'THE CITY A LICENSE TO USE CERTAIN LAND SITUATED AT OR NEAR ATWOOD, ORANGE COUNTY, FOR THE WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE, CROSSING NO. 2N-l.1. On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None, Dutton. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-726 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-V27: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-727 for adoption. Refer to Resolut:on Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE JOINT INSTALLATION OF FLASHING LIGHT SIGNALS AT CERRITOS AVENUE CROSSING NO. BK-511.8, ANAHEIa: PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF THE COST THEREOF BY THE CITY: AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: CO~NCILM~N: NOES: COUNCiLMeN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Dutton. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-V27 duly passed and adopted. ~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-728: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6~R-728 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR A~ EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (George A. Gade) ~ 6 O17 'City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Dutton. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-728 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-729: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-729 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE A. GADE WITH REFERENCE TO DEDICATION OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY AND IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGETHORPE AVENUE. (Rancho La Paz Club) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schut%e, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Dutton. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-729 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1742: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1742 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-71 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1742 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the read~_ng in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CAR~IED. On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEM[: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Dutton. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1742 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1743: On report by the City !~anager, Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1743 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR PROMOTION AND ADVE.~TISING OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1743 and havlnq kr~owledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the readinq in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1741: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1741 for corrected first reading. 6018 City Hall, Anaheim, Calif0~Bia - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 7, 1962, 3:00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 1.04, SECTION 1.04.370, PARAGRAPH (g), AND SECTION 1.04.380 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1741 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITFJ~S: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held July 23, 1962, pertaining to the following appli- cations were submitted for Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO, 1505 - Submitted by James G. Hull, requesting permission to waive rear yard setback requirements at 1604 East Elm Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 413, Series 1962~63, granted said variance subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1506 - Submitted by Adelaide A. Morse, requesting permission to waive rear yard setback on property located at 709 Neptune Street, The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 414, Series 1962-63, granted said variance subject to conditions, VARIANCE NO. 1507 - Submitted by Raymond R. Nelson, requesting permission to waive side yard setback on corner lot on property located at 2633 Carnival Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 415, Series 1962-63, granted said variance subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1508 - Submitted by Peter A. Giovannoni, requesting permission to waive rear yard setback requirements at 1784 West Alomar Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 416, Series 1962- 63, granted said variance subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO, 1509 - Submitted by David W. MacMath, requesting permission to waive rear yard setback requirements at 1414 East Elm Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 417, Series 1962-63, granted said variance subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 273 - Submitted by Robert S. Unger, requesting permission to construct an R-3 planned unit development on property located at 2533 West Winston Road (north side of Winston Road, approximately 635 feet east of Magnolia Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 419, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 275 - Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. V. Schneider, requesting permission to construct a walk-up restaurant on property located at 121 West Ball Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Reso- lution No. 420, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action was taken on the above numbered variances and conditional use permit applications. VARIANCE NO. 1504: Initiated by the Anaheim City Planning Commission, requesting permission to establish a real estate office on property located on the west side of State College Boulevard, approximately 90 feet south of Broadway (311 South State College Boulevard). The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 412, Series 1962-63, 9ranted said variance application subject to conditions. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by Councilman Chandler, and the City Clerk directed to schedule Variance Application No. 1504 for public hearing before the City Council. REVISED TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 4230: Submitted by Gaetane Abandonato, Owner, and 3ce Abandonato, Subdivider; tract located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 665 feet west of Beach Boulevard, and contains 6019 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. twenty-five proposed R-3 lots and two proposed C-1 lots. (Reclassification No. F-55-56-40) The City Planning Commission at their meeting of July 23, 1962, approved said Revised Tentative Map of Tract No. 4230, and previous action by the City Council on November 28, 1961, limiting subject tract to one- story construction, was noted. Councilman Chandler moved that Revised Tentative Map, Tract No. 4230, be approved as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Council- man Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, 7:10 P.M., all members of the Council being present. INVOCATION: Rev. John Emmons, of the Stanton Community Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-125 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 260: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Cecil M. Lancaster and Jusuke Ononue, (Joseph P. Gleason, M.D., Agent) concerning property briefly described as located at the northwest corner of Orangewood Avenue and Beach Boulevard. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-125 - Requesting change of zone from R-A %o C-l, property described above. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 392, Series 1961-62~ recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue, (20 feet existing), this is to include a return radius of twenty-five (25) feet. 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard. 4. Provision of trash storage areas as de/ermined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup;and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 5. Subject to /he approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 260. 6. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of: Item Nos. i, 2 and 3. 7. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, including the installation of landscaping along the Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard frontages as indicated on Exhibit No. 1. 8. Provision of all necessary air conditioning equipment to be installed in such a manner so as not to destroy the esthetic qualities of the renderings o£ the elevations presented on Exhibit Nos. 3 and 4. 9. Subject to the written approval of the State of California, Department of Public Health, prior to issuance of a business license for the hospital and/or convalescent home. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 260 - Requesting permission to establish a hospital and convalescent home on Parcel No. 1 and service station on Parcel No. 2 (corner parcel), property described above. 6O20 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 393, Series 1961-62, granted said conditional use permit subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. Dedication of forty-five (aS) feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue (20 feet existing), this is to include a return radius of twenty-five (25) feet. 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard. 4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by %he Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall prior 'to Final Building Inspection. 5. Subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 61-62-125. 6. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 7. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and a including the installation of landscaping along the Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard frontages as indicated on Exhibit No. 1. 8. Provision of all necessary air conditioning equipment to be installed in such a manner so as not to destroy the esthetic qualities of the renderings of the elevations presented on Exhibit Nos. 3 and 4. 9. Subject to the written approval of the State of California, Department of Public Health prior to issuance of a business license for the hospital and/or convalescent home. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission relative to Reclassification No. 61-69-125 and Conditional Use Permit No. 260, was filed by ~estridge Home Owners Association by Michael Zehra and John Simpson. Letter dated August 3, 1962, favoring Reclassification and Conditional Use Permit, was filed by Phillip Kouri, M.D. Mayor Coons announced that both public hearings would be held concurrently, inasmuch as both pertained to the same parcel of property. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the subject property and summarized evidence presented to the City Planning Commission. He reported that one objection was received, which, after further clarification, was withdrawn. He called attention to Finding No. 5 of the City Planning Commission's Resolution No. 392, concerning action resulting from request of Orange County Medical Association for thirty days continuance, to allow for a survey and analysis of existing facilities and anticipated needs. In answer to question of Councilman Dutton concerning a request for Dr. Russell, Orange County Health Officer, to express an opinion, Mr. Kreidt replied that he had personally notified Dr. Russell of the petitions in accordance with a previous request from Dr. Russell to be advised of any pending zoning for the purpose of establishing hospital facilities. Mayor Coons advised that the issue before them was a matter of land use, and its compatibility with other uses of land in the same area~ and thereupon invited the applicant to address the Council. Mr. Kenneth Lae, Attorney representing the agent for the applicant, Dr. Gleason, requested to reserve 'the right of rebuttal, and advised of a letter filed by the ~estridge Home Owners Association stating the following: (1) The selection of this site for this type of operation was very well suited to the surrounding area, inasmuch as it does not conflict, to a major degree, with adjacent or nearby property owners of homes. (2) Ingress and egress to the institution will not present ~ny 6ajor traffic problems, and the round-the-clock functions which could create possible sources of undesirable disturbances to future residents is duly 6021 G.it~ Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. confined, because of the strategic location of this site. (3) Long and studied consideration by the prospective proponents of this project for the most suitable site possible, in their ultimate choice of this location. (4) Proponents knowledge and experience in the medical field would aid greatly to ease the need for hospital accommodations by the public at large. He called attention to the fact that the Planning Commission has also thoroughly investigated this request and has recommended this use for this particular site. He reported that there is a need for a hospital~ and called attention to a record on file in the California Department of Health of a feeling that within five years, this area will have a deficiency of four hundred hospital beds~ and that all existing facilities are, as a general proposition, occupied to capacity at all times. Further, that this is a proper usage of the land, and would be in conformity with the plan of development for the area. Mr. John W. Brooks, Attorney, 4047 Long Beach Boulevard, Long Beach, California, representing Mr. and Mrs. Lancaster, called attention to the primary purpose of zoning regulations and the reasons why they have been held to be constitutional, although they do limit and restrict the use made of property. They are for the benefit of public health, morals~ safety and welfare. As to the highest and best use of the property, the land, due to its location on Beach Boulevard and Orange Avenue, has a property value so great that it could not possibly be used economically for residential pur- poses. Mr. Brooks requested the right of rebuttal. Mr. John Simpson, 3309 West Deerwood Drive, Anaheim, representing the Westridge Home Owners Association, reported that their position as outlined by Mr. Lac in their letter still stands; however, they felt that there are other factors involved. They did not know that other groups in the County, such as the Orange County Health Association and the Orange County Medical Association, and Hospital Plannin9 Committee were interested in this; therefore, no position should have been expressed by them regard- ing the need. In their opinion, other factors other than land use must be considered, and referred to the application form regarding supporting documents, particularly a written statement from the petitioner giving any pertinent analytical or market research data, or other data which will clarify and support the proposed use of the subject property. In his opinion, market data was economical data, and if it is a requirement of the petitioner to provide such data, it should be the privilege of other interested parties to submit conflictin9 information. Dr. Edward Lee Russell, Orange County and City Health Officer, addressed the Council, submitting "Study of Hospital Needs - City of Anaheim, August, 1962", compiled as result of his investigations. He reported that this Friday, a meeting of the Area Hospital Planning Objective Committee will be held for the purpose of considerin9 additional information; that said committee is composed of sixteen members, four practicin9 physicians, four hospital administrators, and eight mem- bers representing the public at large. Dr. Russell requested action be deferred on this and the subsequent application, pending the recommenda- tions of this committee, as in his opinion, additional statistical information as to need should be gathered. Regarding hospital occupancy, he advised that there is a fifty per cent or sixty per cent vacancy factor in the hospi{als in this area, and a greater number of facilities will reflect in cost to patients and cost of insurance. Discussion was held concerninq hospital standards and regula- tions, qualified personnel, projected p~pulation and possible conflict of interest in proprietary hospitals as compared to non-profit operations, Dr. Russell advised, as results of surveys made in 1940, and because of the explosive population, several hospitals were recommended and constructed. 6022 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the report from the committee should be made available prior to Council action. Mr. Michael Zehra, 3406 Glen Holly Drive, Anaheim, asked Mayor Coons if it was permissible, on various cases, that the question of economic factor be applied, and not applied to others, when in the petition : form, a market research :f requirec~ and asked, for their own informations if this was applicable to every petitioner and every type of petition requested. Mayor Coons, in answering, stated personally he would say "No." Ne felt that market data was used by the staff, and further stated that he personally was concerned with the land use only. Councilman Chandler stated that according to his interpretation, a market research is not actually required, and further advised that all applications are dealt with through a realm of reasonin9. Mr. Zehra reiterated the stand of the home owners, that they were not against hospitals as such, or for any hospital as such; but are inter- eared in that sufficient hospitals be established in the best manner and at the best location, and by the best group; and further, after due study of the two hospital applications, respectfully submit for serious consideration: That the two mentioned hospital projects be postponed, pending a Precise Plan Study of hospital needs and locations throughout the City of Anaheim, as related to neighborin9 cities; that any other hospital projects presented also be postponed until this study is completed and improved. That a study committee be formed composed as follows, Three representin9 the governmental group: One qualified member of the City Planning Staff, appointed by the Mayor; One member of the City Plannin9 Commission; One member of the City Council. Three representing the medical group: One - Dr. Russell, Orange County Health Officer; Two additional members of the medical field. Three representin9 public at large group: One representing Anaheim Chamber of Commerce; Two selected by the various home owner organizations representing residents. He further recommended this committee be permanently maintained, The Mayor asked if anyone else had any additional evidence to submit on either the reclassification or conditional use permit; there bein9 no response, declared the hearth9 closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-730: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-730, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested (Reclassification No. 61.-62-125}, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE t8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE /~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-6 -12 - C-l) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-730 duly passed and adopted. 6023 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust ?, 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-731: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-731, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 260, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amendin9 Condition No. 5 to read, "subject to final reading of Ordinance reclassifying subject property in accordance with Reclassification No. 61-62-125." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 260. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN~ NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. Schutte. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-731 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 265: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Calvin E. Pebley (Sydney Gross, Agent), requestin9 permission to construct hospital and medical center on property briefly described as located on the south side of Ball Road, approximately 103 feet west of Oakhaven Drive. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 400, Series 1962-63, 9ranted said conditional use permit, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road (30 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Ball Road subject to the approval of the City Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on Ball Road. 4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall prior to Final Building Inspection. 5. Provision of a modified cul-de-sac at the terminus of Oaklawn Drive wzthin the present street dedication subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 6. Installation of fire hydrants as determined to be necessary by the Gity of Anaheim Fire Marshall to provide adequate fire protection prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Access drives shall be a minimum of twenty-one (21) feet in width with adequate angle cut-offs provided or a minimum of twenty-eight (28) feet in width if no cut-offs are provided, and in all cases, shall have a minimum vertical clearance of fourteen (la) feet. 8. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5. 9. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3, provided that said approval shall not apply to 'the proposed medical offices. 10. Provision of all necessary air condi~ionin9 equipment ~o be installed in such a manner so as not to destroy the esthetic qualities of the elevations presented. 11. Subject to the written approval of the State of California Department of Public Health prior to issuance of a business license for the hospital. 12. Provision of a six (6) for masonry wall to be constructed alon9 the east property line of subject property where said walls do not exist. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Westridge Home Owners Association by Michael Zehra and John Simpson. 6024 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 Mr. Kreidt briefly outlined the location of the subject property and the existing zonin9 in the immediate area, and specifically called attention to Finding No. 6 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. aO0, Series 1962-63. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Bryan McM~llan, Attorney for the agent representing appli- cant Mr. Calvin Pebley, addressed the Council, stating that even though he believed Dr. Russell's statements as submitted during the prior hearing to be considered irrelevant by the majority of the Council members, he felt compelled to comment on the figures used in Dr. Russell's remarks; that in his opinion, there would be considered fifty per cent good hospi- tals and fifty per cent poor hospitals, and if there was a thirty per cent occupancy in the poor hospitals and over one hundred per cent occupancy in the good hospitals, the means would be approximately sixty per cent. He believed these to be the statistics referred to by Dr. Russell, and did not believe anyone is readily admitted into the better hospitals in Orange County. Mr. McMillan explained that he represents a group of thirty-four practisin9 physicians in the Anaheim area, each ownin9 an equal share in the Young Cur Corporation, and each being men dedicated to their profession desitin9 to construct and operate a hospital in which they know their patients will receive proper care. He referred to their meeLing with Mr. Zehra and two members of the organization, where plans of development were reviewed, and as result, certain revisions 'to the plans were made. The plans were reversed so as 'to relocate driveways away' from the existing homes, and remove the incinerator, which was previously adjacent to the home side of the property, and agreement was made ~o a substantial wall between the hospital and the existing homes. Because of these revisions, they' had felt no further objections would be made. After reading Dr. Russell's letter 'to the City Council, he had the impression that Dr. Russell's interest was in the proper equipment of the hospital in order to provide service; that at a meeting with Dr. Russell, 'there was no mention made of hospital equipment. Mr. McMillan further advised that 'the State of California dictates 'the requirements that a hospital must meet. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either for or against said application, and stated that it would be assumed that Dr. Russell's comments made during the previous public hearing (Reciassifica%ion No. 61-62-125 and Conditional Use Permit No. 260) would also apply to 'this application. Mr. Jack Brown, i223 South Oakhaven Drive, directly adjacent to the proposed hospital, addressed the Council on behalf of the property owners adjacent to the subject property, and also on behalf of the West- ridge Home Owners Association, advising that his neighbors have indicated no objections %o hospitals per se in this area; however as result of certain events that have Taken place, there is a whole-hearted opposition to this particular proposal. He referred %o the meeting of June 18, 1962, with the proposed developers of the hospital, and 'the plans submitted contain objectionable features, such as ambulance entrances and incinera- tors, etc., directly adjacent to the homes on Oakhaven Drive. Me ~a~ed that after the meeting, they were assured that plans would be withdrawn, removing these objectionable features; that on June 27, 1962, a new set of plans were submitted. Mr. Brown presented the plans presented to them June 27, 1962, for comparison by the City Council with plans filed with the application. Plans were compared by the City Council as requested, and dis- cussion was held between the City Council and Mr. Brown. It was noted that the plans on the application filed indicated a crosshatched area of a 6025 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. subsequent one hundred-bed addition (Unit No, 2). Mr. Brown advised that 'they had not been afforded an opportunity to review the revised plans prior rio the Planning Commission hearing, and that said revised plans still contain many features objectionable to them; basically, the incompatibility to the area~ and the hazard to their children by the ambulance entrance along the only route to the school. Patricia Fyler, 1318 South Oakhaven Drive, addressed the Council advising that she was standing in support of Dr. Russell, as it was her opinion that the majority of 'the Council failed to see the point Dr. Russell was endeavoring to make; that control of hospital building was truly in the public interest and for the public welfare; %ha% doctors owning their own hospitals are subjecting themselves to a great deal of conflict of interest, and are in a position to 'take advantage of their power because of the complete faith of the patient. She pointed out that hospitals differ somewhat, and are contrary to the laws of supply and demand, inasmuch as they do not close their doors if they are not making money. She stated that services can be decreased, that professional nurses can be replaced with vocazional nurses, etc.~ and that this operation is very much a matter of public welfare. Mr. A. L. Wolfert, 3404 West Ball Road, owner of property adjacent to subject property, called attention to the fact that this is located in an area where, within one mile, there are eight or nine schools~ and is a very good location for a hospital, and would also serve residences of Cypress and Buena Park. He further reported that owners of property along Ball Road are heartily in favor of the project. Mr. Brown further advised '~ha~ at a meeting held in his home, ali. ot t. ne families direc~iy affected, with the exception of three who were on vaca'~on, disapproved of [he proposed nosp:tai. Mr. Simpson addressed the Council, read:hq excerpts from "Supplement to Petition", and referred to Section i~.6a.020 of the Anaheim Mdniz~pa~. Code, mherein, according to his interpretation, this use would be incompatible with the R-i Zone. Wt. Simpson referred to the Master Plan and restrictions of land use, and fcrther referred to other applica- tions der-~:ed by the City Council on the basis of incompatibility, specifically in the area reserved for indu$~riai use. Dr. Lawrence ~osier, member of the Area Hospital Planning Ob2ect~ve Committee, stated that the committee worked diligently to promote good nospitais in Orange County; that one of the main reasons that the committee was formulated ~as to prevent bureaucrazic control of hospitalsl that this :s an advisory body' and a .group of citizens actinq at local level for local interest: that this committee is a planninq commi{tee trying to create the best hospitals for the mos[ patients ai t~e least cost. He sta%ed that he did not have an opinion for or against this appi~cation, and would not have an opinion until factual information is presented at the meeting to ~e held Friday, and thereupon requested delay of f~r%al action on this application until -this information can be available. l¥Ir. Michael Zehra read from the minu~es of the meeting held May 29, i9~.2, relating to the proposed R-3 zoning of the subject property concerr:zng the basic concept of zoning as expressed by the Assistant City Attorney. In his opinion, they were in the same position as before, except where there was formerly proposed an R-3 development there is now proposed a commercial development; that said commerczal venture is bo~:nded on three sides by R-1 and R-A zones; that in his opinion, the proposed commercial use is not the ~est use because of the depth of the property, and because of incompatibility. Wt. McMillan submitted as evidence photos of ten existing hos- pitals located in Anaheim, Garden Grove, Santa And, Stanton, Buena Park and ~estmznster, noting homes shown adjacent to said hospitals, and related the taxes to the City and Savanna School District estimated for the hospital. 6O26 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. The Mayor asked if anyone else had anything new to offer, there bein9 no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION .NO. 62R-732: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-732 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 265, subject to the recommendations of the City Plannin9 Commission, and further subject to the following: a. All free standing signs to be submitted to and approved by the City Council. b. That light standards lighting the parking lot shall not be in excess of six feet in height, and shall be directed toward the 9round. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 265. On roli call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein, and Coons. Schutte. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-732 duly passed and adopted, RECESS: Councilman Coons moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:45 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present, except Councilman Schukte. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 245: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. George E. Sibbett (E. A. Dan%ell Company, Agent), requestin9 permission to establish a trailer park on property bounded on the North by the River- side Freeway, on the West by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, on the East by the Orange County Flood Control Channel, and on the South by a line runnin9 east and west, approximately thirty-five feet north of Kenwood Avenue. The Ciiy Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 340, Series 1961-62, denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed, public hearing held by the City Council June 26, 1962, and continued to this date, to consider additional reports and planning study of the entire area. PLAN STUDY NO. 49-81-2: Mr. Ronald Grudzinski, Planning Assistant, noted the location of the subject property, and referred to exhibits placed on the east wall of the Council Chambers; one, of the land use; and two, zoning of 'the area. Mr. Grudzinski reported that the Plannin9 Commission deSermined the highest and best use of the vacant land in the area would be light manufacturing development, and the area should be reserved for this use. Mr. Grudzlnski read four findings of the City Plannin9 Commission concernin9 said plan study, stating that the General Plan projects this area for industrial use. Considera't:on was given to the restrictions of land for a par- ticular use, which does noi materiai:ze over a lon9 period of time, thereby reducing the value of 'the land, resulting in the denial of a property owner the highest and best use of the land. Vapors and odors created by the industrial activity in the area as a possible detrimental factor to a residential use was also considered. 6027 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Leonard Smith, 125 South Claudina Street, representing the applicant, was of the opinion that the fact that the property is adjacent to a railroad track did not necessarily mean it must be restricted solely to industrial use, and gave several illustrations in support of his opinion. He advised that an attempt to sell this property for industrial use has been made, and because of the location of the flood control channel, it has been impossible to sell. Regarding odors emanating from the existing industries, he stated that 'the odors drift in a northeasterly direction, and that residents to the East have not complained. In addition, the developer is cognizant of the faci that the industries are in existence, Mr. Smith stated the trailer park use is possible, and a developer is ready %o develop it to [ne City's advantage and to the advantage of %he trailer park owner. Regarding the Planning Department's recommendation, if approved, Mr. Smith requested that the installation of 'the six foot masonry' wall be on the west and South boundaries of the property, and not alon9 the Riverside Freeway because of the existin9 fence on State property, which would result in an unkept area between the State Highway fencin9 and the trailer park fence. Ne reported 'that the developer would prefer landscaping to be approved by the proper City authority. Regarding circulation and fire protection, Mr. Smith reported that /he streets within the proposed trailer park will be forty feet wide, and wider than those in some residential areas. In his opinion, approaches and entrances to the City should carry beautification, and a landscaped trailer park at this location would be better than a possible unsightly industry. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there bein9 no response, declared 'the hearing closed. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution denying said conditional use permit, because of the possible complaints from the residents of the trailer park of the noise and odors emanating from the adjacent industrial activities, vote: On roll call, said resolution failed to carry' by 'the following AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Krein. Chandler and Coons. Schutte. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted that this was an allowable use in an M-1 Zone, with a conditional use permit; and Councilman Dutton stated that his only objection to the use was the possibility of complaints, as recently the Manager of the La Par Mobile Home Park reported complaints received from fifty of the residents of noise which was emanating approximately 600 feet distant. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-733: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-733, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 245, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1, 2, 3 and a, and substantially in conformance with the proposed trailer park ordinanceI the square footage of any single trailer plot shall not vary more than fifteen square feet from the proposed trailer park ordinance. 2. Installation of a six foot masonry wall along all borders of subject property. 3. Dedication of forty-five feet from the monumented cen%erline of East Street (30 feet existing). 4. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for East Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office 6028 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 7. 1962, 3:00 of the City Engineer. 5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on East Street. 6. Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 per trailer space, to be collected as a part of the buildin9 permit. 7. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to final buildin9 inspection. 8. Fire hydrants to be installed as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall. 9. A minimum forty (40) foot access road shall be provided. If this street is to be dedicated, the forty foot roadway should be in a sixty-four (64) foot right-of-way, and constructed to City standards. 10. If bridge is to be used for access of the property to the South, a plan for the street alignment shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 11. Provision of three (3) foot public utility easement and a two (2) foot overhang easement southerly, westerly and northerly; and a five (5) foot public utility easement and a three (3) foot overhang easement easterly, along the said boundaries of the subject property, to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at the time of installation of service facilities. 12. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accom- plishment of Items Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 11. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 245. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-733 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO, 62-63-1: Submitted by Carriage Estates Sales Corporation (William C. Sangster, Agent), requesting change of zone from R-A to M-i, an irregular parcel of land briefly described as located on the west side of Manchester Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of Katella Avenue (1835 South Manchester Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 404, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Manchester Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of 'the City Engineer. 2. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street ligh%in9 purposes on Manchester Avenoe. 3. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Work$~ Sanitation Divisions which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. Yime limitation of one hundred eightY (180) days for the accomplishment of Items Nos. 1 and 2. 5. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1, except that a minimum twenty-five (25) foot setback be provided. 6. Installation of landscaping in the parkway abutting subject property as indicated on Exhibit No. 1, in addition to a six (6) foot landscapin9 strip abuttin9 the Manchester Avenue right-of-way of subject property, plans for said landscapin9 to be submitted to and subject to the 6029 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, said landscapin9 to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. The applicant was present for the purpose of answering any question pertaining to the application. 'The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there bein9 no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-734: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-734, authorizin9 the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF /HE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT 'THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-1 - M-l) ~ On roll call-the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-734 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-3: Submitted by James B. Kerwin (John J Magrann, Agent)~ requesting change of zone from C-1 (Restricted) to C-1 (Restricted to Professional and Medical Offices); property briefly descrlbed as 'the southwest corner of South Street and State College Boulevard (1920 East South Stree't}. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 405, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Recordation of amended deed restrictions originally recorded against subject property on August 15, 1962, to wit: (8) That all buildings or structures erected on subject property shall be limi'ted to one story in height, except on Parcel No. 1, wherein two-story construction shall be permitted, and no single story buildin9 shall exceed 4,000 square feet in area. 2. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall alon9 the west boundary of subject property, the height of said walls to be measured from natural grade level of the abuttin9 residential property. 3. Installation of a ten (10) foot landscaping strip abuttin9 the wes% property line of subject property in accordance with Condition No. 4 of Ordinance No. 1527, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 4. Elimination of two parking spaces abutting the south boundary of subject proper~y, as indicated on E×hibi-t No. 1, %o provide ingress and egress to the abutting properiy to ihe South when it is developed. 5. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ~ble to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. Installation of driveways on South Street and State College Boulevard in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer, prior to Final Building inspection. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and existing zoning in the area. He further reported that C-1 zonin9 on the property was in accordance with Reclassification Application No. 59-60-94. Ordinance No. 1527; and that the amendment would permit development of the originally 6030 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. permitted uses, and, in addition, would allow two-story construction. The ??,ayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Elizabeth D. ~J!cCarter, 1112 North Brookhurst, addressed the Council on behalf of the authorized agent, Dr. John J. Magrann, advising that the building consultant, ~r. Harold Roseburrough, was present to answer any questions. The ?ayor asked if there were any questions, there being none, asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. ~r. Joe Brewer, 1838 Diana Avenue, addressed the Council objectin9 only to the two-story construction, thereby establishing a precedent for the balance of the development. The l,?!ayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there bein9 no response, declared the hearin9 closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted that the precise plan of development previously approved by the City Council limited all construction to one-story development. Original file (Reclassification No. 59-60-94) was reviewed and compared with plans of development filed with Reclassification No. 62-63-3. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-735: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-735, authorizing amendment %o Ordinance No. 1527; that each parcel of subject property shall be developed in accordance with the overall site plan (59-60-94), except Parcel No. 1, which shall be developed substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, ? and 3, as amended and filed in con- junction with Reclassification No. 69-63-3; further, subject to the recommendations as outlined in City Plannin9 Commission Resolution No. 405, Series 1962-63. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~,~ DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ~'!ENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1527 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. F-59-60-94. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNC IL?~EN: NOES: COUNC I LI'4EN: ABSENT: C OUNC I L~4 EN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. The ~,!ayor declared R~solution No. 62R-735 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-~: Submitted by Paul S. Lone (Rayco Investment Company. Inc., Agent), requesting change of zone from R-2 to R-3, property briefly described as located on the west side of Rose Street, between Lincoln Avenue and Broadway. (199, ~03 and 905 Rose Street.) The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. ~06, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Repair of damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks on Rose Street in accord- ance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 9. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelline unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 3. Provision for nine and one-half (gL) foot garages with a nine (9) foot clear openinc! into the garages, and the provision of a seven and one- hal~ (7~) foot trash storage area on the center lot of subject :031 2ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962. 3:00 P.M. pr'operty, said trash storage area to be designed so as to meet the approval of the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division. 4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Rose Street. 5. lime limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accom- plishment of Item Nos. 1 and 4. 6. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, ~, % and 6, as amended. Br. Kreidt noted the location of the property and zoning in the immediate area. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-736: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-736, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLNTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- ~INING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OS CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-4 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. The Hayor declared Resolution No. 62~-736 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED: a. Dorothy Ulvestad (architectural parking lot committee). b. Kwikset Division, the American Hardware Corporation (requesting oppor- tunity to work with architects on specifications for future City buildings). c. Standard Gas Company (withdrawing application for franchise privileges in Ball Road). d. Feather River Association. e. Southern Pacific Pipe Lines, Inc.; San Diego Pipe Line Company (Eugene L. Freeland}, requesting pursuant to Section 6 of Ordinance No. 1727, the consent of the City Council to the assignment by Southern Pacific Pipe Lines to San Diego Pipe Line Company of franchise. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said assignment was approved, and preparation of necessary formal document author{zed. ~OTION CARRIED. WEST ORANGE COUntY WATER DISTRICT: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, a representative of the City Attorney's office was authorized to appear representing the City of Anaheim at the public hearing to be held by the Orange County Board of Supervisors in the matter of the formation of the ~est Orange County Water District. ROTION CARRIED. A.B.C. APPLICATION: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney's office was authorized to file protest on Or.-Sal~ G~n~ral alcoholic b~v~rag~ lic~n~ application ~or 4~0 ~oufh BrooPhurst, due to the {act that the property is presently zoned C-1. ~OTiON CARriED. 6032 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 7, 1962, 3:00 P.M. CITY HALL SITES: Mr. Murdoch reported that the Urban Renewal Committee is presently considerin9 proposals and the "Re-Use Study" for the downtown area, and further reported dates scheduled to consider other proposals, which as a result, the Urban Renewal Committee will make their recommend- ations concernin9 the employment of a firm to make the "Re-Use Study"~ that the Urban Renewal Committee have reviewed representatives of the two organizations of certified appraisers for the appraisal of the property in the downtown area, and building inspections of the commercial buildings in the downtown area are about to be started. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN: 11:15 P.M. S IGNED:~.~(".-~ , ~~ ~ City Clerk Councilman Krein seconded Hail, Anaheim, Caiifornia- COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust la, 1969, 3:00 P.M. fhe Ci~ Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dut~on, Schutte, Chandler and Coons. ABSEN[: COUNCILMEN: Krein. PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. DEPUTY CItY ATI'ORNEY: Furman Roberts. CIIY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CI[Y ENGINEER: J'ames P. Yaddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Marzin Kreidz. I'vla'yor Coons called the meeting to order. ~diNU[ES: Minutes of the regular City Council meeting held August 7, 1962, were deferred %o the ne×'z meeting, August 21, 1962, for approval. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-737: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-737 for passage and adopiion. Refer t.o Resolugion BooK. A RESOLUTION OF THE CF[Y COUNCIL OF THE CIiY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF AUGUST la~ 1962. Warrants Nos. 19587 'to i984t, both inclusive, totaling $1,000,593.50.) On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted oy 'the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENI': COUNCILMEN: Dution, Schutte, Chandler and Coons. None. Krein. Fhe blayoz dec].ared Resolaf~on No. 62R,-/37 duly p'assed and adopted. SfGN APPLICA[IO~,: Applzcatton b~/ 3ames ~. Vaughn for permission to erect a free-s[and~ng, reader pa~,ei si,~n, ac i203 East Vermont Avenue, was submitted at t:he meenin<,~ held A~,a .... 7 i962 and continued to this date to further consider the overa.;~ r:o-~a~ szze of ~he s}gn and possible obstruction.