Loading...
1972/03/2872-164 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust LIBRARY DIRECTOR: William Griffith CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman William J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION GOOD FRIDAY BREAKFAST: A Resolution urging all citizens to join the Y.M.C.A. organization in observance of Good Friday, particularly at their Fifth Annual Good Friday Breakfast, March 31, 1972, was unanimously adopted by the' City Council, and presented to Herbert Leo, Chairman of the Good Friday Breakfast Committee. MINUTE'S: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held March 14, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,229,778.41, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved. AWARD $8.000.000.00 ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS JOHN NUVEEN COMP,NY: The City Manager reported on the nine bids received for the sale of $8,000,000.00 City of Anaheim, 1972 Revenue Series Bonds, as follows, and recommended the low bid of John Nuveen Company, at an average 4.9263% Interest Rate be ac- cepted: John Nuveen Company Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus premium of $2,075.00. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7.00% 1983 $400,000 4.60% 1974 225,000 7.00% 1984 400,000 4.70% 1975 250,000 7.00% 1985 425,000 4.80% 1976 250,000 7.00% 1986 475,000 4.90% 1977 275,000 7.00% 1987 500,000 5.00% 1978 275,000 7.00% 1988 525,000 5.10% 1979 300,000 7.00% 1989 550,000 5.10% 1980 325,000 7.00% 1990 600,000 5.20% 1981 350,000 7.00% 1991 625,000 5.20% 1982 375,000 6.20% 1992 675,000 2.00% City Nall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 72 -165 Baler. Stuart Co.. Inc. Manaaer and Ass. iates: Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus Premium of $3,200.00. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: B$ SS= INTEREST RATE AM AMMUT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7.00% 1983 $400,000 4.60% 1974 225,000 7.00% 1984 400,000 4.70% 1975 250,000 7.007. 1985 425,000 4.80% 1976 250,000 7.00% 1986 475,000 4.90% 1977 275,000 7.00% 1987 500,000 5.00% 1978 275,000 7.00% 1988 525,000 5.10% 1979 300,000 7.00% 1989 550,000 5.20% 1980 325,000 7.00% 1990 600,000 5.20% 1981 350,000 5.10% 1991 625,000 5.20% 1982 375,000 4.50% 1992 675,000 3.00% ;llamas M. Thiel for Merrill Lvnch. Pierce. Fenner 34th Inc. Manager Associates: Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus Premium of $1,034.25. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: ,fig AMIQUE INTEREST RAT Y868 ignaa INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7.00% 1983 $400,000 4.6% 1974 225,000 7.00% 1984 400,000 4.7% 1975 250,000 7.00% 1985 425,000 4.8% 1976 250,000 7.00% 1986 475,000 4.9% 1977 275,000 7.00% 1987 500,000 5.0% 1978 275,000 7.00% 1988 525,000 5.1% 1979 300,000 7.00% 1989 550,000 5.2% 1980 325,000 7.00% 1990 600,000 5 17. 1981 350,000 7.00% 1991 625,000 4% 1982 375,000 4 -3/470 1992 675,000 4% Tecott. Jackson. Wilson White Co. Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus no premium. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7% 1983 $400,000 4.75% 1974 225,000 7% 1984 400,000 4.75% 1975 250,000 7% 1985 425,000 5% 1976 250,000 7% 1986 475,000 5% 1977 275,000 7% 1987 500,000 5% 1978 275,000 7% 1988 525,000 5% 1979 300,000 7% 1989 550,000 5.27. 1980 325,000 7% 1990 600,000 5.2% 1981 350,000 7% 1991 625,000 5.2% 1982 375,000 7% 1992 675,000 2% The First Boston Corvoration:Bid par and accrued interest to the date of de- livery, plus Premium of $1,678.75. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: AMOUNT INTEREST RATE YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7% 1983 $400,000 5% 1974 225,000 7% 1984 400,000 5% 1975 250,000 7% 1985 425,000 5% 1976 .250,000 7% 1986 475,000 5.2% 1977 275,000 7% 1987 500,000 5.2% 1978 275,000 7% 1988 525,000 5.4% 1979 300,000 7% 1989 550,000 5.4% 1980 325,000 7% 1990 600,000 5.4% 1981 350,000 6% 1991 625,000 5.4% 1982 375,000 5% 1992 675,000 3.0% 1 72-166 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28, 1972. 1:30 P.M. Security Pacific National Bank as Agent for: Blyth Co., Inc,: Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus no Premium. Bonds to matur 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7% 1983 $400,000 4.60% 1974 225,000 7% 1984 400,000 4.75% 1975 250,000 7% 1985 425,000 4.75% 1976 250,000 7% 1986 475,000 5.0% 1977 275,000 7% 1987 500,000 5.0% 1978 275,000 7% 1988 525,000 5.10% 1979 300,000 6.4% 1989 550,000 5.20% 1980 325,000 4.3% 1990 600,000 5.20% 1981 350,000 4.5% 1991 625,000 5.25% 1982 375,000 4.5% 1992 675,000 4.0% Smith. Barney Co.. Incorporated White. Weld Company and Associates. Joint Managers: Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus Premium of $947.75. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the fol- lowing schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7% 1983 $400,000 4.70% 1974 225,000 7% 1984 400,000 4.80% 1975 250,000 7% 1985 425,000 5% 1976 250,000 7% 1986 475,000 5.10% 1977 275,000 7% 1987 500,000 5.20% 1978 275,000 7% 1988 525,000 5.25% 1979 300,000 7% 1989 550,000 5.30% 1980 325,000 7% 1990 600,000 5.30% 1981 350,000 7% 1991 625,000 4% 1982 375,000 5.70% 1992 675,000 4% Salomon Brothers and Associates: Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus Premium of $1,015.50. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of interest and in- terest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7.00% 1983 $400,000 6.707 1974 225,000 7.00% 1984 400,000 4.75% 1975 250,000 7.00% 1985 425,000 4.90% 1976 250,000 7.00% 1986 475,000 5.00% 1977 275,000 7.00% 1987 500,000 5.10% 1978 275,000 7.00% 1988 525,000 5.20% 1979 300,000 7.00% 1989 550,000 5.25% 1980 325,000 7.00% 1990 600,000 5.25% 1981 350,000 7.00% 1991 625,000 5.25% 1982 375,000 7.00% 1992 675,000 1.00% Thomas E. Morris. Goldman, Sachs Co. Manager: Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus Premium of $15.00. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the following schedule, together with the amount of inter- est and interest rates which the bonds are to bear, as follows: YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE 1973 $200,000 7.00% 1983 $400,000 4.60% 1974 225,000 7.00% 1984 400,000 4.70% 1975 250,000 7.00% 1985 425,000 4.80% 1976 250,000 7.00% 1986 475,000 4.90% 1977 275,000 7.00% 1987 500,000 5.00% 1978 275,000 7.00% 1988 525,000 5.10% 1979 300,000 7.00% 1989 550,000 5.10% 1980 325,000 5.507. 1990 600,000 5.20% 1981 350,000 4.40% 1991 625,000 5.20% 1982 375,000 4.50% 1992 675,000 4.00% City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -112: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R 112 for adoption, awarding the sale of the $8,000,000.00 Electric Revenue Ronthi to John Nuveen Company, as recommended by the City Manager. tion. Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: 0-1;/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, AWARDTNG $8,000,000.00 BONDS OF SAID CITY TO THE BEST BIDDER AND REJECTING ALL OTHER BIDS. (4.9263% Interest Rate) AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -112 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Renato Durigon, requesting permission to move a dwelling from 10630 Adoree Street, Norwalk, to 1614 Pounders Lane, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council together with report of the Development Services Department recommending said permit be granted, subject to payment of the $200.00 park and recreation in -lied fee at the time the building permit is issued. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant was present and satisfied with the recommendation of the Development Services Department, to which he re- ceived an affirmative reply. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- Mr. Hieb, 1516 Pounders Lane, who resides across the street from the proposed new location, asked if the owner would occupy the property, to which he received an affirmative reply from Mr. Durigon. Mr. Hieb stated he would have no objection to the proposed house moving if the dwelling will be brought up to Code regulations. Mayor Dutton advised him that the Development Services Department report indicates the dwelling and garage are to be remodeled to comply with Code requirements, and also that the house is equal to or better than exist- ing neighborhood homes. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R- 113: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 72R -113 for adoption, granting said house moving permit, subject to the condition recom- mended by the Development Services Department. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO RENATO DURIGON, TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 10630 ADOREE STREET, NORWALK, CALIFORNIA, TO 1614 POUNDERS LANE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-113 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC DIANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Santa Ana Police Officers Benevolent Association for permit to conduct public dance on March 30, 1972, from 10:00 P.M. to 2:00 A.M., at the Anaheim Convention Center was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that six officers be hired to police the dance, as recommended by the Chief of Po- lice, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Roth. MOTION CARRIED. L 72- 168 City Hall. Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Charles Kanenbley, on behalf of the Firemen's Association, for permit to conduct public dance March 29, 1972, from 10:30 P.M. to 12 :30 A.M., at the Anaheim Convention Center was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that six officers be hired to police the dance, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Council- man Roth. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DAME PERMIT: Application filed by Frances B. Gonzales, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana #24, for permit to conduct public dance April 2, 1972, from 4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M., at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that two officers and one matron be hired to police the dance, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOS$D AMENDMENT TO AijAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. 4.40 HYPNOTISM Request of Richard St. Charles, Director,Educational Motivation Institute, dated March 4, 1972, was submitted to amend Sections 4.40.010, 4.40.020 and 4.40.030, to remove any mention of the words "hypnotism" or hypnosis" related to the practice of this science, and also to establish a license fee to practice hypnotism. Also submitted was report of the City Attorney's office,stating the Code Sections cited are not unconstitutuional in their opinion, and re- port of the City Treasurer, making no recommendation. At the request of Councilman Thom, the Petitioner was invited to address the Council. Richard St. Charles presented a packet of material to the Council, which included correspondence and copies of Code Sections pertinent to his request. He stated he felt the City Attorney's office had misinterpreted the State Business and Professions Code in its determination that Anaheim's Code is not unconstitutional. Mr. St. Charles asked that the Council recognize the State law as it is written and not as it is interpreted, and establish a reasonable license fee to allow them to operate a school teaching self- hypnosis. Councilman Dutton stated he would like the subject continued to allow time to study the material presented by Mr. St. Charles, and to get additional information. In response to Council questioning, the City Attorney advised he had analyzed and discussed with Mr. St. Charles the request submitted, and it was his opinion Anaheim's Code is not preempted by State Law; that the practice of using hypnosis in the healing arts by doctors, dentists and others qualified to use it is preempted by State Law, but the use of hypno- sis in entertainment, which the Council permits, and utilization by teaching is not preempted. He added that teaching hypnosis for a proper purpose may be acceptable, such as to doctors or dentists; however, they are taught this in their regular curriculum. In reply to Councilman Roth, Mr. Geisler advised that, in his opin- ion, the use the Petitioner wishes to make of hypnosis would be in conflict with the existing City Ordinance. He added. that some doctors have stated hypnotism, in the hands of a layman, is extremely dangerous,, and suggested an opinion on unrelated uses of hypnosis could be solicited from the medical profession before a decision is made. Mr. St. Charles quoted a passage from Section 2908 of the State Laws, which states "Nothing in this Chapter prevents....persons utilizing hypnotic techniques by referral from persons licensed to practice medicine, dentistry or psychology, or persons utilizing hypnotic techniques which offer avocational or vocational self improvement and do not offer therapy or emotional or mental disorders." He added that they do not want to prac- tice hypnotism, but would like to teach persons to educate themselves in a motivational factor. Councilman Dutton moved the item be continued for three weeks, pending complete investigation and to obtain a report from the Orange County Medical Association on the subject. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28. 1972. 1:30 P.M. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BULK VENDING MACHINES: Reg, r. of Leo W. Weiner, Western Vending Machine Operators Association, dat.vd 1'4_h- ruary 29, 1972, was submitted to place the bulk vending industry in the cate- gory of retail businesses and have taxes on these machines levied according to gross receipts, rather than the present system of taxing individual ma- chines. Also submitted was report of the City Attorney's office, making no recommendation, but stating that since Anaheim is a Charter City, any change in such license fees is at the discretion of the City Council, and also report of the City Treasurer, stating no objection to placing this in- dustry on a gross- receipts basis provided they pay a $25.00 license fee per machine. tion. 72 169 The Council invited the Petitioner to present his arguments. Leo Weiner stated he was representing only the bulk vending mart ine operators; that only one item can be sold from a bulk vending machine, wh:.:re- as many different items can be sold from the large ones, such as candy and cigarette machines. He noted the candy machine outside the Council Chambers offered 10 columns of candy, plus a gum /lozenge column, and is licensed at $3.00 per year, whereas a sample stand he displayed of four bulk vending ma- chines with different priced items had a $9.00 tax per year; the cost of the candy machine was approximately $400.00 and averaged $1,200.00 per year re- ceipts, whereas the four machine bulk unit cost approximately $75.00 and averaged $200.00 in gross sales per year. Mr. Weiner stated he did not feel the license fees were excessive, but that the bulk vending machine industry was in the wrong classification and an operator could not stay in business on a per machine tax base, He contended the bulk vending machines have taken the place of the penny -candy counter which no longer exists, because of the high cost of labor; also, that large machines can handle multiple coins, and thus the charge can be adjusted as costs rise, whereas the bulk vending machine operator must absorb the rising costs until they have risen enough to warrant a machine that takes a larger coin. Councilman Roth stated he felt there may be a basis for a change of classification and suggested the item be continued for further investi- gation by the City Attorney and City Manager, and to draft a possible ordi- nance changing the base. Councilman Pebley advised he did not feel the bulk vending machine industry should be placed on a gross- receipts base since it would be diffi- cult to verify receipts. Mr. Weiner requested that any new ordinance drafted include a de- finition of a bulk vending machine. Lane Weitzman, 650 South Avenue 21, Los Angeles, manufacturer of bulk vending machines, asked that a determination also be made, for tax pur- poses, on the number of bulk vending machines that can be placed on one stand. By general Council consent, this item was continued for four weeks for further investigation and draft of an ordinance more equitable for the bulk vending machine business. TRAFFIC CONTROL CIRCLE SEAL CENTER: Request of Robert E. Thon, President, In- ternational City Security, Inc., dated March 8, 1972, was submitted for au- thorization to provide patrol and traffic directing services for Circle Seal Center, 1111 North Brookhurst Street, replacing Lyon's Patrol. Also submitted was report of the Chief of Police, stating no objec- RESOLUTION NO. 728-114; Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 114 for adoption, approving and authorizing International City Security, Inc. to provide patrol and traffic- directing services for Circle Seal Center. 72- 170 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTRok- IZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BETWEEN ROBERT E. THON DOING BUSINESS AS INTERNATIONAL CITY SECURITY, INC., AND TIE CITY OF ANAHEIM RELATING TO THE DEPUTIZING OF GUARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DIRECTING TRAFFIC ENTERING, LEAVING, AND TRAVERSING THAT PORTION OF BROOKHURST STREET WHICH BORDERS THE CIRCLE SEAL CENTER PROPERTY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -114 duly passed and adopted, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64 -65 -90 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Ronald J. Grudzinski, Donald L. Bren Company, dated February 28, 1972, was submitted for a retroac- tive extension of time from January 10, 1971, to January 10, 1972, and an ad- ditional extension of time to January 10, 1973, for Reclassification No. 64- 65-90, together with report of the City Engineer and report of the Development Services Department, with the following recommendations: 1. That a retroactive extension of time be granted for the period from January 10, 1971, to January 10, 1972, and an additional extension of time be granted to expire on January 10, 1973. 2. That the resolution approving the C -1 (Resolution No. 65R -469) be amended, deleting Condition No. 6 which required development substantially in accordance with plans and adding a condition requiring Council approval of development plans prior to the introduction of an ordinance reclassifying the property to C -1. Council discussion followed on the fact that the property on the east side of Imperial Highway presently is owned by the State Division of Highways and Rinker Development Corporation has indicated they have an option to purchase a portion of that property for a proposed shopping center, although that property was not included in their recent zoning and variance request. (Reclassification No. 71-72-21 and Variance No. 2310). Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that, since both parcels of property were included in the original reclassification application, at which time they were owned by a private property, they automatically are in- cluded in an extension of time; however, if an ordinance is introduced on this property the legal description would have to be amended to cover only that pro- perty which still is privately owned. Harry Merrill, representing Donald L. Bren Company, the Petitioner, advised they were requesting an extension of time on only that portion of the property on the west side of Imperial Highway. Mr. Roberts suggested an extension of time on both properties could be granted if the Council desired, or if granted only on the western property, an action terminating the eastern property and, at some time in the future when the property on the east side of Imperial Highway is ready for development a new reclassification application would then have to be filed. RESOLUTION: Councilman Roth offered a Resolution granting a one -year exten- sion of time, subject to the conditions recommended by the Development Ser- vices Department. The City Manager advised that the conditions attached to subject reclassification would have to be met only on the property owned by Applicant. Councilman Pebley expressed concern that granting a one -year exten- sion of time on the entire property may result in Rinker Development Corpora- tion being unable to develop the property on which they have an option until the extension of time has expired, and he suggested the request be continued 12 -•171 City Hall, Anaheim. California.- COUNCIL LUTES March 28. 1,972, 1:30 P.M. until after the action has been completed on the Rinker Development Corpora- tion application, scheduled for April 11, 1972. The City Attorney advised that granting the requested extension of time would not preclude the Council taking additional action on any of thy property at any time. Councilman Thom stated that, since the property east of Imperial Highway was not a part of Rinker Development Corporation's application, thi.�, extension of time should be considered for the entire original reclassifica- tion action. Following Council discussion, Councilman Roth withdrew his previous offer of Resolution. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Peble'r, Or request for an extension of time to Reclassification No. 64 65 90 was con- tinued three weeks, and if at that time the extension of time is approved, and the original resolution amended, as recommended by the Development Ser- vices Department, an additional condition is to be added permitting ordin- ances to be read on separate parcels as each parcel complies with require- ments. LOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES: Correspondence from Y. Francis Hammatt, Hammatt Sons, dated March 9, 1972, was submitted recom- mending a study on the possibility of a joint powers agreement whereby high school facilities would be coordinated with City Library staff and City book purchases to expand library services for the community. The Council requested Library Director William Griffith to present his view on these suggestions. Mr. Griffith stated he felt the closest cooperation possible between the City and schools was desirable. He advised that a small committee, of which Jack Brown, Instructional Media Consultant of the Anaheim Union High School District, is Chairman, has been discussing such projects for more than a year and the next meeting will be April 7, 1972, at which time he will pre- sent Mr. Hammatt's letter. Mr. Griffith offered to discuss the proposal with Mr. Hammatt and brief him on past discussions and also invited him to attend the April 7th meeting. No further action was taken at this time by the City Council. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission, at their meeting held March 6, 1972, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 2332 Submitted by William E. and Joy L. Ditmar, to permit a mobile home in conjunction with an existing single family residence on R -A zoned property located on the north side of Ball Road, east of Gaymont Street, west of Dale Street, and further described as 2901 West Ball Road, with wai- ver of: a. Permitted buildings, structures and uses. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -42, granted said variance for a period of three years, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2335: Submitted by George and Adele Wetherbee, to construct a family room addition to the rear portion of the existing structure on R -1 zoned property located at the northwest corner of Turin Avenue and Avocado Street, which is northeast of East Street and Bali Road, and further des- cribed as 1031 South Avocado Street, with waivers of: a. Minimum rear setback. b. Maximum coverage of the required rear yard. (Not necessary) The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -43, granted said variance, subject to conditions. 77- 1.7 2 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28 1972. 1 :30 P.M. VARIANCE NO. 2336: Submitted by Phillip G. and Marjorie L. Leipold, to per- mit an existing room addition within the required rear yard and a carport in lieu of a garage, on R -1 zoned property located on the west side of Cap- lan Street, south of Vermont Avenue, and further described as 935 South Cap- lan Street, with waivers of: a. Minimum rear yard setback. b. Minimum parking requirements. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -44, granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2160: Submitted by D.L. Woodward, The Big Brake, requesting a six -month extension of time to complete conditions for the establishment of a brake servicing shop on C-1 zoned property located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a two -year retro- active and future extension of time to expire October 2, 1972. VARIANCE NO. 2286: Submitted by Bill Silzle, E.A. Silzle Company, Inc., re- questing a 180 -day extension of time to comply with conditions to allow a proposed warehouse on M-1 zoned property located on the west side of Atchi- son Street, south of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a one -year exten- sion of time to expire February 9, 1973. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 937: Submitted by Aleen Aganowitz, Speech and Language Development Center, requesting a three -year extension of time for the expansion of a speech and language therapy center on R -A zoned property located on the west side of Loara Street, between Lincoln Avenue and Broad- way. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a three -year ex- tension of time to expire April 24, 1975. CONDITIONAL USE N' T NO. 1130 Submitted by T. Eugene Dahlgran, Martin Luther Hospital, requesting a six -month extension of time to comply with conditions for the expansion of the existing Martin Luther Hospital complex on R -3 zoned property located on the south side of Romneya Drive, west of Euclid Street. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a one -year ex- tension of time to expire January 25, 1973. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1281: Resolution No. PC72 -46, amending Condition No. 12 of Resolution No. PC71-245, required landscaping to be provided in accordance with the C -1 (SC) Zone, to establish a restaurant on R -A Zoned property located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway. (Resolution of Intent to M 1 65- 66 -25) The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -46, amended Condition No. 12 (landscaping) of Resolution No. PC71-245, granting said conditional use permit. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1287: Resolution No. PC72-45, amending Condition No. 2 of Resolution No. PC72 -29, limiting hours of operation for an Italian restaurant on C-1 zoned property located at the northeast corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Tustin Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -45, amended Condition No. 2 of Resolution No. PC72 -29, amending the permitted hours of operation to allow the establishment to remain open until 11 :00 P.M., on Thursday, Friday and Saturday. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council, and no further action taken. 7 72- 173 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28, 1972, 1:30 P.M. TENTATIVE MAPS. TRACTS NOS. 7754 (RECLASSIFICATION N0 7 -72 -31 AND VARIANCE NO. 2333 5162, REVISION NO. 4 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1295): 7728, (RE- CLASSIFICATION' NO. 71 -72 -37 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1297): TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7754: Developer Adam Gittelson. Property located on the east side of Sunkist Street, south of South Street, containing 33 proposed R -1 zoned lots. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5162, REVISION NO. 4: Owner Everett Miller. Property located on the north side of Ball Road, east of Brookhurst Street, contain- ing 112 proposed R -3 zoned lots. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7728: Developer Stanley E. Bell. Property located on the north side of Broadway, east of Magnolia Avenue, containing 31 pro- posed R -3 zoned lots. Councilman Roth moved that action be deferred to be considered with zoning applications. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAPS. TRACTS NOS. 7785, 7786 ANp 7787 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71- 72 -5): Developer Ponderosa Homes. Property located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, at Walnut Canyon Road, and contains: Tract No. 7785 59 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots. Tract No. 7786 77 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots. Tract No. 7787 51 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held March 22, 1972, by Motion, denied said tentative tracts. In reply to Council questioning, Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson advised that the suggested amended R -2 -5,000 develop- ment standards will be considered by the City Planning at their April 3, 1972 meeting. Larry Matzick, representing the Developer, advised that subject tracts were a re- subdivision of Tract No. 7485 (Tentative Map approved for R -2 -5,000 lots, September 14, 1971); however, subsequently the owner of the property between the Riverside Freeway and the now proposed tracts Nos. 7785 and 7786, on which they have had an option, reached an agreement with another developer, necessitating the filing of these different tract maps. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Matzick stated his company would stipulate to conform to any R -2 -5,000 Site Development Standards the Council may adopt, after consideration of those being presented to the City Planning Commission shortly. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Roth, Ten- tative Maps, Tracts Nos. 7785, 7766 and 7787 were approved, subject to the following Interdepartmental Committee recommendations, and stipulation by the Developer that he will conform to the extent practicable with any new R -2 -5,000 Site Development Standards. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "No. TENTATIVE NAP. TRACT NO. 7785: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7785 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -5. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings to Santa Ana Canyon Road, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the south property line separating Lot Nos. 38 and 39 and Santa Ana Canyon Road. Reasonable landscaping, including irriga- tion facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. T 72 -174 City Hall. Anaheim, Californ &a carpal, MINUTES Mach 28. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 5. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 6. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the offfice of the Orange County Recorder. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the build- ing permit is issued. 9. That the drainage from Tract No. 7785 shall be conducted to the point of its ultimate disposal in a manner satisfactory to the City En- gineer. Should a drainage reimbursement district be formed which includes subject tract, the developer of Tract No. 7785 shall participate in said 10. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control Dist- rict. 11. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and unpaved portion of the Santa Ana Canyon Road parkway in accordance with plans. Plans for said landscaping to be sub- mitted to and approved by the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsi- bility for maintenance of said landscaping. 12. The City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the as- sumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 13. That a modified cul -de -sac shall be constructed at the easterly end of Street "D". 14. That final elevations and floor plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council prior to Council approval of the final map. TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 7786: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7786 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -5. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings to Santa Ana Canyon Road and Street "A shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the south property line separating lot Nos. 39 through 53 and Santa Ana Canyon Road. Reasonable landscaping, including ir- rigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the ar- terial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said land- scaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 5. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the west property line separating Lot Nos. 53 through 56 and Lot No. 77 and Street "A" 6. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 7. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 8. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 10. That the drainage from Tract No 7786 shall be conducted to the point of its ultimate disposal in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. Should a drainage reimbursement district be formed which includes subject tract, the developer of Tract No. 7786 shall participate in said district. 11. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control District. 12. That a left-t rn ocket for eas bound trfff�ic shall be provided at the Santa Ana Canyon nom' intersection with Street A MOTION CARRIED. 72 -1.75 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. 13. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and unpaved portion of the Santa Ana Canyon, Road parkway in accordance with plans. Plans for said landscaping to be sub- mitted to and approved by the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Followini. installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsi- bility for maintenance of said landscaping. 14. The City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the as- sumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 15. That final elevations and floor plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council prior to Council approval of the final map. TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 7787: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7787 is gran- ted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -5. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to Santa Ana Canyon Road, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the south property line separating Lot Nos. 36 through 42 and Santa Ana Canyon Road. Reasonable landscaping, including ir- rigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the ar- terial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said land- scaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 5. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 6. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 9. That the drainage from Tract No. 7787 shall be conducted to the point of its ultimate disposal in a manner satisfactory to the City En- gineer. Should a drainage reimbursement district be formed which includes subject tract, the developer of Tract No. 7787 shall participate in said district. 10. That the developer shall obtain a favorable flood hazard letter acceptable to the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Flood Control Dist- rict. 11. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and unpaved portion of the Santa Ana Canyon Road parkway in accordance with plans. Plans for said landscaping to be sub- mitted to and approved by the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsi- bility for maintenance of said landscaping. 12. The City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the as- sumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 13. That final elevations and floor plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council prior to Council approval of the final map. FINAL MAP. TRACT NO. 7448 (RECLAS IFICATION NO, 70-71 -57): Developer Covington Brothers. Property located on the south side of Ball Road, east of Belhaven Street, containing 32 proposed R-3 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said Final Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map previous approved; that bond has been posted and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required fees paid. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7448 be approved, subject to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 72 -176 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70 -58(1) EX NSION OF TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT: The City Clerk submitted a request from George H. Drayton, President of Drayton, Inc., dated March 27, 1972, for an extension of time to the temporary occu- pancy of his building at 2836 East La Palma Avenue. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, a 30- day extension of time was granted to expire April 30, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REOUjp ANAHEIM BILLS. INC.: Referring to Council action March 21, 1972, at which it was determined Sign No. 4, requested by Anaheim Hills, Inc., would require a variance application, Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that Anaheim Hills, Inc. subsequently had indicated they would exclude any refer- ence to model homes on this proposed sign, in which case a variance may not be necessary. He submitted a photograph of an artist's rendering of the original sign and a report from Development Services Department recommending: 1. That the sign be only directional in nature and not used for promotion of sales activity in the Anaheim Hills area. 2. That the City Council shall review and approve any signing above and beyond the simple placement of the Anaheim Hills logo and the words "Anaheim Hills" and /or "Anaheim Hills Golf Course." MOTIQN: Councilman Stephenson offered a motion to approve Sign No. 4, as recommended by the Development Services Department. James L. Barisic, representing Anaheim Hills, Inc., stated it defi- nitely is not intended at any time to advertise specific real estate develop- ments in the Anaheim Hills area on this sign, but to use the sign exclusively for directions; therefore, he requested Condition No. 2, recommended by the Development Services Department, be amended to allow the Development Services Department Staff to approve any additional lettering on the sign, since there will be a number of areas developing, such as an Equestrian Center and other recreational areas. Councilman Dutton commented that it would be just as easy to submit any changes to the Council, Councilman Miley stated he could see no objection to having the signs give d.reexions to the model homes. Following Council discussion, Councilman Stephenson amended his mo- tion to approve Sign No. 4 as a directional and non commercial sign, subject to the conditions recommended by the Development Services Department, amend- ing Condition No. 2 to allow approval of any additional wording by the Develop- ment Services Department, rather than the City Council. Councilman Roth se- conded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-115 WORK ORDER NO. 1239: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -115 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE WALNUT CANYON SEWER IMF PROVEMENT, PHASE II, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, W3RE ORDER NO. 1239. APPROV- ING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CON- STRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened April 20, 1972, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -115 duly passed and adopted. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28, 1972. 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -116 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Stephenson offered Reso- lution No. 72R -116 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Maurice,, M. Lebanoff and Carole Nadine Lebanoff) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -116 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT SMALL RIDING MOWER: The City Manager reported that one bid had been received for a Small Riding Mower, as follows, and recommended purchase be authorized: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT. INCLUDING TAX B. Hayman Company, Santa Fe Springs $4,588.50 Park Turf Equipment NO QUOTE Toro Pacific NO QUOTE Westpoint Industries NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the bid of B. Hayman Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $4,588.50, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF SERVICES STAND•BY AMBULANCE SERVICE, STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for Stand -by Ambulance Service at the Stadium and Convention Center for a three -year period, as follows: VENDOR COST PER HOUR Mission Ambulance, Orange $10.00 Southland Ambulance, Buena Park 11.00 Schaefer Ambulance, Santa Ana 12.50 Morgan K M Ambulance NO QUOTE Bowers Ambulance NO QUOTE In reply to Council questioning, Mt. Murdoch advised that the Cali- fornia Angels pay 1007. of the cost of ambulance stand -by service for their events, and submitted a letter from them stating they are satisfied with the service presently being provided by Southland Ambulance and because of past performance, would rather stay with them even though they were not the low bidder. Inasmuch as Southland Ambulance Service was not the low bidder and they are the preference of the major tenant of the Stadium, Mr. Murdoch recommended each individual user of the facilities carry their own obliga- tion and provide for their own services. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, all bids were rejected, each event to contract for their own ambulance stand -by service. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson: a. Claim filed by Jones /Peterson Associates, Inc., for purported personal property damages sustained as result of a City sewer main in alley plugging up and causing an overflow, on or about March 10, 1972. b. Claim filed by Mrs. Kathy Harris, for purported personal property damages sustained as result of blockage in the City sewer system, on or about March 11, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. 72 -177 72 -178 City Hall. Anaheim. Cakifor a QOUI[CIy MINUTES March 28. 1972 1:30 P.M. APPLICATION TO FILE LATE CLAIM: It was moved by Councilman Thom that permission to present late claim submitted by Donald T. Scher, Attorney at Law, on be- half of Jo Ella Challender for purported personal injuries sustained on or about August 8, 1971, be denied, as recommended by the City Attorney's of- fice. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom:' a. City of Garden Grove ,Resolution No. 4313 -72 Urging the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of Cali- fornia to support an increase in the amount of funds now being set aside for undergrounding of existing utility lines. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3019: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3019 for adop- tion. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking At Any Time (79) Portions of Magnolia Avenue, (80) Portions of Rampart Street.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILi: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3019 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE $0. 3020: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3020 for adop- tion. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67 -68 -13(5) R -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3020 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3021: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 3021 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. ((81) Portions of Ball Road) RESOI,IUTIOI NO. 72R -117 KATHRYN-LINDSAY ANNEXATION (INHABITED): Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 72R -117 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE A PETITION RELATING TO THE ANNEXA- TION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION THEREOF, AND APPROVING THE CIRCULATION OF SAID PETITION. (KATHRYN- LINDSAY ANNEXATION INHABITED) Signed Roll Call Vote: 72-179 City Hall. Anaheim, California COUNCIL MSS ;.march 28. 1972 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -117 duly passed and adopted. JUAREZ PARK GATE: Councilman Pebley reported on phone calls received, stating the gate to the Juarez Park property is broken and motorcyclists and mini bike riders have been using it for their activities. He asked that the gate be repaired. FREEWAY LANDSCAPING: Mayor Dutton noted that the Freeways through Anaheim that are completed are no longer landscaped, as was the practice at one time. He questioned why. City Engineer James P. Maddox advised they have discussed this with the State Division of Highways and were informed there generally were not sufficient funds to landscape after a Freeway is completed, since it no lone ger is a part of the Freeway construction contract. Council discussion followed, and it was determined members of the City Council would request Freeway landscaping by the State Division of High- ways, and the Chamber of Commerce and surrounding cities also would be asked to assist in this project. REPORT ON TRIP: Mayor Dutton reported on his recent trip to Washington, D.C., to appear before the Civil Aeronautics Board in connection with the resump- tion of helicopter service. ADJOURNVENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 3:30 P.M. City Clerk