Loading...
1969/01/2169-33 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A~ Murdoch DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Schutte led the Assembly in the Pledge of Alle- giance to the Flag. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held January 7, 1969, were approved as corrected, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. MINUTES CORRECTION: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Clerk was authorized to amend the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held December 17, 1968, Page 68-743, under Resolution No. 68R-764, (granting Variance No. 2029), as requested by the applicant, thereby deleting the following from Condition No. 2: " ....... provided that the plans for the southerly portion shall conform to the maximum lot coverage provisions of the R-3, Zone~" MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Clark moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $854,330°63, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-49 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. ~.1~ (TENTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 6812, REVISION NO. 1; 6824, REVISION NO. 1 AND 6825): RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-49: Submitted by Incentive Aid Foundation, re- questing a change in ~c',~ from M-1 to R-2, 5,000, on Parcel No. 1, and M-1 to R-3 on Parcel No. 2, (Parcel No. 3 to remain M-l). Parcels located generally north and east of East Street and Ball Road. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68- 361, recommended said Reclassification be approved, subject to the condi- tion that a Final Tra~ Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91 (READVERTISED): Initiated by the City Plann- ing Commission to review present land use policies and consider a possible change in land use symbology from low density residential and general in- dustrial to low-medium, medium density residential, and general industrial within the general area defined as west of State College Boulevard, north of Ball Road, west of East Street, and south of Vermont Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. ?C68- 358, reco~ended that said General Plan Amendment be approved in accord- ance with Exhibit "C"~ Assistant Development Services Director Ronald Thompson noted the location of the subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant was present and wished to address the City Council~ 69-34 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January, 1:30 P.M. Mr. CoM. Jones, Secretary-Treasurer cf C. Michael, Inc., Developer, showed slides of their recently completed unit at State College Boulevard and Ball Road, which he reported was completely sold in less than sixty days. He noted that the second unit, which is in. the plastering stage, is more than forty percent sold. He outlined several new features that will be offered in the proposed development, such as more elaborate elevations, staggered setbacks, four different roof designs, three colors of composition roofing, with shake roofs on ten percent of the homes~ He called attention to Exhibits 1, 2, and 4 posted on the east wall, depicting three alternate entry' patterns for Tract Nos. 6812 and 6824, and requested that these tentative c~ be approved subject to final approval of the traffic entry and circulation pa~tern by the City En- gineer. Mr. George Page, owner of the subject property, approved of subject reclassification and requested certain modifications be made to the location of entries to the two tracts to comply with requests made by Mr. Kilroy, an adjacent property owner. Mrs. Ann Madison, of Madison Real Estate, reported the results of a survey she conducted which indicated that all home owners adjacent to the subject property favor R-1 or R-2, 5,000 zoning on Parcel 1. She subm~ted letters from residents and businessmen in the area supporting the proposed development, and quoted from an article which appeared in the Santa Ana Regis- ter in December, 1967, which described the need for this type of housing in areas wishing to attract new industry° She noted that East Street provides an effective buffer between the proposed residential land use and the indus- trial use to the east. Mr. Bill McKay, of Sargent-Welch Scientific Company, 1617 East Ball Road, stated that he had no objection to the proposed homes, as it was appar- ent that the property would be developed for a use other than M-l, and re- quested that the R-2, 5,000 zone be extended southerly to the north boundary of their property. He further stated that he opposed the small size of the M-1 lots on Ball Road, (Parcel No. 3, Tract No. 6825) and felt that larger M-1 lots would be more compatible with the area. Mr. Jones agreed that the lots in the M-1 tract were small, and further agreed that as far as the lot lines were concerned they could be moved to provide larger lots. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. receiving no response, declared the hearing closed. ' Mr. Thompson noted that lot lines could be redrawn within the exist- ing boundaries of the M-1 parcel ~,~ resubmitted for Council approval; however, boundaries of the M-1 parcel itself could not be changed without initiating an additional zoning action. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-38: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-38 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission, subject to the condition that Final Tract Maps of the subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (68-69-49 - R-2 5,000 and R-3). ' Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None N~ne The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 69R-38 duly passed and adopted. 69-35 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-39: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 69R-39 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 91, Exhibit "C", as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT '"" '~"~E GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS A~N?'~EUT i!O. 9!. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-39 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 6812~ REVISION NO. 1: Developer - C. Michael, Inc., tract located on the east side of East Street, north of Ball Road, containing 109 proposed R-2, 5,000 zoned lots. (Parcel No. 1). The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held December 16, 1968, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6812, Revision No. 1, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68-69-49. 3. That Streets "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E" shall be named Clifpark Way, Clif~ark Circle, Dover Circle, Avocado Way and King Circle. 4o That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the west property line separating Lot Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 106, 107, 108 and !_09 and East Street. Reasonable landscaping, in- cluding irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Super- intendent of Parkway Maintenance° FoIlowing installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said land- scaping. 5o That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to East Street from Lot Nos. 4, 106, 107, 108 and 109 shall be dedi- cated to the City of Anaheim° 6° That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 7. That access to McCloud Street shall be acquired prior to approv- al of Tract No. 6812, Revision NOo 1, by the City Council. 8. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satis- factory to the City Engineer. Councilman Krein moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6812, Revision No. 1, be approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commis- sion and further subject to final approval of the traffic entry and circula- tion pattern by the City Engineer. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6824, REVIglON NO. 1: Developer - C. Michael, %nc.; tract located on the east side of East Street, north of Ball Road, containing one proposed R-3 zoned lot, (Parcel No. 2). The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held December 16, 1968, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 69-36 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California ~, COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969~ 1:30 PoM. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract NOo 6824, Revision No. 1, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No~ 68-69-49. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the nor- therly and east~l, ly lines of Lot NOo 1. 5. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satis- factory to the City Engineer. Councilman Krein moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6824, Revision No. 1, be approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commis- sion and further subject to final approval of the traffic entry and circula- tion pattern by the City Engineer. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 6825: Developer - Co Michael, Inc.; tract located on the north side of Ball Road, east of East Street, containing 10 proposed M-1 lots, (Parcel No. 3). On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, action on said Tentative Map was deferred to February 18, 1969, 1:30 P.M., for possible revision of lot sizes. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-53 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1078: Cubmitted by Everett and Grace Koontz, requesting a change in zone from R-A to C-1 and permission to establish a walk-up restaurant with waivers of lo- cation of a free-standing sign and tree screen along zone boundary. Property located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Broadview Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-364, recommended said Reclassification be approved, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engin- eering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue, and Echo Place, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drain- age facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2. That all access rights to Echo Place shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue,for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Lincoln Avenue, for tree plant- ing purposes° 5. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted, to guarantee the installation of an 8-foot masonry wall at such time as the City shall require it, along the south and east property lines and along the southeast adjacent to the Echo Place property line. 6o That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 9. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residen- tial homes. 10. That the parking areas shall be lighted with down-lighting a maximum 6-feet in height, and shall be directed away from the property lines to the south and east to protect the residential integrity of the area. 11. That Condition Nos° 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 69-37 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68- 365, denied .,~':,''~:c.~a]_ "'r'~ .~,. 178. Mr. Thompson noted the location of the subject property, the ex- isting uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence sub- mitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that the Conditional Use Permit was denied on the basis that the proposed use is heavier and more intense than the present uses in the surrounding area, and the City Planning Commission felt that a less intense commercial use would be more desirable. Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr. Harry Jobe, of Percy H. Goodwin Company, 1808 West Lincoln Avenue, representing the owners, spoke in favor of the requested zoning and use, and stated that he felt the proposed development, a Carl's Jr. restaurant, would be compatible with the surrounding area. Mayor Pebley noted that Carl Karcher, President of Carl Karcher Enterprises, served as his Finance Chairman during the last City Council election ca~}}aign, and because of possible conflict of interest, thereupon withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue. Mayor Pro-tem Schutte assumed Chairmanship of the meeting. Mrs. Grace Koontz, owner of the subject property, stated that many offers had been received for the property during the last few years, and she believed that the proposed development would be in the best interests of the community and the City. Mr. Frank Karcher, Vice-president of Carl Karcher Enterprises, outlined the nature of operation of the proposed restaurant, and submitted pictures of a similar development, noting that the building is designed to be compatible with both residential and commercial areas. (Pictures were later returned to Mr. Karcher). He called attention to the interior view, noting that the dining facilities seat 65 people, and would therefore para- llel a coffee shop operation rather than the typical walk-up, drive-in type operation. He estimated that 75 to 80 percent of the food served will be eaten on the premises. He noted that of the 4 operations in Anaheim two of the Carl's Jr. restaurants are located next to residential property, and stated that no serious complaints have been received at these locations. He further felt that the noise created by the operation of the proposed res- taurant would be no greater than any other normal business permitted in a C-1 zone, and that the odors created would be of a pleasant nature. Hours of operation would be from 10:00 or 11:00 A.M. to 10:00 or 11:00 P.M. In response to fears expressed at the City Planning Commission ]ublic hearing, Mr. Karcher stated that there are presently 25 Carl's Jr. resta~.~rants in operation, and that there has been no teenage problem in any of these locations; that if such a problem threatened to develop at any of their locations,off-duty police officers would be employed to deter the congregation of teenagers. He noted that the management is especially trained to handle such situations before a problem develops. Mr. Dick Tevlin, 106 Echo Place, stated that he does not oppose commercial zoning on the subject property, but is in opposition to the Con- ditional Use Permit application. He objected to the indefinite statement of the proposed hours of operation, and also stated that at the City Plann- ing Commission hearing it was stated that the proposed development is only one operation which is planned for the subject property; that it is his understanding that a roast beef restaurant will also be proposed at a later date. He felt that in view of the location of other similar food handling operations in the general area, there was no need for this type of commer- cial enterprise on the subject property. He felt that the outdoor eating area and service window is not compatible with the adjacent R-1 land use, and noted that five or six residential parcels border the subject property. 69-38 City Hall~ Anaheim? California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. Mrs. Donna Nelson, 111 Echo Place, also opposed the Conditional Use Permit, and called attention to the fact that the back door of her residence is situated four feet from the subject property line. She felt that there was no need for the proposed development in that location, and that it would be incompatible to the area. She requested that if the application is granted, that a block wall, 8 feet in height be required. Mr. Jim Chavos, 1903 Embassy, stated he is not opposed to commercial zoning, but objected to the proposed use. He noted that this is not a permitted use in the C-1 zone, and described the traffic circulation pattern in the area which he felt would become hazardous if the Conditional Use Permit is granted. He felt that no hardship exists which would justify granting the Conditional Use Permit, and requested that the property be required to develop in a manner that would not be detrimental to the home owners in the area. Mr. Joseph Pynn, 110 Echo Place, also expressed opposition to the proposed use, specifically objecting to the noise that would be generated, and in answer to Councilman Clark's inquiry stated that he would continue to oppose the use even if the business hours were curtailed to no later than 9:00 P.M. In rebuttal, Mr. Jobe noted that the potential traffic hazards described ea~"'~:rwere not applicable; it will not be necessary to make a U-turn in order to enter the subject property from the west-bound lane on Lincoln Avenue, as 60 feet of the Lincoln Avenue frontage is located opposite the intersection of Muller Street. He further noted that several successful businesses have been developed on streets where center dividers limit traffic access from one direc- tion only. Regarding additional development plans on the subject property, Mr. Karcher stated that nothing is contemplated at this time. He noted that the proposed 48 ft. x 45 ft. building is to be located very near the center of the parcel, which would leave very little space suitable for any future development. He reported that the problem of traffic flow is being resolved with the City Engineer. He pointed out that a full fledged restaurant, which is permitted by right in the C-1 zone, could operate until 2:00 A.M., serve alcoholic bev- erages, and would in all probability receive as many requests for take-out orders as this requested operation. He noted that all access to Echo Place would be prohibited, and agreed to construction of an 8 ft. masonry wall to protect adjacent homeowners. He explained that overhead lighting would be properly shielded, and requested that the 6-foot height limitation be waived to allow the installation of their nor- mal lighting, 10 feet in height, as was approved for their location at 2119 South Harbor Boulevard. In answer to Mr. Tev~in, he stated that methods of operation have changed in response to public demand, and self-service is more popular today than car service. Mayor Pebley felt that sufficient evidence from those present had been received and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-40: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-40 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69- 53 - C-l). Roll Call Vote: 69-39 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21, 1969, 1:30 P.M. AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Schutte None Pebley None The Mayor Pro-tem declared Resolution No. 69R-40 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION: Councilman Krein offered a resolution for adoption granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1078, subject to the conditions recommended by the Inter~!e?~r~mental C¢~ittee. Vote: The foregoing resolution failed to carry by the following Roll Call AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Krein Clark and Schutte Pebley None Mayor Pebley returned to the Council table and resumed Chairman- ship of the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-54 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1080: Submitted by Century Properties, requesting a change in zone from R-A to C-1 and to permit On-Sale Beer and Wine in a proposed restaurant, with wai- ver of location of a free-standing sign; property located on the east side of Stanton Avenue, north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-366, recommended said reclassification be approved, sukject to the following con- ditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land that varies from 30 feet to 44 feet in width, from the centerline of the street along Stanton Avenue, for street widening pur- poses. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Stanton Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Stanton Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Stanton Avenue, for tree plant- ing purposes. 5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur- ther time as the City Council may grant. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-367, granted said Conditional Use Permit in part, denying requested waivers of maximum height of free-standing sign and location of a free-standing sign, and approved the sale of beer and wine in the proposed restaurant, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-54. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mir. ad to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east property line. 69-40 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21, 1969, 1:30 PoMo 5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 6. That parking areas shall be lighted with down-lighting a maximum 6-feet in height and shall be directed away from the property lines. 7. That Condition Nos° 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Ex- hibit Nos° 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Mr. Thompson noted the location of the subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Pebley asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative reply. He then asked if anyone else present wished to address the City Council, and receiving no response declared the hearing closed. RES£LUTION NO. 69R-41: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-41 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AI~AHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69- 54 - C-l). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-41 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO0 69R-42: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-42 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1080, in part, as recommended by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1080. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-Z~2 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-55 ~TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6820): Submitted by Richard W~ Henning, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-2, 5,000 and R-I; property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Rio Vista Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-360, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the condition that a final tract map of subject property be approved by the City Council and re- corded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 69-41 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Thompson noted the location of the subject property, the ex- isting uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence sub- mitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant was present and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative response° He then asked if anyone else present wished to address the City Council, and receiving no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION ~0o 69R-43: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-43 for adoption~ authorizing 7raparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-55 - R-2, 5,000 and R-l). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-43 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NOo 6820: Developer - Downey Saving and Loan Associa- tion; tract located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Rio Vista Street, containing 9 proposed R-1 zoned lots, and 39 proposed R-2, 5,000 .~ned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held December 16, 1968, approved said Tentative !.lap, subject to the following conditions: 1o That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval° 2o That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6820 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68-69-55. 3. That Street "A" shall be named Alice Way and Streets "B" and "C" shall be named Barbara Way. 4. That in accordance with City Council policy a 6-foot masonry wall be constructed on the south property line separating Lot Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 45 through 48, and Lincoln Avenue° Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superin- tendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 5. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to Lincoln Avenue, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6~ That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities~ 7. That Street "B" shall be improved as a 40-foot roadway within a 60-foot right-of-way° 8~ That Street "C" shall align with "E" Street in adjacent Tenta- tive Tract NOo 6647. 9. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satis- factory to the City Engineer. Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6820 be ap- proved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Councilman Krein seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. 69-42 City Hall, Anaheim, California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES .- January 21, 1969, 1:30 PoM. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-56: Initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider a change in zone from A-l, Agriculture District (County), to C-l, General Commercial~ property located on the north side of Ball Road, east of Sunkist Street° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Noo PC68- 368, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facili- ties, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guar- antee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road, for street light- ing purposes. 3. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be re- corded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road, for tree planting purposes. 5. That the alignment of the parcel property line where adjacent to the Orange Freeway shall be approved by the State Division of Highways. 6. Drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satisfac- tory to the City Engineer. 7. That Condition Nos. 1~ 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That Condition No. 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Mro Thompson noted that the subject property was designated for commercial land use, pursuant to General Plan Amendment Noo 110, but the legal description of the property was omitted from the advertisement for Reclassification No. 68-69-29, heard in conjunction therewith° Mayor Pebley asked if the owner of the subject property was pres- ent and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative reply. He then asked if anyone in op- position wished to address the City Council, and receiving no response, de- clared the hearing closed° RESOLUTION NO. 69R-44: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-44 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE Aiiglf?~ED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-56 - C-i). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-44 duly passed and adopted. 69-43 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. ? PUBLIC DISCUSSION - PARKS AND RECREATION IN LIEU FEES: Public ~iscussion of Parks and Recreation In Lieu Fees, continued from the meeting of January 7, 1969, to this date at the request of the Building Industry Association, was held to consider an adjustment of in lieu fees established pursuant to Res~ [ution Nos. 68R-659, 661 and 662. The C .~y Manager reported on a meeting with representatives of the Building Industry Association, the Anaheim Board of Realtors, and the Mobile Home Association, at which time these organizations recommended the follow- ing In Lieu Fee Schedule for consideration: $100.00 for each Single-family dwelling unit; $50.00 for each Multiple-family dwelling unit; and $35.00 for each Mobile Home space; the foregoing fees to remain in effect for two years, at the end of which time it would again be reviewed with interested members of the building industry. Mr. Murdoch noted that a subsequent review of the predicted con- struction rate of parks indicates that a reduction in the fees established by Resolution No. 68R-659, ($250.00, $150.00 and $100.00), would be reason- able; however, his recommendation is to reduce fees as follows: $125.00 for each Single-family dwelling unit; $75.00 for each Multiple-family dwelling unit; and $50.00 for each Mobile Home space. He noted that this fee schedule would effect a 50% reduction of the fees previously adopted in October, 1968. He felt that any further reduction would be detrimental to the park program; and he further recommended that the new fee schedule, if adopted, be reviewed at the end of one year. Mr. Murdoch noted that Resolution Nos. 68R-661 and 68R-662 allowed applicants to pay the previously established fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit if proceedings in the City were commenced prior to October 22, 1968, and ad- ministrative processing is completed and fees paid by May 1, 1969. He felt it would not be appropriate to apply the previous fee unless construction is immanent, and thereupon recommended that fees be payable at the time a build- ing permit is issued; noting that a building permit is valid for sixty days, and if construction is not commenced during that time, a new building permit must be acquired which would be subject to the new fee schedule. In cases where fees have already been paid in the amounts estab- lished pursuant to Resolution No. 68R-659, Mr. Murdoch recommended that the difference between the amount paid and the new schedule of fees, as adopted by the City Council, be refunded. He suggested that all building permits issued before March 1, 1969 be eligible for payment of In Lieu Fees under the previous rate ($25.00) ~, and all those issued after March 1, 1969, be subject to the new rate. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone in the audience wished to address the City Council. Mr. Royce Coln, representing the Building Industry Association, stated that the Building Industry Association would not interpose an objec- tion to the fee schedule recommended by Mr. Murdoch, and concurred with his recommendation that fees be paid in conjunction with the issuance of a build- ing permit° However, he suggested that the date of May 1, 1969, rather than March 1, 1969, be used as the deadline to aalify for fees under the old schedule. Mr. Marc Andrews, representing the Anaheim Board of Realtors, stated he is also fully in accord with the recommendations of the City Mana- ger, with the exception of the effective date, which he felt should be May 1, 1969. He requested and received clarification from the City Manager that under the proposed provisions, building permits must be obtained before the date specified in order to qualify for payment of In Lieu Fees under the old rate, even if the tentative tract map was approved or zoning action was in process prior to October 22, 1968. Mr. John Seymour, President of the Anaheim Board of Realtors, re- quested that the same groups again be invited to participate in any future review of the fee schedule. The City Council indicated this procedure would be followed. 69-44 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969, 1:30 PoM. In the ensuing discussion, Council indicated they favored maintain- ing the date of May 1, 1969, as the deadline to qualify for fees under the old schedule, with fees to be payable upon issuance of the building permit ~zm- ~s~-~c~s-~-~s~s-~~r~i~r-~-~)c~t~q~-~-R~, as recommended by the City Manager. Mro Larry Armour, 2731 West Lincoln Avenue, addressed the City Coun- cil in opposition, particularly to the change in the method of payment in or- der to qualify under the old fee. In his opinion, payment of the fees by May 1, 1969, on those cases in administrative process prior to October 22, 1968, should be at the discretion of the developer and not tied in to obtaining a building permit. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-45: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-45 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS IN CJ ........... ~Y WITH VARIANCES, RECLASSIFICATIONS, TRACT MAPS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND TRAILER PARKS. (Parks and Recreation In Lieu Fees - Amends 68R-659 and Supersedes 68R-661 and 68R-662). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 69R-45 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED CODE OF ETHICS: Consideration of a proposed Code of Ethics was continued from the meeting of January 7, 1969, to this date for a full Council. Councilman Clark noted that a bill has been prepared and is expected to be introduced this month in the State Legislature relating to conflicts of interest, which would affect municipalities and their government. He pointed out that there are only five cities in the State of California that have adopted a code of ethics, and felt that in view of the pending legislation, no action by the City Council should be taken at this time. He thereupon moved that the matter be tabled pending action of the State Legislature during this session. Councilman Krein seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - COMMUNITY FAIR: Request of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce for waiver of all license fees for rides and game booths in connec- tion with the Community i~'.~ to be held February 13, 14, 15, and 16, 1969, near the corner of Euclid Street and Katella Avenue was submitted, together with recommendations of the Development Services Department that said request be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Posting of a $100.00 cash clean-up bond with the Director of Public Works. 2. Compliance with electrical and building codes. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Clark, said request was approved as recommended by the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by Mr. Herbert A. Stenberg~ for entertain- ment permit to allow a guitar player or a piano player or a combination of both at the !lorn O' Plenty Restaurant Jester Room, 2219 and 2221 West Ball Road, was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to the pro- visions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED° DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT: Application filed by Mr o Sidney Binder for permit to allow dinner dancing at Robins Restaurant, 2970 West Lincoln Avenue, was sub- mitted and granted, subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. 69-45 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. REQUEST - ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION: Correspondence dated January 3, 1969, from the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association was submitted re- questing Council consideration of (1) a proposed revision of Rule 3 of the Personnel Procedure regarding survey information in setting compensation to include governmental data of comparable public positions as well as private employment and the data obtained from the benchmark cities, and (2) author- ization of eight man-days for attendance by Anaheim Municipal Employees Association representatives at employee conferences. The City Manager outlined present City policies covering these areas, and regarding the first request, felt the request was appropriate; however, felt that the issue should be deferred to allow his office an op- portunity to ~repare an analysis, not necessarily a recommendation, of the implications of the subject request should the policy be changed. As to the second request, Mr. Murdoch felt this was contrary to any current policy in effect, and being a matter discussed and dropped during negotiations, any action on this request at this time would be inappro]~r~e. Mr. Murdoch briefly' explained how this problem was handled by other associa- tions and unions representing employees within city governme~a. Mr. Jake Petrosino, President of the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, addressed the City Council in support of the requests. He felt the proposals were timely, and urged consideration of the first request prior to October, to facilitate preparation of the salary survey for this year. He explained that many positions within the City were not comparable with private industry; however, they do have counterparts in public employment. He further advised that the association has commenced their salary survey for next year and this was the reason for the requested amendment to Rule 3 at this time° The City Manager indicated he could probably analyze and report to the City Council on the first request in approximately six weeks, and that he would instruct the City Clerk when the item is to be scheduled on the agenda. In support of the second request, Mr. Petrosino noted that there are two leadership and training programs offered ~ach year, which the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association would like four members to attend. The first conference is this coming April, sponsored by the Associated California Em- ployees. The three-day conferences begin on Fridays, which would involve the loss of one working day for each member attending. He pointed out that offi- cers of the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association are laymen, serving on a ~.iunteer basis without pay, whereas unions have paid representatives, and requested that the City Council take this into consideration in making their determination. He noted that the benchmark cities in Orange County, Garden Grove and Santa Ana, have adopted policies which enable members of their employees' associations to attend such conferences without loss of pay, and pointed out that no expenses are being requested. Mr. Murdoch advised against granting preferential treatment to any single employee organization. He noted that the subject requests were con- sidered during last year's labor negotiations, and in his opinion it was a breach of faith '. z~esuch requests during the term of a negotiated agree- ment. Mr. Petrosino observed that such requests are not normally made by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, but felt that under the cir- cumstances he outlined they were justified. By general consent of the City Council, further consideration of the subject requests was deferred, pending further study and analysis by the City Manager. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held December 30, 1968, pertaining to the following appli- cations, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: 69-46 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1082: Submitted by Omy A. Jackson requesting to permit On-Sale Beer and Wine in conjunction with the serving of meals in an existing restaurant; M-1 zoned property, located at 1239 North East Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-373, granted said conditional use permit, subject to one condition. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1083: Submitted by J.L. Garwood, et al, request- ing permission to establish an outdoor eating area (patio) in conjunction with a proposed restaurant~ with waiver of minimum height to the lowest por- tion of a free-standing sign; R-3 zoned property, located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Magnolia Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-378, granted permission to establish an outdoor eating area, subject to conditions, and denied waiver of minimum height of the lowest portion of a free-standing sign. VARIANCE NO. 2040: Submitted by Eugenia Weston Dorian, et al, requesting waivers of vehicular access to carport from alley only and minimum width of pedestrian accessway; C-1 zoned property, located at the southeast corner of Winston Road and Iris Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-374, granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1192: Submitted by Edward Rogers, requesting approval of revised plans for the proposed construction of 31 two-story apartment units; R-3 zoned property, located on the north side of Crescent Avenue, west of Euclid Street. The City Planning Commission, ky motion, approved revised plans. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no fur- ther action taken on the above applications. VARIANCE NO. 2038: Submitted by Howard and Victoria Louden, requesting waivers of minimum number of covered parking spaces, minimum recreational area, and maximum coverage, to permit a 16-unit, two-story apartment building; R-3 zoned property, located at 420 North Lemon Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-370, granted said variance, subject to conditions. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by Councilman Schutte, and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 6792~ REVISION NO. 1: Developer - Kit Kenyon; tract located on the west side of Ninth Street, approximately 860 feet north of Orangewood Avenue, containing 17 proposed R-1 zoned lots. (Reclassification No. 68-69-41 and Variance Noo 2028). The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held January 13, 1969, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval° 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6792, Revision No. 1, is granted subject tothe approval of Reclassification No. 68-69-41 and Variance No. 2028. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the east property line separating Lot No. 1 and Ninth Street, except that Corner Lot No~ 1 shall be stepped down to a height of 30 inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right-of-way of an arterial highway° Reasonable landscaping, including irri- gation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arter- ial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping 69-47 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Park- way Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance,the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 40 That all lots within this tract shall be served with under- ground utilities. 5. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to Ninth Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner that is satis- factory to the City Engineer. 7. That Street "A" shall be recorded as Wakefield Avenue and that Street "B" shall be recorded as Waverly Drive. 8. It is normal City policy to require dedication of ultimate street right-of-way and construction of street improvements for "not a part" parcels resulting from tract development; however, because of existing trees and improvemants on the "not a part" parcel remaining from Tract No. 6792, ultimate dedication and improvement is impractical at this time. Therefore, it is recommended that the following conditions be placed on this "not a part" parcel: a. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 30 feet in width from the centerline of the street, along Ninth Street, for street widening purposes. b. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of Ninth Street, for street widening purposes. This easement deed is to be written so that it shall become effective upon the death of the grantor or upon the sale or rezoning of the "not a pa~'' :~ar,~._~~, w!:~-::~-,..~'ar o.~,r~ first. c. That street pavement be installed westerly 22 feet from the centerline of Ninth Street in accordance with standard plans and speci- fications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that the estim- ated cost of the pavement be included in the improvement bond for Tract No. 6792. d. Reference Paragraph 8b above. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ninth Street, such a. ,~rb~ and ~er:~, ~;f~!ewa!!:~, ~;['reet grad- ing and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be com- pleted as required 'by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file with the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be pos- ted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering require- ments. e. That the existing asphalt sidewalks on Ninth Street be re- located adjacent to the new street right-of-way, and that the estimates of the asphalt sidewalks be included in the improvement bond for Tract No. 6792. f. That items a and b, above mentioned, be complied with prior to final approval of Tract Noo 6792, and that conditions c and d, above men- tioned, be completed in conjunction with the improvements of Tract No. 6792. Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6792, Revi- sion No. 1, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-46 - VARIANCE NO. 2029: Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 69R-46 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 68R-764, pursuant to Minutes correction, authorized this date° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 68R-764, GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2029. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution NOo 69R-46 duly passed and adopted. 69-48 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-47 - WORK ORDER NO. 338: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-47 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT THE PURCHASE OF SOUND SYSTEM COMPONENTS IS NECESSARY FOR THE ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER; APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS THEREOF; AND DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR THE FURNISHING OF SAID SOUND SYSTEM COMPONENTS; WORK ORDER NO. 338. (Bids to be Opened February 13, 1969, 2:00 P.M.). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-47 duly passed and adopted. SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTOR - WORK ORDER NO. 1952: On report and recommenda- tion of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein moved that the City Council authorize change of subcontractors under Work Order No. 1952, Utility Yard, Phase III, from G & G Floor Covering to Apache Floor Covering. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Clark offered Resolution Nos. 69R-48 to 69R-50, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-48: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robbie Kaufman and James Norman Morgan). RESOLUTION NO. 69R-49: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Nealy A. and Lilly M. Roscom). RESOLUTION NO. 69R-50: A RESOLUTION C? T~.~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Elliot R. Fine, et al). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resc'.ution Nos. 69R-48 to 69R-50, both inclu- sive, duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte: a. Resolution of Building Industry Association of California, Inc., Competitive Bidding. b. City of Stanton Resolution No. 792 - Commending the stand of Dr. S.I. Hayakawa in his administration of San Francisco State College and urging all those in academic authority to give full support to the acting president of San Francisco State College. c. State of California Highway Commission Resolution - Restating procedure relative to Adoption of Freeway Locations by the California High- way Commission. 69 -49 City Hall, Anaheim, California - CO[~CIL MINUTES - January 21, 1969, 1:30 P.M. d. Western Greyhound Lines Notice of application filed with the California Public Utilities Commission - to increase its mainline passenger bus fares and package express charges. e. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meeting of December 19, 1968. f. Financial and Operating Reports for the months of December, 1968. g. HEARING: January 29, 1969 - Orange County Board of Supervis- ors: Proposed Irvine Ranch Agricultural Preserve and Proposed Rancho Mission Vie]o Agricultural Preserve. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2625: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2625 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-14 - Parcel B Only - R-2, 5,000). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No.2625 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO, 2628: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2628 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-4 - R-1 - Tract No. 6752 Only). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No, 2628 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2629; Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2629 for adoptfon. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AHAHEIMAMENDING TITLE'18 .OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-8 - R-2, 5,000 - Tract No. 6686 Only). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Erein, Schutte, Clark and Pebiey None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2629 duly passed and adopted. pRDINANCE NO. 2630: Councilman Krein offered ordinance No. 2630 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-28 (2) - R-2, 5,000 - Tract No. 5591). Roll Call Vote: 69-50 City.Hall, Ana.;.eim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2630 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2631: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2631 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 6, OF THE A/fiHEIMMUNI- CIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 6.80 THERETO, RELATING TO REMOVAL OF ABANDONED, WRECKED, DISMANTLED OR INOPERATIVE VEHICLES OR PARTS THEREOF FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY OR PUBLIC PROPERTY, NOT INCLUDING HIGHWAYS, AND RECOVERY OF COSTS OF ADMINISTRATION THEREOF AS AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 22660 OF THE ~CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2631 duly passed and adopted. ALCOHOLIC ~E~ERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION; Application submitted by Joe Taylor Pharris and J6h~ William Emge, for Original On-Sale General (Bona Fide Eating Place) for an un-named business at 477 South Brookhurst Street, C-1 zone, was pre- sented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark, the City Attorney was authorized to file Conditional Protest with the Alcoholic Beverages Control Board against said application, on the basis of zoning. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were submitted by the City Manager to the City Council for their information: a. Application submitted by Michael J. and Vivian J. Sofia, for On-Sale Beer and Wine (Bona Fide Eating Place) Person-to-Person Transfer, for Ando's Italian Food and Delicatessen, 622 West La Palma, C-1 zone. b. Application submitted by Seth Morrell Norman, for On-Sale General (Bona Fide Eating Place) Person-to-Person Transfer, for The Ranch House, 1490 South Anaheim Boulevard, M-1 zone. c. Application submitted by Wei Shee Jew and Wah Sing Wong, for Off-Sale Beer and Wine, Person-to-Person Transfer, for the Northgate Market, 722 North Anaheim Boulevard, C-2 zone. No Council action was taken on the above applications. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Clark, Encroachment Permit was granted to Charles E. Costner, for the en- croachment of a garage into a portion of a City Easement; property located at 929 Chippewa Street, (68-12E). I~OTION CARRIED. NO PARKING ZONE - BROADWAY A_ND HARBOR BOULEVARD: It was noted that studies are in progress regarding the No Parking Zone on Broadway at the intersection of Harbor Boulevard, and by general consent of the City Council further ac- tion was deferred to a later date. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, Council recessed to Executive Session to consider appointments to existing vacancies on various City Commissions. MOTION CARRIED. (4:15 P.M.). Al ?ER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present, (4:20 P.M.). 69-51 .City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 21, 1969, 1:30 P.M. APPOINTMENTS - CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION AND COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY: By general consent of the City Council, appointments to the Cultural Arts Commission and Community Center Authority were deferred to a later date. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT: Councilman Clark moved that William Thom "~ appointed to the City Planning Commission to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Robert W. Mungall (term to expire June. 30, 1969). Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. ~DTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Councilman Dutton moved that A.L. Mahoney be appointed to the Park and Recreation Commission to fill his unexpired term, (term to expire June 30, 1972). Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Councilman Dutton moved that action taken December 24, 1968, nam- ing Planning Commissioner Dan Rowland as an ex-officio member of the Park and Recreation Commission be rescinded and that he be reinstated as a full voting member. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 4: 30 P.M. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 28, 1969, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COI7~CtLMEN: COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P.Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley Ronald Thompson Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Conradson, of the Trinity Lutheran Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Pebley proclaimed the week of February 17 to 23, 1969, "Heart Sunday Week," and the month of February, 1969, as "Heart Month°" RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT AND COMMENDATION: The City Council unanimously adopted a Resolution of Support and Commendation to the "Anaheim Youth Coun- cil,'' in the advancement of their stated goals toward the better- ment of the community. INTRODUCTION: Miss Shari Bescos, Miss Disneyland Ambassador to the World for 1969, was introduced to the City Council by Mrs. ~ry Jones.