1972/04/1872 -212
City IIa1,1. dim.. C}lifor a COIL mss. 4Aor$l ;A Am. 1:30 P,M.
FAY L&PINGI Councilman Stephenson inquired why there was no landscaping
at the point where Riverdale Avenue crosses the Freeway (La Palma overcross-
ing.)
The City Engineer advised that this evidently was the property re-
cently relinquished to the City by the State of California.
Mac. Msrdoch advised the situation would be investigated to see
who reeponsibi]. it was, and the matter taken care of, or a further re-
port would be mode to the Council.
AmgAgNmull Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Roth seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 4:35 P.M.
City H].1. Apaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR: John Collier
CITY ENGINEKR: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
IpOCAnot Pastor Dean Humbert of the Trinity United Methodist Church,
gave the Invocation.
FLAG S6LUTE: Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
GENERAL MUNICIPAL. ELECTION. APRIL 11. 1972 CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATI J: Pursuant
to Resolution No. 72R-39, City Clerk Dene M. Daoust submitted;Certificate of
Canvass of Returns of the Regular General Municipal Election held in the City
of Anaheim, April 11, 1972, conveying the number of votes given at each precinct
for each candidate,' and the number of votes given in the City to persons voted
for the office of Councilman.
rt
m
."S a H
fD `C Y
M
fD (DD
‘.0 0 7
O fD
n N
M c X
K rt
rt W
h+• 0
M 0
z
rt 0
P
rt -.1
7y
W
C
fD
n a
w 0
•o
C rt
w fD
to a
w
CD tr
a
rt et
w tD
Pt A
CD w
rt rt
M
O A
CA 0
O 0
M n
1+
rt
O
CD 0
rt
M (A
OQ
F w
0.
w
n A
r•
OQ rt
tD
M 0
Pt
w
fD
tJ1
rt
a
0
PI
V
a
0
0
rt
OQ
fD
72 14
-4
ZG6T 'TT
r-
u cx,
I
1 I
(P p
w
N
I-r
CI
•C)
J
CT
1 I
1 A
r-
1 nbse u...
,!DATED PRECINCT NC
ACT
-..1).
G.) a•
It) N
N
OD
r-0
.t)
A W ICJ
4) 3
F 74
38
49
iii
4)
1-
A
•O
N A
A W
N
OA
W
CP
I-'
O•
CO
62
C4,
v— ala_••'•L .i4V Ai lt. LLLV11V11
FOR TWO MEMBERS OF THE CITY CO
1
A
CT W CT
as O. 1-+
1�
co v
W O• W
u1 co co
33
58
68
35
35
CP
J
A
0
N CP W
-J0- J
1
1 47 1
O•
O
CP
O•
CP
CP
p
FBL F,,
1 :IN
III
A to
u P..)
N)NP4a n
W'-
'Nr -�r-+A
Q•OCP
R. R O
8p8
0 0 1
co
J .b.
4
11
12
7
12
A
N
(JI co N
F 11 1
O
(Pr-
O•
B YRON
1 o
N0
-•W tlP CO
3
5
11
3
1
N
J(3•.1).WNo-.0AO•
CI,
N
RA C coK
LIFF
34
33
A
26
38
N
20
34
52
36
28
I
A
i t
23
18
19
1 54 1
I 58 1
16
a),
231
391
COrfFR
Wm F
CPrNp.rANwo�
I- 004)
WNAWOA
J
(BI LL
1 DAL,,
w
O w
v
r
v CP +a CP N CP
r-•
Na+
r-•
CP
O•
I--.
1-.
CP
N
S
'41
co
20
10
O•
A
14
14
1'3
21
14
10
O•
•O
43.1).
J
CP
(.3
.11
O•
11
RGI BBO
RD
E 19
34
23
1 32
1 101
30
14
34
37
18
24
I 14
I 171
1 101
131
1 181
I 201
CP
19
1 111
19j
M, HART
A LL
�9
0
0
I.
O I-. A O I--.
0
0
r..
0
0
0
0
0
M. 'TORO
AN
0 o
N►rO►rOOrO►- rO
L IC,,
4 T
I p.
1 r
A W 0
0
0
0
N
(.30
CPO
A
NA R
4 (414 RD
0 co 4 3
L P
c
CO
7
8
12
6
4
A
w
.o
.a
211
J
A
CO
A
N
W
O I RF �N
CON
16
6
14
15
1 33
F 10
17
9
21
20
17
21
a
--.1
11
W
x16 I
12
CP
N
77
[lot
LD F
pq yN F
jilitf
PRO CTOR
N
r7.7
co
15
7
8 1
8
5
19
8
8
2
CP
4/
W
N
O
UJ1
Cr
J
CP
10
15
I—'
O•N
O• ■'--.1-41).
10
04)4)
(4)
J
N N
RFINF
b8
r217
72
37
29
1
1
1
44
34
30
N.)
44
28
47
37
32
7371
1
24
45
7271
23
41
30
F, ROLUPFS
JOHN
1 16
N A A
0` CP
A O• w I- N
2
1
13
6
4
10
W
Co 1- rr
CP
CP
N
W
CP
CO
SFyMO uie
C
1 58
41
W W :P
cP sQA
1
i
23
62
i 1
11 N•
41
20
92
60
23
37
O•
-4N)
7
19
28
N
A
01
1
20
12
i
1
r--511
1 34 1
A,
S'nl
R,
G.
r7;71
J co do
N
2
14
O• D` O• W
O
I—
Oo
QO
CP
tP
A
1
11
A
SNFF�
F T
I!!
N N ■1 N N A
0
0
I--0
0
4)
I-+
1-•
0
1-•
R. SULLI
v v A N
O
NN0
A N1-+ O W
I-
r
'NI-
M vIRT�
R�
B(j�
P
-40N
-.I
AAJODJr
AI
11'
4
11
7
8
7
WI-•rrCP
W
A WCPJ
l 252 1
r•.,
vs
5
215
103
1 118 1
cavil
SowiJO(Nr
it
o
BALLOTS VOTED
72 14
-4
ZG6T 'TT
t--►- I-'N► N NN N CO 0NN
(P W CP r CP OD CO •0 .G CO s O` J A W N
W ON ANNQCPJNANNA CO
C r-
NNN
NN-4 W W
NNW r-'
45,1-4001s)
k
0000 -'0
O F-' N C-' O
CPr�N► -'O
O• J 0
C7 G)
CO W .D
CO CO
O• N
N 0 0
r
.C) W r
CO J CO
Co
r n
r
N OD
Co
N
N O A
N O• W
N U
0004-'#-.N)
A 4--
(.J
J 0) 0
CP
.D
O• v
A
W
O
C.) CP
CT
W
0 A
r N
W
W N
0 0
O N
0 0
O
O.
N O
O N
V) N
O 0
0 0
r
4-
r r
1-.
W
•0
N
J
0
W
N
0'
N
Cx
N
CO
W
4
r
0
0
A
r
r
O
N
w
r-•
0
N
r
N
N
N
W
r
N
J
J
0
0
0
0
r
f
H
J
0
O
0
N
OD
N
N A (P
0 (P r
W N
H F-'
CO 4 cP
N
0'
r•
00
0
O•
(J
0)
0
W
J
A
(J
CO Co
0' A
A A
N LP
(T(!+ A 1.s CP LP CT Ca Oh A CP W J CP N N
W CD CP CT J Ate O' Co (P CO •O CP N
1.3,C0 r-' N W W ANN A A co co (P
Rq y
Coo
CLIFF�
ANCPWWAAWC.PCTC.)ODCa ANA(PWN O F
ODU W W CPJ A WOJ0•DN000'.0 0 k
(BI LL
N4N0 WCPCPAG.) OD(PNW D NZ}, ONALDL
Cr 0-'A ACP� 'O•J WO AJ W O•W OOJO∎O pis
itUR
FDWgR GI880At
D AI
W W W A— A N W N A W N r
JA �A•oCO.0N)(P0 .0A.o TXELa�''AA RTNFLL
JORD
tt3NgLD
L k lRk
o 0'- 0(' •OO R 08FRTq
o►-' 0000NNO NAGG
0 OD
CO r
O• N
r
N CO
r r
CT
r A
0
r-•
C CP
O N
J CO
N
0
r-•
4) N
W NNNNNNN
(.+Nr0.00.)JCT(PAW
CPJNrnA A WO'O•W N
-4 .00' A Q•(.P.O CA A •C) .0
r►-' NN► -'r-• NN
O •O a Co
Nr �r 'NO000�'O
O O C--� r
RICHA W.
ND LP 00N O•O•COO•J N
r-' N C-' N t-- CO W 0-.
W NWNCTOJNONOD
r r r r r r
O (P O• J r-' 0' CO .O O• CP r
NW000AW•000.OW
r
O' 0'I0 OD J O A
•O NJA•0O-4W 0'JO
r r 11 Y
O CP O' 0 W N A A CO A ,0 A'
Rk
0(3 A0NN .OAN R
-4 ACAN O0'(A000DNW A LpH
(,IgR
►-•r NN rr r 7-'
040'0'0 -'NN(PJ M4R�
RFT R,
N Is) 0OAJ is) OAO
NN 0 AWW ACI1--
r
N N N 0( 01'0(.) CT(0 W
N N 4-' W N N r C.) W r
(J -3 O+NUCD N. ('30 J' V
G,)h- to C.)0l.ONA is )A
r
.0
ONSOLIDATED PRECINCT N:
J44 'LS
DpAN PROC1,OR
RRI ��NN
1'
S
A, ULLI vAN
M, y R r�
1b Wg
B AR
WILL IA I
TCTAL
BALLOTS VOTED
0
H
72- 215
not 'IT 1IliciV
I 67
65
63
C1
60
1 59
1 58
F 57
t�
1 55
1 54
T 53
F52
0
1 48 1
1 47 1
1 46 1
.".:ONSOLIDATFD PRFCINCT NC
FOR TWD MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
1 101
m
75
12i
1 48
0'
r
A
1 98 1
1 122 1
1 188
37
72 1
148 1
1 56
A C P
1 4 0 1
1 49 1
1 6a
35 1
CA Lv
P&p y
C
DON
ii). Rpr
bb��
RA CcK
,L IFE
CO 7
F. (BILL
DAL
LD L. DOA
S
B ATOR GI8
Ftl Off,
1 19
1116
Cr'
CD
CO
WJ
1 47
LP
V
t-•
O
110 1
1 109 1
1 193
42 I
51
L4
1 43 1
1 3
47
261
21 1
57 1
18 1
n
r
W
1J
r-.
A
M
a-.
CN
La
N) N
0
P.)
0..
4a
O
S
A
w
1 25
r
1--�
1 21
c,,
1 19
N
1 64
1 60
r 55 i
38
.O
19
30
1 31 1
13 1
17
151
15
tT
o
o
18 1
O
w 4)A0000
N
i-'NN
Ow0N
W
tTNtr
1 45
47
1 53
31
1 44
1 49
7461
1 52
19
44
w
49 1
75 1
50 1
P
Li
33 1
35
34 1
21 I
A
CA)
w
A
Cs)
N
OOA
ww
A�'
Q•
J
T 10
A
V
GI
CO
0'
"0
S Ww0
A
JF-'
1 25
116
1 38
1 19
1 16
,1
N3
1 27
1 32
36
1
11
16
CO
1 2 1
19
16
16 1
10 1
.o
LP
.o
"0
1 22
1 46
33
58
Z .o
1 27
55
L 46
rn
O^
1 8 1
I-.
A
14
52
J
t-'
22
1 41
31
Ch)
21
35
-4
22
12
M H ART
LAyq At Jo
R DAgt
IA
Pk
NA R
9 RD
FG9
ALD
P A y NF
,-.00,-.1-01-.0,-.1..11-.01-.1-.01-
i00
000
I
n
`-.o.-
'0-
0 0000wN
N'-
C
I''''
I.."'
0
P
0
v
AV
16
1 12
GI
CO
1 10
43
A
4
13
1 13 1
J
io 1
CO
GI
W
10 1
A
A
1 21
12
16
03
CO
CDA
22
1 24
22
12
20
co
11
14 1
16
10
JJCO
11 1
11 1
1 11
1 12
1 13
1 13
N
1 23
1 19
NO
9
14
OT
1 16 I
15 1
13 1
10 1
a'AJoo
(JZA,f pR0
CPO'
qN RBIA
LP
CA)
J
Cn
1 10
r
1 10
0
T
CO A
CD
N
J
CO
•o
CT
A
A
Cr
A
19
1 41
1 46
1 67
1 43
GI
1 52
1 93
1126
22
59
N
44
42
29
24
36 1
24
53 1
14
OZ, I FS
fN SBy
Q,
A
S MI nY
RRy
S Np F
jA Rte uiS
R. SULL
4N IVAN
M yI R T/t.
"C
7.04 WA /sN
BURR
WILLI
AMS
VOTED
CO
A
1 12
1 13
1 11
0
0
1 21
J
N
2
17
0"
A
13
17
y
t
t i
13 1
C
C
J
1101
1 58
1 102
1107
1 33
o3
o
1125
-4
1 95
30
78
ON
w
A
A
47 1
1 41 1
47 1
54 1
1 11
1 12
13
1 19
0
Cr
•o
1 28
15
22
0
J
'0
10 1
14 1
w
.o
u+
10 1
rn
0 0
0 0
O►
-.O
0
w
0t-'
LP 1-.
00wN'000
11
26
F313
33
26
_13
18
2
•D
00
A
4
12
1 11
J
11 11 233
N
O-
J
11 11 207 1
J
0'
611 139 1
10 11 140 1
N
2 11 115 1
CT
5T 204
A
4 11 109 1
IC TAL
BALLOTS
1 95
324 j
1 233 _I
310 1
I 370 I
169
110
1 329 I
1 394 A
j 377 1
1 474 1
1 275 1
1 132 1
CAI
CA
w
J
`o
not 'IT 1IliciV
72 -217
ZL6T 'IT
.0
o
CO
•a
OD
OU
CD
0'
CD
CP
CO
A
CO
W
OD
co
J
'n
.4
Cu
.j
-J
JJJ.jJJJ
Ln
A
W
N
0
j 69 j
.:ONSOLIDATED PRECINCT NC
i
FOR TWO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COIJNcIL
W•OJO•CTWNN
OVA
ACP
400
CAW
N.QA
A
A
tot
�4
49
49
AOO•UCTN
N0AOOD
1
I
l 37 1
W J
W C,
J0'JO•WW
CANCDN
CP'
U' W
0
W i i
37
50
63
W CDJ00'
N.oO'
N
1 39
PP... E
N
b-'
'O
N •0 W
O
A 1-' N,
N-
N
N
N N
O,
Rp �1i
N
O
A r-+ F-
NW CT-4
16
5
14
11
39
31
5
42
37
19
45
7
NNWWN►�
OW
JJ0.-'C'
10
16
1 1
rN�N000CP
CPr• -'A
N•-'
r►-•W
4aNCPO
NI- C
�k
ONN
O
36
37
30
50
59
36
53
87
72
1 44 1
1 41 1
48 I
N
N
aD I
J-4
71
87
67
A
Cr.
1 25 1
31 J
Cp R
r-'
LP Co
CPA•
-.A
0.�A0•CrOW
q� L
D°tI GZgS
L 'EdlAto i?
2
8
7
6
11
1
ONCPI-''N
OJJNWN.N
aD
20
24
14
50
18
24
21
8 i
11
LP .o
18
20
13
9
5
o 0'
UT
25
15
l32I
21 I
24 l
54
C r8 80It
D
31
32
31
32
39
25
18
12
12
21
19
27
45
12
19
49
52
49
21
31
18 I
M, Hq
R T NFLL
yA
00►�O0
CO
000►�f
-'r
O•
Nr0
-0►-•
M. JpR
itiV4 A N
LD
O
CD LP O
1
2
0
1
0
11
5
0
NO
ONNON►-'0
L K IRk
LP
o o
ru00'0
00000'
—o
?D
W
CA•-'JA
W
AJJCTCPCP
11
5
CT JNCP
Gg111
A
C�
15
11
14
30
18
22
14
16
71.T1
C‘
A W .O
9
21
10
3
4
151
24
30
25
13
13
11
Y NF
7
9
8
18
17
7
4
14
10
LP A J .O
22
26
10
32 1
A
10
4
16
(..714,1 n,
PRw 1-
J
F
F
J CT 0 3 O•
b
4
6
17
3
5
6
7
LP
O
OD A CP LP W
N
•O
191
11
W 4-.
i
RF I
••`Y
54
79
43
66
77
48
56
24
40
22
44
44
28
47
24
7§7 1
54
65
76 1
32
31
45
I FS
JOHN
-4 -4 NI DI
6
4
3
6
2
14
18
7
7
JO
CI. .0 CO
3
24
9
6
0
.4
0-
13
1
JCOWCD
Sp }M po
A A Pk
N
64
111
71
78
142
140""
154
104
67
30
i
62
135
49
33
19
b3
11 104
23
160
82
45
88
q• S
MIS
W
J .0 (4 .O •r CP
10
5
1
9
19
6
9
15 I
7
LP CT N I W
8
12
22
6
5
11
LP
17
15
5
w LP CO
8
5
10
8
R R Y)
S NF F S
RFTR
1--
000
Wt- •'DNrC•-
W0r�0
•CPOWNO
LIfr gN
NA0C
I--' N3 ON►-'A•-'00
0
5
2
1
6
0
4
Ch C)CP Co N
&f
vl Rr 08
..1
r N
•O O•
s Ch CT
W •-GJ .D U
45
65
61
49
57
31
23
N
co J 0 N N
OW iV
I N A •O N
22
19
24
68 I
42
78
19 1
LS ff
a Uf�R
133
n)
NO�ONOJ
3
4 J
,0
Q•.OA A:.P
135
2S4
1.94
189
96
130
L
A BALLOTS VOTED
4 W• -r CXJ
.ti o
Cn
0
j t-- .3
141
4N24
363
3
179
72 -217
ZL6T 'IT
I Total
�o
A
.o
w
92
NSOI.IDA
TL- D PRECINCT N(
1 5154
W
w
A
o
I
3a1
CALVIN
FOR TWO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
4906
w
N
1 21 1
L
PF BLFY
DpN
222 1
.0
w
r
R pm
8p8
1 1851 1
I
L 2.9
w
cr
BY
278
A
Jr
RA C�K
CL1
[3903
1 81 1
1 29
F CpTTFR
F.
267
w
(BILL) D
ALY
DO NALD
391
w
o
L•
FL
FqAOR
1512
Z,-.3
N.)
it
FDWAR D
2679
1 18
N
1 27
M, HA 4,44
niF LA61 4f
r NO
ORDAN
DONA
195
0
0
o
L 4
RpBFRT
91 1
woo
A
RICH NA
OD
587
co
o"
W, p
L bNA RF �N
1282
cr
1 13
LD F
P4 1'4-
JABS
889
o.
w
(,T
DF TO
N
F 521
cr
w
w
RF INFNNN
RpN
4580
143
91
1
Rp LLpFs
pHN
773
43
50
cr
SFYMp
M4RK
5533.
96
[771
o'
RAL
859
w
.1s.
C.
(,T S NF
AR�RFT fiS
108
r
o
Re SULLIVAN
�1
CAN
148
r
W
M. VIRT
1 'OM
1451
w4
B c�R
BALLOTS VOTED
'19,992
t
213 1
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -137; Pursuant to said canvass, it was determined that candi-
dates Calvin L. Pebley and Ralph G. Sneegas received the highest number of
votes cast and were elected members of the City Council of said City for the
full term of four years. Thereupon Councilman Thom offered Resolution No.
72R -137 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
72 219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA,
RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY
OF ANAHEIM ON THE llth DAY OF APRIL, 1972, DECLARING THE RESULTS THEREOF
AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CHARTER
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, TIghkey, Thom and Dutton
ABSTAINED NOES: COUNCILMEN: None P bley
of
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -137 duly passed and adopted.
OATH OF OFFICE: Oath of Allegiance for Public Officers was administered by City
Clerk Dene M. Daoust to elected Councilmen Calvin L. Pebley and Ralph G.
Sneegas.
REORGANIZATION OF THE COUNCIL: The meeting was called to order by the City Clerk
who announced nominations were in order for Mayor of the City of Anaheim.
Councilman Stephenson nominated Councilman Dutton as Mayor for the
City of Anaheim. Councilman Pebley seconded said nomination.
Councilman Pebley moved nominations be closed. Councilman Stephen-
son seconded said motion. (Councilman Thom abstained from voting.) MOTION
CARRIED.
Jack C. Dutton was declared Mayor of the City of Anaheim.
The City Clerk announced nominations. were in order for Mayor Pro
Tempore of the City of Anaheim.
Councilman Pebley nominated Councilman Stephenson as Mayor Pro Tem-
pore for the City of Anaheim. Councilman Dutton seconded said nomination.
Councilman Dutton moved nominations be closed. Councilman Pebley
seconded said motion. (Councilman Stephenson abstained from voting.) MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Stephenson was declared Mayor Pro Tempore for the City
of Anaheim.
All members of the City Council being present, Mayor Dutton assumed
Chairmanship of the meeting and the business before the Council resumed.
RESOLUT ON OF CONGRATULATIONS: Resolution of Congratulations to the Anaheim Truck
and Transfer Company on the occasion of their 100th Year of Operation was
unanimously adopted and signed by the Anaheim City Council.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held March 28, 1972,
were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley.
MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING -_ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading
of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of
such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
72-220
City Hall, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $1,021,686.97, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71- 72 -30: VARIANCE NO. 2327: TEN-
TATIVE TRACTS N0S. 7617 AND 7730 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 7739: Reclassification No.
71- 72 -30, submitted by Ernest Danker, etal, requesting a change of zone from
County zoning to City R- 2 -5,000 (Portion A) and City C -1 (Portion B) to per-
mit the construction of a 593 -lot, R -2 -5,000 subdivision on Portion A. Pro-
perty described as located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east
of the intersection of Walnut Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road, extend-
ing easterly to the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Riverside Free-
way.
VARIANCE NO. 2327: Requesting waiver of Section 18.04.075 on the above -des-
cribed property (Reclassification No. 71- 72 -30) requiring that lots rear upon
arterial highways.
TENTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 7617 AND 7730 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 7739: Developer
Classic Development Corporation, involving property described in Reclassifi-
cation No. 71- 72 -30, containing approximately 125 acres, as follows:
Tract No. 7617 38 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7730 64 proposed R-2-5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7731 49 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7732 63 proposed R-2-5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7733 67 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7734 69 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7735 56 proposed R-2-5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7736 47 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7737 41 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7738 51 proposed R-2-5,000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 7739 48 proposed R -2 -5,000 zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -30,
recommended Reclassification No. 71 -72 -30 be disapproved, and pursuant to
Resolution No. PC72 -31, denied Variance No. 2327. By Minute Motion, the City
Planning Commission denied all tracts noted above.
Public hearing was held by the City Council at their meeting of
February 29, 1972, at which time said hearing was continued to this date,
at the request of Mr. M.C. Mickle, Vice President of Classic Development
Corporation, to allow revision of said tract maps and also revision of site
development standards for the R-2-5,000 Zone, to be recommended by the City
Planning Commission.
Mr. Charles Roberts, referring to map posted on the east wall of
the Council Chambers, noted subject property and reported that the request
was for R-2-5,000 zoning on approximately 125 acres, and C -1 zoning on an
approximate 1 -1/3 acre parcel at the east end of subject project, for the
development of a small, convenience shopping center sometime in the future.
He advised that the design of the tracts conform to the projected Access
Point Study, previously adopted by the State of California, County of Orange,
and City of Anaheim, with the exception of Access Point No. 9, which has
been shifted easterly approximately 600 feet.
Mr. Roberts noted that the area is designated low residential de-
velopment on the General Plan, however, an R -2 -5,000 zoning has been approved
on property west of subject property; further, the General Plan also projects
the location of an elementary school, a junior high school, a park site and
commercial facility in this immediate area. He stated that the only school
facility anticipated by the Orange Unified School District at this time was
an elementary school, and the Developer has taken into consideration the need
for an elementary school and city park and has designated approximately 18
acres for the joint use; school and park site.
Mr. Roberts read the findings of the City Planning Commission, be-
ing the basis of their recommended disapproval.
72-221
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Roberts further reported that subsequent to the City Planning
Commission action the Developer has submitted a revised layout of the area
which now indicates deletion of the side -on lots at Access Points 9 and 10;
therefore, the waiver would no longer be necessary. He stated the revised
maps were reconsidered by the City Planning Commission yesterday (April 17,
1972), and did not alter their original recommendation of denial as their
position of denial was mainly taken on the basis of the proposed density of
the project.
In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts reported that the
City Planning Commission considered and will be soon forwarding recommended
changes to the R -2 -5,000 Site Development Standards and Zone, and that the
primary changes related to the maximum lot coverage of 33 and the relation-
ship of the size of the house proposed to be developed to the total lot area.
He gave as an example, a 3- bedroom house would be appropriate on a 5,000-
square foot lot, and each additional bedroom would require a proportional
increase of 850 square feet of lot area.
Mayor Dutton noted that under the proposed new standards, the build-
ing part area must be 5,000 square feet, and any slope area would be in ad-
dition to the buildable pad.
Another major change reported by Mr. Roberts was the front setback
requirement which will be recommended to be 25 feet when a garage is orien-
tated to the street, instead of 20 feet.
Mr. Thompson added that the City Planning Commission will also
recommend that the criteria to be used in determining whether a development
would be entitled to proceed under former standards will be in accordance
with Council Policy No. 524,(said Policy was read in full.)
Mr. Morris Mickle, Vice-President of Classic Development Corpora-
tion, Developer, requested favorable consideration this date. He advised
that they withdrew the variance, as the revisions to the map made a variance
no longer necessary. He was of the opinion that the revised map was not ap-
proved by the Planning Commission due to the revision in the R -2 -5,000 Zone,
and although they felt the proposed standards too restrictive, they were
prepared to and agreed to develop under the new standards.
Mr. Mickle reported that one third,or 200 of the lots were pre-
sently in excess of 6,000- square feet,and under the new standards qualified
for a 4- bedroom home, which would be their largest house. Approximately 5%
of the tract will be a 2- bedroom home.
Mr. Mickle noted the area is either presently zoned or projected
for R -2 -5,000 zoned development.
In answer to question of Councilman Pebley regarding submission
of plans and elevations of the homes proposed, Mr. Mickle replied that the
new standards will require redesigning of the homes, and possibly the tract,
as for example, the 3- bedroom, 1 -story homes will no longer conform to the
lot size and will now have to be of 2 -story construction or the lot size
increased. He again requested approval of the application this date, with
the knowledge that the lot size of the tracts can be increased or modified
before Final Map, which would be minor in nature, and probably reduce the
number of lots between 10% to 14 Mr. Mickle advised that the project in-
volves 11 separate parcels, with separate and mixed ownerships, and further
delays would be very difficult.
Mr. Ronald Martin, 2212 Dupont Drive, Irvine, California, Archi-
tect rid Engineer for the development, reported the revised snap now under
consideration contains 586 lots, of which 200 are more than 6,000- square
feet, and 60 lots of between 5,500 and 6,000- square feet, that the homes
are to be one, two and three bedrooms.
72 -222
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972, 1:30 P.M.
In regard to Policy No. 524 and expenditures made, Mr. Martin ad-
vised that the project was a composite of 11 separate parcels of property,
which has taken over a year to put together, at an expense of his own staff
and a tremendous investment involving expenditures to soil engineers and geol-
ogists and for an aerial topographic survey of the property, plus an expen-
diture to his firm. of over $25,000.00.
Mr. Martin explained that the Developer has agreed to build under
the new standards and needs approval of the zoning and tentative maps today,
as owners involved are insisting on monies being released to them to remain
in the escrow.
To clarify the map presented by the Applicant, indicating areas
approved or projected for R -2 -5,000 development, Mr. Roberts pointed out that
the southern half, or approximately 115 acres was the proposed site for the
Yorba Regional Park; that only the area north of the La Palma Avenue align
ment has approved R-2-5,000 zoning.
In opposition, Mr. Bob McQueen, representing the Santa Ana Canyon
Improvement Association, 4831 McKinnon Drive, referred to General Plan Amend-
ment No. 122, establishing low-medium or medium density north of the River,
and establishing low density south of the River, not south of Santa Ana Canyon
Road.
Mr. McQueen noted that there is projected approximately 85% of new
construction to be in the Canyon area, and felt the R -S -5,000 approved by the
City Planning Commission was a step in the right direction to make the Canyon
area livable community.
In conclusion, on behalf of the Santa Ana Canyon Improvement Asso-
ciation, Mr. McQueen requested said applications be denied.
Mr. Donald L. Kirk, 560 South Bond Street, Anaheim, advised that
it was his opinion the City needed larger homes in subject area.
Mr. Phil Joujon- Roche, President of the Santa Ana Canyon Property
Owners Association, also referred to the General Plan, noting south of the
River was to be low density.
Mr..Joujon -Roche reminded the Council that the total number of units
in Planning Area "B which is south of the River, north of Santa Ana Canyon
Road, between Eucalyptus and Imperial Highway, was less than what is projec-
ted in subject development, which is approximately one fourth of the total
area in Planning Area "B and if all of the units in the proposed develop-
ment were 4- bedroom units the density would be 20% greater than projected on
the General Plan.
In conclusion, and on behalf of the Santa Ana Canyon Property Owners
Association, Mr. Joujon -Roche urged the City Council to adhere to the General
Plan and deny subject applications.
Mr. Ronald Roluffs, 1591 Minerva Avenue, Anaheim, was of the opin-
ion that the area could be developed as an R -1 development.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Counil; there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -138: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman
Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -138 for adoption, denying Reclassifica-
tion No. 71- 72 -30.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (71-72 -30)
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Thom
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
72- 223
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -138 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-139; Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -139 for
adoption, denying Variance No. 2327.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE
NO. 2327.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -139 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -140: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R-
140 for adoption, reclassifying all property described in Application No. 71-
72-30 to the R -1, 7,200- square foot lot zone, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject
to the completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim.
2. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submit-
ted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office
of the Orange County Recorder.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to
be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the
building permit is issued.
4. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted
as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such par-
cel, provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently exist-
ing parcels of record, and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Coun-
cil for a lot split.
5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, final elevation and floor plans shall be submitted to and approved
by the City Council.
6. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Conditions Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed.
The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and
void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with
within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Coun-
cil may grant.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (71-72-30 R -1)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -140 duly passed and adopted.
72 -224
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
TENTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 7617 AND 7730 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 7739: Property
described in Reclassification No. 71- 72 -30; Developer Classic Development
Corporation.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
Tentative Tracts Nos. 7617, 7730, 7731, 7732, 7733, 7734, 7735, 7736, 7737,
7738 and 7739 were denied. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -33 AND VARIANCE NO. 2337: Submitted
by Maurice M. Lebanoff, requesting a change of zone from R -1 and R -3 to R -3,
to construct a 74 -unit apartment complex on property briefly described as
located on the south side of La Palma Avenue, adjacent to the Santa Fe Rail-
road right-of -way to the west, and west of East Street, requesting waivers
of:
a. Maximum height of a building within 150 feet of an R -1 Zone.
b. Minimum distance between buildings.
c. Minimum floor area per dwelling unit.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -52,
recommended Reclassification No. 71-72 -33 be approved, subject to the fol-
lowing conditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along La Palma Avenue for street widening purposes.
2. That street lighting facilities along La Palma Avenue and North
Street shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and
in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of
the Director of Public Utilities, and that a bond in an amount and form satis-
factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
3. That the vehicular access rights to La Palma Avenue, including
ingress and egress, along the northerly property line of subject property
from the westerly end thereof to a point 75 feet from the easterly end there-
of shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15C per front foot along North Street for tree planting
purposes.
5. That the sidewalks shall be installed along North Street as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and spe-
cifications on file in the office of the City Engineer.
6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
7. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter-
mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
8. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south
and east property lines adjacent to R-1 zoned property.
9. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
10. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the build-
ing permit is issued.
11. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a man-
ner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro-
perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be completed.
The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and
void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with
within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council
may grant.
13. That Condition Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -53,
granted Variance No. 2337, in part, subject to the following conditions:
72-225
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 71-72-33.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, provided, however, that a
20 -foot landscape buffer strip shall be provided immediately adjacent to
the west property line of the westernmost R -1 parcel on the north side of
North Street and the first two proposed apartment buildings west of said
R -1 parcel shall be limited to one story in height; and further provided
that any second story windows which may face the R -1 parcels on the north
side of North Street shall be no less than five feet above the floor as
stipulated to by the petitioner.
Mr. Roberts, in summarizing the hearing held before the City
Planning Commission, noted the location of subject property and the im-
mediate uses in the vicinity. He reported that the area is projected on
the General Plan for multiple family development, and advised that the den-
sity of the proposed project would be approximately 25 -units per net resi-
dential acre, or approximately 35% coverage.
As to the waiver of maximum height of a building within 150 feet
of an R -1 Zone (Waiver "a Mr. Roberts advised the City Planning Commis-
sion granted said waiver in part, thereby permitting two -story construc-
tion for all buildings or 46 units, with the exception of the two build-
ings immediately adjacent and west of the R -1 property on the north side
of North Street.
Mr. Maurice M. Lebanoff, Applicant, addressed the Council, ad-
vising that the project is a result of land assembly and called attention
to the support of the project received by the residents within the area,
with the exception of one.
In explaining the appointments of the development he reported
that in working with the people in the area he had agreed to put no win
dows,affecting nine apartments,lower than five feet, and has now learned
that a State Code provision limits placements of bedroom windows no lower
than four feet, and as a result, all of the units have been changed to face
either La Palma Avenue or a courtyard, so no units are facing the back areas
of the single-family homes on the north side of North Street.
sition.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppo-
Mr. Gerald Meyers, 907 East North Street, owner of property ad-
jacent to the east and south of subject property, addressed the Council
in opposition, and advised that he had submitted a petition of opposition,
representing eleven property owners in the general area. He agreed the
proposed apartments were beautiful, but felt the one -story height limita-
tion should be upheld.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -141: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R 141
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as recommended by the City Planding Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (71 -72 -33 R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -141 duly passed and adopted.
72- 226
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MI April 18, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -142: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -142
for adoption, granting Variance No. 2337, as recommended by the City Plan-
ning Commission, changing Condition No. 2 thereof to provide that any second
story windows which may face the R -1 parcels on the north side of North Street,
shall be no less than four feet above the floor, as stipulated to by the Pe-
titioner.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
No. 2337.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -142 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71- 72 -36: Submitted by Paul Altheide, et al,
requesting a change of zone from County A -1 to City M-1; property briefly des-
cribed as located on the south side of Winston Road, east of State College
Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-54,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along Winston Road and a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline
of the street along Sunkist Street for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Winston Road and Sunkist Street, including preparation of improvement plans
and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks,
street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work
shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City
Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Winston Road and Sunkist
Street shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities
and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the of-
fice of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and
form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter-
mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
5. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view.
6. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a
manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to
completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim.
9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro-
perty, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The pro-
visions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by
action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within
one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
10. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with the
conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, to which Mrs. Ann
Madison, Agent for the Applicant, replied in the affirmative.
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -143: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -143
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing
the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (71 -72 -36 14-1)
Roll Call Vote:
72 -221
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -143 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -37 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
1297.- TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7728: Submitted by Howard P. House, requesting a
change of zone from C -1 to R -3, to establish a 30 -unit, planned residen-
tial development on property briefly described as located on the north side
of Broadway, east of Magnolia Avenue, requesting waivers of:
a. Requirement that a lot abut a public street.
b. Minimum building site area.
c. Minimum building site width.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -55,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of
the Orange County Recorder.
2. That street lighting facilities along Broadway shall be in-
stalled as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Direc-
tor of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory
to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the in-
stallation of the above mentioned requirements.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Broadway for tree plant-
ing purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter-
mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east
and west property lines.
7. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City
of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined
to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time
the building permit is issued.
10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a
manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed.
The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and
void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with
within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Coun-
cil may grant.
72-228
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
12. That Condition Nos, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10, above mentioned,
shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
13. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is
contingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 1297 and Tenta-
tive Map of Tract No. 7728.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -56,
granted Conditional Use Permit No. 1297, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the com-
pletion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -37 and Tentative Map of Tract No. 7728,
now pending.
2. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of
the Orange County Recorder.
3. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be sub-
mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and further, that the approved covenants,
conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final
tract map.
4. Prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall sub-
mit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the
proposed functioning of the operating corporation, including but not limited
to the articles of incorporation, by -laws, proposed methods of management,
bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such
other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its
citizens, and the purchasers of the project.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar-
ked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 7728: Developer Stanley E. Bell. Property des-
cribed above in Reclassification No. 71 -72 -37 and contains 31 proposed R -3
zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission approved said Tentative Map, subject
to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7728 is gran-
ted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -37 and Conditional
Use Permit No. 1297.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of
the Orange County Recorder.
5. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be sub-
mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and further, that the approved covenants,
conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final
tract map.
6. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley
openings to Broadway, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
7. That drainage of Tract No. 7728 shall be disposed of in a man-
ner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
Mr. Roberts summarized the hearing held before the City Planning
Commission, and advised that the waivers requested were the typical type
requested for a planned residential development. He further reported that
the development is unlike a statutory condominium, where air space is sold,
as this will be a postage stamp lot development where the ground is sold
with the unit.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with
the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, to which Mr.
Stanley Bell, acting as Agent for the Owner, replied in the affirmative.
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op-
position; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -144: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -144
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Com-
mission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MJNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71 -72 -37 R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -144 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -'145: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -145
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1297, as recommended by
the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
Roll Call Vote:
72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1297.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -145 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7728: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by
Councilman Thom, Tentative Tract No. 7728 was approved, as recommended
by the City Planning Commission. LOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64 -65 -90 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Ronald J. Grud-
zinski, of the Donald L. Bren Company, for retroactive and extension of
time to Reclassification No. 64 -65 -90 from January 10, 1971 to January 10,
1973, to establish C-1 Zoning on property briefly described as located on
both sides of Imperial Highway, extending northerly from Santa Ana Canyon
Road, was continued from the meeting of March 28, 1972, to first resolve
application No. 71 -72 -21 (Rinker), as said Reclassification overlays a
portion of subject property.
Development Services Department recommend:
1. That a retroactive extension of time be granted for
the period from January 10, 1971, to January 10, 1972, and an additional
extension of time be granted to expire on January 10, 1973.
2. That the resolution approving the C -1 (Resolution No. 65R-
469) be amended, deleting Condition No. 6 which required development sub-
stantially in accordance with plans and adding a condition requiring Coun-
cil approval of development plans prior to the introduction of an ordinance
reclassifying the property to C -1.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
extension of time was granted as requested, subject to the recommendations
of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
72 -230
City Hall, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -146: Councilmahom offered Resolution No. 72R -146 for
adoption, amending Resolution No. 469, deleting Condition No. 6 thereof,
and adding a condition requiring Council approval of development plans prior
to the introduction of an ordinance reclassifying the property, with an ad-
ditional condition to read: "That ordinances reclassifying the property shall
be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to
such parcel, provided, however, that the word "Parcel" shall mean presently
existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City
Council for a lot split."
Refer to Resolution Book.
Roll Call Vote:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
t NO. 64R -469 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 64- 65 -90.
65
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -146 duly passed and adopted.
REQUEST AMENDMENT TO ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. SECTION 4.40 EDUCATIONAL MOTIVA-
TION INSTITUTE: Request of Richard St. Charles, Educational Motivation Institute,
to amend Sections 4.40.010, 4.40.020 and 4.40.030, removing any mention of
the word "hypnotism" or "hypnosis," relating to the practice of the science;
and further requesting a license fee be established to practice hypnotism,
was continued from the meeting of March 28, 1972, pending further investiga-
tion and to obtain a report on the subject from the Orange County Medical
Association.
At the request of Mayor Dutton, and to further clarify the request,
Mr. St. Charles advised that they wish to establish a school to teach hypnotism
and the establishment of a license fee would be to "teach," not "practice"
hypnotism. He stated they were not asking permission to teach medical hyp-
nosis and the course would include self hypnosis educational motivation
of the application of hypnosis self- hypnosis, sales motivation with the
application of self- hypnosis complete curriculum in hypnosis and complete
curriculum in psychology, taught by an accredited instructor of psychology,
currently a professor at Pacific Christian College and licensed by the State
of California as a psychologist and educator.
Mr. St. Charles further advised that their curriculum has been sub-
mitted to the State of California for accreditation and they are asking the
State that their courses, which total 41 years, be accepted as a criteria
for the licensing of hypnotists in the State of California.
Councilman Thom stated he was not completely convinced the Code
should be changed although he was convinced that Mr. St. Charles operated
a legitimate business; however, if the Code was changed, it would open the
door to the undesirables that Mr. St. Charles has mentioned and is also en-
deavoring to restrain.
Discussion was held on how to permit this activity and also restrict
by controls possible undesirables.
Mr. Geisler advised that an exception could be written into the
Code permitting the teaching by accredited schools or by schools with a cer-
tain specified course. The only problem, as has always been indicated by
the medical profession, is that hypnotism in the hands of persons not thor-
oughly familiar with the problems can result in serious problems, such as
psychiatric problems, suicide, etc.
Mr. St. Charles advised that although there have been claims that
hypnotism can create psychological problems, there has never been a documented
case where harm has been done to an individual.
72 -231
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
It was the general consensus of the Council that a way to allow
this activity should be found.
Mr. St. Charles advised that he would be happy to furnish the
City Attorney his complete curricula.
Mr. Charles R. La Rue, 603 South Breezy Way, Orange, owner of
the Institute of Self- Hypnosis, 18031 Irvine Boulevard, Tustin, Califor-
nia, addressed the Council in support of the right to teach self hypnosis.
Mr. Cliff Cotter, 612 Bronwyn Drive, formerly Vice President of
the California Professional Hypnotists Association, and presently Director
of the Hypno -Mercy Foundation, a State recognized organization, working with
cancer patients for the purpose of alleviating pain, reported that he has
been in hypnosis 40 years, and his father before him was a hypnotist.
Mr. Cotter explained the working of hypnosis, and supported the
request to strike the words "hypnotism" and "hypnosis" from the Code, rather
than draft an exception to the Code to allow a particular school. He stated
that he also would like to be able to teach hypnosis in order to recruit
for the Hypno -Mercy Foundation.
Mr. Leo Wagner, 2051 Monte Vista Street, La Habra, California,
reported on the expenditures presently being made by Russia in the inves-
tigation of this science.
At the conclusion of the discussion, and on motion by Councilman
Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Mr. St. Charles was requested to
refer his curricula to the City Attorney to review for possible guide lines
to an amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code, relative to hypnotism, as
requested. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Stephenson moved for a five minute Recess. Councilman Dut-
ton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:05 P.M.).
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Pebley. (4 :15 P.M.).
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69 -13 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Armour Building
Company, dated March 15, 1972, was submitted for an extension of time to
Reclassification No. 68- 69 -13, to enable the developers to complete filing
of final tract map (No. 7802), together with report of the City Engineer
and report of the Development Services Department recommending an extension
of time retroactive from October 29, 1969, and an additional extension of
time to expire October 29, 1972, be granted.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
an extension of time retroactive from October 29, 1969 to the present, and
an additional extension of time to expire October 29, 1972, was granted.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pebley entered the Council Chambers, (4:16 P.M.).
PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Qurelio Flores, on behalf of the Clas-
sic Car Club, for public dance permit,on. April 22, 1972, at Carpenters Hall,
608 West Vermont Avenue, from 8:00 P.M. to 1 :00 A.M., was submitted and gran-
ted, on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, sub-
ject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that
8 private security'officers and 1 matron be hired to police the dance, as
recommended by the Chief of Police. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70 -71 -6 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1244 OBJECTION:
A letter of objection from Mrs. Roy W. Beckham was submitted, regarding ap-
plication of Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus
Christ of the Latter Day Saints, for a change of zone from R -2 to R -3, to
establish a 57 -unit, planned residential condominium development, on pro-
perty located on the east side of Euclid Street, south of Orangewood Ave-
nue, which application was considered in public hearing March 21, 1972,
zoning approved, and conditional use permit granted, in part.
72-232
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1;30 P.M.
Mrs. Beckham's letter alleged none of the adjacent property owners
on Della Lane had been advised of the application or public hearing.
The City Clerk advised that a check of the file revealed that,
through an error, no property owners on Della Lane were sent notices of the
scheduled public hearing, thus, Mrs. Beckham's letter is being presented
to determine if the Council wishes to schedule another public hearing on
the matter.
Mayor Dutton noted that adjacent property owners from Ord Way were
represented at the meeting; however, he invited Mrs. Beckham to address the
Council.
Mrs. Roy W. Beckham, 2223 Della Lane, stated they had lived in
their present home 12 years and at that time Della Lane was designated a
deadend street, although subsequently the street was extended and it now
is a speedway; that four years ago the property on the corner of Orangewood
Avenue and Euclid Street was changed from R -1 Zoning to allow apartments,
which has further increased traffic; and now subject property will be di-
rectly behind her property and she objected to the proposed development,
and specifically the driveway that would be adjacent to her property.
She stated that had she seen the notice posted on the property prior
to the public hearing, there would have been greater opposition represented at
the public hearing.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted that both subject property
and the property on the corner of Orangewood Avenue and Euclid Street were
zoned R -A, prior to the approval of the current R -3 Zoning.
In reply to Council questioning, Mrs. Beckham stated that she pre-
ferred to have the garages of the proposed project back -up to her property,
rather than the alley driveway.
The Council requested Staff to contact the developer to determine
if it would be feasible for them to change their plans so that garages would
back -up to Mrs. Beckham's property, rather than the proposed alley driveway.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -147 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 622 -B: In accordance with recom-
mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No.
72R -147 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENT: THE SUNKIST STREET, CERRITOS AVENUE, HOWELL AVENUE STREET AND
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 622-B.
(Kelly Corkill Contractors, Inc. $151,741.75)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-147 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -148 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 643 -A: In accordance with recom-
mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No.72R-
148 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR TTIE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENT: THE WALNUT CANYON CHANNEL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 643 -A. (K.E.C. Company $93,549.00)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -148 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution Nos. 72R-
149 and 72R -150 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
72
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -149 WORK ORDER NO. 642-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CON-
VENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE JACKSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, EAST OF PARK
VISTA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 642 -A. APPROVING THE
DESIGNS, PLANS,PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORD-
ANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CON-
STRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened, May 11, 1972, 2 :00 P.M.).
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -150 WORK ORDER NO. 645-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CON-
VENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BROADWAY STREET IMPROVEMENT, EAST OF GILBERT
STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 645-B. APPROVING THE DE-
SIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORD-
ANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CON-
STRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened, May 11, 1972, 2 :00 P.M.).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 72R -149 and 72R -150 duly pas-
sed and adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 72R-151: Councilman Thom offered Resolution
No. 72R -151 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Perry R. and Pauline A. Uber;
Thomas H. and Testa A. Boswell; Helen Marie Baker; John F. and Catherine
Quinn Ganahl; The Wickes Corporation; Fred and Suzanne Miller.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -151 duly passed and adopted.
72 -2 34
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -152 EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS: On recommendation of the
City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -152 for adop-
tion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE
NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, OF REAL
PROPERTY FOR HIGHWAY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Hideo and
Kiyoshi Shigekawa, north side of La Palma Avenue, east of State College
Boulevard.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -152 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -153 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY LAW EN-
FORCEMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM: On recommendation of the City Manager, Council-
man Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -153 for adoption, amending the agree-
ment dated May 4, 1971, between Anaheim and Orange County, relative to an
Ultra High Frequency Law Enforcement Communications System, by authorizing
a Joint Powers Agreement, wherein the County will purchase for Anaheim the
required equipment and services therefor.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE PERTAINING TO AN ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY
LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-153 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE OF MATERIAL LEAP. FROG TRANSFORMERS: The City Manager reported on the
recommended purchase of 50 Leap Frog Transformers and advised that the sole
vendor, General Electric Company, has submitted a quotation for said mater-
ial in the amount of $36,647.10, including tax. He thereupon recommended
the purchase be authorized.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
purchase was authorized in the amount of $36,647.10, including tax, as
recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF MAT,FIAL 600 VOLT URD SERVICE WIRE: The City Manager reported on
informal bids received for the purchase of 40,000 feet of 600 Volt, URD
Service Wire, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid:
VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT. INCLUDING TAX
General Electric Supply Company, Anaheim $8,379.00
Graybar Electric Company, Anaheim 10,416.00
Westinghouse Electric Supply, Anaheim 10,526.04
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the low bid of General Electric Supply Company was accepted and purchase
authorized in the amount of $8,379.00, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
72 -235
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
PURCHASE OF MATERIAL ACSR WIRE: The City Manager reported on informal bids
received for the purchase of 20 reels of 336.4 ACSR Merlin Wire, and 10
reels of 653.9 ACSR Wire, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the
low bid:
VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT. INCLUDING TAX
Alcan Cable, Fullerton $23,358.45
General Electric Supply, Anaheim 24,988.34
Graybar Electric Company, Anaheim 26,480.18
Maydwell- Hartzell, Los Angeles 34,152.62
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the low bid of Alcan Cable was accepted and purchase authorized in the
amount of $23,358.45, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF MATERIAL 10 REELS 336.4 ACSR MERLIN WIRE: The City Manager re-
ported that immediate delivery on 10 reels of 336.4 ACSR Merlin Wire was
required for the current construction of the 12 KV Line, and the only com-
pany who could meet the delivery schedule, General Electric Supply, has
submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $10,501.35, in-
cluding tax. He thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
purchase was authorized in the amount of $10,501.35 including tax, as
recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by
the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion
by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton:
a. Claim submitted by Wilson Kwong for purported personal pro-
perty damages sustained as result of claimant's glasses being broken by
another player while playing basketball at Patrick Henry School Playground,
on or about March 11, 1972.
b. Claim submitted by Mary Dolan and Dennis E. O'Meara, Attorney,
on behalf of Steven Patrick Dolan, for purported personal injuries sustained
as result of a City employee dropping a 5 -foot pole on his foot, on or about
March 17, 1972.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-154 NOTICE OF INTENTION BROOKHURST STREET WIDENING: Coun-
cilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -154 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
CITY CLERK TO RECORD THIS RESOLUTION AS A "NOTICE OF INTENTION TO WIDEN
BROOKHURST STREET IN THE VICINITY OF CERTAIN PROPERTY." (Ben Hur Oil Com-
pany, Texaco, Inc.- Brookhurst Street, Crescent Avenue to Lincoln Avenue.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -154 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -155 AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM MAUCH. PEARSON PARK SHUFFLEBOARD
COURTS: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -155 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM MAUCH, WITH
REFERENCE TO OPERATION OF THE PEARSON PARK SHUFFLEBOARD COURTS.
72 -236
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -155 duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was discussed and ordered received
and filed, on notion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dut-
ton:
a. Before the Public Utilities Commission Application of Arrow
Charter Lines, Inc., a corporation, for a Certificate of Public Convenience
and Necessity to operate Passenger Stage Service between Orange and Anaheim,
on the one hand, and Culver City, on the other hand, all points in Califor-
nia.
b. City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 72 -36 Urging the League
of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California
to modify the rules established by Public Utilities Commission Case No. 8209
for undergrounding existing utility lines.
c. City of La Habra Resolution No. 2031 Requesting prompt
acquisition of the Los Coyotes Park Site brthe Master Plan of Regional
Parks for Orange County.
d. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of March, 1972:
Building Division
Police Department
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3026: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3026 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 -72 -25 R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3026 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3027: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3027 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-57 R-3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3027 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANC; NO. 3028: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3028 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-10 R72-5,000)
ORDINANCE NO. 3029: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3029 for first
reading.
72 -237
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69(42) M-1)
ORDINANCE NO. 3030: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3030 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71- 72-32 C-0)
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Kam Foy Yee
and Siu Loong Yee, for premises located at 314 North Beach Boulevard, was
presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the City Attorney was authorized to file a conditional protest with the
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis
that the premises are presently located in a C-1 Zone, which does not
permit the on -sale sale of alcoholic beverages. MOTION CARRIED.
BANZAI MINI -CYCLE PARK: Mayor Dutton submitted correspondence dated April 14,
1972, from Wilma Dickerhoff and Ford A. Dickerhoff, owners of Park Royale
Mobile Village, Orange, again requesting that the operation of Banzai Mini
Cycle Park, which is located adjacent to their mobile home park, be dis-
continued.
Mayor Dutton asked Parks and Recreation Director John Collier to
report to the Council on possible alternate locations, as requested by the
Council at the February 1, 1972 meeting.
Mr. Collier advised he had investigated the Shorb Wells property,
located on Wier Canyon Road, as suggested by the Council, and outlined
the area on a map on the wall.
He noted that, at this time, there is only one narrow access to
the property which would have to widened for use; also, it would be neces-
sary to purchase new and separate equipment for maintenance if this was
developed as a motorbike park because the property is far removed from any
existing equipment storage unit.
In response to a Council suggestion that the area be made avail-
able on an "at your own risk" basis until such time as development in the
area demands discontinuance, the City Attorney advised that there was no
guarantee the City would not be held liable, even on that basis. He added
that a recent State law requires a study of environmental control when a
city develops anything that could disturb the environment.
Councilman Pebley asked for the cost of insurance to allow use
of the Shorb Wells property on an "at your own risk" basis.
Mr. Collier advised that he again had discussed the Newkirk Dump
Site, owned by the County and at one time considered as a location for such
a park, with Supervisor Ralph Clark, in whose jurisdiction the property lies,
and a sound test is being arranged on it. He added that Anaheim's insur-
ance coverage for the sound test has been assured, but it probably would
be July by the time the test results were completed.
In reply to Councilman Dutton, Mr. Collier advised that develop-
ment of Banzai Park had cost approximately $12,000.00, over half of which
was donated, while development of the Shorb Wells property would cost at
least $75,000.00. He further advised that, at present, the Banzai Park
operation deficit is about $6,000.00.
Councilman Sneegas suggested that if the present operation was to be
moved to the Shorb Wells property it would be just as close for Anaheim
residents to use the Irvine Park which is already in existence.
MOTION: Councilman Dutton offered a motion to cease operation of Banzai
Mini -Cycle Park by June 1, 1972, at the latest. Councilman Sneegas seconded
the motion. Councilman Thom abstained from voting on the motion, stating
he would not take such action without a reasonable alternative. MOTION
CARRIED.
72-238
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES April 18. 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
Councilman Sneegas suggested offering a franchise for development
and operation of a park on the Shorb Wells property.
Signed
Mr. Murdoch noted that land across the road from the Shorb Wells
property was approved for a motorcycle and off -track vehicle operation by
the County but this has never been developed.
Mr. Collier advised he understood a concessionaire could not be
obtained for the proposed facility across from the Shorb Wells property;
however, one has inquired about the Newkirk Dump Site property.
The Council directed Mr. Collier to further pursue the possibility
of the Newkirk Dump Site as a location for a motorbike -park operation.
Mr. Collier commented that it is anticipated State funds collected
from vehicle taxes may be available on a 75/25 basis after July 1, 1972,
for developing off -road areas.
DEPARTMENT HEAD MEETING INVITATION: Mr. Murdoch invited Council members to at-
tend a Department Head meeting scheduled for 10:00 A.M., Monday, April 24,
1972, in the Library Multi Purpose Room, at which time John Dedischew, of
the Research Division of the Orange County Planning Department will discuss
the County's Forecast Analysis Center and the Geo- Coding System which have
been developed for the entire County.
JUAREZ PARK FENCING: In response to an inquiry by Councilman Pebley at the March
28, 1972 meeting, Mr. Murdoch reported that the front gates of Juarez Park
have been replaced; however, additional fencing is needed to protect the
property.
He advised that at present negotiations are being held on the
possibility of leasing this property for strawberry growing which will
take into consideration the need of fencing.
TRAFFIC PROBLEMS: Councilman Sneegas noted a request for a traffic signal at
South Street and State College Boulevard. He was advised the State High
way Division has been asked to reassess the situation.
Councilman Pebley asked that the traffic signal on Ball Road at
Lewis Street be investigated to determine if it is necessary. City Engin-
eer James Maddox advised that when the Lewis Street underpass is completed
it is anticipated 5,000 or 6,000 cars per day will enter that intersection;
however, a study will be made to determine if the signal can be deactivated
until needed.
Councilman Sneegas suggested the situation of the trees and bushes
blocking view of the signals at East Street and La Palma Avenue be rectified.
Councilman Pebley requested the left -turn lane at East and North
Streets be renoved to decrease traffic hazards.
ADJOURDmNT: Councilman Stephenson moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley sec-
onded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 5:20 P.M.
City Clerk