1972/04/25Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
72-239
Cwr gall. Anaheim. Califo a pima =TES Anri1 472, 430 P,M.,
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson (entered the meeting at 1 :35
P.M.), Pebley, Thom and Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alone M. Farrens
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR. OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
INVOCATION': Father Pat Hill, of St. Boniface Church, gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the Assembly in the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag.
MINIMS: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held April 4,
1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman
Pebley. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUZTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after read-
ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading
of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ROT FI3ANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY; Demands against the City, in the
*mount of $942,193.19, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved.
R*SCIODUI,AD PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1288: Submitted by A.L.
and M.E. Rist, to establish a 219 -unit, three story motel on W1 zoned pro-
perty located on the south side of Orangethorpe Avenue, west of Raymond
Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-
21, denied said conditional use permit.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by Dale L. Ingram, Agent for the Applicant, and public hearing sched-
uled April 4, 1972, at which time it was discovered the Applicant had not
been notified of this scheduling of the public hearing and it had not been
advertised nor posted in accordance with law, and public hearing was or-
dered rescheduled.
Mayor Dutton again stated that inasmuch as he owned property
near subject parcel and at some time may wish to make application for a
similar operation, he would abstain from acting on this item, and thereupon
left the Council Chambers.
Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson assumed Chairmanship of the meeting.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the
evidence submitted to and considered by the. City Planning Commission, and
read the findings of the City Planning Commission.
He noted that the parking facilities are proposed on a 1 -space
per unit basis (1.5 spaces per unit required for apartments) and each
proposed unit would be 312 square feet and contain efficiency kitchen
units (700 square feet minimum for apartment complexes), which the Platy
ning Commission deemed could be considered a substandard apartment house
development, rather than a motel.
Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson asked if the Applicant or his Agent
pas present and wished to address the Council.
72-240
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL 1INU ES April 25. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
Dale L. Ingram, P.O. Box 229, El Monte, stated he was the Agent for
all parties involved, and advised that the subject property had been vacant
for the past 19 years. Mr. Ingram displayed photographs of an area motel sign
and contended that since subject 2.76 acres is surrounded by commercial pro-
perty and there are other motels in the vicinity, the area already is estab-
lished for motel usage.
Referring to the City Planning Commission findings, Mr. Ingram averred
that their proposal could not be construed as an apartment project, since there
would be no ovens and the units would be too small for permanent living. He
contended the kitchen facilities actually constitute a wet bar with coffee
making facilities.
Mr. Ingram stated that the proposed units would be the same as those
this developer had constructed at 2638, 2738 and 3400 West Lincoln Avenue. He
noted that the present owner of those units had erroneously advertised them as
apartments, but that had been discontinued.
He further stated that not only are motels in demand in industrial
areas, but the large tourist trade made motels necessary on all major streets
and near freeway offramps.
Mr. Ingram advised that they have no objection to the Interdepart-
mental Committee recommended conditions of approval.
In reply to Councilman Thom, Mr. Ingram stated he felt the developer
would be willing to omit all of the kitchen facilities except the refrigera-
tor, since they are an added attraction to travelers, and also new area resi-
dents use motels as temporary accommodations and like the convenience of a re-
frigerator.
Councilman Thom stated he did not feel refrigerators were necessary.
Councilman Pebley suggested half of the units could be equipped with
the kitchenettes and Mr. Roberts advised that the City Planning Commission had
permitted kitchen facilities in 10% of the units of some motels.
Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson asked if anyone wished to address the Coun-
cil in opposition.
Merrill Skilling, representing Northrup Corporation, which is lo-
cated approximately one quarter mile west of subject property, stated their
company has been in its location for twenty years and feel the Akua Motel's
63 rooms and the Hilton's 160 rooms are sufficient for the area, and permit-
ting another motel would result in an overabundance of available rooms, since
the existing facilities do not appear to be filled to capacity. He added he
felt the only way the proposed facility could survive economically would be
as an apartment house.
He urged the conditional use permit be denied.
In reply to Council questioning, W. Skilling stated they would have
no objection if the proposed facility was to be strictly a Intel with no more
than 1070 of the units having refrigerators only; however, he felt the number
of units proposed was excessive.
Gerald Knudson, Bryan Industrial Properties, Inc., stated his company
owns or manages approximately 45 industrial buildings in subject area, and feels
the proposed motel would be detrimental to the integrity of the area since there
are many more rooms planned than necessary and it would end up being a substandard
apartment project.
In reply to Council questioning on whether their company still would
object if the kitchen facilities were eliminated, M. Knudson stated he had not
seen the plans, but felt the number'of units was excessive and that to alter
their proposal at this point would require complete new plans.
Donald Kirk, 560 South Bond Street, noted 67. of the tenants of exist-
ing Casa Cordova and Village Inn Motels, which have kitchen facilities, stay
for from three to six months, and it was his opinion such units were too small
for use as apartments in this manner.
72-241
C4ty Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL RTES April 25. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
Bill Burke, Ashwill —Burke Company, representing adjacent Hyer
Hardware to the west, stated Hyer Hardware had purchased their property in
1959 because their property was zoned industrial and it was his opinion the
proposed motel would be incongruous to the area and would encroach on the
Hyer Hardware.
Robert Kottman, Chairman of the Industrial Committee of the Ana-
heim Chamber of Commerce, stated they had reviewed the proposal and urged
the City deny the application.
Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson invited Mr. Ingram to again address the
Mr. Ingram stated he did not feel the proposed motel operation
would interfere with or be interfered with by Hyer Hardware. In reply
to Mr. Kottman, Mr. Ingram advised that the proposed motel would serve
the industrial area by providing temporary housing for employees moving
into the area.
Responding to a comment, Mr. Ingram stated the proposed facility
would pay the 6% room tax, just as the previously- mentioned units on Lincoln
Avenue do.
It was determined sufficient evidence had been presented and Mayor
Pro Tem Stephenson declared the hearing closed.
414SPLUTION NQ. 72R -46; Councilman Thom stated he did not feel the proposed
project was a compatible land use, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 72R-
156 for adoption, denying said conditional use permit.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1288.
Roll Call Vote:
COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Stephenson
COUNCILMEN: None
COUNCILMEN: Dutton
COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson declared Resolution No. 72R-156 duly
passed and adopted.
Mayor Dutton resumed Chairmanship of the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING ABANDONMENT NO. 71_JOA: In accordance with application filed
by Frank R. Jackson, The Colwell Company, public hearing was held on proposed
abandonment of a portion of Addington Drive, which runs northerly from Santa
Ana Canyon Road to its intersection with Addington Drive, which runs in an
east -west direction in Tract No. 5000; pursuant to Resolution No. 72R -121,
duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accord-
ance with law.
Report of the City Engineer was submitted, recommending approval,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant will remove existing street improvements of said
north -south Addington Drive that lies within the area of the east -west Ad-
dington Drive and reconstruct new curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving to join
existing curb, gutter and sidewalk of said east -west Addington Drive. Said
removal and reconstruction to be done at no cost to the City of Anaheim.
2. Reservation of a public utility► easement requested by the Sou-
thern Counties Gas Company to accommodate an existing gas line, a portion
of which lies within the property line return area proposed for abandonment.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant was present and satisfied with
the recommended conditions, to which he received an affirmative reply from
Hal Raab, Agent for the Applicant.
72-242
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 25. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -157: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R-
157 for adoption, approving Abandonment No. 71 -10A, as recommended by the
City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DES-
CRIBED HEREIN AND RESERVING THEREFROM A CERTAIN EASES FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES. (Addington Drive)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-157 duly passed and adopted.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BULK VENDING MACHINES; Re-
quest of Leo M. Weiner, representing the bulk vending machine operators
of the Western Vending Machine Operator's Association, was submitted at
the March 28, 1972 meeting for amendment of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
to change license fees for bulk vending machines to a gross receipts
basis, rather than a per machine basis. The request was continued to
this date from that meeting for further investigation and draft of an
ordinance more equitable for the bulk vending machine business.
Councilman Sneegas stated he would abstain from any action on
this item since, although it would not directly affect his vending machine
business, it could indirectly.
City Attorney Joseph Geisler submitted a draft of a proposed
amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code and advised that it had been
reviewed with W. Weiner, who indicated he was in accord. He stated he
felt the proposed amendment was fair and equitable and recommended it be
adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3031: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3031 for
first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.36 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 3.36.015 RELATING
TO LICENSE FEES AND PROVIDING A DEFINITION FOR BULK VENDING MACHINES.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP: Correspondence from E.O.
Barrows, President, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, dated April 13 and 25,
1972 was presented, recommending the Community Redevelopment Commission
membership remain at seven, and submitting names to be considered at the
time the replacement is appointed for former member Stanley Pawlowski.
Following Council discussion, Councilman Stephenson moved dis-
cussion of membership on the Community Redevelopment Commission be con-
tinued to May 2, 1972, to allow further time to study recommendations
submitted by other agencies as well as that submitted by the Anaheim
Chamber of Commerce. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REPORTS: Minutes of the April 5, 1972,
meeting, Agenda for the April 19, 1972 meeting, and the report on "Survey
Areas" from the Community Redevelopment Commission were accepted and or-
dered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Coun-
cilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED.
HORACE Min SCHOOL PROPOSED CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: Communication from B.W.
Jordan, President of the Anaheim Foundation for Culture and the Arts,
dated April 14, 1972, requesting the City of Anaheim sign the lease with
72-243
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES April 25. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
the Anaheim City School District for the Horace Mann School as a proposed
Cultural Arts Center and proclaim the period May 13 to May 16, 1972, "Buck
Bag Days" for a community -wide fund drive campaign, was submitted.
The Deputy City Clerk reported a verbal request from Mr. Jordan
to delay consideration of this item until May 2, 1972. On motion by Coun-
cilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley, subject was continued to
May 2, 1972, as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST ANAHEIM ART ASSOCIATION: Request of Etschkin Tarlow, Special Exhibits
Chairman of the Anaheim Art Association, dated April 1, 1972, was submitted
for permission to display price, name and telephone number of exhibiting ar-
tists at the Carrousel of Anaheim at the Convention Center, May 14, 15 and
16, 1972.
The City Attorney advised that the request complies with Council
Policy No. 013, with the exception of displaying the price. However, since
the Convention Center, unlike parks, is considered to be a commercial area,
it was felt the display of price would be appropriate as long as no actual
sale was made on the property.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, re-
quest of the Anaheim Art Association was granted, in accordance with Council
Policy No. 013, and allowing. display of prices on the exhibits with no actual
sale taking place on the Convention Center grounds. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST Sj JTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY: Request of Southern California Edi-
son Company for approval of additional transmission lines was deferred to
the May 9, 1972 meeting, at the request of Tom Lacy, Agent for the Petitioner,
on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission, at
their meeting held April 3, 1972, pertaining to the following applications,
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
VARIANCE NO. 2306: Submitted by Paul J. Knaak, proposing to utilize an ex*
isting service station to sell new and used automobiles and recreational ve-
hicles on C -1 zoned property located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Ave-
nue and Brookhurst Street, with waivers of:
a. Permitted uses required to be indoors.
b. Permitted retail uses.
c. Landscaped setback.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -58,
denied said variance.
VARIANCE NO. 2343: Submitted by John R. and Sandra L. Balaam, proposing to
construct a two -story addition to an existing single- family residence on R 2
zoned property located at the southwest corner of Lemon and South Streets,
with waivers of:
a. Maximum rear yard coverage.
b. Minimum required rear yard depth.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -64,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE NO. 2344: Submitted by Stella M. Brandt, to permit the establish-
ment of an automobile radiator repair and service shop on C-2 zoned property
located on the east side of Anaheim Boulevard, south of North Street, with
waiver of:
a. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -65,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
72 -244
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINU'. S April 25. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
VARIANCE NO. 2347: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs: A.B. Hoffart, proposing to con-
struct a swimming pool in the front setback on R -1 zoned property located on
the north side of Broadway, west of Gilbert Street, with waiver of:
a. Minimum required front setback.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -66,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1289 CLARIFICATION; Submitted by Don Fears,'
Architect for the proposed Western Avenue Baptist Church establishment for
elderly residents, requesting Planning Commission's clarification regarding
stipulation in the minutes on relocation of the covered parking spaces and
number of covered parking spaces required.
The City Planning Commission, by Motion, determined that any amend-
ments or deletion of conditions to said conditional use permit would have to
be considered at a public hearing.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1300: Submitted by United Brotherhood of Carpen-
ters and Joiners of America Local Union No. 2203, to establish an existing
union hall as a conforming use and to permit its expansion on R-A zoned pro-
perty located on the south side of Vermont Avenue, west of Harbor Boulevard.
(CUP NO. 517)
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -68,
granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council, and no
further action taken.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1302: Submitted by Burton Zoul and L. Roberts
Plymouth, Inc., to establish a carwash in conjunction with gasoline sales
on C -1 and C-3 zoned property located on the northwest corner of Anaheim
Boulevard and Ball Road, with waivers of:
a. Maximum number of free standing signs.
b. Minimum height of free standing signs.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution to. PC72 -62,
granted said conditional use permit, in part, subject to conditioh
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was reques-
ted by Councilman Thom, and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule the
matter for public hearing before the City Council.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1299: Submitted by Dunn Properties Corporation,
to establish retail distributing firms and service businesses, including busi-
ness and professional offices primarily servicing business and industry, with
incidental sales to the public in an industrial complex on M-1 Zoned property
located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and East Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -59,
granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
Councilman Dutton questioned Conditions Nos. '1 and 2, in that they
did not specifically state an Applicant has recourse to the City Council in
the event he is not satisfied with the decisions of the Development Services
Department.
The City Attorney stated he felt the entire conditions should be
rewritten since they were, in fact, granting the Development Services Depart-
ment power to approve a use which otherwise would be prohibited. He sugges-
ted including a list of uses that could be approved.
A review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was re-
quested by Councilman Dutton, and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule
the matter for public hearing before the City Council.
72- 245
City pail. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUS April 25. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
R -H 10.000 ZONE SETBACK STANDARDS: The City Manager submitted correspondence
from Alan G. Orsborn, Director of Development Services Department, advising
that a developer has indicated an intent to provide 10 -foot setbacks for
straight -in garages in an R -H- 10,000 Zone project and has requested a writ-
ten opinion from the City Attorney on setback requirements for that zone;
in view of the recent concern expressed by the Council on setbacks, and
the resulting Code amendment to the R-2-5,000 Zone, an amendment to the
Anaheim Municipal Code is being prepared for consideration, providing for
a 25 -foot setback for straight -in garages in the R- H- 10,000 Zone. He sug-
gested that the Council may wish to instruct the Planning Commission to
recommend an amendment to the Code that would provide for a 25 -foot setback
for straight -in garages in all Single-Family Zones.
Mr. Murdoch stated that the 10 -foot front yard setback for R -H-
10,000 Zoning was specifically designed for hillside development to reduce
the necessity of a substantial cut in the hilly areas. He suggested con-
sideration may be given to the fact that an R -H- 10,000 development provides
less density and quite a bit more curbing space for parking than an R -2-
5,000 Zone; that there very likely will be sidewalks adjacent to the curb-
ing in an R -H- 10,000 Zone development, which would thus provide parkway
area between the sidewalk and a garage that could be used for parking; if
the City Council wished to make a driveway clearance standard for all zones
of 20 feet, consideration could be given to requiring electric garage door
openers in the R- H- 10,000 Zone.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Geisler advised that R -H-
10,000 Zoning does not necessarily provide wider lots, since the minimum
requirement is 70 feet. He stated he understood the 10 -foot setback for
R -H- 10,000 lots was determined on the presumption that side entries would
be provided, since it would be impractical to have garages come straight
in in the hilly areas.
Mr. Geisler stated that, in his opinion, if a developer wishes
to provide straight -in garages, he is entitled to receive building permits
under the existing ordinance. He added, however, that if automobiles are
parked over the sidewalk area they are in violation of the law, and subject
to fine.
By general Council consent, the Development Services Department
was requested to present recommendations to the City Planning Commission
for consideration as soon as possible.
AWARD OF CONTRACT WORK ORDER J0. 1239: At the request of the City Engineer,
Councilman Thom moved that award of contract for Work Order Nd. 1239,
(Walnut Canyon Sewer Improvement, Phase II), be deferred to the next regu-
lar meeting. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R 158 AWARD OF CONTRACT. WEED ABATEMENT WORK ORDER NO.
3 2 x- 3 7: City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that the Fire Department had no-
tified all bidders for the Weed Abatement contract that they could with-
draw their bid if they were not willing to,pay the prevailing wages, as
required by Council action for all public works projects; that the response
of the low bidder was that he would like to increase his bid by 257 in this
case. He further advised that upon informing the low bidder his bid could
not be amended, he had stated his original bid would stand and he would pay
the prevailing wage scale as required by the specifications.
Mayor Dutton asked if any of the other bidders on this contract
were present and wished to make a statement, to which he received no reply.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -158: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R.158 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR AND EQUIPMENT TO CUT AND REMOVE ALL RANK GROWTH AND
WEEDS AND REMOVE RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UPON ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF REAL
PROPERTY OR ANY PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 322 -297.
(Harold Watts $23,905.00)
72- 246
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MANTES Aril 25. 1972 1;30 P L M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-158 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-159 WORK ORDER NO. 1242: Councilman Dutton offered Resolu-
tion No. 72R-159 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ORANGE AVENUE SEWER LATERAL
EXTENSION FROM BEACH BOULEVARD TO KNOTT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK
ORDER NO. 1242. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECI-
FICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED
PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened May 18, 1972,
2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -159 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -160 WORK ORDER NO. 632 -A: Upon receipt of certification from
the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R-
160 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND CON
PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE RED GUM STREET CORONADO
STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 632 -A.
(Amex Paving Company, Inc.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-160 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -161 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Thom offered Resolution
No. 72R -161 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Anaheim Properties, Inc.; Mervyn A.
Phelan; Tariq M. Shamma and Don C. Gilmore, 2 deeds.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-161 duly passed and adopted.
City Hall. Anaheim. California CQJJGjL Mtt 1T S April 25. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R- 162 UTILITY AGREEMENT. GRANT CORPORATION: Councilman Dut-
ton offered Resolution No. 72R-162 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
72-247
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ROBERT H. GRANT CORPORA-
TION AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, FOUR CORNERS PIPELINE COMPANY AND THE PACIFIC
TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF ACCESS ROAD
FOR UTILITIES OPERATIONS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-162 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -163 AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON. TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAIIf
WAY COMPANY: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -163 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY PROVIDING FOR THE EXTEN-
SION OF KELLOGG DRIVE ACROSS SAID RAILWAY COMPANY'S TRACK. (MILE POST
39.2)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -163 duly passed and adopted.
CANCEJLATION OF COUNTY TAXES MINI-PARK. CLEMENTINE AND ELI SWETS: On motion
by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the Orange County
Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County Taxes on property ac-
quired by the City of Anaheim for municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolu-
tion No. 71R -536, formerly assessed to Jack Hollins Fulks; deed recorded
December 14, 1971, as Document No. 11785, in Book No. 9925, at Page 468,
Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF MATERIAL GATE VALVES The City Manager reported on informal bids
received for the purchase of Gate Valves for the Water Division, as fol-
lows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid:
VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT. INCLUDING TAR
Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe, Los Angeles- $7,648.25
MarderrSusco, Santa Ana 8,667.86
Howard Supply Company, Garden Grove 9,036.30
Taylor -Jett, South El Monte 9,239.79
Parkson, Inc., Santa Fe Springs 9,802.40
Hanson Water Works NO QUOTE
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom,
the low bid of Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe was accepted and purchase au-
thorized in the amount of $7,648.25, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF MATERIAL ENVELOPES: The City Manager reported on informal bids
received for the purchase of one year's supply of envelopes, as follows,
and recommended acceptance of the low bid:
72-248
City hell. Anaheim, California COUNCIL
VENDOR
Refer to Resolution Book.
Roll Call Vote:
S April 25. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
TOTAL AMOUNT. INCLUDING TAX
Coast Envelope Company, Los Angeles $5,410.19
Federal Envelope Company, Buena Park 5,442.99
Mailwell Envelope Company, San Gabriel 5,563.96
Business Envelope Company, Anaheim INCOMPLETE BID
Gilmore Envelope Company NO BID
Aaron Envelope Company NO BID
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the
low bid of Coast Envelope Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the
amount of $5,410.19, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -164 SETTLEMENT OF EMINENT DOMAIN: On recommendation of the
City Attorney, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -164 for adoption.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM COMPROMISING CERTAIN
EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION; ACCEPTING A CERTAIN EASEMENT DEED; AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING PAYMENT THEREFOR. (Paul T. Schlue $1,990.00; east side of
Kraemer Boulevard, north of La Palma Avenue.)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -164 duly passed and adopted.
CLAJMS AGA7,NST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the
City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by
Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson:
a. Claim filed by Joyce Hancock, for purported personal property
loss sustained as result of food spoilage when electricity was shut off in
error, on or about April 11, 1972.
b. Claim filed by J. Monk, Special Agent for the Pacific Telephone
and Telegraph Company, for purported personal property damages sustained as
result of City's power cable exploding in an adjacent manhole, damaging their
telephone cable, on or about February 24, 1972.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -165 APPORTIONMENT OF TOPICS FUNDS: On recommendation of the
City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R-165 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DIRECTING ACTION TO
BE TAKEN WITH FUNDS APPORTIONED TO CITY FROM FEDERAL TOPICS PROGRAM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-165 duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was discussed and ordered received and
filed, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley:
a. Orange County Board of Supervisors Ordinance Uniform Sales
and Use Tax.
Report: City Attorney's Office.
City Hall. Anatolia, California COU Io April 25. 1972. 1:30 P
b. Greyhound Lines West Notice With regard to Application
No. 52591 filed with the Public Utilities Commission, to increase fares.
c. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Minutes March
16, 1972.
d. Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes March 16,
1972.
e. Financial and Operating Reports for the months of January and
March, 1972:
Roll Call Vote:
Water Division (January)
City Treasurer's Office (March)
Fire Department (March)
Engineering Division (March)
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3028: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3028 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-10(2) R-2-5,000)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3028 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3029 Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3029 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61 -62- 69(42) M-1)
72-249
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3029 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3030: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3030 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 -72-32 C -0)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COIJNCILI+EN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3030 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANC$ NO. 3032 Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3032 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION
14.32.160 OF THE ANAHEIM MiJUICIPAL CODE RELATING TO RESTRICTED PARKING
3:00 A.M. TO 6:00 A.M. (Clementine Street, on both aides, from Lincoln Ave-
nue to Chestnut Street.)
72-250
City Hall. Anaheim. California cog= DES April. 25. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
ORDINANCE jtO. 3033: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3033 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE REIATING TO ZONING. (68 -69 -49(2) R -3 Tract 6824)
ORDINANCE NO. 3034; Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3034 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 72 -16 C-1 (SC)
ORDINANCE NO, 3035: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3035 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71 -51 C-1)
STATUS RESORT C.BLE TELEVISION: Assistant City Manager Robert M. Davis intro-
duced William Armstrong, an employee of Northrop Corporation, who has been
working with the City of Anaheim Research Division the past year as a science
and technology advisor, who presented a status report on the Cable Antenna
Television proposal for Anaheim.
Mr. Davis advised that in the past year Anaheim has participated
in a program sponsored jointly by the National Science Foundation and NASA
for the purpose of transferring technology from the aerospace industry to
cities, and as a result Anaheim has amassed a vast amount of information
on cable television.
Mr. Armstrong advised that cable television ordinarily has been
a process of re- transmitting television signals to areas that do not have
good reception; however, the system proposed for Anaheim is far more ambi-
tious and comprehensive than any existing or planned throughout the United
States. It will originate programs from its studio and from a mobile van,
and provides individualized, continuing two -way education to a child unable
to attend school.
He reported that the proposed requirements are for three cables,
two dedicated for retransmission of material over 45 television channels,
with capability for 62 channels, and one a special dedicated two -way cable
for returning television and data from subscribers.
Mr. Armstrong concluded his presentation by stating that Anaheim
has the following options on Cable TV:
a. Franchise in accordance with Federal Communications Commission
regulations.
b. Experiment by overstepping FCC regulations.
c. City ownership of the system.
d. Combination of City and private ownership.
e. Defer action.
He recommended proceeding with the system as described in his pre-
sentation, and advised that an ordinance to this effect presently is being
prepared for Council consideration.
He stated the proposal would be for a 15 -year, non- exclusive ar-
rangement and the specifications mould be sent only to the four firms who
previously submitted bids, a franchise fee of 5% of the gross operational
revenue would be assessed, the City would have the right to take over the
system in the event of default by the operator or damage to the City, the
City would have the option of assuming ownership of all the capital assets
after a 10 -year period, disputes would be haadled by the City Manager's
office with recourse to the City Council, a $100,000.00 good performance
bond would be required for the period of the agreement, a 240-hour service
on complaints, all failures corrected within 24 hours, and appropriate
staffing. That the City would have the authority to take over the complete
system in the event of a disaster, such as Invasion, riot, flood or earth-
quake.
72-251
City Hall. Anaheim. California QOU1CIL Mt uns Apra 25. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
Mr. Armstrong stated it was hoped the contract could be awarded
about September of this year and the certificate of compliance received
by the grantee by the first part of 1973, that 20% to 40% of the system
would be completed within one year and the entire system within two and
a half years.
about September of this year and the certificate of eceived
by the grantee by the first part of the system would
be completed wi -ar and the entire system completed within two
In response to a query by Councilman Pebley, Mr. Murdoch re-
quested a study be made to determine if the proposed $100,000.00 faith-
ful performance bond was sufficient.
Councilman Dutton noted that the efforts of the Cable TV Com-
mittee actually have resulted in upgrading the industry and he commended
Mr. Armstrong on his achievements.
Mr. Davis advised that one of the basic differences in the phil-
osphy of the FCC and Anaheim is that the FCC allows an operator to start
with a minimum development in a community and then install facilities to
expand the system as it becomes necessary, whereas Anaheim would require
certain facilities for additional services at the outset to give the opera-
tor an incentive to use them.
He further stated that Anaheim in essence is going to challenge
the FCC by going to Washington, D.C. with the selected franchisee and
take the approach that this undertaking will be on an experimentation
basis, which may result in the FCC denying the application; also, they
have been encouraging joint action by surrounding communities and school
districts.
He added that if the Council approves proceeding as described,
a presentation will be made before the League of California Cities Execu-
tive Committee so that other Councilmen will be aware of this project.
Councilman Thom expressed concern that all the effort would be
wasted if the FCC denied the application.
Mr. Murdoch advised that in that case the franchise would have
to be within the FCC regulations.
By general Council consent, the City Manager's office was di-
rected to proceed with the Cable TV proposal as presented.
SAR ITATION DISTRICTS NO. 2 AND 3 ALTERNATE MEMBER: Mayor Dutton' appointed
Councilman Stephenson as the alternate representative to Sanitation Dist
ricts Nos.•2 and 3.
TION sx!YsSI Mayor Dutton appointed Council-
man Pebley ex-officio member of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
The City Manager reported correspondence received from
the National League of Cities United States Conference of Mayors urging
support of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972 (Revenue Shar-
ing Bill) and advising that Anaheim would be entitled to receive $1,686,656
in 1972 if the bill is passed.
The Council indicated a desire to continue to support this bill.
R8Ct18 AMERICAN FREEDOM FROM HUNGER FOUNDATIOJI: On invitation from Council-
man Pebley, Miss Sarah Oliver, 9892 Pacific, Anaheim, student at Magnolia
High School, addressed the Council, requesting an endorsement from the
City Council of a planned 30 -mile Waik on May 13, 1972, for the American
Freedom From Hunger Foundation. She explained the Foundation is National,
established and incorporated in Washington as a private, non profit organi-
zation to acquaint the public with poverty and hunger and started by Presi-
dent Nixon in 1961. That the Northern Orange County May 13th Walk is be-
ing organized by Magnolia High School. students, and to better organize
their Walk they need publicity to let the people of Anaheim know what
they propose is for a very worthy cause.
72-252
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MUTES April 25. 1972. 1 :30 P
Miss Oliver explained that 15% of the funds collected will go towards
operational costs; 42k% to foreign projects (Unicef Bangladesh Relief Fund)
and 424% to domestic projects. That one -half the domestic funds goes to the
Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Fund for high school projects, such as the estab-
lishment of a network of persons (teachers, doctors, lawyers, etc.) to help
high school students with their problems. The other half of the domestic
portion will go to a local Mexican- American Community called Independencia.
to do.
Councilman Stephenson asked what the students expected the City
Miss Oliver replied they need an endorsement and cooperation and
requested a Council Proclamation indicating the Council's awareness of what
the students are doing. She further explained that included in the Northern
Orange County District are 77 schools in Anaheim and the neighboring cities
of Cypress, Stanton, Orange and Fullerton and prior to the Walk, the students
will solicit sponsors to pay a donation of so much a mile. That they have
received approval from the Cities of Fullerton, Cypress and Stanton.
Councilman Thom stated that the students of Magnolia High can rely
on the fact that they have the Council's backing and support in this very
worthwhile project and he commended each and every one of them for their un-
selfish and humanitarian efforts.
Mayor Dutton advised they certainly had 100% backing of the Council
on that part, and their request would be considered further; however, it is
a policy to have a background check made on all such requests for solicitation
of donations.
Miss Oliver was advised by Councilman Stephenson that she should be
sure to contact the Anaheim Police Department as to their planned activity.
Miss Oliver advised they were aware of this and had contacted the
Police Department. She further expressed their need for an office and tele-
phone facilities, and requested any assistance the City might be able to offer.
The Council advised Miss Oliver that no City facilities could be
made available for this purpose, as such assistance would constitute a gift
of public funds.
RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton
moved to recess to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing a litiga-
tion matter. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
(4:00 P.M.)
AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the conclusion of Executive Session and upon return
of all Councilmen to the Council Chambers, Councilman Stephenson moved to ad-
journ. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 5:18 P.M.
Signed 7.
Deputy City Clerk