Loading...
1969/04/0169-164 City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 25; 1969~ 1:30 P.M. The City Attorney noted that the City has the responsibility and authority to provide a crossing guard for the purpose of regulating and moving traffic, and that a traffic signal provides a greater degree of regulation than a crossing guard. Councilman Clark observed that the situation merits investigation after a trial period has passed, and suggested the possibility of better identification of the crosswalk by means of additional signing. He stated that it was his understanding that a uniformed patrolman will be at the in- tersection for the first 10 days, to acquaint the children with the proper crossing procedures and provide instruction at the school. He also pointed out that the crossing guard released from this intersection will be assigned to a new location at Crescent and La Reina, in response to numerous requests. Mayor Pebley noted the similarity to the intersection of Euclid and Crescent, which is even more heavily traveled, where children have learned to cross safely and without incident since the installation of such signals. He pointed out that if this request is granted a precedent would be established to place crossing guards at all signalized intersections. By general consent of the City Council, the City Engineer was re- quested to conduct an investigation, after a 2-week trial period, and submit his report and recommendations for further Council consideration. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 2:45 P.Mo City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1, 1969, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley (entered the meeting at 1:38 P.M.) ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch (entered the meeting at 2:30 P.M.) ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts FERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Roy Heissner INVOCATION: Reverend Don Ganstrom, of Bethel Baptist Church, gave the invo- cation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Clark led the Assembly in the ~'edge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE: The following Resolution of Condolence was adopted unanimously by the City Council: 69-165 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. "WHEREAS, the Great Creator, in His Divine Wisdom, has seen fit to summon unto Himself His faithful and humble servant, Dwight D. Eisenhower; and WHEREAS, Dwight D. Eisenhower rose to the Army's highest military rank of five-star general, and during World War II held the post of Supreme Allied Commander; and WHEREAS, this great soldier-statesman obtained the highest honor of the land as the 34th President of the United States; and Wt~EREAS, his unwaivering sense of duty, his wisdom, compassion and foresight contributed immeasurably to the welfare of our country and the people he loved, NOW, Tt{EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim, on behalf of the citizens of this City, that it deeply mourns the passing of General Dwight Do Eisenhower, a great patriot and statesman, and ~.~.tends sincere sympathy to his wife, Mamie. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be spread in full in the Minutes and a copy thereof forwarded to his beloved wife. UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 1st day of April, 1969. s/ CALVIN L. PEBLEY~ MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: DENE M. WILLIAMS, CITY CLERK, CITY OF ANAHEIM" MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held March 18, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $162,049o60, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approved° Mayor Pebley entered the meeting, 1:38 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-65 AND VARIANCE NO. 2049: Submitted by Ann Prentice, Berniece Meier and Fred Meier, requesting a change in zone from R-A to C-1 on Portion A, and R-3 on Portion B, and also requesting waiver of maximum dwelling unit distance from a standard street, to establish a 94-unit apartment complex on Portion B only; property located generally at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street. The City Planning Commission recommended said reclassification be approved for C-1 on Portion A, R-3 on Portion B, and R-2, 5,000 on Por- tion C, and granted said variance~ Public hearing was continued from the meeting of March 4, 1969~ to allow further analysis of the proposed development as it would relate to a proposed library site projected for the southwest corner of subject property. 69-166 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area~ and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission~ Councilman Clark noted that only a portion of the R-1 development to the south would be buffered by the R-2, 5,000 zone recommended by the City Planning Commission for Portion "C", and that the remainder of the adjacent R-1 homes would border the proposed R-3 development on Portion "B"; Mr. Roberts pointed out that carports would be located along the southerly boundary of Por- tion "B", which would provide a buffer area for the R-1 development. The Assistant City Manager reported plans of development presented in conjunction with the proposed library site were considered by the Library Board and it is now recommended that this location no longer be considered a potential library site. cil o Mayor Pebley asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Coun- Mr. Kenneth A. Bryant, representing the Applicants on behalf of Robert Waldron, Authorized Agent, asked approval of R-3 zoning on the entire portion "B" as requested, as the area is no longer under ~c~nsideration as a library site. He also requested that if action on Portion "B" or "C" is con- tinued that commercial zoning be approved for Portion "A"~ as development of that parcel is imminent. The City Attorney advised that Portions "A~' and "B" could be con- sidered separately. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the subject reclassification. Mrs. Thomas Avery, 2521 Westport Drive, indicated her property is adjacent to Portion "B" of the subject property, and objected to approval of C-1 zoning on Portion "A" at this time, on the basis that it would subsequently influence the action taken on Portion "B"o She favored R-1 zoning on Portions "B" and "C", as the proposed R-2, 5,000 zone is impractical and inadequate. Mro Bryant felt that commercial zoning is the only appropriate con- sideration for the corner parcel, (Portion "A"), and again requested that it be approved at this time° Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; hearing no response, he declared the hearing closed. Councilman Clark moved that decision on Reclassification No. 68-69- 65 and Variance Noo 2049 be continued to the meeting of April 22, 1969, at 1:30 P.Mo, for the submission of more revised plans incorporating the former proposed library site° Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-69: Submitted by Helen West and Parke and Betty Young, requesting a change in zone from R-A to C-l; property located east of Knott Street and north of Ball Road° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No~ PC69-36, recommended said reclassification be disapproved as requested, and further recommended that reclassification to the C-O zone be approved, subject to the following conditions: l. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Knott Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2~ That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineer- ing requirements of the City of Anaheim along Knott Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other ap- purtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in ac- cordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 69-167 City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES = April 1~ 1969~ 1:30 P.Mo 3o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2900 per front foot along Knott Avenue, for street light- ing purposes. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Knott Avenue, for tree planting purposes. 5o That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 7. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property line. 8. That any air-conditioning £acilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 9. That any parking area lighting shall be lighted with down- lightingamaximum 6-feet in height, and shall be directed away from the property lines to maintain the residential integrity of the area~ 10~ That Condition Noso 1, 2, 3, and 47 above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur- ther time as the City Council may grant. 11. That Condition Nos° 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Mro Roberts noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that applica~ tion for a conditional use permit to establish a convalescent hospital on the subject property has been filed, and will be heard before the City Plann= lng Commission at their next meeting° In answer to Council questions, Mro Thompson, Assistant Director of Development Services, advised that a conditional use permit would be neces- sary for the proposed use of the property in either the C-1 or C-O zone; how- ever,the City Planning Commission felt that C-O zoning would ensure develop- ment consistent with existing land uses in the area. Mayor Pebley asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Council. Mrs° Patty Berg, 11951Brookhurst Street, Huntington Beach, repre- senting the Agent for the Petitioners, indicated that C-1 zoning was request- ed on the basis that the two subject parcels will be combined with the third parcel fronting on Ball Road, which was previously reclassified to the C-1 zone, approximately one year ago, (Reclassification No. 67-68-1), for the ex- press purpose of developing a convalescent home; that the applicant wished to have zoning which would allow the proposed development on the three as- sembled lots~ The City Attorney advised that although a convalescent hospital could be developed in either zone, with a conditional use permit, approval of C-O zoning would restrict the future use of such a structure to those al- lowed in that zone~ rather than allowing 8eneral commercial uses permitted in C=l zone. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone present opposed the subject reclassi- fication; receiving no response, he thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-156: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-156 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zeno as recommended by the City Planning Commission° Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69- 69 - C-O). 69-168 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1, 1969, 1~30 PoMo Roll Call V©te~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES o° COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT ~ COUNCILMEN: S chut te The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-156 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 68-69-70 AND VARIANCE NOo 2055: Submitted by RoJo Dixon, requesting a change in zone from C-2 to C-3~ and also request- ing waiver of minimum number of required parking spaces to permit the expan- sion of an existing brake shop; property located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and East Street~ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Noo PC69-37, recommended said Reclassification be disapproved, and granted said variance, pursuant to Resolution Noo PC69-38, subject to the following ccnditions~ 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width along Lincoln Avenue and 40 feet in width along East Street, with a 25-foot radius property line return~ for street widening purposes~ said dedication shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant° 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works° 3o That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view° 4o That Condition Nos~ 2 and 3~ above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections~ 5~ That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Noo 1, provided, however, that an overhead door shall be constructed so that parking located at the rear may be reached by passing through from front to rear of the structure° Mr~ Roberts noted the location of the subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He reported that the Appli- cant stated, at the City Planning Commission hearing, that the reclassifica- tion would not be necessary if the variance is granted to allow continuation of the existing operation° cil. Mayor Pebley asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Coun- Mro R.Lo Dye, 402 North State College Boulevard, representing the Agent for the Petitioner, indicated that the variance was requested to en- large the building to house that portion of the operation which is presently outside the existing structure~ and that the application for reclassification was suggested by the Planning Staff, only because it may be beneficial to the property owner in the future° He stated that he would prefer to have both applications granted~ however, the variance application is the'only one neces- sary to continue the present operation. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the City Coun- cil; receiving no response, he thereupon declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NOo 69R-157~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 69R-157 for adoption, disapproving Reclassification No. 68-69-70, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (68-69-70). 69-169 City Hall, Anah~imz California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 13 1969~ 1:30 PoM0 Roll Call Votes AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: $chutte The Mmyor declared Resolution No~ 69R-157 duly-passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-158: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R~158 for adoption, 8rantin$ Variance Noo 2055, as requested~ subject to the con- ditions recommended by the City Planning Commission° Refer to Resolution Bock~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NOo 2055. Roll Gall Vote: AYE8~ COUNCILMEN° Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT° COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-158 duly passed and adopted~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-72 AND VARIANCE NO. 2058 AND CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMI~ NOo 1095: Submitted by Anne Henning Paulus~ requesting a change in zone from R-A to C-1 on Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4, and requesting a waiver of maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone on Parcel 3, and permission to establish a walk-up res- taurant on Parcel 2~ property located south and east of the southeast cor- ner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Streeto The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Noo PC69-40, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following conditions~ 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width on Lincoln Avenue and 45 feet in width on Rio Vista Street from the centerline of the street, for street widening purposes. 2o That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and pav- ing, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer~ and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements° 3~ That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2°00 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, for street lighting purposes° 4° That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, for tree planting purposes° 5~ That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder° 6o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property line~ 7o That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works° 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 9o That any air-conditioning fa<~ilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes° 69.-170 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. 10o That Condition Nos~ 1, 2, 3, and 4~ above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur- ther time as the City Council may' grant° 11o That Condition Nos° 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9~ above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 12o That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; PROVIDED, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing par- cels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No0 PC69-41, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions~ 1~ That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No~ 68-69-72. 2o That any parking area lighting shall be lighted with down-light- ing a maximum 6-feet in height and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the areas 3o That subject property shall, be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5~ 6~ and 7o The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to Resolution NOo PC69-42, granted said conditional use permit, sub.ject to the following conditions: 1o That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the com- pletion of Reclassification NOo 68-69-72° 2. That any parking area lighting shall be lighted with down-light- ing a maximum 6-feet in height and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area, prior to final build- ing inspection~ 3~ That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 1, 2, 3~ 4, 5, 6~ 7~ and 8° Mro Roberts noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission° Mayor Pebley asked if the Applicant was present and wished to ad- dress the City Council~ Mro Leonard Smith, 125 South Claudina Street, Authorized Agent of the Applicant, stated that plans for development of the balance of subject property will be submitted as they become available° Mro Charles Nealey, 502 Stehly Street, addressed the City Council in opposition to the subject applications~ stating that his property is im- mediately to the south of Parcel No. 3. He cited sections of the Zoning Code relating to lighting in areas adjacent to an R-1 zone and development of property in a manner not detrimental to the surrounding area. He felt that maintenance of his swinnnin8 pool would become an impossible problem if the proposed development is allowed, and objected to the requested waiver of height limitation within 150 feet of a residential zone~ gpea~ing on be- half of his neighbors, he expressed concern regarding the noise~ hours of operation of the proposed convenience market~ from 7:00 AoMo to 11:00 P.Mo~ and the high incidence of robberies occurring at these establishments; he also objected to noise~ increased weekend traffic, grease and odors which would result from the development of the proposed walk-up restaurant. Mr. Nealey was of the opinion that an 8-foot masonry wall would be required along the south property line, and noted that there is an exist= ing 6-foot masonry wall at the rear of his property~ that the foundation would not support an 8-foot wall and if an additional wall is constructed by the applicant, his wall would either have to be torn down or, if allowed to remain, would provide a breeding place for spiders. He felt that a com- mercial-professional building would be a more suitable development for the subject property, since the hours of operation would be more compatible to the adjacent R-1 property° 69-171 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April ir 19697 1;30 P.M. In answer to Council questions, Mro Thompson indicated that the requested waiver of height limitation is a minimum variance, as the building height is slightly more than that allowed within 150 feet of an R-1 zone. Mrs~ Charles Nealey, 502 Stehly Street, clarified statements made regarding the required masonry wall, indicating that the City Planning Com- mission ask~ed whether she would approve of the proposed development if an 8-foot wall is required, to which she resporded "No~" Mr~ Nealey stated further that he would object to any plexiglass extension to the existing walls and fences to meet an 8-foot height require- mento Mrso Anne Paulus, owner' of the subject property, indicated she had paid for one-half of the construction costs of some sections of the existing masonry walls, although Mr. Nealey had paid entirely for his own wall~ and that she felt it was not fair to require another wallo Mr. Smith noted that a 6-foot masonry wall is required where no wall or fencc~ presently exists. Council discussion, ensued~ regarding height of the required block wall, at the conclusion of which it was determined that although the City Council does not wish to impose a hardship on the Applicant, an 8-foot mas- onry wall would be necessary to adequately protect the home owners to the south° RESOLUTION NO. 69R-159: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-159 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 6 to read as follows: 6~ That an 8-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property line of Parcels Nos. 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-72 - C-1)o Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-159 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-160: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-160 for adoption, granting Variance Noo 2058 as requested, subject to the cons ditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Beok~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2058. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein~ Clark and Pebley NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 69R-160 duly passed and adopted. 69-172 ~lty Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April It 1969~ 1~30 PoM. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-161: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-161 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1095 as requested, sub- ject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 1095o Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-161 duly passed and adopted. REQUEST - ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CONTINUED FROM THE MEETINC OF JANUARY 21~ 1969~ FOR FURTHER STUDY AND ANALYSIS): The City Manager reported that the request of the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, proposing a revision to Rule 3 of the Personnel Procedures~ to provide under "compen- sation'' that the wording "public" as well as "private" employment in the appropriate labor market be included, and also in considering compensation for comparable positions of the Benchmark Cities that it be the 16 largest cities, not including the City of Anaheim~ He noted that it has been the policy of the City Council, for some time, to ~pecifically refer to private employment in the appropriate labor market, although exceptions are made where no comparable position exists within the private sector (such as Po- lice and Fire Department positions;) and that representative surveys for some positions may be from Orange County alone~ whereas others may include Los Angeles and Venture Counties, and the Corona area; however, survey ma- terial gathered each year by the Personnel Director has been based primar- ily on the labor market in private employment~ not public, within the Los Angeles-Orange County area° He emphasized that the policy of the City Council has been that government salaries, specifically Anaheim's~ should not lead private em- ployment, but rather should be a fair wage in line with what is paid in the private sector. He felt that the A~MoEoAo proposal could place a great- er emphasis on salaries offered by public employment° Mro Murdoch thereupon recommended that Rule 3 of the Personnel Procedures be amended, not as recommended by the A.MoE.Ao, but to follow and conform with sections o~ the Government Code recently adopted, relat- ing to Labor Relations, and to continue the policy followed by the City Council, relating to salary-setting procedures~ RULE 3 ~ COMPENSATION Section 3~0 ~ The Personnel Director, under the direction of the City Manager, shall be responsible for recommending wages, rates and salary schedules for each job class in the classified service, the City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk and the City Treasurer. Prior to any such recommendation, the City Manager, or his designated representative, and representatives of recognized em- ployee organizations, shall meet and confer in good faith to en- deavor to reach agreement on matters concerning wages~ hours~ and other terms and conditions of employment in classifications repre- sented by such employee organizations~ At such time as agreement is reached for such classifications~ the City Manager and the recognized employee organizations shall jointly submit a written memorandum of said understanding, which shall not be binding, to the City Council for determination. 69-173 City Hall, Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Section 3~1 -. Each job class in the classified service and the positions of City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk., and City Treasurer shall be assigned to a wage or salary schedule in the uniform pay p~an to reflect the similarities and differ- ences in levels of duties and responsibilities. The wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment shall be related to similar conditions in private employment in the appr~priate labor market° Such assignment to a wage rate or salary schedule shall be made by the City Council in the form of a Salary Resolution. Mr. Jake Petrosino, President of the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, indicated he did not receive a copy of the recommendations sub- mitted by the City Manager, but it appeared that very little change is be- ing proposed~ and felt that it would not solve the problem that the Asso- ciation is seeking to resolve in the area of sa!ary-settin$ procedures. He stated that it was their understanding that the proposed change relating to benchmark cities is already £o]lowed informally~ and the Association is only requesting that this be formally stated in the Personnel Procedures. ~e further stated that it was not intended that the Association constrict the City in its consideration of compensation for employees, but rather it is £elt that the use o£ both public and private salary and benefits data will provide more realistic information upon which the City can base its compensation policy each yearo He noted that placement or ranking with the benchmark cities is not being proposed, as the Association is confident that the City of Anaheim will provide fair compensation commcn~3urate with ability to pay. He called attention to the statement contained in the recommenda- tion of the City Manager~ under Section 3.1, relating to working conditions, and indicated it was their opinion that this was not relevant to that section. He outlined the problems faced by the Association in negotiating salaries where it is not known what "appropriate labor market" means; that when a specific classification is discussed, where there are only two or three such positions in the private labor market, the public labor market should be considered and determined as it would be more realistic. He stated that the Association does not expect City salaries to lead the private labor market; however, it does request that the interpretation of what is the "appropriate labor market" be spelled out in the Personnel Procedures, rather than be determined I.. the City Manager and Personnel Director, so that our surveys and data will relate to the same thing. He felt that such a revision to the Personnel Procedures would allow the use of other surveys felt by the Association to be more realistic, and would insure competitive salaries for City employees. He cited an example of a City employee accept- ing a comparable position elsewhere for a sizeable increase in salary, which necessitated lowering the requirements for that job classification in order to fill it at the same salary level~ He reported that recognizing the Rule needs changing, in their opinion the rule proposed was inadequate and would not resolve the problem that confronts them° At the conclusion of Council discussion, the City Manager recom- mended that the A~M. EoAo and other employee organizations be given the op- portunity to review the proposed r~vision to Rule 3o He further recommended that the ~llowing statement ~e considered by the Council and the various employee organizations for deletion from the proposed revision of Section 3ol, relating to working conditions: "The wages, hours~ and other terms and considerations of employment shall be related to similar conditions in private employment in the appropriate labor market." By general consent of the City Council~ the proposed revision of Rule 3 of the Personnel Procedures was deferred to the meeting of May 6, 1969, for further study and written expression pertaining thereto by the various employee organizations. 69~174 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES o April 1, 1969~ 1:30 P.Mo In answer to Mr. Petrosino's inquiry, the City Manager advised that consideration of a second request for authorized leave with pay of a maximum of 8 man days per year for members of the A.MoEoAo to attend employee conferences is considered inappropriate at this time, as it was considered and withdrawn during last year's salary negotiations, and should not be con- sidered again nor decided prior to the next negotiation period. Mr. Petrosino stated that it was his understanding that this re- quest was also continued to this meeting~ and felt that the change of cir- cumstances warrant consideration of the request before the end of the nego- tiated wage period and this was not a breach of faith. In answer to Council questions, Mro Murdoch indicated that usually the appropriate employees are allowed to take time off to attend these ses- sions, however, should a situation arise where the absence of a particular employee at that time would create a hardship to the City, in all probabil- ity an alternate could attend. No further Council action was taken on the above requests and recommendations, as the matter was deferred to May 6, 1969o VARIANCE NO~ 2052: Request of Earl Nellesen, of The Earl's Plumbing~ Inco, was submitted for a one-year extension of time for the payment of street light- ing fee for the Manchester Avenue frontage of property located at 1533 West Lincoln Avenue° Also submitted was report of the Development Services De- partment recommending approval~ On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said request was granted, as recommended by the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED° SIGN REQUEST: Request of Julius Engoren of Advance Neon and Plastic Sign Company, for permission to project a free-standing sign three feet into the public right-of-way, C-2 zoned property, at 1009 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted together with report and recommendation of the Development Services Depart- mento On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said request was granted, subject to removal of the existing roof sign, in order to comply with the ordinance, as recommended by the Development Services De- partmento MOTION CARRIED° RECLASSIFICATION NOo 68-69-56: Request of Albert Toussau was submitted, to amend Resolution of Intent No. 69R-44, (C-l), to require installation of street improvements and recordation of parcel map, prior to obtaining building per- mit; property located north of Ball Road, east of Sunkist Street. Also sub- mitted were reports and recommendations of the City Engineer and Development Services Department. Council° Mayor Pebley asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Mr. Albert Toussau, 6672 Richfield Road, indicated that the exnen- sion of time for the required Ball Road street improvements is requested on the basis that the State Di!~ ~£ Highways has agreed to construct these improvements at the time that the Orange Freeway off-ramp is constructed° He noted that tying the required improvements to the issuance of building permits would ensure that the improvements are in before development of the subject property takes place, if commenced prior to installation of street improvements by the State. In the ensuing discussion it was determined that posting of a bond for street improvements would not be required as the State has acquired the total right-of-way involved~ 69-175 City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION N©0 69R-162; Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-162 for adoption, amending Resolut~i~n of Intent Noo 69R-44~ Conditions Nos~ 1 and 3, as follows; 10 That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, including preparation of improvement plans and installa- tion of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engin- eer, prior to obtaining final building inspection. 3~ That a parcel map, to record the approved division of subject property, shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder~ prior to obtaining building permits~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO~ 69R-44 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 68-69-56° Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENTa COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No, 69R-162 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP ~ TRACT NO0 6170: Request of C.Eo Bever, Developer, for a one-year extension of time to file ?:~al Tract Map, Tract No. 6170, was submitted together with report and recommendation of the City Engineer; property lo- cated on the west side of Peralta Hills Drive, south of Santa Aha Canyon Road. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said extension of time was denied~ as recommended by the City Engineer, in accord- ance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act° MOTION CARRIED° CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission, at their meeting held March 10, 1969, pertaining to the following applica- tions was submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 1092 AND VARIANCE NOo 1790~ Submitted by Edward and Irena Corwin~ to permit the continued outdoor storage of wrecked and abandoned automobiles in an M-1 zone, with waiver of (1) required enclosure of outdoor uses by a 6~foot masonry wall and (2) required setbacks and land- scaping; property located on the west side of Orange Street~ between Adele and Cypress Streets. The City iPlanning Commission, b3~ motion, terminated all proceed- ings on Conditional Use Permit No. 1092, as requested by the Petitioner, and granted a one-year extension of time to Variance Noo 1790, subject to conditions° VARIANCE NO. 2061~ Submitted by' E1Vee~ Incorporated, requesting waiver of permitted R-1 uses to permit expansion of an existing trailer park~ property located south of Midway Drive, between Zeyn and Clementine Streets° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Re~c.'i~tion No. PC69~53~ granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2062: Submitted by Incentive Aid Foundation, requesting waivers of (1) maximum number of main buildings per building site, (2) maximum build- ing height within 150 feet of a sin$1e-family zone, (3) minimum number of required covered parking spaces, (4) front setback, (5) minimum distance be- tween buildings,(6) minimum required front landscaping, to establish a 279- unit, one and two-story apartment complex on 4 parcels of property located 69-176 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1~ 1969~ 1:30 P.Mo on the east side of East Street, north of Ball Road° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-45, granted said variance in part, subj~-t to conditions, denying requested waiver No. 5, which was subsequently withdrawn by the Applicant~ VARIANCE NO. 2063; Submitted by Sidney Landau~ requesting waiver of minimum required front yard, to permit the construction of a 6-foot masonry wall, property located at 2137 West Huntington Avenue° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-46, granted said variance, subject to conditions° CONDITIO.NAL USE PERMIT NO. 802 AND VARIANCE NO. 1757: Request for exte. nsion of time for construction of a 240-unit, single adult apartment development; property located west of Harbor Boulevard, at the corner of Wilken Way and Mallul Drive. The City Planning Commission, by motion, granted a six-month ex- tension of time° CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1039~ Request for an extension of time to estab- lish a 150-bed convalescent hospital; Halopoff Properties, property located on the north side of Ball Road, approximately 460 feet east of Knott Street. The City Planning Commission, ~by motion, granted a six-mo~:h ex- tension of time, subject to conditions~ The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken° PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE - LAKEVIEW AVENUE: City Planning Commission Resolu- tion No. PC69-54 was submitted, recommending that street name change be ap- proved, renaming Crescent Drive, between Santa Aha Canyon Road and its eas- terly extension, 500 feet south of Cerro Vista Drive, to Lakeview Avenue° RESOLUTION NOo 69R-163: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 69R-163 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CHANGING THE NAME OF CRESCENT DRIVE TO LAKEVIEW AVENUE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCIIRVIEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-163 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 68-69-51 AND VARIANCE NOo 2030: Request of Richard Kenneth Brooks, Jro, Architect, for rehearing of Reclassification No. 68-69-51 and Variance No° 2030, was submitted and granted on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, subject to thepayment of a $50°00 fee; Pub- lic Hearing to be scheduled May 6, 1969, 1~30 P.Mo MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO° 6880: Developer - G. Ko Construction Company~ tract located at the northeast corner of Euclid Street and Crone Avenue, and con- tains 1 proposed R-1 zoned lot, (continued from the meeting of March 18, 1969, to allow further study and recommendations regarding a method of tran- sition from Residential to Commercial land use° The City' Attorney recommended approval of said tentative map, sub- ject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, allowing the developer to commence the commercial development, while proceeding to vacate the premises and remove the existing structures,~ a schedule meeting administrative approval, with the operation to be completed prior to final 69-177 Cits Hall~ Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1~ 1969~ 1;30 P.Mo building inspections. On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Clark, Tentative Mas, Tract Noo 6880 was approved as recommended by the City At- torneyo MOTION CARRIED° PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT~ Application filed by Mrs. Frances B. Gonzale~, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana #24, for permit to conduct public ~ance on April 6, 1969, at Carpenters' Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was sub- mitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Coun- cilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NO. 69R-164 - WORK ORDER NO. 3509: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-164 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERViCES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO 'WIT: THE YORBA SUBSTATION, LA PALMA AVENUE AT ORCHARD DRIVE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NOo 3509° (Jenkin Construction Company)~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: CO~JNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-164 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-165~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 69R-165 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A PRO- POSED RE~ISiON IN THAT CERTAIN FREEWAY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CiTY OF ANA- HEIM AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DATED NOVEMBER 4, 1959, RELATING TO THE ROUTE 57 FREEWAY, STATE HIGHWAY ROAD 07-ORA-57, AT THE LINCOLN AVENUE AND KATELLA AVENUE INTERC~NGES~ Roll Ca'.l Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Ne. 69R-165 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Ceunciln~.n Kreim. offered Resolution Nos. 69R-166 to 69R-175, both inclusive, for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-166: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Gilbert - La Palma Properties)° RESOLUTION NO. 69R-1 7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEtl NT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CI_.Y OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Menasha Container Corporation of California). 69-178 City Hall, Anaheim~ Cai '.f~ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1~ 19694 1:30 PoM. RESOLUTION N©o 69R-168: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CI~ 7 OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Croton Realty Cc~, and Texacc~ Inc.) RESOLUTION NOo 69R-169~ A RESOLUTION O~~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND Pb~LIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Aubrey Anderson and Elizabeth Anderson)~ RESOLUTION NOo 69R~170~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Shelton & Son~ Inco). RESOLUTION NOo 69R-171~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES. (Forest Lawn Cemetery Association)° RESOLUTION NO. 69R-172: A RESOLL~ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (The Roman Catholic Archbi . p of Los Angeles.) RESOLUTION NO° 69R=173: A RES©LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Ci~3Y OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Forrest Co Price and Oma Mo Price). RESOLUTION NOo 69R-174: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Miles Mahan)o RESOLUTION NOo 69R~175~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Gilbert Lo Schrceder and Opal Mo Schroeder). Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES oo COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT~° COUNCILMEN ~ Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Nos~ 69R-166 to 69R~175, both inclu- sive, duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED LITIGATION - WATER METERS, {RESTRAiNT OF TRADE): On report and recem~ mendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Krein moved that the firm of Rutan and Tucker be employed on a contingent fee basis to represent the City of Ana- heim in bringing suit against two firms in connection with conspiracy and res- traint of trade on water meters; said employment contingent upon the with- drawal c~ ~hat firm from any action that produces a conflict of interest, as representative of the City of Anaheim° Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (To the foregoing motion~ Councilman Dutton voted "No.") CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The f,pllowing claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ~rdered referred to the insurance carrier~ on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark: ao Claim submitted by Mrs~ Albert Jo Olson, for personal property damages~ purportedly sustained on or about February 23~ 1969. b. Claim submitted by Arno C. Rortvedt, for personal property loss, purportedly sustained on er about January' 2, 1969~ c~ Claim submitted by Raymond L. Fischer, on behalf of Raymond D. Fischer, for personal injury damages purportedly sustained on or about January 26, 1969o 69-179 City Hall, Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1~ 1969, 1~30 PoMo MOTION CARRIED° CORRESPONDENCE~ The following correspondence was ordered received and filed~ cn motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton: ao City of Fountain Valley' Resolution No~ 5040 - Urging the Board of Supervisors of Orange County' and the Orange County Flood Control District to take immediate steps rega~ ]g construction of flood control projects. b~ Orange County' Chamber cf Commerce - Resolution regarding New- port Freeway (Route 55) between Bay Street in Costa Mesa and Coast High- way (Route 1) in Newport Beach° c. Minutes - Anaheim Public Library Board - meeting held Feb- ruary 17, 1969. do State Controller Report - Estimated _ared Revenue to be ap- portioned by the State Controller during 1969-70 Fiscal Year. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED INCREASE IN TAX RATE - ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT~ The City Manager noted that a request was received from the Orange County Board of Supervisors for an expression of support for ten cent increase in the maxi- mum Orange County Flood Control District tax rate° No Council action was taken on said request at this time° LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS: Correspondence was submitted from Orange County Division~ League of California Cities, requesting the City Council to take a position on proposed resolutions pertaining to (1) Airport Land Use Commission, (2) Island Annexations, and ~) Local Agency Formation Commission Staffing~ The City Manager noted that the City Council has previously ex- pressed positions on proposals (2) and (3) above, and suggested that a rep- resentative be selected to attend the League's Executive Committee meeting April 10, 1969, for the purpose of voting on the proposed Resolutions. On. motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Krein, Coun- cilman Dutton was authorized to attend the Executive Committee meeting and vote as a representative of the City', using his own judgment pertaining to issues not previously considered by the City Council. MOTION CARRIED° ORDINANCE NO° 2656: C~uncilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2656 for adoption~ Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (65-66~24 (10) - M-l). Roll. Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Schutte The Mayor declared Ordinance Noo 2656 duly passed and adopted° ORDINANCE NO~ 2657: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2657 for adoption~ Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 '~2) ~ C-R). Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NCES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COL~CILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 26.57 duly passed and adopted. 69-~180 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1~ 19693 1:30 PoM. ~.~DINANCE NO° 2658~ Councilman Kr¢in offered Ordinance NOo 2658 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY' OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66-67.-61 (24) - C-R). Roll Call Vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton~ Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Schutte The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2658 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2659~ Cc:unc. ilnm. n Clark offered Ordinance. Noo 2659 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAl, CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTIONS 17.08.550 TO 17,08.559, INCLUSIVE, RELATING TO ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR DEDICATION OF LAND, PAY- MENT OF FEES, OR BOTH, FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL LAND IN TRAILER PARKS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS, NOT INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION (R-©~ R-l, R-2, R-3). ORDINANCE NO. 2660: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2660 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTIONS 17.08.530 TO 17.08.539, INCLUSIVE, RELATING TO ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR DEDICAT/ON OF LAND, PAY- MENT OF FEES, OR BOTH~ FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL LAND IN SUBDIVISIONS° ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS~ The following applications were presented by the City Manager to the City Council, for their information: a~ Application submitted by Claude Robert Millhouse, for On-Sale Beer and Wine, (Bona Fide Eating Place), PersoD..-to-Person Transfer, for the Country Girl, 226 North Manchester Avenue, C-2 zone. bo Application submitted by James Oscar Crowson and Esther Crow- son, for Original On-Sale Beer and Wine, (Bona Fide Eating Place), for an un-named business, at 2916 West Lincoln Avenue~ C~2 zone. Nc Council action was taken on the above applications. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-176: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Council- man Krein offered Resol~tion NOo 69R-176 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 66R~239 AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 68R-119 AND AMENDING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS CLASSIFICATIONS OF PAk~-TIME EMPLOYMENT NOW EM- PLOYED AT THE PARKING LOT OF ANAHEIM STADIUM AND ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER. Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton~ ~ein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-176 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-177~ On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Council- man Dutton offered Reso].ution No. 69R-177 for adoption.. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 63R-910 AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NOo 67R-407 AMENDING PERSONNEL RULE ~9 PROBATIONo 69-181 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 1, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES~ COUNCILMEN; None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-177 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-178: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Coun- cilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-178 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 68R-426 AND AMENDING THE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE FOR THE JOB CLASS OF COMMERCIAL FIELD SUPERVISOR° Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-178 duly passed and adopted. .REQUEST - KINGSMEN DRUM AND BUGLE CORPS: Mr. Frank Graham, Director of the i~ings- men Drum and Bugle Corps, requested a waiver of license fees in connection with the "Show of Shows" Carnival to be held at the White Front store park- ing lot, Harbor Boulevard and Chapman Avenue, on April 2 through 6, 1969~ The City Attorney advised that the activity qualifies for the re- quested waiver of fees, with the exception of the food concession, which will not be manned by members of the Drum and Bugle Corps. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, wai- ver of license fees on behalf of the Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps Carnival was granted for the dates requested, with the exception of the food-handling concession~ for which standard license fees must be paid, as recommended by the City Attorney° MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Clark seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (4:37 P.M.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present~ with the exception of Councilman Schutte. (7:00 P.M.). OTHERS PRESENT~ CITY MANAGER, Keith A. Murdoch, CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Bo Geisler, CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams, CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson, ZONING SLOPER- VISOR: Charles Roberts° PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 68-69-75; RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-71, VARIANCE NO. 2057 AND GENERAL PLAN AMEMDMEMT NO. 112: Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney, addressed the City Council on behalf of the applicants in Reclassification No. 68-69-71 and Variance No. 2057, and requested that the subject public hearings be continued in order that they may be heard by a full Council. Each Councilman present observed that in their experience on the City Council, no applicant has been denied the privilege of continuing a public hearing for a full Council when so requested. Mr° Bruce Wallace, Attorney, representing the opposing property owners in the subject area, expressed opposition to the continuance on the basis that it would inconvenience the large number of persons present who made special arrangements to attend the meeting; that the continuance is not requested due to lack of preparation on the part of the applicants, as is usually the case in such requests; and that four out of five of the Council- men are present and able to hear the matter at this time. 69-182 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCI.L. MINUTES-' April 1; 1969; 1:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton pointed out that the decisions on these appli- cations will be of great importance to the City of Anaheim, and may influ- ence future zoning ordinances; that it is only fair tl~a a full Council be present; and considered the request for a continuance a valid one. In the ensuing Council discussion, it was determined that the meeting of April 29, 1969, would be the earliest date when a full Council could reasonabl.f be expected to be present. Mr. Charles Woodall, 2318 West Broadway, chairman of the committee opposing the proposed development of the subject property, stated that al- though his committee would prefer that public hearing.proceed at this time, he could understand the request for a full Council, and would accept the decision of the City Council in this matter. He requested that the hearing, if continued, be scheduled for a night meeting so that as many interested persons as possible may attend. Mayor Pebley reported that he had been contacted by telephone by Councilman Schutte, and that it was his desire that these public hearings be continued so that he could participate in the deliberations. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, pub- lic hearing on Reclassification No. 68-69-75, Reclassification No. 68-69-71, Variance No. 2057, and General Plan Amendment No. 112 was continued to the meeting of April 29, 1969, at 7:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Clark moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 7:30 P.Mo City Clerk