1972/05/1672-293
City wk. Aat}eim. California C1CI IONIZES Mav 14, 1972. 10:00 A.M.
Jim Allee, student, reported at their school (Loara).they were
presently expanding the library, however, it would requiremuch more ex-
pansion to serve the community.
Councilman Sneegas asked if there were any percentage figures
of less than seventh grade use of the library facilities.
Mr. Griffith, in reply, advised that no definite statistics were
available, however, there is extensive use of the facilities by children
in the evening, primarily those children accompanied by their parents, and
that many library assignments are now given to the elementary school stu-
dent.
Councilman Sneegas felt, since transportation would still be re-
quired for the younger students, building branch libraries would only solve
a small portion of the problems for the less than seventh grade, and the
concern is to arrive at a percentage factor serving the greatest need with
the least expense. To him, a program incorporating the school libraries
should be tried to see if it does alleviate the load at the Main Library.
Councilman Sneegas agreed construction of branch libraries would
be the ideal situation, however, considering the economy, and the fact that
such a facility would serve only those within perhaps a tent block radius,
the percentage factor must be considered as justification for such facili-
ties.
Discussion was held on the cost of internal operation of a branch
library, that being between $75,000.00 and $80,000.00. It was noted that
the after -hours school program was projected for a four- hour operation.
five -day week, at an approximate cost of $25,000.00 per site.
Mr. Fry noted that an "after- hours" program was tried in one high
school library in 1964, and proved unsuccessful. He personally felt if such
a service could be established in all high schools within the City it would
serve a need, but to establish the service at one or two specific locations
would again be unsuccessful and would not solve the situation. He also
questioned the justification of expenditures for books not available in
the public library nor to the general public.
Mr. Fry was of the opinion that a large sum of money was not re-
quired for branch libraries, that all that was needed was a utility build
ing, perhaps of Butler construction, where space is available for the books.
He was of the personal opinion that utilizing the school libraries was not
the answer to the problem.
In answer to a direct question, Councilman Sneegas stated he would
favor a trial program after first obtaining a percentage figure of the preva-
lent usage and where the students are coming -from.
Further discussion was held regarding the utility type building
as a branch library, being a slab, tilt -up, truss beams with ':drop suspended
ceiling and air conditioning. It was estimated that the basic cost of a
10,000- square foot, tilt -up building would be approximately $7.80 per square
foot, and with furnishings, approximately $20.00aper square foot, not in-
cluding the cost of land.
Councilman Thom, in remembering the previous experiment, stated
he could not favor the proposal or justify the expenditure, and instead he
would more likely favor the warehouse -type branch facility, as suggested by
W. Fry, than to try again a program that failed.
It was agreed by all that the community' need was general branch
library services, and that a school library could not effectively serve the
general public; however, it was also agreed that it should be considered as
a means of alleviating the peak load at the Main Library.
Mk. Murdoch felt more information should be obtained on:why the
experiment in 1964 failed.
7 2- 294
City Nall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Nay 16. 1972, 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Sneegas requested a•form be prepared to be handed out
at the Main Library, asking the address, age and time at the library to be
gathered and information compiled for perhaps a period between 6:00 P.M.
and 10:00 P.M., to determine how many might utilize a school library or
how many might be served.
Mr. Griffith reported that the problem is not only the lack of
space in the school libraries but the lack of material.
Jim Allee reported that he personally felt the reference material
needed was periodicals and newspapers, which school libraries do not have.
Discussion was held and review made of current operational prac-
tices; the area presently served, and those requiring service, and the lo-
cation of projected library sites.
Also considered was the possibility of placing a bond measure on
the forthcoming November General Election ballot to complete the capital
improvements as recommended by the 1968 Library Capital Improvement Commit-
tee.
Mr. Dahl felt a joint -power measure, requiring only a majority
vote, would have a better chance in successfully passing, and that building
branch libraries must be the ultimate concern.
Mr. Murdoch asked if the Council would be interested in the joint
powers approach which will require a cooperative agreement with the Orange
County Library District, and if the Council is considering the utility -type
building it could be a pay-as-you-go program; however, it would be a matter
of weighing priorities.
Councilman Sneegas felt every avenue should be tried before going
to the people with the bond issue.
Mrs. Stanton, not minimizing the problems of the students, noted
that the students were a small segment of the community, and that many older
citizens have difficulty in getting to the library. She hated to see money
put into only a seventh to twelfth -grade operation.
GEORGE WASHINGTON SCHOOL: Mr. Griffith reported that Mr. Jim Brier has ap-
proached the Library Board on the possibility of partially converting the
George Washington School as a Community Center, and one of the rooms would
serve as a library for the Mexican American community. He stated that this
proposal has been explored and with the PEP personnel conversion could be
accomplished for approximately $3,000.00 in capital outlay, plus personnel
costs between $3,000.00 and $3,500.00 per year; the balance of the school
to be used for grades kindergarten through grade two.
The City Council felt the proposal should be pursued and that more
information was necessary, particularly cost estimates, before considering
the George Washington School proposal.
ACOUISIIXOW QF PROPERTY: Euclid Branch Library Site Nohl Ranch Road Site:
Mr. Murdoch recommended that additional property adjacent to the
Euclid Branch Library site and the three -acre site on the Nohl Ranch Road
be acquired and funds be obtained from this year's Council Contingency Fund.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, nego-
tiations were authorized to proceed on the acquisition of the Nohl Ranch Road
site and additional property adjacent to the Euclid Street site. MOTION
CARRIED.
RESTWATION OF AUDIO VISUAL PROGRAM: Mr. Murdoch noted a $10,000.00 item,
projected in the forthcoming budget for the restoration of the Audio Visual
program, proposed with PEP personnel, which might only be for a 15 -month
period, or one year from this coming October, and expressed concern over
starting a program and then dropping it.
4
Citq N,1. riltfornjla coupcIL mum Ittv ii 1273. J O t OO
Councilman Thom felt the program should be restored as planned,
with or without PEP funds.
t Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded
the motion. MOT/ON CARRIED.
Adjourned: 11 :55 A.M.
Signsd
Atie?-r4.
City Clerk
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
72-295
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley Thom and Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: John Harding
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alone M. Farrens
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry McRae
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph 0. Pease
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOP!€NT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
INYOCATIO11: Lt. Neil Hogan, of the Salvation Army, gave the Invocation.
FLM SALUTE: Councilman William J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PRQCLeMATIONS: The following Proclamations were issued by Mayor Dutton and
unanimously approved by the City Council:
"Industrial Engineers Days" May 31 through June 3, 1972.
"Senior Citizens Day" May 27, 1972.
"Poppy Days" May 26 and 27, 1972.
"Realtor Week" May 21 27, 1972.
SUGGgSTION PROGRAM AWARD: Mayor Dutton presented a plaque to Howard Weber,
of the Engineering Department, in recognition of his suggestion
of putting the emergency telephone numbers and the garage number
in all City vehicles.
MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meetings
held May 2 and May 9, 1972, and the Adjourned Regular Meeting held May 16,
1972, were deferred to the next regular meeting.
72-296
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 16. 1972, 1 :30 P.M,
WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading
of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such
ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI-
MOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount
of $225,231.85, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved.
PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -40 AND VARIANCE NO. 2350: Submitted
by Frank M. Iwasaki, requesting a change of zone from R -A to R -3, to establish
a 72 -unit, two -story apartment complex on the north side of Lincoln Avenue,
east of Magnolia Avenue, with waivers of:
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -78,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Lincoln Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and installation
of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and
paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with
as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street light-
ing facilities along Lincoln Avenue shall be installed as required by the Di-
rector of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifi-
cations on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that
a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be pos-
ted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned require-
ments.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for tree plant-
ing purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
5. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north
and west property lines.
6. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That the owners) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
9. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a man-
ner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
10. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro-
perty, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The pro-
visions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by
action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within
180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
•11. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-79,
granted said variance, in part, denying Waiver 'b and granting Waiver "a,"
subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re-
classification No. 71- 72 -40, now pending.
a. Minimum distance between buildings.
b. Maximum distance from carports to units to be served.
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 16. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, provided, however, that revised plans
shall incorporate carports no more than 200 feet from any living unit being
served by said carports.
The Deputy City Clerk submitted a memorandum from the Traffic
Engineer, dated May 1, 1972, reporting that a stop sign will be installed
on Gain Street at Chain Avenue, as result of a traffic study suggested
by the City Planning Commission.
The Assistant City .Engineer advised the stop sign had been in-
stalled.
72 -297
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area.
In reply to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Roberts advised that the swim-
ming pool now on the property is being used by the Savanna School District,
with permission of the property owner; however, that pool will be removed
and a smaller one installed in conjunction with the proposed development.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
wished to address the Council.
William S. Phelps, 1095 North Main Street, Orange, Project De-
signer, advised that the walk designed for their project is curvilinear,
which gives a better appearance than a straight walk, and thus the tenants
in the southeast unit would be required to walk 250 feet from their car to
their unit, whereas if the walk was straightened it would be 227 feet; that
he did not feel there was any way to make the walk between the carports and
the southeastern units as short as 200 feet.
Phillip Case, W.P.C. Development Company, Agent, advised they also
had developed Villa Del Rey Apartments, immediately to the east of subject
property, and Sierra West Apartments, a little farther east; they had used
a split -level concept with carports under the units on Sierra West, as is
proposed for this project, which results in a "greater amount of open space.
Mr. Case stated he felt the four persons in the southeastern unit
would not object to the longer walk to their carport in view of the addi-
tional open space the design allowed.
table.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the Council at the Council
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Case advised that the exist-
ing pool equipment would be donated to the Savanna School District, when
removed. He also advised that 25 feet of back -up space is furnished for
the carports and that their experience has been that even with carports
beneath the units, all excess carports have been rented by tenants.
Mr. Case also stated that speed control bumps and good lighting
are being provided in their drive to minimize traffic problems, although
there always are some difficulties when drives open onto Lincoln Avenue;
that more traffic problems have been encountered in the Villa Del Rey pro-
ject than the similarly designed Sierra West development.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op-
position; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-182: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R-
182 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing
the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City
Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(71 -72 -40 R -3)
72-298
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 16. 197Z, 1:30 P.M.
Vote:
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -182 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION: Councilman Stephenson offered a Resolution granting Variance No.
2350 and the waivers, as requested, subject to development in accordance with
Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The foregoing Resolution failed to carry by the following Roll Call
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson and Pebley
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Thom and Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -183: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -183 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2350, in part, denying Waiver "b," and grant-
ing Waiver "a," subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2350, IN PART.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson and Pebley
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-183 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING VARIANCE NO. 2342: Submitted by Ott and Lillian Hays, to estab-
lish a real estate and notary office in conjunction with an existing single
family hone on R -1 zoned property located at the southeast corner of Siesta
Street and Sequoia Avenue, with waivers of:
a. Minimum number of parking stalls.
b. Signs permitted in the R -1 Zone.
c. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -63,
denied said variance.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by Lillian Hays, Applicant, and public hearing scheduled this date.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro-
perty, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He further noted that
the original plans submitted necessitated vehicles backing out directly onto
Sequoia Avenue; however, subsequent plans indicate some. sort of circular drive,
although a large portion of that drive would be in the public right -of -way.
Enumerating the findings of the Planning Commission, Mr. Roberts
advised it was their opinion granting said variance would be spot commercial
zoning and would set a precedent.
In reply to Councilman Pabley, Mr. Roberts advised that the proposed
operation would qualify as a home occupation if there was no outside help em-
ployed, no signs, and no customers coming to the property.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant was present and wished to ad-
dress the Council.
72-299
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
Lillian Hays, 946 North Siesta Street, advised she would withdraw
her request for a lighted sign and agreed to a time limitation on her pro-
posed activity if the Council desired. She added that there would be no
employees in her activity; that she would be the only person involved.
In reply to Council questioning, Mrs. Hays advised she had been
selling real estate for fifteen years from a different location, but had
been using her home for a notary office since before annexation to the City.
Mrs. Hays stated she would be happy with a five -year limitation
on her operation so she could use her address as her business and have a
one square foot sign with no lighting on the property.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Councilman Thom noted the property is located adjacent to the for-
mer Irray Manor commercial operation and there appears to be no opposition
from area residents.
Councilman Dutton expressed concern that granting this applica-
tion would set a precedent for establishing commercial uses in residences.
Councilman Pebley noted that the notary office is a legal, non-
conforming use, since the Applicant had that operation prior to annexation.
In reply to Council questioning, the City Attorney advised that a
variance stays with the land when sold; however, any restrictions placed on
the variance or stipulations by the present Applicant in connection there-
with, still would apply.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-184: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -184 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2342, subject to the following Interdepart-
mental Committee recommendations, and further subject to it being a one
person operation, with no additional employees, the sign limited to one
square foot, unlighted, and a five -year time limitation on the variance,
as stipulated by the Applicant:
1. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Siesta Street and
Sequoia Avenue as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with stand-
ard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer.
2. That the vehicular access rights except at the driveway loca-
tion as shown on the submitted plan to Siesta Street and Sequoia Avenue shall
be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the sou-
therly property line.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar-
ked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
6. That Condition No. 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution,
or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period
of 180 days from the date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
7. That Condition Nos. 1,3,4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2342.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley and Thom
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson and Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -184 duly passed and adopted.
72-300
City Hall, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1299: Submitted by Dunn Properties
Corporation, to establish retail distributing firms and service businesses,
including business and professional offices primarily serving business and
industry with incidental sales to the public, in an industrial complex on
M-1 zoned property located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and East
Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -59,
granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested
by Councilman Dutton at the April 25, 1972, Council meeting, and public hear-
ing scheduled this date.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro-
perty, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evi-
dence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He added
that the Applicant had submitted a list of requested uses for subject property.
Noting the Council's previous objection to the conditions of appro-
val set by the City Planning Commission, Mr. Roberts submitted recommended
amended conditions for consideration.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts advised that two park-
ing spaces are proposed per 1,000- square feet of gross floor area.
Mr. Roberts further advised that subject application for the entire
property was instituted at the suggestion of the Development Services Depart-
ment, in view of the variance application for the Cycle House and the subse-
quent application by Treck Photographic Supply, indicating there may be sev-
eral such applications for this property.
Councilman Pebley stated he felt a serious parking problem could
develop if both commercial and industrial uses are allowed on subject M-1
property.
Mr. Roberts advised that the City Planning Commission expressed this
same apprehension and the Applicant stated he felt he could satisfactorily con-
trol the parking situation by the selection of tenants.
Councilman Dutton suggested the property could be zoned Commercial.
Councilman Pebley contended there would not be sufficient parking
for commercial use.
Councilman Dutton noted the motorcycle shop on the premises has a
non- conforming sign.
the sign.
Mr. Roberts advised this shop has been informed they must remove
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
wished to address the Council.
David Travis, Dunn Properties Corporation, 2009 East Edinger Ave-
nue, Santa Ana, stated that the leases for subject property stipulate the
number of parking spaces allotted each tenant, based on the square footage
leased in a building.
Referring to the tenants, Mr. Travis advised that because of the
aesthetic appeal and identity of their property they have had a greater num-
ber of companies with a quasi commercial requirement that have been interested
in leasing the property; that machine shops or general manufacturing companies
are not interested because the price is too high.
Mr. Travis stated the Cycle House sign noted earlier by Councilman
Dutton is because of a two -week special event permit. He added that the Cycle
Shop, which was approved for this property earlier (Variance No. 2316) at
72-301
City Hall Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
this time is the only tenant, although Treck Photographic Supply, who would
be the first occupant under subject conditional use permit if approved, is
in the process of executing a lease.
In discussion on street parking, Councilman Stephenson advised
that it is permissible unless parking restrictions have been imposed.
Councilman Stephenson stated he did not feel the buildings would
lend themselves to a normal industrial -type operation.
City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that in an industrial area
incidental commercial sales are permitted in connection with the operation
of the business.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts advised that the Ap-
plicant is aware of the recommended conditions.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -185: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R-185
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1299, subject to the fol-
lowing amended conditions submitted by the Development Services Department:
1. That each use proposed to be established on subject property
which is intended to qualify under Section 18.52.050 (2 -a and 2 -b) shall be
submitted in written form to the Development Services Department for review
and approval in order that a determination may be made as to whether the
proposed use would be appropriate for the site and whether sufficient park-
ing is provided on the property to accommodate an additional parking demand
created by such a use. In order to provide guidelines for staff determina-
tion the following type of uses may be permitted subject to the written re-
quest and review procedure outlined above:
(a) Interior decorator, manufacturing drapes, shades, etc.
(b) Mattress manufacturing and distribution.
(c) Carpet and floor covering distribution.
(d) Wholesale plumbing supplies.
(e) Architectural Services.
(f) Construction offices and warehouse.
(g) Jewelry manufacturing and wholesaling..
(h) Glass cutting and wholesaling.
(i) Furniture manufacturing and sales.
(j) Automotive accessories warehouse and distribution.
(k) Photography studio and supply distributors.
(1) Sales offices and distribution centers.
(m) Training centers.
(n) Stationery supply sales.
2. If a question arises as to the judgment made by the Develop-
ment Services Department concerning a particular request, the matter shall
be submitted to the Planning Commission at its next regular meeting for a
determination. The applicant may appeal any Development Services Department
or Planning Commission decision to the City Council.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1299.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -185 duly passed and adopted.
R
72 -302
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL mum May 16, 1972. 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1302: Submitted by Burton Zoul and
L. Roberts Plymouth, Inc., to establish a carwash in conjunction with gasoline
sales on C -1 and C-3 zoned property located on the northwest corner of Anaheim
Boulevard and Ball Road, with waivers of:
a. Maximum number of free-standing signs.
b. Minimum height of free- standing signs.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -62,
granted said conditional use permit, in part, denying the requested waivers
and granting the use, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along Anaheim Boulevard and a strip of land 53 feet in width from the center
line of the street along Ball Road, including 25 -foot radius property line re-
turn, for street widening purposes.
2. That street lighting facilities along Anaheim Boulevard and Bali
Road shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and
in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office
of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guaran-
tee the installation of the above mentioned requirements.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Anaheim Boulevard and Ball
Road for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view.
6. That a parcel map to record the approved division of subject pro-
perty be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded
in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar-
ked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; provided, however, that a minimum six
foot strip of landscaping shall be provided along Anaheim Boulevard.
9. That vehicular access points to Ball Road and Anaheim Boulevard
shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
10. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resolution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or within
a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
11. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 7 and 8, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and read the find-
ings of the City Planning Commission.
He advised that the Applicant has indicated he will remove the ex-
isting service station building and other improvements on the property before
constructing the proposed car wash; that the car wash would be situated on the
western boundary of the property, facing Anaheim Boulevard. He further ad-
vised that three gasoline pump islands are proposed, each to have a three
faced message unit sign, with each face eight square feet.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the Council.
Mr. Roberts stated that, to his knowledge, the Applicant does not
propose any self- service signs such as have been requested for the regular
Mobil Oil service stations.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
wished to address the Council.
position.
7 2- 30 3
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL DES Mav 16. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
Don Robbins, Senior Real Estate Representative for Mobil Oil Cor-
poration, 11001 Valley Mall, Suite 300, El Monte, presented a mock -up and
artist's rendering of the proposed facility and stated that this facility
would be company-operated as opposed to the normal dealer operated service
station, and this should result in better control of the employees; also,
there would be no sale of auto accessories and no service work, and thus no
cars would be parked on the property for these purposes.
Mr. Robbins advised that the proposed car wash building would be
much lower and about half as long as a conventional car wash facility, and
would be operated by two persons, one at the pumps, and one at the car wash;
that it is anticipated the gasoline sale would take approximately four min-
utes, since there are no additional services such as windshield cleaning,
and the wash would take approximately one minute, with the driver remaining
in the car; no vacuuming and no hand wiping would be done, as dryers at the
end of the wash tunnel are designed to dry the automobile 90%.
He noted that conventional car -wash operations in this area charge
3Q to 5Q per gallon more for gas than the regular service stations, and ad-
vised that his operation would charge le per gallon more.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op-
D.W. Layne, Laguna Hills, owner of the adjoining property to the
north on Anaheim Boulevard, objected to the proposal on the basis that there
is no provision in the plans for separating the north boundary driveway for
subject property from his driveway, which would be adjacent. He stated that
his driveway previously had been used by some for access to subject property
because there was no way of knowing it did not serve that property, and thus
he felt the Applicant should be required to install a 3, 4, 5, or 6 -foot
wall or fence, and also plant trees.
Mr. Layne noted that there presently are 60 to 80 persons using
his drive daily for the business college on his property.
He added that he felt the proposed use would result in a downgrade
of his property value.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Layne advised that the only
one of his tenants that had expressed objection because of the noise factor
was the business college; however, he felt the newer -type equipment that
would be used, along with 8,10, or 12 -foot planting at the north boundary
would reduce the noise considerably.
Bob Garrett, representing Dr. Irving Moskowitz, Laguna Beach,
owner of the property at 1025 South Anaheim Boulevard, on which East Ana-
heim General Hospital is being constructed, objected to the noise that
could bother critically ill and seriously injured patients, the traffic
congestion and the dust and dirt that could damage their filter and com-
puter systems.
Walter Scott, 1120 South Lemon Street, representing Hospital In-
vestment Properties, Ltd., owner of Starlite East Convalescent Hospital,
at 1024 South Lemon Street, expressed the objection of the hospital because
of the noise since many of their critically ill and seriously injured pa-
tients' rooms would be 75 to 80 feet from the northernmost boundary of sub-
ject property.
Tom Broderick, Administrator of the East Anaheim General Hospi-
tal, now under construction at 1025 South Anaheim Boulevard, advised they
expect to begin operating in September of this year, and asked what the
hours of operation would be for the proposed car wash facility, since it
was his opinion noise from this operation could be mingled with the daytime
industry noises and not be objectionable, but it could disturb patients
at night.
He advised that the intensive and coronary -care units of their
hospital, which would have approximately 50 patients, are situated in the
wing that would be closest to the proposed facility.
72-304
City Hall, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 16, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
Mr. Broderick also expressed concern that the proposed operation
could cause electrical interference to their monitoring and computer systems.
Murray Weisberg owner of Angel Car Wash, 558 South Anaheim Boule-
vard, advised that he has complaints every Saturday and Sunday because of the
noise from his operation with two 30- horsepower motors, and it was his opinion
the proposed car wash would have at least four or six 40- horsepower motors.
He added that he had received information from the Automatic Car Wash
Association of Southern California that their prices for gasoline are being
cut in order to meet the competition from big oil companies who are selling
gasoline at one cent over the regular price in order to supply a free car wash.
Mr. Weisberg contended that Fullerton, Costa Mesa, Yorba Linda, Pla-
centia, North Long Beach, Brea and La Habra, in this area, no longer permit the
installation of car washes because of environmental impact and the fact that
the only labor available for this operation is generally undesirable.
He also stated that, although these car washes start out being auto-
matic, they change to a conventional car wash because people are not satisfied
with the results of an unattended wash.
Mayor Dutton invited the Applicant to present a short rebuttal.
Mr. Robbins advised that they would be willing to plant trees to
separate their driveway from that of Mr. Layne to the north, as requested,
if the Council desired, although there presently is a planter separating the
two drives.
He questioned the contention of Mr. Garrett that there would be hos-
pital patient rooms about 70 feet from subject property, since the property
owned by Mr. Layne is between his property and the hospital property; also
that car washes are constantly using water, and thus there is no dust created.
In reply to Mr. Weisberg's remarks about motors, W. Robbins advised
that the proposed operation would have two 30- horsepower motors.
Responding to Council questioning, Mr. Robbins advised that the blower
to dry the cars at the end of the car wash operation is the noisiest part of
the process, and theirs would be located on the southern portion of their
property and would be approximately 150 to 200 feet from the northern property
line; that their proposed hours of operation would be from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00
P.M.
Further in reply to Council questioning, Mr. Robbins advised that
they would create two parcel maps on the property to even the boundary lines,
and currently are negotiating with McDonald's Drive -In on one piece of land
that makes the property line irregular; that all facilities, such as rest rooms
and offices would be contained within the building and the only outside facil-
ity would be for trash.
Councilman Pebley suggested a sound test be made on a similar opera-
tion before a decision is made.
Councilman Sneegas stated he did not feel the noise would turn out
to be an objection as far as the hospital is concerned since they already have
Disneyland six blocks away and McDonald's Drive-In within 100 feet.
Mr. Roberts advised that the Sound Code sets a maximum of 60 decibels
at the boundary line.
Councilman Stephenson stated the noise, and how it would affect pa-
tients, would be a determining factor in his decision.
It was determined sufficient evidence had been presented, and Mayor
Dutton declared the hearing closed.
72-305
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
In reply to Councilman Sneegas, Mr. Roberts advised that, to his
knowledge, there have been no complaints received because of car washes in
connection with a service station.
Councilman Thom stated the noise of the blowers, the noise of the
traffic in and out of the facility, and the additional noise from automobiles
stacked up all should be considered.
Mr. Robbins advised the only facility in this area that he knew of
that would be the same as proposed is the Shell Oil Station and Car Wash fa-
cility located on Hawthorne Boulevard, Torrance, about one mile south of the
San Diego Freeway.
Councilman Thom moved that a decision on Conditional Use Permit No.
1302 be deferred to May 23, 1972, 1:30 P.M., to allow the Development Services
Department Staff to make a sound test of the Shell Oil Station and Car Wash
operation on Hawthorne Boulevard, in Torrance, mentioned by Mr. Robbins; such
tests to be made at the same distances from the facility as would be the case
for the proposed operation. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
On request of the Deputy City Clerk, the Council granted permission
to return to the Applicant the mock -up and artist's rendering on subject pro-
posal.
DINNER DANCING PLACE PN' 'T: Application filed by Tausilinuu David Hannemann,
for dinner dancing place permit to allow dancing Wednesday, Thursday, Friday
and Saturday, from 8:00 to 12 :00 P.M., at Polynesia Luau Restaurant, 218
West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted subject to provisions of Chap-
ter 4.16 of the Anaheim l&inicipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police,
on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION
CARRIED.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.06 HILLSIDE GRAD-
ING: Report of the Engineering Division to the City Planning Commission, dated
April 13, 1972, requested by the City Planning Commission at their March 20,
1972, meeting was submitted regarding the proposed revision of Chapter 17.06
of the Anaheim I4inicipal Code Grading, Excavation and Fills in the Hill-
side Area wherein the existing 50 -foot maximum height limit on cut and
fill slopes would be eliminated. The conclusion of the Engineering Divi-
sion was as follows:
"Based on the previous traffic estimates and assumptions of devel-
opment in the area, the proposed roadways will be taxed to handle the demand
using existing design criteria. If any serious consideration is given to a
reduction in the design criteria covering horizontal and vertical alignment,
width, grades and other features, which is what would result if the 50 -foot
height limitation for cut and fill were adhered to on the construction of
arterial streets, it will be necessary to either establish more access roads
into the area or reduce the overall allowable density of development in the
area if future massive traffic congestion in the area is to be avoided."
The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held April 17, 1972,
by motion recommended no changes be made to the Hillside Grading Ordinance
relative to the 50 -foot height limitation for cut and fill on the basis that
it was possible the overall allowable density in the hill and canyon area
was too great at this point in time due to topography to permit any change.
Councilman Dutton stated he agreed with the Engineering Division
report and felt the 50 -foot height limitation should be changed.
Councilman Thom advised he agreed with the City Planning Commission
recommendation that no change be made since this would help control the den-
sity in the area. He added that he also had been opposed at the time the
City Council granted Anaheim Hills, Inc. permission to exceed the limitation
in one instance.
Councilman Stephenson stated he felt it would cause a hardship on
the Developer to demand that the 50 -foot limitation be adhered to.
72- 306
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
The City Attorney's office was authorized to prepare an ordinance amending
Chapter 17.06, removing the 50 -foot height limitation, as recommended by the
Engineering Division. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "No." MOTION
CARRIED.
REQUEST SIDEWALK FLOWER SALES: Request of Attorney Ronald Steelman, dated May
2, 1972, on behalf of Robert Dueker, President, Holiday Flowers, was submit-
ted for permission to sell flowers on sidewalks.
Mayor Dutton invited the Petitioner to address the Council.
Ronald Steelman, Attorney at Law, 611 Civic Center Drive West, Santa
Ana, stated Mr. Dueker's operation involves using high school students to sell
bunches of flowers on sidewalks approximately 4 hours a day, Thursday through
Sunday.
He advised that he was not certain the Anaheim Municipal Code ac-
tually requires permission for such an operation; however, they now are re-
questing that permission and would like to know what licenses would be neces-
sary.
He added that Mr. Dueker had obtained a general business license,
although he understood that license supposedly had expired at the end of the
calendar year; also, the City Attorney's office had advised that a license
to operate a flower stand would be required, and it was his opinion this could
not apply to his client since the flowers are not sold at a stand or fixed
place in the area, although they do have a warehouse for a fixed location.
Mr. Steelman advised that Mr. Dueker would like permission to operate at
specific locations, and is prepared to submit a list of those locations, and
is willing to operate under any conditions the Council may set.
He outlined Mr. Dueker's mode of operation as selling low priced,
high volume fresh cut flowers at a lower price than florists; however, the
overhead is high because the students require constant supervision. He added
that, since Mr. Dueker was aware of the safety problems that could result,
he cooperates with the Police and changes locations any time they object to
one; that he avoids highly congested commercial areas or areas where there
are hazards.
Mr. Steelman contended the advantages to the City from Mr. Dueker's
operation are that he would pay applicable business licenses, flowers on the
street are attractive, high school students are given employment and are su-
pervised to be sure they are neat in appearance.
Councilman Dutton noted that Mr. Dueker had instituted litigation
against the City; that the judge has decreed such sales activity must cease
until an appearance is made before the City Council relative to the applic-
able ordinances and yet the operation has continued.
Mr. Steelman stated that Mr. Dueker attempts to comply with the
City's ordinances; however, it is difficult to ascertain the Anaheim City
boundaries, and thus there is sometimes a violation.
Councilman Pebley noted an incident of a youth darting to the cen-
ter of the street in front of traffic to make a flower sale; also, that since
florists are required to comply with building codes, pay property taxes, etc.,
the proposed operation would create unjust competition.
Councilman Stephenson stated it appeared Holiday Flowers is in de-
fiance of laws and regulations of Anaheim, and is contributing to the delin-
quency of minors, since reports indicate youths are sent out to sell flowers
and are told they may be arrested; that several students have been arrested,
taken into the Police Department and released to their parents, resulting in
a Police record that will stay with them all their lives, thus jeopardizing
the character of youths.
Mr. Steelman replied that Mr. Dueker has attempted to protect the
students, but he feels his operation is legal; that the District Attorney
advised he did not feel the Police citations should be against the students,
and several have been dismissed.
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES -May 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
72 307
Mr. Steelman contended Mr. Dueker has a perfect safety record. He
also advised that although Mr. Dueker may not be required to have a building
for his business, he does and will have a lease on property in Anaheim, even
though his overhead is high and profits are low.
The City Attorney advised that according to the Anaheim Municipal
Code it is the City Council's right to prohibit the requested operation;
that, in his opinion, the Petitioner has no constitutional right to sell
on a public sidewalk, and thus arrests will be made as long as they contin-
ue to violate the law. Further, the City's Zoning Code also prohibits sell-
ing outside a building and in residential areas.
Councilman Sneegas left the Council Chambers, (3:45 P.M.).
Mr. Geisler further stated that if the Petitioner complied with
the Code provisions he would be required to have a business license for each
location at which flowers are sold.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
request for permission to sell flowers on sidewalks in the City of Anaheim
was denied. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a 5- minute Recess. Councilman Thom seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:50 P.M.).
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being pre-
sent. (4:00 P.M.).
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72 -23 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of H.J. Belshe, dated
April 11, 1972, was submitted for a one -year extension of time to Reclassi-
fication No. 71- 72 -23, for compliance with certain conditions, pursuant to
Resolution No. 72R-11, together with report of the City Engineer.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that the time limit on
subject reclassification would not expire until July of 1972, and the Devel-
opment Services Department has been unable to complete their report, as one
property owner is out of town; therefore, the Applicant had requested, via
telephone, that this matter be taken off the Agenda until such time as ad-
ditional information could be obtained.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley,sub-
ject was taken off the Agenda, to be rescheduled at a later date, if neces-
sary. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63 -64 -40 AMENDMENT REQUEST: Request of Sam Nakamura,
dated April 24, 1972, was submitted to delete Condition No. 4 of Ordinance
No. 1979, zoning Reclassification No. 63-64-40 C-2, which requires construc-
tion of a masonry wall along the north property line, located at the north-
west corner of Magnolia and Lincoln Avenues, and also to release the bond
that has been posted for said wall. Also submitted was report of the City
Engineer and report of the Development Services Department recommending that
Condition No. 4 of Ordinance No. 1979 be deleted and that the bond held by
the City be released.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the
bond held by the City to insure installation of a masonry wall required by
Condition No. 4 of Ordinance No. 1979 was ordered released, as recommended
by the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3049: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3049 for first
reading, deleting Condition No. 4 of Ordinance No. 1979.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1979, IN RECLAS-
SIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 63 -64-40 (C -2)
ENVIEONNENTAL IMPACT REPORT: Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald
Thompson,noting that State legislation now requires Environmental Impact
Reports of all governmental agencies on major projects, briefed the Council
on a report prepared by Koebig and Koebig, Inc., for the Orange County Flood
72-308
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Maw 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
Control District, regarding levees, flood control, channels, and water spreading
basins, as pertained to the Community Goals, Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Element, Storm Drain System Element, and the Water Distribution System Element
of the Anaheim General Plan. He also noted the Planning Commission's concern
pertaining to the problems of water quality, which was supported by the City
Council at their May 9, 1972 meeting, regarding a complaint to the State Su-
preme Court for a review of the practices of both the Regional and State Water
Quality Boards concerning upstream discharges into the Santa Ana River.
The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held May 15, 1972,
by Motion, recommended that the Environmental Impact Report for the Santa
Ana River in an area located between Ball Road and Imperial Highway, as pre-
pared for the Orange County Flood Control District by Koebig and Koebig, Inc.,
is in close conformance with the adopted General Plan; that the proposed pro-
ject will be beneficial to the environment, and that staff be directed to re-
solve the concern regarding water quality with the Orange County Water District
and the responsible agencies.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
the City Council concurred with the Planning Commission recommendations, and
ordered them forwarded to the Orange County Flood Control District. MOTION
CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-186 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 642 -A: In accordance with recour
mendations of the Assistant City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson offered Reso-
lution. No. 72R-186 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM
PROVEMENT: THE JACKSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, EAST OF PARK VISTA STREET,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 642 -A. (Silveri Ruiz $16,440.85)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-186 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -187 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 645 -B: In accordance with recour
mendations of the Assistant City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolu-
tion No. 72R-187 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM
LNG ALL WOItK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM
PROVEMENT: THE BROADWAY STREET IMPROVEMENT, EAST OF GILBERT STREET, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 645-B. (John W. Tiedemann Company
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-187 duly passed and adopted.
City Hall. Anaheim. Callforn.a COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -188 WORK ORDER NO. 640-A: Councilman Thom offered Resolution
No. 72R -188 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE (RtAMERCY AVENUE, BROOK
HURST STREET, VALLEY STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
WORK ORDER NO. 640-A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUC-
TION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICA-
TIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A
NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be
Opened June 8, 1972, 2:00 P.M.).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No.72R-188 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-189 WORK ORDER NO. 617-A: Upon receipt of certification
from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No.
72R-189 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALL-
ING OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY
AND BROOKHURST STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 617-A.
(Grissom Johnson, Inc.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -189 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -190 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution
No. 72R- 190 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Werner A. Franz; Lear Siegler, Inc.,
(2 deeds); James C. Jones; Colwell Michael Developers #2)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -190 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -191 DEDICATION OF CITY -OWNED PROPERTY: Councilman Stephen-
son offered Resolution No. 72R -191 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
72- 309
72-310
City Hall. Anaheim. Calt orn a COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DEDICATING CERTAIN
CITY -OWNED PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. (City Yard
Gramercy Avenue and Valley Street)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -191 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-192 DEDICATION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY: Councilman Stephen-
son offered Resolution No. 72R-192 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DEDICATING CERTAIN
CITY -OWNED PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. (Magnolia
Avenue, south of Ball Road)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -192 duly passed and adopted.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Bethel Roberts for personal injuries, pur-
portedly resulting from an automobile collision with an Anaheim Police vehicle,
on or about April 13, 1972, was denied, as recommended by the City Attorney,
and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Thom,
seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom:
a. Joint School /Public Library Research Committee report on "Pro-
posed After School Hours Library Project."
b. Cultural Arts Commission Minutes March 3, 1972.
c. Financial and Operating Report for the month of April, 1971
and April, 1972: Building Division.
d. Orange County Criminal Justice Council Orange County Bicycle
e. City of Irvine Endorsing the agreement sent by the Ad -hoc
Environmental Enhancement Committee.
f. City of Irwindale Resolution No. 72 -13 -740 Opposing attempt
to alter the method of levying, collecting and distributing the uniform sales
and use tax under the Bradley-Burns uniform local sales and use tax law.
g. City of Garden Grove Resolution No. 4236 -72 Expressing sup-
port for the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972, H.R. 14370.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3035: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3035 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MiTNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-51 C-1)
Roll Call Vote:
Study.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3035 duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call Vote:
Refer to Ordinance Book.
Roll Call Vote:
Roll Call Vote:
Roll Call Vote:
72- 311
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
ORDNANCE NO. 3d42: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3042 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-85(2) P-1)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3042 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3043: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3043 for adop-
tion.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 4.40 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 4.40.030 AND ADDING THERETO
SECTION 4.40.050. (4.40.030 Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, Magic- Teaching
for Consideration Prohibited. 4.40.050 Exemption Members of Professional
Groups)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3043 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3044: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3 044 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTIONS 14.32.110 AND 14.32.152 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO PARKING. (14.32.110 Delete Paragraph 8. 14.32.152 Add Paragraph
(2) Portions of Manchester Avenue.)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3044 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3045: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3045 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65 24(16) M
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3045 duly passed and adopted.
72- 312
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 3046: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3046 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70 -71 -45 R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3046 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3047: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3047 for adop-
tion.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-29 C -1)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3047 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3048: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3048 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71 -47(2) M-1)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3048 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3050: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3050 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71- 72- 15(1), Tract No. 7566 R -H-
10,000)
ORDINANCE NO. 3051: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3051 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61 -62- 69(14) HE-1)
ORDINANCE NO. 3041: Deputy City Attorney Frank Lowry advised that Ordinance No.
3041, which had been offered for first reading on May 9, 1972, required an
amended first reading, inasmuch as a determination must be made as to the
number of days candidates would have to remove campaign signs before the
City takes action.
Councilman Thom stated he would like to amend that section of
the ordinance requiring written permission from the owners of property on
which campaign signs are posted since this could work a hardship on a can-
didate placing fifty or sixty signs.
The Council invited comments from the audience.
72 -313
Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COMM, MINUTES Mav 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
He also asked that the ordinance state the exact dimensions of
signs covered by this proposed ordinance and suggested it be any sign over
two feet by three feet in size.
Councilman Pebley stated he felt the section requiring permission
was included to protect service stations no longer in operation and added
that he felt permission of the property owner should be obtained prior to
erection of signs.
Councilman Dutton stated he also felt permission should be ob-
tained for each sign erected.
Councilman Sneegas questioned requiring a person to apply to City
Hall before a sign could be erected.
James Proctor, 724 Geneva Street, a recent Council candidate,
stated he felt the proposed ordinance was a good example of government at-
tempting to tell the people what is best for them; that he felt some of
the old political traditions should be retained.
He contended the ordinance would be unenforcable and stated that
any time the law has to turn its back on an ordinance it is not a good or-
dinance.
He added that it is difficult to determine who owns some property.
Mr. Proctor asked for regulations governing campaign signs on
public parkways.
Donald Payne, 3529 Del Monte Drive, Apartment 3, a recent Coun-
cil candidate, contended the $100.00 deposit required by the proposed or-
dinance would mean he could not afford to run for office and that this also
would create a hardship for older candidates.
He agreed something should be done to control signs, and stated
he felt the ordinance should govern specific size signs.
Mr. Payne asked if an ordinance could be so stated as to place
a fine on persons after an election for those signs not removed after a
specified number of days.
Councilmen Pebley and Thom stated they felt all campaign signs
should be removed within five days after election.
Councilman Stephenson stated he felt the proposed ordinance was
unenforceable and suggested no more action be taken.
Councilman Sneegas advised he felt permission should be obtained
to post campaign signs on vacant buildings. He suggested that no new or-
dinance be adopted regarding campaign signs, but that letters could be
sent to campaign managers or candidates informing them that if their signs
are not removed the City would remove them and bill the candidate or his
campaign manager for labor involved.
Clifford Cotter, 612 Bronwyn Drive, a recent Council candidate,
stated he felt no signs should be permanently affixed with glue, and it
should be illegal to post vacant service stations.
James Conrad, 2262 West Coronet, campaign manager for a current
supervisorial candidate, suggested requirement that 40 days prior to an
election either the candidate or his campaign manager register at a City
Hall office and if the signs are not removed the City would contact that
individual and stipulate as to a deadline for said sign removal, after
which time the City would remove any existing signs and bill the person
registered.
1
72-314
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1 :30 P.M.
He advised that he objected to the proposed $100.00 bond as too
great an expense for candidates.
No further action was taken on Ordinance No. 3041.
ALCOHOLIC B1VERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Albert F. Salerno,
for Original Transaction, On -Sale Beer, for an un -named establishment (formerly
Pitcher House) at 2880 East Miraloma Avenue, was presented by the City Manager
to the City Council for their information.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the
City Attorney was authorized to file a conditional protest with the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Board against said application on the basis that the prem-
ises are currently located in an R-A Zone, which does not permit the on -sale
sale of alcoholic beverages. MOTION CARRIED.
TAXICAB PERMIT APPLICATION BLUE-WHITE CAB COMPANY: Application by Gordon P.
Wiggins, (also owner of Tustin Cab Company), for a taxicab permit for Blue
White Cab Company, was submitted at the May 9, 1972, meeting and deferred to
this date at the request of the Police Chief, to allow additional time to
complete investigation.
The Deputy City Clerk advised that an additional taxicab permit ap-
plication has been filed by Quick Cab Company and will be placed on a future
Agenda for Council consideration.
cil.
Mayor Dutton invited the Applicant or his Agent to address the Coun-
John Murphy, Rutan Tucker, Law Firm, Agent for the Applicant, ad-
vised that Blue-White Cab Company is not connected with Quick Cab Company in
any way. He submitted a verification of insurance form and some letters of
recommendation on the Blue -White Cab Company that he requested be made a part
of the record on said application.
Mr. Murphy advised that the taxicab company is insured for one mil-
lion dollars, and in addition they have medical and uninsured motorist cover-
age exceeding the requirements; each taxicab for which a permit is requested
was inspected by the California Highway Patrol in February of this year and
management has a weekly maintenance survey of each cab; the drivers are of
good moral character, competent, and comply with terms of the Municipal Code.
He noted letters of recommendation in the file evidencing the competence and
integrity of Mr. Wiggins.
Mr. Murphy contended there was a need and necessity for an additional
taxicab service in Anaheim because the existing service company has about 70
cabs to service 12 Orange County cities (although they have permits for 75)
and thus there would be only about 23 cabs available for servicing Anaheim;
the population ratio in Anaheim is approximately 8,151 persons per cab, where-
as in Santa Ana it is 2700:1; Anaheim being the entertainment capital of Orange
County has 230 restaurants, which is three times the number in Santa Ana.
He stated it wa8 his opinion taxicab service should be treated as
any other business in a city and not be subject to governmental control along
with other transportation services such as railroads; that taxicab competi-
tion in Anaheim probably could result in better service.
Mr. Murphy advised that application is not being made for taxicab
stands and that their rates are substantially the same as Yellow Cab Company.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Murphy advised that there is
no injunction prohibiting Tustin Cab Company from operating in Santa Ana;
that Mr. Wiggins is not operating taxi service in Tustin without a permit;
that to his knowledge it is not true that cabs have not been brought in for
inspection in Tustin; that Mr. Wiggins has stated he did not apply for a taxi-
cab permit in Stanton for Blue -White Cab Company; that the pink slips for 2
cars to be sold by +1r. Wiggins to former employees were in the hands of Mr.
Wiggins, but the checks refunding the down-payments were held up by the bank
because there was a dispute over who was to take title; that he did not feel
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 16. 1972. J.:30 P.M.
72- 315
citations against the taxi drivers should be a reflection on the taxi company;
if the company had problems in Santa Ana at one time,they were no longer evi-
dent.
Gordon P. Wiggins, 1001 Logan, Santa Ana, stated there never was
an injunction against his companies in Santa Ana; that a Minute Order was
issued by a judge May 3, finding that they, as well as other companies, had
not proven need and necessity in connection with their application.
He advised that they have 16 permits in Tustin but only 5 to 7 cabs
since getting drivers fingerprinted and cabs checked and approved is a slow
process. Mr. Wiggins stated he never had applied for a taxicab permit in
Stanton.
Referring to one of the automobiles that was a part of court action,
Mr. Wiggins advised that he does hold the pink slip on that car, but there
is a balance due of $400.00; that, although a judgment was signed to return
the money placed down on the auto, they have filed an appeal, which is sched-
uled for May 23rd.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Wiggins advised that he is
scheduled to appear before the Labor Board on May 23, 1972, relative to some
payroll checks that were marked "Not Sufficient Funds."
Mayor Dutton invited attendees in opposition to the application to
address the Council.
Ed Slagle, Yellow Cab Company, 1619 East Lincoln Avenue, stated he
had operated in Anaheim for five years and had charged the lowest rates in
the County. He advised that they have excess cab permits in all of the towns
in which they operate so that the cabs can be rotated; also, that a recent
check on calls for service showed there was approximately two minutes between
the time a call was received and a cab was dispatched, although the average
probably is about five minutes.
W. Slagle stated he constantly returns profits to the company for
improving facilities and service, although the rate of return on the dollar
sales averages 2
Marion Tatum, 421 North Brookhurst Street, Suite 116, a private in-
vestigator, asked what percentage of Tustin Cab Company and Blue -White Cab
Company George Brazer owns, stating he understood it was approximately 407.,
although his name does not appear on the application.
He noted that Tustin Cab Company stickers with phone numbers were
placed in telephone booths and referenced photos previously supplied showing
these stickers.
Return of the photos to Yellow Cab Company was authorized by the
City Council.
David Bishop, 1205 Florida, a Yellow Cab Company taxi driver, ref-
erenced an earlier letter that noted that taxi drivers' paychecks over a two
week period averaged $88.00 net, for 60 hours of work, which proved to him
additional taxi service is not needed since the present drivers are not that
busy.
He stated that he is president of the Stand -by Club, which is the
employees' organization, and advised that Yellow Cab Company employees have
many advantages most taxi drivers do not, such as major medical and life in-
surance, uniforms, maintenance and gasoline for the taxis, maps, etc., all
at the expense of the company.
Mr. Bishop advised the Stand -by Club feels another cab company in
Anaheim is entirely unnecessary.
Larry Slagle, 2489 Cottonwood, an employee of Yellow Cab Company,
advised he had received a letter from International Taxicab Service stating
population to taxicab ratios have no effect on taxi service; also that when
there are many taxis in a town, such as Washington, D.C., there is no way of
knowing where to place the responsibility on complaints.
E
72-316
Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
•I r
He stated he felt that the application for 19 taxis for Blue -White
Cab Company would mean they would have to operate solely in the Disneyland
area.
Referring to the questionnaire Blue -White Cab Company presently
had inserted in newspapers, Mr. Slagle stated evidently the cab service they
provided was satisfactory since no customers seemed to be present at the
meeting even though the ad had offered free transportation to the meeting.
Arthur Gray, 914 West Lincoln Avenue, Attorney for Yellow Cab Cour
pany, advised that the modus operandi.of Blue -White Cab Company is to con-
tract with a driver, the driver then operates as an independent person for
a flat fee for each shift.
He added that Blue White Cab Company does not pay Social Security,
unemployment, or any other taxes for its employees.
Albert R. Caracausa, 12760 Newport Avenue, Tustin, a former em-
ployee of Blue-White Cab Company, now a dispatcher with Quick Cab Company,
stated he was the person involved in litigation over an automobile he pur-
chased from Blue -White Cab Company for which he could not secure a pink slip.
He added that he quit the company because pay checks were returned
to him mark "Not Sufficient Funds."
Mayor Dutton invited Mr. Wiggins' Agent to again address the Coun-
cil.
Mr. Murphy advised that they had had no problems controlling their
drivers or maintaining equipment in their mode of operation; he noted they
presently have 8 former Yellow Cab Company drivers in their employ.
In reply to a previous question, Mr. Murphy advised that George
Brazer is an employee of Blue-White Cab Company but has no ownership in it.
Councilman Dutton stated he felt the applicant had not proven suf-
ficient need and necessity for a permit to operate Blue -White Cab Company
in Anaheim, and it was his opinion Yellow Cab Company was doing a very satis-
factory job.
Councilman Pebley stated that when there has been a need for ad-
ditional taxicab service, Yellow Cab Company has provided it; that a check
of Yellow Cab Company revealed a sound financial basis.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, ap-
plication for permit for Blue-White Cab Company was denied. To this motion,
Councilman Sneegas voted "No." MOTION CARRIED.
LEASE HORAC MANN SCHOOL Deputy City Attorney Frank Lowry advised a proposed
sub -lease of Horace Mann School to the Foundation for Culture and the Arts
has been delivered to the President of that organization and that a suggested
form of lease to the City and a copy of the proposed sub-lease were sent to
the Anaheim Elementary School District for their consideration.
In reply to Councilman Sneegas,
Personnel Director Garry McRae advised that the various employe or gan iz a
tions had been invited to attend the Council meeting the previous
which time the proposed amendments to Ordinance No. 3040 were presented;
also, that he had discussed the proposed amendments with representatives
of each organization.
Councilman Thom stated he felt the. employee organizations had ex•
pressed valid concern at the May 2, 1972 meeting over some aspects of the
proposed ordinance, particularly the lack of an impasse procedure, and com-
munication of non confidential matters which was one of the prime thrusts
of the Meyers- Milias -Brown Act, and thus he did not feel he could vote on
the issue. He added he felt some good alternatives had been proposed by
the employee organizations in mediation and fact-finding and he felt that
should have been incorporated in the ordinance.
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Zav 16. 1972 1:30 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 3040: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3040 for adop-
tion.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 1.06 RELATING TO EMPLOYER
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas and Thom
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3040 duly passed and adopted.
ANAHEIM GREENBELT COMMITTEE: The following persons were appointed to the Ana-
heim Greenbelt Committee by the individual Councilmen, Councilman Stephen-
son stating he had not yet received an acceptance from his appointee:
Donald Fears appointed by Councilman Thom.
James Bush appointed by Councilman Sneegas.
John H. Willoughby appointed by Councilman Dutton.
Robert W. Rodenberger appointed by Councilman Pebley.
Joseph A. Wade appointed by Councilman Stephenson.
REQLUZION NO. 72R -194 BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEM FEES: Upon recommendation of the
Assistant City Manager, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R-
194 for adoption, setting a $25.00 membership fee and $6.00 per month main-
tenance fees.
72-317
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING THE
FEES FOR INSTALLATION COSTS AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES FOR A POLICE DEPART-
MENT BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -194 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 7ZR- 195 BANK OF AMERICA. FISCAL AGENT FOR ELECTRICAL REVENUE
BONDS: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -195 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT APPOINTING THE BANK OF AMERICA AS
PAYING AGENT FOR THE ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS, ISSUE OF 1972, AND AUTHOR-
IZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R- 195 duly passed and adopted.
WAL&ATHON REQJEST "EN» OF THE LIHE21 Application of "End of the Line," a drug
prevention and problem center, for permission to hold a Waikathon, beginning
at 8:00 A.M., May 20, 1972, was submitted, together with report of the City
Attorney's office stating no objection provided all Police Department traf-
fic regulations are strictly complied with, and report of the Police Depart-
ment recommending the walk, if approved, be properly monitored and the
72- 318
City Hall: Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 1972. 1:30 P.M.
participants observe all laws by walking on the sidewalks.
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
Walkathon permit was granted, subject to the recommendations of the City At-
torney's office and Police Department. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE: The Deputy City Clerk submitted
a Resolution of Condolence from the City Council of the City of Garden Gtove
on the death of former Mayor and Councilman Chas. A. Pearson.
APPOINTMENT METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT: Mayor Dutton submitted the following
letter to the City Council:
"As Mayor of Anaheim, it is my pleasure to designate and appoint
Keith A. Murdoch as the City of Anaheim representative on the Board of Direc-
tors of the Metropolitan Water District, under the provisions of the Metro-
politan Water District Act.
This designation and appointment is subject to the consent and
approval of the City Council, and I respectfully request that you gentlemen
grant your consent and approval to this appointment."
Councilman Pebley moved the foregoing appointment be unanimously
ratified. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion.
vote:
On Roll Call, the foregoing motion was carried by the following
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
APPOINTMENT ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT: Upon recommendation of Mayor Dutton,
Councilman Stephenson moved August F. Lenain be appointed to represent the
City of Anaheim on the Orange County Water District Board, replacing Mr.
Chas. A. Pearson, deceased. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Stephenson seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 6:20 P.M.
Signed 2&1i4 )77-
Deputy City Clerk