Loading...
1972/06/1372-380 City Hall,, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MI1lgES June 13. 1972. 10:00 A.M. Councilman Dutton noted the top priority of service rendered by government was the protection of life and property and, in his opinion, there was definite physical evidence that this was being accomplished to a certain degree by use of the helicopters and that the program should continue. Councilman Thom agreed and felt the Police report on the operation indicates it is more justified now than it was a year ago when he requested the report. Councilman Pebley related investigations made prior to going into the program and noted that he and Councilman Dutton were the only Councilmen, when the program was approved, who are presently on the Council. He noted that he favored it then and still approved of the program. In further exploring the area of costs, Mr. Mike Ringer, Finance Director, reported $21,700.00 represented the third payment to the Bank of America of a five -year loan toward a total cost of $98,000.00 for the two helicopters. CULTURAL ARTS ACCOUNT NO. 214-110: The position of "Secretary" was ex plained, that in accordance with the ordinance creating the Cultural Arts Commission, secretarial assistance is provided and at the present time the activities of the Commission have advanced to a point where the services of one full-time secretary are required, rather than half -time, as in the past. William J. Griffith, Library Director, reported that the secretary takes the minutes of the monthly meetings of the Commission and is presently primarily involved in coordinating the volunteer work on the Horace Mann School project. Discussion was held regarding the amount of work involved as sec- retary to the Cultural Arts Commission and also the possibility that this of- fice would be located in the Horace Mann School. Councilman Sneegas was of the opinion that the Council was permit- ting exactly what they agreed not to do, as it was his understanding when the lease was signed that the Horace Mann School project was to be self -sup- porting; that they were going to man the facility themselves, and that the only assistance from the City was to be custodial work. Mr. Griffith explained that the Commission and the Cultural Arts Center (Horace Mann School) were separate entities, and that the secretary is the secretary to the Commission and not to the Center. However, the Comr mission has been directing their activities primarily toward the Cultural Arts Center the past couple of years. Councilman Sneegas advised that a forthcoming problem could be an- ticipated and felt as time went on the City would be required to run the Cen- ter, contrary to the agreement, and that the line should be drawn as to where the secretary's duties to the Commission begin and where the secretarial du- ties to the volunteer project begin as the project is very possibly headed for a full staff. Assistant City Manager Robert M. Davis agreed that it was a very good possibility that this could evolve into a fully-paid operation by the City, however, so far the Council has held a firm position that it is not their intent to pay the operating costs of manning the facility, other than the cost of the janitorial services as agreed to. COI5JNITY REDEVELOPHENT Mr. Davis explained the approximate $26,000.00 of the Community Redevelopment Commission Budget included a full -time staff em- ployee for approximately six months of the fiscal year. However, this may not materialize and the Commission may continue to use City staff personnel over hiring a separate staff. ELE9TRICAL MARKETING: Councilman Thom questioned the spending of $211,561.00 (page 151) to sell power that we may not be able to deliver due to projected power shortages, and noted seven positions, at approximately- million dollars, for which he personally could not justify a function. City Hall. Anahein} California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 10:00 A.M. 72-381 Mr. Gordon W. Hoyt, Public Utilities Director, noted that the amount mentioned on page 151 was last year's budget, and referred to page 212, stating that with the sale of the Electrical Revenue Bonds, separate funds are now required. He reported that former programs, such as the Medal- lion Program, have been discontinued and that one of the primary functions of the Marketing Service Division was to assist the Electrical Division in determining the electrical needs of the new customer so that proper facili- ties can be designed and installed. Regarding the Home Economist, Mr. Hoyt reported that she primarily works with the teachers in the high schools teaching use and conservation to the electrical users of tomorrow. Councilman Thom questioned why there should be a recommended in- crease in sales force when under present adverse selling conditions we do not have the product to deliver. Mr. Hoyt felt that under the present recommendations money would be saved in getting the needed load information from salaried personnel (Mar- keting) rather than electrical estimators or electrical service representa- tives who are at a higher salary level. Correction was made on page 206, Account No. 320 521-910 -02, being three 4-door sedans without radios, at a total cost of $10,360.00. ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE ACCOUNT NO. 340 -632 PAGE 221: Councilman Thom reported that the budget for this activity last year was a little over '-mil- lion dollars, and the forthcoming budget is $663,940.00. He questioned why the monthly summaries show a total of $1,146,000.00. Mr. Mike Ringer, Finance Director, replied that $1,146,000.00 rep- resents the approved budget for this year; that the City Council has approved this total amount, a portion of which came from two separate funds, "Capital Outlay" and "Unappropriated Surplus," to supplement the approved budget. As to the status of the Golf Course, Mr. Ringer reported that the level of expenditure on the construction is approximately $1,100,000.00 or $1,200,000.00. In the forthcoming budget Capital Improvement items total $289,965.00 (page 223), and that this amount has been provided for the neces- sary equipment to open the Golf Course; that with the approval of subject bud- get, the Golf Course will cost in the neighborhood of $1,300,000.00, or $1,400,000.00 for the first eighteen holes. Discussion was briefly held concerning the estimated revenue this year and projected revenue for next year for the two l4inicipal Golf Courses. RESEARCH ACCOUNT NO. 100-241: Mr. Davis explained that this was an organi- zational unit created this year as a separate entity to provide research and assistance to the City Manager and other City Departments. He stated that for several years we have had a research activity under various departments. He reported that one of the projects was the necessary research in the Cable Television area. Other studies include Workmen's Compensation study, which was made to determine the advisability of going self- insured. Meter Reading audit on the level of work performance. Parking Studies for the Convention Center. Down -Time for the Police vehicles. Technology Transfer Program. The Private Alarm System, and several other Management area studies. He fur- ther stated that the Division will be staffed by three professional-level em- ployees funded from PEP, and two interns from local schools. DATA PROCESSING: Councilman Thom noted that he would like to further explore the area of Data Processing; however, because of the hour, would defer this area to another time. He stated he was interested in what they were doing in light of the Ernst and Ernst report, and how critical the charge -backs to the different departments to their operation is to the Data Processing budget. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Stephenson moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas se- conded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:45 A.M.). Signed KV gn City Clerk 72- 382 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry McRae LIBRARY DIRECTOR: William Griffith ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts DISASTER SERVICES COORDINATOR: Paul Hayes INVOCATION: Father Mark Stehly, St. Anthony Claret Church, gave the Invo- cation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman William J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. INTRODUCTION MISS ANAHEIM. KAREN OLDEN: Mrs. Temmie Miller of the Women's Division, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, introduced and presented Karen Olden, reigning Miss Anaheim 1972-73. Mayor Dutton welcomed Miss Olden on behalf of the City Council and presented her with a commemorative memento of the City of Anaheim. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meetings held May 23 and 30, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Council- man Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $478,710.17, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved. CONTINUED DECISION AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 18. ZONING: Public hearing was held May 30, 1972 to consider amendments to the Anaheim Municipal Code, Title 18, Zoning, Chapter 18.26, R-2-5,000, One Family Zone, at which time the hearing was closed and decision continued to this date, to allow considera- tion by the City Planning Commission of recommendations regarding front yard setback requirements, lot coverage and for a definition of 'building pad site.' The City Planning Commission,pursuant to their Resolution No. PC- 72-80, recommended Chapter 18.26 be amended per Exhibit A, which exhibit indicated eleven areas of study and recommended changing the designation of the R -2 -5,000 Zone to RS- 5,000. Said resolution further recommended that a Council Policy similar to existing Policy No. 524, be adopted in order to provide the parameters for developers who have R- 2-5,000 plans, zoning, tracts, etc. either approved or processed, thereby determining what properties shall be affected by the proposed amendment. Communication dated June 13, 1972 from Anaheim Beautiful, Don J. Fears, President, was submitted and read. Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson repor- ted that the City Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 5th, basic- ally felt that their original recommendations were appropriate to solve the problems that had been encountered in the R-2-5,000 One-Family Zone; that the only changes they recommended would be to increase the lot coverage from 33% to 35 thereby allowing the developer more flexibility to meet certain FHA requirements should the developer choose to locate more of the storage areas in the garage. 72-383 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. Mr. Thompson further reported the City Planning Commission recom- mended the building pad area be defined as follows: A buildable pad area is the level total buildable area including any required setbacks, but excluding any natural or manufactured slopes. As to the manner in which the proposed changes should be adminis- tered, the City Planning Commission recommended that the same criteria as contained in Council Policy No. 524 be utilized in determining whether new developments are entitled to proceed under former R- 2-5,000 regulations or under the new proposed RS -5000. Regarding the garage setback area, Mr. Thompson advised that the Commission felt there should be substantial area available for on -site park- ing; that by going to the flat, level pad area and by gearing the coverage and open spaces to the size of the dwelling, this should provide the needed recreation area and open space on the lot. During Council discussion, Councilman Pebley moved the recommenda- tions of the City Planning Commission be approved, including their definition of a pad site, increasing the lot coverage from 33% to 35 and adding the condition that the garage setback may be 6 feet to 10 feet with automatic garage doors, or 25 feet, with nothing in between. Mr. Larry Matzick, representing the developers of Ponderosa Homes, asked for permission to address the Council regarding lot coverage and pre- sented exhibits showing 40% coverage in an existing project within the City. He advised that in their series they have a house that just won a gold medal award at the Pacific Coast Builders Conference, and if the 35% coverage is adopted, it would mean they can no longer continue building this three-bedroom award winning home in Anaheim. Mr. Matzick was of the opinion that the proposed amendments say that homes that exist in virtually every R-2-5,000 development in Anaheim can no longer be built. That most of the developers have been conscientious and have developed under the R -2 -5,000 Code as it was intended to be used, and now they are being penalized because of another developer's mistakes, and he questioned whether this was what the Council really intended to do. Mr. Matzick recommended that a 15-foot rear yard be placed as a minimum in the standards, unless the appropriate balconies or decking could be incorporated on the hillside situations with a down slope. He felt that a precise plan review is welcomed by any developer who desires to use the zone as the City intended. Councilman Pebley indicated that he favored a greater lot coverage with precise development plans, and in answer to Councilman Dutton, Mr. Thomp- son advised that staff originally recommended to'the'City Planning Commission that the coverage be decreased, as well as requiring specific plans, and es- pecially, if the house size increased, the lot size should also increase. Mr. Matzick further recommended that the limitations be placed at four bedrooms, as most families use the fourth bedroom as a den, sewing or hobby room; that this type of house is a very popular design and has mar- keted very well in this area for a number of years. He believed that any- thing over four bedrooms would attract larger families and should be placed on an R-1 lot. Mr. Matzick asked if he started a new project, would he be able to submit house plans for review and approval at the same time his tract map came before the City Council and would he be able to submit a four-bedroom plan if he designed to it properly. The City Attorney advised he could by a variance procedure, however, noted that there was no limitation on the humber of bedrooms as long as the size of the lot was increased accordingly. 7 2- 384 City Hall. Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Matzick expressed concern that this proposed ordinance would produce lots tailored to fit a certain product and if the market indicated a different trend for a phase two development, you could not interchange the house plans without modifying the size of the lot. He presented a rendering of a two story, four bedroom house on a 5,000 square foot lot having a 23-foot front yard setback and a good -sized back yard, which is presently being mar- keted in the City. That 35% to 407 of their houses within a tract are designed for four bedrooms, however, this tends to vary with the area and the market. Mr. Geisler advised that the proposal before the Council is a zoning code and the conditions thereof apply to all locations of like zoning. That different rules for different lots in a subdivision would be accomplished by variance. Councilman Pebley withdrew his previous motion. Councilman Thom felt that flexibility was built into the proposal under consideration, and thereupon moved that the City Attorney be authorized to prepare the necessary ordinance for the RS -5000 Zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission, increasing the lot coverage to 35% in Section 18. 26.050 (3 B); in Section 18.26.050 (5,a,3), increasing the minimum front yard setbacks to the garage entrance to 25 feet, however, allowing 6 feet to 10 feet setback with automatic garage door openings, with nothing in between the permitted 10 feet and required 25 feet; and further, that said ordinance in- clude the definition of building pad area as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL POLICY RS-5000 DEVELOPMENTS: The following policy with reference to the criteria to be used in determining whether new RS-5000 developments are entitled to proceed under former R -2 -5,000 regulations or newly- enacted regulations, was adopted on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson: 1. Has the permit been applied for? 2. Has substantial money been spent on preparation of plans in conformity with old regulations? 3. Have any commitments for loans been made on the plans under old regulations? 4. Were plans connected with the reclassification submitted to the City Council in connection with the reclassification, and tied in to such reclassification; and in connection with the reclassification, have substantial sums been spent? Based on the answers or combination of answers to the four basic questions, determination would be made by the City Attorney's office as to whether the applicant was to develop entirely under old regulations, or should develop under new regulations; with an additional provision that no applica- tions for relief from provisions would be processed by the City Attorney's office after a period of six months from the effective date of the ordinance establishing new regulations. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS SETBACKS. ALL RESIDENTIAL ZONES: Councilman Pebley moved that staff commence necessary procedures for amendment to all residen- tial zoning codes to provide minimum 25 -foot front yard setbacks for garages where straight-in drives are used; or, 6-foot to 10-foot setback if automatic garage doors are provided, with nothing in between the permitted 10 feet and required 25 feet. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72 41 AND VARIANCE NO. 2351: Submitted by Melvin Schantz, requesting a change in zone. from R-A to R -3, to develop a two story, 96 -unit apartment complex on property located at the northwest corner of the Orange Freeway and Miraloma Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum floor area. b. Minimum distance between buildings. c. Storage area requirements. 72-385 Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M, The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -94, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 2. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 3. That a five -foot high earthen berm and five -foot to six-foot masonry wall on top of the berm shall be constructed along the easterly property line provided, however, that any berming proposed on the freeway right -of -way shall be subject to the approval of the State Division of High- ways. 4. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shiel- ded from view. 5. That subject property shall be served by underground utili- ties. 6. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner approved by the City Engineer. 8. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-95, granted Variance No. 2351, in part, Waiver "a" being withdrawn by the Ap- plicant upon submission of revised plans, and granting Waivers "b" and "c subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71-72-41, now pending. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Revision No. 1, provided, however, that the ceilings and the walls of the apartment units adjacent to the freeway shall be insulated and double pane windows installed in the windows facing the freeway to sound buffer the apartments from the freeway noise; and fur- ther provided, that any berming proposed on the freeway right of-way shall be subject to the approval of the State Division of Highways. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property and existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He briefed the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission, noting that in those apartment units adjacent to the freeway the Applicant has stipulated to providing insulation in both walls and ceilings, and to install double pane windows to sound buffer the freeway noises. Further, along the east- erly boundary adjacent to the freeway the development plans have been re- vised to indicate a five -foot high, landscaped earthen berm, with a five foot to six-foot high masonry wall on top of the berm, the landscaping on the berm slope to be on both sides of the wall. He advised a portion of the berm would be on State right -of -way, however, the State Division of Highways has indicated their concurrence with this proposal. The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present and wished to be heard. Mr. David Mayer, President, H.M.S. Air Conditioning Corporation, Agent for the Applicant, indicated their concurrence with the conditions as recommended by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RE OLUTION NO. 72R-234: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 234 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance chang- ing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. 72-386 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL WNW June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71 -72 -41 R -3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -234 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-235: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 235 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2351, in part, denying Waiver "a," and granting Waivers "b` and "c," subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2351, IN PART. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-235 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72 -45 AND VARIANCE NO. 2364: Submitted by Albert S. Toussau, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R -3, to es- tablish a 22 -lot fourplex development on property located on the east side of Sunkist Street, north of Ball Road, with waivers of: (TT-6931, Rev.No.l) a. Minimum building site width. b. Landscaped setback requirement. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -106, recommended said Reclassification No. 71- 72-45 -be disapproved, and by Reso- lution No. PC72 -107, denied Variance No. 2364. Communication dated June 9, 1972, from J.E. Hallin, District De- sign Engineer, State Division of Highways, was submitted and read, suggest- ing that noise abatement measures should be considered as the proposed de- velopment will abut the southbound off -ramp from the Orange Freeway to Ball Road, scheduled for construction in 1973. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property and existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission, noting that the proposal is for construction of fourplex units on each of the 22 lots, those units within 150 feet of the adjacent single family zone to the north and east to be one-story and the remainder to be two -story structures. That the entire project would be developed at the density of 14.1 dwelling units per net acre. He advised that the plans indicate the extension of Hilda Street through the property to Sunkist Street, as required under Area Devel- opment Plan No. 45; however, the proposed development does not conform to General Plan Amendment No. 110, which was approved for low-medium density on the southern portion of subject property up to the extension of Hilda Street, with low- density residential for the northern portion. Mr. Roberts further reported that the density of the proposed de- velopment would fall within the R -2 Zone, rather than the R -3 Zone, as re- quested by the Applicant. City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Vic Edge, Lander Engineering, 1782 West Lincoln Avenue, rep- resenting the Developers, advised the proposed project is similar to other Covington Brothers developments with the exception of the series of single story, fourplex units adjacent to the R -1 Zoned property to the north and east. That Covington Brothers are looking forward to developing this tract in the manner proposed, hoping the tier of single family, fourplex units may be a solution to development of problem areas in other cities. In answer to Councilman Sneegas, Mr. Barry Zimmerman, represent- ing Covington Brothers, advised that the trash storage areas are at the rear of the units along the alley, with landscaping around the trash en- closures; that the residents of the units will bring the trash containers out to the street for pick-up. Mr. A.J. Schutte, owner of property in the area, spoke in favor of subject application, urging full consideration be given to the fact that it was not the owner of the property that caused this parcel of land to be in its present size and shape, but rather the State, by acquiring through the Courts the right -of -way for the Ball Road off -ramp of the Orange Free- way. sition. Mr. Walter Gintner, resident at 1180 Hilda Street for eleven years, advised they were told at the time they purchased their home that subject property was R -1. That he did not want the owner of the pro- perty to take a loss, but he felt consideration should also be given to the homeowners in the adjacent areas who bought their property in good faith. He was of the opinion that development under the R -2 -5,000 Zone should be fully explored, thereby satisfying the neighborhood with single family dwellings and still allowing the owner to make a reasonable profit. Mr. Earl Griffiths, 2544 Whidby Lane, spoke in opposition to sub- ject application, advising that at the time they purchased their home four years ago they also were assured that the property in question would be used for R -1 purposes only. He objected to land, immediately adjacent to his home, being used as experimental grounds for a new development concept for single- story, fourplex units on multiple -zoned properties. He felt the property could be properly and economically developed with a combination of R-1-R-2-5,000, single family homes. In answer to Councilman Stephenson, Mr. Griffiths stated he would prefer having all RS -5000 Zoning on subject property. buttal. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppo- Mayor Dutton invited the Applicant to address the Council in re- Mr. Edge advised that the project proposed was, in their opinion, the best development for the area; that they certainly have no objection to an R-2 designation, rather than the requested R -3. The Mayor declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-236: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R-236 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 71- 72 -45. Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None 72-387 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DE- TERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (71-72-45) The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -236 duly passed and adopted. 72-388 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. RESOLVTIOs NO. 72R-237: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R-237 for adoption, denying Variance application No. 2364. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2364. Roll Cali Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -237 duly passed and adopted. RESOI4TTION NO. 728-238: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 238 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to RS -5000, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a tentative and final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71-72-45 RS-5000) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-238 duly passed and adopted. TENr4TIVE TRACT NO 6931. REVISION NO. 1 Developer Covington Brothers. Property located on the east side of Sunkist Street, north of Ball Road, containing 22 proposed R -3 Zoned lots. On the basis of the foregoing Resolution of Intent, in connection with Reclassification No. 71-72-45, Councilman Sneegas moved that Tentative Tract No. 6931, Revision No. 1 be denied. Councilman Thom seconded the mo- tion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEORING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72 AND VARIANCE NO. 2366: Submitted by Margarete L. Niquette, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R -3, to establish a two story, 9-unit apartment building, on property located at the northeast corner of Orangewood Avenue and Spinnaker Street, with waivers of: a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of single-family resi- dential zone. b. Vehicular access requirements. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -108, recommended Reclassification No. 71 -72 -46 be disapproved, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-109, denied Variance application No. 2366. 72- 389 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property and existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the proposal as submitted to the City Planning Commission. That the basic reason for denial by the Commission was the Applicant's reluctance to sub- mit revised plans meeting the Code requirements for one-story development adjacent to the existing single-family residential use; that the requested zoning, however, is in conformance with the land use designated on the Gen- eral Plan. The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present and wished to address the Council. Mr. Allen Nel, 12791 Newport Avenue, Tustin, representing the Ap- plicant, stated it was not unwillingness on his part to submit revised plans, but a misunderstanding, as he did not realize the R -3 Zoning and the request- ed waivers were two separate applications. Mr. Nel asked for permission to withdraw the requested waivers under the variance and that Council consider only the reclassification to the R -3 Zoning. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppo- sition; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -239: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R-239 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R -3, as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. That street lighting facilities along Orangewood Avenue and Spinnaker Street shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 150 per front foot along Orangewood Avenue and Spinnaker Street for tree planting purposes. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 5. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east property line. 6. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 8. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 10. That Condition Nos. 3,4,5,6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71-72 R- 3) Roll Call Vote: 72-390 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -239 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Stephenson moved the withdrawal of Variance No. 2366 be approved, as requested by the Applicant. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-47 AND VARIANCE NO. 2369: Submitted by Thomas Sarac, Jr., requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-3, to permit construction of a two story, 32 -unit apartment complex on property located on the south side of Orange Avenue, east of Knott Street, with waivers of: a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone. b. Minimum distance between buildings. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-110, recommended approval of said reclassification, and by their Resolution No. PC72- 111, denied Variance application No. 2369. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property and existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence reviewed by the City Planning Commission. That the Applicant has submitted revised plans since the Commission's action, which plans re- duce the total number of R -3 units from 32 to 30, and indicate single -story construction within 150 feet of existing R -1 to the north, with two-story units on the south portion of the property, 120 feet from the R -A zoned pro- perty on the south side of the Orange County Flood Control Channel. The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present and wished to address the Council. Mr. James Glover, 9763 Candlewood, Cucamonga, representing the Ap- plicant, further explained their proposed development and the revised plans. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-240: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -240 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R-3, as requested,aibject to the recommendations of the City Plan- ning Commission, as follows: 1. That street lighting facilities along Orange Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the instal- lation of the above mentioned requirement. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Orange Avenue for tree planting purposes. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 5. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and west property lines and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the in- stallation of a 6 -foot masonry wall along the west property line. 6. That a 5-foot chainlink fence shall be constructed along the south property line adjacent to the Orange County Flood Control channel in accordance with the standard of the Orange County Flood Control District. City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 7. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 9. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 12. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71-72-47 R-3) Roll Call Vote: Refer to Resolution Book. 72-391 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -240 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-241: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -241 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2369, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion o Reclassification No. 71- 72 -47. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1, Revision No. 1, and Exhibit Nos. 2 and 3. 3. That Conditions Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2369. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -241 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1304: Submitted by Vacationland Ltd., to allow the expansion of an existing travel trailer park, establish a self- service store as an accessory use and to allow permanent storage areas for campers, boats and trailers on presently zoned C -R and R -A property, situated approximately 660 feet south of Ball Road, between West and Walnut Streets. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-83, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 72-392 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 57 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Walnut Street for street widening purposes. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Walnut Street, including preparation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Walnut Street and West Street shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements. 3. That the vehicular access rights to Walnut Street shall be dedi- cated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15Q per front foot along Walnut Street for tree planting purposes. 5. That the sidewalks shall be installed along West Street as re- quired by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and speci- fications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 7. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 8. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and south property lines and that a 5-foot wide landscaped area including a minimum of 15-gallon trees be extended through the proposed storage area in- side the wall along the north and south property lines. 9. That a heavily landscaped minimum 3 -foot high earthen berm with a minimum 5-foot high solid masonry wall on the top of the berm shall be con- structed 20 feet easterly of the west property line. 10. That a landscape plan indicating the landscape treatment of the areas discussed above in Condition Nos. 8 and 9 be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Department. 11. That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down lighting of a maximum height of 8 feet within 120 feet of the single-family residences to the west, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 12. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 13. That the proposed development shall be in accordance with the requirements of the State Trailer Act, and that plumbing shall be provided in order that the travel trailer park will accommodate all trailers and not be restricted to "California approved trailers" only. 14. That the conditional use permit is granted subject to the com- pletion of Reclassification No. 66- 67-61, now pending. 15. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 16. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar- ked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, except as Condition Nos. 8, 9, and 10 may modify the plans. 17. That the developer shall pay water and sewer assessment fees as determined by the Director of Public Utilities. 18. That a crash gate shall be constructed along the westerly pro- perty line as required by the Chief of the Fire Department for emergency pur- poses. 19. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections of the first phase of development. 20. That Condition Nos. 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections on each phase of development. 21. That a fifteen (15) year time limit shall be established for the existing and proposed travel trailer park, self service store and the camper, boat and trailer storage area, after which time the use shall be re- viewed for consideration of an additional period of time or termination with- out prejudice. 72-393 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 22. That no advertising signs shall be displayed on the convenience market to attract outside trade from other than occupants of trailer space in this park, as stipulated to by the petitioner. Appeal of certain conditions imposed by the City Planning Commis- sion was filed by Russell H. Forsyth, Agent, and public hearing scheduled this date. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. The Applicant is proposing to expand to the west of the existing travel trailer park and will include 42,675- square feet recreation area, 2 camper storage areas to accommodate permanent storage of 150 campers, boats and trailers, and 178 additional spaces for overnight travel trailers and campers. In addition to the proposed expansion, Applicant is requesting the construction of a 1,000 square foot, self- service store to be located adja- cent to the existing administration building as an accessory use in conjunc- tion with the travel trailer park, solely as a convenience to the people utilizing the park, and there would be no signing on the store visible from the streets in the immediate area. The plans indicate a 20 -foot landscaped setback and a 6 -foot high masonry wall along Walnut Street frontage. Mr. Roberts advised that the proposed expansion would be accom- plished in two phases. Phase 1 includes the addition of an approximate one -acre recreation area and the camper, boat, and storage "areas. Phase 2 would include the addition of 178 overnight parking stalls, to be located west of the storage and recreation facilities. Mr. Roberts advised that it is the Applicant's desire to proceed immediately with Phase 1, but no specific date has been scheduled for Phase 2. The proposed expansion is consistent with the facilities presently developed on the property. The proposed expansion plans of the travel trailer park, depict- ing Phase 1 and 2 were reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Roberts stated that the Planning Commission was of the opin- ion that at this time and with the Phase 1 development a 6 -foot masonry wall should be constructed along the north and south property lines with screen planting provided along the area adjacent to the storage area so that stored vehicles would be invisible from the adjacent property; a wall should also be constructed 20 feet east of the right of-way along Walnut Street, having a 3 -foot high earthen berm, topped with a 5 -foot high mas- onry wall, with landscaping in the 20 -foot setback area and dedication along Walnut Street should be required at this time and bonds posted to guarantee the installation of improvements along Street. Council. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Russell Forsyth, representing Wrather Vacationland Ltd., 270 North Canyon Drive, Beverly Hills, addressed the Council and stated that in his past two years experience in the operation of the existing travel trailer park, they have found that some services for their guests could be improved: 1. A small store. 2. A storage area for vehicles. 3. A one-acre park. He stated it is their desire to commence Phase 1 developments immediately, bringing them to within 450 feet east of Walnut Street. Con- struction of the wall, landscaping and berming within the park would be accomplished at this time and at the Phase 1 property line, thereby buf- fering the sound and view from the residents on Walnut Street, and yet allow them to expand as planned more economically. 1 72 -394 City Hall. Anaheim. CalifoLnia COUNCIL IMNUTP June 13. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. Mayor Dutton noted the conditions imposed by the City Planning Cour mission, which the Applicant apparently requests be removed for economic con- ditions, are the standard conditions required of everyone. In answer to Mayor Dutton's statement, Mr. Forsyth stated that they are willing to meet all the conditions when the last 450 feet of subject pro- perty is developed, that the buffering requirements for the residents along Walnut Street can be accomplished now by installation of a wall on the west side of Phase 1, and that when Phase 2 is developed the wall would be torn down and all conditions would then be met. To clarify himself, Mr. Forsyth reiterated that the wall to be con- structed around the one -acre park area would be torn down, leaving the wall around the storage area intact and then construct the wall along Walnut Street when additional revenue becomes available from the income of the expanded travel trailer park. Councilman Pebley asked the Applicant if Wrather Corporation would consider a lot split to allow development of Phase 1 at this time, develop- ment of the remaining parcel would be accomplished when Phase 2 commenced. The City Attorney advised that the underlying fee of the property facing Walnut and West Streets involves separate ownerships and that a lot split would create a landlocked parcel in the middle of subject property. A lot split could not be granted in this case. Mr. Forsyth advised that the property is under two separate owner- ships and leased by the Wrather Corporation. The City Attorney advised it is not policy to allow a developer to develop on the rear portion of a parcel without requiring the installation of street improvements on the front portion. The City Engineer advised that the street dedication and street im- provements are needed at this time along Walnut Street; however, bonding there- for would be acceptable until such time as the property to the north or south develops. Mayor Dutton left the Council Chambers at 3:55 P.M.; Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson assumed Chairmanship. Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson asked if the Council had any more questions of Mr. Forsyth; there being none, he then asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Betty Ronconi, 1241 South Walnut Street, stated they are not in op- position to the development of Phase 1; however, they are concerned with the appearance from Walnut Street that the trailers in the proposed additional travel trailer area will create. Mrs. Ronconi stated she preferred to have the 660 feet along Walnut Street fenced according to City Planning Commission recommendations, with the development of Phase 1 requiring an earthen berm and wall, possibly decorative type, and staggered. Installation of improve- ments along the 660 feet along Walnut Street at this time was her primary concern. In answer to Councilman Pebley's question, Mrs. Ronconi stated she and other residents along Walnut Street would like some type of screening at this time along Walnut Street in order to offset the appearance of the travel trailers. She noted that in briefly reviewing the proposed plans no indica- tion was made as to the type of wall to be constructed. Mrs. Ronconi ques- tioned who would be responsible for the landscape maintenance along Walnut Street, to which the Council answered the property owner. Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson asked if anyone else wished to speak in op- position. There was no response. Mayor Dutton returned to the Council Chambers, 4:05 P.M. The Mayor asked if the Applicant would like a few moments of rebut- tal. City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Forsyth reiterated that landscaping along Walnut Street would be installed in conjunction with the Phase 2 development because it was eco- nomically unfeasible to install it at this time. Mr. Forsyth stated his im- mediate concern is providing the much needed recreational facilities for their guests. Councilman Pebley questioned Mr. Forsyth's economic reasoning in construction of a wall and installation of landscaping as he proposes for Phase 1, then tearing it down and rebuilding same along the Walnut Street frontage. Mr. Forsyth advised that if the wall and landscaping is construc- ted along the Walnut Street frontage at this time there would be an extra 950 feet of 6 -foot high block wall, and a 6 -foot wide landscaping require- ment on the north and south property lines, as well as the wall along Wal- nut Street. It would also be necessary to engineer and grade completely back to Walnut Street. By postponing the construction of the wall and land- scaping along Walnut Street until Phase 2 commences, additional resources would be generated from the use of the facilities provided by Phase 1, ther- by making it economically feasible to complete the improvements along Walnut Street. Mayor Dutton declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION N0_ 72R7242: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -242 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1304, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1304. Roll Call Vote: 72-395 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-242 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Thom moved for a five-minute recess. Councilman Sneegas se- conded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:02 P.M.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. (4:07 P.M.). PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1309: On motion by Councilman Peb- ley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, public hearing scheduled this date on Conditional Use Permit No. 1309, requesting the establishment of a travel park on C-1 property located on the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and the Orange County Flood Control Channel, west of Magnolia Avenue, was con- tinued to June 27, 1972, 1:30 P.M., at the request of Harry Knisely, Attor- ney for the Applicant, Roy W. Mabee. MOTION CARRIED. APPLICATION PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Concha C. Flores, on be- half Sociedad Progresista Mexicana Lodge No. 33, for permit to conduct pub- lic dance June 18, 1972, at the Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that two officers and one matron be hired to po- lice the dance, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Council- man Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. BRANCH LIBRARY GEORGE WASHINGTON SCHOOL: Mr. William Griffith, Library Direc- tor, referenced his report to the City Council dated May 30, 1972, regard- ing cost to the City of utilizing the resource room in the George Washing- ton School as a branch library to provide a program of service to Mexican- American residents. He advised that the project has been endorsed by the Library Board, and would be a joint program with the Anaheim School Dist- rict. Mr. Griffith reported that the capital outlay costs, approximately 72-396 City Hall. Anaheim. California CO2WIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. $2,930.00, could be carried forward from the current year's budget, however, salary provisions for the additional part -time personnel, approximately $3,432.00, would probably need to be included in the 1972-73 Budget. Mrs. Elizabeth Schultz, Chairman of the Library Board, advised they have not been able to serve any age group from the George Washington School area at the Main Library due to lack of transportation and the language barrier; however, the residents in this area easily relate to the school and with a bi- lingual member on the staff she felt the area residents would use the services provided. Councilman Thom concurred with Mrs. Schultz, advising the people in the area identify the school as a community center and felt this program may motivate further and continued use of the Main Library. Councilman Thom moved that the report and recommendations of the Library Director be accepted and that the branch library program for the George Washington School be implemented as soon as possible. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE CQUNTY COMMUNITY SHELTER PLAN AND COMMUNITY EMERGENCY PLAN: On report and recommendation of Paul Hayes, Disaster Services Coordinator, it was moved by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that the State- devel- oped Orange County Community Shelter Plan be accepted and approved and the distribution within Anaheim of the Community Emergency Plan be authorized contingent upon the following: 1. That the Community Emergency Plan portion of the report list shelter facilities in Anaheim by zip code address only. 2. That this portion be submitted to the Anaheim Office of Dis- aster Services for review and approval of final layout prior to printing and distribution. 3. That the City of Anaheim is not obligated for any costs for printing, pre release publicity or promotion, or for distri- bution of the Community Emergency Plan. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEWNT EXPANSION OF (MILL WATER SPREADING FACILITY (ANAHEIM LAME): Mr. Ronald Thompson reported that the City Planning Commission, at their meeting held June 12, 1972, recommended that the Orange County Water District be advised that the proposed expansion of the Crill Water Spreading Facility known as Anaheim Lake is in general conformance with the land uses set forth in the Anaheim General Plan. However, because all the surrounding land uses are either projected for industrial development or are presently developed with industrial complexes, that the District is urged to develop in accordance with the minimum setback and landscaping standards of the City of Anaheim's NE-.1, Light Industrial Zone. The City Council sustained the recommendations of the City Plan- ning Commission, and authorized said recommendations forwarded to the Orange County Water District, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-243 OF WORK ORDER NO. 640-A: In accordance with re- commendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R-243 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT: THE GRAMERCY AVENUE, BROOKHURST STREET, VALLEY STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 640-A. (R.J. Noble Co. $26,954.20) City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-243 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72117244 WORK ORDER NO. 626-A: On the certification of the Di- rector of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -244 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICA- TION AT THE INTERSECTION OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 626-A. (Smith Electric Company) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None 72- 397 The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-244 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-245 WORK ORDER NO. 635 -B: On the certification of the Di- rector of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -245 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE SYCAMORE STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TO BUTTONWOOD STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 635-B. (R.J. Noble Company) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -245 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-246 WORK ORDER NO. 791: On the certification of the Di- rector of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -246 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMA PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: POLICE FACILITIES BUILDING SUNSCREEN, 425 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 791. (Porvene, Inc.) Roll Call Vote: 72-398 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -246 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-247 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolu- tion No. 72R- -247 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Collins Limited Partnership) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -247 duly passed and adopted. LICENSE PERMIT ELECTRICAL CROSSING. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AT ORANGETHORPE AVENUE: On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Coun- cilman Stephenson moved that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to exe- cute License Agreement dated May 25, 1972, with the Atchison, Topeka and Railway Company, permitting an electric supply line crossing their right of way at Orangethorpe Avenue near Atwood (Reference, A.T. S.F. Drawing No. L-3- 31913), and further authorized payment of the License Fee in the amount of $150.00. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered forwarded to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Claim filed by Elizabeth A. Campbell, for purported personal property damage sustained as result of Anaheim Police unit backing into automobile, on or about February 25, 1972. b. Claim filed by Richard C. Kostner, Vice President, Nelco Pro- ducts, for purported personal property loss of material and press time sus- tained as result of a City power failure, on or about May 31, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-248 DEDICATION CITY-OWNED PROPERTY: Councilman Pebley of- fered Resolution No. 72R -248 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DEDICATING CERTAIN CITY -OWNED PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. (Underpass of the A.T. S.F. Railway at Lewis Street Crossing) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-248 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCI: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of May, 1972: Building Division. b. Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes May 18, 1972. 72- 399 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. c. City of Seal Beach Resolution No. 2106 Expressing support for the State of Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972, H.R. 14370. d. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Minutes May 18, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3055 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT. CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION: Coun- cilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3055 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO JOINT EX- ERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT, CITY OF ANAHEIM AND ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXERCISE OF POWERS. ($8,000,000.00 Bond Issue Addition to Convention Center) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3055 duly passed and adopted. TAXICAB PERMIT APPLICATION QUICK CAB COMPANY: Application by Harvey L. Cole, for a taxicab permit for Quick Cab Company (C.& S. Tours, Incorporated), was submitted at the June 6, 1972 meeting and deferred to this date at the re- quest of the Applicant. Mayor Dutton invited the Applicant to address the Council. Harvey L. Cole, 1522 Bush, Santa Ana, President- Treasurer of C S Tours, Incorporated, which is owned and operated by Mr. Cole and his wife, under the status of a California Corporation, advised they are currently operating three businesses in a number of Orange County Cities, a deliv- ery, tour and cab business; licensed by the Public Utilities Commission, sufficiently insured; and all vehicles are inspected by the California Highway Patrol. Mr. Cole stated his opinion,he believed the current cab service in the City of Anaheim is operating under a monopoly and it should be up to them to prove there is not a need for competition since they are providing a public service. He related to the Council that residents of Anaheim are very dis- satisfied with the present service, having to wait a substantial period of time after requesting a cab. Mr. Cole advised that as a veteran and American citizen he has a right to do business since this is what free enterprise is. His cab service is provided to surrounding cities, drivers bring fares into Anaheim and leave a calling card with their passengers in order to build their clientele, not- ing that his drivers are not concerned that he is not licensed in Anaheim. When a prospective Anaheim passenger calls they are advised that Quick Cab cannot pick them up. They are requesting a taxicab permit as it is eco- nomically unfeasible to bring passengers into the City and leave empty. Mr. Cole was of the opinion that the ratio of population to cabs figures were unimportant. The important factor is that if there is a need they will make money, and if there is no need they won't. Mr. Cole advised that his company is morally fit and financially sound. He felt they have a right to operate under the free enterprise sys- tem and advised that any court would rule in their favor on this issue. He advised that simply because a cab company had numerous permits to operate it did not mean these cabs are in the city at the same time and it was a tool to keep competition out. The current cab company serves 72-400 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. approximately nineteen cities in Orange County and in many of the cities is sole operator of a taxicab service. Now that some other companies have been licensed to operate in the same cities, Mr. Cole felt that the service had improved greatly because of the competition. Quick Cab Company's rates are the same as those charged by the current taxicab company in Anaheim. Mayor Dutton advised that need and necessity have to be established and by past experience it was the general consensus of the Council that neither need nor necessity has been proven. Mayor Dutton explained that periodically Yellow Cab Company applies for new permits and cars, which is standard procedure, and since their actions are controlled by the City Council, Yellow Cab Company does not have a monopoly. He questioned if five taxicab permits was the number requested. Mr. Cole replied in the affirmative and further stated he believed in being practical and that the five permits requested at this time would give him a chance to build a business here in Anaheim. Mayor Dutton asked Mr. Cole if he was an independent contractor, to which Mr. Cole replied "Yes, with some drivers." Mr. Cole advised he intends to advertise on TV and in the newspapers free rides and that they are going to operate in the City of Anaheim. From viewing past Council actions relating to the granting of the taxicab permits, Mr. Cole was of the opinion that pressure was necessary in order to get Coun- cil approval for him to operate within the City. Councilman Sneegas suggested that Mr. Cole was taking into consi- deration past Council actions relating to taxicab permit requests; he felt any taxi firm has a right to do business, that the people are the best judge of need and necessity, and that competition is healthy and needed. Mayor Dutton and Councilman Stephenson were of the opinion that the current cab company is providing good service. Albert R. Caracausa, 12760 -B Newport Avenue, Tustin, stated that in the preparation of a plan to present to the City Council he researched the de- finition of "necessity and convenience," which the Anaheim Municipal Code re- quires be proven in order to obtain a taxicab permit. He learned that "need" is something that affects ones body or body functions (noting his opinion that a cab company will have no effect on this), and that "convenience" is whatever conduces freedom from difficulty, from trouble, from annoyance, whatever pro- motes ones ease or advantage or fits ones use or wants. David Stambaugh, 1802 West Neighbors, advised that he was a former employee of Yellow Cab Company, and felt that their service was not all good nor all bad. He was of the opinion that a person should have the option to call whichever cab company he desires or whichever gives him the best possible service. Mr. Stambaugh believed that the citizens of Anaheim should make the determination of convenience, and if Quick Cab Company is permitted to operate in Anaheim and is successful economically, the convenience requirement would be proven and be provided. Mr. Konrad Larson, representing Mr. Arthur Gray, Attorney for Yel- low Cab Company, advised that four weeks ago the Council considered an appli- cation from another cab company which had made an effort to prove need and necessity through publication in a newspaper to have people who were unhappy with Yellow Cab Company service respond accordingly. No forms were returned, thereby indicating Yellow Cab Company service is adequate. He made reference to the fact that letters are on file from Greyhound Travel Bureau and former Councilman A.J. Schutte, stating that the service provided by Yellow Cab Company is prompt and adequate. 7 2- 401 City Hall. Anaheim. California COW IL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr Larson questioned whether or not the addition of five cabs pro- posed by Quick Cab Company will add any more convenience to the City, inas- much as Yellow Cab Company has 77 cabs available and, on an average day, 20 are idle, and on slower days 50 are idle. Consequently, this indicates there is no need for an additional taxicab service. Further, he questioned the Ap- plicant's remark that they are a solvent company, being in business for some time, since their financial statement indicates they have been operating at a net loss. Mr. Larson stated that a similar application reviewed by Council approximately four weeks ago, failed to show necessity and convenience and expressed his opinion that he could see no present change of circumstances that would warrant Quick Cab Company's application being granted. Marion Tatum, a licensed investigator, 421 North Brookhurst Street, Suite 116, recalled Mr. Cole's statement that they drop passengers off in Anaheim, with no return fare and stated it was his understanding that fares are adjusted for one -way trips. Mr. Tatum stated he checked with the Public Utilities Commission and was advised no permit has been issued to C. F. Tours, Mr. Cole, or any of his companies to carry packages or property. Mr. Tatum related his investigations revealed long waiting periods or no arrivals at all, indirect routes to destinations resulting in overcharging, and pick- up service provided from cities in which they are not licensed to operate. Mr. Tatum advised that Quick Cab Company is not found in the Yellow Pages of the telephone directory, and their method of advertising is the placement of calling cards or stickers on public telephones. He submitted to the City Council photographs taken of the telephone booth at the North Orange County Municipal Court Building, 1170 North Anaheim Boulevard. Said photographs were reviewed by the Council and authorized to be returned to Mr. Tatum. Larry Slagle, 2489 Cottonwood, an employee of Yellow Cab Company, stated that any time someone desires to start a new business in the trans- portation industry they must prove need. In the case of taxicabs, the de- termination of need is delegated to the cities because they have a local knowledge of the situation. He further stated that Yellow Cab Company is striving to provide the best possible service to Anaheim, and he was cer- tain that if the service was not being provided, City officials would be the first to know. Richard Grant, of Tustin, an employee of Mr. Cole's, and a former employee of Yellow Cab Company, explained that even though Yellow Cab Com- pany has 77 taxicabs licensed in the City of Anaheim, that does not mean that all are used in the City of Anaheim. He related his experience, when employed by Yellow Cab Company, of the All Star Game at Anaheim Stadium and advised there was no way in which they could handle all the people who wanted taxicab service. He felt that no one single taxicab company could handle the situation. Mr. Grant stated they are requesting a permit in order to serve primarily the local citizens, so that the citizens have an option to call the taxicab company who gives them the best service. Mayor Dutton, in response to the statement relative to the news- paper ad requesting people to give their rating of the current cab service in the City of Anaheim, stated none were received, which indicated no need for additional service, and that in light of the evidence presented today, no need has been shown. Patsy Caracausa, 12760 -B Newport Avenue, Tustin, related her ex- perience using a Yellow Taxicab for a month's duration; that she was re- quired to call every day for service and there was no monthly rate; she was subjected to verbal abuse by a driver concerning working mothers with children; and delays in response time to her calls. She was of the opinion that people should have the option to call a cab company who serves them best. 72 -402 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. Dale C. Hamlet, of Santa Ana, an employee of three different cab companies, expressed his opinion that when he desires taxicab service he calls the one which is going to be most convenient and will get him to his destina- tion the quickest way, and further stated he should have this choice. Councilman Sneegas stated that since public transportation must comply with specified governmental regulations, he wondered what would happen if gov- ernment stepped out and let free enterprise take over, thereby possibly solving some problems carried by the taxpayers in subsidizing the industry. He stated he favored competition in the transportation industry Mayor Dutton, presently serving on the United States Conference of Mayors Transportation Committee, advised it is very prevalent that money received from public transportation users will not support a private enterprise, and most cities are going to be required to subsidize transportation to get people moved. Mayor Dutton stated he felt there was no necessity or convenience shown to war- rant additional taxicab service, and if two taxicab companies were licensed to operate in the City of Anaheim they would consequently be fighting and even- tually both would be out of business, thereby leaving the citizens of Anaheim without service. Councilman Pebley stated he has lived in Anaheim all his life and has been a member of the City Council for the past eight years, and he has never had a citizen call complaining about the present taxicab service. He stated he is in favor of free enterprise, however, he did not want to be a part of the same thing happening to the present taxicab service as happened to the two competitive bus companies licensed to operate within the City. Councilman Pebley voiced his opposition to subsidizing any form of public transportation, as many cities throughout the Country are doing. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Thom, ap- plication for a taxicab permit for the Quick Cab Company was denied. To this motion, Councilman Sneegas voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. CABLE TELEVISION REVISED SPECIFICATIONS AND PROPOSED FRANCHISE QRDINANCE: On report and recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Stephen- son moved that the City Manager be authorized to forward the revised speci- fications and proposed franchise ordinance to the four bidders who previously submitted proposals for the providing of Cable Television service in the City of Anaheim, to allow them to submit an amended proposal in accordance with the new specifications. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -249 AMENDED SALARY RESOLUTION: On report and recommendations of the Personnel Director and City Manager as to revised pay plan for part time employees of the Recreation Division, and creating a new job classifi- cation of Youth Employment Aide at the pay rate of $1.65 per hour, Council- man Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R-249 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71R-471 AND ESTABLISHING A RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS NEW JOB CLASSES. (Recreation Division, Parks and Recreation Department) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-249 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-250 LEASE. PARK SITE AT LINCOLN SCHOOL: On the recommenda- tion of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No.72R -250 for adoption, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a lease agreement with Anaheim School District of Orange County for a portion of the Lincoln School site for public park and playground purposes, for a period of 25 years, with option to renew for an additional 25 -year period. City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 13. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Signed Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A LEASE WITH THE ANAHEIM SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY FOR A PUBLIC PARK AND PLAYGROUND (LINCOLN SCHOOL SITE). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-250 duly passed and adopted. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 823 SOUTH BEACH BOULEVARD: Application filed by David Alani, for entertainment permit to allow 16th- Century Period Music, history and songs performed by five persons, with lute and piano, at the King Henry VIII Old English Restaurant, 823 South Beach Boulevard, was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-251 REJECTING IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION. TRACT NO.6392: On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 72R-251 for adoption, rejecting the Irrevocable Offer to Dedi- cate Lot A, of Tract No. 6392, in that Lot A was not a part of the public alley and was designed for reimbursement purposes by the adjacent property owner, which are no longer necessary. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION. (Lot A, Tract No. 6392) Roll Call Vote: 72 -403 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -251 duly passed and adopted. COUNTY TAX SALE NO. 1125: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the Council indicated no interest and no objection to County Tax Sale No. 1125, relative to several excess parcels of land in the City of Anaheim. MOTION CARRIED. PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE COUNCILMAN DUTTON: On motion by Councilman Peb- ley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Councilman Dutton was granted per- mission to leave the State for 90 days. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:35 P.M. Deputy City Clerk 72-404 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES June 20, 1972. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Stephenson ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Pro Tem Stephenson called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ANAHEIM STUDENT AMBASSADOR: Mr. Ken Clements, Public Information Officer, introduced Elizabeth Victoria O'Neil, a student'from Katella High School, selected as Anaheim's Student Ambassador, under the People to People High School Ambassador Program, founded by President Eisenhower. Miss O'Neil was given baseballs autographed by the City Council for presentation to the proper dignitary of the ten countries she is scheduled to visit. MINUTES: Approval of the City Council Minutes of the regular meeting held June 6, 1972, and adjourned regular and regular meetings held June 13, 1972, was deferred to the next meeting. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,789,887.63, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved. FINAL MAP TRACT rT0. 7118: Developer, Woodbine Corporation. Property located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Solomon Drive, and con- tains 61 R-1 Zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that the Final Tract Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map, as approved, and fur- ther reported that Woodbine Corporation and Ponderosa Homes, Developers of Tract Nos. 7785, 7786, and 7787 have posted bonds representing 100% of the cost of the storm drain improvements. On the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7118 be approved. Councilman Thom seconded the mo- tion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP TRACT O. 7754: Developer, Sunrise Homes. Property located on the east side of Sunkist Street, south of South Street, and contains 33 R-1 Zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that the Final Tract Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map, as approved. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Final Map, Tract No. 7754 was approved in accordance with the recommendations of the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. CITY nom= commtssiom ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held May 31, 1972, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for Council information and consideration: