1962/09/046083
Q.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 28, 1962, 3:00
of mementos and photographs, and thanked the Committee for the outstanding
tribute arranged for Mr. Pearson.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-789: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-789 for
adoption, rescinding Resolution of Necessity No. 62R-770, 3ob No. 695.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RESCINDING RESOLU-
TION NO. 62R-770 WITH REFERENCE TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, JOB NO. 695.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton and Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-789 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-790: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-790 for
adoption, that effective immediately, it shall be the Policy of the City
Council that Agenda items scheduled for Tuesday Council meetings must be
in the office of the City Clerk prior to 5:00 P.M. on the second Friday
preceding said meeting.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING A
DEADLINE FOR INCLUSION OF ITEMS IN CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS.
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton and Schutte.
ADJOURN~EN/:
motion.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-790 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the
MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 7:55 P.M.
Alona M. Fattens, Deputy City Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PRESENT:
ABSEN/:
PRESENT:
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: Dutton.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held August 21, 1962, were
approved on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRIED.
6084
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING, MOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Servite High School
requesting permission to move a building from the northeast corner of Harbor
Boulevard and Romneya Drive, Anaheim, California, to 1952 West La Palma
Avenue.
Application and file were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Father Mazurk, Principal of Servite High School, addressed the
Council advising that the restaurant building is being donated to the
school by Mr. Karcher, and will be placed at the rear of the school
property; that the kitchen portion of the building will be used for
storage, and the restaurant portion of the building will be used for
student council meetings, band and glee club prac%icesl further, this
buildin9 will release a classroom that is currently bein9 used as a
storage room.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearin9 closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-791: Councilman Schu%te offered Resolution No. 62R-791,
granting moving permit as requested.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE
MOVING PERMIT TO SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL TO MOVE A BUILDING FROM THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND ROMNEYA DRIVE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, TO 1952
WEST LA PALMA AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-791 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, MOVING PERMIT: Submitted by Arthur W. Kruse, requesting permis-
sion to move a dwelling from 810 South Los Angeles Street, Anaheim, California
to 832 South Los Angeles Street.
Application and file were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Kruse addressed the Council advising that he has sold the
property located at 810 South Los Angeles Street to Casey-Beckham, and
that he also owns the property at 832 South Los Angeles Street, where
there is sufficient room for this house. He further advised that the
garage presently existing at 832 South Los Angeles Street will be removed
in order to move the house in, and thereupon requested the permit be
granted to enable them to move their home to this other location.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-792: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-792,
granting moving permit as requested.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE
MOVING PERMIT TO ARTHUR W. KRUSE TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 810 SOUTH LOS
ANGELES STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, TO 832 SOUTH LOS ANGELES $TREET~
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.
6085
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-792 duly passed and adopted.
SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by P.B.R. Company (Bob Miller, Owner),
requesting permission to erect an oversized sign at 150 Katella Avenue
advertising "Twilight Motel".
Plans were reviewed by the City Council and Building Department
report noted.
Councilman Chandler moved said request be granted, subject to
no projection over the property line. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by Union Oil Company requiting permis-
sion to erect two signs at 1500 North State College Boulevard, advertising
"Union Oil Company" (corner of State College Boulevard and Cies Street).
Mayor Coons,being a party of interest, withdrew from action on
this application.
Discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. D, V. Ellis,
representing Electric Products Company, sign contractor. Mr. Ellis
requested Sign "B" be changed to allow a fifty-foot sign, to be located
on the property in accordance with the setback ruling of the Council.
Sign "A": Councilman Schutte moved said request be granted,
(Sign "A") subject to no projection over the property line. Councilman
Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Sign "B": Councilman Krein moved said request be granted
(Sign "B") subject to the provision that the height of the sign shall not
exceed the distance between the center of the street and the center line
of the property; further, subject to no projection over the property line.
Councilman $chutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Coons returned to the Council meeting.
SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by Advance Neon Sign Company for
permission to erect an oversized sign at 511 South State College Boule-
yard, advertising "Burger Chef".
Plans were reviewed by the City Council and report from the
Building Department noted.
Discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. Floyd Trombley,
representing Advance Neon Sign Company, contractor. Mr. Trombley advised
that the sign is their stock sign, and used throughout their national
advertising.
Councilman Schutte moved said request be granted, subject to the
provision that there be no overhang of the property line. Councilman
Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER: On the recommendations of the City Engineer James P. Maddox~
Oroweat Baking Company was granted temporary sidewalk waiver on property
located at the northwest corner of Orangewood Avenue and State College
Boulevard, subject to the provision that no permanent planting (trees)
be allowed in the future sidewalk area, on motion by Councilman Chandler,
seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED.
6086
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962~ 3:00
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 186 - REVIEW OF PARKING PLANS: Conditional Use Permit
No. 186, granted pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-27, pertaining to Theater-
Convention Hall, to be located on property described briefly as east of
South Harbor Boulevard, north of Katella Avenue (adjacent to the Charter
House Hotel).
Mr. Leo Freedman presented the Council with plans indicating
sixty additional parking spaces available on the existing Charter House
Hotel property, together with letter of approval from the General Manager
of the Charter House.
Mr. Freedman explained that Council approval was necessary for
a lease that he was about to enter into, and further, that with this
additional provision, there will be six hundred (600) parking spaces, as
required.
Councilman Chandler moved that it be the finding of the City
Council that under the present Code requirements, with the additional
parking provided along the south boundary of the Charter House property~
there is sufficient parking provided as shown on Exhibit "A", dated
September 4, 1962, and signed by Mayor Coons. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-793: In accordance with report and recommendation of City
Engineer 3ames P. Maddox, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-793
for adoption, awarding Ball Road Street Improvement from Loara Street to
Sherrill Street (Job No. 4809) to Electric and Machinery Service in the
amount of $59,219.06, the low bidder.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE BALL ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM LOARA STREET TO
SHERRILL STREET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 4801. (Electric and
Machinery Service)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-793 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-794: In accordance with certification of Thornton E. Piersall,
Director of Public Works, that Crown Fence and Supply Company, Ltd., con-
tractors, have completed Work Order 4004a, in accordance with plans and
specifications, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-794 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND TH£ FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVIC£S, MAT£RIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UIILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISH AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK
FENCING AROUND PORTIONS OF THE PERIMETER OF THE OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 4004a. (Crown Fence and Supply Company,
Ltd. )
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
6087
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4. 1962, 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-794 duly passed and adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 62R-795, 62R-796,
62R-797 and 62R-798 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-795 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Oroweat Baking Company)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-796 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(20th Century Homes, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-797 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(North American Aviation, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-798 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Long Beach Banana Distributors, Inc.)
On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adopted by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dut%on.
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-795, 62R-796, 62R-797
and 62R-798 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-799: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-799
for adoption. Said resolution was read in full in public by Assistant
City Attorney Joseph Geisler.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURE IN CONNECTION WITH THE REUSE AND DESTRUCTION OF TAPE RECORDINGS
OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS.
On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-799 duly passed and adopted.
RE$OLUIION NO. 62R-800: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-800 for
adoption.
Refer ~o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF UTILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7Ut-2781 WITH THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR REROUTING AND ENCASEMENT OF CERTAIN PROPOSED
UTILITY FACILITIES OF THE CITY AT THE WAGNER AVENUE OVERCROSSING OF THE
ROUTE 19 FREEWAY.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
6088
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A'~S: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6QR-800 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1747: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1747 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No Parking, portions of Magnolia Avenue and Santa Ana Street.)
After hav5ng read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1747 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roi1 call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1747 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1748: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1748 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FIXING AND LEVYING A PROPERTY TAX ON
ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1962-63.
After having read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1748 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1748 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1751: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1751 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-90 - R-3)
After having read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1751 and
having knowledge of 'the contents therein~ Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1751 duly passed and adopted.
6089
Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1752: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1752 for final
readin9.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CItY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-7 - R-l)
After having read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1752 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
%he motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSEN/: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, K~'ein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1752 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1753: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1753 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-99 C-i)
After having read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1753 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOT~N UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1754: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1754 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-43 - C-l)
After having read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1754 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
YORBA ANNEXATION: Report of Orange County Boundary Commission dated August 27,
1962, finding the boundaries of the proposed Yorba Annexation %o be
reasonably definite and certain as to Section 35002 of %he Government Code,
although it cuts property lines, was ordered received and filed upon
motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION
CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed,
on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION
CARRIED:
a. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District meeting held
August 17, 1962.
b. Alpha Beta Acme Markets, Inc., commending City Attorney's office and
Police Department.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT, TITLE 18~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, PERTAINING TO GENERAL
PROVISIONS, PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AS RECOMMENDED BY CITY PLANNING CO~[MISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 408~ SERIES 1962-63:
Public hearing was held by City Council August 14, 1962, and action
deferred to this date for further study and investigation.
6090
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
At the request of Mr. Martin Kreidt, Zoning Coordinator, Council
action was further deferred four weeks (October 2, 1962) on motion by
Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 57-58-39: Submitted by Robert Wetzler. Property located
on Magnolia Avenue, south of Broadway. Mr. Murdoch reported that the
description contained in Reclassification No. 57-58-32 proceedings was in
error; that in order to correct this error of omission, the reclassification
was bein9 reprocessed; however, the property has been sold as commercial
property in accordance with 'the master map in the Planning Department, and
thereupon recommended permission be granted to issue permits for the con-
struction of the building in line with the previous action taken.
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
permission was granted to issue Building Permits at the applicant's
own peril, while Reclassification No. 57-58-32 is being reprocessed to
correct an error of omission. MOTION CARRIED.
TEMPORARY CIVIL DEFENSE APPOINTMENT: On the recommendations of Mr. Paul L.
Hayes, Civil Defense Coordinator, temporary appointment continuing to
November 30, 1962, of Mrs. Norms Thiel to serve as Volunteer Coordinator,
Women's Civil Defense Activities, representin9 the City of Anaheim at the
California Women's Civil Defense Conference, was made by Mayor Coons.
Said temporary appointment was ratified by the City Coundl on
motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION
CARRIED.
URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY: Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney be
authorized to prepare necessary document for the transfer of $49,000.
from the General Fund to the Urban Renewal Agency for the purpose of
institutin9 an Economic Survey and Area Appraisal of the center City
area, in accordance with the bud9eted item for that purpose. Councilman
Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ALCOHOLIC LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were presented by
the City Manager to the City Council for their information:
a. Kenneth LeRoy Roundy, "Speedee Mart", new Off-Sale beer and wine
license, 2437 West Ball Road (C-1 Zone).
b. Roland James Jensen, "Satellite Market", new Off-Sale beer and wine
license, 2206 East Katella Avenue, (C-1 Zone).
c. Charles Clinton Davis, "Davis ~arket~', Off-Sale General alcoholic
beverage license, 857 North Harbor Boulevard (C-1 Zone.).
d. Fhomas LeRo¥ Stark, "Stark~s Discount Grocers", Off-Sale beer and
wine alcoholic beverage license, 150-152 East Orangethorpe Avenue
(Kunin and Sorts) (~-1 Zone).
No further Counc:l action was taken on the above applications.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE APPLICATION: Submitted by Ina Laura and
Leal Chester for New On-Sale beer license in established business (C-1
Zone) 892 South Knott Avenae, "Little Venny~s'' was authorized to be
protested by the City AttorneyVs Office on the basis that the present
zone does not perm:t this activity. Further, that the City Attorney
be authorized to withdraw said protest, subject to obtaining necessary
conditional use oermit, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Schutte. MOTION
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE APPLICA'[ION: Submitted by Lorenzo Anthony
Caccomo and Kenneth Eugene Tremayne for new Off-Sale General,"Un-named
business", 2930 !~s't Lincoln Avenue, (C-1 Zone).
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board was ~equested to make special inves-
tigation of the alias used by Kenneth Eugene Tremayne. MOIION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to v:O0 P.~. Councilman Chandler
seconded the mot~on. ~OTION CARRIED. (~:15 P.M.)
6091
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September a, 1962~ 3:00
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order (7:00 O~Clock P.M.).
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
INVOCATION: Rev. Hazen of the First Presbyterian Church gave
the invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO. 1504: Initiated by the City Planning Commission in
lieu of reclassification filed by Charles J. and Clare Ducoff for permission
to establish a real estate office in an existin9 single family residence, on
property located on the west side of State College Boulevard, approximately
ninety feet south of Broadway (311 South State College Boulevard).
City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 412, Series
1962-63, 9ranted said variance, subject to the followin9 conditions:
1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of
State College Boulevard (50 feet existing).
2. Repair of damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks on State College Boulevard
in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of
the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on State
College Boulevard.
4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
5. Limitation of all signs to one eight (8) square foot unlighted sign and
said sign shall indicate only the specific business being operated on the
subject property, and the prohibition of all flags and banners, rotating
and other lights for advertisement purposes.
6. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 pro-
vided that the proposed access drive shall be posted for one-way traffic
from State College Boulevard to the rear of 'the property, with provision
for egress from subject property to be made by way of the alley to the
rear.
7. Posting of a bond to insure the installation of a six (6) foot masonry
wall along the north and south sides of subject property.
8. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the west side of the
abutting alley prior to issuance of a business license unless the
abutting property owner to the West specifically waives in writing said
wall construction.
9. Time limitation of three years, or until such further time as the
Commission may grant, upon a written request of the property owner.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council, and the original reclassification returned to the City
Planning Commission for public hearing and recommendation (new application
No. 61-62-120, to be considered by 'the City Plannin9 Commission September 5,
1962)
Mrs. Ducoff addressed the Council, giving a brief review of the
application. She stated that they chose this site because of its location,
that the property was placed in escrow contingent upon the real estate use;
that on June 25, 1962, hearing on 'the reclassification was held by the City
Planning Commission. At that time, it was ruled that the reclassification
be withdrawn and a variance initiated by the City Planning Commission.
July 22, 1962, the Planning Commission hearing was held and the Variance
was granted, pursuant 'to Resolution No. 412. She further advised that at
no time was any opposition entered; further~ after the expiration of the
twenty-two day appeal period, the escrow was closed; that after the escrow
was closed, notice of the City Council hearing was received from the City
Clerk.
Mayor Coons explained the reasons that the City Council requested
review. If no action had been taken by the City Council, it was felt that an
illegal variance would have been finalized.
6092
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Discussion was held by the City Council. At the conclusion thereof
Councilman Chandler moved to continue said public hearing to October 9, 1962,
7:00 P.M., to be considered in conjunction with reclassification now bein9
processed by the City Plannin9 Commission. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Vincent Smith, broker, 226 W~st Union Avenue, Fullerton,
representing owner of property to the North of 311 South State College
Boulevard, addressed the Council obtaining procedural information regarding
the pending hearing on reclassification of subject property.
INTERIM BUSINESS LICENSE, 311 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD: It was moved by
Councilman Chandler that the City Treasurer and Business License Department
be authorized to issue a temporary business license for a period of sixty
days, to be taken at 'the risk of the applicant, pendin9 finalization of the
zonin9 application. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-5 AND VARIANCE NO. 1510:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-5: Submitted by Rudolph Wesner request%n9 a
change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located at the southeast corner
of West Street and Romneya Drive (1036 West Romneya Drive).
City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 434, Series
1962-63, recommended said reclassificaiion, subject to the followin9 con-
ditions:
1. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Romneya
Drive and West Street.
2. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of a Building Permil for the new unit.
3. Provision of standard %rash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Buildin9
Inspection.
4. Subject to the approval of Petl'tion for Variance No. 1510.
5. Installation of the rems%nih9 improvements on West Street, in accord-
ance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City
Engineer.
6. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. i and 5.
7. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1.
8. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the southerly
property line of subject property, said wall to be reduced to forty-two
(42) inches adjacent to the front yard setback of the adjoining lot to
the South.
VARIANCE NO. 1510: Requesting permission 'to waive rear and side yard
se%back requirements on property described above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 435,
Series 1962-63, 9ranted said variance, subject to the followin9 conditions:
1. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Romneya
Drive and West Street.
2. Subject 'to the approval of the Petition for Reclassification No. 62-63-5.
3. Installation of the remaining improvements on West Street in accordance
with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
ment of I'tem Nos. 1 and 3.
5. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1.
6. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the southerly property
line of subject property, said masonry wall to be reduced to forty-two
(42) inches adjacent 'to the front yard setback of the adjoining lot to
the South.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
in accordance with Council policy, to be considered in conjunction with
requested reclassification.
6093
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Wesner, applicant, requested approval of revised plans, and
stated said plans have been checked by the Planning Department and substan-
tially conform with the plans submitted to the City Planning Commission.
Mr. Martin Kreid% reported on the revisions of 'the plans, noted
the location of 'the subject property, and referred to Plan Study No. 52-51-4,
projecting multiple family residential in the area, supporting City Planning
Commission's recommended approval. He called attention to Findin9 No. 1 of
%he Variance, statin9 that this should read, "waiver of required side and
rear yard setback requirements".
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished ~o address the Council.
Mr. Weaner, applicant, requested that the required masonry wall
be substituted with the existing wood fence. He explained that both he and
his neighbors have landscapin9 on each side of the fence that would have to
be removed. He felt the expense involved was unnecessary, due to the fact
that the wood fence is in good condition; further, that it would only be a
matter of time when all the surrounding area would be reclassified R-3 Zone.
In answer to Mayor Coons inquiry, concerning Condition No. 8,
considering the projected use of the area as R-3 Zoning, Mr. Kreidt
explained that the requirement of the masonry wall was imposed for the
protection of the existing single family residential area to the south of
subject property.
Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted
that the driveway ~o the 9ara9e has been reduced from 17~ feet to 13 feet.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council~
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Regarding the relocation of the garage, Mr. Weaner explained that
to move the garage further than 13 feet would block the rear entrance to
the kitchen.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-801: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-801,
authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as
requested, subject to 'the recommendations of' the City Planning Commission,
with the following amendments:
Condition No. 7: Io read,"Deveiopment saesLangially in accordance with
Exhibit 1 - Revised," signed by MaFor Coons and approved by City Council
this date.
Condition No. 8: fhere be added the words"or that a bond be posted to
guarantee construction of six foot masonry' wail in the event the property
to the South is not: reclassified R-3 ~ithin a Lwo-year period."
Refer ~o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF tHE CITY COUNCIl. OF rHE crr¥ OF ANAHEIM FIbbING AND DETER-
MINING THAT 'TITLE 18 OF iHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BELA'rING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND FHAi' iNE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (62-63-5 .- R-3)
On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL,MEN..
NOES: COUNC ILP{EN:
ABSEhFT: COUNCILMEN:
Duhton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None,
Schutte.
The ~ayor declared Resol~tion No. 62R-801 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUIION NO. 62R-802: Councilman DutLon offered Resolution No. 62R-802
granting Variance No. 1510, subject to the r~commendations of the City Plan-
ning Commission with 'the f'ollo~ing amendmen'ts:
6o9a
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Condition No. 5: To read, "Development substantially in accordance with
Exhibit 1 - Revised," signed by Mayor Coons and approved by City Council
this date.
Condition No. 6: There be added the words,"or that a bond be posted to
guarantee construction of six foot masonry wall in the event property to
the South is not reclassified R-3 within a two-year period."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1510.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NO£S: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-802 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 62-63-10 AND VARIANCE NO, 1512:
RECLASSIFICATION NO, 62-63-10: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Charles S.
Elardi, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-S, property located on the
north side of Sycamore Street, approximately 4a5 feet east of Century
Drive, (1637 East Sycamore Street).
'The City Planning Commission pursuant 'to Resolution No. 439,
Serie~ 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Dedication of thirty-two (32) feet from 'the monumented centerline of
Sycamore Street. (24.75 feet existing)
2. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Sycamore Street, in accord-
ance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City
Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Sycamore
Street.
4. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
5. Subject to the approval of Petition for Variance No. 1512.
6. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit, for
the new units only.
7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. i, 2 and 3.
8. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2,
except the turning area shall be brought to the minimum of twenty-six
(26) feet in front of garages.
9. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall alon9 the south property
line of the westerly one hundred twenty-four (124) feet of subject
property and along the west property line to be constructedfrom the
southerly edge of the garages to the front setback line, said six (6)
foot masonry wall to oe constructed alon9 the south property line of the
easterly 124.76 feet and along the east property line for a distance of
140 feet to separate the parking area of the R-3 from the adjacent R-A
Zone property.
10. Provision that the interior walls of the proposed carports be stuccoed
where said masonry walls do no~ exls~ ~ha~ enclosed storage areas shall
be provided along the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper
guards shall be provided to protect the rear of the proposed carports.
VARIANCE NO. 1519: Requesting permission to waive side yard setback
requirements and parkin9 reqoirements on property described above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 440, Series
1962-6~, 9ranted said variance subject to the following conditions:
6095
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September aI 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
1. Dedication of thirty-two (32) feet on Sycamore Street (24.75 feet now
existing).
2. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Sycamore Street, in accord-
ance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City
Engineer.
3, Payment of $2.00 per front foot for trash storage areas as determined
by the Department of PuOlic WorKs, Sanitation Division, prior to Final
Building Inspection.
4. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
o£ Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
5. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 62-63-10,
6. Payment of Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwellin9 unit, for the
new units only.
7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
8. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2,
except the turnin9 area shall be brought to the minimum of twenty-six
(26) feet in front of garages.
9. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the south property
line of the westerly one hundred twenty-four (12a) feet of subject
property and along the west property line to be constructed from the
southerly edge of the garages to the front setback line, six (6) foot
masonry wall to be constructed alon9 the south property line of the
easterly 12~.76 feet and along the east property line for a distance of
one hundred and forty (140) feet %o separate the parking area of the
t-3, from the adjacent R-A Zone, proper'ry.
10. Provision %nat Lhe in%er%or walls of the proposed carports be stuc¢oed
where said masonry walls do not exist~ that enclosed storage areas
shall be provided along '%he rear wall of each carport, and that adequat
bumper guards shall be provided to protect the rear of the proposed
carports.
In accordance with City Council policy, review of action taken
by the City Planning Commission on Variance No. t512 was ordered by the
City Council to be considered concurrently with Reclassification No.
62-63-10.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the T-shaped parcel of
property and summarized 'the evidence before the City Planning Commission.
He called attention to Finding No. 5, whereln the developer proposed to
erect carports instead of garages.
Mr. Elardi, applicant, was present at the meeting.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished %o address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearth9 closed.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council and discussion held
concerning construction of carports in lieu of garages.
RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-803: Councilman Kreln offered Resolution No. 62R-803
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subjeci to %he recommendations of the City Planning
Commission with the following amendments:
Condition No. 6: That there be added, :"at the time Duilding permits are
obtained."
Condition No. 10: To read, "In lieu of garage requirements, there bs
provided 25 carports, that the interior walls of the proposed carports
be stuccoed where masonry walls do not exist, %hai enclosed storage area
shall be provided along the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate
bumper guards shall be provided to protect the rear of the carports."
Refer to Resolution Book.
6096
City Hall, Anaheim, Caiiforn~a - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF i'HE CITY COUNCil OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OE THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED ,AND THAt I'HE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (62-63-i0 -
On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by 'the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Duzton, Chandler, Krein and Coons,
None,
Schut'te.
The Mayor declared Re~oiu~ion No. 62R-803 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-804: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-804
for adopzion granting Variance No. 1512, subject to the recommendations of
zhe City Planning Commission, wit~ the following amendments:
Condition No. 6: To be added, "aZ the time building permits are obtained."
Condition No. 10: fo read, "In liez of garage requirement, there be provided
25 carports; that the interior walls of the proposed carports be stuccoed
where masonry wails do not exist; that enclosed storage areas shall be pro-
vided along the rear wail of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards
shall be provided to protect the rear of the carports.
Refer ~o Re.o~u,-uzon Book
A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF I'HE CI'TY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1512.
On roll call the fore~olng resoluzion was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Duzton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resoluh:on No. 62R-.804 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-ii AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97,):
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-1i: Submitted by Stanley G. Anderson, requesting
change of zone from R-A to R-3, properly located on the north side of
Orangewood Avenue, approximately 630 feet west of Haster Street (239 West
Oranqewood Avenue).
City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 441, Series
1962-63, recommended said reciass~f~cation, sub~ec~ to the following
conditions: ~
i. Dedication of forty-five (45) feel from the monumented centerline of
Orangewood Avenue (20 fee~ now existing).
9. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Orangewood Avenue and a £uture ~ ora sixty-four (64) foot
street to be construczed along the wesheriy property line of subject
property running from Orangewood Avenue -to 'the northerly property line,
subject 'to ~he approval of 'the City Engineer and in accordance with
the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
S. Payment o£ $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Orange-
wood Avenue.
4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $P5.00 per dwelling unit.
~. Provision of standard hrash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitat'lon D~v~sion, prior to Final Building
Inspection,
6. Subject to the approval of PeLit~on for Conditional Usp Permit No. 279.
7. Installation of fire hydrants as de~ermined to be necessary by the City
of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection.
8. Access drives shall be a minimum of twenty-one (91) feet in width with
6091
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California .- COUNCIL MINUTES .- September 4~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
with adequate angle cutoffs provided or a minimum of twenty-eight (28}
feet in width if no cutoffs are provided, and in ail cases, shall have
a minimum vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet.
9. Recordation of an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of
Anaheim, at its request, of a thirty-two (32) foot half-width of a
sixty-four (64) foot street, said sZreet to be constructed along the
westerly boundary of subject property extending from Orangewood Avenue
to the northerly property' line, said half street to be contructed to
City of Anaheim standards, and 'to be subject to City of Anaheim inspec-
tion.
10. Time limitation of one h~mdred and eight~ (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 9.
11. Construction of a six (6] foot masonry wall sion9 the northerly
property line.
12. Posting of a two-year bond, renewabie by proper request ~o the City
Council, to insure the installation of a six (6) foot fence or
masonry wall along the westerly proper-ty line.
13. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 3, and
9 revised, except that other 'than composition roofs shall be provided,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 279: Requesting permission to establish a
planned unit development on property described above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 442,
Series i961-629 granted said conditional use permlt, suoject to the fol-
lowing conditions:
1. Dedication of for'zy-five [45) feez from the monomenLed cen%erline of
Orangewood Avenue (20 feet now existing).
2. Preparaiion of street improvement plans and Znsi~aJ. la%ion of ail improve-
1
menhs for Orangewood Avenue and a f~ture ~ of a sixty-four (64) foot
street to be oonstruc%ed along the wesierl? property' line of subject
property running from Orangewood Avenue to the norLherly property line,
subject to the appro'vaz of the City ~ngzneer and in accordance with
the adopted standard plans on file in the off~ce of the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on
Orangewood Avenue°
4. Payment of Park and Recreation Fee o~ $~5.00 per dwelling unit.
5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the
Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final
Building Inspection.
6. Subject [o ~he approvai of Petlhion for Reclassification No. 69-63-11.
7. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the
City of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection.
8. Access drives shall oea minimum of ~went¥-.one (21.) feet in width with
adequate angle cut-offs provided or a minimum of twenty-eight (28) feet
in width if no cunoffs are provided and in all oases shall have a
minimum vertical clearance of fourteen (i4) Fee~.
9. Recordation of an irrevocable offe~ of dedication ~o the City of Anaheim
at its request of a thirty-two (32) foot half width of a sixty-four (64)
foot street, said streel ~o be constructed along the westerly boundary
of subject property, ex!endin9 from Orangewood Avenue to the northerly
property line, said half stree'~ to be constructed to City of Anaheim
standards and to City of Anaheim inspection.
10. Time limitation of one hundred eighty ]80) daws for the accomplishment
of Item Nos. I, 2, 3 and 9.
11. Construction of a six (6) foot masonr'~ wall along the northerly property
line.
12. Posting of a two-year bond, renewable by proper request to the City
Council, io insure 'the ins~allahion of a six (6) £oot fence or masonry
wall along the westerly proper~y llne.
13. Development substantially in a~cordance wlth Hxhibits 1, 2 revised, and
3, except that other than composition roofs scull be provided.
Review of action 'taken by the City Planning Commission on Condi-
tional Use Permit No. 979 was ordered zn accordance with Ciiy Council
policy, to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 62-6~-11.
6098
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES- September aI 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler withdrew from the Council Chambers and from
ail proceedings pertaining to Reclassification No. 62-63-11, Conditional
Use Permit No. 279, Reciass:fication No. 62-63-16 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 283, because of possioie conflict of interest.
Mr. lvIartin Kreidt noted /he location of the properties included
in Reclassification No. 02-63-11, and 62-63-16. He advised that the City
Planning Commission considered 'the evidence presented, including Plan
Study No. 53-88-1, and also considered the need of access from Orangewood
Avenue northerlf into the sioc~ of property that will be shut off from
access zo Orangewood Avenue and Master Street ~¥ Zhe proposed developments
and other pending deveiopmenzs.
Discussion was brZefi'y held Oy Lhe City' Council and City Manager,
concerning zhe requirement for a tnlrty-two ±out half street, and necessary
provision for improvemen~ of said street,
[he ~ayor asked if' the applicant was present and wished to
address the Council.
Mr. l.^!illiam Vickrey, Agent for the applicant, was present,
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppos-
ition to this requesz~ there oeing no response, declared the hearing
closed,
Plans were reviewed Sy the Cihv ~
~Ou f C~i.
RESOLUTION NO. 02R-,805: Councziman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-805
for adoption, aughorlzir~g preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as req,~ested, s~,O~ect ~o the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission, wi'~h 'the following amendment:
Condition No, ~: Fo ada, 'a~ the 'ime bu.=i, ding permits are obtained."
Refer to Resold ion Book.
A RESOLUI'iON O~ iRE CIiY COUNCIL O~ fHE CiI'Y O~ ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
2tNING 'rMAT lilLE ~80~ fhE ANAHEIM MUNiCiPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED Ah~ i'~A]' rHE BOUNDARIES OF CERFAiN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-ii - R-3)
Or} roil ca~i the foregoing resol~:tion ~^.,as duly passed and adopted
by the foil. owing vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
FEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Ddh;:on, Krein a'nd Coons.
None.
Schu ,~te.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler.
Fhe Mayor dec±ared Resot,~lon No. 02R-805 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-806: Counciiman Dutzon offered Resolution No. 62R-806,
granting Conditional Use Permiz No. 279~ suoject to the ~ecommendations of
the City Planning Commission, amendnag Co~diLion No. ~ thereof to add,
"at ~he z[me building permits are oo~a~nedo"'
Or', ~o,i] .::a~i :re ~orego;.~! r-'so.~.~,::~on was duly passed and adop[ed
by Lh~? ~ OiiOWlr:~ ,/() el
AYES: COUN( i
NOES: COUNt: [ [/,.~E N:
ABSENI: COUNC[:MEN:
FEMPORARiL/ ABSEN[:
1;~ t;.t;, K~"~tn and Coons.
No;~e.
COU!,,'.O i tHEN: Chand:er.
6099
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolu[ion No. 62R-806 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-16 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 283:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-16: Submitted by Mae Thompkins, requesting change
of Zone from R-A to R-3, property located on the west side of Haster Street
approximately 310 feet north of Orangewood Avenue (11355 Haster Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuan% %o Resolution No. 448,
Series 1962-63, recommended said recla~eificahion, subject 'to the following
conditions:
1, Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the centerline of Haster Street
(30 feet existing).
2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Haster Street subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Haster
S~ree%.
Payment of Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit.
5. Subject to the approval of petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 283.
6. Installation of fire hydrants as determined to be necessary by the
City of Anaheim Fire Department to provide adequate fire protection.
7. Access drives to be a minimum of twenty-one (21) feet in width with
adequate angle cutoffs provided or a minimum of twenty-eight (28)
feel in width if no c~tof~s are provided and in all cases a minimum
vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet.
8. Izme i~mrtaLion of one hundred eignky (180} days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos. ~, 2 and 3.
9. Development s~bstanx.:a~y ~n accordance ~::h Exhibit Nos. I and 2,
except :.na~ a m~r::mum i:nlz,%y (30) foot a~s~e shall be preserved between
garages where said garages face one another.
10. P~ovzsmen o~ standard %~ash storage areas as demerm~ned ~ the Department
of Public Works, San~.ha~.~on D~v}s~or:~ or,or :.o Fina~ Building Inspection.
CONDITIONAL USE PERHif NO, 283: Req.=estzng permzsszon to construct a
planned ,nL~ deve~opmenh on propex~ described above,
ihe Czt¥ P. annzng (3omm.~sszon p~z~an~. .o Reso~usion No. 449~
Series J962-63, gran..ed sa£a Con~Ls~ona~. Use Permit, sub3ec% ~o the fol-
lowing condit ;one:
1. Deal:cat,on of for:y-f~ve (45) feet ~rorn uhe cenheri~ne of Haster
Strpet (30 feet
2, Preparas~on bt s'treet smprovement p~.ans an~ ~s:~a~iahxon of al~
~mprovements ~o~ Haszer S%reec subject to 'the approval of the City
Engineer and tn accordance xit. h the adopted o.andard pi. ans on
fihe office of t. he C~zy Engineer,
Payment of F2.OQ per fxom. fooc for ~s'~'ee;~ ~.~gh~s~ng paPposes on
Has't er Shreet,
a, Payment of Path and Ne(;reazion See bt $95,00 per ~well~ng uni~,
5, Subiect to she approva~ of pet.~tion for Conditional Use Pemit No, 283,
6, Instaliauion of f~re hydrants as deherm~ned :o be necessary by ~he City
o~ Anahezm Fire DepaPsmer~h to provide adeq~aue fz~e p?otection.
7. Access drives to be a m~ntmum of zwenhy-one (21) fee~ in width with
adequate angle co%offs erovlded or
feet in wid[h :f no cutoffs are provided and xn ail cases a minimum
vertical clearance of ~Our%een (i~) feeL.
8. Fime lim~ta'tion of one h~ndred e~ghty- (180 days for the accomplis~en%
of Jr:em Nos i, 2 and 2.
9. Developmen5 sbbstanklai/?
except that a minimum thirLy (30) fOOl, a:sie shall be preserved between
garages where said garages face one anokher.
i0. Provision of ~%andard Lrash St,brags area5 a5 deherm:ned by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, 5an~Lat:or'~ Div~b.On, pr/or %0 Final Building
Inspection.
6100
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission on Condi-
tional Use Permit No. 283 was ordered in accordance with Council policy, to
be considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 62-63-16.
6o98. )
(For notes concerning City' Planning Commission action, see page
The Mayor asked if anyone wished ko speak concerning this issue,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-807: Councilman button offered Resolution No. 62R-807
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission, amending Condition No. 4 thereof to add, "at the time building
permits are obtained."
Refer ~.o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF [HE CITY COUNCIL OF ~HE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING 'THAI' '[ITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (62-63-i6 - R-3)
On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by ~he following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENf:
DuL%on, Krezn and Coons.
None.
Scnu?te.
COUNCIU~I~N: Chandler.
The Mayor declared Resol~tion No. 02R-807 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-808: Councilman Dalton offered Resolution No. 6~R-808
granting CondiSionai Use Permit No. 283, subject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commission, amendin9 Condition No. 4 thereof to add,
"at tge time building permits are obtained.~'
Refer Lo Reso±ution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF ['HE CIYY COUNCil O~ fHE CI['Y OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 283.
On roil call. the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENi': COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENE:
Du%ton, Kr~in and Coons.
None.
Schunte.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler.
[he Mayor declared ResoiuLion No. 62R-808 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Chandler rezurned to the Council meeting (8:00 P.M.).
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSI~ICA'iION NO. 0~-63,-12 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 280:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-12: Submitted by Wayne R. Davidson, requesting
change o{ zone {rom R-A to PIS, prope~ty located on the north side o£
Broadway, approximately 133 feet east of Brentwood Place (1769 West Broadway).
The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to Resolution No. a43, Series
1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ~80: Requesting permission to construct planned
unit group housing on propertv described above.
'The City' Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 444, Series
1962-63, denied said conditional use permit.
6101
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission on Condi-
tional Use Permit No. 280 was scheduled in accordance with Council policy
to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 62-63-12,
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property, and reviewed
briefly the opposition presented to the City Planning Commission, calling
attention to Finding No. 3.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Davidson, applicant, addressed the Council, calling attention
to the irregular shape of the parcel, and advising that according to the
best professional advice he could obtain, the requested use was the best use
for the property. In his opinion, this would be good planning and would
provide a buffer zone between the church educational building and parking
lot and the homes to the West. He explained that they plan to completely
enclose the project, with a masonry wall, that only the front of the
building and driveway would be visible from the street. Mr. Davidson
asked what other use could be made of this land~ which is too large for a
single family residence. He felt the development would enhance the area
by developing otherwise unused land and requested the Council to carefully
consider the merits of his request.
In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Davidson reported that
the property was acquired by him a't the same 'time the church acquired the
church site, and at that time, he served as minister of "the church. The
acquisition of the church property and his purchase was contained in the
same escrow~ that the net acreage of the church property is 1.85 acres,
and his parcel is approximately 3/4 of an acre.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished 'to address %he Council.
Mr. John Zaharson, 2a6 Bren'twood Place, addressed theCouncil
advising that in his opinion, the church was %he bdffer development, and
Mr. Davfdson~s position was the creation of: his own making° He reported
the approximate value of the twenty~two homes on Brentwood Place, and the
approximate tax return ~o the City, and stated their basic objection was
that 'the proposed use of the land wou~d De contrary ~o good use, and would
be the beginning of a new type of zoning in the area.
He further advised that they come to the City Council, not as an
organized group or association, but as individuals concerned with the
common problem that 'threatens the future of their homes and development of
their residential area. He related three points on which they base their
opposition:
1, That the proposal is contrary to the best use of the land.
2. That it would be establishing a precedent in the immediate area.
3. That the present zone is good in its present stage.
Mr. Zaharson then presented a petition of protest containing
thirty-seven signatures.
Mr, Philip Soma, 252 Brentwood Place, requested a show of hands
of those present for the purpose of expressing ~heir feelings on this
application. Mr. Soma advised ~ha% one of ~%he reasons he purchased his
home at this location was the zoning in the immediate area.
Mr. Thomas O'Br[en, 1780 Brentwood Place, advised that they much
preferred the church as a buffer and furiher, that a masonry wall around
the project would be useless if two-story units were permitted. Regarding
what other use the property could be put to, Mr. O~Brien advised that he
believed there were three other property owners on Brenzwood Place with
land close to the size of the subject property.
Mr. Dick Venturelii, 1793 Brentwood Place, sub-contractor (tile)
in O~ange County, advised that in his business, he has seen what construction
of two-story multiple units can do to an R-1 area, and in his opinion, the
present use of the subject property was a proper one; and stated he would
6102
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
see it remain. He felt that because of the shape of the property, it would
be impossible to dewlop a multiple project 'that would lend itself to the
area.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Further discussion was held by' the City Council, and the opposing
group was complemented on their presentation by Councilman Dutton.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-809: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-809
denying Reclassification No. 62-63.-12.
Refer Lo Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NO'/ BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-12)
On roll call %h~ foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vo~e:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schu'Lte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-809 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-810: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-810
denying Conditional Use Permit No. 280.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF file CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 9_80.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the follow}ng vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC 1LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
D~tton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schut'te.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6~R-810 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSiFICAiION NO. 62-63~i3: Submitted by Bill Bayzerman
requesting a change of zone from C-1 (with required planting area) to C-1
(without required plan[:ng area)~ on property located at the ~utheas%
corner of Euclid Shreet and Pampas Lane.
'The City Planning Commission pursuant-Lo Resolution No. 445,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied.
'Copy of letter sen'L to Mr. Bayzerman, applicant, by Anaheim Board
of Realtors, was submitzed approving said change, with the provision that a
two-foot planting smrip be maintained along the northerly edge of the
building, and complying with %he orzginal restrictions on the balance of the
property.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the property and called
attention to the development in the area. In his opinion, the letter
submitted by the Anaheim Board of Realtors was to amend statement made at
the City Planning Commission hearing, Reference was made 'to Finding No. 3.
Reference was also made by the City Council to the original
application.
'The Mayor asked if the applicant wished 'to address the Council.
6103
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September a~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Bernard Zimmerman, Architect and City Planner, 622 South West
Moreland, Los Angeles 5, California, representing the lessee of the proposed
building, addressed the Council advisin9 that their request was that the
requirement of a six foot plantin9 strip running 277 feet adjacent to
Pampas Lane be reduced to two feet fronting the proposed building.
Revised drawing was submitted clarifying the request, said revision
being the result of a meeting with the Anaheim Realty Board.
Also submitted was a sketch rendering of the proposed building
(sketch retained by the Architect).
Mr. Zimmerman called attention to the fact that the present
requirement is for an eighteen foot setback on a minor street. In his
opinion, esthetic value of the planting area was not necessarily how
large the area was, but how well the area was planted.
Mr. Bill Bayzerman, owner of the property, addressed the Council
calling attention to the value of land on the Euclid Street frontage,
advising that this was the reason that the reduction in the planting area
was requested.
The City Council reviewed the original plans and compared said
plans with revised drawings submitted at this meeting.
The Mayor asked if anyone had any additional evidence to submit,
there being no response, declared the h~aring closed.
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-811: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-811
for adoption, sustainin9 action taken by the City Planning Commission,
denying Reclassification No. 62-63-13.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF
THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-13)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-811 duly passed and adop{ed.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-14 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 281:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-14: Submitted by Rayco Investment Company, Inc.,
requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3; property located on %he south
side of Orangewood Avenue approximately 610 fee% east of Haster Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 446,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 281.: Requesting permission to construct a
planned unit development on property described above~
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 4a7,
Series 1962-63, denied said Condiiionai Use Permi't.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission on
Conditional Use Permit No. 281 was ordered in accordance with Council policy
to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 62-63-1~.
Communication dated September 4, i962, from Mr. Harry Knisely,
Attorney representin9 the applicant, was submitted advising of extensive
revision in plans, and requesting this matter be continued to a future
6104
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
date in order that revised plans can be finalized and reviewed by the City
Planning Commission.
Mr. Knisely addressed the Council explaining that substantial
revisionsto the plans are being made in light of the recent knowledge of
the proposed park development in the immediate area.
He further advised that this was a situation wherein the applicant
was caught in between a change of policy', and reported that the applicant
purchased the property when it was the policy that R-3 was to be limited to
those areas where there is presently R-3 Zoningl that with the condemnation
of the southeast corner of Raster and Orangewood Avenue for park purposes,
a change was made to the policy to disapprove further R-3 zoning south of
Orangewood Avenue. He felt sure ii was not the intention of the City
Council %o make such a policy retroactive.
Mr. Kniseiy further reported that the plans drawn are well above
the minimum requirements, and ~f it was the Councii~s wish, would just as
soon have zhe issue heard tonight.
Mayor Coons asked for a snow of hands of how many present were
interested in th~ application, and further asked how many favored the con-
tinuance of the hearing to allow f~nalization of revised plans.
Mrs. Schma!i wondered whai good consideration of revised plans
would do when the Co~nc~].'~s poiicE' was no'~ to allow any future R-3 south
of Orangewood Avenue.
Mayor Coons informed Mrs. Schmal! 'that the City Council has made
no such poi. lc>., bat ~eiieved 'there was such an action taken by the City
Planning Commission.
Co~;ncilman Chandler slated trial his question was whether 'those
interes'ted would prefer holding ihe public nearing as scheduled~ or
referring Lhe application ~ac~ to the City Planning Commission for addi-
tional hearings ~efore the Commission.
ar. ~ran~ Roessler, ~P~4'7 Vern Street, protested the continuance
of ute hearing. To ~urther clarify sta'cement of Mrs. Schmall, stated in
his opinion ~he mac referring to the receni aczion taken by ~he City Council
on Reclassification No. 62-03-8, wherein the decision of the City Planning
Commission ~as upheld~ and the R.-3 zoning was denied.
Farther discussion was held; a~ the conclusion thereof, it was
determined b~ ~P,e Cily Co,ncil to hear the issue.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Krein
seconded the motion. MOriON CARRIED. (8:55 P.W.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeiing to order, ail members of the Council
being present, wiLn the exception o~ Co,mci]man Schutte.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSi~ICAi'iON NO. 62-'03-14 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ~81:
Mr. Martin Krezdt noted the iocat:on of the L-shaped parcel of
property' which excludes the corner area, and called attention to findings of
the City Planning Commiss,on. Mr. Kre:d~ staled that it was the opinion of
the City Planning Commission that the requested zoning and use was incom-
patible with the R-l, single family use abubting subject property. He
£urther noted thai the proposed general plan projects this area for low
density residentiai development, having a maximum of seven dwellings per
acre.
Councilman Chandler referred [o the multiple development granted
on Crescent Avenue between Gilbert and Brookhursi Streets, ~hich is located
near a proposed park site, and aszed Mr. Kre:d'h if: he ~ould like to comment
on the Planning Commission's change :~r: ihin~ing,
6105
Q. ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Kreidt replied he was of the opinion that the considerable amount
of R-3 development in close proximity to the subject property and the proposed
park as compared to the Crescent-Gilbert site would be a factor. Also, he
believed considered was the size of the two park areas.
Discussion was held regarding a new proposed zone, now being
considered by the Plannin9 Department and Planning Commission, limiting
development to a maximum of eighteen units per acre, shown as "golden" in
color on the proposed General Plan, and designed to be a buffer between low
density residential use, medium density residential use, commercial centers
and highway rights-of-way. Mr. Kreidt further reported that preliminary
drafts of the new proposed zone and revisions to the R-3 Zone are presently
being made.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address 'the Council,
Mr. Harry Knisely addressed the Council regarding the Planning
Commission's recommendations, based on recent policy. In his opinion,
said policy should not be retroactive, thereby affecting changes already
started, He referred to the Staff Report (contained in Finding No. 2)
wherein it was stated that the proposed development meets only the minimum
requirements, and reported that the facts are, even the original plans were
only approximately fifty per cent of what could be developed on the land,
The original plans provided for one hundred and twenty-four units, and
there is sufficient land to accommodate two hundred and forty units.
Knisely further advised that the revised plans are being designed to be
compatible with the park, and will. certainly upgrade 'the area.
Revised plot plan was reviewed by 'the City' Council and discussion
was held. Mr. George Jeffrey, Architect, came forward and explained the
plans, stating that only the "G" structures will be of two-story construc-
tion.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished 'to address the Council.
Mr. Frank Roessler, 2147 Vern Street, addressed the Council in
opposition to apartments. He called attention to the vacancy factor of
apartments, and also noted the master plan projected this area for R-1
development. In his opinion, an R-3 development would not he compatible
with the existing R-l, and would not be an improvement to the area, and
would add approximately five hundred people to the area. He felt that
when the parcel of property' was purchased, the purchaser was aware of the
existing zone; also that they, as property owners, stood to lose more than
the land speculator, and thereupon requested the reclassification he denied.
Mr. Roessler then presented a petition of opposition purportedly
containing 209 signatures.
Mr. Clifford Rothrock, 2161 South Spinnaker Street, asked if the
revised plans were the plans being considered by 'the City Council.
Mayor Coons advised that the Council was hearing the case based
upon the original plot plans in the file.
Mr. Rothrock felt that the real problem was a community problem,
that they have a close knit residential area, completely surrounding the
park site and subject property; that they were the people who had roots in
the ground and were voting for the bonds favoring schools, etc. He further
advised of his conversation with the tractor man, who on the same date the
Planning Commission hearth9 was held, advised him that there would be
apartments on the property; and in conclusion stated that it was not
necessarily the zoning, but the area, and requested the same Council
decision as on the other side of Orangewood Avenue.
Mrs. Gertrude Velten, 2141 South Spinnaker Street, addressed the
Council stating tha~ in her opinion, there was no reason to change %he
policy line for R-3 development; and further advised %h4% at the present
time, R-1 homes are being constructed on the land at the rear of her
property, and requested subject property also be reserved for R-1 development.
6106
~zty Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. John Hamilton, 2203 Vern Street, called attention to the
traffic congestion that would be created, and siated in his opinion apart-
ments would retard the park and recreational program for their area, and
would possibly attract people to the area who were not stable, and would
not participate in community af~aJ ~
Mrs. Schmall recognized the large investment involved in the
apartment project, but also wished to protect the investment in her own
home, and requested the area south of Orangewood Avenue remain R-1 Zone,
so that the plans 'they had worked so hard for could become a reality.
Councilman Chandler noted that along the east and west boundary
of subject property, there presently exists R-3 Zoning, and that the park
property was zoned R-3. The R-1 home owners protest the development of this
type on the basis that %hey should not back their homes up to R-3 zoning;
and yet if this particular parcel of property develops R-l, these same
people who are in the caiegory of "s'tabie people" will back up to R-3
development. Councilman Chandler felt 'there were two opposing factors
and that a compromise should be reached agreeable to both the developer
and the home owners.
Mrs. Clifford Ewing, 2160 Vern Saree%, stated that if R-1 homes
are constructed on subject property, the purchasers would have a choice of
whether they wish to be next to the apartments. Mrs. Ewing wondere~ about
the schools, and asked if more schools would ~e built, and where in this
area co~id schools ~e constructed.
Mayor Coons advised 'that the provision of schools and school
sites was that of 'the School Board elected oythe people, and that the
City Council had no jurisdiction over schools.
~he Mafor asked if anyone had any new evidence to offer.
~rs. Nora gec~ett, 2147 South Lewis Street, owner of property
a~ Lewis Street and Orangewood Avenue, referred to their two previous
attempts to rezone %he~r property R-3, and advised that the homes in
the area of Spinnaker Street were purchased ir] the neighborhood of
$ia,O00. or $i5,000., and are now selling for approximately $~3,000. She
agreed that the area needed parks, and stated that she has owned her
property since i9~2, and that 'they have tried to provide as much pleasures
for the newcomers as possible; that they have used her property for a ball
diamond and pla~ area for a long whzie. She stated that the property
owners are now trFing 'to develop their property, and were only asking for
the right to develop thezr properties and an agreement between the City
and the other property owners.
Mr. Knlseiy, in rebuttal to some of the statements made, referred
to the law that every man is entztzed to develop his property %0 the
highest and best use, so long as it is not detrimental 'to the safety,
welfare, health and property values of the adjoining properties; and
stated ~rs. Beckett has brought out that the oojectors are not suffering
a loss ~n property values. Regarding the statement that a line was drawn
long ago relative to apartment developments north and south of Orangewood
Avenue, he stated that every one was aware 'that said line was drawn
recently, and drawn subsequent %o the applicant's position.
Mayor Coons feig a good cross-seciion from both sides of the
issue had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed,
Further dZsc'uss~on was held by 'the City Council, and it was the
general feeling that the Boorey-Beckett property I6~-63-8) because of the
surrounding development, was not necessarily in the same position as
subject property. Also, ~he applicant recognizes the deficiencies in the
original plans, and is making drastic revisions, and with a little thought,
might be able to work out many of the objectionable features presented by
the opposition.
6107
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved that
this application be referred back to the City Planning Commission for study
and report on any revised plans that may be submitted, and continue this
public hearing to October 9, 1962, 7:00 O~Clock P.M. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
At the request of Mayor Coons, Mr. Knisely agreed to make available
revised plans to Wt. Roessler, Mr. Rothrock, and Mrs. Schmall; and he further
stated that he mould be happy to meet with them and the Planning Department
regarding these revisions.
Mayor Coons reopened said public hearing, and declared the
hearing to be continued to October 9, 1962.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-17 AND VARIANCE NO. 1515:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-17: Submitted by Henry and Carmen Hogg and James
and Constance Slosh, requestin9 change of zone from R-A to R-3, property
located at the northwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Acacia Street.
The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 450,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied.
VARIANCE NO. 1515: Requesting permission to construct a planned unit
development and waive the tmo-story height limitations on property described
above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. a51,
Series 1962-63, denied said variance.
Review of action 'taken by the City Plannin9 Commission on Variance
No. 1515 was ordered in accordance with Council policy, and public hearing
scheduled to be considered concurrently with Reclassification No. 62-63-17.
Subsequent to action taken by the City Planning Commission,
revised plans were submit%ed to the Planning Department, and were reported
to indicate insufficient street dedication.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of 'the property and briefly
summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission, resulting
in their recommended denial.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present. There
was no response. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on
this issue.
Mr. Thomas Perry, 1020 Wanda Drive, addressed the Council in
opposition, and asked if every time rezonin9 is requested would they be
required to appear 'to protect their rights.
Mayor Coons explained the procedure for reclassification and the
rights of a property owner 'to make applicaiion.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-812: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-812
for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 62-63-i[7.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FIbbING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-i7)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
6108
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 4~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Cooms.
None.
Schutte.~
The Mayor declared Resol. tion No. 62R-812 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-813: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-813
dentin9 Variance No. 1515.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE
NO. 1515.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-813 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURN: (10:37 P.M.)
~ City Clerk
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 11~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session,
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: 3ohn Dawson.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox.
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held August 28, 1962,
were approved on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-814: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-814 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF SEPTEMBER 11~
1962. (Warrants Nos. 20094 to 20383, both inclusive, totaling $1,128,357.95)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.