Loading...
1962/09/256133 ~ity Hail~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 18~ 1962~ 3:00 On roll call the £orsgoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-838 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-839: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-839 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TRANSFERRING FUNDS TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE FUND. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-839 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENF: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED:f-~9:22 P.M. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. PRESENt: ABSENT: PRESENY: The City Coancil of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte (entered the meeting 3:10 P.M.), Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY flTORNEY: John Dawson. CiTY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. ~,layor Coons called the meeting to order. ~'.,~INUTES: Approval of the minutes for City Council meeting held September 18, 1962, was deferred to October 2, 1962. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-840: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-840 for adoption. R~fer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'FHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1962. (Warrants Nos. 20384 to 20645, both inclusive, totaling $523,145.41.) On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-840 duly passed and adopted. 6134 .C.ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. SIGN REQUESTS: Application was submitted by Desta Development Company for per- mission to erect two directional signs, one at 2100 South Harbor Boulevard and one at 220 West Katella Avenue, advertising sale of apartments. Mr. Martin Glick, 111 West Orangewood Avenue, Vice President of the Villa Desta Company, advised that their former application for signs was denied; however, they are asking reconsideration on the basis that people from outside the area have difficulty locating the apartments~ which in his opinion a}e a high quality development and an asset to the City of Anaheim. He submitted for Council review photographs of signs within the City advertising rental properties, and requested their permits be granted for a period of six months. Plans were reviewed and discussion held by the City Council,. and Mr. Glick was apprised of the Council Policy regarding signs being limited to the premises where 9oods are grown or sold, or where the advertised business exists. Also noted was the policing problem of illegal signs used by others after expiration of original permit. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Coons~ sign request for 2100 South Harbor Boulevard and 220 West Katella Avenue was denied. Councilmen Chandler and Dutton abstained from voting on this issue. MOTION CARRIED. Further discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. Glick concerning standards to be established in the new sign ordinance, such as time limits, number of signs allowable for specific uses, etc. Mr. Glick offered to post bond to insure removal of signs within a six month period. The City Council felt the establishment of this precedent would be contrary to provisions of the new proposed sign ordinance. TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT, 111 WEST ORANGEWOOD: Communication dated September 19, 1962, from Martin N. Glick, was submitted, requesting temporary clear- ance for Villa Des%a Anaheim Apartments, stating Final Building Inspection is being withheld pending completion of the balance of off-site improvements. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, request for temporary occupancy permit was granted, with the provision that a sixty day bond be posted to insure completion of all items. Said bond to be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and City Engineer. Councilman Chandler abstained from voting on this issue. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST~ 629 STANTON AVENUE: Application was submitted by George Kubo, Highway 39 Nursery, 623 Stanton Avenue, for permission to erect a non- conforming sign at 629 Stanton Avenue, advertising "Hi 39 Nursery". Plans were reviewed by the City Council and report from the Building Department noted. It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, that said application be granted on condition that the present Highway 39 Nursery sign be removed, and that the new sign be installed within the center ten per cent of the property. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-82, REQUEST: Communication dated September 13, 1962, from Frank M. and Madeline Del Giorgio, Robert L. Balen, Agent, was submitted requesting removal of Condition No. 1, Resolution No. 62R-648, limiting construction to one story. Mr. Frank Del Giorgio advised that their reason for said request was to enable the developers to derive the best land value from the property by permittin9 two story construction. Plans were again reviewed by the City Council and discussion held~ and existing uses and zoning in the immediate vicinity noted. Also noted was that the R-3 reclassification was contingent on approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 220 for a planned unit development, and to consider their request would probably constitute a new public hearing on the entire issue. 6135 City Hall, Anaheim, California = COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Robert Balen, Agent, advised that the property is now under new ownership, and new plot plans will be submitted for approval. No further action was taken by the City Council on this matter. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a five minute recess. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:50 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council bein9 present. (3:55 P.M.) APPROVAL OF PLANS: City Council approval of plans for Lions Club Buildin9 in La Palms Park was deferred for one week {October 2, 1962) to allow the Park and Recrea±ion Department to complete their review of the plans. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Pubi~c Works office was authorized to prepare said plans in such a manner so that the building can be constructed in total, making it available for the entire community; and further authorized necessary funds therefore to be transferred from the Contingency Fund. MOTION CARRIED. JOB NO. 4600 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, POLICE FACILITIES BUILDING: On the recommen- dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein moved that Change Order No, 1, bain9 a credit to the City of Anaheim in the amount of $588.47, Job No. 4600 (Police Facilities Building). be approved. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOl'ION CARRIED. DEEDS OP' EASEMENT: Coanciiman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 62R-841 and 62R-842 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-84i - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEME~i' FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Cecil Miles Lancaster, et dx) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-842 --A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF STORM DRAIN FACILIFIES. (J. Howard Portzer, et ux) On roll call. Lae foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following voie: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-841 and 62R-842 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-843: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-843 for adopt:on. Refer to Resoiut~on Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF HASTER STREET AND KATELLA AVENUE, IN THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 110(2}; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS~ PROFILES~ DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CON- STRUCTION THEREOF~ AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECINICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened October 18~ 1962, 2:00 P.M.) 6136 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-843 duly passed and adopted. RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-844: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No, 62R-844 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT~ OR TYPE OF WORKMAN, OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL MATERIALS, PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION AND COMPLETION OF A PORTION OF GREENACRE AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, JOB NO. 584. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-844 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-845: Counczlman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-845 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF YHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF GREENACRE AVENUE, FROM GILBERT STREET TO APPROXIMATELY a32 FEET EAST OF GILBERT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 584; APPROVING THE DESIGNS~ PLANS, PROFILES, DRAININGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.~ AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK ~0 PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened October 18, 1962, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-845 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R,-846: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-846 for adoption. Refer 'to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY WITH REFERENCE TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF LEWIS STREET~ CROSSING NO. BM,-512.2, AT OR NEAR SOUTH ANAHEIM IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. On roll cai1 the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-846 duly passed and adopted. 6137 C.ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-847: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-847 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF' THE cI'r'Y COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY OF THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN AND USE A STREET OR HIGHWAY UPON AND ACROSS PROPERTY OF THE GRANTOR, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDENTURE COVERING THE CONSTRUCTION, USE AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID STREET OR HIGHWAY. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-847 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-8~a: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-8~8 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT TO THE CITY TO CON- STRUCT AND MAINTAIN A STORM DRAIN CONNECTION TO SAID DISTRICT"S EXISTING 2~-INCH C.M.P. IN IHE CARBON CREEK DIVERSION CHANNEL AT LA PALMA AVENUE. On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by [he following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. 'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-848 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R.-849: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-849 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ~ACATE AND ABANDON AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN AND SURFACE DRAINAGE PURPOSES UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND 'THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing October 16, 1962, 3:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-849 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-850: On the certification of Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, that Sully-Miller Contracting Company has completed the construction of the Euclid Avenue Street Improvement from the North City Limits to Katella Avenue, Project No. 76, in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Du%ton offered Resolution No. 62R-850 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND 'THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOW- ING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF EUCLID STREET, FROM THE NORTH CITY LIMITS TO KATELLA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 76. 6138 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. (Sully-Miller Contracting Co.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vo%e: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-850 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-851: On the certification of Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, that Sully-Miller Contractinq Company has completed the construction of the Nutwood Street Improvement, from 745 feet north of Woodworth Road ~o Woodworth Road, Job No. 684, in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-851 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMEN/ AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE NUTWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMffTELY 745 FEET NORTH OF WOODWORTH ROAD TO WOODWORTH ROAD, IN THE CITY O~~ ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 684. (Sully-Miller Contracting Co,) On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-851 duly passed'and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. {:2R--859: On the certification of 'the Board of Trustees, Anaheim Public L:brary, tha~ California Structures, Inc. has completed the installa- tion o~ ~Orar~ shelving [n Anaheim Public Library, Branch No. 1, Work Order No. ~500c, i~ accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Schutte offered Reso]oLlon No. 62R.-.852 for adoption. Refer t~o Resolu'zion Book. A RESOLU[iON OF fhE CiI'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING [~E COMPLETION OF WOR~ ORDER NO. 4bOOc--FURNISHING, DELIVERING AND INSTAL- LING LIBRARY SHELVING FOR ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY, BRANCH NO. 1, LOCATED AT 2650 WES'f BROADWAY; IN [,~ CITY OF ANAHEIM. (California Structures, Inc.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSeNt: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. Fhe ~ayor declared Resolution No. 62R-852 duly passed and adopted. RE$OLUIION NO. 02R-853: On 'the certification of Thornton E. Piersa11~ Director of Public Wor~s, that Oramge County Sewers, Inc. has completed the Sunkist Street Sewer Improvement, Job No. 1247, in accordance with plans and specifications, Cour~ciiman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-853 for adoption. Refer {~o Resolution Book. A RESOLUYION OF rHE CII'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTIN3 tHE COMPLETION AND I'HE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PL~LIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: 'THE SUNKIST STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, 6139 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. FROM APPROXIMATELY 957 FEE'[ SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 754 FEET NORTH OF SOUTH STREET AND FROM APPROXIMATELY 151 FEET SOUTH OF SOUTH STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 737 FEET SOUTH OF SOUTH STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. i247. (Orange County Sewers, Inc.) On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I IJ~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dui[on, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-853 duly passed and adopted, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held September 5, 1962, pertaining to the following applica- tions, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 1520: Submitted by Warren L. Elmblad, requesting permission to waive rear yard setback requirement on property located at 2459 Level Avenue. [he City Planning Commission pursuadt to their Resolution No. 484, Series 1962-63, granted said variance. VARIANCE NO. 1529: Submitted by Raymond J. Young, requesting permission to establish a rea). esha'to office on property located at 504 North State College Boulevard. The Cit~ Plannin9 Commission pursuant to their Resolu- tion No. 486, Series i'962-63, denied said variance. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 298: Submitted by Land Estates, Inc., requesting permission %o have on.-sale beer in restaurant on property located on the south side of Lincoln Avenae, said property being located at 2220 West Lincoln Avenue. T~e City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolut~n No. 487, Series 1962-~63, granted said conditional use permit, subject %o conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMII NO. 300: Submitted by Douglas J. Caruthers, et ux, requesting permission %o construct main offices of van lines on property located on 'the sou[hwest side of 'the Santa Aha Freeway, the northerly point of 'the subject property beln9 30 fee% south of an extension of the center line of Ball Road. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to %heir Resolu- tion No. 488, Series 1962~.63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. [he foregoing aclions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action was ~aZen on the above numbered conditional use permits and variances. VARIANCE NO. i521: Submitted by Arthur W. and Edna H. Kruse, requesting permis- sion to add sales and service of automobiles to existing facility on adjacent property. Said property located on the east side of Los Angeles Street, [me norihwest corner of sa~d property being 126 feet south of the southeast corner of South Street and Los Angeles Street, and further described as 8i0 So'd'~ Los Angeles Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant zo 'their Resolution No. 485, Series 1962-63, 9ranted said variance, subjec~ to conditions. Yhe C~ty t,,~anager reported receipt of a petition containing · thirteen signatures, requesting said application be denied. [..~1ayor Coons requested a review of action taken by the City Planning Commission on Varsance No. i521, and requested the City Clerk to schedule a date for public hearing [:hereon. RECLASSINICATION NO. 61-62-6 - EXFENSION OF lIMN: Request of Harry L. Drake, President, Rinse-Away Corporation of America, dated September 24, 1962, for extension of time to comply with landscaping and sidewalk requirements, pursuant to Resoiut:on No. 7127 in Reclassification Proceedings No. 61-62-6, was submitted. One year extension was granted, provided proper authority be given ~o present bond. on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Kre~n. MOTION CARRIED. 6140 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUIES - September 25, 1962~ 3:00 p.M. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED: a. County of Orange, 1961-62 Secured tax rolls. b. Orange County League of Cities, regular meetin9. c. Orange Coont'y League of Cities, Executive meeting, d. Feather River Project Association. e. Progress Report, State Water Project, 1961. f. Minutes, Orange Cou~{e~oard of Supervisors, regardin9 formation of West Orange County/D[stri¢%.,J~/w22,-' ORDINANCE NO. 1757: Codncllman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1757 for final reading. Refer 'to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELAYING YO ZONING. (60-61-52 - C-3, SERVICE STATION ONLY, Or any C-1 Use) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1757 and having knowledge of the contents %herein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by' [ne following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSE~r: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1757 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1758: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1758 for final reading. Refer'to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF ?HE Ci'IY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-76 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1758 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the readin9 in ~ull of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman $chutte seconded the mo%ion, MOIION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following 'vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I L!VIEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1758 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1759: Councilman Dui%on offered Ordinance No. 1759 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OP iNE CFTY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ~.,~UNICIPAL CODE RELAiIHG TO ZONING. (59-60-72 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1759 and nav~ng ~nowledge of 'the contents therein, Councilman Dui%on moved read~n9 in full of ss~d Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schut%e seconded t:he motion. ~JOFION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. ~760: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1760 for firs% readia9. 6141 ~.ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING'TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-116 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1760 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1761: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No, 1761 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1750 IN RECLASS- IFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-69(1). After ~earing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1761 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motlon. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1762: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1762 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI~rY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAl. CODE RELAIING TO ZONING. (60-61-31 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1762 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of sa:d Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded %he motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1763: Cotlncilman Du'tton offered Ordinance No. 1763 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELAi'ING ]'0 ZONING. (61-62-125 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1763 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading ir] full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1764: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1764 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ~MENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELAIING 'I0 ZONING. (62-63-9 - M-1 and P-L) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 176~ and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. N~OIION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application by Kenneth John and Floyd Jeremiah Keating, for person to person transfer of On-Sale General license for the Royal Archer, at 815 South Brookhurst Street, was presented by the City }~?~anager for City Council information. No further Council action was taken on said application. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application by Charles S. and Josephine Cimlnesl, et al, for person to person transfer of Off-Sale Beer and Wine license for Caruso~s Delicatessen, 514 North Magnolia Avenue, was presented by the Assistant City Attorney for City Council information. No further action was taken by the City Council on said application. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-SEa: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-854 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 6142 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962~ 3:00 P,M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BETWEEN PACIFIC PLANT PROTECTION AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RELATING TO THE DEPUTIZING OF GUARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DIRECTING TRAFFIC ENTERING~ LEAVING~ AND TRAVERSING THAT PORTION OF BROOKHURST STREET WHICH BORDERS THE CHRYSLER CORPORATION PROPERTY. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEM[: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-854 duly passed and adopted. DRAINAGE - ORANGEWOOD AVENUE/STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Attorney was authorized and directed to forward a letter to the Division of Highways of the State of California assuming liability for possible damage attributable to drainage waters entering State College Boulevard because of the design and construction of the encroachment of the easterly extension of Orange- wood Avenue within the following limits: from said intersection south approximately 900 feet to the existing northerly fence of the Orange Drive- In Iheatre, until such time as the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, or substitute, is constructed. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED (4:40 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Ma?or Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present. (7:30 P.M.) INVOCAflON: Rev. But'tram, Pastor of the Town Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE; Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-22 (See Paqe No. 6149): Mr. Edward N. Rose, applicani, verbally requested that public hearing on Reciassifica- tion No. 62-..63-.22 be continued, as his attorney was unable to be present this evening~ Mayor Coons asked if anyone in the audience was interested in subject reclassification, There was no response. Mafor Coons stated that inasmuch as said public hearing was scheduled as the last item on this evening's agenda, that perhaps interested parties were not yet in attendance, and therefore action on the request of Mr. Rose would oe deferred at this time to be considered at the scheduled time on the agenda~ PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 285: Submitted by Maurice Pinto, requesting permission to establish a hofbrau type tavern on property located on the east s:de of Mountain View, and 65 feet on the west side of Manchester Avenue. %he northwes~ corner of said property being 3~5 feet SOuth of the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and Mountain View, and further described as i813 "C" South Manchester Avenue. 'The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 461, Series 1962-63, denied said Conditional Use Permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Maurice Pinto, applicant. Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and the zonin9 and uses in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence presented at the City Plannin9 Commission hearing, and read in full the findings contained in City Plannin9 Commission Resolution No. 461, Series 61~3 Gitv Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962, 3:00 P.M. 1962-63. He further advised that Variance No. 1513, requesting permission to construct commercial and industrial building on property at 1832 South Mountain View, immediately adjacent on the South to subject proper%y, has been withdrawn by Mr. Pinto. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and the Mayor asked ~f the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Maurice Pinto, applicant and owner of the property, presented photos o: the surrounding area and front elevation and floor plan of the proposed hofbrau, and was of the opinion that subject property was a suitaOie location for a hofbrau operation, because of the surrounding industrial buildings which have daily business hours, and the adult residential apartments and trailer parks in the area, and the fac% that · there are no schools, churches, hospitals or many children. That the pet:'tlons in opposition filed at the City Planning Commission hearing were signed by residents of the trailer park~ objecting because of the no,se from the hoforau, which in his opinion, would be very slight compared to the noise of the busy adjacent freeway. He further explained that his commercial bullding is presently completely vacant, as the small market, barber shop and restaurant moved because of lack of business. Fhe May'or asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, I~r. Gerald Weoer~ 1833 Mountain View, addressed the Council advls:.ng t:haL ae resides with his family of seven children directly across the sLreel from sobject property, and favors the operation of the hofbra_,. Mr. Borer,, owner of property sixty feet south of the proposed hofbra~, advised [hat was in favor of the operation, and his invalid neighbor ~o %~,e North, Mr. Barker, would certainly benefit from having food avai;able next door. ~r. Csarles Fran~, one of 'the owners of the Plantation Mobile Home Park, addressed the Council in opposition, advising that he under- stands boon hue Barker and Boron properties are for sale, and %o allow the hoforau operat, ion could set a precedent for undesirable development of these adjaceni p~operties; that he objected to the additional noise that would be ~reated o} the proposed operation, such as the slamming of car doors and starting of motors, and the music emanating from the hofbrau, as a[ ~eas% si× of their tenants would be disturbed, and such disturbance wohid commence immediatei~ ar%er workinq hours and continue until midnight. He ad~:}sed of the high character of' the residents in their park, and was of the opinion thai the close proximity of the hofbrau backing up to the Freewa./ would in~ize a "hide-cst~' operation, which would downgrade their park. ~.~rs. Nell Brown, ~.,lanager of Plantation Mobile Estates, advised that ~r. Pinto had discussed his plans of development with them; however, upon cor~struction they were surprised to find that the beautiful glass front sdJlding did not face the Freeway, and the entrance was off Mountain View; taat their trailer park residents are permanent, and they are opposed to the hofbrau 'use. ~,tr. Clarence ~:!eddoc!~, owner of the property directly across the street [~om suOjec'[ propert?, the commercial property at the southeast corner of Ma%ella and Has'her Streets, and the Satellite Trailer Park, addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed use, and advised that the residents in ~heir par~ are also opposed to the hofbrau; further, that he has refused to consider similar offers on his property as he did not Gel:eve such type of operation would be good business for this area. in rebuttal, Mr. Pinto stated that the space to be occupied by the hofbra~ was twenty-three feet by twenty-three feet in the central portion of the building; that every precaution would be taken to reduce any ~oise, and to operate an orderly business, and he would personally s~gn such a guarantee. He was of the opinion that if noise was a basic factor, hofbraus would not be allowed anywhere in the City. He requested 6144 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. favorable consideration by the City Council on his application, as it is a great financial burden to maintain a vacant buildin9. Mr. Frank further advised that he has acquired the north two lots adjoining the existing trailer park, and therefore the commercial use could extend to the park property line, and be a disturbing factor to their tenants. Communication from Prudential Savings and Loan Association dated September 13, 1962, addressed to the City Council regarding the loan on Mr. Pintoes commercial building, was submitted and read in full, The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-855: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-855 for adoption, sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission and denyin9 Conditional Use Permit No. 285. ,~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 285. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Coons. Chandler. None. 'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-855 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that this was in fact within an area designated for commercial activity, such as the requested hofbrau. PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 297: Submitted by Eleanor A. Manion, requesting permission to expand an existing nursery school on property located on %he wesi side of Brookhurst Street, the northeast corner of said property being approximately 950 feet south of the southwest corner of Bali Road and Brookhurst Street, and further described as 1309 South Brook- burst Street. 'The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 472, Series 1962-63, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject %o development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1. Appeal: from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Mrs. Joan Crumley and public hearing scheduled to be heard this date. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and communi- cation received September 20, 1962, from Mr. and Mrs. Elby Crumley, 10172 Hearth Lane, requesting that the construction of a block wall along the westerly line of subject property (Condi±ional Use Permit No. 297) be a condition of said permit, was submitted. Mr. Martin Kreldt noted the location of subject property and the exzsting uses in the area, and specifically referred to Finding No. 6 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. a72, as follows: That parking requirements be waived until such time as the Brookhurst Street frontage of abutting properties is widened, or until such time as continued off-street parking would impede traffic movement on Brook- burst Street as determined by the City Engineer, at which time off-street parking shall De provided as deemed necessary by the Architectural Review Commi%tee. 6145 git¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962, 3:00 P.M, Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council and discussion held regarding the continued construction of the additional buildin9 under consideration. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Crumley, 10172 Hearth Lane, owner of adjoining property to the West, advised that they did not object to the nursery school use on subject property; however, requested that provision for a block wall between their properties be a condition of approval, as the existin9 redwood fence is entirely on his property. He further advised that he and his wife do not have a license for a nursery, but they care for two children only. Mrs. Crumley concurred with her husband's statements, and further advised that the new nursery buildin9 and the play area is very close to their home, and they requested the six foot block wall to protect their privacy and to help in abatin9 the noise from the play area, as the proposed expansion of 'the nursery will increase the school to approximately fifty children. Mrs. Manion, applicant, addressed the Council advising that she has moved her building ten feet from the rear property line, and there will be no windows at the back. That from the north edge of the building to the north fence will be a board fence~ which will create a ten foot dead air space for further protection. In answer to Councilman Schutte's question as to whether it would be possible for both parties concerned to jointly construct a block wall, Mrs. ~..4anion stated that at the present time, provision for such a wall would be a financial hardship; however, she would be willing to share the construc- tion costs arguer a year. Councilman Chandler questioned whether the Code required a block wall fence between the parkin9 area on a commercial lot and any residential use° ~rs. Manion stated that she had no parking area, that the parking shown on the plan was waived by the City Plannin9 Commission. That with the additional, fence, most of the play area will be thirty feet from the fence, with the building in between. Mr. and Mrs. Van der Boom addressed the Council advising that they were the original owners of subject property, that Mrs. Manion has established a wonderful school and is a very fine teacher, and they were of the opinion she would maintain control of the noise problem. the Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Mr. Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that either type of fence under consideration complies with Code requirements. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-856: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-856 for adoption, 9ranting Conditional Use Permit No. 297, subject to continued development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1, with the further provision that parking requirements be waived until such time as the Brook- burst Street frontage of abutting properties is widened, or until such time as continued off-street parking would impede traffic movement on Brookhurst Street, as de%ermined by %he City Engineer, at which time off-street parking shall be provided as deemed necessary by the Architectural Review Committee. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERiV, IT NO. 297. ,On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: 6146 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962, 3:00 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons, NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-856 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARINGS, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-114 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 251: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-114: Submitted by George and Gertrude Dykstra, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, on property located on the south side of Bail Road, the northwest corner of said property being 625 feet east of 'the southeast corner of Holder Street and Ball Road, and further described as 3730 Ball Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 473, Series 1962-63, recommended said Reclassification be denied. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 251: Submitted by George and Gertrude Dyks%ra, requesting permission to construct a single story multiple family residential development on property described in Reclassification No. 61-62-114. lhe City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No, 474, Series 1962.-63, denied said Conditional Use Permit. Mr. MarLin Kreidt noted the location of subject property and existln9 uses and zoning in the immediate area, and in summarizin9 the evidence presen'%ed ai the City Plannin9 Commission hearing, advised that the Commission cons:dered the development plans acceptable architecturally; however~ considered the establishment of the proposed land use in the area to be spot zoning, and not in accordance with the preliminary General Plan; that an R-i tract map had been previously filed, however was terminated by the appiican't. Plans and ~ne file were reviewed by the City Council, together with communication from ~r. and ~rs. George Dykstra, advisin9 that Stanton Nurseries, Inc., are the new owners of the subject property. The Mayor asked if the appl:cant wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert Johnson, representing the applicant, presented %0 each Councilman a reporL in booklet form and reported on studies and surveys conducted by himself, and photos of a successful identical development in slmilar surroundings contained therein. He explained in detail their proposed planned unit development, being of minimum density, utilizing less ].and than allowable under multiple zoning, the high quality of con- s/ruction, and apartment conveniences; that there would be seventeen buildings in their development (six triplexes, eleven fourplexes) containing a total of sixty-two units (twelve one-bedroom and fifty two-bedroom units) on 20].,450 square feet of land. Regarding the traffic flow on ~remont Street for direct access to Ball Road, ~r. Johnson advised the proposed development has been planned so as not to add to the traffic congestion, as there will be a fifteen-foot planting strip and sidewalk located fifty feet from the centerline of Ball Road, a twenty-five foot private driveway across the front of the property, and a twenty-foot guest parking area, making a total of 145 feet of unobstructed vision for traffic exiting or entering Ball Road. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, ~r. Johnson advised that ~t ~s their intent 'to lease the units, that the basic rent would start at $i~5.00. The ~iayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. ~.,!r. Bob l,:!ann, 1215 Fremont Street, addressed the Council in opposition, and presented a petition purportedly containing 206 signatures of residents in Anaheim and Buena Park, urging denial of said R-3 zoning request, because of the following reasons: 1. Weuld be "spot zoning ..... we wish to maintain our residential character and values. 2. Would overload public facilities. 6t41 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962, 3:00 3. Would be used as a precedent in our area for future building of (apartments) next to R-1 (residential). 4. Current survey (ret. The News article 7-8-62) shows "an extremely dangerous apartment vacancy situation "in Orange County" with Anaheim leading the pack." 5. The Anaheim Planning Commission is unanimously opposed to granting this change as indicated by their decision August 20, 1962. Mrs. Betty Wesley, 1247 Berkely Street, residing directly back of Stanton Nurseries, addressed the Council favoring the requested use, and stating that they desire to have Berkely Street remain as a dead-end street, Mr. Eddie Ray Brock, 1219 Fremont Street, addressed the Council in opposition, advising that he was one of the circulators of the petition in the Buena Park tract, and was also representing them. He spoke of the existing traffic problem in their area, and advised that they did not approve' of the proposed plans. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 61-62-114 and Conditional Use Permit No. 251. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-857: Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the multiple development was not in keeping with the single-family area, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 62R-857 for adoption, upholding the action of the City Planning Commission and denying Reclassification No. 61-62-114. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-114 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution mas duly passed and adopted by 'the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENt: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Krein and Coons. Dutton and Chandler. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-857 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-858: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-858 for adoption, upholding the action of the City Planning Commission and denying Conditional Use Permit No. 251. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 251. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Krein and Coons. Dutton and Chandler. None. 'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-858 duly passed and adopted. The Council commended Mr. Johnson on the preparation of his brochure and the information contained therein, based on his own personal surveys. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:35 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present. 6148 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-2: Submitted by Everett J, Martinez, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 to permit the establishment of a two-story apartment building on Parcel No. 1, continued utilization of two single family residences on Parcel No. 2, and construction of single- story apartments on Parcel No. 3, property located on the west side of West Street, the southeast corner of said property being 451 feet north of the northwest corner of La Palma Avenue and West Street, and further des- cribed as 1135-1145 North West Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 453, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of thirty-two (32) feet from the monumented centerline of West Street (20 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for West Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on West Street. 4. Provision of a three (3) foot public utility easement and a two (2) foot overhang easement along the northerly, southerly and westerly boundaries of the subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at the time of the installation of the service facilities. $. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 6. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall, to provide adequate fire protection. 8. Access drives shall be a minimum of twenty-one (21) feet in width with adeqdate angle cutoffs provided, or a minimum of twenty-eight (28) feet in width if no cutoffs are provided, and, in all cases, shall have a minimum vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. 9. 7ime limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 10. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 as amended, except that single story construction shall be main- tained on Parcel No. 3. 1i. Completion of the interior walls of the proposed carports with %he installation of suitable bumper guards and enclosed storage cabinets, prior %o Final Building InsDection of any construction on subject property. 12. Subject to Architectural Committee approval for any cons%ruction on Parcel No. 2. 13. Posting of a two-year bond to insure the installation of a six (6) fcc% masonry wall along the easterly one hundred seventy-four (174) feet of the northerly boundary of subject property, and the installation of the proposed three (3) foot iron pipe railing, or the installation of said six (6) foot masonry wall prior to Final Building Inspection of any proposed construction on Parcel No. 3. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and referred to Planning Study No. 52-51-4~ previously submitted, whereby the City Planning Commis- sion endorsed R-3 development for subject property and the abutting property to the North. Regarding Condition No. 8 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. a53, Mr. Kreidt reported that the Interdepartmental Committee upon further investigation recommends eighteen foot access drives on the southerly parcel, inasmuch as said parcel is a single lot multiple family residential development, not requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 614g ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Kreid% further advised that Conditional Use Permit No. 299, requesting a two story planned unit development on a portion of subject property, was approved by the City Planning Commission at %heir meeting of September 17, 1962. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. John Von der Heide, 1862 Crone Avenue, agent for the appli- cant, addressed the Council requesting that Condition No. 8 of the City Planning Commission Resolution be amended to allow eighteen foot access drives and to eliminate the requirement for the building cut-off. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and the Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Lynn 'Thompson, 1658 Me~s Lane, further explained the Condi- tional Use Permit application, and advised that they originally intended to apply for two-story on the L-shaped parcel, as well as the triangular shaped parcel. At that time they were advised that inasmuch as the property was adjacent to R-A, even though it was Projected for R-3, that it would be necessary for the triangular shaped parcel to be considered under a Conditional Use Permit application~ that he understands said Conditional Use Permit No. 299 will be considered by the City Council very soon. Mr. Ihompson further advised that he has purchased the small R-A parcel of land, and has submitted plans for R-3 development~ %hat the large R-A parcel across the street is also in escrow with plans for R-3 development. Mr. James ~anning, 1153 Hermosa Drive, residing in the tract immediately west of subject property, addressed the Council advising that their homes were designed for rear yard living, and therefore felt that subject application should be restricted %o one-story development. ~4r. Robert Penham, 1136 Lombard Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to the two-story construction adjacent their rear yard. In answer to Mayor Coons' question, Mr. Penham advised that he objected to an~ portion of the development being two-story R-3 construc- tion. Further discussion was held by the City Council regarding the description of the property' included in subject reclassification proceed- ings, and the parcel included in Conditional Use Permit No. 299. At the conclusion thereof, Councilman Krein moved that public hearing on Reclassification No. 62-63-2 be continued to October 30, 1962, 7:00 O'Clock P.M., and 'that public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 299 be scheduled %o be heard concurrently therewith. Councilman Schu%%e seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-22 (See Paqe No. 6142[: Submitted by Edward No and Mary Rose, requesting a change of zone from R-1 to C-1 on property located at the northeast corner of Carnelian Street and Katella Avenue, and further described as 1794 Carnelian Street. ~Iayor Coons asked if anyone in the audience was interested in Reclassification No. 62-63-22, scheduled as the last public hearing on this evening's agenda. There was no response. Councilman Dutton moved that, in accordance with the verbal request of Mr. Edward Rose, applicant, public hearing on Reclassification No. 62-63-22 be continued %o October 9, 1962, 7:00 O'Clock P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-15: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Vincent L. Kuljis, requesting a change of zone from C-1 to 0-2, to allow the establishment of a hotel and appurtenant facilities, on property located on the south side of Ball Road, approximately 408 feet west of 6150 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. the southwest corner of Empire Street and Ball Road, and further described as 2130 West Ball Road. The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 456, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the followin9 conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented cent.tithe of Ball Road (20 feet existing). 2, Preparation of streei improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Ball Road, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street liphtin9 purposes on Ball Road. Pro'vis:on of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department to provide adequate fire protection, 'Time limltaiion of one hundred eightY (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos, l, 2, 3 and 10. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Provis:on of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the west, south and east properzy lines of subject property, and with the provision of a forty-two (42) inch masonry wall on the northerly property line, except for those areas reserved for ingress and egress to subject property prior to Final Bull. ding Inspect}on. Installation of planting in the proposed planting area abutting the planned highway right-of-way line of Ball Road, said landscaping plans to be suomit'ted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and to be installed prior to Final Building Inspec- Lion. i0. Recordation of deed res%fictions limiting the C-2 use of subject property ~o "on sale" of liquor in conjunction with the serving of food in the resLa,.~art% oni'~ or any C-1 uses. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ",~r. !,"ar'~, n Krezdt noted the location of subject property and ex~szi~9 ~ses an~ zoning ir} the immediate area, and summarized the evidence preser,.ied i,-> tr.e C:ty Planning Commission at their hearth9. He referred to Find~nqs Nos 5, ~ and ? of City Planning Commission Resolution No. 456, as follows: 5. Fhat ute _~se as proposed at the time the original petition on subject proper-fy was approved by the .Commission was assumed to be primarily for restaurant purposes only, that the cocktail lounge would be incidental to tae serving of food, and that the Commission passed said petition about zb:ree months ago knowing that churches and schools were within six pmndred (600) feet of subjeci property but Zha% i~ would be an ac~ion of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board %o rule on %he close proximity of said churches and scbools. (Beclassifica~]on No. 61-62-83, and Condi- tioaai Use Permit: No. 915) 6. 7hat ao one from hhe nearby churches appeared in opposi~ionto subjec~peti~ion. 7. 2hat one person representing two neighborhood organizations appeared in ,opposition to ~u~bjec~ petition. Fhe t,.'layor asked if +,:he applicant wished to address the Council. .'~-. Harrl/ Kni~ely, Attorney representing the applicant, addresse~ the Council uroln9 Favorable consideration by the City Council in accordance w~th the recommendat}ons of the City Planning Commission. l~rs. ~ary Andrews, 927 Nutwood Street, addressed the Council in opposition, no'tin9 ihat ihe r~ason for the requested C-9 was for the purpose of conducting a cocktail lounge, and if said request is granted, the Council would in fact be approving the establishment of a cocktail lounge in an area of schools and churches. Mrs. Andrews also read from the Anaheim Municipal Code %he list of allowable uses under a C-2 Zoning. 6151 ~..ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962,. 3:00 P.M. Mr. Bill Johnston, developer of the property, referred to Condition No. 10 of the City Plannin9 Commission,s resolution requiring recordation of deed restrictions limiting the C-2 use of subject property to on sale of liquor, in conjunction with the serving of food in the restaurant only. Mrs. Delores Shannon, 90a Echo Place, employed by Trident Junior High School, and President of the St. Justin Women's Council, addressed the Council advising that St. Justin Martyr Church and School is within approxi- mately 350 feet of the proposed establishment, said school having an enroll- ment of approximately 600 children up to the sixth grade. She was of the opinion that a cocktail lounge would not be conducive to the type neighbor- hood that exists in the area, which is primarily residential, and the chlldren going to school must pass subject property. She presented a petition containing several signatures objecting to subject C-2 reclassifi- cation, as they do not feel a cocktail lounge on subject property is at all compatible to the surrounding area, due to the close proximity of the existing churches and schools, namely St. Justin Marry Church and School, West Anaheim Hethodist Church, and Francis Scott Key School. Mr. Calvln Cooper, one of the pastors of West Anaheim Methodist Church, addressed the Council in opposition, advising that they were not aware of she hearing before the City Planning Commission, that the official s[and of %belt church is total abstinence, therefore they are very concerned with the possibility of the establishment of a cocktail lounge within a city Oiock from [heir church. He also called attention to the proposed City park appro×ima~eiy cwo blocks from subject property, and the school cro~s waiK[n %his ~mmedzate area. >fr. Harry Kniaeiy was of the opinion that approval by the Council of their zoning application would not necessarily endorse their application before the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. ['he l,..iayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there beLng no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLU'[ION NO. 62R-859: Counc:Iman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-859 for adopt:on, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone ss requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commiss[or:. [{efer to Resolution Book. A RESOLiIiON OP iHE CtTY COUNCIL OF [HE CITY OF' ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- HINI:~.6 ~b~,~ 'lilLE i8 OF I'VE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND [HAt iBE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (,62-63-15 - C-2) On roil. call the foreqoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: >,YE~: COUNC I L;'4EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENF: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons. Schutte and Krein. None, lhe Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-859 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICAflON NO. 62-63-18: Submitted by Double Three Associates, requesting a .change of zone f~om R-A to u-l, property located on the north s~de of L]ncoin Avenue, approximately 640 feet east of Gilbert Stree t. fhe City Planning Commi ss; on, pursuant to their Resolution No. 475, Series i962-63, recommended said ~' ; - re~.£asa., ftCatJ, on be denied. ~ro Martin Kreidt noted the location of the property and existing uses in the area, anf advised that the Planning Commission recommended denial on the basis of the Preitminary General Plan, projecting this area for business and prcfess~onal off~.ces., Reference was maJe to a recent reclassification at Gilbert and 6152 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Lincoln ~venues whereby the C-i use was limited to business and professional offices. The Mayor asked if the Applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Hulett Brecht, 920 Rodeo Road, ~ullerton, California~ addressed the Council~ urging the granting of the reclassification, and called attention 'to the fact that commercial use is prominent in the area. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to offer any evidence in opposition~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Mro Kre]dt suggested a one week continuance to allow for pre- sentat]on of a status and analysis of need report, justifying the amount of commercial and business and professional projected in accordance with the Preliminary General Ptan~ The City Council felt that zonings should not be deferred pending reports concerning the Preliminary General Plan, as consideration of the Preliminary General Plan could be sometime in the future. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-860: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-860 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the following conditions: i. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Lincoln Avenue, subject to the approval of the City 5nqineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the offJce of the City Engineer° 2o Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on LJncoi~ ~venue,~ 3. Provfsion of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public ~orks, Sanitation Division, prior to final building ]nspect~on~ 4o Provfs].on of a three (3) foot public utility easement and a two [2) foot overhang easement along the northerly and westerly boundary of the subject property~ to adequately serve the subject property and other properties~ at the time of the installation of the service facilities. 5~ A m~nimum six (6) foot landscaped strip along Lincoln Avenue be provi.~eO~ 'to be installed prior to final building inspection. 6o Subject to conformance with the Anaheim Municipal Code parking requirements. 7. Time limitation of 180 days for the accomplishment of Items Nos. i and 2,, Refem to Resolution Book, A RESOLUITON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT 'TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-i8 - C-l) On roll call the foregoinq Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOE~: COUNCILMEN; ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte~ Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-860 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-19: Submitted by Fredrick C. Howard, Jeanne Howard, and Peter M. Elliott and Betty Joe Elliott, re- questinq a change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located on the west side of ~estern Avenue, approximately 605 feet south of Lincoln Avenue. The City Dianning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 476, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the 6153 City Hall, Dnaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTE'S - September 25~ 1962; .3:00 P.M. followinq conditions: 1. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of Western Avenue (20 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Western Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Western ~venue. 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit° 5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6o Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department~ to provide adequate fire protection. 7. Access drives shall be a minimum of twenty-one (21) feet in width with adequate angle cut-offs provided, or a minimum of twenty-eight (28) feet in width if no cut-offs are provided, and in all cases, shall have a minimum vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. 8. Provisions of a thirty (30) foot radius turn around at the west end of the driveway or acquisition of the access rights to the alley by purchasing a portion of Lot A, Tract Noo 3886. 9~ Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos~ 1~ 2~ 3~ and 8. iOo Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. ilo Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the north boundary of subject property prior to Final Building Inspection. i2~ Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the easterly two hundred (200) feet of the southerly boundary, and the southerly eighty- nine (89~ feet of the easterly boundary of subject property, or the postin~ of a two-year bond to insure the installation of said wall. Mr~ Martin Krei~t noted the location of the property and present zoning in the immediate area~ and briefly summarized findings of the City Planning Comm~ssio~ Mayor Coons reported on letter received by him from the Centralia School District in opposition 'to additional residential units (copies of said letter, furnished to each Councilman). Yhe Mayor asked if the Applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Peter 5li~ott~ 1210 West Santa Clara Street, Santa Ana, California, addressed the Councit~ calling attention to the present R-3 zoning to the west and south, and felt that this was a natural development for the property. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response~ declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTTON NO. 62R-861: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-861 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ~UNICIPA[ CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63~19 - On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin~ vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, $chutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. 6154 City Hall~ Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25~ ~952, 3:00 The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-861 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIPICATION NO. 62-63-20 and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 294: RECLASSIPICATION No. 62-63-20: Submitted by Wilson S. Nakamura, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located at the south- east corner of Dale Avenue and Orange ~venue (800 foot frontage on Orange Avenue and 655 foot frontage on Dale Avenue - 2760 West Orange Avenue). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 477, Series t962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied. CONDITIONAL USE PSRMIT NO. 295: Piled in conjunction with Reclassification No~ 62-63-20, requesting permission %o construct a planned unit development with a ten foot rear yard setback on property briefly described above. /he City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 478, Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit, and public hearing was s. cheduled in accordance with City Council policy~ to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification NOo 62-63-20. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission, resulting in the].r Jenial, as in their opinion, the requested use would not be compatible with the existing development in the area. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Lloyd Mount, Agent, Suite 609, California Federal Building, Anaheim, California~ addressed the Council, advising that the planned unit deveiopm~nt would be similar to the Mona Lua and the Sherwood Riviera. He stated thai the units would be three bedroom or two bedroom and den of approximately 1000 square feet, having many delux features. That there would be three swimming pools and complete recreational ~cilitie~ and the units would rent for approximately $170. per month. Mr. Mount was of the opinion that perhaps the City Council intended the aubject property for C-2 zoning, being the intersection of two main mtree!s~ Dale and Orange Avenues, and inasmuch as the Fire Station was con$1.~ucted adjacent to this property. ~:. Coons advised Pm. Mount that it was necessary to provide a fire stat]on for adequate protection of this area, and the station was so designed to keep the residential character of the neighborhood. 'The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council on this issue° Mr~ Duane Lo[a, 2715 West Orange Avenue, referred to the petition of pro test presented to the City Planning Commission and advised that the area is presently completely surrounded by R-1 zoning. Mrs. Dale Noack, 718 South Wasco, addressed the Council in opposition and :referre~ the present vacancy factor of apartments in the West Bali Road area, and opposed the additional traffic that would be brought to the area by th~s development. Mr. [ravers, 701 South MacDuff, advised that those in the area favored the £]~re §ration construction~ which was for their own protection, however, opposed multiple development on the subject 20-acre site. Mrs. Erwin Rodemsky, 700 South Wasco, addressed the Council in opposition~ stating th]s area would be served by the Magnolia School District (Maxwell School) which will have no future expansion. In her opinion, the increased density in the area would be more than the schools could absorb. Kenneth Gandy, 718 South MacDuff, addressed the Council in 6155 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25,. 1962, 3:00 P.M. opposition to the construction of the 288-units and related some of the statements made by Mr. Mount concerninq the cost and difficulty in finding property for R-1 development~ Mr. Gandy, being a realtor, was of the opinion that Mr. Mount was not, in fact, looking for R-1 property. Mr. Mount, in rebuttal, stated that everything he built was for himself and built to own. That the planned unit developments which replace trailer parks, s~ngle family homes and apartment house living, have all been rented within 90-days of completion, because it is the equivalent of living in a $300 or $400 a month home° The Mayor' asked 'if anyone else had any new evidence to offer, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 62-63-20 and Conditional 'Use Permit No. 294. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-862: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-862 for adoption, denying reclassification No. 62-63-20. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-20) On zoii call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the foilowing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COJNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None° None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-862 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUIION NO. 62R-863: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-863 for adoption, sustaining action taken by the City Planning Commission, denying Conditional 'Use Permit No. 294. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CT[Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIF NO~ 294. On :roil call the :fozegoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following ~ote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-863 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING -. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-21: Submitted by James F. and Ivy E. Ryan~ requestin9 permission to change zone from R-1 to C-1, property located on the w~s;t s~de of Harbor Boulevard, approximately 162 feet south of La Verne Street (84i Nozth Harbor Boulevard). The City PiannJn9 Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 479, ~eries 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: i. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented center- line of Harbor Bouievarg (34~v5 feet existing). 2~ Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building In- spection~ 3~ Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purpo~s on Harbor Boulevard° 6156 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25; 1962~ 3500 P.M. 4o /ime limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1 and 3. 5. Recordation of C-t deed restrictions limiting use of subject property to business and professional office use only. 6. Limitation on all signs or displays to one free standing unlighted sign no larger than eight (8) feet square. 7. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Ntt. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission:, advising that considering the precedent that has been established on Harbor Boulevard between La Palma Bvenue and Ball Road, said reclassification was recom- mended. Communication dated September 21, 1962, received from Dr. Frederick A. Rusch~ concerning parking requirements, was submitted and read. /he ~ayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to address the Council° Mr~ Yon der Heide advised that the Applicant has requested he appear in their behalf, and stated that he concurred with the Planning Commission's fin~ings and that the parking requirement meet Code require- ments; that the property will be used for a construction company office. Plans from the file were reviewed by the City Council, which indicate~ a mai×imum of eight parkinq spaces available on the property. 'The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Dr, Frederick Rusch, owner of office two lots north of subject property, adv~.sed ~hat the lots separatinQ this buildinq from his office area parkinq lot. Dro Rusch stated his parking accommodations provide for his patients very well, however, if something other than a construction off~ce business was to go in on subject property, he felt his patients would have ~::~ff~cu!ty in parking on the lot he was required to provide~ and wondered if this could be restricted in some way to keep the C-1 use in an a~ea of less demand on parkinq. As far as the C-1 zone was concerned, he had no objections, his only concern being that of accessibility and number of parking spaces that would be provided. Dr. Rusch further advised of his own concern regardinq the use of the alley and going in and out of the alley at La Verne Street. ~,~ Von der Heide agreed that a medical business attracted more people to the area than a construction business, however, noted that there were no such deed restrictions on Dr. Rusch~s property, and felt to piace such restrictions on subject property would be unfair. M:r~, .Tames Ryan~ owner of subject property, 526 North Bush Street~ a]dresse~ the Council, statinq he felt Zf the rear yard was used as a parking lot and the fence removed~ it would be of assistance to both parties bv provfdlng for a larger turning area into the alley. Ihe Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, %here being no response, ,declared the hearinq closed. Further discussion was held by the City Council~ and Councilman Chandler called attention to the fact that any change in use would require a change ~n the parking requirements in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Discussion was also held concerning different parking requirements for different professional businesses. ~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-86~: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-86~ for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning 6157 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 25, 1962; 3:00 P.M. Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-21 - C-l) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte~ Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-864 duly passed and adopted. AD3OURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:50 P.M.) ADJOURNED:~ SIGNED: .~/..,{~._ ~. ~ ./~~~_~...~_~ City Clerk ~lty_Hall~ An2heim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 2, 1962~ 3~00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT g COUNC!LMEN~ Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. ABSEN/~ COb~CILMEN~ Noneo PRESENT~ CiTY MANAGER~ Keith A. Murdocho ASSISTANT CiTY ATTORNEY~ 3oe Geisler. CiTY CLERK~ Dene Mo Williams. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ~ORKSI Thornton Eo Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order° MINUTES: Minutes of the regular meeting held September 18, 1962 were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman $chutteo MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION: Mayor Coons announced that this was a public hearing continued from the meeting of September 18, 1962~ to allow for the filing of supplemental protests to the annexation of the territory designated as the Southwest Annexation° A Certificate was submitted by the City Clerk containing, briefly, the following information~ Assessed valuation of privately owned property, exclusive of improvements, within said proposed annexation, $1,392,600. Assessed valuation of publicly owned property (City of Anaheim)~ 50° Appearing on the Assessment Roll, publicly owned property