Loading...
1962/10/09~%__lY Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27 19627 3:00 PoM. AYES: COUNCILKKN~ Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons° NOES: COUNCiLmEN: None° ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: None° The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-876 duly passed and adopted. ORANGE COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT - APPOIN/MENT: At the request of Councilman Chandlery because of inability to attend meetings, Mayor Coons appointed Councilman Jack C. Dutton to represent the City of Anaheim on the Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Board° Said appointment was unanimously ratified by the City Council° O~'~,!G~ OOUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - APPROVAL OF SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL PLANS: Mr. Maddox, City Engineer, reported that [~n~l plans and specifications for the improvement of Santa AAa River Channel from Ball Road to Lincoln Avenue have been reviewed by the Engineering Division, and recommended that said plans as they pertain to that portion within the City of Anaheim, be approved° On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman $chuttm ~ C otro moved that the work proposed to be done by the Orange ounty Flood/DUi~rzc~ within the City of An~h~ m, as indicated on their Drawing No. 51-101-2 consisting of 3 sheets, be approved° Councilman Krein seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° ADJOURNMENI~ Councilman Krein moved to adjourn° Councilman $chutte seconded the '~ r o mo~..o~ MOTION CARRIED ~ity Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCII~EN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: 3chh Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreid%. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the City Council meetings held September 25, 1962 and October 2, 1962, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-877: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-877 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST 'THE CITY AS OF OCTOBER 9, 1962. ($1,082,351.81) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC IL~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-877 duly passed and adopted. 6170 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. PRESENTATION - FRED SORSABAL: Mayor Coons presented Mr, Fred Sorsabal his certificate in Local Planning Administration, and commended him on the completion of this course. INTERIM BUSINESS LICENSE - COAST ELECTRONIC INSTITUTE~ 231-A NORTH EUCLID AVENUE: Request submitted by Robert MacMahon, Attorney, on behalf of Coast Electronic Institute requesting Interim Business License, pending the processing of a conditional use permit, was held over from the last meeting to determine the sufficiency of parking. Mr. MacMahon was not present, and the City Clerk advised that he had been notified by telephone that this matter was deferred to this date. It was reported that application for conditional use permit had not been filed. Discussion was held by 'the City Council; at the conclusion thereof, it was determined that no action would be taken until a condi- tional use application is filed, and thereupon, Councilman Dutton moved said request be denied. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT: Pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-835, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin September 27, i962, and notices posted accordin9 to law, public hearing was held on 'the proposed abandonment of an easement for storm drain purposes upon, over and along the southerly twenty feet of Lot 16, Tract No. 2520. Mr. James Maddox noted the loca'Lion of the subject abandonment, and advised that said abandonmen't has been cleared by all departments and any agencies having any interest in the easement, and recommended the abandonment be approved. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-879: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-879 for adoption. Refer %0 Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACA- TION AND ABANDONMENT OF AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Duz'ton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resoh~tion No. 62R-879 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-878: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-878 for adoption, calling a special Southwest Annexation Election to be held on December 11, 1962. Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION ON THE llTH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1962, IN A CERTAIN TERRITORY IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM; PROVIDING FOR THE HOLDING OF SUCH ELECTION AND SUBMIT- TING TO THE ELECTORS RESIDING IN SUCH TERRITORY THE QUESTION WHETHER SUCH TERRITORY SHALL BE ANNEXED TO, INCORPORATED IN, AND MADE A PART OF SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE PROPERTY IN SUCH TERRITORY BE, AFTER SUCH ANNEXATION, SUBJECT TO TAXATION EQUALLY WITH PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO PAY ~.itv Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. ITS PRO RATA PORTION, BASED UPON ASSESSED VALUATION, OF ALL THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED AS OF THE DATE OF THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION, OR THERETOFORE AUTHORIZED; DESCRIBING SAID TERRITORY AND DESIGNATING IT BY THE NAME OF SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION; ESTABLISHING AN ELECTION PRECINCT AND POLLING PLACE IN SAID TERRITORY; APPOINTING THE OFFICERS OF ELECTION FOR SAID SPECIAL ELECTION, AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SUCH ELECTION. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schu%te, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No, 62R-878 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.52, PURSUANT TO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 481, SERIES 1962-63, RELATING TO M-1 lIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE, AND CHAPTER 18.56~ PURSUANT TO CITY PLANNING EOM MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 482, SERIES 1962-63~ RELATING TO M-2~ HEAVY MANUFACTURING ZON?: Mr. Richard Reese, Planning Director, referred to the proposed ordinance listed as Exhibit ~'A", accompanying Resolation No. aS1, Series 1962-63, and suggested certain changes. Discussion was held by the City Council, Mr. Reese and Mr, Murdoch, and the following changes were considered: Section 18.52.020 Permitted buildinqs, Structures and Uses, Second paragraph to be numbered No. 1, and the following list itemizing certain uses to be considered "illustrations" or "'examples" for administrative purposes. (19) Strike the words "fresh fruit and vegetables excepted", (35) Strike the words "not employing a boiling process; no tank farm, above surface thinner storage limited to 200 gallons". Section 18.52.030 Accessory Uses ,-to read "The following accessory uses are permitted in the M-1 Zone, only where they' are integrated with and clearly incidental -to A primary permitted industrial use. (7) Pertaining to Helistop, omit the words "or storage". Section 18.52.040 Outdoor Uses - (2) %o read "Light weight equipment storage or rental" ' Section 18.52.050 Conditional Use~ - (2) (L) Motel, strike the words "kitchen facilities prohibited". (P) ~Fhere be added, "Service business firms, primarily servin9 commerce and industry, only incidental service to the public permitted". Skating Rinks be changed to (2). Section 18.52.060 Site Development Standards - (2) (E) There be added (5) to read, "Decorative screen walls for the purpose of screenin9 utility devices, or facilities, subject to the review of the Development Review Board" (F) Be amended to read, "Where an automobile service station is established in an industrial zone, the required landscapinq shall be in accordance with service station site development standards, but the building setback etc (balance of paragraph to remain). ' ' 6172 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 Discussion was also held concerning the wording of Section 18.52.050, wherein a five acre minimum site would be required. It was the feeling of the City Council that 'this section should be revised to provide development of less than a five acre site, under certain circum- stances. Also considered was the phrase wherein a lesser use is allowable in a greater zone. In this particular instance, it was felt that an use in an M-2 Zone could possibly deprive M-2 of their full rights. In noting the development of the present M-2 Zone, should this phrase be omitted, the presently existing M-1 plants in the M-2 area would be unable to expand without further application. Mr. Reese reported that the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and Anaheim Board of Realtors have studied these proposed amendments, and have recommended these changes. Mr. Reese further reported that necessary revisions would be required in the proposed M-2 Ordinance, in accordance with the changes discussed. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. L. B. Condon, Cai State Agencies, addressed the Council notin9 that these uses such as banks, restaurants, etc., established in an M-1 Zone by Conditional Use Permit, would still require a sixty to ninety day delay, and asked how this would apply to a planned development, Mr. Murdoch explained that where a planned unit development is proposed basically industrial, but also commercial, it was possible to request various uses at the time the Conditional Use Permit for the planned unit development is first filed, Mr. Condon requested 'that M-1 uses in the M-2 Zone that are complimentary to each other be allowed to continue. Mr. Dave Collins referred to a copy of a suggested uniform zoning ordinance, prepared by the Los Angeles County Regional Planning Commission, wherein approval is based on the basis of material detrimen- tality rather than compatibility. He felt Anaheim should also take this approach. Mr. Collins favored the change allowing less than a five acre site development, and was of the opinion that Anaheim should encourage stable basic industries to further our economy, and that this could be made possible by increasing the M-2 Zones; however, in order to allow a property owner their right of development, M-1 use in an M-2 Zone should be permitted. Referring again to the proposed Los Angeles Ordinance, Mr. Collins advised that there are twenty-two zones listed, in which each contains an extensive list of uses, each of the uses including most of the lesser uses, but not includin9 all of them. He felt some considera- tion should be given to the proposed Los Angeles Ordinance, and felt that a uniform zonin9 between the two counties would enhance our development. In his opinion, the proposed amendment to the Anaheim Code would still require the sixty or ninety days delay necessary for the processing of applications. Mr. John Yon Der Heide advised that the proposed Los Angeles Ordinance l{s~s approx{malely s{x hunSre8 d{~{eren~ types o£ manu£acturlng actlvi~ies, which le£t little doubt as to what zone would be required for each use. This, in his opinion, was the American way of doin9 things by law, rather than by men. He felt 'this would be a saving of time to all concerned, even though additional time would be required to compile such a list. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. There was no response. 6173 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. In order to give the Planning Staff and Attorney's office an opportunity to make the suggested changes and corrections considered at this meeting, Councilman Chandler moved that the public hearing be con- tinued to November 7, 1962, 3:00 O~Clock P.M. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION: Application submitted by Standard Oil Company for permission to erect two signs at 1950 East La Palma Avenue (State College Boulevard and La Palma Avenue), was submitted. Plans were reviewed by the City Council. Mr. R. C. Runyon, Engineer with Standard Oil Company, addressed the Council advising that the signs were shown on the plans submit%ed with their application for Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Runyon was advised that generally, signs were not considered as par% of the consent on a Conditional Use Permit, that signs are considered by separate application. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler, signs were approved as requested, with the provision that there shall be no projection over the property line. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION: Application was submitted by Standard Oil Company for permission to erect sign at 3448 West Lincoln Avenue (southeast corner of Knott and Lincoln Avenues). Plans were reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Runyon advised that 'this sign replaces sign on existing station that presently projects five feet over 'the property line, and requested permission to maintain four feet of the five foot projection. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, sign application was approved as requested, with the provision that there shall be no projection over the property line. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION: Request of McDonald's for permission to erect sign at 2411-17 West Ball Road, was held over from the last meeting and the applicant or his representative was requested %o be present. Plans for said sign were reviewed by the City Council. Mr. George Murphy, representing Electrical Products Company, addressed the Council advising that the subject property contained 150 foot frontage and 150 foot depth; that there are proposed two small entrance signs and one large pole sign in the center of the property; that none of the signs project over the property line. He further advised that this was the standard type sign used on all of the McDonald Drive In Restaur- ants. Discussion was held by the City Council; at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved said application be approved, subject to the provision that ~he lighting on the arches be diffused and shall remain diffused lighting, to prevent the light being cast into the area to the North. Councilman Dut±on seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 O~Clock P.M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:05 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. PRESEN/: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert A. Davis. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dswson CITY CLERK: Dens M. Williams. 6174 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9~ 1~62~ 3:00 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Yhornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese, ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. INVOCATION: Rev. Jones, Pastor of Knott Christian Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-14 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 281: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-14: Submit%ed by Rayco Investment Company, Inc., requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 on property located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue, approximately 610 feet east of the southeast corner of Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 446, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 28]: Submitted by Rayco Investment Company, Inc., requesting permission to construct a planned unit development on property described in Reclassification No. 62-63-14. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No, 447, Series 1962-63, denied said Conditional Use Permit. At the request of Mr. Harry Knisel¥, Attorney representing the applicant, public hearing was continued from the meetin9 of September 4, 1962, for submission of revised plans, and subject application was referred back to the City Planning Commission for study and report on said revised plans. Mr. Martin Kreidt briefly noted the location of subject property and the findings of the City Planning Commission as result of review of the revised plans at their meeting of October 1, 1962; and although the revised plans provide for more open area than originallY proposed, the additional units would compound the basic reason for their denials being the encroachment of multiple family residential in an area projected for low density single family residential. Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council and the Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Agent, was of 'the opinion that upon reviewing the file and staff reports, ~hat denial by the City Planning Commission originally was based on the plans that were submitted, and the matter of the recent policy to draw the R-3 line along the north side of Orangewood. He advised that 'the plans have been drastically revised to be compatible with the proposed neighborhood park, and also that the Orangewood line was established subsequent to [he Council's decision to condemn for use as the park site the R-3 zoned property to the west of subject property. That at the time the applicant acquired this property, the master plan indicated R-3~ and there was existing R-3 on two sides of subject property. Mr. Knisely was of the opinion that policy should not be governed entirely by experience, as experience has been that R-3 is a situation where the developer uses the maximum land coverage with the highest density allowed, and constructs two story barracks type buildings, and because of this, any requested R-3 Zoning is considered undesirable. He called atten- tion to the fact that their seven and one-half acre parcel could contain two hundred fifty-seven units; however, they propose one hundred twenty units. Also, their land coverage is thirty-five percent, as compared to the Code maximum of sixty percent. He advised that their proposed development was of very high quality, and will definitely be an asset to the area. He advised that the Arch~ect was present to give further infor- mation, and requested an opportunity to speak in rebuttal. 6175 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert Leonard, 2150 South Spinnaker Street, referred to the population density in relation to the proposed neighborhood park site at the corner of Haster and Orangewood, and stated that the national standards for neighborhood parks a% the present time allow one acre for each eight hundred total population; that with the proposed area development bordering said ten acre neighborhood parks, the saturation population of 11,593 people is forseeable, and therefore, the park when completed will be under the national average. That their community supported the bond issues and worked hard for this park, and they were opposed to the proposed R-3 development, which would further decrease the park coverage for their community. Mr. Frank Roessler, 2147 Vern Street, addressed the Council in opposition, and presented sketches of the area in question, indicating the predominance of R-1 usage, and was of the opinion that the proposed apartment development would devaluate their homes in the event of resale, and be detrimental to the single family residential area. He referred to the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to changes in zone, and felt that the applicant definitely has not shown the proposed project to be an improvement to the surrounding area. Mr. Clifford Rothrock, 2161 South Spinnaker Street, addressed the Council in opposition, and noted the existing zoning surrounding the present twenty-one park sites in the City of Anaheim, being in general 68 per cent R-1 zoning, 12 per cent R-A zoning, and 18 per cent R-3 zoning; that the people in their area consider their community as R-i, and objected to any encroachment of R-3 south of Orangewood Avenue. Mrs. Gertrude Velten, 2141 South Spinnaker Street, addressed the Council in opposition, being of the opinion that the park site property should no ionger be considered as R-3, as it is now public property. Further, that there is only one isolated area of R-3 which was developed approximately six years ago, subsequent development of their community bein9 as R-l, single family residential. Mr. Knisely in rebuttal 'to the statements made, stated regard- ing population density, that apartments are not usually occupied by families with children; further, that the revised plans are compatible with the park development, and will not be detrimental to any property values; that this particular type of development has been placed throughout the country in very choice locations, and in many cases, have enhanced the value of the surrounding area, and asked the Council's permission for Mr. Middlebrook, Architect, to speak regarding 'the quality of their proposed apartment development. Mayor Coons stated that the Council has reviewed the plans and are familiar with the quality of construction and architecture, and there- upon declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 62-63-14 and Conditional Use Permit No. 281. Discussion was held by the City Council and Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that the use of the adjacent property as a park site was as heavy a use as R-3; further, that the greater portion of the westerly and northerly boundaries of subject property is bordered by R-3 Use, and felt that in developing, special treatment could be given to protect the R-1 homes on the easterly boundary. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-880: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 6~R-880 for adoption, concurring with the findings of the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and denying Reclassification Application No 62'-63-14. ' Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-14) 6176 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENt: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Krein and Coons. Dutton and Chandler, None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-880 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-881: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-881 for adoption, upholding the action of the City Plannin9 Commission, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 281. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 281. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Krein and Coons. Dutton and Chandler. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R.-881 duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO. 1504 AND PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-120~ CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 311SOU[H STATE COLLEGE BLVD: VARIANCE NO. 1504: Variance No. 1504 was initiated by 'the City Planning Commission to replace application for Rectsssification No. 61-62-120, filed by Jesse F. and Callie A. Pruett, for the establishment of a real estate office by Charles and Clare Ducoff at 311 South State College Boulevard. Ihe City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 412, Series i969-63, 9ranted said variance, subject to the followin9 conditions; 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of State College Boulevard (50 feet existing). 2. Repair of damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks on State College Boulevard in accordance with 'the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on State College Boulevard. 4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- lishment of Item Nos. 1., 2 and 3. 5. Limitation of all signs to one eight (8) square foot unlighted sign and said sign shall indicate only 'the specific business bein9 operated on the subject property, and 'the prohibition of all flags and banners, rotatin9 and other lights for advertisement purposes. 6. Development substantially in accordance with E~hibit Nos. 1 and 2 provided thai 'the proposed access drive shall be posted for one-way traffic from State College Boulevard to the rear of the property, with provision for egress from subject property to be made by way of the alley to the rear. 7. Postin9 of a bond to insure 'the installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the north and south sides of subject property. 8. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall alon9 the west side of the abutting alley prior to issuance o£ a business license unless the abuttin9 property owner to 'the West specifically waives in writing said wall construction. 9. Time limitation of three years, or until such further time as the Commission may grant, upon a written request of the property owner. Review of action taken by 'the City Planning Commission concerning the variance was ordered by the City Council, and original Reclassification No. 61-62-120 was requested to be reconsidered. Public hearing on Variance No. 150a was continued from the meeting of September 4, 1962, to be consi- dered in conjunction with said reclassification application. 6177 Qity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-120: Requested change of zone from R-1 to C-1. City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 489, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on State College Boulevard. 2. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 3. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Sta~e College Boulevard (50 feet existing). 4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- lishment of Item Nos. 1 and 3. 5. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 6. Provision of a one way drive from State College Boulevard along the northerly property' line of subject property 'to 'the abutting alley to the rear. 7. Recordation of C-1 Deed Restrictions limiting the use of subject property to business and professional offices only. 8. Posting of a two-year bond to insure the construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the north and south property line of subject property. Limitation of all display signs on subject property ~o one unlighted sign with the maximum area of eight (8) square feet. 10. Cons%ruction of a six (6) foot masonry wall opposite subject property along the west side of the abutting alley unless waived by that property owner, prior %o Final Building Inspection. Mr. Marzin Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the h~story per%ainin9 'to this action, advisin9 that as result, ~he City Planning Commission has initiated proceedings under Reclassification No. 62-63-29 for C-1 Zoning on 'the west side of: State College Boulevard. That sa~d reclassification was considered by 'the City Planning Commission at their meeting held October i~ 1962, and continued to the meeting to be held November 26, 1962. The Mayor asked if 'the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Charles Ducoff, i340 Venedale, Anaheim, California, advised of the lengthy time involved in gettlng this request acted upon; that apparently the City Council and Planning Commission approved of the use; however, they are unable to remodel until final action is taken. He further advised that bids are ready to be let, and 'the delay was proving costly. He explained of his plans for zhis business after his retirement from the Air Force. Mayor Coons referred to communication received from Mr. E. C. Tune, concerning the present living conditions on this street, and stated that as result, the City Planning Commission initiated the reclassification referred to by Mr. Kreid't. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held concerning Requirement No. 6 of reclassifi- cation, and Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that this was a determination that should be left to the discrimination of the proper~y owner. Mr. and Mrs. Ducoff advised their plan for access to the street, and stated that they intended to install the driveway if the tree could be removed, and the telephone pole replaced. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-882: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-882 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to 'the recommendations of the City Planning Commission; however eliminating Condition No. 6 thereof and amendin9 Condi- tion No. 9 to read, "Any installation of display signs on subject property 6178 C.itY Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. _. exceeding an area of eight square feet of unlighted sign, must be submitted to and approved by the City Council." Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-120 - C-l) On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-882 duly passed and adopted, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-29: Submitted by Edward N, and Mary Rose, requestin9 a change of zone from R-1 to C-l, property located at the northeast corner of Carnelian Street and Katella Avenue (1794 Carnelian Street). 'The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 480, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied. Public hearing was continued from the meeting of September 25, 1962, at the request of the applicant. Communication dated October 8, 1962, received from Mr. Edward N. Rose, requesting said application be withdrawn, was submit%ed and read. RESOL~IION NO. 62R-884: Councilman Schu'tte offered Resolution No. 62R-884 terminating Reclassification No. 62.-63-22 proceedings. Refer ~o Resol~'Lion Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WiTH RECLASSiFICATiON NO. 62-63-22. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-884 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 244: Submitted by Darryl Walker, requesting permission to establish a motel on property located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 1,275 feet west of Euclid Avenue (1800 Lincoln Avenue). The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 452, Series 1962-63, denied said Conditional Use Permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by John Kimble, on behalf of Darryl Walker and public hearin9 scheduled. Mr. Martin Kreid/ noted %he location of the property and existing uses in the immediate vicinity, and called attention to findings of the City Planning Commission, specifically Finding No. 2. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present. ~*RESOLUTION NO. 62R-883: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-883 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1504. On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-883 duly passed and adopted. 6179 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. John Kimble, Newport Beach, advised that they had interpreted the 150 feet to be in a radius, which would make it economically unfeasible to cut out all of the units involved. He stated they were willing to revise the plan to reduce to single story construction the rear area of the develop- ment, which is adjacent to the one single family residential dwelling. Mr. Kimble further advised that the motel is designed with a con- ference room and for the use of manufacturing and sales representatives, as in his opinion, with the industrial growth of Anaheim, there was a real need for such a facility. Councilman Chandler informed Mr. Kimble that unless special per- mission is obtained, the 150 foot radius would practically obviate any double story construction. Mr. Kimble submitted revised plans and advised that the rear area which is adjacent to the single family residence, could be utilized for parking, and agreed to reduce the back area of the motel to one story to provide protection to the adjacent house. Plans also showed the office and lobby relocated to provide for a thirty-five foot setback. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Homer Wilson, 1797 Embassy Street, owner of the single family residence adjacent to the south portion of subject property, addressed the Council in opposition. In his opinion, the multiple dwell- ing would not improve his property or his neighbors'. He called attention to the plans he reviewed, which indicated a serving bar and a trash area in close proximity to the R-1. He asked if children would be there, and if cooking would be permitted. plans. Mayor Coons explained the five typical units shown on the revised Mr. Kimble advised that the motel was specifically designed so that it could not be used as an economy apartment, Mr. Wilson and Mr. Kimble were invited to the Council Table to review the plans, and discussion was held relative to how the plans could be further modified in compromise, to allow commercial use of the property, and at the same time provide the maximum protection possible to the single family residence. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Chandler requested the hearing be continued, and an elevation plan be submitted, wherein the project could be reversed, with the second story breeze-way baffled to provide privacy. In an effort to compromise this issue, Mayor Coons reopened said public hearing. Councilman Chandler moved that the public hearing be continued one week (October 16, 1962, 3:00 P.M.) for submission of additional plans. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 277: Submitted by Cowan Oil and Refining Company, requesting permission to establish a hofbrau, on property located on the east side of Euclid Avenue, approximately 100 fee% north of Catherine Drive (932 North Euclid Avenue). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolut~n No. aec, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions; 1. Dedication of fifty-two (52) feet from the centerline of Euclid Street (30 feet at one portion and forty (dO) feet existing). 6180 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. 2. An encroachment should be granted for the existin9 overhang and sign at the time the fifty-two (52) foot dedication is obtained. 3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Euclid Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. Provision of a three (3) foot overhang easement along the southerly property line. 6. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos~ 1 and 4. 7. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Appeal from action 'taken by the City Planning Commission was filed in the office of the City Clerk and public hearing scheduled. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the subject property and advised that the City' Planning Commission considered the evidence submitted and was of the opinion that 'this was a reasonable request, and should be 9ranted subject to conditions. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. James Smith, 931 Dresden Street, advised that the appeal was filed on behalf of the people who signed 'the petition of opposition filed with the City Plannin9 Commission. He felt that the statements contained in his letter of appeal were sufficient to express his stand on the issue, and in his opinion, the proposed business would not be compat- ible with other bdsinesses in the building, and would be more or less contrary to a so.-called gentlemen's agreement, wherein no competitive businesses would be established in the buiidin9. Mr. Leonard Smith, 1~5 South Claudina Street, representing the owners of the property, advised that this use has been consented to by the other occupants in the building. He stated that the shopping center comprises approximately five acres, and the hofbrau should be considered as an acceptable portion of a shopping center. Further, that negotiations are under way to build the vacant portion of the property between the subject building and 'the Alpha Beta Store. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that the area proposed for 'the hofbrau was eighteen feet by thirty-six feet, or approximately six per cen[ of the total area of the building. Mr. William Reeves, 1015 East First Street, Santa Ana, California, proposed operator of the hofbrau, submitted a sample menu and advised of their operation in Santa Ana, which will serve as the main commissary for this location. He stated food will be pre-cooked in the Santa Ana facility and stored, heated and served at this location. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-885: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-885 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permi~ No. 277, subjec~ to Zhe recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Pesolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 277. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons. Schutte and Krein. None. 6181 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-885 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:03 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called 'the meeting to order, all members of the City Council bein9 present. PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 291: Submitted by M. E. Hulett, requesting permission to establish sales and service of motor scooters, bikes and lawn mowers, on property ioca%ed on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 88 feet west of ~anchester Avenue (1520 West Lincoln Avenue). the City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 467, Series 1962-63, granted sa~d conditional use permit, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Lincoln Avenue. 2. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Lincoln Avenue in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- meni of Public Works, Sani'taiion Division, prior 'to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 4. Time limitation of one hundred eight~ (180) days for the accomplishment of I~em Nos. 1 and 2. 5, Development substantiazl~ in accordance with Exhibit Nos, 1 and 2, provided that the easterly forty-,six (46) feet of subject property from the existing building to ~he rear propert~ line shall be fully improved and striped for parking purposes. 6. Provision thai if the parkway portion of Lincoln Avenue is not cemented, [hat landscapin9 shall be provlded therein to enhance [he appearance of subject property; plans for said landscapin9 to be submitted to and subject to the approval of' the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance prior to Final. Bullding inspection. 7. Subject to the approval of the building by the Chief Buildin9 Inspector for conformance to Boiiding Code requirements prior to issuance of a business license for the proposed use. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission regardin9 certain conditions was filed in 'the office of 'the City Clerk, and public hearzna scheduled. ~,,(r. ~.~artin Kreidt noted the location of the property and briefly summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission. The ~layor asked if ,Vt. Hulett would like to address the City Council. Mr. Hulett advised that he was not present at the Planning Com- mission meeting, as he had been notified that the matter would be considered in the afternoon session. He changed all of his appointments to the evening and found later that the malter had been also changed to the evenin9 session. He presented sketches of the subjec[ property, showing location of the present buildings. ~r. Hulett advised that he was the owner of the property; however, the bu].lding is under lease to Mr. and ~rs. Stolaski, doing business as Anaheim Electric Motor Service, who desire to sub-let the buildin9 to Mr. Crowe. Objections to conditions imposed are briefly as follows: Condition No. 1 - Since only twenty-four feet of frontage is being con- sidered, and since this is merely a change in renters, the assessment should not apply in ~his case. 6182 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Condition No. 2 - There are only two feet of right-of-way behind the curb face on Lincoln Avenue, therefore driveway approaches and sidewalks could not be installed. Condition No. 3 - There presently exists sufficient trash storage area, and everything is paved with the exception of the contractor's yard. In Mr. Hulett's opinion, this condition already exists. Condition No. 4 - Would not be applicable, if the foregoing conditions were not insisted upon. Condition No. 5 - Some of this area could not be paved until the expira- tion of the contractor yard lease. Regarding landscaping, the front area is presently completely paved. Mr. Hulett related his future plans for the property, when the present lease is expired; that plans are to remove all the buildings from the center and erect new buildings on the property. He thereupon requested that all conditions with the exception of Condition No. 7 be withdrawn. Plot plan submitted by Mr, Hulett was reviewed by the City Council and discussion held. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-886: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-886 9ranting Conditional Use Permit No. 291 subject to the followin9 condi- tions: ' 1. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 2. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2, provided that the easterly forty-six feet of the property %o a depth of sixty feet %o the rear of the subject building be striped for parking purposes. 3. Subject to the approval of the building by the Chief Building Inspector for conformance to Building Code requirements, prior to the issuance of a business license for the proposed use. Refer to resolution book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 291. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-886 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-23: Submitted by Hubert and Jana Vee Wade, requestin9 a change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located on the south side of Orange Avenue, approxima'tely 400 feet west of Knott Avenue (3614 Orange Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 490, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue (40 feet existing). 2. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Orange Avenue. 3. Removal and/or reconstruction of the two non-standard driveways on Orange Avenue. 4. Installation of paving on Orange Avenue in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 6183 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. 5. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit. 6. Provision of standard 'trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection, 7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. 8. Development sabstantiail, y in accordance wl%h Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 9. Cons%ruction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the east and west boundaries of subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted 'the location of the property and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Plannin9 Commission, stating that the area was projected on the Preliminary General Plan as Multiple Family Residential. '[he Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-887: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-887 for adoption, authorizin9 the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Plannin9 Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TIYLE 18 OF YM~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAl, CODE RELATING YO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THA'i THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-23 - R.-.3) On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the ~oiJ_owing ~ote: AYES; COUNCILMEN: NOES. COUNCILMEN: ABS ENq' ~ COUNCILMEN: Dutlon, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-887 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSiFiCATiON NOw 62-63-24: Submitted by J. Ty~n Ellis, requesting a change of zone from R¢.A to C-l, property located on the west side of Euclid Avenue, approximately 257 feet north of Sallie Lane (south of Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way), and further described as 1637- 1045 South Euclid S~ree%. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 491, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassificaiion, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (532 feet from the monumented centerline of Euclid Avenue, (50 feet existing). 2. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Euclid Avenue. 3. Provis:on of standard 'trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public ~orks, Sanitation Division, prior 'to Final Building Inspection° Yime limi%a%ion of one hundred and eighty (180) days {or ~h~ accomp- lishment of Item Nos. i and 2. 5, Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 6. Installation of a minimum six (6) foo~ s~rip of landscaping abutting the planned highway right-of,~wa¥ line of £uclid Avenue togethsr with the installation of tree wells in the parkway on the Euclid Avenue right-of-way, plans for said landscapin9 to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the west and south boundaries of subject properties prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 8. Limitation of all display material to one unlighted sign with a maximum size of eight (8) square feet for each building. 9. Recordation of C-1 Deed Restrictions limitin9 [he use of subject property to business and professional uses only. 6184 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. 10. Removal of all flags and banners on subject property, except as permitted under Condition No. 8. Mr. Martin Kreid~ noted the location of the property and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission, advisln9 that the present building is occupied and had prior zoning by the County of Orange. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present, Mr, Raymond R~ Ribal~ Auihorized Agent, was present. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared 'the hearin9 closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-88R: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 62R-888 authorizlng preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. ('02'~63-2a ~' C-l) On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dution, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons, None. None. The May'ut ~eclared Resolution No. 62R-887 duly passed and adopted. ACCEPTANCE - JOB NO. i250: Thorn-hun E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, certified that J. P S. C · on'tract:rig Company, Inc., has completed Job No, 1250, in accordance wltn plans and apecifications, and recommended the accep'hance of the work. RESOLUTION NO. 02R~889: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 62R-889 for adopilon, accepiing Job. No. i~50. Refer -ho Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALi. PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BLUE GUM STREET SEWER IMPROVE- MENT, FROM ANAHEIM ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 330 FEET SOUTH OF CORONADO STREET, IN THE COUMi'Y OF ORANGE, JOB NO. 1250. (J.P.S. Contracting Co., Inc.) On roll the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None· None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-889 duly passed and adopted. ACCEPTANCE - WORK ORDER NO. 4069: Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, certified 'that I. B. Dixon Company has completed Work Order No. ~069, in accordance with plans and specifications, and recommended the acceptance of the work. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-890: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-890 for adoption, accepting Work Order No. a069. 6185 g.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES- October 9~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF FHE CI'FY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, YO WIT': FURNISHING AND INSTALLING A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN, UNIT NO, 2A~ iN JEFFERSON STREET, iN ANAHEIM ROAD EXTENSION, AND IN LINDA VIS'FA STREET, WORK ORDER NO. 4069. (I. B. Dixon Co.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCII~EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEN[: COONCiLMEN: handzer, Schut/e, Krein and Coons, Datton, C ' None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R,-890 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 4679: Request of McDaniel Engineering Company for clarification of Condition No. 5, which required [hat the most northerly parcel fronting Western Avenue, and not shown as a portion of this develop- ment, be included w~' ° z~h~n hhe blue boundary of the tract, and assigned a lot number, was subml'hLedo Mr~ Murdoch reported that in reviewing hnls action, a phrase was om:thed from 'the Interdeparhmenta~ Commithee recommendation, and the require- ment was either include this parcel in %he trac~, or dedication and improve- ments be provided fox', ~4r. Maddox adv]_sed that Mr. McDaniel nas indicated that he would acquire necessarx ded~cat2on and would agree to 'the improvement of the frontage. Councilman Chandler moved [ha't correction be made as outlined by Mr. Murdoch, ~.mdez the conditions as stipulated in paragraph 2 of Mr. McDaniei's letter da~ed September 27, i962. Counciiman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRiED,~ VARIANCE NO. i383 - EXTENSION OF TiMF: Request of Lign. ffP. ouse Mortgage Company, Inc.for an extension of time to Variance No. 1383, was submitted. Assistani Cihy Attorney John Dawson reported that the time limit to Variance No. 1383 has expired; that this variance has become void because none of the requisites set forth have been met° ~urther, that an extension cannot be granted 'to an action that no longer exists. Thereupon, it was moved by' Councilman Schu~e, seconded by Councilman Krein, that said request be denied. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 1451 - EXTENSION O~ '[IMF: Request of Magnolia Baptist Church for six months extension of time from expiration date of October 16, 1962, was submitted and granted, on motion b/ Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. ~EQUEST - SIGN APPLICATION: Request of Mr. Roy Henry, Flamingo Motel, for permission to clarify former request for sign, was submit%ed (sign request denied by the City Council July 24~ i962). Mayor Coons advised 'that he has been informed that the requested sign was to replace an existing roof sign, and in Mr. Henry's opinion, the sign company representative did not make this fac[ clear. It was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that the request for reconsideration be approved, and Mr. Henry be instructed to refile application. Further, that [he required filing fee be waived. To this motion, Councilman Chandler voted 'No." MOTION CARRIED. 6186 City Hail~ Anaheim~ California .~. COUNCIL MINUfES - October 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P,M. FINAL MAP~ TRACT NO. a~750: SjOdlvider, '02, th Century Homes; tract located on the east and west side of Kenmore StreeL, 382 feet north of Stonybrook Drive~ and contains eight R~.i ioLs. Mr. Maddox noted the location of the property and reported that bonds have been posted and fees paid, that said tract conforms with the 'tentative map previousl-~ approved by the City Council, and recommended i'ts approval. On the recommendations of 'the City Engineer, Final Map~ Tract No. a750, was approved on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dulion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE .-. TRANSFORMER: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following informal bids received for the purchase of one 2,000 KVA Transformer, and recommended the acceptance of the low Old: Parks & Co., Long Beach Maydweli.,HarLzeil, inc., Los Angeles Line Material Co., Los Angeles General Electric Co., Los Angeles Mo]oney Electric, Los Angeles 8,708.96 8,724.56 8,785.92 8~928.40 ll,4aO.O0 P~,rctase from Parks & Co. ~n tire amount of $8,708,96, was a~'~ho~lzed o". motion by Co~r;c~iman Dui'car,, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R 89i: Cou,'~c:i~.man Sch. ul.~.e offered Resolution No, 62R-891 for adopt ion~ Reler Lo Resol ~t~on Book. A RESOLU}]ON OF i'HE CIYY COUNCIL OF THE CII'Y O~ ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE URoHAbE A~D ACQU[Sii£ON O~ CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Guerrero) On roil ca}i the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the fcilowin9 AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEN'I: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Ma'vor declared Resoiulion No. 62R-891 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-899: Councilman D,o.on~'"* offered Resolution No. 62R-892 for adoption. Refer to Resold'tion Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FHE CI~Y OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE COMPROMISE O~ CERTAIN EMiNE~[' DOMAIN LiTiGATION. (Urbigkeit, et al) On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNC i LMEN: NOES: COUNC I L~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dui/on, Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-892 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUflON NO. 62R-893: Councilman Dulton offered Resolution No. 62R-893 for adoption. Refer 'to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O~ ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING 'TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Olvera) 6187 City Hall, Anaheim, California ~. COUNCIL MINUTES- October 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call ~he foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENF: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schuthe, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-893 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Chandler offered Resolutions Nos. 62R-894 through 62R-906, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer 'to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-89~: A RESOLU!'ION OF ~HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT' DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Lenzi M. and Mildred ImoRene Allied) RESOLUIION NO, 62R-895: A RESOLOTiON OF THE CiIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert C. Miller[) RESOLUi~ION NO. 62R-89o: A RESOLUI'iON OF YHE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT' DEED CONVEYING 'i'0 THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPER'iT FOR AN EASEMENt FOR A SEWER LINE. (Northrop Corporation) RESOLUTION NO, d'2R-897: A RESOLUTION OF YHE CiTY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING 'FO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMEM£ FOR PUBLIC U[ILITY PURPOSES. (Emanuel Candell, et al) RESOLUTION NO. 62R.-89~: A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANF DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMEN? FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Janna B. Blake) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-899: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT POR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES (Robert L. Luec~e, et al) ' RESOLUTION NO. 62R-900: A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAMF DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (F. A. YunDbluth, et :ax) RESOLUfiON NO. 62R-90]: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (The Roman Catholic Arch~,[shop of Los Angeles) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-907: A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Ferol F. Smith, e't al) RESOLUIION NO. 62R-903: A RESOLUTION OF IRE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC U~ILITY PURPOSES. (Virgil C. Collier, et al.) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-90~: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAMI DEED CONVEYIht3 TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMEN~ FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES (Anne Henning Paulus) ' 6188 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3~00 P.M~ RESOLUTION NO. 62R-905: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert R. Heydon, et ux) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-906: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Orange County Flood Control District) On roll call 'the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-894 through 62R-906, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-907: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-907 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF ~HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BALL ROAD SEWER IMPROVE- MENT, FROM APPRO×IMATELY 690 FEET EAST OF SUNKIST STREET, JOB NO, 1254; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMEM[ IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DiRECTiNG THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened November 1, 1962, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-907 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-908: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-908 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CORONADO STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM BLUE GUM STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 665 FEET WEST OF BLUE GUM STREET, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, JOB NO. 1255; APPROVING THE DESIGNSj PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOFj AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.I AND A~rHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened November 1, 196~, ~:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-908 duly passed and adopted. City Hail, Anaheim~ California ,- COUNCIL MINUFES - October 9~ 1962., 3:00 P.M. CITY PLANNING CO~ISSION Ii'EMS: ~ctions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held September i7, i962, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDIFIONAL USE PERMIY NO. 90i..- Submitted by Pacific Telephone and Tele- graph Company, requesting permission to construct an addition to an existing office building, on property located at 'the southwest corner of Orange and Knott Avenues, and further described as 3502 West Orange Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to 'their Resolution No. 49~, Series 1962-63, granted said Conditiona~ Use Permit, SubOect to conditions. CONDIflONAL USE PERMIi' NO. 309 - Submitted ~¥ ~iiliam J. Wesolek, Owner, First Christian Church, Aqent~ requesting permassion to use a single family residence for a temporary c~.:zch, o~ property located on the south side of South Si. feet, the northwest, corner of said proper't? being approximately 800 feet eas~ of zr-~e sou~t;:~esu {.ornez of So,th S'treet and State College Bouie~ard, and faz'~hez aescrloed as 22].6 East So.~th S'tree~. lbe City P!ann:ng Commiss:on purs~:an-z to their Resolution No. 495, Series ~ conditions. ~.962.-.63, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to CONDIi'IONAL USE PERMIi NO., 303 - S,xomiuied by Buena Vista Convalescent Hospital, req.~estLqg pe:nn:'~s,~jo~ ~:o cons'ti:ct art addiLior, cf fifteen rooms to an ex : ,:g ~esl tome,: o'.: p.'~opert> ..cea'ted ire so~:_neas't corner of E'uc~Ld S.teet and Buer.a v'~a Avenue, and fcrlher described as 1682 Buena Vzsta Avenue, l'he Cl!:lr PIanning Commission p~rsuant 'to uheir Resolution No. 496, Serzes ~.967-{3, gran'tea said Conditional Ose Permlt, subject to conditions. Y~e faz'e:~oi~-~q app. zc. ation, s were reviewed by the City Council and no further actioq ~as 'taken on the above n~mbered conditional use permit appl ica Lions, VARIANCE NO. 1513: ExcerpLo :rom the mlnaues of Ci't¥ Planning Commission meeting held September ~7, igc,"2, were s:xbmitted granting the request of the applicant:, Ted E. Barker, Lo w[[,hdzaw 'Variance No. i5t3. No ffurther action e~as ta~er~, b~: ahe Citk Council. RESOLUTION NO. 62R.909 - RECLASSi}iCATiON NO. 59 .00-4: Excerpts from the minutes of the C~y Planning Commission meeting he~d September 17, 1962, recommending ~ne termination of' Reclassiflca'tlon No. F-59-60-4, requesting C-i Zoning, inasmuch as sabjecL proper, t? has been developed as R-l, was submit'zedl and Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-909, concurring wi'th the recommendations ct the City Planning Commission and terminating all proceedings. Refer to Resoiutzon Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CiYY COUNCIL O~ i'VE CiTY O~ ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION Wii'H RECLASSIFICATION NO~ ~'-59-60-4. On roll call the foregoinq ~esolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: ,aYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEhIi': COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None, The ~ayor declared Resoiuhion No. 62R-909 duly passed and adopted. POLICY OF THE COUNCIL - INStALLAtION O~ BLOCK WALLS~ RESIDENYIAL LOTS ABUTTING FREEWAYS OR ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS: On report and recommendations of ~he City Planning Commission, Councilman Schutte moved that the following be adopted as Council Policy, pertaining to reqalremepts for the installation of block walls on all residential lots abuZtir~g freeways or arterial highways: 6190 Qity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9, 1962, 3:00 ~'It is the policy of the City Council where all single or multiple family residential %rac±s are proposed with lots abutting a freeway or siding or backing upon any arterial highway, a six foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the property line separating these lots and the freeway and arterial highway, except that on corner lots created where residential streets intersec't arterial highways, such walls shall be stepped down to a height of twenty-four inches in the front, one-half of the front yard set- back, and a height of forty-two inches in the back, one-half of said setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right-of-way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping including irrigation facilities shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping." Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPOR'rS: Councilman Chandler moved that Financial and Operating Reports for the month of September, 1962, be received and filed. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: 'The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion b?' Councilman Sch~tte, seconded ~ Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. a. Mrs. Joan Crumiy, 10172 Hearth Lane, Anaheim. Feather River Project Association. c. Pop Warner Football Association, Inc., da%ed September 17, 1962 - letter of appreciation. ORDINANCE NO. i768: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1768 for first readin9~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELA?iNG TO ZONING. (61-62-108 - R-3) After hearing read in fdll the title of Ordinance No. 1768 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance De waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion, MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1767: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1767 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1593 iN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. F-59-60~101. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1767 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schut%e seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1767 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a five minute recess. Councilman button seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (10:20 AFTER RECESS: (10:25 P.M.i Mayor Coons called the meeling to order, all members of 'the Council bein9 present. 6191 C_itv Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 9~ 1962, 3:00 P.M, URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY~ RESOLUIIONS NOS. URA-1 AND URA-9: Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council approve the contract with Cedric A. White, Jr,, and David F. Mason, for performance of certain appraisal services pursuant to Urban Renewal Agency Resolution No. URA-1, and also approve the agreement employing Economics Research Associates to perform certain services pursuant to Urban Renewal Agency Resoiuiion No. URA-2, and authorizin9 the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreements. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion, MOIION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATION: Application of Speedee Mart, 801 South Euclid Street, for new off-sale beer and wine license, was presented by the City Manager for City Council informaiion. No further Council action was taken on said application. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-910: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-910 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROPRIATING CERTAIN FUNDS FOR ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ AUTH- ORIZING A CONTRACT WITH THE ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE DOING OF SAID ADVERTISING; AND PROVIDING FOR COMPENSATION TO THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR SERVICES TO BE RENDERED To THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by 'the foliowlng vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSE~Ff: COUNCILMEN: Dutzon, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. ADJOURNMENT: motion. The Mayor declared Resoi~iion No~ 62R-910 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Krein moved %o adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the MOl'ION ARRzED ADJOURNED: 10:34 P.M. City Clerk