The URL can be used to link to this page

1962/12/186318 C~tv Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Prior to the commencement of the City Council meeting, cake and coffee was served to members of the City family and friends in celebration of Councilman Schutte's 70th birthday. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ADS ENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held December 4, 1962 and December 11, 1962, were deferred to December 26, 1962. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - PRESTON TURNER: The following resolution was offered by Mayor Coons for adoption, and read in full. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXPRESSING APPRECIATION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PEOPLE OF ANAHEIM TO PRESTON TURNER UPON HIS RETIREMENT FROM THE POSITION OF CITY ATTORNEY. WHEREAS, Preston Turner has served the City of Anaheim faithfully and with honor and distinction for a period in excess of sixteen years since his appointment on September 10, 19a6; and WHEREAS, during his tenure in office, Anaheim has grown from a city of approximately 12,600 population, with an area of 4.1159 square miles, to a city of more than 130,000 population with an area of 27.53274 square miles; and WHEREAS, his astute handling of the litigation involving the City of Anaheim and h~s sound legal advice to the City Council and the Departments in the City during his tenure in office, when the City was experiencing its explosive growth, has been a material factor in establish- ing the City of Anaheim as the largest city in the County of Orange with an outstanding reputation for integrity; and WHEREAS, Preston Turner has shown his devotion to the City of Anaheim by rendering the services of his office with a diligence and inte9- r}ty above and beyond the call of duty and by personal efforts in the community outside of his office; and WHEREAS, we, the members of the City Council, find that the people and residents of the City of Anaheim are deeply indebted to him for the invaluable services that he has rendered to the City durin9 the past sixteen years. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that we do hereby express to Preston Turner our deep personal appreciation and gratitude, and the appreciation and gratitude of the citizens and residents of the City of Anaheim for the distinguished service he has rendered to the City and its citizens and residents as City Attorney, which office he will have held from September 10, 1946 to his retirement, December 31, 1962. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be spread upon the minutes of the City Council and the City Clerk be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to prepare an appropriate copy of this resolution and deliver it to Preston Turner. 6319 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 18%h day of December, 1962. /s/ Rector L. Coons MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: . /s/ Dene M. Williams CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM Mr. Turner accepted the resolution and expressed his thanks and appreciation to the City Council and employees. He noted that during his first year as City Attorney, fifteen Ordinances and seventy-seven resolu- tions were adopted as compared to the current year, to date, One Hundred Thirty-two Ordinances, and One Thousand Sixty-nine resolutions. OFF-SITE SEWER CHARGES: The City Mana9er reported on the detailed study o£ a proposed increase in off-site sewer charges, and recommended that said charges be increased from $300 to $350 per acre. Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare a resolution adjustin9 off-site sewer charges, in accordance with the recommendations of the City Manager. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 1533: Submitted by Carl F. Burnett, requestinq permission for a lot split on property located at 705 West LaVerne Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 5a4, Series 1962-63 granted said variance, subject to conditions. ' No further action was taken on the above numbered variance. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING_~__HOUSE MOVING PERMt/_~_CARL F. BURNETT: Submitted by Carl F. Burnett, requesting permission to move a dwelling From Stanton House Movers Yard, Buena Park, California to 705 West LaVerne Street, Anaheim. Subject application was deferred to this date to be considered in conjunction with required Variance No. 1533. House moving application and file were reviewed by the City Council, together with recommendations of the Building Department. The Mayor asked if the applicant or anyone else wished to address the Council~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUIION NO. 62R-1070: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-1070 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO CARL F. BURNETT TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM STANTON HOUSE MOVERS YARD, BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA TO 705 WEST LA VERNE STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. ' On roll call the foregoin9 resoiution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1070 duly passed and adopted. 6320 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1071 - HOLIDAY PROCEDURE: Councilman Schutte offered Resolu- tion No. 62R-1071 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING DECEMBER 24, 1962, AS A HOLIDAY FOR CITY EMPLOYEES AND AMENDING SECTION 22 OF RESOLUTION NO. 6148. On roll call the Foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1071 duly passed and adopted. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATION - THE CASCADES: Request from Russell C. Mangold for reconsideration of application for premises-to-premises transfer of On-Sale General license at The Cascades, 2125 South Harbor Boulevard, pro- tested by the City of Anaheim, was submitted. No further action was taken by the City Council on said request. LA PALMA PARK RECREATION BUILDING, ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES: Thornton Piersall, Director of Public Works, submitted and read proposal received from Dan L. Rowland, A.I.A., dated December 18, 1962, for architectural services to be rendered on the La Palms Park Recreation Building. Discussion was held by the City Council, Director of Public Works, Assistant City Attorney and the City Manager. At the conclusion thereof, and on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, employment of Dan L. Rowland, A.I.A., was authorized to perform architectural services, as outlined in his letter, on the basis of two per cent of the contract price, in the amount of $1,987.66 for said services. Resident Inspector to be assigned by the City Building Department. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF PORTION OF ROAD AND ROAD EASEMENT: Public hearing was held pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-1025, duly publzshed in the Anaheim Bulletln December 6, 1962, and notices thereof posted in acco:dance with law. Mr. Maddox, City Engineer, reported the location of subject property, and recommended said abandonment. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against the proposed abandonment, there being no response, declared the hearzng closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1077: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-1072 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF A ROAD AND AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DES- CRIBED REAL PROPERTY. On roll call 'the Foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC IL~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1072 duly passed and adopted. 6321 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M, SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by Ellis-Schrader, Realtors, for permis- sion to erect a sign (oversize) at 1637 South Euclid Avenue, advertising their firm. Plans were reviewed by the City Council and report from the Building Department noted. Mr. Ellis addressed the Council advising that the existing sign on the adjacent lot would be removed, and the reader panel will be installed on the new sign. Further, he described the existing property uses in the area. Councilman Krein moved that said sign application be granted, as requested, providing there be no projection over the property line, and that the existing sign be removed. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. To this motion Councilman Dutton voted "No". MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by James White Oil Company for permission to erect an oversized sign, replacing two smaller signs, at 3175 West Ball Road. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and report from the Building Department noted. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, said sign application was granted, with the provision that there be no projection over the property line. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by Approved Homes Realty (James Thomson), for permission to erect oversize sign at 121 North State College Boulevard. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, together with Building Department report. Councilman Dutton moved said sign application be granted as requested, with the provision that there be no projection over the property line. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN ORDINANCE: Discussion was held by the City Council and Assistant City Attorney concerning the status of the amendment to the Sign Ordinance. Assistant City Attorney 3chh Dawson reported that the draft of the new sign ordinance is presently being reviewed by affected departments, and will be available for Council consideration in the near future. SIDEWALK WAIVER~ 1101SOUYH EAST SIREET: Request of Co-ordinated Construction, Inc., for waiver of sidewalk requirement at 1101 South East Street, was submitted. Because of a possible conflict of interest, Councilman Krein withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte moved that temporary waiver of sidewalk requirement be granted, provided that no permanent planting (trees) be allowed in the area reserved for future sidewalks. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-30 - APPROVAL OF PLANS: Pursuant to Condition No. 10 of Resolution No. 7353, in Reclassification Proceedings No. 61-62-30, plans were submitted for approval by Dr. Ray L. Kelson for development of Lot 7, Tract No. 1635 (206 North S±ate College Boulevard). Said plans were reviewed by the City Council~ together with recom- mendations of the Planning Department. Dr. Kelson was present. Councilman Chandler moved that plans For development marked xh~b~ts 1 and as submitted be approved. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 6322 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 179t: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1791 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (60-61-96 - C-l, Dena Property Oniy) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1791 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the readin9 in full of said Ordinance be waived, Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-66 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 192 - REVISED PLANE: Revised piot pinna submitted by Gene Durand in connection with Reclassifica- tion No. 61-62-66 and Conditional Use Permit No. 192, were reviewed by the City Council, together with recommendations of the City Planning Department. The Council noted the R-3 zoning pending on subject property. Mr. Gene Durand advised that the original plans filed with Condi- tional Use Permit No. 192 indicated apartment units along the Lincoln Avenue frontage, and in his opinion, his revised plans were an improvement over those originally submitted. He outlined changes and refinements incorporated in revised plans, such as through alleys and private patios. Discussion was held by the City Council, City Manager and Assistant City Attorney regarding the disposition of the Lincoln Avenue frontage omitted from revised plans. It was noted by the City Council that the applicant was advised by the Plannin9 Department to file a new application for Conditional Use Permit, and an application for commercial reclassifica- tion on the two parcels fronting on Lincoln Avenue; as revised plans indicate substantial changes. Councilman Chandler moved that revised plans be referred to the City Planning Commission for their review and recommendations, to be further considered by the City Council January 2, 1963. Councilman Schutte seconded 'the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-66 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 192 - EXTENSION OF TIME: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, a 180 day extension of time from expiration date (February 6, 1963), was granted to Reclassification No. 61-62-66 and Conditional Use Permit No. 192, to allow compliance with conditions pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 62R-102 and 62R-103. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PEP~IT NO. 299: Request of M R C Developers, Inc., for permission to proceed with development of Parcel No. 3 of Reclassification Proceedings No. 62-63-2, described as Conditional Use Permit No. 299, was submitted. Mr. Lynn Thompson, 520 D~yer Drive, advised that the subject property is the northerly irregularly shaped portion of property described in subject reclassification. Further, street improvement plans have been filed, and development plans for Parcel No. 3 are presently in the Planning Department for checking. Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted that subject reclassification was composed Of three parcels of property in dif- feren~ ownerships, and Resolution of Intention to Re-zone, No. 62R-969, pertains to all parcels. Further, Conditional Use Permit No. 299 was granted subject to completion of said r~clag~if{ca~ion. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1072: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-1073, removing Parcel No. 3 from Resolu- tion No. 62R-969 in Reclassification Proceedings No. 62-63-2, permitting reclassification of property separately upon compliance with requirements. Refer to Resolution Book. 6323 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING RESOLUTION NO. 629-969 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-2. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1073 duly passed,and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-107 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 243 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Paul C8lvo and Ted Fish for 90 day extension of time to Reclassification No. 61-62-107 to April 10, 1963, and 180 day extension of time to July 10, 1963, to Conditional Use Permit No. 243, was submitted and granted, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MO/ION CARRIED. PERALTA HILLS - ZONING STUDY: Mr. Murdoch submitted and read petition received December 12, 1962, requesting the City of Anaheim to make a land use study of an approximate 400 acre long strip land, commonly known as Peralta Hills, which property is included in the proposed Yorba Linda Annexation. Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, the City Manager's office was instructed to advise the interested parties that study of the area known as Peralta Hills is included in a study of canyon areas in conjunction with the General Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1074: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-1074 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1067 AUTHORIZING THE COMPROMISE OF CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION. (Fire Station Site - Euclid and Westmont) On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1074 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1075: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-1075 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (James Goodman, et al - Lot 47, Tract 1591, Fire Station Site) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1075 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported in informal bids received for the purchase of one fork lift truck, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the bid of Hyster Company~ in the amount of $4,606.16, including tax, as the lowest and best bid: 6324 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~. 1962~ 3:00 Towmotor Corporation, Anaheim Hyster Company, Los Angeles Pacific Lift Truck, Los Angeles Robert H. Braun, Los Angeles 4,548.44 4,606.16 4~586.40 4,628.00 Mr. Murdoch further advised that the fork lift truck was to be used inside the City warehouse; that the Towmotor Corporation could not offer the City a demonstration as equipment would not be available until approximately March; a demonstration was requested and not received from the Pacific Lift Truck, and without a demonstration the City could not be sure that the four wheel Yale lift truck would be satisfactory for interior use. On the recommendations o~ the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the bid of Hyster Company, Los Angeles, being the lowest and best qualified bid meeting specifications, be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $4,606.16, including tax. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 62R-1076 to 62R-1080, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1076: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Richard E. Os~root, et ux) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1077: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Gock Woey 3ung, et ux) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1078: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Norwood Homes) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1079: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Kenneth C. Randall, et al) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1080: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Peter M. Elliott, et al) On roll call, the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-1076 to 62R-1080, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1081: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-1081 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN AT 'THE INTERSECTION OF DALE AVENUE AND BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 742; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, 6325 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 P.M. ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None, None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1081 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-lO8P: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-1082 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, FROM APPROXIMATELY 416 FEET NORTH OF SANTA ANA STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 221 FEET NORTH OF SANTA ANA STREET, AND FROM APPROXIMATELY 1176 FEET NORTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO LINCOLN AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 733; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. On roll call, the foregoZn9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1082 duly passed and adopted. JOB NO. 676 - EXTENSION OF TiMF: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte moved that 13 day extension of time be granted to Stromberg, Incorporated for culvert construction at Southern Pacific Railroad, east side of State College Boulevard, south of Cerritos Avenue, Job No. 676, due to circumstances beyond the control of the contractor. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY REQUEST: Request of Southern Pacific Company to construct and operate a railroad track in and across unnamed alley (134.5 feet south of Broadway, immediately west of Atchison Street) was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte moved that the City Attorney's office be instructed to prepare a resolution granting said request. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 62R-1083 to 62R-1090, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1083: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRA~ THE DEVELOPMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE. (Pauline Street to Mayfair Avenue) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-lO8a: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING '/HE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF KATELLA AVENUE. (East City Limits Line to Los Angeles Street) 6326 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1085: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF ORANGETHORPE AVENUE. (Dowling Avenue to East City Limits) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1086: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOWLING AVENUE. (Anaheim Road to Placentia-Yorba Boulevard) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1087: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE. (Harbor Boulevard to Haster Street) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1088: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF WALNUT STREET. (Cerritos Avenue to 1320 feet north of Cerritos Avenue) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1089: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEWIS STREET. (1200 feet south of Ball Road to 520 feet north of Cerritos Avenue) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1090: A RESOLUYlON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF HARBOR BOULEVARD. (South Street to Vermont Avenue) On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-1083 to 62R-1090, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT - DELLA LANF: Petition requesting abandonment of a portion of Della Lane and terminating Della Lane by a cul-de-sac southerly of Orangewood Avenue, was submitted. Mr. Murdoch reported that said request has not yet cleared all City departments involved, and recommended a two-week continuance for receipt of reports therefrom. Mr. Douglas B. Nokes, 1634 Orangewood Avenue, was present and requested permission to address the City Council. He advised that Della Lane is reduced Lo a very narrow half width street, running along side his property, that %he s:lgners of the petition felt that a cul-de-sac arrange- ment would be a solution to this problem. In their opinion, %he only way to widen Della Lane would be to acquire the Perez property, who they understood does not wish to sell his land. Mrs. Douglas Nokes advised that if the street was abandoned, agr~g~ could b~ from Ord Way and Orangewood Avenue. The City Council continued said issue to January 2, 1963, 3:00 P.M., as recommended by the City Manager. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, RESOLUTION NO. 62-1464 - COUNTY JAIL CARE OF CITY PRISONERS: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 62-1464, per- taining to costs for care of city prisoners in the County Jail, together with Orange County Division, League of California Cities communication, were ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED. 6327 Ci%v Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. CITY OF COLUMBUS~ GEORGIA - ORDINANCF: At the meeting held December 4, 1962, Assistant City Attorney Joseph Geisler was requested by the City Council to render an opinion concerning the constitutionality of Ordinance adopted by the City of Columbus, Georgia, which regulates businesses offerin9 for sale products produced by Communist labor. Mr. Geisler advised that the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce is also making a study of said Ordinance, and will forward their findings to the City Council in the near future, at which time he will submit his report. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED: a. Feather River Project Association. b. Youn9 Men's Christian Association, expression of thanks for allowin9 Citron Street to be blocked off. CITY PLANNING CO~ISSION ITF~S: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meetin9 held November 26, 1962, pertaining to the following applica- tions, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 1523 - Submitted by William H. and Mary C. Dillow and Clarence and Rhea L. Meddock, requestin9 permission to waive parkin9 stall size on property located at the southeast corner of Naster Street and Katella Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 551, Series 1962-63, granted said variance, and rescinded Resolu'tion No. 500, Series 1962-63, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 323 - Submitted by Johnnie F. and Eugenia May Snyder, requesting permission to establish an ambulance service on property located at 1244 North State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 546, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. ON-SALE BEER LICENSE, NORTHEAST CORNER LINCOLN AVENUE AND RIO VISTA STREET: Report and recommendations regarding appiication pending before the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for On-Sale Beer License at the Aipha Beta Shopping Center, located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, were submitted. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held November 26, 1962 noted that said use on subject property would not be in conformance with Anaheim Municipal Code C-1 zoning regulations, but would be permissible under County regulations; further, that the area in question is presently under annexation procedures. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action was taken on the above numbered conditional use permit, variance application, and report. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONES - REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: At the request of the City Council, the City Planning Commission reviewed substantial changes in proposed amendments to the M-1 and M-2 Zones, originally considered pursuant to City Planning Commission Resoiution No. 481, Series 1962-63, and Resolution No. 482, Series 1962-63. Excerpt of the City Planning Commission minutes from their meeting held November 26, 1962 was submitted, recommending the adoption of said Amendment, as revised, to Title 18, Chapter 18.52 and Chapter 18.56 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as presented in Exhibit "A", dated November 20, 1962. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing was scheduled before the City Council on January 15, 1963, at the hour of 3:00 O'Clock P.M. to further consider said amendment. MOTION CARRIED. 6328 City Hall: Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - December 18, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. REVISED TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 4476: Subdivider, Rinker Development Corpora- %ion; Engineer, McDaniel Engineering Company; tract located north of the Riverside Freeway, south of Santa Aha River, and contains 185 proposed R-1 lots. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held November 26, 1962 approved said Revised Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions: 1. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. Dedication of access rights from Lot 161 and Lots 32 through 41 to Batavia Street. 3. Drainage across Balavia Street, a secondary highway, shall be by means of an underground system. 4. Drainage shall be discharged into the Santa Aha River with the approval of the Orange County Flood Control District and the Orange County Water District. 5. Final design in cross section of the service road adjacent to Batavia Street and Batavia Street itself, shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 6. Temporary access road south of Addington Drive shown as connecting to old Santa Aha Canyon Road, shall be used as a temporary means of access, until Addington Drive is extended easterly as a public street. 7. /he offsite access road, the old Santa Aha Canyon Road, shall be widened to provide a twenty-four (24) foot travelway, with the approval of the Orange County Road Department. 8. Installation of median landscaping strip between Batavia Street and the service road; plans for said landscaping shall include adequate watering facilities, and plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping shall be installed prior to acceptance of tract improvements. 9. In accordance with the policy of the City Council, adopted October 9, 1962, construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the property line separating Lot Nos. 32 through 41, and Lot No. 161 from Batavia Street, and Lots Nos. 3 through 16 from the Riverside Freeway, except that on corner Lot Nos. 32, 33, 40, 41, and 161, said wall shall be stepdown to twenty-four (24) inches in the front one-half of the front yard setback and a height of forty-two (42) inches in the back one-half of said setback. 10. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the Batavia Street parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Main- tenance. (Following the installation acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.) Mr. Martin Kreidt advised that subject map is located in the County of Orange, within the proposed Yorba Linda Annexation area; further, an additional condition is recommended, that the 60 foot "collector" street (Ashmont Street) be developed 64 feet. Mr. Kreidt suggested the City Council make the following street name changes: Alicia Circle to Alicia Avenue; Alicia Circle, North and South to Appleton Street; East -~flest Street, north of Addington Avenue and between 'Ashmont Street and Appleton Street to Augusta Avenue; Addington Drive to Addington Avenue. Mr. 3acobson, representing McDanlel Engineering Company, addressed the Council concerning Condition No. 4, and the jurisdiction of the Orange County Water District and Orange County Flood Control District, with reference to the discharge of water into the Santa Aha River. Councilman Dutton moved that Revised Tentative Map, Tract No. 4476, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, adding Condition No. 11 changing the 60 foot "collector" street (Ashmont Street) to a 64 foot width, and adding Condition No. 12 changing the names of streets and avenues, as suggested by Mr. Kreidt. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTI~N CARRIED. 6329 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. CHARTER CITY GOVERNMENT¶ CITIZENS~ ADVISORY CO~qITTEE: On December 4, 1962, the City Council considered a list of sixty-seven nominees submitted for the Charter City Government Citizens~ Advisory Committee, and to obtain a more complete cross section of the city, insuring equal representation, the Council extended the time flor submission of additional recommendations to December 17, 1962, for further consideration this date. To the list of nominees, Councilman Chandler submitted the name of "Mr. Kenneth Lae", and Councilman Schu'tte submitted the name of "Mrs. Robert Daily". Mr. Murdoch reported that twenty-seven additional names have been submitted, and presented a map showing the City divided into five areas, and indicating the area locations of the nominees. Said map was reviewed by the City Council and discussion held. The Coun¢:l requested that copies of the map be made for each Councilman, and that /he matter be continued to the next meeting, December 26, 1962, as the t~me each Councilman will submlt a list of his selection for joint considera'tion~ RECESS: Councilman Schutte moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. }40TION CARRIED. (5:05 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. PRESENt: COUNCILN~EN: A BS E htr: C OUNC I LM EN: Dui/on, Chandler, Schutte (entered the meeting 7:10 P.h~.), Krein and Coons. None. INVOCAflON: Rev. Forest ~. Lance, Grace Bretheren Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUiE: Mayor Coons led '/he assembly in 'the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC H~ARING - CONDrrlONAL USE PERMIT NO. 315: Submitted by Chip and Norma Chasin, requesting permission 'to establish a cocktail lounge on property located on the south s~de of Ball Road, approximately 195 feet west of the southwest corner of Bali Road and Dale ,Avenue, and further described as 2890 West Bail Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 528, Series 1962.-63. denied said conditional use p~rmit. ,Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Roy E. June, Attorney representin9 the applicant, and public hearth9 was scheduled to Ce held this date. ~r l¥!artin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and exist:ng uses and present zoning in the immediate area, and advised that the plans presented to t. he City Planning Commission indicated the establishment of a bee:' ~ar, without sale of food. Plans and 'the file ~ere reviewed by [he City Council, and the Mayor asked if anyone wished to address %he Council. ,,Counc:iman Schu'[te entered the mee'king, 7:10 P.~,1.) I,,'lr. Roy June, AtEorney representing the developer, advise~ {hai at the time of filing the application they were not aware of the proper terms to use to describe their proposed operation. Mr. John A. Haurice, Agent, representing Norwood Homes - Chasin organization, addressed the Council advisina that they had understood when filing their application tha't the one classification "cocktail lounge" applied to the service of alcoholic beverages, whether it was beer, wine or mixed drinks. He advised that they have conducted a survey of the area and feel that the surround~n9 area ~s not conducive to an expensive restaurant with cocktail lounge, and further, 'there is not sufficient parkin9 for such a large facility. Based on the follow~ng, Hr. Maurice urged favorable con- 6330 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, i962, 3:00 P~M. sideration of their proposed bar and more informal type of business: 1. Will be the sole such facility within a mile and one-half radius; 2. Will provide recreation for a large light industrial work force; 3. Will provide recreation for the tract housing area; 4. Location of the approaches will not impede or congest traffic; 5. It is an economically feasible business in terms of investment and operating costs; 6. It will enhance the area and will not be undesirable from a social or capital improvement point of view. In answer to Councilman Dutton~s question, Mr. Maurice advised that the proposed use would be better termed a "beer parlor" rather than a cocktail lounge; that the lessee is quite amenable to serving light food and having an establishment of a hofbrau nature; however, he is not finan- cially able, and they as developers cannot provide enough space for kitchen facilities necessary for a more extensive type of business, such as a steak house; that the area at the rear of the building, originally intended for a game room, would be sufficient for small kitchen facilities adequate for a hofbrau type business, the area in question being thirty feet wide and fifty feet lon9. Mr. Davser, 2880 West Ball Road, resident within the area, addressed the Council favoring the type of use requested. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and in answer to Mayor Coons' question, as to what other tenants were to be in the small commercial center, the applicant advised that they have contacted two small markets, a gift shop and a laundromat; however, no actual leases have been signed. RESOLUTION: Councilman Schutte offered a resolution upholdinq the action ~7 ~--~e ~-~y Planning Commission and denying Conditional Use P~rmit No. 315. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area again noted; and it was suggested to the applicant 'that inasmuch as there is an uncertainty as to the exact nature of his requested operation, and also no definite uses for the remaining buildings in the shopping center, that the application be withdrawn at this time, and refiled when more definite and certain uses have been established for the neighborhood commercial center. Mr. ~aurzce verbally requested withdrawal of application for Conditional Use Permit No. 315, providing they be allowed to refile at any time they submit definite proposals for subject property. Councilman Schutte withdrew his previous resolution. Councilman Chandler moved that the applicant's request for with- drawal be accepted, and that said withdrawal be recognized as based on the applicant's intention to file again when his plans become more certain; this motion to be without prejudice to the filing of the new application. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 316: Submitted by Lin-Hurst Club, a corporation~ requesting permission to establish a private recreational facility on property located on the north side of Woodley Avenue adjacent to Lot 39, Tract No. 2625, and further described as 400 North Siesta Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 531, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the follow- ing conditions; Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6331 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. 2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall alon9 the east and south property lines, said walt to be stepped down to forty-two (42) inches in height with the front yard setback of subject property, prior to Final Build~ng Inspection. 3. Provision of a six (6) foot chain link fence to enclose the swimmin9 pool area prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 4. Said recreational facility shall be vacated by 9:00 o'clock P.M. on Mondays through Thursdays, and 12 o~clock Midnight on Fridays, Saturdays Sundays and Holidays, ' 5. Membership %o %he club shall be limited to Property Owners in Tract No. 2625, and may be used by said property owners and their guests only. 6. Compliance with Code, Section 6.56 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 7. The swimming pool shall be supervised by an adult at all times, and the gate to %he swimming pool shall be locked a% all times when not so supervised. 8. Use of the remainder of 'the property to the East may be devoted to playgrounds, picnic area, and park recreation. 9. Installation of landscaping in accordance with the elevations as sub- mitred and marked Exhibit No. 1. Appeal from action taken by the City' Planning Commission was filed by Edith Vay Benson, 8741Kathryn Drive, and public hearing scheduled to be held this date. Communications of protest to subject application were submitted from Mr. and Mrs. Walter I. Marable, Jr., 312 North Monterey Street, Mr. John Misity, 313 North Slesta Street, and Mrs. G. Paul Keller, 201 North Monterey Street. Mr, Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and briefed the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission; that the subject property is located in an area which does not offer recreational facilities tO the children of the area, and the care and cost of operating this facility will not be born by the City of Anaheim, but by members of the recreational facility~ Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and petition of opposition and petition of approval, each containing forty-four signatures were noted. ' The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Charles Kirk, 306 North Siesta, addressed the Council explaining in detail the development under County standards of their residential tract, and advised that the subdivider set aside subject lot for recreational facil- ities for the tract; that most of the people in the tract purchased their homes with the understanding that this lot would be maintained as a childrens' play area and improved with swimming pool facilities; that it has been such a play area since 1958, and they now desire to add the pool facilities. In referring to conditions of approval by the City Plannin9 Commission, he questioned Condition No. 2, pertainin9 to the wall requirements, and advised that they were proposing to have one fence surrounding the immediate pool area with self-locking gates, and they also plan to have another six foot fence completely surroundin9 the entire property. The Mayor asked iff anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION: Councilman Krein offered a resolution for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 316, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the amendment to Condition No. 2, that the existing chain link fence be removed, and a block wall of matchin9 color be erected in lieu thereof. Considerable discussion was held by the City Council regarding the proposed wall requirement, and the removal of the chain link fence, possibility of commercial activities on the property, closing time and adequate supervision. 6332 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ i962~ 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1091: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Krein amended his previous resolution and offered Resolution No. 62R-1091 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 316, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the exception that Conditions Nos. 2, 4 and 5 therein be eliminated. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 316. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followzng vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEMT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. 'The ~.ayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1091 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 322: Submitted by Morten M. and Maude A. Dizney, requestin9 permission to establish 126 bed convalescent nursin9 home (one story) on property located at 2860 Ball Road (south side of Ball Road, approxzma'tely 719 feet west of Dale Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 534, Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Roy E. June, Attorney representin9 the applicant, and public hearin9 scheduled to be held this date. Mr. Mart:n Krezdt noted the location of subject property and existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He referred to Finding No. 3 of the City Planning Commission Resolution pertaining to the need for a periphery drive to provide ingress and egress to subject property for adequate fzre protection, and also advised that the applicant was not present at the City Planning Commission hearing. ~!r. June, representing the applicant, addressed the Council and presented revised plot plan of the proposed development. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and at the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Krein moved that application for Conditional Use Permit No. 322 be referred back to the City Planning Commis- sion for reconsideration on the basis of the revised plans submitted this evenzng by Mr. June; that this public hearing before the City Council be continued to January 2, 1963, 3:00 O'Clock P.M. Councilman Chandler seconded the mot~on. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-124 AND VARIANCE NO. 1525: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-124: Submitted by James and Mary Alice Allen, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 on property located on the south side of Ball Road, appro×imatel¥ 477 ~eet east of Beach Boulevard, and further described as 2944 West Ball Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 523, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification to allow the construction of a two story multiple ffami~y residential development, subject to the following conditions: Ded:cation of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road (30 feet exfsting). Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Ball Road subject to the approval of the City Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 6333 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Road, 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 5. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall prior to Final Buildinq Inspection. 6, Installation of fire hydran{s, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 8. Development substantially in accordance with Revision No. 1: Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, n and 5. 9. Subject to the approval of Variance No. 1525. VARIANCE NO. 1525: Submitted by James Allen, requesting permission to waive single-story height limitation on property described in Reclassifica- tion No. 61-62-124. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 524, Series 196Q-63, granted said Variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road (30 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Ball Road subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Road. 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit %o be collected as par% of the Building Permit. 5. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- lishment of I±em Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 8. Development substantially in accordance with Revision No. 1: Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. 9. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-124. Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and existing land uses and zoning in the immediate area. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. 3ames Allen, 9562 Harvest Lane, addressed the Council further explaining their proposed development, and advised that the adjacent c~urch is in favor of said development, and are particularly pleased with the fact that there will be a wall erected between the church property and the apartment building. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 61-62-124 and Variance No. 1525. ~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-1097: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-1092 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 6334 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-124 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1092 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1093: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-1093 for adoption, 9ranting Variance No. 1525, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1525. On roll call the Foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1093 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARINGS~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-27 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 306: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-27: Submitted by Floriene Sandersfeld, Owner, Robert W. McMahon, Agent, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-1 and R-3 on property located on the southeast corner of Knot% and Orange Avenues. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 525, Series 1962-63, recommended C-1 Zoning for Parcel No. 1, and R-3 Zoning for Parcel No. 2, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Knott Avenue (30 feet existing). 2, Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue (15 feet existing), including a twenty-five (25) foot radius property line return. 3. Preparation of street :mprovement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Knott and Orange Avenues, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Knott and Orange Avenues. 5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. 8. Development substantially in accordance with Revision No. 1: Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, as amended for Parcel Nos. 1 and 3. 9. Limitation of structural height to one story for the multiple family development; and, further provided that final development plans shall be subject to the approval of the City Council. 10. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the easterly and southerly property line of Parcel No. 1, prior to Final Building Inspec- tion. 6335 ~..ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 P.M. 11. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the southerly property line of Parcel No. 2. 12. Installation of a minimum six (6) foot wide landscaped strip abutting the planned highway line of Knott and Orange Avenue abutting Parcel Nos. 1 and 3. 13. Installation of tree wells along the Knott and Orange Avenues right-of- ways abutting the proposed service station site of Parcel No. 3, prior to Final Building Inspection of said service station. 14. Subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 306 for the specific waiver of garages in lieu of carports for Parcel No. 2. 15. Provision that the interior walls of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided along the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior wail of the proposed carports from damage. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 306: Submitted by Floriene Sandersfeld, requesting permission to construct a restaurant, cocktail lounge and service station on property described in Reclassification No. 62-63-27. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 526, Series 1962-63, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 306, allowing the estab- lishment of a service station on Parcel No. 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Knott Avenue (30 feet existing)' 2. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue (15 feet existing) includin9 a twenty-five (25) foot radius property line return. 3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Knott and Orange Avenues, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Knott and Orange Avenues. 5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. 8. Development substantially in accordance with Revision No. 1: Exhibit Nos. i and 9 for Parcel No. 1; and further provided that final development plans shall be subject to the approval of the City Council. 9. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 62-63-27. 10. Provision that the interior walls of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided alon9 the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior walls of the proposed carports from damage. 11. Installation of tree wells alon9 the Knott Avenue and Orange Avenue right-°f-ways abutting the proposed service station site of Parcel No. 3, pr}or to Final Buildin9 Inspection of said service station. Communication of approval dated December 17, 1962, from Westridge Home Owners Association was submitted and read. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property and advised that the petition for a cocktail lounge with restaurant was verbally withdrawn by the applicant at the City Plannin9 Commission hearing. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council~ and the Mayor asked if the applicant wlshed to address the Council. 6336 ~itv Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M, Mr. Robert MacMahon, representlng the Applicant, addressed the Council and requested that the condition imposed by the City Planning Commission limiting the entlre R-3 to single story construction be re- consmdered, and that they be allowed two story construction on this 1on9 and narrow Parcel No. 2; or in the event this is not favorable to the Council, that for the best economic development of the property they be allowed to limit the one story construction to within one hundred fifty feet of the south boundary line of subject property. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 62-63-27 and Conditional Use Permit No. 306. Discussion was held regarding the provision pertaining to proposed carports, and Mr. MacMahon advised that the carports are below the second story of the apartments. Plans and the file were again reviewed, and it was determined by the Council that the Conditional Use Permit applied only to the request for a servlce station on the C-1 portion, and does not include the request for waiver of garages on the R-3 portion. Mr. ~acMahon stated that inasmuch as the R-3 plans must be revised, due to the unknown factor at the present time as to future develop- ment on adjacent property, they will at the 'time of submission of said plans, request the installation of carports in lieu of garages. In connection with Finding No. 6 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. 525, Series 19~2-63, pertaining to an amendment to Ordinance No. 1742 (Reclassification 61-62-71) Condition No. 2, which requires the construction of a six foot masonry wall alon9 the east property line of subject property. The Council felt any amendment thereto was a matter to be considered in conjunction with the finalization of Reclassification No. 62-63-27. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1094: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-1094 for adoption, authorizin9 the preparation of necessary Ordinance changin9 the zone as requested to C-1 and R-3, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, however deletin9 therefrom Conditions Nos. 9, 14, and 15. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT 'TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-27 - C-1 and R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by 'the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. the Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1094 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1095: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-1095 for adoption, 9ranting Conditional Use Permit No. 306~ allowing ~he establish- men% o£ a service s%ation~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the exception that Condition No. 10 thereof be deleted. ReFer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 306. 6337 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1095 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-40: Submitted by Takito and Matsue Yamaguma, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-l, property located on the east side of Western Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Ball Road (850 South Western Avenue). City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 535, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet From the monumented centerline of Western Avenue (20 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Western Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightlng purposes on Western Avenue. 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 5. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Mr. Martin Kreid't noted the location of the property and summarized the action of the City Planning Commission, advising that the application was submitted to conform with a condition of approval of Tentative Map, Tract No. 4679, which reduced subject property to less than one acre in size. The ~ayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1096: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-1096 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CI~IY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O? ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-4o - On roll call the Foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENt: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1096 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-42 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 32]: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-42: Submitted by ~inoru and Hatzue Shiota requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 and R-3; property located on the northeast corner of Western and Orange Avenues (3139 West Orange Avenue). 6338 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTHS - December 18~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 536~ Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 321: Filed in conjunction with Reclassification No. 62-63-42, requestin9 permission to construct a service station, neigh- borhood shops, and planned unit development, on property described above~ and further requesting waiver of parking requirements, waiver of building height limitation and building separations. City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 537, Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit. Public hearing was scheduled on the conditional use permit in accordance with Council policy, to be considered in conjunction with requested reclassification. Communication dated December 17, 1962, from John F. Simpson, President of Wes[ridge Home Owners Association, requesting the City Council sustain the action of the City Planning Commission, was submitted and read. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property and land use in the immediate area. He advised that the basic reason for denial was because of conflict with the proposed General Plan, which projects low density residential development for this area. Mr. Kreidt called attention to an error on the map and advised that the ~rontage along Western Avenue zs 240 feet lnstead of 340 feet, as noted. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Thomas J. Beerman, Agent, advised that he wished to build a project on the property that would be a credit to the community. In his opinion, the commercial would be good planning, and advised that part of the commercial center would be in medical and dental offices, which would accommodate the medical building to 'the South. He further advised if the density of the maltiple is considered too great, he would be willing to revise these plans. Mrs. iris Gorin, 3134 lflest Olinda Lane, resident og the tract immediately north of subject property, addressed the Council in opposition to the reclassification. She called attention to the multiple developments in the area, and the fact that the area is presently being served by five major shopping centers. Regarding the medical and dental offices serving the proposed medical center on Beach Boulevard, she felt the distance from the proposed hospital was too great to be o£ much service. Mrs. Gorin ~urther advised that 'the area is R-1 in character and so designated on the proposed master plan, and requested the Council to retain the proposed R-1 zoning. Mr. Scarpa, 315i West Vallejo, addressed the Council in opposition. He called attention to the many schools in the area, and felt the increase of density in the area would detract from the existing residential. Mr. Scarpa advised tha~ most ct the home owners purchased their homes in this area with the thought in m:nd ~hat at would remain residential. Mr. Avon Carlson, Principal of iflestern High School, stated he felt there was no need to remind the Council of the problems created when commer- cial areas are next to a school, and re~erred to some problems already created by the establishment of the gasoline station across ~he street from Western High School. Mr. Carlson stated he was looking forward to the thousands oF citizenry attending Western High School in the years to come; that the property surrounding the school as it now is makes an ideal situation ~or the school. He further advised that Assistant Superintendent Mr. ~ines has notified the Planning Commission of the problems of parking, and to comply with the parking requirements on the subject property would leave very little area for buildings. Wt. Carlson stated that it was his feeling as a citizen of this community that subject property should remain in housing. 6339 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 P.M. In answer to Mayor Coons' inquiry, Mr. Carlson advised that Western High School operates a closed campus, and their main concern was the before school and after school operation, with students congregating at these estab- lishments. Mr. Don Fobes, 3150 Vallejo, addressed the Council in opposition, stating that the waiver of the building height requirement would invade the privacy of their rear yard and use of their swimming pool. He felt multiple dwellings attracted a transient type population. Mr. Fobes called attention to the gasoline stations which have closed, and was oF the opinion that there was an overmarket for this type o~ service. Mr. Fred Robinson, 3168 West Vallejo, addressed the Council in opposition, on the grounds that %here wasn't sufficient area For the apartment project, and because of the transient population o6 apartment dwellers. In his opinion, there would be an invasion of privacy, and would decrease the property values in the area. Ihe Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1097: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-1097 sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission denying Reclass- ification No. 62-63-42. ' Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-42) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. 'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1097 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-lO9g: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-1098 for adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 321. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0~ ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 321. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-t098 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-43: Submitted by Clifton M. and Annie Mae Martin, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-1 (limited to business and professional offices), property located on the south side of Ball Road approximately 190 feet west o~ Nutwood Street (1916 West Ball Road). Ihe City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 529, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 6340 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California 1. 2, 3. COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18~ 1962~ 3.:00 p.M, Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Road. Installation of sidewalks and paving on Ball Road in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- lishment of Item Nos. 1 and 2. 5. Recordation of C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, deed restrictions, limiting the use of subject property to business and professional office use only, and to be accomplished prior to the issuance of a business license. 6. Iime limitation of three (3) years For the use of the existing structure for business and professional offices, from the effective date of the reclassification of said property to the C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, unless petition is made for a review by the Anaheim Planning Commission and the Ci%y Council for continuance of the said three (3) years. 7. Plans for %he removal of the existing structure and replacement with a suitable commercial development shall be subject to the approval of the City Council, prior to the issuance o~ a Building Permit for said construction. 8. Interim use of the existing residence on subject property in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The reclassification of said property to the C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, shall be completed prior to %he issuance of a Business License. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the action of the City Planning Commission. He called attention to Condition No. 6, which the Commission felt afforded sufficient safeguards to protect the adjacent areas. 6 and 7. Discusszon was held by the City Council concerning Conditions Nos. Ihe Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mrs. Martin addressed the Council advising that the street dedi- cation and improvement fronting the property has been completed, and that the rear of the property is a productive persimmon and orange grove. She further advised that they would like to conform with whatever requirements are necessary for the zoning. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 6QR-1099: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-1099 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, in accordance with the City Planning Commission's recom- mendations, deleting 'therefrom items numbers 6 and 7. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'THE C~TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF 'THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. 62-63-43 - C-l) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC I LW EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1099 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motlon. MOTION CARRIED. (9:23 P.M.) 6341 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 P.M. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Schutte. RELOCATION~ STATE ROUTE NO. 2 (LOS ANGELES STREET): Discussion was held con- cerning the estimated cost of running a couplet of Lemon and Los Angeles Street, as compared with the realignment of Harbor Boulevard. Mr. Murdoch reported that the primary reason for the difference in cost was that to establish a couplet of Lemon and Los Angeles Street would not require additional widening or additional right of way. Truck traffic on State routes was discussed and consideration given to the residential area on North Harbor Boulevard. At the conclusion thereof, it was determined that further consideration should be given prior to officially requesting the State Division of Highways to investigate the possibility of transfer; also, study should be given to the possibility of designating Harbor Boulevard as State Highway Route 2, with Los Angeles Street as an alternate route for trucks. SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION: Mayor Coons appointed Councilman Krein Inspector, and Councilmen Dutton and Chandler Judges, for the purpose of canvassing the returns of votes cast at the special election held December 11, 1962, for the annexation of territory designated as Southwest Annexation. The tally list and semi-official returns were compared by the Canvassing Board, and found to have been reported correctly. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-1100: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-1100 for adoption. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CAUSING A RECORD OF CANVASS OF RETURNS OF SPECIAL ELEC- TION TO BE ENTERED UPON ITS MINUTES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim has canvassed the returns of a certain special annexation election held on the llth day of December, 1962, in certain unincorporated territory to be annexed %o said City of Anaheim~ and WHEREAS, said City Council has caused a record to be made of the canvass of returns of said election, which record is entitled, "RECORD OF CANVASS OF RETURNS OF SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION HELD DECEMBER 11, 1962"~ and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the %oral number of votes cast in said electron in favor of annexation was 485, and that the %o%al number of votes cast against said annexation was 708. NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that said record of canvass of returns of said election be, and the same is hereby ordered entered upon the minutes of said City Council, and that no further proceedings be taken in such annexation. THE F'OREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th day of December, 1962. ATTEST: /s/ Rector L. Coons MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM /s/ Dene M. Williams CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-1100 duly passed and adopted. 6342 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 1787: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1787 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (55-56-40 - C-i, Portion - Bennett Restaurant Property Only) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1787 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1787 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1788: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No, 1788 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-1 - M-l) After nearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1788 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Cha~lermoved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. ~ayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1788 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1789: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1789 for final reading. Refer %o Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-103 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1789 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCII.N, EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. !"~ayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1789 duly passed and adopted. 6343 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 18, 1962, 3:00 ORDINANCE NO. 1790: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1790 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-115 C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1790 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1790 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1792: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1792 for first reading, Councilman Chandler withdrew, taking no part on this issue. AN ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-16 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1792 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion, MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1793: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1793 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-78 P-1 and R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1793 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1794: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1794 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-110 - C-l, P-1 and R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1794 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. CO~qUNICATION: Communication from Senator Murdy advising that the 1963 session of %he Legislature would commence January 7, 1963, and inviting the Council to contact him prior to that time to discuss any problems, was submitted and read. ADJOURN: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 10:16 P.M. City Clerk