Loading...
1965/01/058328 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - CDUNCIL MINUTES - January 5~ 1965~ 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Kreino ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M..Williams. CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. ZDNING OOORDINA/OR: Robert Mickelsono Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Chandler. MINUTES1 Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held December 2, 1964, and RegUlar Meeting held December 8, 1964, were approved on motion hy Councilman Dutton, seconded hy Councilman Pehleyo MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST - 1811 WEST KATELLA AVENUE: Application for sign permit filed by Donald Howard and George Kri~ger, to erect a roof sign of approximately 52 square feet, 12 feet above roof, reading "Executive West", was submitted and reviewed together with reports from the Planning and Building ~- Departments. On motion hy Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said permit was granted subject to compliance with proposed sign ordinance, and further subject to lighting being directed away from the residential properties to the north. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-22 (TRACT NO. ~48~) ~XTENS,ION~ O.F 11IME~ Reques't'of' Farrow Development Corporation for 180 day extension of ti~, wasi~'submitted together with reports from Planning - Development Review and City Engineer. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley% extension of time was granted as requested. MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO° 5024 - PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT (CHAPARRAL PARK): Petition signed by residents on South Anthony Street requesting the pedestrian passageway to the City park site, between lots 6 and 7 of Tract No. 5024 be elimi~atedj stating their reasons therefor, was submitted together with reports from the Planning Department, City Engineer and Director of Parks and Recreation. Mro John Collier, Director of Parks and Recreation, submitted a map and an aerial photo of the area to be served by the development of the Chaparral Park located north of Tract No. 5024, and reported that the park is estimated to serve from 6,000 to 7,000 population at this time, and when the area is fully developed the ten acre park will serve an estimated 12,000 people. Mr. Collier advised of, the need for the pedestrian walkway for access to the park from the south, and by means of the aerial map, noted the route required to be taken by residents to the south should the pedestrian passageway be closed. Mr. Ellis Craig, 508 South Anthony Street, addressed the Council advising that the walkway between the two houses was not fenced, and because the small passage, any attempt to make a significant use of the access would defeat their purpose in selecting a home in this area. Mr. Craig further advised that he purchased his home before the homes were constructed and when the area was still an orange grove, and since undeveloped property is still available in the area, thought that another access to the park site should he provided hy the City, and that this should he accomplished during the planning stage of the park before the situation becomes impossible to resolve. Mr. Geisler reported that the passageway ref6'rred to is a dedicated public easement, and that to close said walkway, would be by abandonment proceedings, finding that it is no longer necessary for public use or that it is a nuisance and/of hazard to the neighborhood. 8329 City.~all, Anahg.$m~ Califo[nia ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - Janqary 5~ 1965,, l:3Q Mr. Craig stated that~they' had not known that this'Was presently a dedicated public easement, and had hoped different arrangements could have been made. '..No action was taken by the City Council, however,~'those'~Dres~nt were advised that should a problem arise resulting from the walkway, every effort will be made to lessen the condition; further, the City Engineer was requested to investigate requirements of the tract pertaining to fencing the easement. ,~ , , ANAHE. IM I~F~LE ASSOCIATION - REQUESTI WAIVER OF FEES: Request of Anaheim Temple 'AssoCiation for waiver of fees charged for the use of La Palma Park facilities to stage annual barbecue, was continued from the meeting of AuguSt 11, 1964, tO this date to allow investigation and reco~ndation by the Park and Recreation Commission° The Park and Recreation Commission at their meeting held December 10, 1964, recom~nended that no exception be made to the policy and fee schedule adopted pursuant to Resolution 64R-482. Mr. Davis reported that this activity was arranged during the period that the policy was being prepared and adopted, and that in this one instance there could have been some misunderstanding; further, in the opinion of the Manager's Office, the policy was a good one and should be adhered to, and if the fees are waived, recommended waiver be limited to this one instance. Mro Geisler called attention to the fact that use of public grounds for a profit making activity for the benefit of the me~ership of any certain group, must be considered a private purpose and not a public : purpose. Mr. D. Ho Van~eter, 201 North Emily Street, addressed the Council advis~ing that in his opinion a charge should not be made to a purely local group for a purpose that will ultimately benefit the City (building of a Masonic Temple, South Harbor Boulevard). H~ was of the further opinion, the park~ being maintained by city taxpayers, that charges should be asse%sed to only outside 9i%y~groupso Discussion followed, at the conclussion thereof Councilman Dutton moved that there be no deviation from the policy and fee schedule as adopted~ ~ e ._~ and that the fees originally assess d stand.--.To this motion Councilman Schu%te voted "No". MOTION'CARRIED: Councilman Pebley seconded6~e motion. R~.SOLUTION. NO. 65R-1: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-1 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION ID VACATE AND ABANDON THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF A RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Anaheim Union Water Company - East of Euclid, South of Palm Lane - Public Hearing 3anuary 26, 1965, 1:30 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES= COUNCILMENI NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler. None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-1 duly passed and adopted. ORANGE COUNTY CASE NO. 86~~ Excerpts of the City Planning Commission meeting held~i3anuary~4, 1965~ pertaining to proposed local business district at the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Sunkist Street, were submitted. 8330 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3anuary 5, 1965, l~30.p.M. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Clerk was authorized to advise the Orange County Planning Commission that the City of Anaheim makes no recomotendation on Case No. 865. NDTION CARRIED. ORANGS COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE PEPJ~IT NO. l146:'..Excerpt of City Planning Commission meeting held 3anuary 4, i965, pertaining to the establishment · of an elementary school on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road~ approximately 800 feet westerly of the easterly intersection of Crescent Drive, recbmmending approval of said conditional Use permit, was. submitted. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Clerk was authorized to forward said recommendation to the Orange County Planning Commission° MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST - 2375 WEST ORANGE AVENUEs Application submitted by Anthony and Victor Dtdodo for permission to erect a free-standing 50 square foot sign 17 feet high, advertising Cortina Grocery and Delicatessen, was continued from the meeting of December 29, 1964 for a letter of approval from the" adjacent property owner to the west. Letter received at open meeting from O. Earl LindSey, District Sales Manager of Standard Oil Company of California, lessees of adjacent property, advising they have no objection to the erection of said sign in accordance with plot plans submitted with application~ was submitted and read. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte~' sign permit was granted as requested, subject to lighting being cdntrolled so asnot to illuminate the single family residential area. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-2, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-2 for" adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM'ACCEPTINGiA GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL P~OPERTYiFOR AN EASF~ENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Fredericks Development Company - 64-65-37) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIIJ~EN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-2 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-3: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-3 for adoption, awarding 3ob No. 918 to the Sully Miller Contracting Company ..... in accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING iA SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT IO /HE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE'!' BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, NL~TERIAL5 AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT: THE IMPROVF~ENT OF THE TRAFFIC ISLAND AT LINCOLN AVENUE AND CENTER STREET, APPROXIMATELY 950 FEET WEST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM JOB NO. 918. (Sully Miller COo, $3,328.00) Roll call vote: AYES: COU NCIL~EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley,.D~tton, Schutte and Chandler None Krei~ 8331 .C. ity .Hall, Ana..heim, California - COUNCIL MINUIES - Jan.uary .5, 1965., 1:30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-3 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-4 - ACCEPTANCE OF JOB NO. 5010t In accordance with .~ 'cert~c'ati~n of Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, Councilman pebiey off~red Resolution Nco 65R-4 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND GO~PL£TE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVFA{ENT, TO WIT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STOR~ DRAIN IN PORTIONS OF DALE AVENUE AND BROADWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 5010. (REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ALTERNATE). (Charles L. Butch & Sons, Inc.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 65R-4 duly passed and adopted. SETTLF~ENT OF LITIGATION - HEP~AN LENZ IWATER DAMAGE), Mr. Robert Davis reported on the proposed improvement of State College Boulevard and also settlement of the case of Lenz versus-City of Anaheim, in Which the Court awarded $1,500 damages to Mr. Lenz. To accomplish both the settlement of said claim and acquire necessary dedication for the widening of State College Boulevard, .Mr. Davis~ further reported that Mro Lenz has agreed to make necessary dedication of 53 feet for the widening of State College Boulevard, and install ,curbs and gutter improvements and dedicate a right-of-way of 45 feet from center line for the widening of both sides of Wagner Avenue~' the City to pay for the cost of all improvements on Wagner Avenue, total cost ~to the City $40,385.00. At the conclusion of the discussion and on the recommendations of the City Manager, City Attorney and City Engineer,' Councilman Dutton moved that settlement of litigation be authorized in accordance with proposed agreement, with the stipulation that the injunction has been completely fulfilled and that there is no other requirements on the part of the City, and that the Court injunction be removed. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. To this motion Councilman Chandler voted "No". NDTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a 15 minute recess. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (3:03 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Chandler, all meng~ers of the City Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Krein. MORT'S CATERING CONTRACT (ANGELS STADIUM): Mr. Robert Davis advised that the catering firm serving the Angels Stadium during construction was selling their business and recommended another firm be selected. Mr. John Roche, Administrative Aid, reported that the next highest proposal was A1Follman Catering of Compton, 16 percent gross, and the third highest proposal was Cater King, Inc. of Santa Ana, 15 percent gross. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Manager was authorized to negotiate for a contract with Ca%er King, Inc., as the lowest and best proposal due to the ~tose p~oxi~t~y of the firm for auditing purposes, and if unable to negotiate said contract, authorized to negotiate for a contract with A1Follman Catering of Compton 8332 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January. 5~ 1965'~ 1:30 P.M. or Larry's Catering, in that order, subject to the posting of a $1,000.00 cash security bond. MOTION CARRIED. CONTRACT - PACIFIC AIR INDUSTRIES: Mr. Robert Davis reported on the following three informal proposals received for aerial topography maping of approximately 4,000 acres of the Santa Ana Canyon Area: Pacific Air Industries Aerial Survey and Engineering Co. American Aerial Surveys, Inc. $15,385.00 17,500. O0 23,800. O0 Mr. Davis further advised that this was a budgeted item and will be useful in the preliminary routing of sanitary sewers, computing drainage areas, preliminary alignment of roadways, review of subdivision tracts, setting alignments of electrical lines and will save considerable amount of time in field investigation° With the aid of a map Mr. Davis indicated the area basically involved and further reported that after analyzing what the firms proposed, and the time for delivery, it would be the recommendation of the City Manager's Office that award be made to Pacific Air Industries in accordance with their proposal° Contract with Pacific Air Industries for aerial mapping services proposed was authorized in accordance with recommendations of the City Manager, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° CORRESPONDENCE: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the following correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. City of Albany, Resolution Nco 64-95, commending appropriate~ legislation to prevent disruption of educational processes at State supported Universities. b. Minutes - Anaheim Stadium Commission - Meeting of December 17, 1964. c. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meeting of December 17, 1964o MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2086: reading. Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2086 for final Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (C-l, General Commercial ZOne) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2086 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutt°n moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION UNANINDUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: ORDINANCE NO. 2090: reading. AYES: COUNCIIAtEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES: COUNCII2~EN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2086 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2090 for final Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-80 - C-I) 8333 C..it¥ Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL ~!.NUTES - January 5,. 1965, 1.,30 P.M. After hearing read tn'full the title of'b~dinance No. 2090 and hsving knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll ~all votes AYES~ COUNCILMEN: NOESt COUNCILMEN: ABSHNT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Kretn Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2090duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE MOo 2091: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2091 for final readi~go Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ~UNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (64-65-42. and-64-65-44~through 64-65-48 - C-1 and 64'65~50 - R-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2091 and h~ving knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dui%on moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES t COUNCILMEN: NOES .' COUNCILMEN, ABS~NT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Kretn Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2091 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2092~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2092 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-118 - Sahagen Property only - C-l) ' After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2092 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE .NO. 2093~ Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2093 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ~UNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-37 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2093 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. CONDITIONA~ uSE PERMIT NO. 543t The City Engineer reported that problems pertaining to driveway locations have been resolved. BOND - PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: The City Council reaffirmed action taken December ~9, 1964, authorizing the City Manager to secure a bond in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for the position of Public Works Director, at the best price available; further, it was determined that a separate bond for the position of the City Manager was not necessary. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-5~ Counci.lman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-5 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 8334 City H. all,~ Anaheim, Californi. a .- COUNCIL MINU. TES - Janu.a.,ry 5t 1965, 1530 P.M0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT A~ENDING THAT CERTAIN ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND COUNTY OF ORANGE DATED APRIL 16, 1963. (Katella Avenue, Project No. 155) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None ~ Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-5 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-6: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-6 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONGRATULATING AND GIVING RECOGNITION TO 30HN HUARTE FOR HIS ACHIEVEMENTS IN COLLEGIATE FOOTBALL. Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENTs COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None ~ Krein ~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-6 duly passed and,adopted. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAG~ LICENSE APPLICATION: Application of Bertha A. and ~loyd A. Carlson, for Off-Sale Beer and Wine license, Speedee'Mart, 2437'W~st Bail Road, was submitted for Council information. No action was taken by the City Council. EMPLOYEE'S COMPENSATION ,(HOLIDAy): Discussion was held pertaining to holiday pay authorized at the meeting of December 29, 1964.- To further clarify motion previously made, Councilman Dutton moved that December 24th and 31st be declared half-day holidays, and that all city employees receive half-day holiday pay for these dates. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:15 P.M.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutto'n, Schutte and Chandler. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein. PRESENTt CITY ~ANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. 20NING COORDINATORt Robert Mickelson. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge ofjAllegiance to the Flag. , PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE 1668: Submitted by Associates Funding, Incorporated, requesting waiver of minimum required lot area, minimum required side yards and minimum required lot widths~ R-3 property briefly described as located on Merrimac Drive, northwesterly of Santa Ana Canyon Road, and further described as lots 1, 4, 8 and 10 of Tract No. 5063. : City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1412, Series 1964-65, granted said variance subject to the following conditions: 8335 City H.~i~, Ana.heim, California -~COUNCIL MINUTES- January 5, 1965, 2, That a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject property, in accordance with Exhibit No. 1, shall be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. That each parcel and building thereon he served hy utilities independent from any other building including sewer lateral and a metered water service, or that an agreement be entered into by the property owners, said agreement to guarantee performance necessary to carry out the spirit and intent of the plumbing and building codes, and further provided that said agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office and be recorded with the Record of Survey in the office of the Orange County Recorder. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall he complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered ~f the City Council, and public hearing scheduled this date. City Attorney's opinion relative to proposed agreement pertaining to common sewer and water services, referred to in Condition No. 2 above, was submitted. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicants, addressed the Council and reported that the applicants purchased the R-3 zoned property and then discovered that the lots were designed to have been sold in pairs instead of individually. That the variance in fact was for a lot split and in hi~ opinion, the only problem involved was the common sewer, as the buildings are presently served with separate water meters. ~ Mr. Hal Halvorsen~ 701 Sunny Hills Road, Fullerton, owner of 109 ~ Merri~ac Drive, addressed the Council representing other owners in the area advising that they have no objection to the requested lot split, however, regarding the common sewer, the~ as individual owner% could foresee many problems, and felt that these individual units should have individual sewer lines, Further, when these units were sold, nothing was pres.ented indicat- ing either a common sewer or water line. Mr. Arthur Gage, 100 Merrimac Drive, stated that they were advised that the block wall separating the individual buildings would be the dividing line;to this they agreed if the individual sewers could be installed. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, thereilbeing no response, declared the hearing closed. ~SOLUTION NO. 65R-7: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-7 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1668 subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 2 thereof %o read as follows: "2. That each'parcel and building thereon be served by utilities independent from any other building, including sewer lateral and a metered water service°" Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI/Y OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1668. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-7 duly passed and adopted. Prior to roll call vote on the above, the Mayor advised those present that until the variance is completed, they have factually established 8336 C.ity Hall~ Anaheim,. Cal. ifornia - COUNCIL MINUT~-S - January 5, 1965, 1:30 P.M. an illegal lot split and would be subject to prosecution by the city~ in his opinion, the conditions by which the variance was granted in this case is mandatory and not permissive. ~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-56 AND CONDI?IQNAL. USE PEP~II NO. 652~ Submitted by Anion D. Geiger, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, and permission to establish a multiple-family planned residential development with waiver of one-story height limitation within 150 feet of R-A zoned property, property briefly described as located on the west side of Velare Street, approximately 270 feet south of Orange Avenue. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1454, Series 1964-65, recommended reclassification to the R-2, Multiple Family Residential zone subject to the following conditions: 1. That street improvement plans shall'be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Velare Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim may be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Velare Street, for street lighting purposes° 3o That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sUm of 155 per front foot along Velare Strret, for tree planting purposes° 4o That the curbs and gutters shall be repaired along Velare Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer° 5o That all driveways shall be a minimum width of 21 feet, and that a minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet shall be provided for a minimum width of 21 feet and at corner cutoffs. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with all requirements of the R-2, Multiple Family Residential, Zone, and that all development be limited to one story in height. 8. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works. 9. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 10. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued 11; That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north, west and south property lines. 12, That Condition Nos. 5, 8, 9, and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1455, Series 1964-65, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 652. - Mr. Mickelson noted the location of the property and existing development in the immediate vicinity. In summarizing the hearings held by the City Planning Commission, Mr. Mickelson reported that during the period the applications were being considered by the Commission, the applicant submitted a new plan which qualifies as a standard R-3 develop- ment rather than a multiple family planned residential development. He further reported that the City Planning Commission recommended that the R-2 zoning limited to one-story development be granted, which would be in conformance with General Plan Amendment No. 24. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Mr. 3ames Schuler, representing the applicant, addressed ihe Council calling attention to the present condition of the area and the fact 8337 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January .5, 1.955, i~30-P.M.. that the development now proposed meets existing R-3 Code requirements. He requested approval of the R-3 zone, limited to one-story on the front portion facing existing R-1 property, with two-story construction at the rear.~ Dr. Milton Borenstein, 944 Agate Street, proposed pu,Ghaser of sub- ject property, noted that Velare Street was a 60-foot street-~omparabte-to Orange Avenue, and that the Traffic Engineer has advisedtbat .~.he. drivewa¥ locations as proposed would not create a traffic prohlemo He catled et%eh%ion to existing R-3 property in the immediate area, and explained, the plans,of development which in his opinion would he an asset to the area, and act as a hu£fer,'conforming~to the tone' of the Generai 'Plan. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in'opPoSitiOn. : Mr. Louis Kaufman~ 803 Velare Street, addressed the Council advising that he was not opposed to apartment development of the property~ but was opposed to two-story construction° He further advised of the increased traffic caused by the existing multiple developments which has created a traffic hazard to the children, and has caused overloading of the schools. Mr. Gray, owner of 641 South Vel-are Street, addressed the Council favoring said apptiCa~'ions. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response~ declared the hearing ¢'l'osed.' ' RESOLUTION NO. 65R-8~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-8 for adoptton~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R-3, subject to the following conditions, 1. That street improvement Plans shall be prepared and all engineering require- mSnts of the City of Anaheim along Velars Street, such as curbs and gut{ers, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or ct.her-appur- tenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in %he office ~of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim may be posted with the City to guarantee the instal- lation of said engineering requirements. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front fOot along Velare Street for street lighting purpose§. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 155 per front foot along Velare Street for tree planting purposes. 4. That the curbs and gutters shall be repaired along Vel.are Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and.~ specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. That all driveways shall be a minimum width .of 21 feet, and that a minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet shall be provided for a minimum width of 21 feet and at corner cutoffs. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 9. That the owner of subject property sh-~l-1 pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation pur- poses, said amount to be paid at the time the .building permit is issued. 10. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north, west and sOuth property lines. 11. That the completion of these recla.ssifica%ion proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No-. 652. 12. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit NOs. 1, 2, 3 and 4, Revision No. 1, provided, however, t-ha-t all develop- ment along the easterly 90 feet be limited to one-story in height. 13. That Conditions Nos. 5, 7, 8 and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection° 8338 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 5t 1965~ 1530 Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING IO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-56 - R-3) Roll call votes AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: OOUNCILMEN: Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-8 duly passed and 'adopted. RESOLUTION NO o 65R-9= Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nco 65R-9 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit Nco 652 subject to the following conditions= 1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance With approved plans on file in the~office of the Director of Public Works. 2o That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25°00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recrea- tion purposes~ said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued° 4o That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification Nco 64-65-56° 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibits Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, Revision No° 1, provided however, that all development along the easterly 90 feet be limited to one-story in height° 6o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north, west and south property lines° 7. That the rear and side wall of the proposed carports shall be finished with exterior building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets of a minimum capacity of one hundred cubic feet shall be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior walls of the carports. 8. That Conditions Nos° 1, 2, 6 and 7, above mentioned, shall be'complied with prior to final building inspection. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 652. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 65R-9 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO° 64-65-57 AND VARIANCE NO. 1671: Submitted by Houston J. Nickens, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 and waiver of one-story height limit within 150 feet of R-A zoned property, property briefly described as located on the west side of Velare Street, south of Orange Avenue (721 Velare Street)° City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1434, Series 1964-65, recommended R-2 zoning subject to the following conditions: 1, That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2°00 per front foot along Velare Street, for street lighting purposes. 8339 City Hal%, .AnaheimI California - GOUNCIL MINUTES - January 51 1965~ 1530 2, That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Velare Street, for tree planting purposes. 3o That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Variance No. 1671. 4. That all driveways shall be a minimum of 21 feet. 5. That a minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet shall be provided for a minimum width of 21 feet and at corner cut-offs. 6, That an adequate turn-around of 27 foot radius or a hammer-head be provided for trash trucks and emergency vehicles. 7, That Condition Nos° 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission may grant. 8. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Velare Street as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 9. That the curbs and gutters shall be repaired along Velare Street as ~equtred by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans ~nd specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 10. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 11. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25°00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued° 12o That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department° 13. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north, west and south property lines. 14. That the rear and side walls of the proposed carports shall be finished with exterior building materials, that enclosed storage Cabinets of a minimum capacity of 100 cubic feet shall be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior walls of the carports. 15. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, provided however, that all develop- ment be limited to one story in height; 16. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14 above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1435, Series 1964-65, denied Variance No. 1671. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of the property and advised that the s~me basic arguments for and against said reclassification and variance as presented on application Nco 64-65-56 and Conditional Use Permit No. 652, were considered by the City Planning Con~nission, resulting in their denial of the variance and recommended R-2 zoning instead of the requested R-3 zoning. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mro 3ames Schuler, 914 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, addressed the Council representing the applicant, and reported that his arguments for the reclassification and variance were primarily the same as presented for Reclassification No. 64-65-56 and Conditional Use Permit No. 652, that in his opinion the correct zoning would be R-3, maintaining a one-story construction on the front portion of ~the property fa~ing the R-1 develop- ment across the street. Pictures of the area were presented and reviewed by the City Council (pictures were returned to Mr. Schuler). Mrs. Nickens addressed the Council urging favorable consideration. 8340 City Hall, Anaheim, California - OOUNCIL MINUTES - January 5, 1965~ 1:30 Mr. Louis Kaufman, 803 South Velare Street, advised that his only interest was keeping the number of units to a minimum because of the increased!traf£ic~ lack of sidewalks in the area, resulting in increased danger to the children. Mr. Kaufman was invited to the Council Table and reviewed the proposed plan development° The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. . RESOLUTION NO° 65R-10: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-10 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone,of the property to R-3 subject to the following conditions: o 10o 11. 12. 13o 14. 15. 16. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Velar, Street, for street lighting purposes. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 155 per front foot along Velar, Street, for tree planting purposes. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Variance Noo 1671o That all driveways shall be a minimum of 21 feet. That a minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet shall be provided for a minimum width of 21 feet and at corner cut-offs. That an adequate turn-around of 27 foot radius or a hammer-he~d be provided for trash trucks and emergency vehicles° That Conditions 1 and 2 above mentioned, shall be completed within a period~of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant° ~ That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Velare Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of th~ City Engineer. Ihat the curbs and gutters shall be repaired along Velar. Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with stand'ard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with: approved plans on file with the office of the Director of public Works. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of A!naheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined %o be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north, west and south property lines. That the rear and side walls of the proposed carports shall be finished with exterior building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets of a minimum capacity of 100 cubic feet shall be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior walls of the carports. That subject property shall be developed substantially in acqordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibits Nos~ 1, 2 and 3, provided however, that all development along the easterly 90 feet be limited to one-story in height and that the development be limited to a maximum of 18 dwelling units ,On the subject property° That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14 above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. 'i Refer to Resolution Book. -( A RESOLUTION OF THE CI/Y CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL OODE RELATING IO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (64-65-57 - R-3) 8341 City Hall, ...Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 5, 1965~ 1~30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES.. OOUNCII~EN.. Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES.. OOUNCIL~EN: None ABSENT.. COUNCILMEN.. Krein The Mayor declared Resolution NOo 65R-10 duly passed and adopted. .~,.SOLUTION NO. 65R-11.. Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-11 granting Variance No. 1671, subject to the following conditions.. 1. That sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Velare Street as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications, on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. Thatcurbs and gutters shall be repaired along Velare Street as required 6y the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 5. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifica- t-ion Noo 64-65-57. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibits Nos. 1, 2, and 3, provided however, that all development along the easterly 90 feet be limited to one-story in height, and that the development be limited to a maximum of 18 dwelling units on the subject property. 8, That a 6-foot masonry wall be constructed along the north, west and south property lines. 9. That the rear and side walls of the proposed carports shall be finished with exterior building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets of a minimum capacity of one hundred cubic feet shall be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior walls of the carports. 10. That Conditions Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9, above mentiOned, shall be ~omplted with prior to final building inspection. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1671. Roll call vote: AYES .. COUNCILMEN, NOES t COUNCILMEN: ABSENT.' COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-11 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING . RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-60 AND VARIANCE NO. 1674.. Submitted by Neil Rettman, requesting change of zone from R-2 and R-1 to C-O and waiver of height limit within 150 feet of R-1 soned property, described as located on the north side of Center Street, approximately 235 feet east of Evelyn Drive. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1439, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 8342 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 5~ 1965~ 1:30 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum 15¢ per front foot along Center Street, for tree planting purposes° 2o That the completion'of these reclassification proceedings is ~contingent upon the granting of Variance No. 1674. 3. That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 1, 2, and 3. Pursuant to Resolution No. 1440, Series 1964-65, the City Planning Commission granted Variance Noo 1674, subject to the following conditions: 1o That the sidewalks shall be installed along Center Street, required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. That the driveways shall be installed along Center Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4° That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassi- fication Noo 64-65-60. 5o That all'air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets° 6o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. 7. That Condition Nos° 1, 3, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection° Mr. Robert Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to subject applications° There was no response. The Mayor asked if anyone wished speak in favor of the proposed two-story professional office building, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed on Reclassification No. 64-65-60 and Variance No. 1674. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-12: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-12 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETEPAtINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (64-65-60 - C-O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIIJ%IEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No° 65R-12 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-13: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-13 for adoption. 8343 ~it¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTSS - January 5, 1965, l~SO P.M. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1674. Roll call votes AYESs OOUNCILMENs NOES~ COUNCILMEN= ABSF. NTa COUNCILMEN~ Pebley~ Dutton, Schutte,and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-13 duly passed and adopted. PUBLI C HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO o 64-65-59~ Submitted by William H. Remland, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1, L shaped property with frontages on Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard° (514 South Beach Boulevard). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1445, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of Reclassification No. 64-65-59, subject to the following conditions~ 1, That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land forty-five feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Orange Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Beach Boulevard and Orange Auenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a ibond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineer- ing requirements. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Beach Boulevard and Orange Avenue, for street lighting purposes~ 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Beach Boulevard and Orange Avenue, for tree planting purposes° 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 9. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east property line, prior to final building inspection. 10. That all air-conditioning facllities shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets, prior to final building inspection. ~ Mr. Robert Mickelson noted the location of subject property, being~adjacent on the north and east to service station located at the ~ northeast corner of Orange Avenue, with commercial zoning across Beach Boulevard to the west. He noted existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and the Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to subject reclassification, there being no response, asked if anyone wished to speak in favor thereof. : Mro William ~. Elder, 436 South Glassell, Orange, California, Architect and Authorized Agent, displayed a rendering illustrating the 8344 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Janu. a.~ry 2, 1965, 1:30 P.M. residential character of the Spanish style architecture, and stated that a uniform sign control on the building for each shop was planned, with one free-standing sign to identify the commercial center. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed on Reclassi- fication No. 64-65-59° RESOLUTION NO. 65R-14: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-14 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commi- ssion, Subject to amendment of Condition No. 7 by the deletion of reference to Conditions Nos° 5 and 6 therein° Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL OODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES ~ SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-59 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILAIEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton,.Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-14 duly passed an~ adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-41: Initiated by the Anaheim City Planning Commission, proposing change of zone from M-1 to R-3 on Parcels Nos. 1 and 2, and from M-1 to R-A on Parcel No. 3! property located between East Street and the Atchison, Topeka'and Santa Fe Ratlroad~ and between La Palma Avenue and the Riverside Freeway. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1436, Series 1964-65, recommended Reclassification No. 64-65-41, ParcelsI Nos. 1 and 3, be approved, and that there be no change on Parcel No. 2.' Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property, aavising that the northernmost Parcel Noo 1 has been developed as a trailer park (Conditional Use Permit No. 245); Parcel No. 2, immediately south of said trailer park, is presently undeveloped; Parcel No. 3 comprises the Orange County Flood Control District Retarding Basin. He advised that between Parcels Nos. 2 and 3, a 7 acre parcel has been approved by! the City Council for R-3 zoning (Reclassification No. 64-65-27), and that the City Planning Commission felt R-3 zoning would be appropriate for Parcel No. 2. However, the owner of said parcel was opposed to any change in the existing M-1 zoning. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and the Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to subject reclassification, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed on Reclassification Noo 64-65-41. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-15: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-15 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone of subject properties as recommended by the City Planning Commission, unconditionally. : Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL OODE RELATING IO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (64-65-41 - R-3, Parcel 1; R-A, Parcel 3) Roll call vote: 8345 City .~all~ Anaheim~ California - OOUNCIL MINUTE~ - January 5, 1965t 1:30 PoMo AYES: ODUNCILAtEN: Pebley, Dut~°~,'~ Schutte and Chandler NOES: OOUNCIL~EN: None ABSF_NT:OOUNCIIAIEN: Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No° 65R-15 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a 15 minute recess° CoUncilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° AFTER RE~E~S: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilman Krein~ AGRE~,ENT~:3OHN NUVEEN AND COMPANY: ~r. Murdoch briefed proposal submitted by the 3ohn Nuveen and Company for services as Underwriters for the Convention Hall Auditorium Facility Bonds advising that they would employ bond counsel and work with them in the preparation of the documents suitable for the sale 0f the bonds~ the bond rate to be presented to the city for acceptance or rejection when the amount of the bonds are known, which would be after the bids have been accepted by the Agency (City) for the construction of the facility. At the time of presentation of the bond rate, which would include the cost of employment of the bond counsel, the city would determine if the' bond rate is satisfactory; if not satisfactory, in the opinion of the Agency, ihe obligation on the part of the Agency would be the cost of the bond counsel and the out-of-pocket expenses of the Nuveen Company. The Agency would then be free to obtain financing from any other source. By this method~ the Nuveen Company contracts for the purchase of the bonds when all the documents have been prepared. A second choice, Mr° Murdoch reported, would be the employment of a financial consultant and a Bond Counsel to prepare the documents° After preparation of the documents, bonds would be offered for competitive bidding° This method, he explained, would mean that the patterning of the documents must be necessarily broad to meet the requirements of all bidders; rather than a specific bidder° In conclusion, Mro Murdoch advised that it was his recommendation, together with the City Attorney and Finance Director, that the proposal of the Nuveen Company be accepted as it assures sale of the bonds, and is probably the most time saving° Further, this method, has an excellent chance of guaranteeing the city the lowest bond.rate~..the acceptance would be subject to the approval of the other Agency (High School District) with the upderstanding that title to the land is acquired. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that the recommendations of the City Manager, City Attorney and Finance Director, be accepted, and that the proposal of the 3ohn Nuveen and Company, Bond Underwriters, be accepted subject to the approval of the other 3oint Powers Agency° Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 9:08 P oM.) 03NDI~ONAL USE. PERMIT NO. 649 - CHRYSLER TRAINING C~NTER: Mr. Robert MacMahon Introduced Mr. Harker, Manager of Vidtosonic Systems Division of Hughes Aircraft Company, Fullerton, California, and asked that he explain a proposed training program for the property located at the northwest corner of BrookhurSt and La Palma Avenues. Mro William A. Harker, 9956 East Broadway, Temple City, California, advised that the company has been working on the preparation of a proposal under the 5conomic Opportunity Act of 1964, for the establishment, operation and management of an Urban Vocational Training Center for Young Women. The procedure to be followed, he explained, was to present the proposal to the office of Economic Opportunity in Washington which is under~ the direction of Sargent Schrivero If considered favorably, the proposal ~would be referred to the Governor of the State in which the proposed 8346 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Jan~a,r¥ 51 1965, 1:30 project is to be located; the GovernOr after investigation, having the right to approve or veto the proposal° He further explained the curriculum and courses offered,!,and advised that this would accommodate a minimum of 250, and a maximum of 350 girls living on the premises during the time they.were in the program. That the students would be deprived individuals recruited and thoroughly screened by the office of Economic Opportunity in Washington, and un'er no Circumstances would there be any juvenile delinquency, etc. Mr. Harker explained that the living quarters Would consist primarily of sleeping quarters and facilities for study, plus four two- room units° He further reported that the basic fundamental princiPle of the Act was to get individuals off the relief rolls, and on the tax rolls, and make them aware of their responsibilities as citizens,' preparing them for ,sUgh responsihilitieso He stated that they selected Orange county because of the cultural advantages, which would be beneficial to the program~ The urgency in bringing this before the City Council at this time~~ is that in order to submit their proposal, one of the requirements is assurance that the facilities can be provided. Mro Harker further reported that each of the enrollees, ~pon acceptance, receive an allotment of $150 for clothing, plus $30 per month spending money, and $50 per mOnth to be deposited in a fund to be used after completion of the course~ with a matching amount of any amount saved from the $30 per month spending money; that enrollment would be from all sections of the United States, such as New York,. New Jersey, FlOrida, Texas and Coachella Valley here in California° (Councilman Schutte entered the meeting, 9:30 PoMo) In explaining the program further, Mr. Harker stated that upon completion of the course the enrollee, if offered a job in this area, could elect to stay, or they would be transported back to their home or to an area where employment opportunity for which they were trained was available° Mr° Harker thereupon requested an expression from the City Council to the anticipated proposal of Hughes Aircraft to the Government as contractor for the education and training project under the Man'Power Development and Training Act, and Economical Opportunity Act° Mro MacMahon reported that the proposal must be submitted by the 14th, as the property would not be available after that date; that the problem is whether or not this is a proper use for the property, and would living quarters come under the training program concept so that the property can be made available to Hughes Aircraft for their final proposal to the government within the time limit established° Mr° Geisler noted that Conditional Use Permit No. 649 wax initiated and granted by the City Planning Commission, and that the normal procedure would be to refer this inquiry back to the City Planning Commission for their interpretation to be later submitted to the City Council for their information. He further noted that the conditional use permit specified that the permit was for an "automotive training center". Mro Harker reported that the dead line for submission of~ their application to Washington was January 15, 1965; which application must include the complete facilities. It was the unanimous opinion of the City Council, that decision will not be rendered without first obtaining a recommendation from the City Planning Commission and an expression from the people in the area. 8347 City H~ll, AnahiemI California - COUNCIL MINUTHS - January 5, 19651 l~30P.M. As result, n° further action was' taken by the City Council. ADJOURNMENT~ Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded ~he motion, MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN£D~ 10~00 P.M. SIGNED City Clerk City H~ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January, 12, 1965~, 1,30 PoM. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Pehley, Schutte and Krein. ABSENTI OOUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler. PRESENT~ CITY MANAGERs Keith A. Murdocho ASSISTANT CITY MANAGERs Robert Davis, CITY ATIT)RNEY, 'Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK, Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEERs James P. Maddox. ZONING O00RDINATOR, Robert Mickelson. PLANNING O00RDINATOR~ Allan Shoff. I The City Clerk of the City of Anaheim called the meeting to order for t~e purpose of electing an Acting Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, due to the absence of Mayor Chandler and Mayor Pro Tempore Dutton. Councilman Krein moved that Councilman Schutte he Acting Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore for this meeting° Councilman Pehley seconded the raotione MOTION CARRIED. MINUT~F~: Op motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings held December 15 and 22, 1964, were approved. MOTION CARRIED° REC4AS~IFIC~TION NO. ~3-64-5 - CORRECTION TO MINUTESI On motion by COuncilman K~etn,~ seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Clerk was authorized to correct the minutes of the City Council Meeting held December 1, 1964, Page 8~62, pertaining to Resolution No° 64R-881, amending conditions of Reclassi- fication No. 63-64-5, to read as follows~ "RESOLUTION NO. 64R-881:' Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-881 for adoption~ amending Resolution No. 63R-713~ in accordance with City ~lanning Commission recom~nendations, as follows~ Delete Condition No. 5. Amending Condition No. 6 by making these reclassification proceedlngs contingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 643. ~ding Condition No. 7 to provide for development of subject property in accordance with revised plans marked Re- vision No. 2, Exhibits No. 1 through 5." MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-16, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-16 for adoption. Refer t° Resolution Book.