Loading...
1969/05/1369-277 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 6, 1969, 1:30 PoM. ADJOURNMENT: motion. ADJOURNED: Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-265 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Krein moved to adjourn; Councilman Pebley seconded the MOTION CARRIED. 2:30 P.M. City Clerk ]ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark COUNCILMEN: Pebley CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts SUPERINTENDENT OF PROPERTY MAINTENANCE: Rex Bruhns Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutton led the Assemb~ ~ in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS: The following Proclamations were issued by Mayor Clark and unanimously approved by the City Council: "National Insurance Women's Week" - May 18 - 24, 1969 "Service Station Week" - June 1 6, 1969 "Realtor Week" - May 18 - 24, 1969 "Police Officer Memorial Day" - May 15, 1969 "Salvation Army Week" - May 12 18, 1969 "Senior Citizens Month" - May, 1969 ~AIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - iNANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $501,600.66, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 68-69-51 AND VARIANCE NO. 2030: Request for rehearing submitted by Duayne C. Prescott, to consider additional information and evidence pertaining to petitions requesting a change in zone from R-A on Parcel A and R-3 with deed restrictions on Parcel B, to ~, .~i~ed R-3 on Parcels A and B, and also requesting waivers of maximum ouilding height, mini- mum building setback and maximum permitted number of main buildings per site, 69-278 Cit~ Hall~ Anahe~m_~ California -. C3UNCIL MINUTES - May 13~ 19697 1:30 PoM. to permit a 30-unit, one and two-story apartment complex on. property located or~ the east side of Loara Street, set, th of Orangewood Avenue. Public Hearing was held January 7, 1969, resulting in Resolution of Intent Nc. 69R-5 to z,:,ne R--3~ limited to single-story construction, Par- cel A, and Res31ution Nc,. 69R-6, granting ~ariance No. 2030, in part. (Par- ce] B z~ned R~3, limited by deed restrictio~s to single-story construction, per Reclassification Noo 58~59.~7, Ordinance No. 1338). Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts briefed the b£story of the sub- ject applications, noting that the City Planning Commi. ssion originally recommended approval as requested; however, the City Council denied the requested waiver of het:,~ 1. imitation. Mr. Richard Brooks, Architect, 4.50 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, addressed the City Council. He displayed a plot plan of the proposed de- ~zelopment2 noting the green open areas, the single-story, garden-type apart- ments on the rear portion of the property, and the two.-story units on the front p~rtion.. He distributed copies of an area map to the City Council, which i~.dicated the prpximity of the subject property to (a) Garden Grove City Limits; (b) single-family residences in the area; (c) other R-3 zoned property in the area. He noted that although the surrounding area da':eloped predominantly in single-family residences, the subject property, as well as the four other parcels immediately adjacent to the north and south, are 300 feet deep and are zoned f,~r R-3 development. Also noted were two R-3 par- cels directly across the street. He explained that upon learning of the height limitation within 150 feet of a single-family residence, he proceeded to plan the development in a manner which he felt would be appropriate to the surrounding uses and zoning and he pointed out se~:~ral features which he felt were desirable, such as circula, ti<~n, garage space, side setbacks~ and inner and outer pri- vacy provided by the island concept. He felt that the waiver of height iimitatio~ is technical~ in that only a portion, of one building falls with- in a 150-feet radius ,~f R-1 property. He noted that the 39.5% age received apprc>va. 1 of the City Planning Commission. He pc. inted ~ut that more coverage would resul;.t from development strictly in accordance with R-3 site development standards, and although deed restrictions on Parcel B may have been reasonable in 1958~ he now felt their proposal was a more logical development, and further noted the low profile of the buildings~ and the landscaped berm at the front of the pro- perty. He directed attention te the area maps which indicated the location of those who signed t:~e i~atJtJon supporting the proposed development, which he estimated were 98% of the pe~7~,~ in the immediate neighborhood, lYhere the word "Ne" is indicated on the map, he explained that these persons were not necessarily opposed to the development, but did not wish to sign the petition. In answer t~ Council questions, he indicated that only three of the pr~posed 2-story units within one building fall within 150 feet of R-1 property~ and thaC entry to the units will be off the court at the rear~ Mro Gese Fe]ling~ 2220 South Learn Street, one of the applicants, presented the petition in support of the project, purported to contain 69 signatures. He was of the opinion that the proposed development would en- hance the neighborhood, and felt that the larger units would attract older, more stable tenants. Mr~ Jack Rogoway, 2200 South Loara Street, manager of the apart- ment building directly no the north of subject property, addressed the Council in opposition, and requested the deed restrictic, ns limiting the density of the area be retained. He stated he was never contacted by the Applicant tg discuss whether the proposed development is compatible with the surr~unding area, ar~,! reported that h.e has talked to the residents directly behind the subject property, and they are opposed to the develop- me~t, as are several c~thers in tbe immediate area. He was of tbe opinion 2'79 :y Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 13~..1969~ 1:30 P.M. the mere submission of a petition by the Applicant was insufficient new evi- dence to warrant a re.-hearingo Mro Rogoway noted the existing of many ex- pensive homes in the area.~ the precedent which would be established if the request for two-story development is granted, the increase in traffic that would be generated by families with young adults, and the fact that there are no shopping facilities within walking distance, and presented photographs of the existing parking conditions on Loara Street. He further felt that by granting the waiver of minimum building setback, his units would be ob- scured from view, making it more difficult to obtain tenants, and noted that all of the existing R-3 developments were built in accordance with Code re- quirem.ents, and on the assumption all future developments in the immediate area would also be single-story construction° Mr. Rogoway pointed out that the applicant is requesti~g waiver of maximum permitted number of main buildings per site, and has compared his plan to a Planned Residential Development, however, he is not conform- ing to the Code requirements for this type of development, noting that two parking spaces per unit are required, which would be 22 more spaces than proposed° In his opinion, the applicant has made no effort to justify the variances requested, nor is he being denied a substantial property right enjoyed by others in the vicinity. In the ensuing Council discussion, it was noted by Councilman Dutton that the applicant proposes an R-3 development with certain amenities found in a planned residential development; and that any future applications for two-.story development in the area would also be considered in relationship to the 150-feet setback requirement° He pointed out that the proposed den- sity is considerably less than the maximum allowed under the R-3 Code. Councilman Schutte was of the'opinion that the requirement of 1-1/4 parking spaces per unit for apartment developments is sufficient. Mayor Clark and Councilman Krein observed that although the plans were very good, they felt one-story development would be more appropriate to the area° Mayor Clark asked if anyone else w~shed to present new and differ- ent information. Mro Charles Dominguez, 2221 South Loara Street, directly across from subject property, reported that a small shopping center is to be built in the near future at the northeast corner of Orangewood and Euclid, and noted the existence of two-story complexes to the south~ Mrs~ Ladonna Rhodes, 1599 Sim Place, reported that no one on Sim Place had beep approached by the Applicant; that she and her neighbors were opposed to the development of apartments in that area; however, if approved, felt mor~ parking should be provided. Mr~ Clyde Winslow, 2230 South Loara Street, felt the proposed de- velopment would be beneficial from his point of view, as his property adja- cent on the south, has been in the R-3 zone for several years. He felt that parkir~g is a problem only because people fail to utilize the off-street park- ing which is provided, and noted that there are cars parked in front of the single-family residences, also~ In rebuttal, Mr~ Broo~s stated that approval of the subject applica- tions would n~t precipitate other R-3 reclassification requests, as the remain- der of the area is static and will remain as presently zoned. He summarized the advantages offered by' the proposed design, and emphasized that the property owners in the immediate vicinity are in favor of the project. He stated that the parking could be increased by using a portion of the green belt area, but ~oted that the property' has 332 feet of street frontage which would provide additional parking~ The Mayor felt that a good cross section of the evidence had been presented~ and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION: Councilman Dutton offered a resolution for adoption, amending 69-280 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COb2qCIL MINUT!S - Maz_~3_~ i969~ 1:30 PoMo Resolution of Intent Noo 69R-5, Parcel A, by deleting Condition No. 5, (deed restrictions) and amending Cpndition No. 8 to require $75.00 per apartment ~nit for park and recreation p~Jrposes. Refer tc Resolution BCOko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl, OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MIINICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED~ (68~-69-51 - R-3). Roll Call V~te: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Schutte NOES~ COUNCILMEN: Krein and Clark ABSENT~ C ~ UNCILMEN: Pebley The City Clerk announced that the foregoing resolut~on failed to receive a majority vote~ On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Coun- cilman Dutton moved that decision on Reclassification No. 68-69-51 and Var- iance No. 2030 be continued to the meeting of May 27, 1969, at 1:30 P.M., for a full Council. Cc~ncJlman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. GENERAL PLAN AME. NDMENT NO~ 113: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, to consider an amendment to the General Plan, Circulation Element, Highway Rights- of~Way, to extend Sunkist Street southerly from Cerritos Avenue to Howell Ave- n~e, as a Secondary Highway; and to amend the Highway Rights-of-Way Map and Resolution N©~ 67R-376 to include that portion of Cerritos Avenue extending easterly from the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way to Douglas Road as an exception to s Secondary Highway. Approval in accordance with Exhibit A was recommended by the City ?lanning Commission and public hearing was held April 29, 1969, by the City Coancil and continued to this date to allow analysis of dedication require- ments .~n Cerritos Avenue as they affect an existing industrial complex° The Cit? Clerk noted correspondence from Alfred Fo Ricker, of Mutual Benefit Li~e Insura~e Compa~.~ r~questing further continuance to May 27~ ]9~9~ ,a moti~,p by Coo. ncilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Schutte, de- cision ,i~n Geperai Plan Amendment Noo 113 was continued to the meeting of May ~'7, 1969~ at 1~0 iP.M~, as requested. MOTION CARRIED. Mr~ Stuart Noble, 2526 Whidby Lane, noted that there were several interested persons present and felt that an announcement should have been made at the beginning of the meeting that the matter would be further con- tinued. Mayor Clark apologized fc~r the inconvenience and explained that there is no way t~ determine whether an item will be deferred until a vote is taken ~ the issue° R__EQUEST TO DISCUSS PROPOSED METROPORT: Mr. Noble stated that the majority of those is the audiepce were interested in Item No. 26, "discussion of the proposed Metroport~" and he felt they sh.o~ld not be expected to wait until that item ]s reached om the age,da~ The City Manager advised that the principals from Computer Centers, ]nc~ had not ~et arrived~ therefore, it would not be possible to consider Item No~ 26 at this time as requested. An unidentified woman in the audience requested that the number persons present be n~ted and their testimony heard at this time. The C~t? Att,'~rney advised that there is no public hearing scheduled t~da~ in conpectio, with a proposed metroport; that the matter to be consid- ered by the City Council is the presentatiop of a proposal to lease City- owned propertw if it is later determined by the City Council that the site u~der consideration is appropriate for ~i~ration of a metroport. He noted that only discussio~ relating to the terms of the proposed lease agreement would be in ._~rder at this meeting. 9-281 itl Hall~ Anaheim~ California .- COUNCIL MINUTES May 13~ 1969~ 1:30 P~M. In response to comments from the audience, Mr. Geisler noted that neither the advantages nor the disadvantages of the proposed metroport would be discussed today, and emphasized that the purpose for scheduling the item is to allow the presentation of the proposal; that a public hearing will be scheduled at a later date for the purpose of hearing evidence dealing with the propriety of establishing a metroport at the location under consideration° Mayor Clark assured the audience that a public hearing would be held on the proposed use of the property before any decision is made by the City Council on the lease agreement~ Mrs~ Lois Barke, 2022 Spruce, Orange~ reported that she was advised that it w<)uld be permissible to p~int out to tl.e City Coumcil certain areas of concern regarding the establishment of a metroport in the proposed loca- tion~ The City Attorney again noted that an interest in the terms of the proposed agreement by a taxpayer of the City of Anaheim would be an ap- propriate basis for discussion at this point; however~ public hearing is not being held on the desirability of the proposed land use. He felt that if th~,se who are concerned about the proposed use of the property would like to submit a list of their concerns that they wish considered at the public hear- ing~ they be invited to do so~ and they may also request at this time that the public hearing be scheduled as a night meeting; however, he would rule it improper for the Council to discuss the land use at this time° Mro Phillip Brauneis~ 400 South Loara Street, noted that the City has as yet received no official recognition from the Federal Aviation Adminis- tration regarding the prop©sed metroport site~ nor has the City Council made any official determinatien relatimg to the development of a metroport~ There- fore, he felt discussion cf any other subject than the proposed lease would not be germaine at this time~ UBLiC HEARING RECigSSiFiCATION NO~ 68-69.-81 AND VARIANCE NO. 2070: Submitted by Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, requestimg a change in zone from R-A a~d C--i t:, M-i~ and waivers ef structural setback from an arterial street and minim~m required front !~ndscaping adjacent to right-of-way line, to per- mit expansion of an existing r~n-conforming industrial development on property located on the s~th side of Ball Road~ east of Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution NOo PC69-75, recommended M-1 reclassification be denied, and C-1 reclassification be ap- proved, subject to the following conditions: lo That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engin- eering requirements :0f the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as curbs and gutters~ sidewalks~ street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be p~sted with the City to guarantee the installation of sa~d engineering requirements~ 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2~OO per front foot along Ball Road, for street lighting purposes. %~ That the owner ~;~ subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15c per front foot along Ball Road, for tree planting pur- poses° ~. That trash steerage areas shall be provided in accordance with appro~ed plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5~ That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department~ 6,, That a 6~fo:t masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and so~th property lines~ 7~ That any air-conditi~ming facilities proposed shall be properly shielded £r~m view, and tbe s~und shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes o 69-£82 ~ity Hall, Anahei~ California - COUNC.IL MINUTES - Ma~j~l_~969:1:30 iP.M. 8~ That any parking area lighting shall be lighted with down- lighting a maximum 6-feet in heigbt and shall be directed away from the property limes t~ protect the residential integrity of the area. 9~ That Condition N~so 1, 2, and 3, ab3ve mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such ~urther time as the City Council may grant. 10~ That Conditiop Ncs~ 4, 5, 6~ 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with pr~:.r ;_~ f~n.al building amd zoning inspections. The City Planning Commissioa, pursuant t~', Resolution No~ ~C69-76~ denied said Variance as requested on the basis that it is not required under the site development standards o~ the C-.1 zone recommended above; however, granted certain waivers of code provisions relative to walls, and non-conform- ing use of a nz~m--c~nforming building, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-81. 2~ That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-- cordance with plans and specifications un file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2o Mr~ Roberts described the location of subject property, and noted chat the applicant seeks to expand an e×isting facility; however, the Plann- ing C~pmmissi~n felt that the requested M-1 zoning would not be compatible with the existing C-R zoning and land use in the immediate area. Cooncilman Schutte left the Council Chambers, (3:00 P.M.). Mr~ Davis Taylor, Applicant, addressed the City Council, and ex- plained that the purpose for requesting the change in zone is to replace an existing 48,000~square~foot sheet metal structure with a 72,OD9-square foot aggregate building which, he felt, would enhance the area. He submitted pb~tographs of the existing structure, and displayed an architectural render- Jng of the proposed addition. He noted that 83% of the property in the area ~s undeveloped at the present time, and that the existing Commercial-Recrea- :i~mal uses were taken into consideration in the des~n of the proposed struc- ture, noting that loading wodld be confined to the rear of the property, and the front of the building would reflect the design of a retail outlet, which is a portion of the operation~ He explained that the lending commitment is contingent upon M-1 zoning~ and was doubtful whether the loan would be sufficient to make the improvement ~n the basis of a non-conforming use. He noted that the opera- ti.op has existed in that locati~n for twenty years, long before the area was annexed t~ the City of Anaheim; that there was no opposition to the pro- posed development. In answer to Council questions, Mr. Taylor stated there is very little demand for Commercial land at present, and the company received no c~ffers during the 6 months the property was listed for sale. Further, the expense of moving would be prohibitive. He stated that the churches in the vicinity have ~o ~3bjection to the proposed development, and noted that the c~>mpan~'s parking f'acJlities ar~ quite often used by one of the churches dur- ing Sunday services. He pointed out that a six-foot block wall is proposed across the rea~ property line, adjacent to property he felt would be eventually zoned for R-3 development. Mayor Clark asked if anyone wished tc address tbe Council in oppo- (Councilman Schutte returned to the CouDcil Chambers, 3:10 P.M.). Mr~ Edward Warmington~ a partner in Brookmere Properties, stated that a!tb~nogh he c~pposed the present land use, he would rather see the sheet mctel structure replaced as proposed tha~ remain in the present state. He n~ted there are schools and churches ~earby~ 8nd felt that R-3 zoning would be more appr~priate since there are many children in the area. 283 y Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Mayor Clark asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. The City Attorney advised that the recommendation of the City Planning Commission for C-1 zoning could not be acted upon without first denying the sub- ject application and by motion directing the Planning Commission to initiate an application for reclassification to the C-1 zone. He further advised that if the City Council wishes to permit the use requested, it would be more logical to grant the reclassification as requested by the Applicant. The City Manager noted that although the existing operation has been compatible to the area, the City Council and the Applicant must be fully aware that if M-1 zoning is approved, the full range of uses allowed under this zone, some cf which may be undesirable, could be carried on without any further appli- cation. On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Schutte moved that decision on Reclassification No. 68-69-81 and Variance No. 2070 be contin- ued to the meeting of May 27, 1969, at 1:30 P.M., to allow further study and recommendations regarding the proper zoning vehicle for the intended use, and possible list of acceptable M-1 uses. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. LIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-82: Initiated by the City Planning Com- mission to consider a change in zone from County A1 to R-A, on property located at the northwest corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road, the easterly half thereof further described as Ball-Sunkist Annexation No. 2. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-78, recom- mended said Reclassification be approved, unconditionally, effective upon the com- pletion of annexation proceedings of each parcel to the City of Anaheim. Mr. Roberts described the location of the subject property, which was noted to be approximately twenty acres in size, and outlined the basis for the City Planning Commission recommendations. Mayor Clark asked if anyone present wished to address the City Council; hearing no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-266: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-266 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUT~D~,~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT T~iE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-82 - R-A). Roil Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILlv[EN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMBN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-266 duly passed and adopted. LIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NOo 69-2A: Public Hearing was held on proposed aban- donment of a former Anaheim Union Water Company right-of-way for irrigation purposes, reserving an easement for public utility purposes; requested by Hazel Mo Rock; property located approximately 650 feet south of South Street, r~nning westerly from East Street, pursuant to Resolution No. 69R-267 duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. Mayor Clark asked if anyone present wished to address the City Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 69-284 .City Hall) Anaheim) California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13~ 1969) 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-267: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 69R-267 for adoption, approving said abandonment subject to reservation of an ease- ment for public utility purposes. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A FORMER ANAHEIM UNION WATER COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF A DITCH FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF WATER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES OVER, UNDER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY. (69-2A), Roll Cai1 Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-267 duly passed and adopted. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION: Correspondence from Carl A. Benscoter, President of Air California, requesting support of their application before the Public Utilities Commission to establish direct airline service between ~range County and Sacramento, was submitted. Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council support the request of Air California to permit scheduled, direct airline service between Orange County and Sacramento at the earliest possible date. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - WEST STREET AND SANTA ANA FREEWAY: Request of Mr. Frank Hutchi- son, of Royal Coach Inns, for temporary waiver of sidewalk requirements on the parcel of land bounded by the Santa Ana Freeway, West Street and Ball Road was submitted. On the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that a temporary sidewalk waiver be granted on West Street and the Freeway off-ramp, subject to the condition that no permanent planting or permanent-type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalk; and that request for temporary sidewalk waiver on Ball Road be de- nied. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMITS: The following applications were submitted and granted sub- ject to provisions of Chapter 4o16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recom- mended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Coumcilman Krein~ a~ Application filed by Eduardo Negrete for permit to conduct public dance May 18, 1969, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue. b~ Application filed by Frances B. Gonzales on behalf of Socie- dad Nacional Mexicana #1, for permit to conduct public dance May 25, 1969, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West V~rmont Avenue. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS~ Actions ~a~en ~y h~e City Planning Commission at their me~ting held April 21, 1969, pertaining to the following applica- tions~ were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NOo 2074: Submitted by the Anaheim Hotel Company, requesting the cor~structicn of two free-standing signs on subject property with waiver of location of free-~.standing signs from abutting property and minimum distance of a free=standing sign from a roof sign. R-A zoned property located north o~ Freedman Way and east of Harbor Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-84, granted said Variance, sut~j.~t to one condition. No action was taken by the City Council. ,9-285 :ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 1107: Submitted by L. Kenneth Heuler, et al, to establish a 120-bed rest home with waivers of maximum structural height within 300 feet of a single-family residential zone, minimum driveway width, and minimum vertical clearance over driveway, on R-A zoned property located on the north side of La Palmm Avenue, east of Euclid Street, (Reclassifica- tion Noo 66-67-65)° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-80, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. The foregoing action was reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken. Councilman Krein requested the record to show that he did not participate in the discussion or vote on this issue. VARIANCE NO~ 1890: Submitted by Lo Kenneth and Edith F. Heuler and G. Barton and Margaret Do Heuler, requesting the construction of a 6-story medical-office building on R-A zoned property located on the north side of La Palma Avenue, east of Euclid Street, The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-92, terminated said Variance~ RESOLUTION NO. 69R-268: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-268 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESO~UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIAiNCE NO. 1890 A/qD DECLARING RESOLUTION NOo 67R-452 NULL AND VOIDo Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte and Clark None Krein Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-268 duly passed and adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 1110: Submitted by Maurice B. Dillow, to estab- lish retail distribution of tires, appliances and furniture to employees of the sorrcunding industrial facilities, with waivers of minimum site area for retail service center in the industrial zone, and number of required parking spaces for retail commercial uses, on M-1 zoned property; located on the west side of Fountain Way, north of La Palma Avenue, and further des- cribed as 1159 Fountain Way° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-85, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by Councilman Dutton, and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council. ENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO° 6733: Developer - W.I.R. Developers, Incorporated; tract located on the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, east of the center- line of Highland Avenue, and containing 97 proposed R-2, 5,000 zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said Tentative Tract Map was continued to be considered in conjunction with Reclassi- fication NOo 68-69-26° MOTION CARRIED. RANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 6244: Council consideration of Orange County Use Variance Nco 6244 was continued from the meeting of May 6, 1969, to this date at the request of Attorney Harry Kniselyo (The City Planning Commission recom- mended denial of said application.) 69-286 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Mro Kmisely addressed the City Council, and submitted maps de- picting the location of the subject property in relation to the proposed Orange Freeway to the west, agricultural preserves to the north and west, the Santa Aha River Channel to the east, and the Phoenix Club to the south. He pointed out that the parcel is isolated from other industrial properties; that the agricultural preserve will not be developed for industrial use for at least ten years; that the subject property is not being used for indus- trial purposes at present~ and the primary' question was whether there is such a shortage of industrial land to warrant reserving this property for such use, or whether certain areas should be given relief. He called attention to the fact that property on the south side of Ball Road was recently reclassified to the R-3 zone; and noted there is a 28-year supply of industrial property, and holding property for many years could create a financial hardship to the owner. He thereupon requested the City Council recommend approval to the Orange County Planning Commission, perhaps limiting the use for a period of 20 or 25 years if the City Council felt a time limit should be established. In the discussion which followed, it was noted that a reappraisal of the particular parcel may be warranted; however, if subject request is approved a precedent would be established for applications from property within the agricultural preserve. Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that such developments should be in residential areas, and Mr. Knisely agreed that in most instances subject developments are in residential areas; how- ever, he noted the existing shopping center close by, and reported additional commercial development was anticipated to the north of the subject property. Councilmen Schutte and Clark felt that the requested use would be acceptable if limited to 20 years. At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was moved by Council- man Krein and seconded by Councilman Dutton that the recommendation of the City Planning Commission urging denial be sustained and forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. The foregoing motion failed to carry by the following Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley RESOLUTION NOo 69R-269 - WORK ORDER NO. 426-297: In accordance with recommenda- - tions of the ~~~, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-269 t~ for adoption~ / Director of Public Works Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR AND EQUIPMENT TO CUT AND REMOVE ALL RANK GROWTH AND WEEDS AND REMOVE RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UPON ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY OR ANY PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO~ 426-297~ (Commercial Lot Cleaning, Inco- $26,468.50). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-269 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-270 ~ WORK ORDER NO. 557-B: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 69R-270 for adoptien. Refer to Resolution Book. 9-287 ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF KATELLA AVENUE AND WALNUT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 557B. R.J. Noble Company°) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley Schutte and Clark The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-270 duly passed and adopted. EEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nos. 69R-271 to 69R-273, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-271: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~!~HEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Raymond Jo and Thelma R. Dixon). RESOL'UTION NO~ 69R-272: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Palmall Properties, Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 69R-273: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~AHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Hartman Corporation). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 69R-271 to 69R-273, both inclu- sive, duly passed and adopted. ROPOSED LITIGATION - ASPHALTIC PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CASE: Deputy City Attorney Alan Watts reported on proposed anti-trust litigation against certain manu- facturers of asphaltic petroleum products used in road building and road maintenance, and recommended that the City Council authorize participation in said litigation. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-274: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-274 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. AUTHORIZING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA TO CONDUCT LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R~274 duly passed and adopted. 69-288 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mm~ 13, 1969, 1:30 P.M. CLAIM A~AINST THE CITY~ Claim submitted by Mrs~ EoMo McLaughlin, Sro, for per- sonal property damages purportedly sustained on or about April 1, 1969, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney and referred to the insur- ance agent oH motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte~ MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NOo 69R-275: Councilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 69R-275 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY TO RELOCATE AND RECONSTRUCT iTS RAILROAD TRACK LOCATED IN COMMERCIAL STREET BETWEEN PATT STREET AND LEMON STREET. R~>ll Call Vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN: NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-275 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE~ The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a~ Resolution - 1969 Grand Jury - regarding position expressed by Assemblyman John V. Briggs pertaining to legislation affecting Orange County, bo City of Brea - A statement concerning the proposed airport in Brea. c. Anaheim Public Library Board - Minutes for the meeting held March 17, 1969o do Building Division Report for the month of April, 1969. MOTION CARRIED° ORDINANCE NOo 2679: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2679 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.40 OF. THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 3.40.070 THERETO, RELATING TO PRODUCERS OF SHOWS, EVENTS, PRODUCTIONS OR EXHIBITS AND THE OPERATORS OF BOOTHS OR EXHIBITS THEREIN, AND ESTABLISHING THE LICENSE FEES THEREFOR° Roll Call Vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NGES~ COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2679 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO° 2680~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2680 for adoption° Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66-67-59 - R-3). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2680 duly passed and adopted. Hail, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma.¥. ]'3~ 1969, 1:30 INANCE NOn 2681~ Councilman Clark offered Ordinance Nc. 2681 for adoption° Refer to Ordinance Book~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MI~ICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (65-66-24(9) - M-l). Roll Call Vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Cl. ark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT~ COUNCIL~N~ Pebley The Mayor declared Ordinance No~ 2681 duly passed and adopted. N_ANCE NO. 2682: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2682 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (68-69-57 - C-l). Roll Call Vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Pebley The Mayor declared Ordinance No~ 2682 duly passed and adopted. NANCE NO° 2683~ Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2683 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14~32.190, PARAGRAPH 23 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING° (Crescent Avenue) ~NCE NO. 268&: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2684 for first reading° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ML~ICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66-67-61(28) - C-R). DLiC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were pre- sented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information: a~ Application submitted by Kenneth David Teel for Original On- Sale Beer and Wine (Bona Fide Eating Place) for L~Scene, 1721 South Manches- ter Avenue, R~A Zone~ (Conditional Use Permit No. 1063). bo Application submitted by Edmund Milton Savidge for On-Sale Beer, Person-to-Ferson Transfer, for The Gold Room, at 508 South Knott Avenue, C-1 Zone, (Conditional Use Permit Noo 776). Nc Council action was taken on the above applications. S: Councilman Krein moved for a ten-minute recess. Councilman Dutton second- ed the motion° MOTION CARRIED° (3~50 P.M.)o ..RECESS: Mayor Clark called the meeting to order, all members of the City %ouncil being present, with the exception of Councilman Pebley. ~ER CENTERS, INCo- PROPOSED LEASE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY - METROPORT: The ]ity Clerk reported receipt of a written request from Mr. Dale Jensen to ad- tress the City Council with regard to land use, in connection with the pro~- ~osed Metroporto 69-290 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13, 1969~ 1:30 P.M: Mayor Clark announced that the purpose of scheduling the proposed Metroport on the Council agenda was to receive a letter of intent to lease City-owned property; that the presentation of this proposal would be no in,- dication of approval or denial on the part of the City Council of the pro- posed use cf the land~ that it is primarily the purpose of making the in- formation public and placing the matter under study~ Subsequently, public hearings will be held, at which time anyone who is in favor of or opposed te the proposed Metroport can be heard° He noted that public hearing would first be held by the City Planning Commission, who would then make a recom= mendation to be considered by the City Council at their public hearing, and thereupon invited those present to submit a list of items of concern, as suggested by the City Attorney, to be considered at the public hearing° Mr. Robert So Barnes, representing Commuter Centers, Inco, pre-~ sented a letter of intent to the City Council setting forth the terms and conditions upon which Commuter Centers, Inc~, will enter into a firm agree- ment with the City of Anaheim to develop and operate a metroport in the City of Anaheim, accompanied by exhibits of the proposed lease area and a schedule of projected income to the City° He concurred with the Mayor's statement that this would not be the proper time tc discuss the merits of a metroport operation; however, he would answer any questions the City Council might have relative to the terms of the proposed agreement° Council expressed the desire to place the letter of intent under study, and had no questions of the representative of Commuter Centers, Inc., at this time, It was suggested by the City Manager that should the City Council wish to proceed, initiation of a Conditional Use Permit to permit the es- tablishment of a metroport on the property designated in Exhibit "A" would be in order, so that the City Planning Commission may commence necessary proceedings and set the date for public hearing before that body. He pointed cut that although the City Council has firmly indicated its intent to hear evidence, by law a public hearing on a conditional use permit is not re- quired by the City Council unless an appeal is filed or action taken by the City Planning Commission or a review is ordered by the City Council° On recommendation of the City Manager, it was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton that the City Council authorize the initiation cf a Conditional Use Permit for the land use proposed in the letter of intent by Commuter Centers, Inc., on property generally described in Exhibit "A", and that action taken by the City Planning Commission will be reviewed at a public hearing before the City Council. MOTION GARRIED. Mayor Clark asked if those present wished to submit, for the rec- ord, a list of items of concern° Mro Larry Noggle, 2608 Palais Road, Anaheim, stated that he has a list, but does not wish to submit it at this time; however, he requested that he be furnished with a copy of the letter of intent submitted by Com- muter Centers, Inco Mrs° Lois Barke, 2022 Spruce, Orange, began reading from a list of objections to the proposed metroport, claiming it would be distracting and hazardous to homes in the area° It was ruled by the City Attorney that these statements are argu- ments concerning land use and out of order at this time, Councilman Schutte left the Council Chambers, 4:15 P.M. Mr. Dale Jensen, 2018 Janette Lane, Anaheim, referred to his let- ter dated January 2, 1969, requesting permission to address the City Council in regard to the proposed metroport, and a reply from the City Clerk which indicated ~he would be given an opportunity to speak at this meeting. 69-291 City Hall, Anahefm, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13, 1969, 1~30 P~Mo It was noted by the City Council that his letter from the City Clerk indicated only that his request would be scheduled, and that it has been determined that the proper time to present evidence would be at the public hearing on the conditional use permit° It was again explained by the City Attorney that only evidence pertaining to the terms of the proposed lease would be appropriate at this time; that it would be improper for the City Council to hold a pre-hearing on the question of land use° Mr° Jensen then requested that the City Council consider the pro- posal with respect to the safety of the operation in the proposed location; the noise factor; and the necessity of such a facility° Regarding notice, Mr. Geisler indicated that the public hearing would be advertised as required by law, in the same manner as all others, which includes publishing in the newspaper and posting the property, and noted that as a courtesy it is the policy of the City to notify by letter the owners of property' within 300 feet of the subject property. He also advised that this information could be obtained through a telephone call to the Planning Department° At the conclusion of Council discussion, and on recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton moved that the letter of intent be re- ceived and referred to the Administrative Staff for analysis and recommen- dations. Councilman Krein seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NO° 69R-276: Councilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 69R-276 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU- TION NO. 63R-910 AMENDING. PERSONNEL RULE #3 COMPENSATION° Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Clark None Schutte and Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No'° 69R-276 duly passed and adopted. ..REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF BUSINESS LICENSE FEE: Request of the Anaheim Firemen's Benevolent Association for waiver of business license fees in connection with the Rudy Brothers Circus, May 15 and 16, 1969, was reconsidered on the basis of new information submitted° On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that said request be granted, in accordance with Council Policy No. 305. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 2ARROUSEL OF ANAHEIM: The City Manager reported that the total cost to the City for the 1969 "Carrousel of Anaheim" was $9,591.36, exclusive of cost of ad- ministrative time, materials and supplies, rental of equipment owned by the City or charge for rental° The City Clerk read letter dated May 13, 1969, from Mrs. Ruth Salaets, thanking the City on behalf of the Women's Division, Anaheim Cham- ber of Commerce, for providing the facilities of the Anaheim Convention Cen- ter for the 1969 event° ~OTING EQUIPMENT - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On report of the Property Maintenance Superintendent, Rex Bruhns, Councilman Krein moved to authorize the installation of electric voting equipment in the Council Cham- bers at an estimated cost of $600°00, and further authorize a transfer of funds thereof from the Council Contingency Fund to Account No. ]09-442-937- 01~ Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. 69-292 City HailI Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13~ 1969, 1:30 P~Mo REQUEST .. WEST ORANGE COUNTY WATER BOARD~ The City Manager reported on request received from the West Orange County Water Board for support of their po- sition opposing use of funds cf the Orange County Municipal Water District ~or construction cf storage facilities which would not be beneficial to all entities of said district° On recommendation of the City Manager, no Council action was taken at this time, and the City's representative, Mro Lenain, was requested to keep the City Council informed on future action and deliberations on the subject° ANAHEIM JITNEY SYSTEMS~ INC~ - INSURANCE~ It was reported by the City Manager that in connection with the lapse of insurance coverage required under the temporary permit of Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc., a certificate of insur- ance has been received and forwarded to the City Attorney for approvals Should it be found that the coverage is not sufficient, it would be the City's obligation to immediately order suspension of operations~ ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn° Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIEDo ADJOURNED: 5:00 P.M. SIGNED City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark COUNCILMEN: Pebley ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend A.N. Ramey, of Calvary Baptist Church, gave the In- vocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. COUNCIL RECOGNITION EDWARD T. MECK: The City Council unanimously adopted a Commendation of Edward T. Meck, Director of Publicity, Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom, for his outstanding contributions to the City of Anaheim. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held on April 22 and 23, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.