Loading...
1969/05/2069-292 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 13, 1969, '1:30 P~Mo REQUEST '~ WEST ORANGE COUNTY WATER BOARD: The City Manager reported on request received from the West Orange County Water Board for support of their po- sition opposing use of funds cf the Orange County Municipal Water District for construction of storage facilities which would not be beneficial to all entities of said district° On recommendation of the City Manager, no Council action was taken at this time, and the City's representative, Mr~ Lenain, was requested to keep the City Council informed on future action and deliberations on the subject° ANAHEIM JITNEY SYSTEMS~ INCo - INSUR~CE~ It was reported by the City Manager that in connection with the lapse of insurance coverage required under the temporary permit of Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc., a certificate ef insur- ance has been received and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval° Should it be found that the c~verage is not sufficient, it would be the City's obligation to immediately order suspension of operations° ADJOURNMENT~ Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Clark seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED° ADJOURNED: 5:00 P.Mo City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20, 1969, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark COUNCILMEN: Pebley ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend AoN. Ramey, of Calvary Baptist Church, gave the In- vocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. COUNCIL RECOGNITION EDWARD T. MECK: The City Council unanimously adopted a Commendation of Edward T. Meck, Director of Publicity, Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom, for his outstanding contributions to the City of Anaheim. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held on April 22 and 23, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. -293 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 2.0~ 1969~ .1:30 P.M. ]VER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution° Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED~ 'ORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,211,964o35, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approved. ;LIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 68-69-79 AND VARIANCE NO. 2066: Submitted by~ Decon Corporation, requesting a change in zone from R-2 to R-3, with waivers of minimum distance between buildings and minimum distance between parallel walls of the same building~ living units located within 200 feet of a standard street, number of required covered parking spaces, permitted number of main structures on a site, parking space location, structural setback from a local street, and building site area. per dwelling unit, to establish a one and two- story, 122-unit apartment complex° Property generally located west of the Riverside and Newport Freeways~ east of the terminus of Santa Aha Canyon Road. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-81, recommended that said reclassification be disapproved, and granted said var- iance, pursuant to Resolution Noo PC69-82, subject to the following condi- tions: iD That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim an easement for road and public utility purposes over the easterly 54 feet of subject property for the extension of Santa Ann Canyon Road. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engin- eering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Santa Aha Canyon Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks~ street grading and paving, drainage facili- ties, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on fi~ in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satis- factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements° 3. That the alignment of the easterly line of subject property, where adjacent to the Newport and Riverside Freeways, shall be approved by the State Division of Highways° 4o Tbmt street lighting facilities shall be installed along Santa Aha Canyon Road in accordance with the requirements of the Director of Public Utilities. 5. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed on the east side of Santa Ann Canyon Road. Plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superinten- dent of Parkway Maintenance~ Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 6~ That Santa Aha Canyon Road shall be developed as a 40-foot road- way with a 7-foot concrete sidewalk on the west side, and a 7-foot landscaped parkway on the east side. 7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a man- ner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer~ 8. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 9. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 10o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property line adjacent to the existing single-family residential tract, and along the north property line, except at the terminus of the proposed street; said wall shall be a maximum of 42 inches in height within the front setback. 11~ That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes~ 12o That any parking area lighting shall be lighted with down-light- ing a maximum 6-feet in height and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area~ 13, That Condition Nos° 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with within a period cf 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant~ 69-294 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 209 1969~ 1:30 P.M~ 14~ That Condition Nos~ A, 5, 6, 7~ 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspec- tions. 15o That the owner ~,f subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees of $75.00 per dwelling unit, as required by City Council resolution~ which shall be used for park and recreation pur- poses~ said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 16~ That subject pr~perty shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Ne. 1~ Revision No. 1, 2~ 3, and 4. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts described the location of the subject property and reported that the City Planning Commission originally felt the request to be appropriate, except that it would allow a density slightly higher than that permitted under the present zoning, which could be detrimental to the R-1 subdivision to the west. It was therefore felt that by including an additional waiver of minimum building site area per dwelling unit, under the variance application, development under the exist- ing zoning would be possible~ He noted that all two-story construction will be at least 150 feet away from the R-1 subdivision. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Coun- oil. Mr~ William Jo Richardson, of Decon Corporation, indicated there was no objection to the recommendation of the City Planning Commission, as it would permit development in accordance with the plans submitted. He noted that the location of the street had been changed, at the request of the Plann- ing Department, to provide a greater buffer from the R-1 development, and also to provide circulation to the State-owned parcel to the south. Mayor Clark asked if anyone else wished toaddress the City Council. Mr. Roy Vandewarker~ 206 Merrimac Drive, stated he is not opposed to the City Planning Commission recommendation~ but he is opposed to R-3 zoning as requested on the subject property. He also requested and received clarification of the block wall requirement set forth in the conditions. Mr~ Dick Fox~ 206 North Kennebec Drive, also concurred with the City Planning Commission recommendations, but opposed R-3 zoning on the basis that many children reside in the area~ He stated he had no objection to the var- iances requested~ Mayor Clark asked if anyone else present wished to address the City Council; receiving no response he thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOs 69R-277: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-277 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 68-69-79, as recommended by the City Planning Commission~ Re~er to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (68-69-79)~ Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUN¢ILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-277 duly passed and adopted° RESOLUTION NO. 69R~278: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-278 for adoptiono granting Variance No. 2066, subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution BOOks ~-295 .ty Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2066. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-278 duly passed and adopted. IBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-83: Submitted by Venie Daniels Kneip, requesting a change in zone from R-2 to C-l, to establish a convenience mar- ket. Property located at the northeast corner of East Street and Santa Ana Street° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-89, recommended said reclassification be disapproved° The City Clerk noted receipt of a copy of a petition filed with the City Planning Commission containing 8 signatures in opposition to the subject reclassification° Mr. Roberts described the location of the parcel which consists of three combined lots, and noted that an identical request was submitted to the City Council several months ago, (Reclassification No. 68-69-46), and was de- nied on the basis that no specific plans for development were submitted. He reported that Petitioner proposes development of a 7-11 Convenience Market on a portion of the property, but there are no plans for development of the remainder of the property° Since requested development does not conform to the General Plan, and there have been no changes in land use in the immediate area, it was recommended that the request be denied. In answer to Council questions Mr. Roberts noted that plans indi- cate the market is to be located on the southerly portion of the property; and that the General Plan designates Low-Medium Residential Density for that general area.. Mr. Jim Kemmis, Agent for the Applicant, reported that the present buyer cannot definitely state who will be the tenants, other than the 7-11 Market, but can show the precise layout of the proposed shops. He stated that the homes on the property are deteriorating rapidly and the occupants are aged and no longer wish to reside on s~ch a heavily-traveled street. Plans were submitted and reviewed by the City Council. Mrs. Venie Daniels Kneip, Applicant, stated she lives on subject property, and that conditions are as Mro Kemmis described and she wishes to sell the property so that she can move° She felt that a market was needed, as the only other store in the area is the liquor store which is located 3 blocks away'. Mr. Robert Beadle, representing the Southland Corporation, the prospective buyer, stated that if the application is approved his company proposed to build a 7-11 Store, similar in operation to others in the area, but of improved architectural design° He noted results of surveys taken in the area which indicates there is a need for the proposed operation, and he felt this was the highest and best use for the subject property. He estimated that the operation would gross approximately $200,000.00 to $250,000.00 per year, after the fifth year. Mrs Beadle noted that the plans have been modified in accordance with all suggestions and recommendations made by the Building Department, and stated that no lease commitments for the balance of the property could be obtained until zoning is approved. Mayor Clark asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; hearing no response, he thereupon declared the hearing closed. 69-296 Ci__t~__~ Anaheim~t~ornia -__~Z,b~C~L Mi.NUT.ES f_Maz. 20,._j~q~9 i:30 lO,M__. Councilman 5chutte f~lt that the pr~perty would eventually be zoned for the use proposed, a~d Mayor Clark indicated he would favor ap- proval of the applicatio~ if developed in accordance with the plans sub- mitted Councilman Krein felt that in the absence of any definite plans for the other shops the balance of the de~:eL~pment may not take place for many years, Mr. Kemmis indicated that the entire parcel, would be developed simultaneously~ Counctlman Krein was ~en ct the opinion that the application should be approved, with that stipulation~ Councilman Dutton felt that the proposed land use is reasonable, since the three lots have been assembled, however, he did not feel it would be fair to require simultaneous development as it is a restriction that is not placedon other applications. Mr, Roberts suggested that should the Council consider the ap- plication favorably, clarification be made whether it is approved subject to development in accordance with revised plans just submitted, or in ac- cordanc:e with C-.1 Site Development Standards, as the new plans have not been reviewed by the Staff~ RESOLUTION NO. 691:t ~]79: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-279 for adoption, auttu.rizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, suoject to the following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee~ and further subject to the condition that development of the entire site be in accordance with C-1 Site Development Standards and be commenced simultaneously: (1) That the ownerr(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 40 feet on East Street, 30 feet on Santa Ana Street, including a 15-foot radius centerline corner return, for street widening purposes. (2) That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along East Street and Santa Aha Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as re- quired by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and spe- cifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. (3) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front, foot along East Street, for tree plant- ing purposes. (4) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. (5) That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and north property lines (6) That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes, (7) That any park£~g area lighting shall be lighted with down- lighting a maximum 6-feet fn height and shall be directed away from the property li~tes to protect the residential integrity of the area. (8) That Condition Nos, 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant, (9) That Condition Nos. A, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections° Councilmart Dutton requested the record to show that he did not. agree with the condition requiriug simultaneous development, for reasons stated above; however, he would vote affirmatively to grant the requested zoning~ . Refer to Resolution Book. i9-297 .]ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (6s-69-s3 - c-1)~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-279 duly passed and adopted. ~UBLIC HEARINC - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69~84 AND VARIANCE NO. 2075~ (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6931): Submitted by Albert S. Toussau, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-is with waivers of minimum lot width, minimum lot width on a cul-de- sac, minimum front setback, and minimum lot size, to establish a single-family residential subdivision~ Property located on the east side of Sunkist Street, north of Ball Road~ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-87, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject ':o the following con- ditions~ ~. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2~ That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees of $125.00 for each dwelling unit, as re- quired by City Council resolution, which shall be used for park and recrea- tion purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is is- sued. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-88, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1o That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classifJ~::ation Nc~ 68-69-84~ 2~ That snbject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 10 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7~ Mr. Thompson noted the location of the 8-acre subject parcel, des- cribed the existing uses and zoning in thc immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Ma~or Clark asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative reply~ He then asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to the subject proposal, receiving no response, he thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-280: Councilman Krein offered Resolution NOo 69R-280 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI'L OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND T'IJAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CItANGED. (68-69-84 - R~i)o Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The M~yor declared Resolution No. 69R-280 duly passed and adopted. 69-298 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969~ 1:30 PoM. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-281: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-281 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2975~ subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Restriction Beoko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO~ 2075° Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILM~N: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILM~N: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark' None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-281 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NOo 6931: Developer - Sunrise Homes, Adam Gittelson; tract located on the east side of Sunkist Street, north of Ball Road, and containing 35 proposed R-1 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held April 21, 1969, approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions: 1o That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval° 2o That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6931 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68-69-84 and Variance No. 2075~ 3~ That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the west property line separating Lot Nos. 1, 2, 3, 33~ 34, 35, and Sunkist Street, except that corner Lot Nos. 1 and 35 shall be stepped down to a height of thirty inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right-of-way line of an arterial high- way° Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be in- stalled in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Fol- lowing installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 4o That streets "A", "C", and "D" shall be recorded as Hilda Street, Alki Street and Hilda Street. 5o That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities~ 6o That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of Hilda Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. C©uncilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract NOo 6931 be ap- proved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission° Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 68-69-87 AND VARIANCE NO. 2078: Submitted by John Wo and Mildred Seapy, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-2, with waivers of minimum lot width, minimum setback from an interior lot lime, required screening of parking facilities from adjacent street, minimum lot area~ and minimum lot width, to establish a multiple-family residential subdivision. Property located on the north side of Pearl Street, west of West Street~ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Noo PC69-90, recommended that said reclassification be approved, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1~ That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder° 2~ That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees of $75.00 per dwelling unit, as required '-299 ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M~ by City Council resolution, which shall be used for park and recreation pur- poses, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 3o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west, north and east property lines, where adjacent to single-family residential properties, prior to final building inspection~ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-91, granted said variance in part, as follows: Granting requested waivers of minimum lot width and required screening of parking facilities from adjac- ent street, as requested; granting waiver of minimum setback from an interior lot line in part, to permit the requested deviations from Code-required set- backs from interior lot ~ne~,except for the required setbacks along the north boundary (Lot Nos~ 4 and 5 of Tract NOo 6819), which shall be in conformance with minimum standards specified in the R-2 zone; and denying waivers of mini- mum lot area and minimum lot width~ said variance to be subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1~ That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification NOo 68-69-87. 2. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Pearl Street and the new street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with stand- ard plans amd specifications on file in. the office of the City Engineer. 3. That Con. dition No. 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12; provided that the structural setbacks along the north boundary of subject property (Lot Nos. 4 and 5 of Tract Noo 6819) shall be in conformance with minimum standards specified in the R-2, Zone. Mr. Roberts indicated the location of the subject property and briefed the findings of the City Planning Commission, noting that the proposed R-2 zon- ing was felt to be appropriate as a transition from single-family to R-3 land use; however, there was concern that the small parcel proposed to remain in the R-A zone would be held for a more intense land use in the future. It was for this reason that the entire area was advertised and recommended to the City Council for R-2 zoning. It was noted that the requested waivers of minimum lot area and minimum lot width were no longer necessary if the application is approved as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Mr. Robert Mc Michael, 469-A West Valencia, Fullerton, Agent for the Applicant, stated that he concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, but requested clarification regarding the waiver of mini- mum setback from an interior lot iine, which, was granted in part. Mr. Roberts advised that the portion which was denied applied only to the small parcel requested to remain in the R-A zone. In answer to Council questions Mro Roberts indicated that the ori- ginal plan submitted would require waiver of sideyard setback on two lots abutting C-O property~ however, revised plans were subsequently submitted, conforming to the Site Development Standards. Mayor Clark asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, and receiving no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-282: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-282 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to ResoIution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-87 - R-2)o 69-300 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma~ 20~ ]969~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vcte: AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-282 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-283: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution NOo 69R-283 for adoption, granting Variance Noo 2078 ~ part, as re¢omme~d~ b~ t~ ~ity Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2078. Rell Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILM~N: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-283 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 6819: Developer - J.W. Mc Michael Company, tract located on the north side of Pearl Street, west of Carleton Avenue, contain- ing 10 proposed R-2 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held April 21, 1969, approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval~ 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract Noo 6819 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68-69-87 and Var- iance No. 2078. 3. That the new street shall be recorded as Dwyer Place. 4~ That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6819 be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2072: Submitted by Forest Lawn Cemetery Associa- tion, to establish two free-standing signs and one roof sign with waivers of required distance of a free-standing sign from a roof sign, maximum height of a free-standing sign within 300 feet of a residential structure, maximum area of a free-standing sign, maximum height of a roof sign within 300 feet of a residential structure, and maximum height of a roof sign from a roof. Property located at the southeast corner of Sta~ C~-'~lege Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue, further described as the East Anaheim Shopping Center, in the C-1Zone~ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-72, denied said variance~ A?peal from action taken by the City Planning Com- mission was filed by the Applicant, and public hearing scheduled this date. Mro Roberts described the location of the subject property and noted that the applicant has withdrawn the request for waiver of maximum height of a roof sign from a roof, and that revised plans have been sub- mitted since the Planning Commission p~'~]ic hearing, reducing the height of the proposed signs to 38 feet, and the area to 458 square feet. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant was present and wished to ad- dress the City Council. -301 ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. Mro James Arnerich, representing Forest Lawn, displayed a rendering of the proposed sign, noting that each sign consists of four panels, separated by open space, wbich is part of the total area° He pointed out that under the Sign Ordinance they are allowed 3 signs on Lincoln Avenue and 3 more on State College Boulevard; that his company proposes to place one of the pro- posed four-panel signs on Lincoln Avenue, in addition to the one existing sign on that frontage, and tc remove the one existing sign on State College Boulevard and replace it with the other proposed four-panel sign. He noted that the company no longer wishes tc increase the height of the existing Bank of America roof sign; therefore~ the request for additional waiver has been withdrawn. In answer to Council questions, Mr. Arnerich indicated the proposed signs would benefit the smaller shops in that they would be offered display space on one of the panels i'ntended for multiple listing° Mayor Clark asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppo- sition to the subject application, hearing no response, he thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-284~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-284 for adoption, granting Variance Noo 2072 in accordance with revised plans on file, indicating a maximum height of 38 feet, maximum area of 458 square feet, and allowing the Applicant tc withdraw requested waiver of maximum height of a roof sign~ Refer to Resolution B~ok. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2072. Roll Call ~ote: AYES~ COL~CILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley %he Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-284 duly passed and adopted. BLIC HEARING - VARIANCE ~. 2073~ Submitted by A1 Stovall, et al, requesting to permit the construction of a free-standing sign, with waivers of maximum height of a free-standing sign, and maximum display area of a free-standing sign. Property located at the southwest corner cf Katella Avenue and West Street, in the C-R Zone° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-83, denied said variance~ Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Cosmic Age Lodge and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Roberts indicated the location of the subject property on a map posted and noted that a motel and restaurant are currently under develop- ment. He briefed the adjoining land uses and reported that all other sign- ing in the area conforms to code requirements; ~erefore, the Planning Com- mission, finding no evidence that a hardship exists did not feel the variance is justified~ Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Court- cil. Mr~ Jack Stovall, 1717 South Harbor Boulevard, reported there is some confusion surrounding the proposed sign; that the plans have always indicated a sign 45 feet high, with an area of 350 square feet; not 60 feet high, as indicated by the City Planning Commission, with an area of 425 square feet: He stated that before the Planning Commission hearing he talked to 140 persons living in the area, and that 128 had no objection to the proposed sign, and 12 persons were opposed to ito After ~h~ ~aria~ce wa~ d~u~d I~ ~h~ City 69-302 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20, 1969, 1:30 P.M.' Planning Commission he returned to those who were in opposition and obtained signatures from eight of them, indicating approval. He noted that the lo- cation of the swimming pool was voluntarily changed in order to cooperate with the wishes of these property' owners. He felt a sign exceeding the maximum height permitted under code would be necessary in order to achieve visibility from the Convention. Center; that if the sign is less than 45 feet in height it would be obscured by a nearby restaurant sign which is 32 feet high~ He displayed s drawing which depicted the view path from the Convention Center and another indicating that the sign would not be visible from the backyards of residences in the area° Mayor Clark asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Willard Harmon, 1108 Dewey Place, stated he lives directly behind the subject property and objects to the variance because it would affect property values in the area. He called attention to a petition in opposition which was placed on file previously° He did not see any neces- sity to allow a 4.5.-foot sign when other motels in the area had 25-foot high signs and felt that the light from the sign would be a nuisance. He also ~1~ that such a pr~d~nt would precipitate other similar requests. Mro Keith Nosack, 1855 South West Street, owner of the Eden Roc Motel, stated that his sign is in conformance with the Sign Ordinance and be was told that this ordinance would be firmly enforced. He asked what the maximum height of the motel would be, and was informed it would be 38 feet high, and that the proposed sign would be 7 feet higher than the build- ing. Mr~ Nos~ck stated his building is 26 feet high and his sign is 24 feet, 11 inches in height. He further noted that his home is adjacent to Mr. Stovall's property and opposed the variance on this basis also. In answer to Council questions Mr. Nosack stated that he felt property values in the area had declined since the commencement of this development, and that there would be some visual intrusion from the bal- conies of the motel° Mr. Bill Lantini, 2868 Bridgeport, representing the sign company, indicated that the sign would be located at the center of the highest part of the building and could not possibly be visible from the residential pro- perty. Mr~ Stovall corroborated this statement, noting that the sign will be 600 feet away from Mr. Nosack's property. Mayor Clark asked if a roof-height sign (38 feet high) would be acceptable, and Mr. Stovall indicated that only the top of the sign would be visible in that case° RESOLUTION NO~ 69R-285: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Council- man Scbutte offered Resolution No. 69R-285 for adoption, granting Variance No, 2073, to allow a maximum 45-foot high, 350 square-foot sign, gubj~ct ~ i~,~ following c~nditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee: 1~ That mdequate clearmmce of existing electrical lines shall be provided as required by the Electrical Division, Department of Public Utili- ties, and the State of California G.O~ 95. 2.. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 1 and 2~ Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!~, OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE N~ 2073~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley ,9-303 :it¥ Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-285 duly passed and adopted° Drawings used by Mro St~vall in his presentation to the City Council were returned to him by the City Clerko 'UBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERM_IT NO. 1111: Submitted by WoHo Jewett, re- questing permission to establish ~ 50-unit motel, with waivers of front set- back from a major arterial highway, maximum height of a free-standing sign, maximum area of a free-standing sign, and location of a free-standing sign with respect to abutting prcpertyo Property located south and east of the southeast corner of State Collage Boulevard and Katella Avenue, in M-1 Zone. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No° PC69-86, approved said conditional use permit, in part, denying requested waivers of maximum area of a free-standing sign and location of a free-standing sign, with respect to abutting property; approving other requested waivers, subject to the following conditions: 1o That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2~00 per front foot along Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, for street lighting purposes. 2~ That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15C per front foot along Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard~for tree planting purposes. 3. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer~ 5o That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plaps on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6~ That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief nf the Fire Department. ?~ All c~>nstruction within the Orange County Flood Control District easement shall be in accordance with district requirements. 8. That any air-c<~nditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded frnm view. 9o That Condition Nos° 1 and 2~ above mentioned, shall be complied with prior tc the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission er City Council may grant° 10~ That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5~ 6, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections° 11. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibii Nos° 1, 2, 3, and 4~ as they pertain to the sign on the Katella Ave- nue froatage~ provided~ however~ that all. covered vehicular cntryways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet; and further provided, that kitchen efficiency units with a maximum ~ 6-cubic foot refrigerators, 2- burner stoves, excluding oven and baking facilities,and single-compartment sinks may be provided, with the exception that the manager's unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facilities. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed b~ Phillip Quarr~ ~gent £~r the Applicant, and public hearin~ scheduled this date° Mro Roberts described the location of the subject property, noting the access road from the westerly property line to State College Boulevard, on which the Applicant holds a common easement with the owners of two other adjoining parcels, and briefed the evidence considered by the City Planning Commission in recommending denial cf the requested waivers to permit signing on State College Boulevard. 69-304 _Ci__lty Hal__la__A__n__ah__ei__~m California COUNCIL In answer to Council q~,estzo~s, Mr~ Roberts advised that no ob- jection to the pr,posed signing was received from adjacent property owners. Mr. Maurice Dill,w, 2942 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, addressed the City Cot~nci] on behalf of the Applicant, and indicated that Mr. Jewett presently owns all three parcels sharing an interest in the easement. He outlined the desirability for signing cn State College Boulevard, noting the heavy traffic at the intersection with Katella. He felt that recog- nition of the access road would be impossible without a sign, due to the distance of the motel itself from State College Boulevard. He noted that the owner of the only other parcel adjacent to the easement that is not ,owned by Mr. Jewett holds no i. nterest in the access road. Mayor Clark asked if anyone wisbed to address the City Council in opposition; hearing nc respcnse, he thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-286: At the conclusion of Council discussion Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-286 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1111, as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, and with the further stipulation that said sign projected for State College Boulevard shall not exceed 25 feet in height, with a maximum area of 100 square feet; and shall become an integrated sign as the other parcels sharing the common easement develop. Refer to Resolution Bock A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 1111. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-286 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65~66-63~ AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 833: Report of the Development Services Department was submitted, recommending a three-year extension of time be granted for temporary access rights to Harbor Boule- vard, in connection with Reclassification No. 65-66-63(2) and Conditional Use Permit No. 833. (866 South Harbor Boulevard). On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, said extension of time was granted, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 964 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Clarice Graham, dated April 8, 1969, was submitted, for an extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 964. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, a six-month extension of time to expire October 24, 1969, was granted, sub- ject to the payment within thirt) days of street light and street tree fees, totaling $165~55~ as recommended by the Development Services Depart- ment. MOTION CARRIED~ ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Applicatic. n filed by C, Robert Millhouse, for entertain- ment permit to allow not more: than 4 musicians at the Country Girl Bar and Grill, 226 North Manchester Avenue, was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krei~. MOTION CARRIED. VAR/ANCE NO. 2051 - SIDEWALK WAIVER: Request cf Clarence Wagner for temporary waiver r;f sidewalks for Parcel No 1, and all street improvements for Par- cel No. 2~ Variance N~?~ 205] was submitted ,9-305 ]ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20, 1969, 1:30 PoM. On the recommendations of'the City Engineer, it was moved by Council- man Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that sidewalk construction for Parcel NOo 1 be required, and a temporary waiver of street improvements for Parcel NOo 2 be granted until such time as the City Council may require them to be constructed; ultimate street right-of-way fronting both parcels to be dedicated at this time. MOTION CARRIED. iRANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 62477 Excerpt of the City Planning Commission meet- ing held May 19, 1969, pertaining to Orange County Use Variance No. 6247, re- quest [o establish a temporary stand for retail sales of locally-grown fruit and vegetables, on property located at the northwest corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road, was submitted, recommending that the City Council urge the Orange Cou~ty Planning Commission to deny said variance on the basis that subject property is in the process of being annexed into the City and the use would be in violation of Anaheim's zoning ordinance. Councilman Krein moved that the recommendation of the City Plann- ing Commission be sustained and forwarded to the Orange County Planning Com- mission° Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. MUSING (RESiDEL 'IAL) COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ELEMENTS ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC69-93 was submitted, recommending that the City C~uncil defer consideration of Housing (Residential) Commercial and Indu~ al Elements of the Anaheim General Plan - 1969, to be considered in conjunction with recommendations concerning the Public Facilities Element. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Coun- cil consideration of said Amendments to the General Plan was deferred, as recommended by the City Planning Commission° MOTION CARRIED° :ESOLUTION NO. 69R~287 - WORK ORDER NO. 451-A: Councilman Dutton offered Resolu- tion No. 69R-287 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF TUSTIN AVE- NUE FROM M%RALOMA AVENUT TO LA PALMAAVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NOo 451=A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPE- CIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - June 12, 1969~ 2:00 PoM~)o Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-287 duly passed and adopted. ~ESOLUTION NO. 69R~288 ~ WORK ORDER NO~ 1216: In accordanc~~ with recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-288 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE II)WEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL 7T, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORY NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT: E WEST STREET SEWER IMPRO%~MENT, IN WEST STREET, FROM BALL ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 755 FEET NORTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1~16~ (Lynam~Wood Construction, inco ,- $16,370o00). 69-306 1__1 ~_~A~a,~e~i~, Call fornia - CO!~TNCI L M] NUTES - Mal_2. 0z~..i~69_~z_~: 30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: C?3UNCILMEN~ Dutten, Krein, Sch~3ttc~ and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Peb] ey The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-288 duly passed and adopted° RESOLUTION NOo 69R-289 WORK ORDER NO. 563-A: In accordance with recommenda- tions of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-- 289 for adcption~ Refer to Resoluticn Boo'k.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR ~{E FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION~ INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF DALE AVENUE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 132 FEET SOUTH OF WESTHAVEN DRIVE TO APPROXIMATELY 279 FEET SOUTH THEREOF, AND FROM APPROXIMATELY 370 FEET NORTH OF BALL ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 188 FEET NORTH THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ WORK ORDER NO0 563-A. (Sully-Miller Construction Compsny $11~306~36). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Duttcn, Kreio, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN' None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-289 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-290 - WORK ORDER NO. 547-B: Upon receipt of Certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R~290 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIA/~S AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND CONVENTION WAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 547oB~ (Steiny and Mitchel). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES. COUNCILM_EN~ None ABSENT; COUNCILMEN; Feblcy The Mayor declar~ Reso!~ticn No. 69R-290 duly passed and ~dot~ted. DEEDS il.F EASEMENT: C.?.~,nci]man ~' t, ,tre, ~ffered ReaD1 ~t~on Nos. 69R-291 to ~.qR-2r~6, both inclosive~ fc.r ~9-307 ]ity Hall~ Anaheim~ Califcrnia- COUNCIL MINUTES May 20~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO, 69R-291: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (The Prudential Insurance Company of America). RESOLUTICN NO, 69R-292: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Frank Horny, Paul Amir, and William Weisel). RESOLUTION NO. 69R-293: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Barbara R. Warnes and Mobil Oil Corporation), RESOLUTION NO. 69R-294: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL~CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (M.S. Bernard)° RESOLUTION NO. 69R-295: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL~CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PR©iPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Margaret S. Wright), RESOLUTION NO. 69R-296: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim Country Club Apartments). Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NCES: COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 69R-291 to 69R-296, both in- clusive, duly passed and adopted. ESOLUTION NOo 69R-297: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-297 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITH REFERENCE TO INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ORANGETHORPE AVENUE-ESPERANZA ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 90 (IMPERIAL HIGHWAY). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No, 69R-297 duly passed and adopted. ~SOLUTION NO. 69R-298: On report and recommendation of the Assistant City Mana- ger, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-298 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM MAUCH, WITH REFER- ENCE TO OPERATION OF THE PEARSON PARK SHUFFLEBOARD COURTS. 69-308 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COL~CIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Duttor~, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-298 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-299: On report and recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-299 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH PARSONS ENTERPRISES WITH REFERENCE TO, SELF-SERVICE LOCKER SERVICE. (Pearson Park). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-299 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION No. 69R-300: On recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Coun- cilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 69R-300 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING GREEN FEES TO BE CHARGED AT THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 67R-303. R~ll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES~ COUNCILMEN: A]]~LNT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-300 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: ao Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application of Pacific Lighting Service Company for authority to include in its tariff for resale natural gas service a limited rate adjustment provision for purchased gas cost based on Federal Power Commission Dockets Nos. RP69-20 and RP69-27. bo Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application of Sou- thern Counties Gas Company of California for authority to include in its tariff schedules for retail and wholesale natural gas service a limited rate adjustment provision for purchased gas cost based on Federal Power Commission Dockets Nos° RP69-2~ and RP69-27~ C. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of April, 1969. MOTION CARRIED° ORDINANCE NO. 2683: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2683 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190, PARAGRAPH 23 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING~ (Crescent Avenue). 59-309 ]ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 20~ 1969, 1:30 P.Mo Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2683 duly passed and adopted. )RDINANCE NO. 2684g Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2684 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (28) - C-R). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COL~CILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2684 duly passed and adopted. RDINANCE NO. 2~.,6~: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2685 for first reading. AN (ilDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (29) - C-R). RDINANCE NO. 2686: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2686 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (30) - C-R). RDINANCE NO 2687: C,:,~;~_;i~a~ :~u ton ,~&L~.c~d Ordinance No. 2687 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (66-67-8 - C-l). RDINANCE NO. 2688: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2688 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (66-67-67 - C-l). IDI. NANCE NO. 2689: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2689 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL C,q;~;£ RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-71 - R-3). 5COHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were pre- sented by the Assistant City Mmnager to the City Council for their infor- mation: a. Application submitted by Alexander D. and Anita M. Zinda, for Original Off-Sale Beer and Wine, for Zinda Liquor Mart #2, at 1679 West Katella Avenue, C-1 Zone. bo Application submitted by Frank J. and Grace P. Leuschen, for On-Sale Beer, Person-to-Person Transfer, for an Un-named Business, at 806 North Anaheim Boulevard, C-2 Zone. No Council action was taken on said applications. 69-310 _Ci_tz...Hal_~l Anahei_m_~California COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma~l__969_~_l:30____~P.M__~. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-301: On report and recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Dutton ~2ffered Resolution No, 69R-301 for adoption, Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AGREEING TO ABIDE BY THE ORANGE COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE AND DISASTER RELIEF PLAN - EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES APPENDIX I OF ANNEX B, AND TERMINATING ALL CURRENT AGREEMENTS FOR MUTUAL FIRE PROTECTION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COL~CILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: Ncne ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 69R-301 duly passed and adopted,, TERMINATION OF MUTUAL AID CONTRACTS: On motion by Councilman Dutton, sec- onded by Councilman Krein, notice of termination of Mutual Aid Agree- ment from the cities of Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana and Stanton were ordered received and filed~ MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 69R-302: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-302 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM INITIATING PRO- CEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESIGNATING THE TERRITORY AS BROADWAY-BROOKHURST ANNEXATION; SETTING FORTH ITS REASONS FOR DESIRING ANNEXATION; ACKNOW- LEDGING CONSENT OF 100% OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN SAID TERRITORY; DES- CRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR, AND PLACE WHERE AND WHEN ANY PERSON OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY WHO DOES NOT ALSO OWN PROPERTY IN THE TERRITORY SO PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SUCH TERRITORY SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Public Hearing to be held May 27, 1969, 1:30 P.M.)~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-302 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion., MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: ~:40 PoM. City Clerk