Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1965/01/26
83~6 City Hall,. Anaheim, California - CDUNCIL MINU, TP-$ - January 26~ 1965 The City Council o {he City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ODUNCIIJ~EN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein a~d Chandler· ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None o PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. . ' ASSISTANT CITY ATIORNEY: 3ohn D~son. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY.. Furman Roberts. CITY .CLERK: Den, M. Williams. ' CITY ENGINEER~ 3ames P. Maddox. ZONING. ODORDINATOR~ Robert Mickelson. PLANNING CDORDINATOR:- Aglan Shelf. Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. P~ESENTATION OF HEALTH AWARDS - ANAHEIM RESTAURANTS1 ~ouncilman Krein reported on activities of the committee established to formulate specifications for high maintenance operation ~tandards in restaurants, and advised that- Award of Excellence plaques have been deci~e~.upon for presentation to those restaurants achieving a high level o~ cleanlines~ a~d'.health pro- tectiono He expressed appreciation to' Dr. Edward Lee Russell, Orange County Health. Officer, and to %he committee members, as follows:. Mro Bud Coulson Robert $. Stone (Assistant.to Dr. Russell) Dfc John McBurney 3ack Stewart (Orange County Health Dept.) It was noted that the ?laque~ will remain the property of the Orange County Health Department, .and may be r~voked for cause; further, that as of this date, sanitation inspections have been made of ~pproximately forty of the 290 Anaheim ~estaurangs, with the hope that all restaurants will eventually display with pride the Excellence plaque. Councilma~Krein and D~o Edward Lee Russell. presented awards to the representatives of' the following restaurant operations: .Aunt Jemima's Pancake House~ ~isneyland Jack-in-the-Box, 1122 North Anaheim Boulevard' McDonald's Drive-In, 2411 West Ba?i Road Satellite Coffee Shop, 150 Katella Avenue Fantasy Nee 2 (UoPoTo), Disneyland Sandwichland, 1287 "C" East Lincolh Avenue McDonald's Drive-In, 119 West Ball Road Disneyland Hotel Coffee Shop, 1445 South West Street Disneyland Hotel Oak Room, 1445 South West Street Disneyland Hotel Gourmet Restaurant, l~45.~out~ West Street' Carl's Restaurant,[ 1168 West'Katella Avenue Carl~s Restaurant., l~O0'North Harbor Boulevard Plaza Pavillioo & Tahitian Terrace, Disneyland Carnation Plaza Gardens, Disneyland Oscar's Drive-In, 1770 SouthHa~bor.Bo~levard . Casa de Fritos~ Disneyland~ Tastee Freeze, 2444 West Ball Road Winchell's Donut House, 618 West La'Palma Avenue Letty's Delicatessen, 622 West La Palma Avenue Denny's Restaurant~ 1610 South Harbor Boulevard Original Pancake House, 1418 East Lincoln Avenue Mr. Rober~ S%~pe addressed the Council bri~l¥ describing the .point system g~e~ to $g0~9 ~a~in~ e~%~blishments. Dr. E~W~ Le~ Rgs~e~ ~v~4 ~h~% %~ h~s knowledge, this was the fi~% ~%~. §Ugh ~B ~W~ h~ ~q ~ ~D %h~ ~ognty of Orange, Mayo: ChandleN commended %home who ~eceived the awaNd~," as well aa the committee £o: the~ ou:s%anding cont~but~on~ ~o %he public health. 8377 City Hall,.Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 26, 1965, 1:30 ~,M. MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held 3anuary 5, t965, were approved. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 65R-46: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-46 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND £bIREGTING THE PAYMENT OF DF3~ANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF JANUARY 26, 1965. (Warrants~N~s~ 36582 to 36886, both inclusive, totaling $1,013,975.30) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 65R-46 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC !~EARING - ABANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of a portion of right-of-way easement, located east of Euclid Street, south of Palm Lane, adjacent to a portion of the northerly boundary of Tract No. 3840, pursuant to Resolution No° 65R-1~ duly published in the Anaheim Bulle- tin 3anu.~ry 14~ 1965~ and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. The City Manager noted that said easement is located at the south end of property currently under development, and immediately east of Fire Station Noo 6 on Euclid Avenue; further, the proposed abandonment has cleared all interested City departments. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the public~aring closed. Mro Murdoch called attention to technicality, as the easement was acquired through the purchase of the Anaheim Union Water Company facil- ities~ rather than by dedica%iono On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, action on said proposed abandonment was deferred one week (February 2, 1965, 1:30 P.M.) for further investigation by the City Attorney. NK)TION CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - A~ENDMENT TO M-1 ZONE: Public hearing was scheduled December 8, 1964, and continued to 3anuary 12, 1965 for additional study and recommendation by the City Planning Commission, and further continued to this date; said hearing to consider proposed amendment to Section 18.52.060, M-I~ Light Industrial Zone, Site Development Standards, pertaining to build- ing and structural height limitations, pursuant to City Planning Commission ReSolution Noo 1402, Series 1964-65.- Planning CoordinatorAl'}a~Sh.off submitted for City CoUncil review memorandum dated 3anuary 26, 1965~, set~ing forth alternative wording for the proposed.~amendment to the M-1 Zone° He called attention to the apparent trend io 'high-rise buildings in the space and electronics industries., the costs of multiple story-construction being out-weighed by the need and advantages~of~close communications, and advised that Industrialists were or'the opinion that the three to on~ ratio, recommended by the City Planning Commission, could be detrimental to industrial building. Mr. Shoff advised that the memo suggests the height limitations for buildings or structures in the M-1 Zone within 200 feet of residential zone boundaries, rather than within 300 feet thereof, as use of these build- ings would in all probability be office in nature., and no greater than in the C-1 Zone. He noted the Industrial Zone Height Limit Exhib~i%~, ~Posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers, which was amended to reflect the two alternative ratios. . 8378 City Hall, Anaheim, Ca%ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES --January 26, 1965, 1:30 The City Council reviewed the proposed amendments to the M-t Zone and discussion was held. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed° Councilman Dutton moved that memorandum setting forth the pro- posed amendment to the M-1 Zone, dated January 26,' 1965, be adopted, and -that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare necessary ordinance amending the M-1Zone~ in accordance with said memorandum. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO C-O ZONE: Public hearing was scheduled December 8, 1964, continued to January 12, 1965 for further study, to con- sider proposed amendment to Section 18.38.050, C-O, Commercial Office Zone, Site Development Standards~ pertaining to building and structural height limitations~ pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution No 1379, Series 1964-65. The City Council reviewed memorandum dated. January 7, 1965, set- ting forth proposed amendment to. the C-O Zone, building and structural height limitations, proposing 'that the height of any building or structure within 300 feet of any single family residential zOned boundary shall not exceed one-half the distance from said building or structure to the zone boundary. Discussion was held by the City Council, and the Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council~ there being no response~ declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Dutton moved that memorandum setting forth the proposed amendment to the C-O Zone, dated January 7, 1965, be adopted, and that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare necessary ordinance amending the C-O Zone~ in accordance with said memorandum. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION ZONE: Public hearing on proposed amendment to Title 18, Chapter 18.61 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, "NRC~ Natural Resources and Conservation Zone", was con- tinued from the meetings of September 15 and 29, October 27, and November 29, 1964, for further study of revised draft of NRC standards.., Mro Shoff referred to excerpt of the City Planning Commission minutes of their meeting held January 18, 1965, and to memorandum dated January 29, 1965, reporting that after hearing representatives~of both the Orange County Flood Control District, and Orange County Water District, as they apply to sand and gravel excavations, it was the City Planning Com- mission's conclusion that excavation of sand~ gravel and o~her similar minerals should be allowed by conditional use permit, and be inserted in Chapter 18.64 of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ further, that property development standards therefor be inserted in Title 17, as a new chapter. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, %here being no response, declared the public hearing closed. Draft of the proposed ordinance was reviewed by the City Council,. together with aforementioned memorandum and excerpt from the Planning Commission minutes° Councilman Dutton moved that memorandum setting forth proposed amendment to the NRC Zone, dated January 21, 1965, be adopted, and that the City Attorney be instructed tO prepare necessary ordinance amending the NRC Zone, in accordance with said memorandum.. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. MODIFICATION OF .~DIAN OPENING - 2144 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE: Request of W. P. Fuller Company for relocation of LinColn Avenue median opening serving Lin Brook Hardware and W. P. Fuller Company, was continued from the meeting of December 8, 1964, and January 12, 1965, for additional study and report from the City Engineer and Chief of Police. 8379 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL. ~INUTES - January 26,.1965, 1:30 P.M. . The City Clerk reported that Attorneys for both Linbrook Hardware and W. Po Fuller Company had verbally requested continuance, being of the opinion that the matter can be resolved in a few weeks, time. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, action on the foregoing matter was continued to February 23, 1965. 'MOTION CARRIMD. ANAH~I~ CO~VENTIONCEqT~R - A~PROVAL.OF COLOR SCHF~TICS, Mr. Murdoch reported that final plans for the Anaheim Convention Center, scheduled for approval this date~ could not be presented at this times however, materials and color schematics were ready for consideration, in accordance with the City's contract with the Architect° Mro Adrian Wilson, Architect for the Convention Center, advised that final drawings were virtually complete and had been submitted to the Building Department for checking. He was of the opinion that the project could go to bid approximately February 18, 1965. Mr. Wilson submitted color theme displays, keyed to samples of materials, advising that if the City Council approves the display as a general theme, the final details following the theme can be determined as work progresses° Also presented and brought to the Council Table were colored photographs illustrating the recently completed convention facility in Honolulu~ Hawaii, which was designed by his firm. Councilman Schutte moved that the color schematic theme for the Convention Center be approved, as recommended by the Architect, and that the color scheme and samples of materials submitted be placed in the custody of the City Manager for future reference. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. Mro Murdoch announced to the audience that the display could be viewed in the lobby outside the Council Chamber for the balance of the afternoon. SIGN ~EQUF~.~T8 Application submitted by Richard Dully, requesting permission to erect a non-conforming sign, advertising liquor, gifts and sundries, 640 West Katella Avenue (Jolly Roger Inn property), was reviewed by the City Council together with reports from Building and Planning Department noting proposed sign does not comply with the recently adopted ordinance. Mr, Herb Luttrell, of Nu-Art Sign Company, advised that they haPe attempted to design the requested sign in keeping the redwood and stone trim building, using all gold lettering.' In his opinion~ the proposed sign was smaller than other liquor store signs in Orange County, and he called a~tention to a similar store in the immediate vicinity which has larger stgns both free-standing and on the building. · (Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 3800 P.M.) In answer to Councilman Dutton's question concerning policy of the City of Anaheim in regarding businesses in connection with a primary complex, wherein signs advertising said businesses were limited to those serving the primary complex and not the general public~ Mr, Luttrell stated that a business such as this cannot depend solely upon the motel tenants, and must~cater to outside business. (Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting, 3806 P.M.) 8380 City Hall~ Anaheim,. California --COUNCIL MINUTES - January .26,....1965~ 1~30 P'..Mo . On motibn by councilmen Krein, seconded by Council~n Dutton, said sign permit was denied, on the basis that said sign does not co~ty with the new. sign ordinance, and in addition, the sign is in conflict with .the policy established for said signs in the commercial recreation area° MOTION CARRIED° ENTERTAIb~ENT PERMIT: Application filed by Sam E° Rosen and Robert Walsh for entertainment permit at the Water Wheel Restaurant, 1154 North Euclid Street, to allow a piano bar, Tuesdays through Saturdayg, 8:00~PoM. to 1~00 AoMo, was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion hy Councilman Dutton, seconded hy Councilman Pehleyo MOTION CARRIED° DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT~ Application filed by Richard Jerome Brian for dinner dancing place permit to allow dancing every night, 8:00 PoMo to 1:30 AoMo~ in conjunction with the serving of dinners and cocktails at Brian's Syrena Restaurant, 231 West Katella Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motiOn by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutteo MOTION CARRIED° SIDEWALK WAIVER ~ NORTHEAST OORNER OF PALAIS AND ANAHEIM BOULEVARD~ Request of Phil Shanedling Investment Company for waiver of sidewalks at the northeast corner of Anaheim Boulevard and Palais Street, was submitted. The City Engineer recommended that a temporary sidewalk waiver be granted on Palais Street, but that temporary waiver be denied on Anaheim Boulevard, based on the following factors: 1o Palais is mn industrial street° 2° There are no existing sidewalks on Palaiso (Blanket waives granted in 1958) 30 Negligible pedestrian traffic was observed on Palaiso 4o Properties to north of subject property have constructed sidewalks° 5o Revere Elementary School (Anaheim City School Disto) is within ~ mile radius° 60 High density traffic area° On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that temporary sidewalk waiver be granted on Palais Street, providing that no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalksl further, that temporary sidewalk waiver he denied on Anaheim Boulevard° Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° SIDEWALK WAIVER - 1360 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD: Memorandum dated January 18, 1965, from the City Engineer, recommending that temporary sidewalk waiver granted by the City Council for the Ktlroy Building, 1360 South'Anaheim Boulevard, April 22, 1958, be rescinded, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council. Mro Maddox reported that subsequent construction in the subject area necessitated installment of sidewalks on all other parcels on the east side of Anaheim Boulevard, and that Mr° William Messenger from the John Bo Kllroy Company has indicated his agreement to installation of sidewalks at this time° On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, temporary waiver of sidewalks at 1360 South Anaheim Boulevard was rescinded. MOTION CARRIED° SIDEWALK WAIVERI Request of Wallace S. Stevenson, of John Bo Kilroy Company, for waiver of sidewalks for property at Shepard and Carpenter Streets, south of La Palme Avenue, 1390 feet ~ast of Dowling Avenue, was suhmitted~ On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved said sidewalk waiver be granted, providing that,no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalk° Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 8381 City. Hall~ Anaheim,- California - COUNCIL MINUIES - January 26~ 195.5., 1,30P.Mo CONDITION;~.L USE PF-RMIT 'NO o 200t Communication dated January 6, 1965, was submitted toques.tin§ rem~)val of debris at 89t South Watnut Street. The City Clerk advised that a telephone request was-received in her office this date from Gilbert Io Huffman, requesting continuance, due to his inability to be present because of illness. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Council consideration of the foregoing issue was continued to February 16th, 1965. Not voting: Councilman Schutteo MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL USE PERMIT NOo 88 - EXTF. NSION OF TIME:.. Request dated January 4, 1965, from Louis Po Helmretch, representing the petitioner, was submitted for one year extension of time to .Special Use Permit No. 88° On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, one year extension of time was granted° MOTION cARRIED. CONDITIONA~ USE PfRMIT NO. 597 - EXTF_NSION OF TIMEI Request dated January 7, 1965, from Paul Jo Ruffing, Architect, requesting six months extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 597t property located on the east side of West Street, approximately 330 feet south of Ball Road. The City Clerk called attention to the fact that subject conditional use permit was granted by the City Planning Commission, with no action taken by the City Council° The City Clerk was instructed to refer subject request to the City Planning Commission° VA~.!~E NO_t 1518 (R~CLASSIFICATION ~NO_~ $$-$4-74) - EXTF. NSION OF TIME,. Request of Bill W~ Pebley, dated January 8~ 1965, for six months extension of time on Variance Noo 16189 was submitted° Six months extension of time was granted by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutteo Councilman Pebley abstained from voting on the foregoing motion° MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO° 1641 (RECLASSIFICATION NOo 63-64-123) - EXTENSION OF TIME~ ReQuest of Bill Wo Pebley, dated January 8, 196~ for six months extension of time on Variance No° 1641~ was submitted° On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, six months extension of time was granted to Variance No. 1641o Councilman Pebley abstained from voting on the foregoing motion° MOTION CARRIED° RECLASSIFICATION NO o 62-63-41: The following requests were submitted conc~rning Reclassification No° 62-63-41, property located on the north side of La. Palms Avenue, West of Euclid Street: ae Communication dated January 5, 1964, from Lev Bowers, requesting amendment to Condition No. 7, Resolution No. 63R-13, and further re- questing an extension of time; both requests pertaining to lots 7 and'8o On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Clerk was authorized to schedule public hearing before the City Council, to consider amendment to Condition No. 7, Resolution No. 63R-13, sub- ject to payment of $50 fee by the applicants further, that said request be referred to the City Planning Commission for recommendation prior to public hearing before the City Council. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Dutton moved that two year extension of time to Reclassification No° 62-63-41, lots 7 and 8, be granted. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. ~ bo Communication dated January 4, 1965, from 3. Co Neighbors, requesting two year extension of time for lots 28 and 29, Reclassification No. 62-63-41, was submitted° 8382 City Ha~l~ Anaheim~ California -.COUNCIL. MINUTES - Janu~¥~26t 1965t.t130 P.M. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, two. ygar.extension of time-.was granted~for lots 28 and 29. MOTION.CARRIED. CITy PLANNING CON~ISSION ITEMSt Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held 3anuary 4, 1965, pertaining to the following .applications, were. submltted for City Council. information and consideration. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 660: Submitted by R. H. Grant, requesting permission to establish a training school for medical and dental assistants; C-1 property located at-t717 South Brookhurst, Street. '~, ~ City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Noo 1476, Series 1964-65, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 662: Submitted by Laurence W. and Abilene Allen, requesting permission to establish a semi-automatic car wash; C-1 property located on the east side of Dale Street, approximately 188 feet north of Lincoln Avenue° Granted by the City Planning CommiSsion, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No° 1477, Series 1964-65. VARIANCE NOo 1676~ Submitted by LeRoy Bo and Elsie Shultz, requesting waiver of code provisions as follows: minimum floor area of dwelling unit, minimum required side yards, minimum distance between buildings, and minimum required parking spaces; P-1 property located at 612 East Chartres Street° The CitY.Planning Commission granted Variance No. 1676, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution Noo 1478, Series 1964-65,- The'foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above applications. ' RESOLUTION NOo 65R-47: On report and recommendation of the Director of Public Works~ 'Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No o 65R-47 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITy COUNCIL OF THE CITy OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING RESOLUTION NOo 63}t-652 RELATING TO FEES TO BE CHARGED AT THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE° (Student Golf Play - Western, Magnolia, Loara and Savanna High Schools) Roll call vote: AY ES: COUNCI I~EN: NO ES .' COUNCILMEN ~ ABSENT: COUNCII/~EN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-47 duly passed and adopted° DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-48~ 65R-49 and 65R-50 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-48: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI/Y OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY- OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPER/Y FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert Louis and Helen Allgeyer Clark) , RESOLUTION NO. 65R-49: A RESOLUTION OF THE CI/Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASF~ENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL 'PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Abbko Developers Inc., et al) 8383 City Hall,, Anaheim,, Caltfornia -OOUNCIL ~INUTES - J, anuary RESOLUlION NOo 65R-50~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF · ANA~{EIM ACCEPTING..A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAH£IM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASF~ENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Maria G~e*rsinda Hernandez) Roll call vo~e~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Kretn and Chandler NOESI COUNCIL~EN~ None ABSENT-~ COUNCt t3~EN ~ · None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 65R-48, 65R-49 and 65R-50, duly passed, and adopted. PL~CHAS~ - COPPER TUBING~ The City Manager reported on informal bids re¢,eived for the purchase of Copper Tubing9 as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of Charles A. Estey in the amount of $5,301.61, including tax~ Chaso Ac Estey, Anaheim, Familian Pipe.& Supply Co.,.Anaheim .Howard Supply Company~ Los Angeles Bell Pipe & Supply Company, Anaheim Park-Son9 Inco~ Santa Fe Springs Taylor-3ett, San Gabriel $5,301.61 5,333.22 5,309 o !0 5,395.73 5,595.20 5,262 o 40 On the recommendations of the City Manager, COuncilman Schutte moved that the bid of Charles Ac Estey be accepted as the lowest and best bid~ and purchase be authorized in the amount of $5,301.61. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion~ ~OTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a 15 minute recess. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (3,32 AFTER R$CRSS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present° CANCELLAIION OF COUNTY TAXES~ 'On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley~ the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for Municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-31, formerly assessed to Albert S. andMarie Toussau, deed recorded 3anuary 15, 1965, as Document No. 9363, in Book 7381, Page 60, Official Records of Orange County, California° MOTION CARRIED° AWARD OF ..WORK ORDER NO° 6007, Mro Murdoch reported on bids received and opened 3anuary 21~ 1965, for additions to the Lewis Substation, advising that low bidder, Pebley Brothers, inadvertedly failed to submit with their proposal a list of subcontractors. When the omission was discovered, a list of subcontractors was furnished the City Engineer. RESOLUTION NOo 65R-51~~ On the recommendations of the City Attorney and ~ity"Manager, Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nco 65R-51 for adoption, awarding contract of Work Order No° 6007 to Pebley Brothers, the low bidder, and authorizing acceptance of the subcontractors list as correction of an inadvertant oversight. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVE- ~ENT' ADDITION TO THE LEWIS SUBSTATION, 826 EAST CERRITOS AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF' ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO o 6007; AND ACCEPTING THE LIST OF SUBOONTRACTORSo (P'ebley Brothers - $35,427) 8384 r'-- City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3anuar¥ 26~ 1965, 1~30 P.M. Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCIL~F~ NO~S~ COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ ABSTAINED~ COUNCIIN~N~ Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandler None None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-51 duly passed and adopted. Mr. Jo £. Barrington~ of Barrington Construction Company, one of the bidders for the project, addressed the City Council registering his protest to the acceptance of Pebley Brothers proposal, and explained his reasons therefor° RESOLUTION NO. 65R-52~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 65R-52 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT F34PLOyING DAMES AND MOORE TO PROVIDE GEOLOGICAL INSPECTION AND CONSULTATION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WALNUT CANYON RESERVOIR AND DAM. (Work Order No~ 6004.) Roll call votes AYESs COUNCIL~ENs NOES: COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 65R-52 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC IMPROVF3~ENT PRCIIECTSs Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-53, 65R-54 and 65R-65 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book° RESOLUTION NO. 65R-53s A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY coUNcIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROYFJ~£NT, TO WITs THE IMPROVEMENT OF WALNIrf STREET, INCLUDING LOWERING OF 3ET FUEL LINE, FROM APPROX. 1320~ NORTH OF CERRITOS AVE. TO CERRITOS AVE., PRO3ECT NO. 155~ AND LOWERING OF JET FUEL LINE IN LEWIS ST. FROM ORANGBWOOD AVE. TO APPROX. 900' SOLrfH OF ORANGEWOOD AVE., 30B NO. 905 APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS, EIC.i AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF~ (Project Noo 155 and 3ob No. 905 - Bids to be opened February 18, 1965, 2~00 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-54 - JOB NO. 1307~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENT TO WITI THE BROOKHURST STREET SHWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 264~83 FEET NORTH OF CATALINA AVENUE TO APPROXINL~TELY 71.97 FEET NORTH OF CATALINA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1307~ APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 18, 1965, 2sO© P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-55 - PROJECT NO. 149I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENT, TO WITs THE IMPROVB~ENT OF RIO VISTA STREET, FROM LINCOLN AVENUE TO APPROXINL~TELY 1740 FEET NORTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 8385 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL ~INUT.~S. -3. anuary ,25, ..1965, ~1:30 P.M. PROJECT NOo 149~ APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND. SPF~IFICATIONS. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THF~F.~ AUTHORIZING THE. CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROV~ENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC$ AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CL~RK TO .PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SHAL~D PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THERBOF. (Bids to be opened February 18, 1965, 2:00 P.Mo) Roll call vote: AYESl COUNCILMEN: Pe.bley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOESl OOUNCILMENt .None .,ABSENT: COUNCILMENt None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos; 65R-53, 65R-54 and 65R-55, duly passed and adopted. R_w~O__LUTION NOo 65R~56 ' WORK ORDER NO. 6004: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-56 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO° 64}t-972 FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVFJ~ENT, TO WIT: THE WALNUT CANYON RESERVOIR, WORK ORDER NO o 6004, BY EXTENDING THE tIME FOR THE OPENING OF SEALED PROPOSALS$ AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE OF 'SAID CHANGE OF DATE FoR OPENING SEALED PROPOSALS. (Extending opening of bid date to February 11, 1965) - · Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Kr~in and Chandler NOES: COUNCIL~EN~ None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-56 duly passed and adopted. RF.$O~UTIO~ NO% 65R-57: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-57 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING SUPPLF~ENTAL AGREF~ENT S-1 FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES. (State College Boulevard) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: ODUNCI L~N ~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-56 duly passed and adopted. OORRES~NPENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, off motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pehley, a. Letter from Soroptimist Club of Anaheim regarding presentation of $2,000 check - second payment toward cost of the'Mobile Show Wagon for %he Park and Recreation Department. b.' The Metropolitan Water District Resolution No. 6635. Co Before the Public Utilities Commission - Investigation into status, safety, maintenance, use and protection or closing of various crossings at grade of the lines of the A.T.&.S,F. Railway Co., the Union Pacific RR Coo, the Southern Pacific Co., and the Pacific Electric Railway Co., in the County of Orange, California, with various streets, roads and highways in said county° do Anaheim Stadium Commission Minutes - Meeting of January 7, 1965. eo Letter from Anaheim Concessions regarding return of material included with bid for Stadium Concessions. MOTION CARRI ED. 8386 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California -.COUNCIL MINUTES -January, 26~1965~,l:30 P,M.~ ORDINANcE NO,' 2098: Councilman Pebley .offered Ordinance No. 2098 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL OODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-58 - R-i) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2098 and having knowledge of the. contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILM~N: None ABSENT: OOUNCILMEN~ None Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2098 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOo 2099: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2099 for final reading° Refer to Ordinance BoOk. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-140 - C-i) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 2099 and having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Dutton moved fhe reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: OOUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, SchUtte, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN, None Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2099 duly passed and adopted° ORDINANCE NO.° 2100: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2100 for final reading° Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 4.08, SECTION 4°08°080 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE,' RELATING TO SIGNS. (Non-conforming signs and structures) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2100 and having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ~'~' Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None MaYOr Chandler dedlared Ordinance~No. 2100 duly passe~ and adopted. WAIVER - FIRE ZONE'REQUIRF~ENT: Communication dated ijand'ary ~i, i965, from J, C. Dunstan, Operations Manager at. Essex Wire Corporation, requesting waiVer of fire zone requirement of a maximum size open area of 54,140 square feet in class "F" facility, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with reports from the Building and Fire Department. 8387 City Hallt Anaheimt Calif. ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 26t 1965t lt3OP.M. Fire Chief Stringer introduced Inspector Danley, who briefed information contained in their report. He noted that the-structure does not have the required setback along-the east or west sides of the property, and the facility will contain an open area of 77,275 square feet. The building is being brought up to meet all other reffdirements.of the code~ and. with. the proposed method of operation to be utilized~ he was of the opinion that safety measures will be adequate. Also noted was the fact that the open area of the, street, on the east side of the building, if considered part of the setback, would increase the distance to meet the requirement on that side. Councilman Krein asked if carbolic odors which were present durtng former operation of the facility would be evident when production.is resumed. Mr. O. D. Skipper, of Marion, Indiana, representing Essex Wire Corporation, explained the new processes which would be employed, stating that there would be no. odors emanating from the facility. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, request to waive fire zone requirement was granted., NDTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2101~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2101 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 4.1% SECTION 4.18o010 OF IHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING IO A~USE~ENT AND ENTERTAIN- MENT PR~I SES--RESTAURANTS. £ After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2101 and haying knowledge of the contents therei'n, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2102, Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2102 for first re~ding. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 14~ CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHHIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No parking - portions of Walnut Street) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2102 and having knowledge of the contents therein' Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 21031 Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2103 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE cITy OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.44, SECTION 3.44.030 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO RENTAL BUILDINGS. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2103 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded th9 motion. NOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINAR.CE NO. 2104, Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2104 for first re~dtng. ANiORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-49 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title, of Ordinance No. 2104 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2105, reading. Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2105 for first 8388 City Hall~_Anaheim~ Califorgia - COUNCIL MINU/ES -Jan~uary 26t.1965~ 1~30' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-8 - R-2) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2105 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schut%e seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMQUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2106~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2106 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI/Y OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING 'TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-107 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2106 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Du%ton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-35 AND CONDITIONAL USE PER~I'T NO. 313: Submitted by Roy Lee Burroughs~ et al, originally requesting permission to construct a planned residential unit development, and waiver of two-story height limitation within 150 feet of residential property~ property described as being situated on the west side of Knott Avenue, approximately 614 feet south of Lincoln Avenue (Tract No. 5403). Public hearing before the City Council was held 3anuary 19, 1965, to consider revised plans previously approved in connection with said reclassification and conditional use permit, at which time the ~earing was closed and action deferred to this date pending visual inspection of the property. Council discussion was held concerning possible effective screening for the two-story buildings adjacent to the Buena Park residentiR1 homes on the west, and Councilman Kretn asked whether a four foot colored translucid plastic panel extensibn to the existing wall on the west propeTty line, or the planting of trees in the alley, would be the most acceptabl~. Mr. David C. Maddox, 111 Western Avenue, Developer of the project, advised that they would be willing to cooperate by either method, and so long as they. own the property, the trees would '3e.proper!y maintained. Regarding the possibility of second story dinette windows allowing a view of private properties., Councilman Dutton asked whether o~aque glass could be installed in these windows. Mr. Maddox stated that this would be a possibility. Mr. Robert Sheer, 6873 Via Notre Circle, Buena Park, i'n answer to Council questioning, referred to the purported depreciation of"his property in the approximate amount of $4,000, which in his opinion was caused by erection of the two story apartment buildings adjacent thereto. He felt that the acceptable solution would be for the developer' 'to under- write the loss i2 values of the adjacent single family homes. Mayo,r Ch~D~le~ ~vi~e~d that th~s w~s 8 civil matter, 6vet which the C~ty Council h~d ~.o jurisdiction. ~ ' If giVeD %h~ cho~G~ 0¢ pl~B~d t~$~ fO~ ~reening, or a four ~oun~i%~h P~b!~Y mOV~ ~% ~he fO~ property ~Whe~ tD the Wes~ adjacent to s~Dj~gt p~op~rt~, b~ girth the choice O{ rec~V~h~ ~h8 following~ 8389 City Hallt Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - 3anuaz7 26~1965~ ls30 P.~. 1. A'four foot ptastis fence to be ptatedlon top of the.existing six foot block wall. '' 2, Trees to be planted on. the west side of the wall~ the variety, size and number to be designated by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. .Further, all costs of the above to be borne by Mr. Maddox, the Developer, and written evidence of acceptance or rejection be submitted to the City Council within one week (February 2, 1965). Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED., INTRODUCTIONs Sargent Harold Bastrup, of the Anaheim Police Department, introduced eight new officers in attendance as a part of their three month training course. Mayor Chandler welcomed the new officers on behalf of the City Council. LETTER OF APPRECIATION - ANAHEIM FIRE QEPART~ENT~ Communication from Annette Parker, Executive Vice President, Autonet'tcs Administration, 1550 South State College Boulevard, to Chief Stringer com~snding the department for thetrpromptresponse and efficiency in containing a fire at that location on January 15, 1965, was submitted° Special appreciation was expressed for the personal risk undertaken in protective measures afforded stored materials which were under the fire areao Damage to property and records was kept at a minimum to the efficiency and the firemen's individual thoughtfulness and courtesy beyond the call of normal duty. RECL~.SSIFICATION NOo 63-64-68 AND VARIANCE NO. 1616z Keystone Savings and Loan property located on the soUth side of Crescent Avenue, between Euclid Street and Fairhaven Drive (C-O zoning, Reclassification No. 63-64-68 - Ordinance No. 2058). ~ Mro Murdoch reported that the walls have been constructed along the Crescent Avenue frontage, the. Fairhaven Drive frontage, and the southerly property line adjacent to single family residential zoned property, as re- quired by the Conditions of Resolution No. 64R-160, granting Variance No. 1616. He advised that in contacting residents both adjacent to the parking lot and across Fatrhaven Drive, some were of the opinion that the wall should be lowered at the alley opening unto Crescent Avenue for better vision of'on- coming traffic. It was also felt that the wall along Fairhaven Drive was too high, and that the wall adjacent to residential property should be set down from the front setback line of the dwelling to the front property line. Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton moved that the wall on Cres,cent Drive at the alley be reduced to three courses, on Fairhaven DriVe, that two courses be removed frOm the wall, and that a wall along residential property be set down to two courses, between the front setback line to the front property .line. At the conclusion of further discussion, Councilman Dutton withdrew the foregoing motion, and Coundil dbterminatlOn'~as Continued one week (February'2,~ 1965) pendiflg'visual insPectioh.of the property°. ~ RECE$S~-I Councilman Dutton moved t° recess to 7t00 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ~t27 P.M.) AFTER RECESS~ Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. PRESENTs COUNCIINENt Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. ABS~NTt GOUNCII~ENt None. PRESENTt CITY MANAGERt Keith A. Murdoch. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEYz Furman Roberts. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEYt Alan R. Watts. CITY CLERK~ Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEERt 3ames Po Maddox. 2DNING GOORDINAIOR~ Robert Mickelson. PLANNING COORDINATORt Allan Shoff. · FLAG SALUTE~ Councilman Dutton led the Assembly in the Pledge of Aleiegiahce . , to the ~lag. 8390 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL M~NUT£S - January 26, 1965, i:30'P~M. CONIINUED PUBLIC H~ARING - CONDIIIONAL USE PF~J~II NO. 606 (ANGEL SPIRE), Submitted by Hazel M. Powell, requesting permission to establish a tower restaurant with observation deck and cocktail lounge with a maximum height of 760 feet~ R-A property located approximately 660 feet eas.t of West Street and 1000 feet north of Orangewood Avenue. Subject application was continued from the meeting of October 20; November 4 and December 1~ 1964. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No,~1336, Series 1964-65, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 606. Mr. Ronald Ac Karos, 1077 West Ball Road,~..rePz~senting the applicant, advised what he considered was the issue before the City C6uncil, and briefly reviewed the history of the public hearing before the ~ity Planning Commission. He further advised that.after the public hearing before the City Planning Commission was closed, and during the discussion by the City Planning Commission that followed, invasion of privacy became ~.an issue, which in his opinion had no bearing, and was not considered during the public hearing. To his knowledge, no citizen had entered objection on the grounds of invasion of privacy. To prove that so-called "visual intrusion" had no bearing on the case and would not harm the Disneyland Park, Mr; Karos showed slides of views from various portions of the park, some of the slides having the · ·proposed tower restaurant superimposed thereon. In his opinion, the different portions of the Disney~and Park intrude on each other, a condition they have created themselves. Further, if so-called "visual intrusion" was a deterrent in attendance, last year's Disneyland Report proves differently as last year was a record year and represented an increase of 7 percent over 1963. Some of the slides shown were taken from the following~ general areas~ 1. 1890 Main Street, looking towards Sleeping Beauty's Castle in Fantasyland including the Douglas Moon Rocket in Tomorrowland. 2.~ Swiss Family Robinson Treehouse showing Disneyland Hotel Tower - parking areas - office building. 3. Mark Twain Riverboat including Disneyland Hotel ToWer. 4~ Sky Ride. ' Mr. Karos reported that approximately thirty-five groO~ps of people visiting the park had been questioned as to whether they.i'were bothered by the ability to see a structure in another part of D~sneyland, or by seeing buildings outside the park from elevated attractions, and none of the people questioned seemed concerned.' Mr. Karos felt"that their tower restaurant would be accepted in the same manner. At the time the Spire was first conceived, he advised that the applicants presented verbal plans and ideas to members of the Anaheim Planning Staff, which were received with enthusiastic encouragement as a compatible use in the Commercial-Recreation Area. Due to the fact that a high-rise hotel request for property north of Disneyland had been recently granted, subject to lowering the pgoposed height, the Planning Staff recommended that the tower restaurant be located south of the park, in accordance with their understanding that Disneyland was most;seriously concerned with high rise structures proposed for areas to the Northwest, North and Northeast. Concerning the height limitation standards~ at that time under study, ~r. Karos advised that the Planning Staff informed them the standards would apply only to high rise buildings, not tower structures. ~r. Karos felt that to deny their request would set a pre- cedent for future denial, s to use valuable air space rights in the City of Anaheim, and used as an illustration the new Pan-Am Building being erected over the Pennsylvania Station in New York~ according to his information, the air-space rights costing in excess of thirty-three million dollars. 8391 City Hall~ Anaheim,.California - COUNCIL MINUTES r January 26, 1965! 1:30 Po~ Attention was called to the Space Needle in Seattle, Washington, which overlooks Queen-Ann Hill, one of the finest residential areas, $~u'bTs~a'n%Jan!t~i'-s!fing the opinion that "invasion of privacy" is not a valid reason for denying subject application° Mro Karos was of the opinion that this major tourist attraction would.bring a minimumof two million visitors each year to the City of Anaheim~ and that it would compliment both the proposed Anaheim Convention CeNter, and the'Disneyland Park° ~-- .............. ~ In. summation, Mro Karos.requested that the City Council judge this ap~licati0n on its own merits, and not be influenced by the apparent negative ......... %{tttude taken by a major industry in the area° Councilman Dutton .asked if any investigation had been conducted by the Civil Aeronautics Association. Mro Karos replied that the petitioners requested the C.A.A. to delay any study because of possible site relocation. However, the C.A.A. representatives indicated to them that they nad no objections to the proposed tower provided they are informed as to the exact lOcation thereof, and that an adequate beacon be provided on top of the tower. Mro David Colltns~ reported that the C.A.A. advised their jurisdiction is recommendatory, however, buildings in New York City higher than the proposed tower have presented no major problem. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council in favor of Conditioaal Use permit Noo 606° Mro Abe Eidelson, owner of property adjacent to the proposed site~ stated that after giving considerable thought to the proposal~ he considered the proposed development a mutual benefit to the neighborhood an~ urged a favorable decision° The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City CounCil in support of subject application, there being no response, asked if any- one wished to offer opposition. Mr. Wallace Wade~ Manager of the Marketing Division at Disneyland, addressed the City Council advising that no less than 15 hearings have been held on the subject of high-rise construction in the Disneyland area resulting in the establishment of a policy regulating height limitation standards for the area° Further, Disneyland's world of visual illusion was ~lanned to be enjoyed from ground level~ it has never been claimed that visual illusion was gained in the air° He noted that visitors spend approximately 5~ of their time on rides or attractions above grOund level, and 95% of their time in fantasy; three million dollars were invested to create ~this illusion° He called atten'tion to their cooperation with the City and other local people to help create new tourist attractions in this area, forexample~ the Anaheim Baseball Stadium and the proposed Cherry Blossom .Land, an oriental theme park° Reference was made to height limit standards, established for the Commercial Recreational area by the City, and Mro Wade was of the opinion that these limits should be adhered to. He felt it would not be right to take a chance of damaging one organization, or attraction for the benefit of another. Councilman Dutton noted that the height limit standards were not inflexible, that they were to be used as a guide, with each application for hiigh-rise structures to be judged on its own merits. He asked What per- centage of visitors to the park ride the monorail.. Mr. Wade advised that he did not have-thelfigures before him; however, the closely tabulated attractions were averaged and it was -estimated that 5% of the time visitors spent on all attractions was spent on rides or attractions which are elevated° 8392 qity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNQ~L MINUTES - January. 26, 1965,' 1130 P.M. In answer to Councilman Dutton's first comment, Mr. Wade stated that they understood each request for high-rise structures must.be individually reviewed, however he felt when each request is made all facts should be considered as to whether or not the standards established as a guide should be broken. He further advised%hat it was his understanding the restaurant portion of the proposed Angel Tower would be approximately 50 feet by 200 feet in size. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in opposition~ Mro Stephen 3. Slade, Assistant Secretary, Los. Angeles Airways, Inco, a scheduled helicopter airline, addressed the Council explaining ~ the Federal Aviation Agency procedure 6f informal aeronautical Studies conducted when a proposal of this nature is made, and advised that Los Angeles Airways forwarded comments regarding subject application; however the F.A.A. apparently did not act on the matter, as the obstruction proposed was withdrawn in October of 1964, and as of this date the aeronautical study has not been completed. Mr. Slade stated that the tower restaurant is proposed to be 1,pCated near the heliport, and the L.A.A.'s comments to the F.A.A. concerned problems which could arise relative to direction of approach, altitude restrictions, flight minimums, and possible navigation around the structu~particularly in deteriorating weather conditions. In answer to Mayor Chandler's question, Mr. Slade stated they were concerned that the proposed lOcation is within the Los Ang~eles Airways' helicopter flight track, as established by specificati6ns of both the F.A.A. and L.A.A., and route deviations might be requi~ed as result, which in turn would affect their scheduling and possibly conflict with other established flight patterns. In answer to Councilman Dutton's inquiry, Mro Slade r$ported that this heliport has the reputation of being the busiest throughout the world and compares basically with 98% of all airports handling local service traffic. At the Aeronautical Hearing all matters concerning the proposed project and its affect on aerial operation would be considered. At this time Los Angeles Airways takes the position of neither approval or disapproval of the proposal. Mr. Marvin Wendt, 210 South Florette, addressed the City Council in opposition to the conditiOnal use permit, being of the opinion that the tower restaurant would be a visual intrusion to the Disneyland Park. Mr. Wendt questioned whether or not the proposal would have been made had Disneyland Park not existed. At the invitation of Mayor Chandler~ Mr. David CollinS, representing the applicant, addressed the City Council in rebuttal, stating it was his belief that the tower restaurant would be successful whether it was in close proximity to Disneyland or not. He felt that the visual illusions enjoyed at Disneyland are transitory~ and would not be disturbed by the'"Angel Spire". ~ Mr. Collins read from a prepared statement (copy on f~le) concerning the Stanford Research Institute Study of the area; the present and future land values; the necessity to develop the land to itt highest potential. ~ Mr. Collins noted the location as proposed, being of %he opinion that the Spire would be a significant aid in attracting conventions to the new convention center, which in turn will attract tourists to the Commercial-Recreation area during the winter months. 8393 City HallI Anabeim~ Califernia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 26~ 1965~ i~3~P~. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Coltins~advised that they had considered a location in the area of thebaseball stadium~ however, because the stadium will be dark three-fourths of the time, they felt that the spire would make the greatest contribution on the proposed site. Concerning question pertaining to ingress and egress to the property, Mr. Collins stated that they would be willing to stipulate to a condition that they meet requirements of the City Engineer for provision of adequate ingress and egress° ~. Qon¢¢~tng the ir pos it ion should the site of the proposed convent ion cente~~, mr. Collins advised that they 'would re-evaluate their plans and consider possible relocation of their spire, to a site which would compliment the convention center. Mayor Chandler asked if there were any further questions of the Council, there being no response, declared the public, hearing closed. Council discussion was held, and Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that although the proposed tower if allowed, might be the least detrimental to Disneyland, it would establish a precedent for many other high-rise structures in the area which would destroy the visual illusion. R£SOLUTION NO. 65R-58~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65}{-58, sustaining action of the City Planning Commission, denying Conditional , Use Permit Noo 606° Refer to Resolution Book. A BEBOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERI, IT NO. 606. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley, Dutton~ Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOMS~ COUNCIL~EN~ N6ne ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-58, duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-67 AND VARIANCE NO. 1675~ Submitted by'Harding Iorres~ requesting change of zone from R-A to R-2, and permission to waive minimum required yard.area and minimum required pedestrian access- way~ property located on the west side of Gilbert Street, bounded on the southwest by the Santa Aha Freeway right-of-way° City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Noo 1458, Series 1964-65, recommended said Reclassification be approved, subject to the following conditions~ 1o That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 30 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Gilbert Street, for street widening purposes. 2o That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Gilbert Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks~ street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and !! specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer~ or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Gilbert Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer° If all parties are agreeable, Gilbert Street south of Rhodes Avenue may be abandoned and a knuckle constructed rather than a modified cul-de-sac. 4° That the owner of subject property shall .pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Gilbert Street, for street lighting purposes and due to the fact that frontages may change if a 8394 City Hall, Anaheiml. California - CQUNCIL MINUTRS - Janua.rY 261.1965,..1:30 P.~, portion of Gilbert Street is abandoned, said fee to be paid prior to final building inspection° 5o That:the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 156 per front foot along Gilbert Street, for tree planting purposes o ,. :~ L 6° That the owner of subject property shall deed to the CityOf Anaheim -a 3-foot overhang easement along the northerly bOundary or,subject property° 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2~ 3, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.- ~'~ 8. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the freewaY frontage of subject property as stipulated to by the,petitioner 'to be constructed prior to final building inspection. Variance No° 1675 was granted by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1459, Series 1964-65, subject to the following condittons~ ' 1o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25°00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation pUrposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 3o That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of~Reclassifi- cation No. 64-65-67° 4. That trash storage areas ~shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public WorES~-prior to final building inspection. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses in zoning in the immediate area. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the proposed use of subject property. There was no response° In answer to the Mayor's question, the petitioner indicated his presence at the hearing to answer any questions, and advised that he had nothing further to add° Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed on Reclassifi- cation No. 64-65-67 and Variance No. 1675. RESOLUTION NOo 65R-591 Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-59 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Pi'arming Commission, amending Condition No. 3 thereof to readl 3.' That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Gilbert Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer, provided, however, if prior to final installation of any accessways, Gilbert Street south of Rhodes Avenue should be abandone~, then a knuckle' could be constructed instead of a. modified cul-de-sac. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION oF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ FINDING AND DETF_R~INING ,THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE R~LATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-67 - R-2) Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCIIAtEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None 8395 City Hall,.Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 26, 1965, 1~30 P.M. The Maygr declared Resolution No. 65R-59 duly passed and adopted° RESOLUTION NO. 65R-60~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-60 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1675 subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A' R£SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAH~IMGRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1675. Roll call votel AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOESI COUNCIL~EN~ None ABS~NT~ COUNCIL~£N~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-60 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC H~AR~ING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-68 (VARIANCE NO. 1677, TENTATIV£ TRACT NO. 5141.~ AND RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-108)~ Submitted bY Oliver G. Baker, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-3 to .permit the establishment of two 45-unit motels with a restaurant and cocktail lounges property briefly described as located at 147 South Beach Boulevard. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1457, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification be app.roved, to the following condttions~ 1. That final plans for development be submitted to Development Review prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheir~ a strip of land 64 feet in width, including 15 foot radius corner returns at Beach Boulevard, for street purposes as shown on Exhibit No. 5. 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Beach Boulevard and Graciosa Lane, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineers or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City 'to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 4. That the owner of subject proper~ty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2°00 per front foot along Beach Boulevard and Graciosa Lane, for street lighting purposes. 5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 155 per front foot along Beach Boulevard and Graciosa Lane, for tree planting purposes. 6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 80 That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is conting~ent upon the approval of a revised map of Tentative Tract No. 5141. Mr. Mickelson noted the location and briefed history of subject property, noting that Reclassification No. 62-63-108, filed for R-3 zoni6g on subject property, included the additional parcel immediately to the west (Tentative Tract No. 5141). Subject application requests C-3 zoning on the Beach Boulevard frontage of the total property. Attention was called by Mr. Mickelson to. request from Russell Jay, Agent for the applicant, asking that a one acre portion of the Beach Boulevard frontage upon which the Baker residence is located, be retained in the R-A zone. 8396 C.ity Halli Anaheim~,:california - COUNCIL-.MINUTES -.Janumry, 26~ 1965, ~ 1~30 P.M. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the recla§sification, there being no response, asked~,if the applicant's agent wished to address theCoUn¢il. Mr. Russell Jay, 1590 Palm Lane, referred to description amendment marked Exhibit "A", and requested that the one acre parcel on which the Baker residence is situated be deleted from subject application, in accordance with'said Exhibit "A". The Mayor declared the public hearing closed on Reclassification No. 64-65-68.' -, ~ RESOLUTION NO. 65R-618 Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No, 65R-61, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as .requested, deleting from subject applicatioh the one acre residential pagcel, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 1 thereof by addi~g~the.'folloWing: ~i "...to insure that such final plans comply to all zoning ordinances." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETF_RMINING THAI TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-68 - C-3) Roll call vote8 AYES~ COUNCILMEN, Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Kretn and Chandler NOES~ COUNCIIJ~EN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-61 duly passed 6nd adopted. VARIANCE 16778 Submitted by Oliver G. Baker, requesting waiver of minimum required side yards, property located at 147 South Beach Boulevard (adjacent to the west of Property described in Reclassification No. 64-65£68). Said variance was filed in conjunction with Revision No. 3~ Tentative Tract No. 5141. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 1965, granted Variance No. 1677, Subject to conditions, and forwarded the application for City Council information and consideration. The foregoing action was reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on Variance No. 1677. ~ TENTATIVE N~p~ TRACT NO~ 5~41~, REVISION NO. 3~ Developer, Russell Jay~ tract located on the west side of Beach Bou[evard~.south of Lincoln Avenue "(Variance No. 1677), and contains 21 proposed R-3 lots. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 4, 1965, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions8 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one..subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Revision No. 3 of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5141 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassificati!on No. 62-63-108 and the approval of Variance No. 1677. 3. That an easement shall be dedicated and an underground off&site storm drain shall be constructed to the Orange CoUnty Flood Control Channell o_~r the drainage shall be discharged by other means to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. That a dedicated alley be provided along the west tract boundary o_~r access to the proposed alley in Tract No. 4230 be obtained~:by~acquiring Lot "C" of Tract No. 4230. 8397 City HallI Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES~..-,January 261 1965, I~30P~M. 5..That Beach Boulevard in front of the two "Not a Part" parcels be fully improved. ~ 6. That the one foot holding strip along the northerly and southerly tract boundaries be designated as Lot "A" and Lot "B"~ and that a predetermined price for Lot "A" and Lot "B" shall be calculated and an agreement for dedication entered into between the Developer and the City of Anaheim prior to approval of the final tract map. The cost of Lots "A" and "B" shall include land and a proportionate share of the underground ..~. utilities and street improvements. Mr. Mickelson reported that the revisions of the proposed, R-3 tract entails a change in access, in that the northerly east-west street from Beach Boulevard (originally to connect with proposed street in Tract No. 4230 to the west) is omitted, and the southerly east-west access from Beach Boulevard, connecting with proposed Graciosa Lane in tentative Tract No, 4230, ~s retained, with a cul-de-sac street extending northerly there- from through subject tract. Councilman Pebley moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5141, Revision No. 3, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City , Planning Commission. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REC,LASSIFIQAT.ION NO. 62-6~-108~ Submitted by Oliver G. Baker for property on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 320 feet south of Lincoln ' Avenue, proposed R-3 zoning unde~ Resolution of Intent No. 63R-475. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1473~ Series 1964-65, recommended the amendment of legal description~ which included property described in ReclassificatiOn No. 64-65-68~ Variance No. 1677 and Tentative Tract No. 5141. Action by the City Council on the foreging proposed amendment was continued from the meeting of 3anuary 12, 1965. R£SOLI~..ION NO. 65R-62~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-62 ~ for ad~ption, amending legal description contained in Reclassification No. 62-63-108, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING RESOLIrrION NO. 63R-475 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-108. Roll call vote~ AYES8 COUNCII.~IEN8 Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES8 COUNCII3~N~ None ABSENT8 COUNCII~£N8 None The Mayor declared Res~lu~ion No. 65R-62 duly passed and adopted. R£C.~S~I. Councilman Krein moved for a 15 minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8857 P.M.) AFTER,R~C£~S8 Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present. City Attorney 3oseph Geisler was also present at'this time. CONVENTION CENTER SITE - SOUTH SIDE~ KATELLA AVENUE~ ~ayor Chandler announced his withdrawal from the discussion and action on this issue and stated, as to the question of '~onflict of IntereSt", in his opinion there never has been nor is there now a conflict of interest~ his withdrawal was only because of a "possible" conflict of interest. Mayor Pro Tem Dutton assumed chairmanship of the meeting. 8398 City Hall~ AnaheSm, California - COUNCIL MINUTES .- January..26~ 1965 The City Attorney reported on negotiations for the acquisition of the proposed Convention facility site, advising that after lengthy and involved discussions with the property owners and the attorneys representing the multitude of trust deed holders concerning what in his opinion was an acceptable agreement, the attorneys for said trust deed holders have determined the agreement to be unacceptable. Mr. Geisler further reported on attempts made to resolve those areas which were not acceptable, and advised that at this time, Ne had no document to present to the City Council for action. Basically, the City is in a position to clear title on the property, ~lth the exception of the seven and one-half acres, plus another one and ohe-half acre.n6t involved in the City purchase of which the obligation would still be that of the attorneys for the trust investors to clear title. In addition, clarification of claim by Raymond and Associates is necessary; however, the City of Anaheim has their assurance that they will cooperate with the Orange County Title Company to set up a method by which this matter can be cleared; said claim involving a two acre parcel adjoining the aforementioned seven and one-half acres, and would in part include a portion of the actual convention building site. In answer to Council questioning, Mr, Geisler explained the many problems involved in an eminent domain proceeding on subject property, and further stated that these problems could possibly be resolved by an expenditure of some Thirty to Sixty Thousand Dollars, additional to the amount designated by the City Council for acquisition of the site. At this time, he recommended that negotiations to acquire the site~~under discussion be continued, and that other possible locations be investigated. At the conclusion of the di~s~ussion, Mr. Geister's recommendation was accepted, and no further action was taken by the City Council. Mr. Ralph Petreny, 111~ DeWey Place, addressed the City Council being of the opinion that because of the considerable effort already spent to procure the property, eminent domain proceedings should be instigated in order to obtain subject property. Mr. Ben Schroeder, President of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, addressed the City Council offering the services of the Chanfoer in acquiring the Convention Center site. Mr. Fred Tierbock~ co-owner of Alpine Motel, 795 West Katella Avenue, questioned the City Attorney at length on the procedure of acquiring the property by eminent domain. Mr. Geisler again explained the procedure and reported that because of the complexity of problems involving the property, it could be two or three years before possession could be obtained by eminent domain. He further reported the reasons for his reluctance to serve the many lease hold interests by constructive service. At the conclusion-of the discussion, Mayor Chandler resumed chairmanship of the meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-63~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-6"3 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE UTILITIES DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO EXL~CUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AGREF~ENTS FOR THE SUPPLYING OF WATER IN THE CITY. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN,' Pebley, Dutton~ Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCIL~EN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ None 8399 City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUIF~ - January 26~ 1965,...lt30 P,M, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-63 duly passed and adopted. NOTICE OF M~ETiNGS: The City Council was notified of the following meetings: a. February 10, 1965, 2:00 P.M. - Orange County Board of Supervisors meet- lng regarding the Worlds Fair. b. February 12, 1965, 7=30 P.M. - Baseball Writers' Dinner in Los Angeles. ORANGE.COUNTY HEALTH DF~ARTMENT PERSONNEL: The City Manager reported that at the most, recent Orange County Board of Supervisors meeting, consideration~ was gtven to employment of one or more additional Sanitarians {or the Health Department to assist with inspection of all hOtels and motels; however the Board of. Supervisors withheld action at this time. PROPO~F/) AGREEMENT - KATF. LLA AVENUE MODIFICATION= Mr. Murdoch reported that the Orange County Board of Supervisors discussed a proposed agreement between the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange for the improvement of a por- tion of Katella Avenue, said agreement setting forth financial responsibility of the City of Anaheim for the disbursement of certain arterial funds for this project° No action was taken by the City Council at this time. RB~U~I - ANAHEIM CONCESSIONS= The City Manager reported that a request has been received from Anaheim COncessions, asking for the return of all those mater- ials submitted with their hid for concessions at Anaheim Stadium which have no~ yet been released. Mr. Geisler explained his review of the materials originally sub- mitted, advisin9 that the only items retained hy the City of Anaheim were those which had specific connection with the Anaheim Stadium. All other items have been returned to them, Due to the fact that a law suit may be filed, it was his opinion that those items must he retained until the con- tract with Automatic Canteen is fully executed. VI$ITQR AN$ CONVENTION BUREAU RBQUEST - CITY SPONSORSHIP OF ORIENT TOUR DELEGATE: Communication dated January 22, 1965, from the Anaheim Area Visitor and Convention Bureau, was submitted recommending that the City Council sponsor Mr. Charles Currier as a dele9ate on the AGTA Gray Line and ASTA Orient Tour, March 6 to 29, 1965. No action was taken by the City Council at this time. CHAmBeR OF CONt~RCE - LEASE..OF~'~UNIOIPAL PARKING= Mr. George Strachan, Manager of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, requested that approximately twelve to fourteen parking spaces located in one row of the Municipal Parking lot on Chartres Street, between Anaheim Boulevard and Lemon Street, be rented to business people in the area for all-day parking purposes. ~ ~'~ Mr° Murdoch reported..tk~t~the .parking lot referred to was to be further improved in conjunction with redevelopment of the one hundred block on, West Lincoln Avenue. ~ Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, the' City Manager and City Attorney were requested to investigate the matter and report their findings to the City Council at a later date. AD~QURNMF~NT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. AD3OURNED: 10:30 P.M. City Clerk