Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1965/02/02
8400 City Hall~ Anaheim, Cal. ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2~. 1965~ 1~30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT~ ABSENT~ PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN,' Pebley, Qutton, Schu%te, Krein and Chandler. COUNCIL~EN~ None. ASSISTANT CITY Nt~NAGF~R~ Robert Davis. ASSISTANT CITY AT/ORN~Y~ 3ohn Dawson. CITY CLERK~ Dene M. Williams. CITY ~NGINEER~ 3ames P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR~ Robert Mickelson. PLANNING COORDINATOR~' Allan Shoff. Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. MINUTES~ Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings held January 12 and 19, 1965, and Adjourned Regular Meeting of January 22, 1965, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilman Dutton left the meeting~ 1~35 P.M.) RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-39 AN~ CONDITIONAL USE PF_RMIT NO. 632~ Communication dated January 26, 1965~ from Frederick B. and Blanche Morley, was submitted requesting amendment to legal description contained in Reclassification No. 64-65-39 and Conditional Use Permit No. 632 to reflect a lesser amount of property than that originally described. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-64~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No.-:65R-64 for adoption~ amending Resolution of Intent No. 64R-927. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64R-927 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 64-65-39. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ TEMPORARILY ABSENT~ COUNCILMAN~ Pebley~ Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-64 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-65~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-65 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 64R-928. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~F_NDING RESOLUTION Noo 6&R-928 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PF_RMIT NO. 632. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ NOES~ COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ TEMPORARILY ABSENT~ COUNCIIA~N~ Pebley, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None Dutton ' The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-65 duly passed and adopted. IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-39~' Irrevocable offer of dedication of a 5 foot strip of land 140 feet in length for alley widening purposes~ executed by Frederick B. and Blanche Morley~ in conjunction with Reclassification No. 64-65-39~ was submitted and approved as to form~ .and the CiTy Clerk authorized to record said irrevocable offer of dedication~ on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOIION CARRIED. 8401 City ~all, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2~ 1965~ 1:30 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-110 AND CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 248~ Request of Linbrook Hardware for permission to delay construction~of wall along the southerly boundary on Parcel 3 of property described in Reclassification No. 61-62-110 and Conditional Use Permit No. 248, was before the City Council January 19~ 1965~ with no action being taken at that time. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte~ temporary waiver of wall construction on the southerly boundary of Parcel 3 was granted for a period of one year~ subject to the posting of a bond to guarantee said wall installation° MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-68 AND VARIANCE NOo 1616~' Action by the City Council on report and recommendation by the City Manager that portions of wall construction along Fairhaven Drive and Crescent Avenue be lowered, was continued from the meeting of 3anuary 26~ 1965, pending visual inspection of the property° '(Keystone Savings and Loan Property - Reclassification Nco 63-64-68 and Variance Nco 1616)o RESOLUTION NO. 65R-66~ Council discussion was held and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nco 65R-66~ amending Resolution No. 64R-159 in Reclassification proceedings No. 63-64-68, on the basis of the finding that for the health~ safety and welfare of the citizens of Anaheim, walls should be modified as recommended by the City Manager 3anuary 26, 1965 (Minute Page 8389)0 Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6AR-159 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 63-64-68. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: TEI~PORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Pebley, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-66 duly passed and adopted. (Councilman Dutton returned to the meeting, 1~50 P.M.) PUBLIC HEARING - BILLBOARDS~ City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1460~ Series 1964-65~ recommending the amendment to Title 18 by the addition of Chapter 63~ Billboards~ and City Planning Commission Resolution Nco 1461~ Series 1964-65, recommending the amendment to Title 18, Section 18.64.020 (3-f) Use-Billboards° Staff report from the City PlaBning Department dated 3anuary 27, f965, setting forth the background of the proposed ordinance and explaining portions thereof~ was submitted and reviewed (copies furnished each Councilman). Assistant Planner 3ack Christofferson briefed the high points of the proposed ordinance~ advising that billboards which would be located along freeways were excluded from this ordinance~ being governed by the Anaheim municipal Code. Mr. Christofferson called attention to chart posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers, entitled~"Amortization of existing R-A billboards - zones permitting billboards - and potential billboard site". The ck~z'c ~]tustrated how billboards will be restricted to certain locations along major arterial highways~ primary and secondary streets~ in conjunction with the proper zoning~ as well as reflecting existing billboard signs. He pointed out that the center-city area was not included for billboard locations~ since it is under urban renewal study by Victor Gruen and Associates; also omitted were Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard~ due to their location in the commercial-recreation area, plus their connection with the baseball stadium and the downtown area, respectively. 8402 F City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2~ 1965~ 1730 P.M. Slides were shown illustrating some of the 97 existing billboards in the City of Anaheim, 38 of which are oriented to freeways. Discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. Chris%offerson, and it was noted that this ordinance has been understudy and preparation for approximately five years. The Council expressed their desire to receive comments from representatives of the billboard industry. Mr. Don Davis, of Foster and Kleiser Division, 1550 West Washington Boulevard, Los Angeles, addressed the City Council complimenting the planning staff for their accomplishment, and the City Attorney's Office for their assistance. He was of the opinion that the approach taken and the proposed ordinance was very reasonable, and felt that it will be beneficial to the City of Anaheim as well as to the industry. In answer to Councilman Krein's question, Mr. Davis advised that the proposed three to five year period was stipulated for existing signs to conform with the ordinance as a reasonable length of time in which to amortize investments in signs which would become non-conforming. He pointed out that many of their potential non-conforming signs would be removed in advance of the three year minimum, due to ~evelopment of vacant properties on which the signs are located. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Krein moved that the City Attorney be instruc- ted to prepare necessary ordinance, substantially in'accOrdance with recommendations as presented, including those contained in report dated January 27, 1965. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - CON~ERCIAL-R~CREATION AREA POLICY~ SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPING: The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1~64, Series 1964-65, recommended the establishment of a setback and landscaping policy along the street frontages in the commercial-recreation area, as set forth in said resolution. Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning CommissiOn meeting held January 4, 1965, were submitted advising that when the original commercial-recreation area setback study had been initiated, Freedman Way and Clementine Street were not extended; since that time said streets were extended and development occured, therefor the City Planning Commission recommended that Freedman Way and Clementine Street be included at the public hearing before the City Council pertaining to said policy. Mr. Mickelson briefed the background information and proposed setback and landscaping areas for the various streets within subject area~ referring to aerial map posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber. He no%ed the flexibility of the prOposed policy, and advised that it was not the intent of the City Planning Commission to ask established businesses for immediate conformance to the policy~ however~ if expansion w~re to take placer new or additional landscaping might be requested. Basically the policy would apply to new developments. C~un¢il discus~ign was held~ and Councilman Dutton expressed In answ~ %~ mayor Chandler'~tion, ~r. m'i~bn reported ~ha~ ~h~ variati~h in ~ ~roposed re~ents al~ ~%~in streets was based ~ ~ ~asks {St ~9 and land,taping ~lished on the ~jorfty d~ ~ing devel~%s on Bald s%reet~% He stressed %he fact that dev, i~e6~ propose~'~n %~ C~ ares ~e ,~%owed only ~ ~nditional us~ perm{{' and 8403 City Mal.l~ Anaheim~ Cali{ornia COUNCIL ~INUT~S - FebruarT~.2~ t965, 1~30. P,~. Subject %0 the approval of the City Planning Commission and the City Council. ~ayor~Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council concerning the proposed policy. Mr. Leo Freedman indicated his desire to address the Council. Therefor due to a possible conflict of interest, ~ayor Chandler withdrew~ from the meeting, and ~ayor Pro Tem Dutton assumed chairmanship. Mr. Leo Freedman, 7 Freedman Way, called attention to the fact that usually lessees are responsible for maintenance, of landscaped areas, which can be a costly item. In his opinion, landscape reqQirementsare greatly exaggerated, and he requested that Setbacks along Freedman Way be established at ten feet. Mayor Chandler resumed chairmanship of the meeting, and asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. ~r. Hiroshi Fujishige, owner of property on Harbor Boulevard, addressed the City Council indicating his opposition to the proposed fifty foot landscaping setback for Harbor Boulevard. Mr. Charles Currier, Manager of the Disneyland Hotel, 1441 South West Street, advised that when they expand their hotel, the proposed thirty feet of landscaping for West Street would eliminate approximately fifty parking spaces in front of the hotel. ~rg Mickeison advised that it was not the intent to require that a portion of asphalt paving of an existing parking area be removed, however~ if no-i~ landscaping exists on the property proposed for expansion, a minimum requirement would be recommended. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the City Qouncil D ~tr. Dave Collins, 1077 West Ball Road, was of the opinion that not only should the proposed policy be reasonably flexible, allowing creative landscaping and architecture, but also said flexibility should be written into the policy. Mr; Paul Schlund~ owner of property at 2036 South West Street, advised that he would be opposed if his residential property, adjacent to a C-R use, were required to comply with landscaping setback for West Street. ~r. James Rose, 802 Glendale, Orange, representing Disneyland, advised that there is a parking problem in the commercial-recreation area, and perhaps additional study would ~eYe~'more realistic formula in keeping with the city's beautification expectations, while allowing for the increasing traffic and parking problems.' He requested an opportunity to study the proposed policy in detail. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded bY Councilman Krein, public hearing on recommended setback and landscaping policy in the commercial-recreation area was continued to ~arch 2, 1965, for further study. MOTION CARRIED. RR~CF. SS~ Councilman Dutton moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3~25 P.~.) (Councilman Pebley left the meeting, 3:25 AFTERRECE~S~ Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with exception of Councilman Pebley. 8404 C,i~y Hall, Aneheim~ C~tifornia'--C~KltAMI~UT~S,'-,Feb~u~r¥2t,,1965~l:30,'P;M. PUBLIC HMARiNG - GENFaRAL PLAN A~ENDMENT NO. ~7:' City Planning Commission pursuant 'to Resolution No. 1462, Series 1964-65, recommended that the Circulation Element Highway Rights-Of:-Way of the General Plan be amended by the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 47, establishing Cerritos Avenue and Douglas Road as secondary highways between Sunkist Street and the Santa Aha River, based on the following findings~ 1. That the preliminary estimates by the Traffic Engineer indicate daily traffic volumes on these streets will reach approximately 11,000 to 12,000 vehicles at ultimate development. The County standards for a secondary highway is 10,000 vehicles. Therefore, a secondary highway designation is deemed necessary. That although said streets are outside the City limits of the City of Anaheim they are represented as part of the Highway rights-of-way of the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response~ declared the public hearing.closed. · R~SOLU~IgN NO. 65R-67~ Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-67 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OB ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AM~NDML:NT TO THE G~NF-R. AL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 47. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN,' Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandle~ NO~S~ COUNCIL~N: None ABSENT: COUNCIL~EN~ None T~B~PORARILY ABSENT: COUNCIL~AN~ Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-67 duly passed and adopted. SIGN REQUESI~ Application submitted by Federal Sign and Signal Corporation, requesting permission to erect a non-conforming sign at'the IndePendent Bank, 129 West Lincoln Avenue, was reviewed by the City Council together with report from the Building Department. In answer to Council questioning~ Mr, William Barker, Sales ~ngineer for Federal Sign and Signal Corporation, advised that no letter of approval has. been. obtained from the adjoining property owner to the east. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, said sign permit was granted, subject to letter of approval from property owner to the east (sign "A"). MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-120 AND CONDITIONAL USE PF_RMIT N0. 571 - R£V,ISE~ PLANS~ Revised plans submitted by Standard Oil Company of California, in connection with Reclassification No. 63-64-120 and Conditional Use Permit No. 571, were reviewed by the City Council together with recommendations of the City Engineer and Planning Department-Development Review. ' Mr; R, C, Runion, Sr., representing Standard Oil Company, questioned the necessity of the required planting area in the rear of the service station, marked in red on the revised plans, and advised that a block wall constructed six feet from the finished grade would result in an eight foot wall on adjacent properties. Mr; Runion was advised that the six foot wall and the planter strip were required as a protection to adjoining R-1 properties.' Councilman Krein moved that Revised Plans marked Exhibits 1, 2 and 3~ Revision No. 1, be approved. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Revimed pl~n~ dated thi~ date and signed by Mayor Chandler. 8405 City Hall~ Ana. heim~ California - COUNqIL MINUTES -.February 2~ 1965~ 1.z3Q R~QU~T - FUNDS SOLICIIA.IION~ Communication dated December 2, 1964, from Mr~ ~lbert Hall requesting permission to solicit funds in the City of Anaheim for charity purposes, on behalf of the United Mission and Church in Los Angeles, was submitted. Mr. Hall, 2657 Dalton Avenue, Los Angeles, addressed the City Council advising that although they did not have a church in the City of Anaheim at the present time, their primary purpose in raising funds is to build a non-denominational church. He described the services performed by mission workers in the field, and noted the proportions of amounts to be solicited which would be used for religious purposes and for overhead expenses. In answer to Council questioning, Assistant City Attorney 3chh Dawson explained the provisions of Section 7.32.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code concerning allowable administrative costs for such solicitation of funds. Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton moved that the request to solicit funds be denied on the basis that the application is deficient under provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code.' Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. In answer to Mr. Hall's question, he was informed that a revised application could be filed, and if investigation proved the validity thereof, further consideration would be given by the City Council. (Councilman Pebley returned to the meeting, 4~15 FINAL~AP - IRACI NO. 5452~ Iract located on the southwest corner of 'Bast Street and Vermont Avenue, and contains 17 M-1 lotsl Developer ~ Parks Properties, Inc., L. Grant Robinson. The City Bngineer reported said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been posted and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required fees paid. In ~is recommended approval thereof, Mr. Maddox noted that in accordance with Condition No. 2 in the tentative map approval, the "Not a part" has been included in the final tract, precluding the necessity of dedication of access rights to Bast Street~ further~ because of necessary lot renumbering, Condition No. 3 should be amended to read as followsl !~Ihat a drainage easement be provided over Lot Nos. 7 and 18, from Lacy ~venue to Vermont AvenQe". On the recommendations of the City ~ngineer, Councilman Dutton moved Final Map~ Tract No. 5452, be approved as amended.' Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 30B NO. 9~2 - REd, OVAL OF PAL~. IRE~S~ Mr. Robert Davis reported on call for bids to be opened 3anuary 28, 1965, for the removal of 38 Canary Island palm trees on the west side of State College Boulevard, between Wagner Avenue and Ball Road, and transportation thereof to designated area on the Anaheim Stadium site, transplanting trees per specifications, to include protection of City electrical division communication cable during tree removal operation. He advised that one bid was received from American Tree Service, in the amount of $12,312 (Alternate "A") or, if the communication cable was remoVed:~'b~ them from the working area prior,to the'tree removat~.the~cost wO~ld be reduced '~ {o $11,172 (Alternate "B")~. Mr, Davis further reported that nb lb~s of trees was guaranteed, and the City' force-could remove.%he~trees~ however~,,.¢onsiderihg .the :equipment ~equired~ in his opioion the cost would:be higher than the bid received. It was determined by the City Council that the action on the foregoing matter be deferred to 7~00 P.M. for reports from the Director of Public Works (Page No. 8419). 84O6 C!t¥.:.~a~l, Ana-hei.~Catifernia - GOUNGIL.'MINq~ES - February 2~ 1.965~ l:30<P;~. PUBLIC SNLPROV~ENT PROJEGTS~ Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-68 ' through ~5R-71~ both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book~ RESOLUTION NO. 65R-68 - 30B NO. 301~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETF_RMINING THAI PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVF3~ENT~ TO WIT~ FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTF_RSECTION OF EAST STREET AND VERMONT AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 3011 APPROVING THE DESIGNS~ PLANS~ PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCIION THEREOFi AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUC- TION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVFA4ENT IN ACCORDANCE WIIH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 25~ 1965, 2~00 P.~.) RESQ~U.TION NO. 65R-69 30B NO. 300~ A RESOLUTION OF IHE CITY COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLEIION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT, TO WIT~ FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST AND SANTA ANA STREETS~ IN THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 300; APPROVING THE DESIGNS~ PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZINGTHE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING IHE CITY CL~RK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING S~ALED~PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 25~ 1965, 2~00 P.~.) ~ RESOLUIION NO. 65R-70 - PRO3ECT NO. 146-A. (UNIT 11~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DET~h~INING THAT PUBLIC CONV£NIENC~ AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSIRUCIION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC I~2ROVF~ENT~ IO WIT~ FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND EAST STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIm, PROJECT NO. 146-A (UNIT'i)I APPROVING THE DESIGNS~ PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION. THEREOF;' AUTHORIZING THE CONSIRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS~ EIC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CL~RK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF° (Bids to be opened February 25, 1965~ 2100 P.M.) RF~OLUTION NO. 65R-71 - JOB NO. 926~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVFJ~ENT~ TO WIT~ THS IMPROVEMENT OF SEQUOIA AVENUE~ FRO~ BROOKHURST STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET EAST OF SIESTA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 30B NO. 926; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS~ PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUC- TION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING IHE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE . INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR IHE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. '(Bids to be opened February 25~ 1965~ 2tO0 P.M.) Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ NOES~ COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~. COUNCILMF~ Pebley, Dutton, $chutte~ 'Krein .and'Chandler None None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 65R-68 through 65R-71, both inclusive~ duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO~ 65R-72 - 30B NO. 302~ Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-72 for-adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 8407 City ...Hall, Anaheim, California.- COUNCIL MINkFfES - February 2, 1965, i~30P~M, A RESOLUTION. OF TH~,. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHMIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANt, LABOR, SERVICES, ~Nt~TERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND. TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWERs-FU~L AND WAIER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY-TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVFJ~ENT, TO.WIT~ FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC'. SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND WEST STRL~T, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 302. (William R. Hahn) Roll call voter AYESI COUNCILMEN~ NOES~ COUNCILMENI ABSBNT~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None Mayor dectared Resot~tion,No. 65R-72 duly passed and adopted. R'IqHT.-OF-WAY CERIIFICATION - PROJECT NO. 155~ PART 21 On the recommendations of the City Engineer~ it was moved by Councilman Schutte) seconded by Councilman Pebley, that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign. right-of-way certification in connection with the right-of-way for Katella Avenue Street improvement, Lewis Street to 670 feet west of Lewis Street. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY~ The following claims against the City were denied and referred to the City Attorney and City Insurance Carrier, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Kreinl a. Claim filed by Bailie, Turner, Lake an~ Sprague~ Attorneys on behalf of Robert Cody for personal injuries and damages purportedly resulting from accident caused by the claimant's motorcycle striking holes in /L~ roadway on Orangethorpe Avenue on or abOut October 25, 1964. bo~ Claim submitted by 3acqueline Arnold for injuries and damages purportedly ~ resulting from collision with police car at the intersection of BrookhU~st ~ Street and Orange Avenue on November 17~ 1964. MOTION CARRIED° DINNER DANCING PLACM PF~RMIT~~ Application filed by Anthony DePiano for Dinner Dancing Place Permit from 8~00 P.M. to 2~00 A.M. every night at D~e's Restaurant, 1750 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police~ that permit not be issued until dance floor is completed and all pr6visions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are complied with, on motion b? Councilman Dutton, seconded ~y Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED~ ANGEL~ BAS~BALL CLUB~ Resolution of the Anaheim Municipal ~mployee'S Association, '"strongly urging the Los Angeles Angels to adopt the name "Anaheim Angels" after the conclusion of the 1965 baseball season, together with letter from ~rs, Bill Anderson regarding petitionsrequesting said club to rename the team'"Anaheim Angels", were submittedand~mderedreceived and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. Brso Bill Anderson addressed the City Council explaining the reasons for circulating the petitfons and noted that the request for the Angels Baseball Club to change their name was not an attempt %o usurp the contract already, entered into by the City of Anaheim and the Golden West Baseball Co.~ but merely 'to request consideration be given to the name "Anaheim Angels". Mrs. Anderson was commended by the City Council on the interest and enthusiasm shown, by the many signers of the petitions. CORR~PONDENCE~ The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. a. State Senator John G, Schmitz letter and news release indicating the California Senate's reaction tO Supreme Court decision on reaportionment, Senate 3oint Resolutions 2 and 3. 8408 City Hall~ Anaheim.l California b. Copies of senate 3oint Resolutions 2 and 3~ and letter from 3chh W. Smith, Chairman~ Orange County Ceordinating Repubtican. Assembly~ urging the City Council's concurrence with proposed Resolutions 2 and 3~ and support thereof, or the adoption of similar resolutions. Mr. Russ TOwnsend¢ 535 South West S%reet~ requested permission to address the City Council concerning proposed reapportionment of the California State Senate~ on behalf of Senator Schmitz. He asked for official Council's support of the foregoing resolutions by the State Se'nate~ and briefly outlined the contents thereof. The City.Council determined that the matter would be taken .under advisement. c. Anaheim Park and Recreation Commission Meeting - Minutes January 14~ 1965. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2101z Counciiman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2101 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTF. R 4.18, SECTION 4o18~010 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELAIING TO AMUSB~h~NT AND ENTBRIAIN- MENT PRFJ~ISES--RESTAURANTS. : After hearing read in full the title'of Ordinance No. 2101 and having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Schutte moveld'the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. r Roll call vote~ AYESz COUNCIL~F. Nz' Pebley; Dutton~ Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCIL~ENz None ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ None Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2101 duly passed ,and adOpted, ORDINANCE NO. 2102~ Councilman $chutte offered Ordinance No. 2102 for final reading, Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14~ CHAPTER 14.32, S~CTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No parking - portions of Walnut Street) After hearing read in full the t~{le of Ordinance 2102 and having knowledge of the contents therein; Councilman $chutte moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived, Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN,' Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCILM2N~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2102 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NO. 2103~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2103 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. 84O9 Ci%¥...Hallt Aha. helm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February .~t 19~5t 1130 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPT~R 3.44, SECTION 3.44.030 OF THE ANAhr~IM MUNICIPAL COD~ RELATING TO R~NTAL BUILDIN.G~. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2103 and having knowledge of the contents,therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call voter ~ AYESz COUNCII~ENt .Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCIL~ENI None ABSENTz COUNCILMEN~ None Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2103 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2104~ Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2104 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF TH~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-49 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2104 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the ~eading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded ~he motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote~ AYESz COUNCIIJ~ENI' Pebley, Dutton, Schutte' Krein and Chandler NOESz COUNCIL~EN~ None ABSBNT~ COUNCII~ENt None Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2104 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2105~ Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2105 for final reading° Refer to Ordinance Book. . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-8 - R-2) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2105 and having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived.' Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ NOES~ COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2105 duly passed and adopted.' ORDINANCE NO. 2106~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2106.'for final reading. Refer %o Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODS RELATING TO.ZONING.' (63-64-107 - C-i) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2106 and having knowledge of the contents %herein, Councilman Schatte moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein'seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 8410 City.Hall~.Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2~ 1965, 1~30 P.M. Roll call voter AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOESz COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENTz COUNCILMEN~ None MayOr Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2106 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2107z Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2107 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE.14, CHAPTER 14,32~ S~CTIONS 14.32.185 AND 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING. (Par~ing restrictions - Lincoln Avenue- Ball Road - Empire Street) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2107 and having knowledge of the contents therein! Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NOo 2108~ Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2108 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTF_R 18.52 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTIONS 18.52.050 AND 18.52.060, AND BY DELETING SUBPARAGRAPH (h) OF PARAGRAPH (2) OF SECTION 18.5~.060. (Site Development Standards After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2108 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the .reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2109~ Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2109 for f{rst reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF IHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.- (64-65-38 - C-i) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2109 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said ordinance bewaived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY,CARRIED. RECESS~ Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 7~00 P.M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5~01 P.M.) AFTER REOESS~ Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. PRESENT~ ABSENT~ PRESENTI COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN~ None. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER~ Robert Davis. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYz' 3chh Dawson. CITY CLF_~K~ Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEF~R~ 3ames P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR~ Robert Mickelson. PLANNING COORDINATOR~' Allan Shoff. Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. FLAG SALUTE~' Councilman Dutton led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ~ CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RF:CLASSIFICAIION NO. 64-65-66~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 659 AND GENERAL PI~ANAM~NDM~NT NO. 48~' Submitted by Grace Elizabeth Dicker$on, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-2~ and permission to establish a one and two-story multiple family planned residential develop- ment with subterranean parking~ property located on the north side of 8411 C.i.ty .H.all~ Ana.hei.m~ California - COUNCIL MIN .U~ .-~February~2~ 1965 Broadway, approximately 134 feet west of Date Street. Public hearing was continued from the .meeting of 3anuary 12, 1965, at the request of the Agent for the applicant for submission of revised plans. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to ResolutionsilNos. 1449, 1450, and 1451, Series 1964-65, recommended denial of said reclassification, general plan amendment, and conditional use permit. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, advising that properties adjoining on both sides are R-1 subdivisions adjacent to C-1 zoning, fronting on Lincoln Avenue. It was noted that application for R-3 zoning on the property was withdrawn, after denial was recommbn~d'by the City Planning Commissidn:~ In summarizing the evidence presented to and consideredbYl,the City Planning Commission, Mr. Mickelson noted findings of the Commission in denying these applica%ions~ and noted petitions submitted, one in opposition containing 161 signatures, and one in favor containing 12 signatures. He called attention to General Plan Amendment No. 48, posted on the west wall of the Council Chambers, advising that it was the finding of th~ Commission that the present general plan indication for the area in question adequately represents past and current city policies regarding possible future development of said general area. ~ Mayor Chandler asked if the applicant or her agent wished to 'address the City Council. Mr. Robert W; McMahon, Attorney for the petitioner, called attention to revised plans submitted after action had been taken by the Planning Commission. Said plans were prepared in accordance with the R-2 zoning ordinance, and the adopted standards for planned residential develop- ~nents, reduding the density approximately, one~%hird~ lowering, the nu~ber'bf ~nits from 6~ to~42~ p~an~ing~ the~ two~'t~o~:s.%o~¥c~bU,ildings in~.~%he.cente~ . of,~the develo~e~t~ He further~eport~d it~w~as e~fl.Omical~:~unfeasible to include subte.~r~nean, parking; ~herefo~.ga~r~geS and:~ ~ur.face.'~a~kin~w~e Mr. McMahon was of the opinion that the vacant land is a detriment to the neighborhood because weeds and dust conditions, whereas the projects planned would be single story wherever it adjoined R-1 property, and would be leased by the owner, with landscaping ingtalled and maintained by the o~mero ~He felt that~the increase in~,sshoollieniollmeh%'dan~t~affi¢: ~ene~ated by the development~wpuld beo¢i2~etmere:th~n, that which re~ul%~ f~om.a~ d~e~opme.nt of targe.':two-stOry §~ng~e~femil¥.. home~ on ~:pe rt¥. In conclusion, Mr. McMahon noted that the petition of opposition was signed by many people living some distance away from the property, while those people on adjacent properties which would immediately be affected, where not objecting. Mr. Louis Miller, 403 ~ast WardloW Road, Long Beach, Architect for the project, read from an article on city planning contained in the American Institute of Architects Journal.' He advised that the proposed development has been designed in an attempt to prevent urban scrawl, and noted variations in styles and sizes of buildings, and the spaces between %hem, retaining the general residential character. Mr. Miller displayed a rendering in color illustrating the appearance of the development from Broadway Street. Miss Grace ~. Dickerson, Applicant, addressed the City Council advising that subject property has been owned by her family since the year 1912, that she now resides on the property and intends to live in one of the units proposed. She noted the improvement of these plans, as compared to the plans proposed when the R-3 application was made. 8412 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2, 1965,. 1~30 P,~. Miss Dickers°n was Of the opinion that the development would increase the assessed valuation of property in the area. She explained her plans for setting aside sums derived from the rentals, so that the education department of Whittier College could aid deserving young people to become teachers. In answer to Council questioning, Miss Dickerson stated she had no intention of selling the property. Concerning the college fund, she advised that it would commence when the lease is in force. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to the development. Mr. Stanley Hankins, 223 Wayside Place, advised that the property fronting on Lincoln Avenue is zoned C-l, however no development has taken place° He was of the opinion that any multiple dwellings on subject property would be incompatible with adjacent single family residential properties. Mro Hankins noted that the revised plans were submitted after the City Planning Commission hearing, and had not been reviewed by the Com- mission; although the density proposed has been reduced, the development would still increase the density by at least 60 per cent over that indicated by the general plan. Concerning petition containing signatures of persons not immed- iately adjacent to the property, Mr. Hankins was of the opinion that they are affected, not only by development on subject property, but other vacant properties which might request multiple residential zoning on the basis of approval of subject applications. Concerning access to the property, Mr. Hankins noted that an access drive a minimum of 120 feet from both Date Street West and Wayside Place would conflict with Elder Street, extending southerly from Broadway, generating a traffic problem. Mr. Hankins further noted that some children in the Lincoln Elementary School District last year were transferred to other schools to alleviate the crowded conditions. He thereupon requested the City Council to concur with the findings of the City Planning Commission, and deny subject applications° Councilman Dutton asked what were the specifics that make R-1 and R-2 properties incompatible. Mro Hankins stated that since the general plan gives some pro- tection to property owners~ any usage other than indicated on the general plan would be incompatible; further, he noted prices of real estate in subject area, and failed to see why single family residential community advantages should be enjoyed by apartment dwellers. Mr. Hankins felt that R-2 zoning would overcrowd a neighborhood, and referred to the fact that residential property owners chose this location because of its single family residential characteristics. Further discussion was held, and Mr. Hankins felt that the City Planning Commission should review the revised plans, and if approved, in his opinion there would be little objection thereafter. On inquiry of the City Council, several persons in the audience raised their hands indicating their opposition to the proposed development. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. 8413 City .H. all~ Anaheim, California - CO,UNCIL MINUTES ~- February 2, 1965, 1~30 Mr. Art C. Paris, 217 Date Street ~est, addressed the Council in favor of the proposed development, advising that he encobnteredno' traffic problem entering onto Brdadwayi In his opinioh~ the highTquality.,develop- merit was the best that has been proposedlfor subject~property:, and it wouldl, be compatible with the neighborhood, .. i. ~ In answer to Council questioning, Mr. McMahon advised that the Lincoln Avenue frontage adjacent to subject property is also owned by the applicant, and will be included in the lease. Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed. Counci'l discussion was held, and due to the density reduction on revised plans submitted, it was the consensus of Council opinion that plans should be. returned to the City Planning Commission for review. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Duff.n, Council action on Reclassification No. 64-65-66, Conditional Use Permit No. 659 and General Plan Amendment Nco 48 was deferred tO February 23, 1965, and said applications were referred to the City Planning Commission for study and report on revised plans. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HF~ING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-691 Submitted by James G. and Madeline Lo Gantes, requesting change of zone from C-2 and R-A to C-3, property located on the west side of Beach Boulevard north of Ball Road (901-907 South Beach Boulevard)° The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1480, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification for approval, subject the following conditions~ That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Beach Boulevard, for street lighting purposes for the northerly 95 feet. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Beach Boulevard, for tree planting purposes° That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned~ shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant. That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. That subject property shall be dev61oped substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 1 and 2. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets. Mr° Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He advised the applicants propose to expand an existing restaurant and to construct a two-story motel on the rear of the property. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the reclassification, there being no response, asked if the applicant wished to speak. Mr. James Gantes, Applicant, advised that in order to make the best use of the property in question, he desired to expand the restaurant and construct a 30-unit motel. The Mayor declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUIION NO. 65R-73~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-73 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone' as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. 8414 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTB$ - February 2~ 1965~ 1~30 P'.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RE$OLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DEIBRMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE R£LATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND IHAT THE BOUNDARIES OF C~RTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE GHANGk'D. (64-65-69 - C-3) Roi1 call voter AYE$~ COUNCIL~EN~ NOESz COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~ COUNCII~EN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-73 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RF/]LASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-70~ Submitted by Ball Investment ' Group, requesting a change of zone from R-A. to C-O~ property located on the south side of Ball Road, approximately 900 feet east of Knott Street (3350 West Ball Road). Ihe City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1481, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification for approval, subject to the following conditionsz That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball~Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2o Ihat the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road, for tree planting purposes. 3.That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4.That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire DepartmenT. 5. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Oaklawn Drive, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 5, above mentioned~ shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7.That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. 8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4. 9. Ihat all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view'from abutting streets. Mro Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He summarized the evidence submitted %o and considered by the City Planning Commission, and reported that the property is developed as a medical center, in accordance with Conditional Use Permit No. 265, granted by the City Council August 7, 1962. Ihe applicants are now proposing to add a restaurant, office facilities and office related uses to this medical center, which would front on Ball Road on the easterly portion of the property. Mr~ Mickelson further reported that the Commission felt that even though it is proposed to construct the facility to the height standards allowable in the C-O zone, the use of the property is more suited to the new C-1 zone, and for that reason, a new C-1 reclassifica- tion has been initiated by the City Planning Commission (Reclassifica- tion No. 64-65-84), which will be before the City Council at a future date. 8415 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIE$ - February 2~ 19651 1130 P.M. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to the proposed addition to the medical center, there being no response, asked if anyone wished to address the Council in support. Mr. A. L. Wolfert, 3404 West Ball Road, addressed the City Council in support of subject application, advising that the owners of the property have indicated they would agree to installation of a cul-de-sac street on the west side of the property, provided that he would dedicate 30 feet on the east side of his property to their 30 feet, and further provided that he assumed the expense for improving said street. He inquired as to whether the wall on the west property line would remain a condition. Mr. LeRoy Rose, Agent for the applicants, advised that at the present time they have filed a request to the City Council to allow posting of a bond to insure installation of said wall, as in the event that the property to the west is zoned commercial, the wall will no longer be necessary. Ihe wall required on the east property line would be installed, however, since adjacent property is residential. Mr. Wolfertwas of the opinion that R-3 zoning might possibly be the best zone for his property, and he again asked whether or not the wall on the west property line would be required. Mrl Rose advised that the applicants were in favor of installation of the cul-de-sac street, provided that each property owner donated half of the street and assumed responsibility for improvement of that half street. Mro Mickelson reported that the wall was a requirement under the conditional use permit, and would also be required under either C-O or C-1 zoning9 in the event that adjacent, property was put to residential use. Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-74: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-74 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to C-O, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETF~MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT IHE BOUNDARIES OF GF_RTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-70 - C-O) Roll call votez AYE$~ COUNCIL~£N.z NOE$~ COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ T]R~PORARILY ABSENT~ COUNCIIb1ANz Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-74 duly passed and adopted. REQUEST TO POST BOND~ Communication dated January 21, 1965, from LeRoy Rose asking permission to post a bond for one year to insure construction of masonry wall on the west property line of property described in Reclassification No. 64-65-70, was submitted together with recommendations from the City Engineer and Planning Department. Councilman Dutton moved that applicants for Reclassification No. 64-65-70 be allowed to post a $4,000 bond for a period.of .oh~.¥ear, in lieu of mas6nry wal~ c6netruction, on~,th~.westerly pr°perty'l~ne~'' Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC H~ARING - R~CLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-73~ Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to change the zone from R-A to C-l] property located at the south- east corner of Lincoln Avenue and Brookhurst Street, to zone the property'in accordance with existing use. 8416 City Hall, Anaheim, Calif.ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2, 1965, 1~30 The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1484, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of said reclassifica~on, uncondi- tionally. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to the proposed reclassification, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 65R-75: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-75 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended, unconditionally. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING /HAT TITLE 18 OF IHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-73 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-75 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-72 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 663: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission proposing a change of zone from R-A to C-l, and permission to operate existing bar on Parcel No. 4~ property located at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Lincoln Avenue, and presently developed in commercial businesses. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1482, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of said reclassification, uncondi- tionally; and pursuant to Resolution No. 1483, Series 1964-65, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 663, unconditionally. ~ The City Clerk called attention to City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1507, Series 1964-65, correcting Resolution No. 1482, Series 1964-65, to properly identify the ownership of Parcel No. 6. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to subject applications, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-76: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-76 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAI TIILE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING'TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-72 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNClLMF_N: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILM£N: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None TFJ~PORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-76 duly passed a~d adopted. 8417 City Halll Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Febru@ry 2~ 1965i 1130 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-77~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-77 for adoption. .' Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 663. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMF_N~ Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None /SMPORARILY ABSENTI COUNCILMAN~ Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-77 duly passed and adopted. PqBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-74~ Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission proposing change of zone from C-3 and C-1 to C-l; property located at the southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Broadway~ and presently developed as a service station. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1485, Series 1964-65~ recommended approval of subject reclassification, uncondi- tionally. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to said reclassification, there being no response, declared the Public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-78~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-78 for adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF C~RTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-74 - C-i) Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILM~N~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein Chandler NOES~ COUNCILM~N~ None ABS~NT~ COUNCILM~N¢ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-78 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-65-75~ Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission proposing change of zone from C-3 to C-l; property located at the northeast corner of Brookhurst and Orange Avenues, presently developed with a service station on a portion thereof. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1486, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of said reclassification, unconditionally. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the proposed rezoning, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 55R-79~ Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-79 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. 8418 F F City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MIN. UIE. S - Febru. arY. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELAIING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN zoNEs SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-75 - C-l) Roll call vote~ AYE$~ COUNCIL~£N~ NOES~ COUNCIL~EN~ ABSENT~ COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley~ Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler None None The Mayor declared Resolution No..65R-75 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HFARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-76~ Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission proposing change of zone from R-A to C-i; property located on the southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Orange Avenue, and developed as a service station. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1487, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of said reclassification, unconditionally. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition~ there being no response, declared the public hearing, closed. RF~OLUIION NO. 65R-80: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-80 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNGIL OF THE CITY OF ANAH£IM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AM£NDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-76 - C-1 Roll call votel AYES~ COUNCIL~£NI~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCII~EN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCII~BN~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-80 duly passed and adopted. REC~SS~ Councilman Pebley moved for a 15 minute recess.' Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8~38.P.M.) AFTF. R REGESS~ Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. ANAHEIM CITY CHARTER - JUNIOR CHAMBER OF CON~RCE~ Communication from the Anaheim Junior Chamber of Commerce was received in the office of the City Clerk January 21, 1965, proposing Council consideration of certain changes in the City Charter as outlined and attached to said letter. The City Clerk noted that subsequent communication dated January 27~ 1965, was received requesting that the matter be considered at the evening session of this meeting to allow interested citizens to attend. Proposed amendments were reviewed by the City Council, .and the Mayor asked if the representative of the Junior Chamber of Commerce wished to address the City Council. Mr. Lou Francis, 1253 Bluegrass Street, representing the Junior Chamber of Commerce~ advised that the Jaycee's were of the opinion that district representation by City Councilmen should be provided to the people of the City of Anaheimo~ Briefly, they are proposing that Council membership be increased to seven, three of whom would be elected at large, with four being elected by district; further~ that the office of Mayor be a separate 8419 City Hallt Anaheim. Catifgrnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - Fg~ru.arx 2,.t9~.5 ~ffice, to be elected by the people. Mr. Francis requested that a public hearing be set to consider the amendments as. proposed. Councilman Dut%on stated that so far as he was concerned, he, as City Councilman, represented every person residing within the City of Anaheim. Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the citizens should have district representation! and he pointed out that the Federal~ State and County Governments have proportionate representation, and felt that the same should apply to citie§~' Mr. Wayne Reedstrum, 517 South Falcon Street, addressed the City Council urging Council approval of the basic intent Of the recommendations submitted~ and requested a resolution be adopted setting the matter for public hearing before the City Council. Further discussion was heldo Councilman Krein was of the opinion that the City should operate under the newly adopted Charter for a sufficient period of time to determined if, in fact, changes are warranted. Councilman Pebley advised that in running for office of Councilman, he expressed his opposition to district representation, and that his position on this matter has not changed. Mayor Chandler referred to the "initiative,' ~ourse.of.acti6n available to the people, and suggested the Junior Chamber of Commerce collaborate with the Chamber of Commerce concerning any recommended changes. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was determined by the City Council that no formal action be taken at this'time on amendments to the Charter as suggested by the Junior Chamber of Commerce° REMOVAL OF TREES - 30B N©. 9221 Mr. Maddox reported on the one bid received for the removal of 38 palm trees on State College Boulevard. The City Council questioned the amount of the bid and asked if all firms performing this service had been contacted. Mr. Maddox reported on other firms contacted requesting a bid therefrom, and felt that the price as quoted was based on the prOblemSlin- volved and the method that must be used to. remove the tr~es, as the owner of the adjacent property refuses to allow entry, on h~s property; also,: reflected in the price quoted is the problem of an existing power'tine.: ~ ~ Mr. William Ho Gray, owner of American Tree Service, reported on his experlen, ce in the tree removal business and explained the method of removal planned to be used on this project. He further advised that if ~hey could enter the adjacent property, they would be willing to negotiate on the bid price Submitted. Further discussion was held, and Mr. Roland Woll, Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, reported on the work involved, and in addition, %he care to %he trees required to keep them until permanent location at the Anaheim Stadium site ca, be made° Mr. 3ohn Dawson, Assistant Cit~ Attorney, advised that the problem was that of timing, and questioned whether sufficient time would be available to prepare new specifications and advertise for bids. RESOLUTION NOo 65R-81~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-81 ~or adoption, rejecting all bids received for the removal of palm trees on State College Boulevard, fro~ Ball Road to Wggner S~r~et~3Db No. 922. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE REMOVAL OF TREES ON STATE COLL~GE BOULEVARD, 30B NO. 922. 8420 City Hall, Anaheim, Califqrnia -.CO..UN. CIL MINUTES.- February .2m...19~5,. 1.:.30 Roll call votel. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Krein and Chandler NOESI COUNCIL~ENI None ABSENT: COUNCILM~N: None T~PORARILY ABSF_NT: COUNCIL~N~ Schutte · /he Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-81 duly passed and. adopted. RESOLUTION NO.. 65R-82: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-82 for adoptions declaring the pDoject can be more ebonomically performed by day labor or on a negotiated basis° Refer to Resolution Book. A-RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGF. R TO PROCEh'D WIIH THE REMOVAL OF TREES ON STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, 30B NO. 922. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCILMF_N~ None ABSF. NT: COUNCILM~N~ None TF~PORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN~ Schutte · Zhe Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-82 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT: Public hearing on proposed abandonment of a portion of right-of-way easement, located east of Euclid Street, south of Palm Lane and adjacent to a portion of the northerly boundary of Tract No. 3840, was held January 26, 1965, at which time the hearing' was closed and Council action deferred to this date for further investigation by the City Attorney. Assistant City Attorney John Dawson reported that the right-of-way easement was acquired through the purchase of Anaheim Union Water Company facilities, rather than by dedication, and he was of the opinion that it was within the province of the City Council to proceed with the proposed abandonment° RESOLUTION NO. 65R-831 Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-83 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDF~ING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT C~RTAIN PORTION OF A RIGHT OF WAY EAS~ENT UPON, OVF_R, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HER£INAFTER DESCRIBF. D REAL PROPF_RTY. (.East or.Euclid Street, south of Palm Lane) Roll call votei AY~Sa COUNCILM£N~' Pebley~ Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ ~COUNCIL~£N~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMF. N~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-83 duly passed and adopted. R~CLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-35 AND coNDITIONAL US£ PERMIT NO. 313~' COntinued from the meeting of January 26, 1965, for receipt of written evidence of acceptance or rejection of the choice offered to four property owners adjacent to the west of subject property concerning screening of two- story multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Knott Avenue, approximately 614 feet south of Lincoln Avenue (Tract No. 5403). Mr. Dawson r~ported that attorneys representing the developers and the owners of property adjacent to the west contacted him by telephone and advised that all four property owner's~ w&th th~xception'of the owner with a swimming pool, were willing tO accept tre~s to be~.plant~d!.On thc.west side Of the wall between the propertie~ With th~ var~ty, size~and number to be 8421 C%ty Halll. Ana. heim, California - QOUNCI.L M, INUTES -.Febr.uary 2, 1965, 1~30 P.~. designated by the S~perintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Further, .the owner of the lot with the swimming pool requested that not only the trees be planted, but a four foot plastic fence be placed on top of the existing six foot bloc~ wallo The Attorney for Mr. Maddox, the Developer, indicated their willingness to bear the costs of the tree planting on the west side of the wall, and the four foot plastic fence being placed on top of the wall adjacent to the one. property owner who requested.it, No further action was taken by the City Council at this time. CLAI~ AGAINST TH~ CITY~ On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, claim filed by Elsa Kievits on behalf of Kenneth E. Ricks. for compensation and damages purportedly resulting from false arrest, was continued to February 9, 1965, for further~investigation. MOTION CARRIED. CONVENTION C~NTF_R SITE~ Mayor Chandler withdrew from the discussion because of possible conflict of interest and turned the meeting over to Mayor Pro Tem Duttono Mro Davis advised that at this time there was nothing to report on the status of the original convention center site nor alternate sites. However, he was of the opinion that a report will be available in another week~ Mro Dawson advised that a meeting has been scheduled by the City Attorney and Boller and Associates to be held February 4th, and that ~egotiations were still pending. : Others addressing the City Council taking this opportunity to ~riefly present their position in this matter were~ Mr. Ingall W'. Bull; Jro Mr~ Tom Coffman Mr. Clarence Mauerhan No action was taken by the City Council, and at the conclusion of the discussion~ chairmanship of the meeting was resumed by Mayor Chandler. REQUNST - BUILDING P~RMIT~ TRAD~ SC~O~L, Mro Davis read Section 18.40.070(4)(c), of the Anaheim ~unicipal Code~ newly adopted C-1 Site Development Standards for off-street parking concerning the provision of center-city parking, and advised that a request has been submitted by owners of property located on the west side of Lemon Street between Oak and Chestnut Streets, for a determination on this portion of the Anaheim Municipal Code as it pertains to said property°' The petitioners intend %o convert the building on said property to a beauty college, and it was their understanding, that 100 parking spaces would be required for this particular building, whereas there are now existing 40 spaces~ with sufficient area available for 30 additional spaces. Mr. Dawson explained the provision quoted by Mr. Davis, advising ~hat in lieu of requiring the additional parking spaces~ the city may include parking available in existing municipal parking lots as the balance ~equired in the center-city area; however, to accomplish this~ an "in lieu" payment by the petitioner would be necessary. Mr. Milton Copeland, Attorney representing the applicants, addressed the City Council with reference to Section 18.40.070(4)(a)(3~b), and advised that since the provision for that portion of the school used for assembly or instruction states one space per seat or per each ten square feet of gross floor area, without specifying "whichever is greater", it was his opihibn, that the intent was written in the alternative. If the parking required for the ~300 square feet used for teaching were broken down by ten square feet of gross floor area, 43 parking spaces would be required. He displayed a rendering in color of the building in question. 8422 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MIND, ES---February--2t 1965! .1:30 P.M. · ' Council discUssion was held~ and CoUncilman Schutte was of the opinion that there would be no parking problem resolving from the beauty college, and he felt that such parking requirements in the downtown area would be a deterrent to redevelopment. Mr. Ben Schroeder, President of the Chamber of Commerce, stated it seemed logical that the operators of the school should provide parking for the students° However, he was of the opinion that new industry and commerce should not be discouraged from coming into the center-city area. In answer to Council questioning concerning beauty college on North Lemon Street in the area of the Chamber of Commerce Butlding~ Mr. Schroeder advised that there have been no apparent problems, wi%h paMling as result of that operation° Mr. Dawson was of the opinion that the available 43 spaces on subject property do meet provisions of Section 18.40.070(4)(a)(3-b) of the-Anaheim Municipal Code, as they Would constitute one space for every ten ~quare feet gross floor area, o~, one parking space per seat. He', felt the prOposed operation wCuld not fall Onder the "heavy equipment" provi- tion. Councilman Schutte moved that the proposed beauty college be interpreted by the City Council as falling under the provision of the code requiring one space for every ten square feet of gross area. Council- man Krein seconded the motion. Further discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilmen Schutte and Krein withdrew the foregoing motion and second. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, it was the finding of the City Council that the existing 40 parking spaces on subject property are sufficient for the 40 seats to be used in' the proposed beauty collegei MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BR'VF. RAGE LICENSE APPLICATION~ AppliCation, submitted by the LebeCke Corporation for Premises. to Premises Transfer of Wholesaler's andImporter!s Beer and Wine Licenses, .for ~arehouse¢ operation located at 1315'South State College Boulevard (M-1 zone), was presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for their infOrmation. No Council action was taken on said application. (Councilman Pebley left the meeting, 11~10 P.~.) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-84~ On the recommendation of the Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 65R-84 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGR~F. MRNT ~PLOYING ROSE & FEARS, ARCHITECTS, TO PROVIDR ARCHITECTURAL S~RVICES IN CONNRCTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CORPORATION AND UTILITIES YARD AT 901 ~AST V~RMONT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAH£IM. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILA~EN~' Dutton; Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None T~MPORARILY ABSENT~ COUNCILMAN~Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-84 duly passed an~d adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-85~ On report and recommendation of the Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-85 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 8423 Ci. ty Hall~ Anaheim, California.- COUNCIL MINUTES - Februar¥.2~ 1965 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO REFUND CERTAIN WATF_R M~T~R DEPOSITS TO $/ELING HOMES #2. (Deed No. 3083) Roll call voter AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ Dutton, Sc~utte, Krein and Chandler NOES ~ COUNCI}3~MN ~ None ABSFmNT~ COUNCIL~N~ None /q~PORARILY AB$~NTt COUNCILMANt Pebley The Mayor declared ReSolution No. 65R-85 duly passed and adopted. (Councilman Pebley returned to the meeting~ 11715 P.M.) CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESIGNATION~ Pursuant to City Planning Con~nission resignation submitted by R. W. Mungall, Councilman Krein reported on his conversation with Commissioner Mungall~ concerning his resignation from the City Planning Commission. Councilman Schutte moved that the resignation submitted by R. W. Mungall not be accepted, and that he be requested to serve an additional four.,¥ear term. Councilman Krein.secohded the [mstion. ~OTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. HF_ALTH AWARDS - ANAHEIM RESTAURANTS~ Councilman Krein requested that Award of Excellence Plaques for high maintenance operation standards in Anaheim ~estaurants be scheduled on the City Council Agenda for the first Tuesday of every month° ADJOU~NMF. NTt Councilman Krein moved, to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. AD3OURNED ~ 11~17 P;M. ,? -' City Clerk C~t¥..Ha!l., Ana.~gim, Ca.lifor. nia - COUNCIL MINUTES -. February 9, 19~5, 1,30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESFJqTs COUNCIL~£N~ Pebley (entered meeting 1~55 P.M.)~ Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. ABSENTs COUNCIL~£N, None. PRESF. NT~ CITY MANAGER~ Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY NtANAGF_Rs Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEYs' 3oseph Geisler. DEPUTY CITY ATIORN£Y~ Furman Roberts. . CITY CLF~RK~ Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEF. Rs James P. Maddox. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Chandler. PR~S~TAIION - .DISNEY.LAND TF. NC~NNIAL~ Mayor Chandler submitted~ ~.read and ~resented the following proclamation to Mr, Walt Disney~