Loading...
1969/07/0169~405 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - CO~CiL MINUTES ~ Jul~~6.~ _l~:)0 ~.~M. o. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met' in regular PRESENT: ABSENT~ PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutt©n, Krein, Schutte~ Peble> and Clark COUNCILMEN~ None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER~ Robert M, Davis ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY~ John Dawson CITY CLERK~ Dene Mo Williams CITY ENGINEER~ James P, Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DE~iOPMENT SERViC~S~ Ronald Th~mp~©n FINANCE DIRECTOR~ Douglas Ko Ogden ZONING SUPERVIS©R~ Charles R~berts CONVENTION CENTER ©PERATIONS MANAGER~ EoJ~ St~tereau Mayor Clark called the meeting tc ~rder~ INVOCATION: Reverend L~Do Webb~ of the Church of Christ~ gave the Invc~catio~o FLAG SALUTE~ Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance t~ the Flag~ PROCLAMATION: Mayor Clark proclaimed the week of July 7 to 1~, 1969~ as "Ex=Prisoners of' War Week°" MINUTES~ Minut~es of the Anaheim City Council meeting he.ld June 17~ 1.969~ were approved <~.n motion by Cc. uncilman Dutton~ seconded by C~'~uncilman Pebley~ MOTION CARRIED° WAIVER OF READING ~ ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS~ Councilmam Dutnon m~ved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that c~nsent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read; ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ©rdinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the m©ticn~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° REPORT ~ FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY~ Demands against the City~ in the amount of $1~473,317.22, in accordance with the 1969~70 Budget~ were ap~ proved~ CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NCo 68~69;92 AND CONDITIONAL USK PERMIT NO. t112~ Submitted by La Salle Downey Industrial Properties, requesting a change in zone from County 100~M1-20,000 t~ R-A~ t~ establish a 257~space trailer park, with waiver of setback from an arterial highway. Property located at the southwest corner of Kraemer Boulevard and La Palma Avenue° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Re~olution No. PC69~101, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject tc the following cc.n- ditions: 1o That this reclassificati©n is granted subject to completion of the annexation of the subject property t~ the City of Anaheim~ 2, That the owner of subject property shall deed tc~ the City of Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet inwidth fr~m the centerline of the street along White Star Aven.~e, f~i~r street widening purp~ses~ ~ That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim al.c~g La Palma Aven~e~ White Star Avenue, and Kraemer Boulevard, such ~s curbs and gutters, ~idewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work sha]l be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the ©ffice of the City Engin~ eer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Ann~ heim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements° 4~ That the owner of subject pr©perty shall ~nstall street light~ ing along La Palma Avenue, White Star Avenue~ and ~raemer Boulevard, as re- quired by the Director of Public Utilities a~d in acc~rdance with standard plans and specifications on file in the ©ffic. e of the Director of Public Utilities~ amd that a bond in an amount and form satisfact~vr?' t~ the City of Anaheim shall be pested witb the City to guaranr, ee tbe installation cf said street lighting~ 69=406 City Hall~ Anaheim~ Califorqia 5~ That the owner of subject pr?petty ~hali pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per frop. t forint a~long La Palma Av~nue~ White Star Avenue, and Karemer Boulevard, for tree planting purposes. 6~ That Condition Ncso 1~ 2~ 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a peri. cd of 180 da~ from th~ date hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant~ The City Planning Conm~ission~ pursuant to Resolution Nc. PC69~ 102, denied said conditional use permito Public hearing was c~ontinued at the request of Applicant's At~ torney, from the meeting cf June 17, fo~ a bearing by the full Council° Zoning S~perviscr Charles R<~berts n~>ted the ]ocati~n ©f the sub ject property, the snrrounding industrial uses and zoning, proximity to the Riverside Freeway to the south, and agricultural land use to the west~ He reported that the Applicant pro, poses to establish a home park on the southerly portion ~f the pzopert?~ retaining for future development that portion fronting ©n ia Palma Avenue~ to ~n average depth of approximately 150 feet° Mr~ Roberts reviewed the findings of the City Planning Commis= sion, indicating the requested land ~se wo~ld adversely affect existing and project industrial land uses in the subject area. May~r Clark aske~d if the Applicant wished to address the City Council° Mr. Odra L~ Chandler~ 608 South Harbor Boulevard, Attorney rep~ resenting the Applicant, stated that the sobjec[ pr©perty did not actually have frontage on the Riverside Freeway or' Rraemer Boulevard, as stated in the report of the Planning Staff. that this access was taken away by the Freeway on-ramp~ He noted that approximatel~ 7~/2 acres were proposed for future industrial or commercial development~ and that the Applicant would agree to zone that portion M~i, if the City Council so desired° Mr. Chandler felt that the subject property differed from most other parcels in the northeast industrial area i~ that it lies below the level of surrounding roadways~ ~nd the proposed development would be sop= arated from the industrial area by the parcel with La Palma Avenue front~ age~ He noted that although the proposed use was residential in nature, it was not a permanent use, and would involve an overlay cf commercial activities as well. Mr. Chandler stated it was not universally true that ind~stry does not desire adjacent residential uses~ citing examples in the area of State College Boulevard and Ball Road, in support of his contention° He then quoted from an article which appeared in the Santa Ana Register, December 1, 1967, indicating that the shortage cf houses and apartments was driving new industry away from Anaheim~ Mr. Chandler was of the opinion that if the City Council felt the proposed development wo~]d, in the future, be an impingement upo~ nhe industrial area, a specific time limit c~uld be attached to the condition- al use permit~ He ~tated that alth©~gb a~ investment wo~ld stihl exist at the end o~ a given time limit it w~[d not behoove the City Council to grant an extension at th. at time~ that the conditional use permit would be self-terminatlng and w~uld require n~ further acti©n~ He called attention tc the fact that A~tonetics was deveiop~ lng a large residential subdivision for ho~sing cf their employees, with- in 1/2 mile of their Laguna Niguel fscil~ty', and n~ted that at their Anaheim facility trailers are being used f©r temporary office space~ He felt that it was unwise f~r t~he City to deper~d cn erie industry f~r the development of sc many acres, and shc~ld c~psider the subject proposal as it would bring commercial uses, s.~h as a grocery store~ barber shop, etCo that would also benefit empl,<>wees i~ the area~ 69-407 ~!~Z..~all, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1~ 1969~ 1~30 P.M. Mr. Chandler stated that the Applicants would like to develop the land for industrial use themselves; however, they were prevented from doing so for reasons both economic and political in nature. He reported the recent sale of property located on Kraemer Boulevard for which the owner received only $13,000.00 per acre, indicating that the property must be held in order to profitably develop for M-1 uses He felt that during this interim holding period, however, thecowner should be allowed to use the property for some other purpose. He cited figures which indicated that the average rate of development of industrial land in the area was 42.9 acres per year, and predicted it would take at least 34 years, to reach the saturation point for the use of land desig~ nated for industrial use~- and perhaps as long as 54 years if territory which is projected for annexation is included° He felt that the proposed use is the best possible interim use, in view of limited access, and reported that the architects felt the street pattern could be adapted to almost any plan for commercial or industrial use in the future. He called attention to the Ri- viera Mobile Home Park in the Disneyland Commercial-Recreational Area, which was developed as an interim use, and is now slated for development of a high- rise structure~ He submitted an aerial photograph of the subject property which he felt supported his statement for the proposed development~ that it would bother no one in the industrial area~ particularly with the proposed buffer strip. He referred to a letter of oppositiom from Autonetics, which he recalled as stating that the proposed development would have no impact on Autonetics itself, however, it may have an impact on the rest of the indus- trial area, and for that reason they were protesting it. Mr. Chandler noted that the densit~ of the proposed development would be only slightly more than found in an R~2~5~000 development, and that children would not be immediately prevalent~ although there may be scme in the future. He reported that the Applicant is in a poor position to retain the property; that he needs relief, and felt that no precedent would be set by granting the requested use° Mayor Clark invited those in opposition to address the City Council~ Mrs° Jessie Coykendall, 15332 East La Palma Avenue, stated that her main concern was ingress and egress from White Star Avenue, feeling that no problem would exist if it is limited only to La Palma Avenue° She stated that if the following changes were made in the proposal, she would not object to the subject development: 1. Reduction of the number of proposed spaces from 257 to 212. 2~ Construction of a 6-foot masonry wall, which would eliminate access to White Star Avenue and prevent children from playing in orange groves which could be hazardous to them and destructive to the property. 3~ Recognition of the fact that her property will continue to be used for growing oranges for an indefinite period of time, during which noise, drafts and dust may be created during normal activities necessary to such ag- ricultural land use. ~ 4. Provision for proper drainage of subject property to protect her property from run-off. Mr~ Gerald R. Knudsen, representing Bryan Industrial Properties~ Inc~, addressed the City Council in opposition~ He reported that his company had been engaged in industrial real estate development in Anaheim for more than 15 years~ and has a substantial stake in the continued growth of the area. With the aid of a map posted, he noted the location of a 14~acre parcel to the north of subject property, betweem White Star and Red Gum, which was currently under development for industrial use in the belief that the in- dustrial integrity of the area will be maintained~ He felt the subject pro- perty was a prime parcel for industrial development, due tc Freeway exposure, the adjacent off-ramp, which is the main e,trance t~ the northeast industrial area, and frontage on La Palma Avenue, which is a maim thoroughfare~ He felt the proposed interim use would have an adverse effect on the growth and de- velopment of the surrounding area. 69~408 9ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ July 1.~ 19694 1~30 PoM0 Mr. Knudsen read and submitted a letter from Gate Properties, Inc., owners of an 18-acre parcel located on the west side of Kraemer Boulevard, between La Palma and Coronado, which stated that they may abandon their plan to develop the property in 1970, should the subject application be approved. Council discussion ensued regarding the difficulties involved in holding land, with Councilman Schutte expressing the opinion that owners of such property should be allowed to utilize their property for the high- est and best use possible, as long as it would not harm others. There being no further statements in opposition, Mayor Clark offered the Applicant an opportunity for rebuttal. Mro Chandler stressed the fact that there was a housing sh©rt~ age, noting that 2 years ago the vacancy factor was 2% and it is now 1o8%, and pointed out that R-2-5,000 developments have become more numerous since residential land was in short supply, and therefore expensive~ He stated that there would be no objection to the requirements outlined by Mrs~ Coykendall for the protection of her property~ and further stated the Applicants wculd accept a 20-year time limit with the knowledge that such termination is final, unless the City Council wished to grant further extension. With regard to Mr~ Knudsen's statements, he stated that Bryan Industrial Properties, Inc. had many opportunities to purchase the subject property and felt they would have done so if it was indeed a prime indus- trial parcel. He noted that the company has holdings across from a mo- bile home park on Orangethorpe Avenue. Mr. Chandler stated that the proposed development would produce sales tax income to the City, and provide housing for industrial employ- ees, and noted that no trailer sales would be permitted. Mr. Chandler felt that undeveloped property was more inimical to growth of the area than property which was being used° Mayor Clark asked if a 15~year time limit would be acceptable to the Applicant, to which he received a negative reply. Councilman Dutton requested verification of a report that Macco Construction Company was interested in the property, to which Mr. Chandler replied that the owner had received no indication of such an interest; that his client was willing to sell for a reasonable price and would sell now to someone wishing to hold it; however, with an iron-bound policy re- stricting the use of the property, they will not sell unless they can de- velop it themselves. He noted that lacking the resources of a large de- velopment firm, it was impossible to develop an industrial park at their pleasure. An unidentified man from the audience requested that the letter of opposition addressed to the City Council, from Autonetics, be read, and Mr~ Chandler requested that the letter to the C~ty Planning Commission, from Autonetics, also be read. Both letters were read in full by the C~t'? Clerk~ It was determined by the Mayor that sufficient evidence bad been presented, and he thereupon declared the hearing closed. Councilman Krein observed that a fine presentation had been made by Mr. Chandler, however, he felt that by granting the conditional use per~ mit an undesirable precedent would be established, which would result in the development of trailer parks throughout the industrial section. Coun- cilmen Dutton, Pebley and Clark also agreed that the industrial integrity of the area should be protected. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-380: Councilman Krein offered Res,~lution No. 6qR~38~ for adopti~3n, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordination chang- ing the zone as requested, subject to the c~ndit[ons reco~mnended I~v the 69-409 ~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1~ 1969~ 1:30 P~M~ City Planning COmmission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-92 - R-A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-380 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-381: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-381 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 1112, as recommended by the City Planning Commission~ Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1112: Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-381 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2086: Submitted by Big Boy Euclid, Incorporated, to permit an existing statue as a free-standing sign in conjunction with an existing restaurant, with waivers of number of free-standing signs permitted, location of a free-standing sign, and minimum height of a free-standing sign, on C~I zoned property generally located south and west of the southwest cor- ner of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-105, denied said variance° Review of action taken by the City Planning Commiss- ion was ordered by the City Council and public hearing scheduled this date° Mr. Roberts reported that the Planning Commission's denial of the subject application was on the basis that the statue was not construed to be a sign; however, a later finding, based on additional recommendations obtained from the City Attorney's office, ruled that such emblems should be construed as signs and, therefore, would be subject to provisions of the sign ordinance. Mayor Clark asked if anyone present wished to address the City Coun- cil; receiving no response, he declared the hearing closed. In the following Council discussion it was agreed that s~]ch statues or three-dimensional emblems were to be construed as signs, and should come under the provisions of the sign ordinance, and further determined that ap- plications for such variances should be considered individually, rather than attempting to establish specific guide lines at this time. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-382: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-382 for adoption, granting Variance No0 2086, subject to the condition recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee and Development Services Department that sub- ject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos~ 1 and 2. Refer to Resolution Book. 69-410 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2086. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-382 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1114: Submitted by William Harmatz and William Shoemaker, toi establish a 74-space "mobile motel" on C-R zoned property generally located south and east of the southeast corner of Ball Road and Walnut Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No~ PC69- 108, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions° Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was or- dered by the City Council, and public hearing scheduled this date. The City Clerk noted receipt of a petition of opposition to the subject application, and two letters of opposition signed by Mr. and Mrs° Elio Ronconi and V.A. Harris. Mr. Roberts noted the location of the subject property, and ex- isting uses and zoning in the immediate area° He reported that when the application was considered by the City Planning Commission 75 trailer spaces were proposed and approved, subject to submission of development plans in the event the facility was to be expanded. Since that time the Applicants have submitted plans for expansion to 156 spaces, which were approved by the City Planning Commission. Mr. Roberts noted that at the City Planning Commission hearing there was some concern expressed relative to the width of Walnut Street; he pointed out that the conditions of the zoning reclassification required dedication for future widening purposes, and these conditions have been complied with. Councilman Pebley expressed concern that approval of such a re- quest would destroy the integrity of the Commercial-Recreational Area, and stated that, in hi's opinion, travel trailers were very unsightly~ Councilman Dutton felt that "Mobile Motel" were the key words, and noted the demand for such a facility. Councilmen Pebley, Schutte and Clark noted the proximity of sub- ject property to residential land uses to the north and west, and felt that although there is a demand, this was not the proper location for such a development. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicants concurred with the recom- mendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirma- tive reply. He then asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition° Mrs. Betty Ronconi, 1241 South Walnut Street, called attention to the two petitions submitted, the first of which was intended for the City Planning Commission, but was not received, through a misunderstand- ing. She explained that her home is located directly across the street, facing subject property, and she voiced the following objections to the proposed operation: 1~ It was not a desirable location for a travel trailer park. 2. By granting a permit for even a 5-year interim period, real estate values would deteriorate. (She noted that the Disneyland Heliport was to be an interim operation also, but was extended beyond the original 5-year period.) 69-411 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1~ 1969~ 1:30 PoM~ 3o Traffic would become further congested at the intersection of Ball and Walnut o~ 4. Trail bikes would be used on residential streets in the area~ 5. Disagreeable odors would result from the disposal station° 6. Noise would be created, both day and night° 7. Outdoor lighting would be a nuisance~ In response to Council questions, Mrs° Ronconi indicated she would not oppose the development of a motel on th~ subject property, as it would be an enclosed use. Mrs° Hightower, owner of the Jack and Jill Motel, 1042 West Ball Road, also opposed the subject application, feeling the children staying in the travel trailer park would annoy others in the vicinity as they would have no air-conditioned room in which to stay, such as motels offer. She stated she would not oppose a motel on the subject property. COUNCIL POLICY: Councilman Dutton called attention to an anonymous communi- que, written upon a copy of the legal notice which was mailed to property owners in the subject area, and moved that a policy of the City Council be adopted whereby anonymous communications with regard to zoning matters shall not be duplicated or considered as evidence by the City Council. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° Mr~ Go Barry Miller, Vice-President of Hemisphere Constructors, 1045 Artesia Boulevard, Bellflower, Authorized Agent for the Petitioners, read Paragraph 10 of the report to the Planning Commission, dated May 19, 1969, indicating there is a need for such facilities in the Anaheim Area, and also read the text of a letter from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, stating the need for transient trailer parks in Anaheim~ He felt that the subject property would be both convenient and accessible, and reported that surveys have shown the property is ideally located for such a use. He displayed a plot plan of the subject development, noting the 150-foot setback, 6-foot block wall, landscaping, and street improvements. An architectural rendering of the entrance was also viewed, showing the check-in office and recreational hall, and it was noted that barbecue areas would be provided for guests. In response to Mrs. Ronconi's statements, he pointed out that the proposed development was not just a travel trailer park; that it would be built as a mobile home park, with utilities and sewers to each pad, and that there would be approximately 30 to 40 spaces for those staying overnight only. He noted that during busy seasons 50 to 100 people are turned away each day, due to lack of such facilities in the area. Mr. Miller stated he felt the property would eventually be used for high-rise development, and felt that because of the traffic in the area use of the property should not be restricted~ The Applicant, Mr~ William Harmatz~ felt that the Council should allow thE- use in order that a return could be realized on his investment, and that he would agree to a 5-year limitation on the proposed use~ He stated that the proposed facility would be a first class par~, which will cost proximately ]/4 million dollars to develop~ He cutlJned the need for such facilities in the area, noting that many people cannot afford to stay in a motel, and also noted it would be impractical to locate away from the immed- iate proximity of Disneyland. He pointed out that other developments proposed in the Commercial-Recreational Area will create a greater traffic problem than the subject proposal, and asked that the Counci] approve the application. Mayor Clark felt that a sufficient cross-section of evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing clesed~ Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that the proposal constituted a justifia~le interim use, and that the ]and is valuable and will eventually be used for other purposes~ He felt that the use should be restricted to a ~obi]e motel, subject to the room occupancy tax. 69-412 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES Jul,~_~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M, RESOLUTION NO. 69R-383: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Council- man Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-383 for adoption, denying Condi- tional Use Permit No. 1114. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1114. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-383 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a 15-minute Recess, Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:30 P.M.), AFTER RECESS: At the conclusion of the 15-minute Recess, Mayor Clark called the meeting to order with Councilmen Schutte and Pebley temporarily ab- sent. STANDING WATER - STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD AND LINCOLN AVENUE: Report of the Public Works Department in response to poem-complaint submitted by Mrs. Dan Hanshew (meeting of June 10, 1969) was submitted and read in full by the City Clerk. Said report set forth, in verse form, the reasons for the stand- ing water at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Lincoln Ave- Councilmen Schutte and Pebley returned to the Council Chambers, (3:50 P~M,)~ ~EQUEST - SCHAEFER'S AMBULANCE SERVICE: Correspondence dated June 12, 1969, from Carlos Palidini, of Schaefer's Ambulance Service, was submitted re- questing that they placed on the rotation list in order to respond to Police ambulance calls~ Also submitted was report of the Chief of Police, recommending denial of subject request on the basis that the City was receiving excel- lent service from Southland Ambulance Company, owner of the franchise now serving both the east and west portions of Anaheim. Councilman Pebley moved that the subject, request be denied, as recommended by the Chief of Police° Councilman Schutte seconded the mo- tion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Palidini, General Manager of Schaefer's Ambulance Service, indicated he had been told by an employee of the City that he would be allowed to address the City Council, and he was invited to speak by Ma~or Clark~ denial~ Mr~ Pa]Jdini requested that hc be informed of the basis for the Mayor Clark read the recommendation of the Chief of Police in full, and noted that Schaefer's Ambulance Service was not denied the right to operate in the City. Mro Palidini stated that be understood tttis and c-ailed att~,ntion to a written complaint against Southland Ambulance Service which ho be- lieved was submitted at the last Couucil mee, ting~ and which contained ap- proximately 50 signatures. He felt there was a need for an additional ambulance service in the City of Anaheim, and stated that he was approached by hospitals and do,'tots and pat i,,~ ,? , 69-413 ~i__ty_Hal___~l~Anaheim, ~alifornia - COL~CIL MINUTES -July_j_~ 1969 ~i:30 P~M~ He felt that complaints began after the sale of Bowers Ambulance Service, when the City no longer had two ambulance companies on call. He noted that Schaefer's answers police calls in the cities of Fullerton, Garden Grove, Santa Aha and Orange, and felt it was their duty to offer their ser-= vices in Anaheim° He asked what the City would do if they became dissatis- fied with Southland, noting that if the contract were cancelled the City would be without ambulance service° He felt that for this reason competition would be beneficial. He further stated that Southland Ambulance Services charges more for an ambulance call than any other ambulance service in Orange County. MOTION: Councilman Krein requested the City Clerk prepare a transcript of Mr. Paiidini's statements, and moved that his allegations be investigated~ Councilman Dutton seconded the motion~ Mr~ Palidini stated that such an investigation would be in the pub- lic interest~ and noted he felt there was no reason to charge $5.00 extra for a police or emergency call. He stated he was not accusing Southland of doing anything illegal. He reported that in at least a dozen other cities in Orange County~ where Schaefer's does police work, they rotate with another ambulance company and he felt this was the best arran§ement~ He recommended that the ambulance operators who wished to serve the City of Anaheim be required to have a cer- tain number of vehicles in the City, and be required to give a reasonable response, or further services would be discontinued. Under this procedure, if one company took too long to respond, another could be called. Further, there would be more vehicles available in the event of a disaster. At the conclusion of Council discussion~ a vote was taken on the foregoing motion; MOTION CARRIED. Mr Palidini was informed by Mayor Clark that the City Clerk would contact him when the investigation had been completed. "CARROUSEL OF ANAHEIM"- 1970: Correspondence dated June 19, 1969, from the Women's Division, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, was submitted requesting use of the available Convention Center meeting room facilities May 26 through 29, 1970, and the Arena on May 27 and 28, 1970, for the presentation of the Sixth Annual "Carro~sel cf Anaheim" in 1970~ Mr~ E~J~ Stotereau, Convention Center Operations Manager, reported that there was a possibility the Anaheim Room and other meeting rooms would not be available on May 26 and 27, 1970, due to a conflict in dates with a convention of the American Academy of Neurologists, May 24 through 27~1970; and that t~heir needs will not be formalized for several weeks. He noted there would be no difficulty in reserving the meeting rooms for the balance of the dates requested, and the Arena, Grand Lobby~ and Exhibition Hall would be avai]ab]e~ as requested~ Assistant City Manager, Robert Mo Dav~s~ noted that umder Council Polic, y t[~e Anaheim Area Visitor and Convention Bureau has one year of lead time tc book conventions, and reported that this had been d~scussed with the Women's Div~sion~ Mr~ Davis also requested c]arifJcatJo., r~gardJng the ext~ent of City parti~ipat~on ~n~emded by the City C0unci]~, He p,0t~ tbat on~ ~nt~rpr~ation would include use of buildings, lighting and air conditioning, City Staff, equipment presently owned by the City, and sponsorship of the parking opera- tion This interpretation would not include out-of-pocket costs for addi- tional personnel and stage hands, nor would it include additional equipment that must be rented or purchased. He reported that the total cost of the 1968 Carrousel was $5,800.00; that in 1969 the cost was approximately $9,600°00, of which over $2,000~00 would not be included under the foregoing interpretation of the extent of City participation intended~ 69-414 _City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1~j_1~1~1~_[~1969_~_~1:30 PoM. Mrs. Ruth Salaets, Chairman of the "Carrousel of Anaheim" com- mittee, thanked the City Council for their cooperation in the past, and noted that the request for meeting room facilities for the 1970 Carrousel was specifically for a "all rooms and facilities available," May 26 through 29, 1970; that it is understood that some of the rooms will not be avail- able for a portion of that time, and the necessary adjustments will be made. She requested that the City Council include the expenses for necessary event personnel, and equipment needed by participants in their authorization of City participation~ and stated that the Women's Division will endeavor to adhere to the funds budgeted. She noted that the Women's Division budgeted $545°00 for the 1969 Carrousel, and many businesses and individuals made donations as wello She felt that the Carrousel was a valuable promotional and public relations vehicle for the City of Anaheim. Council discussion ensued regarding the possibility of deriving income from paid parking, in order to cover cut-of-pocket expenses~ It was noted by Councilman Dutton that the Carrousel was a fine thing for the City, but he felt a limit should be placed on such operating expenses. He suggested that some means of income be found to augment the funds bud- getedo Councilman Pebley felt that a parking charge would discourage attendance by students and others who would otherwise attend° At the conclusion of discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council that the City would furnish the building, all personnel and all equipment on hand, and in addition, submit a budget for review and approval by the City Council° Councilman Schutte moved that the City Manager, Convention Cen- ter Staff, and the Women's Division, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, submit their recommended budget to the City Council, for approval at a future date. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° Councilman Pebley moved that the Convention Center facilities requested by the Women's Division, May 26 through 29, 1970, for the Sixth Annual "Carrousel of Anaheim," be approved as recommended by Mr~ Stotereau~ Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 6812: Developer - Co Michael, Inc~, tract located north and east of East Street and Ball Road, containing 110 lots in the R-2- 5,000 zone (68-69-49)° The City Engineer recommended approval, as said final map con- forms substantially with the tentative map previously approved; that bond has been posted and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval and re- quired fees paid° ' On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 6812, be approved subject to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Krein seconded the motion MOTION CARRIED. · TRACT NO. 6409: Councilman Duttom moved to accept waiver of payment, outlined in the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (Lot A, Tract N0~ amd accept dedication from C~ Michael, Inco, in connection with Tract Noo 6812 above. Councilman Krein seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Pebley left the Council Chambers, (4:40 P~M.). RECLASSIFICATION NO, 56-57-76: Report of the Development Services Depart,nent was submitted, recommending amendment of Resolution of Intent No. ~q77, to delete Condition Nos. 4 and 6, which are no longer applicable due to revised M-1 standards. RESOLUTION NOo 69R-384~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No 69R-384 for adoption~ 69-415 C__ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 1, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERSEDING RESOLU- TIONS NOS. 3977 AND 7393 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 56-57-76. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-384 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2700: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2700 fOr first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (56-57-76(1) - M-l) RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-81: Correspondence from Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company was submitted, requesting amendment to Resolution No. 69R-311, Con- dition No. 6, to delete the requirement for a block wall along the commer- cially developed property to the east and along the west property line, which property is projected for other than residential use° RESOLUTION NO. 69R-385: On the recommendation of the Development Services Department, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-385 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 69R-311 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 68-69-81. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None P~bley None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-385 duly passed and adopted. ORDINAI~CE NO. 2701: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2701 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-81 - M-i, Restricted) RESOLUTION NO. 69R-399 - WORK ORDER NO. 5~8-A: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R- 399 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- lNG ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF KATELLA AVENUE FROM KATELLA WAY TO APPROXI- MATELY 450 FEET WEST OF KATELLA WAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO~ 568-A. (R.J. Noble - $10,931.55) Roll Call Vote: 69-416 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-399 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO4 69R-386 - WORKORDER NO. 570-B: Councilman Krein offered Reso lution No. 69R-386 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CON- STRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND AGATE STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 570-B. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECI- FICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICA- TIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened July 24, 1969, 2:00 P.M.). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-386 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION No. 69R-387 - WORK ORDER NO. 1215: Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 69R-387 for adoption, upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPT- lNG THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PI~NT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CRESCEN% DRIVE SEWER IMPROV~MENT FROM APPROXIMATELY 321 FEET WEST OF ROYAL OAK ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 1,836 FEET WEST THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1215. (Dateline Pipe Contracting, Inc.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COI~CILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Peb]ey None adopted. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-387 duly passed and DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nos. 69R-388 to 69R-394, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 69-417 ~ity. Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCI~ MINUTES July !, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-388: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMMNT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Helen F. Reynoza) RESOLUTION NO. 69R-389: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A WATER MAIN AND METER VAULT. (W.PoC. Development Company) RESOLUTION NO. 69R-390: A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES (Sprayon Products, Inc.) ' RESOLUTION NO. 69R-391: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANA~EIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Clarence and Alice Wagner) RESOLUTION NO, 69R-392: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES (Robert W. Quick) ' RESOLUTION NO. 69Ro393: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Gilbert-La Palma Properties) RESOLUTIOI~ NO. 69R-394: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRA~qT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Mohawk Data Sciences Corporation) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 69R-388 to 69R-394, both inclu- sive, duly passed and adopted. Counci. lman Pebleg returned to the Council Chambers, (4:45 P.M.), PURCHASE OF E~UIPMENT: The Assistant City Manager reported on the recommended purchase of [,960 - [8 inch Metal Brackets for Armless Overhead Line Construc- tion, and advised that the one manufacturer meeting electrical safety stand- ards, M.I.F. industries, Inc., has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amo,Jnt of $15,075.32, plus 5% sales tax. Or, the rocommendat£on of the Assistant City Manager, Cou,cilman Dutton moved that said purchase be authorized. Councilman Krein seconded the motio,. MOT£ON CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by Mrs. Marguerite Camp, for personal injury damages purportedly resulting from a fall at the Anaheim Golf Course, on or about May 26, 1969, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The fei|owing correspondence was ordered received amd filed, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Co,ncilman Krein: Financial and Operating Reports for the month of May, lP6q, Minutes - Anaheim P~h]jc L~brarv 69-418 Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Jul 1 1969 1:30 PoMo c. Town of Emeryville - re: Opposition to any legislation en- croaching upon home rule. d. Division of Highways - re: California Highway Functional Classification Advisory Committee initial study of all existing highways roads and streets in California. , e. Orange County League of California Cities - Parts I and II of the new Orange County General Planning Report. MOTION CARRIED. (Mr. Davis reported that a Staff Report regarding item "e" above will be mmde at the conclusion of study and analysis.) O_RDINANCE NO. 2690~: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance NOo 2690 for adoption., Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 1338 IN RE- CLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 58-59-7. (R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2690 duly passed and adopted. PRDINANCE NO. 2692: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2692 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2539 IN RE- CLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-64. (C~i and R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2692 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Pebley left the Council Chambers, (4:50 P.M.) ORDINANCE NO. 2695: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2695 for adoption, Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-93 R-A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark None Pebley None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2695 duly passed and adopted, Councilman Pebley returned to the Council Chambers, (4:52 PoM.). 69-419 ~~Anaheim~ California - COb~CIb MINUTES - July 1, 1969, 1:30 P MD ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for their information: ao Application submitted by Stanley Maurice Surlow, for On-Sale Beer, Per~:on-to-Person Transfer, for the Classy Lassy, at 332 East Lincoln Avenue, C-2 zone. bo Application submitted by Charles Alphonso McHugh, for On-Sale Beer, Person-to-Person Transfer, for the Pizza Inn, 940 South Euclid Avenue, Anaheim, C-1 zone, (Conditional Use Permit NOo 915). c. Application submitted by Robert Wilson Stanley and Carl Soren- son, for Person-to-Person Transfer, On-Sale General (Bona Fide Eating Place) for O'Garrity Restaurant, 3030 West Lincoln Avenue, C-1 zone (Conditional Use Permit No. 343)° ' No Council action was taken on said app]icationso TOWN TOUR COMPANY - REQUEST TO EXPAND SERVICE: Request of the Town Tour Company was submitted for permission to perform additional transportation service to Disneyland and the Anaheim Convention Center, from 18 motels and hotels along Beach Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, in accordance with conditions set forth in their proposal dated June 24, 1969. Consideration of said request was deferred from the Adjourned Regular Session of June 25, 1969, to allow telephone notification of other interested transportation services. Letters of support from 16 motels and hotels on the proposed route were noted by the City Clerk. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing Mr. Jaeger, of the Anaheim Jitney Service, expressed appreciation for the notification received regard- ing the request, and asked to be notified of any future requests. He stated that the proposed service would not conflict with the Jitney Service, and they would offer no opposition to the request. Mr. CoJ. Holzer, representing Southern California Rapid Transit District, addressed the Council in protest to the request. He stated he was not familiar with the subject proposal except for having seen a list of rea~- sons given by the Town Tour Company for the requested extension of services. He stated that his company supported Mr. Jaeger's past statement that the Town Tour Company was "chipping away." He took exception to Town Tour's state- ment that the proposed service was much needed and was not now provided. Mr. Holzer reported that the Southern California Rapid Transit Dist- rict operated Line 58, from Los Angeles to Santa Aha, transporting over 100,000 people per year to Knott's Berry Farm and Disneyland areas via Beach Boule- vard and Katella Avenue. He felt that no additional service was needed as the R.T.D~ operates on a daily basis from 7:00 A.Mo to 11:00 PoM., with a total of 33 trips from Knott's Berry Farm to Disneyland. The fare for this trip was either 38 cents or 46 cents, depending upon where the passenger boards and leaves the bus, and he felt that the proposed Town Tour fare was slightly out of line. He noted that the requested extension of service would further deteriorate the transportation dollar available from this area, and said that to his knowledge the Town Tour Company has no active application pending before the Public Utilities Commission, since at a previous public hearing they asked that their application be set aside. Mr. Holzer described the RoT. Do equipment as consisting of mostly air-conditioned vehicles, less than 5 years old, which would transport 50 or 51 passengers, in contrast to the smaller, older, non-air-conditioned equip- ment to be used by the Town Tour Company. Mr. Michael Valen, of the Town Tour Company, stated that the R.T.D. was a government-subsidized agency, whereas his company was operated on the free-enterprise basis, and could not stay Jn business by offering service where there was no need or demand. He noted that the Harbor Boulevard run, which was granted in April, filled a similar need and that 2,000 people per day are being carried over a route s.~milar to that covered by the R.T~Do This is an Anaheim custom-made service. 69-420 C__ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Jul_~q~___~_~69 1:30 PoM. Mr. Valen described the equipment to be used as an older-type bus, without air-conditioning, but clean, newly-painted and well main- tained, meeting all safety standards. He stated that if the route is suc- cessful, equipment will be up-graded and added he had never received a complaint about his equipment. Mr. Valen felt that some people leave the area, after spending only one night, because of a lack of transportation service. Mr. Vernon Carter, owner of the Town & Country Motel, 2740 West Lincoln Avenue, stated that the motels on Lincoln Avenue did not have the service which Mro Holzer indicated, nor was taxi service readily avail- able or the Jitney service reliable. He noted that he made several trips each day to take his guests to Disneyland, and would appreciate the service that Mr. Valen proposes. Mr. Carter felt that least half of the people staying at his motel did not have their Own transportation and that the service was defi- nitely needed. , Mr. Holzer objected to the statement that his company was a gov- ernment-subsidized agency, and stated for the record, that Southern Cali- fornia Rapid Transit District was a private agency under public ordinance by Act of the State Legislature, operating from the fare box just as the Town Tour Company does. MOTION: Councilman Pebley moved that the request of the Town Tour Company for additional transportation service as outlined granted for one year, and that permission to operain their proposal, be te all other routes pres- ently in service be extended to expire the same date, June 30, 1970 Coun- cilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ' ANAHEIM JITNEY SYSTEMS - EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PERMIT: The City Clerk noted receipt of a request from Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc., for 120-day exten- sion of time to their temporary operating permit to apply for permanent permit. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney for Mr. Jaeger, amended the request to a one-year extension of time. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, a one-year extension of time was granted as requested to expire June 30, 1970. MOTION CARRIED. , RESOLUTION NO. 69R-395: On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-395 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING A FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THAT CERTAIN AGREMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND SAFETY STRIPING SERVICE, DATED AUGUST 7, 1964, AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Peb]ey and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-395 duly passed and adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1098: Review of the requirement that 2 collector streets be developed, or bond posted for future development, in conjunc= tion with Conditional Use Permi~t No~ 1098 (Huarte) was continued from the meeting of June 24, 1969, to allow inspection of the area. Council indicated that after inspection they were in general agreement with the recommendation of the City Engineer that the collector streets be required, and Councilman Krein reported that Mr. Huarte had agreed to post ~ b~,~ ~" ~c~:orda,~:e witt, ~'~icl ~e~,mm,~,~t~/]ons. 69-421 ~i~¥ Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1, 1969, 1:30 P.M. CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION ,MEMBERSHIP: Report of A. Fo Lenain, Water Superintendent, was submitted recommending Council authorization of member- ship in the California Water Resources Association for the coming year, at a cost of $1,000o00 per year. It was noted that Charles A. Pearson, the City's representative on the Metropolitan Water District Board, also recom- mended membership in the Association. (Formerly Feather River Project Assn.) It was moved by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that said membership be authorized, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS: On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Krein moved that $6,426.33 from the Miscellaneous Accounts Re- ceivable, $41,883.58 from Customer Service Accounts Receivable, and $3,624.49, from the Convention Center Accounts Receivable be written off as bad debts as requested and itemized in communication dated June 26, 1969, from Lee Peacon, Accounting Officer. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. POLICE SERVICES - BILLING PROCEDURE: Discussion was held toward the possibility of revising the procedure used in billing for police services requested by business establishments, to require that a cash deposit be made in advance° The matter was referred to the Assistant City Manager for further investigation and recommendations. ~EQUEST FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS - JAPANESE VILLAGE AND DEER PARK: Report of the Development Services Department was submitted in connection with the request of Mr. John Tomlinson to establish Japanese Village and Deer Park directional guide signs within the City of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said request was granted, subject to approval of the sign and the number, and lo- cations proposed for said signs° MOTION CARRIED. DIRECTIONAL GUIDE SIGNS - REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS: It was recommended by the Assistant City Manager that the criteria used to qualify for directio,nal guide signs be revised, and that regional shopping centers be excluded. Council concurred with said recommendation~ CONVENTION CENTER PARKING ~ MARK Ao STEP.HENSON RETIREMENT DINNER: Mr. Davis re- ported that request by the Steering Committee for the Mark Ao Stephenson Re- tirement Dinner was made for City sponsorship of the parking for the event to be held July 19, 1969, at the Anaheim Convention Center. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, City sponsorship of the parking for the event was authorized. MOTION CARRIED° ORGANIZATION FOR COMPUTER PLANNING - JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT: Mro Davis reported on the proposed Joint Powers Agreement between Anaheim and several other cities in Orange County, to establish a centralized data processing system known as "Organization for Computer Planning," and submitted recommendation of the Director of Finance to authorize participation for a period of one year, ending June 30, 1970o RESOLUTION NO. 69R-398: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-398 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR JOINT DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS IN ORANGE COUNTY AND APPOINTING AN OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. 69-422 Ci__~ty Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES Roll Call Vote: July 1, 1969, 1:30 AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None adopted, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-398 duly passed and On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein, Mayor Clark was designated as Member of the Board of Directors, represent- ing the City of Anaheim, Douglas K. Ogden to serve as Alternate. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF ORANGE ~ R-3 ZONING APPLICATION - PROPOSED METROPORT AREA: Letter to the City of Orange was authorized, recommending decision be deferred on a zoning reclassification in close proximity to the area in the City of Ana- heim upon which a conditional use permit is pending for the establishment of a Metroport, until a determination has been made. Said letter was to include a statement that such recommendation should not be construed as a predetermination of the proposed Metroport use. PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, Mayor Clark was granted permission to leave the Country for 90 days° MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Clark reported he would be i'n Mazatlan, Mexico, on City business, at the expense of Mexico's National Airline, Aeronaves de Mexico from July 19th through the 27th, 1969. ' RESOLUTION NO. 69R-396: On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-396 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU- TION NO. 68R-426 AND ESTABLISHING A RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR .VARIOUS NEW JOB CLASSES. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-396 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-397: On recommendation of the AsSistant City Manager, Coun- cilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-397 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU- TION NO. 68R-426 AND AMENDING THE RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR THE JOB CLASS OF SUPERVISING DISTRIBUTION ENGINEER. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-397 duly passed and adopted. 69-423 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCI~ MINUTES - July 1~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. FOSTER & KLEISER - BILLBOARD SALUTE TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM: Councilman Dutton re- ported that as a community service, Foster & Kleiser has developed a billboard as a salute to the City of Anaheim displaying the official seal with the words, "Pride and Progress;" that these signs are used in areas in which no lease exists and one such sign is presently located at the southeast corner of Lincoln and Knott Avenues, and thereupon requested a letter of appreciation be sent to the Foster & Kleiser Company. The City Council concurred that appreciation should be expressed. ADJOIIRNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 5:50 P.M. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COL~CIL MINUTES - July 8, 1969o 1:30 P.M.. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COb~CILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A~ Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams ASgISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden DISASTER SERVICES COORDINATOR: Paul Hayes Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Maxie Dunnam, of the West Anaheim Methodist Church, gave the Invocation° FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutton led the Assembly in the Pledge of Alle- giance to the Flago INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Lee Sale, of the City Personnel Department, introduced new employees attending the Council meeting as part of the City's Orientation Program° Mayor Clark welcomed the new employees to the City Family. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that con- sent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution° Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. BEAUTIFICATION OF CENTER DIVIDER - LINCOLN AVENUE: Consideration of petition requesting beautification of the center divider on Lincoln Avenue, between Euclid Street and Crescent Way, was deferred from the meeting of 3une 24, 1969, for additional report and recommendations of the City Engineer's office.