1969/11/1269-679
G.~y Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Novembe~ 12, 1969, 1-30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY!: John Dawson
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams
CITY ENGINEER: James Pi, Maddo~
DIRECTOR. OF DEVELOPMENTi SERVICES: Alan Orsborn
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR. OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
Mayor Clark called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION: Dr. Alfred Ms Engle, of the First Baptist Church, gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Schutte led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City ~Council meeting held October 28, 1969, were
approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RE~OLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading
of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such
ordinance or resolution~ Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI-
MOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount
of $625,252.26, in accordance with the 1969-70 Budget, were approved~
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN, 1969: Public hearing to consider
the combined Housing, Commercial, Industrial and Community Facilities Elements
of the 1969 Anaheim General Plan, pursuant to recommendations contained in
City Planning Commission Resolution Nos. PC69-93 and PC69-147, for the area
generally bounded on the west by Holder Street, on the north by Yorba Linda
Boulevard, on the east by Gypsum Canyon Roa~, and on the south by Chapman
Avenue, was continued from the meetings of July 29, September 23, and October
14, 1969, for further study.
Mayor Clark asked if anyone wished to address the City Council.
Mr~ Francis L~ Ricker, 2459 East Lincoln Avenue, requested that if
the plan was approved, the area between Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street, on
both sides, be designated commercial, as it should no longer be considered
residential and current zoning creates a hardship for property owners on East
Lincoln Avenue.
Councilman Schutte raised strong objections to the General Plan,
specifically the inclusion of County area, stating that if adopted, it would
predetermine the future usage of an individual's land. He stated that the
City has no jurisdiction over County territory, and owners of County terri-
tory at the time of annexation to the City should have the right to receive
the zoning of their choice.
Councilman Dutton pointed out that the General Plan is a guideline
and not a precise plan, and does not show, or intend to show, the exact land
patte~n which will, in fact, occur. He stated that a plan is needed so that
the C~ty can be developed in an orderly manner on a sound basis, and provi~-
sions for future community facilities can be considered. He agreed that the
C~y ~as po jurisdiction over County territory, however, the City has the
right to ~nake pro'visions for and recommend objectives and policies on those
areas within the sphere of City in!luence, where it is reasonable to assume
the ar~a ~ill ultimately ~e annexed to Anaheim.
69-,680
City Hall: Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - N'o'vei~:ber 12~ !969z 1-30
Councilman Pebley, in answer to Councilman Schutte~$ o'bjections,
stated that approximately 90% of the land shown on the map east of the City
Limits could only go through Anaheim for uti. lit~les, and. pointed out that
this was the reason the General Plan includes that territory~
Mayor Clark asked if anyone else would like to address the City
Council.
Mrs~ Evelyn Glotfelty, 2427 East Lincoln Avenue, corroborated
Mr. Ricker's statements regardin, g the difficulties encountered with the
current zoning and requested that this area be zoned commercial.
Mrs. Robert Carter, 2433 East Lincoln Avenue, substantiated the
earlier comments of both Mr. Ricker and Mrs. Glotfelty, and also requested
a change in the current zoning in her area.
Mr. Sam Campbell~ 232 South Lemon Street~ Editor of the Anaheim
Bulletin, voiced his objections to a General Plan, agreeing with statements
made by Councilman Schutte. He felt the plan was undertaken by people net
in that business and was of the opinion that nothing makes a city more dis-
orderly in its development than a General Plan which has a tendency to fix
things in a rigid pattern. It was his belief, economics should be the cri-
teria for development, inasmuch as economic trends change more slowly and
gradually'~than ~the Planner's mind and can be studied more objectively.
concluded by stating that it is impossible to make up people's minds by
legislation, arfl even though the plan is intended to be elastic, it is
known in advance that the plan is unworkable.
At the invitation of Councilman Pebley, Mr. Alan Orsborn, Direc-
tor of Development Services, addressed the Council advising the reasons
for a General Plan. In designing and proposing a General Plan, it was
his opinion that the professional planners employed by the City were an
acceptable source of information. He explained that a General Plan of
consequence is not a plan designed or made for planners. A General Plan
that is meaningful is made for people, and reflects true goals and objec-
tives.of the community.
Mr. Orsborn explained the steps taken in updating the General
Plan, advising that it was first presented to the Planning Commission,
who in turn held innumerable public meetings to which the press and public
were invited to study and explore the impact of each phase upon the goals
and objectives of this Plan on the citizens of Anaheim. Following all of
these study sessions, hearings and considerations of the proposals as sub-
mitted by the Planning Commission to the people of Anaheim, the Planning
Commission did incorporate into their thinking the thoughts expressed by
the people, and also the directives, policies, actions and desires expressed
by the City Council of the City of Anaheim, since the Council comprises the
elected official body of the City as provided to the City by the elector-
ate themselves.
In conclusion, Mr. Orsborn advised that a General Plan was neces-
sary in order to provide a guide line of the community goals and objectives.
He noted also that the General Plan differed from a precise plan in that
the outlines 'purposely do not follow street boundaries and is purposely
so designed to allow flexibility.
Mr. Orsborn was asked by Councilman Pehley if the Chamber of
Commerce and the Board of Realtors endorsed this Plan, to which he replied
in the affirmative.
Discussion was held among the Councilmen, at the conclusion of
which the Mayor declared said hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-644: Councilman Krein moved that the General Plan be
approved as outlined, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 69R-644 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
69-681
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 12~ 19.69~ 1'30 P.Mo
AMENDING
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN - 1969.
Roll Call Vote-
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schut te
ABSENT' COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-644 duly passed and adopted.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - COLCHESTER-B~L ANNEXATION ~INHABITED): Pursuant to
Resolution No. 69R-553, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and the Pla-
centia Courier according to law, public hearing was held October 28, 1969
and continued to this date to allow for filing of supplemental protests to
the proposed annexation to the City of Anaheim, designated as Colchester-Ball
Annexation.
The following Certification was submitted by the City Clerk:
"I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that this office has checked the last equalized assessment roll of
the County of Orange, State of California, to ascertain the assessed value
of the territory within the proposed annexation known and designated as the
COLCHESTER-BALL ANNEXATION.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that according to the last equalized assessment
roll of the County of Orange, State of California, the assessed valuation of
privately owned property exclusive of improvements, within said proposed an-
nexation is $218,490.00.
AND, I FURTHER CERTIFY that the total assessed valuation of pro-
perty, exclusive of improvements, owned by persons within said territory pro-
posed to be annexed who have filed written protest, on or before October 28,
1969, and whose ownership I have been able to determine is $86,020.00.
AND, I FURTHER CERTIFY that the total assessed valuation of property,
exclusive of improvements, owned by persons within said territory proposed to
be annexed, who have filed written protests since October 28, 1969, and whose
ownership I have been able to determine is $31,540.00.
AND, I FURTHER CERTIFY that the total protests filed as of this
hour, whose ownership I have been able to determine is $117,560.00."
It being determined that protests represent more than 50% of the
assessed valuation of the land, the Mayor declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-645: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-645
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST HAS BEEN MADE IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM KNOWN AND
DESIGNATED AS COLCHESTER-BALL ANNEXATION.
Roll Call Vote-
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark
NOES. COUNCILMEN. None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-645 duly passed and adopted..
69-682
C_ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - November 1~2,__.1_969, 1:30 P.i{.
REQUEST - ENCROACHMENT PERMIT- On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Coun-
cilman Pebley, encroachment permit was granted as recommended by the Cit~z
Engineer, described as follows'
1. To construct a masonry block wall along the southerly 10
feet of the westerly boundary of Lot 65, Tract No. 6784, and along the
westerly 7.09 feet of the southerly boundary of Lot 64, Tract No. 6784.
2. To construct a masonry block wall along the common boundary
line between Lots 64 and 65, Tract No. 6784.
3. To construct a service sidewalk in the drainage easement
in Lot 65, Tract No. 6784.
MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST - KINGSMEN DRUM AND BUGLE CORPS- Mr. Robert B. Mack, 1333 Aetna Street,
Personnel Manager for the Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps, addressed the
Council requesting recognition of the Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps as
the official musical representative of the City of Anaheim.
Mr. Mack briefly described the activities of the Corps and their
accomplishments and submitted to each Councilman copy of a letter signed
by Howard Adler, the Legislative Assistant to Congressman Richard T. Hanna,
and also a copy of the Drum Corps News, in which the Anaheim Kingsmen were
mentioned.
Dr. James Caron, 12671 Abbott Street, Garden Grove, requested
the use of a City facility to be considered their permanent location for
indoor practice and the storage of uniforms and instruments of this group.
Discussion was held by the City Council and it was agreed that
every effort should be made to find a location, either a City or private
building, for the Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps, and that the Council mem-
bers would personally seek such a facility and would advise Mr. Mack with-
in two or three weeks of their findings.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS- Actions taken by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting held OctOber 20, 1969, pertaining to the following ap-
plications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: 904' Submitted by Ray Miller, for a proposed
expansion of an existing Children's day school facility, located at 744
North East Street (on the east side of East Street, between La Palma Ave-
nue and Wilhelmina Street.)
Petitioner was advised that his request could not be approved
without another public hearing, and that a new conditional use permit
should be filed.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1131' Proposed outdoor storage of building
materials in the M-1 zone; property located at the northeast corner of
Broadway and Loara Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-
215, amended Resolution No. PC69-185, granting Conditional Use Permit No.
1131, subject to the addition of Condition No. 13, reading ~That a time
limitation of 3 years shall be granted for use of subject property as an
outdoor storage area, as stipulated to by the Petitioner; and that upon
request by the Petitioner, an additional period of time may be granted
upon review and approval by the City Planning Commission and/or City
Council."
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6509 AND VARIANCE NO. 1972' Developer, Empire Savings
and Loan Association. Subject property is located on the east side of
Aladdin Drive, between Alameda Street and Catalina Avenue. Total area
of the parcel is approximately 10 acres, current zoning is R-3, and the
property is undeveloped.
69-683
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - C_OUNCI~,L MINIYTES - November 12, 1..96__~z9 1'30 P.M.
The City Planning Commission advised the City Council by corres-
pondence containing excerpt from their meeting o6 November 3, 1969, that the
Petitioner's representative, Mr~ Howard Frye, has advised that Empire Savings
and Loan Association is presently investigating a new development approach
to the property, which has a different concept than that proposed under sub-
ject petition; therefore, they are requesting termi~a, tion of the Variance No.
1972 and Tentative Tract Map No. 6509.
The City Planning Commission terminated all proceedings on Variance
No. 1972 and Tentative Map of Tract Noo 6509, as requested,
No Council action was taken on the foregoing zoning matters.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO~ 70~3, REVISION NO, 1' Developer, Downey Savings and Loan As-
sociation. Subject property is located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon
Road, approximately 350 feet east of Solomon Drive, and is proposed for sub-
division into 57 R-1 zoned lots,
The City Planning Commission, on November 3, 1969, recommended said
tentative tract be approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7003, Revision
No. 1, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No.. 68-69-98
and Variance No. 2097.
2;2 That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That necessary drainage facilities for the proper control and
disposal of storm runoff arriving at and originating within the tract shall
be designed and constructed in a manner meeting the approval of the City En-
gineer, and the necessary easements therefor shall be dedicated to the City
of Anaheim.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
5. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior
to approval of a final tract map.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Ten-
tative Tract No. 7003, Revision No. 1, was approved, subject to the recom-
mendations of the City Planning Commission~ MOTION CARRIED,.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7118: Developer, Downey Savings and Loan Association. Subject
property is located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, approximately
350 feet east of Solomon Drive, adjacent to Tentative Tract No. 7003, and is
proposed for subdivision into 61R-1 zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission, on November 3, 1969, recommended said
tentative tract be approved, subject to the following conditions.
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7118 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68-69-98 and Variance No. 2097.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry
wall shall be constructed in the north portion o6 the lots adjacent to Santa
Ana Canyon Road. Subject wall shall be measured from the highest finished
grade level of subject property or Santa Aha Canyon Road, whichever is highest.
Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed
northward from this wall including any required Santa Ana Canyon Road parkway,
plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval o6
the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and accept-
ance, the property owner(s) shall assume responsibility for maintenance o6
said landscaping to the northerly lot lines regardless of the location of the
block wall. The City of Anaheim shall assume responsibility for maintenance
of landscaping northerly o6 the north tract boundary.
69-684
City Hall~ Anaheim~ Californi~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 12~ 1.9.69z.' 1:30 P.M.
4. That the necessary drainage facilities for the proper control
and disposal of storm runoff arriving at and originating within the tract
shall be designed and constructed in a manner meeting the approval of the
City Engineer, and the necessary easements therefor shall be dedicated to
the City of Anaheim.
5. That all lots within this tract shall be served by under-
ground utilities.
6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim
prior to approval of a final tract map.
7. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or
alley openings, to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City
of Anaheim.
On motion by COuncilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
Tentative Tract No. 7118 'was approved, subject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commiss!ion. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 8021 AND VARIANCE NO. 1757 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Pur-
suant to request of Mr. FTank F. Boss, of American West Corporation, the
City Planning Commission granted a six-month extension of time to comply
with conditions under Conditional Use Permit No. 802 and Variance No. 1757.
No further action was taken by the Council on the above request,
thereby sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission.
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-646 - WORK ORDER NO. 487: In accordance with recommenda-
tions of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-
646 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A
SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE
BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER,
FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGE-
WOOD AVENUE FROM LOARA STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 130 FEET WEST OF DELLA
LANE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 487. (R.J. Noble Company -
$13,162.S5.)
Roll Call Vote.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Pebley
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSTAINED' COUNCILMEN: Clark
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-646 duly passed and
adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No$.69R-647 to 69R-
653, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-647' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES. (Gioia Bonomini)
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-648- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANA-
HEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER LINE PUR-
POSES. (Riverside Apartments)
69-685
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Novembar 127 1969~ 1'30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-649: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER LINE AND TEMPORARY CON-
STRUCTION PURPOSES. (Gloria L. Levey and Daniel H. Ninburg)
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-650: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD, ALLEY AND PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSES. (Robert L. and Ethel L. Wetzler, and A.E. Arnold and Katherine
Arnold)
~,ESOLUTION NO. 69R-651: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Inmont Corporation)
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-652: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CER-
TAIN REAL ?ROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD, ALLEY AND PUBLIC UTILITY PUR-
POSES. (Home Savings & Loan Association)
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-653: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ALLEY AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOgEg.
(David A. and Caroline C. Skelly)
Roll Call Vote'
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark
NOES. COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN- None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 69R-647 to 69R-653, both inclu-
sive, duly passed and adopted.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Coun-
cilman Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel
County Taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal pur-
poses, pursuant to Resolution No. 69R-616, recorded October 31, 1969, as Docu-
ment Number 21571, in Book 9124, at Page 792, Official Records of Orange County,
California. (Fire Station Site #9). MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASES - IMPROVEMENTS~ ANAHEIM STADIUM: The City Manager reported on bids re-
ceived for the purchase and installation of elevated floor and partitions
in certain Anaheim Stadium offices to be used by the Data Processing Depart-
ment, as follows-
VENDOR
TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX
Partition Specialties, Inc., Los Angeles
R.E. Howard Company, Los Angeles
Glen Mart Company, Los Angeles
$3,908.00
3,968.00
3,800.00
and recommended the low bid of Glen Mart Company, Los Angeles, in the amount
of $3,800.00, including tax, be accepted.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, pur-
chase and installation of said material was authorized from Glen Mart Company,
in the amount of $3,800.00, including tax, as recommended by the City Manager.
MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF MATERIAL: Mr. Murdoch reported on bids received as follows, for the
purchase of 700 feet of 2-inch Seamless Copper Bus Tubing, and recommended
the low bid of Pacific Metals, Los Angeles, in the amount of $4,351.20, in-
cluding tax, be accepted.
69-686
C~ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California~- COUNCIL MINUTES - November 12, 1969, 1.30 P.M.
VENDOR
TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX
Pacific Metals, Los Angeles
Chase Metals, Los Angeles
Stanley Supply Company, Wilmington
Kilaby Tube, Los Angeles
$4,351.20
6,166.65
4,623.15
NO BID
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
purchase of said equipment from Pacific Metals was authorized, in the
amount of $4,351.20, including tax, as recommended by the City Manager.
MOTION CARRIED~
PURCHASE OF MATERIAL. The City Manager reported on bids received for an addi-
tion to the Pole Storage Yard, as follows, and recommended the low bid of
Harry Schmidt, Santa Ana, in the amount of $3,976.07, including tax, be
accepted:
VENDOR
TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX
Harry Schmidt, Santa Ana
Pebley Brothers, Anaheim
Klug Construction, Anaheim
$3,976.07
5,574°50
NO BID
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
purchase of said equipment from Harry Schmidt, in the amount of $3,976.07,
including tax, was authorized. Councilman Pebley abstained from voting.
MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by
the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion
by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein:
a. Claim submitted by Arthur R. Budd, D.D.S., for purported
lost time and aggravation to patients sustained on or about September 4,
1969, caused by power outage~ -
b. Claim submitted by Ray Link Insurance Agency, Inc., for
Margaret Booms, for personal property damages purportedly sustained on or
about October 24, 1969, due to collision with City vehicle.
MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed
on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley:
Decision No. 76336, before the Public Utilities Commission of
the State of California - In the matter of the application of the Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, for authority to increase California.
Intrastate Passenger Fares to the level authorized for Southern Pacific
Company, by Decision 75940, Application 50670.
MOTION CARRIED.
ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - RE, SOLUTIONS: Submitted for Council consideration
were the following.
(a) Chamber of Commerce Resolution recommending the appointment
of an individual Redevelopment Agency from a cross-section of Anaheim busi-
ness and professional men, to consider the depressed physical and economic
condition of the area bounded by North, South, East and West Streets, for
development of a plan to expedite and upgrade said area.
(b) City Center Task Force Report, concerning the creation of
"Anaheim International Mart" in the center city area to aid in redevelop-
ment of said area°
(c) Chamber of Commerce Resolution recommending a feasibility
study for the utilization of the Main Library Building as the first phase
69-687
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - November 12
~ 1_9.69, 1:30 PoMo
of development of a new City Hall; adding an additional story to 'the build-
ing on a ~pay as you go" basis, and that a new Main Library' Facility be built
on City-owned property in the center of Anaheim to provide a catalyst for the
redevelopment of a Cultural Center in Anaheim°
Mr. Bill Thom, representing the Chamber of Commerce, reported on
the criteria and background of the above recommendation, and advised that ac-
cording to their "Project 80" recommendations should be implemented within
the next five to ten years° He briefed the prior recommendations resulting
from prior studies and investigations.
Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that the expense involved to
remodel the existing Main Library',adding an additional story to the building,
as opposed to building a new City Hall,would be a poor economic move.
Councilman Pebley noted that the bond issues approved for the Li-
brary' construction designated and included the present site. He further
noted that the former position taken by Mr. Thom and others favored a new
City Hall at the present location~
Councilman Dutton further advised that the Cultural Arts Commiss-
ion is presently considering a facility in the Nohl Ranch area.
Councilman Schutte remembered that the Library contributed $35,000°
for the purchase of subject property, on the condition that a Main Library
facility be constructed on the present site.
Discussion was then held on the recommended appointment of anainde-
pendent Redevelopment Agency, and Mro Thom reported that with all of the var-
ious studies and recommendations nothing has been done to redevelop the down-
town area, and their recommended approach was different, thought-provoking,
and could bring about the desired results.
Regarding the City Hall, Mr. Thom reported that for years there
has been a debate on the location of a new City Hall, the Harbor Boulevard
site versus the present location, with the general concensus being that it
should be built on the Harbor Boulevard site. Recognizing the site is too
small for a civic center complex without acquiring the school athletic field
to the west, and also recognizing that acquisition of the athletic field co~ld
be 20 to 25 years hence, it was felt that the Library building could adequately
serve as the first phase and be a goal that could be recognized in five or ten
years.
In answer to Council questioning concerning the cost involved to
remodel the Library facility as recommended, Mr. Thom advised that costs
were not studied.
Councilman Dutton reported that it was his hope that the City Hall
issue would be placed on the forthcoming election ballot, and with the prob-
able change in plan as it relates to a Cultural Arts Facility, perhaps the
Harbor Boulevard site would be adequate to accommodate a high-rise City Hall
building.
Mr. Thom felt that either a new City Hall or a Library on the pres-
ent City Hall site would be a catalyst to redevelopment in the downtown area,
however, the first step would be that taken by the City.
In answer to Mayor Clark's inquiry, Mr. Murdoch advised that there
is an existing Committee which has not been dismissed which is the UrBan Re-
newal Advisory Committee, anddiffe~_~.f~om~ that recommended by~ the Chamber
of Commerce in that the City Council is the Redevelopment Agency, and the
Committee referred to is a committee apointed by the City Council to be ad-
visory to the City Council in matters of redevelopment. Mr. Murdoch then
briefly related the functions of the Advisory Committee and the duties they
have performed.
69-688
City Hall~ Anaheim,. California,. - COUNCIL MINUTES - Nove,nber 12, 1969, 1:30 P.M.
Mr~ Murdoch further reported that if the City Hall issue is
placed on the April Ballot in all probability the City Council should
consider an architect to prepare a rendering.
Councilman Krein reported that the location of a new City Hall
should be the decision of the voters.
In answer to question raised as to when a decision must be made
to include issues on the iApril Ballot, the City Clerk reported that the
decision should be made between the period of January 29 (75th day) and
no later than February 14 (54th day), 1970; that the last day to file
arguments for or against a City measure would be February 27, 1970.
RECESS__.__....[ Councilman Schutte moved for a five-minute Recess° Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:42 P.M.).
AFTER RECESS. Mayor Clark called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council being present, and the business before the Council resumed.
Councilman Krein moved that the communication and recommendations
of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce be received for further study.
Prior to a second on the above motion, discussion was held rela-
tive to the recommended Independent Redevelopment Agency. Mr. Thom ad-
vised that it was the feeling of the Chamber of Commerce committee that
an independent, non-political Redevelopment Agency would proceed and hope-
fully obtain results.
Councilman Krein amended his motion to add that the Urban Re-
newal Advisory Committee be contacted to determine if they wish to con-
tinue to function.
Councilman Schutte felt that the motion should also include a
provision referring the recommendations regarding the conversion of the
Library to a City Hall to the Library Board for consideration.
The motion as offered by Councilman Krein was rePeated by Mayor
Clark, to wit: That the recommendations of the Anaheim Chamber of Com-
merce be received and held in abeyance for further study, and that the
existing Urban Renewal Advisory Committee be contacted to determine if
they wished to continue, and that the recommendations concerning the Main
Library be referred to the Library Board for consideration. Councilman
Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
BALLOT MEASURE - CITY HALL: Councilman Dutton moved that a new City Hall, to
be built on the Harbor Boulevard site, be placed on the forthcoming bal-
lot, and that an architect be selected to prepare necessary renderings,
which architect is to be the ultimate architect on the project, in event
of approval of the measure by the voters. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion.
Under discussion, and prior to vote, Councilman Pebley noted
that two-thirds of the block on which the present City Hall is situated
is owned by the City. He failed to see how the expense of a multi-story
parking structure could be justified at th~ Harbor BouleVard site when
ground parking could be purchased in the area of the present location for
a lesser amount needed to construct a multi-story parking structure. In
his opinion, to raze one and one-half square blocks at the present loca-
tion would act as a catalyst for redevelopment of the Center City Area.
He favored a new City Hall, but disapproved the multi-story parking struc-
ture that would be required if the Harbor Boulevard site was selected.
Roll Call Vote to the foregoing motion was requested by Council-
man Pebley.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark
NOES. COUNCILMEN: Pebley
MOTION CARRIED.
69-689
~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCiLiMi. NUTES _ November 12..~ 1969,. 1.30 P.M.
Councilman Pebley left the Council Chambers, (4:05 P.M.).
ORDINANCE NO. 2747: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2747 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ANENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32~
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No Parking at any Time - Harbor Boulevard on the east side, from Katella
Avenue to 650 feet south of Katella Avenue.)
Roll Call Vote-
AYES- COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
TEMPORARILY ABSENT' COUNCILMEN: Pebley
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2747 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2748: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2748 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-1, R-2-5,000 - Tract No. 4241)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN- Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley
AB SENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2748 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2749: Councilman Shhutte offered Ordinance No. 2749 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-46, R-2-5,000 - Tract No. 4241)
Roll Call Vote.
AYES' COUNCILMEN. Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN. Pebley
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN- None
The Mayor declared Ordinance Noo 2749 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOo 2750: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2750 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO %ONING. (61-62-69(35) - M-l)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES' COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Clark
NOES: COUNCILMEN' None
TEMPORARILY ABSENT' COUNCILMEN: Pebley
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN- None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2750 duly passed and adopted.
69-690
City Hall, Anaheim~ California~.- COUNCIL MINUTES -November 12, 1969,~ 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Pebley returned to the Council Chambers. (4:10 P.M.)
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were pre-
sented by the City Managek to the City Council for their information:
a. Application submitted by Howard Joseph and Betty Louise
Curtis, for On-Sale General (Public Premises) Person-to-Person Transfer,
for the Capri Lounge, 1728 South Euclid Street, (C-2 zone).
b. Application~submitted by Carl Edward and Gloria Jane Leonard,
for On-Sale Beer, Person-to-Person Transfer, for Mimi's, 3148-1/2 West
Lincoln Avenue, C-1 zone.
c. Application submitted by Charles Elmer Rees, for On-Sale
Beer, Original Transaction, for the Top Hat, 180 West Lincoln Avenue,
C-3 zone.
d. Application submitted by Natividad Zavala, for On-Sale Beer,
Person-to-Person Transfer, for Mi Cabana, 900 North Anaheim Boulevard,
C-3 zone.
e. Application submitted by Anaheim Discount, Inc., for Off-Sale
General, Person-to-Person Transfer, for Pilot Foods, 639 North Euclid
Street, C-1 zone.
No Council action was taken on the above applications.
PRODUCE STAND - 1525 SOUTH EUCLID STREET: Mr. Charles Roberts reported on
the illegal expansion of Subject produce stand. He advised that a Staff
Report was just prepared and realized that the City Council had not had
time to review it.
It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
that the matter be deferre.d one week to allow Council review of said report.
Mr. John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, asked if it was the
Council's intent that the Notice to Cease and Desist be also deferred one
week. He reported that the Notice has been held to this date, and the
operator allowed to continue, due to the fact that he had produce that
would spoil. He further advised that according to his information the
building that was constructed was not structurally sound; that no build-
ing permits were obtained, and no inspection of the construction made.
Councilman Schutte moved that the Order to Cease and Desist
also be postponed for one week, and that the operator be permitted to
operate during the interim. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST - FILING REQUIREMENTS: Mr. Murdoch presented and read a
new law requiring every public official to file a statement describing
the nature and extent of investments, including the ownership or shares
in any corporation,or financial interest in any business entity, subject
to regulations by any State or Local Public Agency, if such investment'
is in excess of $10,000.00; candidates to file at the time of filing nomi.-
nation papers and those in office to file by April 15, 1970.
Discussion was held and it was reported that interpretations of
the new law will be forthcoming from the California League of Cities and
also from the City Attorney's office. The City Council requested copies
of said Bill be furnished them.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn~ Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 4:25 P.M.
SIGNED
City Clerk